ERASMI, Opus Epistolarium 4, Oxford, 1922
ERASMI, Opus Epistolarium 4, Oxford, 1922
ERASMI, Opus Epistolarium 4, Oxford, 1922
= CNJ
ioo
= OJ
iOO
CD
00
JJ^-^-^^H^
OPVS EPISTOLARVM
DES. ERASMI ROTERO.DAMI
P. S. ALLEN, M.A.
COLLEGII MERTONENSIS SOCIV.M ET BIBLI0THECARIV3I
ET
H. M. ALLEN
TOM. IV
1519-1j21
OXONII
IN TYPOGRAPHEO CLARENDONIANO
MCMXXII
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
London Edinburgh Glasgow Copenhagen
New York Toronto Melbourne Cape Town
Bombay Calcutta Madras Shanghai
HUMPHREY MILFORD
Publisher to the University
;
PREFACE
SlNCE the third voliime of this edition appeared, the republic
of learning, worklwide and international, has been shattered into
fragments by a war more devastating than any of those which
disturbed the sixteenth century. Seeking, not for itself, that
knowledge which leadeth unto wisdom wisdom the worker of — '
—
now the costs of production papermaking and printing and
—
publishing remain much higher than they %vere. This is a
serious hindrance to all learned work ; for it profits little to
make researches, if the fruits cannot be multiplied and difiused
to long life and usefulness through the medium of print. On all
sides may be heard lamentations over work delayed or even
abandoned. There is therefore every reason for me to express
iny gi-atitude to the Delegates of the Clarendon Press for con-
tinuing this edition and allowing me to bring it further on its
way to completion.
These nine years which have elapsed, have cut olf from me
a 2
iv PREFACE
the aid of three friencls to whom I am infinitely indebted. It
not only that the difficulties were to be faced at once, but that
they would in the end be surmounted. A keen and penetrating
scholar, with the patience of a leader who is master of himself
and of those around him, he was rightly placed at the head of an
institution whose care it is to provide for the great aims of a
—
University sound education and useful learning. I am bound
also to mourn for William Osler, most brilliant and inspiring
of men, ttoXXc^v dvTa^io? ctXXcDv indeed Hhe Wellbeloved
; the ',
occasionally, when the sources aro diverse or there is some special reason for it,
e.g. in Ep. 296, all the authorities are specified by their sigl-a.
The Corrigenda found in some of tlie volumes of letters have usually been
treatcd as the true readings of those editions ; but occasionally the uncorrected
text and the correction have both been given ; the latter following immediately
after the former.
The small superior figures attached to lotter-numbers refer to letters answered,
the inferior to letters answering.
Angular brackets ( ) denote additions by an editor, square brackets [ ] denote
omissions.
TABLE OF LETTEES
[* Not in LB. ** Printed here for the first time. Autograph.
J
Letters indented are written to Erasmus.]
1519
1520
1056. Lypsius. Vt ad
. . <c. I Jan. 1520? Louvain,
1057. Jod. Vander Noot. Ornatissime . . 7 Jan. 1520 Louvain
*1058. Beraldus. ne qnid . . <c. Jan. 1520 Louvain.
1059.<Latomus?>. Eximie . . <.Jan. 1520? Louvain,
1060. Wolsey. Nunc raeritas . . 1520
I Feb. Louvain
*1061. Lee. Eam statuo . . 1520
I Feb. Louvain.
1062. Campegio. Quoties . . 5 1520 Feb. Louvain,
**1063. B. Rhenanus. Hic adhuc . . 5 1520 Feb. Louvain,
*1064. Oecolampadius. se . . <c. 5 Feb. 1520 Louvain,
1065. Ant. de la Marck. Persuaserat 16 Feb. 1520
. Louvain,
1066. Budaeus. Cum multis . . 17 Feb. 1520 Louvain
*tl067. Wimpfeling. S.D P. Opto 19 Feb. i52oSchlettstadt. . .
*1118. Melanchthon. S. P.
Sanctis . . (a. 21 June 1520) Louvain.
1114. Marlianus. Maiorem (a. 21 June 1520 . Louvain.)
1115. Halewin. Mihi vero 21 June 1520 . Louvain.
*1116. Kloster. Ornatissime (c. 21 June 1520 . Louvain.)
1117. Brixius. Dum curru 25 June 1520 . Antwerp.
1118. Pace. Sero mihi (c. 25 June?) 1520
, . Antwerp,
1119. Spalatinus. Alexander 6 July 1520 Louvain,
**1120. C. Frick & L. Esinger.
S. P. D. Animauit 12 July (1520) . . Freiburg,
*1121. Zasius. Quid censes 13 July 1520 . . Freiburg.
1122. Meyner. Felicitatem 30 July 1520 . . Louvain.
1123. Mosellanus. Redditae 31 July 1520 . . Louvain.
1124. Conrad of Thuengen. S. P.,
ornatissime (c. 31 July 1520
. . Louvain.)
1125. George of Saxony. Illustris-
sime . . 31 July 1520 Louvain.
1126. Busch. Miseret . , 31 July 1520 Louvain.
:1127. Platz. Vir eximie . . 3iJuly(i52o) Louvain.
*:1128. Lang. S. P., vir . . 2 Aug. (1520) Louvain.
1129. Fisher. Reuerende . . 2 Aug. (1520) Louvain.
*1130. Merliberch. Carmen . . (Aug. 1520? Louvain.)
1131. H.Hermann. Eruditissime (c. Aug. 1520) Louvain.
1132. Wolsey. Tanto . . 7 Aug. 1520 Antwerp.
1133. Budaeus. Amicorum . . 9 Aug. 1520 Antwerp.
1134. Rotenhan. Consuetudinis 13 Aug. 1520 Louvain.
*1135. Hutten. Audisti 15 Aug. 1520 Steckelberg.
1136. Leontius. Boni (c. . . 29 Aug. ?) 1520 Brussels.
1137. J. Turzo. Cur ita . . 31 Aug. 1520 Louvain.
1138. Burbank. Is demum . . I Sept. 1520 Louvain.
1139. Pirckheimer. Non deerant 5 Sept. 1520 Louvain.
*1140. Lyjisius. Si non . . (Sept. ? 1520 Louvain.)
1141. (Teldenhauer. Brugis . . 9 Sept. 1520 Louvain.
*:1142. Schirn. S. D. Nulla . 10 Sept, 1520 Milan.
TABLE OF LETTERS
1143. Leo X. Tametsi . . 13 Sept. 1520
1144. Chieregato. Aniinum . .
1175. P. VergiL te . .
1521
1179. Schinner. Nuper . .
COLLECTIONS OF LeTTEES
AE. =
LeB correspondants d'Alde Manuce, 1483-15 14; par P. de Nolhac
(Studi e documenti di storia e diritto, 1887, 8). Rome, 1888.
Agr. E. — Epistolae Henrici Cornelii Agrippae ad familiares et eorum ad
ipsum pp. 681-1061 in Agrippae
: Operum pars posterior. Lugduni
. . .
—
Toulouse Paris, 1907.
Bemh. E. = Petri Bembi Card. Epistolarum familiarium libri vi. Eiusdem
Leonis x Pont. Max. nomine scriptarum lib. xvi. Venetiis apud
Gualterum Scottum, 1552.
Bl. E, = Briefwechsel der Briider Ambrosius und Thomas Blaurer, 1509-
1567; bearbeitet von T. Schiess (Badische historische Kommission), t. 3.
Freiburg i. Br., 1908-12.
Boh. E. = i. Listaf Bohuslava Hasisteinskeho z Lobkovic ed. J. Truhlar. :
Praze, 1893.
ii. DvaListai;e Humanisticke: (a) Dra. RackaDoubravskeho, (b) M.Vaclava
Piseckeho s Doplnkem Listafe Jana Slechty ze Vsehrd ed. J. Truhlar. :
Praze, 1897.
(Sbirka Pramenuv ku Poznani Literarniho Zivota v Cechach, na Morave
a v Slezsku. Skupina Druha: Korrespondence a Cizojazycne Prameny,
cislo I, 3.)
BRE. = Briefwechsel des Beatus Rhenanus herausg. von A. Horawitz und ;
s.l. et a.
GE. = Roberti Gaguini epistole et orationes ; ed. L. Thuasne. t. 2. Paris,
1904.
GHE. = Georg herausg. von 0. Clemen (Archiv fiir
Helts Briefwechsel :
Zu: E. = Huldrici Zuinglii Opera, voll. vii, viii, Epistolae ed. M. Schuler ;
Othee Sources
ADB. = Allgemeine deutsche Biographie. t. 56. Leipzig, 1875-1 9 12.
^(//vc.^ = Rodolphi Agricolae opuscula; ed. Petro Aegidio. Anueiiiiae,
T. Martinus, 31 Jan. 15 11.
^r/Wc.'^= Rodolphi Agricolae lucubrationes, tomus posterior; ed. Alardo
Aemstelredamo. Coloniae, J. Gymnicus. (1539).
Agric^ = Unedierte Briefe von Rudolf Agricola von K. Hartfelder (Fest- ;
1870.
Brerver = Letters and papers, foreign and domestic, of tlie reign of
Henry 1509-46; arranged by J. S. Brewer, and continued by
viii,
J. Gairdner and R. H. Brodie. t. 33. London, 1862-1910.
Brodie = Brewer i 2nd edit., by R. H. Brodie. t. 3. London, 1920.
;
Brotvn =
Calendar of State Papers and MSS. relating to Englisli afiFaii-s,
existing in the archivesand collections of Venice and in other libraries of
Northern Italy, 1202-1629; edited by Rawdon Brown and continued by
G. C. Bentinck, H. F. Brown, and A. B. Hinds. t. 23. London, 1 864-1 916.
Bulaeus = Historia vniuersitatis Parisiensis authore C. E. Bulaeo. t. 6. ;
Parisiis, 1665-73.
Biirchard= lohannis Burchardi Argentinensis, capelle pontificie sacrorum
rituum magistri, Diarium (1483-1506) ed. L. Thuasne. t. 3. Paris,;
1883-5.
Butzbach = Beitrage zur Gescliichte des Humanismus am Niederrhein und in
Westfalen von C. Krafft und W. Crecelius (Zeitschrift des Bergischen
;
1866-97.
Herzog = Realencyklopadie fiir protestantische Theologie und Kirche
begriindet von J. J. Herzog. 3" Auflage ; herausg. von A. Hauck. t. 21.
Leipzig, 1 896-1 908.
Heumann = Documenta literaria varii argumenti in lucem prolata cura
lohannis Heumanni. Altorfii, 1758.
= Calendar of State Papers and MSS. existing in the archives and
fl^nuZs
coUections of Milan, 1385-1618 editedby A. B. Hinds. 1. 1. London, 1912.;
Horaioliz =
Erasmiana von A. Horawitz. Wien, 1878, 80, 83, 85.
i-iv. ;
Wien, 1882.
(in Sitzungsberichte der phil.-hist. Classe der kaiserlichen Akademie der
Wissenschaften, 1878, 79, 82, 84, 82.)
xviii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS COMMONLY USED
Jdnig = Liber confraternitatis B! Marie de Anima Teutonicorum de Vrbe ;
Kraft = Briefe und Documente aus der Zeit der Reformation im 16. Jahr-
hundert herausg. von K. und W. Krafft. Elberfeld, 1876.
;
LB. i-x = Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami opera omnia; ed. J. Clericus. t. 10.
Brescia, 1753-62.
JI/o?am<s = loannis Molani (1533-85) Historia Louaniensium, ed. P. F. X.
de Ram (Collection de Chroniques belges inedites).
t. 2. Bruxelles, 1861.
MSH. = Messager des sciences historiques. Gand, 1823- .
mentary .; by F. M. Nichols.
. . t. 3. London, 1901-17.
NNBW. = Nieuw Nederlandsch biografisch woordenboek ed. P. C. Mol- ;
Paris, 1879.
Seebohm = The Oxford Reformers, John Colet, Erasmus, and Thomas More ;
b2
XX
ADDENDA
VOL. I
P. 32, ign. Prof. Preserved Smith points out that the second letter must be
LE'. 710, to Conrad Pellican, i Oct. 1523, which was printed in Erasmus
Alberus' ludicimn de Spmgia Erasmi (c. 1523-4).
Pp. 48-50. Two extracts from Erasmus' writings throw light on the course
of his education
'
Has naenias (the distinction between certain logical terms) didici . . .
P. 91, Ep. 16. ]2n. A picture signed Erasmus p(inxit) 1501 and claimed
'
'
Art in America, Dec. 1917, and a letter by W. Roberts in the Times, Lit.
Suppl., 24 Oct. 1918.
P. 168, Ep. 53 introd. Ten letters from Bostius' correspondence, 1475-98, are
printed from Bodleian MSS. in EHR. xxxiv, 1919, pp 225-36.
P. 174, Ep. 57. m. A copy of Vegetius, De re militcm, Utrecht, s. a. (e. 1473-4:
Proctor 8850), which belonged to Lord Mountjoy and was very likely
read by him under Ei-asmus' tuition in Paris, is now in the Library of
Univer.sity College, Oxford (X. 20. 11). It is inscribed Iste liber est '
P. 198, Ep. 71 introd. In an Appendix de scriptis Cliihouei, Aug. 1526 (LB. ix.
813 Erasmus mentions early mss. of the Be conscribendis epistoKs
b), :
ctiam oscula.'
ADDENDA xxi
unimportant but it may be noted that inll. 9, 17, 51, 56 (o^Jtbcs) the ms.
;
P. 261, Ep. Sixtin took his degree at Siena on 27-8 July 1510.
113 introd.
The University (11, f. 158: now in the Archbishop's Archives at
Piegister
Siena) describes him as rector seu archipresbiter in ecclesia Hac-
'
comben, in Anglia \
P. 275, Ep. The 'viculus' in which Erasmus spent the night of
119. 20.
I Feb. may
probably be identified with St. Just-en-chaussee, a small
town on tlie main road to Paris, 31 ms. from Amiens and 9 from
Clermont. With his indifiference to accuracy in trivial details Iie might
easily have remembered its name as St. Julien.
obseruando ', and speaks of Tutors veneration for the dead Emperor.
P. 385, Ep. 174 introd. Greek ms. of the New Testament, except Revelation
A
(Evang. 90, Act. 47, P. 14 copied by Faber of Deventer, is now in the
,
and C. R. Gregovy X.T. Prolegomena, 1894, ii. 487. Faber's original was
a MS. written Ly Theodore of Hagios Petros in 1293 and he used also ;
Mss. lent to hiui by Wessel (cf. Epp. 504. 2, 515. 3-5J, and by the Warden
of the Recollets at Zirickzee.
—
Dominicanus nomine, si satis memini, loannes, luscus erat, furtassis
xxii ADDENDA
adhuc superest — aate annos ferme viginti sex in aedibus Nicolai Middel-
burgensis medici nominauit theologum Louaniensem vnde acceperat.'
:
P. 404, Ep. i8r. i8n. The date of Colefs actual assumption of the deaneiy
of St. Paul's must be later than 20 June 1505 for a ms. written by :
Peter Meghen (see Ep. 231, ^n^ and containing new statutes made by
Colet for the regulation of the ehantry-priests in the Cathedral, is dated
20 June 1506, 'et decanatus sui anno primo'. See a description of the
MS. by W. S. Siinpson in ArclMeologia lii, i8go, p. 164.
P. 406, Ep. 182 introd. Christopher Fisher is praised by Badius as vir heroica '
P. 414, Ep. 184. i^n. Jo. Theod. Harius died in 1532 as eanon of the Hague :
see BWN. His books were acquired by Charles v, who with them
founded the Royal Library at the Hague Ccf. Jo. Secundus, Opera,
Utrecht, 1541, f. 1*; and Arn. Buchelius' Biarium, ed. G. Brom and
L. A. van Langeraad, 1907, i>. 87) but they are said to have been ;
P. 432, Ep. 201. 2n. The date of Marcus Laurinus' death must be 1540, as in
GC. V. 258, not 1546 as in BN. ; see the inscription on his tomb, in
J. Gailliard, Itismiptions funeraires de la Flaiidre, 1861, p. 159.
. For his
. .
—
brother Peter (7 Dec. 1489 27 Feb. 152^) see Ep. 1271. i22n.
P. 443, Ep. 211 introd. For an acquaintance that Erasmus made at Venice
witli the hi»»torian Bern. Ruccellai of Florence see Apophthegmata, viii,
Thrasea 2 (LB. iv. 363 e).
P. 449, Ep. 213. There seems to be no doubt about the reading of the ms.
I.
But M. de Nolhac'3 interpretation receives some colour from a passage in
Lond. XX. 2, LB. 1000 Dici vix potest quantum mali precer his bellis
:
'
P. 453, Ep. 216. 23. For the form quicpiam cf. Arnold of Tongres' preface to
his ArticuU, Cologne, Quentel, 28 Aug. 1512 Bocking pp. 78-9, .545. :
P. 467, Ep. 227. in. Erasmus' Missa Chri/sostomi was first pi-inted in the Clie-
vallon Latin Chrysostom, Pari->, 1536, vol. v, ff. 350-4.
The Pope's physician was a Proven^al Jew, Jaoob ben
P. 483, Ep. 240. 36n.
Emmanuel, known as Bonetus or Bonnet de Lates. He was appointed
to his office by Alexander vi and held it till 1515. See Renaudet
pp. 392, 499.
P. 488, Ep. 243. 6on.In the Bi*itish Museum (G. 1203) is an Oration on
Henry P. Gryphus, 'nuncius apostolicus ', pi'inted for him by
vii l)y
Pynson, with a preface to Ruthall (Ep. 192) dated 15 May 1509,
London. In consequence of the king's death, the Oration was never
delivered. A
poem on Lud. Sforza's captivity by P. M. Carrantus, Bologna,
J. A. de Benedictis, 1507, is dedicated to Gryphus.
P. 501, Ep. 255 introd. An account of Erasmus' conversation with Warliam
about his Aldington pensiou, earlier but shorter than that in the
Ecclesiastes, is given in the Apophthegmata, bk. iii (LB. iv. 156 bc).
P. 509, Ep. 259 introd. In a deed executed by Linacre 14 Jan. 1515 and now
(Kent, no. 1348) in the archivcs of Merton College, Oxford, John
Babham, son of John Babham, is named as ouf "f the executors, in
conjunction with Thomas More, 'gentihiian '. In Mareli 1526 Jo. Ba))ham,
'
stuard ', was one of tlie parties to a release of tlie nianor of Waterstock,
ncar Oxford Queen's College MS. 366, f. 38 v".
:
ADDENDA xxiii
P. 515, Ep. 263. 2in. The Bodleian has two volumes of Luther's works
(TL. 18. 10 and 15) presented to Mich. Hummelberg in 1522 (one on
II Nov.) by the Adelmanns of Augsburg the Vom Eelichm Leben,
:
Wittemberg, 1522, and Wirie)- den falschgenanten gaystlichen stand des Bapsts,
s. 1., 1522. Besides inscribing his name on the last leaf of each, in
the latter Hummelberg has copied a short letter to him from Thomas
Blaurer, 15 Sept. (1522?), which seems to be unpublished.
P. 528, Ep. 270. 6on. The Library of Queens CoUege, Oxford, possesses a
Biblia Latina, Paris, R. Stephanus, 1528 (252. C. 12), with the autograph
inscription * Thomas Lupsett twice on the title-page.
'
P. 533, Ep. 275. 5n. In the Library of Peterborough Cathedral (E. i. 17) is
a copy of Ovid's Mefamoi-phoses, Lyons, C. Davost, 22 Oct. 1504, which
belonged to John Watson.
P. 557, Ep. 291. 3u. On 6 Nov. 1525 Dr. Augustinus Aggeus was sent to England
by Charles of Gueldres as envoy to Henry vin : Brewer iv. 1746.
P. 563,Ep. 295. 25. Sir John Paston in 1473 (no. 725) considered a riall
enough to take a man from London to Calais.
P. 564, Ep. 296 introd. The Francis of Nj^megen to whom Erasmus showed
Ep. 296 very likely to be identified witli Gerard Geldenhauer (Ep.
is
487), who was a Crucifer at Louvain, and in 1517 beciime chaplain to
Philip of Burgundy, bp. of Utrecht Lypsius having made a mistake in
:
the Christian name, as Ei-asmus did so often (cf. Ep. 1054 introd.).
P. 608, i^n. Dr. A. A. J. Karthon of Heusden has made an important
discovery in the Library of tlie Prov. Genootschap van Kunsten en
Wetenschappen at Hertogenbosch of the source from which Leclerc
:
clusively that the ms. was in the hands of Leclerc or De la Faye for LB.
His collation shows that, apart from Leclerc's standard orthography, in
II out of the 19 letters there are no variants between the ms. and LB. ;
in the remaining 8 he i-ecords the following readings of the ms. :
Ep. 6. 7. negotius.
qui.
xxiv ADDENDA
VOL. II
P. 38, Ep. 316 introd. Lucas Paliuius was perhaps son of Michael Klett
of Giitingen in Swabia, who was Pellican's schoolmaster at Ruffach
c. 1487 (CPR. p. 7). Lucas' name is mentioned in ZE. 78, of 28 Dec.
1525, at wliich date he appears to have been still in Basle and his ;
and T. Platter, March 1537. The auniversary of the death of his vvidow,
Dame Barbe, was celebrated on 29 Jan. see the Liher Vitae of the con-
:
mane '.
but I cannot lind any trace of him in the University Grace-Books. For
a somewhat similar name to the form in Ep. 330. 21, see Ep. 1039 introd.,
of a printer at Nuremberg in 1531.
P. 132, Ep. 347. 196. Prof. C. H. Turner points out to me that the i-eading must
be not imperauisse but temperauisse, as in Jerome's preface to the Vulgate
Gospels.
P. 172, Ep. 374 introd. Caesarius' returu from Italy may be dated in 151 1 :
P. 183, Ep. 384 introd. Mr. H. F. Moule has indicated to me th;it the numer.a-
tion of the pages of Pt. ii of the Nouum Instrumentum, 1516, is faulty and ;
that instead of more than 1,000 pages' the correct number is 990.
'
P. 198, Ep. 388. i73n. For Jo. Clement in Italy in (1522) see Lo. E., f. 143. He
was M.D. on 30-31 March 1525, Mr. lo. Clemens Anglius, tilius
at Siena '
S. 5- 33). About Jan. 1568 he offered to lend his Octateuch and other
Greek mss. to Plantin for use in tlie preparation of the new Polyglott
(Pl. E. 102).
P. 211, Ep. 396 introd. Prof. A. Souter has discovered from Reisch's two letters
of 1513-14 (ti. II. 29. 151,2) that for tho Amorbach-Froben Jerome he
borrowed two mss. from the monastery of Echternach. near Treves : the
Hieronymian Martyrology and the Pseudo-Jerome (now Paris 10837 and
9525). The latter was priuted in vol. ix, Maj- 1516, which is the cditio
princeps. See Proc. of tli.e Brilish Acadvmy vii, 1915-16, pp. 282-3. For the
Chevallon edition oF Jerome, Paris, 1533-4, see Transactions 0/ the Biblio-
graphical Society xiii, 1913-15, p. 316.
P. 284. A facsimile of Ep. 404 is given in Ulrich Zwingli. Zum Geddchtnis der
Ziircher Beformation, 19 19, pl. 62.
ADDENDA xxv
P. 241, Ep. 411. 8n. In Symph. Champerius' Symphonia Plafonis, Paris, J. Badius,
18 April 1516, is a letter from Marlianus to Champerius, dated 27 Oct.
1513, Ghent.
Alvar Gomez, De rehiis gestis a F. JCimenio, Alcala, 1569, f. 151 v°, states
that Marlianus was made bp. of Tuy against Ximenes' wishes.
Among the Mss. of Gi'oenendael (seevol. i, p. 590) in 1640 wasMarlianus'
Epistolae ad diuersos principes
'
eiusdem diuersa opuscula simul in :
de Ponchier '.
The form Poncher occurs twice in Marcus de Grand VaPs Non tres siue cluae
Magdalenae, Paris, J. Badius, (15 19).
P. 470, Ep. 531. 415^. Lucas Walterus Conitiensis was one of the correctors
of Faber Stapulensis' edition of John de Sacrobosco'3 Sphera, Paris,
W. Hopyl, 12 Feb. 149* see Renaudet, p. 273^.
:
VOL. III
P. 12, Ep. 602 introd. Salisbury Cathedral Library has a copy of Froben's
edition of the Antiquae Lediones with the same colophon as the British
Museum copy but a title-page on which the preface composed in Ep. 602
does not appear so that explanation 2 seems to be correct.
:
P. 57, Ep. 635. 2on. In Oct. 1526 Seb. Munster dedicated to Jo. Erasmius Froben
his Latin version of Elias Levita's Capitula Cantici, Basle, Froben, 1527.
P. 59, Ep. 637. 5-8. This passage is quoted ahnost verbally by Nic. of Hertogen-
boscli in his notes on Erasmus' Lucian, Antwerp, M. Hillen, June 1528,
f.7 v°. His citation shows that Erasmus wrote 'Triglas in delitiis esse
Hecate atque illi sacras ', and that the scribe (Hand C)
. . . fell into an
easy error.
P. 66, Ep. 644 inti-od. The Library of the Royal College of Physicians in London
has a volume of the Script. rei rusticae, Reggio, 18 Sept. 1496, with an
autograph inscription by Linacre from whom it passed bj- presentation
:
P. 77, Ep. 656 introd. The Library of the Vicars Choral at Hereford has a copy
(II. 2. 13) of Erasmus' Cyprian, Basle, Froben, Jan. 1530 (see Ep. 1000)
Avith the name of Vannes inscribed inside the back cover, in bold
capitals.
P. 82. Ep. 660 should perhaps be transferred to 1519 : see vol. iv, p. 67.
P. 124, Ep. 700 introd. Pirckheimer's Laus Podagrae, Nuremberg, F. Peyp, 1522,
is dedicated to Banisius see P. p. 204.
:
P. 185, Ep. 750 introd. In 1915 Dr. J. A. Vor der Hake was good enough to
report to me the existence of the Codex Horawitzianus in the Public
Library at Rotterdam (Erasmus III. 102) ; and shortly afterwards he lent
it to the Bodleian for my
use. 1916-19. It is in Martin Lypsius' auto-
graph throughout. Examination showed that Horawitz, though dis-
carding the original spelling, liad on the whole done his work very well,
in printing the Jis. in Horawitz v. Out of the 28 letters to or from
Erasmus, only six were printed by himself ; and of these, four appeared
in vol. iii of this edition. In Ep. 750 p. i) the text of tlie Eotterdam MS.
'
a few variants of no real importance. The text for the other two letters,
Epp. 1056, 1070, may be seeii in this volume.
In the letters in vol. iii for which the Brusseis and the Eotterdam MSS.
were the only authorities (Epp. 899, 901, 912, 921-2, 960) and the one
whicli is only found in the latter (Ep. 900), there are no variants of
importance to record between the Rotterdam MS. and Horawitz's text.
It remains to consider the relations between these two mss., whicli are
both in Lypsius' autograph throughout. The Brussels MS. is clearlj- the
earlior, .>ince it contains nothiug later than 1519 (Epp. 1048-9, 1052), or,
if Ep. 1130 is riglitly dated, tlian 1520: whereas the Rotterdam MS. has
nothing of Erasmus earlier than 1518 (Ep. 750) and goes down to 1525.
Another point of difference is in tiie arguments prefi.\ed to the letters
in the Brussels MS., with the design of elucidating their contents in :
the Rotterdam MS. there is nothing of the sort. To some exteiit the
xxviii ADDENDA
Mss. overlap, for ten letters are common to both. Why Lypsius should
have copied them twice over I am unable to conjecture.
Tlie Rotterdam MS. was at one time in the hands of the famous Belgian
antiquary J. F. Van de Velde (i 743-1823).
P. 187, Ep. 751 introd. John de Hondt (fa. 24 Nov. 1571) was already M.A.
and in holy orders by 1506. He contributed some verses to Eligius
Houcarius' Tradatus de Pmitentia, Ghent, 1513, styling himself 'canonicus
Phauopinus* see Bibl. Belgica. In 1514 he began to accumulate further
;
P. 261, Ep. 807. 2n. The actual volume of Gregorj- given by Erasmus to
Lypsius was recently in the possession of Mr. P. M. Barnard of Tun-
bridge Wells who kindly lent it to the Bodleian for a short time in
:
Oct. 1917. See the Bodleian Quarterly Record ii, 1917-19, p. 61.
P. 29.5, Ep. 829. 27n. For the Colts at Netlierhall see an article in The Times,
Lit. Suppl.,26 Dec. 1918.
P. 297, Ep. 831 introd. There is a contemporary copy of this letler in the
ms. letter-book of Alexander Minutianus of Milan AD. xi. 31, f. 128 at :
the Brera Library in MiLan. Except for a few depravations and trifling
variations it follows the text of By, and, when 7 fails, of 13, against a
and the printed editions and may therefore be presumed to have been
;
P. 390, Ep. 866. For praise of Eicholtz see Th. Loher's preface, 4 Sept. 1536,
to an edition of Dionysius the Carthusian's commentary on tlie LHrri
Sapientiales, Cologne, J. Genepius, 1539.
P. 393, Ep. 867. 12. In the Moria Erasmus writes of quidditates, ecceitates ',
'
19. desidendum] sc. vsque ad multam noctem. Cf. tlie colloquy Diuersoria,
lir.st printed in Aug. 1523 LB. i. 717 g, 718 a.
:
ADDENDA xxix
P. 394. Ep. 867. 36n. Cratanders eilition of Cicero, March 1528, is dedicated to
Varnbuler, with thanks for help in getting an Imperial privilege.
P. 415, Ep. 877. lon. Prof. Preserved Smith suggests that the allusion is more
likoly to the summons to Luther to appear before Cajetan at Augsburg
early in October 1518.
P. 418, Ep. 881 introd. In June 1521 Longicampianus was tutor to -John,
a son of Duke William of Bavaria: see Oecolampadius' preface to his
translation of Greg. Nazianzen's De moderandis disputafionibus, Basle,
A. Ciatander, Sept. 152 1.
P. 420, Many details about Bathodius (matric. at Heidelberg
Ep. 883. i^n.
M.A. 1513, t6 April 1554) are given in J. Ficker and 0. Winckel-
1511,
mann's Uandschriftenprohen ii, 1905, no. 78.
P. 423, Ep. 886. 22-3. TunstalFs copy of the New Testament, 1519, on vellum,
is is now in the Library of York Minster.
no doubt that whieh It came
thither with the books of Toh. Matthew, abp. of York, and at one time
dean of Durham where he bought other books which certainly belonged
:
to Tunstall.
Pp. 467-8, Ep. 910. The Bodleian hasnow acquircd a copy of Pezels volume,
1590 (a). In I. 9 its reading is SoAorex''»'', in 1. 22 Luther; the month-
date it gives as 9. lanuarii.
Pp. 471-2, Ep. 913 is reproduced by lithograph in the Autographic Mirror,
1864-5, ii- 141.
P. 505, Ep. 925. i3n. For Berquin and the Sorbonne see the Registre des proces-
verbaux de la Faculte de Theologie de Paris, 1505-33 (Bibl. Nat. MS. nouv.
acq. Lat. 1782) printed in extract by L. Delisle in Notives ef Extraits
:
P. 562, Ep. 957. 16. I owe to the late Mr. Bywater, ahd again to Prof. A. C.
Clark, the suggestion that by spirifosus Erasmus means the TrftvfiaTos
KoKoPoTTjs wliich Plutarch (Bem. 6j attributes to Demosthenes. He uses
the word similarly in the Ecclesiastes, bk. i (LB. v. 782 f) hominem :
'
P. 613, Ep. 986 intrpd. For a letter of Erasmus to Hutten e. 31 May (con-
temporary with Epp. 981, 985), which ought to have been delivered at
Frankfort in June by the bearers, Jonas and Sclialbe, see EHE. p. 289
(=HE. 135) and, for their movements, cf. Ep. 963. in.
;
P. 627, App. 12, 11. 10-12. The six letters in the Epislolae selectae 2)er Barlandiim
which are in F but not in E, are Epp. 605, 1106, 1107, 1122, 1159, 1160.
The two letters not found elsewhere are Epp. 646, 1163.
VOL. IV
COERIGENDA
VOL. I
Erasmus by 5 Oct. ;
n. 8. j- j. For are certainly read is only one letter in this hand (Ep. 692),
. . .
VOL. II
VOL. III
P. 41, Ep. 620 introd. Delete askiiig at the same time . . . Epistolae. But.
P. 45, Ep. 622. 3in. For Lond. xiii. 26 . . . addressed to him read Ep. 1051.
P. 146, Ep. 715. 35cr.n. For H read F Corrig.
P. 344, Ep. 850. 21. For obturare read ob(sa)turare. Cf. Ep. 1047. 6.
VOL. IV
Read solor.
P. 369, Ep. 1154. 26. For et read ac.
29. Read nostratis.
36. Read vite.
41. For At read Ac.
App. crit. 16. For cum read cu.
The secretary links many of his words together, especially prepositions mto :
the word following in 11. 12, 28, 29, 45, 47, 56, 60, 64 9, 64. adte 1 1. miruminmo- ; ;
dum ;
promerito 45. obhoc;
41. ;
62. interhomines 65. ame 67. anteoculos.
; ;
67. quoadpossum.
LIST OF PLATES
PA.GE
1. Medallion of Erasmus cast by Quentin Metsys at Antwerp, 1519 ;
The originals of Epp. 210, 217, 223, 251, 257, 681, 705, 1166, 1208.
"2993. To Leonard Priccard.
Fairago p. 368. Louvain.
F. p. 459: HN: Lond. xi. 17 : LB. 442. l July 1519.
haec via visa est illi cum primis compendiaria. Quanquam autem
ipse sibi de^^dvws nihil non tribuat, non tamen vsqueadeo perfrictae 20
frontis est vt dicat se melius scire Graece quam Erasmum. lactat
libellum nescio quem, at huius nuUi copiam facit, nisi quem cognorit
nobis male velle. Quiduis ab illo citius impetrari potest quam vt
mihi faciat inspiciundi copiam, in quem vnum scriptus est. Adeo
fidit suo libello, quem tamen nusquam non iactat. Vtcunque haec 25
habent, organum opportunum sese praebuit theologis quibusdam,
quibus iampridem male cogitantibus nihil deerat praeter occasionem,
iuxta Graecorum prouerbium. Imo sunt qui negant hoc opus esse
illius, sed potius omnium sycophantiarum centonem ac rhapsodiam :
huic tamen corniculae cessuram facti gloriam. Id mihi multis .^0
;<B Apologiao qua Latomo resi^ondeo, testatus sim esse quendam ex fucis
ac mendaciis conflatum, qui gloriae fame insanus nihil in me non
moliretur nec vllam addo coniecturam qua suspicio possit in quen-
:
introd.) and against Latomus (Ep. 934. 896. 9on, 961. 5, 6, 1045. 95-102, 1080.
3n). Ep. 994 also was carried by 3. It apj^ears from Ep. 1117.2-4,29-
Nesen. It mu.st be noted that in 30 that Erasmus gave a conditional
answering Epp. 925, 994 in Ep. 1002. j^romise that be would come. For his
20-1, Erasmusspeaksof tlie latteronly change of outlookon thissubjectcf. Ep.
as brought by Nesen. But this may 1004. 145-6. See also Ep. 1129. 18-19.
easily be explained by supposing that 13. ad Dorpium] For this mtdiation
when Nesen arrived with Ep. 925, with Dorp on behalf of Erasmus cf. Ep.
Erasmus was absent from Louvain (cf. 1024. 2-3. The tlieological society for
Epp. 927 introd. or 955 introd.) so ; which Beraldus wrote, was probably
that the letter had to be forwarded by liberal in character : see Ep. 925 introd.
B 2
4 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
15 Apologia illa qua tuam tutaris causam super illo Fsalmi versiculo,
Minuisti eum paulominus etc. vltimo demum loco in paraphrastico
;
994. 17. iis E : his F. 095. 15. F : Apologo E. 23-4. minori valde E :
multo minoris H.
dubio facturus es, quousque saltem hae tuae vigiliae et labores inter
—
manus meas erunt, erunt autem quoties a publicis laboribus ad
priuata haec solatia subterfugere dabitur. Qui quidem quod eorum 40
nouitate quibusdam stomachum moueant, hoc ventriculi eorum labor,
non ingesti vel apparati cibi noxia qualitas fecerit quo minus :
eorum ingenia mirari aut aegreferre debes. quo apertius tibi constat
sanissima etiam laboranti stomacho insuauia esse.
Ego ab huiusmodi offensione tantum absum, vt hoc ipsum Instru- 45
mentum tuum Nouum quod ad me misisti. propemodum sim vora-
turus neque enim minorem eruditione pietatem tuam censeo.
;
eis exercet? nisi qui cuncta videt et veluti ab ipso lapsa arguit. 60
24. constent £ habeantur: fl". 26. diapasonJB: q\i3im 5is 5ia vaawv H.
28. F Corriy. habueris E.
: 34. ininus expectatae fi. 38. inter F: in E.
34. primam et alteram] It is not but speaks lower down (1. 8i'i of 'a
clear what books Campegioreceived. book '. Erasmus, however, in Ep. 996.
The second edition of the New Testa- 31 uses the plural.
ment was in two volurnes the notes ; These inconsistencios may perhaps
completed on 23 Aug. 1518, the text in be explained by taking the hist utter-
March 1519. In Ep. 961. 8-9 and 66-7 ance as an oversight arising out of
Erasmus had written of sending the Erasmus' intention and by supposing
;
thanks for the first and second editions, see £p. 502 introd.
6 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [15 19
Quai'e istud pro constanti tibi habe, me eum non esse qui de te
aut quouis alio male sentire multoque minus dicere velim. Quin
studiosis omnibus tibique praecipue omnem operam meam adeo
syncere et iucunde exhibeo, vt eorum ingenia et nomen pro viribus
65 semper prouehere nitar quod sedulo in gloriam tuam et doctrinae
:
75 ueris.
Caeterum aliquas gratias pro misso mihi munere tibi agere omnino
superuacaneum arbitror, cvim huiusmodi gratissimis officiis tuis
nullus verborum apparatus recte respondeat. Animum itaque
meum pro verbis et gratiis tibi addictissimum suscipies, vnaque
80 pignoris loco adamanta anulo inclusum, liis literis insertum, quem
mei mnimosynon tenebis. Nuncio vero qui librum ad me detulit,
nummos decem aureos pro viatico dedi.
Et bene vale ex Londino quarta lulii. Anno m.d.xix.
995. 73. charis] xa/)<y. Bodlelan Qrhj. Becord, July 1918. By his
Ep. 1025. 4n.
<liutiiis] Cf. last will he left it to Ju&tina Froben
;
anulo] This diamond nnjj'\vasin
80. whose husband, Nic. Ei^iscojjius, was
Erasmub' possession, 9 April 1534 see : one of his executors. See Q. p. 123.
996] TO LOEENZO CAMPEGIO 7
cus puri candidique pectoris, alienas dotes ex sese metiens cum oculo 45 ;
prauo vitiatoque mala sint etiam quae sunt optima. Nihil igitui*,
inquies, profecit mea laudatio Profecit nonnihil, certe stimulos
'?
20. Pacei] ForErasmus'rccent meet- 43. Batauo] sc. crasso : cf. Erasmus*
ing with Pace see Ep. 968. 6n. interpretation of the adage Auris
35. tuis verbis] See Ep. 995. tit. Baiaita,&ndin Adag. 2001 {LB.ii. ti^i').
41. Champegio] For this lorm cf. 'HoUando, hoc est plusquam Boeoto.'
Ep. 990. II. See also Epp. 1238.U. 1331. 35 6.
8 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
died, 20 Oct. 1505, the see was kept open until John should reach an age at
which the Pope might be induced to relax the requirement. On 19 Oct. 1517
John was created Bishop of Toul, on his twentieth birthday he was admitted to
Metz, and on 28 May 1518 he was made Cardinal see Ciaconius iii. 418.9, GC. xiii.
;
neque modus neque finis iactandi trecentas annotationes, coepi odiosius ctiam
prouocare ad aeditionem, primum verbis, mox per epistolam aeditam, sed quae
sic haberet nonnihil aculeorum vt Leum extimulare posset, atrum facere non
posset Apologia qua respondet ff. B* v°, B^, Jortin ii. 501.
' :
Apparently it was not sent off at once for Lee says (Ep. 1061. 2,3) that the
;
Farrago was on sale at Louvain before the manusci-ipt reaclied him. In replying
to it in Ep. 1061, he reprints it section by section. For the greater part his text
agrees more or less closely, after allowing for the depravation incidental to
copying or printing, with that of E, even to the reproductiou of the inaccui-ate
name (cf. 1. ^n) but at the end, for II. 56-77, he gives a considerably shorter
:
form. This perhaps indicates that in the brief interval before sending the letter
to Basle to be included in E, Erasmus amplified the conclusion.
Epp. 307, 1006, 998 are the last three letters at the end of E but in F, which ;
reprints E and all the preceding volumes of Epistolae usually in strict order — —
their position is quite different. Ep. 307 is there printed twice over, first on
p. 472, where it raarks the end of E and is foUowed by 142 pages of new letters
(Lond. xii. 8-xvi. 18), and again on p. 615, where itis followed by Epp, 1006, 998:
after which come more new letters (Lond. xvii. 2-26). An explanation of this
unexpected arrangement may perhaps be found in a letter from Burer at Basle,
12 Nov. 1519. to Beatus Ehenanus at .Schlettstadt (BEE. 133) Erasmus . . :
'
.
epistolas duas sero post factum misit iam enim Farrago ab incude ijrodierat.'
:
Now in E Ep. 307 ends at the foot of a page, K^ v°, p. 388 ; after which come
Epp. 1006, 998, the two last lotters in the book, filling leaves K^-L. It is quite
possible therefore that the first copies of E ended with Ep. 307, the remaining
leaves of sheet K being occupied with the Jnde.c epistolarum and Index ternionum ;
and that when Erasmus sent Epp. 1006. 998. they wore added in copies printed
later. The Froben firm no doubt retained for its own use specimens of tlie
various books produced in its presses, and would thus naturally take one of E in
its first form. If we suppose that it was forgotten to replace this 'office-copy'
12. canem] Cf. Adag. 913 ; where inclusos diligenter adseruet, quos nec
Erasmus gives as an example of such ipse vnquam euoluat, nec aliis euol-
conduct, '
veluti si quis egregios codices uendi faciat copiam '.
10 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
by tlie enlarged volume with the two letters added, aiid further that this 'office-
copy was talien as the basis for F, the variation in order is easily accounted for.
'
And the ^ame explanation serves, if we suppose that F was printed fiom a copy
of E revised bj' Beatus Rhenanus who of course received one of tlie earliest
;
copies of E. When the omission was discovered, during the printing of the new
portion in F, it was at once rectified but by a new oversight Ep. 307 was
;
ttiough I have not seen any copy of E with the two final letters missing.]
QvoD a
nie dissentis alicubi, non admodum aegre fero ; semper hoc
incolumi amicitia. Quod istis rationibus rem tra-
licuit inter eruditos
ctas, demirabor si quisquam vir grauis probet, quando nec ipse probat
D. loannes Briareus Ateus, tui, vt par est, amantissimus. In tot mili-
5 bus Annotationum, in tanta sententiarum et ingeniorum varietate,
quid nouum aut mirum sicubi vidisses quod me fefellisset ? aut tibi
minus placeret quod mihi non displicuisset ? Quis autem probaturus
est quod subito ex amico factus hostis in absentem sci'ipseris ? cum nec
vlla lacessitus esses iniuria nec vnquam expostulasses cum praesente
10 quod in veterem aeditionem scripseris, cum scires adornare me nouam?
quod opus tuum per omnia monasteria sparseris, praesertim vbi scix'es
esse qui mihi parum bene vellent ? quod iis modo communicaris quos
noueras iniquiores Erasmo ? quod nunquam prouocari potueris, nec
Atensis autoritate, vt mihi voluminis tui faceres copiam, imo ne ad
15 hoc quidem, vt voce vel vnum proferres locum quem reprehendisses ?
quod virulentis conuiciis, imo mendaciis, opus passim asperseris (id
enim affirmant qai viderunt, neque recLamant paginae quas intercepi) ?
quod nusquam non praedicas ac iactitas sexcenta loca abs te repre-
hensa, nec vnius interim facis copiarn? Quaeso te, vnde istud
20 exemplum vel grauitatis vel animi Christiani?
Si prodesse vis omnibus, cur non aedis ? Si me docere vis, cur
solus non impetro vt legam ? Si tibi scripsisti, cur tam late volitat
hber ? Si diffidis operi tuo, cur sic vbique iactas ? Si fidis, cur tam
anxius es ne quis legat, nisi qui mihi parum sit aequus ? Ita dum
4. D. om. F. E : Atensis F.
quo paratior c-ssem ad respondendum \°, Jortin ii. 517. In Ep. 886. 72 the
si quando illu sua euulgasset. Sed figure isgiven as 200, in Ep. 1053. 7933
frustra omnia nam ille non paulo
; 300 cf. Ep. io6r. 102.
;
vigilantior orat in celando quam ego in 23. iactas] Cf. Ep. 993. 21-5.
998] TO EDWARD LEE 11
me traducis apud eos qui tibi iurati mihi male cupiunt, nec me reddis 25
meliorem et illos infieis. Quid quod interim nec tuae gloriae, quam
lioc tumultu venaris, satis recte consulis ? Si statim aedidisses opus
tuum, omnes admirati fuissent prodigiosam ingenii tui felicitatem,
qui pauculis mensibus tantum Graecitatis et Hebraismi deuoraris, vt
tuo iudicio nihil sapiat in Graecis Erasmus, in Hebraicis Hieronymus 30
(si tamen haec est illius translatio) nam id honoris gratia soles
:
aut legeretur, nisi Lei suffragio proljatus, nimirum totius rei literariae
Aristarchi.
Nunc plerique dictitant te hoc consilio premere praeclaras istas
Annotationes, vt me fatis functo tum demum aedas ip-i^jj.ri victurus, 4° ;
turus videaris. 55
Nec tamen ob istafacta adeo tibi sum infensus vt cupiam quenquam
tibi vel pilo minus amicum esse mea causa tantum abest vt grauius
;
student etiam quam velim. Nec ignoras huius gentis animos ingenii-
que violentiarn. Nondum enim prorsus exuerunt natiuam illam fero-
citatem, quamuis assidue mitescunt humanis literis. Vides quibus 65
libellis confodiant eos a quibus sunt lacessiti. Equidem multorum
37. niinirum add. F. 65. mitescant 11.
29. Graecitatis] Cf. Epp. 607. 15. 906. 64. violentiaml Cf. Epp. 967. 76-7,
450-1, 912. 7-9, 972. 2, 1053. 292-3. 981. 4, 1155. 28 9, 1167. 9-10.
34. etiam] For this estimation of 65. miteseunt] Cf. Ep. 941. 10-12.
Capito above Reuchlin cf. Ep. 413. 14. 66. libellis] As specimens of tlie
46. Latomus] See Ep, 934. ^nn. attacks nuule sub^iequently on Lee from
59. istonim The fi-iars; whom Eras-
i
Germany may be cited Eae (.p. 201 :
genus si quid accideret (id quod Deus auertat), nec ego possem tuo
70 mederi malo, et, vt est nunc prona hominum suspicio, inuidia facti in
meum quoque caput recideret. Ita ex tuo malo niihi dupiex incom-
modum nasceretur, primum ipse dolerem mea causa laesum esse cui
nihil tale velim accidere, deinde non deerunt qui suspicentur me
conniuente factum. lam, vt spero nihil huiusmodi futurum, ita
75 contra metuo ne quid accidat. Si nihil est periculi, amice timui sin ;
and again in 1533 he wrote to John Faber, bishop of Vienna (Ep. 386), describing
the household as he had lieard of it at Chelsea (Lond. xxvii. 8, LB. App. 426).
Tlie greater part of this letter to Hutten (down to L 297) is printed in J. Fichard's
Virorum illustrium Vitae, Frankfort, C. Egenolph, Sept. 1536, ff. 112-16, from the
text of F. Appended to it, with a short connecting passage, is the portion of
LB. App. 378 which deals with More. For all the details of More's life Sir
Sidney Lee's article in DNB is an invaluable source. I am indebted for some
notes and suggestions to a i'eviewer in the Athenaeum, 2 Jan. 1909.
It looks at first sight asthough, Epp. 1000 and 1007 notwithhtanding, Erasmus
might have been at Antwerp from 23 July to 15 Aug. continuously but in fact :
his movements at this time were rapid. As he probably met Pace not later than
25 July (Ep. loor. 53^), it seems likely that he went to Antwerp for the purpose
just at this time, and travelled back with Pace on tlie way to Mechlin, which
would serve also for his own return to Louvain. The phice-date of Ep. 1000 is
confirmed by Ep. looi. 3. Within a few days lie was in Antwerp again, having
visited Mechlin on his way (Ep. looi. 7) and he wasstill there on 15 Aug. (Ep.
;
1009). The place-dates of Epp. 1007,8 conflict cf. the introductions to Epp.
;
962, 965. If Louvain is not a mere oversight in Ep. 1007, it may be conjectured
that in writing on important matters to the Pope, Erasmus preferred to give his
liermanent address.
A letter of this character clearly was not composed during a hurried excursion
to Antwerp. The biographical part liad no doubt been thought out at leisure in
Louvain and was then taken to Antwerp on the chance of finding a messenger
;
Cnapp, c. 3 Junc 1520 (cf. Epp. 1123. also Ep. 1077. in.
19-20, 1128. in); HecriminatioIoan.Ger- 67. cohibui] See Ep. 993. 52n,
tophii, adidescentis Germani, aduersus 68. his atrociora] Lee {Annotationes,
furiosissimum nycophantam Edoardum ft'. CC v°, CC^) reports that in conversa-
Leum Anglum, qui aitsus est prinms Eras- tion he askod Erasmus the meaning of
mum candidissimum luto aspergere, Basle, the ' acriora stilo with which he is
'
A. Cartander, June 1520 and ; the threatened in tliis letter, and received
Hochstrufus onans (^Ep. 1083. 23^). Cf. the reply '
verbera '.
999] TO ULRICH HUTTEN 13
—
numerous indications of 1519 the relation to Ep. 986, the mention of More'3
—
second embassy, and of Hutten's Aula the change is quite inadmissible.]
yiveTai EF. t om. H. 15. caeteris non item «f(!rf. i^. 27. delineare i\'".
2. scribis] The letter is not extant. suggested contrast between refined and
But it must have been prior to Ep. 986 ;
vulgar enjoyinent. The idea in Eras-
cf. \. 302. mus' mind was perhaps sometbing of
4. mutuum] For this opening com- this. The ^('/ienaejoH reviewersuggests
parison cf. i, p. 27. 29-31. that Erasmus supposed them to be in-
10. Graecoi-um] A proverb quoted by different painters. But contemporary
Diogenianus cf. Adag. 179. : notes on Horace indicate them as
20. 3uauissimi]Evidently theepithet gladiators and of tliis interpretation
;
for More, whicli gives the note for tlie Erasmus can hardly have been igno-
whole sketch cf. 11. 11 1, 301. ; rant. He often uses the same figuie,
21. oi) navTuf\ Cf. Adag. 301. e.g. in the first prefacc to vol. ii of
26. Fuluii Rutubaeque] The gladia- Jerome, 1516, f. 3 v" (cf Ep. 326 in-
tors of Hor. S. 2. 7. 96, where their trod.): cum bubulcus interim aliquis
'
incuses aut caecutientiae, qui ex tam niultis bonis tani pauca vel
viderim lippus vel commemorare voluerim inuidus.
Atque vt ab ea parte exordiar qua tibi Morus est ignotissimus, statura
35 modoque corporis est infra proceritatem, supra tamen notabilem
humilitatem verum omnium membrorum tanta est symmetria vt
;
nem non maiorem annis viginti tribus, nam nunc vix excessit quadra-
gesimum.
Valetudo prospera magis quam robusta, sed tamen quae quantis-
60 libet laboribus sufficiat honesto ciue dignis, nuUis aut certe paucissi-
mis morbis obnoxia; spes est viuacem fore, quando patrem habet
57. vix E : non multum F.
34. statura] Beatus Rhenanus (iv. 55. Ouidius] A.A. i. 509 seq.
529-39, 545) expressly borrows some of 56. e/c rrjs fcaKd/xr}?] Cf. Adag. 3103,
the details of this description in por- quoting Hom. Od. 14. 214 and Arist.
traying Erasmushimself thus making : lihet. 3. 10.
the two friends comparable in height, 57. non maiorem] This statcment is
complexion, colour of hair and eyes, approximately correct, if More's birtli
expression of face, voice aiid clearness is phiced in 1477 (cf. Ep. 114 introd.) ;
of speech ; also for constancj' in friend- for Erasmus met him first in thc
ship (h loo-i) and suavity in address autumn of 1499 (i, p. 6 and Ep. 104
(1. iii). introd.).
barba rarior] Tbere is nothing
40. vix] The correction in F was
that can be called a beard in eitlier the perhaps made in the desire to bring
drawing or the paintiug of More by the estimate up to date. In July 1519
Holbein in 1527 so it must be inferred
: More was eitlier 41^ or 42^. ,
that More liad removed this since 61. patreni] .Tohn Moro(i453?-i53o),
Erasmus had List seen him in April butler of Lincoln's Inn. was called to
1517. The bearded portrait in LB., the Bar, and in Nov. 1503 was a
from anengravingmadeby Vorsterman serjeant at-hiw. By 1518. perhaps as
in 1631, is derived from a small panel a reward for his son's services, he had
in the Brussels Muscum (No. 641); been made a .Judge of Common Pleas,
wliich it is now recognized is not by and by 28 Nov. 1523 was promoted to
Holbein and cannot possibly be More. the King's Bench. In Ep. 1233 his age
See A. B. Chamberlain, Hans Holbein is ostimated considerably higher than
the yov.nger, 1913, i, pp. 304,5. tlic figure given above from DNB. On
999] TO ULRICH HUTTEN 15
Vox neque grandis est nec admodum exilis, sed quae facile penetret 75
aures, nihil habens canorum ac molle, sed plane loquentis est nam ;
datur, hibens vtitur, ita quoties jjoscit res, nemo vigilantior aut 95
patientior.
66. frequenter aquam meram add. H. 73. qui F Corrig. : quae E. 89. re-
perias N.
Mr.s. Bowes and Alice Clarke (t i544)j feratur lex ne quis cum alio poculum
nee More of Loseley, who from tlie habeat commune. G. Istam vix recipiat
change introduced into the text in F, Anglia' (LB. i. 830 d). Cf. also Adag.
must have succeeded between 1519 and 553.
1521. Tho other was perhaps .Johanna 70. secundario] Of inferior quality ;
115. comoediolas] Roper (iiy;- 0/ J/ore, new colophon 13 Nov. 1506 Erasnius" :
ed. Hearno, 17 16, p. 3) records that portion bearing date i Nov. More's
More, when a boy in the household of work is dedicated to Ruthall (Ep. 192)
Cardinal Morton. would at Christmas
' with an undated preface (LB. App. 475.
tyd sodenly sometymessteppinami.ng quite wrongly ascribed to Erasmus)
the players, and never studinge for the which Ruthairs acceptanee
offers for
matter, make a parte of his owne there 'has in Graecis litteris studii mei pri-
presently amonge them, which made mitias '. See also Ep. 550 introd. and
the lookers on more sport then all the i,p. 18. 26-9.
players besid '. 120. fuit autor] The precise
value to
118. cpigrammatis] Cf. Ep. 635. 9-10. must be
be attached to this statement
119. Luciano] To the joint volunie of determined by comparison with Epp.
1506 (Ep. 187) More contributed tran^- 222. 1-18, 337. 126-39.
lations of three dialogues and of thc 127. Denioeritum] Cf. Ep. 222. 17,8.
ri/raH>iiCirfrt with adeclaniation in reply Pythagoricum] Cf. Diog. Laert.
(cf. II. 253 5 and E|>. 191 . These fill 8. i. 6.
999] TO ULRICH HUTTEN 17
tem, quoties alios conspicit oblectari. Cum aetas ferret, non abhor-
ruit a puellarum amoribus, sed citra infamiam, et sic vt oblatis magis
frueretur quam animo mutuo caperetur potius quam coitu. 140
captatis, et
Bonas primis statim annis hauserat. luuenis ad Graecas
literas a
literas atque philosophiae studium sese applicuit, adeo non opitulante
patre, viro alioqui prudenti proboque, vt ea conantem omni subsidio
destitueret ac pene pro aljdicato haberetur, quod a patriis studiis
;
133. et (MJi. F. i3i. EK^LB: vhieTa,N^ Loncl. 135. atque F aque £. 137. ac :
133. domi] It is quite possible that ness caused by the frequent changes of
at this time More's home was still in subject in this sentence.
Bucklersbuiy. Inhermarriage-licence, 148. Nec temere] A conflation with.
2 July 1521, Margaret More (1. 174) is ' Nec temere habetur apud illos ea via
des»cribed as of the parish of St. . .maxime idonea '.
.
but I cannot find any definite evidence restored it. For other citations of ms.
to connect liim with Chelsea before his originals in E Corrig. cf. Epp. 123.
purchases of land there in 1524. See i2n, 987. 32.3^^.
P. Norman, Crosby Place, 1908, p. 21. nobilitatem] Cf. Ep. 1053. i^on.
simia] A
story of More's ape and 153. schohisticas disciplinas] Pre-
weasel is told in the colloquy Amkitia, sumably at Oxford cf. Ep. 1002. 8-12.
:
first printed in Sept. 1531. P. Falk also 158. Augustini] This course of lec-
delighted in an ape seeEp. 450. 57-61.
;
tures was perhaps undertaken at the
144. abdicato]The technical term for request of Grocin for Roper (p. 3, ed.
;
instituendam E instruendam H.
171. : 172. libuisset N. 174. tres F :
A. 214, J5, i. 26. Bonge became More's 13311)she was married to William Eoper
conft?ssor, christened two of his chil-
*
(1496-1578), a member of a Kentish
dren, buried his first wife and married family living at Well Hall, near Eltlaam
him to his second '. (cf. Ep. 104 introd.) but was still
;
164. sui periculo] A point on which dwelling, with her husband, in her
Erasmus always lays great stress : cf. father's house. At Christmas 1523
II. 67-71, Epp. 296. 34-6, 447. 138, 194, Erasmus dedicated to her some hymns
858. 495, 1158. 4-5, 1202. 220. of Prudentius, with a preface which
168. Tamen] This unexpected con- carries congratulations on the birth of
junction suggests that the three pre- their first child. He wrote to her
vious sentences (which are a character- again in 1529 (Lond. xxvi. 50, LB.
istic Erasmian sally) were added later 1075) and her autograph replj' is still
:
than the first composition. extant (Breshiu MS. Rehd. 254. 129
puellam] Jane Colt (c. 1487- LB. App. 352). Some of her father's^
1511 cf.
: Ep. 221. 3in), eldest letters to her are printed by Stapleton,
daughter of John Colt of Netherhall, Tres Thomae, 1588, in Latin, and are re-
near Roydon in Essex (see Ep. 829. produced in English by Cresacre More.
27n). Her marriage with More cannot JohnCoster (see Ep. 75ointrod.)inedit-
be dated later than c. Jan. 1505. From ing Vincentius Lirinensis' Pro Cathoticae
the initial simiharity of language she M. Julianus, 1569,
fidei antiquitate, Paris,
may be identified with the young wife cites (f. 47 from information received
:
from the eountry, married at 17, who from John Clement) an emendation by
at first found her husband's instruction her in Cyprian's Ep. 30. 3,>ie(«osformsi
irksome, but was brought by her father vos :which is the reading of Erasmus'
to happy compliance as described in
; editions. Mr. A. W. Keed has shown
the colloquy Vxor fxffnf/iyafios, first {Trans. of the Bibliographical Soc, n. s, ii)
printed in Aug. 1523 (LB. i. 704 D-5 c). that she translated Erasmus' Precatio
See The Times, Lit. Supph, 26 Dec. 1918. Dominica into English, in an edition
A story of More's docciving her with printed by T. Berthelet before 12 March
sham jewels is told in the Moria (LB. 152I. No copy is known but it was
:
tAloysia, Cecilia, puer vnus loannes. Neque diu celebs viuere susti- 175
nuit, licet alio vocantibus amicorum consiliis. Paucis mensibus a
funere vxoris viduam duxit. magis curandae familiae quam voluptati,
quippe nec bellam admodum nec puellam, vt ipse iocari solet, sed
acrem ac vigilantem matrem familias quicum tamen perinde ;
Quin huius domus fatalis quaedam videtur felicitas, in qua nemo 190
vixit qui non prouectus sit ad meliorem fortunam, nulhis vnquam
vllam famae labem contraxit. Quin vix vllos reperias quibus sic
conuenerit cum matre vt huic cum nouerca nam pater iam alteram —
induxerat vtranque non minus adamauit ac matrem.
;
Nuper
induxit tertiam hac Morus sancte deierat se nihil vnquam vidisse '95
:
C 2
20 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [15 19
aoo effundit. Cum aduocationibus adhuc aleretur, nulli non dedit amicum
verumque consilium, magis illorum commodis prospiciens quam suis ;
plerisque solitus persuadere vti litem componerent minus enim hic :
210 pecunia quam ex praescripto debent qui litigant siquidem ante litis :
220 admitti quam hic studuit effiigere. Verum cum esset optimo Eegi
in animo familiam suam eruditis, grauibus, cordatis et integris viris
differtam reddere, cum alios permultos, tum Morum in primis acciuit
quem sic in intimis habet vt a se nunquam patiatur discedere. Siue
seriis vtendum est, nihil illo consultius siue visuni est Regi fabulis
;
nunc magis exerit. quando plus potest prodesse. Alios pecunia sub-
leuat, alios autoritate tuetur, alios commendatione prouehit. Quos
alioqui iuuare non potest, his consilio succurrit. Nullum vnquam
a se tristem dimisit. Diceres Morum esse publicum omnium inopum
patronum. Ingens lucrum sibi putat accessisse si quem oppressum 240
subleuauit, si perplexum et impeditum explieuit, si alienatum redegit
in gratiam. Nemo iubentius collocat beneficium, nemo minus ex-
probrat. lam cum tot nominibus sit felicissimus, et felicitatis comes
fere soleat esse iactantia, nullum adhuc mortalium mihi videre con-
tigit qui longius abesset ab hoc vitio. 245
Sed ad studiorum commemorationem redeo, quae me Moro mihique
Morum potissimum conciliarunt. Primam aetatem carmine potissi-
mum exercuit, mox diu luctatus est vt prosam orationem redderet
moUiorem, per omne scripti genus stilum exercens. Qui cuiusmodi
sit, quid attinet commemorare praesertim qui libros eius semper 250
? tibi
halDeas in manibus. Declamationibus praecipue delectatus est, et,
in his, materiis adoxis, ingeniorum exercitatio.
quod in his acrior sit
Vnde adolescens etiamnum dialogum in quo Platonis
moliebatui-,
communitatem ad vxores vsque defendit. Luciani Tyrannicidae
respondit quo in argumento me voluit antagonistam habere, quo
;
255
certius periculum faceret ecquid profecisset in hoc genere. Vtopiam
hoc consilio aedidit, vt indicaret quibus rebus fiat vt minus commode
habeant respublicae sed Britannicam potissimum effinxit, quam
;
236. potest plus iV. 238. his add. H. 253. in add. N. 255. ant-
agonistam F: aut agonistam E. 272. Habet . . 274. spe add. F.
.
285. aliam Aulam] Cf. Ep. 863. 3111. Master of the Rolls, and in 1523 he
286. Principe] Albert of Branden- was created bishop of Bath and Wells.
burg, archbishop of Mainz see Ep.
: See DNB.
661. Knight, pp. 220-1, identifies vvith
288. Coppus] See Ep. 986. 140. another John Clerk (f 10 May 1552%
289. Stocschleii] See Ep. 855. 43^. who had Icnown Pace (Ep. 211. 43^)
Latimeri] I do not know on wliat intimately in Italy(De jPn<c<M, pp.24-5),
ground Erasmus connects Latimer (Ep. became secretary to the Duke of Nor-
207. 22n) with the Court, unless that folk, and wrote an Opusmlum de mortuo-
he was for a time tutor to Eeginald rum resuiredione, 1545 : see DNB. But
Pole. in such company the bishop is perhaps
290. Clerici] John Clerk (fs Jan. more likely.
1541). He was B.A. at Cambridge 302, epistolam] Ep. 986. Foraletter
1499, M.A. 1502, and then began a of Erasmus to Hutten c. 30 May (con-
career of incessant ecclesiastical pre- temporary with Epp. 981, 985', which
ferment. At this time he was chaplain ouglit to have been delivered at Frank-
to Wolsey and dean of the Chapel fort by tho bearers, Jonas and Schalbe,
Royal, and thus was in froquent c. Juno mod., see EHE. p. 289 (HE.
attendance on the Court ; except when 135) and cf. Ep. 963. in.
he was sent on embassies, twice to 305. adomnes]Throughtheprinting
France and twico to Rome (cf. Ep. 1227. of Ep. 986.
5n). For a year, 1522-3, he was 307. Paceum] See Ep. 986 introd.
999] TO ULRICH HUTTEN 23
Si quis est isthic qui cupiat artem sycophanticam discere, indicabo 315
illi quendam huius disciplinae mirum artificem, quem huic rei plane
repperit dociles multos apud nos. Nondum tempus est, verum breui
vobis hominem commendabo, vt, quo dignus est quodque misere
ambit, omnium eruditorum literis celebretur, portentum verius quam 320
homo. Bene vale.
Antuuerpiae. Decimo Cal. Augusti. anno m.d.xix.
[The preface to Erasmus' edition of Cyprian, Basle, Froben, Feb. 1520 (o).
This was possibly projected early in 1519 for on 9 April Faber Stapulensis ;
writes to Beatus Rhenanus, answering inquiries about the text of Cyprian and
mentioning a ms. (BRE. 105"). The first definite indica-
at St. Victor's in Paris
tion of thework in Epp. 975, 984 ; perhaps cf. also Ep. 997. On 3 Oct. 1519
is
Boniface Amerbach writes to Zasius that Erasmus is engaged with it (Am. E. i
cf. BRE. 133, 140, and 420 (Nov. fin. 1519)" at Christmas that the printers aro ;
hard at work and on 31 Jan. 1520 that it is nearly ready (^Basle MSS. C. VI*.
;
sciebam artificium commodius indices colligendi (CPR. p. 76). Zasius received '
his copy from Boniface between 8 and 22 Feb. ZE. 19,20). Subsequent Froben (
editions of Cyprian's Opera with Erasmus' name appeared in Nov. 1521, ' ab
' iam tertium a mendis repurga-
innuraeris mendis repurgata (/3), Feb. 1525, '
tiora (7), and Jan. 1530, 'iam quartum accuratiori vigilantia a mendis repur-
'
duplid martijrio. Some criticisms on the first two editions are refiected in Epp.
1479, 1482.
A note appended to the introductoiy matter in 7 (f". b^ v°) states that for his
text Erasmus made use of three printed editions, Romanae . . ; cuiusdam '
.
alterius, cuius tituhis excidit et Badianae '. Tlie first is clearly that of
;
Sweynheym and Pannartz, Rome, 147 1 ; the second is shown by Hartel {Cypriani
Opera, 1868-71, pp. Ixxiii-iv in Corpus script. eccl. Lat.) to be Pafraefs, Deventer,
:
(c. 1480) (Hain 5894 Proctor 8954) the third is the Paris edition printed by
: ;
B. Rembolt and J. Waterloes, 13 Nov. 1512. The ground of this last identifica-
tion is that in producing the treatise De cardinalibus Chrigti operibus Erasmus says
(f°. b of a) that it was not in any of his manuscripts but that in aeditione '
310. Caietanum] See Ep. 891. 25^. some of the forms which occur in
He had no doubt seen Hutten at Brewer ii, iii. For the present form
Augsburg in 1518. cf.Ep. 1166. 72.
311. Cinglii] The name of Francisof 313. hic] No doubt Louvain ; see
Sickingen (Ep. 582. 27^) is often cor- introd.
rupted: Seken, Sekyn, Sekkym, Sicken, 316. quendam] Clearly Leo.
Sykkynge, Sequinghen, Zekinghe, are 320. eruditorum literis] Cf. p. 210.
24 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
23, iii. 449), Erasmus' attribution of the 1512 edition to him is perhaps some-
thing more than mere conjecture.
Besides these printed texts Erasmus had the use of two manuscripts to ;
germanensis' (p2). 1, 464) inferring (p. Ixxviii) tliat it was thence tliat Erasmus
;
derived Epp. 73, 74, 71, and the Senientiae Episcoporum, which also he printed for
the first time.
That Erasmus considered the third book of the Aduersus ludaeos to be new
and unpublished, probably indicates that he was using a copy of the Deventer
edition in which this treatise is lacking. Hain shows tbat when the treatise is
found, it is always on separate leaves, A-D. apart from the rest of the book.
A copy lacking these is in the Bodleian (Auct. Q sub fenestra ii. 4).
In Aug. 1544 Erasmus' Cyprian was re-edited (Cologne, P. Quentel see :
Migne i, pp. lxxiii,iv) bj' Henry Gravius, a Dominican of Cologne and perhaps
a kinsman of his old friend (cf. Ep. 610. 47^}. By this time the maniiscript of
the De duplici martyrio had disappeared, or at any rate Gravius had not seen it.
On internal evidencehe evolved the theorythat this othei'wiseunknown treatise
was a forgery by Erasmus and this view was followed by James Pamelius of
;
idea was soon discarded but moderu editors point out that on evident grounds
;
the work cannot be attributed to Cyprian. Either therefore Erasmus must have
read it through very hastily, or possibly he had not seen it at all. The edition
in which it appears (5) belongs to the Freiburg period and though there is much ;
revision of this preface, no doubt from Erasmus' own hand, he clearly cannot
have taken part in tlie actual production of tlie book. It is possible, therefore,
that, as their description (f, b^ v° of 5) suggests quem in vetustissima — '
fuisse.
Caeterum cum Lactantius testetur a Cypriano admodum multa
fuisse conscripta, rectius perspicietquanta fuerit ea calamitas quae 25
caetera nobis ademit, qui reliquiis quas habemus, notha ac pseudepi-
grapha detraxerit. Etenim vt Cypriano cum caeteris scriptoribus est
commune, quod ipsius lucubrationibus multa sint aliorum admixta,
ita hoc fuit Hieronymo felicior, quod huius voluminibus multa sint
interspersa prorsus indigna lectu, Cypriano nihil asscriptum est nisi 30
doctum et a magnis viris profectum. Proinde nos adeo nihil semoui-
mus etiam huius generis, vtnonnullaex vetustis codicibus adiecerimus
neque enim protinus reiiciendum quod Cypriani non est.
lam ne quis in hac censura putet nos nihil aliud secutos quam
somnium animi nostri, Symbolum fidei, quod in euulgatis pariter ac 35
descriptis voluminibus Cypriani titulum hactenus possidet, inter
opera diui Hieronymi fertur Ruffini nomine. Liber De singularitate
clericorum habetur inter Augustini lucubrationes quanquam is an :
63. Hieronymus] Ep. 58. 10. interest in Jerome see Ep. 396 introd.
looo] TO LORENZO PUCCI 27
Cypriano quam vel spretae sunt vel neglectae. Nihil in hoc reperies
quod ad ostentationem ingenii videri possit ascitum, aut quod vllo
pacto vafriciem sapiat, quae non abest Hieronymo. Talis vbique
sermonis habitus est vt loqui sentias vere Christianum episcopum ac 100
martyrio destinatuni. Pectus ardet Euangelica pietate, et pectori
respondet oratio. Loquitur diserta, sed magis fortia quam diserta
neque tam loquitur fortia quam viuit, vt ipse meminit alicubi.
Huic nimirum personae magis congruebat dignitas quam lepos,
etiamsi locis aliquot declarat sibi non defuisse nasum, sicubi res ita 105
postulasset velut vbi salsissime ridet haereticum quendam qui nega-
:
bat Cyprianum habendum pi'o episcopo deinde cum refellit eos qui
;
quis sibi stolide placeat quod nihil rhetorices attigerit. Efferant alii
quantum libet eos quos nobis aediderunt dialecticorum ac Peripateti-
corum scholae, quos nec nos sane improbamus certe primas inter ;
Dum enim sedulo vitat lacus liaereticorum contritos horretque bibere aquam de
cisterna aliena, incautiore mali fuga in eum errorem inciderat. Nec ille repertor
fuit eius erroris, sed a maioribus acceptum tuebatur, haud dubie mutaturus
sententiam si melioribus argumentis veritatem fuisset cdoctus ;
quemadmodum
post episcopi caeteri priorem opinionem meliore sententia mutarunt. Nam
testimonia Scripturarum et rationes quibus illi fuerunt in eum errorem inducti,
eleganter refellit Augustinus in libris De baptismo contra Donatianos, prae-
sertim libris tertio, sexto, septimo 5. 154. alicubi a in epistohi quadam ad :
Paulinum S.
[Between the Imijerial Election (1. 63) and the publication of the Farrago (E).'^
perimus, pro nouis vetera. ' Ibi frustratus aperio literas Pirkemheri
has comperio scriptas anno millesimo quingentesimo decimooctauo, 30
Calendis Octobrib. Maior etiam obortus risus. Resigno literas Ricardi
Sbrulii Foroiuliani, Caesarii poetae reperio scriptas anno item ;
Non dubito quin optimus ille lonas cum collega suo et literas et 40
animum nostrum fobis rettulerit. Male me habet quod nomisma quo
ilhistrissimi Ducis imago mire repraesentabatur, mihi periit vna cum
epistola. Cum enim sensissem reuerendissimum Episcopum ac
Piincipem Leodiensem vtriusque videndi percupidum esse, neque
tum forte haberem in crumena, et ille ad multam noctem tardaret 45
in intimis consiliis apud D. Margaretam, Maximiliani Caesaris filiam.
postridie summo diluculo Germaniam aditurus, tradidi cuidam qui
nobis vna cum Episcopo prandentibus astiterat pocillator, vt illi osten-
sum vtrunque mihi restitueret. Post dies complures ex medico disco
et iuuenem abisse cum caeteris in Germaniam. Nec adhuc Episcopus 50
sese in aulam nostram recepit e Germania reuersus. Mihi tamen
magis dolet epistolae iactura quam nomismatis.
29. Pirkemheri] Not answering Ep. Exegesis of Irenicus (Ep. 877. in), f. 14
856 which Pirekheimer did not see
; v°. An
edition of John of Freiburg's
till it was in print (cf. Ep. 1095. 5-7^. Smnma Con/essorum, Lyons, J. Saccon,
Like the letters from Sbrulius and 9 Sept. 1518, is dedicated to him ;
Beheni, it is not extant. and he is associated with Flamming
32. Sbrulii] See Ep. 1159 introd. (Ep. 867. 56^) in the dedication of
His letter was probably written from Adelphus' Gregory Nazianzen. Apart
Augsburg. ffom the mention here nothing is
34. Behem] (c. 1461 1,2 June — known of his correspondence with
1520), of Nuremberg, a friend of Chr. Erasmus.
Scheurl. He matriculated at Leipzig 40. lonas] See Epp. 876, 963. in,
in the summer of 1482, and was B.A. 985.
1484,M.A. I48f. Subsequently he was literas] Ep. 978.
given a canonry in St. Mary's ad ' 41. nomisma] See Epp. 872. 26n,
gradus at Mainz, where c. 1509 he
'
978.6-9, 1119. 2n.
appearsasaidingin thefoundation of a 43. epistola] See Ep. 963. in.
new college and thence in Sept. 1513
; 44. Leodiensem] Cf. Ep. 978. 7-9.
hewaselectedProvostof St. Laurence's 47. Germaniam aditurus] Though
at Nuremberg in succession to Ant. not an Elector, the Bp. of Liege was
Kressen. See 6. Bauch and F. Herr- sent to Frankfort insupportof Charles'
mann in Arch. /. Jiess. Gesch., nf. v, interest; and was one of the signatories
1907, 99pp.Scheurrs life of
54, ; to the letter informing Pace of the
Kressen, Nuremberg, F. Peyp, 24 July result (Brewer iii. 338 written, 28
;
1515 (f' P- 354) ; ^^^ -A-' Wiirfel, Di- June, from Hochst, 5 ms. w. of Frank-
ptycha ecclesiae Laiirentianae, Nuremberg, fort, where the Elector of Mainz had
1756, p. 21 alsoSE. 60, 66, 71, 82, 115,
: a castle). Subsequently he returned
176, 209, 218. Behem's praise is in from Germany with Pace (Brewer iii.
et vltro missum est. Nam quae iudicio dantur, testimonia sunt verius
quam munera.
Edimus Cyprianum, emendatum non mediocri sudore, ita me
Christus bene amet. deinde auctum accessione libellorum aliquot,
quos ex vetustissimis codicibus adiecimus adiunximus annotatiim- 90 ;
[1519, because Poncher is Archbishop of Sens ; cf. Ep. 924. i^n. In 1518, too,
Erasmus Avas at Basle in August.]
1001. 88. Cyprianuml Ep. 1000. 9. scholis publicis] This term maj-
8. non eo spectant] An interestiiig Cf. also Epp. 1211. 486, 512, 1220. 23 ;
fortunam cum onere pari coniunctam. Mihi semper animus fuit ocii
ac libertatis amans et a strepitu rerum abhorrens. Quid ad Dorpium
scripseris adeo mihi non indicauit Nesenus, vt ne hoc quidem ex eo
,^5 cognouerim, scripsisse te. Ante pauculos dies audiui literas illi
redditns abs te per Hermannum Phrysium, nescio quid cum illo
expostulantes. Si quid acerbius est, nolim, mi Beralde n.an Dorpius ;
29. ELB: Senonen. /". 36. EN- LB : Hernianiim TZA'^. 48. m. d xviii aAZ. i7.
Nesenus] Cf. Ep. 994. gn. for he was sunimoned to France in the
25. ad Giolierium] £^.,831. summer of 1518 (BRE. 120; cf. BE.*
27. respondissel In May 1519 Alex. 24).
Miniitianus, tlie Milan printer, wrote 39. resipiscunt] Cf. Ep. 993. 55.
to Grolier that he had found 'earum 41. Hermannus] See Ep. 903. i2n.
literarum exemplum quas ad Erasmum The Jetter that he brought is probably
Parisiisscripseras tertio circiter abhinc Ep. 989, which must belong to this
anno, cum in Galliam processisti. . . . period, since it elicited Ep. 1003 : it
Descriptum ad te mitto' see his letter-
: was pcrhaps delivered later than Ep.
book in the Breraat Milan, AD. xi. 31, 994.
1003] 35
[Contemporary with Ep. 1002. For Hue see Ep. 989. ^n. It appears from
Ep. 1185 that this letter elicited no reply.]
Agit hoc miro conatu per litteras Nicolaus Beraldus, homo Gratiis
natus, vt nos committat. Quod si certamen foret eruditionis aut
eloquentiae, non poterat magis deterrere quam cum sic adhortatur
In hac ' inquit palaestra prouocari ahs te mauult quam te prouo-
*
4. inquit] Ep. 989. 10-12. points out that Lascaris (^Ep. £69. 510)
15. Parisiorum Academiani] Lefranc had recently arrived in France. Cf.
{Collige de France, pp. 59 69) cites Zw. Ep. 1C02. 8n.
E.' 38 aud Ep. 925. 23-9 for the studies 24. nos] at Louvain,
of Paris University at this time ; and 30. libertatem] Cf. Ep. looi. 820.
D 2
36 LETTEES OF EEASMUS [15 19
Bene vale, vir optime ; quem ego posthac inter Guilhelmos illo3
35 nieos fatales sum relaturus.
Antuuerpiae quinto Id. Augusti. [Anno m.d.xviii.]
suggested in Ep. 992 introd. Ep. 101 1. i-ii shows that this letter did not reach
Budaeus till the evening of the day on which Longolius had left Paris there-
—
;
fore not before 19 Aug. (Ep. loii. 411) an inference which is confirmed by a
letter of Budaeus to Vives, 19 Ang. 1519 (BE.* 43), complaining that Erasmus
had not yet replied to Epp. 915, 992.
The Greek text here and in Ep. loii presents many points of divergence from
modern usage, which are repeated in one edition after another sometimes ;
variations in accent, in the use of short vowels for long or in the iota
ti-ivial
subscript, sometimes positive errors. Many of these are doubtless due to the
correctors, who with inadequate knowledge of Greek revised the proofs without
supervision by the author. But even the loremost scholars of the Renaissance
had much less mastery of Greek than of Latin : so that some of the irregularities
to be noted here are perhaps original.]
1003. 36. Anno m.d. xviii add. H. 1004. 3. ovtojttqjs E LB : ovtojs Lond.
7. F : neneifj.ai. E. 10. fmaToKwv E : ypafJifxaTcuv H.
1003. 34. Guilhelmos") Cf. Epp. 534. (Erasmum) tuae quae suntin principio
32 seq., 957. 132-6, 1184. 2, 1191. 54, huius nouae Farraginis <Epp. 810, 896,
1224. I also Ep. 1005. i5n.
; 915)? me nunc, quum eas attentius et
1004. 1. TpiTov] TJiethirdletter,beside consideratius lego relegoque, vsqueadeo
Epp. 987, 992, is not extant. But, as non aliqua in re oflTendunt vt mirifice
his words suggest, Erasmus is perhaps me oblectent. In eandem sententiam
miscounting cf Ep. 1023. 2-3, and
: eundemque affectum adductus est et
Budaeus' figurcs in Ep. 101 1. 93-7. Erasmus ipse. Quocircasiqnid vnquam
3. iiTiaToKTfv'] Ep. 915. ad te de illis scripsi, ignosce, quaeso,
9. B(^«a)s] He continued to act as a mihi, qui tunc parum attentus eas per-
mediator between tho two friends curreram'.
writing to Budaeus from Louvain, 7 KoWaffTrjpos'] This word seems to
March (1520) (Goldast, Fhil. ep. cent., beunknown Greek butits
in classical :
1610, pp. 222-3), 'Epistolae illae ad sense is clear from Ep. 987. 3.
I004] TO WILLIAM BUDAEUS 37
AotSopiais Tats ets e/>(.e, dA.Aa (f)o/3ovfxai Trj <^^yu.?/ o-oi;, r/v Koi avrrjv ifxr]V cTvat
rjyovfJiai, e—ctSjy Travra Kotvot 17 <^tA.ta. AAAa /acv /<at atTos 6 BtySeiJS, 15
SetKvvo^avTos e/xoC tt^v eTrto-roAvyv o-oi», /xet^ova rpoTrov iOav/Jiacrev, ouSa/^ws,
<us e<^7/, TTtCTevcrwv TOtauTa ypacfyarjvaL BouSato) —pos Epao^p-ov, et //,7) avTO';
avTrj<; avToypatfiOV dvayvwcrTrys yevo/xevos.
Kat 8t/ etTre /AOt av Tts
Trpos tojv ^j^aptVwv, (SeXTio-Te BouSate, Tt airoKpivavT
Trpos Tota£'Ta, aKatws Kal e^^^pcoSws Xe^^^^vat 8oKOvvTa aXXa Kat 20
oiu /jlovov
dKaipw<; Kttt aTrpocrStovvCTcos, J)S eTros etTretv IIpttJTOv 8r) eyeypd^etv ttou ;
uvTeTrttrreAAcuv crot Travra Ttov Acjycov /cat yvw/xwv TvpovTTTa crot Kat Tvapa
)(^£paiv, ws 0ap,ev, etvat, Sv/XovcJTt evSaLfxovL^ojv cre t-^s re ev</>utas Kat jj.vi]jx-q<i
tc Kat TupavvtSos, cos uTragdTravras ifxirohiC^ovTa koX KwXvovTa fxr] •^rjcrOaL rots
Twv TraAattuv avOeai, o/xcus 8r]fxo<TLOL<i ^Srf Kal tov kolvov yevofxevoL<;, i'7ro7rtd^cov 30
fxeTa^ To TTjs e/A^s Trapot/jttoAoytas TreptTTov. IldAiv aS^is epcoTw, Tt Trpos
TuvTU a7roKpLvaLfxr]v ^dv} J Avtc) ^acrt SetKwcrtv, a eyci) ets tov eTrutvtJV crou
yeypacfta, TavTu. cre 8Le(TTpafxfxevtx}<; Trpos v^pLV epfxrfvevearOaL. IIws 3e 8?)
<fiOovep<Jtj<; Kut /SacTKdvcos evo;^Aco TOts oTrcocroiiv ;^pco//.e'vots Tuts Trapot/Atats, <os
TAr/cras, cijcrTe /xdAAov KOtvus uTracri Kat Sr]fxoo-La<; yeveaOaL ; 1] Trtos ifXTToSwv
fXfXL TOts eK8tSo{5crt to. atiTcov oa^yypd/x/xuTa, 6 ttoAAous TroAAdKts eTrorpvvas
*7rt TOtauTT^v CTTrODSTjv Kut u/AtAAav ; evfievrfs tov ou fxovov Tol<; tv)(Ov<tlv dAAd
ecrrtv ovofxa Tovfxov. IIoAii /SeXTLOv ovv e8o$e Trpos TaCra TrdvTcos aTrocrtcoTrdv, 40
•^ Trpos To €7ros aTTOKpLvofxevov fxaTTfv ipeOit^eLv tcrcos Kut e^opyt^eiv tov (fiL\ov,
Kev Kttl TovTo To ArffxovoKTOv^; ets T^p-ds KaTajSoXLaofxevoL^;, O /xev tov Tpdyov
ufxeXyei, u 8e to KCJcrKtvov vTroTiOr^aL.
OlfxaL ydp iXd)(LaT0v 8ta<^e'petv to kut' e/xe Trcjcras eft8ofxdSa<; rf /xvptdSas 45
CTcov fxep.eXeT7]Ka tu. vvv irap ifxov eVaAAr/Acos, cos ^tjs, cK8t8<j/xeva* et KUt
a(x(f)e<; kuI ^avepcjv ecm Tots c/AOt TrXqaLa^ovaL Kut oiko^cv eyvcoKocrt Tafxd,
oTt 7rdvi; ets OdTepov p.epo^ dfxapTdvo), irdvTa a)(e86v dfxeXrfTl Kut atirocr^j^eSta-
afxevo)^ eK)(e<i)v pdXXov r) tlkt(dv, dfxop(f>a eTL KUt areAT} ovtu, qyovv AeovTcov
Kut dpKT<j)v 8LKr]v. 'Ev TovTco Se fxepeL ovk iyu) ^ratSevroTepos d|^tco vofxiCeaOaL, 50
dAAd crc' <^7/p.t evTV)(eaTepov dfxa Kat (^povLfxoTepov etvat. Auros yup tcrtos
TrActovd crou ypd^co, dAAd kui ^etpova, auTos Odaaov iKTLKTO), dXX ov fxeTa
TToXv TeOvr]^<')fxeva' oirov av jBpa8vvrj fxev iv tco TiKTeiv, dAAd TiKTeL<; <xOavaTa.
21. e7€7pd</)eii'] Fp. 906. 29 seq. 39. en-i<T«oTiXoucriv] Cf. Ep. 1107. 8n.
25. 5ia(TTp(</)eis] Ep. 915. 14-19. 43. Aj^^ovaKroi^s] Luc. 7itoZ)cm';?i.§afl:
26. €£i/7ro/.ii'r;/idTa;>'] Cf.El». 906.98- 100. <^t'. ,4(Zct(/. 251.
.28. €7Ka\ers] Ep. 915. 22 sec|. 45. e;35o/xd5as] Cf. Ep. 915. 58,9.
34. kvoxXw] Cf. Ep. 915. 50. 49. CKxewv] Cf. Ep. 935. 33.
38 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [15 19
Ilept TOVTwv fj.€V ToaavTa' Trepi Se tov 'lepovi^/xov Kal 'ApeoTrayLTwv, tov
C5 IxvrjixiKov afxapTiqfxaTO^ (Tvyyvu)p,T]v Kal 8t8a)/xt dcr/x.eVto9 Kal e/cojv d7ro8e';;^o/xat,
/cara rr/i' TrapoL/jnav, lo^ov Law iirLf^(.povT6<i (tov' ei kol /cXott^? yevet Ttvt
aav(i(TLfjio<; ifv iKSLKrjo-L^ Traph. TOts TraAai, Sicnrcp kcll to vvv, ovS' dyvoets, ev
ot6 oTt, TTavTa KpLTTfv l(r)(rffiiaTLa-fj.iv(i}S ' ApeoTrayiTrfv Ka\e7.aOaL.
T(t ye Srf /xeTa Ta^Ta ttws ov
Xe^OevTa Bo^CTaL, ov fxovov dTOTrws J
TTLKpu)^
60 " Et Ttva ' ^T/s '' ev Tots e/xots tt^os Toi'i'o-Ta/\A.oi' ypd/xfxaaLv dTOTrojs Kat ovk
iv KOLpQ Xe^^Orjvai 8o/<et, {efeo-rt^ crot, tu> tu>v aTrdvTwv KpiTrj Te Kat BiaLTrjTTJ,
ifxovyf. iTriTpeif/avTO^, dAAd^at TavTa *<at iwavopOwcraL' " toito 87/Xoi'OTt
r7ratJ'tTT(oi', o.Tiva iKei eTratvets //.or, oi' cr7roi;87j o^ot ovS' e/c Ovfiov yeypdcf^Oai'
Kat To eKeivo iyKdjfxiov ovk eXaOev ip.\ fivKTrjpa<; Kal (TTpo(f>as «X^''"
ct AX\
6; tva or] dvtiTroKptVtos Ae'^oJ/xat, i-Tri<f>ave(TTaTe BovSate, Sicnrep rjBofiai iiraivov-
/ytevos Trap dvSpos eTratvwv d^iov, oiVoj crTeprjOeL<i ttojs tojv eyKOj//.t'ajv crou ot^K
av dorffjLovrjcraLfXL ovSe (T)(^eTXL(icraL/xL. Ato et /xaAAov
TaiVr/s evepyecTLa? r)
EvTau^a 8e (/^r/s ovk otoa Tt virdp^ai iv to2s ypdfxfxaai ctov o tl iyw fxoXi-
potvos oAos ov (TvvrjKa. Tt tovto r/v ov SiVa/xat ctKa^etv, dAAa ixefxvrffiai CTe
Aoyots Travr cra(f>i(Ti yeypa<f)evai SeS('))(Oai crot TrarVacr^at Tor Trpdy/xaTOS,
dfX(f>OTep(i)v eveKa, crov tc Kat e/tov. TovTiJ ye Kat 6 AaOos 6 eV t^s Koj/A(i)8tas
So (rvvecretev av, ot/x,at. 0^8 eTt tcAos, dAAa Kat t^s di^aptcrTtas, KaKicrTov wdvTwv
eyKXr]fj.aTos, OiKrjv fxoi ypd(^ets* v^ tov Ata, OTt Trpos Ta oiVojs dcra<f>w<; iirrjy-
yeXfLeva. Kat, (Ls TVTrtiJ etTretv, KaT ovap fxovov drroSeL^^OevTa or^ev cracftes
drreKpiOrjv, 6(f>eiXwv fieTa^v Kat to. ei'ayye'Ata. EtCcrTtv, ot/xat, e7rtTpc'v//'(jVT0)v
vfxwv T-^s Trapov(Tr]<; TV)^r]s, et oiVojs 8oKet, dyaTrai', biroLa tis ovv vrrdp^^ei r/
85 vtrap^ei' fxdXiCTTa oirov 6 Tt irpdTTeTe, wairep irpdTTeTe ifjiov tv/v evfxeveiav T-qv
vfj.erepav drroSe^^^opevov, orVojs orrroJTroTe 8er/^evT0S e/xov r/ dvTi/3oAr/(ravTOS
TrpaTTCTC. O/^ojs yc fiefxvrffxaL Slu. ypafxp.dTwv vovOeTycras tva /tr/ (lyai' crrrov-
odcTr]<; tovto to Trpay/xa" V7ro(rr/p.at'vojv oVt c/tot ov At^iai' avrov peXeL. Kat
8tu Tt' /;teTa Tavra dyavaKTCts />tot
90 Kat TOVTOJV CTt TrLKpoTepd. icTTLV d C7rt(/)cpcts Trept tov dpovpaLov fxv6$, rrepl
54. 'lepaii'vf.tvv H. 60. <pf]s E : (p^s F. 61. f^eari addidi ; cf.v. 83.
62. «at 5i F.E : 63. F : aiViva £". 66. i\' : (TTef.pTjeeis E. 67. «t fl : ^i' .E.
72. (trrjvrfOfj E : eTrrjvrjOr/ F. 75. F £o)irf. : d(p(\^s EH. 76. if : ivOavTa E.
^pfjs E : (/117? F. vnap^ai saii^si : lirfjpiai E. 80. avvqcretev E. av add. F.
84. vfiiiiiv EN"^ : qfj.uv HN^. 85. F : vnd^ei E. 90. i^ : tovtov E.
54. 'I6povi;/iov] Cf. Ep. 915. 74 seq. long and short vowels are often due to
50. Trapoi^tiai'] Adag. 35 aiid 3567. the compositor, it seenis likcly here
60. Er Tii^a] Ep. 915. 84 seq. that Eiasmus niay have been thinking
70. epnTjVfvri'] Ep. 915. 88-93. of such Homeric fornis (cf. 1. 104) as
76. 0j7s] Ep. 915. 97 secj. dviaaifii (/?. 14. 209. Cf., however,
78. -fe-)pa(pevai] Cf. Epp. 568. 53 5. 1. 24.
744. 37n. dxapiaTiai] Cf. Ep. 915. 94-6.
80. avvtaeiev'] The form given in all 83. cua^^eAm] Cf. Ep. 915. 96-7.
theprinted editions iscom^Jarable with 87. •^pafipia.Tajv'] Not extant ; cf. Ep.
a 'forma barbara ', avvfjaas, cited by 778.4-7.
Stephanus. Butas confusions between 90. d «Tn^e/jeu] Ej». 915 100 seq.
1004] TO WILLIAM BUDAEUS 39
XO^V"^ T^? virep t6 Atar ijlol TrepL(T(Tivov(xr]<;, Kal ra^^a TeOvrj^ofjLivio, el fxi} (tov
Tr/v aXe^LKaKov KdOapaiv €is efxeTov Trapi^ovTo^i. TovTots opLOLov kui eKelvo
o ypa^ets, ''ovtws eOL^6fX€vo<; SifirovOev o-f/xTrat^eu' c/xot '' ws ciTOTrov oi'tos
Tov Tov "Kpacr/xov dvTLTraL^eLV Boi;8at'a), 7/ dis eyo) ot' ToXfxrjaaLfXL uv dvTi/x,i'^etj',
£t yu.7/ KaTo. fXLKpov eWL(Tfxevo<;. Tt aAyVo, Trpos Twi' fxovcrwv, Xe$eLev /3a(TLXev<; 95
Tts y craTpdTTrfS Trpos 8oi'/\.ov dAwvr/Tov Kat TavTa ctv ypd<j>eL<i (f>LXo<; Trpos
;
^t'Aov, TavTa ypd^eis auTos Trpo/caAeVas cts toCto 7re8tov" TaSTa ypd<^ets 6
^tAoTraty/xwv Kat (f)LXoaK(jjfifL(i)V Kal //.r/Sa/Aws Svcr^epatvwv to. ottojo^ovv dvTi-
CTKWTTTo/Aeva, Tai'Ta ypd^ets o TretpoKaAos twv tc ^^aptVwv fxv(TTr]<;.
ToiavTa 8r/ Trat^as Kat XL0o/3oXr]CTa<; ets e/xe', Kai Trpos Tas dTretAds fxera- ico
/SaLveLs, Adyots //.dAa /AetAti^t'ots OeXyoiv ifxrfv Ke<^aAr/v, oiItojs oe ypa<j6ets'
" Et op,otais eTi /tavtats 6 8aLfnov 6 cros KaKOS dyet (re Kai <f>epeL, ea, cTTpeij/aL
t6 to? KaXdfxov oLKpov Kal tov /3eXov<; aKfxrfv ets t6v fxovoypafxp.ov ^eoAcIyov
TToAAd KOKa crot /3vcrao8ofiLevovTa, ws O/Ai/ptKws Xe^o), Kayw iv tw fiepeL ei-oJ
IIoAAd cnrovSrj ed> Aeyetv, ev ots ecTTtv u ypd^cts Trept toS AeAotvov Kat
Tov Pov^atov. Ou^ opw 8td Tt cf^LXoKoXaKa Trotets e/xe tov cv TOts fxaXLCTTa
^t'Aots iXevOepoL<; )(aLpovTa. Ov TrpeireL fxev Trj ^lXlci t6 KoAaKcvetv, t/ttov
8e TrpeTrei T(3 <^t'Aaj Aot8opt'ats ivTpv<f>dv. ETret 8e ets fxovov ifxe TOLavTa uo
7rat'^cis, 7) ^tAeis fxdXa otKctcos r) eVepdv Tt ctvat Sdferat. IIpos 8e Trdcrt tovtois
Kat T-^s cruKo^avTtas eyKXrjfxa. fiOL ctcreveyKcts, ort TOTrov Ttva €k tojv ypafx-
fxaTOiv CTOV 7rapaTL0eL<; ttov to "<f)-^s" eXt$a dvTi tov " </)r/cretas dv "* d)S S^^^cv
''
irapd 'F(x}fxaL0L<; ttoXv 8ta^€'poi'TOS ev t^ AoyoTrottu Trorepov <f>r]creLev Tis Aeyets
TovTo " 7} '' AecOts dv TOL'TO ". AiTO ydp toiJto icrr']fLa\L)vov, t6v Aoyov ov iji;
TrdvTa cv TiOefxevo<; rd dno <f>LXov' <f>o/3ovfxaL Se //.r/ Tts aTretpoKaAos Kat r/TTOv
otKetos Tw Twv xapLTOiV xopd Kat dXXrj Tpeir(i>v Ta V7r6 Groi' ^payKtKws
7rc7raty/A€va, ^^ctpova 17 cyojye {dv} OeXoLfxi Trepi BovSatou Xd/3r] yvoj/xr/v. 120
AiTos ydp ovT€ <f>o^ovp.aL ti o{'t€ Ktv8vvcv'o/>tat. Ol'koi)v c'/xoi, <)j dvopdJv
AoyioTaTC, /3eXTL(TTOV ecrecrOaL 8oKet, et Tavra cTTpocfxoSr] Kal /xtfo;^oAa Tratyvia
TrdrTOJS cdcravTCS, Tats fxovaai^ Kal Tats ;(dpicri tt^ tc ^tAtcx Kat </)tAoAoyia
TrpcVovra to va-Tepov ypd\f/o>fxev 7rp6s dAAr/Aovs-
ets E^rt TOtTots a/xi'r/crTta
ecrTo) To)V dyrdvTOJV 7rp6 tovtov d^rojcrovv elpqfLevo)v kcxl 7r€7rotr/p.evoji'. eppcoao. 125
NoN admodum mihi placuit quod in vna quapiam epistola tua
videris literarum causam velle deserere, posteaquani in aulam es
cooi)tatus. Imo mea sententia nunc maxime patrocinandum est iis
93. 7pd</>«(s] Ep. 915. 109. Paris, June 1519 (Ep. 785. 1711; in ;
loi. 7/)(i</)fis] Ep. 915. 113-18. ^vliich Eudaeus ex(.-uses himself for
103. efoA(i7oi'] Lee. inaking only snmniary examination of
104. '0//r;pi/<aij] OJ. 17. 66. Linacre',s translation, on the ground
108. </.(Xo/co'A.a/ca] Ep. 915. 119.20. tliat he is busy with preparations for
112. «Tf/fo^/^aiTias] Cf. Ep. 915. 130 s(q. departure no doubt, as M. Delaruelle
:
140 his ipsae etiam scholae frigeant. Tu modo fac paulisper assuescas,
non dubito quin mox futurum sit vt fatearis tibi calcar additum ad
culturaraMusarum. Neque multum negocii fuerit vt coalescas iis :
et illustri Veriensium principi Adolpho a consiliis ', and sends greetings to him
from Dorp (Ep. 304), iam inde a puero tibi amiciis'. Barhind had been hos-
'
1004. 138. repperit i'A'3 : reperit N"^ Loncl. 143. accipit E : recipit N.
149. Ruzeo Lond. Ruzaeo LB.
: 1005. tit. zvtpenio add. H.
136. regio famulitio] Cf. Epp. 999. determination expressed in Ep. 809.
22in, 1005. 31-3. 127 seq., cf. Epp. 964 introd., 1005;
138. aedita] Cf. h i26n. 24-7, 1032. 17-23; and see Ep. 994. iin.
145. iKibisj in the Nethf-rhinds. Epp. 148. Deloino] Cf. Ep. 915. 120-2. He
948. 195, 969. 16, 970. 13-14, 1007. 107' answered Ep. 535 in the cour^e of 1517,
1094. 41, showhow keenly Erasmus fclt l)ut retained his letter for some time
Charles' absence. For liis view of the (Ep. 744. 53-4). By 22 Feb. 1518 it
Court see Epp. 1028. 2-3, 1148. 9-11, appears that Erasmus liad received it
1220. 44-8. iEp. 778. 31-3 ; so that it was no doubt
146. me illi committere] For tliis dispatclied with Ep. 744.
cliangeof outlook as compared with the 149. respondi] Ep. 928.
1005] TO PETER ZUTPENIUS 41
video vii-tuti rectisque studiis nusquam esse plus honoris quam apud
principes. Omnibus itaque qui studiorum sacra colunt. exjiedit tai
similes aliquot in aulis versari, ne non sint qui summates viros ad
fauendum literis ac probitati suis dictis infiamment, qui ad benigni-
tatem stimulos addant, qui submoneant quibus artibus nunquam 30
intermoriturum honestae famae decus paretur. Quanto studiorum
omnium bono in regia Britannica viuere credis Thomam Morum,
Thomam Linacrum et Ricardum Paceum ? in Gallia Guilhehiium
Budaeum? quorum felicitati gratulandum quod in tales principes
inciderint, officio habenda gratia si tales reddunt. 35
Scio tibi nihil esse dulcius ocio literario. nec deesse in aula,
praeter negociorum tumultum, quod offendat animi tui i^uritatem :
quae omnia hdc moderatius ferre debes, quod sub optimo principe
Adolpho meres, qui fauorem erga literas ac viros virtutibus ornatos,
a teneris vsque vnguiculis olim haustum e Batto praeceptore, in 40
hanc vsque aetatem retinet qui nos quoque non ob aliud diligit ac
;
15. Aegidio] The collocation of Zutpe- 32. regia Britannica^ Cf. Ep. 999. 92^.
nius with Gilles is piobal)ly based on 39. AdolphoJ See Epix 93 introd.,
tlie ideniity of Chiistian nanie cf.
: 932. 47.
Ep. 1003. 34n. 40- Batto] See Ep. 35 introd.
23. deploratos] Cf. Ep. 994. 21. 44. filioluni] Eit]ierAdolphus'eldest
24. non ferebam] Cf. Ep. 1004. i46n. son, Philip, born i Oct. 1512, or
42 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [1519
returned (Ei^. 615. 10,11), the case having come to a standstill (ef. Ep. 622. 32n).
Ah-eady ia May 1517 he had tlireatened 'perseeution of Erasmus for the liouum "
Instfuinentum (HE. 51, § 7) and some report of this had perhaps reaehed
;
Erasmus' ears. They had never met (Ep. 856. 31-2) but Erasmus knevv enough ;
Hochstrat sheltered himself behind Atensis' authority. After that some degree
of intimacy appears to have arisen between tliem for in Ep. 1342. 614-15 ;
Erasmus speaks of Hochstrat as vetus meus, si non familiaris, certe amicus '.
'
Maximilian, the second, born 28 July I cannot discover at what date Philip
1514 see J. Ermerins, Zeemvsclie Oud-
; died,
/tede/i, iii (1786), j). 132. Probably Maxi- 45. Borsalo] John Becar of Borsse-
inilian, for Becar vvas afterwards tiitor len see Epp. 291, 737. 8n, and for
:
tum non minus erant ignoti quam Capnion ipse. Idem deplorabam
apud amiculos inter c|uos erant Cjui Capnioni studentes sic placare
;
quidem non potui refellere omnia, lenii tamen pro viribus sermonum
atrocitatem.
Aliquanto post euenit vt et acta legerem totius causae, et tuus
50 libellus exiret in manus hominum, quo Benigni dialogum refellis ;
rint, neque de tota causa quicquam attingo neque enim mea refert. ;
38. Pepericorni] See Ep, 487. son. rium, Cologne, E. Ceruicornus, May
Gratii] See Ep. 526, 8n. 1518 containing RE. 251, 255, HE. 75,
;
Tongrensis] See Ep. 543. ^n. aletter from H. Busch toCt. Hermann,
39. variabant sententiae] Ep.
Cf. 12 Apiil (1518, Cologne), and a Ittter
856. 37,8 ; and for a specimen see Ep. from the Count to the reader, 13 April.
849. 21-30. See HE. pp. 20*, 21*.
50. libellus] Hochstrafs first Apo- 67. Hutteni] He demurred very
lo(jia, Feb. 1518 (Epp. 808. 6n, 889. muclitothispassage butCt.Hennann,
;
virorum ad Hermannum comitem Nuena- 74. libelii duo] Destrudio Cabale seu
1006] TO JACOB HOCHSTKAT 45
Nihil hic rursus attingam vtrius causa niihi magis arrideat neque :
enim mihi mandata est haec prouincia, et, si mandetur. videor mihi
libenter recusaturus. Nec tantam mihi arrogo doctrinam vt existi-
mem me posse pronunciare de causis tam arduis, in quibus identi- 80
dem haereseos fit mentio. Siquidem in praesentia non ago nego-
cium Capnionis, tuum potius ago negocium et hactenus ago, vt ;
dubito quin haec res in prirais obstiterit quo minus assecutus sis
quod, vt putant, venabaris. Inquisitio tibi mandata est, non ius
pronunciandi. Quoties autem de Capnione pronuncias, pi"aesertim
cum lis adhuc sub iudice pendeat, et sub eo iudice vnde negant
106. detorqueat E : torqueat H.
