Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 605 views

    Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Don Jun
    This document contains an internship performance evaluation form for a College of Criminology intern. It collects information about the intern, agency, and evaluator. It consists of two parts that evaluate the intern's performance based on competencies like ability to learn, responsibility, quality of work, and safety practices. Ratings are on a scale of poor to excellent. Space is provided for comments on strengths, weaknesses, and how the intern can improve. The evaluator and agency head must sign off on the evaluation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Don Jun
    605 views2 pages
    This document contains an internship performance evaluation form for a College of Criminology intern. It collects information about the intern, agency, and evaluator. It consists of two parts that evaluate the intern's performance based on competencies like ability to learn, responsibility, quality of work, and safety practices. Ratings are on a scale of poor to excellent. Space is provided for comments on strengths, weaknesses, and how the intern can improve. The evaluator and agency head must sign off on the evaluation.

    Original Description:

    OJT Evaluation Form

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains an internship performance evaluation form for a College of Criminology intern. It collects information about the intern, agency, and evaluator. It consists of two parts that evaluate the intern's performance based on competencies like ability to learn, responsibility, quality of work, and safety practices. Ratings are on a scale of poor to excellent. Space is provided for comments on strengths, weaknesses, and how the intern can improve. The evaluator and agency head must sign off on the evaluation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    605 views2 pages

    Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Don Jun
    This document contains an internship performance evaluation form for a College of Criminology intern. It collects information about the intern, agency, and evaluator. It consists of two parts that evaluate the intern's performance based on competencies like ability to learn, responsibility, quality of work, and safety practices. Ratings are on a scale of poor to excellent. Space is provided for comments on strengths, weaknesses, and how the intern can improve. The evaluator and agency head must sign off on the evaluation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    ST.

    PETER’S COLLEGE
    # 042 Sabayle, St., Iligan City
    221-5860 or 6247

    COLLEGE OF CRIMINOLOGY
    OJT/INTERNSHIP PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

    Agency Contact Information

    AGENCY NAME : CONTACT PERSON:

    AGENCY ADDRESS: CELL/TEL. NO.:

    Intern’s Information

    INTERN’S NAME : DATE STARTED:


    JOB TITLE: DATE ENDED:
    CELL/TEL. NO.: TOTAL TRAINING HOURS:

    Part I: (Please complete the evaluation of the Intern for each period. Please be as accurate as possible in
    evaluating the Intern’s progress. Kindly check the appropriate rating box for each item).

    RATING
    COMPETENCY POOR MARGINAL GOOD VERY EXCELLENT
    GOOD
    1. Ability to Learn
    2. Acceptance of Direction and Responsibility
    3. Adaptability
    4. Appearance/ Hygiene
    5. Meetings of Deadlines
    6. Moral and Ethical Values
    7. Motivation/Initiative
    8. Operation of Equipment
    9. Punctuality and Attendance
    10. Quality and Accuracy of Work
    11. Safety Practices
    12. Sensitivity and Concern for Others
    13. Overall Rating

    Rating Scale Range Value Percentage Equivalent Interpretation


    5 4.3 – 5.0 96- 100 Excellent
    4 3.5 – 4.2 91 - 95 Very Good
    3 2.7 – 3.4 86 - 90 Good
    2 1.9 – 2.6 81 - 85 Marginal
    1 1.0 – 1.8 80 bellow Poor

    COMMENT SECTION
    List or explain other concerns so that the Intern can successfully complete or more productive in attaining
    learning outcomes/skills.
    STRENGTH(S)
    WEAKNESS(ES), if any
    Are there additional supportive services the workforce system can help with? (Please list)

    __________________________________ _____________________________________

    Signature over Printed Name of the Evaluator Signature over Printed Name of the Agency Head

    Page 1 of 2
    Part II: Part I: (Please complete the evaluation of the Intern for each period. Please be as accurate as
    possible in evaluating the Intern’s progress. Kindly check the appropriate rating box for each item).

    Criteria (5) (4) Very (3) (2) (1) Points


    Excellent Good Good Fair Poor
    1. Follows Directions and Instructions
     The intern completed the task as directed and
    instructed to do so with appropriate procedures.
    2. Time Management
     The intern used 100% of the time wisely and
    appropriately, and accomplished the assigned
    task within the allotted time
    3. Organization Coherence
     The intern kept notes and other resources in a
    neat, legible, organized and systematic manner
    4. Quality and Excellence
     The intern produced best results and quality
    output
    5. Evidence Learning Outcomes
     The intern documented, and evaluated and
    demonstrated the needed competencies, and can
    accurately explain and perform the job well.

    SCORING PROTOCOL

    TOTAL POINTS VERBAL INTERPRETATION


    23 points and above Most Acceptable
    19 – 22 points Very Acceptable
    14 – 18 points Acceptable
    8 – 13 points Barely Acceptable
    7 and below Unacceptable

    COMMENT SECTION
    List or explain other concerns so that the Intern can successfully complete or more productive in attaining
    learning outcomes/skills.
    STRENGTH(S)
    WEAKNESS(ES), if any
    Are there additional supportive services the workforce system can help with? (Please list)

    __________________________________ _____________________________________

    Signature over Printed Name of the Evaluator Signature over Printed Name of the Agency Head

    Page 2 of 2

    You might also like