Cabalistice perfldie ab loanne Reitchlin Cap- 1519, with a preface to John Inge-
nione iampridem in lucem editae, Coloi^nf, winktl, 12 Aug. 1518 (Bdcking xxxiii).
Quentel, April 1519, with a prefaco to 93. Ciipnion praeoj etc.] Tliiscatcli-
Leo X. 7 April 1519 fBOcking xxxv ; word recur.y continually througliout
and^po%iasecMnda,(Cologne,Quentel,) the Destructio Cabale.
46 LETTEKS OF ERASMUS [151
131. praesagium] Cf. Ep. icxjg. 68n. accurate name (see crit. n.) needing
142. odisse ludaeos] A very fiaiik correctiou ; cf. p. 152.
utterance for Erasmus, wlio, in spite of a Vio] See Epp. 891. 25^, 256.
his virulence against individuals, is 45^.
usually free from prejudice against 153. sic est amicus] Cf. Ep. 1155.
classes and careful of his words about i8n.
them. It illustrates well the position non admisceam] For Erasmus'
of the Juws at this period. For other close concern in Reuchlin's case see a
conteniptuous expressions about them letter of Reuchlin, 21 Nov. 1514 '^RE.
in liis letters see Epp. 164. 27, i8r. 49, 198) Louanii fcrtur hoc aduersariis
: '
296. 82-3 541. 137 9, 694. 34-56, 697, esse constitutum, vt, si me oppres-
700-1, 703. 9, 20, 710.81, 713. 9. serint, Erasmum Roterodamum sint
146. lustiniani] See E]). 810 356^. aggressuri, et ita singillatim omnes se
Prieiatis] Seti Ep. 872. i6n. velle poetas (sic eriira bonarum litera-
147. Thomae] Another case of an in- rum studiosos appellant) eradicare'.
1006] TO JACOB HOCHSTRAT 47
tum expostulo quod iniquius nos attigeris. Nam quod ego de com-
315 moda interpretatione meminerim, vide quam tu non commode inter-
quasi calumnier Ecclesiam Christi decreta antiquare
j)reteris, cum :
qui irascitur ita sibi Wanditur Non temere est quod illi succenseo'.
:
'
215. niemiiieram H,
sertation, Annot. in N. T. 1519, pp. 325- potissimum loco lex inducta apud
34- Clirist lanos ne dirimantur matrimonia.
208. fueram pollicitus] See Ep. 809. Cum caetera Christi dogmata de non
6on. The statemont is repeated in iurando, de non resistendo, de in
ihi.' Apol. qua respondet yvith ihe siddiiion diein viuendo, de iuuandis ac dili-
of pulam (f°. A°' Jortin ii. 497).
: See gendis inimicis, atque id genus per-
also Epp. 1053. 292, 1074. 97- multa vel antiquare patiamur vel
209. nemo nesciebat] Cf. Ep. 1225 {scripsl : vt Annot.) interpretatione
init. and Apol. quu respondet, f°. A^ commoda prorsus abrogemus, solum
(Jortin ii. 497). vrgemus do matrimonio'.
ioo6] TO JACOB HOCHSTRAT 49
liberet totum hoc ai'gumentum iusto studio tractare, videres nie 260
fortasse non vsqueadeo caecutientem quam tu videri vis.
Verum et res foret non vnius voluminis, et iam pleraque a nobis
attacta sunt in posteriore aeditione, quasi praesagientibus fore qui
locum eum labefactare conarentur. Quanquam nec illic quicquam
asseuero, sed Ecclesiae iudicio suam vbique reuerentiam et autorita- 265
tem defero argumentor, non decerno. Quod si dices nephas esse
:
234. votum] sc. castitatis ; of whicli stomachari] ihid. f°. dd* v°. ^.
4(2.4 E
50 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [151
'
non concessit quasi quicqviam intersit inter permittere et conce-
' ;
295 dere, nisi quod iDermittit qui quocunque modo ius facit, concedit
qui de iure suo remittit aliquid vnde fit vt posterius verbum sit
:
270. initio disputationis] Deslr. witli tho aid of Gratiiis ; see Ep. 526.
Cabale, 1». dd v° ; cf. 1. 156^. 8n. It apj^ears from 1. 76 above that
293. inquis] ibid. f^. dd* v°. 14-15- Brasnuis suspected Hoclistrat of doing
302. alieno calamo] As Pfefferkorn tlie same.
1006] TO JACOB HOCHSTRAT 51
aut illius. nihil ahud intelligit quam haereticos esse de quibus fit
mentio. Nec possunt imaginari quomodo bellum dicatur Gallorum, 320
cum ipsi bellatores non sint. Imo cum publice loquuntur, vbi me-
tuunt obseruari se, dicunt haereses Capnionis cum priuatim et inter ;
tragoedias admiscentes. cum obscurum non sit quid Ecclesia debeat 335
viris Hnguarum peritis, quid debeat eloquentibus. Haec studia non
obscurant theologicam dignitatem sed iHustrant, non oppugnant sed
famulantur. Neque enim ideo protinus cum haeresi copulata sit
musica, si quis forte musicus huc prolapsus deprehendatur. Damnan-
dus est error hominis, studiis suus seruandus est honos. 340
At nimis proHxum sit referre quam ridiculas fabulas dequibusdam
audiamus quotidie qui dum conantur apud imperitam i^Iebeculam
;
316. haoresi] See Destr. Caba!e,i°. \)h^. 936. 36 seq., 948. 36 seq., 990. ^n.
320. Gallorum] The allusion in tliis 341. fabulas] Cf. Ep. 950. 26-30.
illustration seems to be to the Swiss 346. Paiilus] Gal. 5. 15.
mercenaries in the French army sie : 349. R. P.] reuerende Pater.
Ep. 134- 3"- 352. Moses] Thiscomparison is used
333. linguarum] Cf. Epp. 934. 311, also in Epp. 1167.375, 1329. 17-18.
E 2
52 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [15 19
1007. To Leo X.
Farrago p. 354. [Louvain.]
F. p. 452 : HN : Lond. xi. 9 : LB. 453. 13 August 15 19.
[A further appeal to Papal authority against his opponents among the Louvain
theologians, with whom he had not jet come to a reconciliation (cf. Ep. 1016. i5n).
For prosecution of the appeal in other directions see Epp. 1033, 1060, 1062. The
date of time is confirmed by the Imperial Election (1. 106) but in view of the;
conflict with Ep. 1008 the place is perhaps only a permanent address (cf. p. la).]
ex poetica '
nam hoc vocabulo traducunt quicquid est elegantioris
;
37. linguarum] Cf. Ep. 934. ^n. 967. 181-5. Erasmus was doubtless
47. Praetexunt] Cf. Verg. ^Ie>t.4. 172. thinking, too, of the unacknowledged
80. licentius] In tlie Moria (Ep. lulius {Ep. 502). SeealsoEp. 1195. ^n,
222); cf. also Epp. 622. 21-2, 636. 4-5, 81. nigrior] Cf. Epp. 337. 59 seq.,
54 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
minus pius nullus mea causa tumultus ortus aut oriturus. Hoc
;
85 suo domino stat aut cadit. Doleo tamen maiorem in modum quo-
rundam amarulentis contentionibus labefactari tranquillitatem stu-
diorum ac rei Christianae. Neque res iam intra argumentorum
conflictationem consistit; atrocibusvtrinque conuiciis pugna crudescit,
dentatis lil)ellis res agitur, ac reciprocantibus maledictis tumultu3 in
90 rabiem
exit. Nemo non labitur alicubi, nisi qui homo non est. At
decet humanos lapsus, si tales sunt vt non oporteat ad eos conniuere,
Christiana lenitate corrigere. Nunc deprauant et quod recte dictum
est, saepe et quod non intelligunt. Amarulentis dictis exacerbant
quibus poterant Christiana mansuetudine mederi alienant saeuitia ;
Erasmus' first relations with Erfurt in Oct. 1518 (Ep. 870 introd.) and is printed
in E.
Christopher Hack or Hacke of Jeiichow on the Elbe, n. of Magdeburg, matri-
culated at Erfurt in 1509 and was B.A. 1512. He was a friend of Eobanus (Ep.
874) and Cordus (Ep. 941), both of whom addressed verses to him. In Dec. 1517
he was preparing to lecture at Wittenberg on the Gospels (see a ms. letter cited
by Krause in editing Cordus' Epigrammata, 1892, p. xxvi). In the summer of
1518 he was travelliug with CeHarius (Ep. 877. 5n), and visited Hutten at Mainz
(HE. 104) and Reuchlin at Zell in Baden (RE. 261 = MRE^. 578) but returned ;
to Erfurt, where he took orders and became Euangelii minister'. ' Like many
other priests he married c. 1523 (EHE. p. 90; cf. SlE. 1647); but little else is
known of him. See Krause's Eobanus, i, pp. 146, 236, 299, 336. Camerarius,
Narratio cle Eohano, 1553, f. B^ v°, praises his skill in melicis carminibus ', '
the death of Erasmus (cf. Epp. 950. 28, 1021. 13-15 LE^. 172 and perhai^s EHE.
; ;
2>. 86, where Krause tlirows doubt on the date of Eobanus'4etter to Draco) and
wrote an elegiac poem addressed to Hack, deploring the event. The preface to
ihe Palinodia shows that on the suggestion of Draco (Ep. 871) the poem was
printed but that shortly afterwards, while it was still engaging public atten-
;
tion, Cordus received a letter from Erasmus (evidently Ep. 941) and learnt the
falseness of the rumour whereupon he composed the Palinodia, also addressed
:
to Hack. The Palinodia is printed among Cordus' Optra poelica but the former ;
15 enim ausim dicere 'superet', sed tamen ausim optare tacitus. Deinde
ea est Caroli felicitas vt imperii titulo, qui superioribus aliquot seculis
plus habuit iuris quam autoritatis, par responsura videatur potestas.
Nam complures magnos reddidit commissum imperium, Carolus ipsi
imperio dignitatem adiunget. Aliis imperii nomen adserebat ius
20 orbis, Carolus orbis principatum adseret imperio. Denique ea est
aetate vt propicii numinis praesidio spes sit fore vt sub eo Principe
quam diutissime floreat orbis Christianus. Et eiusmodi regnis irnperat
vt nemo magis sit formidandus barbaris Christianae religionis
hostibus.
25 Illud omnium votis optandum a superis, vt hanc eximiam virtutis
indolem quam nunc praesefert Carolus, et seruent et semper in
melius i^rouehant quo profligatis ab omni rei^ubiica Christiana
;
TIT. E : EBASMVS KOT. ALEERTO CABD. MOOVNTIN. S. D. II. 30. ita N : ista E.
I009J TO ALBERT OF BEANDENBUEG 57
strare. Nihil superest nisi vt summus ille Princeps, cui vni cor regum
omnium in manu est, et vestrum iudicium et Caroli conatum et
nostrum votum bene fortunet. Ad id omnibus pro sua cuique por-
tione est adnitendum, quando negocium agitur omnium.
Non poenitebat antehac libelli quo quod sit Principis munus 45
vtcvmque praescribimus quem libellum Ferdinandus noster, ado-
;
immori: quos Christo non ingratos esse confidimus, vel hoc certe
nomine quod simplici animo in illius gloriam a nobis suscipiuntur.
Quid ni boni consulat hanc nostram sedulitatem, qui pauperculae
viduae quadrantem omnibus omnium diuitum muneribus praetule-
rit ? Aliis alii benefactis Christum demerere student nos, quando : 65
nihil aliud possumus, hac victima litabimus.
illi
41. cor regum] Cf. Prov. 21. i. added in F shows that this word is
45. Principis muniisl See Ep. 853. iiscd here withnoreprehen>ive intent.
47. in manibus] Cf. Epp. 917 introd., Erasmus was no doubt thinking of
943. 23-4, 970. 24-5. Hutten's recent publications men-
53. rcuersus] Cf. Ep. looi. 530. tiont-d in Ep. 923. 18-21, 29.
68. praesagit] Cf.Epp.990.20,1006.131. 72. error eius] Cf. Epp. 745 introd.,
71. lasciuiam] The qualification 976. 13-27.
58 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
inlerpraefe Erasmo Roterodamo, Louvain, Th. Martens, 1519, 16'' (Ghent Univ. Lib.,
Res. 1137). In the Apol. qua respondet (f°. D* v" Jortiu ii. 512) he describes this
;
issue as undertaken against his wishes and says tnat he added tliis preface
;
'
laaudquaquam in rem typographi in order to warn the reader not to accept
',
any text, not even that of Greek manuscripts, without critical examination. At
tliesame timehetestifios, as here, tliat hisdesire wasnot tosupersede theVuIgate,
but only by what lie considered a more correct translation to throw liglit on the
meaning of the Greek text :' cf. Epp. 809. 84-93, 860. 44-9.
The separate issue proved a success, and was quickly reprinted, eitlier complete
or the Gospelsonly, b^' Schumann at LeiiJzig 18 Oct. 1519 and 1520, by Cratander
at Basle Aug. 1520 and Marcli 1521, by Morhard at Strasburg Sept. 1520 and
1521, and by Anshelm at Hagenau 1520 (see BEri. pt. ii, pp. 26, 57). Unless
there is a prior Martens or Froben edition of 1520, Cratander's issue of Aug.
1520 is notable as containinga new piece by Erasmus the only case that I know — '
ot where Cratander printed any thing of his for the first time a noua praefatio :
'
intention of finding fault with the Vulgate, but otherwise is of little interest,
and therefore need not be included among Erasmus' letters. A Froben edition
of 14 June 1521 reprints this of Cratander's closely but in alater edition after
; —
—
Erasmus' return to Basle by Froben, July 1522, which has the text as slightly
modified in the New Testament of Feb. 1522, two new prefaces are substituted
for that of 1521, also addressed to the reader and without dates. The first,
Toties iam didum, repeats again his disclaimer hac versione non damnari mihi
•
vulgatam aeditionem qua nunc vtitur Ecclesia Romana, sed vt illa sit emendatior
magisque perspicua'. The second, Quanquam in rebus diuinis, which comes at
the end of the book, is of the nature of a Paradesis rather than a letter, and was
doubtless composed in rem typographi (cf. Ep. 43 introd. to fill the last eight
'
' )
pages. Neither is suitable for inclusion here. AII the three later prefaces
appear in Froben editions of Jan. and Oct. 1523, Nov. 1524, and s. a. but so far ;
as I can discover — there are Froben editions of 1521 ,8"' and 1532 which I have
not seen — this preface was not reprinted in any authorized volume.
,
After 1521 unauthorized reprints of Erasmus' Latiu version of the New Testa-
ment become very numerous, especially in Germany and Switzerland. Trans-
lations of it appeared, too, into German 1523, Flemish 1525, Bohemian 1533,
English 1538, Italian 1545, Polish 1552, Freneh 1554 see BEr'. jit. ii, N. Test. ;
Erasmus' movements at this time are not clear (Ej). 1013. 23^) but thei-e is ;
reason to suppose tluit about i Sept. he was at Bruges (Epp. 1012, 1025. ^n),
staying, no doubt, with his friend Mai-cus Laurinus, theDean of St. Donatian's.]
[This letter was fiist printed by Budaeus with Epp. 1015, 1073 in BE'., Paris,
.T. Badius, 20 Aug. 1520 (a^ Bodl. B. 18. i6Linc.), corrected inahiter impression
:
bearing the sanie date (a^ Bodl. Byw. K. 9. 9) and it was again included, with
: ;
Epp. 403, 435, 493, 522, 583, and others of later date to Erasmus, in BE^., Feb.
1531 ('^)- It might be conjectured that F would have been printed from the
actual letters received by Erasmus but examination of its readings shows its
;
close dependence upon a. Such differences as there are between them are
—
mainLy rectifications of tlie iota subscript a matter in wliich the early printers
of G-reek were very uncertain, probably through the inadequacy of tJieir supply
of type tliere are a few necessary corrections (11. 31, 62, 109), and some degenera-
;
tions (11. 30, 43, 74, loi). As between a^ and a^, tlie readings of 11. 4, 17, 28,
44i 73- 117» 124 show unque.stionably that a^ was the archetype of F. This
inference is even more markedly evident in Ep. 1015, where some obvious inis-
prints which are special to a-, are faithfully reproduced in F.
It is clear therefore that Erasmus —
remembering perhaps Budaeus' notice
(Ep. 493. 45 seq.) of a misprint in Ep. 403. 149 as printed in B instructed the —
editors of F to follow Budaeus' published text with scrupulous care, leaviiig
them,however, free to eorrect undoubted errors in their original and furthor that ;
tliey used for the printing a copy of a^. This view of the facts supplies a further
and conclusive proof fcf. vol. iii, pp. 627-8 that Ep. 1206 is to be placed in 1521. It
may be noticed that in printing some of his own letters in BE^. (^b) Budaeus
ai. atquae a.
22. andabatarum] A
kind of gladia- 25. Pontifex] Leo's Brief, Ep. 864,
tor, whoise helmet had no eyeholes. is printed in Martens' present volume :
The figure is a tavourite with Jerome : also Ep. 384. For this appeal to Pa])al
cf. Adog. 1333. authority cf. Ep. 1007.
60 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [151
appears to liave used iiot the rough-drafts butthe text pi-inted by Erasmus in
C^ see vol. ii, p. xx.
:
otherwise of no value, and probably was made frorn one of the printed volumes.
The month-date given for this letter in all the contemporary editions is
identical with that for Ep. T015, 15 Sept. Both letters answer Ep. 1004 ; but
this was written somewhat the earlier, and not long after the arrival of Ep. 1004
(Ep. 1015. 166-8). The correction required might be made in either letter. Thus
Leclerc dates this 15 Aug. ; or in Ep. 1015. 165 Nouembris might be read for Ociobris,
or Sepiimo for Septimodecimo. But as the postscript to Ep. 10x5 shows tliat this letter
was brought back and the two sent off at the same time, though by different
messengers, it seems easiest to suppose that the month-date was altered here,
perhaps by Budaeus liimself, to accord with that of the second dispatch. In any
case Longolius' movements (1. ^n) make Leclerc's coiTection impossible for ;
U. 3-1 1 show that by the time Ep. 1004 reached Budaeus, Longolius had
already left Paris. Ep. 1023. 2 also iudicates that when he left, Budaeus had
not yet written to Erasmus. The letters were not delivered quiekly ; for on
2 .Jan. 1520 Budaeus wrote to Vives (BE*. 51), in answer to a letter not extant,
'
Quod miraris me non scribere, velim vt scias Erasmi epistolae nouissimae
Graece et Latine rescripsisse '. By 2 Feb. he had heard that they had arrived
(BE<. 52).]
E0TAAI02 EPASMn ET nPATTEIN.
Hay
fjiOL Travu iyevero ra ypdfxixaTa. crov Xa/Jciv, irvy^avov yap e/c TroXXov
TOVTOv icfnijxevo^. Ov firjv 8e ovtws r)8ea fjiOL to. ypdfXfiaTa aiiTa dveioyfiieva,
To ye TTpoiTOV dvayvovTi, yeyove. EKeivr] fikv ovv 7]p.epa XpiorTO^opos 6
AoyywAtos, dvrjp ovk ets pLaKpdv VTrdp^wv Twv €7rt TratSeta evhoKLfxovvTwv, Sta
5 T^s dypoLKLa<s T^s ifJLyjs fxeTa(3e(3rjKeL, avv tlltl 8r) ;^a/3t'eo-iv dvSpda-LV ets BpeT-
Tavtav ttov" €7ri ye firjv Ti^ crvyyeveadaL crot Kat Aoofavtov 81) TroAtv oi//oyuevos
iv TTf oSoLTTOfHu., ws ye fLOL e(pao-Ke. Hepl SetAv^v ovv oij/Lav e^ovTL poL Trepl
To. ttJs (^«XoAoytas aTr^yyeiXe Tts twv olkol vcavtCTKOV Ttvci Trcpt tt;v avXctov
Ovpav eaai, LTrr-o) iTroxov/J-evov. Kat Trapaxp^f^o. KaTa/3dvTt fxoL vcavtcrKO?
outos iTricrTr], fj.€Ta Sr] to Trpoo^etTrctv e/y.e, ypd/xfxaTa aTro tov Epao-//,ov koijllC,€lv io
<f>dfjL€VO's K-at Ttvos aXAoL' Twv cJ3l\(j)v. Tovtov TOLtn)v ovk oto d«poco/xei'os
OTTws VTTo ;^apas SLCKetfxrjv, //.eTa^v 8t^ ato"^avo/xei'os t^s Kapotas cittovo-t^s dva
Tois <f>piva^ ifi.d<;.
€771 To evdpecTTOv KaTipp€\f/a Kal €7rt€tKe's, ttjs ^tAtas S^/Trov^^ev e_>^c)/>tevos ttJs
rffxoiv^, TOVTO 8r/ iKirpLacrOat Setv c/xe tepo^tVo) Ttvt ov tw tvxoi^ti ovo' ojs av 30
TvxV L€povpyrjOii'TL. "Otl tolvvv ovS' ctv evt lepeto) tov TrXrffXfxeXovftevov Oeov
€vx^picrT€pov €^tAacrat'p.e^a ^Trep Trj tojv rffxapTrffxivoiv i^op.oXoyrfcreL re Kat
p.€TavoL(x, 6fxoXoyovfi€v6v icTTLV cv T7/>ttv TOtS ifJL(f>LXocro(f>ovcrLV Tots petots.
Totydp ovv, dvcp vpocrcftLXicrTaTe, cre /xev irpoKaXovfX€vov ifxi ets x^P'-^^'''^^^^
TLvd Kat <f>LXoirp€7r€crTipav twv d/i.ot^ai'ojv ypafxfxdToyv iSiav t€ Kal vTrcjpccrtv, 35
ovToJs d7ro8e'xop.at t^s tc evyvoj/xoovvTjs {eveKa} Kai, t^s fXLcr€yKXrfp.ovo<; if/vx^s,
ojcrT€ Trj v€vofxoO€Trffxi^nrf vtto crov dfxvrjcrTtcx Ko/xtSr/ t€ dpicrKOfxai, otaTeAecretv
T€ virtcrxyovfxat avTjj ivaTrofxivoiv. "IctOl ovv tov crov BovSatov e^ojv to d^ro
TOVTOV Tots (f>tXtas vo/At/xots irctOapxovvTa, et Kat dAAov Ttva St/ Toiv 8oKtfio)v
crov Kat i$r]Ta(rp.ivo)v (f>tXo)v. 4°
Ov fxrfv dXXd ovK oKvqcro) €ya)yc ovro) Trept ^tAtas <f)povo)v kol crov hiecrOat
fXLav hirfcTLV Tr^vSe, trv 8e hr) Tavrqv ot/zat ovk dv (SapvvOeLrfs atrov/xevci) /AOt
17. n^H : (vyvofjiuvajs a^. N : SuaKexvi^ivos a. 27. J^c : (nTjfi ab. 28. a'^
(ftXoi^ a^. 30. itpodvTw aX^b : UpobvTCi) FK^. 31. F Corrig. : IfpovyrjOevTi a.
33. F:
fifTavuia a. ac : fCTTt b. qnii' a v^rf c. : 35. b dfioiPoiaiv a.
:
43- ^: «£'7^. -^^ • clri ovJ' a. aN : ^ia^ojfievTji F. 44. ttjs rjavxiai add. C.
a^ : biafipTvptaOai a'. 45. ac* ivavTiojv c^. : 46. 7? b : ^ a. 47. re arfrf. c.
48. ab : dKovtadiTrjs X.
8. veaviaKov'] Doubtless Herm. Phry- 1002,3 also see Ep. 1002. 41-7.
; He
sius (Ep. 903. i2n) by whom Budaeus
; returned to Paris in March 1520.
endeavoured to send this reply (Ep. 12. aTTovarjs'] sc. diaaovar^s.
1015. 167). He wa-; the bearer of Epp. 34. npoKaKovfitvov] Ep. 1004. 121-5.
62 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [15 19
(rofxaL, Kal vovOeTovvTo^; evAa^ws dKpoucrOaL, fL€)(pL 8rf kol tov Kparelv SvcrKu-
OeKTOV TTaOrffxaTO^ kuX p,dAto"Ta tujv aTrdvTcuv Trpds Tdv XoyLcrfxhv d7ravOa8LaL,o-
Sn, fievov. Ov ydp tcrO dVt twv ttuOwv r/TTOv vTrrjKOvcre tov Xoyov, oiSe
8v(r)(epecrTepov itreLOdp^^r^ae ttj iyKpaTeiix, TTjaSe t^^s dvTaytovtcTTtKT/s 6pfLrj<;,
epyov ecTTat, w (f>LX6Tr]<;, koX irpovoiav TTOLrfaaaOai tov fii] SoKetv cre dv€7rt€tKe'-
arepov tovtov drraXXd^aL tov dyoivos' oTrou ye Kat atirds opiov ae irepX Tfj
90 (f>rjfJir] fLOv ocStoTa, ws e(f)r]<;, Trpds Toi; KaOr'fKOVTO<; 8r] tov ifLOV wrfOrfv elvai,
Kat OTj ooKT^trecos, dvTeTrt/AeAetcr^at t^^s ct^^s.
Tt ovv TT/Dos 6eov eo-rtv ocrrts twv kolvwv rjfjuv <^t'Aajv iv KaXiZ tovto
;
OijcreTaL, otl TpLwv vtt ifiov ypa^cio-oiv €<^e^s eTrtoroAojv, /xta /Aev fJLovov av
yc Tjij ^eLpLCTTrj koI rjhq aTrqp)(aLia[jiivr] iire^Lwv, aTravTa Tavrr]? fjLopLa di^Sois
•ye e;(OVTa TrdvTrj TravTws fteTLwv, iTnjTLaau), ovtw tol Trap€pfjLr]V€vara<; ws 95
aKaTavoT^Td /tot etvat to. vtt' ifiov iTrea-TaXfieva' Svotv 8e Tatv Trpoo^c^tXojs Kat
ctivoiKois €;(oi'o"atv oi'8' oAws ifivy](r6r]<; ouSeTrtaTroTe. Oi'8e ydp iKelvr] ye 17
cn; €icrr)yr]Tr]<; ye'yovas, 7ri^avov rtvos etSovs Kat KOfjnf/ov —poKaTdp^], oiov koX
Ttt TTpoy€y€vr]fjL€va KaAciJs OicrOaL.
93. b /ita n.
: 94. 7? «'^frf. c. 99. iKfivcuv add. c. loi. crii ab cr^ i^. :
104. oTTojs Tinvv R. 105 a^ i^ : StefoScu a-. SctccoriKaijc. t€ add. c ante Kal.
106. ab : navranaaijjv 11. 107. Fc irei(Tris ah. 109. i^c :avcrrrjj^dv ab. :
113. 7/: in-naddaripov &. 115. et ^t^ ab tifii H. 117. a^ KaAii/So/uei/oy a^.
: :
ad /ifTaroCj/Ta c^.
: 119. re ac/r?. c awfe «ai. 120. o 5^ ifc oSt) ab. :
125. 5€ acifZ. c. 127. fi'5oi'j ac?(/. c. F\) TtpoKardp^r] a.V^. 129. ac^ :
vfjifripq) b.
93. rpiwv] Epp. 915, 987, 992; cf. 98. iT(«p;'av] Cf. Ep. 1004. 59.
Ep. 1004. in. 107. KwniKuv] Ar. Pt. 600.
/.«9] Ep. 915. 120. TreSto»'] Cf. Ep. 1004. 28, 97.
64 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
•Tohn Fevinus (f 27 Nov. 1555) of Furnes was Dean of the Bachelors of Law
at Louvain (Val. Andreas, p. 2ro\ On 15 June 1510 he was appointed canon
at St. Donatian's, Bruges (J. Gailliard, Inscr. funer. de la Flandre, 1861, i. 135);
where he was an intimate friend of the Dean, Marcus Laurinus (I. 10), and also
of Cranevelt (Ep. 1145). Vives in 1522 praises him as a young man of great
promise (note on Aug. Ciu. Dei, xix. 21; p. 660). He performed the niarriage
ceremony, 26 May 1524, for Vivcs who presented him with two books now in
;
the Roj-al Library at Madrid (A. Bonilla, Vives, pp. 757-8). In March (1530?)
he wrote to Erasmus announcingthat he had been niade master of the Cathedral
schoolat Bruges (EE^. 71, 159). His relations with Erasmus were always cordial.
Above ninety of his letters written to Cranevelt exist in ms., and are being
edited by Prof. H. de Vocht of Louvain. One is printed in Geldenhauer's
CoUectanea, ed. J. Prinsen, igot, pp. 73-4. Adr. Barland's Inst artis oratoriae was
dedicated to Fevinus with a preface li-om Louvain, 13 Feb. 1535 but no copy of ;
(1. 7). See Gailliard ibid. and EE^. same words in EE^. 71.
71. 14. Roberto] R. Hellyn (f 15 Oct.
4. nidus] Cf. Ep. 1209. ^n. 1527), pensionarj' of Bruges ; husband
7. palatio] The now demolished of Fevinus' sister Eleonore (f 13 Oct.
Princenshof, a palaco of the Counts of 1526). Both died of plague. See Gail-
Flandors, in which the Archduke liard ibid. and EE^. 71.
Philip was born, 1478 towanls tho w. ; 16. Cantorem] I eannot identify ;
side of tlie town. In 1520, aftcr nor Fistula.
Charles' return from Spain, Erasmus
1013] 65
an autograph rough-draft (a) in the Copenhagen MS. (^App. 13, in vol. iii). Of
the printed editions the iirst is probably that by M;irtens, rursus accuratissimo '
Froben, without any change in this preface, but with some revision of the notes
by Ei'asmus and witlx additions by Goclenius. According to Erasmus' wish (i,
p, 39. 26 seq. cf. Ep. 1000 introd.) this preface is included in N.
;
23. relicto Louanio] Erasmus' move- 1025. ^n) ; and there are indications
ments cannot be closely followed. of a visit to Brussels (Epp. 1040. i,
About I Aug. he was at Louvain (Ep. 1041. 25), which may, however, have
loor. 3) ; c. 7 Aug. at Mechlin (Ep. been later (see p. iii).
looi. 7n) ; 7-15 Aug. at Antwerp 33. consuetxidinis] At Orlcans in the
(Epp. 1001-9), and perhaps longer. autumn of 1500; cf. Eijp. 133. 103-4,
Later he was at Bruges (Ep. 1012), 147. 47-8.
where c. 28 Aug. hemet Campegio (Ep. 64. Augustinus] in Psalm. 25. 14.
1013] TO JAMES TUTOK 67
1. Lister's proposal about the Enchiridion (Ep. 660. 12) for an edition by him ;
(Ep. 1016. i5n), wliereas in 15 17 there had not yet been much effusion of
' virus '.
3. Lister's wife (Ep. 660. 24), who is probably newly married. In BRE. 193
^March 1520) Lister announces his marriage and the birth of a daughter.
In corroboration of the change it may be noted :
Erasmus' relations with Froben and his other friends at Basle. Tlie Pamgyrici
vetereswereprinted by Froben in Dec. 1520, with a preface by Beatus (BRE. 187)
to Lucas Bathodius (Ep. 883. i3n). In addition to the coUection of FanegjTics
l)ublished at Milan (c. 1481 Proctor 5837^ Bruno's copy of whieh (11. 2-3) was
:
no doubt used by tlie printers, they contain, as Erasmus directed (11. 1-2), his
own (Epp. 179, 180) and Ausonius' also others by Hermolaus Barbarus to- ;
is also a copy at Schlettstadt, wliich I have not seen except as printed in BRE.
From the variant in 1. 4 it appears to have been made from Beatus' rough draft.
He writes
lubet Erasynus in suis ad me literis vt Frobenius Fanegyricos veteres excudat, ipsius
uddendo Panegyricum et Ausonianum ad Gratianum Caesarem. Dabis igitur codicem
tuum, quem in marginibus contaminaui, Frobenio, priusquam discedas. Et de hac re
Frobenium monebis : nam non veniebat in mentem vt id ei dicerem, cum hic nudius quartus
5 adesset. •
[This letter, like Epp. loii, 1073, wasprintedbyBudaeus in BE.^ (a) before it
appeared in any of Erasmus' editions. The connexion of F with a, and specially
with a-, is shown conclusively by the readings in 11. xii, 112, 142 and 94, 96^
100. 106. For BE.3 (b) see Ep. 403 introd. Not being wholly in ftreek, this letter
is placed there in the Latin section, and therefore is not found in the later
issues of Budaeus' Greek letters mentioned in Ep. loii introd.
It was carried by one of the Gourmonts, probably the printer (seeEp. 263. gn)^
who chanced to visit Marly see BE.* 51.] ;
BVDAEVS ERASMO.
Tt <^7js ; To Trept iyKwfXLOv (tov to Trpos TotVcrTaA/\.ov ov XiXrjOe ae fX-VKrr]-
pKjjjLOV KoX a-Tpocjiyjv ^x^^ ' ®avfxdl,<a tolvvv eycoye crov aTeT^rws 8>/7rov o-avToC
KaTeyvcoKOTOS TOLavTrjv tlvo. crTpoffioXoyLav, iv ois vtt ifj.ov yeypaif/aL av Trpo-
Tepos eyKw/AtwSws. Viues tuus tibi testis esse potuit, cui epistolam ad
5 me scriptam ostendi ab homine naris emunctae (tametsi nomen
digito suppressi superposito) ; os virefJLvrja-i /u,e, otovet ovk alcr6av6p.evov
Tors KaOaTTTLKOv^ Adyous iv TOts a-vyypdfifiacri crov SLecnrapfiivov?.
crovs
Quanquam ipse non vidit iino-ToXrfv fxiav ets to avrb KadtfKovaav, diSpos
iTaXLWTov evboKLfiovvTO^ iv Tots fxdXLCTTa, ovK ifjLol fi€v eTricTTetAavTos, civSpt
^€ Tivt tCjv iavTOv yvojpt/xwv Kal ^tAwv' os 8ij to avToypacfyov eTre/j.il-e /.'.oi lo
evayyos. Et quum haec
huiuscemodi permulta silentio praeteimit-
et
tenda duxerim, atque etiam obliuione, tu niihi dolorem nunc re-
fricuisti ac pene opinionem ex suspitione fecisti nisi vero supradictis :
lam primum quod dixi, Catapotia epistolae meae iam, vt spero, "
ab : Lond.
Se 21. kav H kav pte N.
: iav aCb26. ab : castigare Lond.
: 28.
nitescere b. 29. ab pertractasse H.
: 32. te commodius a commodius :
te soluo, quae per me licebit ipsa vt sit inter nos perpetua, atque
etiam per te, quoad tu ex tuo animo meum aestimabis, non ex aliorum
sententia, quantum argumentis coniicio et hominum relatione.
Age, aestima tecum ipse quam illud^tXtKoi', immo quam €'pacr/x,o-
49. a, Loncl. : postea N^h. 51. it;i ow. b. 68. ab ixffivrjaf: N LB:
M(fivT)ao Loncl. b : exeipoSiKTeis a. 69. irpa-ffia add. b. 72.
dfj scripsi sicut iii V. 19: 5« a. 76. ab : id nonduni N. 81. Fb :
51. iocorum] Cf. Ep. 906. 67 seq. 70. nominatum] in Ep. 778. 19-24.
65. criminaiis] Ep. 1004. 76-7. 71. ojTaKovariis] Cf. Epp. 522. 20 104,
66. cicatricem] Cic. Agr. 3. 2. 4 cf. ; 568. 10.
Ep. 906. 206. 77. iocatus sum] Ep. 915. 97.
68. «Va] Wm.Petit soeEp. 522. 1711.
; verba] Ep. 915. 98,9.
illa
Tujv TovKUKpLOJv'] Cf. Eji. 1003. 34n. 83. evayfeKiuv'] Cf. Ep. 1004. 83.
IOI5] FEOM WILLIAM BUDAEUS 71
gaudeas amicorum. 'Ew vvv i^eTdcdv tovto cit' dXr]6e<s iaTiv eiVc firj,
To ix.dXi(TTd (T€ ^^atpeiv Kai y]8ecrOai twv ^tAcor toi? iXevOepLaaTiKoTs- 'ETret
TTouev dXXoOev TrpocnKpovaafxev aAA>^Aot9 dixw<; ye Trws oi yu.aAto"Ta TrpoTepov 95
<^t'Aot etvat 8oKovvT€<i, el fMr] i$ ojv iXevOepidcras ttov Trjv dp^rjv ev Tats €7rt-
o-ToAats yeypaeia sane nunc verum et pro comperto habitum
; Sed sit ;
94. a}H : i\(vrepiaaTiKoh iv^. 96. i\}II .IXevrepiaaas a". F tou ab. 99.
nov :
90. Deloini] See Ep. 1004. 107 and ; nius makes the first syllable short, an<l
cf. Ep. 915. 121. tlieaccent different but in Ep. 1066. ;
mihi ante existimaui quam tibi cordi esse magis genus illud ludicri
certaminis sensi atque perspexi, quod praepilatis iaculis certiusque
innocuis editur. Non quod tibi metueres aut mihi, aut tibi a me
metuendum esset aut mihi f\ te, sed quod spectatores delectandos
135 magis duceres quam expectatione suspendendos tristioris exitus
cuius consilii rationem faeile mihi iorobasti, posteaquam attentius
rem animaduertere coepi.
Denique nullam inter nos animorum alienationem, et hua-raaiv
mtercessisse puto, oiav 8r] Kal 8iaAA.a"yi}s Seicrdai, ovx ottojs BiaWaKTOv.
140 AfxeXei To kot efj.€ ei Tt TroTe KaTa crov tlprjKa rj yeypacf^a KaKovpyw; ye /cat
SvcrvoLKw<;, quo commodis tuis officerem aut gloriam istam tuam -afx.-
fxeyeOq imminuerem, eKeZvo 8i] eirLTrjSevoyv TOts e(T^p.aTL(rfievoL<; Adyots, w?
eK fxeTewpov TrjaSe tt/s So^^tjs e/<7reo-ots, Deus me pari mactet infortunio.
Datum est aliquid stomacho, et humanitus nonnihil admissum est,
145 et incommode fortasse atque imprudenter de amicitia consultum,
dum iugulum existimationis mutuo petentium speciem piaebebamus ;
139. II biaWayrj a.
: H : StaWaKT^ a. 142. H : (axp-q^xaTiafievots ab.
146. mutuo add. b. 166.ab : exomologesim Lond. 167. ajV^b : Herman-
num N'^ Lond. 170. Vtraque b.
159. aulicum] Ep. 1004. 127-8. 1520 (^BE.^ 51), without the qualifica-
163. expeditionis] Cf.Ep. 1004. i26n. tions tliat follow here and it is made
;
24. Beraldus] Cf. Ep. 994. 11-13. given reasons for thinking otherwise.
37. Copum] See Ep. 124. i6n. 9. Cantuariensis] Tliere is no trace
1017. I. Paraphrasim] See Ep. 710. of this request in Erasmus' correspon-
5. Literae] It seems that this must dence with Warham. He did not
refer to a letter about theiV^o!tMwlHs<r«- comply Avith it, perhaps from lack of
mentum in answer to Ep. 334, not to a mss.; but cf. Ep. 1140. in.
letter about the Paraphrase (Ep. 710) ;
Just at this time Bruno Amorbacli
forwhenthat was printed, Ammonius was preparing for a Basle edition of
was dead. A possible interpretation, Origen, and collecting notes of Greek
suggestcd by the similarity of phrase and Latin mss. Cf. a letter of Hedio
in Ep. 835. 10 to 11. 4, 7 here, is that about tho project, froin Basle, 21 Nov.
tlie Paraphrase was sent to Grimani in 1519 (Zw. E.^ 102) headds, Erasmus,:
'
ms., as soon as it Avas composed, c. June vt est omnipotentis ingenii, posset nou
1517, in timc for Ammonius to have modo interpretemagere verumet para-
been concerned in the acknowledg- phrasten, si modo vellet atque vtinam ;
suo Prineipi longe gratissimo. Bene valeat T.R.D. : cui quam com-
mendatissimus esse cupio. 15
Louanii. Postridie Calend. Octobr. An. m.d.xix.
[The reference to Ferdinand (1. i6) iniplies that the question of his education
was recent so that the date given in tlie text may be accepted.
still ;
Florence of Egmont was a patron with whom Erasmus had had relations
during his early residence at Louvain (cf. Ep. 178. 44^). His only son, Maxi-
milian of Egmont (t 23-4 Dec. 1548), had been a student at Louvain since 1516 ;
for in a preface, dated 20 April (1519), to the first edition of Adr. Barland's De
Hollandiae principibus, Antwerp, J. Thibault, July 1519, he and his kinsmen,
George and Philip of Egmont, to whom the dedication is jointly made, are said
to have been attending Barland's lectures for nearly three years. The question
of providing a new teacher for him seems now to have arisen Arnold (I. 10) ;
being probably a tutor who lived with the boy but took no part in his studies.
As in an earlier case (Ep. 737), Erasmus declined the post for himself, but sug-
gested a friend as a substitute cf. also Ep. 1208. In 1521 the boy was still at
;
Louvain, and learning Homer by heart for 'repetition (Ep. 1192. 81-2). '
1017. 14. T.R. D. F: amplitudo tua 7/. lOIS. tit. clariss. . . .florektio F
FLORENTIO AB I3ELSTEYN // {H Lond. FLORENTiNO A'*).
: 12. H : Goclenius F.
lOlS. 12. Goclenius] See Ep. 1209. 16. Ftrdiiiaudo] Cf. Ep. 917 introd.
76 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [15 19
bitur hic filii familiae adiungendus, agam cum illo, et agam non
minore fide quam si filii mei negocium ageretur : sin minus, scito
Erasmum toto peetore tuum esse. Bene vale.
20 Louanii post. Cal. Octobr. Anno m.d.xix.
[For the ms. see Ep. 296 introd. Lypsius' argument is Leus vacillans :
'
the intrigue to obtain a sight of Lee's notes (cf. Ep. 998. i^n), Lypsius had lent
Lee his own copy of the second edition of Erasmus' NewTestament (cf. Ep. 955),
and subsequently, in fear lest Lee should notice tlie numerous corrections made
in that edition and use them for further attacks on Erasmus, had enquired
whether he should endeavour to conceal the fact of the corrections and that ;
of Lee's English friends (Epp. 1026. 11-16, 1029. 10-151, this letter, which deals
with Lee's announcement on the subject, may be placed conjecturally earlier in
the month. For the course of Erasmus' controversy with Lee see pp. 108-11.]
them at Basle, MSS. C. VI'^. 54 and 73. The letters belong mostly to the years
1519-36» and number about 550 including more than ninetj' to Zasius, about
:
sixty each to Alciati and Erasmus, and others to well-known humanists, Beatus
Rhenanus, Hutten, Glareanus, Dor]^, Sadolet, Botzheim, besides his brother
Basil and some intimate friends. Seventy-five of them are printed by Th. Burck-
hardt Biedermann in Am. E., some nearly complete, others in brief extract
and there is a short description of the collection in the Transactions ofthe Bihlio-
fjraphical Society, xii ^1914),
i^p. 78-80.
The letter actually sent to Erasmus i^erhaps contained as a postscript (of which
there is no trace in this i-ough-draft) a i^roposal that Jerome Froben (Ep. 903. 2n)
should be put to study law under Zasius at Preiburg, as Boniface had done. See
a note from Zasius to Boniface (ZE. p. 483) Quod nuper ad magiutm Erasmum
:
'
scripsisti in calce literarum suiaer Frobenio, legere male oculatus non potui.
Itaque siquid officii dicto adolescenti per nie praestari poterit, declarato, et
paratum ad tua eiusque commoda inuenies '. If this conjecttire is correct, it
secms likely that .lerome carried this letter, together with BRE. 132.
The date of tliis letter is confirmed l)y Boniface's projected journey (L 540).]
1018. 20. post. F : postr. X.
1018. 17. agam] Ep. 1192. 81-2 shows that Erasmus fulfilled this promise.
io2o] FROM BONIFACE AMERBACH 77
ViDEOR mihi meo iiire facturus. vnicum seculi decus Erasme, si post
tantam atque adeo inuisam bonis SvcrwTrtai'. litteris nostris, immo
ineptiis, te compellauero, et hiis sane parcissimis. Non enim pluri-
bus debeo, vel omnium honorum studiorum causa, que iam pr(op)e-
modum cadentia tu tuis humeris ceu Hercules quispiam et fulcis et 5
sustines, adeo quidem vt prope de postliminio asserueris. Quo
iiomine vel populari actione conueniendus forem, qui hec tois (3aTTa-
pL(T/j.o'i<; interturbarem, cum semel omnium saluti, omnium commodo.
omnium emolumento prospiciatur. Quid quod tu non nisi castis et
puris reuerenter adeundus es ? quottusquisque enim est vel
doctissi- 10
morum qui te litteris compellare audeat Nimirum a cunctis tanti !
consecroque.
Si de rebus nostris certior fieri cupis, pestis mitius hucusque nos
acceperat, sed in diem seuius incrudescit. Ego in breui Auenionam
55 profi(ci)scar, illic Andream Alciatum Mediolanensem auditm'us,
hominem in legali prudentia tantum quantum non memini alium.
Ex lucubrationibus recens Mediohmi editis hominem estimes licet.
Videbis summe iurium cognitioni vtramque linguam nimium quam
feliciter adiectam. Hunc et Zasium nostrum duo iuris presidia
60 dixerim, cum non solum in textuum emendatione, quamquam id
etiam, sed et in ipsa harena, in ipsis adytis versentur.
Disputationi theologicae apud Lipsenses suprema manus imposita
be gatliered from a similar passage iii a 152 1 he wasat Lyoiis 011 his way
letter of Boniface to Bruno (? 26 Aug.) home his departure from Avignon
;
jaei^ova Toi'Twt
eviacrdai TavTr]<; ov 8vva/xaL fJLavcrjv.
[For Erasmus' relations with Slechta and the Bohemians at this time see my
Age 0/ Erasmus, 1914, pp. 281-98; and cf. Epp. 11 17 introd., 1154, 1183. For
other vievvs of them see Ep. 1260. After Slechta's death his son was sent,
apparently by guardians, to Wittenberg in July 1523 to complete his education
(ME. 247). Melanchthon was in correspondence with him in Oct. 1524 (ME. 295).
Portions of this letter and its answer are printed in S. Clementis Epistolae duae
ad Corinthios, ed. P. Colomesius, London, 1687, pp. 288-95.]
24. ceu H
seu F.
: 30. ceu H : seu F. 35. notes, cari^as et damnes H.
36. parcas H. 50. habeo H : omnes habeo F.
15. praesenti anno hic] Fora rejjort 27. interfectrici] Cf. 2 Cor. 3. 6.
ofErasmus' doath cuirent in Ceiitral 30. poeta] Ter. AmJr. 68 ; cf. Cic.
Europe in April 1519 cf. Ep. 1008 Amic. 24. 89.
introd. 34. Innocuum] Cf. Ep. 1007. 8in.
102 1] FROM JOHN SLECHTA 81
tunum et idoneum seponamus, vbi te, cum hic fieri non potuit, alio
loco et tempore, concedente Domino. conueniamus. Quod autem
patria nostra in alias pergentibus regiones certo comitatu et con- 60
ductoribus securitatis gratia indiget, mirari id, amice charissime,
desines, si ab omni parte arduis et in altum surgentibus montibus
vallatam, densissimisque syluis ac proceris arboribus late circumsep-
tam cognosces, quales in sylua Ercinia saepe multas videre potuisti
in qua frequentissimi grassatores delitescentes et aditus viarum 65
obsidentes saepe multa damna viatoribus minus cautis, maxime vero
mercatoribus inferunt, nonnullos vero non solum rebus sed et vita
spoliant. Et quamuis fere singulis mensibus ex vicinis vrbibus et
oppidis infinitos id genus latrones capiant, et vario supplicioi'um et
mortis genere disperdant. nunquam tamen tam perniciosum et noxium 70
seminarium et extirpari et radicitus euelli potest sed cum hi damnan-
:
tur et delentur, protinus alii succedunt ; haud secus quam fiebat circa
hydram illam Herculeam. cui adempta capita renascebantur.
Scribis mihi postremo non sine certa admiratione, quod attinet ad
dissidiuni illud fidei et religionis, quod a satis longinquo tempore 75
in patria nostra subortum durat quodque in tanto tempore nullus
;
tris sectas diuisus est. Prima est eorum qui Romanum Pontificem
in omnibus sequuntur et obseruant, verumque vicarium Christi 100
71. ei av(e extiTpari add, N. 74. quodiV: quid f. &d add. N. 85.
H : temperaria F.
—
mille et ducentos inuiolabiliter obseruatam quibus Concilium singu-
lis diligenter perspectis et rite examinatis, concessit eis praedictum
vsum et consuetudinem communionis ante memoratae his tamen ;
minus vos accipere credatis quam sub vtraque specie et qui sub '
;
102. caulae] Cf. Aug. c. Pelag. i. i. 2. accepted for university. In Ep. 1033.
106. Alia secta] Tlie Utraquists. 116, Erasmus uses vniuersitas, perhaps
'l'hey sent envoys to the Council of foUowing Lutlier (cf. explan. n.), but
Basle in 1432-3 (11. 115 seq.), and in modifies itin F ibid. 255, he uses ac«-
;
Nov. 1433 a settlement was made, demia. Cf. Epp. 447. 97, 166, 1002. gn.
known as 'the Compacts (11. 113-14,
'
116. Sigismundi] 1368-1437 ; King
137)5 by which they were allowed to of Hungary 1387, Kingof the Romans
"iontinue, with some modification, the 1410, King of Bohemia 1419.
practice of their own ceremonials. See 136. comprobauerunt] sc. theologi
Creighton, vol. ii, bk. 3, ch. 5. Concilii (1. 117).
115. studii] The change in H was 138. Eugenio] Pope 1431-47. Forhis
])erhap8 made word that was
to avoid a quarrel with the Council and conse-
now becomingold-fashioned. It seoms quent refusal to ratify the Compacts
that as yet there was no word definitely see Creighton, bk 3, ch. 6.
.
io2i] FKOM JOHN SLECHTA 83
connectcd with the Beghards (Ep. leader of the Taborites from 1420 until
843. 62on). his death, 11 Oct. 1424.
183. Zyzka] (= ' the one eyed ') of 189. Vladislai] f 13 March 1516 (see
Trocnow a Bohemian noble, who was
;
Ep. 950. sn) King of Hungary, 1490.
;
io2i] FROM JOHN SLECHTA 85
from the correspondence of this period many of the gaps may be filled.
For the circumstances of this letter see p. 42.]
1021. 232. sit om. H. 236. his F: hiis N. 238. multiplicum i/.
240. Misnae N. 246. tibi om. H. 1022. 2. amarulentis] Cf. Ep. 1007. 86,
93 : vt ab istis coni. Horawitz. 7. Christiano homine] C/. Ep. 1006. 58.
8. dissidium] C/. Epp. 1007. 102, 1041. 44. 9. noc metitur] Cf. Ep. 1057. 14.
and, for his departure from Paris, Ep. have been conteut witli, when his two
lori. 4n. He had now spont a long last letters (Epi). 987, 992) were still
two days (Epp. 1026. 4-5, 1029. 25-6) unanswered.
with Erasmus. 4. i>ostremas] Ep. 1004.
a. expostuh\tionem] M. Dehiruelle 5.ad Viuetem] BE.'' 43, dated 19
(3fj<se'e6eZ(jfe, ix. 1905, j). 338, n. 4) under- Aug. 1519.
I02 3] TO WILLIAM BUDAEUS 87
legi nec enim licuit per LongoLium, loannes Coletus, vir optimus
:
[Tlie year-date of this group of letters for England, Epp, 1025-32, is conclu-
sively confirmed by the reference, in all except the last two, to the death of Colet,
16 Sept, 1519.]
Triginta iam annis nullius mors mihi fuit aeerbior quam Coleti.
Percupio hominis memoriam posteritati consecrare. Sed hoc negocii
tu pro tua in illum pietate capesses, vt me instruas, praesertim si
thereturn ofPace'sbooksfrom Italysee 1581, p. 46) ; and Brovvn ii. 1297. For
Epp. 30. i6n, 706. 3211, 732. 24, 887. 3-5. Erasmus' visit to Bruges see Epp. loio,
1025. 4. Campegium I have failed to ) 1012, 1013. 23^ and, for Pace's share in
;
determine precisely the day on whicli promoting the meeting, Ep. 996. 18-25.
he entertained Erasmus at Bruges (cf. 6. responsurum] Erasmus was
Epp. 1029. 26-8, 1031 2-3, 1062. 186). awaiting replies to Epp. 964, 967.
Earlyin Julyliewasexpectingto return 9. Antonius] See Epp. 760 introd.,
soon to Italy (Ep. 995. 73-4). On 15 Aug. • 1 106. in.
he took leaveof the Kingat Greenwich, 16. senex] Cf. Ep. 1031. 22. John
and on 17 Aug. left London (Brown ii. of Bergen (Ep. 737), being older than
1279). By 22 Aug. he was at Dover his brother Antony (Ep. 143), must
(Brewer iii. 433,4), having perhaps have been about 65 at this time. For
stayed with Fisher at Rochester on the other estimates of age cf. Epp. 1067,
way (cf. Ep. 1030. sn). On 24 Aug. introd., 1103. 2411, 1166. 2311, and i,
Brewer iii. 439, 452, 454, 461, 533 (cf. In Epp. 1027. 8-9, 1030. 46-8 also
C. Sigonius, Vita L. Canipegii, Bologna, Erasmus announces his intention.
I02 6] TO THOMAS LUPSET 89
qua sunt quae putes mihi non esse cognita. Longolio pene totum
triduum dedi placuit omnibus modis, hoc vno dempto, quod ni-
: 5
mium Gallus est, cum sit nostras. Commigrat isthuc clarissimus
adolescens Antonius a Grimberga, filius cordatissimi herois D. de
Bergis, rara indole ac probitate, literarum ex animo studiosus, cui nec
inuisus est Erasmus. Valent hic tui Hermannus Phrysius ac
Nesenus cum Carino caeterisque. 10
Vesculus nunquam magis fuit in negocio quam nunc sed omnia ;
[To 'Master Dancjister' Colet in his will, 22 Aug. 1519, left £6. 13S. ^d. 'to
supporte hym in hys vei-tue (S. Knight, Life of Cokt, p. 465)
' cf. Ep. 278. 8-11.
;
Hence J. H. Lupton, Life of Jolm Colet, 1909, p. 234 n, conjectures that he may
have been *a scholar of Colefs now studying for ordination '. On 23 Aug. 1521
Erasmus sent greetings to him through Lupset. He appears to have sided with
the King over the Divorce and in reward received the living of Ampthill in
:
Bedfordshire, 8 Aug. 1528, being then M.A. (Brewer iv. 3232, 4687. 8). Tlie
present rector of Ainptliill, the Rev. W. D, May, kindly informs me that a new
rector, Richard Byrdsall, was appointed on 20 Feb. i5|f the living being void
,
1026. 4. Longolio] Cf. Ep. 1023. in. liim see Ep. 906. 448.
6. Gallus] For the question of 14. tres aut quatuor] Lee had sent
Longolius' nationality see Ep. 914 ras. copies of his book to Morc, Lati-
introd. mer, Fisher (Ep. 1061. 61-2"), and per-
9. Phrysius] See Ep. 903. i2n. haps to Tunstall (Ep. 1029. 29; but cf.
10. Carino] See Ep)). 920, 1034. Ep.io6i. 136-7). See also Ep. 1053. 344.
11. Vcsculus] Tlic accompanying 1027. 3. Ploratur] Juv. 13. 134.
letters show clearly that Lee is in- 5. reuocari] Cf. Ep. 1028. 15
tended. For a similar description of 7. Christo] Cf. Ep. 1211. 325, 329.
90 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [15 19
et, quod tecum habet commune, fauentem Erasmo. Hunc quid ego
tibi commendem ? cum et illum norim iis rebus praeditum quas tu
10 non potes non amare. Ducit secum praeceptorem suum Adrianum
Barlandum, virum haud vulgariter eruditum.
Quod non respondes meis literis, nihil aliud in causa suspicor quam
solitam tuam hac in re pigritiam. Mors Coleti tam acerba mihi fuit
vt nullius his annis viginti fuerit acerbior. Sed quis vsus querelarum
15 aut fletus? ille ad nos redibit nunquam, nos illum sequemur.
Cum theologis sarta pax, quam illi vltro expetierunt : quam sic
admisi vt nec meo vitio tamen vnquam
siin violaturus nec illis
fisurus. Nunquam audita fuit eiusmodi conspiratio ex vnius hominis
bili nata cuius etiam opera sarta est, cum videret et se imparem esse
:
1027. 10. Gerardum] 'MaisterWilliam her see Epp. 296. 117, 855.30-2,948.
Garrard was Colefs stevvard, and one
'
221 9, 964 96, 968. 12, 976. 38-9.
of the executors to his will. See also 11. Barlandum] Cf. Epp. 760. i^n,
Ep. 1229. 1106. i5n.
13. foedus] See Ep. 1016. 150. 12. literis] Probably Ep. 965; cf.
1028. I. aulae] Cf. Ep. 999. 22in. Epp. 1025. 6n, 1031. 1-4.
a. nostra] Cf. Ep. 1004. 145^. This 15. redibit nunquam] This recalls,
condemnation is somewhat softened though not verbally, 2 Sam. 12. 23 cf. ;
Nos sat prospera valetudine sumus, nisi quod aetas semper aliquid
decerpit huius corpusculi neruis sed non recusarim immori Hteris ;
1028. 26. futurus om. Lond. 27. Anno ow. H. 1029. 4. iam anfe pridem
om. H. g. nosses : nosces F. H
1029.1. catalalis]TheLouvain theolo- de eo scripsi, illum ab omnibus esse
gians cf. Ep. 1016. 15^.
; For the word laudatissimum nec vnquam tamen sa-
cf. Rom. I. 30, where Erasmus trans- tis laudatum, hoc etiam ipsi theologi
lates oblocutores ' in 1516, 'obtrecta-
'
Louanienses cum risu legeruut lauda- ;
? u -u^^ *. ^- ™
perabat omnes : mihi moriturus etiam
». *.
A
k „ .
Erasmus -j.
erit
>
,5
' denunciabatu • >.
pacem et amicitiam,
j- i.
quoda
'
M. N. Bruardus Atenais'. For Eras- of the similar passage in i, p. 22. 30-6.
mus' relations with Atensis cf. Epp. 8. non placere] Cf. Ep. 663. 43 seq.
670, 993. 49n, 1053. 296n, 1123. i^n, Apologias] See Epp. 597. 32n,
and especially the Spomjia (LB. x. 1649 670 introd.. 934. ^n.
A-c = HE. 333, §§ 167-8): 'Atensi^ 9. meam lenitatem] Cf. Epp. 906.
vir erat nec inhumanus nec iniquus 463, 931. 19,952. 24, 1042.20, 1139.43;
bonis literis, sed ingenio iritabili. and the Epistola de magishis nostris
Itaque per quosdam monachos ac theo- L(juanieiisHius,Z\\. E.^^p. 388. 11, 12. .So
logos protrusus est vt ageret odiosam also Listrius to B. Rhenanus in Eae.
fabulam. Et qui huc adegerunt homi- App. f». b', (c. April 1520) : 'Erasmus,
nem, eadem opera adegerunt in mor- cui saepe nocuit sua lenitas ' : where
tem erat enim imbecilli valetudine et
; Eev. p. 145, reprinted iu BRE. 193, has
irae impatiens, iniuriae insolens. Ac wrongly leuitas. Cf. the similar depra-
post huius mortem maxime coepit ea vation in Ep. 1053. 476 and i, p. 34. 33.
tragoedia incrudescere, vt intelligas For the qualitycf. Epp. 843. 530-1, 906.
illum multa moderatum. Porro quod 342-3, 946. 9, 947. 31-2.
92 LETTEKS OF ERASMUS [1519
15 est. Mihi tamen non est animus cum vestra pugnare sententia.
Dorpius etiamlibello edito testatus est animum mutasse sese, ac
in rebus talem se praebet vt satis fidam.
caeteris Cum caeteris
initum foedus a me quidem non violabitur, et arma deposui
caeterum excubias non intermittam. Hac hyeme Paraphrases absol-
20 uam si Christus adfuerit. Coleti mortem inconsolabiliter deplora-
rem, nisi scirem nec illi nec mihi profuturas lachrymas.
Commigrat aulae vestrae Antonius a Grimberga, filius primarii
viri D. de Bergis, iuuenis natus virtuti, literarum ac literatorum
amantissimus, indole mansuetissima pudorisque plena: huic non
25 grauaberis declarare quantum faueas probitati. Longolius hic mihi
totum biduum absumpsit. Cardinalem Campegium vidi Brugis
coenaui cum eo, mira hominis humanitas. Placuere mores aperti
minimeque fucati.
Si fiei-i cuperem mihi fieri copiam eorum quae notauit Leus ;
possit,
30 nam adornant rursus terciam aeditionem ab ipso nihil potest :
faueo F.
1029. 16. Dorpius] See Ep. 1024. sn. lena libri tres, Paris, J. Badius, 22 Feb.
19. excubias] Cf. a letter of Hedio to 1519 ; cf. Ep. 936. 7 seq.
Myconius from Basle, 10 Dec. 1519, 3. posteriori libro] Probably Fisher's
'Erasnius yprjyopu, vbi tempus erit, EuersiomiinitionisquamlodocusCHchtoKeus
amicis omnibus signum daturus. In- erigere inoliebaiiir aduersus vnicam Magda-
terim oportet non seuire stilo. Capi- lemm, Louvain, Tli. Martens, s.a. and
to quaedam pepererat, sed monente Sept. 1519. Fisher also jiroduced ^cf.
Erasmo supprimit hactenus': quoted Ep. 1016.20) a Con/utatio secimdae dis-
by Egli to illustrate Zw. E.* 107, which ceptationis per lacobum Fabrum StapuJen-
is to the same effeot. sem habitae, in qua tribus foeminis partiri
30. adornant] sc. Frobenius ot Amei'- moUtur quae totius Ecclesiae consuetado
bachii. vnicae tribuit Magdalenae, Paris, J. Badius,
terciam aeditionem] of Erasmus' 3 Sept. 1519 in the preface to which,
;
6. praedicatoium F : Dominicanoruni H.
(cf. Ep. 1163. lo-ii). (de Jongh, pp. 205, 43*-4*)- Fo''
14. Dodonaei lebetes] Cf. Adag. 7, Luther's reply see Ep. 1113. 33^ ;
and,
used of a man improbae atque impor-
' for a conscquence of Hochstrafs visit,
tunae loquacitatis '. An explanatiou Ep. 1033. a^n. By 28 April 1520 Eras-
is given from Suidas oraculum louis
:
' mus had sent a copy of the Condemna-
quod olim erat in Dodona, lebetibus tions to Hutten (LE.^ 300 = HE. 160;.
aereis vndique cinctum fuisse, ita vt 18. inuidiam] Cf. Ep. 877. 16 31.
94 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [1519
36. respondebitur] Cf. Ep. 998. 66n. in) Duke Ulrich had sought external
47. si quid] Cf. Verg. Aen. 9. 446, aid against the Swabian League. On
Ov. Tf. I. 6. 35. 12 Aug. heagaininvaded Wurtemberg,
49. bis] Ep. 963, andtheletter there andcapturedStuttgart 15 Aug. Tubin-
mentioned in 1. 1 : both answering Ep. gen and other towns he failed to take ;
TiT. R. v. F THOMAE
: II.I. R. T. D. F : tua sublimitas H. 3. reucren-
dissimus D. o»». H. R. T. D. F eam H, ante rursus.
6. : 30.eum H :
vitiis quibus fere sunt obnoxiae magnatum aulae, verum etiam hiis
virtutibus instructus quae tam claris stemmatis tantisque nego-
ciorum molibus, ad quas haud dubie vocabitur. dignae sint. Nihil
agam si tibi iuuenem commendem. Ea est indoles, ea morum sua-
15 uitas, is pudor ac probitas, vt optimum quenque protinus in sui
amorem rapturus sit.
Atque hic quoque sentio mihi Rhamnusiam infensam. Ante com-
plures annos et Regis benignitas et R. Cardinalis Eboracensis
humanitas me ad aulae consortium non semel inuitauit, eodem
20 prouocauit Guilhelmi Monteiouii fidele semper et amicum consilium.
Sed mihi laeua mens erat, surdo canebatur fabula. Sciebam haud
vllam vsquam aulam ista esse incorruptiorem at quis diuinare ;
[Some about the prmting of this letter are given by Erasmus in Epp.
facts
1153 162-7, 1167. iii-r8, 121 7. 20-5 writtenin 1520-iandpublished in F. But the
fuUest narrative is found in the Spongia, composed and printed in 1523 Ante :
'
13. Nihil agam] Cf. Ep. 1031. 26-8. and cf. Ep. 966.
19. inuitauit] See Ep. 964 introd. ;
21. laeua mens] Cf. Ep. 1004. 146^.
1033] TO ALBEET OF BRANDENBURG 97
enim illum. qui viueret in familia Card. et illi, vt tum putabam, esset a con-
siliis, melius nosse sensum Principis. Quid factum est ? Aedita est epistola
vulgataque typis. nec reddita illi ad quem erat scripta. Ex hac re quum et
Cardinali grauis inuidia conilarctur apud Komanenses et mihi apud nostros
iam enim triumphum adornabant. gloriantes me teneri medium Moguntinus —
commotus exigit epistolam ad se scriptam, quae iam totos tres menses per omnium
manus volitabat. Tandem acriter flagitanti reddita est ea quam miseram, semi-
lacera ac typographorum atramento contaminata. Ea res, vt debuit, aegre
habuit Principem, mihique indignabatur. suspicans id mea culpa factum. Nihil
hic aflBngo. Ipse Cardinalis post suis literis raecum expostulauit hac de re.
Quas tragoedias excitasset Huttenus si quid eius generis commisissem in ipsum !
Primum prodita est fides in maudatis amici. Nocuit causae vulgata epistola,
quae secreto lecta prodesse poterat ; et amicum et patronum benemeritum
grauauit inuidia. Postremo mihi Principem tantumex amico reddidit inimicum
(LB. X. 1664C-E HE. 333, §§ 325-8). Subsequently, in revising Ep. 1152 for
;
The earliest issues of this letter are numerous, and all unauthorized. From
the nature of the case such publications appear without adequate indications of
time and place. and without the printer's name, so that it is difficult to deter-
raine their origin and sequence. From such examples as I have been able to
examine, the following order suggests itself ,
1. D. Erasmi Roterodami preshyteri thedogi ad E. Cardinalem Moguniinum epistola, in
tiones, zo^ausam, 222 iMas, 266 aeetemum. Which was derived from the other
I cannot determine.
5. The same m.d.xx. (7*).
title, (Augsburg, S. Grimm and M. Wirsung.)
Proctor 10920 ; Bodl. TL. 9. 102 and 89. 10,
6. The same title, f°. a''' in Luther's Lucubrationes , Basle, A. Petri, July 1520
(7*). Apreface by Petri to the reader states that he had seen the letter 'typis
excusam, Germanice quoque versam '.
7. D. Erasmi Eoterodami epistola ad Eeuerendiss. Archiepiscopum ac Cardiixalem
Moguntinum, qua commonefacit illius celsitudinem de causa Doctoris Martini Lutheri.
Selestadii in officina Schureriana. Sumptu Nicolai Cuferii, bibliopolae Selesta-
diensis. Anno h.o.xx. (5). Bodl. TL. 9. 103. On the verso of the last leaf in
— —
some copies in others the last page is blank is a letter from Wimpfeling to
98 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
the Bishop of Basle (ef. Ep. 598 introd.), i Sept. 1520, wishing that all the
bishops and nobles of Germany would unite to secure from the Pope favourable
treatnient for Luther. This edition was very hkely produced from a copy, ms.
or printed, left behind at Schlettstadt by Egranus (Ep. 872. i2n) in the summer
of 1520, at Beatus* request (BRE. 176).
a^ and a^ (designated together as a) are clearly connected. In a large number
of readings they agree together against all the other soui'ces, and differences
between them are few. The contents of the pages exactly correspond, though
the arrangement of the lines is not identical a condition which is frequcntly
;
found when a book is reprinted after a short intei*val of time, e.g. with N*, N*,
N^. Some of the obvious misprints of a} are corrected in a^ and are not shown
;
in the critical notes here. But a'^ has a few errors of its own, which have crept
into the text through aberration, in spite of the castigation ' announced in the
'
colophon. This pair agree, too, in printing Ep. 980 after tbis letter: according
to the text of the Farrago (E), and therefore not before Nov. 1519 (Ep. 1040
introd.). A possible indication of date may be found in anotlier point. The
colophon in both cases follows on to Ep. 980 at once, in the same line and in a-
;
pamphlet to change the date into accord with the actual year of reissue. Thus a^
and a" may be dated conjecturally in the end of 1519 and the beginning of 1520.
In Jan. 1520 a copy of the letter, apparently in ms., reached Wittenberg (LE.^
264), and Luther expected that it would soon be printed. But, as in April
Melanchthon sent to John Hess, canon of Breslau (cf. Ep. 11 13 introd.) a ms.
copy of it, corrected by himself (ME. 69), we may perhaps infer that he had not
yet seen it in print. Hutten, in passing through Bamberg about tho end of
April, showed the letter, perhaps in a^ or a^, to Crotus Rubianus, who, being
greatly pleased witli it, at once prepared to send a copy to Luther (HE. 160 =
LE." 300. 228-31). In view of the priority of these indications in tirae, the
Wittenberg issue (/3^) may have precedence of the others here. In June 1520
Pirckheimer from Nuremberg sent Epistolam Erasmi emendatam to Bernard
' '
Erasmus' admirers there. In the Gotha MS. Chart. B. 20, ff. 19-24 there is a
contemporary copy (^^) which shows a great deal of degeneration, but on the
whole has distinctive connexion with /3'. The contents of the ms. suggest that
it was written by or for someone who had an interest in Breslau, perhaps John
Hess, in which case the connexion with jS' would be explained.
This is perhaps the letter sent by Zwingli to Oswald Myconius from Zurich,
6 July 1520, Erasmi epistolam preciosissimam ab exemplari descriptam, quod
'
identification of that see Ep. 1120. i2n. As late as 3 Aug. 1520 Conrad Grebel
saw this letter in ms. at Zurich (VE. 207). Of the German version mentioned
by Petri, numerous contempovary editions are known.
IfHutten was responsibleforany of the texts enumerated above, it musthave
been for a^ ;but I cannot find there, nor anywhere else, the one specific change
— thc addition of noster after Luther's name — which Erasmus in Epp. 1 153. 165,
'
121 7. 25, alleges, on hearsay, that Hutten made in this letter before printing it.
The existence of so many unauthorized issues impelled Erasmus to print the
letter himself. It was a composition of some note. He realized no doubt (cf.
Ep. I041) the importance of making clear his attitude towards Reuchlin juid
Luther, whose names, for diflferent reasons, had now become a cause of anxiety
to the orthodox and so, while continuing the moderate support already mani-
;
tested in Epp. 939, 967 cf. also Ep. 1153. 110-16), he was careful to .issert his
1033] TO ALBERT OF BRANDENBURG 99
detachment fx"om them (Ih 34-42, 192-211). But this purpose was only secondary.
His main concern was to continixe in a new quarter (cf. Epp. 1007, 1060, 1062)
his protest against the attitude towards learning adopted by the reguLir orders.
The Archbishop (Ep. 661 introd.) was credited with wide sympathies, and his
friendliness towards Erasmus gave good hopes of securing his support against a
campaign of detraction which was likely to have serious results. Apart from
a single name (1. 80) there was nothing in the letter that Erasmus need wish to
conceal, except perhaps the allusions (11. 130, 223) to the traffic in indulgences,
from which the Archbisliop was already deriving large profits ; and, but for being
too late, it would probably have been included, like Ep. 967, in E. It was, in fact,
—
one of the first selected for the new portion of F only Epp. 299 and 645 precede
—
it and there is very little change in the text ; less than might have been
expected underthe circumstances. The agreement of F with /3 in many readings,
as against 76, may be remarked but though it seems probable that all the un-
;
authorized editions are prior in time to F, it is hardly likely that the Basle
editors would have used any one of them to print from.
The text of the Cologne editions is on the whole the best, especially as con-
taining what seems a more accurate month-date ; but, as Erasmus indicates, it
is not uniformly satisfactory. I have adopted it as the basis, but have discarded
some of its readings. In the sigla a-5 precede F. The year-date is amply con-
firmed by the contents. Egli notes several pa.ssages in the Epistola de magistris
nostris Louanieiisihus (Zw. E.* pp. 385-8), which evidently imitate this letter.]
quem magis conuenit vitreis aut Samiis quani auro celatis poculis 5
bibere. Quod si calix vitreus missus fuisset, tamen mihi inter ea
quae maxime sunt in delitiis reponeretur vel ob id ipsum quod ab ;
TiT. a om. /3
: reverendissimo sacrosanctae rhomanab ecclesiae tt. s. chryso-
:
05 Croio H.
: 18. ay^ Louonienses 7^.
: 19. )3 redierant a. 20. cohibere P:
:
prohibere a.
2. munus] Cf. Ep. 986. 34-9. 18. theologi] Cf. Ep. 1016. isn.
14. de Croy] See Ep. 647 introd. 20. cohibere] Cf. Ep. 993. 5211.
II 2
100 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
imputetur. Illud video, vt quisque vir est optimus, ita illius scriptis
minime offendi non quod probent omnia, opinor, sed quod hoc
:
strato Ji'. 41. laudis/SJ': om.ay. 43. hoc a^ om. 0^. 45. 13: Lumbar- :
22. compotatione] Cf. Epp. 447. 456, 36. conflictationes] See Ep. 1006.
643. 36n, 867. 112, 1170. 39. ignotus] Cf. Ep. 939. 66n.
24. epistola] Ep. 104 1. 44-5 sho\vs 40. carptim] Cf. Ep. 967. 79,80.
that tlie reference is to Ep. 980, which 47. obstabam] Cf. Epp. 904. ign,
was novtr in circulation (cf. Ep. 948 967. 92, 1143, 1167, 1195, 1217. Two
introd.) andevidently had just reached of Luther's books were reprinted by
Louvain through the agency of Hoch- Jorome Frobcn just at this tinie,
strat (Ep. 1040. 2-4). See de Jongh, during his father's absence at Frank-
pp. 209,10. fort. See LE.^ 278. i^n, 285. 17-19.
34. Reuchlini] Cf. Ep. 967. 69-71. 49. epistoLam] Ep. 933.
1033] TO ALBERT OF BRANDENBUEG 101
ipse sohis admonui. Ego Lutheri nec accusator sum nec patronus
nec reus. De spiritu hominis non ausim iudicare est enim diffi- ;
55. stultissime /J. 56. nemoa: nullus i/. 57. 07^: Luttheri 7I.
58. reus af : iudex P F. 59. si 07 : om. yS^. 60. etiam a5 : om. 7I : & ^^.
62. si vt oppresso a om. : /3: et obruto H. simulatae a. simulato :
deuotis animis P, cf. Epp. 1053. 520-1, 1097. 35, 1098. 15, 1128. 9, 1167. 26 et
saepixs deuotionis a.
: 64. me causae /3. est adcl. F. 65. eum add. H.
66. sin /3F: si 07. 68. extinxit a^^: extinguit a^. 70. vocari a^.
reuocari/3F. 71. praedicandam gloriam a praedicationem gloriae /3. 73.:
hominem post lacerant add. /3: om. ay. 75. et haereticos a et haereticus :
schismata et antichristos H. 76. iis a his /8. viderant /3. 79. mor-
:
talia a capitalia H.
: 80. confitentibus add. F. Carmelita theologus om. F.
58. reus] 'answerable for '. The 67. Prophetae] Is. 42. 3; cf. Ep.
reading of most of the unauthorized 939. 113.
editions can hardly be a corruption of 78. Lutherus scripserat] In the
the reading adopted in F, and is pro- Sermo de poenitentia, Wittenberg, J.
bably therefore correct. But cf. Epp. Grunenberg, 15 18, f°. A' x" (Weimar
1041. 34, 1167. 247. ed. i. 322): '
Primum
vt nullo modo
62. praotextu] Cf. Epp. 694. 40-1, praesumas peccata venialia,
confiteri
loi. 21. sed nec omnia mortalia, quia impossi-
64. fauere Luthero] The carefully bile est vt omnia mortalia cognoscas.'
measured support given here did not I owe this reference to Prof. Preserved
impress Luther, who wrote of this Smith. For Erasmus' treatnient of
letter as egregia epistola Erasmi . .
'
. this point in the CoUoq. Formidae, March
«Je me multum solliciti ., vbi me . . 1522, cf. Ep. 1301. 28-32.
egregie tutatur, ita tamen vt nihil 80. Carmelita] Cloarly Egmondanus
minus quamme tutari videatur ; siciit ''Ep. 878. i^n) cf. Zw. E.^ p. 384. 28
;
solet pro dexterit.ate sua' LE.'- 264. seq. Ep. 1 153. 41-3 shows that he took
19-23 : 26 Jan. 1520). umbrage at this passage. Hence, no
102 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
nec apieulus vllus sit meus, aut me conscio aut volente editus. Et
100 tamen hac falsissima suspicione freti, citra omnem expostulationem
excitarunt hic multas tragoedias, quibus ego nihil adhuc in vita
vidi furiosius. Ad haec, cum theologorum sit proprium docere,
nunc video multos nihil aliud agere nisi vt cogant aut perdant et
extinguant cuni Augustinus ne aduersus Donatistas quidem non
; —
105 haereticos modo verum etiam saeuissimos latrones probet eos qui —
cogant tantum, non etiam doceant. Homines, quos maxime decebat
mansuetudo, nihil aliud sitire videntur quam humanum sanguinem.
tantum in hoc inhiant vt capiatur, vt perdatur Lutherus. Atqui
hoc est carnificem agere, non theologum. Si se inagnos theologos
iiovolunt ostendere, conuertant ludaeos, conuertant ad Christum a
Christo alienos, emendent publicos Christianorum mores quibus ;
8r. quae palam essent 07 : om. /3^. 82. est adcJ. H. 83. Bernardi S. et
Augustini a Augustinique : fi. 84. 07 :vt ante pia a F Corrig.
orthodoxo /3^.
et /3.86. et a ac j3. : esse 89. oporteret a'/3 (oporteret o^ i\'^ oportet 7'iV^) :
. . . :
per lapsum.
oni. a', 93. Hisia^^^F: Hiisi^^^: Nisi a'-'. 94. negent aS :
negant /3 F. ay" : oporteri 7I. 95. vnde )3 vt a. 96. videretur:
omnem a vllani fi. : loi. ego nihil adhuc in vita a : adhuc in vita iiihil /3.
103. aut perdant et a : vt perdant, vt F. 104. ne aF: nec /3. 105. probet
aS : probat 7. 112. a^jS : Turquas a^. 114. atque etiam dubitatuni oon. fi,
115. se submittit /8. 116. apostolicae a : Romanae /3. vniuersitatum o :
scholarum quas vniuersitates appeUant F.
doubt, the excision in F cf. Ep. 1196. : burg, Louvain and Paris, in his inter-
27in. view witli Caietano at Augsburg, 13
83. Bernliardi] Cf. Ep. 1142. 45U. Oct. 1518: cf. LE." 112. 252-62, 464-5.
ri6. vniuorsitatum] Luthcr had In Aurifaber's printed text (,1556; of
offered this submission, to the Popo that htter, U. 435, 464, the word aca-
and to the Universities of Basle, Frt-i- di:mia is substituted cf. Ep. 1021. 1 150.
:
1033] TO ALBERT OF BRANDENBURG 103
huius a^. 121. Oneratus est OJM. jP. 125. illorum a eorum )3. 128. :
130. idiotae] Cf. Ep. 1153. 17111. 34^. But Erasmus is wrong in calling
135. ludaicas] Cf. Ep. 296. 83. liim a Dominican.
144. modoratius] The reading of the Syluester] See Ep. 872. 1611.
unauthorized editions is corroborated S. Sixti] Caietano see Epp. 256. :
173. Maro] G. 1. 514. 183. imago mentis] Cf. Ep. iioi. ^n.
1033] TO ALBERT OF BRANDENBURG 105
tueri sed niihi non tempero quin illud mysterium aperiam, istos 195
:
longe alio tendere quam ore prae se ferant. lampridem niale habet
eos efflorescere bonas literas, efflorescere linguas, reuiuiscere veteres
authores, quos antehac exedebant tineae puhiere opertos, mundum
ad fontes ipsos reuocari. Timent suis lacunis, nolunt videri quic-
quam nescire, nietuunt ne quid maiestati ipsorum decedat. Hoc 300
hulcus cum diu presserint, nuper tamen erupit, dolore vincente
dissimulationem. Antequam exirent libri Lutheri, iam magnis
studiis hoc ageb.int, maxime Praedicatores et Carmelitae quorum ;
Lutherum, quem isti putant nostris literis praeditum, cum eas .'20
199. lacunis] Cf. Ep. 1002. 15^. seems to be required, perhaps covferen-
207. offerentesj Neither reading is (es.
easy : some antithesis to diuidentes 222. Thoniaf] Cf. Ep. 1126. 262^.
106 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
causam, hoc statim habent iix ore, Haeresis est, haeresis est '. '
/32, 244. quo tendant owi. /3. 248. ay videamus fi F. : 249. praedica-
torum a^ paedicatorum a', per lapsum, sine duhio, fijpographi Dominicanorum H.
: :
1891, pp. 243-8) ; see also Geiger, Hist. Verein, iii (18881. 48-166.
Reuchlin, pp. 150,1, If this spirit was 254. Capnionis] Cf. Ep. 622. 32^.
already manifosting itself, it doubtless 255. Academiis] Cf. 1. ii6nand Ep.
supplied Erasmus with an additional 1030. i6n.
1033] TO ALBEET OF BRANDENBUEG 107
excitatvu'us. Haec tamen certis de caussis volebam esse nota E.D.T. : 260
non vt illi consulam aut praeeam, sed vt, si conentur aduersarii
bonarum literarum abuti praetextu dignitatis tuae, certius possit
hisce de rebus quod optimum sit statuere quae, mea sententia, quo :
Basle under Glareanus (Ep. 920 introd.) to his residence at Louvain as a pupil
of Nesen (cf. Ep. 1026. 10). It is noticeable that the Pliny was printed whilst
Erasmus was at Venice, and may therefore have been presented to him there.
Above the inscription Erasmus has written :
'
Maro (G. 2. 272).
Adeo in teneris consuescere multum est.
riapoi/iia (cf. Adofj. 2402).
"Ep^a Vioiv ^ovKal Se (lictcxiv evxai Se ffpoVTOiv '.
From the testimony of Melanchthon this Greek proverb seems to have been
a favourite with Erasmus see CR. x. 304
: and K. Hartfelder, Mekmchfhoniana
Paedagogica. 1892, p. 176.]
256. hi af^^F : hii /3-3, 257, sediciosi 0^y desitiosi 0-. 258. ero a
: :
ow. a H.
265. Methodum] The FMfio Verae Froben'.s edition of Feb. 1520; see Ep.
Theologiae, which was enlarged for 745 introd., and cf. BRE, 147, 153.
108 LETTEES OF EEASMUS [151
the theological society in Paris (cf. lipp. 994, 1002, 1024), or one of the Univer-
sity officials and the trouble about Nesen's lectures (Ep. 1046 introd.). In the
former case the date would be about the end of July, in the latter perhaps
October.]
comes Lee's letter to Erasmus (Ep. 1061) of i Feb. 1520. The letter to Louvain
is on four sheets signed aa-dd. The Annotationts begin on sheet a, and the letter
to Erasmus follows, beginning 011 f°. k*. This arrangement shows that the
Annotationes, which are the substantive part of the volume, with this pi-eface on
the verso of the title, were printed first, ending on k^, witli k* perhaps blank
that then the letter to Louvain was added on new signatures and that finally ;
Ep. 1061, or at least the later part of it, was appended. The priuting was
executed by Gilles Gourmont (cf. Ep. 1074. 87) for Conrad Resch of Basle (cf.
Epp. 1061. 505^, 1083. 1-3), the connexion with Basle being shown by an
ornamental border on the title-page to the Annotationes (f°. a) bearing the
initials of Vrs Graf and the Basler Stab, also the date 1519. The book perhaps
appeared 15 Fcb. 1520
c. for by 17 Feb. Erasmus had heard at Louvain that
;
it was out (Ep. 1066. 88-90), though on 21 Feb. he had not yet seen it (Ep. ro68.
14-17). By 27 Feb. More had seen copies at Greenwich (Eev. pp. 81,2 Jortin ;
ii. 659,60). But these were perhaps sent in advance, for the book seems not
to have reached Basle till c. 14 March (Epp. 1083. i, 1084. 66-7: cf. Zw. E.^ 124,
BRE. 159 and Basle MS. C. VI\ 73. 298, 397) and it was at Cologne about the
;
replies, the first of which, Apologia nihil habens neqiie nasi negiie dentis neque stomachi
neque vnguiutn, qun respondet duabits inuectiuis Eduardi Lei, Antwerp, M. Hillen,
(c. March) 1520, is not reprinted in his works (cf. i, p. 22. 18-21), but may be
found in Jortin ii. 496-528.
The pointsof the dispute need not be examined here in detail, but the chrono-
logy of the various incidents may be given briefly. When Erasmus firstmet Lee
(Ep.765 introd.) on coming to settle at Louvain in July 1517 (cf. Ep. 1074 and Lee's
Annot. f°. AA^), he was already aware that the young Englishman had attacked
him (Ep. 1074. 17-23 ; cf. Ep. 973. 7). During the following autumn and winter
Lee made some criticisms on the Nouum Instrtimentum, and spoke of producing
some notes. These Erasmus asked to see, but for some reason onlv a few
actually reached him at first (cf. Ep. 750 introd.). Then, just beforehe went to
Basle in May 1518, a larger collection was forthcoming (cf. Ep. 886. 58-78^,
which he answered in detail (Ep. 843). On his return to Louvain in the autumn
there was talk of more, and these he tried to secure, first by a personal inter-
view (Ep. 1581 later than 22 Oct., cf. Ep. 886. 73), and then even by under-
:
hand methods (cf. Ep. 998. i^n), but without success. After some weeks of
wrangling, recourse was suggested to the judgement of friends. Lee's notes
were sent first, without Erasmus having been allowed to see them, to the Vice-
Chancellor of the University, .Jo. Briardus Atensis (cf. Epp. 998, 1061. 666-7,
794, 1074 ; and Lee's Avnot. f
bb r°. and v".), who, however, after keepiiig
.
them for a month or two (cf. Ep. 1061. 780 ; Apol. qiia respondet, P. G^, Jortin
ii. 526), —
declined to act to the great relief of Erasmus. who had not much
confidence in his impartiality (Apol. qua respondet f". B, Jortin ii. 500 cf.
;
Epp. 1029. 3n, 1053. 296n). A sentence from a letter of Erasmus to Lee at this
pcriod, preserved in tho Iatter's Annot. f°. bb^, 'Quod agere destinaueramus, alias
aj^etur per ociuni ', is expressive of his satisfaction. Lee states (ibid.) that this
was about the period when Erasmus was sending off to Basle the final 'copy'
for the second edition of the New Testament (cf. Apol. qua respondet, f°. B^^, Jortin
ii. 500), therefore about the end of 1518 (cf. Ep. 864 introd.).
By this time Erasmus was seriously annoyed with his critic (cf. Epp. go6.
448-66, 912). The ostensible question debated between them subsequently was
about the production of Lee's notes, Erasmus averring that Lee had withheld
them in spite of his repeated requests (cf. Eev. pp. 86,7), Lee stating that Erasmus
and his friends had received with such contumely those that were shown to
them that he \vas justified in withdrawing from the field. But this issue is too
paltry to account for the extreme acerbity shown on both sides. A more
plausible explanation may be conjectured in a mutual antipathy between the
young aspirant for lionour in the world of theology and the mature and suc-
cessful scholar, high on a pinnacle of fame, almost dictator to the admiring
circle round him. More, writing to Lee in May 1519, describes hirn as olim '
non admodum aequum in Erasmum (Eae. f°. D' v°. Eev. p. 67 Jortin ii.
' ; ;
653), words which suggest that in entering the lists Lee may have been led by
a desiro to lower his antagonisfs pride (cf. Ep. 1074. 18). Such personal
feeling, doubtless easily recognizable, mightwell havo rendered criticisms, whiuh
were otherwise inoffensive, extremely unwelcome to the older scholar, and have
moved him to conduct the controversy without moderation, which in such
cases he always found difficult. Quite likely, too, thei-e was ground for the
suggestion (cf. Epp. 973. 7-10, 993. 28-33, 998.42-7) that Lee was encouraged by
some of the orthodox theologians at Louvain, which Erasmus repeated freely
110 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
(Epp. 1074. 80-82, 1097. 6, 1098. 18 cf. BRE. i7o)even after liis recoiiciliation
:
with them in Oct. 1519(01". Ep. 1016. i5n) ; having come to suspect (Ep. 1097.
26-7) that there was a wide difiference between Lee's original ms. notes and tbe
book actually published. Indeed, in 1525 he confidently declared (Ep. 1581)
that very little of this was Lee's own handiwork.
Lee next proposed, in March 1519 (Ep. 1061. 692-4), that Fisher should beasked
to judge between them, and for this purpose he sent his book to England. So
he wrote to More on 10 April (Eae. f°. B* Eev. p. 56 Jortin ii. 646) but
; ; ;
from Louvain, 28 March 1519, and printed by Thibault at Antwerp, s.a., with
a passage in which Lee, with good reason, considered himself lampooned (cf.
Ep. 1061. 2iin). On 20 April he wrote again to More stating that he was com-
pelled by Erasmus' violence to print his book and appeal to the public verdict.
Erasmus' friends in England did their utmost to constrain their countryman to
silence. In March Fisher (cf. Ep. 936. 90), More on i May (Ep. 1061. 603^),
Colet (cf. Apol. qua respondet, i°. G^ v°., Jortin ii. 525), and Pace (Ep. 1074), pro-
bably about the same time, all wrote to protest against his conduct, no doubt
in response to appeals froni Erasmus (cf. Eev. p. 80). Before these letters
arrived (Lee's Annot. f°. cc r". and \°.) Lee attempted to carry out his intention
of publishing. Betaking liimself to Antwerp in April or May, he tried first
Thibault (?) and then Hillen, but neitlier would undertake the book. This
failure he ascribed without hesitation to Erasmus' intem^ention, a suspicion
which may have had no ground but this, that they were in Antwerp together,
and indeed travelled back to Louvain on the same day, perhaps 6 June 1519
(Ep. 1061. 593n).
The letters from England mentioned above, which reached Lee about this
time, mitigated his vexation possibly, too, his patron Foxe may have responded
;
to Erasmus' urgent entreaty (Ep. 973), and so in July (Ep. 1061. 690-6) he was
inclined to say he would not publish (cf. Eev. p. 80). He commuuicated this
resolve to Pace at Antwerp (cf. Ep. looi. 53n), and even entered into a definite
agreement on the subject (Ep. 1074. 1^~3 ^f. Epp. 1090, 1097). But on returning
5
to Louvain from Antwerp at the end of July 1519 he was irritated by finding
the Dialogus Trilinguimn (Ep. io6r. 505^) in circulation and a further attack
;
was made upon him by public placards (Ep. 1061. 50511). His good resolution
quickly disappeared, and he proceeded to Antwerp agaiii in October or November
(Ep. 1061. 6o8n) to find a printer, this preface being perhaps ah-eady written.
A second negotiation with Hillen was unsuccessful, again, as he alleges, by the
action of Erasmus though it inay be noticed that in October Erasmus was still
:
eager to obtain a sight of Lee's notes, whether in print or otherwise (Epp. 1019,
1026, 1029, 1030). Later on, the appearance of Ep. 998 in the Farrago (cf. Ep.
1061. 2 and Ep. 1040 introd.) incensed Lee still more, and in turning over
;
that volume he may have lighted upon other unwelcome references to himself
(cf. Ep. 1061. 586n). So towards tiie end of 1519 he sent his book to Paris,
—
where it was published (c. 15 Feb. 1520) 243 notes on the first edition of
Erasmus' New Testament and twenty-five on the second. Within three days of
seeing it Erasmus replied in detail to Lee's letter to Louvain aud Ep. 1061, with
his Apologia qua respondet, written before the end of February (Ep. 1072. 4-5) and
printed, no doubt, in March 1520 (cf. Epp. 1077, 1086) and then with two Eespon.
;
siones he combated Lee's Annotationes in April and May (cf. Ep. 1092), all three
volumes being published by Hilleii, though Martens would gladly have had
them (Ep. 1077).
The quarrel cost Erasmus forty (Ep. 1098. 27-8) or fifty days (i, p. 22. 21,2
cf. Epp. 1117. 27, 1134. 25-6, 1139. 41), but suddenly came to an end. Early in
May 1520 he was still apprehensive of a further attack, and wrote to even more
powerful patrons to avert it (Epp. 1097-9). ^^^ before the end of the month
Froben produced at Basle, upon Erasmus' instigation (cf. BRE. 166), a volume
{0) wliicli was a visible sign of i^eace concluded between the two combatants.
—
AIl the bitterest parts of the controversy had been omitted Lee's letter to
Louvain and Ep. 1061, and Erasmus' rejoinder, the Apologia qua respondet (cf. i,
p. 22. 18-21). There remained the merely critieal portions, Lee's Annotationes
with this preface (Ep. 1037), ^^<i Erasmus' two Rcsponsiones with a preface (Ep.
1 roo) written ostensibly in a better state of feeling. It seems probable, how-
ever, that Erasmus only consented to this nevv edition in deference to sug-
gestions from his English friends (cf. Epp. 1090, 1097) for the series of letters
;
I037] FROM EDWARD LEE 111
cited in Ep. 1118. 6n, some of which were written when the book must have
been in the press, shows that Erasmus was still feeling sore. Of thepreparation
of Eev., published in Aug. 1520, Erasmus was perhaps not cognizant : see Ep.
1083 introd. The combatants met at Calais in July 1520, with a show of amity
(Ep. 1132. i8n). But after that Lee disappears for a time from Erasmus'
correspondence, until in 1525 the attacks made on the critical scholar by estab-
lished orthodoxy encouraged Lee, who was now in contact with Spanish theo-
logians, to renew the conflict. For Erasmus' opinion of Lee by that time, cf.
Ep. 1581. A
very full account of the whole controversy is given by A. Bludau,
Die beiden ersten Erasmus- Ausgahen des Neuen Testaments, 1902, pp. 86-125.
For the defence of Erasmus by liis friends see Epp. 998. 66n, 1083 introd. ;
and for original copies of Lee's book and Erasmus' Apologia qua respondet see Ep.
1095 introd.
A precise date is not possible for this preface. It may have been composed as
early as April 1519, when Lee made liis firstendeavours tohave the book pi-inted
at Antwerp, but it may equally well be assigned to the later date, when the
book actually appeared.]
through Louvain (shortly before 17 Oct. cf. Ep. 1030. 63-4), and that Erasmus
:
had visited him there, V>ut had omitted to go again and take leave before the
Bishop's departure that subsequently Erasmus heard from a friend among the
;
4. nomini 0.
4. annum iam totum] In the Apol. praefatione scribit (Leus) toto anno
qua respondet f°. G', Jortin ii. 526, Eras- librum a me flagitatum, quem toties
mus bases an argument upon this In :
• inculcat apud me fuisse.'
112 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [15 19
Eraslnus in Ep. 980. 36-7, which had ju.st reached their ears (Ep. 1033. 2411):
The Bishop declared on the word of a priest, Lutheri librum sibi non visum '
neque lectum, tantum aberat vt rei pericuiosae et ignotae faueret '. See
J. Latomus' preface, 31 Dec. 1520, to his Articulornm Lutheri damnatorxim Ratio,
Antwerp, M. Hiilen, 8 May 1521 (f. A of his Opera, Louvain, 1550), and
de Jongh pp. 212-13, 1°*-
The tone of easy assurance in this letter seems to imply that Erasmus had
made his peace with Erard at his own interview in Louvain indeed, the form ;
2. nebula] Cf. Ep. 1016. ^n. 23^), can hardly be intended, for he
3. Medicus] Perhaps the magnus '
seems to have been still in Switzer-
Adamus', who was Erard's physician hind.
in 1515 (Al. E. ii. 10, 11, 17, 32) and Hoechstratensis] Antony de La-
16.
accompanied him on his travels. Or laing —
1480 2 April 1540) had been
(c.
he possibly to be identified with
is chamberlain to the Archduke Philip,
Adam, son of J. Bogardus (Ep. 932. whom he accompanied to Spain 1501-
54n), who was M.D. at Louvain 25 3, writing a narrative of the journey,
May 1512, became a Franciscan23 Nov. which is printed by Gachard, i. 121-
1525 on his wife's death, and died 23 340. Margaret, as Regent, retained his
Mareh 1550. See Val. Andreas, pp. services, and he became chamberlain
230-1. to Charles. In 1516 he was elected a
6. cominus] At Frankfort ; cf. Ep. KnightoftheGolden Fleece(deReiffen-
loor. 47n. berg, p. 308), and in June 1518 the
poculum] Cf. Ep. 986. 34-9. barony of Hoogstraeten, n. of Turn-
15. One of these was no
Bergens.] hout, which he had received with his
doubt John of Bergen (Epp. 737, 952. wife, IsabeUa of Culerabourg, was
62 cf. Epp. 1025 &c., 1040), the other
; raised by Charles to a county. In Feb.
perhaps tlie Abbot of St. Bertin's (Ep. 1522 he succeeded Henry of Nassau
143), of whose good opinion Erasmus (Ep. 829. i2n) as Governor of Holland
shows himself careful in Ep. 739. and Zeeland. By this time he luid
John's nephew, Maximilian (Ep. 953. become Margarefs trusted adviser and
1038] TO EKAKD DE LA MAKCK 113
Luther's call for reform could not be stifled. Erasmus made no secret of what
he had written, but published it in his next volume of Epistolae (F). Some years
later it was translated into German and printed, Nuremberg, S. Tunckel, 1531 ;
tlie title showing that it was regarded as exhibiting die eynigen waren Mittel
'
. .
Bucer and a later addition, perhaps by the original hand, in which the letter is
described as durch Johann Froben von Andernach ausz dem Latein getreulich
'
verteutschet '.
As a result of the present correspondence with Slechta, a powerful noble,
Artlebus of Boskowitz, was moved to communicate with Erasmus in 1520 and
further invite his sympathy for the movement of progress with which Bohemia
had been so long associated see Epp. 1154, 1183. For a visit paid by repre-
:
sentatives of the Brethren to Erasmus at Antwerp, also in 1520, see pp. 291 -i..
To the theme of ecclesiastical unity Erasmus retvirned in 1533, with his Liber
cle sarciencla Ecclesiae concordia.'^
Ad
prolixam epistolam tuam, optime Slechta, paucis in hoc tantum
respondebo, vt intelligas eam mihi et redditam fuisse et perlectam ;
the most influential member of her 19. vnius] Cf. Ep. 1029. ^n.
CounciL See BN and cf. Lond. xix.
; 20. adamicitiamj Cf. Ep. 1016. 150.
115, LB. 747, 2 .July 1525. 22. pronuncient] sc. principes.
1038. 18, coorirentur] sc. theologi. 1039. 13. hic] sc, Deus.
114 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
50 tam demens qui huius doctrinae vel dux esse velit vel comes.
Quemadmodum et Nicolaitas reperias permultos, quibus vxores sint
cum multis communes sed huius dogmatis nulla est professio,
;
nec publica bene habent, nec priuata, neque fere quisquam ingeniosus 85
inuenitur, nisi ad ea quae sunt philosophiae vulgaris quae, vt ferunt, ;
fenestra aperta, vt cuique hic aut ille esset inuisus, ita impius
haberetur. Quanto probabiHor est Augustini sententia, ministri
moriVais non vitiari donum Dei, quod nobis per sacramenta confertur ;
hoc est plus deferunt Deo quam hominibus. recte sentiunt sed quod ;
160 horum autoritatem vbique reiiciunt, tam iniquum est quam si vbique
reciperent. lam tametsi non abhorret a vero Christum et Apostolos
145. et 0111. N. 159. {ilus F Corrig. : minus /'.
nissimum, coguntur esse ociosi totos dies, qui non aliis reditibus
alunt vxores ac liberos, fortassis etiam parentes, quam opera diurna.
His indicere ferias nec dare quicquani, quid est aliud quam eos ad 1S5
famem adigere ? Sint crebra festa, sed in templis ad quae diuitibus ;
in sacris literis, aut sine quibiis non constat ratio salutis nostrae.
Ad haec pauca sufficiimt, et pauca citius persuadentur pluribus.
225 Nunc ex vnico articulo sexcentos faciraus, quorum aliqui tales sunt
vt citra periculum pietatis vel nesciri possint vel ambigi. Atque sic
est raortalium ingenium, quod serael definitum est, tenemus mordi-
cus. Porro philosophiae Christianae summa in hoc sita est. vt
intelligamus omnem spem nostram in Deo positam esse, qui gratis
230 nobis largitur omnia per Filium suum lesum. Huius morte nos
esse rederaptos, in huius corpus nos insitos esse per baptismum, vt
raortui cupiditatibus huius mundi ad illius doctrinam et exemplum
sic viuaraus, vt non solura nihil adraittamus mali verumetiara de
oranibus bene mereamur et, si quid inciderit aduersi, fortiter tolere-
;
235 mus, spe futuri praeraii quod oranes pios haud dubie manet in aduen-
tu Christi vt ita semper progrediamur a virtute in virtutera, vt nihil
:
quo viro vix aliud quicquam vidi melius. Bene vale, vir egregie.
Louanii Cal. Nouemb. Anno m. d. xix.
yet finished (Agr. E., p. 757), and on 10 Nov. the book had only just appeared at
Basle (BRE. 129, 133, 136 see also Ep. 998 introd.).
; A
copy reached Zasius at
Freiburg c. 13 Nov. (ZE. 12, 13) in Jan. Erasmus was distributing others in
:
Brabant (Epp. 1056,7). But he had perhaps now seen clean sheets of the first part
of E (which would include Ep. 980), such as had been sent to Beatus at Schlett-
stadt on 30 Sept. (BRE. 128;. The book sold with astonishing rapidity for by ;
17 Feb. Erasmus had heard from Basle that the copies were subito distracta ", '
and that a new edition was called for (Ep. 1066. 83-6).]
faueam Lutero cum ipse in hoc ediderim, vt testetur nihil mihi esse
;
rei cum Lutero. Et si faueam, quid esset prodigii ? Egit ille apud 5
aulicos, praecipue D. Bergensem sed erant qui rem melius intel-
;
1039. 265. resiliunt] sc. homines. lite, Adrian Arnoldi (fNov. 1536), a
1040. I. ille] Perhaps Lee. Belgian who made his profession at
Bruxellae] See p. iii. Bruges in 1483, was B.D. 1507, D.D. at
2.ad Luterum] Ep. 980; which Paris 1515, and on 18 Sept. 1517 was
Hochstrat had no doubt found in appointed provisory Bp. ot Risano, ou
either the Leipzig or tlie Augsburg the Guif of Cattaro in Dalmatia. See
edition (see Ep. 948 introd.^. Bibliotheca Carmelitana, 1752, i. 1-2;
5. ille] Hochstrat. Gams, p. 415; Le Glay, Cameracuni
6. D. Bergensem] SeeEp. 1038. i^n. Christianum, p. 85; and Dom U. Ber-
7. Briselotum] See Ep. 597. ^n. liere. Les evtqiies auxiliaires de Cambrai et
8. Suffraganeum] Briselot's succes- de Tournai, 1905.
.sor in this office was also a Carme- Egmondano] See Ep. 878. i^n.
120 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [151
printing, and should thus be dated rather later than Ep. 1040. But the
numerous points of resemblance in 11. 33-45 to Ep. 1033. 24-5, 57-68, 192-3,
show that in date this cannot be far distant from 19 Oct. In the Apologia qua
respondet {{", F* v" Jortin. ii. 520) Erasmns states that he was not present when
;
the book was printed perhaps being away at Brussels or Antwerj) ;cf. p. 11 1).
;
In writing this letter his purpose evidently was to keep himself from beijig
involved in the still undetermined controversy about Reuehlin and the troubles
which Luther was raising cf. Ep. 1033 introd. To what extent he writes
:
iugenuously is not clear. With regard to Ep. 713 it may be pointed out that
the form given by both authorities is Christianisfes, not Christiajiista, and that
there are several small changes in from the text of a but it may be ciuestioned :
therefore probably does not invalidate the unauthorized text. But the sugges-
tion in nescio qui euulgarunt (1. 23% as compared with Ep. 1040. 4, tliat he was
*
'
not cognizant of the publication of E, may be taken only as part of his habitual
affectation of modesty in the matter ; cf. App. 7. In any case it is to be
noticed that he does not deny the general authenticity of either letter.]
1040. II. Noua Colloquia] See Epp. citum pagina inuenies niox sequenti.'
909, 104 1. On i°. a.^ at the head of the list of
1041. 3. Epistolls] The lUustr. virorum Reuchlin's defenders is Erasmus qui '
Episi. of May 1519 ; see Ep. 300 introd. Capnionem suis diuinis operibus vndi-
6. ad Reuchlinum] Ep. 713. 2,3. que purgat ac defendit '.
II. tituli] The titie-i)age of lU. vir. For the word Beuchlinisia cf. HE. 46,
Epist. ends : ' Reuclillnistarum exer- 50. 4, 51. tit., 53. i.
io4i] TO THE KEADER 121
suri'. Ego nec Reuchlinista sum nec vllius humanae factionis. Ista
dissidii nomina detestor. Christianus sum et Christianos agnosco
Erasmistas non feram, Reuchlinistas non noui. Cum Reuchlino 15
praeter ciuilem amicitiam nihil intercedit. Porro patrocinium illius
nec ego suscepi vnquam nec ille desyderat. De causa eius viderit
summus ille in terris iudex, qui extremae sententiae negotium in se
recepit.
Quin et in illis prudentiam desydero, qui litteras ad quemlibet 20
familiariter scriptas in vulgus edunt, praesertim mutatis quae viden-
tur. In ej)istola qua respondi Lutherio, addita est mentio Episcopi
Leodiensis at ea non est in eadem epistola, quam nescio qui euulga-
;
faueo, non malis ; imo Christo faueo, non illi. Et sic respondeo vt
illum de multis admoneam. Admonui ciuiliter, quod ita plus profici ?,o
sciam. Sic, opinor, illi fauent permulti, quemadmodum Cyprianus
fauit Tertulliano, multi Lactantio, plui*es Origeni. Quod tamen citra
fraudem Lutherii dictum velim. Ego illius nec accusator sum nec
patronus nec iudex. Viderint ii quibus hanc prouintiam nominatim
delegauit Rhomanus Pontifex. Quanquam quae tandem inuidia sit 35
extra causam fauere primum viro bono (quod fatentur et hostes),
deinde pectori quod, etiamsi iustis de causis exasperatum plus iusto
incanduit, tamen alio vocatum j^ossit esse egregium organum Christi,
qui non extinxit linum fumigans, sed excitauit longe dissimilis
;
14. dissidii nomina] Scheurl ijrob- dialissimis amicis cum magna gloria
ably liad this passage in his mind when ostendit, qujim etiam multi lacobitae
he wrote to Melanchthon, I April 1520 (the Dominicans) excopiauerunt '
(SE. 214) :'Erasmus se integrum ser- reveal both why and liow the letter
uat, odit ista sectionum nomina sicut passed into circuhxtion. Sec also L a^n.
vere odienda, quod omnes Christi 25, BruxellaeJ See jx m.
sumus.' 27. malim] Erasmus proceeded to
16. nihil intercedit] Cf. Ep. 967. act on this principle himself cutting
;
104.2. To .
1041. 46. literis] Not extant but : 1042. concordiam]Cf.Ep. 1016. 15^.
i.
traces of other correspondence between 1041. 22-4, 44-5. The other is perhaps
them in 1520 see Epp. 11 13 introd., 1 141. Ep. 948, which was printed and circu-
i5n, 1166. 9on. but no letters survive lati-d with it.
thoiigh perhaps not -written, before Ep. 1062. The firs.t edition was by Hillen at
Antwerp (Ep. 1061. 618), and had perhaps reached Zurich by 4 Jan. 1520 (Zw. E.^
113) but no copy is as vet known. It was reprinted by Froben in March 1520
;
(a), for the progress of which see BRE. 153 and there are later Froben editions
;
of March 1521 ($), reprinted in July ; of Feb.-March 1522. folio (7) ; of 1522,
octavo (5), followed by the folio of 1523-4; of 1523 octavo (e) ; of 1532, folio (C;,
followed by the octavo of 1534 ; and of 1540 and 154 1, foho (??).
The date can be determined with some precision from Lee's statement
(Ep. 1061. 617-22) that this was the book given by Erasmus to Hillen, in order to
hinder him from undertaking Lee's Annotationes, at the second attempt made by
Lee about the beginning of Nov. 1519 (Ep. 1061. 6o8n). If, as Lee suggests, it
was thrust hastily upon Hillen, the preface may have been composed while the
printing was proceeding, and this view i^ corroborated by the resemblance
between the opening sentence and Ep. 1053. 523 but iu any case it can hardly be
;
later than Nov. 1519. In the Apol. qua respondet ^tf. E* V.F Jortin ii. 518) Erasmus ;
states that he expected the printing to take 12 days, and that he gave it to
Hillen because Martens was short of workmen also that he was at work on;
the Paraphrase 40 days before Christmas, and long before he had formed any
idea of writing Ep. 1053 (ibid. ff. B', B* v" pp. 502,3). ;
For recent intercourse betweeu Erasmus and the Bishop of Utrecht see
Ep. looi. 7-811.]
uentus aliquis redeat. Mihi porro visum est aequum vt hinc nonnulla
portio decideretur episcopo, velut huius agricolationis principi. 5
Etenim cum rem Euangelicam pro nostra virili adiuuamus, aliqua ex
parte in vices tuae solicitudinis succedimus. Id autem eo feci liben-
tius, quod argumentum etiam ipsum ad hoc inuitaret. Explicauimus
enim paraphrasi Epistolas diui Pauli ad Timotheum duas, ad Titum
vnam quibus adiecimus, ceu coronidis vice, quam scripsit ad Phile-
:
10
monem, ne sola reh'nqueretur, cum sit vltima, licet argumento dis-
simili quanquam in Paulo nihil est quod non pertineat ad episco-
;
mouthpiece (Epp. 304, 337. 3730, 347', he had hacl a reconciliation with Erasmus
(Ep. 438) and then again a rupture (Ep. 474. i^n). But tlie breach had been
healed again (cf. Epp. 627. 16, 852, 946, and BRE. 121) and now, reacting ;
towai'ds humanistic studios, and yielding perhaps to external pressui"e (cf. Ei^p.
994. 13-15, 1002. 33-9), he had recenth' printed his Oration (1. i6n'i, in evidence
of his changed point of view, and for a time was even inclined to take an
interest in Luther (cf. Zw.^ E. 124, LE.^agi). From this he retired later but ;
his sympathy with humanism remained unimpairod. and parted him from his
former allies.
contra Lxdlierum.
—
See de Jongh, pp. 162-5, 45* 4^* and cf. Acta Acad. Louanien.
;
The purpose of his present visit to the Hague is not known. He liad just
resigned tiie Presidency of the Coliege du Saint Esprit at Louvain, pcrhaps not
altogether willingly (seo I. i6n;, and liad been succeeded by Ruard Tapper, 21 Nov.
(de .Jongh. pp. 181.44*). It seemsfrom I. 81 thatlie wason businessand was not
quite his own master. It is evident, however, from de Jongh, p. 46*, that his
severance from Louvain was only temporary cf. Epp. 1 103. 25-6, 1165. 26-7,
;
40. nescio quibus etc. a' : nes. a*. 41. sum o : fui )3. 42. mi a : o mi )3.
and he wrote also to Hutten (cf. HE. this Dorp evidently was unaware.
164) and Oecolampadius (Ep. 1064). 53. Edmondensis] Meynard Mann;
His friends complied on all sides see Ep. 304. i6in.
More (Jortin ii. 668,9), Beatus (BRE. 58. Rhenanus] Cf. Ep. 732. in.
156), Hutten (HE. 164), Zasius (ZE. 61. Pater meus] Nothing else seems
21,22), Botzheim (ibid. cf. Ep. 1103),
; to be known of Dorp's fatJier.
Bo. Amerbach (Am. E. 3, 19 March ;
64. Atrebatensi] The foundation of
cf. Ep. 1084 and Basle MS. C. VI*. 73. Nic. Ruistre see Ep. 177 introd.
;
392, 31 Jan. 1520, with a very different Mauritius] See Ep. 176.
128 LETTERS OF EKASMUS [15 19
the printing of the Antimorns can be stretched. As More did not reply till well on
into the spring (cf. Epp. 1087, 1090^ it may be conjectured that Brixius' book
was not published until some time after the turn of the year (cf. LE.* 284, from
Paris, 14 March, announcing its appearance, and Zw. E.^ 124 and BRE. 159, 17
and 19 March, reporting its arrival in Basle also Basle MS. C. VP. 73. 298. 397)
;
but this letter, which is concerned with Erasmus' defence of More, was probably
wi-itten immediatelj' on perusal of Ep. 620.]
Ilocn ; cf. Ep. 1166. necessary ; see Ep. 504. 26n. A Jac.
75. veterum turbarum] Cf. Epp. 696, Coelman, M.D., is mentioned as Dean
838. 7-10. of Andorlecht in 1510 see Gestel,
;
77. Berselio] See Ep. 674. Hist. archiepiscopatiis Mechlinien. 1725, ii.
85 non stet, si illi ita videatur, quominus tragoedia haec tota, te authore
ac veluti choragum agente, in comediam desinat, ac dextris inuicem
iunctis Erasmo patrepatrato foedus feriamus animisque vtrinque
coeamus. Qui si tragoediae ipsius exitum spectare mauult, nihil
item moror quominus ea ad postreraum vsque actum deducatur vt ;
66. Apologia] See Ei5. 597. 3211. a printed note in tlie margin of f". B
77. Vdepotiae] It appears that defines Vtopia as remp. quae nusquam
*
— —
amico item falli me non puto optimo. Mortalium nemo sane
vsquam viuit cuius gloria fauorabilior ac fama plausibilior apud hos 105
omnes elegantium literarum mystas circumuolitet quam tua vnius.
Atque equidem maximam tibi ipsi, maximam item omnibus nobis
Erasmi conspectum, complexum, colloquium tam auide coneupiscen-
tibus iniuriam facturum te arbitramur, nisi tu omnino ad nos adeas,
si non contubernii ac conuictus perpetui, at saltem peregrinationis iio
atque hospitii (quanquam contubernii malim) nomine. Hosj^ites
autem tametsi omnes tibi adesse cupiunt, teque vnusquisque, quod
video, in aedes suas proprias, vbi adueneris, excipere certat, tamen id
vnum abs te vehementer etiam atque etiam peto ac precibus omnibus
contendo, ad me vt diuertas, apud me tibi hospitium vt deligas, 115
futurum sane hospitem tam gratum tamque liberalem vt fortunas
omneis meas communes habiturus sis. Quae etiam si non longe
amplissimae sunt, tamen ambobus nobis, quod satis erit, victum,
vestitum, famulitium, equitatum et crumenulam insuper nunquam
non aere grauem suffecturae sunt vt hic omittam hortulum, quem
: 120
domi meae habeo, tam mhercule amoenum, tam voluptuosum, tam
oculis gratum et arridentem (id quod Lutetiae habere quammaximo
aestimari non nescis) vt eum incolere vel Musas, opinor, ipsas non
tederet.
Porro facit vetus nostra amicitia Venetiis primum inita, mox 125
Patauii confirmata, vt te etiam tam familiariter, ne dicam temerarie,
ad hospitii foedera mecum sub tuguriolo hoc ferienda inuitem potis- :
simum vbi olfaciam a non paucis hic tibi Moecenatis hortos et Lucul-
lianas plane aedes apparari, in quibus illa ipsa quae dixi foedera
splendidius multo ac magnificentius inire possis. Sed video Appol- 330
lini placere magis Musarum conuictum vel simplicem quam louis
lautissimas dapes ad quas ille, si quid Homero credimus, accedere
:
98. promissis] Cf. Ep. 994. iin. 128. LucuUianas] Cf. Epp. 435. 137,
123. aestimari] For a 'hanging 480. 156.
garden at Paris see Beatus Rhenanus'
'
132. Homero] Cf. II. i. 602-4.
Res Ge.rmanicae, Basle, Froben, March 136. t}'pogi-apho] Froben, who had
153I) P- 183. printed the Farrago (E).
125. Venetiis] Cf. Ep. 212. in. 138. epistola] Ep. 569.
E 2
132 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [15 19
[The researches of the late Prof. de .Tongh ehicidate this letter in a mos
interesting manner. The diffictilties of the professors of Busleiden's eollege and
of external teachers in genei"al were not ended by the settlement of 20 Sept. 15 19
(Ep. 991. 39n\ In accordance with the requii"ement of the University Rescius
(Ep. 546) had supplicated for incorporation, and tlierewith for licence to teacli ;
but finding himself without colleagues, the Latin and Hebrew chairs being
temi^orarily vacant (11. 28, 29nn), he applied on 29 Nov. to have the considera-
tion of his case deferred. The Arts Faculty, too, foUowing the example of the
Theologians, were raising difficulties about unmatriculated students as well as
about unincorporated teachers and Nesen (Ep. 329), Avho had recently arrived
;
in Louvain with his pupils (Ei^p. 994. ^n, 1026. 9-10, 1034), was forbidden to
proceed with a course of lectiires on Mela (1. 23^) which he had announced to
be given publicly at the Austin Friars.
According to modern standards such control by the University seems reason-
able ; but in an age of fluid and irregular conditions the requirements appeared
arbitrary and tyrannical, especially as thej^ conld be represented as aimed
against the new studies of humanism. In consequence among some of the
students, feeling against the University and the Faculties ran high. On the
night of 29 Nov. between 9 and 10, four men armed rang at the house of the
Rector, John Calaber, and one of them, coveriug his face with his gauntlet,
thrust into the hand of the astonished servant a letter threatening violence to
the Rector and the Vice-Chancellor, Briard, unless the inhibition on Nesen
were immediately removed. Their letter delivered, the men ran off. But one
of them had been recognized and next day the Rector had Rescius arrested.
;
This action was appi-oved by the University on i Dec, and at the same time
Rescius' application for incorporation whichhe wishedto withdraw, wasbrought
forward and granted in his absence.
Evidently Erasmus had been moved to invoke the aid of the Dean of Mechlin,
who, as intimately concerned with Busleiden's college (Epp. 805, looi. 15-18)
might be expected to protect one of its profcssors. There is some reason to suppose
that the arrest of Rescius was wrongful, and that he may really not have had any
hand in the nocturnal visit to the Rector for when Calaber's half-year of office
;
was over, Rescius brought an action against him. The Uuiversity decided to
support their officer but as thej' could hardly do otherwise, their decision does
;
not throw much light ou the rights of the case. The issue of the suit is not
known.
See de Jongh pp. 200-3, i4*-i6*, 25*-6* and, for the subsequent develop-
;
ments of the contest within the University, Epp. 1057 introd., 1240.]
1046] TO JOHN KOBYNS 133
MECHLINIEXSI, S. P.
religio. Nulla res egregia nisi difficillibus initiis nata est. Argu-
mentum omne cognosces ex Bartholomeo, qui fuit non modo spe-
ctatorverumetiam affinis periculo. Vt sunt res humanae non vsque- 10
quaque purae, etiam si quid commissum esset, tamen humanitatis
vestrae fuerat aliquousque fauere Professori. Nunc et tali et inno-
centissimo multo minus debetis deesse. Doctior an inueniri possit
nescio, certe diligentiorem ac moribus puriorem vix inuenias.
Vtimur eadem mensa, et inter pocula quiduis garrimus. Ille tot 15
modis fuit lacessitus— hunc enim studio expetunt, ne quid offendant
magis masculos —
nec vnquam tamen audiui ilhmi quicquam
•
;
impotentius loquentem.
pectus vere Christianum Modo cum Paulo contuli Rutgerum !
;
qui hac certe j^arte vincit, quod qui Paulum affligebant, errabant, 20
nimirum alieni a professione Euangelica ; hi proceres Christianae
doctrinae, prudentes, de composito haec designant. Inhibuerunt
et Nesenum, aggressum Geograpliiam Pomponii Melae qui si domi ;
tiring character Ep. 1237. cf. Lloriously' after a month. See VaL
23. Nesenum] Cf. Epp. 1104. 25-8, Andreas, pp. 283-4, Neve, and DNB.
II II. 61-2. Campensis was the first to liold tlie
Melae] Vives subsequently h:c- ehair for any length of time.
134 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1519
[For the ms. see Ep. 850 introd. : the copyist of this letter also is Hand B.
As shown ah-eady, the Munich MS, has excellent authority but like Ep. 850, it ;
was probabJj' copied from a rough draft among Turzo's papers at Breslau, whereas
F obviously was printed from the letter actually received, Accordingly the ms.
cannot be given invariable preference.]
MS.
TIT. lOANNES TVFZO EPISCOPVS VRATISLAVIENSIS ERASMO ROTEROD. S. D. F.
:
men n iV/S. quam MS, iV^: quoniam F. 21. vsus ifS. huius iY, 24. :
nuUo MS, : multo J'. f' : barbarici 1/S. 25. quoque illius /'.
2. septimo] This reply was six states that tlio box of presents reached
monthsonthe journey ;cf. Ep. 1137. 3. Erasmus at Autwerp (p. 291).
Lond. XXV, 26, LB. iio3,3oMarch 1530, 16. pellKuhmi] Cf. Adag. 592.
I047] FEOM JOHN TURZO 135
[In a Lypsius prefixes this argument Has misit literas per ministrum suum
:
'
1049 must be phiced between Epp. 1046 and 1051, of i and 7 Dec.]
sed possim certum scire qui sit, liet vt sit aliis exemplo, quisquis
si 5
est ille Satanae organum. Tu fac te sacris litteris oblectes absque
contentione quae tuam tranquillitatem turbat et meis negociis non
;
[Probably shortly before E^). 1051 : after Goclenius' election on i Dec. and
before Erasmus had left Louvain _cf. 11. 6. 9-10" for Antwerp. The year-date
added in H has no value.]
meiiti illius. Est vir egregie doctus, nec minus integer quam doctus,
nullius gloriae inuidens. Postremo conuenit hoc tempore crvyKpr]TL(uv
qui colunt bonas literas, barbarorum phalangibus sic sese vndique 5
condensantibus. Non me fugit esse quosdam in hac schola qui
morbo naturae pessime loquantur, et de his a quibus nunquam
fuere laesi, imo quorum beneficentiam experti sunt. Qui si sanari
non possunt, tu tamen, mi Barlande, tui similis esse pergito, nec
horum consuetudine te coritamina. Bene vale: cum voles, confa- ic
at Louvain.
In Ep. 622. 3in Val. Andreas' statement that Ceratinus had competed with
1049. 12. Anno M.D.xix ac(d. If. 13. Erasmus tuus ow. F. lO-oO. 11.
Anno u.D.xviii add. H.
1049. 10. aetate fili] Cf. Ep. 807. 8; among thcmselves: cf. Adag. 11, quot-
quoting Hier. Ep. 105. 5. iiig Plut. Phil. 19. 490B. Erasmus uses
Goclenium] See Ep. 1209.
1050. 2. the exprossion frequently see Epp. :
To combini> against
4. avyKp7)Ti^ttv \ 620. 38, 930. 9, 947. 20, 1066. 76, an<l
a common a practice for which ihe
foe, Zw. E.^ 107, where it is porhaijs ro-
Cretans were famed, when combatants peated from him.
138 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [151
Croclenius foi- the Chair, led me to suggest that it was he who vvas the object
of Erasmus' indignation here. He certainly was a candidate against Goelenius.
But he cannot be intended hei-e for P. Nannius exj^ressly states {Fimehris
;
oratio pro Goclenio, Louvain, S. Zassenus, 1542, f°. B^) thatinthe election Erasmus'
whole support was given to Ceratinus, and further dilates on Erasmus' candour
in accepting Goclenius when duly appointed. Eppendorft-s identification with
Barland (App. 14) may thereiore be talien as correct for though Eppendorff ;
was not in Louvain at this time, it can easily be imagined that while living
with Erasmus at Basle in the summer of 1522, he may have asked questions
about the enigmatic descriptions and allusions which lic found in his newly
acquired copy of the Epistolae ad diiiersos (F).
The identification seems to sliow that Barland's appointment to the Latin
Chair in 1518 (cf. Ep. 492 introd.) was only provisional and that now, after ;
little more than a year, he liad been obliged to give way to Goclenius. Under
tliese circumstances it may be conjectured that Ep. 1050 was written whilst
Erasmus was still at Louvain, when he had heard the first report of Barland's
attacks on Goclenius Ep. 105 1 hiter, when fuU details of what had been said
;
had reached him. Epp. 1163 and 1237 sliow that his indignation with Barland
was not lasting.]
volunt, non cogi. Nimirum isti sunt mores ob quos Abbas tam
parce tecum agit. Non, vt opinor, antehac sum male de te meritus,
si nihil bene meritus. Etiam nunc te admoneo vt in posterum
15 rectius sapias, et sapias tibi. Nam minimum est in quo me possis
laedere. Bene vale.
Antuuerpiae. Px'idie conceptae virginis matris. [Anno m.d.xviii.]
17. H : Pridiae F. Anno m.d.xviii add. H.
[It is clearfrom Ep. 1061. 637-40 and from two passages in the Apol. qua rcspondet
(ff. C v°, D v" Jortin ii. 505, 510), that this letter was iirst printed by Martens
;
:it Louvain. shortly after it was written, and when Lee had already sent his
boolc to Paris and Ep. 1061. 626-7 shows that Martens' issue was eompleted on
;
14 Dec. 1519. the day after this lettei-. A further iudication of the date of thls
separate publication is that to the points made here Lee rejDlies in his letter of
I Feb. (Ep. 1061) having evidently seen them in print, not in manuscript. In
;
reprinting Eae. p. 2to) in Eev., Aug. 1520, Froben preidxed this letter taking
( ;
the marks of rapid composition. No coi^y of the first issue is known to the
Ghent bibliographers in its absence Froben's must serve' as the archetype.
:
In the Apologia qua respondet (f°. B* v° Jortin ii. 504) Erasmus rather loftily
;
declare.s that a letter like this could be written in half a day. It amounts
almost to an Apologia, and a» such is placed next to Epp. 1006, 998 in F (cf.
p. g . The selection of Lupset for recipient of it was perhaps suggested by
the fact that he was Lee's countryman, and by the warmth with which, on a
visit from Paris to Louvain during 15 19. he had espoused Erasmus' cause
against Lee (Eev. 76-8).]
1052. r. Chry.sostomum] Probably the 1053. i.amici] Probably More cf. 11. ;
13. vel anfe persuaserit «rf(Z. i''. 25. F: l«X«Ae«7roTos a. 32. praedicatores
a: dominieani i7. 33. Baccalaurei iontZ. 34. his a : istis if.
7. Tov TToXtnov Kfva] Cf. Adag. 1919: 255-6; and Z\v. E." 107. The leaders
<De inani suspicione aut pauore sine of the Fuculty of Theology at Louvain
causa oborto ; with quotations froni
' had no doubt giveu an iuformal com-
Polyb., Cic, Plut., Curt. mission, that Erasmus' works should
18. obcsao] Cf. Hor. Epud. 12. 3. be examined in the same way as
25. T\vK(T'] Cf. Adag. 3392, quoting Luther's (cf. Ep. 1030. i6n) but no ;
quam his qui non loquuntur ex animo nisi forte non fuit ille
:
57. ixvrjnovtKov voluit LB : sed cf. Ep. 1061.691. 58. his a : iis F. 72. pro-
ferre ante qui a : producere H.
100 exemplari suo. Quod cum nec ipsum placeret, coepi pi'ouocare vt
opus suo meoque periculo publicaret nihil enim aliud superesse, :
quando iam liber ipsi propemodum esset aeditus, mihi non item,
cum in exemplaria non pauca propagatus legeretur a coniaratis
duntaxat, et me rumor per illum illiusque fautores iactatus magis
105 etiam grauaret quam si fuisset aeditus iiber vt semper auget fama :
125 sic excusum iri librum, vt inter mihi male volentium manus voHtans
post annum demum a me deprehenderetur. Et multis coniecturis
adducor vt id verum esse credam eas alias fortasse adducam. lam
:
103. exemplaria] Cf. Ep. 1026. i^n. Apologla says that Lee applied to Hil-
115. Theodorieo] Mai"tens, len first but Lee's narratives in his
;
117. typographis] The Apol. qua re- letter to Louvain and in Ep. io6r are
spondet (P. B^ .Tortin ii. 502} identifies
: obviously tlie better authority.
thesc with Hillen (1. 133^) and a 122. missuniColoniam]Tliisisdenied
French printer, ? Thibault or Tlieobald, in Ep. 1061. 680-1. In Ep. 1074. 85 and
who had printed recently for Erasmus the Apol. qua resp., f. C (Jortin ii. 504)
(Ep. 934. 311) and Barland (Ep. 681. Erasmus alleges Bonn where, how- :
tioni. Appellent qui volent Galfredum, Lei fratrem, per quem 130
velut 'Epfj.TJi' aliquoties mecum collocutus est, quoties per
quempiam
hunc prouocaui vt aederet. Postremo iam dicebatur transegisse
cum Michaele typographo Antuerpiensi nihil esse in mora nisi ;
quin hanc admonitionem esset boni consulturus. Quod si hoc offi- 155
cium meum secus interpretatur, malo tantisper hoc officii perisse
mihi, quam illum scire quantum mihi hac sane in parte debeat.
Proferat epistolam quam illi proxime scripsi ea docebit quod ;
130. Galfrednm] Lee, whose parents More's actual successor, Thos. Audley.
were connecttd by ties of close friend- 133. Michaele] (c. 1480 22 July —
ship with More's (cf. Ep. 1139. 56), 1558), son of JoJin Hillen of Hoog-
had more tlian one brother (cf. Ep. straeten. He became a burgess of
1126. 6: Eev. pp. 59. 64; Jortin ii. Antwerp in 1508-9, and about the same
648, 651). Wilfrid had been much in time began printing, with a Flemish
Louvain 'cf. Ep. 1074. 88 and Apol. : service-book. In 1519 he was one of
qua rcspondet, f°. D, Eev. pp. 56, 69, 78, the leading printers in Antwei-p so :
79 ; Jortin ii. 509, 646, 654J and in ; ihat Erasmus entrusted to him one of
1533 Erasmus writes of him with regard his Paraphrases (Ep. 1043), the Apologia
as 'mihi olim amicus, adeo vt in con- de In principio erat sermo', andthethree
^
flictu quem habui cum Leo, palam a me rcplies to Lee (p. iio\ c. March-
steterit : nec vllam habt-t nobilitatem, May 1520. He produced three reprints
nisi quod est in iure consultus, vnde of tUe Colloqnioruni Fonnulae ini^ig {aee
apud Anglos omnis fere nata est nubili- BEr.'^) and printed also for Latomus,
;
tas <cf. Ep. 999. 149-50). Natus est Dorp, Vives, and Barland in 1519-20.
in vico '. See a letter printed by T. In 1546 he handed over his business
Wierzbowski, Materyabj do Bzicjow Pism. to his son-in-law, John Steelsius. See
Polskiego, 1900, p. 43, and by C.
i, BN ; and for a bibliography of his
Miaskowski in Commer's Ja/<>-6./. P/a7o- publications, Bidl. du bibliophile belge,
sovhie, XV, 1901, p. 326. Erasmus' state- 2nd series, x-xi, 1863-4.
ment therc that W. Lee had succecded 148. commonefaciendum] Cf. Ep.
More as Chancellor is perhaps based 998. 68.
on a misapprehension of the name of 158. epistolam] Ep. 998.
144 LETTEKS OF ERASMUS [15 19
180 quod ipse saepius eflflagitanti atque vrgenti, cur tantopere caueret ne
liber quem in me scripsisset, mihi omnium vni nollet communicare,
cum eius copiam faceret tam multis, tandem respondit inesse quae-
dam quae mihi bilem essent motura quasi vero non indignius esset,
;
1S5 quod vna atque altera annotatio, quam mihi forte contigit intei-ci-
pere, satis declararet quale futurum esset reliquum opus admonui — ,
185. intercipere] Cf. Ep. 998. 17U. of Diana at Ephesus iu order to make
205. Erostrato] who burnt the teniple his nanie famous.
I053] TO THOMAS LUPSET 145
Haec faeiunt vt, etiam si quid iuuenilius scriptum esset a Leo, non
admodum aegre laturus sim, modo ne nimium diu torqueat nos ista
parturiens, pollicitans, iactitans, minitans, obtrectitans, et rem ad
seditionem vocans. Quod si meo consilio parens meminerit vbique
modestiae Christianae, magisque spectarit quid ipso dignum sit quam 235
quid cupiant quidam qui alienis ingeniis abutuntur ad laedendum
subolescentia meliora studia, non solum apud studiosos verum apud
me quoque gratiam non mediocrem inibit. Cur enim mihi turpe
ducam si in tot milibus locorum. quae vel restitui vel explicui, cernat
aliquid quod meos oculos alio properantes suffugisset, aut deprehen- 240
dat in quo a me dissentiendum putet ? Non hac lege seripsimus
Annotationes, vt caeteris ius esset tidemptum vel addendi, si quid
praeterea queat aliquis animaduertere, vel corrigendi, sicubi nos
essemus hallucinati. non solum homines, verum etiam et ingenio
perquam exiguo et eruditione vix mediocri. Id etiam si non essem 245
testatus, tamen nemini debebam vsque adeo videri arrogans vt, cum
ipse non dubitem locis aliquot a probatissimis doctoribus, Ambrosio.
Illud mihi videor meo iure sumpturus, neminem ante me vel plura
260 vel diligentius annotasse. Vt ne dieam interim quod in eo opere
non profiteor me quicquid est scitu dignum annotaturum, sed ea
duntaxat quae ad lectionis synceritatem faciunt. Quod si cui vide-
bitur diuersorum generum annotationes complecti, non continuo me
vicerit, nisi in eodem argumento se praestiterit copiosiorem. Et
265 tamen sic faueo piis studiis, vt non a Leo tantum verumetiam ab
omnibus vinci cupiam. Ad Christi gloriam, ad publicam vtilitatem
eorum qui deamant sacras literas, hoc quicquid est laboris desudaui
cur repente mutatus inuiderem iis quorum gratia tantum vigiliarum
exantlassem ? imo cur mihi ipsi inuideani, si quis suo sumptu me
270 velit docere vel plura vel rectiora? Quaeso, quid hic est quod vel
mihi Leus indignetur vel ego sim illi iniquior ? Si non probat argu-
mentum susceptum, cur ipse vohiit in eodem argumento versari ? Et
cum res fei-e tota pendeat a Graecae Latinaeque linguae peritia, cur
mihi non concedat vtriusque linguae aliquanto, opinor, peritiori quam
275 ille sit, quod ipse sibi permittit, nuper Graecae linguae rudimentis
initiatus, nec eo progressus adhuc in lingua Latina vt mecum, opinor,
dedignetur vti iure communi? Deinde cur mihi non permittat in
Nouo Testamento, qui sibi nihil non permittit in Veteri, idque nuper
degustatis Hebraeorum literis ? praesertim cum a me stet tot probato-
280 rum exemplarium consensus, tot orthodoxorum autoritas, ille praeter
hodie vulgatos Hebraeorum codices et lexica quaedam nuUis pene
praesidiis nitatur. Postremo cur mihi ius non sit hoc facere, hor-
tante et approbante Leone Pontifice Maximo, quod ipse sibi sumit
autoritate propria ?
285 Neque vero haec dico quod parum comprobem Lei industriam, sed
quo declarem neutri causam esse cur alteri vel inuideat vel indigne-
tur. Etenim qui contendunt nefas esse quicquam immutare in
vulgatis nostris codicibus, pi-orsus insaniunt vt abunde docuimus
:
275. nuper] Cf. Ep. 998. 2911. 289. Apologia] Cf. 1. 24611.
278. in Veteri] Cf. Ep. 1061. 751 2 292. prouocarira] Erasmusevidently
Ascham states (Ep. ii. 17, ^c. 1544 means in his first edition of the New
iin. )) that Lee left at his death a com- Ttstament (cf. Ep. 1006. 2o8n) : for
mentary on tiie Pentateuch in ms. It Lce was at work on Greek in July 15 17
has never been printed. '
Ep. 607. 15).
I053] TO THOMAS LUPSET 147
technis viribus, non insidiis ; aperto Marte, non dolis. Qui caedem,
;
L 2
148 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [15 19
339. llinca: Hie //. 353. ne a K LB : nec H Lo)id. 357. his a : iis i^.
dubito quin pro vno Erasnio plures sint exorituri qui Leo respondeaut
inclementius quam ego fuerim responsurus qui tot contumeliis hinc ;
quasi vero desit sicariis et parricidis, quo sibi sua facinora vtcunque
excusent. Age, conferamus, si videtur, quantum horum scelus absit 425
a libello famoso aut etiam ab homicidio. Quisquis autor est famosi
384. atque hinc add. F. 389. his a : iis i^. 390. vti/: et a. 391.
aH: blaioraui F Corrig. 401. F: emissorios a. 413. F: diffidentur a.
415. Praedieatorum a Dominicanorum
: //. 416. facere a iacere F Corrig.
:
382. plures] See Epp. 998. 66n, 1083. 397. serpentis] Gen. 3.
385. ater] Cf. Ep. 1007. 8111. 401. omissarios] Cf. Ep. 998. 59-60.
150 LETTEES OF EEASMUS [1519
536 puritate respondit Quot annos ille gratis populum docuit, et in hoc
!
master.
It is possible tliat Erasmus was iutending James Probst ;,Praepositus) of
Ypres for wliom see Ep. 980. 54^. Mistakes in Christiau names occur not infre-
:
quently in Erasmus' lettei-s (cf. Epp. 966 tit. nn, 1006. 147, 1057 introd.. 1162. 153,
1200 tit., 1281. 5-7), especially of persons with whom he was unfamiliar. Of
Probsfs antecedents befoi'e 1518 uothing seems to be known but at this time ;
Decker in MSH, 1883, pp. 374,5), so that they might quite well liave owned
a house which was near the Chapter school. Probst is knowu to have been
intimate subsequently with Nicholas of Hertogenbosch, beiug iuvolved in the
same persecution by the Inquisition. If Erasuius had written his local desig-
nation Ipano ', it might conceivably havc beeu misread at Basle fi-om his
'
rough draft as 'Edano': for iu contracting iJt/- he not infrequently curls the
522. Paraphrasibus] Cf. Epp. 1043, tice Ep. 296. 135), and therefore for
i^cf.
down stroke of the p up and round to form tlie cross-stroke, in a way that gives
it something the appearance of a d.]
[The continuance of Erasmus' friendly relations with Hutten (cf. also Ep. 1030.
i6n) may be illustrated by thefoUowing extract from a letterof Hutten to Melanch-
thon, 20 Jan. 1520. It refers probably to the controversy with Lee, in which
Hutten subsequently took part with a letter to Lee, 19 May (1520) (HE. 166),
printed in the appendix to Eae. To Melanchthon he writes :
Curabo Erasnii qitoquc negocium ibi, qui magnas mihi tragoedias de suis aemulis
scrihit. Primum conc iliandas nohis Ferdinandus vst ; quo de Franciscus bene mereri
gestit. Post facile erit exagitare improbos.
Active intervention on Erasmus' behalf had perhaps been expected from
Hutten; fur after mentioning Erasmus' threatsof verbei-a from Germany (Ep. ' '
998. 68n) Lee states {Anmtationcs P. CC^) that he liad been warned to leave
Louvain, for fear lest nobilis quidam et doctus iuuenis' should come to punish
'
who was just producing the Collectanea Busciducu.s] Sce Ep. 616. i^n.
10.
antiguitatum in vrbe atque agro Moguntino 1055. i. ibij At the castle of Land-
repertarum see Ep. 919. 12, 5onn.
; stuhl, belonging to Francis of Sickin-
3. Drusiana] The Eigelstein, out- gen see Ep. 582. 27^.
;
[Perhaps contemporarv with Ep. 1057, "1 whieh a copy of the Farrago (E)
is sent as a present. Lypsius' may have been intended as a New Year's gift
{strena).']
Nesen being prohibited from lecturing ;Ep. 1046. 23^) had announced that
he would take part in an opposition on 7 Jan., the date of this lettei*. The
'
'
Sucquet, had intei-Aened on behalf of the College with such success that on :
12 March 1520 an agreement was made, tlie Univei'sity recognizing the CoUege
3. Epistolarum] E : see Ep. 1040 had perliaps just arranged (cf. 1. 12),
*
introd. contains only 21 adages more than
tontasse] with an attack in sup- that of 1517-18: which ho had prob-
port of Erasmus. ubly presented to Lypsius earlier. The
8. sacris autoribus] Cf. Ep. 1048, 1520 title-page has tlie words Qui : '
and accepting its professors already appointed, witliout requiring from tliem
the formality of supplication (cf. 1. ^n). For external teachers in general the
requij-ement was still enforced and thus Vives obtained it on 3 March. Nesen,
;
however, seems never to have applied for it, being doubtless indignant at his
treatment over this matter. In April he was away at Erfurt, probably in quest
of employment under more liberal conditionS (Ep. 1088. 10) and he perhaps ;
with constituted authority. But authority in this case was coincident with his
opponents, and the jDresent contest was only another form of the struggle that
he was continually waging for the freedom of liberal studies. So he was glad
enough to appeal to a member of the Council of Brabant before which the ;
Brabant four years later. Possibly Erasmus had the Christian name wrong (cf.
Ep. 1054 introd.) and was intending the ChanceIlor's brother and successor,
Adolphus or he may have been thinking of Josse Laurens, who was a member
:
of the Council, and wliom he couples with the Chancellor in lettei-s of 14 July
1522.J
BRABANTIAE, S. D.
Ornatissime lodoce, si clarissimus simul et prudentissimus D. Can-
cellarius fauebit in hac causa libertati studiorum, maxime faciet ex
sententia Regis nostri, qui haud dubie cupit suara Aeademiam quam
maxime florere honestis disciplinis. Quod obiiciunt de supplicando,
merum commentum est, et huius quosdam iam pudet, quanquam 5
alioqui satis perfrictae frontis. Res per paucos coniuratos acta est,
qui sua doctrina contenti magis student augendae rei quam literis ;
nec curant quantum i3i-oficiant iuuenes, modo ipsi Louanii suo regnent
arbitratu. Nusquam est Academia quae modestiores habeat iuuenes
minusque tumultuantes quam habet hodie Louanium. Horum boni- 10
tate iamdiu abutuntur isti, et ingenuos iuuenes habent pene pro
emptitiis mancipiis. At illi consul consul non erat, cui ipse non esset
senatoi'. Si quid murmui-is aut tumultus est, ab ipsis est, non a
iuuenibus. Mihi hic nec seritur nec metitur. Ipse nec lego cuiquam
nec audio quenquam a nemine colligo quicquam, do nonnullis. Sed 15
:
14. nec lcgo] Theso w^ords, though v/hen he was above want, he should
not necessarily applicable to the wholo hnve returned to the schools.
156 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
[The following extract is tVom Erasmus' first Apoloyia against Lee, Antwerp,
M. Hillen, (c. March) 1520 (see p. 109). The date of the letter mentioned can he
established with some precision from the printing of Lee'.s book (pp. 108, iio), to
which it refers. Erasmus, of course, is the speaker.]
[The hist line shows that the person addressed was at the head of some society,
very likely the Theological Faculty at Louvain, with which he was expected to
have weight. He may therefore be identified very probably with Latomus (Ep.
934. 3nn), who fromEpp. 1113. 12-14, 1123. 16-19, ajipe.ars to have taken the lead
among the theologians after Atensis' death (8 Jan. 1520). OtherpersonsiJossible
are Vianensis (Ep. 650. ^n cf. Ep. 651. 21-3) or Nic. Coppin (Ep. 1162. io8n).
;
A date may be assigned conjecturally not long after Atensis' death. For re-
newed attacks on Erasmus by the theologians at that time see Ep. 1063. i.]
[This letter may be compared with Ep. 1062 : with which it is evidently
contemporary.]
ipsis corporibus aliter atque aliter affectis, siue quod magis reor, ab
humani generis hoste, qui nulla re magis gaudet quam nostra dis-
cordia. Quis enim alius tantum veneni studiisinuexit, etiam saeris?
a quibus pendet tum incohimitas tum dignitas Christianae religionis. 10
Tam amaris odiis nunc passim inter sese decertant etiam theologi,
tara virulentis libellis inuicem sese proscindunt, publicis apud popu-
lum concionibus sese mutuo lacerant, vt mea sententia praestiterit
hortum colere quam literas.
Atque hac in re nulli peccant impudentius quam ii qui sub mendi- 15
citatis professione tyrannidem meditantur. Complures eruditissimi
viri ex toto orbe mihi gratias agunt pro Nouo Testamento iam bis
recognito, inter quos et aliquot episcopi sunt, atque adeo summus ille
omnium Leo, eius nominis decimus. Et istos non pudet, nondum
lecto opere, seditiosis clamoribus apud populum traducere bene me- 20
scripserit Latine, aut quasi non ante me Filium Dei pro verbo sermo-
25 nem appellarint Cyprianus, Hilarius, Hieronymus, cumque his in-
numeri aut quasi sermo non melius exprimat Graecam vocem logos
;
quam verbum. Quid stultius dici potuit apud doctos? at quid apud
imperitam multitudinem seditiosius? At vbi interim illa dulcedo
studiorum quam narrat Hieronymus ? vbi ilhid in campo Scriptu-
30 raruni sine dolore nostro ludere? Quid quod interim bona pars
fructus perit vtrisque ? nam et illi dum sacris concionibus, quae
pi*aeter Christum nihil sonare deberent, admiscent suos affectus,
minus commouent populum ad pietatem et nostri libri vel a paucio- ;
ribus vel minore cum fructu leguntui', viciata per istos imaginatione,
35 quae vbique valet plurimum adeo vt si quis Augustini librum legat,
:
28. At Caeterum H.
J^: 37. R. D.T. F: Tua autoritas II. 40. R. T. D.
om. H. 41. tuis admoneas H. 49. vt facit add. H. 50. S. Domino N. F:
summo pontifici H. 55. vt om. N. 61. valeat R. T. D. F : vale H.
[A letter printed in the volume to whicb Ep. 1037 is preface. Besides con-
testing Ep. 998 almost sentence by sentence, it replies to Ep. 1053, wbich Lee
had doubtless seen in Martens' edition of (c. 14 Dec. 1519) : this second portion
beingperhaps composed later. It may be noted that the citation of Ep. 998 is far
fromexact. Erasmus' reply is the Apology cited on pp. 109, 156, and frequently
referred to elsewhere in this vohime as tbe Apologia qua respondet. The year-date
of this letter needs no confirmation.]
2. Basileae] In the Farrago (E), Oct. 21. secunda aeditione] of the New
1519 : for the date of its publication Testament.
see p. 119. 33. concederes] In May 15 18.
160 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
meas ad calcem ijroduxi id quod teipso nemo melius nouit, qui ante
:
55. praeter duo] Evidently Winch- to apply to him. For in view of his
eombeand St. Mary Overey; see 11. 150, subsequent relations with Lee and of
i52nn. Lee's connexions with Kent and Lon-
Alterum] This description is don, Southwark rather than Winch-
given later for Linsted of St. Mary combe would be likely to serve Lee as
Overey (1. 152^); but the alternative a place of deposit.
description here might also be taken 66. exasciatumue] Cf. Plaut. As. 360.
io6i] FROM EDWARD LEE 161
tamen tam sum semper mei compos vt nihil possit mihi excidere),
monitus recantabo. Nam certe hoc foedissimum est, publice mentiri : 100
quod miror te aliquoties faeere, hominem et theologum et monachum.
Nusquam iactitaui sexcenta loca a me
reprehensa. Hoc fingis, vt
caetera. Exemplum mei ex saeris literis. Si peccauerit
facti accipio
in te frater tuus, corripe eum inter te et ipsum. Si te non audierit,
adhibe vnum vel duos testes. Si nec illos, dic Ecclesiae. Hunc 105
ordinera adaraussim obseruaui vt nune frustra tentatis duabus
;
vellem. Sed quominus liceret, quum vellem et tentarem, idem qui iio
nunc vrges vt aedam, bis obstitisti. Primura interturbato negocio,
quum iam characteres essent compositi ad primum praelura deinde :
77. proditore] Lypsius ; cf. 11. 88. Polycarpum] Cf. Iren. c. Haer. 3-
401-3. 3. 4-
epistola] The reference is pos- 90. Paulus] r Tim. 5. 20.
sibly to Ep. 900. 10,11; but more 103. sacris literis] Ct.Matt. 18. 15-17.
likely to some letter wliich has not 112. compositi] with Thibiiult ? cf. ;
aiunt, non satis faueras quod domini lacobi Latomi Dialogum typis
suis emiserit. Si tibi tam cordi erat liber meus, cur mihi bis clausisti
officinas ?Ego prorsus decreueram nullo sumptui parcere quo aedere-
tur nec te credo sumptui peparcisse quo reiiceretur siquidem non
: ;
125 puto tam negligentes esse sui compendii tyi^ographos vtgratis tantum
lucri vellent amittere.
Eras. Si cnr solus non impetro vt legam ?
nie docere vis,
Ed. Ego omnes veluti cum imperio doces, et corni-
te docebo, qui
cum, quod dicitur, oculos configis?
130 Ekas. Si tibi scripsi(sfi}, cur tam late volitat liber?
Edo. Imo vero magis tibi scripsi quam mihi. Nam meum commo-
dum uullum est nisi quod nunc pro cotidiana plusquam semestri
opera odiosissime abs te infamor. Tu quantum inde commodi assecu-
tus es, indicabit secunda aeditio quantum praeterea potuisses iudi-
:
135 cauerit lector. Liber non late volitat: nam qui ante aeditionem vide-
rint, in toto orbe non sunt viginti qui exemplaria habuerunt extra
;
121.Latomi] See Ep. 934. ^nn. pointed witli Fislier to attend the
128.cornicum] Cf. Ep. 456. 2in. Lateran Council (Ep. 252 introd.). A
150. Vvinchelcombensis Eicbard of I
letter from him. Aug. 1514, congratu-
KidderminsterenteredtlieBenedictine lating Wolsey on preferment to York,
Abbey of Wiuchcombe in Gloucester- is in a very sei-vile tone (Brewer i.
shire at the age of 15. Four years 5355 cf. iii. 668). In 15 15 he led the
;
rarer quiduis abs te dictum, nee vUo pacto conuellerem '. Quod me
stupidum fefellit alioqui iam habitus essem tuo albo suffragio
:
immortalitatis. 175
Id vero scilicet mire prodigiosum fuerit, si potui pauculis mensibus
hiid becoine 'altera noua vniuersitns, .Jerome's Vitae Pairum, 'Lyons,'N. Wo]tY,
tametsi exig\ia', and recommends it as 28 April 1502 (MS. Rawl. Q. d. 12) witli
an example to nostrae tempestatis
' an inscription of his ownership, and
monachi, qui putant praeter vniuersi- ms. notes, a few of whicli are perhaps
tates nullum esse eruditionis locum '. in his autograph. See Dugdale ii. 299
See A. Wood, Hist Univ. Oxford, ed. .J. A. Wood, ^//(eHae Oxon. i, i8i3,pp. 61-4 ;
Gutch, ii, 1796, pp. 20,1. D. Royce, Landboc de inchelcumha, ii, W
About 9 Nov. 1525 he resigned his 1903, pp. xxxiii-v Miss R. Graham in
;
letter froni him to Cromwell, 3 Nov. was still living, on a pension, in 1553.
O531 ?)> which speaksof greatage and See Dugdale vi. 169.
sickness ibid. 510). 157. Suffenus] Cf. Cat. 22. 17.
The Bodleian possesses a copy of 168. comice] Cf. Ter. Eun. 252.
M 2
164 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
adeo profecisse vt iudicare licuerit haec verba Graece sic haberi vel
non haberi, id quod tantum mihi sumo. Sed id parum nimium tibi
visum est, quod toties moneo te contra fidem exemplaris tui annotasse,
180 oscitanterne an de industria alii viderint.
Erasmum nunquam sensi parum scire Graece, imo tantum quantum
omnibus meis fortunis non grauatim redimere vellem. Nec est
tamen quod egre feras si sint qui quosdam tibi praeponant aut saltem
aequent. Nec id tamen arrogo mihi vt iudicare possim, sed sic
^^^5 quorumdam fert opinio. Nec tamen de hac re digladiabor.
Nec vnquam dixi Hieronymum nihil sapere Hebraice. Insanus
plane essem si sic dicerem. Certe non inficiabor dixisse me olim
quum variis de i'ebus confabularemur in templo diui Petri
tibi,
Louanii, videri mihi toto diameti*o alicubi distare a veritate Hebraica
190 quod in templis canitur Psalterium, et non satis mirari me si Hiero-
nymi esset. Hic si quid peccaui, monitus ab Hebraice docto paratus
sum dare manus. Et quam Christiani pectoris hoc est, quod non
male nec arroganter dixi, calumniae miscere Si ego par pari vellem
!
saepe admiror, qui cum optimis Hteris, id est sacris, trium linguarum
peritiam non vulgarem coniunxerit.
210 Sed facile agis quod semper soles agere. Haec fabula tibi perpetuo
tractatur, vt mihi inuidiam facias apud omnes doctos viros. Bis iam
depinxisti me tanquam trium linguarum hostem, quum nihil minus
sim nunc obiicis procacitatem in doctissimos viros, quum nihil sit
:
204. gramniatices] Cf. Ep. ^sgintiod. enemies oi' tlic Muses (ff. a', b* v°) a*
211. Bis] Lee (^Mwo/a^/owes, f". CC V*') Plithonidos pallidus, macilentus'
: •
rffer.s for this to the Dialorrus trilin- (cf. Ep. 906. 448), *risum habens sar-
fjidum (1. 505n), where he is twice donium' (cf. 1. 341), 'X«ros wcTTre^^xri^oj',
introduccd unmistakably among the '
caudam longam trahit (cf. 1. 35011;.
'
io6i] FROM EDWAED LEE 165
agas ; qui damnes etiam ea quae vix vnquam gustasti ; qui veterLim
dogmata conuellas, qui nec Ecelesiastica decreta patiaris esse inteme- 235
rata ; qui haeretieorum deliriis in specie non mihi tantum videaris
patrocinari qui quasi ius tibi in theologiam vendices
;
qui praeter te ;
literis multos annos supersis si tamen is esse velis quem expetunt 255
:
tum haec aetas, tum praeter Christianum officium duplex hie qui in
te est ordo.
Eras. AUi praedicant interim vndique captare te quid quisquc calum-
ni<;tur, tuum opus alind futurum quam ali{en)arumsgcopJiantiariim
nec
rhax)sodiam, in qua minima portio sit tui Maiiis. . 260
Edo. Si quis in meis Anuotationibus suas plumas agnoscet, licet
repetat. Ego ne vnum quidem locum didiei ab vllo theologorum.
Si secus sit, sim apud istos mendax. Nee puto tam felices esse
nostras Annotationes vt certare de his quisquam volet.
Era. Ita pericxdum est ne fiat, quum tihi speraris opimam laudetn, 265
minus ex tuo lihro referas gloriae cpiam Latomus retttdit ex suo illo
frigido Bialogo, in quoferunt totam theologorum cohortem desudasse.
225. tibi an(e fueiit add. a. 226. Lei E. 249. dicunt a dictitant E.
:
230. suppellex] Cf. Pers. 4. 52. selves from seculars by the duplicated
245. tumultuavie] Cf. i, p. 3- 6-11. title 'Canonici regulares'. Cf. 11. 65,6 ;
256. duplex . . . ordo] The Austin Epp. 447. 189-90, 718. 4-5, 838. i and ;
Canons; who liked to distinguish them- t}ie Colloquy, Peregrinatio (LB. i. 7760).
166 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
270 volui. lam tu vrges vt experiar aleam. Scio quibusdam probata iri
nostra, contra quibusdam tua. Forte neuter satis opimam laudem
referet ex hoc certamine. Mihi minus infeliciter cadet sors quod
propiciam aleam non expectem quanquam hoe meis rationibus
:
290 raihi viuo et literis. Nulla prebeo foras indicia sanctitatis, nec
sancti nomen vnquam ambiui. Mihi sane satis sit donec viuam, si
Christianus sim. Atque vtinam certe sim Nam multa quae in me
!
304. quater] In 11. 504-7 Leo men- Scealso twopassages in the newedition
tions five places in which he con- of the CoUoquiorum Formulae (\.\. 334,
sidercd that Erasmushad attacked hini. 367^^).
io6i] TEOM EDWARD LEE 167
'
AvGVSTi. Quid si vnam aut altei-am vmbram adduxero? 335
Chbisti. Licet, modo ne nigras vmbras adduxeris.
AvGVSTi. Quid si N. adduxero ?
Chkist. Scotistam illum ?
AvG. Imo Scotum, si lubet.
Chr. Age: admittetur, modo domi relinquat gryphos sophisticos, 34°
matheologias, sycophantias. supercilium. virulentias, risum sardo-
nium, glorias Thrasonicas, philautiam.
AvG. Citius caudam reliquerit.'
Orbis agnoscat ex his verbis suum theologum, suum censorem,
suum monachum, modestum suum simplicem illum simulque illum
; 345
Erasmicum pudorem, grauitatem, verecundiam, honestatem. Quid
est, si hic libellus famosus non est ?
Sed Vbi sonat hic nomen tuum ? inquis. Hic satis est vnde
'
'
facile sit augurari quem i^erstringas. Quid tibi hic cum caudis, '
327. profiteris] Ep. 1053. 150-3; cf. Martens' edition of the Colloquiorum
Ep. 967. 77,8. Formulav {c. Nov. 1519: soe ]}. 120),
331. sycophantisissimae] This form f. d^ v". Lee was quite likely correct
isperhajjsanother example of the inad- in liis conjecture that he was the per-
vertent substitution of s for c which son intended.
occurs not infrcqucntly at this period In Erasmus' next revision of the
in both France and England. Cf. Ep. CoU. Fonn., Basle, Froben, March 1522,
673. 6n. In Pynson's volume of Long- the whole of this passage and most of
lond's sermons (L i^on) the form iri- the next 11. 368-73) wero expunged.
sesimus occurs in the head-lines more ThespeakersareErasnins'Parisfricnd3,
than 80 times, more often, indecd, Augusline Vincent (Ep. 131) andChris-
thixix tricesimus. tian Northoff (Ep. 54', for whose use
334. Colloquia] Thepassageto which the Coll. Form. were first written (cf.
Lee here objects, had been added in Ep. 130. 92^).
168 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
tibi placent, vt nihil tibi sit magis in vsu. Cur tibi excidit quod
440 alibi iactitas,ex tuis scriptis neminem vel pilo factum esse nigriorem'?
*
Hic ego numquid per te saltem voto factus sum nigrior, quando
famam meam denigrare summa vi conaris ? Nam quid magis impium
queas impingere quam quod sordidus adhuc et tot sycophantiarum
mihi conscius audeam accedere ad Cliristi mensam, vt reus sim
445 corporis et sanguinis Domini ? Certe si non sum factus nigrior,
non id tuae modestiae sed lectorum prudentiae fuerit ascribendum,
qui nihil tibi credant tali authori. Sed o homo, tu quis es qui iudicas
alienum seruum domino suo stantem aut cadentem ? Noli iudicare
vt non iudiceris.
4£o Hic ego si vellem, possem te remordere : sed reprimo me. Nam
nec quae dixi plane dixissem, nisi vt modestiae tuae quam tantopere
ostentas veluti simulachrum deliniarem, quo ne ex nudis verbis glo-
riam reportes, quum facta nequaquam respondeant. Sed quod rem
nusquam gentium sparsam non esse scribis, id tuis et tuorum literis
455 factum est, non meis. Ego tantum ad aliquot amicos in Anglia de hoc
tumultu scripsi, et eos quidem communes ac paucos. Tu vt vbiuis
gentium amicos habes, ita vbiuis spai'sisti rumorem, nec satis vere.
Eras. Et nosti impotentes Germanorwn animos ingeniique violentiam.
At in-his x^lurimi sunt qiii mihi plus fauent quam velim. Literis meis
460 stilum quorundam cohihui, et cohibeho, quod qiiidem erit in me. Sed
audio quosdam minari atrociora. Quod genus si quid accideret {quod
Beus auertat), nec ego possum tuo mederi malo, et, vt est nunc prona
hominum suspitio, inuidia facti in meum quoque caput recideret. Vt
spero nihil tale futurum, ita metuo ne quid accidat. Si nihil eueniet,
465 amice timui : sin eueniet aliquid, amice praemonui, vt si videtur aliquo
consilio occurras malo, quod tuae prudcntiac videhitur esse cominodissimum.
Ed. Non facile adducor vt credam hanc rem cordi esse militibus
Germanis : illis nihil cum balneo. At eruditos Germaniae, quorum
458. Ep. 998. 59. sic enim . . . 62. conciliarint om. a. Et nosti impotentes
Germanorum a : Nec ignoras huius gentis E. plurimi a Gormania
459. liis :
sem E. Ep. 998. 71. Ita ... 74. factum om. a. 463. Vt a lam vt E. 464. :
tale a huiusmodi E.
: ita a ita contra E. eueniet a est periculi E.
: 465. :
me concitauit, nisi tu ipse qui nihil non dicis vnde me ledas ? Quis
tam' ferus est vt seuiut sua sponte. nulla ratione prouocatus ? imo
quid tam graue vnde irritari potuerint? Quin etiam si vera essent 4*^0
quae contra me non minus falso quam virulente torques in hac epi-
stola, num tantum sceleris hic est vt non nisi gladio vindicari possit ?
Plane si verum sit quod oblique veluti sub aliena persona mihi mina-
ris, grauiora de me eifutisti quam scribis. haec leuiora sunt Nam
quam vt aliquem bene sane stomachum ad fustes commouere possint. 485
Et vbi nunc Christianum pectus tuum, quod nunquam spirat nisi
charitates, modestias, facilitates et simplicitates? Tantumne tibi places
his vocabulis? Siccine summam statuis Christianismi, vt si verbis
queas adumbrare, nihil non audenduni sit sceleris, vt et tutus sit qui
crimen molitur, si in aliorum qui forte nihil conscii sunt, caput possit 49°
reiicere ? Quin vero, age aliquando, aut exhibe te eum virum quem
toties ostentas, aut exue personam, vt orbis cognoscat te qualis sis.
Disputationem de literis sacris, qui alicubi videri vis patronus pacis,
misces cum fustibus et gladiis? De me nihili homine vt niliil sit
iacturae, praecogita tamen tecum quid Ecclesia Dei passura sit, si in 495
eam te authore hoc exemplum irrepserit, vt de sacris literis dissidium
quoties occurret, ad sicariorum examen res reuocetur. Et certo crede
fore vt posteritas habitura sit Erasmi nomen tanquam pestilentiam,
luem aliquando et execrationem : siquidem posteritati plus obfuturus
es, etiam si moriar, quam mihi. 5°°
Nec vero quicquam mali hac de causa mihi
sic fide fucis tuis, si
acciderit, vt etiam si sacra omnia prophanaque iures, al) huius sceleris
infamia queas elabi. Si quis mihi insidiatur, Erasmus plane author
est. Stilum vt cohibueris, docent Apologia ad dominum lacobum
Latomum etDialogus Triling(ui>um, et infamatoriae scedulae valuis 505
504. Apologia] See Ep. 934. 30. Ep. . brought the first copies with him from
993. 34-40 aud n. shows that Lee had Germanj-, when he met Lee at Antwerj)
good reason for considering that a in July 1519 (cf. Ep. loor. 53^) ; but
passage in § 120 was directed against declares tliat he had only seon tlie work
hiniself. in England, presumably ufter his retnrn
505. Dialogus] Eruditi adulescentis (Eev. p. 87). Lee {Annotoilones, f*. CC
CliotiradiNastadiensisGermanidialogussane v")found it in circuhition at Louvain
({uam festiuus bilinguium ac trilinguium, Avhcn he returncd from his intorview
siue de /unere Calliopes. Sub scuto Basi- with Pacc tlieroforc c. xVug. 1519. By
;
liensi vcnale comperies. s. l. et a. As the tho ond of 8o])t. it had bton sont from
scutum Basiliense was the sign of Basle to Beatus lihenanus at Schlett-
Resch's shop in Taris (cf. Renouard, .stadt(BRE. 128, 133), and by 15 Oct.
Badius, i. 41-2, ii. 254) the book was tu Adelmann at Augsljurg, who on
without doubt piinted for him, But i Nov. agreed with Pircklieimei' in
the date is not so clear. Pace mcn- attributing it to Erasmus i^Houmann
tions a Louvain report that he liad p. 177 = HE. 143). But there is no-
172 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
thing to show whether it was in i»riiit nents. In tlie Apol. qua respondet (f°. D
as yet or in ms. certainly it is short
: v° ; Jortin ii. 510) Erasmus uses much
enough to invite copying by hand. equivocation, but makes no definite
Indication of date is given, however, denial of authorship ; so, too, in
witli some pi"obability, by a ms. in- defending himself to Bucer in 1532
scription, 'Oct. 1519', on tlietitle-page (cf. Ep. 495 introd.), ' De dialogo
of the copy from wliich Haupt re- trilingui, vt largiamur quod tu su-
printed tlie dialogue in his Wilhehn u. spicari videris, non illic ad Euan-
Conrad Nesen, 1843, pp. 77 seq. and ; gelii persuasionem adhibetur fucus
the copy sent by Conrad Grebel to tametsi quid fuci est vbi nullum appo-
Vadianus, 6 Oct. 1519, from Melun, s. nitur nomen ? But a letter from
'
of 'Paris (VE. 170) was very likely in Boniface Amerbach to Zasius (Basle
Resch's edition. Besides the first MS. C.VP. 73. 380(0. Sept. 1519, just
edition (12330 aa. 55), the British Mu- when this dialogue was beginning to
seumhas alaterone (12314 aa. 57) with be circulated)) seems almost con-
the year-date 1520, and on the title- clusive :
' Adiecimus hiis iu Erasmo-
page, '
exactissime ad autoris arche- mastygas Subodoraberis
dialogum.
typum recognitus ' : which Proctor auctorem. Non enim Lucianus festi-
(11980) ascribes to Laz. Schiirer at (ui)us lusisset'. I cannot think of
Schlettstadt. Van Iseghem mentions any possible author, familiar also to
a copy of another edition (no. 128), Zasius, for whom Boniface was likely
which he believed to be by Martens, to be so discreetly reticent, other than
at Louvain. Copies of the Bialogus the master to whom he was so devored
were sold by Jo. Dorne in Oxford, (cf. Ep. 1020), thetranslator ofLucian's
25 Aug. and 13 Sept. 1520 : see nos. dialogues. But the truth is perhaps
1134 and 1274 in his Day-hook, ed. F. to be found, as with Lystrius' soholia
Maclan, OHS. v, 1885, pp. 117, 121. In on the Moria (see Ep. 495 introd.) and
the Eccius dedolatus attributed to Pircli- Faber's Consilium (Ep. 1149), in joint
heimer, 1520, the pseudonyms of the authorship that Nesen composed and
;
ascribing the dialogue to Wm. Nesen tious a copy in his own possession
(Ep. 329 introd.) witli the suggestion
; which he believes to have been pre-
that he used his brother's name be- sented by Erasmus to Adelmann, with
cause Conrad, being unknown in Lou- an autograph inscription bj' Adelmann
vain, would be safe from any disagree- declaring that Erasmus was the author.
able consequences. Having come re- 0. Clenien in Arch. f. Reformationsgesch.
cently from Paris (Ep. 994. ^n) Wm. 1, 1904, pp. 355-64, maintains the
Neson would probably have con- authorship of Conr. Nesen.
nexions with Resch. But though Pace 505. infamatoriae] Cf. Eev. p. 88. In
(Eev. p. 88) judged the work too his Annotationes (f°. CC*) Lee describes
puerile to be by Erasmus, and though these as printed. For other occasions
in style and construction it is not on which this mothod was used see
really like the Colloquies, tliere is Epp. 1077. 3, 1168.
nevertheless some ground for the sus- 506. Epistolae] the Farrago (E). Be-
picions of Lee and Adelmann which; sides Ep. 998, addresscd in no friendly
were shared by Zwingli also (Zw. E.* spirit to Lee, it contains damaging
113). The dialogue represents Eras- references to him in Epp. 906. 448-66,
mus' point of view (cf. Epp. 761. 63, 936. 31-5. 993- 17-43, 999- 315-31.
794. 75) and makcs fun of liis oppo- 507. ad Lupsetum] Ep. 1053.
io6i] FROM EDWARD LEE 173
sequeris magistrum, tum tibi bene consulturus es, tum Ecclesiae. 5-0
Ego vero tam iuratus, vt forte tu putas, hostis sedulo Deum preca-
bor vt bonae mentis et pacis spiritu te inspiret. quo teipsum possis
cognoscere et captiuare intellectum tuum in obsequium Christi, in
Ecclesiae aedificationem, non in destructionem quo sic veram illam ;
1053. 11711. Lee's letter to Louvain witli Paceat Antwerpiii July(Ep. looi.
CC
(.Annot. f°. and V) siiows that
1° 5311) : they must therefore he dated ia
these nogotiations with liim and HilUri April or M:iy 15 19. See also 1. ii2n.
174 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
585 prope ambiens rem, diem dicit Mercurii futurum ad auspicium operis.
Vix iam praeterierat horula, quum alia esset sententia, dubio procul
abs te et tuis aut peeunia corrujitus aut minis deterritus. Et tamen
rethoricaris indigne tulisse te quod res ad nihilum reciderit, et mox
accito typogiapho egisse vt pactionem instauraret, sed me mutata
59° sententia meme iam subduxisse. Ecquid non pudet impudentis
mendacii ? Ego post reiectum opus Sabbato hora decima ante-
meridiana mansi Anteuerpiae Sabbatum totum et Dominicum
totum, vsque ad Lune seiDtimam antemeridianam. Nec tamen
interea quisquam ad me accessit. Irao ne te rediens fallerem,
595 diligenter obseruans quid ego agerem, proximo cuitu secutus es
currum meum a Mechlinia vsque Louanium nec sic contentus, quo ;
promulgandum opus, quasi inde cupias fidem esse factam lectori non
645 te impedisse euulgationem operis, quod tam impense ambis vt
euulgetur.
His praestigiis et tam fluenti calamo fisus, nihil non polliceris tibi
posse te persuadere, sed stupidis forte et his qui in rem ipsam non satis
penetrent. Mihi nunquam persuadebis, etiam si tibi stupidus sum.
650 Nam quasi quouis trahere posses me in tuam sententiam, sic rethori-
caris, nimirum ipse sibi satis conscius rem longe secus habere, quum
non sim mihi conscius. Quin vero tu tibi conscius es rem longe secus
habere quam dicis. Et qui etiam tibi a secretis sunt, sibi conscii sunt,
apud sese taciti, mendacii, nihil dubita, te redarguentes. Necdesunt
6.S5 qui arbitrantur non alio tendere quod per tuos quosdam superiore
estate a Germania et Lutecia prohibitus sum, si vellem saluti meae
consultum, quam vt ne his locis liber meus excuderetur nam hie :
661. Theoderico] Martens : cf. Ep. 671. inficias it] Cf. E]). 1053. iu.
1053. 115. 674. dicis] Ep. 1053. 124-6.
662. trecenta loca] Cf. Ep. 1053.78-9. 686. praeteritis] Cf. Ep. 1053. 257.
io6i] FEOM EDWAED LEE 177
ram, non contulerum adhuc cum meis Annotationibus. Nec est quod (jqo
obiicias mihi crcfxiXixa fxvri^.LK6v, quod vtrumque dixerim, et retexuisse
me opus et etiam nunquam futurum vt librum euulgarem ? Etenim
alterum feci in Martio, quum te consentiente librum ad reuerendum
Eoffensem essem missurus et hoc quidem tempore secunda aeditio
:
tua nondum prostabat. Porro alterum dixi postea in lulio, vbi mul- 695
torum amicorum literas ad concordiam nos hortantes accepissem. Hoc
volui dare voluntatibus amicorum. Et phine tum habebam in animo
quod dixi, modo reuerendus dominus Eoffensis censuram dignaretur
suscipere. nec tu amplius pungeres ad aedendum.
Nihil hic fuisse factum nisi simplicissimo aninio, Deus scit qui et ;
700
scit quantum abhorruerim ab hoc certamine, quam et dulce mihi
fuerit illud meum ocium cum literis Graecis et Hebraicis. Quod tu
toties interturbasti, nulla prorsus a me iniuria lacessitus sed {quod;
vero simile est) aut opimam tibi laudem aut grande mihi malum
pollicitus ex hac pugna, aut etiam forte aliud in pectore habens, aliud 705
in ore. Nam et rumoribus fuerat satisfaciendum, qui tua culpa
sparsi sunt, non mea. Ego tantum partes meas tutatus sum contra
calumnias. Tu nunquam cessasti apud pueros, apud laicos, apud
essedarios —
nam et in essedo intellexi te quaedam effutisse vt in — :
hoc Dodonaeum es verius sis quam ego. qui vbique ac perpetuo tin- 710
nieris, nec vnquam quieueris ab illo die quo primum te hortante
hanc operam ingressus sum nimirum quiduis aequiore animo ferens
;
688. resecuisse] Cf. Ep. 1053. 44-7. 713. mouitorem] But cf. Ep. 1076.
691. obiicias] Ep. 1053. 57. 611.
710. Dodonaeum] Cf. Epp. 1030. 1411, 715. facis] Ep. 1053. 201 seq.
1053. 334-5. 722. Tuii illa] sc. gloria.
452.4 N
178 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
nec mihi vlla vnquam cum his fuit consuetudo. Nunquam eorum
—
quenquam instigaui contra te sini 'apud eos mendax si vnquam
feci nec vnquam de eis minus quam par erat honorifice
; aut locutus
sumaut sensi.
770 Calumniaris quod sparso rumore quod mortuus esses Basileae, ego
tum demum faustam occasionem, vt videbar, nactus, totam hanc
regionem et meam Angliam sexcentis illis locis impleuerim. Ille
rumor ad aures meas nunquam increbuit. Postquam iam redisses
ex Basilea, ac nescio quo morbo laborans decubares in domo Theode-
775 rici Alustensis, memini semel mihi nuntiatum a Matthaeo Adriano
Hebraeo desperatum prope esse de tua salute. Nunquam bene valeam
nisi statim illi responderim vehementer dolere me si id verum sit
nam facturas bonas literas magnam in tua morte iacturam.
Impudens essem si iactitassem sexcenta loca mihi collecta, quando
7S0 liber apud Atensem erat vno aut altero prope mense vt tibi niearum ;
738. ab haeieticis] In the introd. to 752. in Veteril Cf. Ep. 1053. 278^.
his second liesponsio against Lee (LB. 760. soribis] Ep. 1053. 327-8.
ix.123,4) Erasmusrehearsesspecimens 764. ordinem] The Dominicans ; cf,
of the heretical opinions with which Ep. 1006. ^n.
he was charged. 770. Calumniaris] Ep. 1053. 338-41.
747. corrigiam] Cf. John i. 27. 774. decubares] Cf. Ep. 867. 193-249.
io6i] FROM EDWARD LEE 179
amicos habere, me vero magno numero fidos Achates ; aut te simu- 7S5
lasse tantum cupere librum habere, nec cupisse tamen, at me viam
fecisse quo haberes, qui tam late sparserim. Nam qui posset fieri vt
tuas ac tuorum manus tamdiu euaderent, si tam late propagata fuis-
sent ? Hic nemo cui vel cor sit tibi credat vnde et metiri est qualis
:
amicus tibi, nec adhuc hostem credo. Notarii qui desciupserant 795
exemplaria vtri nostrum melius velint, mihi incertum est, nisi quod
vnum ex his sciam meas tibi Annotationes prodidisse. In Anglia
viderunt tres amici tui, reuerendus Eoffensis, Morus et Latimerus ;
et qui inimicus sit tibi, quod sciam, nemo prorsus vidit. Nec praeter
hos in Anglia conscius sum mihi ex omni sorte quattuor vidisse. 800
Sed quod dicis me respondisse 'propterea non ostendisse me illi
cuidam librum, quod synceriter fuerit tibi amicus ', sic respondisse
me plane inficior. Mirum vero cur non nomines illum quendam.
Sed haec. vt cetera, quo fidem captes a lectore sed quem spero toties :
791. dicis] Ep. 1053. 359-60. lacking iu the editions whicli Loe had
797. prodidisse] Cf. Ep. 998. i^n. seen but is given in H.
;
801. illi cuidam] JVIore ;cf. Ejj. 1053. 807. Apologiam] See Ep. 1037.
•
360-2. 818. zelus] Cf. Ps. 68. 10 (69. 9),
803. non nomines] More's name is John 2. 1 7.
N 2
180 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [isif
[The preface to the Paraplirase on Ephcsians (cf. Ep. 996. 6on) see also ;
1. i75n. As Erasmtis was at Louvain, it is probable that, liko the earlier Para-
phrases (Epp. 710, 916, 956: biit cf. Ep. 1043), this too made its first appearance
from Martens' pi'ess. No copy seems to be known but Martens' editions were :
—
perhaps sniall of Corinthians (Ep. 916) only three copies are known to me, of
Peter and Jude (Ep. 1112) two, of Hebrews (Ep. 1181) one, of James (Ep. 1171)
only a trace —
and thus this may liave disaj^i^eai-ed. If there was a Louvain
,
edition, it cannot be dated later than Feb. 1520 for on i March 1520 Boniface ;
(Basle MS. C. VI*. 73. 286). Froben's first issue of this composition (a) is dated
in the same month as Boniface's letter but Erasmus seems to have been quickly
;
dissatisfied with his preface, for in Froben*s next edition, March 152 1 (/3), he
materially transformed it, and made considerable additions, some of which closely
—
resemble passages in Ep. 1167 a letter which he wrote to Cami^egio just about
the time when he must have been revising this j^reface for /3. Of the later
Froben editions enumerated on p. 123, the folio of 1532 (e) whows some marks
of revision and the octavo of 1523 (7), the folio of 1523-4 (5), the octavo of 1534
;
(p, and the folios of 1540-1 (»;) have a few, probably inadvertent, variants.
The texts of a and 13 for this preface are so diverse that it is not possible to
fuse them satisfactorily. I liave therefore adopted the text of j8 in all points,
and have recorded the variants of a in the critical notes. A few lapses in Lond.,
which LB. corrects, are disregarded here.
Erasmus used the opportunity offered, to address to Campegio an appeal on
belialf of good learning such as he had alreadj- sent to the Pope and the Abp. of
Mainz (Epp. 1007, 1033) and quite i-ecently to Wolsey {l&p. 1060) continuing to :
connect the two Cardinals togetlier in his mind, as he had done during
Campegio's residence in England (cf. Epp. 968. 12, 969. 9, 970. 15-18J. Ep. 1183.
19 mentions a reply from Campegio, wliich is not, however, extant.]
CAMPEGio ow. a.
TiT. s. R. s. ^3 s. R. E. « s. E. R. a. rARioNo a.
: : :
10. aut certe oligarchia o»i. a. 11. tribunis plebis ac owj. a. 12. im-
peratoribus /3 regibus a.
: 13. pristini desiderarentur y3
. . . democratia
:
desideraretur a. 14. surgentium ... 16. Illud om. a. 17. sacris eon- . . .
Christus illo coelestis hominum argutiis pene esset obrutus, quidam conati sunt
ad pristinam studiorum orbem simplicitatem reuocare, et a lacunis iani nimium
turbidis ad fontes purissimos retrahere. Ad eam rem vidcbatur peritia lingua-
rum ac Vjonarum, vt vocant, literarum cognitio cum primis conducere a.
10. democratia] For Erasmus' in- 37. Philistaeorum] Cf. Ep. 858. 182.
terest in this cf. Ep. looi. 82. 41. lacunis] Cf. Ep. 1002. i^n.
182 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [15^
altera pars nimium mordicus tenet ea quibus assueuit, altera vio-
lentius irrumpit, hosti quam hospiti similior. Ita vtriusque malo
peccatur vtrinque. Sic olim Euangelicae doctrinae niustum auersa-
bantur ludaei, veteri vino Mosaicae legis assueti, et contumeliam
50 interpretabantur quo prior illa lex et perficieljatur et ornabatur ac :
fuerint apud quosdam. Sit sane regina theologia, sed nulla regina
tam potens quae i:)edissequarum i'ecuset officium. Ab aliis admonei'i
se patitur, ab aliis comi et ad suam gloriam pertinere credit, si
;
46. nimium om. a. violentius ... 58. colonis fi (51. potius acld. «. 57. velut
t]) : mauult a fastigiosemel depellere quam paulatim deducere a. 59. in hoc
adhil>entur;3 ita : aboleantur.
sunt adhibendae a. 61. magisque /3 abolea- . . :
tur scholastica di.sciplina, sed vt purgatiores sint ac magis a. 62. Sit sane . . .
72. bonorum /3 (67. ii /3 hi 5) Quod si qui in illis consenuorunt, eas ciuiliter am-
: :
84. qui castigat ... 85. emendat;8 ac Magnificat, vt vocant, qui castigat a.
:
57. irrumperent] Cf. Ep. 1167. 14. Ov. F. 5. 634 and other sources.
de ponte] See Ada/j. 437; citing 84. Precationem] Cf. Ep.948. 108, 114.
1062] TO LORENZO CAMPEGIO 183
tum sedari par erat. Quid enim aliud quam pacem docet, qui
Christum docet? Quod si contigerit salem esse insulsum, quid
supererit quo condiantur insulsa ? Si lucem Euangelicae philosophiae iio
cupiditates obscurant humanae, quid erit quod discutiat animi nostri
caliginem ? Quis autem nescit bonam religionis nostrae partem
pendere a studiorum ratione ? At nunc hanc quoque vitae nostrae
paradisum sic suo veneno vitiauit veterator ille serpens, vt mihi
non paulo prestabilius videatur quemuis hortulum colere quam 115
literas, videlicet cepis et caulibus plus allaturis fructus cultori suo
quam ad hicernam vigilatis noctibus.
Sed iam dudum obmurmurat mihi tuus animus, Quorsmn tandem
tos et /3 doctos ac a.
: dicantur quid /3 niliil a. 89. qui haec /3
: haec :
doctriua Ciiristi quam prolitentur, et bonam fructus partem perdunt, sibi quoque
lidem abrogantes apud populum a. 95. et simultatem om. a. 96. E
diuerso . . 100. Postx-emo
. atque a. 100. pessima zizania seritur
: pessimam :
serunt zizaniam a. 102. animos, haud studia, non a. : 103. Nec faeile
. . . 104. soleatowt. a. 104. autemow. a. 106. .Ateam/3 quama. vita-
:
,
tam 0: seruatama. 107. quorum ... 118. Sed vnde pendet bona pars
:
85. Magnificat] Cf. Ep. 948. 97, 108, found in all the authorized editions.
1x5. 115. hortulum] The unaspirated
Euangelium] Cf. Ep. 1072 introd. form is lound in a. Cf. Ej). 270. i6a.
109. insulsuml Cf. Mark 9. 50. where the aspirate is not inserted un-
113. hanc] This unusual gender is til N.
184 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [15-if
Quid quod haec res non solum generali quadam ratione ad ilUim
pertinet, ad quem pertinet quicquid ad i-eligionis ac pietatis negocium
pertinet ? sed peculiariter etiam illius refert, ne quiduis quibuslibet
liceat in linguas ac bonas Hteras, quibus ipse suo grauissimo iudicio
140 tantum tribuit vt tantis impendiis suis conducat vndique qui Romse
profiteantur ; sic existimans, Vrbi tot ornamentis indytae non me-
diocre decus hinc etiam accessurum. Nimirum perspicit pectus
illius oculatissimum linguarum cognitionem nonsohim ad disciplina-
rum professionem esse necessariam, verum etiam ad Christianae
145 ditionis pomeria vel propaganda vel stabilienda. Quod enim vnquam
regnum aut coaluit aut diuturnum fuit absque linguarum commu-
res raaiore malo constiterit humano generi. illene a. 128. a/85 Heinri- :
cus 7. eius nominis oin. a. 129. D. Thoma otn. a. nec 130. con- . . .
est f. 134. positum H: positus e) potest orbi. Quod si fecerit, tum demum :
plenam laudem habebit longe pulcherrimus ille titulus, Leoni PP. x a. 136.
Quid . . . 152. gloria om. a.
128. Angliae Rex] For tlie recent liere tontatively reportod by Erasmus.
jirogress made at Oxford and Cam- Since 1876 the statue has been phiced
bridge in thf study of the classical in S. Maria in Aracoeli.
Janguages see Epp. 229 intrud., 456. 140. conducat] For Leo's patron-
228 seq., 457. 55-9, 965, 967. 26n, 990 ; .age of learning, and especially tlie
.ind, for Henry's sympatliy with it, foundation of the College of Greek, in
]-]](. 948. 183-219. 1513. with John Lascaris (Ep. 269.
130. coubultore] Cf. Fpp. 961 introd., sm) at its lie.ad, see Creighton v.
990. ir. 173-4, Pastor viii. 259-78.
io62j TO LORENZO CAMPEGIO 185
qui non sint tales vt sub praetextu tidei suum agant negocium ;
Quod si
153. 154. oraculum ^
. . Porro ratio cuncordiae sic facile constabit,
. :
senserint inter sese, vt fit, ingenia, intra ciuilem conflictum consistat contentio a,
167. tibi /3 et tibi a.
: 168. et eruditio candida um. a. 169. /3 ab omni :
147. Nouum Testamentum] Cf. Epp. Erasmus was not now thinking of
384, 446. 53seq., 864. him their open conflicts did not be-
:
175.quinque] Besides Eph. the gin until 1525. Probably he had liis
volume contained also Phil., Coh, and opponents araong the friars, Egmon-
Tliess., without prefaces. danus (Ep. 878. i^n) and Vincent
180. iis qui] A note, 'Tum dormie- Theodorici (Ep. 1196), in his mind cf. :
bat Bedda', added in the margin of Epp. 1153, 1 164, 1 167. 39-44, 1182. For
* ,1532) at tliis point, show tliat the position cf. Ep. 1060. 53-4.
186 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [15^
strictam aliqua saltem ex parte liberare. Neque enim excidit et
quantum debeam inauditae tuae humanitati, et quid illi per literas
sim pollicitus. Hunc
igitur arrabonem boni consules, donec corra-
185 sero vnde summam
quoque resoluam.
Brugis a coena bac oratione, memini, dimisit me R. T. D. quae- ,
5 February 1520.
to be sent from Schlettstadt, where Beatus was at this time, to Basle with BRE.
156, to Boniface Amerbach, 5 March 1520. For the circumstances see Ep. 1044.
49n. The date is confirmed by the death of Briard of Ath on 8 Jan. 1520.
A packet of Erasmus' letters sent to Basle shortly before this time, had been
lost through the carelessness of the messenger, perhaps Livinus Algoet (Ep.
1091) see Zw. E.' 118.]
:
liberare /3 (181 ;35 : R. D. T. 7) : quam vno et hoc proximo impetu absolui, simul vt
meam fidem aliquaex parte liberem a. 183. per literasoi». a. 184. Hunc igitur
3 Sed hunc interim
: a. 186. Brugis . . . 190. deditissimum om. a. 190. E. R,
T. D. R. T. D. e
/3 : : R. T. D. , cui quam commendatissimus esse cupio a. 191.
Nonis februarii /3 : Non. Februar. a.
1062. 183. per literas] Cf. Ep. 996. 3. Extimulabis] This sentence is
'
noster theologus with Oecolampadius, who was at this time preacher in the
'
and 1521 are possible. The jear-dates added in have little or no value but H ;
in default of other guidance this one may be accepted. For the circumstances
see Ep. 956 introd.]
lon, 10151066^,^,
TO WlLLIAM BUDAEUS.
Epistolae ad diuersos p. 214*. Louvain.
HN : Lond. iii. 70: LB. 387. 17 February 15^.
[Ep. 1073. r,2 shows that this letter was delivered by two Germans on 25 Feb. ;
but it had been brought from Louvain by a servant of Erasmus (perhaps
Livinus Algoet, Ep. 1091), who alsD carried back Ep. 1073 (see BE.* 67).
10G5. 20. Martii i'^: Mar. if: Martias.V. :si.v.xix. udd. H. 1066. tit.
ORNATissiMo 01)1. H. procatior F.
2. H : lo. toc F : ruv H. afivrfaruas F.
vofiuv F Corrig. perperam, quod ex Ep. 1073. 17 liqnet.
1065. 16.Rex ipse] wiieu leaving for mus' literary undcsrtakings at this
Spain ; Epp. 596 introd., 809. 127,8.
cf. period see Epp. 844. 255^, 1056. lon,
Or perhapsearlier cf. Ep. 475. 411.; 1062,1072, 1082, 1100, and 11. 83-7 //)/;« :
haberi cupiebam, non perinde volens cedo. Sed tamen hanc quoque
violentus extorques, adeo nusquam nou inuictus es, w yevmSa?. 25
Ac caetera quideni etiam ?) ofxoXoyui rj crvy^^wpS) aoi ws Ka\o}<; Kal
8iKaiU)<; Xi)(Oei'Ta. Tovto [xovov i^aipu) o ypae^ets iv ttJ SevTipa iTricrToXrj
Trepi Tov .\y]Xo'Lvov, ov yap olS ottws TrepaLVT], oVt ovk ''
-^Swao-o (^tAoKoAa/ca
dTroKaActi' €//,€, /X7; ov)(i avTos tovtov d/roKaAwv KoAaKa '
. ^vcfirjfxa cjiwveL,
BovSatc" lepbv yap 7] <^tAta, ov ^e/i,ts to. aKLvrjTa Ktvetv, Ov;^ orrojs fiaLVOfjML 30
ojo-re dv8pos TOtoiVoT; TOtdSe ypdif/aL fj-e rj vorjaai.
Trept Relegi Graecam
illam meam epistolam ; nihil illic video vnde possit colligi quod
ais, certe nulla cogitatio magis abfuit ab animo meo. Quid enim
obfuit quo minus et ^iAoKoAa^ sim, et tamen neminem habeam
KoAaKerovra? Proinde demiror, mi Budaee, qui tibi isthuc in animum 35
inciderit. Neque si quos habeam, continuo necesse sit illum esse
in quem huiusmodi suspicio nullo pacto cadere possit.
At quod in literis ad Tunstallum tuis strophologiam subesse non
negas. atque idem in me retorques, quid tu velis agnoscere ipse
videris ego non prius de me fatebor quam quisquam mortalium
: 40
reperiatur qui vel in liberrimis illis colloquiis, quibus apud con-
gerrones quicquid in buccam venerit eifutimus, vel inter pocula,
cum frequenter et dicenda et non dicenda prorumpunt, audierit
Erasmum secus loquentem de Budaeo quam scripserit aut si quen- ;
27. t ypn<t>eis'] Ep. 1015. 103-6. 52. litoris] BE.* 43, igAug. 1519; in
32. epistolam] Ep. 1004. wliicli Budaeus expresscs his disgust
38. ad Tunstallum]Cf. Ep. 1015. 1-3. with Court lifo and his longing to ro-
Erasmus is here con-
49. 'IroAttuTjys] turn to tho country.
fusing together the two letters men- 55. declamat] Cf. Ep. 1082. 24-45.
tioned in Ep. 1015. 4,9nn. 61. polliceris] Ep. 10 15. 162.
51. expeditio] Cf. Ep. 1015. 163. 63. Fabulam] Scc Epp. 1046, 1057.
190 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [isif
95 quam arbitror nihil opus. Bene vale cum tuis omnibus, patrone
magne et amice incomparabilis.
Louanii xiii. Cal. Mart. Anno. m.d.xix.
[An original letter, autograph throughout : the earliest in the great collec-
tion at Leipzig University Library (MS. 0331™), which was first edited by
•T.F. Burscher in his Spicilegia, 1784-1802, aud then by Forstemann and Gunther,
71. N : abominamur, sic horremus i=^. 75. cauletum tuum curandum iZ.
77. qui anie sua F dum : H. 78. qui F dum
: H. 93. FX^ LB:Ruzaeo
JV^: Ruzeo Lond. 95. nihil J': nil iV.
75. caules] A
figure which Erasmus 78. Leo] Cf. Ep. 1062. i^on.
had had in mind
in Ep. 1062. 115-16 ;
80. Angliae Rex] Cf. Ep. 1062. i28n.
cf. also Ep. 1060. 13-14. 83. Farraginem] See Ep. 1040 introd.
syncretismo] See Ep. 1050. 411.
76. 84. recognitum] Seo Ep. 1206 introd.
77. Rex vester] See Hist. riu CoHege de 89. libro] Lee"s Annotationes, which
France, by A. Lefranc, 1893; and cf. appeared jnst about this time .sce Ep.
;
aduersis, que ab eis quibus semper bene volui, perpessus sum. Sed
hec est mundi huius remuneratio cuius pertesus sum, sperans me
:
rescissem, redditae sunt milii litterae a R. patre Episcopo Roflfensi, quibus aperit
vir optimus prudens quidem et amicum consilium, atque etiam salutiferum, si
in tempore fuisset datum. Et quod ad me sane pertinebat, in tempore datum
erat nisi litterae illius diutius hesissent in manibus negociatorum. Id erat huius-
:
modi: '-Ne periret fructus mei laboris, quo de Christiana Ecclesia optime" vt
aiebat ille "meritus essem : sibi videri consultum vt Leus persuasus ab amicis
mihi faceret copiam sui libri. Deinde res ita temperaretur per.aliquos idoneos
vt et eius Annotationes exirent citra mei nominis iniuriam, et ego vicissim ita
temperarem responsionem vt ne quid lederem famam Lei. Nam rumorem esse
tam late sparsum, ipsa etiam re, vt fit, atrociorem, vt expediret magis euulgari
quam premi quae scripserat Leus".'
The date of tlie arrival of this at Louvain is given a fevv lines below as after
the publication of Ep. 1053. which took place (c. 14 Dec. 1519) :
'Sed paucis ante diebus quam haec reddita est epistola, mea iam ad Thomam
Lupsetum exierat in vulgiis, et ante hanc aeditam Leus suum librum miserat
2. pariat MS.
Lutetiam.' Cf. f. D v°, p. 510: Leo dlxi me non editurum fuisse epistolam
'
mihi crede, nihil est. De animo in me tuo non magis addubito quam
5 de meo ipsius. In priore libelli tui aeditione, crebrius et, vt videba-
tur multis, aculeatius iocabaris in ecclesiam Fabri. In posteriore vt
stilus est cultior, ita minus est stomachi. Tantum demirabar te tam
anxie laborare vt hoc negocium perti-aheres ad causam fidei ; qua re
valde grauatur Faber: quem subleuari malim, praesertim cum ille
10 te et suspiciat et veneretur.
De Nouo Testamento iubeo te bono esse animo. De rumore sparso
apud monachos et indoctos miruna non est, cum Leus velut ad hoc
natus nihil aliud agat. Et agit per monachos. Nouit optimos huius
rei satellites. Sed vbi prodierit ille iam diu iactatus liber, parturie-
15 rint montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Non adeo delirat mundus vt
ad Lei iudicium sit tumultuaturus. Tantum prodeat liber quod ;
1. suspicatur] From Erasmus' re- (Ep. 1030. 3n) : which was perhaps
marks about Faber in Ep. 1030. 1-8. iHsued with the Be V7iica Magdalena pre-
2. librum Lei] A
ms. copy of Lee's fixed. Cf. Ep. 1016. 17-21.
criticisms on Erasmus ; cf. Ep. 1026. 6. aculeatius] Erasmus had already
i^n. made this criticism to Fisher Ep. :
5. pi'iore , . . aeditione] Kenouard, 936. 9-18. See also Ep. 1016. 19-20.
Badius, ii. 443-4, shows that there are in ecclesiam Fabri] See if. 50.51
twoisHweHoHFisher^sDevnicaMagdalena. of the Be vmca Magdalena.
22 Feb. 1519 (Ep. 936. 7n) but they ;
In posteriore] See 1. ^n.
are of the same date and identical in 11. De Nouo Testamento] Fisher
matter, witli only tritling diflferences had perhaps expressed a fear that
in arrangement. So that in using Erasmus might already be contem-
j)rior, Erasmus apparently meant to plating a new edition. Cf. Ep. 1056
distinguisli that book from Fisher's lon.
socond reply to Faber, the Confittatio 14. parturicrint] Cf. Hor. A. P. 139.
1069] 193
Shortly before Ep. 1070. Precise dates may be conjectured for it appears
I
;
that Erasmus had now seen Lee's book, but had not yet made up his mind to
reply. On 21 Feb. the book had not reached him (Ep. 1068. 16-18) by the end :
of the month the statement that he had replied iu three days (Ep. 1072. 4-5)
was in print.]
Bene vale.
[This letter may be dated near Epp. 1079, 1081, in which there is mention of
Charles' expected return from Spain also not long after the appearance of Lee'3
:
NoN queror quod mihi parum tribuas sed lioc nomine parum ;
1069. 2. introd.
194 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [i5i§
—
a similar occasion the only other trace that I can find of Nicholas of Luxem-
burg. The Cardinal in question is perhaps Croy (Ep. 647 introd.) for whose :
communications with, if not presence at, Louvain about this time see de Jongh
pp. 19*, 20*. Cf. also Ep. 1082. 57.]
[Erasmus had becn attacked for his altcration of verbum (John i. i) into scrmo
in the second edition of the New Testament (cf. Ep. 384. 46^) by Standish :
(Ep. 608. i4n'i in London, and Egmondanus (Ep. 878. 13^) in Brussels. He
defended himself with an Apologia palam re/ellens quorundam seditiosos clamores apud
populum ac magnates, quibus vt impie fadum iactifant, quod in Euangelio loannis verterii,
Jn principio erat sermo, Louvain, Th. Martens, Feb. 1520. Of this the only copy as
yet known is in the Royal Library at the Hague but in the library
; of Queen's
College, Oxford, is a contemporary reprint, s. o. et l.
The date of this preface can be fixed very closely siuce on 21 Feb. Erasmus ;
had not seen Lee's book (Ep. 1068. 14-18), and by the end of the month this
Apologia was out.
The first draft of it was short, filling only a few qiiarto pages. But later on,
in connexion with Froben's edition of Eev., Aug. 1520 p. 2io\ which was
attached to the Eesponsiones against Lee, May 1520 (Ep. iioo\ Erasinus con-
siderably enlarged the Apolofjia at tlie same time altering the title slightly and
;
[Like Epp. 101 1. 1015 this is printed first by Budaeus. Here too it is notiee-
able that F adheres closely to the text of a. For /3 see Ep. 403 introd. Erasmus'
servant, who carried this letter back (see Ep. 1066 introd.), had not reached
Louvain by 7 March when Vives wrote to Budaeus,. Erasmus resalutat te ;
:
'
non scribit, quoniam tuae nunc sunt scribendi vices' Goldast, Pinl. ep. ceniHria,
1610, p. 222}.]
voluptariorum H.
O 2
196 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
15 dXAr^Xots ciTroSoCvat, dAAci Kat tt; dfJivrjcrTLCL ttj TeOeLcrr], ws TrporjprjTaL Kal
ftejSovXrjTaL i^/xwv eKaTepo?, ovtojs eva7ro/>teVctv. Kat TavTa yitev ovto) TreTrapoi-
"Eo-tw 8^ 6 d/xvT/OTtas vd/xos TrdvTjf TrdvTCos
hrfcrOoi ev(f)rjfjiLa'i SrjOev eveKa.
Kvpio<;, <i)s 8^ Hac certe lege stare mihi certum
eKKXrf(TL(x TpiTrj KeLfxevo<;.
est tanquam trinundino perlata.
2o Itaque obiectis non respondebo quoniam hanc excetram alia
ratione ineluctabilem esse inter nos'satis conuenit nisi hoc inficiabor,
— —
quod tu de strophologia inquis me non negare. Quem locum epistolae
meae vide etiam atque etiam vt satis intellexeris. Deinde quod
testificaris te nihil vnquam oblocutum, per me licet vt verum sit, nec
25 necesse habeo vicissim itidem contestari: cum id satis superioribus
epistolis actum sit, si semel agi potuit. Quod si qui tuorum mihi
obtrectauerunt, vt eos fecisse literatis testimoniis credidi, non tam
improbus sum vt etiam si id causa tua instituerunt, tu illorum prae-
stare debeas aut stultitiam aut studium inconsultum. Atque vt
.^0 stomachum antehac aloe fortasse immodice temperata perpurgaui,
sic etiam aureis aceto posthac eluere statui, ne quemuis obtrectationis
aut querimoniae nuncium non excussum admittant. Saepe enim in
fraudem nimia simplicitate incidi. Id quod tibi accidisse credo de
epistolis tuis, quas tu maledicas appellas, ego immodice salsas: quae
?,5 tamen a te aceto postea et tunc etiam tinctae, nmltum remiserunt
muriae et salsuginis.
Quod mihi et ingenii et doctrinae palma eedis et laude, non accipio
quod das. Non id agebatur nostra illa controuersia quam ita ipsam :
52. scribis] Ep. 1066. 63, 88-90. identifies this composition, which is
55. antistitis] Jerome Busleiden. .illuded to also in BE.* 43, 48, 50, 60, 61,
58. istinc] For Erasmus' thoughts of 62, 82, 83, with Budaeus' Be contemptic
leaving Louvain see Epp. 1078. 63^, rerum Jhrtuitarum, which was printed
1079. 8n. by Badius, s.a. ; but with the mark
69. literas] On 21 Feb. Budaeus had which is first found in July 1520
received a packet containing lettcrs (Renouard, BacZms, i, p. 44), and there-
from Sadoleto at Rome, from Bembo fore presumably about that time. Cf.
and Longolius at Venice, and from Ep. 1184.
Eicholtz (Ep. 866) at Cologne ; which quadragenarii] Cf. Ep. 1070. iin.
he answered 22-24 Feb. with BE.* 55-8. 76. dies festus] 26 Feb. 1520 was tlie
See also BE.* 54, 59, 60. first Sunday in Lent.
71. commentatio] M. Dehxruelle 80. posti-idie Calend.] BE.* 52.
198 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
now in the Univeraity Library: autograph throughout, and very rapidly written.
It fills eompletely two folios of thin writing paper a tliird, or perhaps more,
;
after the appearance of Lee's book, which he had not seen byai Feb. fEp. 1068),
but which must have reached Louvain by the end of tbe month (cf. Epp. 1037
introd., 1069, 1072). Capito's reply is perhaps Ep. 1083, rather than his letter
of c. 14 March (Ep. 1083. i) : for the passages which he cites from Erasmus in
Ep. 1083, may qiiite well have been on the missing page of this letter.
For a letter of Erasmus to Capito in the autumn of 1519 see Ep. 1029. ign.l
quod Erasmus illi non per omnia assentiretur, cepitque suos vene-
natos aculeos paulatim aspergere. Vbi Erasmus asscripsisset illius
chartis Memento quod hominem mones, sed homo ', offensus stul-
'
44. sed homo] Cf. Apcjl. qua respondef, of only oiie remembering perhaps at
:
i".A*, Jortin ii. 498 ; and Ep. 1039. ^^3- intervals that the hitter was a Prior.
48. repetit Basileam] In May 1518. 67. apud Anglos] Cf. Ep. 1026. i^n.
51. reuersus] In Sept. 15 18. 71. Paccus] In July 1519 cf. Ep.
;
Erasmus maxime cuperet edi. Tandem cum non esse(t) finis iactandi
75 atque obtrectandi, Erasmus prouocat eum ad operis editionem. Ille
fingit se velle edere, cum tamen non haberet in animo. Nam conscius
sibi volebat frui hac vsura glorie, vt vide(re)tur opus premere in
gratiam Erasmi et amicorum communium, et interim orbis suspensus
expectaret ex montibus parturientibus proditurum ridiculum murem.
80 Mox conuicio cuiusdam acerbiore prouocatus coepit insanire, pre-
sertim addentibus animos Anglis quibusdam ac fratribus haud sane
in rem ipsius instigantibus hominem. Antwerpie non ausus est
edere, timens ne responsio prius esset parata quam ipsius opus abso-
lutum. Hic vide prestigium hominis. Spargit de industria rumorem
85 opus excudi Bonnae vltra Coloniam. Eo mittit Erasmus et sumptu
sex florenorum discit esse somnium. Id finxerat vt auocaret eum
a suspicione et interea liber excudebatur apud Gourmontium, quo
;
91. sibi seposui, in initio versiis. 93. teclinis, etc. His tribtis versihus desunt
fines, charta lacerata. 106. quem ... iio. frontem add. Erasmus postea in margine.
79. montibus] Cf. Hor. A. P. 139. Bruxelle] Oct. 1516 to Feb. 1517.
85. Bonnae] Cf. Ep. 1053. i22n. Brugis] In June 1517; cf. Epp. 596
88. fratrem] See Ep. 1053. i3on. introd., 597. i6n.
90. Apologia] Ep. 1061. 103. Basilcam] In May 1518,
97. pollicitus] Cf. Ep. 1006. 2o8n. 107. proditorem] Lypsius : cf. Ep.
99. Antwerpie] In 1516-17. 1061. 403^.
I074] TO WOLFGANG FABRICIUS CAPITO 201
towards tbe Reformers, with wbom be later tbrew in his lot : see Ep. 368
inti-od.]
[I cannot confirm the year-date ; but as this is in the new portion of F, either
1520 or 153 1 is probable.
H. Gnintgen (f 20 Nov. 1547) of Calcar was Dean of Emmerich about 32 years ;
his predecessor having died 6 Oct. 1515 (van Heussen i. 286). He appears to
have suggested some correction in one of the historical works edited by Erasmus,
perhaps Suetonius and the Eist. Aug. Scripfores (Ep. 586) or Curtius (Ep. 704).
I cannot find any correction ascribed to him iu the later edition of Suetonius :
1075. 10. Oecolampadius] This infor- 15. no vapulot] For Erasmus' attempts
mation had probably beencommunica- to restrain his friends at first see Ep.
ted in a reply to Ep. 1064 cf. Ep. 1139.
; 993. 52n.
112-13. For his flight from the world 1076. i. epistola] Not extant.
see Ep. 1095. i73n. 6. officium] For Erasmus' readiness
Vuinpheliiigus] Ep. 1067. 5. to welcomc friondly criticism .see Epp.
12. Coletus] -f 16 Sept. 1519. 180. 12-17, 182.55-61, 1140. 7-8 and ;
1520, for Lee's book has appeared. and Erasmus' replies are expected ; cf. Ep.
1037 introd. His visit to Antwerp was no doubt in connexion with these, for
he corrected all the proofs himself (i, p. 22. 22). For Berselius see Ep. 674
introd.
From comparison with Ep. 1076 Erasmus' departure to Antwerp may be dated
7 or 8 March : his return to Louvain was between 15 and 19 March (Epp. 1081,
1085).]
cus desyderat aut cupit quam aliquid excudere quo Leus inuidia vel lo
furore potius contabescat et rumpatur. Tu bene vale, mi Erasme, et
si quid me facere voles, fac sciam. Curabo id probe et diligenter.
Da veniam quoque quod tam neggligenter scripserim tam non
neggh'gendo domino et patrono meo obseruandissimo. Iterum atque
iterum vale. ^5
Louanii. viii idus martias.
Si non est tibi molestum, dic Petro Egidio meis verbis salutem
non vulgarem.
Domino Erasmo Roterodamo, viro vndecunque doctissimo.
Antuerpiae. 20
[The first letter in Eev ; see p. 210. The year-dtitc needs no confirmation.]
1. epistola in Leum] This ephemcral which Lco compLnins in Ep. ro6r. 505-
coniposition, probably because printed 6. In the preceding year an offensive
by Martens, was not included in Eae paper had been fastened up on Lee's
or Eev, and seems to have perished. door cf. Apologia qua respondef, f. B^,
;
Prodiit tandem laruatus iste Leus, non leo, sed asinus ille
Cumanus, cuius rugitus toto biennio studiosis hominibus magnum
minabatur periculum. Sed nunc demum minus nobis incussit
terroris illius ferox conspectus quam qui de illo sonitus ferebatur.
5 "^O yap Aeros ovtos, ov 77/x.ets ws ayptov re koI /AtiAa Ov/xoXeov^^Tay k<^o^iq(Tafx.ev,
ovh' 6vv)^a<i ouSe KpaTos e;(et, /xovov 8e Kai tw (rT6fj,aTL afjLeTpLO^ wv, avaOXo^
Ktti TTttw yeXoros 7r/3os T^i/ p.axV^ Adnota-
elaeTrrjSrjo-ev. Haec sunt illae
tiones coelum atque terram, si diis placet, obturbaturae ? hic ille
triumphus de quo tantam tragoediam praeluserunt apud nos atrati
loquidam? Quod si sic triumphatur Leo ac suis plausoribus, nihil
aliud his optamus quam perpetuo vt agant triumphos.
Cum primum huc perlata sunt exemplaria Leicarum Adnotationum,
coepimus conferre loca Gerardus noster et ego, anxii interim ne id
esset Leus quod dicebatur. Sed vidimus statim rem in tuto esse :
6. draOXos] Cf. Luc. Culumn. 12. 1529 (Ep. 442 introd.), which speaksof
12. exemplaria] in print perhaps : their working together at Horace. In
about the end of February (see p. 109). 1532, the Count being then dead,
13. Gerardus] Episcopus cf. Ep. Gerardus was a fiscal officer at Treves,
1082. 60) of Enscheringen in Luxem- and married (_Knod p. 672).
burg perhaps the person who matri-
: 17. sine mente sonum] Cf. Verg. .4eH.
culated at Cologne, 27 Oct. 1488. He 10. 640.
matriculated with the Count at Bologna 28. incidere] Cf. Luke 10. 30, 36.
in 1509 as liis 'famulus' (ANGB. p. 30. Hoc ego] For Ct. Hermanu's part
271), and developed into a confidential in the Eeuchlin controversy see Epp.
secretary and chaplain cf. the ^nnaies
: 808. 5-7, 877. 21-2, 889. 40-42. It
(ed. J. B. Menckenius in Script. rer. bogan with his preface contributed to
German. ii, 1728, p. 602' of Spalatinus, the Defensio Eeuchlini (Epp. 680. 26n,
who met him at Cologne on 28 Sept. 919. 5on).
1520 and the Counfs preface of Dec.
; eadem te sors] Cf. Ep. ico6. 153^.
1078] FEOM HERMANN, COUNT OF NEUENAHR 205
modestiae palma. Neque quid egerit ille curandum tibi est, sed quod
te deceat, quod bona studia promoueat, quod nos ornet.
Haec, cum mihi monitor esses nuper, tu ipse sentiebas, et erat
sane digna te sententia, qua meae modestiae consultum cupiebas:
nunc inuicem moneri a me, et quidem tuis verbis, non feres grauate, 40
KULTOL 7rp€o-/3uT7;s vTTo viov. Augcbit fiduciam atque spem .x. Leonis
Pont. patrocinium, sub quo quantum incrementi bona studia cepeiint,
nemo tam stupidus est qui non intelligat. Porro pro Caesare Maxi-
miliano ortum est nobis sydus Carolinum, in quo paternus et auitus
adhuc splendor relucet, imo, si dicere licet, in quo parentum radii 45
velut in sole quodam luculentissimo deficiunt. De Germanis nostris
polliceor tibi faustissima, tot habet haec natio principes, satrapas,
ciues plebeios in bonis artibus versatos et candidos vt alia nulla.
Pauci adhuc restant tttcdxoi koXoloI kol /xeXaves avSpes illa filix nullo ;
nunc agit quod in apologo, 17 /xkv ovos iv Tots TrL6rjK0L<;. Sed caueat sibi 55
ne reliquum fabellae absohiat priorem enim partem satis infeliciter
;
clamosas istas obtere ranas. Qua in re si quid est quod ipse tibi
praestare queam, non deero me semper fidum experieris Achatem.
;
38. nuper] Cf. Ep. 703. 21-4. But explains this as vbi quis incidit in
'
there had been a more recent occasion, homines nasutos et contumeliosos, ipse
perhaps as a consequence of Ep. 1006 : stolidus, a quibus impune rideatur'.
' Quum ComesaNoua Aquila me literis 57. Apologiam] qua respondel; see p.
consuleret an deberet simultatem re- iio.
niittere Hochstrato, hoc tum promissa 58. clamosas] Cf. Epp. 1082. 24, 31,
palinodia arabienti, dedi consilium vt 1136. 18.
animo Christiano remitteret iniuriam. 62. Aduentum] For expectations of
Atque is, quum me virulentissime Erasmus' return to Basle in 1520 see
impetisset Leus, meum mihi consilium BRE. 162, 166, 176, Zw. E.'^ 131, 133, 140,
ingessit, admonens vt quod ipse meo 142 cf. Epp. 1073. 58-9,
: 1085. 13-14,
suasu fecisset in Iloclistrato, nunc iioi. i, 1102.10, 11 19. 22-3. A party
facerem in Leo ', Spongia, LB. x. 1639E of Z\vingli's friends, iucluding the
= HE. 333, §82. 8ee also Ep. 620. 3on. Administrator of Einsiedeln (cf. Ep.
49. iTTuxoi KoKoioi] A contemptuous 11 20. i2n), was prepared to gather at
reference to the monks cf. Ep. 1082.
; Basle to greet him (Zw. E.^ 146).
13, and Adag. 621, 'graculus inter postilitas] Cf. Ep. 867. 62n.
Musas'. 64. Bodburtina] See Ep. 867. 74.
niXava av^pi{\ Cf. Plut. de lib. educ, 66. Principem] Hermann of Wied :
17, and Hor. S. i. 4. 85; also 1. 9 supra. see Ep. 829. i^n. It was not till 1528
filix] Cf. Pers. 4. 41. that Ct. Hermann succeeded in per-
52. culinis] Cf. Ep. 163. 6. suading Erasmus to write to the Abp. :
55. inapologo] In Adag. 441 Erasmus Lond. xxiv. i, LB. 945.
206 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
[Contemporary with Ep. 1080 because of tlie diploma ; with Ep. 1081 because
of Charles' expected return froni Spain.]
1078. 69. Gerraaniae] Cf. Ep. 998.62-5. 1073. 5^, 1078. 63^.
70. frater] Gumpert iv of Neuenahr, 9. reditus] Charles' return had long
1500-46, who married Amoena, heiress been expected (cf. Ep. 1030. 66-7") but ;
pressed in Epp. 1080,1. For Erasmus' 12. testabor] For the redemption of
thoughts of leaving Louvain sce Epp. this promise see Ep. 1181.
io8o] 207
1080. 3. in Galliam] For the con- the roference to the CoUege de Franee
tinued endeavours to attract Erasmus in Ep. 1066. 77-8.
to Paris see Epp. 489, 522 &c., 810. 1081. i. libellum] See Ep. io6a.
360 seq., 896. gon, 994. iin and f ;
' 6. reditus] See Ep. 1079. ^n.
208 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [1520
ans.wers nor is answered by Ep. 1078, in which the Count gives his opinions on
Lee and his notes. It would appear, therefoi'e, that the two letters erossed, and
that this replies to one which is not extant. A
fairly precise raonth-date may
be assigned frora the place.
As a result of his new connexion (see Ep. 1053. 133^) Hillen seems to have
taken advantage of Erasmus' presence in Antwerp to request a letter of com-
mendation for a friend's book that he was about to print. The repetition of
some sentences alraost word for word from the praise of Vives in Ep. 917 iraplies
that Erasmus raust have had that letter before him in composing this ; cf. also
Ep. 1066. 52-61.]
sine lucro redeas domuni. Prorsus inuiderem tibi istam plane deorum
10 vitam, ni charior esses quam vt quicquam bonae rei tibi possit
obtingere, quod non idem aeque meum esse ducam.
Porro quod vicissim scire cupis quid hic rerum agatur, feruet
etiamnum rj 7rT(o;)^oTv/)avi/o^iAo^oDcro/ia;^ta. Sexquipedale verbum,
inquies imo perbreue dices, si cum i'e conferas ; nam isti nullum
:
versatile. 45
Cum in subtilibus quidem sed infantibus disciplinis versare
illis
tur, nemo disputabat acrius, nemo magis agebat sophistam. Nunc
totus in mansuetioribus litteris versatur, et sic versatur vt hoc
saeculo vix alium norim quem ausim cum illo committere siquidem, :
21. Dorpius] For his position at this Sol. i. i ; cf. Serv. on Aen. i. 273.
time and the renewal of his relations 33. tanta dexteritate] Cf. Ep. 917.
with Erasmus see Ep. 1044 introd. and 26-8.
49n. 37. Artis] Cf. Ep. 917. 30,1.
24. clamant] Cf. Ep. 1078. 58. 48. vt hoc saeculo] Cf. Ejx 917. 23,4.
veteris exempli] Cf. Ep. 917. 25. 53. etas virens] Vives was just 28.
30. nominis consortium] For Valen- 57. Card. Croio] See Epp. 647 iutrod.,
tia as tho old Latin name of Rome, 1071. 3.
translated by Evander into Greek, see 60. Gerardum] Cf. Ep. 1078. i^n.
210 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
[While Erasmus was completing his reply to Lee, with his Apologia and two
Eesponsiones (pp. 109, iio), Hillen, who had printed these at Antwerp, published
also a pamphlet expressingthe views of some of Erasmus' friends Epistolae aliquot :
eruditorum, nunquam antehac excusae, muliis nominibus dignae quae legantur a bonis
omnibus, quo magis liqueatquantasitinsigniscuiusdam sycophantae virulentia, s. a. (Eae).
This consists of eight letters referring to the controversy two (this and Ep.
:
1084) which had recently been received by Erasmus ; three addressed by Lupset
(cf. Ep. 1053) from Corpus Christi College, Oxford, 30 March-i April 1520, to
Lee, Paynell, and Nesen at Louvain, and two letters of More also communicated
by Lupset (Eae, f°. B^ v° ; Eev, p. 53) ; and finally Nesen's reply to Lupset,
20 April {1520), which, as standing second in the book indicates a date of
publication early in May 1520. Epp. 1085, to88 show clearly that Erasmus was
cognizant of the undertaking, and, if not actually the promoter, gave it full
encouiMgement, when once he had consented to it ; and even without such direct
evidence, his complicity might have been inferred from the insertion in each
portion of Eae of lelters addressed to him. From the facts of composition Steitz
is clearly right {Arch. f. Frankfurts Gesch., nf. vi, 1877, pp. 102-3) io supposing that
Nesen edited the pamphlet (cf. Ep. 1088. 10). There are two copies of it in the
British Museum (1009. c. 32 and G. 1568).
Later in the year Hillen brought out another issue with an Appendix Epistolarum
quibus eruditi viri detestantur Edouardi Lei virulentiam, 011 new signatures, a and b.
Tliis contains four new letters, one from Listrius to Beatus Rhenanus (BRE. 193),
one from Hutten to Lee (HE. 166), and two more addressed to Erasmus (Epp.
1095, 1109) ; the latest being dated 5 June. For this again Nesen was no doubt
responsible. His own copy of it is in the Town Library at Fraukfort on the
Main (Steitz, op. cit, p. 103).
Finally in August 1520 an enlarged edition of the collection was printed by
Froben with the title, Epistolae aliquoteruditorumvirorum,exquibusperspicuumquanta
sit Eduardi Lei virulentia (Eev). It contains fourteen new ktters two (Epp. 1078,
:
demnation of Lee's book, which he had just seen, 24 May 1520 (MRE. 634 =
MRE.2 590).
This tinal volume clearly was concocted by Erasmus' friends in England and
at Basie, and possibly without his knowledge. For after the attempted recon-
ciliation in the summer of 1520 (Ep. 1037 introd.) he may well have wished the
controversy at an end and have done what he could to check it (cf. Ep. 1139. 99-
102). Only three letters (Epp. 1078, 1089, 1105) of those added in Ekv carae from
his unprinted correspondence ; and these were quite likely contributed by the
writers (cf. Ep. 1089 inti'od.). In November he endeavoured to withdraw the
publication altogether (Ep. 1157).
Copies of Eae were sold by John Dorne in Oxford on 25 and 30 Aug. 1520, and
of the Appendix on 31 Aug. and 9 Sept. see nos. 1133. 1179, 1180, 1183, 1244 in
:
needs no confirraation. For Capito's opinion of Leo see also Zw. E.* 132.]
& 0, 23. esse a : iam esse 0. 28. Quod a : De eo quod /3. 31. im-
modestia a : modestia 0. 32. /3 : m^dico a.
2. Conrardus] Resch ; see Ep. 330. affords some slight ground for attribu-
i^n. ting to Hutten the Hochstratus ouans, in
4. fulgur] Cf. Adag. 1690. which Lee is severely handled see :
15. Erostrato] Cf. Epp. 1053. 205^, title-page of which SpaLatinus has
io6r. 716. written the date 1520,
16. laudatiuncula] See Ep. 1061. 26. Zazius] For his opinions see Ep.
200-9. 1084. 74-97, quoting ZE. 22 from :
rough draft (a) secondly (/3^) Eae (p. 210) and thirdly Eev (/S^). The two last,
; ;
from their close connexion, may be jointly designated as /3. The letter from
Zasius to Boniface (16 March Basle MS. G. II. 32. 17 ZE. 22), which is quoted
: ;
at the end (7), shows that Boniface sent him a copyof a, and in deference to his
criticism omitted the translations of the Greek which are shown in the critical
notes. As /3 represents the letter actuallj' sent and received, I have given
preference to its readings though retaining the spelling of a.
;
This letter was very likely sent with Ep. 1083. The news which Boniface
gives, clearly indicates that he had not written to Erasmus since Ep. 1020.]
ViDE nunquid verum sit quod Graeci dicere solent, vnicum saeculi
decus El^asme, otl rj ajxaOua Opaar^L';, OKvrjpov^; 8e to XfXoyLcrixivov aTrepyd-
^eTai, Quousque tua humanitate abutor ? Scio quantae in maximis
verae theologiae studiis sint occupationes tuae. Scio quam haec te
5 velut dXettKaKov Herculem continuo implorare soleant, quamque pro
illis indefatigabili excubes animo nec tamen interim meis nugis te ;
1083. 36. operismei] EpistolaW. Fahri- I have not becn able to find a copy.
ciiCapitonis,quasepurgatde sKspicmieLeici vltima nauis] Canying books
41.
fauoris, appended to an edition of Eras- for tlie Frankfort fair, and therewith
mus' thrce ^po%iaeagainst Lee, Mainz, letters cf. Ep. 1084. 45^.
;
.T. Scheffer, June 1520 (BEr.> i, p. 14). 1084. 9. solliciti] Cf. Ov. Her. i. 12.
1084] FEOM BONIFACE AMERBACH 213
poterat obiit non sine summa nostra iactura. Ego Basileae hucusque
; 40
ob fratris mortem me continui. Vere tamen ineunte ad Auenionam
proficiscor, cepta studia prosecuturus, et ordini iuridico, si e re mea
videbitur, nomen daturus tametsi nesciam si quid minus possim :
22. DorpiumjCf. Ep. 1044. i6n. face, 6 March 1520: 'negociorum tamon
36. litteras] The rough draft is ex- mole hoc temporis articulo, quo ad
tant at Basle (MS. C. Vl\ 73. 158 Am. : nundinas Francofordias literae mit-
E. 31 dated, like this, 19 Mai-ch 1520,
; tendae sunt, ita premor vt prope de-
from theday of dispatch,thetwoletters ficiam. Sunt enim compluria michi
being sent by the same messenger. consilia principibus et item Sueuiae
34. Brunonem] fzi Oct. 1519 ; and facienda quae ita simul me onerarunt
:
73.411) he says he will start'ad kls. diensesabeant '(BasIeMS. G.II. 32. 16).
Maias '. Cf. Ep. 1083. ^in.
45. principum] Cf. ZE. 21, to Boni- 46. ad Dorpium] Cf. ZE. ar, 22.
214 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
50. a/32 : cauillari /3^. 52. impudentia est P est ista impudentia a. 54. :
Quam valide . . . 55. rationibus add. P. Siccine /3^ Sicne a0\ /3' syco- : :
phante a/S^, 58. Quanquam . 59. elephantum add. /3. 60. ad oni. ff^,
. . m
fine lineae. 62. feliciter Erasme P doctrinarum princeps et monarcha a.
. . . :
65. Basileae . . . m.d.xx /3 (decimoquarto jS^ xiii (i"^) Basill. Raurac. a. : 67. :
vel verius
: & a. 70. /3^ videbatur ajS^.
: 71. his litteris (his . . .
j8i
: hiis 0^) : ad te mitterem a. Leo /8^ : te a/32. 72. alium haec : alie-
num a. 73. sed audi . . . 99. monarcha add. /3. (74. opjunpa; L^o ^'
Eduardo /3"^-/. 78. praesidium /3 Verum louem 7. Tantum 92. : 79. . . .
Leus /3 Nam cui alii nisi loui aequipararim Erasmum, siue ille summus deorum
:
nominetur siue a iuuando nomen mutuetur ? Cum enim dii sint, testante ])ro-
pheta, et filii excelsi omnes quiqui optimis literis ad hominum salutem vtuntur,
quomodo non Erasmus deorum summus sit? qui (si post Hieronymoset Cypria-
nosquisquam) fidei causam, theologiae maiestatem vnusegregie, eleganter, docte,
fundate, immo diuin§ adserit, tuetur, pi-ofert. luuisse autem mortales quis vn-
quam abhinc quadringentis et amplius annis alius compertus est maiore cum
fructu, si ab Erasmo discedas ? 7. 80. vt post /3^ vt nobis post /3^. :
66. scribenda] The letter is not ex- from tlie arrival of Lee's book in Basle
tant. Its date may be conjectured (p. 109).
1084] FEOM BONIFACE AMEEBACH 215
[As in Ep. 407, P produces an anomaly by i5i-efixing the address to the letter ,
which in this case had not even a formal heading, but only the short greeting
common in hastily written notes (cf. Epp. 602, 653, et saepius). The absence of
heading is the more common when, as in Epp. 640, 642, there is a signature. It
may, therefore, be inferred with probability that the editors of P were printing
from tlie originals ; which, being mostly brief, were no doubt autograph.
The year-date can be supplied indubitably from the appearance of Lee's book
(1. 4) ; see Ep. 1037 introd.]
written from Geuder's country house But possibly filiae should bo read for
216 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
[Between tlie Apologia qua respondet and the first Responsio acl Annotationes Lei,
which Hillen piinted in (March) and April 1520 (pp. 109, 1 10). As Erasmus cor-
rected the proofs of these (i, p. 22. 22% it seems clear that wlien this letter was
written, he was about to start for Antwerp to see the first Responsio through the
press. His visit to Antwerp for the printing of the Apologia is to be dated c. 8-15
March (Ep. 1077 introd.). The second Responsio was in the press there ou 17 April
(Ep. 1092) and he was already at Antwerp on 13 April (Ep. 1091). For the
;
that the Tuesday fixed for his departure (1. 7) may be taken conjecturally as
27 March. On 9 April Erasmus was at Louvain again (Ep. 1088), and preparing
lor his third visit to Antwerp on this business cf. Ep. 1094. lo-ri.];
1085. 7. indocti scripsi: in ** P. 13. toti corr. LB, cf. Ep. 597. 25:toto P.
16. Erasmus . raptimPiB om.
. . : O^. 17. Clarissimo . . . incomparabili om. 0*.
More's letter to Dorp (LB. App. 513), which was also 'nunquam antehac
edita'. Apparently written very soon after More had seen the Antimorus
(Ep. 1045), probably about the same time as he composed his reply to that,
Thomae ilori Epistola ad Germanum Brixium : qui, quum Morus in libellmn eitis, quo
contumeliosis mendaciis incesserat Angliam, Itisissei aliquot epigrammata annis abhinc
plus septem, iam intra sesquimensem in summa Anglwmn Gallorumque concordia, suh
ipsum conuentum principum aedidit aduersus Morum libeUum, qui et ineptis et virukntis
iurgiissuum infatnat authorem, Loudon, Pynson ,(ApriI) 1520 (cf. Ep. 1096. 103-5).
The Antimorus no doubt arrived in London about the third week in March (cf.
p. 128, and Ep. 1096. i) so that this letter may be dated in the end of March
;
olim inter nos agitata fuit in mediis belli tumultibus, eam ille iam
olim mortuam nunc demum in summa pace redintegrat. Et sic agit
homo Phormiana confidentia, vt quum suam causam facile sentire
possit nuUi non esse damnatam, qui quidem rem pernorit, tamen 15
velut eam bene ac dOucide quibus oportuit iudicibus ai^probasset, iam
suo iure scihcet quiduis debacchetur in me, et totam pectoris sui
sentinam lepidus et facetus exhauriat qui postquam vnum atque
:
quos quibus res adhuc esset incognita, multos quibus alteruter no-
strum, quosdam quibus vel inique placent rixae ac non hoc pacto :
bos eiusmodi sese iactaret ephippiis apud te, qui non tantum proram
3r puppimque certaminis (nisi non legisti Chordigeram ; nam caetera
legisse te scio) verumetiam certatores ipsos intus, quod aiunt, et in
cute nosti tum cui sciat eiusmodi rixas, etiamsi quae iusta sint exor-
;
tae causa, tamen pro tui ingenii candore atque humanitate odiosas
inuisasque esse, nedum hanc illius ineptissimam, iniustissimam,
40 inhumanissimam, et quam abs te vidisset epistola ad se missa velut
praeiudicio damnatam, adiectis etiam tuae sententiae causis : altera in
honorem vtriusque ciuiliter magis excogitata quam vere, quasi nos
essemus hi quos literarum intersit concordes esse ; altera certe iustis-
sima, quod quae olim flagrante lusimus bello, ea nunc facta pace
45 conueniat obliterari. Ex his causis illam quae ciuilior erat quam
verior, quanquam de me contemptius admittit, de se tamen candidus
atque modestus agnoscit alteram illam quae tam vera fuit vt negari
:
53. quin Joriin : quem a. 64. nos Jortin, vt in U. 94, 183 : omnes a.
35. Chordigeram] See Ep. 212. in. poems on the affair of the Cliordigera in
caetera] More's own epigrams ; More'3 Epigrammala, Basle, Froben,
cf. 1. 5in. March 1518, pp. 242 6. Cf. 1. i35n.
36. intus] Pers. 3. 30. 52. ah cpitasi] in the middle, instead
40. epistola] Ep. 620. of at tho bcginning : the epitads being
47. agnoscit] Ep. 1045. 10-20. the central part of the play, led up to
49. prius] Ep. 1045. 79. hy iYiQ protasis.
51. epigrammatc] There are eight 64. foedlfragos] Cf. Chord. 11. 17,18.
l
1087] FROM THOMAS MORE 219
sese mediis in armis gessisse, homo nimirum sic aifectus erga men-
dacia vt periurium quoque et foedifragium habeat in blanditiis. An
nihil ad me pertinuisse censet, mendaciis et calumniis ab illo laces-
sitam patriam, quod ipse non attingarnominatim? nam id videtur in-
nuere quasi non hac ratione, atque adeo eadem praeclara [ojratione, 70
:
latroni liceat in ius vocare viatorem, a quo sit fortasse repulsus in-
clementius, quod non illum impeteret sed insidias tentaret pecuniae.
At fortassis etiamsi non in illum prius, saltem scripsi acerbius
est enim et in vlciscendo modus. At ego Polyphemi barbariem imi- '
74. modus] Cf. Hor. S. i. i. 106. don (f i Sept. 1497), succentor of Wclls
Polyphemi] Cf. Ep. 1045. 39-43. Cathedral 24 Nov. 1447, and cantor of
83. versus meos] An epitaph in the Kin.G;'s Chapel May 1465: both of
rhyming versc, p. 232 of More's Epi- wliich offices he held until his death.
gramntata. Tlie most grotesque line in He was also master of St. Catherine's
it is, '
Praeter et hacc ista fuit optimus hospital at Bristol 1478. None of his
orgaquenista'. Brixius reprinted it works survive. See More's verses
on f°. H'v° of the Antimortis c{.t°.D*. : upon him (1. 83^), and G. Grove in
It is preceded and followed by other Dictionary of Music, 1879.
verses on Abyngdon. 98. Probae] See Ep. 32 introd., and
Abyngdonium] Henry of Abing- 3711.
220 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
diras haud sane quisquam erit qui vocet, qui quidern Latine sciet
vtpote ad quas nec illud quidem Martialis nostro tam longe morda-
120 cius accedit in Theodorum vatem, Brixio vati fortasse non absimilem :
non optaui tamen istud ei, nec ignem imprecatus sum, quem effuge-
runt etiam multi qui fuerunt in naue. Neque enim quisque statim
imprecatur ea cuilibet, quibus illum censet ac pronunciat dignum.
Nam et Brixius, opinor, fures dignos ducit suspendio, dignos ducit
130 adulteros, dignos hauddubie periuros ; a quibus haud ita multis ab-
sunt parasangis mendaces nec tamen, reor, vsqueadeo immitis est
:
109. dignum] Epigr. p. 242. j.X' t^*^^'"P Cliordigeni, who is the liero
119. Martialis] 11. 93. 3, 4. of Brixius' poem (Ep. 212. in), and
135.nouem] This {igure is reached who perished in the action of 10 Aug.
(cf. 5in) by including two extracts
I. 1512. Another conteniporary poet,
from the Chordigeru Epigr. p. 243.
: Humbert de Montmoret, celebrated
138. Herueum] Herve Portzmogucr him with a Herueis, Paris, s. a, See
or Portimoger, the Brcton captain of NBG. xl. 870.
1087] FROM THOMAS MORE 221
profiteatur aliud quam in meum nomen non minus delira quam con- 155
tumeliosa conuitia. Postremo cum accepissem id agi vt excuderentur
Epigrammata mea Basileae, scis ipse quid egerim vt ea quae in
Brixium scrij^seram, vna cum nonnullis omitterentur quod quaedam :
scriberentur. Nam in illis quibus non minus crebro inculcat quam 165
falso, se prouocatum prius, et tot probris, tot conuitiis, tot maledictis.
tot diris, tot execrationibus offensum capitaliter si ea quae recenset
;
208. hospitio] See Ep. 1106. 9311. actually piosented to Henry, is among
220. commemorem] J.n a congratu- the Cotton MSS. at the British Museuni
latory ode addressed to Henry vni on (Tit. D. iv). For Brixius' treatment
his coronation, 24 June 1509 (Epigr. of it in tlio Antimorus, f°. B' \°, cf.
p. 185). I cannot find that it was Epp. 1117, H33 his marginal note is
:
minated ms. copy, perliaps the original instituit, patrem vituperantis '.
1087] FKOM THOMAS MOEE 223
aduertit omnes, imo omnes prorsus homines quibus vlla scintilla aut 24°
boni pectoris aut sensus insit communis, in hoc Brixiano risvi non
minus animum gladiatorium detestari quam deridere dementiam.
Atque haec quum ita se habeant, tamen tanquam ista Coroebo
cuipiam scriberet aut Mai-gitae, non Erasmo ; tanquam ipso conni-
uente ad suam petulantiam, qua pidor debacchatus est in nos, omnium 245
simul sic eruisset oculos, vt quod ipsi cernere non liberet, idem nemini
pi'orsus liceret aspicere tanquam iam vicisset me lacessisse prius,
;
adeo non arnicitia contracta est vlla, vt nec litera quidem vlla inter-
cesserit : at neque cuni ipso Ehenano, vt omittam plurimos eruditione
non incelebres. Quod si Brixius fingat hos omnes adulari mihi,
multum debeo qui tam magnum virum me facit. Sin caecos,
ei
360 inseios atque indoctos omnes pronunciet, quoniam sic ab ipso dissen-
tiunt, vt quem ille toties stultum vocat, toties appellat insanum, ei,
vt nihil recenseam amplius, aliquanto certe plusculum tribuant pru-
dentiae quam adhuc audio, praeter Brixium, quenquam tribuisse
Brixio nemo ei tam absoluta potestate dictaturam detulit, vt eius
:
365 vnius sententiam ita ratam esse oi^orteat, quin ad populum saltem
supersit prouocatio.
Nam quod hoc ita moleste fert, quod Ehenanus Epigrammata mea
Marulli et Pontani praetulerit, debebajt aliquanto pressius Ehenani
laudationes expendere : qui etsi multo mihi tribuit amplius quam
370 meus pudor possit agnoscere, tamen ea parte qua potissimum Brixius
offenditur, non adeo efifusus est in laudes meas vt Brixius inuidere
debuerit. Neque enim me Pontano aut Marullo vndecunque praefert
Rhenanus aut confert. Natura tantum comparat, non Graecarum
literarum peritia ne sit opus vt ita stomachetur Brixius Graeco
:
genboscli (Ep. 616. i^n) Grapheus was Antwerp, C. Plantin, 1558, without
arrested on 5 Feb. 1522 at the order of his name. Erasmus writes of him with
Egmondanus and Hulst, and under praise in two letters of 14 July 1522,
pressure made an abject recantation in and thought of leaving him money in
April. His life was spared but in ; his tinie of need and their relations
;
Quanquam ipse neque tani superbus sum neque tam nescius mei, vt
quae mihi tribuit Beatus Rhenanus, agnoscam qui me, quod dixi, :
reliquos, Budaeus vnus, vir non minus publicae rei peritus quam
literariae (in qua plane principatum quendam obtinet), quae de me 390
scripsit eiusmodi siut quae —
sicuti nunc hominis candidissimi ciuili-
tati tribuo, non aliter (quam) quae in Brixii Chordigeram prae-
fatur eruditissimus Aliander —
ita longe magis optem esse vera
,
Q 2
228 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
425 nulhis lupus vnquam fuit deteriore memoria, nulla pluma, nullus
ventus magis constanter inconstans.
lani quod ait se tuo consilio fuisse pariturum, nisi liber iam tum
fuisset in raanibus typographi demiror admodum, quum tantam
;
vim obtineat apud illum vel solus nutus Erasniicus, tam leue pondus
430 habuisse monitoriam epistolam, vt potius suam famam pergeret
infamare tam furioso libello, praesertim siticulosus gloriae, quam
perderet pauxillum pecuniae: homo cui, vt ipsius verbis vtar, non
victus aut vestitus modo, sed famulitium quoque atque equitatus
insuper, et crumena denique semper aere grauis abundet cui domus ;
435 sint et hortuli, in quos Apollo ac Musae omnes, nisi Brixius pessulum
obdat hostio, cupiant relicto Parnaso prorsus immigrare. Et tamen
miror si tibi fuisset pariturus, qui re adhuc integra toties admonitus,
neque Budaeo neque Beraldo neque Lascari neque Deloino parere
voluit, neque reuerendissimo Cardinali, qui nuper obiit in Grallia.
440 Caeterum vt bonitatis fuisse iudicat quod Antimori dehortareris
editionem, ita nisi probaris editam, plane iam te censet iniustum:
qui aliud ius illi nunc dicas in me, aliud in Fabrum olim statueris
tibi. Nec dubito quin sibi videatur acutus admodum Brixius, et
peritus iudiciorum, qui te tam graui stringat praeiudieio, vt ni videri
445 veh*s iniustus, aduersus eum pi'onunciare non possis.
Ego, mi Erasme, (quod sicuti apud omnes profiteor, sic apud
neminem libentius profiteor quani apud te cuius animuni hac sane
;
438. Baraldo a.
425. lupus] As the type of ingratL- Fecamp 1505 ; Councillor of the Par-
tude : Adag. 1086.
cf. liament at Rouen 1507 Abp. of ;
427. quod ait] Ep. 1045. 20-6. Bourges 1515 Cardinal t April 1517
; ;
432. verbis] Ep. 1045. 118-24. t 27 Nov. 1519, at Blois. See GC. ii.
437. admonitus] On f. C* v" of the 94, 359, xi. 153, 213. A memberof his
Antimorus Brixius appeals for support household was the future poet, Salmou
to the authority of Budaeus, Deloynes, Macrin, who w.as intimate with Brixius
and Lascaris. and contributed some verses to the
439. Cardinali] Antony Bohier of Antimorus see BE.* p. 88n.
:
Issoire in Auvergne ; Abbot of St. Ouen 440. iudicat] Ep. 1045. 14-20.
at Roueu 1492-1515, of Issoiro 1499, of 442. aliud ius] Cf. Ep. 1045. 65-6.
1087] FKOM THOMAS MOEE 229
472. ludere] Ep. 1045. 7^- 474- gladio] Ep. 1045. 1°'
491. vt ait] Ep. 1045. 81-94.
230 LETTEKS OF ERASMUS [1520
respondi Antimoro, non sat fortasse reuerenter pro tanta viri digna-
tione, sed pro re certe, vt censent nimis aliquanto modeste. alii,
Tu vero, mi Erasme, quid sentias, scire. Nam quod tam cupio
propere curaui excudenda quae scripsi, quae tutius fortasse fuerat
530 per ocium polire, praesertim obiicienda tam oculato aemulo, vt et
ibi cernat mendum vbi mendum non est: malui ei ossa multa
relinquere in quibus exerceat dentes, fatiget, aut frangat denique,
quam mihi diu talibus nugis occupare pectus. Et profecto non
fuissem tam insanum libellum responso dignaturus vllo, ni mihi
535 visum esset amicorimi quorundam obsecundare consiliis, suadentium
vt me tuerer aduersus hominis absurdissimas calumnias. Quae res
vna mihi scopus fuit, non commutare conuitia, ac paria vieissim in
illum spargere. Alioqui, si statuissem non respiciendum potius quid
me deceret dicere quam quid illum conueniebat audire, quantumuis
540 magnifice meum contemnat stihim Brixius, tanquam imbellem,
eneruem, nihilque masculum effecissem saltem vt intelhgeret quam
;
518. palma] In some verses preeed- magna pondera imponas ae tam gra-
ing the Antimorus, f°. A* v°, Brixius uiter vrgeas oneresque vt magnitudo
had written : oneris sustineri non queat, non deor-
Vt si palmam
oneres premasque, sum palma codit nec infra fiectitur, sed
contra aduersus pondus resurgit, et sursum
Haec obnititur altiorque surgit. nititur recuruaturquo '. More uses the
Cf. Adag. 204, citing Gell. 3. 6 Ar- :
'
same figure in his Ejnstola ad Briximn,
bori palmae peculiare quiddam inesse, f°. f* v".
quod cum ingenio fortium virorum 522. scribis] Ep. 620. 32,3.
couueniat. Nam si supor eius lignum 542. Nasonis] Tr. 3. 11. 21.
1087] FEOM THOMAS MOEE 231
574. negat] Cf. 1. 502. 581. Mupixov'] C{. Adag. 1801, and Ep.
578. personae] Cf. Juv. 3. 175. 1144.24.
580. versus] Antimorus, f°. B* v°. 594. dignas] Cf. Ov. Met. i. 166.
232 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
615 es vt nec ipse sibi sit charior. Lupsetus noster magno auditorio
summa cum laude sua, nec minore scholasticorum fruge, bonas
literas in vtraque lingua profitetur Oxoniae. Successit enim loanni
Clementi meo nam is se totum addixit rei medicae, nemini ali-
;
[This letter vvas first printed, from the Gotha MS. described in Ep, 872 introd.,
by Steitz in his life of Nesen (Ep. 329 introd.), pp. 96,7 using a copy communi- ;
cated by Pastor Krafft of Elberfeld. Horawitz printed it later from the same
source. Kawerau (JE. 37) refers also to a ms. copy at Hamburg (58, f. 20 v°),
which I have not seen.
The year-date is confirmed by the mention of Atensis' death (8 Jan. 1520) and
of Erasmus' reply to Lee (Ep. 1037 introd.).]
601. uvTairoTiapdtTv] Cf. Ar. iV«6. 293. Lyons, S. Dolet, 1541, p. 45, Ego u '
604. Caci nomen] sc. a cacando : mea Angliam profectione, quo tem-
in
Jortin. pore quartumdecimuni paulo minus
605. afflatu] Cf. Obseq. 50. agebam annum, duobus annis cum viro
606. meiere] Cf. Juv. i. 131. doctissimo Tlioma Lupseto, qui nescio
608. Caleti] Sec p. 296. quot abhinc annis mortuus est, in
615. Lupsetus] Cf. Ep. 967. 26n. Corporis Christi Collegio Oxoniae habi-
He succeeded Clement (1. 6i8n) about taui '. Lupset held office till 1523,
the end of 1519, and was lodged in when he was succeeded by Vives.
Corpus (cf. p. 210). During his resi- 618. Clementi] He had been ap-
dence there Gentian Hei-vet of Orleans pointed WoIsey's Reader in Humanity
was his pupil see Hervefs Opuscula,
: at Oxford c. Nov. 1518 cf. Ep. 907.
;
1088] TO JODOCUS JONAS 233
[For the source see p. 210. Tlie omission of the precise month-date in Eev
perhaps indicates that the letterwas printed from Pace's i-ough-draft, communi-
cated from England, rather than from the actual document received by Erasmus.
The year-date is indubitable.]
1088. 4. literas] See Ep. 1083 introd. Annoiationes (Ep. 1037). Cf. also Ep.
5. laudt-nt] Cf. Ep. 1083. 3311. 1085. 10-12.
10. Ne.seno] See Ep. 1057 introd. 11. praestiterim] e.g. in Ep. 1033:
By 20 April he had returned (Eae f°. and see Ep. 1038 introd.
B^ : Eev p. 53). 14. claudus] In a marginal noto to
quo vos instituat] Perhaps a Sbrulius' Cartnen (Ep. 1159. 6n) as
copy of Ep. 1053 in Martens' edition, printed in the Flores, Latomus is de-
to show his Erfurt friends how he scribed as 'loripes cf. also Lond.
'
;
wished the case stated and Lee's ; Viv. 6, LB. 615 of 19 Jan. 1522.
234 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
tanto referes gratiam, quanto magis hic referre mundus neque ingratus
curat neque gratus potest. In cuius immensa commoda quum tot
incommoda perpessus sis, quum tot laboribus valetudinem detriueris,
30 vt bona promoueres studia, tamen apud inuidos, eosque tibi prope-
modum vni debentes quicquid habent literarum, si quid liabent
bonarum, mala jjro bonis referas, eo similior es Christo quem non :
8. ea pacta] The settlement at- for las notes (cf. his letter to Louvain,
tenipted in the summcr of 1519: see ^mho<. f". AA*), and the abusive attacks
p. iio, and cf. Ep. 1074. 67-74. mado upon hini (ibid. ff. CC. v°, CC^ :
[Only 1520 and 1521 are possible for by April 1519 Carinus (Ep. 920 introd.)
;
had not yet come to Louvain with Nesen (cf. Epp. 994. ^n, 1034). But beyond
this I cannot confirm the year-date. No corroboration is obtainable from the
place ; for in 1521 Erasmus was again at Antwerj) just at this time (Ep. 1199).
For Erasmus' three visits to Antwerp in March and April 1520 see pp. 203, 216.
His intention was now, after supervising the printing of his third book against
Lee, the second ResjMnsio which Hillen produced in May (p. iio), to go on into
Holland (Ep. 1092. i). But tho dates of his letters signed from Antwerp show
such short intervals that the visit to Holland can hardly have been carried out
(cf. Lond. xvii. 6, LB. 604, of October 1521). Between 3 and 5 May he returned
to Louvain (Epp. 1098,9).
Livinus Algoet (f 25 Jan. 1547) of Ghcnt (Index to H) entered Erasmus'
household as a servant-jjupil c. 1519, and remained with him for nearly seven
years ; frequently carrying his letters. At Louvain he was a pupil of E. Rescius
t,OE. jj. 200), and became proficient in Latin and Greek : ' adeo . vt non
. .
habuerimus apud nos illi similem', if he is the messenger of Zw, E.^ ii8(cf. Ep.
1063 introd.). In Sept. 1524 Erasmus, who was not altogether satisfied with
him (0.'p. 8), sent him to study medicine at Louvain (OE. p. 352), and pro-
posed that he should work there with a young kinsman of Wolsey (Lond. xviii.
50, LB. 686; ; at the same time, on the suggestion of Marcus Laurinus (EE. 27 :
cf. II. 25-7 j, trying toarrange that his Courtray i^ension (Ep. 436. ^n) should pass
to Algoet at his death (Lond. xx. 46, xxi. 31 ; LB. 783, 822). But the young
man was disinclined to study, and in 1525 was still carrying letters (EE.^ 30
Horawitz v. 77, 80 LB. App. 330). In 1527 he was in Paris (EE. 71) ; but
;
Erasmus was disappointed in him (OE. p. 352), and did not, as Laurinus
wished, make i)rovision for him in his will. Continuing to hang about in quest
of court service, Algoet obtained temporary employment with Corn. Scepperus
at Augsburg (EE. 131) ; and at length attached himself to Nic. Olaus, who in
^531-2 procured Ijim, with Erasmus' aid, a small post in the household of Queen
Mary of Hungary (OE. pp. 174-6, 196, 225J. On 6 Aug. 1532, being still a
dependant, Algoet married agranddaughter of Ant. Clava (OE. pp. 219, 224) and :
continuing with Olaus, was appointed in March 1534 to teach Queen Mary's
young pages (OE. pp. 477, 515). For the year 1532-3 he enjoyed the income of
Erasmus' Courtray pension (Basle MS. C. VF. 71, f. i). In Dec. 1538 he received
a present from the Queen for composing a genealogy of Charles v by 1543 he ;
vvas king of arms for Flanders. In Erasmus' later years Algoet regained some
of his confidence, and often acted as messenger to him. See the detailed notes
in EE. E. Boehmer {Sibl. Wiffeniana, i, 1874, p. 93) mentions a rare volume,
narrating the proceedings of the Diet of Augsburg Pro religione Christiana, wliich
Algoet received an imperial privilege to print, 6 Nov. 1530.]
absunt itera illud, Malo coactus qui suum ofificium facit, tantisper
' :
'
ex animo suum officium facit, praesens absensque idem erit '. Mihi
15 semper placuit liaec Mitionis ratio tuae partes erunt adniti ne me
;
10. Tereutianum] Eun. 600. 13. Is quem] Cf. Ter. Ad. 72,3.
11. Malo] Cf. Ter. Ad. 69-71. 18. Monandri] ap. 1 Cor. 15. 33.
1092] 237
[This letter and Ep. 1 188 were first printed by P. Burmann in 1697 in the same
volume as Ep. 949 from the collection of autograph letters belonging to Ant.
;
tions made by Leclerc show that he too had the original manuscript before him :
though he does not mention Vivien in his preface. His text both here and in
Ep. 1188 is so much better than Burmann's that it must be placed first but in ;
spelling and form of date Leclerc allowed himself such freedom that I have
preferred to follow Burmann.
The year-date can be assigned without hesitation from the mention of Erasmus'
replies to Lee (11. 4, 11), the second and third of which were printed by
Hillen at Antwerp in April and May 1520. In consequence the year-date, Anno
1521, which appears in a, may be attributed to the editors.
—
Nicholas Everardi or Everardus (c. 1462 9 Aug. 1532) of Middelburg was
a native of Walcheren. After studying at Louvain under Arnold de Beka and
Peter of Tirlemont he was LL.D. 11 June 1493 and, continuing there to teach ;
law, was Rector 1504. He also becanie Chancellor to Erasmus' patron, Henry of
Bergen, bishop of Cambray (cf. his consilii(.m no. 24). For a time he took
orders, and was appointed Dean of St. Guidon's at Anderlecht in 1498, and
Dean of St. Gudule's at Brussels in 1506. But shortly afterwards he returned
to civil life, married, and served as a member of the Grand Council of
Malines. In 1509 he was made President of the Council of HoIIand, Zeeland,
and Friesland and in 1528 President of the Grand Council in succession to
;
•Tosse Laurens.
He wrote Topicorum seu de locis legalibus liber, Louvain, Th. Martens, Feb. 15 16,
addressed to John le Sauvage (Ep. 410), and with a preface by Remaclus Arduenna
(Ep. 411), who had been his pupil. This was reprinted at Bologna, Jo. Bapt.
Hectoris, 27 Jan. 1528 and a new edition with his final corrections appeared
;
after his death, Louvain, S. Sassenus, 1552. His sons, Everard, Nicholas, and
Adrian, also printed a volume of his Consilia, Louvain, 1554 which, as giving ;
details of the cases submitted to him for opinion, serve, like those of Zasius, to
illustrate the life of the times. In the seventeenth century his works were con-
sulted and several times reprinted. A
translation of Lucian's De non o-edendo
calumniae by Rumoldus Stenemola, (Antwerp, M. Keyser, 1530), is dedicated to
him. One of his younger sons was .Janus or Joannes Secundus (1511-36), author
of the Basia, who made some reputation as a poet.
See Val. Andreas, pp. 40, 177-8 ; C. van Gestel, Hist. archiep. Mechlinien., 1725,
ii. 14 ;Sweert ; NNBW. iii and for his feeling towards Erasmus cf. Ep. 1044.
:
18-22.]
apud nos Antuerpiae. Is mihi visus est non veste tantum sed et
animo candidus. Salutabis caeteros amicos, quibus nunc non vacat
15 scribere, Sasboutum, Carolum, Mauricium, Bernardum Decanum ;
4. Leo a : Leoni ;3. 16. heroesa: homines /8. 17. Y eriensem scripsi
Veriensis a, fortasse pro Verien., cf. Ep. 291, 13, wcnon Ep. 247. 17, 19, vbi Baiocen.,
Narbonen., Bononien. EFHN, Ep. 1094, 15, 31, 47, 48 : Vecicnsis P. 19.
Erasmus ex animo tuus om. 0.
Nuremberg in 1523-4, with perhaps respondet and the first Respcnsio : see
some modification in the reverse see p. IIO.
Lond. XXX. 30, LB. 646, of 8 Jan. 1524. 11. Tertius liber] The second Re-
Geo. Agricohi states (De precio metal- sponsio to Lee: see p. 11 o.
lorum, Basle, Froben, 1550, p. 299) that 12. filio] Peter, the eldest, a Prae-
he had seen an example in silver monstratensian or White Canon,
vreighing a Ib. probably of their abbey at Middel-
As early as 1521 a woodcut of the burg; LL.D. at Louvain, 22 May
medal was produced, which appears 1520, and parish priest of Flushing.
on the title-pages of three parts of See Molamis p. 544 and Val. Andreas
John Eberlin's Die ij Bundesgenossen p. 182. There is an epitaph on him
{Basle, P. Gengenbach). There is a in the Opera of his brother, Joannes
gbod plate, showing both sides, in F. Secundus, Utrecht, 1541, f°. G* v°.
van Mieris' Hist. d. Nederlandsche Vorsten, 15. Sasljoutum] Jodocus Sasbout (4
1733» ii- 94)5 also in a Dresden dis-
: —
March 1487 14 Nov. 1546), a Dr. of
sertation, 1752, by A. Grenzius, who Laws, who since 1515 had been a mem-
discusses the medal fully and states ber of the Council of HoIIand, over
that the Dresden copy, apparently that which Nic. Everard presided. In 1543,
of Ep. II 19. 5, was first silvered and when Gueldres became Imiierial, he
then gilt. was appointed its Cliancellor. He
Tlie present reproduction is from the con-esponded with Erasmus in 1532-3 :
copy (bronze) in the Ashmolean Lond. xxiv. 17, LB. 1219 and EE.'^ 112.
Museum, Oxford. There are also See NNBW. ii. 1265.
copies in the British Museum (lead) ; Carolum] I cannot identify.
at the Basle Museum, reproduced by Mauricium] See Ep. 176 introd.
J. R. Haarhaus in Zs. f. bildende Kunst, Bernardum] See Ep. 1237 introd.
NF. X (1898,9), p. 48, and by A. 16. Nassauwen] See Epp. 147. 58^,
Machiels in Gazette des Beaux-Arts, Nov. 829. 12, 1192.
1911, p. 349 and elsewhere.
; 17. Veriensem] Adolphus : see Ep.
4. duos libellos] The Apologia qua 93 introd.
Meclallion of Erasinus bv Metsvs, 1519-
P. 238
1093] 239
1. literas] Ep. 620; wbich Brixius 7. aedita] Cf. Epp. 550 iutrod., 634. 4.
saw for the first time when it was 10. defendat] Cf. Juv. 2. 46.
printed in the Farrago (E). 22. teinperare] Cf. Ep. 620. 3on.
2. Antimorus] Seo Ep. 1045. 25. diguitas] Cf. Epp. -jSo. 45^, 908.
5. epigrammatum] Cf. Ep. 620. 2911. 1611.
240 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
ante annos plus viginti scripta sint, omnia ferme ante annos decem.
40 Vident illum vellicare pro erratis tujs, quorum alia sunt excribentis,
alia typographi, et in his pleraque talia vt nisi damnatis summis
autoribus reprehendi non possint. Vident epigrammata tua quae
feceras in Chordigeram, iam olim esse scripta flagrante bello nec ;
habuisset, neque scripsisset ea, et vel iratus fuisset fassvis Regem abs te
laudibus vere regiis magnifice laudatum esse.
55 Haec, mi Moi-e, cum omnes et sentiant et fateantur, quid restat
causae cur te torqueas respondendo, hoc est rem. quod aiunt, actara
agas, non alio fructu quam vt venias in periculum, ne famae iacturam,
quam nunc solus apud eruditos patitur Brixius, tibi facias aliqua ex
parte communem si forte (quod haud facile vitai'e possis, vbi calamus,
;
certe malim tacere te, vtque tota res obliteretur silentio. Quod vt
ilico fieri non potest, ita paulatim poterit, te, vt spero, volente.
70 Scripseram Brixio vt Antimorum, quam tum audiebam eum medi-
premeret: et si fuisset in tabellario diligentia, pei-suasissem, si
tari,
vera scribit Brixius. Vei'um (quod ex eius responsione vides) liber
iam erat sub prelo, priusquam meam videret epistolam. Abs te
vero, mi More, mihi plus profecto quam a Brixio polliceor : cui cum
js^ videam persuasurum fuisse me, si meae ad iHum literae venissent in
43. Chordigeram] See Ep. 212. in. 63. Uhrum] M.ore's Epistolaad Brixium;
46. Abyndonii] See Ep. 1087. 83^. seo p. 217.
48. carmen] See Ep. 1087. 22on. 7°- Scripseram] Ep. 620. 28-40.
62. suauitas] Cf. Ep. 999. son. 72. Brixius] Ep. 1045. 4-6.
1093] TO THOMAS MOEE 241
85
delectareris neque quenquam alium facile reperies quem iudicares
;
monuisses sero, hoc tua sponte curabas olim, quum totum librum 100
non libenter audires proditurum in publicum. Igitur efficiam vt e
tua vohmtate, cum posthac excudetur liber. omittantur illa, atque
vicissim ne propagetur Antimorus. Ita tiet vt si nihil accedat
alimenti, ignis iste paulatim emoriatur. Quod si tam obfirmato
animo decreuisti litem hanc persequi, tamen per amicitiam nostram 105
neque nouam neque vulgarem, precor etiam atque etiam dispicias vt
rem tractandam putes. Ego, si detur optio, te, vt dixi, tacere malim,
ac rem plane contemnendam contemnere. Id si fieri non potest, quod
proxirnum est optarim, vt quod et hactenus abs te cui-atum est,
eruditione tantum et causa, non etiam maledicentia vincere pergas; uo
vt quoniam alterum amicum habere me video nonnihil hoc infelici
casu mutihim, alterum saltem, qui mihi sic est charus vt vnum
omnibus habeam potiorem, possim perpetuo seruare integrum, felicior
futurus, si vtrunque hceat. Etenim quum nihil sit homini praeciosius
fido bonoque amico, par est nullius rei iacturam quam amicitiae 115
ducere grauiorem.
Haec scripsimus in mediis turbis, in quil)us nos non ignoras
versari. Bene vale, amicorum syncerissime.
Antuuerpiae vi. Cal. Maii. Anno m.d.xx.
100. olim] For the first edition of of Erasmus and More, Basle, Froben,
More's Epirjrammata, Basle, Froben, Dec. 1520. The predilection of the age
March 1518. for controversy is illustrated by the
loi. efticiam] This pi-oposal for fixct that at this very time Erasmus
iipcaceful settlement was frustrated was being urged by his friends to
by the publication of More\s Epistola a simihir comijosition with Lee see
:
ad Brixium (1. 63). In consequence Epp. 1037 introd., 1078.3811, 1090, 1097.
tlie epigrams against Brixius remain 117. turbis] The printing of his last
in the only later editiou of More's E^pi- reply to Lee cf. Epp. 1086 introd.,
;
Leipzig (see Ep. 1067 introd.). The handwriting is crabbed and difficult; but
the year-date is clear, and may be accepted.]
3. synodi] of rural deans; cf. 11. 22-3. confirming the new beneficiary in
4. Mercurii] 11 April 1520. The possession. Aspecimen is given by
letter is not extant. L. Rockinger, Briefsteller u. Formelbikher,
5. synsrapham vacuam] The receipt 1863, p. 585. But it is not clear why
due by Ei-asmus for the pension paid such a letter should have beeu needed
to him twico a year by de Hondt out every j'ear (11. 34-5). Possibly what is
of the prebend at Courtray (1. sBn). intended here is a certificate, required
Erasmus had forgotten the precise in the case of an absentee beneficiary,
form (cf. Ep. 913. 9-13), and sent a to attest that he was still alive, before
sheet for do Hondt to fill in and return the income of his benefice could be
to him by the messengcr for signature. paid to him.
II. abfuturam] From Louvain see ; 28. Tornacensis] Louis Guillard ;
Rege iam diu desiderato venerit, secum quod honestum erit con-
tractabo, nec interero negocio vbi vestre reuerencie offensum aliquid
aut preiudicium afferens practicabitur quinymmo causam illius haud
;
that Barbirius sshould receivetlie bene- 39. Chieruia] See Ep. 532. 270.
fices (cf. 11.37-8; EE. 3; EE.- 77, while 41. desiderato] Cf. Ep. 1004. 145U.
de Hondt held the canonry. The pen- venerit] Cf Ep. 1079. gn.
.
sion was charged on both sources ^,Ep. 46. lacobus] of Thielt, n. of Courtray,
751. 12-15) ; but the whole sum vvas vicar-general of the bp. of Tournay.
paid to Erasmus by de Hondt, in part In Nov. 1517 de Hondt was living with
for himself and also as agent for liim at Courtray see J. A. Clerval,
:
Barbirius (Ep. 751. 4-6; EE.^ 77). Clichtouci vita, 1894, pp. 27, 35.
29. Wasie] A district forming the 49. Soti] His name is not known to
HE. of Flanders, and w. of the Scheldt me otherwise. His birthplace, Aar-
see Ant. Sanderus, Flandria illuslrata, denburg, lies ne. of Bruges, near the
ii (1644), 538-53. St. Nicholas lies mouth of the Scheldt.
midway between Antwerp and Ghent, 55. Regentem] Nevius; see Ep. 298
with St. Giles to the n. of it. Bar- introd.
birius subsequently ceded St. Giles to 56. V. D.] veneranda dominatio.
his brother Nicholas (Ep. 613) see
; 61. Christianitatis] In the notes
Ep. 1245. EE., p. 373, this is explained as ruralis
38. capellanum] I cannot identify. as opposed to the decanus tapituli.
R 2
244 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
'1139
[There are two texts of this letter one in Pirckheimer's autograph rough-draft,
;
preserved in the Town Librai-y at Kuremberg (a), the other printed in the Ap-
2)endix to Eae (/3^) and then in Eev (^S^) from the letter actually sent and received,
and subsequently rejjrinted in F and later editions. The relation of these
clearly is that a is prior in composition to /8' and /S'^ ( = 0) ; but as these represent
the actual letter dispatched, that is to say the text finally adopted by Pirckheimer,
they must have precedence of a. Accordingly I have taken /3^ for the text here,
and have placed the variants of a in the notes not, however, reproducing :
Leclerc reprinted it as LB. 561, with a note that its substance is the same as LB.
504 (based on /3). For F it might have been expected that P^, as a Froben volume,
would serve as the original but seemingly not, for when ^^ and ^S^ vary, F
:
'Guielmus Nesenus tibi Lei scripta misit '. The Bodleian possesses a volume
(Mar. 869) containing Lee's Annotationes, Paris, Gourmont, (c. Feb. 1520), and
Erasmus' Apologia qua respondet, Antwerp, M. Hillen, (c. March) 1520 (Ep. 1037
introd.), and, bound between them, Erasmus' fir st Besponsio, ibid., April 1520:
the binding being perhaps contemporary. On the title-page of Lee's book ai'e
two autograph inscriptions by Resch and Nesen at the foot Ex dono Conradi :
'
Resch. Ad Guielmum Nesenum ', with the second clause subsequently erased ;
and at the top Nesenus clarissimo Bilibaldo '. On the title-page of the Apologia
'
sine fronte, sine litteris, sine omni dote humana ? Legi et tuam Apo-
logiam, quae tamen pollicetur responsionem ad illius Annotationes.
Scire cupis quid sentiam ? Vellem omnino tacuisses, aut ita homini
vt dignus erat respondisses. Sed pericukim erat ne silentio obiecta
videreris agnoscere? Quasi vero optimus ac doctissimus quisque non 15
confestim intellecturus fuerit, cuncta quae ille furiosus et impotens
sui euomuit, mei'as esse sycophantias et impudentissima mendacia.
Habet suam faciem veritas. Et iste rabiosulus adeo apud se non est
vt ipse frequenter prodat seipsum. De improbis vero et mendicis
nulla tibi debebat esse cura. Quanquam qui inter hos sunt paulo 20
minus stolidi, sentiunt ac damnant hominis prodigiosam arrogantiam,
inscitiam ac virulentiam quam execrantur etiam ii qui tibi parum :
12. annotationes : inuectiuam Angli illius nec non responsionem tuam legi a.
13. Vellem /3 : Vellem vt
silendo a. a.
15. viderei-is 14. silentio :
ligeret a. quae ... 17. euomuit j8: hec a. i8. Habet ... 19. seipsiim
add. H. mendicis ineruditis a. 20. tibi debebat esse j8
: habenda erat :
/3 facere perges a.
: 32. si viderint . . Erasmo )3 cum impudentissimo . :
cuique impunc tibi a. 33. licebit post ilhidere a otn. /3. Quare . 34. : . .
rabulam /3 (33. aa^^ F: & /3^; Tc igitur hortor ac ob aniicitiam nostram obtestor :
[1520
si tamen iste Leus homo dicendus est, ac non potius teterrima belua.
Quid mirum igitur si tandem hominem iuxta cordis sui desiderium inuenerunt,
qui perditam eorum improbitatem ac detestandam loquacitatem teterrima nuga-
rum coluuione ac nephando verborum lenocinio fucaret? Quis enim tam in-
sulssus esset ae hebes qui non cernei-et venerandos Magistros nostros calceum
hunc consuisse, probum vero illum virum induisse ? vnde non imerito maiori
excandescit indignatione cum egregios illos Magistros aliquantisper durius tractas
quam cum Scripturam sanctam (vt illi volunt) peruertis. Et hoc facit caritas
illa non ficta que sul) religionis et modestiae praetextu etiam lenonibus turpiora
audet. Et tu obiter miraris inueniri qui insanienti 'Euge illud accinant? cum '
ego maiori admiracione ducerer ni multos sui similes ac eiusdem farinae reperi-
ret. Nam per imortalem Deum, cui bono nebulones isti vnquam peperceruiit?
et vt vetustiora praetercamus, quis ignorat quam peruersis technis et sceleratis
macliinationibus optimo et doctissimo Capnioni illuserint ? a. 84, spurcis-
sima : probra et a. 85. eximium illum ac vere adcL 0. que in nobilem
add. /3. 86. denique in add, /3. 87. euomuerunt P eructauerint a. :
Quid non 89. egere /3 Quinimo inuidia exagitati nec a siii ordinis abstineant
. . . :
reseos B de heresi a.
: a/3 - condemnauerunt /3i.
: 96. gratias P imortalem :
85. Nouae Aquilae] Cf. Epp. 877. 21- 87. Fabrum] Cf. Ep. 1030. 4-6.
2, 889. 42-3. 90. haeresis] Cf. Ep. 1182. 4U.
248 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
mihi quotidie e corte gallinas rapit, nec vnquam persohiit precium '.
Rogabam num vesci gaUinis poneret inter fiagitia. Maxinie inquit '
'
longe magis virulentis ornarunt conuiciis quam si eum vel ad coelum vsque
contumeliosissimis suis extulissent laudibus a. io6. quid add /3. com-
mouearis y3 : optine, mouearis
107. idque . 108. enim j8 : quodque
a. . .
semper facere consueuerunt, assidue faciant. talia a. 109. vt illa nec Nam
liuor ipse euertere qneat post fundamenta a om. /3. iio. nuUus edax /3 : : . . .
112. tacentem a.
: 114. Sed te . . 117. nonnuUi /3 (116. /S^i^: commemoro .
inter caetera vero pessimo et haud ferendo flagitio te esse obnoxium. Cumque
ego vehementius instarem vt tam horrendum scelus elicoi-em, ille vero perti-
naciter negasset, forsitan vt detractoris culpam euitaret, a. 125. decreue-
ram 126. dixi /3 (125, inquit add. /3^
. . , 'silere' inquit F) : tacere inquit 'ac :
'
tam imane facinus ocultare constitueram, cum tamen ita me vrges, haud vltra
silere sed veritatem dicere compellor a. 126. ille 127. preconils add. 13. . . .
128. didici post relatu a om. P. duobus hisce oculis /3 gemino lioc obtutu a.
: :
villa a. 132, Rogabam 135. omni /8 Sed ad hoc rosponde, obsecro, Num
. . . :
inter peccata censetur galinis vesci Et ille Maxime cum a deuotis fit homi-
'?
'
: '
121. cornicabatur] Cf, Pcrs. 5. 12, 'cum multis gallinis el bonis rebus '.
1095] FEOM WILLIBALD PIRCKHEIMER 249
•
nam cum assidue et deuotis com-
est gulae vieium, et eo grauius
mittitur Adieci, Forsitan diebus quibus fas non est '.
'. '
Non ', '
inquit, sed nos sacros viros ab omni epularum lauticia abstinere 135
'
decet '. Atqui, bone Pater, ni fallor ', inquam haud farre aut
' '
144. Leo tam diuino ^ tali o. 145. semestri :154. Quod litteras . . . :
Grecas et Hebreas tantum non somniando aut pastoris illius instar bibendo
hauserit ac Magistris nostris operam nauando, tametsi conuiciando longe nielius
pessimas horas collocauerit. Quod vero a. esse 155. consilium . . . :
145. pastoris] See Adag. 687,quoting 161. aduentum] Cf. Ep. 1079. ^n. For
Theocr. 16-17.
9. the preparations made in Nuromberg
149. alicubi] See Lee's .4nno<., f». cc'-. for his reception see SE. 213, p. 103.
159. pestis] Nuremberg had becn 162. instituto] of Charles iv in the
free of plaguo for some time (cf. SE. Goldcn BuU of 1356, cap. 28 § 5.
213, p. 107): but it returned in 1521 Charles v on his electionhadpromised
(Ep. 1085. 2n). to carry this out cf. SE. 213, p. 107.
:
250 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
gallorum me abunde
165 vltra gallinas gallos gallinaceos, filios ac filias
appositurum. Tu interim bene vale, Erasme amicissime. Etiam
atque etiam memineris te longe feliciorem esse contumeliis inuido-
rum quam laudibus amicorum, quas nunquam tam aegre ferrent isti.
nisi certo certius cognoscerent te eruditione ac probitate immortali-
170 tatem etiam viuentem induisse.
Iterum vale Norenbergae prid. Calen. Maias.
Tuus Bilibaldus Pierckheymer.
Cum haec scripsissem, certior factus sum Oecolampadium nostrum
.xxiii. Aprilis raonachum esse factum, in monasterio Seruatoris
175 iuxta Augustam, ordinis S. Brigidae, in quo mulieres primas tenere
consueuerunt. Vtinam sibi rectius consuluisset
[Besides the ordinary editions this letter is found in More's Luciibrationes, Basle,
1563, p. 476 (see Ep. 1087) which contains also Epp. 388, 623, 684, 688, 706,
:
163. Alamire
a, cf. Ep. 711. 16 Alamirae )3*: Alamiro F.
: aliqua nostra /3 :
nostro a. accipiam non inamoena excipiam luculenta a. 164. esse
:
tibi apositurum, sed et illarum sobolem, filios ae filias, necnon gallos galinaceos
et de omni genere musico cuncta que manducari solent volatilia coeli a. ami-
cissime fi : optime a. Etiam atque etiam j8 ac iterum a. 167. longe :
feliciorem ^ foelicem a.
: 168. quam . . isti ^ qui nunquam laudes tuas . :
176. consuluisset add. )3 (171. )3* J': Nurenbergae .6^, 172. Pierckheymerus jS^:
Pierkheymer F. 174. .xxiii. iS^ J^ : .23. /8^: vigesimotertio fi". April. F).
most to resist his friend's action, gives ing to the reformed Augustiman order
this account (Oec. E., f. ^* v") : founded by St. Bridget ot Sweden
*studiis suis et fidei libertatem ab illis (f 1373). Their houses were joint, for
stipulatus est quod his verbis ante
: men, at first under a prior, and women
"
contestatus est, " Etiamsi sexcentis under an abbess, the latter having the
inquit " iuramentis me obstrinxero, superior rank but before long the
:
be inferred tliat the variants which occur in Ep. 1090. 9, Leo saucte se, and in
this letter, 72, producat in iudicium ; 166, literarum gratia vel tua (cf. Ep. 706.
33,4 printed on p. 466 of the Lucubrationes) ; 190, Caletum, are merely fortuitous
:
further that the dates ' Grenuici, mense Maio ', which are added in tho Lucu-
brationes before the year-date here, are purely conjectural, the month-date being
easily assigned from Ep. 1093.]
forte serius aliquanto peruenit isthuc aut ideo fuisti segnior, quod
;
12. biennium] The Antimorus had 27. loannes] Of this Greek who
been long projected ; cf. Ep. 620. 28 came from France to England and
seq. visited More, I can find no other trace.
17. amicorum] Cf. Ep. 1087. 437^. Hardly Lascaris(l. 18); thoughhewas
20. Cardinalis] See Ep. 1087. 439^. intimate with Brixius.
252 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
aliis aliter visum est, quorum ego iudiciis in meis rebus magis
fidebam quam meo. Hi quanquam faterentur neminem esse litera-
55 tum vsquam, cui non factura sint nauseam tam insulsa, tam virulenta
deliria, calumnias eius censebant, etsi perabsurdas atque ineptas, ad
haec nec obscuras, si quis attendat satis proram puppimque negocii,
non fore tamen satis liquidas multis, qui fortasse legerent eius Anti-
morum, quum neque Chordigerae neque meorum epigrammatum
60 facultas futura sit. Suaserunt igitur vt haec omnia in vnum librum
cogerem et lectoris pariter subiicerem oculis tum vt meo scripto :
39. Ohordigeram] Cf. lEp. 212. in. 72. producit] Ep. 1045. 26-30.
49. Xpvcrdv'} Cf. Adag. 830. 84. Quemne] Cf. Ter. Andr. 768-70.
1096] FROM THOMAS MORE 253
tibi mirum videtur si vel animi causa fingat homo poeticus? Quan-
quam suberat etiam causa cur fingeret. Nam quum vterque frequenter 95
admonuisset ne tam ineptum libellum ac muliebriter iurgiosum
aederet, volebat fortassis experiri an eodem animo accepturi forent
quum fecisset, quo tam saepe consuluissent ne faceret. Accidit enim
nonnunquam vt quod ne fiat obsistimus acriter, dum res est integra.
id vbi in eum locum venit vt non possit corrigi, patiamur, et vicium, 100
quoad licet, verbis integamus.
At ego, mi Erasme, quo vere videre possis quanto verius Morus
tibi paratus sit obtemperare quam Brixius, quanquam quum tuae ad
me venirent literae. liber non quidem sub prelo esset, sed totus esset
excusus (atque id docere possim non duobus auritis testibus qui ex 105
me audierint, sed oculatis plusquam decem qui suis viderint oculis ;
imo testibus, opinor, oculis ipsius tuis, vtpote ad quem librum ante
hanc epistolam peruenisse non dubitem) quanquam ad eius aedi-
;
tionem tot amicorum consiliis vrgerer, tamen vbi tuas literas ac-
cepissem, cuius vnius apud me sententia omnibus omnium calculis "o
praeponderat, non sum imitatus Brixium cui quum sit, vt scribit,
:
89. non plus octo] Tliere are nine produced Henry vin's Asseriio septem
sheets :A-I. ^acramentorum (Ep. 1227. ^n). His last
90. totidem diebus] An indication known book is dated i8.Tune 1528. See
of tlie ordinary rate of printing at this E. G. Diifi"s Centiiry of the English Book
time. Trade, 1905, pp. 126,7.
nec dimidium] This understates In 1513 he printed the first edition
Ep. 1045. 26, magna ex parte
'
'. of one of Erasmu^s' translations from
iir. scribit] Ep. 1045. 119-20. Phitarcli (Ep. 268 ; cf. vol. iii, p.
113. ait] Ep. 1045. 22-3. xxiv).
119. typographus] Richard Pynson 121. coemi] More's actionisadequate
(t c. Jan. 1530 a Norman, who in 1464
, to account for the rarity of liis volume
was a student at the University of for which see p. 217. Thcre is a copy
Paris. After learning the art atRouen, in the British Museum (714 b. 13). On
he settled in London c. 1490, and ^s.JuneErasmusbelieved thatMorehad
became one of the most famous of its madenopubIicreply(Ep. 1117. 115-16);
early printers. In 1508 he was ap- in A"gust, after seeing it at Calais (Ep.
pointod Printer to the King, and thus 1184. 20 22). he was hoping to per-
254 LETTEKS OF EEASMUS [1520
ab eo studio se, quo charissimae foeturae suae, quoad eius fieri potest.
procuret aeternitatem. Mea vero Epigrammata nunquam admodum
animo placuerunt meo, id quod et ipse mihi, Erasme, conscius es :
cui et quibusdam aliis nisi liber ille arrisisset amplius quam ad-
135 blanditus est mihi, nusquam fortassis extaret hodie. Nunc vide vt
rerum vices inuei'sae sunt. Si conditione cautum esset inter nos
vt ex epigrammatis meis tibi liceret quaecunque velles transfigere.
modo ne ius in pauca quaepiam sit quae mihi liberet excipere, iam
quos in versus solos tu ex pacto ferrum stringeres, eos ego solos
140 exceptione defenderem. Adeo mihi coeperunt adblandiri, postquam
eos video multis commendari virulenta atque inepta versificatione
Brixii. Nec tamen istud dico quo minus tibi quiduis liceat in mea,
cui quiduis etiam licet in me.
lam quod ais eum esse Brixium, quem si pernossem intimius, eum
145 sentirem talem quo nemo sit amore meo dignior equidem, mi :
Erasme, non ego me pro tanto viro gero vt tam tenui quenquam
conditione videam, quem indignum censeam amore meo, modo ne
sit improbus qui non amari debeat a quoquam eoque Brixium facile;
assentior non indignum esse qui maiorum sit amore virorum dignus
150 quam ipse sum. Nam omnino videtur aliquanto plus habere, non
dico superbiae, sed plane generosi cuiusdam spiritus et magnificentiae,
quam vt ad pusillam hanc atque humilem indolem meam possit
vsquequaque congruere, nisi in amicitia tam male copulari vellem
122. aliquid i^ : aliud Jf. 146. egoom.fi. 161. qualis qualis J^JV^
qualis J^ '.
suade More to suppi-ess it altogether 134. liber ille] See Ep. 550 iutrod.
(Ep. 1131. 14-16). 154. Quam male] Cf. Ov. Her. g. 29.
1096] FROM THOMAS MOKE 255
et Regina Gallorum aderit, cui cum sit a secretis Brixius, non poterit,
opinor, abesse. Ita quod ad me attinet, facile rem compones ex
sententia tua. Nam etsi nulla de causa sic egit in me vt plane 195
declarauerit nihil ad meam perniciem praeter vires defuisse sibi
tamen quando tu, mi Erasme, plus es mihi quam dimidium mei,
plus apud me valebit in Brixio quod sit amicus tuus quam quod
inimicus meus. Iteriun vale. m.d.xx.
[It is clear that in the clate, exaltaiae (14 Sept.) must be corrected to inueniae
(3 May) ; for this letter is no doubt of the same epoch .as Epp. 1097,9. This
inference may te corroborated by thc estimate of time in 11. 27-8, forty days
instead offilty as in i, p. 22. 21,2 though it is not safe to lay much stress on
:
cupiant extinctas bonas literas, quas dolent vbique tam feliciter re-
florescere.
Ab his suspicor instigatum Eduardum Leum
vt in nos debacchare-
tur. Cum ipsi in proscenium, iuuenem gloriae
non auderent prodire
cupidum et sibi placentem subornarunt, vt pro ipsis fabulam ageret. 20
Qui vtinam aut aliter scripsisset aut Anglus non esset Eduardo !
nihil debeo, sed tamen animo Christiano melius illi volo quam ipse
vult sibi. Angliae debeo quantum non alteri nationi. Mitto celsi-
tudini tuae libellum quo illi respondeo, sed absque conuiciis quem :
si vacabit inspicere, videbit quam res ipsa Lei pollicitis non respondeat. 25
Non redibit ad conuicia, si suo volet honori consultum. Argumentis
non arbitror vnquam responsurum. Ea in re perdidi dies ferme
quadraginta. Quod temporis vtinam collocare licuisset in opus ali-
quod quo vel tuam egregiam virtutem posteritati commendassem vel
Christi gloriam pro mea virili illustrassem ! 30
Precor vt Christus Opt. Max. generosos iuxta ac pios conatus
maiestatis tuae suo fauore semper in maius meliusque prouehat ;
[The dates are confirmed by the coiirse of the controversy with Lee ; cf. Ep.
1037 introd. Erasmus had now returned to Louvain after the printing of the
tirst Besponsio. For anearlier appeal to Foxe against Lee see Ep. 973.]
[The preface to Froben's reprint of Lee's Annotationes, Basle, May 1520 (see
p. 1 10) undertaken, evidently at Erasmus' request, to ruark tlie settlement of
;
[The year-date is confirmed by Charles' return from Spain and the meeting of
Henry and Francis at the Field of the Cloth of Gold.]
Erasmus' suggestion of youth, here and divorce cause they had espoused in-
in Ep. II 13. 9, was perhaps not a mis- stinctively the Queen's aide' (Froude,
take but merely an atti-mpt to annoy. Hist. of England, ch. 9).
In dedicating to Henry vm, 14 March 1100. 6. apud Anglo.s] Cf. Epp.
1532, the commentaries of Dionysius 1026. 14, 1029. lo-ii, io68)ntrod., 1074.
Rikel, the Carthusian, on the Evange- 67-73, 1089, 1x03. 13-17.
S 2
260 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
1102. 2. comitem] lu monastic re- More (Ep. 999. 190), and Budaeus (Ep.
tirement. 421. 5), he had a very dififcrent view.
3. Index] in fomos omnes operum diui See also Ep. 1060. 5U.
1102] TO JOHN OECOLAMPADIUS 261
cum hoc animo coniunctum, non impune sic imponerent mundo isti
nescio quid addam. Seditionem non amo. Caetera praestabo pro
viribus.
lam adessem in Germania sed remoratur me Regum conuentus.
; lo
Expectatur indies Carolus. Rex Anglus et Gallus adornant collo-
quium in litore Caleti sub Calendas lunias. Monet Cantuariensis vt
adsim. Lutheri libri pene arserant in Britannia. Nec erat reme-
dium. Attulit remedium amiculus quidam humilis, sed in tempore
vigilans. Non sum is qui possim iudicare de Lutheri scriptis. 15
Sed hec tyrannis mihi nullo pacto placet. Bene vale, charissime
Oecolampadi.
Leo respondi tribus libellis intra menstruum fere tempus. Et
obiter alia sunt acta. Nunc aggrediar. imo aggressus sum, Paraphra-
sim in duas Epistolas Petri hoc malo quam rixari cum rabiosulis.
: 20
Taedet me horum Christianorum, imo Pharisaeorum ego malim :
Further encouragement came from Urbanus Rhegius (1. 2). This, which is
—
evidently Erasmus' first letter to Botzheim in the three inaccuracies in Eotz-
heim's name F probably reproduces Erasmus' rough-draft or a copy made froni
it by a secretary — therefore his reply to Botzheim's advance.
, is
The year-date added in H
can be corrected from Pace's succession to Cole
(t 16 Sept. 1519).]
8. nescio] For this periphrasis cf. cf. 1193, 1197). On 12 3Iay 1521
Ep. 732. 43. Luther's books were publicly burned
10. Germania] Epp. 1078. 62n,
Cf. at St. PauFs Cross (ibid. 1273.4) ^iid;
iioi.i. Just aVjout this time Erasmus at the same time mandates were sent
seems to have received an invitation to out to the bishops to collect them and
teach at Leipzig cf. Luther to Spala-
; transmit them to London (ibid. 1279).
tinus, 31 May 1520 (LE.- 308), Lip- '
See P. Smith in EHR. xxv. 657,8.
senses anxii pro retinendis scholaribus Capito reported to Aleander, 29 Marc-li
iactant Erasmum ad se venturum '. 1521, apud Anglos (Lutherii) nomen
'
Enders notes that after the Leipzig mire siquidem nemo bonus vel
frigere,
Disputation (Ep. 1020. 62n) many legere dignatur tam atros affoctus '
.-tudents had migrated from Leipzig to see P. Kalkoflf, W. Capilo, p. 135. The
Wittenberg. sermon preached by Fisher at the
11. Carolus] See Ep. 1079. 9"- burning was transhited into Latin by
12. Caleti] See Ep. 1106. 92^. Pace; who sent it in ms. toLeo x witli
Cantuariensis] Cf. BRE. 166. a letter from Richmond, i June (Bahm
13. penearserant]Cf. Ep. 1113. 16-20; no. 98). Later it was printed by
where Erasmusclaimstohaveprevailcd Siberch at Cambridge, <c. i Jan.) 152*.
with Wolsey against this step. When 14. amiculus] It appears from Ep.
urged to it from Rome, Wolsey replied 11 13. 17-20 thatErasmusmeanshiniself.
at first that he had not the requisite 18. Leo] See p. iio.
powers (Brewer iii. 1210); but later, 19. Paraphrasim] Ep. 1112.
under pressure, hecomplied (^ibid.i^s^; 22, publicanus] Luke 18. 10.
262 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [^520
Hoc mihi iucundior tua fuit epistola, vir clarissime, quod noui
lucrum amici cum veteris recordatione copulauit. Vrbanum iampri-
dem amabam Abstemium libenter agnosco. Fortunae tuae
; gratulor
non aliter quam si esset mea. Caetera placebant omnia.
S Caeterum quod scribis isthic circumuolitare Apologiam, in Pacaeum,
vt suspicor, male discruciat animuni meum. Vtcunque illi hoc
excidit de Constantia, scio non dictum malo animo. Eodem in
libello multa iocatur et in me, quae nollem scripta ob quosdam nihil
non detorquentes ad calumniam. Noui Pacaeum intime. Nihil
10 illius ingenio candidius, nihil integrius, nihil amicius. Simplicitas
haec est, non maleuolentia. Eruditus est sed eum librum, id quod ;
2. Vrbanum] V. Regius ; see Ep. 386 1521 (BI. E. 37), ' Zasius autem, cum
introd. sit iam capularis senex habeatque
5. in Paeaeum] Cf. Ep. 887. 6,7 nn. alterum pedem insepulchro, .' See . .
I cannot find that the Apohgia was ever also ZE. 40 and cf. Ep. 1025. i6n.
;
[This letter is not easy to date. The reference to Nesen seenis to indicate
that it must be near in time to Epp. 1046, 1057. But comparison with Epp.
rio8, II ri suggests that it was written in the following May, in reply to a letter
from Vives sent off immediately after his arrival in Paris (Ep. 1108 introd.) ;
for the opening sentences may be taken to refer to Vives' warm reception by the
Parisians in spite of his attack on their schools (cf. Ep. 1108. 7-23) and there ;
are similar mentions, as in Ep. rrii, of Faustus' lectures and of the controversj-
with Budaeus.
If this view is correct, it appears that the information about the treatment of
Nesen at Louvain, of which Vives must already have been well aware (cf. Ep.
II ir. 6i-2!, was intended for the enlightenment of Parisian readers. to whom
Erasmus no doubt expected that the letter would be shown.
The year-date in the text, having only the authority of H, has no value.]
non casta erat illius professio I Neque cuiquam obscurum erat qualis 15
esset vita. Tantum malorum
Galli doctrinae hominis condonabant,
quae tamen vltra mediocritatem non admodum erat progressa.
Huius Academiae proceres non ferunt Trilingue Collegium, gratis
adiuuans publica omnium studia, gi"atis ornans non solum hanc
scholam verum etiam vniuersam Principis ditionem. Non ferunt 20
professores moribus inculpatissimis, professione casta, doctrina longe
Faustinae praeferenda, Parisiensis Academia certe in hoc litterarum
genere, quod sibi proposuit, semper primas tenuit ; et tamen gaudet
vndecunque sibi contingere litteraturae politioris accessionem. Datur
locus quiduis quacunque mercede profitentibus. Hic Guilhehno 2:^
Neseno Pomponii Melae Geographiam profiteri gratis aggresso nihilo
remissioribus studiis obstiterunt quam si parasset totam hanc vrbem
incendio miscere, Ante annos non ita multos frigebat haec schola ;
dem. Sed hoc quicquid est tragoediae, duobus aut tribus acceptum
ferimus. Quos, etiam si non queant mitescere, tamen obruent
tandem indies magis ac magis inualescentia rectiora studia, praesertim
si tu te in hoc bello Camillum quendam praebeas.
.'.5 De Budaeo tametsi nihil noui praedicas, tamen hominis amicissimi
verissimis laudibus sum vnice delectatus. Ille vero nunquam
Erasmum ab se alienabit, etiamsi atroces inueetiuas in nos scripserit
tantum abest vt illa litterarum velitatio queat animos Gratiarum
nodis coniunctissimos diuellere.
40 Habes epistolam laconicam sic enim soleo pro LucuUianis coenis
;
written (Ep. 1084). Zasius, too, wroto VE. 155.For the cause of his exile
latei' ; to Beatus, 5 June. though on 4 cf. Ep. 1085. i^n. By 5 March 1520 he
June he had not read Lee's book (BRE. liad returned to Freiburg (Zw. E.^ 123).
164, 168 where piobably one of the
; 21. decenter abesse] The question
dates needs correction\ whether it was right to fly before the
1105] FROM PHILIP ENGENTINUS 265
[For the earliest source see App. 12, in vol. iii. The year-date is easily
assigned from the public events mentioned.]
De puero cuius causam commendasti mihi, iam ante cuni patre eius
egeram quam tu scripsisti. Rogarat enim pridem me per literas
puer ipse, quod sibi persuaserat apud illum meam sententiam
momenti aliquid ac ponderis habituram. Tractaui rem diligenter ;
5 quid profecerim haud satis certo scio. Respondit mihi pater eius non
1106. TiT. THOMAS acld. F. T>. aH : r. F.
nated Suffragan Bp. of Spires, with the Urkundenbuch, ii (1853), pp. 496-8 :
title of Bp. of Termopoli and there- ; also BI. E. and VE. 758. specimen A
with parish-priest of Bruchsal. About of his handwriting is given by J. Ficker
1524 his Bp. sought to remove him, for and 0. Winckelmann, Handschri/ten-
sympathy with the new movement for proben des sechzehnten Jahrhunderts nach
reform but his parishioners petitioned
;
Strassburger Originalen, ii, 1905, pl. 54.
that he might remain. In April 1525, 1106. i. puei-o] Perhaps Ant. of Ber-
during the Peasants' Revolt, he fled gen, the younger (Epp. 760, 969 ; cf. Ep.
from Spires with the Bp. but was in- , 737. 3) ; the description of whom in
vited to return (BI. E.93). He settled, Epp. 717. 22-3, 1025. 9-16, agrees with
however, at Strasburg, as preacher at that here. Therc is no letter to More
St. Stephen's, and in Sept. 1526 his in the packet which he carried to
bpric. was given to another. He England in Nov. 1519 (Epp. 1025 etc.)
became more and more advanced in but Erasmus' coinmendation to More
his views, and married c. Nov. 1533 may have been in connexion with
(BI. E. 377, 396). But before long the Ajitony's return to England in 1520.
Straaburg Reformers found him an open Antony perhaps wrote then to More
enemy of their Ohureh, and expelled (II. 2-3), as he had written to Wolsey
rum dignus cuius indolem talem foueant omnes atque omni ope pro-
moueant.
Louaniensem illum scholasticum ita collocaui vt non dubitemquin 15
tibi perpetuo sit Eruditio eius perplacet hero
habiturus gratias. ;
qui quum audiuisset eum mihi commendatum abs te, rogauit vltro
vti iuuenem ipsi permitterem qua in re ego non grauatim illi sum
:
instructum aut melioribus ? Multo vero maximum est sic bonas artes
imbibisse discendo, vt in alios easdem possis rursus docendo trans-
fundere ; at quis illo docet apertius, dulcius, efficacius ? Non 35
possum satis quas in Declamationibus eius tu
admirari virtutes illas
et acute perspexisti et expressisti luculenter potissimum vero (quod ;
15. schoiasticum] Oji tlie same sup- 21. opera] The Declamationes SyUa^iae;
position this would be Adr. Aelius see Ep. 1082.
Barlaud ^ee Epp. 760. 14U, 1028. lo-ii.
; 25. scribis] Ep. 1082.53-4.
16. hero] I have no clue. 37. expressisti] Ep. 1082. 24-56.
268 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
March 1518), where he speaks dis- 647 introd., nnd ef. Ep. 1108. i.
iro6] FROM THOMAS MOEE 269
[It is easy to assign an approximate date from Ep. 1 106, and the indicatioii
of Erasmus' illness (1. 13).]
nesciunt vti. De puero nec ago gratias, nec tu noui quicquam fecisti,
cum nunquam non sis tui similis.
De Lodouici Viuis ingenio gaudeo meum calculum cum tuo con-
sentire. Is vnus est de numero eorum qui nomen Erasmi sint
obscuraturi. Nec aliis tamen aeque faueo, et te hoc nomine magis
1106. 93. Caleti] Henry crossed to On 14 July Charles set out for Bruges
Calais 31 May for the meeting with and Ghent, and Heiiry soon afterwards
Francisat theFieldoftheClothof Gold, returned to England. For Erasmus'
7 June see Brewer iii, pp. Ixvii-lxxvi.
: presence at Calais see p. 296.
At first his head-quarters were at 95. Imperator] Cf. Ep. 1079. ^n.
Guines but on 25 June he moved into
; 103. Aedibus legum] One of the later
Calais to prepare for a meeting with items in the Opusaila varia (Ep. 1108.
Charles. On 10 July the Emperor ^n).
arrived at Wael, where Henry met him. Somnio] See Ep. 1108.20211.
The night was spent at Gravelines, and 108. Declamationibus] See 1. 2in.
next day they rode together into Calais. 1107. 8. obscuraturi] A favourite form
270 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
amo, quod huic tam candide faues. Est anirao mire philosophico.
10 Hei'am illam cui sacrificant omnes, litant perpauci, fortiter contemnit.
Et tamen tali ingenio, talibus litteris non potest deesse fortuna.
Non magis idoneus qui profliget sophistarum phalanges in
alius ;
[The yeai--<;late is given by Ep. iiii. Vives' arrival in Paris must be dated
between 2 May 1520 (BE.* 67) and c. 14 May for by 17 May Budaeus had ;
reached Ardres (BE.* 69'. He stayed on after Budaeus' departure, left Paris
c. 30 May, and then after five days on the road reached Bruges on 3 June.]
non dubitabam quin multos illius notae homines quos modo sophistas
10 appellant, animo parum in me propitio sensurus essem. Verum re
ipsa longe aliud sum expertus quam ipse mihi nimis profecto
meticulosa et suspicaci cogitatione confinxeram.
Venio Parrhisios de via non fessus sed oblectatus, et amicis per
famulum significo me adesse. Conuolant ad me frequentes, salutant
15 officiose, gratulantur aduentui. Ducunt et illi ad me alios postridie
of compliment with Erasmus cf. Epp. ; 13 Feb. 1519 (? I5|^) f^om Louvain.
605. 34, 646. 12, 903. 11,905. 21-2,935. Aftorexpressingregretsatbeingunable
61-2, 967. 46-8, 1004. 39, 1146. 22, to come to Paris as he had hoped, Vives
1159- 37? II75- 15- quotes the opinion that the barbarous
1107. 13. Adero Caleti] See p. 296. sophistries still reigning in the Uni-
valetudo] Probably an indication versity are largely due to tlie Spanish
that he was already ill ; cf. p. 283. students there, qui, vt sunt honaines
'
1108. I. Card. Croio] See Ep. 647 inuicti, ita fortiter tuentur arcem
introd. ignorantiae From the suggestion here
'.
4. vetere mea familiaritate] In the and in Ep. 1106. 64 seq. that the letter
years c. 1509-14 see Ep. 927 introd.
: wasa recent composition, and from its
7. aduersum Pseudodialccticos] Tlie place at the end of the book, it seems
last item in the Opuscida varia, Louvain, probable that the date of publication
Th. Martens, s. a. in the form of a
: must be 1520, and not, as proposed in
letter to .John Fortis (1. i8n), dated Ep. 927 introd., 1519.
io8] FROM JOHN LOUIS VIVES 271
and the Pseudodialectici (1. ^n). 418, 679. Later he became tutor to
28. Poblationem] Jo. Martinus Po- Philip n, and then bp. of Murcia and
blacion wrote De vsii astrolabi compen- abp. of Toledo, +31 May 1557.
diiim, Paris,H. Stephanus, s. o. In the 30. Mellum] A
Portuguese noble
notes on Aug. Ciu. Dei, Basle, Froben,. —
(1490 27 April 1536), who had been
Sept. 1522 (xxii. 22 ; p. 774) Vives sent to study in Paris, and was especi-
praises his skill in medicine as well as ally interested in mathematics see :
excitant.
50 Conuiuatus sum cum
istis, et quidem frequenter et suauiter. Ad
mensam verbo sermo statim de te varius, multus etiam sublatis
tertio
mensis. mi Erasme. dicerem omnia, si patereris te in epistola ad
te laudari, Vtinam ad alium scriberem! Tacendum itaque erit
inuito quid illi dicant de Hieronymo tua opera sibiipsi restituto, quid
55 de Nouo Testamento suae integritati reddito, labore longe Christianae
pietati vtiliore quam quae sunt intra mille annos in scholis clamata
quantum admirentur Paraphrases, i(i est Paulum apertius diuina illa
sua eloquentem sensa quantum AdagiiS; Copia et aliis prophanis
;
parebo tibi.
Illud nunc feres velis nolis, nulla te illos ex parte spectare, vnde
65 non occurras summus, admirabilis, absolutus. Possum tibi plures
quam decem ex hominibus ordinis illius nominare, qui suam tibi
omnem operam, diligentiam, fauorem, studium pollicentur et de-
ferunt nihil se tua causa non facturos, suas esse tibi apertas domos,
:
35. D. om. H. 37. vere N^ : verae FN^. C/. Ep. 1115. 6«.
15 18 and 1526, witli dedications, dated Nationale at Paris and Nic. Antonio.
;
from the College de Beauvais, to tlie Bihl.Hispana nouu, 1783, i. 375-6. The
Dominican, John of Toledo, son of tlie Bodleian also has a collection of three
Duke of Alva (Ep. 1256. 32^). By (.8°. M. 10 Art).
1528 he was dead, immatura morte'
'
35. Lusitano] A young member of
(Alvar Gomez, De rebnn geslis Fran. the reigning family of Portugal. Jo.
Ximenii, Alcala, 1569, f. 222 v°) so : de Cehiya dedicated to him an Expositio
that he may liave been iuuenis at
' ' in librus prio)-um Aristotelis, Paris, H. le
this time, For his books, which are feure, s. a. (c. 1516).
now rare, see the catalogues of the Regis] Manoel i (3 May 1469
Colombina at Seville and the Bibl. 13 Dec. 1521), king of Portugal 1495.
1108] FKOM JOHN LOUIS VIVES 273
siue mores siue, quod postremum in illo homine est, fortunam quae : 90
quum in eo sit splendidissima, minima tamen et obscurissima est, si
cum magnitudine caeterarum dotium claritateque conferatur. Natus
est loco nobili in primis, estque in ordine suo honestissima dignitate,
ab vltima stirpe gentis ad eum deducta, tum etiam opibus instructus,
quae natalibus non sint pudendae. Caeterum hac parte censendus 95
ille non est nam caetera illa, vt solaria quaedam sydera, stellam
:
Omnia quae in hunc diem scripsit abunde ostendunt, quum nihil ilH
sit non lectum, nihil tamen iUum legisse nisi accuratissime. Memo-
riam quis non admiretur? BibHothecas medius fidius dicas hominis
pectus, non pectus. Ita sunt iUi omnia in numerato, historiae, fabulae, 105
antiquitates, res omnes, verba orania. Latine sic scribit, sic loquitur,
vt non sit cur magni nominis non haberetur aetate Ciceronis, si tunc
145 Quumque eloquentia ipsa sine aliquo velut antagonista iaceat, libuit
initio vos leuibus quibusdam stimulis inuicem pungere. Quid enim
est orator, si vel solus dicat vel non ab alio sollicitetur atque
excitetur? torpeat necesse est langueatque. C. Erucium scribit
Cicero negligentissime Roscium Amerinum accusasse, quod neminem
150 suspicaretur fore qui responderet.
Itaque primum de operibus vestris iniecta mentio, campus dicendi
non angustus nam scripsistis plurima et eruditissima, et quae sunt
:
118. H: ypfvSis F. 126. perstrictus J': ? prestrictus te(/e«dMm. Cf. Epp. ^i-j.
pergas aliis scriptis Fabrum impetere, tibi contra nimis quam paucus
modicusque existimare.
Hinc progressum est ad iila quae quidam iam nimia, iam atrocia
et intolerabilia iudicarunt, quum tibi, quod vnum Budaeus satis sibi
esse putat, nunquam amicitiae claustra videantur excessisse ac ne 165 :
dicta, si non mel, certe nec fel habebant. sed salem et lusus, quales
ipsa quoque dictat amicitia :etiam non ex vulgari nota, sed ex *
praecipua illa et germana, cuiusmodi inter Ciceronem et Atticum
Brutumque fuit, qui sese plerunque non absimilibus epistolis
lacessebant. 1 75
Certe de Budaei erga te animo, tametsi eimi tibi exploratissimum
perspectissimumque esse sat scio, tamen nihil non ausim tibi polliceri.
Ostendit ille mihi literas ad se a furiis —
quibusdam nam sic melius
quam homines nominaro — scriptas, qui diuidere vestros animos et ex
vnico duos facere moliebantur, suspitiones afferebant sinistre detortafc, iSo
et semina iactabant discordiarum ex ipsius Alectus sinu petita.
Dixi quae mihi pro tempore videbantur, vt Budaei animus, si quid
forte ex tanto veneno acerbius eoncepisset, leniretur ac placaretur.
Sed nihil mea oratione opus erat. Nam ille quum erga alios omnes
tenacissimus est susceptae amicitiae, nec facile ab amicitia etiam 185
lacessitus iniuria discedit. tum vero te ita in animo suo amoris ac
venerationis radicibus defixit. vt nulla inde vi reuelli queas. Spondeo
tibi pro illo, vt illi pro te feci, amicitiam vestram perpetuam fore,
quae literis, quae studiis omnibus haud dubie gratissima semper
futura est ac vtilissima. Nec huiusce rei auderem sponsor esse, nisi 190
vos tali prudentia praeditos esse scirem, vt rebus ipsis sitis semper
magis credituri quam rumusculis, quam obtrectatoribus, quam amicis
consulentibus, idque prauo aliquo inductis affectu. Sed his de rebus
satis. Spero vos tam feliciter fausteque fundamenta iecisse vestrae
amicitiae, vt vi sua stet perpetuo, nec dirui aut labefactari machinis 195
vllis possit.
Redeo ad peregrinationem meani. Putarunt amici grande piaculum
fore si quindecim dies cessarem a praelegendo ; ita mecum agex'e
coeperunt vt et Parrhisiis aliquid clamose nugarer. Placuit. Ac ne
quid esset serium, Somnium delegimus, in quo si dormitassem, non 200
viderer discedere a decoro. Itaque iacens ac subinde dormiens
Somnium illis somniaui Scipionis ; a quo excitatus parabam
159. Apologia] See Ep. 597. 3211. is to a book which Vives pnblishcd al
202. Somnium] Thereferenceclearly this time, consisting of a 'Somnium'
T 2
276 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
aliquandiu amici tam veteres quam noui, moleste officiosi, qui mihi
205 tot conuiuiis, tot comessationibus cruditatem iam pepererant. Et
fuisset res longius progressa, ni reddita mihi peropportune fuisset
a Cardinale epistola, qua subito reuocabar. Ea lecta iussi illos cum
suis ientaculis, prandiis, merendis, coenis, cum suis pintulis et
artocreis paruis magnisque quam optime valere dieque postquam :
210 illinc discessi quinto, qui diuae Trinitati fuit saoer, perueni Brugas
essedo vectus, postridie haec ad te scripsi.
Vale etiam atque etiam et sahie, mi praeceptor.
[The last letter in the Appendix to Eae see Ep. 1083 introcl. It is noticeable :
* that, as in Ep. 1095, F follows a rather than, as might have been expected,
Froben's reprint, Eev (/3). Theyear-date can be assigned beyond doubt from the
appearance of Erasmus' replies to Lee (Ep. 1037 introd.) ; the month-date in
Lond. is a mere degeneration.]
Louvain, 28 March 1520. This year- 209. artocreis] Cf. Ep. 761. 20.
date cannot be interj^reted as 152^, 210. Trinitati] 3 June 1520.
according to the old style (cf. 1. ^n) ; 1109. i. famulus] Perhaps Hovius
for by May 1520 Moro had seen the (Ep. 867. 177^) or Livinus Algoet
;
ita facturum eum tam certo mihi polliceor, quam ille maledicorum
omnium certus erit vltor, et maxime eorum qui sub nomine ac specie
i'eligionis nihil magis quam vnum id agunt, quo veram omnem
religionem euertant. 20
Duos priores libros tuos iam legeram, forte apud Vuangiones
repertos ex quibus animaduerti te tercium adiecturum.
; Legam
igitur auidissime cum domum rediero, et ideo quoque non paulo
maturius reijetam domum. Ex tempore haec scripsi, alioqui nec
meditatus satis probus scribendi artifex quamobrem hic, quaeso, 25 ;
tibi verbis salutem asscriberem, seque tibi non secus ac summo cuipiam
pontifici reuerenter commendat. Saluta etiam isthic Nesenum mihi
et Martinum Dorpium quem totus nunc amo, postquam intellexi
;
[The preface to book i of the Antlbarhari for the coniposition and subsequent
:
fortunes of which see Epp. 30. i6n, 37. 9 seq., 732. 24-6, 887. 3-5, 1210. 18-19,
1227. I and fin. As the Antiharharl is among the volumes reijresented in
21. aF: Vangiones /3. 25. hieaF: his iS. 29. Hattstein )3 : Hutten-
steinaf. 36. lulii Lo/id.
21. priores libros] The Apol. qua during that period Faber Stapulensis
respondet and the first Responsio, of April addressed a letter to him in Liber trium
1520 : see Ep. 1037 introd. viroruni, Paris,H. Stephanus, June
apud Vuangiones] at Worms. 1513. In June 1516 he matriculated
23. domum] Seemingly Spires 1. 3. : at Bologna, but left next year (ANGB.
26. omniura bipedum] Cf. Cic. Dom. pp. 280,1; Knod p. 187). His only
18. 48, Plin. i'^;. I. 5. 14, Apul. il/6<. 4. 10. published work is a letter to Colet
Zasius uses the phrase for Pestis pacis ' (Eev p. 139), written from Mainz 26
Lutherus (ZE. 57).' April 1520. seven months after Colefs
29. Hattstein] This form of the death (cf. Ep. 1099. i7") J protesting,
narae has the more, authority but I ;
like Busch here, against Lee's book.
cannot establish identity.
its local In Nov. 1521 he welcomed Erasmus
—
Marquard (1489 13 June 1522) was a at Mainz and helped him on his way
kinsman of Hutten (HE. 25, iio) and ;
to Basle (Ep. 1342). At his death he
was canon of Mainz in 1509. He was was aged nearly 33.
B.A. at Paris 1513, M.A. 1514 ; and 34. nunc amo] Cf. Ep. 1044.4911.
278 LETTEES OF EKASMUS [1520
Metsys' portrait of Gilles (Ep. 584. 6 cf. Ep. 684. 14U;, it is evident that
;
shortly after Erasmus' arrival at Louvain he had already recovered the Ms. of
—
book i (cf. Ep. 706. 32n) whicli was based (cf. 11. 47-8) on the draft originally com-
posed at Halsteren (see vol. i, p. 588) —
and had formed the design of printing it.
,
On I Jan. 1519 he was still desidei'ating the ms. left with Pace in Italy (1. sgn) ;
see Luc. Ind., where among nondum aedita et imperfecta he mentions 'Anti-
'
'
bai'bari : quod opus pene puer coeperat, mox mutato arguraento vertit in dialo-
gum. Denique duos libros Bononiae recognouit ac locuijletauit. Exemplar bis
descriptum deposuit apud amicum qviendam, vnde nondum potuit recipere '.
But as nothing more reached him, he proceeded to print book i separately, with
the title, Antiharharorum B. Erasmi Rohrodami liher vnus, quem iuuenis quidem adhuc
lusit, caeterum diu desideratum, demum repertum non iuuenis recognouit et velut postliminio
studiosis restituit. Ex
quo reliquorum, qui diis propiciis propediem accedent, lector con-
iecturam facias Basle, Froben, May 1520 (a). By 1523 he had acquired the
licebit:
beginning and end of hook ii, the ibrmer from England, the latter from Bruges
(i, p. 34. 11-13). But his subsequent researches seem to have been without
success : at any rate he published nothing more of the work. That a part of
book ii should have come to him from England is in accord with the existence
of a much more complete ms.. which Ascham saw at Cambridge in 1550 : see his
letter (iii. 13) to Jerome Froben, 10 June (1551).
The work itself was delivered to the Frobens in Basle c. April 1520 (Zw. E.^
131 :cf. BRE. 165). But this preface is probably to be dated later than the
colophon ; for by 25 May it had not arrived in Basle, though the rest of the book
was set up (BRE. 166) ; and even on 22 July all was not yet rcady for publication
(Zw. E.* 148). This inference is corroborated by the composition of the first
sheet (A) where the verso of the title is blank, the preface fills only ff. A^, A*,
and f°. A* again is completely blank, the book beginning with sheet B au —
arraugement which implies that sheet A
was set up later, and also in some
haste, without any attempt to fill the vacant pages with subsidiary matter.
Copies of the book had been sent to Schlettstadt for Beatus Rhenanus aud Sapidus
before 1 1 Aug. (BRE. 174) ; and by 26 Sept. Alciati had seeu it at Aviguon {Chidii
Epistolae, ed, C. Burmann, 1697, p. 80). At first it sold so well that Froben
reprinted it, without chauge iu this prefiice, in Dec. 1520 ; but the only other
authorized editions by the Froben firm are of Aug. 1535 (/3), and iu vol. ix of the
Basle, Opera, 1540 (7). BEr.^ deseribes also unauthorized issues at Deventer,
Cologne, and Strasburg. From Erasmus' statement here (11. 48-51) that he had
taken the book in hand in order to anticipate publication by others, it foUows
that the Cologue edition of 1518 reported from the Bibliotheque Mazarine, but
not now discoverable (see BEr.*), must be a flgmeut : arising perhaps from a
misreading of the colophon of the edition of 1523.
For criticism of the book from the side of the orthodox theologians see Ep.
ii66. 26n.]
MiRAM quandam esse naturae vim atque ivepyeiav vei hinc coUigo,
Sapide charissime, quod cum me puero prorsus exularent ludia
literariis bonae literae, cum deessent librorum ac praeceptorum
subsidia, cum nullus honos adderet ingenio calcar, imo cum passim
5 omnes ab his studiis deterrerent et ad alia compellerent, me tamen
non iudicium, quod mihi tum per aetatem esse non poterat, sed
naturae sensus quidam ad Musarum sacra velut afflatum rapiebat.
Inuisos habebam quoscunque noueram humanioribus studiis infensos ;
I. energiam H. 5. me om. 0.
iiio] TO JOHN SAPIDUS 279
futuro.
Primum librum locupletaram Bononiae, iam meditansaeditionem ;
15. poetriam] Cf. Epp. 1126. 335, and 1227, also i, p. 34. g. On leaving
1153. 2i5n, 1196. 450, 559. Ferrara Pace distributed some of the
19. perstringerem] Cf. Epp. 936. papers to friends (cf. Epp. 66, 244), but
16-18, 950. 10-12. took the remainderwith him to Rome:
quatuor] This revision must be
23. ultimately leaving them bchind there
subsequent to Ep. 37. 11, where only (cf. Ep. 1210. 15-19). For hisdifficulty
two books are contemplated. in recovering them ef. Ep. 732. 24.
29. Coletus] This conversation must Ascham (Ep. iii. 13, 10 June (1551))
be placed in 1499 or 1505-6; since it describesthe.i4n<t7)ar6a>ias 'olimRomae
preceded Erasmus' visit to Italy. The Richardo Paceo surreptos'.
laterdateisperhapsthemoreprobable. 47. vbi commigrassem] in.Tulyi5i7.
39. deposui] at Ferrara, with otlier 54. Vallum humanitatis] See Ep.
compositions, on his way to Rome in 830 introd. The copy pi-esented by
the spring of 1509 see Epp. 283. 169
: Busch to some friend at the Frankfort
280 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
[The year-date, which has no better authority than H or N^, can be corrected
from the inhibition of Nesen from lecturing (11. 61-2 cf. Epp. 1046, 1057) ^^^^ ; 5
first news of Vives' arrival in Paris. The present letter treats the same subjects
more fully,]
vbi, quod huius disciplinae veluti regnura et arx quaedam esse vide-
batur, periculum erat ne lapidareris aut crabronum aculeis confode-
reris. Profecto gratulor publico successui studiorum sed priuatim ;
fair, isSept. 1518, isnow inthe Britlsh cf. Epp, 112. ii, 321, 10-
ity in culture
Museum (819. f. i). 11,569.57-81,880.5-6,1165.45-7,1187.
1110.62. De conscribendis] See Ep. 6; BRE, 76, 102, 197, 210; LE.^ 87,
71. 90, 98. 46 and see my Age of Erasmus,
:
tum demum suus est honos quum aliis disciplinis gi-auioribus veluti
condimentum admiscentur.
Caeterum illud saepe mecum admiror, quum omnes ferme totius
orbis Academiae vehiti resipiscentes ad sobrietatem quandam com-
ponant sese, apud solos Louanienses esse qui tam pertinaciter ob- 25
luctentur melioribus literis, praesertim quum nec in hoc sophistico
doctrinae genere magnopere praecellant. Narrauit mihi ante annos
tres R. P. loannes episcopus Roffensis, vir vnus vere episcopus, vere
theologus, in Academia Cantabrigiensi, cui Cancellarius est perpetuus
— sic enim illi vocant summum ac perpetuum scholae antistitem 3° — ,
19. n Cyllenum F.
: 28. R. P. om. H. 30. sic . . . antistitem add. H.
34, R. Card. i*' Cardinalis
: J?. 41. Nebrissensis if.
here an<l the four years actually past 41. Nebricensis] See Ep. 487. i^n.
since Ep. 456 was written is not an in- For this form of the name cf. some Lihrl
surmountable obstacle : for his memory minores corrected by him, Alcala, Mich.
for figureswas weak (cf. Epp. 1098 de Eguia, i April 1525 see BEr.' iii. 36.
:
282 LETTEES OF EEASMUS [1520
54. pars aliqua] Cf. Ep. 1057 introd. nonnunquam et obscoenis iocis ad
For another matter, arising out of the cachinnos concitare. Quem morem
University troubles, in which Vives nescio quis cacodaemon inuexit in
had no doubt taken part, through his Ecclesiam. Nam etsi populus aliqua
relation with Cardinal Croy, see de voluptate retinendus est atque etiam
Jongh p. 2o*n. excitandus nonnunquam, tamen huius-
58. in concionibusl For the amaz- modi ludicris excitare risum, scurra-
ing devices employed by preachers, rum est, non theologorum '. For the
especially at Easter, to attract popular note on this passage in the Gouda MS.
attention and fill their churches, see 1324, f. gsee vol. i, p. 612. Vives in his
Oecolampadius' De risu PaschaU, Basle, notes on Aug. Ciu. Dei. Basle, Froben,
Froben, 15 18. Capito's preface to it, Sept. 1522 (viii. 27 pp. 266,7) protests
;
19 April 1518, states that Oecolampa- against the unseemly character of the
dius was regarded as concionator
' Passiondramasexhibited tothepeople,
parum serius' for refusing to imitate and gives some details.
them. Cf. also the Ecdesiastes bk. iii 62. Roma] See Ep. 1062. i^on.
(LB. V. 987 e), More's letter to Oxford Mediolanum] ForFrancis i's Greek
University, 29March (1518), (Jortin ii. College founded in 1520 by John
664) and Erasmus' preface to the
; Lascaris see A. Lefranc, Hist. du Coilige
reader, 14 Jan. 1522, prefixed to his de France, 1893, pp. 71 seq., 391-2.
Paraphraseon Matt. Atque hoc prae-
:
'
69. Horatianum] C. 4. 4. 57.
staret, opinor, quani popuhim ineptis 75. prouocantis] Cf. Ep. 994. im.
II ii] TO JOHX LOUIS VIYES 283
cum negare non possent eum esse summum in omni literarum genere,
summum quidem esse sed vnum. 'Atqui hoc'
solent causificari
inquam 'nomine Gallia vincit nostram Germaniam, quae nulhim
habet Budaeo parem, tametsi permultos habet mediocres, nonnullos 85
supra mediocritatem Velitationis illius qua conflictati sumus, iam-
'.
[The preface to the Paraphrases on the Epistles of St. Peter and St. .Jude.
Tlie first edition is doubtless that of Martens, Louvain, s. a. (a) a rare volume :
of which there are copies in the Bibl. Nationale at Paris (A. 18182. 5) and the
University Library at Ghent (Res. 155). This preface was reprinted by Froben
in an edition of Jan. 1521 without change except for some negligible misprints.
Of the subsequent Froben editions (see Ep. 710 introd.) the octavo of March 1521
(/3) has an insertion which can only have been made by Erasmus himsel£ In
July 1521 (7) there is a necessary correction in the octavo of 1523 (5) a corruption
;
which the later texts followed. But apart from these changes the only consider-
able revision is, as in Ep. 916, in the folio of 1532 (e). There are some slight
variations, no doubt unintentional, in the posthumous volumes of 1540 {^^) and
1541 (C^).
Erasmus had begun these Paraphrases in May (Ep. 1102. 19-20) but while ;
engaged with them, he fell seriously ill. He had probably designed to finish
the book for presentation to Wolsey at Calais (see p. 296), in fulfilment of the
promise made in February (Ep. 1060. 57). So he worked on, dictating to
a secretary and thus completed what was lacking, the Paraphrase on Jude
;
and this preface (Epp. 11 16, 11 17). Martens no doubt did his part punctually ;
but Wolsey was too busy to reeeive the book at Calais, and Erasmus was obliged
to send it later (Ep. 1132). For his illness at this time cf. also Epp. iiii. i,
1113-15, H17. 16-17, 126.
The omission of dates in this preface and the book itself was probably in-
tentional, in case the presentation should be delayed cf. I. 2n and Ep. 284 introd. ;
An approximate date can be assigned for this preface from Ep. 1117. 125-6 ]
aut viris summatibus, aptum esse oportere magis quam aequale siqui- ;
dem olim absurde facere visus fuisset, si quis Musis offerret hecatom-
ben aut hederaceas corollas Marti. Itaque primum illud mihi visum
est congruere, vt ad tam eximium religionis antistitem iret Petrus,
20 incomparabilis ille Christianae religionis princeps vt quemadmodum :
'
ecce vobis, charissimi, secundam scribo epistolam ', non video qui
res possit explicari, nisi aut posterior Petri non sit, aut Syluanus eam 60
scripserit iussu Petri. Quod si haec ab ipso Petro scripta est, videtur
tres scripsisse, quarum prima intei ciderit. De tempore ac loco nihil
habetur comperti, nisi quod coniectent priorem Ehomae scriptam,
quam in fine Babylonem appellauit, imperante Claudio Caesare.
Sed ne longior sit opere praefatio, magnopere cupimus vt hanc 65
industriam nostram, si quo pacto meretur, K. T. D. candido calculo
commendet studiosis ; non quod ipsi venemur aliquid apud celsitudi-
nem tuam, cum nec hic animus vnquam nec nunc haec aetas faciat
ad ambitionem, sed quod ex eorum fauore iudicioque qui summa
dignitate praeminent, mirus ardor ac stimulus addatur studiosis. ;o
Praeter multos absolute doctos subolescunt in vestra Britannia tuae
34. fere acld. e. 40. tametsi . . . 41.dissimulatum add. /3. 46. 7 : epi-
stolae o. 48. illius add. e. 49. etiam si a tametsi «.
: 51. Vnde . . .
53. voluerit add. e. 53. adducit f. 58. aperte add. «. Hanc . . 59. ,
epistolam add. «. 60. eam add. e. 61. Quod . . 62. interciderit add. e.
.
non dubito at maiore fide quam nos fecimus, non adeo multi.
;
it is written from Louvain, it must in any case be before 25 June (Ep. 1117).
Further evidence is that on 5 May both Luther and Melanchthon had written
recently to Erasmus (LE.- 302) Melanchthon's being no doubt the letter
:
nuper, and as intended for Luther quite as much as for Melanchthon (Ep. 11 19.
26-7).
For communication between Melanchthon and Erasmus c. Aug. 1519 see ME.
49-]
hic regnare.
De Luthero varia nuncciantur. Homini faueo quoad licet, eciam 15
si vbique meani causam cum illius causa coniungunt. Plane futu-
rum erat vt illius libri exurerentur in Anglia. Hoc certe prohibui
scriptis ad Cardinalem Eboracensem litteris qui idem a me monitus ;
7. Habet scripsi, cf. Ep. 1126. 11. 12 : Habeo MS. 29. et Strobel : vt MS.
hic adest, mox aulam Caroli petiturus : sed nulla est aula quam non
occuparint isti irToixoTv pawoi. Rursum vale, mi charissime Philippe.
[Evidently written for Hutten to take to Brussels in June 1520 see Ep. 11 13. :
36n. Marlianus (Ep. 411. 8n) had just returned from Spain in Cliarles' train.
About Aug. 1516 he had received the bishopric of Tuy in Galicia (Mart. E. 576) ;
and he had rapidly become an influential member of Charles' Council (cf. Ep.
1199. 4-5). Indeed Peter Martyr, who was his kinsman and fellow-countryman
(Mart. E. 696, 722), calls him Caesaris semi-anima' (ibid. 655, 722) coupling
'
;
him with Gattinara (p. 359). For Erasmus* communications with him through
Barbirius during the Spanish period see Epp. 695. 50, 794. 85, 803. 3-5.]
obiit Syluagius nec rediifc Barbirius. Neque enim dubito quin eum
animum sis praestaturus Erasmo quem hactenus semper praestitisti
5 quem ipsum
non tam mihi praestabis quam optimis studiis ; quibus
quoniam impense faueo, multos habeo qui mihi non fauent. Mitto
Apologiam qua respondeo iis qui me traducebant apud populum,
quod vertissem In principio erat sermo '. Vel ex hac re licet illorum
'
Germany under Charles, and there- another friend at Court (Ep. 1115).
with of emancipation from the domi- But this he subsequently deplored ;
nionofRome (cf. Epp. 1129. 22-4,1135. see his letter of 8 May 1524 to Luther
i9n, n6i);anditwasevenprojectedby (LE.* 792. 63-6 = HE. 364. 41-3). For
his friends that he should be attached liis friendly feeling towards Hutten at
to Ferdinand's court (LE.^ 300. 226,7 this time see Ep. 11 19. 33-4.
= HE. 160). In pursuance of this 1113. 37. aula] Cf. Epp. 1141. 15^,
scheme he set out from Mainz on 4 11 48. ^n.
June (HE. 171, 171*: cf. ME. 78 and 38. iTTaixorvpavvoi] The monks and
Heumann p. 5o = HE. 174) to hay his friars ; cf. Epp. 998. 59^, 1082. i^n.
plans before Ferdinand (cf. Ep. 1055. 1114. 3. Syluagius] f? June 1518:
2), who was now probably with Charles see Ep. 410.
at Brussels. On his way Hutten nec rediit] On Le Sauvage's
hoped to see Erasmus at Louvain death Barbirius had remained in
(HE. 171*); and this intention he Spain entering the service of Adrian
;
carried out (cf. Spongia, LB. x. 1645 a of Utrecht, who had been left behind
= HE. 333, § 128). Erasmus gave him as Charles' sole Regent.
a letter of introduction to an influen- 7. Apologiam] See Ep. 1072.
tial meraber of Charles' Council (Ep. 12. consilio] urging Erasmus to
1114); andafter Hutten's departure to abstain fi-om further controversy : see
Bi-usselswrote further in his praiso to Ep. 1198. 7-14.
III4J TO ALOISIUS MARLIANUS 289
[Halewin (Ep. 641) liad by tliis tinie taken orders, and was at Brussels, pre-
paring to attend Charles to the meeting with Henry viri at Gravelines and
Calais (Ep. 1106. 93n). It was perhaps the hope of seeing Erasmus on that
occasion which evoked the letter answered here. The year-date is confirmed
by Hutten's visit to Ferdinand (1. 45).]
Quod hactenus nemo tuo satisfacit animo, nec inter hos qui
25 conscripserunt de ratione parandae linguae Latinae, nec ex his qui
'
nunc complures libris proditis testantur quantum assequuti sint in
lingua Latina, fortasse nec ipse Cicero satisfaciet animo tuo, vt non
defuerunt quibus Maro visus est soloecus, et barbarus Liuius. Ego
nec hos probo qui neglectis in totum praeceptionibus, ex autoribus
30 petunt loquendi rationem, nec hos qui praeceptis addicti non
versantur in euoluendis autoribus. Praecepta volo esse pauca, sed
optima quod reliquum est arbitror petendum ex optimis quibusque
:
non videmus adhuc cuiquam vsui fuisse. Povro quod eorum qui
scribunt hodie, videtur impurior oratio, fortassis in causa sunt aures
eorum ad quorum iudicium scribimus fortassis quod subinde ;
vix adhuc satis firmus sum. Ea les in causa fuit vt hanc epistolam
dictauerim, non scripserim. Bene vale, vir clarissime.
50 Louanii. xi. Cal. lul. An. m.d.xx.
Louvain.]
37. fortasse H.
Trr. CANONico] Tliis word is per- ing as tliout;h ho had been unaMe to
:
U 2
292 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
quod orauerant futurum esset. Dicit ipsis Erasmus se essc ita multis et magnis
negotiis occupatum vt vix respirare prae illis concedatur. Itaque veniam sibi
dari aequum esse si non ea diligentia atque consideratione qua debuisset, totum
librum pellegerit. Qiiem quidem pereurri ab se, (quando) inspiciendo studuerit,
neque erroi'em vllum aut quod duceret emendandum se.se deprehendisse. Ad
testimonium autem suum quod attineret, ita se rem habere vt neque eis hoc
ornamento adiumentoue esse futurum arbitretur, et inde aliquid sibi periculi
creari ac detrimenti posset afferri. " Neque putare vos " inquit " debetis meo
testimonio aliorum vobis beneuolentiam gratiamue conciliatum iri, cum mea
qualiscunque autoritas patrocinio ipsa indigeat. Quod si tam piis quam
honestis caeteris studiis praebent vtilitatis fructum mea scripta, non existimo
in hoc illa discrimen adduci consultum esse, vt ob communitatem vobiscum
testatam ipsa quoque improbentur vel condemnentur omnino et ex homiuum
manibus excutiantur ". Ignoscerent vel timori vel cautioni isti suae, sibique
persuaderent se eis bene cupere, et ab se aliis rebus oiBcia sua fore paratissima.
'
Seniores his auditis, etsi expectauerant aliam responsionem, istam tamen
excusationem boni consuluerunt, cum praesertim humanorum testimoniorum
fundamentum nunquam statuissent iaciendum supra quod veritatis coelestis
aedificium extrueretur.'
Camerarius can hardly have had any personal knowledge of the events
recorded but as he was a student at Erfurt from 1518 onwards, he may very
;
likely liave heard the story from Draco, -who went to Louvain to i^aj' his homage
to Erasmus at the end of July 1520 (Ep. 1127. 1-2), shortly after the visit
of the Brethren had occurred —
if it is rightly placed in June and not in August.
For communication between the Bohemian Utraquists and Luther in 1519 see
LE.'^ 195, 196, 223, 232. His verdict on tlieir letters was, Erasmisant miro '
scripsei*am ad Beraldum.
10 Ad quae vt paucis respondeam sic enim postulat tempus— Si — :
70 nec opus est Moro nostris praesidiis cuius mihi jiotius est opus
:
66. deferas] Cf. Ep. 1087. 22on. aftor Linacre's return from Italy in
67. notarat] in two couplets on p. the summer of 1499 (EHK. xviii. 514,
246, in the verses phoebvs BRixrsM 15). As Grocin was in London at the
ALLOQvrrvK. sanie time (Ep. 118. 22n), Erasmus is
74. literis] fciee \. gn. perliaps rccording here facts of which
93. Graecas] More states that he lie had personal knowledge.
heard Linacre lecture on the Metcoro- 100. pertraxerit] Cf. Ep. 999. 92.
III7J TO GEEMANUS BRIXIUS 295
optarim hoc quicquid est tumultus aboleri. Quod autem credis vix
fieri posse vt tua Antimorus obsolescat, aut ego plane fallor, aut
nullus est iterum aediturus, si tu conquiescas. Illud multis displieet,
qucd Morum rursus attigisti in praefatione quadam, cum ille ad tuum 115
libellum nihil adhuc responderit.
Sed vt finiam, optime Brixi. si vis me hoc agere cum Moro, vt
iungat vos amnestia, pergam id facere quod coepi. Sin expectas vt
Morus tibi supplex sit. plane falleris. Vt illius animum sentio,
feliciter gessero rem si hoc ab illo impetrem, vt nolit te odiosius 120
impetere idque vt fiat, arbitror et ad communem studiorum digni-
;
[From the connexion with the other correspondence of this period a conjec-
tural month-date may be assigned. It is evident that Pace and Erasmus
had coincided somewhere, and that Pace, learning this just before he left, had
sent a note asking Erasmus to come and see him. It is also clear that Erasmus
expected to have another chance of meeting Pace before long. Such a situation
would have arisen if Pace, who accompanied Henry to France in May-July 1520
(^cf. Ep. 1106. 93n;, had been detached on a mission to Antwerp in June or if :
he had been sent off from Cah\is just after Erasmus' arrival there in July (see
below). There is no evidence that Pace was in Antwerp at this time so the :
102. Meurus] Cf. Ep. 1045. 10 etc. its preface is presumably tlie one re-
115. praefatione] NBG. xl. 870 men- ferred to here. He perhaps checked
tions a second edition of thcCViord/grera, its sale, as More had done with his
Paris, 1519; and P, Papillon, Bibl. des reply (Ep. 1096. 1 17-21;. The Antimo-
auteurs de Bourgogne, 1745. i. 109, speaks rus, too, is ]>y no means eommon.
of Brixius' Carmina, 1519, which is 116. nihil adhuc responderit] Cf. Ep.
probably the same book. 1 cannot dis- 1096. i2in.
cover any copy of it but, as Brixius ; 125. Paraphrasim] See Ep. 11 12.
published no other book at this time. ia6. morbus] See 1. 16.
296 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
latter suggestion should for this reason be the more probable. But, tliough the
dates added in H
have usually little or no value, sucli an adventure as just
missing a friend might have remained witli some distinctness in Erasmus'
memory so that he could place it correctly, when considering it again after a
:
way to Antwerp Erasmus fell in with an English horseman (Ep. 1117. 1,2), who
may have been one of Pace's retinue.
Erasmus' visit to Calais was the result of invitations from More (Epp. 1087,
1096, 1106) and Warham (Epp. 1101,2; cf. BRE. 166) who evidently designed
;
that he should take part in the ceremonial meetings of the three sovereigns (cf.
Ep. 1106. gan). He was ready to accept, and finally went but at first ;
was detained by ill-health (p. 283), and in the latter part of June was at
Antwerp (Ep. 1117). His time at Calais is therefore probably to be placed
between 6-30 July, when his lettei's give no guidance as to his movements.
During that period he was at Bruges, evidently aceompanying Charles (Ep.
1129. in) : so that it seems a reasonable conjeeture that he went to Calais also
in the train of the Emperoi", who was tliere 11-14 July.
He had a public interview with Henry (Ep. 1342. 844), and with Wolsey
probably atthe same time (Ep. 1132. 1-3) but with the latter he had no satis-
;
factory intercourse, and possibly not with Henry either. In any case Andr»5
Meyer, Eelations (VErasme et de Luther, 1909, pp. 44-6, is clearly right in regarding
the conversation between Henry and Erasmus reported by O. Myconius, 20 Nov.
1520 (Hess ii. 607,8), as in the main fabulous. With Longlond, the bishop of
Lincoln, however, he had more talk, and was invited to undertake a commentary
on the Psalms, one fruit of which was the In Psaltnum quartum concio, Basle,
Froben, Feb. 1525 see Epp. 1535, 1570. More, too, Iie saw, of course (Ep. 1184.
:
21-2), and was shown a copy of the Epistola ad Brixium (Ep. 1096. i2in). Also
he chanced to meet Lee (cf. Ep. 1132. i8n), and shook hands with him as a sign
of the reconciliation that had recently been eifected (p. m).]
fortuna responderit.
5 Si non dabitur colloqui, commendo tibi negocium non tam meum
quam litei:arum. Quod enim molitur Leus 6 KaTapaTo?, non ad me
proprie pertinet, fortassis ad vestram Britanniam pertinet cuius ;
3.noua dignitate] Cf. Ep. 1103. i8n. 1126, 1128-9, ^^3-f 1134,- "SPj 1165:
6. Leus] For the continuance of but cf. Ep. 1132. i8n.
Erasmus' troublewith Lee at this time 11. nouum^T^x^^^^Ma^Cf.Ep. 1113.3-4.
see Epp. 1098 9, iioa-3, 1113, 1123, 12. Mori literis] Not extant.
1119] 297
[As the Imperial Election is over (1. 8), only 1519, 1520, 1521 are possible.
For various reasons 1519 is unlikely in 1521 at this time the breach between
:
Hutten (1. 33) and Erasmus had begun. 1520 is corroborated by Erasmus' pro-
jected return to Germany (11. 22-3) and by the letter to Melanchthon (1. 26).]
with a postscript adding that Schuttern had been founded by Offo, an English-
mau of royal blood, and that in consequence it might be hoped that Henry vm
would intervene on its behalf. The present letter was no doubt composed by
Zasius at the request of the two Abbots.
For the business in hand see I. lan. The appeal to Charles, even with the
support of Erasmus and the other councillors addressed, was doomed to dis-
appointment as appears from a letter written by Zasius in 1530, wlien asked
;
a move would have brought him into relations withhim see Ep. 11 13. 36U;
closer connexion with Luther than he and,forsubsequent devehjpments, Epp.
could possibly have desired at this 1135 introd., 1184. 25-6, 1195. 136-41»
timo. His credit there as a theologian 1202. 274-5.
soon declined see BRE. 206.
: 40. veritas] For thisprincipleseealso
26. Scripsi] Ep. 11 13. Epp. 1167. 164-7, ii95- 106-9, 1202.
33. Huttenus] For Erasmus' recent 126-7, 1219. loo-i, 1331. 20-4.
ii2o] FKOM CONRAD FRICK AND LAURENCE ESINGER 299
some distauce up the valley of the Unditz, which debouches into the plain at
Ettenheim, s. of Lahr. Among the hills to the e. of Lahr lay the strong castle
of Geroldseck on the Schonberg, dominating the upper waters of the Schutter
to its w. and the Kinzig on its e. The situation of all three is carefully
described in a letter from Ottelinus of Lahr to Beatus Khenanus, 27 Fel). 1531
(BRE. 272 but on p. 383. 31 for occidenfem read orioitcni).
;
Conrad Frick (i" 3 April 1535) was elected Abbot of Schuttern on 12 July 1518
but not much is known of him. In Feb. 1522 he was visiting Nuremberg (ZE.
266). lu 1523 he was present at the election of nn abbot for the Benedictine
house of Alpirsbach, high up in the valley of the Kinzig (GC. v. 1065 Luscinius
,.
(Ep. 302. i6n) speaks of him as an old fi-iend and tells a story of his humour in
letting a house in Strasburg (Joa ac sales, Augsburg, S. Ruff, 13 Feb. 1524, no. 82).
In May 1525 he took up arms with the nobles for the suppression of the
Peasants (ZE. 243), and in April 1526 was negotiating with the Austrian autho-
rities at Ensisheim for the restoration of the monks of Hiigshoten (BRE. 255).
He had sufficient interest in history to promote the continuance of the Chronicle
of Schuttern begun by P. Volz (Ep. 368) see F. J. Mone, Quellensammhmg der
:
badischen Landesgesch. iii, 1863, pp. 42, 56. The abbey of Schxittern owned a house
in Freiburg, at which Botzheim was staying in 1519 (ZE. pp. 492, 494). For
Mss. formerly belonging to Schuttern see L. Dorez in Mdanges Emile Otaielain,
1910, pp. 293-9.
Laurence Esinger (f 1544J of Villingen, near Donaueschingen, was elected
Abbot of Ettenheimmiinster 4 July 1500, and ruled there for more than 43
years (GC. v. 866). He was present with Abbot Conrad at Alpirsbach in 1523 ;
from Zasius' other two letters mentioned above as written on the same day.
It is noticeable that there is no allusion to this affair of the two Abbots in
Ep. 1121.]
printcd, apparently from the original hut 1:1. DeuiH, Wiens Buchdruckergeschicht,
MS., byMichael Barth in his Annaeherga, 1782, p. 339, states that he had experi-
Basle, Jo. Oporinus, March 1557. In ence of the plague in Bohemia and
his preface Salius speaks of receiving Moravia 1506-7, in Transylvania 1510.
the poefs laurel from Maximilian, in He was a friend of Reuchlin, and
1506, in reward for a poeni on Carin- brought news of him to Erasmus just
thia and describes himself as M.D.
: about this time : see Ep. 1129. in.
Next he wrote De praeserualione a pesti- Aschbach {Gesch. d. Wiencr Univ. ii. 98)
lentia, Vienna, H. Vietor, 16 Nov. 1510 states that he was at one time Professor
with a preface dated 12 Aug. from of Medicine nt Vienna.
300 LETTEKS OF ERASMUS [1520
[From Zasius' Opera omnia, Lyons, S. Gryphius, 1549-50, edited in six volumes
by his son J. U. Zasius and Joachim Mynsinger, with a royal piivilege dated
10 Sept. 1548 apparently the first issue.
: Eiegger, ZE. p. (179), mentions a
Lyons edition, apud Sennetonios fratres, 1548 but about it there seems to be
;
some doubt. At one point the text of a is difficult and has been corrected by
Riegger.
The year-date is confirmed by the reference to the controversy with Budaeus
see ]. 3in. As this letter is thus contemporary with Ep. 1120, some reference
might liave been expected in it to the important business there laid before
—
Erasmus. The subject a dispute which may well have lasted through more
—
than one generation was perhaps omitted in printing, for reasons of prudence.]
ZASIVS ERASMO S. P. D.
ditur? 15
Sed Insurgit contra publicae vtilitatis infestatorem
dii meliora.
totus literatus ordo populari actione opprimendus populi inimicus.
;
10. quam Riegger : vel a. ]^lehiq\ie Riegger, pe^rperam. ii. etaddidi: qui
add. Riegger.
I. Leus] Zasius had expressed him- works. Zasius' reply (ZE. p. 471) is
self fullyon Lee in a letter to Beatus, dated i Sept. 1519 cf. ZE. 6 for his
;
5 .June (BRE. 168), which is printed in views on tlie question a few days earlier.
Eev ; see p. 210. He adhered to his intention of not
7. Caligula] Cf. Suet. Calig. 30. publishing it (cf. ZE. 13). Contem-
27. Dominus] Proverbs 3. 26. porary ms. copies of the two letters are
30. Dorpius]Intherecentreconcilia- not uncommon e. g.
; at St. Gallen,
tion Zasius had taken some part cf. : Vadiana xi. 205 and i. 165. Boniface
Ep. 1044. 49n. Amerbach wrote from Avignon on the
31. Budaeus! He wroto to Zasius same date as this letter, asking for his
(ZE. p. 466 BE.* 39) on 25 July (1519)
: own copies of them which he had left
commentingon thefirstitein inZasius' bebind(BasleMS.C. VI*. 73.47). Stint-
recently published Lucubrationcs (Ep. zing, wlio gives some account of the
862), and defending himself againat dispute {Zasius. pp. 195-201), state»
criticisms made therein upon his own that they are in the Library at Basle.
302 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [1520
[For the first source see App. 12 in vol. iii. The year-date given in the text is
probably correct, but I cannot establish it as certain. It is corroborated by Ep.
1 125, and by the fact that neither letter appears in tlie Farrago (E). But Erasmus
was at Louvain at the end of July in 1517 and 1519 also. The date of Barland's
volume precludes any later year than 1520.
The person here addressed omitted to add his surname (cf. 11. 19-20) in writing
to Erasmus ; and in consequence he has hitherto, so far as I kuow, eluded
identification. The title decimarius shows that he was one of the superintendents
appointed by the dukes of Saxony to control the silver mines cf. the Bermannus ;
was a friend of Eppendorff (N. Arch. f. sdchs. Gesch. xxiii, 1902, p, 142). He was
in office in 1515, but by 1523 his successor had been appointed. It does not
follow, however, that he was dead for the opening lines of this letter seem to
;
indicate that he was now retiring and settling in one of the Saxon university
townsj probably Leipzig, where he had matriculated in 1493, and was B.A. Sept.
1494, procecding later M.A. His widow married Geo. Agricola (I. i2n) in 1543,
borc children to him in 1550 and 1552, and was still living in 1580 .so that she :
was perhaps Meyner's second wife. See C. Meltzer, Historia Schneebergensis, 1716,
h P- 383 and a translation of Geo. Agricola's De re metallica, by H. C. and L. H.
;
The whole packet of letters, 1122-8, was probably sent by the same hand,
Draco (Epp. 1124, 1127 cf. JE. 43) whose journey back to Erfurt wonld lie
; ;
through Mainz, and perhaps Wiirzburg, and who would have facilities for for-
warding to Leipzig and Dresden.
Henry of EppendoriT (1. io),near Freiberg in Meissen. matriculated at Leipzig
in 1506, and was B.A. 11 March 1508; and c. 1511-12 Melanchthon had formed
an ill opinion of him (cf. ME. 267 with Ep. 1496'. Little else is kndwn of
him before his visit to Erasmus at Louvain in July 1520 (Epp. 1122, 1125).
He cLaimed to be of knightly rank but this was disputed by both Mosellanus
:
(Ep. 1437) and Emser (Ep. 1551). The change in L 11 made in F is, however,
noticeable. Duke George of Saxony gave him money to carry on his studies
(Ep. 1437) and from Louvain he went to Freiburg, where he can be traced in
;
June 1521 Basle MS. C. VI^'. 73.222: H. Schreiber, Gesch. Vniv. Freibitrg. ii. 193)
and March 1522 (App. 14V Atone time there he was involved in a suit for debt
(Schreiber, op. cit., ii. 106). By May 1522 he had been for some while at Basle
(Ep. 1283). He attached himself to Erasmus (Basle MS. G. II. 13. 123''),
whom he aceompanied in Sept. to visit Botzheim at Constance (cf. BV'E.
226,7). ^^ Dec. Erasmus could still write of tiim with approbation to Duke
George (Ep. 1325) : but when the breach between H"tten and Erasmus
began, Eppendorflf followed Hutten and quickly drew away from his former
friend (cf. App. 14). In the present letter may be seen signs of growing coolness.
For letters of Eppendorff at this period see Zw. E.^ 253 and N. Arch. f. sachs.
Gesch. xxiii, 1902, p. 142.
On Hutten's death Eppendorff withdrew to Strasburg, where he communicated
his dislike of Erasmus to Otho Brunfels (HE. 334, p. 350) and otbers (Ep. 1466) ;
aniong whom, to Erasmus" disgust, was Capito (Ep. 1485 cf. Epp 1459, 1496). ;
As a result of the attack upon himself Erasmus wrote to Duke George di nounc-
ing Eppendorff. The letter was never puhlished but it reached Eppendorff. and
;
supplied him with a handle againstErasmuswhich he was not slow touse(cf. Epp.
1448,9). For some years he repeatedly Ihreatened an action for defarration f Lond.
xix.72, 58; LB. 906, 927); andatlength,astherewasnoabatementof ErasmusMan-
guage, he cameto Basle tocarry out his threat (Horawitzi. 11, ii. 8\ Pr ceedings
were only averted by the intervention of Boniface Amerhach. Beatus Fh< nanus,
andL. Ber whoon ^Feb. i^^Sestablishedasiirt of peacebetween them (LB. App.
;
73. 89). Early in 1529 he sent a written account of the position to Duke George
(cf LB. App. 348,9); and in the colloquy, 'I-nvfiis axtvTvcs, first piintfd in the
Froben edition of March 1529, the chief character was so lightly disguised as to
be easily recognizable (cf. Ep. 1168. ipn and EE. iii). For a time tbe move to
Freiburg seemed to give relief Lond. xxiv. 4, LB. 1060). Next year EppendorfF
) went to Augsburg to meet the Duke at tbe Diet and expound his side of the case
(EE. 128, 137; cf. Lond. xxv. 30,42, LB. 1118, 1208); and on return visited
Erasmus at Freiburg with some degne of amity (BIE. 275 cf. Lond. xxx. 53, ;
LB. 1146). But neither was satisfied. Erasmus produced for publication a state-
ment of his position, Aduersns menciacivm vfilis admonitio. Fj-eilmrg. s.n., 1530
. . .
;
and Eppendorff replied with a lusla QuereJa, Hagcnau, J. S cerius, Feb. 1531.
After this, through the mediation of J. Pflug,sent by Duke Genige (J. p 60, and
Lond. xxvi. i, LB. 1168), the quarrel w,is h.ippily alhaved to lapse though ;
550 introd.) spoaks well of him in the preface to Imperatores Romcmi. Strasbui'g,
W. Cephalaeus, 1526, f. A ' From 1523 onwards he lived qiiietly at Stj'asburg,
occupied largely in literary pursuits. Schott piinted for him traoslati ns into
German of Plntai'<-h's Ap(>phlhegwafa, 1534. and Moralia. 1535, .'ind of some l)ooks
of Piiny X H.. 1543 of A. Krantzius' Chronicon Daniae. 1545, and of various
;
writings about the Turks, 1550 also a sliort Histojy of Rome in German. 1536
:
SE. 246, 256), and in 1551 a collected volume of s<^>me of these. The date <>f
(cf.
his death is unknown.
See an excellent life by Chr. Saxius, Leipzig, 1745: BEj-.^ Admnitio, witli a
detailed account of the quarrel with Eiasmus and A DB.] ;
304 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
20 tuis nusquam adscriptum repperi. Hoc vbi nactus ero, inter araicos
haud quaquam postremae sortis asscribam. Bene vale.
Louanii. Tertio Cal. Aug. An. m.d.xx.
F. DECiMARio a A DECiMis F.
; lo. ab Eppeiidorff add. F Epphendorpius :
3. Alberti] Duke Albert of Saxony Reisciiach -vvas also sent to meet the
(27 Jan. 1443 —
12 Sept. 1500), named English ambassadorsin Brussels, Nov.-
for his courage animosus '. was ap-
'
Dec. 1514, and ask for aid againstCount
pointed Statthalterof tlie Netherlands Edzard iu East Friesland (Brewer i.
by Maximiliaa in Nov. 1488. See ADB. 5598-600, 5675-6).
i. 314-18 and, for his interest in
; 9. literis] Ep. 963.
Schneeberg, Bermannus (1. i2n), p. 80. xenii.s] Perhaps cf. Ep. looi. 41.
Cancellarius] Simon
6. of Rei- 10. Eppendorff ] See introd.
schach, LL.D., who was Duke George's 12. vaenis] The silver mines in the
Chancellor in Friesland. He was sent Erz Mts.. sw. of Dre.sden the most ;
[As this falls between the appearance of Ep. 1033 in print and the publication
of F, only 1520 and 1521 are possible. The year-date given in F is amply con-
firmed by the contents.]
dam Epigrammata scripta in Leum. Sit sane dignus ille vel sus- 20
pendio sed tamen malim argumentis per graues viros oppugnari
;
[An autograph rough-draft in the Copenhagen MS. for wliich see App. 13 in ;
vol. iii. The dates can be assigned from Ep. 127, which also was carried by]
imbibed that interest in learning which led men of letters to hail him as a
patron in the days of his power. He retumed to a canonry at Wurzburg, and
for some time had been marked out as a suitable coadjutor to his predecessor in
the see, Laurence of Bibra (f 1519) on whcse death he was within nine days
;
diocese he worked hard for conservative reform,and dealt severely v/ith miscon-
duct among his clergy. When his castle of Marienburg, opposite Wurzburg, was
besieged by the Peasants, May-June 1525, he did not play a heroic part leaving ;
the defence to his Hofmeister, Sebastian Rotenhaen (Ep. 1134), and retiring to
Heidelberg, but returning to participate in the exaction of bitter vengeance.
See ADB. xvi. 632-4 and, for his political activities 1521-3, P]anitz's Berichte,
;
1534 the Bishop was one of Erasmus' strong admirers (EE.^ ^^6).]
TiT. Pro titulo Erasmus prius conrado iierbipo. episcopo scripserat, mox am-
iMorem reddidit. reverendo . n. d. om. JI (reverendis. F.
. . d d. MS. D. F). :
1124. 13. esset MS. : sit H. 1125. i. tuae celsitudinis i^ : tui //.
23. Mosellani] See Ep. 560 introd., His influence was always exerted on
and cf.Ep. 1123. 11-12. the side of moderation (cf. LE.^ 1702.
24. Stromerum] See Ep. 578 introd. 20-3 = ME. 766). But Luther in 1541-3
27. Pistorium] Simon Pistorius (a8 found him too orthodox, and a hin-
—
Oct. 1489 3 Dec. 1562) or Pistoris
(probably Becker cf. LE.^ 3332) was
drance to schemes of reform (LE.'*
so also Jonas (JE.
: 3076, 3258, 3332) ;
the son of a noted Leipzig physician. 637, 878). Melanclithon in 1547 wrote
After proceeding B.A. at Leipzig in to him with intimacj' (ME.
4048, 4055).
1505, LL.B. 1509-10, with an interval He possessed a good library but wrote ;
1125.39. eos add. II. 50. ab Eppendorff P: Epphondorpius i/. 52. niihi
om. H. 1126. 6. quos .V Lond. : quod FN^.
verbum ', nunc nouam lectionem induceret, In principio erat sermo '. '
25 Hic existimabat sibi datum esse telum quod nullo pacto mihi liceret
effugere. Addebat Augustinum alicubi magis probare vocem verbi '
12. stolidiuu] Cf. Ep. II 13. 711. London in tlio year beginning 9 Nov.
Standicium] See Ep. 608. i^n. —
1518 in which tliis episode may
17. Concionabatur] This episode is
also related in the Apol. cle In principio
'
probably be placed (cf. 1. r^n) , was
Sir James Yarford.
—
emt sermo ', Feb. 1520 (p. 194). It 44. coelebs] Probably Stokesley,
must be dated betwoen the arrival in Hcnry vni's chaplain and almoner,
England of thc New Testament of who is described in similar language
March 1519, in which the change to in Ep. 855. 43-5.
sermo was made, and tlie publication 47. coniugatus] Thc deseriptions
of tho Apologia. given here and in 11. 106-7 agree well
26. Augustiiium] rrm. 15. 16: whero with More, who was now at Court
tho word is cogitatio, not ratio. cf. Ep. 999. 217-18.
35. Pracfoctum] The lord mayor of 50. alter] More ; cf. 1. 72.
1126] TO HERMANN BUSCH 311
'
Fortassis '
: inquit, '
tantum legi quantum mihi in animo est legere '.
aut rationes. Mihi satis est quod scripsit Augustinus, Dei Filium
aptius explicari per verbum quam per rationem, cum Aoyos vtrunque
significet Graecis Assentior inquit alter de ratione sed quid
'. ' '
'
;
alter, et tu parum pudenter facis qui nec lecto loco nec intellecta
'
non meminisse vbi Dei Filius in sacris literis dictus esset sermo.
Mox alter At ego inquit, qui nec theologus sum nec sacerdos,
'
' '
61. ille posnnquit f' : om. FCorrig. 68. prudenter i/. 87. H : aprobauit F.
864. (1108E-9A).
312 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
iio excutiatur, comperiamus ilkim longe aliud agere quam prae se ferat
oratio Simulque iussit vt posteaquam iniecisset eam solicitudinem
'.
modum, " Omnes quidem resurgemus, sed non omnes immutabimur "
sed Erasmus hanc ecclesiasticam lectionem sustulit, et e suis Graecis
legit hunc in modum, ''Omnes quidem non dormiemus, sed omnes
130 immutabimur ". Palam est igitur ab illo tolli resurrectionem '.
126. H: Collossenses F.
95. nonnihil valet] An indication lation from the Greek in the notes
that Erasnms was not blind to the of both 1516 and 1519: in both texts
possibilities of the rising national he has, with slight difference, *Non
literatures of his own day : cf. Ep. omnes quidem dormiemus, omnes
1211.278^. tamen iramutabimur He subse-'.
104. vtrique] Cf. 11. 44, 47nn. quently wrote an Apologia on the sub-
125. Corinthios] 15. 51. ject ; iirst printed in the Apologiae
129. Omnes] This is Erasmus' trans- omnes, Basle, Froben, Fcb. 1522.
1126] TO HERMANN BUSCH 313
eatis video quibus rationibus isti argumento possit occurri, aut quid 165
responderi debeat pro ipsius dignitate. Neque enim opinor R. P.
vsqueadeo delirare vt existimet eas epistolas primum Hebraice
scriptas fuisse, cum pueri quoque sciant a Paulo Graece scriptas esse.
Quod autem fuisset illud Hieronymi consilium ex Hebraeis volumini-
bus mutantis publicam lectionem, cum ex fontibus id fieri soleat, 170
'
cumque nemo testetur has epistolas vlli visas Hebraice descrij^tas ?
Atque eam rem satis per se stultam atque absurdam sic iterauit, sic
impressit, sic infixit, sic inculcauit, vt Rex pro sua nobili humanitate,
misertus tantae stoliditatis apud tales viros proditae, sic hominis
pudori succurreret vt alio versus diuersum sermonem iniecerit. Sic 175
triumphauit Standicius in primo capite. De reliquis nuHa mentio.
Dic mihi per Musas, optime Buschi, an putas vUum facinus esse
quod isti non sint ausuri, cum non vereantur perfricta fronte sic
157. grauare 2V. 167. H: Hebraicae f". 168. H i Graecae f'. 17^.
H : Hebraicae F.
147. Luciani] Cf. Adwj. 1604, citing OHS. xx, 1891, p. 273) remarks of
Cic. Att. 6. 8 and de Orat. 3. 35. 141 : Standish His bequest of £5 to buy
:
'
from which the words have been as- books for the Oxford Franciscans, and
cribed to Eur. Philoct., fr. 8. Lucian, liis appointment of two executors to
Rhet. praec, 18-20, givea the sense but distributehisown library, should make
not the words. us hesitatt! to accept unreservedly the
151. vir egregius] In this connexion charge of gross ignorance which
A. G. Little {The Greij Friars in Oxford, Erasmus brings against him '.
314 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
192. apud Louanionses] Sco EiJ. 670 rum hostes. But cf. critical note.
introd. 223. Nomen] Ep. 1196 makes it easy
195. alicubi] Cf. Ep. 1006. r^rn. to identify this person with Vincent
208. deblaterantj sc. bonarum litera- Theodoi-ici.
1126] TO HERMANN BUSCH 315
248. libelli] It was never printed, on Rom. i. and cf. Epp. 1171. 73-6,
4 ;
285 aliqua ex parte minus mereri veniam quam libellum famosum, quod
hune aliquando excuset necessitas veluti eum monendus aut territan-
;
dus est tyrannus, quem monere coram non sit tutum, cum tamen id
sit e republiea. Sed isti cum tuto possent admonere, tamen nec
nionito nec audito me, famam incessant mendaciis. Itaque non illie
290 magis faueo libellis famosis quam faueret homicidio qui stuprum
cum homicidio conferret, et ita eonferret vt diceret hac parte grauius
esse cede, quod homicidium non lederet nisi vnam hominis partem,
eamque deteriorem, stuprum et animum et corpus conspurearet.
Mox iDollicitus est sese loeum indicaturum in quo pronunciarem
295 Virginem matrem coneeptam absque peccato originali. Rursum
promisi me deelaraturum locum non intellectum, si ille lectum
ostendisset. Et indicat loeum, in quo cum adduxissem vnum atque
alterum testimonium ex Chrysostomo et Augustino, in quibus vide-
rentur aliquo modo peccatum actus tribuere Virgini, his verbis
300 claudo sermonem, 'Et nos facimus eam immunem proi'Sus ab omni
peccato Hoc illi visum est pronunciatorie dictum, cum intulerim
'.
nos non reete liberare eam ab originis peccato, si tanti viri recte
tribuunt illi peccatum actionis. Atque hic errorem suum lubens
agnouit, videlicet dissentiens a Scoti sequacibus.
305 Post haec ventum est ad locum longe jiei-iculosissimum ; is est
276. opistolal Ep. 1053. verbally accunite. Cf. Ep, 1196. 51-7 ;
280. aliquaudu] A
loose quotatiou : and, for tlie Dominican iDosition, see
really nonnunquam '.
' See Ep. Ep. 1173. 129^.
1053. 447. 305. locum] An addition to the note
294. locum] The note (1519)0^ Matt. on i Cor. 11.24, Hoc est corpus meum
'
'
12. 47. The quotation here is not made in the edition of 1519.
1126] TO HEEMANN BUSCH 317
hic de re de qua toties pronunciauit Ecclesia '. Vide inquam, ' '
'
quam tu stulte scribis ista in locum non intellectura '. Multaque 310
cum admiratione sciscitari coepi quid illum offenderet. Prima pars
habebat, Thomam opinionem eorum qui negabant sub Eucharistia esse
verum Christi corpus, haereticam appellare : caeterum eorum senten-
tiam qui negabant Christum his verbis consecrasse Hoc est corpus '
tandem respondit venenum subesse in his verbis, in totum '. Demi- '
ratus causam, vix tandem percontando exsculpsi illum non intellexisse 325
quid Latinis sonet in totum '. Cum enim ego sensissem abstinen-
'
'
in vtraque parte quae praecesserat ', meque suggillare sententiam
Ecclesiae, quae definisset in Eucharistia verum esse corpus Christi. 330
Ego videns insignem hominis stoliditatem, admonui literas vt
disceret, nec pergeret taxare libros a quorum intellectu procul
abesset.
Huius generis fere sunt qui oblatrant melioribus studiis, qui quic-
quid ipsi non didicerunt, poetriam appellant. Insignis naturae
" '
335
stupor, magna literarum inscitia, iudicium nullum quod si qua ;
scintilla sit ingenii, si quid eruditionis, sic liuore odioque sunt obcae-
cati, vt minus videant quam talpae. Et hi sunt reuerendi rabini,
*sal ten-ae lux mundi ', quorum arbitrio sumus Christiani aut
',
*
secus qui nobis post Apostolos, nouos dictant articulos fidei, qui sic 340
:
'
Suspectum est ', Haeresis est '
Et haec audent freti coniuratis suis
'.
308. reperi jy. 315. H: haereticum J". 324. in his H : in/in his .F.
338. vt F
Corrig. : ne F. 339. aut secus add. H. /
308. seriptum] Evidently in manu- tions are not quite verbally accurate.
script, in Vincenfs own copy of tho The second was removed in the Annot.
Annot. 1519 cf. Ep. 1196. 76-8.
; 1527.
316,319. Sequitur] These two quota- 335. poetriam] Cf. Ep. iiio. 15.
318 LETTEKS OF ERASMUS [1520
[An original letter in the Burscher collection belonging to the Leipzig Uni-
versity Library writt.en by a secretary (a^), but with the heading, part of the
:
subscription, and one insertion by Erasmus (a^). The verso is blank and the
address-slieet missing. In the Town Library at Zurich (MS. F. 52. 122,3) are
copies of this and Ep. 1278, made by Seb. Ramspek (fl. 1665-76). Variants show
that they were derived from the Leipzig originals, and not from the prinled texts.
The person addressed, and therewith the year-date of this letter, are shown
by an entry in tlie Erfurt matriculation register against the name of the Rector
from May to Oct. 1520, Louis Phitz : of whom, after opening with IL 6-9 of
this letter, the writer proceeds to say, ' delectus est in Erfurdieiisis Academie
presidem et inclyte familie litterarie moderatorem, prius id ipsum factis strenue
et pro virili moliens quam ad debita sue functionis regimina a magno Erasmo
Roterodamo, in epistola quapiam inter laboriosas sui muneris ciiras ad illum
scripta, adhortaretur, atque propensissimain animi sui vohxntatem erga nobilis-
sime huius vrbis scholas publicas in eadem epistola attestaretur '.
Louis Platz (+ 1547) of Melsungen, 10 ms. s. of Cassel, matricuhited at Erfurt
in 1497-8, and was M. A. there in 1504. Subsequently he ivas licentiate in theology,
rector, and member of the Great College and in 1530 and 1533 he was Dean of
;
ViR eximie, non possum non amare te, quod, vt ex Dracone iuuene
minime vano cognoui, doctissimus ipse studiis melioribus impense
1127. TiT. add. a^ (magnifico d. n. om. E. erphvrdiensis F).
1126. 356. Ne.senus] See pp. 154-5. o^ ^PP- 9n> nSS) and Ep. 964, 28.
1127. TiT. N.] The common abbrevia- i. Dracone] See Ep. 871, and cf.
tion for a name unknown ; cf. the titles Ei). 1 1 24. 4, 24.
1127] TO LOUIS PLATZ 319
verum ausit proloqui. Non est nec huius conditionis nec huius 20
ingenii de illius doctrina pronunciare. Hactenus certe profuit
mundo. Nonnulli sunt adacti ad euoluendos veterum theologorum
libros, alii quo sibi consulerent, alii quo Luthero negocium faces-
serent.
Draconem tibi commendarem, nisi iis esset moribus, ea ingenii 25
suauitate puritateque, vt non possit non esse optimo cuique gratissi-
mus. Scimus quam nihil possumus. Tamen si quid erit in quo
queam isti Academiae vel vsui esse vel ornamento, sic agam vt
intelligas mihi quiduis defuisse potius quam j)ropensam animi
voluntatem. Bene vale. Louanii prid. Cal. Augusti [m.d.xviii] 30
Erasmus Koterodamus
meapte manu subscripsi.
account of fiding ink, and Louanii (1. 14) had been changed into Lugduni. In
June 1908 Frau Prof. Hohne was kind enough to have a tracing of it made for me
by the skilful hand of Prof. 0. A. Rollfuss of Dresden In Jan. 191 1 she in-
formed my
friend, Sir Aurel Stein, that she had committed the manuscript to
the care of Capt. Meurer of the German Navy, Adalbertstr. 4, Wilhelmshafen.
17. et vberiorem messem demeteret Christo add. F. 18. in liis quae recte
dixit add. aK 20. Non est . . 23. facesserent add. F.
. 27. possimus F.
quid aH: qui id F. 30. M.D.xvm add. II. 31. Erasmus ... 32. subscripsi
om. F{32. meapte manu subscripsi add. a"^).
7. AcademiasJ Cf. Ep. 1021. 115^. 14. corrigi] Cf Ep. 1002. 8n.
320 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [15-20
modern. From one of these Horawitz gave some corrections in his second
Erasmiana, p. 38. The text was first printed by E. S. Cyprianus, Tabularium
Ecdesiae Eomanae, 1743, p. 566, ex autographo '.
'
This letter is no doubt one of those carried back into Saxony by Draco (Epp.
1 124, 1 127) at this time. Further confirmation for the year-date may be obtained
—
from Erasmus' attitude towards Lee of whom in 1519^0 could not have spoken
—
so charitably and the news about Melanchthon and Oecolampadius.]
gressus est, ac librum Aniiotationum letter to Stunica, No. i in App. 15. Cf.
in easdem condere Laurcntium Val-
; also Ep. 1216. 16-19.
lam imitatus, quem primuni fuisse Toletanus] Xiraenes ; see Ep.
constat qui eiusmodi genus scribendi 541- 37"-
attigit. Quod opus apud Basileam, in- 5. nondura vidi] See Ep. 1216. in.
clytam Germanie vrbem, abhinc trien- 9. scandala] Matt. 18. 7, Luke 17.
nium impressoriis excussum forrais r : cf. Ep. 1 13. 26.
1X28] TO JOHN LANG 321
expugnent.
De Philippo Oecolampadioque iam cognoueram ex aliorum litteris.
Vtranque epistolam tuam recepi. Bene vale, vir in Domino mihi
colende. Louanii. postrid. Cal. Aug.
Erasmus ex animo tuus. 15
Eximio theologo lo. Langio.
[The year-date added in HTis clearly wrong. It can be corrected from Reucli-
lin'ssettlement at Ingolstadt in Nov. 15 19.]
1128. 12. Philippo] In June 1520 Me- the information from John Salius
lanchthon had been invited to Ingol- (Ep. 1120. lon) atLouvain, 'quum illic
stadt, at the suggestion of Reuchlin, adesset Carolus Caesar'. As Charles
who was now established there (cf. was not at Louvain till 23 Aug.
Epp. 986. 45n, 1 129), but had deelined : (Gachard ii. 28), it is clear that Eras-
cf. LE.- 319 and ME. 87, which Enders mus' memory played him false at some
dates in July. point.
Oecolampadioque] Cf. Ep. 1123. la. 3. Reuchlinum] He left Stuttgart
ahorum] Cf. Ep. 1095. 173^. for Ingolstadt on 9 Nov. 1519 (RE.
13. Vtranque epistolam] Not extant. 285^). Hutten in his Expostulatio (HE.
1129. I. Brugis] This visit was evi- 310, § 97) objected to this whole passage
dently made in the train of Charles (cf. as insulting to Reuchlin (cf. Ep. 413.
p. 330), who was
at Bruges 25-29 July i^n). Erasmus' reply in the Spongia
(Gachard 28)
ii.it is referred to also
: (see 1. in is rather lame.
in Ep. 1141.1. Ep. 1145. 5-7 shows that Ingelstadii] During his residence
Erasmus was accompanied by More. there Reuchlin lived in Eck'3 house :
doctor quidam] The description see Eck's De ratione studiorum suorum,
fits Peutinger (Ep. 318. 2n), whom Ingolstadt, A. Weissenhorn, 1543, f".
Erasmus met at Bruges (Ep. 1247), B. Cf. ME. 66.
But in the Spongia, written c. Aug. 4. salarlo] Cf. RE. 290.
1523 (LB. X. 1642A-43A = HE. 333, 7. Vuerteubergensis] Duke Ulrich ;
§§ 102-12), after discussing 11. 6-14 of cf. Epp. 923. 23n, 986. 45n, 1030.
this letter, Erasmus states that he had 65n.
322 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
Etsi Leus nullo non malo dignus est, tamen optarim eos conquiescere.
Scribunt aperte se non aliter mihi obtemperaturos, nisi quatenus
abstineant a conuicio gentis Anglicae. Minatus sum me posthac
Gallum futurum, nisi desinant me tam moleste amare. Adnitar
20 equidem quod erit in me. Sed Leus consulto fecerit si ipse aliquo
scripto aedito studeat illos delinire quos irritauit,
Audio bellum parari Praedicatoribus et Romanensibus. Vereor ne
ex hoc ludo nascatur incendium maximum. Bellum indicetur Prae-
dicatoribus et Romanensibus, et interim saeuietur in omnes sacerdotes,
25 exemplo Bohemorum. Bene vale.
Louanii postrid. Cal. Augusti. [Anno m.d.xix.]
canonieis collegii diui Martini, cui nomen erat loannes Merliberch de Diest,
Erasmus subiectum edidit carmen suffigendum scDicet tabulae, in qua Magda-
;
lena depicta erat et effictus loannes, non prorsus contemnendo artificio '.
A date can only be conjectural. Some suggestion may be gathered from Faber's
book (1. i3n), and from some verses by Erasmus on the meetings of amity
between Francis, Henry, and Charles (cf. Ep. 1106. 93^) and In substi-uctionem
'
Caletiensem ' (cf. Ep. 1118 introd.), which follow this letter in /8 printed in :
10. supellectili] Cf. Ep. 986. 46U. Dominicans were the objectsof special
12. saeuiret] Cf. Ep. 986. 46-9. animosity. For Erasmus' attack upon
14. nescire te] For Fisher's interest them see Ep. 1033.
in Reuchlin cf, Ep, 457. 1-20. 25. Bohemorum] As at the time of
15. libellorum] Cf, Ep. 1128. in. Ziska, c. 1420, when there was a wide-
18, gentis Anglicae] Cf, Ep. 1083. spread destruction of monasteries (sce
33n. Hutten's Monitor Secutidns, 1520, §§ 34-
19, Gallum] Cf, Epp. 321. 13-15, 534. 7, in Opp. iv. 354-5 and cf Creighton
;
31, iiii. 81, 1147. 28n ; and, for a ii. 42); or in the riots at Prague in
practical interpretation of the words, Sept. 1483, when the Utraquists mas-
Epp. 994. im, 1080. 3. .sacred many Catholies (see E. Denis,
22. bellum parari] For the feeling Fin de Vindependance bolmne, i, 1890,
now rising in Germany against the pp. 204-5, and cf. LE.- 400. 43-5). The
Roman domination, under the leader- decay ot roligion and of the ecclesiasti-
ship of Luther on the theological. of cal order in IBohemia is emphasized in
Ilutten on the political side (cf. Ep. a remaikable letter from Bohuslaus
1113. 3611), see Creighton v. 126-30, Hassenstcin to King Ladislas, 22 April
quoting Agr. E. ii. 54 = ME. 175. As 1497 (Boh. E. i. 60). For Erasmus'
the agents of tho Inquisition, and rccent intercourse with tho envoys of
thus the persecutors of Reuchlin, the the Bohemian Brethren see pp. 291-a.
1130] TO JOHN MERLIBERCH 323
Horawitz v, p. 30, and not otherwise known. The picture for which the verses
in this letter were written, had perhaps been eiected on St. Mary Magdalen's
<lay, 22 July but just then Erasmus was away from Louvain (cf. Ep. 1129. in).
:
[A replyto a letter from H. Hermann (Ep. 903. isn), which is not extant. It
is clearly of the same period as Ep. 11 17, but after Erasmus' meeting with More
at Calais ;p. 296). The dates added in H
bave no value but if the place-date is ;
accepted, this letter must be put after Erasmus' return from Cahiis to Louvain.
With both dates discarded, it might be taken as contemporary with Ep. 1133 (cf.
I. 5 vvith Ep. 1133. 8-9) which, like this, is addressed to Paris.]
;
1130. TiT. add. /3. i. tetrametron /3. 2. singulis om. /3. et add. /3.
1130. 6. oestro] Cf. Ep. 1132. 13. Stephanus, 1519 vvhich Fisher coun-
;
13. trcs Magdalenas] Fabt'r's first tcred vvith a Confutatio wiitton in Aug.
book on tliis subject (Ep. 766. 22n) had 1519 (Ep. 1030. 311). There is nothing
been reissued in 1518 and 1519. In to shovv vviiich edition Erasmus sent
reply to Fishers attack (Epp. 936. 7-8, here he had doubtless chosen the
;
Y 2
324 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
ein spanioleins mentelle vnd 3 conterfettisch man '. This gift was very likely in
acknowledgement for Diirer's first sketch of Erasraus, to which he alludes in
mentioning the second (p. 330). The earlier sketch appears to have served as the
basis for the finished engraving of 1526 ; for a copy of that exists on which
Nic. Kratzer (Ep. 515. in) has recorded that he was present at the sitting (see
B. Hausmann, Dilrer's Kupferstiche, 1861, p. 39). Kratzer was in Antwerp at this
time, and between 5 and 19 Aug. Diirer took his portrait (Tagehuch, p. 54. 34-5).
By 13 Aug. Erasmus was back again in Louvain (Ep. 1134).]
1181. II. ad Beraldum] Cf. Ep. arf which More had shown to
Ertziio»,
1117. gn. Erasmusat Calais:cf. Epii. 1087 introd.,
15. quae iam adornauit] 'Th& Epistola 1096. i2in, 1184. 21-2.
1132] TO THOMAS WOLSEY 325
expilatur. Hic messis illi fuit admodum sterilis, vel quia tenaciores 25
sumus, vel quia vehementer vbique frigere coepit res indulgentiaria.
Sperat isthic fore aliquanto vberiorem nec dubito quin futura sit, si:
tua celsitudo dextro nutu fauerit. Et fauebit, vti spero, vel causae
piae vel homini probo : non enim ausim postulare vt apud tantum
heroa huius homunculi commendatio pondus vllum habeat. Bene 30
valeat E. T. R. D. cui me summo studio commendo.
:
[Clearly in the sanie yearas Epp. 1087, 11 17. For tlie plaee-date cf. Ep. 1132.]
1132. 10. libello] See Ep. 1112. dextram dextrae iunxi quid ni, cum :
13. oestro] Cf. Ep. 1130. 6. iam inter nos debellatum esset? Lee '
14. libellis] Cf. Ep. 1128. in. was perhaps then upon his way home :
quod duo tam insignes Musarum mystae tam virulentis libellis sese
: conscinderent, magno studiorvim incommodo, magno gaudio eorum
5 qui iampridem cum melioribus literis bellum gerunt. Nunc quum
vterque sit amicus, alter etiam coniunctissimus, dici non potest
quam acerbe feram hoc dissidii inter eos incidisse. quorum vtriusque
et ingenium adamo et gloriae faueo. Vterque strenue contemnit
alterum verum ex mutuo contemptu quid oriri potest nisi simultas
:
Mori cupidum.
Quod Brixius scripsit in Morum, cum omnium iudicio sit pUisquam
satis,tamen odio illius non satis facit. Nusquam non arripit occa-
20 sionem insectandi Morum. Neque quicquam exit illius in quo non
multis verbis illum impetat, cum ille tamen nihil adhuc responderit.
Demiror quis sic instiget animum Brixii. Obsecro te per Musas vt
vestra autoritas iuuenilem istum IvOovcnaa-fxov coherceat. Non hic
ago Mori mei negocium nam si pergat haec contentio, crede mihi,
;
[The year-date is confirmed by tlie mention of Erasmus' reply to Lee see Ep. :
1061 introd. In August 1521, tlie only other year possible, he was at
Anderlecht.
Sebastian Eotenhan (Eubrigallus) of Rentweinsdorf, ro ms. n. of Bamberg
—
(1478 c. 25 June 1532), was of noble birth. He niatricuhxted at Erfui-t in the
summer of 1493, and on 2 Feb. 1496 at lugolstadt. From 1499^0 1504 hestudied
hiw at Bologna where in 1501-2 he was Proctor of the German nation, and in
;
1500-1 delivei'ed an oration to the nation whicli was copied into their Acta
(ANGB. p. 254). He was a pu2iil of Philip Beroaldus (Ep. 256. 137^), who
mentions him in the preface to an edition of Gellius, Bologna, Bened. Hectoris,
I Feb. 1503. His doctor's degree in law he took at Siena, 31 Oct. 1503.
On returning to Germany he became an assessor in the Imperial Chancery,
1507. A letter froiu him to Sebastian Brant, dated Worms, 14 Jidy 151 1 (see
.T. Wcncker, Colkcta arcliiui iitra, 1715, p. 142) and asking for mss. of medieval
chroniclers, shows that he was already interested in the history of Germany.
About 1512 he began travelling, to Spain, France, and England and on 25 SeptT;
1514 was created Kt. of the Holy Sepulchre at Jerusalcm. In Eck's Oraliones tres,
Augsburg, Miller, 5 Dec. 1515, f". B*, he is mentioned as one of the glories of
Germany, in Imi^eriali consistorio inter eruditissimos iudicatus'. By 1519,
'
and perhaps earlier (cf. 1. in), he had become Councillor to the Abp. of Mainz ;
12. locuni] Cf. Epp. 1087. 22on, 1117. error tov patris.
66-7 : wliich show that fdii heie is an 16. charus] Cf. Ep. 999. 217-18.
1134] TO SEBASTIAN ROTENHAN 327
whom he served till the end of 1521, when he took up very actively the duties of
n member of the Council of Regency meeting at Nuremberg, serving many times
on its embassies. On i Jan. 1523 he entered the service, as Hofmeister, of
Conrad of Thuengen (p. 307) for whom he successfully defended the episcopal
;
contain the names of German tribes, whilst three are filled with a selection of
eight phrases, translated into French, English, Italian, Bohemian, Danish and
Swedish, Portuguese, and German.
He was brother-in-law to Hutten, who dedicated to him the Vadiscus (HE.
152, 192 cf. Ep. 1135. 2n).
: Though inclined towards reform of the Church he
could not support Luther without reserve and in fact remained conservative.
;
In founding an annual mass for his own soul at the Ritter-Kapelle in Hassfurt,
near Bamberg, in 1522, he speaks of himself as knowing four languages.
See a life by L. S. Eyring, Jena, 1739; Knod 3134; Dentsclie Keichstagsakten,
jiing. Reihe, i-iv G. Bauch, Univ. Er/uii, 1904, pp. 135-6
; P. Joachimsen, ;
ille scripsit vt nullis aeque displiceat atque iis qui maxime con-
sultum volebant eius honori. Hanc laudem tulit etiam ab iis qui
mihi male volunt. Nemo fuit arrogantius indoctus. Et tamen hoc
30 ille certamen appellat.
Quod mihi Senecae versibus ominaris nominis immortalitatem, de
mea apud posteros opinione viderint superi, modo bene sit iis studiis
quae nos Christo commendant. Quis enim non perspicit mundum
paulatim ad barbaram quandam tyrannidem tendere? Parturit
3.5 iampridem, quid pariturus sit nescio. Nos vt (si liceat) prodesse
cupimus, ita tumultus autores esse nolumus. Bene vale, nosque tuo
Principi commenda. Louanii Id. August. anno m.d.xx.
acerbity must not be read into the admonitions. There is ample evidence of
good feeling in Ep. 1055 and in HE. 166, 171* (Hiitieyii Opp. iv. 689) and as ;
In Ep. 1161, too, good feeling has not disappeared. For Erasmus' side cf. Epp.
II 13. 36n, 1195. 136-41.]
from his service and had 110 more con- jtnntly with Eck, with the publication
1135] FEOM ULKICH HUTTEN 329
of the Bull against Luther. See Pastor ig. in Luthero] With such letters as
vii. 404 Paquier, J. AUandre, 142
seq., Epp. 939, 961, 967, 1033. To Hutten
seq. The instructions to Aleander are Luther stood for the liberation of
dated 18 July he left Rome 27 July.
: Christendoni, especially Germany,
12. Moguntia excesseram] See Ep. from Rome. Cf. Epp. 1129. 22n, 1161.
II 13. 36n. 40 seq.
18. cum arderet] Leo's judgement 26. caelo] i.e. celo.
had just been given, on 23 June cf. : 30. epistolas] Epp. 622, 939, 1033,
Ep. 622. 32n. 1041.
imbecillius] Cf. Ep. 636. 26n ; 32. iugulasti] Cf. Epp. 622, 636.
and, for reason for his alarm at that probatas] Cf. Ep. 363. 4-6.
time, Ep. 1006. 153^. 33. damnas] e.g.in Ep. 1033. 46-8.
330 LETTEKS OF ERASMUS [1520
1136. To Leontius,
Epistolae ad diueisos p. 565. Brussels.
HN: Lond. xv. 6 : LB. 560. (c. 29 August?) 1520.
[Erasmus was not often at Brussels. For him to have assigned this letter to
a stay there, when he was adding the dates for H
in 1529, perhaps indicates,
therefore, that his memory on such points was clearer than usual here. visit A
to Brussels in 1520, after Charles' return from Spain in June, is mentioned in
Ep. 1198; cf. I, p. 33. 4, for his meeting with the brothers Lasky there about
this time. Very likely lie went thitlier in the train of Charles who, after ;
who was at Brussels from 26 Aug. to 3 Scpt., wrote in his Tagehuch (ed. F. Leit-
schuh, 1884, p. 59. 27-8), Ich hab den Erasmum Roterodam noch einmahl (cf.
'
1). 324) conterfet '. So this letter may be conjecturally placed at that date. Diirer's
drawing of him, which was made in preparation for a painting (cf. Lond. xxx.
29, LB. 631 of 19 July 1523), was bequeathed to the Louvre by the late
M. Bonnat. It is rei>roduced hcre witli the permission of the French Govern-
ment. For a large reproduction of it see the publications of the Diirer Society,
vi (1903), no. 12 also C. Ephrussi, Albert Dnrer et ses dessins, 1882, p. 277.
; In
1882 the drawing was in the possession of M. Jean Gigoux.
Of Leontius I can discover nothing but he appears to have been a school-
;
A. Buchellius, Biarium, ed. Brom and van Langeraad, 1907, p. 86, where he
is described as Rhetor. It is possible that he is the person addresscd here.]
5 Negligendi sunt qui vinci non possunt: et ita sunt haec studia
commendanda, ne tamen odiose damnentur quibus alii magis
capiuntur. Certe non expedit irritare crabrones. Caeterum quae
nos scripsimus, non in hoc scripsimus vt inuehantur templis, sed vt
domi legantur. Atque isto tuo studio immodico nihil aliud mihi
10 quam inuidiam paris. Ego nihil honoris istiusmodi proniereor
alioqui ne promeritis quidem aperiuntur templa, nisi a rogo, vt aiunt.
Ac mea quidem sententia plus efficies si quod operae sumis in rixando
cum aduersariis, fortasse deploratis, id insumas erudiendae pubi
aut iuuenibus spei melioris. 1'elicius irrepent bonae literae quam
i^irrumpent; ac facilius coalescent, si ciuiliter semet insinuent vt
hospites quam si irruant vt hostes. Nos quod possumus, gratis ac
libenter impartimus si quis adferet meliora, non grauate cedimus.
;
II. a rogo] Cf. Ep. 867. 273. 18. clamosis] Cf. Ep. 1078. 58.
13. deplorati^] Cf. K[>. 994. 2111. 20. fortunam] Cf Ep. 1102. 6n.
Drawiiii»- of Erasimis hv Diirer. 1520.
1^-330
•I37J I
331
alteram accepi, tuis istis articulis descriptam, tuo isto ingenio con-
ditam, quo magis etiam refert imaginem animi tui, Deum immortalem. 10
quahs Faxit Deus vt istud pectus imitentur complures episcopi
I
Principe scribi? Nihilo enim miniis mirabilis est mihi tuus iste
animus quod me praeter meritum admiraris, sic^uidem hic ei-ror in
persona est, non in re. Hoc erras, quod Erasmum esse credis id
quod non est sed non in hoc erras, quod ea veneraris et expetis
; 20
quae falso tibi persuades in nobis esse. Adnixi sumus mundum
nimis ad scholasticas argutias prolapsum ad veterum fontes reuocare,
ac plus satis hdentem ludaicis ceremoniis ad verae pietatis studium
accendere. Atque vtinam hic meus conatus tantum fructus attulerit
aliisquantum nobis attulit inuidiae Meum incommodum niulto 25 !
tius est quam vt conueniat honiini tenui nisi forte et hic erras, vt —
55 putes Erasmum esse aliquid —
et alienius a more huius regionis.
Olim iuxta prouerbium bonos viros decebant omnia, nunc non nisi
potentes omnia decent tamen seruabitur, et in hoc potissimum vt
:
[I cannot definitely confirm the year-date but it may be noticed that Colet
:
(t 16 Sept, 1519) is not mentioned in the list of English friends. In 8ept, 1521
Erasmus was at Anderlecht.
46, lenta veniat] When these words 8. 18 Suet, Atig. 63) botween^oand
and
were written, the Bp. had been four 29 b,c, ; and referred
to an article by
weeks dead. For the circumstances M. Bahrfeldt in Berliner MimzhlaUer,
underwhich thenewsreachedErasmus 1912, The three figures are there ex-
see Ep. 1242. plained as a consul marching between
56. prouerbium] Adag. 1860, two lictors, and the bird as an eagle ;
59, numisma] In reply to a question and 112 knovvn spccimens arc enu-
Mr. G, F, Hill of the British Museum merated, two of which are in the
iit once identified this with the i-ather * Silesian Museum at Breslau, The sub-
mysterious l)ut not uncommon gold scription is in Gi*eek capitals, KOSnN.
coin struck by the Dacian or Getic
'
For a similar presentation of old
king, Coson (the Cotison of Hor, C. 3. coins seo Ep, 1145. 17-19.
1138] TO WILLIAM BUEBANK 333
1514) and by 1516 was chaplain and secretary to Wolsey, and prothonotary
;
apostolic. When Wolsey visited Cambridge in 1520, Burbank was made Dr. of
Canon Law {Caynb. Grace Book B. ii, p. 78).
Like his friend Tones (1. i6n) he attested many important documents, and
served Wolsey in the survey of monasteries to be converted to the foundation of
Cardinal College, Oxford ; and in 1529 he enjoyed the King's confidence also
(Brewer iv. 5783). His preferment included two prebends at York, 1512 and
1524, and one at Lincoln, 1518 (Le Neve iii. 185, 218, ii. 236) and the arch- ;
deaconry of Carlisle, 1520 (Le Neve iii, 249; cf. Brewer iii. 741).
A copy of Petrus de Bella Pertica's Repetitiones, Paris, J. Poucin, i Sept. 15 15,
presented to him while prebendary of Lincoln by John Clifton, clerk, is in the
Bodleian (Antiq. e. F. ^^-^^).
The Wm. Burbanck, Anglus, who was M.A. at Paris in 1521, Vicar of Staines
1521-2, and till 1527 prebendary of Salisburj' {Afh. Oxon. i. 400), is probably
a dififerent person.]
Is demum
vere amat qui gratis amat. At tu Erasmum immeren-
tem tam constanter, tam ardenter amas, vt vix quenquam inuenias
qui syncerius aut pertinacius aut vehementius amet promeritum.
Romae a me nullis prouocatus officiis quo affectu complecti coepisti I
8. pectus] Cf. Epp. 905. i, 976. i. Lond. xviii. 50, LB. 686, 4 Sept. 1524.
11. prouerbium] See uidag. 34. R. Wakefold praises his knowledge of
15. Louelli] (+1524), subdean of Hebrew (Ora^io, 1524, ff. C^, E^ v°). In
Wells 1516 (Le Neve i. 157) and vicar- view of his age he can hardly be the
general to successive bishops, Adrian de Thos. Lovel who entered at Cambridge
Castello and Wolsey (Brewer ii. 2852, 1500-1, and was Dr. of Canon Law
iii. 2655 1264V I do not know
: cf. iv. there 1506-7 (Camb. Grace Books, B. i,
when lie had met Erasmus, but the pp. 161, 222, F. pp. 54,5).
attraction between them seemsto have 16. Tonicii] Robt. Tones, Tonnice or
been strong for when Zach. Deiotanis
; Tunnys (f 1526), a lawyer of high
(Ep. 1205. in)wenttoEngIand,Erasmu3 standing and clerk to the court of
gave him an introduction to Lovell, Chancery (Brewer iii. 1083). From
who sentback apresentof money with 1514 onwards (id. i. 5282) his name
an affectionate message. He was then appears in attestation of many iiupor-
an old man but still a student see ; tant documents ;sometimes in later
334 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [1520
30 Sed quam isti praeter meritum amant Erasmum, tam alii quidam
praeter meritum auersantur. Et vtinam maleuolentiae non esset
foecundior propagatio Verum mihi potius est paucioribus placuisse,
!
sed egregie probis, quam multis istorum similibus, qui fere aut stolidi
sunt et indocti, aut manifesto liuoris et inuidentiae morbo obnoxii,
35 aut ea ingenii peruersitate vt nemini omnino bene velint, sibi pro-
pemodum ipsis inuidentes. Sed obtrectatoribus mentem meliorem
precemur. Apud amicos tu fac nomenclatorem agas, ac nominatim
singulis ex me sakitem dicito. Bene vale, vir integerrime.
Louanii Cal. Septembr. Anno m.d.xx.
others in the foundation of Cardinal of Spain (Brewer ii. 3446, viii. 189).
'
through him (Brewer, and Camh. Grace for her from Aragonin i5i9,and being
Book B. ii, pp. 109, 119). robbed near Narbonne carrying her
;
180), Westminster, 1523, and Beverley is mentioned (id. iv, }). 865). After
(^Brewer iii. 2987, iv. 2001), also at Katharine's death Henry gave Philips
Salisbury (id. ii. 1076) and perliaps at a iiension the last payraent of wliicli
;
Norwicli (Bergenrotlr ii. 432). He was was made in May 1540 (id. xvi. 380).
still living on 28 Feb. 1526 (Brewer iv. 19. Fi-anciscum] John Francis, one
2001) but his prebends at York and
;
of the foundei's of the College of Physi-
Lincoln were filled up on 31 July and cians in 1518. His extant correspon-
24 Sept. (Le Neve) and in Oct. Wolsey dence with Erasmus begins c. 1524.
bouglit stuff from liis executors (Brewer 20. Samsonem] See Epp. 388. 35^.
iv, p. 2765). 780, 806.
In Sept. 1524 Erasmus
at Burbank's 21. Gonellum] See Ep. 274 introd.
request addressed a polite note to 23. Clementem] See Epp. 388. 173^,
Tones, saying that he had heard his 820.
praisos often from Moro (Lond. xviii. 24. Pacaeum] See Ep. 211. 43n.
40, LB. 701). 25. Tonstallum] See Ep. 207. 22n.
1139] 335
sed mii-am interim modestiam simulans, quo maiore cum fide lederet
famam proximi. Abeuntes omni mendaciorum genere dimittebat
onustos. Quibusdam ostendebat etiam, si quid esset in Annotationi- 25
bus specie fronteque plausibilius. Monasteriorum fauorem xeniis,
cibo vinoque redimebat, praesertim horum quae sciret apud populum
opinione sanctimoniae comniendata. Habebat omnibus locis in quos
huius fabulae scenas fuerat partitus, quorum nemo non strenue erat
in negocio. His rebus tandem effectum est vt hi quoque redderentur 30
soliciti qui me probe norant et se Leum nosse putabant. Itaque si
nihil respondissem, pericukim erat ne ad menses aliquot alienatis
complurium animis periret nonnulla jmrs fructus quem tot vigiliis
venabar. Nam meae gloriae iactura sane leuiter mouisset animum
meum. Cur enim verear aliquam famae partem Christianis studiis 35
impendere, qui vitae bonam partem impendam ? Pi'oinde sic Leo
respondimus vt et illi stultissime speratam gloriam detraxerimus et
veterem nostram modestiae laudem tueremur.
affecit, quam illius sesquimensis quo Lei naenias, non minus in-
amoenas quam indoctas ac virulentas, et legimus et refellimus.
Porro quod vereris ne haec mea l^nitas multorum inuitet male-
dicentiam, ego grauius esse periculum arbitror ne, si maledicentia
45 maledicentiam inuitet, nullus sit insaniendi finis, quando iam prope-
modum res in rabiem exiit. Hoc consilio Deus vetuit ne quis de
Cain sumeret vindictam, ne reciprocis vindictae vicibus nuUus tandem
esset finis. Vtcunque res habet, ego sycophantarum turba malui
obrui, quam committere vt hanc gloriam amittam, neminem adhuc
50 scriptis meis factum esse nigrum. Nam Leus sibi imputet oportet,
si qui male de illo sentiunt. Porro quod suspicaris Leum subornatum
histrionem, vt monachorum ac theologorum partes ageret, quanquam
facile credam huius actionem gratam fuisse quibusdam qui male
volunt bonis studiis, tamen magis arbitror illi potissimum in consilio
55 fuisse proprium ingenium, ad haec natura propensum. Non alium
fuisse praedicant qui nouere puerum semper saeuus erat ac vindex,
:
mus, suae sententiae mire pertinax. Talis erat puer, talis adolescens,
60 talis iuuenis talis nunc etiam vir est, nisi quod cum aetate fere
;
solent accrescere vicia. Atque vtinam vel senex fiat aliquando sui
dissimilis
Quod mihi plurimos non minus doctos quam potentes amicos
gratularis, quod nominis immortalitatem rectefactis partam, quod
65 me liuore maiorem nirnirum facis amanter, mi Bilibalde, dum
facis,
amicum vndique impetentibus sycophantarum machinis periclitantem,
vt tu putas, blanda consolatione subleuas. Ego istam immortali-
tatem nihil moror. Recte facta non agnosco, tantum adnisus sum
aliqua ex parte mea industria prodesse studiis publicis, et ad synceram
70 amplectendam Christi doctrinam excitare mortalium animos. At
vereor ne res in diuersum exeat. Hactenus ad scholasticam ac
disputatricem theologiam frigebant ac nauseabant piae mentes, et
mox ad Euangelicae veritatis gustum ceperant hilarescere sed tanta ;
literis, quas cane peius oderunt et angui, conditi sunt. Verum quid
41. affecit H : affecerit i^. 58. gloriolae erat scnps* : glorioleaera f : gloria-
rum H.
41. sesquimensis] See p. iio, and cf. was one of tliese : cf. Eev, p. 60 (Jortin
Ep. 1134. 26. ii. 648) and Ep. 1053. i3on.
43. mea lenitas] Cf. Ep. 1029. gn. 76. per eos] The monastic orders.
50. nigrum] Cf. Ep. 1007. 8in. 82. caue peius] Cf. Hor. Ep. i. 17.
56. nouere puerum] More no doubt 30.
1139] TO WILLIBALD PIRCKHEIMER 337
scribere. S5
lam de Luthero nihil aliud dicam nisi quod in praesentia solum
impune licet, mihi vehementer dolere tale ingenium, quod videbatur
futurum insigne quoddam organum ebuccinandae vei-itatis Euange-
licae, sic exasperatum esse rabiosis quorundam elamoribus. Fabulam
de rvys 6pvL0o4>ayLas calumniatore risi satis, et tibi tam bono patrono 90
xenium debere me fateor.
De dulci felicique Lei ocio salse tu quidem iocaris sed tamen extra
;
iocum, vtinam ille vel nunc ad suum ocium redeat, expertus Martis
aleam Sed dicitur magno conamine redintegrare bellum, fretus
!
100. voluminum H.
95. Abbate] Cf. Ep. 1074. 60. Calippidem] See Aclag. 543: 'qui
lor. pressi] See p. 210, and cf. Ep. in moliendis negociis, cum multa se
1157. 1-4. facturum minaretur, nihil tamea con-
107. profectione] See Ep. 1078. 62n. ficeret'. Cf. also Ep. 491. 3.
338 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
<S)i non est aliud incommodum nisi quod Origenes nimis magnum
est volumen, nihil est periculi. De Priore diue Agnetis niliil vnquam
sinistri sum suspicatus. sed de fratribus Zwollensibus, quanquam hoc
quoque leuiter. De vxore Listrii deque omissis Graecis literis com-
5 peri falso ad me scriptum fuisse, et exi^ostulaui cum eo qui scri-
pserat nam is est Listrio cum primis amicus.
;
cf. Ep. 504. 26n. as Eck had done in Ep. 769. 80 seq.
5. scriptum fuisse] These false re- 8. tam morosus] Cf. Ep. 1076. 6n.
ports evidently were detrimental to 14. Thomam] 262^.
Cf. Ep. 11 26.
Lister: perhaps that his wife, for 17. in Angliam] In 6 of the Hoch-
§
whom see Ep. 660. 3-6, 24 (? 1519, straius ouans (see Ep. 1165. 22n) Lee is
not 1517: cf. p. 671 and BRE. 193 made to say that he had got himself
(March 1520), was dead, and that he recalled to England to be cliaplain to
liad giveii up teaching Greek in his the Queen. By Dec. 1520 lie was one
school at Zwolle.For the enthusiasm of the Kings chaplains (Brewer iii,
with which he had introduced this in p. 1543).
ii4ij 339
esset vnum hominem perire si res haec illis succedet, nemo feret
:
I. Brugis] See Ep. 1129. in. been given against him ; cf. Ep. 1 135.
3. D. R.] dominus reuerendissimus, i8n.
Philip of Burgundy see Ep. 603 in-
: 15. me
dissuadente] In response,
trod. perhaps, to Luther"s letter of c. 5 May
munus] Perhaps in acknowledge- (see p. 286) Erasmus had written to
ment of the dedication of the Para- Luther to tliis effect c. Aug. 1520 cf. ;
phrase : Ep. 1043. Ep. 1186. 5-6, and, for Luther's reply,
5. Dixeram] Evidently to the Bp. Ep. 1166. gon. A sentence of the letter
of Utrecht ; for whose relations with is preserved in LE^. 352, 11 Oct. 1520,
Erasmus in this matter cf. Epp. 714, ' Erasmus scribit aulam Iniperatoris
751. They had met at Mechlin in esse mendicotyrannis occupatam, vt
Aug. 1519: see Ep. looi. 7-8. nulla in Carolo spes esse possit ' : as
abhorrere] Cf. Ep. 456. i68n. he had written to Melanchthon in
7. remedium] The arrangeraent June (Ep. II 13. 37-8). Its general
made with Barbirius and de Hondt tenour is given in Ep. 1672 of 7
(cf. Ep. 1094) seems to have satisfied March 1526 :
'
Lutherum ante annos
Erasmus for the time. For another quinque literis priuatim scriptis ad-
recent attempt to obtain preferment monui vt ad tam periculosum nego-
for him see Ep. 1065. cium, si suo fideret spiritui, adhiberet
10. consilium] Ep. 1033. 50 shows animum modis omnibusincorruptum'.
that Erasmus waa thinking of Ep. 980. Erasmus himself hadoften associated
38 seq. cf. Ep. 1143. 25-6.
: the nanies of Reuchlin and Luther
odiosis illis] For this usage of a together see Epp. 967, 1033, 1041,
;
neutor plural in an oblique case cf. Ep. 1155. i8n, 1167. 94 «eq.
1164. 6. 16. admiscens] In no. 26 of the Reso-
14. rursus] Since judgement had lutioncs clisjjutatlonum de indulgmtiarum
Z 2
340 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
Rome, 15 June 1520, and publishod in 1180. 11-12 Leo hintsat it again.
Meissen by Eck, 21 Sept. Paquier, J. Aleandre, p. 167^, on the
30. episcopatus] This proposal came ground of Ep. 1236. 1 13-14 considors
from the Papal side ; not, as in 1516 that Erasmus' words quoted above are
(cf. Ep. 475. 4n), from the Spanisb. It apocryphal but that inference seems
;
'
Heu' inquiens, 'estne nobis iratus Deus ? Extinctumne dicitur lumen mundi,
quo solo tenebrosa errorum in Scripturis propulsa fuit caligo?' He then asks
Beatus to send on the letter, in case Erasmus should after all be still alive but ;
Settimo, 1465-74, it reverted to its direct i-elations with Claii-^^aux : to which its
own name is often assimilated. See P. F. Kehr, Eegesta Pontificum, Italia vi. i,
19 13, 1). 120.]
42. Verae Theologiae] See Ep. 745. Bernard occurs in Ejjp. 15. 35, 39. 150.
45. Bernardum] Sunt qui ludant
'
858.513.1033.83, 1 173. 173. 1202. 17,
verbis Scripturae diuinae, ac, veluti 1206.109,1236.159,1313.91,1334.136;
fit in centonibus poetarum, ad alie- butnot frequenth'inErasmus'writings.
numsen.sum ceu per iocum abutuntur. 47. diriguit] Cf. Verg. Aen. 3. 259,60.
Quod aliquoties faeit diuus Bernardus, 74. vitae iibro] In the liCe by Alan
venuste magis quam grauiter, meo ofAuxerre(tii82 ,whichisan abridge-
quidem iudicio. Sic enim imbiberat nient of the earlier composition by
vir illepraeclarus sacras literas vt William of St. Theodore's at Rlieims.
nusquam non occursarent (LB. v. ' In this passage the two agi-ee with
129A). Tho passage ^vas added in only slight differences, but in these
Martens' issue of Nov. 1518, f». p^^v» Schirn's text always foUows Ahxn's :
(see Ep. 745 introd.); and in spite wbich seems not to have ))een printed
of Schirn's protest was left standing before Mabillon'sedition of 1690, vol. ii,
in the later editions. The name of pp. 1072, 1248.
1142] FKOM GEOEGE SCHIRN 343
115
Si quid mihi responsi, quemadmodum tua de humanitate haud
dubito, decreueris dare, fac quo possit modo in monasterium sancti
Ambrosii Mediolanense Abljati vel Cellerario presentari nec offen- :
84. Augu^tini] Enarr. in Ps. 48. i. I oflRce, held for a few years. The
have lestored the text of Augustine ;
present abbot was Angehis Plattus,
about which there seems to be no who held the position three times,
doubt in this passage. Schirn's 1519-21, 1522-5, 1529; and on each
variants are probably mere degenera- occasion was also President of his
tions. congregation throughout Italy. Seo
118. Abbati] Theabbacy ofSan Am- Barth. Aresius, S. Amhrosii . Abhatum
. .
brogio at tliis period was a rotatory ihronologica series. Milan, 1674, i>p. 66-8.
344 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
daris, vir doctissime, ignoti mei audacioribus forte quam vel meae
120 conueniebant liumilitati vel nominis tui decebant ad magnitudinem,
literariis accessibus. Nil mihi, haud dubitatim credas, contingeret
optabilius quam te, quem ex literis solum celeberrimaque fama
cognoui, coram cernere et admirari, illaque suauissima et omni
maiestate referta, vt ex literis, vt hominum ex relacione, sic aureo
125 ab ore percipere verba. Vale, nostri saeculi specimen, literarum
saluator omnisque disciplinae sacrarium.
Ex Carauallae, insigni Cistercien(sis) ord(inis) coenobio prope
Mediolanum iiii Idus Septembris Anno etc. 1.5.2.0.
1143ij8o To Leo X.
Epistolae ad diuersos p. 535. Louvain.
HN : Lond. xiv. 5 : LB. 529. 13 September 1520.
[This letter was occasioned partly by the iiiformation, which had reached
Erasmus by 31 July (Ep. 1123. 8-11) througli Aleander (Ep. 1167. 120-2), that
Ep. 980 had aroused comment in Rome — information which made it important
to disavow his indiscreet introduetion of the name of the Bishop of Li6ge ;
partly by the necessity of giving an answer to the oflfer of a bishopric if he would
write against Luther (cf. Ep. 1141. 3on). ©ver the latter quostion he glides
skilfully, and without mentioning it nianages to convey a graceful refusal at ;
the same time taking the opportunity to make clear his attitude towards Luther,
ashehad already done to other important personages in Epp. 939, 961, 967, 1033.
The year-date is confirmed by Ep. 1180.]
1142. 129. ctc.] In BRE. 178 Schirn liimself in his own mind from Reuch-
writes in place of tliis, '
theologorum lin (cf. Ep. 1155. i8n) as wcll as from
minimus'. Luther but tliis letter might well
:
neam quid facias, sed vt quod facis, perpetuo facias videlicet ' ;
imaginans illum iam sponte sua facere quod illum facere volebam.
Quod si mihi placuisset ea scribendi ratio qua prius vtebatur 35
Lutherus, quid opus erat illi tot verbis nouam formam praescribere ?
Et tamen hunc locum scio quosdam impudenter ad calumniam
sed magis illud quod adieceram, hic esse plures illi
detorsisse,
fauentes. Id sane vere scripseram. Bonisillius hicfauebant plurimi,
non quam ego fauebam. Hoc illum scire volui, non vt his 4°
aliter
fretus pergeret seditiose scribere, sed vt ad formam a me praescrip-
tam moderaretur stilum, si vellet horum fauorem esse perpetuum.
12. testatus sura] But cf. Epp. 1141. 1225. 273-5. But in Ep. 1526 Erasmus
1511, 1155. i8n. seeni&to indicate that his intervention
15. probe compositus] Tliis approval through friends liad begunin 1517-18,
of Luther more advanced than tliat
is shortlyafter theappearanceof Luther's
in Epp. 939, 967, 1033 where Erasmus : Tlieses.
does not venture to do more tlian com- 25. annos duos] A loose statement
mend Luther's repeated,life. It is eighteen months had not yet elapsed
more handsomely, in Ep. 1167. 124-43. since Ep. 933 was written. See also
mysticas] i. e. sacras ; cf. Ep. 1. 49n, and cf. Epp. 1098 introd.,
1167. 127, arcanas. iiii. sSn, 1166. 6n.
21. Frobenio] See Ep. 1033. 47^. 26. consilio] Cf. Ep. 1141. i^n.
There had been further opposition epistohim] Ep. 980.
quite recently see an autograph letter
: 32. subiicio] Ep. 980. 52. Thequota-
of Hedio to Capito from Bas:le,23 June tion here, as in Ep. 1162. 178-9, is not
1520 (Brit. Museum Add. MS. 21524, liieral: but in Ep. 1167. 226 it is re-
f. 5;, Quid hic actum sit hisce die-
' produced correctly. A rcport sent by
bus de Lutheri operibus non ampdius Hezius toRome from Liege in Oct. 1525
imprimendis longum fuerit scribere. (Balan 261, p. 553) sliows tliattliissen-
Praesente Egi-ano acta est comoedia ;
tence liad been quiclily fastened ui)on
a quo auditurus es'. lO" Egmondanus, aiid no doubt other
22. Scripsi] As in Epp. 947. 33-5, opponents of Erasnuisat Louvain, asan
983. 8-12 and nodoubt in theanswer
; indicationof hissympatliy witliLuther.
to Ep. 938. Cf. Epp. 1202. 66-7, 167-70, 38. adieceram] Ep. 980. 36-7.
346 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
43. Leodiensis] Cf. Epp. 980. 3611, with the work which he had now in
104 1. 22-3. hand (cf. Ep.
1167. 1-4). For the
44. Lypsienses] See Ep. 948 introd. tliird edition of the New Testament
and cf. Ep. 1202. 200. (Ep. 1174. rsn) he wished to see the
49. ferme anto bienniiun] On 30 Codex Vaticanus (cf. Epp. 373 introd.,
May 1519. Cf. I. 25n. 1213) and he may have thought, too,
;
51. Luthoranus] Cf. Ep. 1162. 222n. of mss. of Augustine (cf. Ep. ii44- 7^)-
56. Academiis] Cf. Ep. 1033. 255^. But whenever he was turning Soutli,
74. exussissent] See Ep. 1157. 6n. Italy came into his view see Epp. :
76. generosa ingenia] Cf. Ep. 1 153. 300. 4on, 333. 30-34, 334. 32 seq., 770
i52n. introd., 775. 3, &c., 1236. 179-82.
79. Romae] Besides other attractions 80. congressus] cf. Ep. 1106. 93^.
tlie preseut phin was in part connected 81. S. T.] sanctitatem tuam.
144] 347
sem exchidere aut nunc componere Sed res tota, vt est nata malis !
officiant illi stolidi quidam qui sibi videntur eam pulchre tueri
Crede mihi, si quid credis, nuHa res magis commendauit Xutherum
affectibus populi quam horum stolidi clamores apud populum. Et 10
interim nullus illorum refellit Lutherum libris aeditis quod vt ;
facerent, semper hortatus sum. Videbam enim vna hac via Lutherum
opprimi posse, si talis esset qualem illi traducebant. Nam qui
hactenus aduersus Lutherum scripserunt, nec his satisfaciunt qui
Luthero pessime volunt. Ac vide sceleratum consilium quorundam 15
quibus inuisior sum ipso Luthero non quod illi faueam id enim : —
sciunt secLis habere —
sed quod faueam bonis literis, quibuscum illi
,
TiT. D. om. 11. ivKis VTRivsQVE DOCTORi ANGLo om. II. 2. Fortassis N.
Trr. Anglo] I cannot exjjlaiu this But Exsinge, Domine does not do more
designation unless Chieregato
: re- tlian enjoin that Luther sliould be
ceived his degree at an English uni- publicly proclaimed in church as a
versity, perliaps at Cambridge in con- heretic at timesof Divinoservice(§ i6).
nexion with the coremonial opening Thespecificcommand topreach against
of St. John's in .July 1516 (cf. Ep. 433. him i.s contained in the Bull of ex-
2n). He was just then in Enghind communication, Decd Romanum, 5 Jan.
see Ep. 639 introd. 1521, § 6.
4. ros tota] Cf. Faber's Coixsilinm 21. irTOJXoT^po.vvoi] sc. nionachi (cf.
(see p. 357) Constat rem esse natam
:
'
Ep. 998. sgn) ; see Ej». 1192. 31-2.
ex malis initiis, nimirum ex odio bona- 23. Evid.^ntly
KTjpv/cTTji] Vineent
rum literarum odioqueliuguarum ';
. . . Tlieodoiuci soe Ep. 11 96 introd. and cf.
;
with which cf. Ep. 1143.69-70. the description of him in Epp. 1166.
20. Bulhi] Cf. Ep. 1141. 2011. 42 4, 1186. 16-19.
praedicare] Cf. Ep. 1153. 128-g, 24. Morycho] Cf. Ep. 1087.5801.
348 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
libros Erasmi,
'
Volui legere Paraphrases, sed Latinitas erat nimis
alta. Timeo igitur ne possit labi in aliquam haeresim, propter altam
Latinitatem '.
Tales sunt fere omnes qui hic clamant in Lutherum, et qui, vt
50 ipsis videtur, defendunt sedem Komanam cuius dignitati nemo non :
fauebit, sed hos rabulas nunquam ferent cordati viri. Quos si nosset
Pontifex ita vt nos nouimus, in nullos magis saeuiret quam in istos.
Vtinam esset mihi tantum autoritatis apud Pontificem quantum est
syncerum animi mei studium erga illius dignitatem dedissem !
32. Fabriuu] Tliisutterance isgiven Ito/k,i, 1908, no. 1254, andGC. iii.452D,
most fully in the Apologia qua respondet, 239B. Erasmus ajjiDealed to the Bishop
f. F^ v°, Jortin ii. 521 cf. Epp. 1162.
; of Tournay against him (Ep. 1212),
T29-32, 1 192. 51-2, 1 196. 574-5. repeating tliis story with littlo varia-
34. duo] Evidently tlie Dominican tion as also in Ejjp. 1192 and 1581.
;
Prior (Ep. 1164. 48^) and Laurentius Cf. Ep. 1183. 128; where alta (1. 47)
(Ep. 1166. 26n) cf. Ep. 1147. 91.
; becomes o6scM»-a.
38. Ajituuerjnael Cf. Ep. 1 192. 41-4. 44. o niagistratu] Very likely Crane-
39. Minorital Nicholas of Bureau . velt :see Ep. 1145.
(Burellus), a Franciscan of Tournay, 47. possit] Tliis rather unexpected
and bachelor of tlieology. He was tcf. Ej). 1192. 38 cr. n) reading is found
apjiointed suffragan to thc Bp. of in all the other versions (L 39U) of
Tournay 2 Dec. 1519, with the title the story.
of Bp. of Sarepta :
f 1551. Numerous 55 consiHuni] Cf. j). 357, aiid 1. ^n.
1144] TO FEANCESCO CHIEKEGATO 349
tion delivered an oration of welcome to Wolsey, 14 Aug. 1521 (see pp. 551-2).
On27 Sept. 1522 he was appointed a member of the Grand Council at Malines ;
where the remainder of his life was spent. His ofticial duties did not pi-event
him from maintaining an interest in learning and literature cf. Rescius' dedi- ;
cation to him of Plato Leg., Louvain, 31 March 1531, which credits him with
having learnt Hebrew without a teacher. He translated Homilies of Basil,
Louvain, Rescius, 1534-5 '>nd in 1534 Procopius' Be lustiniani Imp. aedificiis,
1
first printed at Paris, C. Wechel, 1537 (cf. OE. p. 602). Later he edited the
posthumous publication of Vives' De veritate ficlei Christianae, Basle, J. Oporinus,
Jan. 1543. He composed an epitaph on Erasmus in 1536 (OE. pp. 580-8, 595) and ;
verses by him appear in Th. Loher's edition of Dionysius the Carthusian's com-
mentary on the major Prophots, Cologne, Qiientel, Feb. 1543. Vives writes of
his character vvith great admiration in 1523 see his Aug. Ciu. Dei, xix. 21.
:
71. Augustini] See Epp. 844. 255^, 78. Romae] Cf. Ep. 1143. 790.
1174. 17, 1204. 26, 1212. 44, 1309. 79. Vuigornien.] Gigli see Ep. 521
:
77. Literas] Not extant. introd., and cf. Epp. 1079, 1181.
350 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [1520
frequensfui, vocante quidem illo cuius ego non tanti facio ras :
Tiberii effigies, in altero diui Augusti. Quae te scire vokii, quia pro
20 his etiam tibi me debere gratiam semper confitebor, Yale et me, si
quid possim, vtere. Brugis xiii. Cal. Octob.
Feuinus noster valet, et suo nomine salutem asscribi voluit. Anno
millesimo quingentesimo vigesimo.
21. Octobris H. 22. H : Feninus F. Anno ... 23. vigesimo add. HN^:
Anno M.D.xx N^ Lond.
[At some date after 13 Sept. (Epp. 1143,4") Erasnius went to Antwerp, where
he stayed, as usual, with Gilles. His purpose was, no doubt, to be ready for the
visit of Charles v, which had been announced for 15 Sept. (Brewer iii, App. 14),
but did not take place till 23-28 Sept. (Gachard ii. 28). It appears that Brassi-
canus called upon him and succeeded in obtaining the following letter of com-
pliment, which is of the same class as Epp. 874, 875, 981, 985. Next day he visited
the friends again, and enjoyed conversation with Erasmus: one of whose remarks
he noted down on the spot. This he afterwards sent to Vadianus, among whose
correspondence at St. Gallen it is preserved VE. 219% It runs '
:
' loannes Alexander Brassicanus rogauit Erasmum qua ratione doctus posset
fieri. Eespondit ex tempore si doctis assidue conuiueret, si doctos axidiret non
:
Jan. 1514 at Tubingen, where his father had taught in the town-school, and was
M.A. 21 July 1517. He continued in the University, teaching on humanistic
lines but c. May 1519 went off in the train of Maximilian of Bergen, ambassador
;
of Charles v (MHE. iii. 22,3% HE. 181 shows that he made tlie acquaintance of
Hutten. Just at this time he visited Erasmus, and i-eturned with him to
Louvain, where on 8 Oct. iie witnessed the burning of Lutlier's books (Ep. 1157.
6n) and sub.sequently he went on to Cokigue (BRE. 189). From Dec. 1520
;
(ibid.) to Jan. 1521 (VE. 233, 238) he was at Constance, staying with John
Faber, then Vicar-General, to avoid an outbreak of plague at Tubingen but oy :
May he had returned to liis University, where he began to study hiw (CE.
ii. 1-4), and where he gained tlie praise of Eeuchlin as vtills eruditor' (MHE.
'
iv. 44). On Reuchlin's death, 30 June 1522, Brassicanus was iuvited to succeed
him as Professor of Philology at Insolstadt by 19 Oct. he was in ofifice, and by
;
6 Nov. had become LL.D. (MHE. iii. 54). But he was not happy there and ;
though afterwards, like Faber, a staunch Catholic, he incurred for a time su-
spicions of favouring Luther. In consequence, with Faber's aid, lie secnred in
April 1524 an invitation to Vienna where he was installed in the King's College,
;
and taught successively Rhetoric, Civil Law, and Greek. The important work
of his life was the discovery of mss. Between 1524 and 1526 he accomi^anied
several missions to the court of Louis of Hungary, and took the opportunity to
examine the library of Matthias Corvinus at Buda which was doomed shortly
:
to fall into Turkish hands. He was allowed to carry away with him a number
of Mss. others he discovered in the abbey of Melk, on the Danube above Vienna.
;
Among the numerous publications of his early years thei-e was, as Erasmus
said (Lond. xx. 66, LB. 966), nothing memorable. But in 1529, so far as ill-
health allowed, he began a series of patristic publications, woiks of Gennadius,
Salvianus, Eucherius, Haymo, Potho, based on mss. he had found. In the
preface to Salvianus, Basle, Froben, Aug. 1530, he dcscriJ)es what he saw of
the library at Buda in Eucherius, ibid., Aug. 1531, f°. aa* v°, he attributes the
;
(Vienna MS. 10575, ff- 60-80). But in 1533 bitterness had intervened (LB. App.
372 Whether this lasted to the end is not clear. In a preface, 6 Feb. 1539,
.
to Hugo Eterianus' Be anima corpore iam exata, Cologne, Gymnich, 1540, Brassi-
canus writes with good feeling of the master whose opinion of Hugo he is glad
352 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [1520
to quote : but the letter he refers to, mav have been wiitten in 1530 (cf. Lond.
XXX. 53, LB. 1146) or 1531 (EE. 155).
See a life by W. Hartl and K. Schrauf, pp. 43-101 in their Nachtrage, 1898, to
Aschbacirs Gesch. der Wiener Univ., with an admirably detailed bibliography :
also CE. ii, MHE. ii, iii, EE. and VE. Many of his books and a few of "his mss.
are now in the Eoyal Library at Vienna. Some letters and verses which passed
between him and Wolfgang Rychard of Uhn, 1517-35, are copied into the latter's
Letter-book, now in the Town Library at Hamburg (Wolf MS. 4°. 49).]
exoriuntur
20 TToAAoi fxa$rjTaL KpetTTore? 8t8ao"/caX(joi'.
sane impensius gaudeo, quod cum apud Italos olim nemo fere bonas
literas profiteretur quin ingenii laudem insignibus morum vitiis
25 contaminaret, nunc nulli fere sint incorruptioribus aut sanctioribus
moribus quam qui politiorum Musarum sacra colunt.
Bene vale, doctissime Brassicane. Antuerpiae. vi. Calendas
Octobris. Anno m.d.xx.
[Evidently of the same period as Epp. 1144, 1 164-6. Tlie name of Peter
Manius seems not to be otherwise known P. Kalkoff thinks that it may be :
fictitious (Zw. E^. p. 4i6n). The note on 1. i6 suggests that he belonged to the
Hague, and that his letter here ansvvered was written at the end of 1519.
As Erasmus had been at Antwerp with Charles (p. 351), he probably accom-
panied the further progress of the Emperor who on the way to Aachen for liis
;
coronation was at Malines 29-30 Sept. and Louvain 1-8 Oct. (Gachard ii. 28).
One result of this contact witli the Court was the request to write Epp. 1149-52.
Another was a visit from a young man who had come from Spain in the
Emperor's ti-ain, Ferdinand Columbus (^1488-1539), son of the explorer, and
founder of the Bibliotheca Colombina, which is now incorporated in the Library
of the Dean and Chapter of Seville Cathedral. One of its books is a copy of
Erasmus' Antibarbari in the first edition, Basle, Froben, May 1520 (Ep. 11 10).
On i°. a* v" is a presentation inscription in Erasmus' own hand, Don. Ferdi- '
nando Colon / Erasmiis Roterodamus dono dedit after wiiich the recipient ' :
Erasmus duas primas lineas sua propria manu hic seripsit '.]
17. II : conabere F.
28. Gallia] Cf. Epp. 321. 13^, 421. Corn. Gerarcl's Batatda, p. 50). Quite
31-3, 926. 33, 928. 40-2, iiii. 81, rt-cently Geldenhauer had resumed
1165. 47. the discussion \n De Batauvrum insula,
29. Batauiam] For the learned con- Antwerji, M. Hillen, 19 Sept. 1520 in ;
78 introd. Bcsides the works there que immortale decus'. See J. Prin-
mentioned by Dorp, Geklenhauer, and sen's life of Geldenhauer, pp. 19, 55-9.
Cornelius Gcrard (Ep. 17 introd.), The earlier works mentioned, except
Erasmus too had exprossed his views Snoy's, are repriuted by Scriverius
in an addition to the adage Auris in Infor, Gennaniae Antiquitatcs, 161 1.
Baiaua. Snoy also alludes to it in his 38. Peripateticus] Ar. Bhet. a. 10.
De rebus Batauicis (Ep. 190. lon ; ef. 46. ad Galliam] Cf. Ep. 534. 31.
II47J TO PETER MANIUS 355
publice vestri ordinis, cui tales rabulae non leuem concitant inuidiam ; 80
vt ne commemorem interim quod et populum detractionis tabe
inficiunt, qua non alia lues capitalior, et sacri sermonis eleuant
autoritatem.
Bene habet quod, vti scribis, iam victus es, expugnatus es,
transformatus es. At mecum interim quam belle agitur, in cuius 85
immerentis famam, vt est coniectandum, digna atque indigna loquutus
es. Qui religionem absolutam protitentur, hoc diligentius oportet
a linguae virulentia temperare, quod hac ratione, vt facillimum est
laedere, ita diflficillimum est mederi et tamen fere videmus, qui
:
piaculum esse ducunt vesci carnibus aut aliter cingi, morbum hunc 90
longe sceleratissimum pro ludo habent. Sunt hic duo vestri sodalitii,
alter theologus, alter theologiae candidatus, quos si velim vieisci,
non alia via magis conueniat quam commendando literis quae illi,
mire sibi placentes, quotidie vociferantur in nomen et studia mea, in
quibus nihil omnino sapiunt. Est et Carmelita quidam, theologus 'J5
93. commenclando F, cf. Brut. ap. Cic. Fam. ii. lo. 2: mandando 11. 103.
adiuuerim H.
76. idiotas] See Ep. 1153. i^in, and 91. duo] Cf. Ep. 1144. 34^.
cf. Ep. 1090. 18. 95. Carmelita] Egmondnnus.
A a 2
356 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
Zasivs ille nihil facit noui, qui, dum sic vbique praedicat Erasmum,
vt ex musca plusquam elephantum non vobis solum verum
faciat,
etiam aliis multis imponit sed prius ipsi imposuit amor quidam
;
nec ignorat vestra prudentia qualis sit aula Caesaris, nimirum belua
10 capitum innumerabilium, adeo vt si mihi incidat aliquid negocii,
malim iactura rei ocio meo consulere quam persequi.
Ascitus quidem sum in ordinem consiliariorum, sed ita vt ne
vocatus quidem adsim, tantum abest vt memet iiigeram. Et tamen
non grauabor causam vestram pro viribus adiuuare, si se dederit
15 occasio quanquam citra meam operam non dubito quin sit succes-
;
decimonono add. H.
8. cubito protrudere] Cf. Ep. 250. 9. therc had been any question of his
9. auhi Caesaris] The deseription of being enmeslied in it cf, Epp. 669. 13,
:
ferent from Erasmus' repeated eulogies mus was called upon for counsel, Ep.
on the court of Henry viii (see Ep. 11 17. 28n. Such occupation for him
855. 28n, 999. 22in). But of that he seemed to his friends niatter for great
might liave written less glowingly if regret : cf. BRE. 181, Am. E. 7.
1149] 357
[The group of letters, Epp. 1149-52, 1156, was written to introduce to members
of the Imperial Court a Dominican of whom Erasmus at this time held a high
opinion, John Faber of Augsburg (c. 1 470-1530), M.A. and D.D. Before long, in
August 1523, he wrote of him differently Is qualis nunc sit nescio certe mihi
:
'
:
consideration of the learning which he had much at heart (cf. Heumann, p. 87).
He wished also to have his appointment as councillor renewed under Charles,
and to secure the revei'sion to the see of Trent, which had been promised to him
by Maximilian. Besides this he brought with him a proposal for settling the
Lutheran trouble, urging both sides to moderation. When Erasmus saw this at
Cologne, it was stillin ms. but it was shortly afterwards printed with the title
;
Consilium cuiusdam ex animo cupientis esse considtum et Ro. Pontiflcis dignitati et Chri-
stianae religionis tranquiUitati. Five editions in Latin are known one with the —
—
date 1521 and four in German see L. Geiger in Arch. f. Litterahirgesch. v (1876),
:
pp. 555,6, and G. Finsler, Zivingli-Bibliographie, 1897, pp. 80-82. In the Bodleian,
4° B 9 Th. Seld., is an issue with a diflferent title, Consilimn doctissimi cuiusdam,
magnorum Principum monitu praecipue ad hoc munus inuitati ... It was soon
suspected that Erasmus was the author (Ep. 1199. 31-4 cf. VE. 247, and LE^. ;
435. 34-7, where Luther has no doubt on the subject also a dispatch of Aleander, ;
IBalan p. 104 and Lond. xxvii. 2, LB. 1195; and this suspicion, which he
; ;
never directly denies, has been commonly accepted in modern times. The fact
that many passages in his letters of this period (Epp. 1143. 69-70, 76-7, 1144. 4)
1153- 152-3» "67.343-7, 1173-42-5. 1183.38-40, 1219. 35-6) appearalmostverbally
inthe Consi7iU»n, and the coincidence of Ep. 1199. 31-8 with Ep. 1217.35-56,1^^^68
no doubt as to his complicity fcf. also Ep. 1267. 17U) Vjut it must be uoticed
:
that the sentence quoted from Fal)er in Ep. 1156. 50-54 is also in the Consilium,
and that Erasmus expressly ascribes the document to him in Ep. 1217 and in
the Spongia, supra. An easy and likely explanation is tliat, as Faber had brought
his scheme with liim in ms. Erasmus, after their frequent conversations at
,
Louvain and Cologne (Ep. 1156. 8-9), rewrote the central part, in wliicli the
resemblances to his letters occur so that the Consilium as finally launched was
:
with him, and so made use of him as a convenient instrument for the cii-culation
of his own ideas. In 1526 Erasmus wrote, no doubt in reference to this occa-
sion, '
O^stendi viam finiendi mali, reiectum est consilium' (Ep. 1690;: cf. also
Ep. 1526 of 12 Dec. 1524.
358 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
In tlie rapid development of the crisis Faber soon found liimself driven into
strong disapproval of Luther, ahd was unable to maintain a mediating position.
With the humanists too he ceased to be in syrapathy cf. Hutten's Expostidatio
:
(HE. 310, § 137% and the Spongia, supra. In Augsburg he was again in difficulties,
and in 1525 was ejectedfrom his house to die in exile and obscurity (EE. 145).
:
Erasmus' opinion of him at the eiud was exeeedingly bitter (Lond. xxiv. 15, xxvi.
18; LB. 1072, 1163). See an excellent study by N. Paulus in Beutsche Domini-
kaner im Kampfe gegen Luther, 1903, pp. 292-313 expanded from an arcicle in
;
Hist. Jahrbuch, xvii (1896), pp. 39-60: also A. Schulte, Die Fugger in Rom, 1904, i.
161-6, ii. 208-9, witli extracts from Faber's Geddchtnisbuch.
Of Villinger not much is known. He was at school at Schlettstadt under
Crato Hofnian (BRE. 163% to whom he subsequently joined in raising a monu-
ment (ibid. p. 619). By 1501 he had entered Maximilian's treasurj^, where his
life was to be spent as a trusted and competent official and by 1513 he had ;
proque fide erga Principem soles impense fauere iis quorum virtuti-
bus intelligis ornari simul et fulciri monarchias. Inter hos vel me
autore pones hunc loannem Fabrum, si quid omnino iudico, non
15 vulgare decus ordinis sui qui vel citra nostrum officium se tibi suis
:
[Mercurino Arboiio (10 June 1465—5 June 1530) belonged to a good familj-
resident at Gattinara, or, as he usually writes it, Gattinaria, in Piedmont, sw.
of L. Maggiore. At 13, finding his mother of 27 left a widow with six other
chiWren, and wishing to help her, he betrothed himselftoan oriihan of 20, wlio
had been left well provided for and though for some years the opijosition of
;
relatives was too strong for him, lie married her in 1490, and with her consent
and means went to study law at Turin, where he made rapid progress and soon
began to practice with success. This attracted the notice of Duke Philibert of
Savoy, who in 1501 recommended him as confidential adviser to the Duchess,
Margaret of Austria. When she was appointed to govern the Netherlands,
Gattinara followed her as her minister and in 1508 she made him Presi-
;
dent of the Council of Burgundy. His letters to her in 1507-8 are printed
by L. M. G. Kooperberg, Margardha van Oos'enrijk, 1908, pp. 337-463. On the
death of Le Sauvage in June 1518, Gattinara succeeded him as Chancellor of
Castile. and served Charles ably for 12 yeai's, until his death at Innsbruck. His
wife died before him, and thus the Pope was able to gratify his desire to become
a Oardinal, 13 Aug. 1529.
Scheurl, wlio met him in Spain in 1519-20, extols his friendliness and capa-
city (SE. 213, p. 109}. To Erasmus he was an appreciative patron (cf. Ep.
1197 also LB. App. 469), sharing his views of moderate reform, and iu-
;
Corn. Grai^heus dedicated to him, 26 June 1520, a poem, Diid Caroli. ex His^Kmia . .
Vaticinium Protei, on the same theme, Augsburg, Grimm and Wyrsung, (c. i
Sept.) 1520. Peter Martyr, who came from ahnost the samo district of Pied-
mont, corresponded with him intimately, 1518-22; and three of Gattir_ara's
letters are in the same collection (Mart. E. 738, 759, 765).
Many studies of his life have Ijeen written. Tlie most recent are by Le Glay,
Mem. Soc. Lilk, 1847, i, pp. 183-260, with a portrait and by G. Claretta in Mem.
;
Reule Accad. Torino, xlviii, 1897, pp. 67-147, and Mem. Soc. savoisienne, xii, 1898,
pp. 245-344, i'eviewed by M. Danvila in Boletin Real Acad. Hist., Madrid, xxxv,
1899, pj). 482-94). But by far the most important source is Mercurino's auto-
biograpliy down to 24 Julj' 1529, recently discovered in his autograph ms. and
admirably edited with other documents by C. Bornate in Misc. di Storia Italiana,
3rd ser., xvii, 1915, pp. 231-585. His will, dated 23 July 1529, is printed bj'
V. Promis in Misc. Stor. Ital. xviii, 1879, jjp. 61-147. See also EE.
The date of his death is giveu from the inscription on his tomb at Gattinara,
printed by Ciaconius iii. 505.
1150. 9. idem munorisl His position 17. Syluagii] See Ep. 410.
as Iniperial Councillor. 1151. 12. pensio] See Ep. 597. 26n.
1152] 361
the signature and address, which are by Erasmus himself. For the passage
inserted in the middle in see p. 97. H
The 3'ear-date is contirmed by the references to Erasmus' visit to Cologne and
to Ep. 1033 cf. Epp. 1 149-51 with the same year-date.]
:
premeret aut aboleret. Quo magis admiror quo consilio factum sit
vt et aederetur per typograjihos nec tibi redderetur. Si hic casus fuit,
sin perfidia, plusquam Punica fuit.
fuit infelicissimus ;
the annexed canonries in St. Peter's church. In 1516 he was D.D. and just at ;
this time, for the half-year 31 Aug. 1520—28 Feb. 1521, he was Rector of the
University. In 1524, on the foundation of the College du Pape, he was appointed
its first President and in 1525 he was one of the judges to try John Pistorius,
;
being in Dutch. They were printed at Antwerp, mostly by Hillen (Ep. 1053.
i33n). See BN., witli a very careful bibliography and de Jongh, pp. 165-7.
;
Apart from the present appeal to him as Rector (cf. Epp. 1164, 11 72) Erasmus
had not much to do with him but he speaks of him later with praise (Lond.
;
xix. 13, LB. 862 17 May 1527;. The year-date of this letter is confirmed by
:
Eosemondfs tenure of the Rectorship. It can scarcely be doubted that the letter
was in the hands of the author of the Acta Acad. Louaniensis (cf. Ei). 1195. 41^)-]
4. diplomatis] See Ep. 1141. 2on. 19. testatus sim] In Epp. 939, 961,
15. Dionysii] 9 Oct., Tuesday. 967, 993, 1033.
1153] TO GODESCALC KOSEMONDT 363
35. praescriptis diebus] Iii Exsurge, isno montion of it iii Ep. 1162.
Domine, § 10 (cf. Ep. 1141. 2on), Luthei- qiiodam vestri ordinis] Perhaps
49.
was allowed sixty days to change his Dorp cf. pp. 87, iir.
;
danus non sit refutaturus, tametsi nihil definio. Mox cum atrocissimis
verbis exaggerasset errores Lutheri, rediit ad intermissum de me
sermonem. In hos inquit, prodigiosos errores incidit Lutherus
*
'
'
89. candidopallio] Cf. Ep. 1144. sSn. liouse was in tlie Rue St. Jacques, and
90. die Dominico] 14 Oct. 1520. dose to thecliurchof that saint, which
Antuuerpiam] Of this, as of his had been glven to them. Erasmus
recent visit to Antwerp (see p. 324), I uses it frequently at this time Epp. :
find no other trace. ii55- 15» 1172. 3, 1173. ^o^) 1196. 511.
99. probatos autores] Cf. Ej). 1033. In the French Kevolution one of tho
82-4. extreme j^arties acquired the name of
101. epistolae] Epp. 980, 1033. Jacobin from using tlie okl Dominican
113. lacobitarum] Thefarisianname convent as their liead-quarters see :
voces aut Antichristum, nihil opus est theologo, cum idem possit
scurra quihbet.
ConsiHum meum non omnino fuisse malum fortassis exitus ijxse 135
docelnt. Ego facti vestri non sum Deo rationem redditurus: quo-
cunque consilio res coepta est, precor vt vertat in gloriam Christi.
Admonui vt primum diligenter legerentur scripta Lutheri, deinde
libris aeditis ac disputationibus refelleretur, et omissis
contentionibus
veritati consuleretur, nec populus ad huius fabulae theatrum admit- 140
teretur: quid factum sit, ipsi scitis. Tot sunt milia rabinorum, tot
sunt qui sibi dii videntur. NuUus extitit qui Luthero sobrie docteque
resjjonderet, siue inscitia fuit in causa, siue ignauia siue metus ;
127. TTTcuxorypafi/ajr'] Cf. Ep. 998. 5911. (Weimar ecl. vi, pp, 498, 501), 'which
128. sj^atiuin indulserit] Cf. 1. 35^. appeared c. 6 Oct. 1520 (LE'*. 350. 38).
135. exitus] Cf. Verg. Aeii. 5. 523. Cf. also Am. E. 5, 7.
146. Syluester] Cf. Ep. 872. i6n. The writer has been conchisivc^ly
Minorita] Augustine of Alfekl ; see identified l)y F. Lauchert {lialien. Gegner
Ep. 1167. 407n. Luthers, 1912, pp. 200-15) with Isidore
uvdivvfxos'] Evidently the author de Isolanis (f 1528), a Dominican of
oi Ileuocatvj Martini Lutherii Augustiniani S. Maria dello Grazie at Milan, who
ad sanctam Sedem, s. 1. et a., but dated was B.D. at Bologna, and taught
22 Nov. 15! I a i"are volume of whicli
: theology In many houses of his order,
thrro is a copy in the Hofbibliothek at at Pavia, Verona, Milan, Cremona,
Munich. H(; was a Dominican, and at 1513 21. Between 1506 and 1533 he
thc end of liis book praises Francis i, publishcd, mostly at Mihan, a number
qui .
•'
meus fuisset.
Sed ad Carmelitam nostrum redeo. Multum e^aTToXoy//a-aTo de
vitandis nouis, de adhaerendo veteribus ; suspectum habere oportere
170 quicquid esset nouum, adhaerendum veteribus, tenendum vetus
Euangelium. Haec quid sibi vellent plebs idiotarum demirabatur ;
148. alii] Cf. Ep. 1165. 13-14. debfnt. Asinorum est cogi tantum,
149. Dertusensem] AdrianofUti-echt tyrannorum cogere' ; witli which cf.
(Ep. 171. i2n), bp.
Tortosa, to of Epp. 1143. 76-7, 1167. 257-8, 1173. 47-8.
whom the Theoiogical Faculty of Lou- 157. consilium] See Ep. 1173. 42-5-
vain had foiwarded their condemna- exurendis] Cf. Ep. 1157. 6n.
tion of Luther, dated 7 Nov. 1519 (see 163. euulgatas] See pp. 97-8.
Ep. 1030. i6n). Hereplied 'ex Papiol' 165. nostrum] See p. 98.
(?Pamplona: Fredericq), 4 Dec, re- 171. idiotarum] AVnlgateword (Acts
commending doctrinalis condemna-
•
4. 13, i Cor. 14. 16, 23-4) used freely
tionis antidotum ' and warning them
; by Erasmus for the unlearned e. g. in :
'
vt in condemnatione per vos publi- the Paraclesis, Benedicti regulam ab
'
canda nullum verbum ponatur aliter homine, eoque pene idiota, et idiotis
quam ab ipso autore scriptum '.sit scrij^^tam liis essay, 14 Jan. 1522,
'
; in
Adrian's letter was printed with the prefixed the Paraphrase on St.
to
condemnations by the two universities, Matthew, 'quos mundus habet pro
Louvain, Th. Martens, Feb. 1520 and ; doctissimis, Christo sunt idiotae'.
in Luther's Opera, ii, 1546, f. 36. See 'Ouessunt idiotae sed rationales'; in
C. J. M. Bottemanne, De Katholiek, the De esw cami((m, Ecclesiae proceres '
It was perhaps at the same time, idiotae'. Cf. Epp. 337. 247, 694. 35,
in Nov. 1519, tliat thc Faculty sent 1033.130,1039.141,1126.144,1166.48,
some articlcs collected froni Erasmus' 1167.438, 1223.36.
writings: to which, however, Adrian Tlie writings of Raymond Jordan,
paid no attention (Ep. 1581). provost of Uzes, Jl. 1381, circulated
152. Ingenia generosal Cf. Faber's anonymously, even after the days of
Consilium (see p. 357) Huiusmodi in-
:
'
printing, as the works of 'Idiota'.
genia doceri cupiunt, cogi iioluntneque 174. Graecae] Cf. Ep. 1062. 1401).
1153] TO GODESCALC ROSEMONDT 367
dicant qui illius legere libros. Sed fortasse negabit se mihi iniurium
esse, qui nomen meum non expresserit. Certe iis notis designauit vt 190
nemo studiosoriun non agnoscei-et. Quicquid meretur Lutherus, mihi
non i^lacet vt istiusmodi clamoribus populus ad seditionem concitetur,
cum res inter doctos transigi possit.
Sed quid de hoc statuatis, vestrae prudentiae relinquo. Verum in
loco sacro, in concione sacra, apud promiscuam multitudinem palam 195
mentiri de homine immerenti. imo benemerenti, mihi videtur nihil
aliud esse quam eleuare autoritatem sacrae concionis, quam expedit
non minus esse puram quam synaxim ipsam, fraudare popuhun suo
fructu, et huius Academiae dignitatem obscurare. Arbitror mihi
pro meis vigiliis multo aliud deberi praemium. Quod si maxime 200
essem in aliqua culpa, tamen quoniam adsum ijDse et sine periculo
coargui possum, non debebam traduci apud jioi^ulum cui vindictae ;
215. poetria] Cf. Ep. 11 10. i^n. The Zw. E^ pp. 384. 2, 11, 398. 9.
368 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
225 Sed quidam abutuntur liuius ingenio, veluti malo nodo malum
adhibentes cuneum.
Haec malui scribere, quod id esset vtrique commodius. Cras si
vacabit et tua valetudo patietur, coram plura tum dicam tum audiam.
Bene vale. Louanii xv. Calendas Nouembris. Anno m.d.xx.
[An original letter, copied by a secretary but signed by the writer. An approxi-
mate date can be assigned from Ep. 1183 which shows that this letter was at
:
any rate received a considerable while after the visit of the emissaries of the
Brethren (Ep. 11 17 introd.).
Artlebus, or Archlebus, of Boskowitz w. of Olmutz, and owning estates at
Wranowa and Czernahora, nw. and sw. of Boskowitz, belonged to an ancient
family, which held a distinguished record in Bohemian history, and was con-
nected with George Podiebrad. One of Artlebus' kinsfolk, Pi-otasius of Boskowitz
and Czernahora, had been Bishop of Ohnutz 1457-82 after education in Italy, ;
where he had been a friend of Janus Pannonius (Ep. 943. 15^1, a pupil of
Galeottus Martius (Ep. 581. 6n), and an admirer of Valla. A Ladislaus of
Bozkowitz was Supreme Chamberlain of Moravia in 1499 andhis sister Martha ;
Lethowicz ', Benessius de Bozkowicz et de Czerne Hory ', occur in 1499 (iv. 475),
'
Captain of Moravia in 1519, and made a name by his vigorous suppression of the
brigandage which reigned there (cf. Epp. 1021.59-73, 1039. 24-40) see A. Pihirz :
and F. Moravetz, Morauiae Historia, 1786, ii. 131, 173. But his tenure of the office
was brief, as he died in 1520 or 1521 see O. Steinbach, Biplomatische Sammlung
: . . .
aiis demArchive des graflichen Cisterzienserstiffs Saar in Muhren, 1783, i. 55, 97. He is
probably the 'Bohemian Captain of Ep. 1263. 22.] '
ren had issucd three defenccs of them- able to see any. It does not seem pos-
selves : an Oratio excusatoria atque satis- sible to determine which of the three
factiua, 1504; a. Confessio fidei, 1507 ; and was sent to Erasmus.
1154] FEOM ARTLEBUS OF BOSKOWITZ 369
legera Dei purius edoceat, eum tandem omnibus odibilem videi'i, sed
hiis potissimum intolerabilem existere qui spiritalitatis sibi nomen
peculiarius vsurpant.
23. perlegendis] Cf. pp. 291-2. 308) with Von dem Bapstum su Rmne,
41. Romanistam] Augustine of Al- ividder den hochberumpten Romanisten su
feld, to wliose attack (Ep. 1167. 407^) Leipizck, Wittenberg, M. Lotther, s. «.
Luther replied in May 1520 (LE.- 302, (Weimar ed. vi, p. 281).
452. 4 B b
370 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
[Wlien the Emperor left Louvain on 8 Oct. on his .w;iy to Aachen (p. 353V
Erasmus was not free to accompany him being detained by business (Ep. 1152.
;
1-3). On 18 Oct. he was still at Louvain (Ep. 1153), though the coronation was
drawing near and he seems to have been there even a day or two later (p. 383).
;
though BRE. 181, 8 Nov. 1520, perhaps implies that he was then at Cologne.
In a letter of 1524 (Ep. 1512 cf. Ep. 1164. 40) Erasmus states that he spent
;
after the Emperor, who set out up the Rhine towards Worms on 16 Nov. On
his return journey to Louvain Erasmus passed through Aachen and stayed
with his friend Leonard Priccard (Ep. 972) whom he left on a Sunday, probably
;
of his writings see Spongia, LB. x. 1659 ab = HE. 333, §§ 259,60, and cf. Resjy.
;
ad A. Piitm, LB. ix. 1117 f. This interview is mentioned by Spalatinus, who was
present, in liis Annales, first printed by J. B. Menckenius, ScrijU. rer. German., ii,
1728, 604 : Die v Nouembr. Princeps noster, audita re diuina domi, admisit in
'
:
translated into Latin, with a wrong month-date. From this it appears that after
the interviow Spalatinus walked back with Erasmus to the house of Count
Hermann of Neucnahr and that there Erasmus sat down and vvrote out a series
;
precaution they were printed at once, s. l.et a. (cf. SE. 223% though to Luther'3
annoyance (LE.'^ 400. 32-8), together with some other items on the same subject.
Tliey are also included in the collected editions of Luther's works from 1545
onwards.
Short aceounts of Erasmus' interview with Duke Frederic are given in the fifth
book of Carion's Chronicle, as edited by Caspar Peucer, Melanchthon's son-in-
law, first printed at Frankfort, 1566 and in M. Dresserus' Isagoge Historica, 1601,
;
p. 523. When they first appeared, they held the field but now that Spalatinus' ;
records are accessible, the value of these less authentic narratives is slight.
At the ceremonies which accompanied the coronation, Erasmus doubtless met
numerous old friends and patrons but he does not mention many by name.
;
Aleander, whom he had cause to distrust (see p. 112), and whom he had not
visited at Antwerj» and Louvain in Sept.-Oct. (i)p. 351, 353), he now with some
difficulty found at Cologne. For fear of poison he would not accept any hos-
pitalitv (Ep. 1188. 31-7 but they had an interview of five or six hours. Tlie
;
grievances that each had against the other were freely rehearsed and Aleander ;
charged Erasmus with denying thegenuineness of the Bull against Luther. But
at the end they parted with the kiss of ancient friendship {Spongia, LB. x. 1645
CD = HE. 333. §§ 131,2 cf. Balan no. 36, which indicates 9 Nov. as the date).
:
Aleander invited him to Rome, and the offer of a bishopric (cf. Ep. 1141. 3on)
was also perhaps renewed on this occasion. For other fragments of their con-
versation see Resp. ad A. Fium {hB. ix. 1099 gd, 1104 c, 1105 d, 1118 ab, 1119b).
Faber (p. 357) and Brassicanushe saw again (BRE. iSg^ toCapito he gave advice
on behalf of Luther (LE.^ 474. 8-^14) and among the new acquaintances whom
;
he made were Hieroslaus Lasky (Ep. 1242^). Rudbert of Mosham, who was in the
train of Matt. Lang, abp. of Salzburg (Epp. 1450, 1512 Heumann pp. 265,6), and ;
Francis of Sickingen (Ep. 1166. 72^). But Hutten, Sickingen's confederate, was
not there (Ep. 1166. 108-10}.
quin tilii adsint graues et amici consolatores, qui tibi omnem aegri-
tudinem adimant, si quam animo concepisti, vt mea consolatione non
sit opiis. Altius infixus es animis bonorum virorum quam vt hinc
vllis lacobitarum obtrectationibus queas reuelli. Res est inuicta 15
veritas. Et tacita bonorum iudicia perpetuam obtinent autoritatem,
etiam apud posteros suum habitura pondus.
tles: cf. Ep. 1171. 47^. There is no- see Ep. 1153. ii3n.
thing to show jn-ecisely when or where 16. tacita iudicia] Cf. Epp. 1167.
. . .
[For the clate and circitmstanees of this letter see Ep. 1149 introd. The varia-
tions of tense in tlie second and third paragraphs, and the sudden reversions to
Faber in 11. 31, 89 are indications of hasty composition. Erasmus had met
Peutinger at Bruges in July see Epp. 1129. in, 1247.]
:
1155. 18. semper] This is by no meaus heed towhat he might liave said in the
true. In Ep. 967. 69-84 Reuchlin and past. His words herecan hardly have
Luther areranked togetherasbringing been intended to deceive : for Ep. 967
discredit upon the cause of good was already published, and had very
loarning and Erasmus dissociates
; likely boen seen by Reuchlin. RE.
himself from them both. So, too, iu 299, 22 Feb. (1521), shows that both
a less degree in Epp. 1033 and 1041, in Reuchlin and Hutten accepted Eras-
S2)it(! of his defeiice of Reuchlin in Ep. mus' present statement of the case.
1006. In Epp. 1167. 94 seq. (cf. Ei). 29. ciuilitas] For his view of the Ger-
1143. lon) and 1217 both are disowned man character in this respect see Ej).
again : though Rouchlin is separated 998. 64^.
from Luther. In Ep. 1183 Reuclilin 31. Episcopus] Fisher; who had
disappeai-s altogether. Such variation doubtless answered Ep. 1129. For his
illustrates Erasmus' indiflference to desire to visit Kcuchlin cf. Epp. 324.
consisfcency in his utterances. He 21-2, 457. 8-14.
wrotehisletters rapidiy, without mucli 1156. 3. Faber] See p. 357.
1156] TO CONRAD PEUTINGER 373
solet vsu venire medicis qui potione propellunt febrem, non ante 20
purgatis venis vnde febris scatet aut qui cicatrice obducunt vulnus,
;
parum feliciter cedat austeritas. Ait non satis esse fortiter huc 25
tendere quo vocat animi voluntas. Plurima circunspicienda sunt.
Primum vt sic consulatur dignitati et autoritati Romani Pontificis
cui merito fauent omnes, vt Christi vicario summo, qui Christum ex
animo diligunt —
ne quid iacturae patiatur Euangelica veritas. Neque
,
dubito quin hoc animo sit Leo noster, vt tum demum se gloriosum 30
esse putet, si doctrinam Principis sui viderit vbique florere. Negat
hoc tantum esse spectandum, quid mereatur Lutherus aut si qui
Luthero fauent, sed quid conducat publicae orbis tranquillitati.
Magni refert qui manum admoueant huie malo, et quibus remediis
curetur. Admiscent enim sese huic negocio quidam qui leua saedu- 35
litate malum exasperant atque conduplicant, non tam Pontificis
autoritati quam suis commodis consulentes breuiter sic agunt vt :
8. Fiequenter] Since tlieir first 50. iiou ignotos] Cf. Faber's Consi7mm
mceting Louvaiu early in October.
at («00 p. 357) : Nouimus Germanorum
'
75 His placet saeuis modis negocium hoc obrui magis quam finiri, nec
laJjorant quanto orbis malo, modo ipsorum bono.
Mea sententia nihil agetur in hac causa, si qui rem tractant, alium
scopum sibi j^roponunt quam Christi gloriam. Saxum illud hinc
atque hinc tundi potest, loco moueri non potest cui inscriptum est :
non imputant, sed instigatoribus. lam vt hac inquit, saeuicia ' ' '
64. vt J^: quasi //. 65. H: trtmanevsmn F. Cf. Ej). 1167. 223. 71. rebus
FCorrig.'. res F. 74. FN^ : SixoaTaaia K"^.
multum abhorrcntcs finitimas re- 80. Nouit Dominus] Cf. sTim. a. 19.
giones.' 85. Bulla] See Ep. 1141. 2on.
74. 'Ei/ 5« 5(xo(TTa(7(j7] Cf. Ep. 1053.212. 89. inqiiit] sc. Faber.
1156] TO COXRAD PEUTINGEE 375
1156.99. abF: oh Lond. loo. Eomanus Poiit. // : Ro. Pon. F. 113 Colo-
om. X.
1X13.6 ANNo om. 7/. 1157. 10. Lutlieranae if.
2.supijrimendas] Cf.Ep.i 139. 100-3. ^^'^ ^^^'* ^P* 1166. 53-9, and Deutsche
aulicus, et suceedit illi res ; sed nonnihil vereor nequid illum inescet 20
hic niundus, si vnquam alias, peruersissimus. Neque quicquam
interea possumus nisi optare optima. Bene vale, frater in Christo
charissime. Agrippinae natali diui Martini. Anno m.d.xx.
[For the earliest source see App. 12 iu vol. iii. Tlie year-date is confirmed by
the other letters of this period from Cologne.
R. Sbrulius(c. 1480-p. 1525) of Udine was an adventurer of the same type as Bar-
tholinus (Ep. 547) and Andronicus (Ep. 991). The earliest date at which he can be
definitely traced is 13 Dec. 1506. when he was at Venice. At Constance in 1507
he attracted the attention of Maximilian with a poem on the Sforzas and this ;
opinion (MRE. 78, MRE.^ 58), and Eobanus in his Bucolicon, Erfurt, J. Knapp,
29 Sept. 1509, made fun. Nevertheless he won great admiration from Scheurl,
who ranked him with Ovid, and introduced Spalatinus to him with reverence
(SE. 58, 59) and this even survived the scaudals which drove him from Witten-
;
he offered found no favour, and he was passed on (MRE. 473,4 MRE.* 49556). ;
* homo
extreme leuis et futilis ', who would spiu out verses to any one who would
give him a crust of bread (HE. 164) a judgement which is justified by Sbrulius'
;
numerous contributions of this sort to books of the period (cf. 1. 6n and NE.
p. 27). But besides the present polite letter Erasmus thought well enough of
him to make him, like Andronicus, one of the characters in the Conuiuium poeti-
cum, first printed in Aug. 1523. In 1522 Sbrulius was teaching at Freiberg in
Saxony but once more there seems to have been scandal at his departure. In
;
with Nausea in the train of Campegio in Hungai-y, and took a doctor's degree at
Buda, 26 March 1525. After that nothingseemsto be known of him. A transla-
tion by him of a portion of Theuerdank into Latin verse, De variis Maximiliani
periculis, dedicated to Ferdinand, is in the Imperial Library at Vienna (MS.
Lat. 9976) cf. Lambecius, Bibl. Caes. Vindohon., ii (1769"), 930.
;
See G. G. Liruti, Letterati del Friuli, ii (1762), pp. 89-96 ; M. Denis, WiensBuch-
druckergeschicJit, 1782, pjx 341-2 ; Jocher and Panzer. ;
15 est iniucundum laudari a viro laudato, ita non expedit apud quosuis
praedicare quae tuus in nos amor suggerit animo tuo vt ne dicani ;
but may be later. The poem also consulis', about tho receipt of presents
appoars in an undated edition of Eras- by a proconsul in his province : cited
mus' Apol. de In principio erat sermo (cf. on Dig. i, tit. 16.
Ep. 1072), of which there is a copy in 22. irrites] Cf. Ep. 1163. 3.
1159] TO RICHAED SBRULIUS 379
[For the first source see App. 12 in vol. iii. Though only addecl in H, tho
dates may have some value as in Ep. 1136. Without them there is no definite
:
indication of time though the limits ar<' iiotwide apart. Tlie book referred to,
;
in which Ritius (Ep. 548. 1511) expounds the interest of the Cabala and defends
a friend against an adversary, but at no great length, is probably his Aiwlogelicus
achiersiis ohtrectatorem Cabalae sermo, in -which he replied to Hochstrat's Destrudio
CabaJe, Cologne, Quentel, April 1519 (cf. Ep. 1006. 74, 93nn\and defends Reuchlin
against Hochstrafs censures. It was perhaps shown to Erasmus in manuscr-pt
for I can find no earlier edition than one with the title Apologefica in allegorisan-
tium seu Cabaleorum dogma Orafio. Nuremberg, F. Peyp, 1523, and dedicated to
Adrian vi. Later it was included in bk. iv of Ritius' Be codesti agricultiira, Augsburg,
H. Stayner, 1541.
Confirmation for the dates given in H
may be found in the position of this
Iftter at the end of sheet a, which is the final sheet of the Epistolae sekctae per
Barlandum, Dec. 1520. Also Ritius, being now physician to Ferdinand, would
natnrally be present at Charles' coi'onation and the subsequent ceremonies.]
1159. 37. obscuraturi] Cf. Ep. 1107. 8. Aug.r^io, Sbruliuschiimed tobe 'eques
In the title of his C7eo-
39. inauret] Foroiuliensis but it does not appear
' :
Neque vero vno nomine mihi placuit opus. Eruditio quae tibi
perpetua est, hic mihi non potuit esse noua. Sed in primis arrisit
candor ille et perspicuitas, quae rem ita ponit ob oculos vt caeco
10 quoque possitesse conspicua. Arrisit animus iste Gratiis et amicitiae
natus, qui tanto studio tuetur hominis eruditissimi innocentiam
aduersus impudentissimos sycophantas. Arrisit denique te, hoc est
absoluto veroque philosopho, digna moderatio qua sic fortiter patro- :
jectures that it was among the papers of Francis of Sickingen at Landstiihl, ne.
of Zweibriicken, wliich were dispersed after his death. Either Klein's copy was
inaccui"ate, or Moser printed from it without much care. Bocking in /3 has
corrected some errors. I am indebted to both Klein and Bocking for the notes.
Ebernburg was a castle belonging to Fi-ancis of Sickingen, a few miles s. of
Kreuznach. Moser considered that the letter never reached Erasmus, the
messenger being detained at Mainz.]
Male mihi cedat quidquid hoc est quod tanto cum periculo incepi,
hoc tempoi'is, nisi me sollicitum magis habet tua salus quam mea
fortuna, Erasme optime. Itaque cum quo spectet res plane videas,
miror quid ibi agas, vbi et magna est, vt nusquam alibi, nostrarum
5 partium infensio et Decimi mandata grassantur nunc, vt audio,
atrociter. Quin etiam exustis Lutheri libris secure te consistere
existimas? quasi non illius damnatio tuae causae sit praeiudicium,
aut tibi parsuros putandum sit qui Lutherum damnauerunt. Fuge,
heus tu, fuge ac te nobis serua. Mihi periculi satis multum quidem
10 est, etiam infinitum, sed tantumdem animi periculis indurati et
fortuna quae ferat tua alia causa est.
; Fuge, optime Erasme, fuge
dum licet, ne siquid aduersi (quod abominor) cadat, iam tum non
sit hoc ipsum integrum, et necesse sit dicere hoc quod sapiens
nemo dixit, Non putaram '.
'
lam palam clamant isti omnium
1160. 17. Agrippinae. m.d.xx add. II. Anno add. X. 1161. 4. nus-
quam scripsi : vsquam aff. 8. parsuros j8 : passuros a.
1161. 4. ibi] at Cologne ; ef. p. 370. 14. Nonputaram]Cf. Cic. Ojf. 1.23. 81,
5. Decimi] Leo x. and other sources quoted by Bocking
6. exustis] Cf. Ep. 1157. 6n. on HE. 191, § 2 also Ep. 447. 644.
;
ii6i] FROM ULRICH HUTTEN 381
horum autorem esse te, atque ab hoc fonte profluxisse quidquid est 15
quod male nunc habet Leonem ; te praeiuisse nobis, te erudiisse. te
primum incitasse libertatis studio hominum mentes, te esse illum
a quo pendeamus alii. Quod etsi huiusmodi non est. quia tamen
nosti quocum genere hominum res nobis est. nullam debes concipere
tantam spem vt te his locis credas. Odiosae sunt hac in causa 20
literae quanto magis qui has intulit, qui eruditione Germaniam
;
bunt etiam literae et honor erit studiis. Difficile hoc tibi est prae- '
75 esse ibi fidum tum vero quia tempus adesse videtur quo haec
',
vero forti viro, qualis esse laboro, quiescere sit despicabilem seruire
seruitutem, hoc praesertim tempore quo ad summum conscendit
80 haec indignitas, quo isti nihil non licere sibi vplunt, quo sacra pro-
fanaque omnia impie, vt nunquam prius, miscentur. quo mentiri et
fraudare regium est et pontificium, diripere et furari etiam sacrum.
Hinc tu laude conatus es reuocare hos l^enigne id quidem, sed :
vincente ipsorum dementia nihil eblanditus es. lam non est igitur
85 tempus vt desperata sanitate, cuius in tantum capaces isti non sunt,
abiiciamus putrida cadauera, exuramus et aboleamus ? Quod si vi
et armis conemur efficere vt his obsaeuiamus furiis, eritne qui forti-
tudini nostrae temeritatis appellatione obructabit ? Fuerit. At nos
hanc gloriam existimabimus neque sequemur tamen gloriam, sed
;
70. edictum] See Ep. 1192. 66n. Biipst (j<gen den tentschen Kaysseren gehalten
72. Aliquando] With tliis passage /mfeen, (?Tubingen, T. Anshelm, 1520) :
may be compared Hutten's Anseig ivie see liis Opera, ed. Bocking, v. 363-84,
allweg&n sich die Rotnischen Bischoff oder and HE. pp. 69^-7 1*.
ii6i] FKOM ULRICH HUTTEN 383
Non tanti fuerit Erasmo Louanium vt illius ergo sui fructu vniuer-
sam fraudare velit Germaniam nimis magni constiterit vnius vrliis
:
[Subsequent to Ep. 1153. Ep. 1 164. 40-2 shows that while at Cologne (pp.
370-1), Erasmus was in hopes that a settlement with Egmondanus had been
attained. It may therefore be inferred that the interview with him in
Eosemondfs presence, which is described here (see also Ep. 1173), had then
already taken place. The probable course of Erasmus' movements (see i). 370)
leaves room for that interview, perhajjs c. 20 Oct., before his departure to
Aachen and Cologne but scarcely for a report of it to have reached More and
;
for his letter inquiring about it to have then come back. This letter must
therefore be later than Erasmus' time at Cologne ; and may be placed conjec-
turally in November, after his return.]
augei-e quod gestum est, et variare fabulas. Neque vei-o mihi tam
1161. 100. poemate] Clag vncl vorma- 473-526 and HE. pp. 65^-68*.
nung gegen dem iibermcissigen vnchrisilichen 119. Moguntiae] For a report that
gewalt cles Bapst.s zu Rom, (?Mainz, J. Erasmus liad gone to Mainz cf. BRE.
Schoeffer, 1520) see Hutteni Opera, iii.
: 182, of 11 Nov.1520 andsee Ep. iioi. i.
:
384 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
25 In libris inquam,
'
meis nusquam est nomen tuum.'
'
'
Nec in con- '
dicere illum lingua sua inficere omnia. Sed haec nec viris digna
sunt, ac vix etiam mulieribus. Agamus argumentis, finge me .'
. .
Hic ille protinus interpellans magno clamore nautico, Non fingo,' '
gere non vis,' inquam, 'da igitur.' 'Nolo' inquit, dare.' 'Fac' '
inquam, '
ita esse.' 'Non faciam ', inquit. 'At pone ita esse ',
inquam, '
Non ponam '. inquit. '
Sit igitur ita iuquam.
', At '
inquit,"Ita est."' •
55
Vix Rector impetrauit vt sineret nie loqui, Vt verum sit '
',
non tamen hoc erat tur.m, ad animi tui vindictam abuti sacri loci,
sacrae concionis autoritate. et populi simplicis credulitate, Poteras
vicissim in me scribere, poteras me in ius vocare, Nunc non tam 6o
mihi facis iniuriam quam toti huic Academiae, quam toti populo,
quam sacrae concioni, quae longe aliis fabulis dicata est.' Hic quum
deesset homini quod responderet, alio, vt solet, defiexit. la ', inquit, '
'
optares tilji simileni autoritatem.' 'Quam?' inquam. "concio-
nandi ? Annuit. '
Atqui inquam et olim sum concionatus, et 65 •
'
'
'
maius operaeprecium facere scribendis libris ; tametsi tuam in-
dustriam non improbarem, si modo doceres ea quae faciunt ad
bonos mores.' Ibi venit homini in mentem quod scripsissem in 70
literis ad Eectorem (legerat enim). haec mihi immerenti, imo bene
merenti, indigne fieri. Vbi inquit. tu bene mereris ? 'Fatentur' '
'
' '
'
inquit, sic vos eas appellatis
'
sunt malae literae.' Et in sacris ;
'
'
la, diplomate inquit quis vidit tuum diploma ? subindicans
'
:
'
'
65. sum
concionatus] Cf. i, p. 37, 15, 88, obtrectationibus] Tliis passage,
16 and Ep, 43 introd, conibiiied with Ep. 1 196. 115 seq., shovvs
70. scripsissem] Ep. 1153. 196. that Egmoudanus was the Carmelite
76. dipiomate] Ep. 864. of Epp. 483. 26,7, 948. 136-43,
84. pluma leuiorj Cf. Piaut. Mirn. 95. actus] Cf,£pp. 695. 18-19, 719.3
488, Potrt. 812. but see the Acta Acad. Louan., f °. a^
462-4
C C
386 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
115 absolutam.
Ego arridens rogabam quota compotatione pax theologica absol-
ueretur me simplicem arbitrari vel sine compotatione confici
:
pacem inter bonos. Hinc rursus aliud illi venit in mentem. 'Recte '
loi. amicitia] Cf. Ep. 1016. 1511. 109. dies Mercurii] If this day is
108. Moderatori] Nic.Coppin or Meu- correctly named, de Jongli's suggestion
rans(ti6 June i535)of Mons, was M.A. (cf. Ep. 1016. i^n) that Friday 7 Oct.
in 1497 from the College du Faucon, and 1519 was the date of tlie formal recon-
became its PrinciiDal c. 1505, teaching ciliation, is impaired. But Erasmus
philosophy there. He was Rector of may quite likely have confused one
the University 1512, 1520, 1528; D.D. fish-day with another, especially in
26 .Tan. 1513 Professor of Philosophy
; view of Egmondanus' practice of ab-
and therewith canon of St. Peters staining from meat on Wednesdays
2 Nov. 1514. About 1520 he succeeded perhaps something out of tlie common
Adrian of Utreeht in another canonry — to which both
tlie Episiola de magistris
at St. Peter'sand in 1525 was Dean of
; nostris Louaaiensibiis and the Vita S.
the Chapter and Vice-Chancellor of the Nicolai testify (cf. Zw. E^. pp. 385. 8-10,
University (Ep. 1608). 396. 18-20). The Apol. de loco Oinnes '
'la, tui ' inquit ; indignans, opinor, quod tui dixissem, non vestri. 125
*
Quod si maxime inquam, aedidissem nomen, quid
'
'
erat flagitii si
quod tu publice ausus es ego simili libertate retulissem?
dicere,
Nunc honoris tui gratia supprimo nomen tuum, et rem atrocem
ciuiliter narro. Dixeras Fabrum ac me, qui nunc pugnaremus inter
nos, olim jDugnaturos in profundo Tartaro.' 'la', inquit, 'hoc ab 130
aliis audisti.' 'Verum,' inquam, at non ab vno. Sed audes tu '
Cum inter caetera dixissem non debere videii mirum sicubi querar
nonnihil de theologis in libris meis, cum loannes Standitius Minorita,
theologus, Episcopus a sancto Asino, apud Regem ac Reginam Angliae
multis proceribus et eruditis adstantibus impudentissime me detu-
lerittribus nominibus primum quod tollerem resurrectionem, deinde 155
;
quam neque seripserim neque loquutus sim, nisi sicut decet, id est
summa cum reuerentia la ', inquit, haec omnia fortasse sunt
:
' '
129. Dixeras] Cf. Ep, 1144. 3211. introd.), Erasmus has the Christian
143. Epistolas] Ep. 1 196. 603-5 «hows name wrong.
that Erasmus was not referring to the 153. a sancto Asino] That this is not
volunie with the title given here (see merely a scurrilous jest is shown by
Ep. 300 introd.) but to Eev (see
; a register of shipping payments for
P- 210). 1524, in which Standish appears as
146. premam] Cf. Epp. 993. 52^, tlie bisliop of St. Asse
'
(Brewer iv,
'
152. Standitius] See Epp. 608. i^n, 158. Declamatione] ^^t-e Epp. 604.
H26. 43-253. As so often (cf. Ep. 1054 lon, 670 introd.
C C 2
388 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
175 inquam, 'moneo quid debuerit vitare/ Imo inquit. 'doces eum "
',
Annuit. Illis
' inquam, iam euulgatis mihi non est in manu
' '
theologos.' Id *
inquam, haud vnquam negaui
' sed quos ego
'
;
scribe aduersus illum.' Hic inficiatus me scripsisse pro illo, sed pro
theologis potius aduersus illum, cum excusassem multa, ocium,
imperitiam, metum, inter alia praetexui suspitionem crudelitatis, si
saeuirem stilo meo in hominem prostratum ac victum. Imo, hoc 215 '
postremo mihi non constare quod eum vicissent, cum libri illorum
nondum prodissent in lucem. Sub haec desperans, versus ad Recto- 330
rem ait, Nonne praedixi nos nihil acturos? Quam diu inquit,
'
'
'
detrectat scribere aduersus Lutherum, tam diu habebimus eum pro
Lutherano.' 'At isthoc inquam, nomine tu mihi Lutheranus
' '
eris, qui nihil scribas aduersus illum neque tu solus tantuni, sed ;
innumeri tecum.' Atque ita non dicto sed significato vale Rectori, 225
non mihi, discessit quemadmodum qui in gladiatoria schola vulnus
:
241. recudat] The classical authority est vitio quod oculis adnascitur, nec
for this word seems to be very slight. facile potost auelli oculo incolumi'.
390 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [1520
[This and Ep. 646 are the two letters in Barland's Ejnstolae aliqiiot selectae ex
Erasmids, Dec. 1520 (see App. 12 in vol. iii) wliich are not known from any
other source. Tlie volume was being prepared for use in schools, and was to
consist mainly of a selection fz-om the Fairago (E). In view of tlie date of the
book, the year-date of this letter needs no confirmation.]
NoN dubito quin tua prudentia selegerit eas epistolas quae nihil
liabeant aculeorum : nam vides vt hodie quidam ad quamlibet occa-
sionem irritentur. Quanquam optassem tibi aliud consilium venisse
iu mentem nam vereor ne hoc ipsum male habeat eos, quod videant
:
sic potius exeat quam vt ante fuit excusa, non autore me, sed tamen
ia hoc amicorum affectibus indulgente.
10 Disph'cet quod Theodoricus recusarit excudere librum M. N. Tu-
renhout. Primum praestabat non indicare suum animum. Deinde
multis nominibus vellem hoc opus exire, Vir est rei theologicae
cum primis pei-itus, nec dubito quin vt disputauit, ita et scripserit,
solidis argumentis rem gerens, non conuiciis. Et vt non probabam
15 Lutherum vociferationibus et conspirationibus ojiprimi, ita maxime
vellem illum sacrae Scripturae testimoniis verisque rationibus re-
uinci. Vt plurimum tribuatur BuUae pontificiae, tamen haec res
magis moueret eruditos aut etiam ingeniosos. Suadebis igitur
homini ne recuset posthac ego pro mea quoque virili idem conabor.
:
20 Bene vale.
Louanii. Natali diui Andreae. An. m.d.xx.
3. irritentur] Cf. Ep. 1159. 22-3. the Cardinal Abp. of Toledo (see Epp.
6. ne rursus aederent] i. e. without 492, 647 introdd.,. He wrote some
revision by the author see Ejjp. 1040,
: considerable works of dogmatic theo-
1206 introdd. logy two of which were published in
;
1512 he proceeded D.D., and soon 1 165. 28-9 givos a different view. The
becameprofessor of theology. Between book whicli Martens refused to under-
1515 and 1531 he was six times dean of take, was never printed. It was pi-ob-
the Faculty of Theology in 15:8 and
; ably a rtfutation of Luther"s Conduscones,
1533 rector of the University and ; and may h.ave becn dolivered as an
froni 1519 to 1529 President of the oration at the beginning of tlie October
CoIIego d'Houterle. At somo poriod term 1519 : see de Jongh, pp. 158, 159
lie was resident tutor to the youthful n. 8.
Charles Croy (c. 1508-1564), brother of 17. BuUae] Sce Ep. 1141. 2on.
1164] 391
1164. TO GODESCALC ROSEMONDT.
Epistolae ad diuersos p. 490. (Louvain.)
HN: Lond. xii. 18 : LB. 491. (December 1520.)
[Subsequent to Erasmus' visit to Cologne (1. 40) and to St. Catherine's day :
grauioris admisceatur.
lam cum fateatur se ideo Lacerare me quod attigerim monachos,
nonne paUxm declarat animo vindicandi sese hoc facere? Quid
autem turpius quam ad vltionem abuti templo, abuti suggestu prae- 25
atrocibus illis] Cf. Ep. 1141. lon. vel alibi publice audiendo philosophiac
8. Sedunensis] Cf. Ep. 1155. in. aut poesis studiis vltra quinquennium
Thesubjectof hiscommunicationabout post grammaticam ac dialecticam sine
the Dominicans is ovidently tliat aliquo studio theologiae aut iuris ponti-
mentioned in Ep. 447. 596-600 a : lieii iucunil)at. Veruni dieto exacto
passage which must therefore be taken ciuinquennio, si illis studiis insudare
as a later insertion, made at the time voluerit, liherum sit ei, dum tamea
of printing. simul aut seorsum aut theologiae aut
i6. Battus] Cf. Epp. 35 introd., 706. sacris canonibus operam nauauerit '
thus nephew lo Charles the Bold, to see Bihliophile hdge xvii (1862), pp, 153-
the Bps. of Utrecht, David (Ep. 603. 225. On 13 Aug. 1525 Cliarles v wrote,
iin) and Philip (Ep. 603), and to perhaps not without prompting
Antony of Burgundy ^Ep. 80 introd.), (Brewer iv. 1213), to Clement vii, ask-
and first cousin to Philip, the fatlier of ing that Maximilian, consanguineus
'
Adolphus of Veere (^Ep. 93). See Stokvis noster', sliould be made coadjutor to
iii, ch. 10. I. His mother was of the Quintin Benoist, the aged Abbot of
blood royal of Portugal. Through St. Ghislain's, a Benedictine house in
Leo X he was appointed to the Abbacy Hainault (Simancas MS., Est. 1554, f.
of the Premonstratensians at Middel- 471) but, as thero is no mention of
;
neque male.
Bene vale in Christo, magnifice D. Rector. [m. d. xix.]
Erasmus tuus ex animo.
did not hold dfificc for life, it is not easy 56. auspicando] sc. in ordinaria lec-
to determine who is meant here per- : tione theologica : cf. Epp. 1173. 25,
haps Eustace of Sichem(de Jongh, pp. 1192. 48-9.
167-70), who was at some time Prior at 57. Paulus] Cf. Epp. 1173. 119-20,
Louvain (B. de Jonghe, Belgium Domini- 1192. 49, 1196. 584-6.
canum, 1719, p. 151), and became a 62. licentioris] Cf. Ep. 967. 182.
bitter opponent of Erasmus.
See also 66. Turenhouti] See Ep. 1163. lon.
Epp. 1144. 34n, 1147. 91» 1166. 47-9. 67. exurerentur] Cf. Ep. 1157. 6n.
Or Aegidius Poorter, S.T.B., who died 70. Lutheranus] Cf. Ep. 1166. ^on.
as Prior, 19 Feb. 1523 see Molanus, : 73. Hollandicum] For this incident
p. 242. at Dordrecht see also Epp. 1165. 6-10,
53. Catherinae] 25 Nov., Sunday. 1186. 17, 1196. 145.
394 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
[An orjginal letter actually sent autograph throughout, with the address on
:
tlielower half of the verso. Many of the lines are worn away at the ends the :
2. Praesidens] Nic. Everard ; see ing) a stage earlier than the 'bacc.
:
regii.
vt, si edat Yitam S. Nicolai, quod prorsus ille mere-
Neseno scribe
tur,addat suum nomen. ne quem alium grauet suspitione. Theologi
putant Lutherum non posse confici nisi meo stilo, et id tacite fiagitant, 40
vt scribam in illura. At ego absit vt sic insaniam. Dorpius nullo
pacto miscendus est huic inuidie sed tamen non jjotest amantiorem ;
22. dialogi] Probably tlie HocJistratiis der gegen Luther, 1908, pp. 93,4.
ouans (Bocking, Eov. 463-88) an ano- ; 35. tumultus] Tliese riots, and at
nymous dialogue, sometimes attributed Vilvorde also, are mentioned by Gel-
to Hutten (cf. Ep. 1083. 23^), which denhauer, Collecfanea, ed.Prinsen, 1901,
began to be circulated just about this p. 2.
time cf. a letter from Capito to Luther,
: 38. Vitam S. Nicolai] A
particularly
dated 4 Dec. 1520 from Mainz,and an- scurrilous lampoon on Egmondanus ;
Polydoro] Vergil ; see pp. 426-7. prorsus non memini, nisi forte sentis
27. DorpioJ Cf. Ep. 1044. i6n. de Vita Stulti Nicolai. Nam quidam
28. Turnhout] See Ep. 1163. lon. hoc liljelli a me profectum su.spica-
32. pastor] Henry
Hoeveliiians of bantur'. In 1524 he was concerned
Westerhoeven N. Brabant, Lic.
in that it should not be printed again by
Theol. at Louvain, 26 Jan. 1518 (de Botzhcim (Ep. 15 19).
.Jongh, p. 43*). 8ee Al. E. i. 45 ;
ille] Egmondanus.
Molanus, p. 648 and P. Kalkoff, Alean-
; 41. Dorpius] Cf. Ep. 1024. ~,n.
396 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
1166. To
(Louvain.)
LB. App. 511. (December 1520.)
[This letter, like Epp. 681, 1208, is one of the few for which I have no earlier
source than LB., but which probably came from the Deventer Letter-book (see
vol. i, p. 609"). The contents show that it is contemporary with Epp. 1164,
1165, 1174. The person addressed was evidently a man of position, with whom
Erasmus had not yet corresponded, and was familiar with Dorp. Erasmus
may also have had reason to know that he was interested in affairs in Holland ;
but beyond this the letter. which is incomplete, gives no clue. Either Meynard
Mann (Ep. 304. i6in) or Hugo of Assendelft (Ep. 1044. 26n) or Cornelius Hoen
(cf. Ep. 1358. 26n) or Bernard Bucho (Ep. 1237) satisfies these conditions but ;
1165. 46. Germanis] Cf.Ep. 1110.6711. 51. Permisi] Cf. the way in which
Aleandro] Before long Erasmus Ep. 867 wasshown tonumerousfriends
seems to have modified this view for : along the road hefore it was delivered
on 29 March 1521 Capito, writing to to Beatus at Basle see Epp. 877-83.
:
probabilis, adeo succedit res istis qui sub praetextu religionis pro 15
ventre tyrannideque sua aduersus optima studia doctrinaeque Euan-
gelicae sinceritatem digladiantur. Proceres aulici alias res agunt
proceres ecclesiastici venantur mitras et galeros. Theologi veteris
farinae adiungunt sese Praedicatoribus et Carmelitis ; quos nihil
omnino pudet neque dicere neque facere. Est hic Egmondanus 20
Carmelita, qui saepenumero me stultissime taxat in publicis con-
cionibus ac professionibus ordinariis ridetur ab auditoribus veluti
:
furiosus, et tamen homo senex sibi non potest displicere sic inep-
tiens.
Yenit ante menses aliquot Phrysius quidam Praedicator, nomine 25
Laurentius, iuuenis indoctus, sed ad insaniam vsque sibi placens.
Is hebdomades aliquot interpretatus est populo locos aliquot e Moria,
magnis conuitiis debacchans in me tandem me dissimulante in-
:
10. cum aula] Cf. Ep. 1148. 911. Oii 28 Oct. 1521, just before finally
16. ventre] Cf. Epp. 1171. 92, 1174. leaving Louvain, Erasmus heard him-
4; II77- 39) II9I. 26, 1205. 27. self once more tlie object of hostile
Egmondanus] See Ep. 878. 13^
20. criticism from the same quarter (Ep.
and, for liis recent encounters with 1342. 113 seq.). Laurentius afterwards
Erasmus. Epp. 1144, 1147, 1153, 1162. rose to be Prior of the Dominicans at
22. ordinariis] Cf. Ep. 1164. 56^. Groningen, 1523. Inquisitor for the
23. senex] He was now about 58. dioceses of Utrecht and Miinster, 1530,
For other cases of tlie application of and in 1533 'Diffinitor' of the Pro-
this term see Ep. 1025. i6n. vincial Chapter. See B. de Jonghe,
26. Laurentius] Laur. Laurentii, a Besolata Batauia Dominicana, 1717, p.
young Frisian Duuiinican, with the 156; NNBW. ii. 789; and perhaps VE.
degree of B.D. (Epp. 1147, 1165). His 246. Erasmus' first mention of him is
attacks had begun in July, wliile Eras- in Ep. 1144. 34 ; but liis name is given
muswasatCalais (Ep. 1173. 100-4); and only here and in Ep. 1582.
were directed against tlie Jlfo/ia. Fora A volume of Buridanus' Quaestiones
time Aleandor silenced him (Ep. 1172. on Aristotle'sEtliics, Paris, P. le Prcux,
3211); but before the end of 1520 fEpp. 1513, which belonged to Laurentius,
1164, 1196. 204) he had renewed his is now in the Groningen University
attack, this time upon the Antibarlari Liljrary see A. G. Roos' Catalogus der
:
(Ep. irio), which had just appeared. Incunabden, 1912, no. iSo.
398 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
tur Lutherus nisi auditus '. Episcopi coacti sunt dissimulare. Solus
Dux exhibito Breui quo iubebatur Lutherum coniicere in carcerem
donec aliud de illo statueretur. respondit se admirari quod Pontifex
talia ab se peteret, cum ipse esset laicus, nec adhuc satis constaret
Lutherum esse dignum cui id fleret proinde rem esse differendam
: 80
in Concilium Wormaciense. Id responsum pessime habet Nuntios.
Constat Bullam a Pontifice vetitam publicari. Aleander, qui
attulit. non aliam docuit commissionem quam vt conferret cum
Academiis. Is est homo trium linguarum peritus, sed quem omnes
affirmant esse ludaeum certe vita est insignis omnium testimonio.
; 85
Quod hic egit in inferiori Germania, hoc agit Eckius quidam, mili-
taris theologus, in superiore. Germani maledicis libellis rem gerunt
et miror neminem exsistere qui rationem inueniat hos tumultus
componendi. Lutherus in dies scribit atrociora, et plane videtur
spectare ad seditionem, me dehortante. Scribit se voluisse plane 90
contemnere Bullam pontificiam, sed ex amicorum consilio renouasse
veterem expostulationem. Cardinali Gurcensi Coloniae exhibebatur
Breue, quo iubebatur aceersere Stupitium, viearium generalem Au-
gustinensium, qui fauisset Luthero, et adigere ad abiuranda omnia
Lutheri dogmata quod si nollet, coniiceret in vincula, aut aliter suo
:
95
modo puniret.
2Iulta sunt in libris Lutheri digna cognitu quaedam admixta ;
82. BuUam] Cf. Ep. 1141. 2on. gedenken, noch keiner andern guten
85. ludaeum] This allegation is Freund, dieweil es sie beschweret. . . .
ma.de a\so in the Ada Acad. Louan.omtm Erasmus vnd ich. wills Gott, wollen
Lutherum, i°. a* and cf. BRE. 194. In
; wohl eins bleiben.' It was perhaps
his Expostulatio (HE. 310. § 120^, Hutten this utterance which led Andi-ea Rosso,
accuses Erasmusof having invented it. secretary to the Venetian ambassador,
Aleander had made the accusation to write to Sanuto from Worms, 30
earlier see the Spongia (LB. x. 1645 e
;
Dec. 1520, about Luther 'Sono molti
:
[Betvveen the issue of the Bull against Luther (1. 399) and the publieation of F.
A letter of the same character as Epp. 1007, 1033, 1060, 1062, and, more recently,
1143 with which, and with
;
Ep. 1062 in its second form, it shows considerable
verbal resemblance.]
tibi esse compertissimum nemo sit qui some pension. See GC. v. 156 ; and
ambigat '. Al. E. i. 43.
116G. 105. epistolae] Cf. Epp. 1153. 108. litteras] Ep. 1135.2,3.
14911, 1161.2211. iio. Coloniae] See p. 370.
106. discipulis] i.e. the theologians iii. bellum] Cf. Ep. 1161. 65 seq.
ofLouvain. Cf. Ep. 1225. 1,2. 114. Praedicatores] But cf. Ep. 1006.
frigidis] For this epithet cf. Epp. 411.
730. 18^ 1238. 88 and de Jongh, p. 239 1107. i. Romae] Cf. Ep. 1143. 79^.
;
quod superi volent superesse, Eomae peragere vbi bonis studiis non :
faciunt tum optimi quique principes, tum ipse Leo, summus antistes
non religionis modo sed et eorum studiorum quibus intelligit Chri-
stianam philosophiam vel illustrari vel propagari vel constabiliri. 25
Atque haec agunt deuotis animis coniurati, et quod est sceleratius, ad
rem execrandam abutentes sacris concionibus quas magis refert ad :
fauere politioribus literis, plane mentiar sed tamen ita faueo vt velim
;
a multis, non sine pudore eorum qui vere fauent illorum instituto.
Hic igitur est fons ac seminarium huius totius tragoediae, immedi-
cabile odium linguarum ac bonarum literarum. At subinde variantur
scenae, variantur histriones et personae ; sed tamen eadem agitur
75 fabula. Hinc illa tempestas in loannem Reuchlinum et fidei defen-
dendae praetextus, cum reuera nihil aliud quam vni stomacho vin-
dicta peteretur. Cum res nondum satis ex animi sententia succederet,
et prodissent malis, vt videtur, auibus scripta quaedam Martini
Lutheri, statim istis creuit animus, existimantibus sibi telum esse
So porrectum quo simul et linguas et literas politiores et Reuchlinum et
Erasmum conficerent. Non dico hunc animum fuisse theologis
omnibus. Sed hoc fuisse consilium primis illis huius fabulae autori-
bus vel illud testatur, quod aliquot eius farinae mox passim velut ex
composito dato signo miris modis vociferari coeperunt in optima
85 studia, Lutherani nominis, quod quam odiosissimum reddere cona-
bantur, communi inuidia degrauantes clamantes ex his literis nasci
;
94 Reuchlino] Cf. Ep. 1155. i8n. 96. colloquium] Cf. Ep. 967. -jzn.
II 67] TO LORENZO CAMPEGIO 403
odium vel in suspicionem adducant. Primum vna aut altera prae- 105
fatio Lutheri libris admixta, paulo Latinior, satis erat illis argumenti
Lutherum mea opera adiutum fuisse in conscribendis suis libellis in :
vel esse credebam imo non illi faui, sed gloriae Christi.
: Et tamen
ineodem videbam que mihi nonnuUam sollicitudinem ac suspicionem
incuterent. Proinde cum ille me suis literis vltro prouocaret, statim 145
arrepta occasione diligenter admonui quid ab illo vitari vellem vt ;
qui conuiciis attacti aut intempestiuius admoniti non solum non red-
duntur meliores, sed exacerbati pei-niciosas aliquoties excitant tempe-
states : fitque vt et monitori sua pereat autoritas, interim et vita, et
monito suus fructus. vSiquidem vt veritati nunquam phas est aduer-
165 sari, ita celare nonnunquam expedit in loco. Semper autem plurimum
refert quam in tempore, quani commode et attemperate eam proferas.
Quaedam inter se fatentur theologi quae vulgo non expediat efferri.
Et saepe sanat admonitio tempestiua, blanda ac ciuilis, quos perderet
saeua et intempestiua obiurgatio. Non enim hic adducam, quod
170 Plato perspexisse videtur, multitudinem promiscuam et imperitam
non posse contineri in ofiicio nisi nonnunquam fuco doloque bono
fallatur. Sed ea res vt integrum virum desiderat, ita desiderat
egregie prudentem.
Admonui ne scholas aut ordines omnino contemneret, sed ciuiliter
175 admoneret quid mutari vellet vt in his quae longo vsu magis quam
:
185 quae mediis etiam pietatis officiis solet insidiari. Quod qui his
obnoxius esset affectibus, non videatur idoneus praeco philosophiae
Christianae. Obsecro, quid hic omissum est de quo fuerat admo-
nendus Lutherus ?
Haec cum syncero et amico scripserim animo, tamen non defuerunt
190 aj^ud Germanos qui hanc epistolam Luthero impingerent veluti illius
doctrinae suggillatricem, quam altera pars calumniatur vt a fautore
scriptam. At quosdam hoc ipsum male habebat, quod liomini
150. (Uibitarem A". 152. Videte i*': Vide !/. 172. virum integrum i\^.
190. velut H.
1
1167] TO LORENZO CAMPEGIO 405
suis dogmatis mihi communicai-et. Alios male habebat quod tam 195
ciuiliter respondissem. Sed isti non animaduertunt quam suo
quisque ingenio blandiatur, quam amara per se res sit admoneri.
Lutherus mihi nec de facie notus erat, vt nec adhuc est librorum ;
193. Sultani] Cf. Ep. 1041. 28n. 226. Hafc] Ep. 980. 52 ; cf. Ep. 1143,
223. transuersum] Cf. Ep. 1156. 65. 320.
406 LETTEKS OF ERASMUS [1520
inutilem. An
continuo fauet parricidio qui nolit parricidii reum
damnari An hosti fauet qui monet quo pacto
nisi cognita causa ?
possit hostis oppi'imi minimo dispendio militum, imo qui monet
tentandum an hostis sine Martis alea possit ad deditionem adigi ?
Si bene consulit rei publicae qui mauult hostem seruari quam perimi, 290
qua fronte reprehendunt qui idem velit a theologis fieri ? Et haec
loquor, fingens interim quod mihi non constabat, Lutherum erroris
esse magistrum. Et tamen sic admonui quid mihi videretur optimum
factu, vt nihilo secius liberum aliis facerem suo vti consilio, si magis
probaretur. Videbam hoc hulcus non sine periculo tangi apud 295
plebem promiscuam, in qua plurirai sunt quos onus confitendi male
habet nullum Hbentius excussuros, si sensissent theologum ac pro-
;
batae vitae virum in hac esse sententia. Et tamen incertum est etiam
nunc an in scriptis suis hoc senserit Lutherus. Deinde quid ahud
quam nobilitabant eius libros eiusmodi clamoribus, ante perpaucis 300
notos, et eos irritabant ad legendum qui nunquam alioqui fuerant
lecturi? magna cum vtilitate bibliopolarum, qui tanto felicius distra-
hebant suos codices quanto isti vociferabantur impotentius. Atque
interim nec populum docebant nec Lutherum. Vnde doctoris titulo
gloriantur, nisi vt doceant? 305
Qualis quaHs erat Lutherus, certe humanius erat sanare quam
extinguere. Olim pro conuictis etiam maleficis intercedebat episco-
porum autoritas tantum abesse debent ecclesiastici viri a perdendi
:
illi videri volebant, nulkim poterat dari consihum quod raagis et gi-a-
mihi pro fideli consilio indignantur, cui tamen per me liberum erat
non parere. Si verum audire cupimus, sit cuique liberum suam
dicere sententiam, sit venia vel male consulenti, modo id faciat
tur. Pene sohis ornnium illius libros non legi, solus nihil vnquam
ilHus sumconatus defendere, ne inter pocula quidem, vbi quod effu-
titur, in vino scribi solet. Semper hortatus sum vt qui possent 395
disputarent aduersus Lutherum, scriberent aduersus Lutherum. Id
vbi Louanii coeptum est, constanti vultu probaui quod vtinam non
fecissent praepostere. Exiit duarum Academiarum praeiudicium ad-
uersus Lutherum. Prodiit BuUa terrifica Eomani Pontificis titulo.
Exusti sunt codices. Clamatum est apud popuhun. Res odiosius 400
agi vix potuit. Bulla visa est omnibus inclementior quam pro leni-
tate Leonis nostri et tamen huius saeuitiae non parum additum est
;
course of 1520 he published at least logical work, which sliows the virtuts
'
four more pamphlets on various aspects of Thos. Aquinas figured in the stars '.
of the case. Altogether fifteen works In the colophon to it he gives his own
by him, most of them controversial, age. Lator lie went to Rome and
have been discovered. He was still taught philosophy in the University.
living on 6 Oct. 1532. While tliere he entered the lists against
See LE^. 296« Epp. 1153. 146, 1154.
; Luther with an appeal Ad principes ei
410 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
fructus.
Si corrupti mores Romanae curiae postulant ingens aliquod ac
praesens remedium, certe meum aut mei similium non est hanc pro-
uinciam sibi sumere. Malo hunc, qualis qualis est, rerum humanarum
430 statum quam nouos excitari tumultus, qui saepenumero vergunt in
diuersum atque putabatur. Qui mare admittunt in nouas lacunas,
saepe falluntur, quod semel admissum non ea fertur qua destinarat
admissor, sed quo lubuit proripit sese magno malo finitimorum. Ego
sciens nec fui nec ero magister erroris, nec vllius tumultus vel dux
435 vel comes sum futurus. Aflfectent alii martyrium, ego me non arbi-
tror hoc honore dignum. Scio me quibusdam inuisum non quod —
Lutheranus sim nam hoc ipsum indignantur, quod Lutheranus non
;
sim — sed iis qui nulli placent nisi stultis mulierculis, idiotis et
,
410. Turenhout J*': T urenholtius if. 433. sed Ji' Comgf. : seF. 438. nullis 2V.
10 Polsce, ii, 1842, pp. 237-8, 514-15, nos. 3138-40). During these years he seems
to have wandered as far eastwards as Brest-Litovsk ;
perhaps c. 1531-2
(cf. La. E. 21J. After a short period as Professor of Law at Frankfort-on-the-
Oder, in 1537 he went as Syndic to Luneburg. About Michaelmas 1539 he was
invited for a time to Rostock, to help in the reorganization of the University,
whiuh had sufFered in the struggles of the Reformation ; but he returned to
Luneburg as Superintendtnt of the church (cf. ME. iv. 1063), in tenure of which
office he died.
His literary activity was ceaseless. Beginning in 1518 with some slighfc
volumes of verse, he produced a rapid succession of small educational books,
notes on classical authors, theological and moral works, and legal conimentaries ;
the last of which gained him most fame (cf. VE. 1190). See an admirably careful
sketch of him by O. Giinther in Plautuserneuerungen, 1886, pp. 70-91 ; an excellent
bibliography by F. Cohrs in Evang. Katechismusversuche {Mon. German. Paedagog.
xxii;, 1901, 347-414 ; and EE. Two autograph letters from him to Capito, whom
he styles 'praeceptor', are in the Basle MS. Ki. Ar. 25. a. 76-8.
His relations with Erasmus were few. This is thu only known letter which
passed between them ; and Erasmus rarely, if ever, mentions his name else-
where. The letter which this answers, perhaps had its origin iu Hcgendorfer'3
desire to explain the appearance of two of his Dialoyi appended to an edition,
Strasburg, J. Knobloucb, 8 Aug. 1520, of Erasmus' Farn. CoUoquioriun Fonnulae,
according to the last recension (cf. Ep. 104 1;. In a later edition by Kuoblouch,
April 1521, tho Dialogi are mentioned on thc title-page, but do not appear in the
text see BEr*. Colloq. i, pp. 83, 93.]
:
456. S. D. N. F: Leoniir.
412 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
30 victoria? Aut ego nihil video, aut alio tendunt quam ad Lutherum.
quam sunt in his qui nobilitatem fin- sublata laeticiaui indiecnt animi '.
gunt, vt haec faciant impunitius ; qui 20. grauat] Cf. Ep. 1165. 39.
:68] TO CHRISTOPHER HEGENDOEFER 413
[1520 is the only year in which Erasmus returned to Louvain from Aachen at
this season.
Augustine Scarpinellus of Naples was in attendance upon Marlianus at the
Court and in that position had perhaps made Erasmus' acquaintanee as early
;
to England. He remained there till 1532, enjoying the credit of 'a man of
great ability (Brown iv. 69).
' Numerous dispatches from and to him are to be
found in Brewer iii, iv Bergenroth iii, iv Brown iv and Hinds.
; ; ;
• Tale iter hostibus eueniat quale mihi contigit huc reuolanti. Qui
venti, qui nymbi, quae inundatio Parum abfuit quin in ipsis !
was not written till 1518. Moreover, though Ep. 867 was shown in ms. to
numerous friends (cf. Epp. 877.32-3, 878. 8-9, 879. 16, 880.6-8, 881.3-4, 882.2-3,
883. 2-3, 885. 31-2, 886. 11-12, 887. 2-3), ineluding the Count of Neuenalir, who
had given Erasmus his introduction (cf. Ep. 867. iii), it probably did not
attract the notice of theCanons of Aachen until its appearanee.in E, c. Nov. 1519
(see Ep. 1040 introd.).
Tlie changes in Ep. 867 made in F may certainly be attributed to the remon-
strances which Erasmus answers here so that this letter cannot be later than
:
1521. The coincidence of 11. 17-18 with the passage substituted in F suggests that
this letter was written about the time when Erasmus was revising E for the new
edition (see p. 390). It may be placed conjecturally in Deeember 1520, after his
visit to Aachen mentioned in Ep. 1169. On such an occasion he might well
have heard hints of dissatisfaction with the language of Ep. 867. The words
'vetus vlcus refricuisse' (1. 6) suggest that the question had been raised before;
and show also that this letter must be placed as late as possible within the limits
of time indicated. For Priccard see Ep. 972 introd.]
and, for their effect upon Erasmus, his way to Basle Ep. 1189. in).
(cf.
Ep. 1248. lon. 27. Saeuerum] mentioned again in
20. Hieronymo] J?p. 22. 30. Epp. 1195, 1198: perhaps the Bene-
26. vestro contubernio] The corps of dictine of this name of whom Vives
diplomatists and officials, with whom writes in Ep. 1271. 142.
Erasmus had beon in closc contact 28. Marlianum] See Epp. 411. 8n,
during the ceremonies at Aachen and 1114,1195.
Cologne. It appears that he contem- 1170. 1. Aristophanes] P/. 885.
1170] TO LEONARD PRICCARD 415
officio possim illis vel ornamento esse vel vsui. Quid enim nie
fuerit orbe terrarum inhumanius, si pro summa humanitate
in
reponere voluissem ignominiam ?
Hoc de meo animo cum primis testatum esse volo. lam quid est, 15
obsecro, in ipsa re quod illorum minuat dignitatem? An quod in
multam noctem productum conuiuium ? Nimirum sero coeperamus
est
accumbere, et hoc ipsum humanitatis erat, quod mea causa vocatis
aliquot, reddidere conuiuium prolixius. Nec enim fuit illic vlla com-
potatio, neque quisquam omnium non minus potus erat quam ego. 20
Porro quod Decanus me reluctantem eo pertraxit, quid aHud incuso
quam illius insignem humanitatem ? Sic et duo discipuli compulerunt
lesum vt apud se diuersaretur.
Quid autem probri impingitur Vicepraeposito, si quum tempestas
arceret piscatores a piscando, nihil erat in conuiuio praeter anguiUas 25
et piscem vento duratum ? Quasi Romae non idem accidat aliquando
summis cardinalibus. Et tamen hoc pisce durato natura delector.
Porro quod admixta fuerint quaedam fragmenta non satis percocta,
illud suspicabar esse quod affluxerint plures conuiuae quam expectabat.
Certe Vicepraepositus ille visus est iuuenis singulari praeditus humani- 30
tate planeque sobrius. Denique vix vnquam incidi in sodalitium
quod mihi magis arrisisset si valuissem. Quid autem scommatis
esse videtur in mentione periodi? Quasi non is mos sit apud
plerosque canonicos multis nominil^us laudandus, vt conuiuiis in
orbem actis inuicem agitent sodalitia vel ob vitandam prophanorum
; 35
consuetudinem, ne familiaritas pariat contemptum, vel ob temperan-
dum sumptum, qui minor est vbi plures conueniunt. Et interim
discitur aliquid in conuiuiis, tractatur aliquid negocii, nonnunquam
con'iguntur et errata quaedam. Vnde et Plato, philosophorum
seuerissimus, probat huiusmodi compotatiunculas, nec improbat 40
etiam inuitatiunculas ex more Graecorum ad largius bibendum,
modo ne praetereatur TrdvTwv fj.€Tpov apto-Tov.
Quare te rogo, mi Leonarde, vt quod ille sycophanta male narrando
deprauauit, tu bene interpretando corrigas ac meo nomine promittas
;
[The preface to the Paraplirase on the Epistle of St. James. Like most of
Erasmus' otlier Paraphrases on the Epistles (Epp. 710, 916. 956, 1112, 1181),
this would naturally be j^rinted at Louvain bj- Martens. BEi'^. mentions such
an edition, Dec. 1520 but no copy of it seems discoverable (cf. p. 180}. The
;
earliest edition that I can find is Froben's of March 1521 (o), -vvith the title, Fara-
phrases in omnes Episiolas PauU germanas et iti omnes canonicas, diligenter ab autore
recognitae ac marginalibus indicihus illustratae the verso enumerating all the
;
Epistles of the New Testament except Hebrews (Ep. 1181). The volume is
comj^osite, of several parts, with signatures running in regular sequence through-
out, and three intermediate title-pages. The first of these mentions Tini. Tit.
Philem. (Ejj, 1043) and the Canonical Epistles ; the second has only the latter
item, Peter and Jude (Ep. 11 12), James (Ep. 1171) and John (Ep. 1179) ; and
the third runs, In Epistolam Pauli ApostoU ad Hebraeos Paraphrasis per Erasmum
Eoterodamum extrema, 1521 (Ep. 1181), wifch the colophon dated March 1521. The
text of this prefaee is followed by all the early Froben editions {p. 1231. except
for a necessary eorrection in July 1521 (/3), and a lapse in the octavo of 1523 -^y),
corrected in the folio of 1523-4 (6). But in 1532 (e,, as in Epp. 916. 1062, 11 12,
there is some revision.
quibus adiunxi Petri duas et ludae vnam, quod hae non solum
5 consentirentcum Paulinis in vigore doctrinae Euangelicae, verum
maioribus etiam tenebris quarn illae essent inuolutae. Siquidem
quae fertur ad Hebraeos, praeterquam quod multis ai'gumentis
coniici potest non esse Pauli, cum stilo rhetorico verius quam
Apostolico sit scripta, non perinde multum habet diffieultatis
10 quemadmodum nec eae quae lacobo loannique tribuuntur. Nam
loannes ipsa sermonis copia veluti sui ipsius interpres est, et lacobus
fere versatur in locis communibus. Quod genus sunt Ob Christum :
mundo et Deo : A Deo destitui qui elati suis fidunt opibus, cum iis
27 . et a : cum e.
1171] TO MATTHEW SCHINNER 417
quam non ficte faueas Erasmo, quam sis ingenio perspicaci, quam
certo, quam non vulgari iudicio. Quales si complures haberet
Ecclesia catholica, multo florentiores et aliquanto tranquilliores
essent res Christianae.
Quis autem spiritus agitet istos, qui suae quoque famae et autori- f>o
tatis dispendio, cum iniuria sacrarum etiam concionum, tam perti-
nacibus studiis conantur vt e nostris lucubrationibus minus fructus
redeat ad studiosos, ipsi viderint. Me magis mouet aliorum iudicium,
quos et eruditio non vulgaris et morum integritas ab omni suspitione
liuoris ac maleuoleutiae vindicat. Ego nulHus obscuro gloriam, 65
neminem e cathedra sua depello, nullius obstrepo studiis non ;
[An approximate month-date can be assigned from the new attack upon
Erasmus see 1. 2n.]
:
91. nodo modo a.: 97. a Christo nato ^Josi anko add. Lond. : LR.
ovi.
1172. TiT. iNsiGNi THEOLOGO o7n. i/. I. D. om. H. 3. lacobitai^': Do-
minicanus H.
1171. 73. Thoma] Cf. Ep. 1126. 262^. 1172. 2. alter quidam] The preacher
78. Lyrano] See Ep. 182. ii6n. of 16 Dec. see Ep. 1173- 108-9.
;
81. tacita. . iudifia] Cf. Ep. 1155. 16. 3. lacobita] Cf. Ep. 1153. 11311.
86. pauciores] Cf. Ep. 1183. 121-3. priori . rabulae] Laurontius
. . see ;
92. vontribus] Cf. Ep. 1166. 16. Ep. 1166. a6n, and 1. 32 infia.
1172] TO GODESCALC ROSEMONDT 419
probari ordini theologico. Ille non potevat ferre vnam vocem ma- '
tibi viro optimo. Sed tua lenitas in me, imo in hanc totam Aca-
demiam, crudelitas est. Eius officium erat vel me tacente toti 30
monasterio, imo concionatoribus omnibus a tali petulantia silentium
indicere. Alter vetitus erat sub poenis grauissimis. Quis vnquani
exegit vel minimam? Haec quid sibi velint intelligunt et pueri.
Posthac non ero tuae magnificentiae molestus, spero te functuruni
officio tuo sin minus, mihi est animus qui ista flocci non faciat. 35
;
8. haci^: tam scurrili if. lo. lacobitas jP: Dominicanos if. 19. Praedicu-
torum i^; Dominicanorum iif. 20. Ego aH^e illos o»i. If. 22. probat //.
26. cum ebrio qui H. 33. minimura iV. 36. quid F: quis //.
dissimulauerunt H. 38. D. om. H. 39. Louanii, m.d.xx achl. H.
II. mataeologi] Cf. Ep. 1173. 112-13. 32. vetitus erat] For the temporary
Erasmus habitually uses the word as silencing of Laurentius (1. ^n) cf. Epp.
an insulting corruption of theologus'. '
1164.2,1166.28-9,1173.105. It pro-
25. cum Egmondano colloqui] Cf. ceeded from Aleander, who actcd upon
Ep. 1162. suggestion from Erasmus see the :
26. Mimus] Cf. Publ. Syr. Sent. Spowgut (LB. x. 16460 = HE. 333. § 142)
A. 12. and Epp. 1581, 1582.
£62
420 LETTEKS OF ERASMUS [1520
ingenia facile duci ratione, non perinde cogi imperio. Nec enim hoc
tantum esse spectandum, quid mereatur Lutherus, sed qua ratione
potissimum kceat huic mederi malo. 5°
Deinde non videri aequum vt ego me vkro negocio admiscerem,
cuius initium a me non esset natum magis autem conuenire vt ipsi
:
qui fabulam hanc agere coepissent. peragerent, ipsi telam quam essent
orsi absoluerent, ipsi mortarium alliatum quod intriuissent exederent.
AHoqui cur ego potius in Lutlierum scribam quam quiuis akus ? 55
Quod si insanum sit omnes theologos in vnum scribere, et a paucis id
praestari possit, maxime congruere vt ilH in eum scriberent, qui in
illum disputassent, qui in concionibus illum proscidissent, qui suo
praeiudicio prius illum condemnassent quam summus ipse Pontifex.
Nam si quid stilo valerem, nec sokuu valere me, nec hanc rem ele- 6o
gantia geri, sed eruditione, quam ipsi sibi potissimum vindicarent.
Ad haec crudele videri posse me stilo confodere hominem iam pro-
stratum, fusum atque etiam exustum. Praetex-ea ne tutum quidem
esse irritare in caput meum hominem nec edentulum nec mutilum,
et qui plane, quod Hbri testantur, foenum habeat in cornu neque :
65
mihi consukum esse principum Germanorum, tot eruditorum
tot
hominum odia in me sine causa concitare. Quin etiam temerarium
videri, si mihi prouinciam sumerem quam nemo cum autoritate
delegasset, praesertim cum videam tot monachorum ordines, tot
scholas malle spectare fabulam hanc quam agere fortassis ob id
: 70
quod addubitent cuiusmodi futurus sit exitus. Nec enim abest a
periculo ne catastrophe futura sit tumuUuosa, ni res moderatioribus
consikis componatur sed quicunque futurus sit exitus, praecor vt
:
35. Louanii] Cf. Ep. 1162. 201-2. nuin, deinde etiam ex bibliothecis.
42. hoc consilium] Cf. Faber's Consi- Nunc txurendis libris fortassisaliqua
/iM»)f ^see p. 357;
; Hoc qui consulunt
* (•xpnrtediuelleturebibliothecis, sedin-
non fauent Luthero, sed ordini theolo- terim illius opiniones infixae sunt iini-
gicoPontificiaequedignitati. Siquidem niis plurimorum.' Cf. Ep. 1153. 154-8.
hac via Luthems plenius aboleri pott- 47. generosa ingenia] Cf. Ep. X153.
rat, primum exemptus ex animisliomi- i52n.
422 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
enim momenti sit habiturum nieum iudicium apud eos quos duarum
85 Academiarum sententia, quos summi Pontificis diploma non permo-
ueret ? Horum si nihil esset, tamen refelli non posse quod non
semel atque iterum a capite ad calcem vsque perlegeris Lutherum :
-oXvypd(fiov esse. Porro mihi vix otium esse meis ipsius libris reco-
gnoscendis. Suos potius aederent libellos, quos iam paratos habe-
90 rent Latomus et Turenhoutus, vtrique docti, alter etiam non prorsus
infacundus.
Tandem Egmondanus hoc erat futurus contentus, vt si nollem
pugnare cum Luthero, saltem testarer illum esse victum a Louanien-
sibus. Respondi non deesse qui hoc praedicarent mihi nondum :
diploma] Cf. Ep. 1141. aon. 106. Antibarbarorum] See pp. 277-8.
90. Latomus] See Ep. 1165. i^n. 108. nudiustertius] i6Dec. Sunday.
:
ab erroribus suis conuertantur ' : quasi mihi phis esset negocii cum
Luthero quam sit ipsi Egmondano. Visum est hoc illis bellum
sophisma sed inter pocula natum, si Lutherum et Erasmum eodem
iugo copulassent, perinde quasi taurum iungas damae.
Miraris fortasse iamdudum cur te hisce naeniis onerem. Sic hibi- 125
tum est, cum amico miscere fabulas, et quicquid est nugarum in tuum
sinum effundere. Sed admiror cur ordo, cui prae caeteris faueo, ac
verius fortasse quam ipsi faueant sibi, potissimum huiusmodi tragoe-
diis delectetur quasi tot excitatis tumultibus, primum de conceptione
:
runt mihi. Totum ordinem existimant esse laesum, si quid dicatur 145
in monachos improbos, perinde quasi nulli sint improbi cum illis ;
127. faueo] Cf. Ep. 1006. ^n. of Erasmus' edition, Basle, Froben,
129. de conceptione] The Domini- 1530. The latter homilies of this
cans steadily refused to accept the series, 22-80,appear first in a Latin
theory of the ImmaculateConception of version by Lucas Bernardus Brixianus,
theVirgin putforward bythe advanced aBenedictine of St. Justina's at Padua,
theologians of the day cf. Epp. 1126.
; whoeditedsomeofChrysostom'sworks,
294n, 1196. 51-7. For Gaguin's contro- Venice, Greg. de Gregoriis, 9 Feb. i5o|.
versy with Vincent Bandello of Castro- They were reprinted at once by Ja.
novo on this question see Thuasne in Pfortzen, Basle, 4 Dec. 1504, and tlie
GE.i, pp. 72-6, andRenaudetpp. 106-7. additional homilies appear in subse-
130. Sauoronellam] See Ep. 1033. quent editions until 1547, when Sig.
25on. Gelenius, in a revised Froben edition,
131. Bernae] See Ep. 1033. 250^. marked them ofif as spurious ; and as
139. admonui] Cf. Ep. 300. 21-4. such they have now disappeared from
141. Hormannus] Cf. Ep. 877. 16 seq. Chrysostom's works. See pp. i, 2, 61
142. literas] Not extant. of Fronto Ducaeus' notes to vol. i of
149. Chrysostomo] These extracts are hisedition, P.aris, T621.
424 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
160 vis ' illorum discere mensam, accede propius, et eos experieris
inquit, '
nihil asperum, sed omnia coelis digna.' Mox vbi virulentas pro-
phanorum obtrectationes commemorasset Clirysostomus, subiecit,
1^6 Horum autem ora riuis comijaranda sunt, melle manantibus et pura
'
[This letter evidently is eonnected with Ep. 1189, which again is connccted
with Ep. 1190. Thepoints of contact here with Epp. 1166, 1177 and the obvious
allusion in Ep. 1190 to the gathering for the Diet of Worms make it easy to
assign the year-dates 1520 and 1521.]
1173. 174. est adrf. ff. 182. lanuarii 7/. 1174. 2. hacc cor?-. /fo/c/iutYs : hac; a.
mouet.
Volumen Vtriusque Testamenti Graeci, quum peteres, erat apud
Minoritas: opus in recognitione Noui Testamenti.
nunc mihi est 15
Tamen perquiram an hic habeatm- venale. Sed vereor ne magno
ematur nec diuidi potest. Ver^^or in restituendo Augustino. Si
;
Having failed to find a copy for Lypsius but under the stress of controversy
at Louvain or Antwerp, Erasmus sub- Erasmus seems not to have taken it
sequently lent him this one see Ep. : seriously in hand until now (cf. Ep.
1189. 4-9. Tlie scarcity of the book is 1143. 79ii). The text was sent to Basle
shown by a note of Vives on Aug. Ciu. some tinie before 27 May 1521 (Epp.
Bei (xviii. 30 p. 604), written betweeii
: 1206. 65-6, 1207. 17-22 cf. Am. E. 10).
:
I April and 14 July 1522 (see Epp. For furtlur progress see Epp. i2ia,
1271, 1303^ : versionem autem Sep-
*
1218, 1235, 1236 ; and, for new mss.
tuaginta (in)felicitatis moae fuit, dum used, Epp.373, i223introdd. The text
haec aedercm, non potuisse nancisci. was printed before Erasnuis left Lou-
Nec est aliquis in hac tanta regione vain (Ep. 1342. 90- 1) ; the notes by
qui habeat. Nam Erasmus, qui viius Feb. 1522. Cratander writing from
habet, nunc agit Basileae.' In 1520 Baslc, 8 March 1521 (VE. 247), alleges
Froben was asking 10 florins for a copy that thf new edition had been forccd
of the Aldine Bible at Basle Zw. eI ( upon Eiasmus by Lee's criticisms.
133, 156 -^ BRE. 180;. Before longthe 17. diuidi] For the readiness with
Complutensian Polyglott was put into which books were cut up into sections
circulation see Ep. 1213. 82n.
: for copying or for other purposes see
15, Minoritas] For friendly rolations Epj). 750 introd., 846. 8n, and cf. BRE.
between Erasmus and the Franciscans 165. But the meaning bere evidently
of Louvain see Epp. 1044. 30-5, 1189. isthat the New Testament could not
7 8. The defilement in their library bc bought separately from the Old.
of Lee's book against Erasmus (Ep. Augustino] See Ep. 1144. 7in.
1037) 'S narrated in Lond. xix. 29. LB. 18. vestra] At Val St. Martin.
1031, 21 March 1529. The appn ciation 19. sacris studiis] Cf. Ep. 1048. 5n.
426 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1520
Froben, July 1521, addressed to Pace from London, 5 June 1519, and renewing
J.
a discussion on which Erasmus hadalready made a public pronouncement (Ep.
531. 408-14). After stating that he had first thought of collecting and publish-
ing Adagia 'abhinc annos alterum et viginti —
the first edition of his Prouerbia
'
—
appeared at Venice, Chr. de Pensis, 10 April 1498 Polydore goes on Post
:
'
hominis doctrinam pergratum fuit etsi ille ceu eiusmodi commentarioli nostri
:
minime sciens, vtrunque decus, inuentae scilicet rei atque auctae, ad se trahere
5 est conatus. Quem tamen vix potuit ignorare, si vnquam suum ipsius Adagiorum
opus Argentorati, quod est suae Germaniae oppidum, apud Matthiam Schurerium
formulis excusum vidit vidit autern dubio procul, cum illud postmodum bis
:
terue adauxerit. Quippe in eius operis fronte Matthias attestatur se paulo ante
nostra Adagia in apertum protulisse (cf. 1. a^n).
10 Ipsi etiam eum, cum aliquando apud nos pranderet (ef. 1, 32), per iocum
'
nostri huius instituti aemulatorem appellauimus. Ita ille rei suae intentus
nuper in nouissima Paroemiarum suarum aeditione est palam professus primum
se apud Latinos id genus argumenti attentasse (Ep. 269. 58), vt cui tum non venit
in mentem nostri libelli imaginis. Etenim pene incredibile est Erasmum tot
15 titulis redundantem velle cuiquam tam modicae inuentionis gloriolam inuidere.
Quanquam sunt nonnulli sagaciores qui adfirment eum idcirco illud dissimulasse,
vt qui praeter Adagiorum multitudinem nihilo plus praestiterat, ne videretur
esse imitatus, atque sic primas ferret partes. Ego tamen, quia veritas procul
eminet, totum istud aequi bonique faciens tantum apud te qui vtriusque nostioim
20 es ex aequo amantissimus, testatum esse volui, quo nihil ex eo offensionis posthac
essem habiturus.' It is surprising that a controversy which so easily admitted
of definite settlement, should have dragged on interminably. All that was
necessary was for the date of Polydore's first edition to be advanced, aud
Erasmus must have been completely silenced. But in 1530, and again in 1533,
he was still claiming priority see Lond. xxvi. 63, LB. 1108, 4 April 1530, and
:
either 1519 or 1520 being possible. The reference to Lee at the beginning sug-
gests 1520 ; as though the business were past and done with. But a clearer
indication is given by Am. E. 10, a letter from Boniface Amerbach to Alciati,
II June (1521). Boniface after residence at Avignon from May 1520 to April
1521, on returning to Basle reports to Alciati the books that he tinds Froben has
in hand '
: Misit ad hunc Polydorus Vergilius sua Prouerbia ex literis Euangeli-
cis potissimum aucta.' If, as indicated here (II. 6-8, 114-18), Erasmus had
received from Froben PoIydore's preface and advised tlie publication in 1519,
Boniface would have known of the fact before going to Avignon, and would have
informed Alciati of it there. Corroboration may be obtained, too, from Ep. 1210.
The year-date given in F may be a mere misprint : or perhaps an example of
the rare method of dating by the incoming year after the Ides of December (see
Proctor i, p. 16, ii, pp. 9, 10). Tlie year beginning at Christmas would not affect
the present case.
—
Polydore Vergil (1470 ? c. 1555), was educated at Padua and Bologna and ;
studied at some time with Aleander (AI. E. i. 34). Later he became a priest and
entered the service of the Duke of Urbino, his native town. His first publication
was a new edition of the Corymcopia of Nic. Perotti, Venice, Jo. de Tiudino,
20 Dec. 1496 which he collated with a manuscript in the Duke's library. To
:
the Duke he dedicated a volume of Prouerbia {v. supra') in 1498 and to a friend
;
tion of Hcnry vii he began to write a History of England, which was carried
down to 1509 in the first edition, Basle, J. Bebel, 1534, and to 1538 in the second,
Basle, M. Isingrin, 1555. The work was carried out on scientific lines, inanu-
scripts being consulted and oral tradition collected and the first specimen of it
;
of 1516-17 in Italy. But he returned, and continued his life and work in
1175] TO POLYDOKE VERGIL 427
England till 1550 : when he decided to spend liis last years in the country of
his birth.
Besides the History of England he composed during these years a commentary
on the Lord's Prayer, dedicated to Fisher, 5 Nov- 1524, and first printed in a new
edition of the Be inuentoribus, Basle, J. Froben, July 1525. At his advice, too,
was printed, London, J. Rastell. s.a., a treatise on The ryghie tvaij of mairimoni, by
Wm. Harrington (f 1523), like himself prebendary of St. Paurs. His relations
with Erasmus continued cordial. Each dedicated to the other a translation from
Chrysostom and their correspondence shows that both the Froben volumes
;
and in DNB. An early ms. of his History (Vatican Urb. 497-8) is examined by :
Card. Gasquet in the Trans. ofihe R. Historical Soc, xvi (1902) see also an article ;
epistola Fausti —
quam typographus ab illo extorserat ad operis com-
37. Lutetiae i^ ComV/. : Louanii F. 44. corniculam F: corniculae exemplo i/.
mendationem ;
quam tamen
ante librum absolutum scriptam oportuit
—tuum exisse in Italia tribus mensibus serius. Quod siquis proferat
aeditionem antiquiorem ea quam nobis dedit loannes Philippus, id 60
quod scio neminem facturum, non erit tamen causa cur me quisquam
insimulet furti aut plagii. Nam fieri potuit, id quod plane crediderim
accidisse, vt cum eadem res eodem ferme tempore vtrique veniret in
mentem, neque tu de Erasmo neque ego de Polydoro somniarim.
Itaque si quid est laudis ex inuento argumento, vterque sibi possit 65
vindicare citra alterius iniuriam. Haec quum a me ioco dicta sint in
—
conuiuio nam te plane credebam iocari —
tuum erat serio conferre
-,
primam aeditionem tui libelli cum prima mei, priusquam hac prae-
fatione insimulares amicum et simplicem et tuo nomini fauentem
liuoris simul et plagii. 70
Sed tuam aeditionem anteuertisse, finge me non latuisse
age, finge
finge me tam auidum gloriae vt amicum non verear compilare, quaeso
quid laudis erat hoc ai*gumentum inuenisse ? neque enim nos gignimus
prouerbia, sed recensemus. Artis medicae, astrologiae repertoribus
multum gioriae tribuitur quantulum autem laudis debetur ei qui e 75
:
1176. 100. nihUo F Corrig. : nihil F. 122. Latamerum if. 1176. tit.
K. D. . . A SECRETIS Om. H.
.
1175. 99. Perottus] See Ep. 117. 42^. preface may be dated in Aug. or Sept.
103 in praefutione] See 11. 19-20 of 117. mentionem Lei] This occui-s in
the passage quoted in the introduction a second preface to Pace, also dated
to this letter. 5 June i5i9,and prefixed to the .4rfa(/?a
113. non fuerimus iniqui] Cf. Ep. sacra (f". h, 49, in Froben's edition of
1210. 1-9. Jnly 1521 with praise of many nota-
,
of the town school since 1504. Both were already inclined to sympathy with
Luther, being attracted by his De captiv.itafe Bab>ilonica, which appeared 6 Oct. 1520
(LE^. 350. 38); and in consequence were ejected by the Bishop of Kamin,
Erasmus Manteufel, in the spring of 1521 (Seckendorf, Comment. de Lutheranismo,
1692, i. 179). Knopken with some of his pupils withdrew to Reval and Dorpat ;
(Basle MS. C. VI"*. 71, f. i) shows that (Brewer iii. 127, v. 1249). On 20 Nov.
the Aldington punsion was paid after 1510 he sunplicated for incorporation
Wiirham's death, as late as Michael- as D.D at O.xford on a foreign degree :
ment in editing the ms. A note printed on the title-page invites the reader to
consult non veterem translationem, sed Desyderii Erasmi, quae iam omnium
'
fere manibus gestatur '. A copy of Knopken's book was in Aleander s libraiy :
See Thuanus, Hist. sui temporis, bk. 21 D. Gerdes, Hist. Reformationis ii (1746),
;
Russia, Galicia, and Transj'lvania, but who is described (f. A^) as tumul- '
Non displicuit carmen tuum quo mihi bene precaris atque ego tibi :
to survive. I can find nothing else of him but De totius orbis literatiss. viri
'
of a great nuuiber of poems on Erasmus. The elegy is reprinted near the end of
the introductory matter in LB. i. In a copy of N' in my possession is written
against Rhodus' name 'a. 2. octo. 1545' —
perhaps the date of his death.
To the position of this letter I can find no clue beyond the dates assigned in F.
At this point may bo mentioned a New Years present made to Erasmus by
another youthful admirer a copy of the Aldine Scriptores rei rusticae, May 1514,
:
parenti, Hugo Bolonius, Musai"um alumnus, don. ded. pro strena, Cal. lanu.
MDXxi '. The donor was perhaps a Hugo Bolonius, vvhose name is found in a list of
learned Dominicans, forming part of a catalogue of writers drawn up by Phiiip
Wolf of Seligenstadt (t 1529J see R. L. Poole in EHR. xxxiii. 515. The book
;
was shown to me in Feb. 1912 by Ihe Uite Dr. Dauiel, provost of Worcester
College, who then owned it. It has now been acquired by Prof. Campagnac
for the Library of the Department of Education at Liverpool University.]
5 quam sunt numerosi Sed quam mihi disphcui in tuo speculo, tam
!
tuum mihi placuit ingenium. Neque enim ilhc te minus vidi quam
meipsum ac libentius tuam faciem contemplatus sum quam meam.
;
[The preface to the Paraphrase on the Epistlesof St. John, in the volume from
which Ep, 1171 comes.]
the signature and the final year-date, odauo, are by Sadoleto himself, \vho adds
on the verso of the next leaf Exemplum breuis ad Erasmvmi '. In the upper
'
right-hand corner is a contemporary note, cum litteris ig Martii 1521 '. As the
'
For Leo's relations with Erasmus at this time see Pastor viii. 255-7. The
suggestion made guardedly here, that Erasmus should intervene on the Papal
side against Liither, was put forward much more definitely five months later in
Ep. 1213. Aleander was indignant at such an indication of Papal favour
towards Erasmus whom at this time he considered to be worse than Luther,
;
and indeed the cause of most of the trouble in Lower Germany and the Nether-
lands (Balan nos. 21, 32).]
F f 2
436 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [152
[The preface to the Paraphraso on Hebrews. Of the first edition, which was
by Martens at Louvain, Jan. 1521 (a), I know only one cop.y in tlie Bil)!. :
Nationale at Paris (A. 18182. 4). In the subsequent Froben editions enumerated
on p. 123, there are only changes in those of March 1521 (13), May 1522, octavo (7),
and 1523 (S). In 1532 and all the editions that follow, this preface was omitted ;
and in consequence it does not appear in Lond. or LB. For the omission I
cannot conjecture any reason. Gigli died shortly after this preface was written ;
and there appears to have been no such ground as led to the suppression of
Ep. 956.]
1X80.23. adpos^eta^: om. /3. 27.07: possinuis ^S^. 35. xv a : ii/3: xvi^.
1181. 7. oflficia] Cf. Epp. 447 introd., 521, 567, 649, 1079.
iiSi] TO SYLVESTER GIGLI 437
TFor the forms of lieading and address see Ep. 1085 introd. Leclerc dates in
15 17 but apart from consideration of Enismus' movements at that time, the
;
1181. 12. Varronis] ^. J?. i. i. i; cf. had already answered Ep. 1095 in
Adag. 1248. Sept. with Ep. 1139 ; so that it is not
1182. 2. expostulas] This passage is clear why he should now refer to it
ratherobscure. Thereferenceappearsto again. The following explanations are
be to Ep. 1095. 5-7, where Pirckheimer po.ssible. If Ep. 1139 had not reached
comphiins that lie liad never received Pirckheimer, he might have written
Ep. 856 (1. 3n), but h.ad onlyseen it in saying that again he had no answer to
print in the Farrago (E). But Erasmus his letter (meaning Ep. 1095) a com-;
438 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [152
[1521 is tlie onlj' year possible between tlie issue of Exsurge, Bomine J. 115) and
tbe publication of F. As this letter clearly answers Ep. 1154, I have assignod
to it an address (11. 144-5) written by Erasmus himself, at the foot of the
MS. of Ep. 1154, immediately below Artlebus' signatiire. It is noticeable that
before deciding on Boscoioid (1. 144 as the form of this doubtless strange name,
Erasmus began Boz, but then scratched it througii. The anonymous heading
(cf. Ep. 1127 tit. n) given in F probably arose from Erasmus' omission to prefix
Artlebus' correct name and titles to the rough draft, from which, of course, this
letter was printed and for the subsequent editions he was no doubt unable to
;
reach its destination. Or perhaps l)ut he was obdurate, and in time the
Pirckheimer, finding no mcntion of recantation was enforced. Meanwhile
Ep. 856 in Ep. 1139, had raised the afresh mandate, dated^ Jan. 1521, was
subject agaiu in a recent letter. forwarded the nuncios (see P. Balan,
to
1182. 3. responsio] Erasmus clearly ilfon. Ee/onn. 1884, pp. 17-21,
i/M</je?-anae,
is referring to Ep. 856, which answers 274-5), informing them that absolution
Ep. 747. to the offenders would only be granted
4. citatum] Eck in publishing the at Rome. See also Ep. 1244. ^n.
Bull(Ep. ii4i.2on),which commanded 9. lapidor] Cf. Epp. 1176. 12, 1185.
Luther to recant (^cf. Ep. 1153. 3511), 10, 1203. 14-17, 1216. 75-6, 1263.41 3.
had received the power to put into it 10. copulor] Cf. Epp. 1155. i8n, 1192.
other persons as well and had pro- ; 31-2.
ceeded to inscrt the names of Hutten, 12. officere] Cf. Epp. 1183. 59-61,
Pirckheimer, and Laz. Spengler, also 1192. 13-15.
1183] TO (ARTLEBUS OF BOSKOWITZ) 439
super hac re nonnihil cum Cardinale Campegio, viro nec indocto nec
inhumano, cum apud nos esset, ac post cum nuncio quodam Ponti-
ficio. Vterque sat benigne respondit, bonam spem ostendens
sarciendae concordiae. Mihi maiorem etiam spem facit huius Leonis 20
nostri clemens ac pacis cupidissimum ingenium, si modo suo mallet
vti ingenio quam quorundam affectibus obsequundare, qui nec illius
dignitati mea sententia consulunt, et publicam orbis vtilitatem suis
priuatis commodis posthabent.
Porro quod a me ceu regulam quandam petis, cui scribis plus 25
autoritatis fore apud tuos quam si Eomanus Pontifex obuibret sua
fulmina, me iam dudum abhorrentem a negocio, cui nec autoritate
par sim nec eruditione, magis etiam deterret. Et haud scio an vllo
queas argumento me magis alienare ab eo ad quod conaris inuitare.
Quis enim ego sum vt de aliena fide pronunciem, aut decernam 30
aliquid praeter id quod decreuit ac sequitur Ecclesia Catholica ?
Quod si mihi constaret perperam aliquid decretum esse ab Ecclesia
Romana, fortasse rogarem aut reuerenter admonerem, si daretur
occasio absit autem vt mihi quicquam decernendi fiduciam arrogem.
:
Ego studiis meis nihil aliud conatus sum quam vt bonas literas pene 35
sepultas apud nostrates excitarem deinde vt mundum plus satis
;
17. Campegio] See Ep. 1062; and, veteris ac nimium ad sophisticas argu-
for their intercourse while Campegio tiasprolapsaotheologiaepertesus, sitire
was in England, Epp. 961. 995, 996, fontes Euangelicac doctrinae '.
440 LETTEES OF EKASMUS [1521
50. Nicolaitarum] See Ep. 1021. 97. 70. Petrus] i. 2. isseq. Cf. Erasmus'
51. Pygardorum] See Ep. 1021. i8in. paraphrase on the jiassage.
54. istis]The monks and friars. 84. Romae praesideret] Cf. Ep. 950.
60. idiotis] Cf. Ep. 1153. i^in. 54.
66. clementiae] Cf. Epp. 1199. 33, 89. scandala] Cf. Matt. 18. 7, Luke
1203. 23. 17. I.
1183] TO (AETLEBUS OF BOSKOWITZ) 441
illud dicam, si Leo sciret quae nos videmus et audimus, aut prorsus
me fallit mea de illo opinio, aut haberet illis pro sua saedulitate non 100
optimam gratiam. Cum Luthero mihi nihil intercedit preter
Christianam amicitiam quod vti verissimum est, ita saepenumero
:
sum testatus. Ego nec autor illi sum nec j)atronus nec actor nec
iudex. Nec eadem scripsimus, opinoi*, nec eodem modo. De spiritu
illius nolo, nec meum est, ferre sententiam. Xec illius admodum 105
multa legi. videlicet meis studiis abunde distentus. Nihil illius
vnquam nec impugnaui nec defendi tantum ahcubi in illo de- ;
tem orbis ' illum identidem appellantes, cum interim nec docerent
hominem meliora nec refellerent nec aliud effecerunt suo tumultu
:
hostem iudicant, quod alicubi scripserim eos non recte facere qui sic
argutiis Scoticis incumbunt vt non attingant fontes diuinae sapientiae 120 ;
97. praedicatoiuni J' : Dominicanoi'um if. loo. aut add. F Corrig. 112.
identidem illum X 122. monachalis i^ : monasticae J?.
103. sum testatus] Cf. Ep. 1153. 1911. but Ep. 296 had circulated (cf. Ep. 304.
104. iudex] Cf. Ep. 1033. 58 cr. n. 82-8 See also Epp. 858. 372-5, 493
.
III. asinum] Cf. Epp. 1144. 41, 1192. seq., 1171. 85-7, 1196. 330-2, 1202.
33-4. 219-20, 1263. 28-9.
BuUa] Cf. Ep. 1141. 2on.
115. 124. veram pietatem] Cf, Ep. 296. 72
119. scripserim] Ep. 456. 242-8. seq.
121. a Tlioma] Cf. Ep. 1126. 262^. 127.non legisse] This story is related
122. adolescentes] Cf. Epp. 296. 28- with more detail in Epp. 1144, 1192,
40,447. Neither letter was yet printed 1212.
442 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
cpia cle re librum abs te conscriptum ex hoc qui has reddit cognoui.
Quid optari poterat a fortuna quod illi non affatim fuerat vltro
hirgita ? Generis antiquissima stemmata tura patruus sic apud ;
1183. 137. petra] Cf. Matt. 7. 24, 5, nim ; see Ep. 1073. ^in.
Luke 48 also Matt. 16. 18.
6. ; 8. patruus] Chievres : see Ep. 532.
1184.2. Guilhohnorum] Cf. Ep. 1003. 27^.
34n. 13. nec oderat] Cf. Ep. 647. 23.
3. Croius] t6 Jan. 1521 see Ep. 647
: 14. Viues] See Epp. 927 introd, 958.
inti"od. 114.
6. librum] Becontemptn rerum fortuita- 16. literas] BE''. 83 ; dated 10 Jan.
1184] TO WILLIAM BUDAEUS 443
offensus officio meo. Quod si est, fac mihi hominem reconcilies, cui
me volebas conciliare.
Tanta hic est rabies quorundam monachorum aduersus bonas
literas, vt iam taedia sint verius quam studia. Ego Praedicatorum
conuiciis lapidor quotidie, in publicis etiam concionibus quae si ;
lo
paterer pro negocio fidei, non cesserim vel ipsi protomartyri Ste-
phano. Semel ille lapidatus finem inuenit malis et saxis ille ;
duntaxat impetitus est. Ego nec vno in loco nec semel lapidor
mendaciis et conuiciis letali veneno tinctis atque haec dum agunt, :
1184. 20. epistoIaMori] The reply to 27. Qui hiisce reddit] I cannot
the Antimorus see Epp. 1087 introil.,
; identify this William.
1096. i2in. 35. pisculcntorum] Lent had begun
22. Caletii] See p, 296. on 13 Fc)).
24. pollicitus est] Cf. Ep. 1096. 102 1185. i. literis] Cf. Ep. 1184. 16.
3 eq. 5- Hueo] See Epp, 989. ^n, 1003.
25, Hutteni] Cf. Ep, 11 19. 33^. 10. hipidor] Cf. Ep. 1182. on.
444 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [1521
nunc ipsi fidem faciunt. Et tamen tanta est caecitas vt vel suo
malo laedere cupiant.
Lutherus maxima inuidia grauat et nos et bona studia. Nemo
20 nesciebat Ecclesiam fuisse grauatam et tyrannide et ceremoniis et
decretis humanis ad quaestum repertis. lamque multi remedium
vel optabant vel meditabantur sed saepe parum dextre tentata
;
only year in which Erasmus was at Louvain in Febriwry after the publication
of the Captiuitas Bahylonica (L 7).]
[M. Delanielle (BE*. 48, n. i) proposes to change the year-date to 1520, which
is the only other year possible apparently in order to sliorten the interval
:
between Bartolini's visit and this letter. I cannot confirm 1521 but, in default ;
of stronger argument against it, it may stand. Ruffus' Boethius (r. infra) suggests
a continuance of Bartolini's relations with the North in 1521.
—
Lorenzo Bartolini (c. 1494 May 1533) belonged to an important Florentine
family, the Bartolini Salimbeni. As early as 1505 Julius ir allowed him to
receive a benefice and during his life, though residing at Florence, he amassed
;
tanus') and Erasmus at Louvain, 15 Oct. 1519 (see Ep. 914 introd.) and gaining ;
friendship for Longolius Bembo writes, 29 May {1520.) (Lo. E. f. 153 v") and ,
through whom tlie ms. of Longolius' Defensiones reaehed Paris for Petit, Gourmont,
and Gromorsus to print, 1520 (Panzer viii. 65). Two letters of Longolius in May-
June (1522) show that he was then in Florence (Lo. E., ff. 143 v°, 144). G. Ruffus
(Roussel) in dedicating to him Boethius' Arithmetica, Paris, S. Colinaeus, 1 1 July
1521, describes liim as 'virtutum ac literarum antistes',and thanks him for long
continued kindness.
See a not vei-y accurate notice in Ildefonso di S. Luigi's Istoria genealogica de''
BarioUni Salimbeni, pp. 355-61, 371, in an appendix to vol. xxiii of his Delizie degli
1786 ; and Th. Siniar in Musee Belge, xv (191 1), pp. 148, 170.]
eruditi Toscani,
[For the sources see Ep. 1092. Here too tlie year-date, thouglx correct, is
evidently an addition by the editors of LB.
As the letter is written from Mechlin, Erasmns was presumably on his way
between Antwerjj aud Louvain, and returaing for, if he had been going towards
;
the Hague, whither this letter was addressed, he would perhaps nothave needed
to write hastily for a messenger going in his own direction. He was at Antwerp
in February or March 1521 Ep. 1189. ^n^i, and again in April (Ep. 1199).
'
From
the connexion with Ep. 1192 I phice tliis conjecturally on the return fz'om the
earlier visit. Erasmus had recently corresponded with Everard see Ep. 1 186.]:
1187. TiT. ABBATi] Evideiitly Eras- cited above, selects the same points for
mus, like Budaeus, was not sure of the praise.
name of Bartolini's abbey. 6. Italus homo] Cf. Ep. 11 10. 67^.
2. indolem] Budaeus, in the letters 8. qui mores] Cf. Hor. A. P. 142.
1188] TO NICHOLAS EVERARD 447
et bonas litteras, quod quidem in ipso fuit. Rursus qui illum im- 5
pugnant, tam stolide rem gerunt vt videantur cum Luthero colludere.
Siessem capitalis hostis lacobitis quibusdam et Carmelitis, non
optarem illis aliam mentem quam habent. Nuper Antuerpiae Mi-
norita quidam, attractus in coniurationem, coepit insanire apud
populum nomen homini Matthias
: Hollandus est. lussus est ; 10
a magistratu praedicare Euangelium in concione proxima dixit, :
'
Euangelium vos docet pastor vester, etiamsi pridie dormisset cum
scorto '. Has belluas alit mundus vsque ad delicias, imo vsque ad
tyrannidem. Aduersus hos non video aliud remedium quam vt
subducatur illis liberalitas, nee admittantur in aedes bonorum 15
virorum. Adolescentes a parentibus, foeminae a maritis edoceantur,
et pastoribus suis confiteantur. Destituantur concionantes ab audi-
toribus imo cum sic incipiunt debacchari, surgant plerique et abeant
:
silium, Minimus digitus meus maior est dorso patris mei, etc.
Aleander plane maniacus est, vir malus et stultus. Antonius Puc-
cius apud Eluetios homo mire est iracundus et impotens. Parisiis
duo potissimum impugnant Lutherum Querquo Normannus, seni- ;
5. lionas om. 13. 7. essent capitales hostes ^. 12. pridem dormiuisset (3.
14. Aduersus hos a : Adusque hoc /3. 17. et scripsi, Epp. 373. 3, 444. 17/m
cf. :
vt a/3. 18. imo a : Tunc /3. 21. fuerat /3. 24. Card. i8. 25. Aloandro /3.
26. etc. oni. )3. 27. Aloander /3. 28. : Heluetios a. iracundus n .
[The close connexion with Epp. 1174, 1190 is obvious. An approximate date
is given by Erasmus' visit to Antwerp (1. 5n).]
1188. 30. Beda **** (i. 32. in mandatis a : mandatuni B. 33. Sedis a :
satis /3. 36. Aloander /S. 40. Haec a : Hoc 13. 44. /3 : Mechlinia a.
bus meis quod tui videor oblitus. Habeo tibi tres Philippicos hi ;
dabuntur in quos voles vsus. To. Bt/3/\ia non minoris emitur quam
decem florenis nec habentur in praesentia Antwerpiae.
; Meum 5
volumen mitto, quod tamen mox a Paschate repetam: nam mihi
erit opus, si tibi non erit magnopere vsui. Valde flagitabatur a
quibusdam Minoritis sed tibi malo gratificari, siquidem res est
;
1189. 4. Bt/3Xt'a] Cf. Ep. 1174. 14-17. Sanderus, Chorographia sacra Brahantiae,
5. Antwerpiae] Erasmus had been 1727, ii. 124 ; and Horawitz v. 49, 53,
there recently for Diirer notes in his
; 56, 72, 80, 93.
Tagebuch (ed. F. Leitschuh, 1884, p. 75) Someverses given by Sanderus, sta-
between 12 Feb. and 10 March Ich :
'
ting that he was a monk for ten Olym-
hab ein mahl mit maister Peter
. . . piads and lived for four lustres besides,
secretary (gessen), do Erassmuss Ro- seem to indicate that he was only 60
deradamus auch mit ass The visit '. when he died. If so, it must be in-
wasperhapsmadebetween 1-13 March ferred that instead of two tenures of
(Epp. 1187, 1192). office by the same person, thei*e were
6. Pascliate] 31 March 1521. two Priors of the same name. But
8. Minoritis] Cf. Ep. 1174. i^n. possibly an Olympiad is to be taken
Augustini] See Ep. 844. 255^.
9. there as five years as it is by Thos.
;
1190.
5. Arnoldo] John Aerts or Radinus (Ep. ii67.4o8n),whoseSu/eraZ<s
Arnoldi 1,^27 Sept. 1537; of Nosseghem, (ibyssus is said to have been printed in
between Brussels and Louvain, was the tirst year after the^o^nd Olympiad
Priorof Val St. Martin c. 1493 to 1497, from the Nativity (1511). On such a
when he resigned because of ill-health calculation Jo. Arnoldi would have been
and went asRector to a convent of nuns, 70 at death.
Bethany nearLeeuwSt.Pierre.N.ofHal. 6. Paraphrases] Doubtless Froben's
About 1509 he was again elected Prior, collected edition of March 1521 (p. 123);
and remained in office till hc died. He for the completion of which cf. Ep.
added some fine buildings to the monas- 1177. 44-7.
tery but his detractors nicknamed
; 9. e Wormacia] Sucli as he shortly
him Prior platteborsse
' See A. '
received, in Epp. 1197,8.
«2-4 Q
g
450 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
i5o£, dedicated to him. After studying at Louvain (cf. 1. isn) Louis took part
in the struggle with Gueldres in 1507. His honours and appointments were
—
numerous : 20 AiJril 1515 15 Jan. 1522, Gi'and Bailifi" of Ghent 1517, member ;
of the Privy Council ; 1522, special ambassador to England (cf. Epi>. 1281, 1286)
—
6 Nov. 1523 6 May 1549, Grand Bailifi' of Bruges ; 1530, after tlie death of
Gattinara (p. 359^ one of the four ministers on whom the government devolved ;
1531, Kt. of the Golden Fleece 1544, Governorof Holland, Zeeland, andUtrecht
;
' de quo dubites litterisne sit ornatior an stemmatis ' (Lond. xxii. 24, xxviii. 23 ;
I. Claua] The last trace extant of his 6. veteris promissi] PerLaps made
correspondence with Erasmus up to when Erasmus was at Ghent in June
this date is in Ep. 841. 1517 ; see Ep. 597. i6n.
ii9i] TO LOUIS OF FLANDERS 451
Merula when his book was well advanced in printing and was inserted,
;
any distinction from the proper numeration which follows. Merula's note traces
the descent of Ct. Philip'3 wife from Maximilian of Buren (I. 8in) and thus ;
suggests that the letter after receipt may have been given by Alexander to the
boy to treasure.
Herminjard (33) in printing an extract from this letter, changes the month-
—
date to 13 May an easj' correction —
following Merula in referring Charles'
,
mandate (I. 66n) to the Imperial Edict of 8 May (see Ep. 12x7. 144«), instead of
to the Mechlin proclamation. But Erasmus' language may quite well apply to
anticipations and from the opening of the Diet Aleander had been endeavour-
;
should be made of the resemblance in II. 21-3 to the passage about Luther in
Ep. 1202. 220-3, written afterthe appearance of the I* ari fiBeterminatio on 15 April.
Alexander Schweiss (f a. 2 Nov. 1536) of Herborn is only known from this
date onwards ; though he is perhaps the youth to whom Erasmus took a fancy
in 1520 (Ep. 1119. i). In 1522 he accompanied Ct. Henrj'- of Nassau to Spain ;
where he was raised to the nobility by Charles v, 23 June 1523, and on 26 Aug.
1524 was aijpointed an Imperial Secretary at Valladolid (Caballero, pp. 309, 357).
Some letters from him, 1526-9, to Ct. Wm. of Nassau (Ep. 147. ^Sn) are printed
by J. Arnoldi in Historisclie Dcnkwilrdigheiten, 1817, pp. 222-6 others to Pirck- ;
heimer, 1526-30, are in P. pp. 265, 264, 330, cf. p. 398. In Charles' service he
took partin the negotiations for the settlement of religious difficultiesat Piaeenza
and Augsburg, 1529-30, In 1533 he left the Chancery whore he was suc- ;
1191. 57. flosculum] Cf. Ep. 1184. 4. church of St. Andrew at Tournus 'do
1192. I. Cognatus] Of Erasmus'kind- singulieret exquisouurage, faictsde la
red very little is known. His brother diuinemont docte main de rexcellent
Peter (Ep. 3) was perhaps still living ;
peintre. maistre Guerard Gregoire
andinEp. 330. 10-13 thereismentionof Hollandois, compatriote et parent
arelation. Besides these another kins- d'Erasme deRoterdam'. This Gregoire
man has recontly been brought to my is anobscure figure. None of his works
noticebymyfriend, Dr. Williani Hunt. have been certainly identified but a :
vicissim negocium exhibeo. Cui-are te rogo, si aut non est spes, aut
spes est vehementer exigua, liberes eum inutili spe. Nam mihi est
aliud quod agam.
Lutheri libros non lego nihil est mihi rei cum homine nisi quod
:
5
est cum quouis Christiano. Certe correctum hominem mallem quam
exstinctum. Et si quid veneni serit in vulgus, nemo melius retrahet
quam qui infixit. Nec obsto, si vel assum malint Lutherum vel
elixum. Leuis est vnius hominis iactura. Sed tamen tranquillitati
publicae consulendum est. 10
Qui hoc negotium agunt, calido ifiagis quam salubri consilio,
vtinam tam prudenter faueant dignitati Romani Pontificis quam
videntur fauere sedulo Hic certe nemo magis officit Pontificiae
!
agitur per monachos quosdam, inter quos nullus est habitus vir
bonus. Bulla iubet vt praedicent aduersus Lutherum, hoc est vt
opiniones illius refellant testimonio sacrarum iitterarum, ac diuersa
melioraque doceant. Nunc nullus est qui sumat calamum ad re-
fellendum illum, quum id efflagitant omnes nullus redarguit 20 ; ;
5. lego O^ LB : legi 0\
Chalon-sur-Saone is printed by Jules episode similarly, except thatLutheris
CTuillemin in Matiriaux d'archeologie, pp. named in place of the MiDorite (ef.
69 seq. (less accurately by others) from 1. 26nn).
9. elixum] Cf. Ep. 1195. 43. by Bocking, Hutteni Opp. iv. 485-514.
14. chimantj Cf. Ep. 1167. 374^. There is a copy of the Misocacus at
17. Bulla] Cf. Epp. 1141. 2on, 1144. Schlettstadt (Cat. Rhen. 199).
2on. Minoritam] Perhaps Bernardinus
22. confessionem] See Ep. 967. 97^ ;
Ochinus (c. 1487-1564) of Siena, a
cf. also Ep. 1202. 222n. man of adventurous mind, who won
lacobita] Cf. Ep. 1153. ii^n.
33. great fame as a preacher. Ho joined
Carmelita] This information is
25. the Observant Franciscans, but left
given alsoin Ep. 1212. 27-31. I cannot them to study medicine. After re-
identify the preacher. A letter to joining he lield high office in the
Corn. Agrippa from Annecy, 10 Sept. Order. In 1534 he went on to the Ca-
1521 (Agr. E., pp. 786-7), reports the puchins; but hiter, under the influence
454 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [152
38. possein 0. Merulne tamen posset magis congrvum riclebatur : adiicit enim in
margine, 'Ita scriptum erat in Autographo vt ad Erasmum videatur referen-
;
dum '. Sed cf, Epp. 1 144. 47, 1212. 19, rbiEraxmus sibi consfat, idem dicens. 39. Episco-
pum scripsi, secundum Ep. 1144. 45, c/. A'^ p. 795: Epicopum 0: fmKamoi' LB,
memorfortasse Ar. Ach. 230,1. 55. plurimis O^ LjB pluribus O^.
: 63. recte
O^ : reeta O^. et in margine ' forte an recte ; quasi lapsus esset I. Ch-otius in transcribendo.
of J. Valdes, was drawn towards the 32. coniungant] Cf. Ep. 1182. 9-ro.
Reformers, and married c. 1545, finally 33. grues] Cf.Epp. 1144.41,1183.111.
achieving notoriety by his writings on 36. magistratu] Perhaps Cranevelt.
polygamy. See a life by K. Benrath, 41. Antwerpionses] Cf, Ep. 1144. 38.
translated by H. Zimmern, 1876 and ; 45. Minorita] Cf. Ep. 1188. 8-13.
NBG. 48. Louanii] Cf. Ep. 1144. 28-33.
29. Brugis] Cf. Ep, 1144. 39-48. 49. Paulum] Cf. Ep. 1 164. 57-8.
31. monachi] Cf. Ep. 1144. 21-2. 52. Fabrum] Cf. Ep. 1144. 32n.
1192] TO ALEXANDER SCHWEISS 455
a copy from his library at Williamscote. Its contents are three Elegiae protrepticae
detestantes errores mortaUxim et adhortantes ad veram pietatem : Elerjia prima in errores
hominum degenerantium et pro summo celestique bono varias falsorum bonorum specie^^
amplectentium incipit ; Elegia secunda in iuuenem luxuria deJJuentem, atque mortis ad-
monitio : Elegia tercia in diuitem auarum. These are followed by Ad Lesbium metrum
phaloecium hendecasyllabum de nvmmo themaiion after which come the Expostulatio
:
Jesu cum horaine suapte culpa pereunte and the iamliics Sub persona pueri lesu praesi-
dentis scholae Coleticae. The Elegiue and the hendecasyllabics had been printed in
the Sihia Canninum edited by Snoy at Gouda, 18 May 1513 (cf. i, p. 5. 33^ and
Ep. 190. lon) and perhaps again ^cf. 11. 9-10) quite recently (see below). The
;
Expostulatio (cf. i, p. 3. 29, 30) and the iambics appeared tirst with the Concio de
puero lesu, i Sept. (151 1) (cf. Ep. 175 introd.) and subsequently in many collec-
;
71. Principes O^ ijB : Princeps O^. 76. Turcae 0. Meinla in Qi^ scribit in
margine: 'Ita. vel Turcis, legendum videtur. In Autograiiho, multorum manibus
trito, hic rima est '.
Fredericq iv, pp. 43-5. Cf. also Ep. He was now on the point of retiring
121 7. r44n. from his oflfice.
74. Praedicatorum] Cf. Epp. 1006. 4n, filius] Maximilian of Egmont,
1196. 272-3. afterwardsCt. of Buren see Ep. 1018. ;
76. Turcae] Cf. Ep. 1041.28^. The well-bound Ghent volume which
79. Comiti] Henry of Nassau, now contains Ep. loio, belonged tohim. He
Governor of Holland and Zeeland : see was perhaps now a pupil of Goclenius.
456 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
If this view is correct, the preface here can be dated within narrow limits.
In addition to a there is another source for thispreface a ms. leaf {0) written —
by Hand A of the Gouda MSS. (see App. 9 in vol. i) and inserted in a copy of
the Confic. Epist. Formula (1. sn), Antwerp, M. Hillen, 23 July 1521, which has
recently (Jan. rgi8) come into mj' possession. As in other of the prefaces copied
by Hand A, the ms. variants are not decisive enough to determine whethev /3 is
derived from an independent source or was copied carelessly from tlie Progymna-
smata as printed in a. Hand A lieads liis copy with the words, Opuscuhmi *
furtiuas nihil est meum. Nec vnquam mihi quisquam notus fuit cui
nomen esset Petro Paludano,
Olim puer, quia minus valebam carmine elegiaco, coeperam excer-
cere me
ceu declamatiunculis aliquot in eo genere, et has semel atque
10 iterum euulgatas video, In quibus non intelligo quid sit quod
mereatur publicum, nisi forte vt exemplo pueri puerorum ingenia
prouocentur, vt malint excercere stilum in argumentis huiusmodi
[The preface to theDe coniemptu mundi epistola, quam conscripsit adolescens ingraiiam
ac nomine Theodorici Harlemei, canonici ordinis diui Augustini. Ex ipsius autoris re-
cognitione Louvain, Th. Martens, 1521 (a).
: The account thus given, and
amplified in this preface, is borne out by the description in 1, p. 18. 16-19. Luc.
Ind. distinguishes between the libellus now published, and a Declamafio in rtramque
partem, qua simul et dissuadet vitam monasticam, ac mox suadet which Erasnius had ;
it survive. St. Bernard's De cont>^mptu mundi was so popular that it was printed
seven times in the fifteenth century Innocent ni's De miseria conditionis humanac,
;
Avhich has thissubtitle, seventeen times. It may be noted, too, that the second
title of ch. i of the De Imitatione Christi is De contemptu omnium vanitatum
'
mundi '. Another may be mentioned from its similarity in circumstances to the
present case by John of Schoenhoven, Austin canon of Groenendael near
;
Brussels (cf. vol. i, p. 590) for his nephew, William Vriman, a Carthusian near
Utrecht the ms. of which was bought by Ferdinand Columbus (see p. 353) in
:
Gologne, Feb. 1522, and is now in the Colombina at Seville (5. 3. 32).
In addition to a I have collated an edition by Hillen at Antwerp, s. a., ()3).
Erasmus revised the treatise for reprint in the Froben De pueris instituendis, Sept.
1529 (7) for the loan of which I am again indebted to the generosity of Mr. T.
:
Loveday, jun., of Williamscote. In the Basle Opera of 1540, v. 1034 (5), there is a
variaiit in this preface which marks out tliat edition as the source of Lond.
The book itself contains no definite evidence of date. Verses from Kud.
Agricola and Hegius are quoted (chh. vi, ix), and there are frequent references
to Jerome. In ch. vii it is said that war has been going on continuously in
HoIIand for twenty-three years but I cannot find any certain term from which
;
to reckon this. Theodore of Haarlem was no doubt a real person (cf. II. 9-10),
tliough the names of him and his nephew may be fictitious. If Erasmus' memory
can be trusted, the treatise nuist have been written c. 1486 during tlie years ;
when he had returned to Gouda, and was in communication with, but hesitating
to enter, Steyn. For relations between Steyn and Haarlem see Ep. 33 intrud,
—
The final chapter perhaps, as Blok suggests (Hist. Netherlands, tr. R. Putnam, ii.
—
tempers much of what had been said
1907, pp. 298-9), added at a later date
tarlier in the book in praise of the monastic life, by calling attention to its
dangers.
For this preface only a conjectural date is possible within the limits of 1521.
It may be placed with Ep. 1193, which is also a preface to some of Erasmus'
earlier writings.]
119.3. 13. eruditi quidam /3. decantandis a : cantandis ;3. 17. Louanii
. . . 21°. add. /3. 1194. 2. aS: reclamanti )3.
[Perhaps contemporary with this were the letters which Erasmus addressed
to Aleander and Erard de la Marck, protesting against Aleander's conduct
{Spongia, LB. x. 16450 = HE. 333, § 133). If so, Aleander's reply mentioned in
the same passage may have been contemporary with Epp. 1197,8. Paquier,
J. Aleandre, p. 224, assigns them, also by conjecture, to Dec. 1520.
In Ep. 1342. 54-61 Erasmus mentions a series of letters to tlie Court about this
time, and replies from Gattinara, Schinner, Marlianus, Aleander, and verbally
from Erard de la Marck among which appear to be this letter and Epp.
:
1197,8. If that is so, his statement (Ep. 1342. 51-2) that tbe incident
occurred after the death of Chifevres (28 May 1521 Ep. 532. 27^) must be an :
error of memory.
For the attitude of the Court, and especially Marlianus, towards Erasmus at
this time see a letter of Aleander (Balan no. 21) from Worms, 12 Feb. 1521, to
the Vice-Chaneellor, Julius dei Medici, reporting that me ho trouato con grandi '
1195. I. amicorum] From Ep. 1482 shows that one of these was Capito
P. Kalkoff {W. Capifo, 1907, p. 42^) cf. Ep. 1199. 22-3.
1195] TO ALOISIUS MAKLIANUS 459
dicos, quos audio istic subinde nouos prouolare, aliunde alios. Scio 5
temporibus his regnum esse calumniae, nec vlla tempestate plus
licuisse effreni maledicentiae sed tamen apud eruditos. cordatos et
:
enim non faueat ei, qui proximus imitator Christi totum se impendat
sahiti populi Christiani ? Sed optarem illi cordatiores patronos. Isti
nihil aliud quam esuriunt Lutherum, nec mea refert elixum malint
an assum. Certe quod me negocio admiscent quod ad me nihil
attinet, et impie faciunt et pai'um prudenter : citius enim Lutherum 45
conficerent me non admixto.
8. R. D. T. F : te H. 29. me om. N.
47. in Aleandro] For Erasmus' rela- Lond. XXX. 58, LB. 1218.
tions with him since his arrival at 52. scriptis] See Adag. 1034 where ;
Antwerp in Sept. 1520 see Al. E. i. 36, the important passage was added in
Balan nos. 12, 14, 21, 32, 36, 102, 108, the Froben edition of Oct. 1520. Cf.
and Paquier, J. AUandre, pp. 165-71, also Epp. 269. 52-3, 756. 29-31, 868. 5 :
223 -g, 280-2. They opened with hesita- Ep. 735. 5 was not printed. By the
tion on both sides (p. 371) ; and timeEp. 1482 waswritten, which speaks
Aleander showed that he was pre- of Aleander's praises as uttered tribus '
pared to be conciliatory (cf. Ep. 11 72. aut quatuor Ipcis', the handsomewords
32n). But though Erasmus could some- in Apol. ad Shmicam (Matt. 4. i LB. ;
times write with an appearance of ix. 295D cf. Ep. 1256. 69^) and in i,
:
respect for his old friend (see Ep. 1165. P- 35- 13-14 J^^d been added to the
46n), he was now impelled to protest collection. Cf. also Spongia (LB. x.
vehemently in high places (cf. introd.) i645F-46a = HE. 333, §§ 137-8).
against the treatment he was receiving ;
An early estimate of Aleander by
Aleander on his side being annoyed by Erasmus is reflected in Croke's preface
repeated injunctions from Rome to to an edition of Pliny"s Letters, Paris,
show consideration for Erasmus, sucli G. Gourmont and H. Le Febure, July
as would retain him on the right side 151 1, 1°. B^ v". His praises rise to a
(Balan nos. 117, 122, 125, 127). Thus climax in describing Aleander as adeo '
forsome months there was a rupture. doctus, adeo invariis linguis etvniuersa
But in July 1521 came a sudden readi- encyclopaedia eruditus, adeo denique
ness on Erasmus' part for reconciliation placidus, benignus, humanus, vt te vel
(cf. Epp. 1219. 15-17, 1233. 171-5, 1236. vnum vniuersae Italiae anteponere
113, 185-6) to which Aleander re-
; Erasmus meus, vir vndecunque doctis-
sponded though without cordiality. sinius et doctoi-um virorum optimus
See also Epp. 1256. 30, 67, 1271, 1281. censor, non sit veritus '.
50. familiaritas] At Venice in 1507- 57. non inhumanum] Cf. Epji. 1153.
8 cf. Ep. 256. 3n. In a dispatch of
; 34-6, 1166. 82.
{c. I March 1521 Balan no. 36)
: 62. hausisse] For this contention
Aleander gives some details Vna :
'
cf. Epp. 1218. 22-3, 1219. 53, 1225. 214,
volta albergamo insieme a Venetia, 1236. 157.
Erasmo et io, in eodem cubiculo et 63. primus] Art. i of Luther's
cubili ben sei mesi, quando io legea li Assertio (Ep. 1203. 25^) maintains the
Morali di Plutharcho graeci, et lui non doctrine of justitication by faith : to
si dedignaua interesse lectionibus meis which Erasmus never gave any support.
quotidianis et dopoi sempre siamo
; 64. osse peccatum] as maintained
reputati amici, l'vno et laltro'. Cf. by Luther in Art. 32 of the Asseriio.
1195] TO ALOISIUS MARLIANUS 461
omnibus libris qui illius titulo circunferuntur. non est vlla syllaba
mea. Hoc quamlibet sancte deierare non dubitem.
A multis iam annis non mihi tantum perspecta est tua singularis
prudentia. perspectus animus in me candidus et amicus nota est ; 75
omnibus tua autoritas. Proinde te rogo vt aduersus istiusmodi
maliciosas cahnnnias patrocineris innocentiae nostrae. Excutiantur
omnia quae secretissimis etiam literis eflfudi in sinum amicorum,
fortasse liberius pro meo ingenio quam expediat nonnunquam excu- ;
consulentes non solum Christianae paci verum etiam illi cui viden-
tur fauere. Monere possum, cogere non possum. Mundus plenus
est officinis typographicis, plenus poetastris et rhetoristis. Quid
135 isti tumultuentur, vt mihi in manu non est, ita iniquissimum sit
mihi imputari temeritatem alienam. Atqiie hac sane in parte minus
sum iniquus Hutteno, etiamsi supra modum discrucior illud inge-
nium, illam in vtroque genere dicendi felicem venam, non dedicatam
esse felicioribus argumentis siquidem is suam phrasim suumque
:
116, Platonis] Bep. 3. 389A, 5. 459D. 137. Hutteno] Foi* Erasmus' intro-
121. me Luthero] Cf. Epp. 1154. 55 duction of liim to Marlianus see Ep.
seq., 1183. 133. On i March 1521 1114; and, for his present relations
Mutianus Rufus wrote to Duke with Erasmus, Ep. 1119. 33^.
Frederick about filliug the vacant 140. grauat inuidia] Cf. Ep. 1165.
preacliership at Wittenberg, * Cogita- 38-9.
bam de Erasmo, sed Erasmus tantum 144. adessem] Cf. Epp. 1189. in.
scribit': MRE^. 603, printed also in 1190. 8-9. In Ep. 1342. 45-50 Erasmus
ME. i. 391. states that he was invited to Wornis,
123. fidei regulam] Cf. Epp. 1154. but declined for fear of being involved
27-8, 1183. 25. in tlie affair of Luther also beeause
;
scire potuissem vos adhuc esse Vuormaciae. Sed mirum quam hic 145
nihil est certi, ne apud proceres quidem aulicos. Bene vale, prae-
sulum decus et aulae Caesareae non infimum ornamentum.
Augustino Scarpinello scripsi pridem. Ei quaeso vti meis verbis
salutem dicas, atque etiam Seuero, viro mitissimo maleque re-
spondenti suo nomini. ^5°
Louanii viii. Cal. April. anno m.d.xx.
[Au approximate month-date can be assigned from 151-2. The identity of tht»
11.
person addressed is obvious, even without the name left in 1. 315 probably by —
mistake, since an endeavour was made to disguise it in the Corrigenda. In later
years Erasmus made no secret of it (Lond. xix. 13, LB. 862) but, though that :
letter was published in H, he only replaced the concealing N of this letter, in ' '
the same edition, by a derisive and transparent pseudonym (cf. Ep. 1342. 139).
—
Vincent Theodorici (c. 1481 4 Aug. 1526) of Beverwyk, between Alkmaarand
Haarlem (cf. Ep. 1166. 42x1), joined the Dominicans at Haarlem, and was sent
for his education to Paris where he lectured on the Seutences, and in 1514 was
;
B.D. In the same year he dedieated to Michael of Pavia (Ep. 85. lon), who
until 1512 had been his patrou, an edition of Petrus do Palude's commentary on
Book 4 of the Sentences, Paris, F. Reguault and C. Chevallon, 23 Jan. 1518.
His preface commemorates Petiiis de Brussellis. a Dominican who had been his
tutor. Vincent also collaborated with another Dominican, Peter of Nymegen, in
editing Aquinas' Summa, pt. 3, Paris, C. Chevallon, 1514, a volume which
I have not seen. Subsequently he migrated to Louvain where he was Lic. ;
Theol. 30 June 1517 and Dr. 13 Oct., and was Dean of the Faculty 29 Aug.
1521. He was twice Regent of studies in the Dominican house there and in ;
Epp. 1144, 1164-6, ir86. Later, under the assumed name of Godefridus Ruysius
Taxander, he attacked Erasmus' Exomohgesis and De esu camium (see Ep. 1274. i^n)
with an Apologia, Antwerp, S. Cocus, 21 March 1525, dedicated to Erasraus'
former adversaiy, Edward Lee. For this Erasmus revenged himself by a
caricature ofVincent in the coWoqnY Fv.nus, first printed in Feb. 1526; which
represents the friar as hanging over a deathbed and settling the dying man's
will in favour of the mendicant orders (cf. Ep. 1162. 165-6).
See Val. Andreas p. 104 Launoius, Hist. Coll. Nauurr., 1677, P- 9^3 B. de Jonghe,
; ;
Desolaia Bataiiia Dominicana, i']i'], p. 66 ; and de Jongh, pp. 171-2, 41*, 46*.]
telo vlcisci affectus suos. Mox vbi tam multa hinc atque hinc
15 referrentur, quid alibi dixisses in conuiuiis, quid alibi in monasteriis,
quid alibi in plaustris aut nauibus, ita quidem credidi vera quae
narrabantur, vt tamen totum hoc quicquid esset rei, negh'gendum
esse ducerem. Et tu interim mihi blandus occurrebas, amice com-
pellabas, videlicet existimans ad me non peruenire quod tu nusquam
20 non spargeres.
Tandera cum me a solenni prandio, quod celebratum est apud
Augustinenses, vultu perquam amico rogares quid tibi mandarem
abituro in Hollandiam, mandaui tibi fraternam charitatem, hactenus
non satis abs te curatam videlicet ciuiliter ac blande submonens vt
;
qui ictus est. Hic quem semel venefica lingua percusseris, mederi
30 non potes et late serpit malum, semper plures arripiente contagio.
;
55 sentiens nos non recte illam liberare a peccato originis, si illi vere
23. iuHollandiam] For his reception 32. adirem] Cf. Ep. 1166. 45.
there Ep. 1164. 73^.
cf. 41. indignum] Ct. Ep. 1126. 262^.
27. scorpius] Cf. Ep. 1013. 1-2. 52. Virgini] Cf. Ep. 1126. 294^.
1196] TO VINCENT THEODOEICI 465
praecesserat ', cum Latinis 'in totum' sonet 'in genere', hoc est non
solum in hac materia verum etiam in aliis similibus nimirum ;
secundae parti de qua tunc agebatur, quae nec argumentis nec 7-5
63. citassem] Annot. in i Cor. 11. 24 : added in 1519. Cf. Ep. 1126. 305-33.
102, Bulla] See Ep, 1141. 2011.
AM.* H h
466 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [152
Charitas omnia sperat rursus adii te, solus expostulaui cum solo,
'
',
iio paulo quidem liberius, sic enim i'gs poscebat, sed tamen araanter.
Hic tu inficiatus quod sciebam esse verissimum, causabaris aliud,
videlicet a me scriptas ad Cardinalem Moguntinensem literas, quibus
perstrinxissem ordinem vestrum. Nec puduit te fateri ]itei'as eas
tibi non fuisse lectas, ob quas tantopere stomacharere nihilo ;
115 verecundior illo sodali tuo Nicolao Egmond. Carmelita, qui cum
digna atque indigna vociferatus esset in Nouum Testamentum a me
recognitum, vbi Louanium commigrassem, et hominem a prandio
subinde rogarem vt coram indicaret quae offenderent in opere nieo,
respondit homo simplex sibi nunquam opus lectum fuisse. Obticui,
120 suspicans illum non esse tam ignarum dialectices quin intolligeret
quid ego ex talibus praemissis colligerem. Odiosissime clamauerat
venturum Antichristum, nec legerat vnquam quod damnabat.
Sed de epistohi mox ; interim ordinem rei gestae persequar. Ac
tum quidem vbi te commonefecissem officii tui. discessi, nec
125 admodum sperans te fore meliorem, nec tamen omnino desperans.
Paucis post diebus loannes Fabei', ordinis tui sodalis, cui vtinam
tam similis esses eruditione, moribus prudentiaque quam es similis
cuculla et pallio, retulit mihi quemadmodum te super hac re
admonuisset vel obiurgasset potius nam illi forte rem vt habebat :
105. quodam] Egmondanus ; cf. Ep. also in Ep. 948. 136-43; cf. Ep.
1144. 28nn. 1162. 88-9.
107. deplorato] Cf. Ep. 994. 2in. The 123. mox] 1. 206.
reference here is evidently to i Tim. i. ia6. Faber] He
visited Erasmus at
20, but is not verbal. Louvain c. 3 Oct. 1520 see p. 357.
:
clementer. Cum Dordraci nescio quid tumultus aceidisset tibi post 145
concionem, et curriculo te Louanium recepisses, nondum satis
promptus pro fide capitis subire periculum, clamitabas, vt aiebant,
hoe quoque mihi meisque literis imputandum cum mihi Dordraci :
nemo mortalium sit notus, imo cum de Luthero nulli tum scripsissem
apud Hollandos, neque bene neque male. 150
Nec his contenta animi tui virulentia, ante paucos dies natali
S. Thomae Aquinatis subornatus est iuuenis ordinis tui, qui bello
commento meam infamiam cum Thomae gloria misceret. Edidicerat
adolescens centonem verius quam orationem, quam non intellectam
velut psitacus recitaret. Quam enim intellexerit vel hinc promptum 155
est colligere, quod, cum referret ex Horatio, Feriuntque summos •
145. post concionem add. H. 159. est ciconia conia N. 161. suggesto
]I :
<:f. Ep.
1062. 8on. 168. N. F : Bucentes //. 174. X. F: Bucenta //.
177. atque id etiam aegre add. II. 188. laudatur H.
145. tumultus] Cf. Ep. 1164. 73. 156. Horatio] C. 2. 10. rr, ra.
^51. natali S. Thomae] 7 March. 159. Plautino] Trnc. 688-9^.
152. iuuenis] I cannot identify. i6g. inipostor] Cf. Ilier. Ej). 38. 5.
II h 2
468 LETTEKS OF EEASMUS [1521
204. Moriae] Cf. Ep. 1 164. 3. 225. Bernae] Cf. Ep. 1033. 25011.
206. epistolam] Ep. 1033. 231. myriades] Cf. Ep. 830. 7,8.
1196] TO VINCENT THEODOKICI 469
tum agebam, postulabat. Quid autem accidisset etiamsi data ocea- 240
sione meminissem ? An mundus ignoraturus erat, si solus ipse
siluissem ?
Secus est si nullum ordinem licet attingere. At vos ipsi principes,
magistratus. episcopos, abbates, palam ac libere incessitis, nonnun-
quam etiam seditiose, neque putatis aequum vt quisquam vos ea de 245
causa in ius trahat, quod intactis personis rem insectemini. In nuUos
libentius inuehimini quam in pastores Dominici gregis custodes.
Pauci dies sunt quod Antuuerpiae monachus quidam (parcetur
ordini) monitus a magistratibus vt doceret Euangelium, a seditiosis
clamoribus abstineret, iu publica concione dixit lubent inquit,: ' ' 250
'vt praedicem Euangelium at isthuc audire licebit a paroehis
;
vestris, etiamsi pridie dormierint cum magno scorto '. Hoc non
minus obscoene dictum quam seditiose sibi ignoscunt, nec imtant
iniuriam ordini factam, quem haud dubie Christus instituit, Et tu
meditaris actionem laesae maiestatis, si quis per occasionem attingat ^55
Praedicatorem aut Carmelitam ? Si cuiquam titulo parcendum erat,
Christiani titulo parcendum erat neque leuis est causa, ne detur
;
248. monachus quidam] See Ep. mus, and in Epp. 483. 26, 948. 137,
1188. 8n. ^033. 80 110 name is given. The new
252. magno scorto] Cf. Rov. 17. i, letters to be includcd in F (see Ep.
19. 2. 1206 canbardlyyet have l)eenselectad.
271. nomen] This is true enough 273. faueo] Cf. Ep. 1006. ^n.
for Ep. 878 was never printed by Eras- 274. Thomae] Cf. Ep. 1126. 262^.
470 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
suasum habens, quae faeiunt isti, oiJtimo cuique eius ordinis impro-
280 bari. Et tamen id faciunt tam multi tamque impune, vt homini
suspicioso videri possint procerum iussu facere quod faciunt. Et
post haec me fingis hostem oi'dinis, qui verius illi faueo quam tu
cum tuis sodalibus? An protinus vindicaueris honorem ordini tuo,
si me dehonestaris, aut illum candidum feceris, si me feceris nigrum ?
285 Si vere studes ordinem tuum conimendare bonis omnibus, fac vt
easdem dotes renouet quibus olim et natus est et propagatus et
commendatus orbi: vitae integritatem, sanctimoniam non fucatam,
contemptum mundi, doctrinam Euangelicam, mansuetudinem Chri-
stianam. Haec sectantibus fauebunt, applaudent, bene ominabuntur
290 omnes. Nunc quae dedecora subinde noua vulgo narrantur de vobis I
Quas passim audimus querelas, quae fiagitia quae vtinam aut essent
!
280. tam J-W^: or,i. N^^ 291. quae flagitia odrf. H. 295. FN^: Herma-
nus N^^. 296. Hochstrati N. 300. FN^ Hermanus N^.
: 309. ducens
F Corrig. i docens J^. 315. VincentiP: Vucentae J" Co>T2£r. : Bucenta if.
vestrum erat inculcare, quae nos admonuiraus. Nam si probi estis, 340
mauultis, opinor, pauciores, modo vere pios, quam multos quales-
cunque nihil enim dicam aliud in praesentia. Malo decem bene
:
'
an hac de causa venimus in tempkim, vt ociosi audiamus quid hic
385 aut ille stomachetur in alterum ? Nos domi relictis negociis huc
accedimus, vt audiamus Christum nobis loquentem e pectore sacer-
dotis, vt domum i^edeamus meliores, vt aliquid sacrae doctrinae,
aliquid bonae consolationis domum reportemus et in templo ;
dignum fraude putat eum qui pi'oditus est. Sed liuiusmodi senatus-
415 consulta vobis nascuntur inter pocula, et putatis orbi placiturum
quod duobus aut tribus compotoribus placuit. Pessime sentitis de
genere humano, si creditis haec probatum iri omnibus. Nondum
371. suggesto H : cf. r. i6i supra. 404. ]S'. F: Buceiita H.
425. etiam Cartusiensium] For Eras- 740 a,d). For friendsof his among the
mus' sense of tlieir special strictntss Carthusians see Epp. 308, 570, 1239
and sanctity cf. liis Apol. adu. debacch. another was John of Heemstede (see
F. hutoris, where he writes of them as Ep. 1646J.
'
vtie mundo mortui', ' ter quaterque 438. Fortuna] Cf. Ep. 1102. 6n.
mundouiortui ', 'religionisarctissimac 450. poetriam] Cf. Ep. 11 10. 15U.
474 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
467. incruentuml Cf. Ep. 967. i8i. in 1519: see Ep. 456. S^n. For his
468. pepercissel Cf. Ep. 950. I2n. 'primacy' among the theok)gians at
479. Saukim] Cf. Acts 7. 57-9. Paris cf. Ep. 1581, where he is ranked
489. theologum] Perhaps Aeg. of with Ber and Lethmatius (Ep. 1320
Delft who can be traced at Louvain
; introd.).
1196] TO VINCENT THEODORICI 475
talium hoc nobis persuasurus erat, nisi res ipsa persuasisset ac tibi ' :
nihil aliud precabantur quam mentem saniorem. Similis erat exitus 510
Antuuerpiae, cum in celebri conuiuio bonus ille lacobita, a melle
cognomen habens, cum nihil eructet praeter merum fel, negaret esse
sceleratiorem liaereticum in his regionibus quam esset Erasmus,
quibus auribus putas eam vocem acceptam? Quis non detestatus
•est hominis insaniam, praesertim ex his qui libros meos legerant? 5^5
Quis autem non detestatur et tuam illam vocem, Pestilens ille '
cunum J". 522. FN^ LB : nitentis FConig. Lond. 523. Sardonico if.
565 tum postea?' 'Ergo' inquit, omnia nostra nihil sunt.' Bellum
'
580 Quis ilh iudicabat esse sanum caput? Qui erant amicissimi, sic
excusabant quod a conuiuio dixisset. Sic fortasse leno poterat
excusari, non theoiogus. Cum omnibus bonis displiceret homo, sibi
tamen displicere non potuit. lam vero vt exhiberet suis camelum,
quod aiunt, saltantem, addebat auspicaturus Epistolas Pauli, Paulum
585 olim persequutum Ecclesiam Dei, sed e lupo factum ouem. Idem '
rhetoricem F Lond.
ita esse.' Ibi commotus homo Nolo inquit, fingere hoc vestrum
' ' '
;
ipse protinus alius haberetur quam semper fuit. Alteram vti 620
scriberem aduersus Lutherum. Haec si reciperem ac praestarem,
tum nos fore fratres sin recusarem, se perpetuo habiturum me pro
;
ad corpus Christi '. Quis bonorum est tam iratus Luthero vt non
oderit sacerdotem haec euomentem ?
Standicii fabulam tibi coram narraui, qui tam stolide gessit se 635
597. expostularem] See the vividdes- 618. syncei"es] Cf. Ep. 1162. 201.
cription given in Ep. 1162. 625. Prior Antuuerpiensis] Seb.
599. Balatro]Thebuffoon, asNomen- Craeys, with whom Erasmus liud
tanus was the parasite, of Hor. S. 2. 8. ah-eady had an encounter cf. Ep. 948.
;
quam quid inter pocula vnus aut alter applausor eiusdem farinae
655 comprobet. Quanquani istam effrenatam linguae petulantiam de-
testantur et tui gregis sodales, mihi quidem parum bene volentes,
sed qui hoc intelligunt ad sui ordinis dedecus atque incommodum
pertinere.
Ego non tam irascor tibi quam misereor atque hoc magis mi-
:
660 sereor, si tibi nondum es miserabilis. Bona pars sahitis est morbum
suum agnoscere. Si natura tibi negauit ingenium, vt euadas egregie
doctus ; si linguam, vt sis probus concionator si stilum, vt libris
;
1197. 19. librorum] Such as Fabers Consilinm : ior wliich see Ep. 1149 introd. ;
^1199
[Between Marlianns' return from Spain with Charles in .June 1520 (11. 7, 15)
aiid the publication of F.]
non fuisse redditas, cum eas maxime optarent. Habuisti tanien eos
tui nominis acerrimos defensores.
Vale Vuormaciae .vii. April. anno m.d.xxi. 55
F. Lauchert, Ital. Gegner Luthers, 1912, the dato of this letter, on lo-ii May
pp. 223-9, and 0. Clemen, Beitrdge zur (Lauchert, p. 222).
482 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [1521
[I cannot definitely confirm the year-date but from the position of this letter
;
near the end of F, 1521 is likely. If it had been written in 1519, it would
33. et add. N.
II. Gratiarum . . . nodum] Cf. Adag. thon, with his name at the end in
1650, 'poetae tres fingunt Gratias,. . . Greek see Ep. 1167. 4080.
:
Halen's life of Agricola, Epp. 23. 57^, 839. iin). By 1477 he was M.A. and
D.M.. and seeretary to the town of Groningen, and in 1484-5 he became curate
of St. Martin's churcii see A. G. Roos, Catalogus der Incunabelen of Groningen
:
Univ. Library, 1912, nos. 18, 34, 90, 139. For forty years he held a dominating
position in the town, guiding its internal affairs, and by his eloquence playing
the chief part in its diplomacy see Ubbo Emniius' Rerum Frisicarimi Hisforia,
:
Leiden, 1616. He retired from his cure at St, Martin's in 1525 and passed his
two remaining years in the house of his son (I. in) at Groningen.
In 1498 he began a history of Friesiand, of which a nis. copy exists in the
Archives at Groningen. See a life by W. Zuidema, 1888, and Ant. Matthaeus,
Vet. aeui Analecta, iv(i738),pp. 527-8^. D. Gerdes, Hisi. Beformationis, iii (1749^
Monumenta some extracts from the Lamentationes Peiri (Ep. 1236.
pp. 3-5, prints
i5on), which speak very highly of W. Frederici. He was a friend and patron of
Gerard Lister who sends greetings to him in dedicating his Commentarioli (Ep.
;
De iuuene reuocato non est quod mihi gratias agas, vir egregie.
Ob hoc officium nihil promereor laiidis sed impius eram futurus ;
praemium expectamus.
Mihi et illud arguit tuam j^ietatem, quod in sacrario bibliothecaui
adornas, iis potissiraum autoribus refertam quorum scripta spirant
35 Euangelicam charitatem quales sunt Origenes, Chrysostomus,
:
33. bibliothecam] Frederici left lus 304. 8911). Another is now in the
books to the church of St. Martin ;
Bodleian (A. 2. 9. 10 Th. Seld.) a :
and, from the anacoluthon in 11. 3-4, not fuUy revised. It may be dated shortly
after Boniface's return from Avignon at the beginning of May (cf. Epp. 1020.
54n, 1207. 29) no doubt earlier than Ep. 1207, since Alciati's request (1. 15^)
:
Iam vnus aut alter agitur annus, eruditorum decus Erasme, quo
studiorum legalium causa Auenionam profectus nihil litterarum ad
te dederim. Nunc domum reuersus, sic volentibus fatis ob immanem
pestilentiae luem, duplex sese offert ad tescribendi occasio. Quarum
cum vtraque per sese iusta sit, vtramque oblatam mirum in modum 5
gaudeo, dum tamen
interini vnius aut alterius anni silentium excu-
sauero, quod non tam magnorum tuorum studiorum causa, ne inter-
pellarere, quam nunciorum penuria factitatum est ; interim tamen
mea in te obseruancia et studio semper saluis atque in diem deuotiori-
bus : id quod testari poterunt quibuscum ego vixi, et inprimis 10
legalium studiorum nostre aetatis princeps, Andreas Alciatus. Is vt
est tuorum studiorum et praeco et aestimator egregius, ita inculputa
sua fide de meo in te studio testabitur.
Sed heus tu, inquis, quaenam illae scribendi occasiones ? A
Francisco Caluo Papien(si) tibi anteactis annis epistohi seu paraenesis 15
Alciati, nescio ad quem, exhibita est. Vna certe est quam ille idem
Alciatus praebuit a quo cum alias sepius viua voce, nunc litteris
:
[Between the Diet of Worms and the publication of F so that the : j^ear-date
is correct. For the purpose of this letter cf. Ep. 876 introd.]
amisit. Quid enim est aUud nostra religio quam pax in Spiritu
10 sancto Porro Christi Ecclesiam, quoniam adhuc pisces bonos et
'?
Boniface renewed the present eu- iussit. Quid enim ab eis non formi-
deavour for him ; and Alciati was dandum ?
In Dec. 1529 liis anxiety revived, and had come through Peter Scriverius.
lie once more begged Boniface to per- From the numerous papers connected
suade Erasmus to burn it (Basle MS. withErasmustliat Scriveriuspossessed
C. VI". 54. 56) and so again in Feb.
; (cf. vol. i, pj). 46, 575, 581, 598. and
and March 1531 (Basle MS. G. II. Ep. 913 introd. ), it may reasonably be
14. 87, 89). Erasmus looked tlirough inferred tliat this too liad come to him
his paperswithout tiuding it, and cou- from Erasmus'collections; butperhaps
cluded tliat he miist have burut it uot iuunediately, since the epistola as
years ago (Q. 23, 49; aiul Lond. xxvi. printed byMatthaeushasa dateaffixed,
6, LB. 1177) news wliich, when ciin-
: '7. Jun. 1553. spat. 4. dier.' j^erhaps —
veyed by Bouiface (Basle MSS. C. VI'. tho date of copying. There is uo
54. 17 v", II 73. 245), gave Alciati
;
reason to doubt Erasmus' good faith
great relief. This he expressed in his when he declared that lie could not
final letter to Boniface ou the sub- lind it, aud concluded that it had been
ject, from Bourges 15 June 1531 (Basle destroyed.
MS. G. II. 14. 90) De Declamatione
:
'
See E. Costa iu Arch. Stor. lialiano,
iam sum animo securo. Non tam me xxxvi, 1905, pp. 120-2.
SfiKus o ttXovtos, quod Erasmus iocatur, 1202. 2. adfuisse] Cf. JE. 47, 48 and
quam ixovaxtcf^oi seu $toKo')u(jfj.ds timere LE.'- 442. 502 seq.
1202] TO JODOCUS JONAS 187
17. Bernardus] Cf. Ep. 1142. 45^. 34. Lutherum] See Ep. 980.
De consideratione] There were 35. amicos] See Ep. 1143. 22n.
many t-ditions of this in xv" the : 57. dispensare veritatem] Cf. 11.
rato, mea quidem sententia, fertur vltra iustum. Quod genus est,
quum satis esset admonuisse theologos, plus satis illos admiscere
philosophiae Peripateticae vel sophisticae magis, ille totam Aristotelis
65 philosophiam animi mortem appellat.
Habet Euangelicus ille Christi spiritus prudentiam suam, habet
ciuilitatem ac mansuetudinem suam. Sic ipse Christus ludaeorum
affectibus semet attemperauit. Aliud loquitur turbis crassioribus,
aliud discipulis quos et ipsos diu tolerans paulatim adducit ad intel-
;
giam esse, non vini. Profert lohelis testimonium, quod sciebat apud
illos plurimum habiturum ponderis. Ac nondum Christum pro-
nunciat Deum et hominem hoc mysterium suo seruabat tempori. ;
84. Messiam K.
64. Avibtotelis] Cf. ' carnifex illa 8i. lohelis] 2. 28-32, ap.Actsa. 17-20.
conscientiarum theologistria '
in Re-
; 84. virum iustum] Acts 3. 14.
sol. super propos. stiis Lipsiae dis^mtutis, 88. Viri . . . fratres] Acts 2. 29.
1519, Weimar ed. ii. 401, 20. 90. Paulus] i Cor. 9. 22.
78. Saluamini] Aets 2. 40. 94. Et tempora] Acts 17. 30.
80. mailidi] Cf. Acts 2. 13, 15. 96. Athenienses] Acts 17. 22.
energiam] See Ep. 1334. lo^n. loi. virum] Acts 17. 31.
1202] TO JODOCUS JONAS 489
sione Christi, magis etiam esse morigeras maritis impiis, non ob aliud
nisi vt commoditate morum pellicerent omnes ad amorem Euangehcae
doctrinae. Cui pia mens est, vtique nihil aliud quam prodesse studet,
aut tacens si nuDa spes sit profectus, aut ita promens ac disj)ensans 120
veritatem ne pro i-emedio morbi vim exasperet.
Brutus indignatur Ciceroni, qui suis concionibus et scriptis irrita-
ret eos quos irritatos non posset opprimere. Platoni non displicet
fucus ac dissimulatio in philosopho rei publicae moderatoi'e, modo
technis in populi bonum abutatur. A
Christiano, fateor, decet 125
omnem abesse fucum sed tamen incidit aliquando tempus quum
;
recte tacetur veritas, et vbique magni refert quo tempore, apud quos,
et quibus modis ea promatur. Medici fideles non statim ad extrema
remedia decurrunt. Prius aegrotum corpus leuioribus pharmacis
praeparant atque ita dosin temperiint vt saiient, non obruant.
; Nec 130
istos audio qui aiunt grauiorem esse morbum huius seculi quam vt
leuibus remediis sanari queat. Praestat malum iuxta Graecum i:)ro-
uerbium sinere vt est, quam non dexti'is remediis exagitari.
Neque vero nego nonnunquam Deum beUis, pestilentiis, affiictioni-
bus emendare suum gregeni non est tamen piorum inferre belhini
; 135
aut afHictionem impiam. si Deus aliquando mahim nhenorum vertit
in bonum suorum. Crux Christi salutem attulit mundo, et tamen
execramur eos qui crucem adegerunt.
illuni ad Mors martyrum
illustrauit pariter et confirmauit Ecclesiam Dei tamen damnata est ;
eorum impietas per quos hoc Ijonum nobis contigit. Multi minus 140
essent mali, si diuitiis essent spohati. Non tamen est probi viri
quenquam spoHare suis, quo illum reddat meliorem. Porro quum
omnis nouitas pariat tumultum, etiamsi quis vocet ad meliora, si
quid dissidebat a receptis, erat ea specie proponendum vt quam
minimum dissidere videretiu-. 145
At aiunt Lutherum aliquoties, quum eadem doceat quae caeteri,
103. Arati] Phaen. 5, «p. Act.s 17. 28. 116. vxores] i Cor. 7. 13-16.
113. Paulus] Roni. 13. i, Tit. 3. i. 122. Brutu^'] See C\e. ad Brut. 1. i-j.i.
115. maledixisset] Act« 23. 2-5. 123. Piatoni] Cf. Ep. 1195. 116-17.
seruo.s] Eph. 6. 5, Col. 3. 22, 127. recte tacetur] Cf. Ep. 1119. 4011.
Tim. 6. I, Tit. 2. 9-10. 132. prouerbium] Cf. Adag. 62.
490 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
150. Paulus] Gal. 5. 13. 169. capro] Cl'. Ep. 11 86. 12.
I202] TO JODOCUS JONAS 491
199. Lutherum] See Epp. 948. 980. thithcr see the WallfahrisUich of Herni.
200. Moguntinum] See Ep. 1033. Kiiuig von Vach, ed. K. Habler, 1899.
203. literis] Not extant. Cf. Enchiridion, LB. v. 63 f, and Epp.
epistolas] Thereference is i^erhaijs 858. 410, 875. i4-i5-
toaletterfromAndr.FrancusCamiczia- 219. Moneo] Cf. Ep. 1183. i22n.
nus toPirckheimer, 17 Sept. 1520 ^HE. 220. sibi noti] Cf. Ep. 999. 164^.
195 - P. p. 329), which is the preface 220, 222, 225. Lutherus] Erasmus
to the iJuae EpisMe of Stromer and evidently is quoting not Luther's
Gregory Copp, Leipzig, M. Lotther, writings directly, but the Dtiterminatio
1520 (see Ep. 986. i4n). Buckin<;com- theolo(jicae FacuUaHs Parisien.superdodrina
pares P. p. 405 = HE. 277, § i (? 1520- Ltdheriana hacienus per eam visa (cf. Ep.
i). Francus' letter, though it con- 1141. i^n) which was delivered 15
;
tion of tbe i'ncyt»(rfJon by Jo. Adelphus being cited from the Capt. Bubylonica,
had just appeared, Basle, A. Petri, thoseonconfessionandthe Aristotelian
1520 cf. VE. 182. The new prefac-
; phih)sophy 1 1. 64^) from writings not
(Ep. 858; liad also been transhited by specilied.
Spalatinus, and may have been in 221. queror] .4nno/. on Matt. 11. 30
IJiint by now. added in 1519, p. 44-
218. diuum lacobum] Santiago de 223. docui] The reference is perhaps
•Compostella : for the pilgrimage to Annot. on Acts 17. 34.
492 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [152
224. Dionysiij Cf. Ep. 1225. 235-7. 242. Rutenis] See Ep. 1177. i^n.
230. Paulo] Cf. 2 Peter 3. 15, 16. 243. Turcis] Cf. Ep. 1041. 28n.
235. et Erasmus] As in Ex obscurorum 248. avicivrjv] Cf. Adag. 685.
virorum salihus cribratus dialogus Eov. i,
: 250. nostrae Germaniae] Cf. Ep..
pp. 301-16. Cf. also Ep. i459n. 11 11. 8in.
202] TO JODOCUS JONAS 493
[As this letter was printed in F, theie can be no doubt as to the year-date.
On 15 July Zasius, v?ho was at the baths of Sugseuthal, 6 ms. ne. of Freibuig,
had heard of the letter, and wrote to Boniface Amerbach that in consequence of
it Erasmus a nostris, nempe hactenus Erasmicissimis, male audit
'
quod abomi- :
nor' (ZE. 29). By the end of September it had been seen at Wittenberg (ME.
135) evidently in a ms. copy, for F was not yet completed (cf. Ep. 1206 introd.).
'•
It is perhaps also the letter fi-om Louvain in May (reading ad Berum for ad
Beatum), in which Erasmus de Luthero, quid velit et quid sentiat, totus erumpit.
'
Sentit autem Lutliero non licuisse vt ius pontificium incendio perderet aut
Captiuitatem Babyhjuicam emitteret ' : see VE. 268, John Faber to Vadianus,
from Constance, 24 July 1521.]
274. Huttenici] Cf. Ep. 1119. 33^. 286. vafricie] Cf. Ep. iii. 44^.
276. Melanchthon] This sentiment 295. meos rabulas] His foes among
underlies Ep. 11 13. the friars.
494 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [152
lo. in tutoj Luther had been carried and, for the effect that it produced
off to the Wartburg on 4 May. On 15 Tipon moderrite opinion, Ep. 1186. 6.
May Duke Frederick of Saxony wa>s Fish.-r repiied to this and the Assertio
willing to swear to ignorance of his togetlier in Assertionis Luthcranae Con-
fnte. See Creighton v. 156. Cf. also /wta^jo, Antwerp, M. Hillen, 2 Jan. 1523.
Ep. 1221. 3611. Assertiones] Assertio omnium arti-
22. Coloniae] See pp. 370-1. culonmi M. Luthei-i per Bullam Leonis X
23. clementiae] Cf. Ep. 1183. 65-7. nouissimam dar)inatoruni, Wittenberg,
24. consiliumj Seo Ep. 1149 introd. (M. Lottcr), 1520 with preface dated
;
incendium Decretalium] Luther i Dec. 1520 (LE-. 369). Cf. Epp. 1195.
burnt copies of the books of Canon 63-64^11, 1263. 5.
Law togetlier with the Bull, 10 Dec. 31. itnriebam Cf. Epp. 1078. 6211,
1520; see LE-. 374-5, 1189. in.
25. CaptiuitasJ See Ep. 1153. 146^ ; 32. autumno] See p. 598.
1204] 495
1520. The advantages of an epitome of the great volume are clearly set forth
here by Erasmus himself. Barhind's was reprinted several times and within ;
a few years others were produced by John Brucherius and John Manrus, besides
many later (see BEr^.). The value attached to them may be illustrated from a
letter of Vives to Henry viu, from Bruges, 13 July 1527 'Epitomen Adagiorum
:
Erasmi, quam dixi tibi aie Londini venalem non inuenisse, hic emptam maiesta-
ti tuae mitto propterea quod opus hoc refertum ex vniuerso litterarum viridario
:
3261).
For earlier work by Barland upon the Adaffia see Ep. 646. Only a conjectuial
date is possible for this preface.]
[I cannot deiinitely establish the year-date from tlie contents though the ;
payment of Erasmus' Imperial pension points to 1521, when the Court had
returned from Spain. But the verbal resemblanees with other letters of this
period, especially Ep. 1228, give ample corroboration. Brewer (iii. 260) corrects
to 1519 but the entire difference of matter from Epp. 973,4, with which he
;
groups this, is coneliisive against the change. Also this would naturally have
appeared, like those letters, in E, if it had been written in 15 19.
Of this visit to Antwerp I find no otlier indication.]
10 ratius. Ipse nunc laborat scabie Gallica sub malo medico non sine
vitae periculo. Vicarius illius eodem tenetur morbo, tum animi tum
corporis. Cum mala scabie mihi res fuit. Sed tamen per amicos
auulsi pecuniae partem. Tuae prudentiae fuerit posthac dispicere
quibus committat pecuniam nam haec fuit pessime collocata.
;
15 Primus ille aestus nos validissima febri affecit, sed semel duntaxat.
Nec adhuc vacauit egrotare aut medicis vti ita distringor necessariis ;
already settled in England by tliat 1532 (Basle MS. Scheti Epist., f. 39) as
date, itis notimpossiblethatheshould having recently forwarded money to
be identified with the John of Fries- Erasmus. ByApril 1533 he was dead ;
life seems to have been spent in Eng- money being no doubt Erasmus' pen-
land, where he came intocontact with sion from Aldington (see Ep. 255
many of Erasmus' notable friends (cf. introd.).
Epp. 1366, 1490, 1491'. 9- conciliator] sc. leno : cf. Vop.
Though not in aifluent circumstan- Carin. 16. 5.
ces,heregularly received intohishouso 15. aestus] Cf. Ep. 1114.14^.
the servants whom Erasmus sent over 16. distringor] Cf. Ep. 1228. 47.
I205] TO WILLIAM WARHAM 497
mentum est, cum haec dat aUquid preter verba. Nec desunt qui
faueant in aula sed prestat agere quod ago.
; Et valetudo fit in dies 20
imbecillior, etiamsi animo nihil decedit.
Ingentes turbas excitauit Lutherus nec video fineni, nisi Christus
;
turpiter isti adulantur principibus et iis vnde spes est commodi, cuni
summa iniuria Christianae veritatis. Ego sic rem omnem tempero
vt neque desim omnino bonis literis et gloriae Christi, neque me
seditionibus admisceam. Affulget aliquid bonae spei ab aequitate
Leonis nostri, fore vt ille Christi gloriam habeat sua potiorem, vel 35
potius vt intelligat se tum demum fore Pontificem gloriosum, si nihil
non conferat ad illius vnius gloriam.
Quod tam solicite metuis ne quid mihi desit, agnosco paternum
quendam tuum in me affectum. Sed non facile premitur egestate
qui didicit paruo contentus esse. Quanquam nunc satrapes quispiam 4°
mihi videoi*, alens duos equos curatiores quam sit ipse dominus, et
duos famulos domino suo elegantiores. De sacerdotio quod pollicetur
tua benignitas, vereor ne per harpyas non liceat. Tot enim adsunt
isthic vultures qui multis mensibus praesentiant cadauer futurum.
Optarim occasionem dari qua liceat adhuc semel frui conspectu col- 45
loquioque tuae celsitudinis et fortasse dabitur aliquando.
; Vitam
longiorem nec deprecor, si donet Christus, nec anxie desidero. Tan-
tum aetatis optarem accedere vt et animum in te gratum posteritati
queam testatum facere, et mortalium animos ad synceram Christi
philosophiam magis etiam excitare. Hoc animo puto me maiorem 50
gratiam initurum apud lesum Principem nostrum quam si ter diui
Petri limina nudis genibus perreptarem. Bene valeat T. R. D. ; cui
cupio commendatissimus esse.
Antuueri:)iae. xxiiii. die Maii. anno m.d.xxi.
29. est ante de stellula add. N. 43. harpyias N. 52. genibus F: pedibus
N. T. B..D.F: tua sublimitas H.
mus' pension as Councillor (Ep. 370. Ecclesiustes (LB. v. 811 e), wheic Eras-
i8n) had perhaps been made at Wliit- mus states that he had only ono bene-
suntide, 19 May 1521 as was proposed
; fice from Warham, that of Aldington.
in 1517 (cf. Ep. 565. 12-16). It is mentioned again in Ep. 1488.
22. Christus] Cf Ep. 1228. 33-5. 44. cadauer] Cf. Job 39. 30, Matt. 24.
26. Scyllam] Cf. Epp. 1186. lon, 1228, 28, Luke 17. 37.
«2.4 K k
498 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
the marginal inscription, by the same hand, against this letter, Praefatio in '
variants shown in Ep. 1225, wliich follows this in both the ms. and F, I incline
to think that the Gouda copyist may have had a manuscript before him so :
that his text may liave precedence, though it is not necessary to retain his
spelling, which, in the frequent use of c for t, is not that of Erasmus.
If Ep. 660 is rightly placed in 1519 (see p. 67', the publication of F was
designed before the Farrago (E) had appeared. E sold so well that within a few
months Froben wished to issue it again (Ep. 1066. 83-7). But Erasmus, perceiv-
ing that the editors had been incautious (ibid. cf. Ep. 1244. 36n), would not ;
eonsent to a new issue until he had revised it. This process was hegun in the
summer of 1520 (Ep. 1123. 6-8) and was completed about the end of November
;
Ep. 1 163 6-9 cf. Ep. 1 170 introd.). The first part of the copy for the Epistolare,
;
'
'
as F is sometimes cailed, together with that for the Paraphrases onincs (cf. Ep.
1171 introd.), was sent to Basle shortly after Christmas 1520 see Froben's letter :
to Boniface Amerbach in Basle MS. G. II. 29. 115, which is discussed in vol. iii,
p. 628n. Though the title-page of F bears the date 31 Aug. 1521, the latest letter
in the book is one written on 22 Nov. 1521, after Erasmus' arrival at Basle (Ep.
1243) but it is not the last, being followed by twenty-nine pages of text. In
;
consequence the printing was not completed on 24 Jau. 1522 (CE. ii. 5). The
purchase of a copy in March 1522 is described in App. 14; and it is evidently
to the new edition that Luther refers in LE''. 525, of 15 May 1522, Erasmus in '
sua Epistolarum Farragine '. There is another example of the title 'Farrago'
applied to a later edition than E in Ep. i2n introd.
For Erasmus' estimate of the editors' performanoe see Ep. 1244. 36^ and, for ;
QvoD scribis, optime Beate, verius esse video quam vellem. Sed
illud demiror, quur ea potissiraum efflagitent amici mei Germani, quae
me degrauant inuidia. Scis enim quam non
dextris auibus exierint
Epistolae, quas tu primum aedendas curasti
quanto peioribus illa ; at
5 Farrago Cuiusaeditionem partim extorsit amicorum flagitatio,partim
!
penditur quo scripsit aliquis, sed quod suo tempore recte scribebatur,
transferunt in tempus incommodissimum. 5°
13, iras] Cf. Ep. 1170. 29) and several of the Paris period had
20. Exercebam stilum]Many of Eras- been printod in tlie farrasro.
mus' early letters which have survived. 24. Senae] Cf. Epp. 216 introd., 1297.
«ome under this and the following 66.
categories. Two from Steyn (Epp. 26, 41. ofiFensos] Cf. Ep. 11 70.
K k 2
500 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [1521
lected volumeof March 1521: seep.416. new matter foUowed. See vol. iii,
56. xli. senionem] Thus far Froben p. 627.
had been reprinting the vohinies of 65. Noui Testamenti] Cf. Ep. 1174.
letters aheady published, C, B, D', E isn.
1206] TO BEATUS EHENANUS 501
130 prodi, quum sint qui nati Gratiis iratis, nihil non interpretentur in
partem peiorem. Saepenumero fit vt quod in conuiuio aut inter
candidos homunculos dictum gratiam habet, si idem loco non suo
dicatur, atroces excitet tragoedias. Hac quidem de causa pauciores
admiscuimus ex iis quibus respondemus, et tamen aliquot adiecimus,
135 praesertim eruditorum: partim quod me piguerit laboris quem An-
gelus Politianus fere sumit, in repetendo argumento epistulae cui
rescribit ;
partim quod, vt addas argumentum, aliquid tamen lucis ac
vitae videtur deesse, ni prius legas eam ad quam respondetur.
Habes, Rhenane, totius consilii mei rationem. Nihil superest nisi
140 vt primum te rogem vt in delectu animum istum vere amicum exeras ;
1206. 131. peiorem partem J^. 134. iisa: his f'. 136. F: Policianus a.
137. tamen aliquid F. 139. Rhenane om. F. 142. qui sodalium . . . 143.
non possum add. F. 145. Anno m.d.xx. add. H.
[This letter is one of the small group for which I cannot trace the originals
used for the Leiden edition see vol. i, p. 609, and cf. Ep. 1166. The date is no
;
doubt in a form invented by Leclerc ; for I cannot recall any instance in which
Erasmus elucidates a reference to a festival by the day of the month. The
year-date also is perhaps added by Leclerc. But it must bo correct for this is ;
the only year in which Erasmus visited Anderlecht for a long stay. He
remained there now for a great part of the summer for his life there and at
:
Hornes being on the w. bank of the Meuse, opposite Roermond. When a young
man, Maximilian accompanied the Archduke Philip to Spam in 1501, as cham-
berlain (Gachard i. 127, 348) and thus on return may have been present at
;
18. Testamento] For the progress of ney I can 6nd no other mention.
tho third edition see Ep. 1174. i^n. 29. Bonifaciua] Cf. Ep. 1201.
19. peregre proficiscij Of this jour- Friburgum] In response to ZE. a6.
604 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
to Charles (Gachard ii. 57, iii. 25). In 15 19 he was ambassador to the Duke of
Gueldres.
He had three sons Henry (f 1540) Martin, born c. 1509, father of the
: ;
Wm. of Hornes, leader of the malcontents ', wlio was executed by Alex. Far-
'
nese, 8 Nov. 1580; and Philip, who became Provost of St. John's at Utrecht.
The boy mentioned here may have been any one of these.
See F. V. Goethals, Hist. dela maison cle Hornes, Brussels, 1848, pp. 241-62 and ;
Henne.]
magis tibi debeo, hoc minus promereor. Vtinam esset in quo vicis-
sim animum in te gratum declarare possim Agam hic fortassis !
[The year-date may be accepted from the mention of Erasmus' impending visit
to Basle ;Ep. 12 16. 72. It is evident that he was away from Louvain.
cf.
—
Of Conrad Goclenius (c. Dec. 1489 25 Jan, 1539), from the village of Men-
geringhausen, near Arolsen in Waldeck, little is kuown before his appearance
at Louvain in 1519. Hamelmann (1580) styles him Paderbornensis, and adds
that he was educated at Deventer {Schriften, ed. K. Loffler, 1908, i. 4, pp. 18,
32, 55) ;mentioning also (ibid. i. 3, p. 274) a nephew Jolm. son of a brother.
Keichling conjectures (J. Murniellivs, p. 53^) that he may be the Coenradus '
death, only rarelyleaving Louvain. His life was spent in teaching, for diffeient
estimates of which see VZE. go and he received private pupils into liis house.
;
c. May 1519 (see Ep. 870 introd.); some verses upon Martens' second edition of
the CoUoq. Formulae (Ep. 1041') a translation of Lucian's HermoUnius, Louvain,
;
Th. Martens, 1522, dedicateu to More and some notes on Cic. Off., added to
;
Ei"asmus' (cf. Ep. 1013) in the Froben edition of 1528. Val. Andreas mentions
also some ms. notes on Cicero, and an edition of Lucan hut the latter seems to ;
mended to others (cf. Ep. roiB), and who was deserving of every praise (cf.
Epp. 1215, 1220, 1223, 1237 and a passage added to Aclag. 1659 i^ ^<^t. 1520).
;
Oii three occasions, beginning in 1521, Erasmus deposited money with him, and to
his liands was committed the Compendium Vitae (n see Ep. 1437 in 1524. He :
was named for legacies in Erasmus' wills of 1527 and 1536 and in the former it ;
was proposed that he should come to Basle and supervise the projected edition
of Erasmus' coUected works. Erasmus' latest surviving letter, 28 June 1536, is
addressed to him ;and for devotion to the master he might almost be'
'
and Peter Nannius, his successor, pronounced a Funebris Oratio upon him, Louvain,
S. Zasseuus, 1542.]
3. petam Germaniam] About this p. 107 (LB. i. 911). The story, which
time Erasmus wrote to Froben that he comes from Kescius' pupil, Henry
should come to Basle as soon as he Ravestein, at one time the possessor of
knew for certain about the Emperor's the original document of the Compen-
movements cf. VE. 264, dated 21
: dntm Fj7ae (see vol. i, p. 575, has many
July 1521. His letter is not extant. absurd inaccuracies (see I. Bywater,
4. nidum paratum] For Erasmus' Tlie Erasmian Pronunciation 0/ Greek,
intentionof returningtoLouvain inthe 1908, pp.8-io) but thetraditiongiven
;
time added in the edition of 1662, by mijn lieeren wel eer ghegeten, tot
506 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
Louen in die Lelie met Erasmo daer : aioi, which contrasts Snaphanum ex
'
was ic acht daghen lanck (Fredericq ' praedationum reditu iactantem sese
iv, p. 4831. Probably as the result of with the honest workman supporting
this visit the boy John, who was born a family by his labour (LB. 1. 743 e) :
Another pupil was Tossanus Hoce- The word was also used in the Nether-
dius of Valenciennes, afterwards Bp. lands for a small eoin worth 3 stui-
ofTouI,iS43 —
130 July 1565, 'in literis vers ; see W. C. Hazlitt, Comagre of ths
politioribus diu ac foeliciter versatus Etiropean Continent, 1893, p. 234.
sub Erasmo nostro, quicum aliquandiu 8, vxor Frobenii] Gertrude Lacliner;
conuixit Louanii, atque adeo aodes ac see Ep. 419. i8n.
mensam habuit communem' (BRE. 1210. i. Polydori] See pp. 425-6.
328). 5. per Hieronymum] Cf. Ep. 1175.
1209. 5. Rutgerus] Rescius ; see Ep. irsn.
546. 10. Thesaurarium] This seems to be
Heluetio] Perhaps a nickname for the earliest mention of More'3 appoint-
•Jerome Froben appropriate in view
; ment as Under-Treasurer the date of ;
of his special citizenship (Ep. 903. 2n). which has not been precisely estab-
He must have returned to Basle about lished. Cf. Epp. 1223. 41-5, 1233. 25.
this time cf. Ep. 1226.
; 13. sui videndi] Evidently in con-
7. snaphano] Evidently a Latiniza- nexion with the Conference at Calais
tion of the Germ. Schnapphahn, a arranged for August : see Brewer iii.
it appears that the details given are drawn from what he might have known by
personal experience, It may be noted that, like Ep. 999, this is addressed not
to one of Colefs own countrj^men, but to a German perhaps in this case with
:
in the British Museum, Harl. MS. 6989, f. 45). Being driven away from King'3
College by the plague, Tyndall came to London and there, to employ his time,
;
visited the booksellers in St. Paul's churchyard. In one of the shops he found
a copy of what he calls Farrago Epistolarum Erasmicarum, a boke off the worste '
printe ', but which must have been F (cf. Ep. 1206 introd.), or even H for ;
there buried in a strange [s]tonge, in corner ofF greate boke ', lay this letter.
'
It delighted him so much that he borrowed the volume for a week and made
a translation which he sent to Cromwell written in a course hande', being
;
'
unable to afford the six or seven shillings which it would have cost to get it
copied out fair.
Tyndairs translation is not known to survive. The earliest extant version,
of the life of Colet only, but amplified with material from other sources, is one
by Dr. Thomas Smith, Cambridge, 1661 ; which was reprinted in a miscellany
entitled Thi' Phenix, vol. ii, 1708, and subsequently by Chr. Woi-dsworth in the
successive editions of his Eccksiastical Biographics. A
complete translation was
made by the late Mr. J. H. Lupton, London, 1883, with elaborate notes, to
—
which I have been continually indebted far more often, indeed, than I have
been able to acknowledge.
The misprint in the year-date aa given in H
has caused this letter to be
wrongly dated by almost all writers who have made use of it. From the fact of
Erasmus' residence at Anderlecht, combined with the mention in Ep. 1229,
there can be no doubt that 1521 is correct. The number of blunders in the text
of F, which had to be set right in the corrigenda, is noticeable.]
QvoD tam impense rogas, vir optime, vt tibi loannis Coleti vitam
paucis velut in breui tabella depingam, hoc faciam lubentius, quod
—
hoc vitae genus adolescens inciderat ; meo iudicio nulla ex parte
15 posthabendus Coleto, nisi quod ob seruitutem instituti minus multis
prodesse poterat. Annos natus erat ferme quadraginta quatuor cum
hominem nosse coepissem ac statim adamare me coepit, hominem
;
20 natura foelici, animo sic excelso vt nihil esset illo humanius. Sco-
ticas argutias puer imbiberat, quas nec prorsus iraprobabat, quod
quaedam scite dicerentur licet sordidis verbis, nec rursus magni
faciebat. Caeterum, vbi contigisset Ambrosium, Cyprianum, Hiero-
nymum degustare, mirum quam prae his illa fastidiebat. Nullius
35 ingenium magis admirabatur in sacris literis quam Origenis cumque :
rit Spiritus sanctus, vnde tot libri tam eruditi tanto ardore scripti
prodierunt '.
perit esse verum quod vox illa praedixerat. Erat illic monasteriolum
sororcularum, in quo sic erat prolapsa omnis reUgiosae vitae disciplina 80
vt lupanar verius esset quam monasterium. Et tamen inter has erant
100 speciem leuitatis aut ineptiae, luxus aut intemperantiae multo minus.
Miscebat sermones eruditos, plerunque sacros et ad pietatem facientes.
Talia erant colloquia, si quis illum adibat aut si quem ille viseret.
Aut si quo faceret iter, habebat potentes amicos, qui illi in itinei'e
mulum aliquoties aut equum subiiciebant, quo commodius jiceret
1C5 confabulari: ibi promebat vir optimus exhilarato spiritu quae nuUis
genimis poterant aestimari. Neminem ab se tristem dimittebat, imo
neminem non dimittebat meliorem et ad pietatis amorem animatiorera.
Nihil erat in quo sentire possis illum vlli suo commodo seruire
non ventri, non ambitioni, non auariciae, non voluptati, non odio,
iio non liuori, non vliis malis affectibus erat obnoxius. Quicquid acci-
derat, agebat gratias Deo nec aliud erat gaudium quam si quos in-
;
89. solet] For this use of tlie pre- the same time he consecrated the new
sent tense cf. 11. 138, 456, 513. church of the Franciscans (1. i69\
91. lacobita] Le Vasseur ; see Ep. X04. mulum] The statutes of the
130- 63n. Observant Franciscans, as codified in
92. Morinensis] Phiiip of Luxem- theGeneralChapteratBarcelona, 1451,
ibiirg June 1519), a prelate whose
(t 2 forbade, as before, the use of horses
advancement at Rome left him little and carringes to travelling brethren,
leisure for the affairs of the sees he and condemned also the evasion by
held. He was Cardinal in 1496, Bp. which they availed themselves of
of Terouenne 1497-1512, of Airas mules. At the same Chapter it was
1513-15, ofLe Mans 1509-19, ofAlbano enacted that every brother should, ns
1510, and of Fraseati 151 1. He is re- far as possible, be accompanied by
corded (GC. x. 1569) as making solemn another (cf. 11. 141, 155) when travel-
•entries into Terouenne, (29) May, and ling or staying outside a convent. Soe
ijito St. Omer, 9 June 1502, bearing Monumonta Franciscana (Rolls Series),
ithe indulgences of tho Jubilee year : at ii, ed. R. Howlett, 1882, p. 95.
1211] TO JODOCUS JONAS 511
detestabatui'. 1
35
Superstitioni ac ceremoniis minimum tribuebat vescebatur cibis ;
fecit. Aliquanto post denuo reuocatus est obiecti sunt phires. Vbi ;
164. a.nte H. 183. H: Mormensem J^. 189. reuocatus J^: vocatus If.
158. lubilaeo] It is incorrect that possible that Erasmus may have con-
Alexander vi reduced the interval fused here the names of Terouenne
between two .Tubilees to 25 years this : and Tournay.
wasdone by Paulii in 1470. Erasmus' 169. structuram templi] The first
statement perhaps reflects the fact house of the Franciscans at St. Onier
that Sixtus iv's Jubilee of 1475 proved was outside the town but it had been
;
159. Tornacen.] During the years of enlarge their buildings, the churcl\
Jubiiee tlie Tournay seems to
see of being completed in 1502. See J. Dc-
have been in hands of the French
tlie rheims, Hisf. de St. Omer, 1843, pp. 594,5 r
bp., Louis Pot (t 6 March 1505), rather and cf. l. 92^.
than of the Papal nominee, Peter 177. affixa] Cf. Ep. 1077. ^n.
Quicke (GC. iii. 236,7) but from the
: 183. Morinensem] See 1. 92^.
action of Philip of Luxemburg (1. 92^) 186. antrum] Cf. Ep. 80. 45.
inconnexion with indulgences it seems aiu'i] Cf. Verg. Aen. 3. 57.
1211] TO JODOCUS JONAS 513
vocaretur esse sibi domi nielius negocium. Ita suo ingenio relictus
;
est, siue quia deerat ansa nocendi, siue quia timebant populi tumul-
tum, in quo probitas illius habebat optimum quemque addictissimum 195 :
non probarent vitam, sed quod ea melior esset quam ipsis expediebat.
Totus inhiabat in lucrum animarum, caeterum ad instruendam 200
culinam aut extruendos parietes, ad illectandos dotatos adolescentes,
segnior erat quam illi vellent etiamsi hoc quoque non negligebat
:
qui sibi tot lapsus ignouerat. Illa tandem longius etiam prolapsa, 210
ad extremam deuenit calamitatem praeter infamiam, scabiei etiam,
;
bant abesse, siue is visus est ad rem magis idoneus. Porro cum ex
huius conuictu subolesceret vnus atque alter, qui simili spiritu 230
raperetur ad studium consulendi pietati Christianae potius quam ad
augendum penu, relegarunt hominem Curtracum in monasteriolum
196. ambioljat H. 218. Guardianum if. 222, ignorabant i/. 224. //:
Guordiani F : Guardiani N. 230. huius F : eius N.
205. thynnum] a fish caught in wlaom the Enchiridion (Epp. 164, 858.
their net, i. e. a rich person from 2) isdedicated : see i, pp. 19. 34 —
20.12.
whom gifts might beexpected; cf. Ep. 232. Curtracum] The only nunnery
451. 7, also Ep. 447. 420. In Ep. 451 at Courtray was the Cistercian house
and here the word has a capital letter, named Groninga: see GC. iii. 316-19.
as though a propor name but the
; But between Courtray and Menin was
sense is plain. anotherCistercian nunnory, Wevelgem
aulicus] The description here is (ibid. 309-13) which may perhaps be
;
tans, diem suum feliciter obiit, relictis aliquot libellis quos e sacris
235 autoribus decerpserat Gallice quos non dubito tales esse qualis erat
;
250 sed adhibitum alterum quendam eiusdem ordinis Stoicum, qui visus
indigne ferre Christianum colloquium interruperit. Ac fortasse
Coletus hoc nomine plus laudis meretur, quod nec indulgentia
fortunae nec impetu naturae longe alio tx*ahentis potuerit ab Euan-
gelicae vitae studio depelli. Natus est enim e claris et opulentis
255 pai'entibus, idque Londini siquidem pater bis in vrbe sua prae-
:
234. libellis] I do not know that 262. procerum] There is a brief life
any of these survive. of Colet by George Lily in his Virorum
248. post] Perhaps on Erasnius' aliquot in Briiannia Elogia, addressed to
return to England in 1505. Paulus Jovius and first printed with
253. natui-ae] Cf. 11. 387-411, 623. Jovius' Bescriptio Britanniae, Venice,
255. pater] Sir Henry Colet (f c. 20 M. Tramezinus, 1548. Lily was a son
Oct. 1505) Lord Mayor of London 1486
; of Colefs first high master at St. PauFs
and 1495. (Ep. 341. i8n), and as he entered as a
256. Mater] Dame Christian Knyvet commoner at Magdalen College, Ox-
(c. 1431-1521). Erasmus, who was a ford,in 1528, he might have seen Colet
favourite with her (cf. Ep. 423. 65,6), as a boy. But his account is largely
extols her again in Lond. xxiv. 16, LB. based upon this letter with which it
:
1226 of 6 July 1532. See also Ep. 258. has a great many close verbal resem-
3-6. blances. Indeed the only sentence
257. superest] In 1532 Erasmus which hasany value is his rather fuller
qualificd this statement Denique, ni
:
'
description of Colefs personal appear-
fallor, et Coleto superuixit'. ance (f. 46) : Huc accedebat ea egregii
'
258. filios] Lupton has identified one corporis proceritas et suspiciendi oris
of these ; Thomas, t 8 Sept. 1479. serenitas, vt subinde in omni actione
261. coepissem] In the autumu of mirus venerandusque existeret '.
1499. 264. titulum] Master of Arts.
:2ii] TO JODOCUS JONAS 515
gradum nec assequutus erat nec ambierat : tamen nullus erat illic
doctor vel theologiae vel iuris, nullus abbas aut alioqui dignitate
praeditus quin illum audiret, etiam allatis codicibus siue hoc laudis ;
267. Platonis] Cf. Ep. 118. 21. methods by which the preacher is to
273. iniquior] 'severe upon', 'unfair train himself for his work, one is
to '
—
implying not so much condemna- '
euoluere libros eorum qui linguae
tion as wrong estimation, based upon vulgaris eloquentia polluerunt quales :
But see Lupton's note, where the pas- 282. gratis] Cf. 1. 344; and see Ep.
sage is discussed at length, and his 1053. 53511-
Life 0/ Colet, p. 57^ :
'
Colet quotes Paulinas] Cf. Ep. 108. 77.
Augustine any other
oftener tlian If Colet was a few
284. triginta]
Father, nowhere with disapproval, and months younger than Erasmus, he
more than once with the addition of a must have been nearly 33 when they
" Praeclare dicit " '.
first met. For Erasmus' inaccuracy
278. apud suos] That Erasmus is about figures cf. i, p. 2. 26n and Epp.;
L 1 2
516 •
292. morem F Corrig. moram : i^. 296. dignitas F Corrig, : ea dignitas J".
306. et . . 307. Decani FCorrig.
. : Decani. Mensam et aulae regiae F. 309.
serius FCorrig. eum seruis F.
:
291. doctoris] Cf. Ep. 181. i8n. he added in 1532 (see Ep. 1274. i^n),
294. Decanus] Cf. Ep. 181. i8n. pp. 171, 178. Bu.sbecq, Leg. Turc, Ep.
309. a coena] Erasmus notes similar 4 fin., 16 Dec. 1562, records that the
abstinence in Warham see : the Emperor Ferdinand '
perpetuo coena
sketches of him in the Ecclesiastes, bk. i abstinet, neque amplius quam semel
(LB. V. 811 c), and in the 1533 preface die cibum sumit, et quidem parce '.
to Jerome (wrongly cited as Adugia in Cf.SE. 279, p. 235.
Ep. i88introd.). Cf. alsoEpp. 1229. 16, 312. sermones] For the importance
1349. 144-5. Itseemsfrom thecolloquy attached by Colet to conversation see
Ichthyophagia, first printed in Feb. 1526 Adag. 974 (964 in the edition of 1508),
(LB. i. 803 e), that in Enghnnd at this where Erasmus records that he waa
time supper was regarded as a self- wont to say tales nos esso qualia sunt
'
P. si6
12 11] TO JODOCUS JONAS 517
de Christo. Si grati confabulonis non erat copia nec enim qui- 325 —
buslibet delectabatur —
puer aliquis e sacris libris aliquid pronuncia-
.
ficentia non laborabat. Non nisi pullis vestibus vtebatur, cum illic
vulgo sacerdotes ac theologi vestiantur purpura. Summa vestis semper
erat lanea ac simplex : si frigus hoc postulabat, interulis pelliciis se 335
muniebat.
Quicquid e sacerdotiis redibat, id in vsus domesticos oeconomo suo
dispensandum reliquit : quod erat autem amplissi-
erat patrimonii —
mum — ipse in pios vsus distribuebat.
, patre defuncto, cum Nam
ingentem pecuniae vim accepisset ex haereditate, ne seruata gigneret 34°
in eo aliquid morbi, nouam scholam extruxit in coemiterio S. Pauli,
puero lesu sacram, opere magnifico adiecit aedes magnificas, in
:
iam norit et legere et scribere. Secunda pars habet eos quos hypo-
didascalus instituit. Tertia quos superior erudit. Alteram ab altera
dirimit velum quoddam, quod adducitur ac diducitur cum libet.
Supra cathedram praeceptoris sedet puer lesus singulari opere, do- 35°
centis gestu, quem totus grex adiens scholam ac relinquens hymno
355. solarium F: coenaculum i/. 360. hoc aiite vir F : illucl if.
352. Ipsum audite] Cf. Matt. 17. 5. conservative theologian; but one of the
Luke 9. 35, 2 Pet. i. 17. Mss. mentioned is of the Homilies of
355. solarium] This term is com- Origen, who was then regarded as
monly used in English of an upper dangerously heretical (cf. II. 24-9) ;
chamber, as towai-ds the sun but it ; others are of Sexieca, Jerome and
sometimes denotes a room cut off from Augustine, Isidore, Galen in Latin,
the great hall and giving privacy. The and Lully. An Easter sermon in
change in H
was perhaps made by English preached by him was printed
Erasmus because the classical and by Wynkyn de Worde, c. 1495. With
Vulgate (O. T.) usage of the word is his i^rother he was joint-founder of
different, for a flat house-top or bal- Bruton School, 1519 ; see Kotes and
cony whieh would be inappropriate
;
Queries for Sonierset and Dorsef, iii
here. (1892-3, pp. 241-8. Bk. 17 of Bern.
362. immensa pecunia] Cf. Ep. 260. Andreas* notes on Augustine, De ciui-
20-30. tate Dei (Ep. 243. san) is dedicated to
see G. Cavendish's Li/e of Wolseij, ed. but an immense number of the na-
F. S. Ellis, 1893, p. 195, My lord than
'
tives'.
in the begynnyng of Lent removed owt 386. ioan. col.] He no doubt de-
of the loge in to the Charter-howsse of signed for himself nothing more than
Richemond, where he lay in a lodgyng this simple inscription though scarcely
,
373. Carthusiensium] See Ep. 314. out the resemblance between the lattor
lon. and Ep. 1053. 531-6, and suggesting
Richemonda] See Ep. 937. 46n ;
that it may have been composed by
and Ep. 287. 5.
cf. either Lupset or Erasmus.
379. sudore] Probably during the 388. paradoxis] Cf. Epp. 230. 31,
outbreak of Aug. 1517; for which cf. 999. 252, 1195. 91 alsoU. 419-20, 512-
:
Cum nemo magis faueret Christianae pietati, tamen erga monasteria, 445
quae nunc falso nomine pleraque sic vocantur, minimum habebat
affectus: eisque aut nihil aut quam minimum largiebatur, ac ne
moriens quidem aliquid ilUs decidit. Non quod inuisos habebat
ordines, sed quod honiines suae professioni non responderent. Nam
ipsi in votis erat se prorsus ab hoc mundo extricare, sicubi reperisset 450
sodalitium vere coniuratum in vitam Euangelicam. Atque id negocii
mihi delegarat Italiam adituro, narrans sese apud Italos comperisse
quosdam monachos vere prudentes ac pios. Nec enim ille iudicabat
esse religionem quam vulgus iudicat, eum sit aliquoties ingenii
penui"ia. Laudabat et Germanos aliquot, apud quos residerent etiam- 455
num Dictitare solet se nusquam reperire
priscae religionis vestigia.
minus corruptos mores quam inter coniugatos, quod hos affectus
naturae, cura liberorum, ac res familiaris ita veluti cancellis quibus-
dam distringerent, vt non possint in omne flagitii genus prolabi.
Cum ipse castissime viueret, tamen inter illaudatos minus erat 460
iniquus his qui tametsi sacerdotes essent aut etiam monachi, venere
duntaxat peccarent : non quod impudicitiae vitium non detestaretur,
sed quod hos experiretur multo minus malos, quoties eos cum aliis
conferret, qui cum essent elatis animis, inuidi, maledici, obtrectatores,
fucati, vani, indocti, toto pectore pecuniae et ambitioni dediti, tamen 465
sibi magnum quiddam esse viderentur ; cum alteros infirmitas agnita
redderet humiliores ac modestiores, Aiebat magis execrandam in
sacerdote auaritiam et superbiam quam si centum haberet concubinas.
Ne vero quisquam haec huc rapiat, vt putet leue crimen esse in
sacerdote aut monacho libidinem, sed vt intelligat alterum genus 470
longius al)esse a vera pietate.
NuUi mortalium generi erat infensior quam episcopis qui pro
pastoribus lupos agebant, nec vllos magis execrabatur quod cultu ;
out that elsewhere Erasmus speaks of ren of the Common Life, or some of
Aquiiias with great respect e.g. in : the reformed orders, such as that of
Annot. on Rom. r. 4, p. 413 of 1516 Bursfeld (cf. my Age 0/ Erasmus, pp.
edition. Of his style,however, he had 79-84), whom Colet may have seen.
less opinion (cf, Ep. 379. 5,6) though : Itwas possibly this opinion of which
that was not what Colet demurred to. Erasmus reminded Colet in 1516 (cf.
451. sodalitium] Such asthat which Ep. 423. 26-8); no doubt in praising
Chr. of Utenheim and Wimpfeling Germany to him as he had done to
wished to found in the Black Forest other friends at the same time (Epp.
see Ep. 598 introd. 411- 3>4 4i4- 10-12
>
416. 8,9).
;
fauens istorum errori, sed indignans iis qui vita palam et vndique
contaminata praebei-ent causam huiusmodi suspitionis.
Collegia quae midto magnificoque sumptu sunt apud Anglos
485 instituta, dicebat ofiicere bonis studiis, nec aliud esse quam inuita-
bula ociosorum: neque scholis publicis perinde multum tribuebat,
quod ambitio profitendi et quaestus omnia vitians corrumperet
synceritatem omnium disciplinarum.
Vt confessionem secretam vehementer probabat, negans se vlla ex
490 re capere tantundem consolationis ac boni spiritus, ita anxiam ac
subinde repetitam vehementer damnabat. Cum apud Anglos mos
sit vt sacerdotes fere quotidie faciant rem diuinam, ille tamen
contentus erat diebus Dominicis ac festis sacrificare, aut certe pauculis
diebus extra hos siue quod sacris studiis, quibus se parabat ad
:
cusses Colefs newfoundation, it seems CoIet's Letters fo Radulphus, 1876, pp. 310,
that this term must mean here Col- ' II, identifies the work mentioned here
legia canonicorum ', corporations of with the Bretdloquium dictorum Christi
secular canons serving a church and attributed to Colet by Gesner {Elenchus
having a school attached. Some of scriptorum, ed. C. Lycostheues, Basle,
these, such as Beverley and Crediton, J. Oporinus, Sept. 1551) ;and gives
were of great antiquity others dated
: examples of such arrangement among
from the reaction against monasticism the sayings of Christ. For Colefs
in xiii*=. med., the oarliest being that fondness for such grouping see his
founded by Bp. Giles of Bridport at Hierarchies 0/ Bionysius, ed. Lupton,
Salisbury in 1261. A few of these 1869, pp. 191,2.
12 ii] TO JODOCUS JONAS 523
men spake not latyn bycause suche basis of Occidentale coenobium' for
'
dere dedignaretur.
Non conquieuit tamen senis odium. Tentauit aulam regiam in
Coletum concitare, atque in primis Regem ipsum. lam aliud telum
nacti, quod publice dixisset in concione pacem iniquam praeferendam
560 bello aequissimo iam enim adornabatur bellum in Gallos. Et huius
:
16. Jar[s] seins alters von eim getautt- pacem] Cf. Cic. Fain. 6. 6. 5.
ten Juden volgeride Kunst mitgeteil(t) Pace alludes to this incident in his
worden, dardurch er ein wunderbar- Be Frudu, Basle, Froben, Oct. 1517,
liche Gedechtnuss erlangt liab, also das p. 83; speaking of Scotist theologians,
was er einmal lass, sein lebenlang ' qui in te, o Colete, satis non indocte
behielte. Wie nun dieser im 39. Jar modo sed etiam impie insurrexerunt,
seins alters sein sterben sahe, baten quum diceres salutarem pacem perni-
seine gute Freund solche geheimnuss cioso bello longe esse ijraeferendam '.
zu ofiFenbaren. Der zeigte an, Er were 560. bellum] The expedition of 1512.
eins grobens vnfahigens vorstands 561. Minoritae] Birkhead {\. 6o2n)
gewesen, aber durch mittel dieser and Standish (Ep. 608. i^n). In Adag.
Kunst in kurtzer zeit ein guten ring- i49^ Standish's latera are noticed.
fiichigen verstand, darzu ein solclie 563. in poetas] Cf. Ep. 258. 7-12.
1211] TO JODOCUS JONAS 525
gerebat.
Sed ahquanto post data est illis ansa. vt sperarent iam posse
confici Coletum. A Pascha parabatur expeditio in Gallos. In die
Parasceues Coletus apud Kegem et aulicos mire concionatus est de
victoria Christi, adhortans Christianos omnes vt sub Kegis sui
vexillo militarent ac vincerent. Etenim qui odio, qui ambitione 5S0
mali pugnarent cum malis seque vicissim trucidarent, non sub
Christi sed sub diaboli signis militare simulque ostendit quam res :
ments, in Brewer ii, pp. 1445-74 ^^^ ; tliere in Feb. 1516, and Elizabeth iu
cf. the pi-eface to Longlond's Sermones, Sept. 1533. A letter from Henry to
London, Pynson, The only ex-
s. a. Leo x, 12 March 1512 from Greenwich,
ception is in 1514 for which year the
: on his neighbours' behalf, extols their
accounts mention no name. In 1508 virtues and devotion (Brewer i. 4871).
too Colet prtached at Greenwich in Catharine, too, cherished them often :
doctor esto, et suo quisque faueat. Hic est doctor meus '. Ita
615 discesserunt quidam lupi, quod aiunt, hiantes, et praecipue Bricotus ;
599. vfc adcl. H. 602. ex Fi-anciscano episcopus add. H. 6io. i!li om. H.
611. rege add. H.
(Hasted, op. cit., pp. 55-8). Kichmond 1445-70). He appears to have had
(1-373) h3,d been the favourite resi- influence with the King, who in Aug.
dence of Henry VII in London. Henry 1510 gave him £10 for the purposes of
viii's preference was for Greenwich, his Order (ibid. p. 1447). On 15 April
where lie had been born, 28 June 1491 15 13 he was created bp. of St. Asaph ;
constanter sequutum esse, non quo vocabat natura sed quo Christus
ita speciosior est laus Vitrarii, quod in eo genere vitae tantum
obtinuerit ac praestiterit spiritus Euangelici perinde quasi piscis in 625:
gerens. Quis autem est scurra tam perfrictae frontis qui responsurus 15
sit impudentius quam ille respondit, rogatus quid offendisset in
libris meis haereticum ? Non legi inquit libros Erasmi. Para-
*
' '
phrases habebam in animo legere ; sed visa est Latinitas tam pro-
1211. 636. fiV : Anderlaco JV2 loMcZ. Idus H. lunii K m.d.xix. //.
1212. TiT R. D. p. om. H. LVDOVico H. 2. amicum F.
1212. 2. Amicum] Cf. Ep. 1173. 911. with his Courtray pension such as
;
S.*; Sed tamen ad ista, quoniam pene quotidiana sunt, par est me
iampridem occalluisse praesertim cum videam illos insanis tumulti-
;
bus nihil aliud efficere quam vt stoliditatem suam cuni pari inscitia
malitiaque coniunctam prodant orbi. Equidem an vtilitatis aliquid
attulerim sacris studiis nescio, certe conatus sum enixissime vt si :
1212. 36. H
occaluisse F.
: 47. Clithoueum Jf : Clitoueum lY. 51. Ander-
laco H. 1213. TiT. svo s. p. d. F: roterodamo s. d. H.
1212. 27. monachum] Cf. Ep. 1192. 43. Noui Testamenti] See Ep. 1174.
25n. 1511. He was now busy with the Notes.
30. praecursores] Cf. Ep. 1192. 2611. 44. Augustini] See Ep. 1144. 7in.
41. operis] I have no clue to this 46. lacunis] Cf. Ep. 1002. 1511.
work. 47. Clothoueum] Cf. Ep. 594. i^n.
1213] FKOM PAUL BOMBASIUS 529
-o jxaTa, et ck tov 0eov f.aTLv, otl irokXol il/evbo~po4>rjTaL i^€ki]Xv$a(rLv cts tov
KocTfxov. Ev Toi'Ta) ytvoJcrKtTe to Ylvevfxa tov ©eov. YVdv TTvevfJia 6 ofxoXo-
yet Irfo-ovv li.pL(TTov iv (rapKl iXrfXvOivaL, eK tov ®eov icrTi. Kat Trdv
"TTvevfxa o p-rf bfx.oXoyeZ tov Iqcrovv, £k tov 0eof; ovk eaTLv. Kat toOto ccTt
To Tov dvTL)(pLaTOv . 'AKYjKoaTe oTt ep;^eTat, Kat Ta AoiTra. Item ex quinto :
75 OTt Tpets eto-iv ot fxapTvpovvTe<i, to Uvevfia Kat to vdatp Kai to at/Ao, Kat ot
Tpets ets to ev elcTLV. Et rrfv fiapTvpiav twv dvOpwTroyv Xafi/3dvoft.ev, rf fiap-
Tvpia Tov ®eov fxeL^wv icTTLV. Otl avTrj i(TTLv rj fxapTvpia tov ®eov, otl
fxefxapTvprfKe irepl toS vlov avTov. O TrtaTevwv ets toi' vlov toS 0eoi5 e\eL
TTfv fxapTvpiav iv avT^- 6 fxrf TTLcrTevaiv tcu 0ew {^evcTTrjv ireTroirfKev avTov, otl
8o ov TreirLCTTevKev ets Tr]v p.apTvpLav rfv fxefxapTvprfKev b ©eos Trcpt tov iiioO
avTOV. Kat avTrj icTTlv rf fxapTvpia, oVt ^cdt/v alwviov, Kal tu. XoLTrd.
Haec in quibus ab impressis codicibus dissideant, non est quod
67.loannis] i John 4. 1-3, 5. 7-1 1. only printed toxts of the Greek New
scriptam] From the readings Testament as yet in existencewere the
given Bombasius' Vatican MS. may be Complutensian, Jan. 1514, ^vhich was
safely identified with the famous B not put into circulation until after
(Vaticanus). In the Apologia cle loco 22 March 1520 (see Leo x's Brief,
'
Omncs qiiideniresurgetnus' {Ei>.8-]8. J^n) printed in some copies of its first
Erasmus describcs it as mirae vetu- '
volume, i°. <i>^ v"), and which Erasmus
statis' (LB. ix. 4350). For assistauce did iiot see till after his third edition
given by Bombasius in 1522, in pas- (p. 425) was completed the Aldine
;
sages of the Pauline Epistles, see of Feb. 1518 (Ep. 770 cf. Epp. 373
;
he had his successor as coadjutor. He vsras the last Abhot on the old footing
for in tlie year following his death the Abbey church was made coUegiate and
the monks were converted into seculars (GC. v. 183). Besides other generosity
(Ep. 1271. 124-6) he lent Erasmus a Latin MS. of the Gospels for one of the later
editions of the N. T., perhaps the second (cf. Epp. 373 introd., 597. i6n) but :
He is tliere called homo senex (cf. Ep. 1025. i6n). In Erasmus' will of 1527
' '
and the Aldine. It seems hardly procured tlicm from Rome. See Mun-
likely that Bombasius can have seen ster's interesting pi-eface to his Didio-
Gerbeirs edition but theCompluten-
; narium Hebraicum, Basle, Froben, .Tune
sian may easily have reached Ilome by 1523. For a volume at Louvain in
tfhis time. About 1522 Sebastian 1522 see Ep. 1274. in.
Munster saw and Vocabulary
its O. T. 1214. 7. Cornelium] Perhaps Corn. of
at Basle, in the hands of Conrad Pel- Schoonhoven, advocate at Ghent, who
lican lent from Constance by John
: is descriVjed in Ep. 1594 as '
magnus
Faber (see Ep. 386 introd.), who had amicus '
of Erasmus.
M m 2
532 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
and at the present time evidently was at Louvain. Later in the year he accom-
panied Erasmus as far as Coblenz on the way to Basle (Ep. 1342. 176-8),
and carried back letters for him. In 1524 he spent some time in Ei-as-
mus' service at Basle (Ep. 1437), in company with Sig- Gelenius see the :
latter's dedication to him {P. *2 v") of Symmachus' EpistoJae, Basle, Froben, Sept.
1549. He seems also to have acted as messenger for Erasmus : going to Rome
for him in Aug. 1525 (NE. pp. 26,7 Epp. 1594-5, 1649-50) in connexion with a
;
dispensation to make a will, and to England in Dec. 1525 with a parcel 01 letters.
For tlie next two or three years lie was teaching privately at Louvain wherehe ;
married Katharine van der Klusen (f 16 Jan. 1559), of whom Erasmus thought
well (Q. 57). For a time he was estranged from Erasmus, whom he accused of
defaming him but tliis did not last long. In Mareh 1530 he entered the
;
service of Duke John of Cleves (Ep. 829. lan) and the rest of his life was spent
;
in executive and dii^lomatic work for that family. In 1533 he visited Erasmus
at Freiburg (EE. 183 cf. Ep. 1313. 85^, and LB. App. 373) but later was engaged
; ;
See five letters from him to Boniface Amerbach, 1527-37 (Basle MSS. G. II.
18. 92-6) Goclenii Epist., fi". 3, 32 v° EE. and ADB.
; ;
—
Nicholas Episcopius tlie younger (1531 29 Dec. 1565) dedicated to Harst the
first book which he pi-inted, an edition of Politian's Opera, Basle, 1553. In the
preface, dated i Sept., he refers to a warm reception 'ante aliquot annos in
aedibus tuis Louauii ', and speaks of the close tie formed between them by
'
inueterata tua oum meis maioribus et cognatis amicitia, praesei-tim cum paren-
tibus et Frobeniis, inchoata iam tum quando propter Des. Erasmum nostrum,
virum aeterna dignum memoria, haec patria visebatur ab eruditis et candidis,
quos ille ceu magnes ferrum ad se attrahebat occulta quadam avinraOfia studio-
rumque, in quibus excellebat, similitudine '. Of this Nicholas can have had
little personal recollection, for at the time of Erasmus' death lie was only about
five years old.]
[Between the death of William Ci-oy (1. i^n) and tlie publication of F. There
is close resemblance with the second Apologia against Stunica (see App. 15)
many of the sentences being almost identical.]
1215. 2. rus] Cf. Ep. 1208. in. from his previous connexion with
cum medicis] Cf. Ep. 1223. 4-6
5. ;
Carinus, might have been expected to
and Ep. 1208. 2n. be able to find him. But on his way
8. vl TtTOJxoTvpavvot^l The friars ; cf. to Frankfort, where Nesen now was,
Ep. 998. 59n. the messenger, passing through Mainz,
10. De Carino] It had perhaj^s becn gave the letter to Capito, with whom
proposed that he should enter Erasmus' Carinus had recently been (cf. Ep.
sorvico as he did shortly afterwards
: 1165. 49).
(Ep. 920 introd.). Erasmus seems to 12. Goclenium See p. 504.
liave directed liis letter to Nesen, who, 121G. i. Tandem nactusstmi] Tliough
534 LETTER8 OF ERASMUS [1521
tam impense fauet, nec miror nec inuideo. Caeterum demiror quae
res sic exacerbarit hominis animum in me, a quo ne verbo quidem
vnquam f uerit laesus neque enim mihi persuadere possum tantum
:
facerem, magis e re ipsius esse premi librum quam aedi sin aut ;
Erasmus had heard of it nearly a year 17. Croius] t6 Jan. 1521 ; 5.ee Ep.
earlier (Ep. 1128. 2-6). the book did 647 introd.
not circulate outside Spain until 21. statim a morte] InEp. 1128. 4-5
Stunica brought it to Eome in Feb. Erasmus is less iirecise and more
1521. Mich. Hummelberg found a correct.
coijy from Eome at Constance 21 May 23. exisse] Anincorrect statement.
1521 (BRE. 204); Alciati saw it at At the time of Xiraenes' death (1. i6n)
Milan between 24 Aj^ril and 31 May Erasmus had indeed laid aside his
{Gudii EpisMae, 1697, pp. 90-1, 94; : secrecy (see Ep. 809. 6on}. and was
cf. also VE. 258 and s.^ 73"^. It reached writing openly of his intention (Epi>.
Basle a little later (Basle MS. C. VI* 694. 17-20, 695. 19-21, 768. 29, 809.
73. 222 v°). For Erasmus' replyseeEp. 56 seq.). But Stimica could not then
1235. have been aware of the publicatiou ;
2. Stunica] See App. 15. for Froben did not even accept the
8. cornu] Cf. Adag. 502, citing Hor. new edition till the spring of 1518
C. S. 59, 60. (Ep. 801. 9-15), and the volumes were
audio] Perhaps froni John- Ver-
14. only completed in Aug. 1518 and
gara who was now in the Nether-
: March 1519 (see Ep. 864 introd.).
lands, and had met Erasmus. See Epp. Erasmus seems to be judging Stunica's
1128. 4n, 1277 introd. book from its date, 1520, as though it
16. Toletanum] Ximenes, +8 Nov. had been composed early in 1519 and ;
^[517 ;
cf. Epp. 541. 37U, 1128. 4. to have forgotten when Ximenes died.
12 16] TO PETER BARBIRIUS 535
turus est illi, quod hoc opus susceperit, non vllo maledicentiae
studio, sed animo prorsus ab omni contentione alieno ? cum toto
'
'
illos oriuntur, vt ad illos collatus ego vere talis videri possim qualem 50
me facit Stunica.
Nec satis erat sic temperasse operis praefationem, vt totidem fere
sint in me conuicia quot sunt verba singulis fere annotationibus
:
vimlentiam qua nunc, nescio quo fato, feruent omnia. vellem abesse
cum ab omnibus honestis studiis, tum praecipue a sacris. 70
Tu, mi Barbiri, expectatione tui nimium diu nos torques, noua
sul>inde spe laetans animos nostros. Meum abitum remoratae qui-
dem sunt aliquot aliae causae, sed harum praecipua fuit, tui videndi
desiderium. Quod si te mutuum habet nostri desiderium, proj^eres
47. FCorrig.: Sogclianas J". 50. vere F C'om'gr. : vero i^. 53. anni FCorrig.:
aint /". 60. videbiturF: videturi/. 61. H: ad/ad .F. 72. A'* : lactas
F: lactasi^'.
35. Enchiridion] See Ep. 164. 58. Imnc inteipretem] The abrupt-
42. Oecolampadii]as correctorof tlie ness of thc transition suggests that
first edition : cf. Ep. 358. ^n. Erasmus is here abridging his own
44. scripseram] In the Annot. on Apologia. Comparison vvith that shows
Acts i6. ir and Rom. 15.24. that by these words he intends the
47. Hollandiae] For this eulogy of author of tho Traduclio ecdesiastica cf
Holland cf. Adag. 3535, Auris Bataua '.
' the New Testament.
52. praefationem] See lilp. 1128. 30. 71. expectatione] Cf. Ep. (114.30.
Tlie phrase quoted in II. 39, 57 occurs 72. abitum] To Basle and Rome cf. :
I
536 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
1216. 79. ScylLi] Cf. Ep. 1186. 10:1. 15. Consilium] See p. 357.
81. rusticus] Cf. Ep. 1208. m. 18. condemnatio] See Ep. 1030. i6n.
1217.13. VincentioJ Theodorici ; see 19. censura] Exgurge, Bominc see;
mihi bene volunt, hos offendit. Sunt autem vbique non pauci qui
75 nobis bene cupiunt, haudquaquam exambitis fauoribus, sed vtilitate
studiorum nobis deuincti. Quod si ego velim meo calamo tam
insolenter vti quam ille sua lingua, nonne res in manifestam rabiem
exiret? Nonne scandalo essemus et Christianis et Christiani nominis
hostibus? Sed ille me contemnit, quasi non phiribus nominibus
80 illum vicissim possem contemnere, si contemnere nos inuicem esset
Christiani pectoris aut quasi meum sit digladiari cum talibus qualis
:
93. ReuchliniJ Cf. Ep. 1155. i8n. 100. Libellos] Cf. Ep. 1195. ^n.
96. obstiti] Cf. Ep. 1033. 47n. 106. Sollicitatussum] Cf. Epp. 1154,
98. bene tacere] Cf. Ep. 11 19. 4011. 1161, 1225. 177-80.
1217] TO THE THEOLOGIANS OF LOUVAIN 539
exitus nescio.
Si in me situm esset. cras esset haec sedata tempestas. Si mihi
non est vobiscum arcta amicitia, per me non stetit. Coepta erat 120
in Falcone comprobata erat superiorum malorum obliuio, etiamsi
;
part of the collection formed by Robert Harley, earl of Oxford .f 1724). It was
tirst printed by T. Crenius (T. T. Crusius) in his Animaduers. pliilol., Leiden,
1699, V. 238, and then by J. W. van Meel in an appendix to Hotomanonim Epistolae,
Amsterdam, 1700, p. 427. To both editors (Crenius p. 238 van Meel f". **, v°) ;
that Menkenius' transeript was made not ex autographo '. as Crenius states, but
'
from a xvii^ copy which accompanies it in the Harleian volume (f. 6), and which
though often inaccurate, is more easily decipherable. AsHarley's fii-st consider-
able purchase of books was made iii 1705 (DNB. xxiv. 405), it seems likely that
this manuscript was not in his liands when Meukenius saw it.
For LB. Leclerc was supplied with another copy, made it is not evideiit —
whether from the original or its copy, or from Menkenius' transcript by —
Sebastian Korthoh, professor of eloquence at Kiel. Leelerc accejits his readings,
which vary from van MeeFs printed text in many places: but they are not
always more correct. These variants need not be reproduced here for the ;
to Epp. 1221, 1236. In Ep. 1342. 64-5 Erasmus says that aiter Charles' return
from Germany to Brussels (wliere he arrived on 14 June) propemodum magis '
habitabam Bruxellae quam Anderh\ci '. In view of this, the fact that this lelter
is dated from Brussels and Ep. 1221 from Anderleclit on the same day, creates no
discrepancy. Pace was now with the King at Windsor.
The last four lines of the manuscript are reproduced in J. G. Nichols' Auto-
graphs 0/ rcmarkaUe personages, 1829. The address-sheet is missing.]
ipse telum hostibus suis quo confoderetur, atque ita rem gessit quasi
7. lacobitej Cf. Ep. 1153. iisn. 22. hausisse] Cf. Eji. 1195. 62.
13. libelli] Cf. Ep. 1195. 411, 37.de lulio] See Ep. 502 introd.
15. Agnouit Lutherusj At his first 41.Lutherus] sc. lil)ri Lutheri, as a
interview with Charles on 17 April consequenceof Charles' edict (Ep. J192.
see Acta Wormatiae habita, in his Opera 66n) cti Ep. 1221. 41-4, also Epp.
:
[Between tlie Diet of Worms (L 88) and the publication of F. The numerous
resemblances to Ep. 1218 suggest that this letter is of the same date. The
resemblances to Ep. 1195 are also striking but the difiference of date is shown
;
1219. 15. Aleandrum] Cf. Epp. 1195. 16. necessitudine] Cf. Ep. 1195.5011.
47n, 1213. 3111. 17. Volitabant] Cf. Ep. 1218. 13.
12 19] TO WILLIAM BLOUNT, LORD MOUNTJOY 543
non omnia quouis tempore recte dicuntur. Atque ego sane hoc
animo sum vt ne Turcas quidem cupiam offendere, si hceat. Germani
fremunt in me quod aduerser Luthero et isthic, vt video, sum 60
;
25. uec vnam syllabam] Cf. Ep. 1218. relations with his '
Moecenas vetustis-
20. simus '(Epp. 783. 30, 829. 3).
35. Nemo non] Cf. Fsihev'yi Consilium 41. inuisum belkim] For his wiit-
(see p. 357) : ' NuUus
ignorat vitam ings against war see i, p. 37. 7-9, Epp.
Christianam rebus paulatim in de- 288, 575. iin, 603, and the Panegyric
terius prolabentibus multum degene- (Epp. 179, 180). His feeling on the
rasse ab ilhi syncera Christi Euan- subject breaks otit rej)eatedly in liis
gelica doctrina, adeo vt nemo non letters, e.g. Epp. 289. 2-3, 335. 180-1,
.'
fateatur . . 549. 6-30, 586. 253-7, 1°4- 46-7- 858.
39. monitor] Cf. Ep. 980. 38-51. 248-51. 37^87, 9i9- 35-4i, 1225. 225-6.
40. Nemo te melius] An ehjquent 53. lactant] Cf. Ep. 1195. 62.
testimony to the intimacy of Erasmus' 59. Turcas] Cf. Ep. 104 1. 2811.
544 LETTEPtS OF EEASMUS [1521
84. erat H : eat F. 98. nobis merito add. H. 99. cui H : qbus F.
fuisset haec tragoedia. Clamitant hic mihi non esse calamum. Imo 115
calamus est, sed innumera sunt quae dehortantur. Lutherum vocare
fungum perfacile est idoneis argumentis tueri causam fidei, mihi
;
Ep. 1218. Very likely Goclenius, hearing of More's expected arrival in the
Notherlands (cf. Ep. 1210. 13-14), had asked for an introduction.]
de la Flandre, i" ser., Bruges, 1847, pp. 14, 15) describes him as interested in
learning, and strict in enforcing discipline. EE'^. iii, where the date of his
death is given as 20 June, speaks of him as (Erasmi) amantissimus', and as
*
knowing Latin and Greek. Peter Tayspil, who was President of the Council of
Flanders in 1527, was perhaps a kinsman.]
1220. 52. Anderlaci Anno m.d.xx add. H. 1221. tit. r. d. om. H bis.
1220. 46.nemo] Cf. Epp. 1004. 145^, Gabbai and had received encourage-
;
cerius (f c. Nov. 1540), clericus ex ' Sack, and lost a valuable collection ot
Calabro oppido Roccha Coragii ap- ', Oriental mss. Returning to Avignon
parently Catanzaro author of Gram-
; he found protection from the Governor,
matica Hebraicae lingiiae, s. ]. et n. (c. Jo. Nicolai, bp. of Apt and in 1530 ;
Hebrew : but they are said to be of no will (Nfeve pp. 376, 378) provided for
grreat value. See A. Lefranc, Hist. du 8 bursai-ii at first,, and after 10 years
Coll. de France, 1893. for 2 more.
The person here mentioned evidently 14. paucos capit domus] Busleiden's
wished to obtain a post in Busleiden's will (Nfeve pp. 379,80) allowed the
College. The Cliairs of the three lan- admission of 12 such nou bursarii' at
*
guages were now full ; but as Erasmus one time, 8 coramensales' and 4 iu-
' '
seems to consider Agathius' election a uenes '. In this way a room was set
possibility, it is perhaps to be inferred apart for Erasmus cf. Ep. 1322. 12-14.
:
may have expected a further change : 1322. ii-ii. In Ep. 1564 a larger
which did not, however, occur till figure is given.
1531- 17. coelum] Cf. Ep. iiii. ^Bn.
10. praeterquam Parisianae] But cf. 18. Collegii locus] The site was pur-
Ep. 1481. chased 14 Sept. 1519 behiiid the
;
12. Collegium] For its position at houses on the east side of the Marche
this time see Ep. 691 introd. aux Poissons, with outlets on the Rues
Praesidem] John Fortis see Ep. : des Augustins, des Ecreniers et des
1322 introd. Bateaux. In the last named, now the
13. adolescentes] I am indebted to Rue de Malines, was the principal
Prof. H. Van der Linden of Lifege for entrance, constructed in 1520 and de-
pointing out to me that a census made molished in 1777. On 18 Oct. 1520 the
on 26 April 1526 showed that the Col- President and the Professors took pos-
lege then held, besides the President sessiun. See Val. Andreas p. 277, and
and the 3 Professors, 3 commensales
'
'
E. van Even, Louvain monumental, 1860,
(cf. 1. I4n), I servant, and 9 bursarii
'
' : pp. 298,9.
see .J. Cuvelier, Denomhrements de foyers 19. Salarium] Cf. Ep. 836. 6,7.
en Brabant, i, 1912, p. 314. Busleiden's a8. Buslidio] See Ep. 205 introd.
i22ij TO DANIEL TAYSPIL 549
[This letter and many others from Vives which follow (Epp. 1256, 1271,
1281, 1303, 1306, 1362 &c.) come from the first collected edition of Vives' works ;
which was publislied at Basle by Nic. Episcopius the younger, Aug. 1555, in
two volumes (a). The originals were no doubt the actual letters received by
Erasmus, and probably formed part of the great manuscript collections preserved
by Boniface Amerbach but they are not now to be found, having perhaps been
;
allowed to perish when once they had been printed. They were not carefully
edited and consequently a number of obvious errors have made their way into
;
the text.
In the following year this series was appended to another collection of Vives'
letters (Vi. E.), printed from his rough drafts, which had come into the hands
of the printer G. Simon, Antwerp, 1556 (/3). Simon's text of tliis part is a mere
reprint of the Basle vohime, with a few corrections and some depravations. The
London editors, also printing from a, did more harm than good to the text but ;
volume of
issued his next great letters, the Opus Epistolarum (H), these may have
seemed somewhat out of date or, if he felt at all uncomfoi-table about the
:
omission of Vives' notes in the Froben Augustine of 1529, it would not be svu'-
prising that he failed to print his own letters about the earlier edition, just as
Vives' letters also he never printed. The dates of some of tliem can be recovered :
1. (c. 14 Dec. 1521) answered by Vives on 19 Jan. 1522 (Ep. 1256).
:
(Ep. 1281).
4. 16 June 1522, delivered at Louvain via Antwerp c. 10 July intermediate :
nusquam erat, miratusque sum nihil eum attulisse mihi abs te.
Cumque Antuerpiae non conualescerem, veni Brugas, ratus me non
mansurum hic supra hebdomadas duas iam sextam hic ero vsque : ;
15 quod restat, non me magnopere terret. Sed cum hic hactenus desedi,
manebo hic Eegem et Morum, vt yideam quo pacto sit mihi viuendum
posthac. Pecunia Reginea me huc vsque alui, et alo. Moro scripsi
me prolixe collocuturum cum eo cum venerit. Suspicari potest quid
velim, sed non aperte quicquam, quum nollem te inconsulto tametsi :
libros habeo paratos, hoc est recognitos nam alii permulti sunt
;
[The gap of between five and six weeks iu Erasmus' con-espondence at tliis
point is perhaps due to hard work (cf. Ep. 1218. 17-19), or to illness— of
which, however, there is no trace— or to the chance which governed the sur-
,
perhaps finished, at Bruges, whither Erasmus had moved in discharge of his duties
as Imperial Councillor. Charles was at Bruges 7-26 Aug., to meet Wolsey ; who
had come over from England to Calais 2 Aug. (Brewer iii. 1458) on a diplomatic
mission, to draw Spain more closely to England in a league against France.
Wolsey arrived at Bruges 14 Aug. (ibid. 1503;, and left about the same date as
Charles (ibid. 1510, 1513), with his purpose effected but he did not return to
;
the Mss. of St. Donatian's (Ep. 373 introd.). Vived, too, was there, busy with his
work upon Augustine ; see Ep. 1306. 43 and his Aug. Ciu. Dei, f°. aa*. On 14 Aug.,
40. tuarum scripsi : tua mortalium/rum a (rum a : tum Lond.), vbi mortalium
a fine huius versus ad finem sequentis, post praeceptor, dubio procul releganduin est :
tuarum mortalium /3.
33. Appiusl ap. Sall. de Rep. ord. i. i. invitation to settle in England ; cf. II.
32. Haec] His negotiations for an 17-21, 24.
552 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
wlien news came that Wolsey was approaching, Charles, followed by his suite
and by the magistrates, rode out to meet him. Cranevelt delivered an address
of weicome, to which Wolsey replied and Erasmus, who was of the company,
;
received greetings from the Cardinal and from English friends who were in his
—
train Tunstall, Mountjoy, More, and many others.
See Ep. 1233. i-io and a detailed narrative in Geldenhauer's CoUectanea. ed.
;
J. Prinsen, 1901, pp. 116-20. After thedeparture of Charles and Wolsey, Eras-
mus stayed on a few days at Bruges, but at the end of the month (Epp. 1231,2)
made his way back
to Anderlecht, to be in attendance on Charles once more.
A detail of Wolsey's state and ceremony during this visit is preserved in the
Paraleipometia added by Hedio (see Ep. 1459) to the Chronicuni of Conrad of Liechte-
naw, abbot of Ursberg, Strasburg, C. Mylius, March 1537, p. 480 Cardinali :
'
Anglo prandenti et coenanti flexis poplitibus (id quod inter Germanos inauditum)
ministrabatur, astantibus multis Anglis nobilibus'.
An incident which may be mentioned at this point is that on 13 Aug. 1521
the Arts Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, wishing to promote the study
of languages, proposed that the Elector Palatine should be asked to write to
Charles v and request that he would send Erasmus to teach there in the :
same hope as at Leipzig (cf. Ep. 1102. lon), that his advent might arrest the
rapid decline in the numbers of their students. The University vouchsafed no
reply see E. Winkelmann. Urkundenbuch d. Univ. Heidelberg, ii 11886), pp. 76,7.
:
There is nothing to show whether any hint of the invitation ever reached
Eiasmus ; but with his invariable dislike of teaching, he would no doubt have
declined.]
TiT. svo om. B. 6. vnguenta, balnea, emplastra add. H. 14. te a?i/e geras
F: remH.
2. vitam rusticanam] Cf. Ep. 1208. i. supportcd Coratinus (Epp. 622. 3in,
4. cum medico] Cf. Ep. 1215. 5. 1051 introd.) against Goclenius in the
14. Deamo te] Erasmus' apprecia- election 0^1519: see P. Nannius' J^Mxe-
tion was the morehandsome, ashehad hris Oratio on Goclenius, 1542, P. B^.
1223] TO CONRAD GOCLENIUS 553
Erasmus had left behind with JPace. When Erasmus liurried off to England
without returning to Ferrara to reclaim these (cf. Ep. 30. i6n', Thale disposed
of them (Ep. 244. 6-21) but one, the De Ratione Hiiidii ,Ep. 66), he retained and
;
had printed in Paris in 151 1, substituting his own name in the dedication. In
spite of the friendly tone of this letter, it appears from i, p. 34. lo-ii that Eras-
mus still cherished resentment for Thale's action.
The person of this name mentioned in Epp. 1256. 90, 1303. 51, was perhaps a
young kinsman.J
[As in Ep. 1206, I have given precedenee to the Gouda MS. (see App. 9 in
vol. i); though I do not feel sure that it was not copied from the printed text of
F. Its sijelling, however, I have discarded.
The narrative of events in the first partof this letter closely follows thatgiven
in the Apologia qua resimidet for which see pp. log, iio.; Later on there are
resemblanees to Epp. 1195, 1218, 1219. The year-date needs no conhrmation.
Bruges oflfered facilities for communication with Spain and the protracted ;
waiting for the arriv^al of Wolsey (see pp. 551-2) gave leisui'e for correspondence.]
5 iis aut non coeat aut coeat infirma. Ego meapte natura simplici
sum animo, et amicos diligo magis quam colo. Cuius rei tu potes
esse optimus testis, qui videris quam indiligenter cokierim eximium
was on his way to Siena and Rome, EHR. xxii (1907), pp. 746-50. For
—
Dec. 1508 Jan. 1509 ; see de Nolhac other young Englishmen at Louvain
pp. 59-61. Erasmus frequently refers in 1522 see Epp. 1256. 90, 121-2, 1303.
to this visit and especially to his re- 50-1.
lations with Pace : see i, p. 34. 9-10, 12. pestem] Cf. Brewer iii. 1516.
Epp. 283. 169, 412. 59-60, 556. 33n, 1225. prouocas] Perhapsunder the
I.
611. 23-8, II 10. 39, 1227. 36, 1490, iniluence of Adrian of Utrecht cf. Ep. :
versity may have reached Nic. Daryng- him to Erasmus through Barbirius,
ton and Blythe at St. John's CoIIege, Ep. 1581. He had been Cardinal of
Cambridge, and have encouraged them Tortosa (11. 35-6) since 1516-17.
1225] TO PETEE BARBIEIUS 555
15. pallio] Cf. Ep. 1144. 28n. The A" Jortin ii. 497.
:
scriV)e of the Gouda MS. i^Hand A; 29. Atensis] See Ep. 670 introd.
adds in the margin 'lutellige dictum
: prouocatus sum] Cf. £p. 637. lon.
de Carmelitis '.
30. prius] Cf. Epp. 474. 17^,475. 18-
17. vnus aut alter] Hand A again 19, 483. 26.
interprets in the margin Nicolauset :
'
32. CoUegium] See Ep. 691.
Vincentius Seo Epp. 878. i^n and
'. 36. Dertusensis] Cf. 1. in.
iigeintrod. 39. Nouo Testamento] See Ep. 864
25. Dorpium] SeeEpp. 304, 337, 347. introd.
27. Commigraui] In July 1517; cf. 43. Montensi] See Ep. 1162. io8n.
556 LETTEES OF EKASMUS [1521
quam cum proprio fratre nam hisce verbis tum vsus est. Eaque
:
Nihil aliud ille respondit quam sibi iibrum nunquam esse lectum.
Idem aliquoties egi cum Latomo, frequentius etiam cum Dorpio.
Tandem appetebat tempus vt ob secundam aeditionem peterem
Basileam. Paulo ante Atensis ad coenam vocat. Aderat Egmondanus
60 et Lodouicus Viues. A coena indico Atensi me intra paucos dies
abiturum Basileam. Kogo, obsecro, obtestor, vt amanter admoneat
si quid iudicaret esse mutandum praesertim si quid officere posset
:
bonis moribus aut fidei Catholicae. Ille respondit, sibi totum opus
esse lectum, ac videri pium iuxta atque eruditum. Hic ego Malim '
45. professus laM. II. 46. possit H. 47. impares esse F. 51.
mecum add. F. 53. verha add. F. 54. Egmundano N. 59. Egmun-
danus iV. 60. F: Ludowicus a. 66. licebit idem J!. 75. aiebat a :
89. nomiais Leici F. 90. acta est F. Ille a I.s H.: 96. affectus
evava F. 99. sxibinde add. F. F: aput a. 100. frequentissima
schola J". loi. lapidauit me J^. 107. est renouatus F. iio. modios
errorum i^. 112. erroribus Erasmi F. 119. addi cupiebat f.
92. successit] This appears to be in- 108. paulo Latiniorem] Cf. Ep. 1167.
accurate for the controversy with
; io6n.
Latomus (Ep, 934. ann) began and 109. Baccalaureis] Cf. Ep. 1053. 34^.
finished early in 1519, whereas that 119. confessionem] In his Annot. on
with Lee (pp. 108-11) dragged on far Acts 19. 18 Erasmus had admitted in
into 1520. But clearly Erasmus is here 1516 fuisse et antiquitus nonnullam
'
100. Atensis] His attack upon Eras- rum quao nunc recepta est chincularia
mus was about the Encomium Mutri- et in aurem fit, videtur ex consulta-
monii cf. Ep. 670 introd.
; tionibus priuatis esse nata, quae solent
106. Lutheri] Cf. Ep. 904. i^n. This apud episcopos fieri, si qui scrupulus
'tumult' may be dated in the autumn vrgeret animum but furtber tlian
'
:
120. nondum n non N.: 121. autor fieri IL 126. Egmundanus iV.
127. certe add. F. 128. demirans F. 129. tam odiosam tragoediam F.
130. aut aiite volente a : seu H. 136. ne . . . laeseram n : quum ne . . .
lueserim JJ. 137. foedus aricZ. H. 141. aediderant i^ : addiderant a.
143. magno meo malo credidi F. 144. iis a : his F. 147. coepisset agi F.
edition. The word nonnullam and the and 11. 360-1 infra also Ep. 1244. 360.
:
wliole of the later passage were ex- 145. offendebantur] e.g. by the re-
punged by the Index. Later, in reply- marks about Dorp and the Carmelites :
ing to Lee in 1520 (cf. Ep. 1153. 74n), cf. Epp. 474. i^n, 483. iio seq.
26, 948.
he had definitely given his opinion 147. excusum fuerat] Here, as in
that confession was not an institution Ep. 1175, Erasmus is obviously inaccu-
of Christ ; but declared his willingness rate. On p. 62 of E is a letter of 28
to submit this to authority. June 1519 (Ep. 991) and the latest;
131. libelli] Cf. Ep. 1195. 4n. letter in the volume (Ep. 1009, of 15
132. Germani] Cf. Ep. 1168. i8n. •A.ug.) is on p. 358, with 40 jjages fol-
134. gymnasiarcha] The Rector of lowing it. Allowing for the time
Louvain University, 31 Aug. 1519 needed forcopies of these letters— both
29 Feb. 1520, was Jo. Calaber : see written by Erasmus from Brabant to —
Ep. 1240. 2on. reach Basle, the printing cannot have
135. Neuiuml See Ep. 298 introd. been far advanced by the middle of
137. foedus] On 7 Oct. 15 19 : see Ep. July, not three months before the con-
1016. i^n. cordia of 7 Oct. and the book did not
;
Falconis] See Ep. 1217. I2in. appear till Nov. (see Ep. 1040 introd.).
Nic. Coppin (1. 43) was Principal. Erasmus must have been thinking of
140. Farrago] E : dated Oct. 1519. the date when the publication of E was
143. meo malo] Cf. Ep. 325 introd. decided on, and the first part of the
1225] TO PETER BARBIRIUS 559
operis mei facerem censores. Vides per me non stetisse quo minus 150
inter nos constiterit amicitia Christiana. Deinde quum Lutherana
tragoedia semper in peius glisceret, mire quidam conati sunt me
illi admiscere. Ego vulgato etiam scripto ante biennium testatus
sum nihil omnino rei mihi esse cum Luthero, nullam agnoscere
factionem nisi Christianam, si tamen ea dicenda est factio. Atque 155
interim mira rabie lapidabar in publicis concionibus, in pubHcis
professionibus, a Carmelita et Dominicalibus quibusdam, nonnun-
quam etiam nominatim. Haec perpeti iudicaui potius quam cum
tanto examine coUuctari.
Porro quod scribis isthic suspicionem extinctam me fauere Luthero, 160
non miror sed miror vnquam ortam fuisse. Vtinam tam immunis
;
163. Initio (uld. F. 165. exituram in tumultum -F. 166. veritas etiam
displiceat jP. 169. crebrisP: crebro a. 170. amicos Lutheri J'. 175.
meus tamen metus F. 179. nisi sint me a : me conati sint F. 183. F
aput a. nostros a : nos F. 184. factionem secedere F.
non excitant tumultus. NuHus enim est qui non cupiat doceri.
Quod si pars diuersa j)arum meminit modestiae, nostrum tamen erat
205 meminisse. Imo hoc erat non modestiae, sed prudentiae, cauere
quod nostram causam laederet, aduersariorum adiuuaret. Id si
fuisset initio factum, aut ego fallor, aut res non processisset huc
tumultus. Nec aliud possunt imputare Erasmo, nisi quod primus
improbauit clamoribus seditiosis impeti Lutherum, praesertim apud
210 populum: sed ita tamen improbabam, vt illis esset liberum quantum
vellent vociferari. Cum eruditis aliquot qui nunc feruntur non
omnino alieni a Luthero, iam mihi intercesserat studiorum nomine
contracta necessitudo, priusquam orbis audisset Lutberi nomen.
Porro, quod dicitur hausisse quaedam e libris meis, mihi in manu
215 non erat praestare ne quis in posterum scriptis meis abuteretur,
quando hoc nec Euangelistae nec Apostoli praestare potuerunt,
Scripsi eo seculo quae tum videbantur ad bonos mores conducere:
fortasse quaedam scripturus circumspectius, si praescissem exoritu-
rum hoc seculum plusquam tragicum. Loci communes quibus fere
220 declamabam, faciunt aduersus eos qui neglectis fontibus sacrorura
voluminum, inhaerent nimium quaestiunculis sophisticis verius
quam theologicis: qui neglectis his quae sunt verae pietatis, plus
188. mihi a : multi F. Lutliero fauent F. 190. quaedam add. J".
191. tumultuJ'. 196. insanis o»i. J'. Qua...i97. rea: Quo negocio il.
. . .
i88. Euangelicum] Matt, 10. 34. 22 March 1521 : see F. Lauchert, Ital.
192. obsignatis] sealed, and tlius Gegner Luthers, pp. 142-55. For a very
private cf. Epp. 435, 87, 8io. 346,
; different cliaracter of Caietano see Ep,
1153. 1^2, 1167. 114-15, 1217. 21. 1188. 23-4.
vtriusque] Church und State. 211. eruditis] Such as Spalatinus
198. liberj De diuina institutionc ponti- and Mutianus (Ep. 501 introd. and 8n).
fcatus Roniani Pontificis super totam Eccle- 214. hausisso] Cf. Ep. 1195. 62, and
siam a Christo in Petro, Rome, M. Silber, II. 337-41 infra.
1225] TO PETEK BAEBIRIUS 561 .
Id quo minus fecerim, duo praecipue in causa fuerunt, ocii penuria 240
et imperitiae propriae conscientia. Distorquebar studiis meis, adeo
vt saepenumero laboribus immodicis valetudo periclitaretur. Et
videbam longe aliud esse hortari ad studium literarum bonarum,
inuitare ad bonos mores, annotare aliquid in lectione sacrorum
voluminum ; rem
fidei in orbis totius theatro tractare.
et Videbam 245
vtrinque partes accensas studiis vt alteri nisi magnis vocife-
sic
rationibus satisfieri non posset alteram sic instructam et copiis et
;
scribit i^. 237. F: Dionisium a. 240. fuerunt in causa i^. 241. meis
studiis F. 242. valetudo laboribus immodicis F. 243. bonarum literarum
F. 245. et a aliud /f.
: 248. F: Heluetiorum a. 254. omnia probare i^.
256. ea add. F.
223. ceremoniis] Cf. Ep. 858. 445seq. 236. Dionysio] Cf. Ep. 1202.224-6.
226. aduersus bella] Cf. Ep. 1219. 248. Eluetiorum] Cf. Ep. 134. 311.
4in. 259. vix duodecim] Ci'. Epp. 1167.
232. damnantur] Cf. Ep. 1202. 22on. 124, 1236. 135-6.
4B2.4 O O
. 562 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
268. reges] Cf. Epp. 1227. 24^, 1233. 284. Pehigianum] This charge (cf.
loon. Epp. 1259. 12-13, 1275. 27)wasbased on
incendio] Cf. Epp. 1218. ^in, 1221. some passages in the Enchiridion seea :
exitum video, nisi Christus ipse velut utto fj.r]xavrj<; felicem cata-
strophen imponat infehci fabulae. Atque interim quum propemodum
obsurduerim ad Lutherani vocabulum, nondum satis intelligo quid 320
sit esse Lutheranum. Si Lutheranus est quisquis Lutheri libros
legit, legit et Latomus. Sin Lutheranus non est qui legit vt refellat
aut damnet, qui, queso, Lutheranus erit qui hoc animo legit, vt si
quid insit quod faciat ad bonam mentem, excerpat, si quid erroris,
detestetur ac reiiciat? Si Lutheranus est qui omnia illius et scripta 325
et scribenda citra exceptionem tuetur ac probat, talis adhuc nemo
mihi compertus est, nec arbitror quenquam esse tam insani cerebrj.
Ego sane nec Hieronymo nec Augustino sic addictus esse vellem ;
306. iisa: hisJ^. 308. iisa: hisF. 309. F discidiuma. :311. posset
lioci" 313. feram a fero //. : 318. F: v^ilitdiicjMixavfa a. 323. queso ow. i^.
325. Si a : Sin F. 328. F : Hieronimo a. 329. vt . v-nfpHoXiKws add. H.
. .
335. fidei nostrae F. 337. Primum add. H. 339. dici possini Lutlieranus
om. F. 340. et Apostolus om. F.
299. pacem] Cf. Cic. Fam. 6. 6. 5. 335. poccatuni esse] Cf. Ep. 1195. 640.
002
564 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
fauet Luthero —
et fauet haud dubie qui hortatur ad meliora, qui
345 —
correctum cupit , hoc nomine plane Lutheranus fui quondam, et
sum adhuc, et esse puto quotquot sunt vere Christiani. Quis enim
non malit fi-atrem suum emendatum quam extinctum ?
Sed vt sit tandem harum naeniarum finis, quando tu desines nos
torquere desiderio tui? quando reddes nobis tuum conspectum?
350 Vtinam te videam in tua Paria mitraturn Dispeream nisi malim !
illic agere inter gentes ignotissimas quam hic inter rabiosas obtre-
ctationes qui morbus olim monachorum latebris familiaris, nunc
:
quidem video glebas illas aureas, quas nobis polliceri soles in Paria,
simillimas montibus aureis Persarum.
Brugis Idibus augustis anno m^.vc.xxi'^. :
[From consideration of the movements of Jerome Froben (Ep. 903. an) tlie
years 1519-21 are possible. But in view of Erasmus' presence at Bruges and the
position of this letter near the end of F, 1521 may be accepted.]
350. Paria F: patria a. 353. etiam add. F 07n. N. : 355. his a : iis F.
357. meis a : amicis F. 358. faueo Germaniae F. 359. propensioribus
studiis J". 365. mi Petre om. F. 367. nohis add. F. PariaJ': patria a.
369. Idibus augustis a Id. Augusti F.: m.d.IvXI. F.
349. desiderio tui] Cf. Epp. 11 14. see Epp. 77. 14^,15, 123. 18 cr.n, 250.
3n, 1216. 7T-2. 14. 292. 6-7, 899. 14-15. But cf. Ep.
350. Paria] See Ep. 913. 6n. 1074. 1-2.
353. compotatio] Cf. Ep. 1033. 22n. vulgoj Thus Leo de Rozmital,
361. Britannia] It is interesting to the Bohemian, who visited England in
contrast this estimate of ' periidc Feb. 146! describes the English in liis
,
1226. TiT. svo om.H. lo. faciasio>id. 1227. tit. cl akiss. om. H. decano
S. PAVLI LONDINI Oni. H.
1226. I. literismeis] Cf. Ep. 1209. ^n ; fender of the Faith. See also Ep. 1290.
and for a ground of diflference between i^n. On 16 Jan. 1522 Pynson printed
father and son see Ep. 1033. 4711. a new edition with corrections. In
13. Erasmiolum] See Ep. 635. 20U. two Strasburg editions, J. Grieninger,
1227. I. commentariis] Cf. £p. 1210. 9 Aug. and 7 Sept. 1522, Epp. 1219 and
15-19. i228are appended nodoubt reprinted
;
2. Douariensi] Cf. Ep. 119. ^n. from F. For the question of Henry's
5. Librum] Assertio septetn sacramen- authorship see Ep. 1228. i8n and, for ;
torum aduersus Martin. Lii/htrum, Lon- further developments, see Epp. 1307.
don, Pynson, 12 Juiy 1521. later A 4-9, 1308. ^n.
issue lias tliree sheets prefixed, con- vidi tantum] A copy, inscribed
taining the oration delivered by the by the king with Erasmus' name,
English envoy, Clerk i,Ep. 999. ^gon), was sent to him in Aug., but did not
on pre-^enting the book to Leo (Sept. nacli him till Feb. 1522 at Basle see ;
legere. Nec enim dubito quin dignus sit illo longe felicissimo
ingenio, quod mire valet, vbicunque sese intenderit. Olim prodigio-
sae pietatis habebatur et diuorum dignum catalogo, si princeps
10 copiis et armis depulisset hostes a ceruicibus Christianorum. At
Henricus octauus ingenio calamoque propugnat pro Christi sponsa,
satis declarans quid praestaturus sit, si res arma flagitarit. At
interim quod nunc praestat, vt mea sententia multo difficilius est, ita
laudeni solidiorem magisque propriam illi pariet. bellicae rei Nam
15 laudem fortuna partitur in multos, saepenumero multo maximam
partem sibi vindicans. Hic quoniam res omnis animi praesidiis
geritur, quicquid laudis est vni proprie debetur Henrico. Quotquot
colimus aut amamus bonas literas, ingratissimi simus ni tale ingenium
veneremur atque exosculemur, quod miris modis ornat commendatquo
20 studia nostra. Porro confido fore vt hoc pulcherrimum planeque
rarissimum exemplar multos principes prouocet ad aemulationem.
An non pudebit posthac sacerdotes, monachos, episcopos, nihil scire
rei theologicae,quum viderint Regem tantum, iuuenem, tot negociis
districtum, eo progressum in cognitione sacrarum literarum vt libris
25 aeditis periclitanti Christianae religioni patrocinetur ? Nec addubito
quin id aliquanto felicius illi successerit quara nonnullis qui antehac
in eodem stadio vires suas periclitati sunt.
Sed hac de re certiora scribam vbi librum deuoraro cuius legendi :
hand. Against the heading, wliich obviously was not part of Erasmus' compo-
sition, another contemporary hand has written Ad Moguntinum puto and '
'
later 'Ad Capito ', in vain conjecture as to the person addressed. The absence
of heading, and presumably also of dates, in the original shows that this must
have been a rough draft. But the copyisfs bhmder in the heading does not
imply moru than that that part of his original was not autograph the rest may :
67n. The meeting is described in de- 966. 24-9, 976. 37-8, 13 13. 72-6, and
tail in Ep. 1342. 848-57. Lond. xxiii. 15, LB. 1038.
24. 00 progressum] For Henry's at- 32. succesaeris] Cf. Ep. 1025. ^n.
tainments in the scholastic theology 36. Ferrariae] Cf. Epp. 11 10. 390,
and philosophy cf. Epp. 964. 119-28, 1224. ^n.
1228] TO WILLIAM WAEHAM 567
liave been in Erasraus' own hand. In the printed editions two passages are
amplified, one very markedly but it does not seem possible to determine
;
whether these amplifications were made before the dispatch of the letter, or in
the priuting. In the main I have adopted the text of the manuscript discard- ;
ing its speliing, however, which is uncou-th, and introducing into the text the
passages added later.
Like Ep. 1219 this letter is reprinted from F in the Strasburg editions of
Henry vni's Assertio (1. 6), 9 Aug. and 7 Sept. 1522. For possible circulation
of it in ms. or in an unauthorized print see Ep. 1263. i8n. The year-date needs
no confirmation.]
dominus a R. D. F Card. H.
: : 8. Id 9. negoi;ium . add.
. H.
, 9, exoscu-
letur F expostularetur a.
; huiusmodi a eiusmodi F. 10. ornet F.
:
38. est om. N) Lutherus omnia fere scripsit sediciose, id nemo negat, multa preter
:
rem et absurde, quedam parum pie a. 46. extricaro F. 47. mire F iure a. :
25. veluti malum Eridis] Murner to Ziegler (Ep. 1260), could write of
(see p. 542) mistranslates, als das bosz'
him witli respect, and be proud of
Eridis '. being admitted to his soeiety icf. Epp.
30. Danorum rex] Christiern 11 1263. 21-2, 1342. 78-80, 1381. 25-8)
(2 July 1481—25 Jan. succeeded
issgi) and Spongia, LB. x. 1635 c = HE. 333,
his father in 1513, and on 12 Aug. 1515 § 38). Diirer, too, took his pnrtrait in
married Isabella, Charles' youngest July 1521, and records the admiration
sister, then aged 13, to whom he was of the people of Antwerp, das er ao '
speedily unfaithful. He had just com- ein mannlich schon man war, vnd nur
pleted the conquestof Sweden in 1520, selbtritt durch seiner feind land kom-
with shoclcing barbarity and perfidy ;
men [Tagebuch, ed. F. Leitschuh, 1884,
'
and now, from June to Sept. 1521, was p. 91.19-20). For his intervention at
visiting Charles in the Netherhinds Wittenberg see Ep. 1241. 26n.
(cf. Brewer iii. 1388). In 1523 he was 34. Christus] Cf. Ep. 1205. 22-4.
expolled from Denmark by his sub- 44. Scylla] Cf. Ep. 1205. 25-6.
jects; and beingdefeated in an attempt 46. Vrgentquidam] Cf.Ep. 1213.42^.
to return in 1531-2, he was captured 47. distringor] Cf. Ep. 1205. 16.
and imprisoned for the rest of liis life. 48. legendos omnesl Ep. 1225.258-9.
It is surprising tliat while the blood shuws how little he had yet read.
of the Stockholm massacres was still 49. Neque temere] Cf. Ep. '236.
. . .
[The year-date added in H lias little or no value ; cf. Epi>. 1220, 1223, 1232,
1239. The mentionof tlie life of Colet, and Erasmus' presence at Bruges (cf.
Ei>. 1230 introd.) clearly indicate 1521.]
1228. 51. Nos ... 55. Precor F: Interim precor a. 56. F cognosce a. Re- :
1228. 52. beUum in Gallos] Cf. Epp. 58. M.D. xxi] Murner(cf.l.25n)gives
1236. 61-5, 1238. 45n, 1283. 11-13, 1284. 'Tausent fiinff liundert zwei vu zwen-
51-2, 1299 introd.. 1306.55-6; and for tzig '
; doubtless bringing the year-date
its progress see E. Arinstrong, Charles v, into conformity with that of the book
eh. 7. (cf. Ep. 1033 introd.). The year-date
Pontifex] For Leo's alliance with in Ep. 1219^6 omits.
Charles at this time against France see 1229. 2. epistola] Ep. 1211.
Creighton V. 159-61. 4. parum.. . instruxeris] Inresponse
54. Hungariam] SeeBreweriii. 1376, to Ep. 1026. 1-4.
56. Halseio] See Ep. 254 introd. 16. coenis] Cf. Ep. 1211. 309^.
570 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [1521
mus was at Bruges at this time in any other of the years possible before the
publication of F except 1521.]
nec senectus attingat vnquam nec morbus vllus. Sed quando hac
lege nascimur omnes, nec sunt vllo pacto exorabiles Parcae, eniten-
6 dum est vt, qua licet, etiam a fatis ipsi nobis simus superstites.
Porro vt aequioribus animis cedunt e rebus humanis parentes qui
viderint liberos suos ad aliquem vitae statum euectos ita nonniFiil ;
lum sit, ne pro cauto modestoque crudelis habearis, qui studia huius
seculi tam lenta torqueas expectatione tuorum laborum, ac tam diu
fraudes desideratissimo fructu tuorum voluminum. Fortasse terret
te nostrum exempkim. Sed etiam atque etiam vide (ne), dum studio-
sius vitas nostram culpam, in diuersam deflectas. De me quicquid 15
tibi audes polliceri, scito semi^er fore pi'omptissimum. Bene vale,
vir optime idemque doctissime.
Bi'ugis, Natali diui Bartholomei. Anno D xxi. M
1231. To Peter Wychman.
Epistolae ad diuersos p. 665. Bruges.
HN : Lond. xvii. 24 : LB. 612. (c. 29 August) 1521.
[Betweeu 28 Aug. {}. 2) and Erasmus' return to Anderleclit (Ep. 1232). His
host there Ep. 1208. i), throughout his stay, was Peter "Wychman {f 18 Feb.
(cf.
1535)) canon and schoolmaster of St. Peter's church, who succeeded Jacobus of
Bologna in these offices in 1507 see A. Sanderus, Tluatre sacre de Brabant, i
:
(^734') P- 297, quoted in EE. p. 460. Wycliman was helpful to Erasmus in con-
nexion witli a ms. of the New Testament (Ep. 373 introd.). For their further
relations see Ep. 1351. A writer in MSH., 1846, p. 289, describes the house in
which he lived as une sorte de maison de campagne, qui s'appelait " de Zwane "
'
the portion occupied by Erasmus liad been puUed down two years before, as it
liad fallen into decay.]
The preface, addressed to Leo x and 14. nostrum exemplum] Cf. Epp.
reminding him of their studies to- 1182. 911, 1234. 6-8.
gether (under Politian and Chalcondy- 1231. 5. Mendicantium] Dominicans,
las at Florence see Epp. 428. 34^,
: Fraiiciscans, Carmelites. and Austiu
520. 13 1-3). i^ dated 5 Sept. 1521 and ; Friars.
speaks of Linacre's having in liaud 8. fons ille] Cf. Gen. a. 10-14.
572 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
tum. Imo nisi nos coelibes fuissemus, iam Christiana fides esset
extincta.' Olim nemo fere dicebat pro concione, nisi dispositis
notariis qui sermonem exciperent. Quod si fieret hodie, Deus bone,
quae fabulae nascerentur Qui talia dicunt in celeberrima ciuitate
!
35 Brugensi, quae tot habet eruditos, tot et sine literis felicia sanique
iudicii ingenia, quid censes eos dicere in pagis, quid in conuiuiis?
columnas orthodoxae fidei
Hoc te nescire nolui, ne dicas tibi nihil communicatum eorum quae
hic geruntur ; sed plura coram. Bene vale.
40 Brugis. Anno m.d.xxi.
[Between the publication of Tertullian (1. in) and the completion of F so that :
the year-date supplied in H is again wrong. The letter is almost of the nature
of a 'review' of Tertullian. For Nicholas" interest in that author cf. Ep. 1697.
Conrad Pellican states (CPR. p. 78) that at Beatus' request he contributed the
index to Tertullian, as he had done for Erasmus' Cyprian (see p. 23).]
1231. 20. araneam] Aug. Conf. 10. ms. (Q. 46) entitled Reportationes : '
nu3 had just edited his Opera sine . . . tend (BRE. 207). His mss. came from
quorum lectione nuUum diem interinitfebat the nionasteries of Payeriie, s. of the
olini divus Cyprianus . . . (ef. Hier. Vir. Lake of Neuchatel, and Hii'sau (see
53), Basle,.T. Froben, July 1521 the
ill. : Ep. 391 introd.).
'
editio princeps '. 8. Hieronymus] Ep. 58. 10.
3. emendatum] Beatus' prefaco, ad- 16. Hieronymus] adu. RuJ. 3. 27.
dressed to Stanislaus Turzo (p. 599), 20. Qui dimiserit] Matt. 19. 9, Mark
describes the 'prodigiosa codicum de- 10. 11, Lukc 16. 18.
prauatio with which he had to con-
'
24. Hieronymus] Vir. ill. 53.
574 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [152
50 His annumero eos qui considerantes quam res sit impia quamque
immanis bellum, simul videntes pacera et concordiam in sacris
literis vbique sic praedicatam, pronunciarunt nullum esse bellum
lieitum inter Christianos. Atque excessus huiusmodi propemodum
excusatur etiam in orthodoxis, quoties aut deterrent a diuersis viciis
55 aut adhortantur ad ea quae procul absunt ab iis quae vitari cupiunt.
Quod facere solent ii qui virgam incuruam, non inflectunt in rectum
statum, sed in diuersam partem incuruant, vt redeat in rectitudinem.
Atque huius formae mihi videntur plerique errores Tertulliani.
Quorundam errores adeo fuere prodigiosi vt ipsos etiam puderet
60 qui profitebantur. Qualis fuit insania verius quam error Simonis et
Menandri, qui se praedicabant summam Dei virtutem. Tum Basi-
lidis cum suo portentoso Abraxa praeterea Nicolaitarum, quibus ;
neque enim haec tempestas erit diuturna, vti spero. Bene vale,
Nicolae charissime. Ex Anderlaco. prid. Cal. Septembr, [Anno
millesimo quingentesimo vigesimo.]
[I cannot assign a moie precise date to this letter than that it must fall between
Erasmus' return from Bruges at the end of August (p. 552) and his departure to
Basle ahout the end of October (p. 598).
For details of More's family see Ep. 999.]
Est quod Moro gratuleris. Nam Rex hunc nec ambientem nec
flagitantem munere magnifico honestauit, addito salario nequa-
25'quam poenitendo. Est enim Principi suo a thesauris. Ea functio
apud Britannos, vt est splendida cum primis atque honorifica, ita
non admodum est obnoxia nec inuidiae nec molestis negociis.
Erat competitor, homo sat gratiosus, qui sic ambiebat hoc muneris
vt non grauaretur suo victu ciboque gerere. At Rex optimus
30 hic certissimum in Morum fauoris argumentum dedit, qui non
ambienti salarium etiam addere maluerit quam gratuitum magistra-
tum admittere. Nec hoc contentus Princeps benignissimus equitis
aurati dignitatem adiecit. Neque dubitandum est quin illum sit
amplioribus ornamentis aliquando cumulaturus, quum sese offeret
35 occasio siquidem coelibes euehere longe procliuius est principibus.
:
At Morus sic est admixtus ordini coniugum vt nec vxoris obitu sit
emancipandus. Priorem enim quam virginem duxei'at extulit, et
hanc viduus viduam duxit.
Sed hunc Principis animum hoc niagis gratulor Moro, quod quic-
40 quid huic accesserit vel autoritatis vel gratiae, id existimem bonis
studiis accedere quibus ille sic fauet vt, si pares essent animo facul-
:
5. R. F reuerendum H.
: 1 1. hii F Lond. : hi N'^ : ii LB. i8. Hii FN^ : Hi HN^.
19. H : dissentionibus i^.
hactenus. Quid tibi venerit vsu, tute melius nosti. Et tamen illius
benignitateni senserunt ingenia, quum adeo non abundaret illi quod
largiretur, vt aere grauaretur alieno.
Nec hac parte sokim ornat studia, quod ipse doctissimus candide
fauet doctis omnibus, verumetiam quod vniuersam familiam hone- 5°
stissimis literarum studiis excolendam curat, nouo quidem hactenus
exemplo, sed quod breui plures, nisi fallor, sint imitaturi adeo :
tium. Hunc chorum amabilem vna cum sponsis duobus donii habet.
NuUam iUic videbis ociosam, nullam ineptiis muliebribus occupatam.
IlHs T. Liuius est in manibus. Nam eo progressae sunt vt autores
huiusmodi legant et inteUigant citra interpretem, nisi si quod incidat 75
verbum quod me quoque fortassis aut mei similem fuerat remora-
turum.
Vxor ingenio magis ac rerum vsu quam eruditione valens, mira
moderatur omne coHegium, ipyodLoWrov cuiuspiam vicibus
dexteritate
fungens, pensum cuique praescribens atque exlgens, neque sinens 80
cessare quenquam nec friuoHs occupari.
Soles in Hteris tuis subinde queri quod tua causa male audiret
philologia, quae tibi duo mala conciHasset, valetudinis ac rei fami-
57. puellam] Margaret Giggs; see 74. Liuius] For a recent edition, a
Ep. 999. i74n. copy of which Erasmus might have
58. priuignam] Alice, married to Sir given to More, see Ep. 919.
Gyles Alington seo her letter to Mar-
; 79. <p7o5ia)KTou]TheSeptuagintword;
garet Roper, 17 Aug. 1534, printed in translated 'overseer' or 'taskmaster'.
More's English Workes, 1557, p. 1433. But Erasmus took the word IVom
61. tredecim] On this calculation Origen who uses it of Amljrose (pref.
John More was born 1508. But
c. to vol. v of John Evang. : Migne iv.
Erasmus' memory for tigures was weak col. 185) see Erasmus' note on Jerome,
;
cf. Ep. 1098 introd. Ep. 60. i (vol. i, p. 28, in his edition of
72. sponsis] Apparently Roper Wm. 1524: not in 1516;.
and either Wm.
Daunce or Giles 82. in literis] Cf. Epp. 435. 57-8,
Heron ; cf. Ep. 999. 174^, I75nn, 187^. 100-133, 583. 95-115.
152-4 P p
578 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
iio sunt quam quae iudicio castae sunt. Neque vero improbo consiHum
eorum qui manuariis operis prospiciunt pudicitiae filiarum. Verum
nulla res sic totum puellae pectus occupat vt studium. Atque hinc
praeter hoc fructus quod animus ab ocio pernicioso prohibetur,
hauriuntur optima praecepta, quae mentem ad virtutem et instituant
115 et infiamment. Multis simplicitas et rerum inscitia pudicitiae iactu-
ram attulit, pi'iusquam scirent quibus rebus tantus thesaurus peri-
clitaretur. Neque video cur maritis sit metuendum ne minus
habeant morigeras, si doctas habeant nisi si qui tales sint vt ea
;
graphice depingunt. Caeterum neque quid dixerit neque quale sit quod
dixit recensere possunt. Hae tibi totam pene concionem ordine refe-
runt, non sine delectu si quid stulte, si quid impie, si quid extra rem
:
effutiit ecclesiastes —
quemadmodum hodie non raro fieri videmus 135 — ,
id norunt vel ridere vel negligere vel detestari. Atque hoc demum
est audire sacras conciones. Cum huiusmodi demum vere iucundum
est conuiuere. (Pku-imum enim ab istis dissentio qui coniuges non
in alium vsum nabent quam ad obsequium vokiptatis, quam ad rem
magis appositae sunt semifatuae. Pectus habeat oportet, quae fami- H'^
liam contineat in officio, quae Hberorum mores fingat ac formet, quae
marito per omnia satisfaciat. Caeterum cum proximo coUoquio
illud obiecissem Moro, [quod] si quid humanitus accideret, fore vt
grauius discruciaretur earum desiderio, in quibus instituendis tantum
insumpsisset operae respondit incontanter, Si quid acciderit quod 145
;
'
vitari non potest, makm eas mori doctas quam indoctas Moxque '.
Interim illa cogitatio subiit animum meum, vt vos duos ceu duces 150
quosdam eximios in hoc laudis genere componam, veluti si quis
Camilkim committat cum Scipione Africano. Tu et pkiribus annis
et iniquiore seculo cum Hterarum hostibus es confiictatus, hoc ce-te
calculo Moro superior. Caeterum quod tu in fikis tantum ac fratribus
ausus es moHri, hoc iHe non dubitat et in vxoribus et in fiHabus 155
facere, fortiter contempta noui exenipH inuidia. Quo nomine vicis-
sim ille te praecelHt. Tu rursuni Hbris aeditis vtriusque Hteraturae
prouentum magis auxisti quam iHe copiosius etiam, vti nobis poHi-
;
133. Hac] More's daughters. Budaeus did not overlook this sugges-
162. octoginta] But cf. Ep. 999. 6111 tion. Besides tlie assistance which he
and, lor a like estimate, Ep. 121 1. 538-9. gave toDumaine Ep. i46on),hehimself
166. Lexico] For the demand for produced Commentarii liiujnae Graccae,
Greek lexicons time see the
at this Paris, Badius, Sept.1529. These, which
preface contributed by Erasmus (Ep. served as the modcl for Dolefs simiLir
1460; for Froben's. Despite the im- work in Latin, Lyons, S. Gryphius,
mensityofthe task(cf.Ep. 1325. 46-53) 1536-8, consist of interpretations of
P p 2
580 LETTERS OF EEASMUS [1521
sed arbitror esse boni viri publicae vtilitatis gratia semet aliquo
170 vsque demittere quod a sapiente suo exigit Plato.
;
L Aleander iam diu apud nos est. sed huius hactenus nobis maligna
fuit copia, quod sategerit in hoc Lutherano negocio in quo sane :
170. sapienti fl". 174. est add. H. 176. et F : at H. 189. AnnoarW, ^V.
M.D,xxr add. H.
was collecting materials for a Greek 283, 285. ForErasmus' attitude towards
dictionary, of words and phrases. liim at this time cf, Ep. 1195. 47^.
These seem to have passed through the 174, licebit] This implies that the
hands of his pupil. J. Tusanus (+ 1547 : interview at Brussels on 6 Oct, (see
Ep. 810. 45011) whose i>upil published
; p. 591) had not yet taken place.
posthumously an alphabetical Lexicon 175. Viues] He was now engaged
Graeco-Latinum, Pnris, C Gmllard. 1552, with Augustine, Ciu. Dei for wliich ;
under Tusanus' name. Before long an Erasmus wrote a preface (Ep. 1309).
almost identical Lexicon appeared at 178. viceritis] in persuading him
Geneva, J. Crispinus, 1554, with Bu- not to cany the quarrel with More
daeus' name on the title-page. The further :see Epp. 1045, -1087, 1093,
editor, Claudius Baduellus. late Rector 1096, 1117,
of the College of Arts at Nimes (1491- 181. oxercet] sc. Brixius.
1561 see a life byM. J. Gaufres, 1880),
: 183. literis] Not extant.
states in his preface that he had re- 186. rusticari] Cf. Ep. 1208, in,
ceived Budaeus' notes from his son, 187. aedificare] See Ep. 435. 136^.
John. But the additions seem to be 188. repetiturus] Perliaps another
few so that the book is little more
; indication of Erasmus' intention of
than a reprint of the Paris vohime. returning to Brabant after his visit
170. Plato] l\ep. 7. 519. to Basle see Ep. 1209. ^n.
:
12 34] TO JOHN SCHUDELINUS 581
:i magister Paulus ', who was executed for complicity in the Peasants' Revolt
'
see F. L. Baumann, Quellen zur Gesch. d. Bav.ernkritgs in Oberschicaben, 1876, pp. 100,
370-1, 693-4.]
[As in Epp. 1216, 1225, Erasmus again communicates to Barbirius the sub-
stance of one of his Apologiae that de loco Omnes quidern resurgemus' <i Cor, 15.
:
'
51), which is an amplification of his note on that verse in the 1519 edition of the
New Testament. The Apologia appeared first in the Basle volume of Feb. 1522
(p. 622), with the description on the title-page, 'quae recens ab autore profecta
nunc primum omnium in lucem prodiit '. To this self-justification Erasnnis
seems to have been moved by advice from Barbirius which he found not alto-
gether welcome cf. Ep. 1245. 54-6.
:
I. Stendelinus] A letter to Corn. friend of the writer : Agr. E., }>. 969,
Agrippa from Aldenburg
(Ep. 711. 14, synagogam] sc. compntationem
i8n), II Feb. 1531, describes liim as cf. Epp. 1033. 21-2, 1225. 350-5.
'compater' to Agrippa and a close 19. instituendis] Cf. Ep. 1232. lo^n.
582 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
tam feliciter peragas negocium quam agis lente loannes Canius sui !
2.recipiasl Cf. Ep. 1114. 311. points, some of -«111011 are reproduced
pensione] See Ep. 436. ^n and, ; in this letter.
for the arrangements now in progress, 16. is cuius] Since Marianus Vic-
Epp. 1094, 1245. torius, who edited Jeronie 1564-72, the
3. Canius] de Hondt see Epp. 751,
; author of these commentaries has been
913. It appears that he was again recognized as some unknown Pelagian.
behindhand with his payments. Erasmus regarded them as orthodox,
5. Ille noster] Egmondanus; see Ep. but not by Jerome; cf. vol. i, 1°. 7* v°,
878. i3n, and cf. Ejjp. 1196. 115, 554, of his 1516 edition. In consequence
1225. i57n. they are only printed there towards
candidum pallium] Cf. Ep. 1144. the end of vol. ix, If. 131-90. See
28n. F. Klasen in Theol. Quarlalschrift, Ixvii
15. in Annotationibus] The double (1885), pp. 249,50.
readingis indicatedin the 1516 edition 32. Dertusensis] See Ep. 1153. 149^.
of the New Testament but in 1519
; 33. Stunicae] See App. 15 ; and cf.
thft note is enlarged with further Ep. 1277. 2n.
1235] TO PETEK BARBIEIUS 583
Quod tantas opes tibi pararis Romae, easque liberas, nec sacris
obnoxias, nec alii cuiquam quam tuae industriae acceptas ferendas,
tametsi tua virtus longe maiora promerebatur, tamen vt nunc sunt
tempora, gratulor tibi felicitatem istam, qui grauissimum illud onus 20
paupertatem excusseris. Nunc video te circunspectare vitae genus
liberum ac tranquillum, ad quod te vehit in portum aliquem tutum
et quietum recipias. Atqui nonnihil vereor ne tibi veniat vsu quod
de mustela narrat Horatius, cui nou licuit exire pastam, cum macra
repsisset in cameram frumentariam et tamen adnitendum censeo.
;
25
Sed vbi potius id speres quam Komae ? Nam Bononiam omnibus
1235. 35. Nouum Testamentum] See 1 1. literis] Ep. 1143 ; or cf. Ep. 1213.
Ep. 1174. i5n. 27n.
1230. 10. N.] Aleander, 24. Horatius] Cf. Epp. i. 7. 29-33.
584 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [1521
27. spartum] Cf. Plin. N. H. 35, 11. doubtless considered himself responsi-
137, with the story of a man weaving ble,and whom he may have sent to
a rope of hay and an ass eating it up try his fortune at Eome.
as fast as woven discussed in Adag,
: 45. GaUorum] As part of the Mila-
382,3. Erasmus' meaninghere clearly nese, Alessandria had been in French
is that at Bologna Bombasius would hands again since Marignano in 1515.
be amongst relatives and dependants It was recaptured from them at the
who would make cLaims upon him. end of Jan. 1522 see Brewer iii. 201 >
;
quam ille sit TruXvypucfio^. Nec solus est centum habet manus. Nec
;
erat satis illius libros semel euokiere, iterum atque iterum erant
reuoluendi. Ne id quidem Multi passim aduersus illum
satis.
aedunt volumina, quorum nihil non inspiciendum milii. si cupiam So
suscepto negocio satisfacere. Vt ne commemorem interim, dum ad
haec vocor, non satis habere loci prouerbium illud, rov tWoi' eis TreSiW.
Res est periculi plena, et in alio studiorum campo magis sum exerci-
tatus. Ad haec iam par erat niihi tot libris aeditis defuncto dari
missionem, quo liceret per ocium posthac studiis frui. Flagitabat S5
hoc aetas ingrauescens, promerebantur hactenus iuuandis pubHcis
studiis exhausti labores. Hoc negocium tale est vt ei, si semel
ingrediar, sit per omnem vsque vitam seruiendum.
mi Bombasi, procliue dictu est Scribe aduersus Lutherum
'
'.
71. reuocaui] Cf. Ep. 1143.2211. 82. prouerbium] Adag. 782: ' Qno-
75. legendi] For the extent of his ties quis ad id prouocatur in quo pluri-
reading as yet sec Epp. 1167. 124, 1225. nium valet, quoque vel niaximegaudet'.
259-60; and cf. 11. 135-6 mjVa. 91. llesiodus] 0;j. 453-6 : quoted in
77. TTo^vypa^pos] Cf. Epp. 221. 360, Adag. 3288.
1173. 87-8. 100. Incendiorum] Cf. Ep. 1218. 4in.
586 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
mihi tribui duos libellos, quorum alteri titulus est Eubulus, alteri
110. Nouo Testamento] SeeEp. 1174. 137. vlla syllaba] Cf. Epp. 1217. 60,.
I5n. 1218. 20, 1219. 25.
113. Aleandro] Cf. Ep. 1195. 47^. 141. agnouit] Cf. Epp. 1218. 15,
114. corycaeorum] Spies; cf. Cic. 1219.88.
Att. 10. 18, quoted in Adug. 144. At 143. Captiuitatis] See Ep. 1217.38^.
Corycus, a proinontory of Cilicia, the '
147. Panegyrici] See Epp. 179, .180.
inhabitants were infainous for spying 149. libellos] Cf. Ep. 12 18. 13-15.
out the destination and value of ships' Eubulus] Oratio Constanfii EubuU
cargoes and thon piraticaliy seizing Mouentini de virtute clauium et bulla con-
them '
Liddell and Scott.
: demnationis Leonis decivii contra Martinum
136. totuin] Cf. I. 75n. Liilherum, s. I. et a. addressed to
:
1236] TO PAUL BOMBASIUS 587
174. S. D. N. J': Leo decimus if. 179. capessere J*'. 187. hi FX- : Lic
HS^ i88. R. D. om. H.
by that time Licentiate in Law. In 1504 Duke George of Saxony (cf. Ep. 586.
266) appointed liim to the executive Council of Friesland, and iu 1515 Charles
made him Regent of the pi-ovince in which capacity he rendered good service,
;
This is the only letter surviving that passed between him and Erasmus, unless
Ep. 1166 is addressed to him but Lond. xx. 80, LB. 1013 indicates warmth of
;
feeling.
One of Bucho's nephews wasViglius Zuichem, born 19 Oct. 1507 ; who reeords
in his autobiography continual benefits received from this uncle, who was like '
a father to him.
' Bucho sent him to school at Deventer 1519-20, had hini and
his brother taught at Leiden with other boys of good faraily 1520-1 and at the ;
end of 1521 recalled them to the Hague to work with a private tutor, with whom
he sent them to Louvain in Oct. 1522. It is tlierefore nol unlikely that these
niay have been the boys about whom Bucho had eonsulted Erasmus at this
time : even thougli in I. 48 they are described aa •amici tui pueros'. At his
death he left Viglius a considerable sum of money and a good library.
VZE. I and 2, 1525 and 1528, testify Viglius' gratitude ; which he records also
in editing Theophilus Antecessor's hist. iuris ciuilis, Basle, Froben, March 1534,
and in his own Comment. in Inst. iur. ciuiL, ibid., 1534. The former (f°. a* v°)
speaks of patronage received by Bucho from Maximilian, Margaret of Austria,
and Charles v.
See C. P. Hoynck van Papendrecht, Analecta BeJgica, i (1743^ pp. 4-8, 55-63,
258-60 also NNBW. iii. 47-8.]
:
5 Nec dubito quin sit sed in promptu non esse doleo. Quod quidem
;
11. Agricolam] See Ep. 23. 5711. Deventer, A. Pafraed, April 151 7, and
Langium] See Ep. 70. 4511. Scoparius in harhariei propugnatores, ibid.
Canterios] See Ep. 32 introd.
12. (1517). From Zwolle ho went t..
s. a.
13. liberos] Cf. Ep. 1220. 45^. Louvain, vvhere he came under the
15. coelum] Cf. Ep. 1221. i^n. iufiuence of Goclenius (p. 504), and
21. Ceratinus] See Ep. 622. 3111. taught for some time. Later he re-
24. Collegio linguarum] See Ep. turned to Westphalia, and became
525 introd. and, for some facts of its
; pastor at Wildeshausen, between
brief existenee 1523-30, A. Hocquet, Vechta and Bremen where he died
;
Tournai et le Tomnaisis au xvi''' siecle, 1906, a few years before tlie publication of
p. 284. In liis will of 22 Jan. 1527 Hamelmann's Illustrium Wesfphaliae
Erasmus left to the College a copy of virornm liber iv, Lemgo, 1564.
the projected edition of his coUected See the critical edition of that by
works naming as the founder of the
: H. Detmer and K. Loffler, Miinster
College, Peter Coutrellus (Cottrel), i. W., 1908, pp. 135, 296, 298; and
who was Vicar-general to the Bp. of D. Reichling's J. Murmellius, 1880, pp.
Tournay, L. Guillard (Ep. 1212). 82, 163,4.
Hermannus] Herm. Stuvius of
25. 29. Suesionius] Adr. Araerotius
Vechta, s. of Oldenburg, was a pupil of (t 14 Jan. 1560 or 1562) of Soissons was
Murmellius (Ep. 838. 2n) and niade a pupil of Aleander in Paris in 1512 ;
Ep. 838. 7n); and Murmellius dedi- cated to Ant. de la Marck (Ep. 956),
cated to him Tabularum opuscula tria, he speaks highly of his teachers, Xevius
590 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
45 ab istiusmodi pi*ouincia. Sunt autem non hii solum sed et alii per-
multi, caeterum mihi non jjerinde -Cogniti. Horum quos recensui
nomine non dubitem fideiubere. Ex his quemcunque delegeris, non
male collocaueris amici tui pueros.
Eximium D. Nicolaum Euerardum, Hollandiae praesidem, vicissim
50 meis verbis salutabis quem virum vtinam fata nobis quam diutissime
:
fEp. 298) and Gavere (Ep. 717. 21 n), cated to him a commentary on Psalm^
and of his friend, Paschasius Berselius (Ep. 1427) and in April 1524 pro-
;
(Ep. 674). He also composed a treatise posed to leave him a sum of nioney
on Greek dialects, of which no edition (Ep. 1437). From 20 June to 20 Oct.
seems to be known before one at Paris, 1525 Melchior was teaching in the tri-
C. Wechel, 1534. In 1545 he succeeded lingual college at Tournay (1. 24^) ;
was over. This may therefore be the letter promised in Ep. 1237. 51.
Before leaving Anderlecht Erasmus went over to Brussels (cf. Ep. 1342. 62-5)
to see Aleander, who had returned thither from Bruges (cf. Ep. 1233. r^in).
Their interview. which lasted nearly five hours, is described briefly by Erasmus
in the Spongia (LB. x. 1645 e = HE. 333, § 134), and more fully by Aleander in
a dispatch from Louvain, 13 Oct. 1521 (Bahin no. 126) : Quello amico de chi se
'
vincit.
50 notior sit quam mihi neque me praeterit quo. studio soleas eiusmodi
;
Arsenale 1021, j). 497;. He was B.A. 21-2. For anotlier aspect of the situa-
1507-8, Proctor of the German nation tion cf. Ep. 996. 43^.
1508-9, M.A. 1509. In 1510 he entered 60. turbentur] «c. bona studia.
the Sorbonne at the age of 19, was 62. Principes] Charles and Francis :
potest apud filios suos a tam pernicioso bello coercendos? Vbi nunc
isti nimium vocales ecclesiastae ? Hic aut linguam non habent, aut
habent adulatricem. Fortassis olim dicet Carolus noster. Non 70 •
putaram belkim rem esse tam pestiferam '. Sed hoe dictum nimio
nobis constabit. Caeterum nos his in rebus nihil aliud possumus
quam a superis optare meliora. Si nostra aula decem haberet tui
similes. melius cuni rebus humanis ageretur.
Sed vt ad studiorum causam ledeam, posteaquam Lutheranum 75
negocium confectum est (quod vtinam recte confectum sit I). eo
redeunt vnde eoeperant. Palam in eoncionibus et lectionibus publicis
damnant linguas ac politiores literas, in Erasmum nominatim magnis
conuiciis debacchantiir quidam. Nec video profecto quid sibi propo-
suerint. Etenim si hoc agunt, vt populus intelligat in istis ordinibus So
esse homines impudenter maledicos, hoc iam persuasius est populo
quam vt ipsis expediat. Sin illud agunt, vt iuuenes a bonis literis
alienos ad suae theologiae studium allectent, non poterant eos magis
deterrere quam huiusmodi moribus. Luteciae Cantabrigiaeque sic
floret theologiae studium vt nuaquam alias aeque. Quid in causa? 85
Nimirum quod sese accommodant seculo alio se flectenti. quod has
meliores literas vel vi irrumpere conantes non repelkint vt hostes, sed
vt hospites comiter amplectuntur, Quod Louanii frigent theologorum
—
scholae nam hoc queruntur quidam —
mihi non possint imputare,,
70. Non putaram] Cf. Ep. 1161. 1411. 97. edictum] Cf. Ep. 1192. 66n.
84. Cantabrigiaeque] Cf. Ep. iiii. 98. Peffercoinus] See Ep. 487. 2on.
28n. His niost recent work was Ein milhyd-
88. frigent] Cf. Ep. 1166. 106. UclieClaeg.. .gegen... h'euchUn,(Co]n'j.nv),
94. professore] Evidently Rescius ;
21 ilarch 1521 see Eov. ii, pp. 114,15.
;
tuerinon possit nisi vitam adimat impetenti, leges hoc illi imputant
qui eausam dedit. Dices, In ius voca Quo tandem ? Nec princi-
' '.
[The value of the manuscript is discussed iii connexion with Epp. 1206, 1225.
For Ofhuys see Ep. 693 introd. and, for Erasmus' respect for the Carthusians,
;
on 30 Aug. 1520 Rescius' suit against Calaber had not yet been heard (see
de Jongh pp. 203, 25*).]
1239. 14. Christus] .Jolm 16.33. Chorograplda sacra Brabanliae, i6^g, vol. i,
19. Reuisam] Cf. Ep. 1209. ^n. Carfchus. Bruxell., ch. 3.
20. Pafcriarchen] The Prior of tlie 1240. 2. pacem] Cf. Epp. 1156. 14,
Carthusiansat Brussels since 1517 was 1211. 559, 1225. 299.
John Meerhoult see Ant. ttanderus,
: 8. Ipsi] The University uuthorities.
<jq 2
596 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
cui videaris litigare cum patre. Quanquam vir ille mea sententia
non peccauit malicia sed obsequio. Bene vale. Eesci chariss.
Anderlaci. Anno m.d.xxi.
[The manuseript, as Merula had it, was either defective in a few places or
else undecipherable : the gaps are not easy to fill. The year-date is established
by the reference to the Diet of Worms, and by the movements of Capito.
He had just returned from a visit to Wittenberg, where he spent two days
c. 30 Sept. : cf. ME. 142, 3037 and BRE. 212. The purpose of his going, in which
he was accompanied by Stromer (Ep. 578), was to urge the friends of Luther,
and through them Luther himself, to moderation, in the hope that his patron,
the young Archbishop of Mainz, might be induced to countenance Luther's
views, if not too uncompromisingly expressed. Albert had indeed recently
shocked Luther by reopening the sale of indulgences at Halle on 15 Sept. (LE^.
459, 461 and BRE. 212) but Capito hoped that with care he miglit be persuaded
;
iip, and that priests who wished to marry should be freely allowed to do so
(LE -. 469). Albert replied in ostensilde humility (LE,^. 475), which aroused
hopes in Luther (JE. 73) and Capito did his best to mediate with a long letter
;
(LE '. 474), sent*with the Archbishop's, and liaving considerable resemblance to
this, which had been written two months earlier. When
Luther's liopes were
disai^pointed (cf. LE ^. 479), Capito fell for a time into disgrace witb him but ;
on 12 March 1522 he made his way to Wittenberg and obtained pardon (BRE.
220).]
ea nobis cautione opus est inter tot insidias. Exemplum istud tuum
est, qui ad me omnia prudenter et circummunite quod consilium :
1240. 20. Calabrum] M.D. afc Louvain Andreas pp. 41, 228-9, and de .Jongh.
1489 Rector of the University 1514,
; 1241. i. Scripsil Not extant.
1516-17,1519-20; 1 14 July T527, *mul- 5. aulicus] Cf. Ep. 1158. 2on, and
tum senex '. Se Molanus p. 563, Yal. 1. 46^ infra.
1241] FEOM WOLFGAXG FABRICIUS CAPITO 597
14. perstringunt] Eriismus had al- letter to Luther, 21 Dec. (LE^. 474.
reacly had this report in August ; cf. 53-6) :
' hominem j^erpuli ad legenda
Ep. 1225. 282-4. sacra, praesertim Euangeliaet Paulum,
18. sententia] Charles had solemnly praeterea quae de bonis operibus pien-
pronounced against Luther at Worms tissime tu pridem edidisti '. On the
on 19 April. same date Capito wrote to Melanch-
Glapionis] See Ep. 1275. Of his thon {Bibl. Bremensis, ix. i-]2o-i, p. g^^;:
' apophtliegm
I ean find no ti-ace.
' '
reui propius agnoscens ad legenda sa-
20. comburendis] Cf. Ep. 1218. 41U. cra, ad audiendas Euangelicas concio-
26. Eegis] The King of Denmark nes, ad jjrimas episcopi partes fungen-
(Ep. 1228. 3on^, who had offered das se destinauit nam
dicendi Euan-
:
to the Rhine, through a j^lace which lie calls Sychimum ', perhaps Sechtem,'
SE. of Bruhl. From Coblenz on, he went by the right bank of the Rhine, to have
the escort of the soldiers but at Spires he left them and crossed back again,
:
finally making his way to Basle through Strasburg, Schlettstadt, and Cohuar.
In a letter to Alciati (Basle MS. C. VP. 73. 163) Boniface Amerbach announces
that he arrived at Basle on 15 Nov. cf. ZE. 33. ;
So long as he was with the soldiers, he travelled very rapidly, partly no doubt
from his desire to keep up with them, and partly because he was eager to finish
his journey and get 011 with his work. Afcer such fatigues he rested two days
at Spires and two at Strasburg, in each case perhaps two full days and three
nights. The last three stages apparently each occupied a day. In this course
t.lift only fixed pointsare those of his setting-forth and arrival, 28 Oct. and 15 Nov.
Some guidance as to time may be obtained from his journey of Sept. 15 18 (Ep.
867) but in the absence of more precise information the following itinerary
;
morning at lo. The rest of the day spentthere : in the afternoon, letters
written, none of which survive.
5 Nov. From Coblenz to Mainz.
6 Nov. Froni Mainz to Worms (for dinner) and Spiies, arriving late. Both
here and at Worms lie was upset by tlie stoves (Epp. 1302. 29-30, 1342.
190-1, 204).
7, 8 Nov. At Spires.
9, 10 Nov. From Spires to Strasburg (cf. Ep. 867. 152).
II, 12 Nov. At Strasburg.
13 Nov. From Strasburg to Schlettstadt.
14 Nov, From Schlettstadt to Colmar.
15 Nov. From Cohnar to Basle.
The i-easons which determined Erasmus to leave Louvaiu and go to Basle
were various. He was weary of tlie incessant controversies in which he had
been involved (Lond. xix. 33, LB. 1033) and he wished to see the notes of his
;
third edition of the New Testament (Ep. 1174. i5n) through the press (Epp.
1302. 8-13, 1342. 90-6). But the most poweiful motive was the tear tliat Court
pressure, exercised through Glapion (Ep. 1275), might compel him to enter the
lists definitely against Lutiier (OE. pp. 351-2, and a Responsio of 1530, LB. x.
1612C cf. Ep. 1342. 47). When he started, his intention was to leturn in the
;
spring (cf. Ep. 1209. ^n) and he probably did not propose to stay longer in
;
Basle than on liis previous visits. But having reaehed the circle of his friends,
he found it hard to tear himself away. Writing in 1533, he coukl say tliat he
had never regretted the migration (OE. p. 352).
His reception by the advanced party in Basle may be illustrated from a letter
of Conrad Pellican to Mehmchthon, 30 Nov. 1521 (K. Hartielder, Melanchthoniana
paedagogica, 1892,^.19): '
Erasmus nobiscum est. Prudenter scribit et loquitur,
ne veritati noii assit et jjericulum non scribendi euadat. Expedit vt sapienter
dissimulando inuidiam superet et promouentis vos in sacris studiis nou
impediri sinat. Frangere mihi passim videtur iras atrocium, leiiinientisque
oportunis insinuare inimicis modestiam. Egit sapienter id et caute nuper cum
Aleandro. Disjiutat crebro contra Lutlieranos Papistarum inuentis, et nunquam
non pro veritate colligit et decertat. Scribit propediem in Euangelia, fortasse
Paraphrases. Epistolas suas nouissimas libro inclusit, pro Luthero omnes,
cautus atque solicitus ad omnes semper. Non possum non commendare virum
sed spiritum Lutheri noii aequat '. Melanchthon at oiice conveyed the welcome
intelligence to Spalatinus (ME. 127) :f^rasmus Basileae est. Heri literas accepi
'
at the same time a present of coins for Krasmus (Ep. 1272;. Beatus then dedi-
cated to him a collection of Aiitores historiae ecclesiasticae, Basle, Froben, 1523
(BRE. 234) a compliment vvhich the Bp. merited, since he could assure Beatus
:
600 LETTEKS OF ERASMUS [1521
that lie had read Tertulliau ri^ht through (BKE. 266). Erasmus carried onthe
conuexion, dedicating to Turzo tirst Pliny's Hist. Kuf., Ba>ile, Froben, March
1525 (Ep. 1544 and then an Enarratio of Fs. 38, ibid., March 1532. AU these
,
works brougbt cups from the Bp. (cf. Ep. 1603 Aventinus' Werke, vi, 1908, ;
p. 90 and Lond. xxvii. 37, LB. 1229; the last of which was in Erasmus' pos-
; ;
session at his death (L. Sieber, MobiUar des Erasmus, 1891, p. 6). Other books
addressed to Turzo are Cuspinianus" edition of Dionysius Periegetes, Vienna,
Winterburger, 1508 Ziegler's attack on the Bohemian Brethren (Ep. 1260.
;
cosmiis, 1522 (see Ep. 950 introd.) Andr, Cricius' De ufflictione Ecclesiae, Kome,
;
1527 and Jo. Faber'& Sermones adv.ersus AtiabajJtistas, Vienna, J. Singren, 1528.
;
Beatus Khenanus, In C. Plinium, Basle, Froben, March 1526, p. 27, extols his
exceptional generosity to meu of learning.
See A. Pilarz and F. Moravetz, Morauiae Ilistoria, ii, 1786, p]>. 124, 128, &c. :
and an article by K. Wotke in Zs. f. Gesdi.Malmns, iii, 1899. 337~^8, wliich I have
not been able to see.]
the west of ]iis home. In May 1524, See H. Dalton'slife of John a Lasco ;
against Luther printed atCracow, 1524 428-35. See also C. Pascal in BuU.
(Ep. 1629 and at departuiv presented
; Soc. Uist. du Protestantismi: fran(;ais, x\i\
him with a silverflask, which was slill (1895), 287-305 and 575-93.
am.ong Erasmus' possessions in 1534 26.Zandeius] Michael Sanderi or
(L. Sieber, Mobiliar des Erasmus, 1891, Sanderus (f c. Sept. 1529) stitdied at
p. 8). Erasmus in return dedicated to Bologna with Thos. Wolf jun. of Stras-
him the Modus orandi Denm, Basle. burg, c. 1492-1501 (Schmidt ii. 61,2
Froben, Oct. 1524 (Ep. 1502 audcor- ;
cf. Knod 4278) aiid became LL.D. He
re.~.ponded with him iu 1525-6 (Epi;. went to Rome and secured a papal
1622. 1751}. chaplaincy andthen acquired further
;
Dominus Hieronimus Laski palatinus vom M'ormsey Reichstage, 1898, pp. 75,6
liiace proximis diebus quatuor castella and Zw. E 2. 5011.
602 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
Quod operam suam mihi tam propense offert tua benignitas, magis
conuenit vt meam tantulus cliens patrono tanto.
tibi offeram, Fauo-
rem ac studium amplector quo mihi nunc sic opus est vt nunquam
:
[The last letter in F in point of time written shortly nfter Erasmus' arrival
;
1242.38. Vtlium] See Ep. 548. ^n. similar reception to aletter of Erasmus
He was novv at Freiburg cf. £p. 1243.: which he showed them c. 1518 see :
[1521 is the only year after Erasmus' return to Basle in which Leo x
(L 32"! was still living. For the forms of heading and address see Ep. 1085
introd.]
1. S.P: BiLiBALDO svo KEASMVs s. D. O^. 9. siut F : sunt O^. 19. quo
LB : qua P. 23. contemnimur 0".
Anderlecht, where he still was on 14 4. ista molestia] Cf. Ep. 1182. ^n.
Oct. (Ep. 1239), and his departure to On 19 July Aleander wrote to the
Basle 28 Oct. (p. 598). Curiaaskingforpowertoabsolve Pirck-
3. diuersorio] Ep. 1342. 105 shows heimer and Spengler without requiring
that this was the Homme Sauvage : their appearance at Rome and a Brief ;
apparently the principal inn in Lou- to this effect was sent oft' to him from
vain, for in Aug. 1426 the secretary Florence 3 Aug. 152 1. See Balan pp.
who brought letters from the Duke of 274, 279.
Brabant approving the foundation of 7. a prouocando] Cf. Ep. 1241.
the Univer.sity, was lodged there at 22. vel armis] Cf. Ep. 1168. ign.
the expense of the town. See E. van 27. Praedicatores] Cf. Epp. 1166,
Even, Louvatn monumentdl, 1860, p. 286. 1173-
604 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
1244. 34. LB : vera Basileae. Bene vale P. 38. Erasmus ... 40. consiliario
om. Oi^.
dicte signatiire bullas facere expedire sine meo vel cuiuscunque nouo -^o
consensu. Quia vero de pensione sex librarum grossorum cum media
super prebenda Cort:racen(si) assignatarum non j>otest lioc modo fieri,
ego decreui vel hic vel in Flandria pro eis accipere beneficium ali-
quod seu sacerdotium. et tunc similiter consentiam in pensionem
similem, sicut iam consensurum me predixi quoad alia beneficia. 25
Quia vero hic rari sunt notarii apostolici, presertim qui Latine scri-
bere j^ossint, ne, precor, putes me fidem non seruare, si cum presenti-
bus non misero procuratorium ad hoc faciendum sed quod non ;
munus abs te potius consequi quam ab alio quocunque simul vt, nisi ;
22. Cortracensi] See Ep. 436. 50. It Epp. 613 inti-f»!., 1094. 2911.
itppears tliat a libra grossormn was 32. sancti E.^idii]See Ep. 1094. 29^.
worth 20 florins. 53. Carolum Charles v.
28. procuratorium] It still liad not 55. nocere] Barliirius evidently con-
arrivedinMay 1522: secEp. 1287. 10 11. sideredthathisadvicehad onlyspuned
30. aliis literis] Not extant. Erasmus ou to justify himself, witl»
fratri] Nicliolas Barbiriu^N ; see Epp- 1216, 1225, 1235.
606 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [15:
W. Tate of York (fc. 10 Sept. 1540) met Erasmus in 1499 or 1505-6 in England
and in 1500 or 1506 Ep. 535. 39-42) at Orleans (1. 2) where he no doubt obtained
i
:
his degree in law. In 1512 he was a trustee to whom certain lands in Yorkshire
wei-e demised (Brewer i. 3386). Later he secured a position at Court whence in :
Dec. 1517 he was sent to carry the King's Christmas offering to Canterbury, and
in 1521 the Assertio to Rome (ibid. ii, p. 1476, iii. 1450, and the present letter
;
evidently was written from the royal palace (Ep. 937. 46^). In 1520 he was
treasurer of Beverley Minster, where his name is carved on one of the stalls
(G. Oliver, Brvcrleij, 1829, p. 330). In 1522 he received a canonryat Windsor and
—
a prebend at Y^ork (Le Neve iii. 392, 176) preferment which perhaps indicates
that he was already attached to the household of Henry vui's natural son, the
Duke of Richmond (1519-36). By 1525 he was a member of the Duke's Council
in the North. at a time when the boy was thought likely to be the heir to the
throne (DNB. xix. 204) and in 1526 he was his almoner (Brewer iv). The
;
date of his death may be approximately inferred for his will was made on
;
9 Sept. 1540, ;ind the rectory of Chelmsford which he held, was filled up on
II Sept. see Notes and Queries, ^th ser., x. 55, and cf. Ep. 623 introd.
;
To his
prebends appointments were made on 7 and 8 Oct. 1540 (Brewer xvi. 220. 13,
and Le Neve iii. 393, 176).
He is very likely the '
humanissimus Dr. Taitus', whom Wakefeld (Ep. 1311.
4411) mentions as a friend and praises for his knowledge of Hebrew (Oratio,
ff. C', E^ v°) : but though he had learning enough to quote G-reek here, the
IHS.
DO. DES. ERASMO ROTERODA., VERAE PHILOSOPHIAE SACRAEQVE
THEOLOGIAE PROFESSORI, GVILHELMVS TATO
INTER LL. DOCTORES MINIMVS S. F. D.
Iam ad te scribere. vir doctissime, (impellit) non modo vetus illa
inter nos amicitia olim et Britanniae hic concoepta, Aureliaeque, Gal-
liarum vrbe, continuata, verumetiam quod indies magis ac magis
philosophiam, illam scilicet Christi, sapere nitentibus viam ipsam.
5 nedum semitam latissimam, demonstras. Eoque quantum emolu-
menti^in Christo militantibus es allaturus, mihi haud facile putem
dictu. Aeuo proculdubio illo natus es foelici, ac me quidem, quod
aeuo tuo superstes sim, ingenti afficior gaudio. Vehementius tamen
gauderem, si illa locorum inter nos distantia (ad)mitteret, quo
10 inpraesentiarum consuetudinem apud me tui interdum haberem.
Animo penitus istic apud te moror, quanquam corpus illud meum
inter nonnullos hic inuidia latrantes bonosque semper et eruditos
lacerantes viros tedio non mediocri afficiatur. Caeterum quum ii
linguis alios feriant, sese dilaniant. Hinc tov to dTrocfideyfxa a-offiov,
15 Ta yap Tov (jiOovov Kivrjjxara avTOv TrXrjyax yivovTat tov /^aa-Kdvov. Sed
8. Pro ingenti afficior gaudio/wsJton prius scripserit ingens tenet gaudiura.
occluduntur ora.
Audisti iamiam, reor, potentissimum ilkmi ac elegantissimum
principem Regemque nostrum Henricum, huius nominis octauum,
cum corporis tum animi dotibus nemini secundum, totoque terrarum 20
c,yclo fortissimum fidei defensorem non modo ab Ecclesia dumtaxat
Ehomana sed et iure ipso meritissime nuncupatum, aduersus Lu-
therianam haeresim, illam videlieet qua sacramenta ferme quasi
omnia pessumire temere conatur, eleganter suo calamo libellum /
[An original letter, with a page 11. 50-62) in.serted by Peutinger'.s wife :
autograph in both parts. The year-date is confirmed by Erasmus' return to
Basle, and by the week-date given in 1. 19.
—
Margaret Peutinger(i8 Mareh 1481 7 Sept. 1552, was the daughter of Antony
Welser, burgomaster of Memmingen. When she married in 1498-9, slie was
already Latinis literis aliquantum imbuta' (RE. 66) and though by now the
'
;
mother of a large family, slie still fouud time for her studies. On i Dec. 1511
she addressed to lier brother Christopher an arehaeological Episfola which ;
1246. 21. tidei defensorem] See Ep. 24. conatur] sc. Lutherus.
1227. 5n. 27. transmitti] Cf. Ep. 1227.
608 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [152
dies docere.
Vrbs quae etsi peste aliquantisper grassata fuit, se nunc
nostra,
habet meHus
nara niue albescente et pruina perusta, gelu atque
;
50
• 'Potestis bibere pocukim quod ego bibiturus sum, et baptismate
quo baptizor, baptizari ? Dicunt ei, Possumus '
Ait illis CaH-
'
'. :
'
II. Brugis] Cf. E^jp. 1129. in, 1145. 32. Marcum] 10. 39.
19. Sunday, 8 Dec.
lieri] atque Vulgario] This name is
33.
22. Noui Tfcstamenti] The notes to added in the Annot. of 1518.
II-33> 5°» ^how tiiat she wasusingEras- 50. poculum quod] substituted in
mus' edition of 1518-ig. Erasmus' translation of i^igfor calicem
30. Et baptismo] Matt. 20. 23. (^new of 1516.
1247] FEOM CONEAD PEUTINGEE 609
" Mogend
'
trincken den kelch den ich wird trincken, vnd mit
ir
dem tawf, darin ich getawft, ir getawft werden?' Sy sprachen, 55
'
Wir mogen Vnd er sprach zu yn
'.
Wan meinen kelch werden :
'
ir trincken vnd mit dem tauf, darin ich getauft, ir getauft werden
aber zu sitzen' ecz." Comunis interpretacio Germanica hoc sokim
habet " Mogend ir trincken den kelch den ich wird trincken ?
:
'
Sy '
[A letter printed at the end of the Paraphrase on St. Matthew (Ep. 1255
introd.). Of the Froben editions enumerated there it is necessary to distinguish
the folio of 15 March 1522 (a) ; the octavos of Mareh 1522 (/3) and s. a. (7); the
folio of 1524 (5), wliich appears to have been set up from a, with the misprint
in 1. 14 corrected the octavo of 1534 (e)
; and the folio of 1535 (Q. The ;
1248. TiT. DEs. ante erasmvs adcL (. 8. subinde add. 0f : om. a5.
genius malus hos tantos tumultus excitat inter mortales. Nec satis
est sic bellis intestinis regna, ciuitates, summos oi*bis monarchas
inter se collidi, nisi studia literarum, nisi reiigio fidesque Christiana
tam periculosis dissidiis concuterentur. Equidem si tantis malis
25 nullum adhibere remedium possim, certe me duce aut autore nuUus
erit factiosus.
Video seculum lioc esse malum ac periculosum. Quid moliantur
quidam aut quid parturiat mundus, nescio. Ego, quod semper feci,
non desinam fauere gloriae Christi. Homunculus sum misellus, qui
30 minus possim quam nihil tamen voluptati est mihi reflorescere ac
;
minus, quae nec aetatem lianc deceant, si libeat frui, et breui mihi
sciam esse relinquendas. Illud milii j^otius studio est, commeatum
aliquem parare quo instructus hinc feliciter emigrem ad Christum,
;
tamen tui similior esse potest qunm es ipse tui. R. D. T. diu floren-
tem et incohnnem seruet Dominus lesus.
65 Basileae postrid. Id. Decemb. An. m.d.xxi.
14. tu li : tum a. 55. Id. a : Idib. t : Idus (,'. a5{': Decembr. 7«.
M.D.xxi 7« : M.D.xx a5 : m.d.i /3.
Milan, on 30 June (^Brewer iii. 1357, Epp. 1186. 22n, 1255. 80-r. Auewform
1388): so tliat tlie date of his inter- of ui)oh)getic disclaimer cf. Epp. 30. :
[An abridgement of Ep. 1248 ; intended for actual dispatch, while Ep. 1248
was i^rinted.]
tibi niliil aliud agere quam quod soluni erat agendum Et tamen, !
De Pontifice Leone coepit hic rumor spargi quem plane velim esse
vanum. Germania nos excepit vt solet nidor hypocaustorum rae ;
[The year-date js eonfirmed by the mention of the war and of Alciati's Decla- '
mation and by Boniface's presence at Basle. See also the letters in sequence,
',
dedicated to French ofBcials in Mihin, and printed by Minutianus (see Ep. 1020.
57n). He also wrote notes on Tacitus, addressed to G. Visconti (cf. Ep. 378.
in) ; first printed by Minutianus, 1517. In Oct. 1518 he was appointed to
lecture on law at Avignon, and he taught there witli great success till Nov. 1522 ;
with an interval from April to Nov. 1521, when he returned to Milan bucau.se
of an outbreak of plague. His resignation in 1522 was due to difficultics about
612 LETTERS OF ERASMUS [1521
the payment of his salary. Por some years he remained at Milan, regretfnl of
Avignoii, and seeking in vain for an appointment in some Italian university,
preferably Padua. A high municipal office was offered to him but he declined,;
wishing to be free for his studies. These were mainly legal but he found time :
to compose a comedy, Philargynis, to translate Ar. Nuhes, and to huut for mss. on
behalf of the Basle printers with whom through Boniface he remained always
:
bishop, Francis of Tournon (Ep. 1319); to come for two years to Bourges. In
1530 he began to negotiate for a chair at Bologna but it was not till 1533 that
;
he succeeded in his ambition of an Italian post, when the Duke of Milan sent
him to Pavia, resisting an attempt of the Doge of Venice to secure him for
Padua. From 1537 to 1541 he taught at Bologna, 1541-3 at Pavia again, 1543-7
at Ferrara after which he returned to Pavia until his death. See Mazzuclielli,
;
with a long list of his works, i^rinted and ms. V. Cian in Arch. stor. Lombardo,
;
xvii (1890), 811-65 ; 0- Giardini, ibid. xxx (1903), 294-346; and E. Costa in
Arch. stor. Italiaiio, xxxvi (1905), 100-35.
Alciati's reputation was raade early see the honourable mentions in Zasius'
:
many letters in ZE, and Horawitz i. 17. His most important composition was
the legal treatise De verborum significatione, written as early as 1523, but not
printed till 1530, Lyons, S. Gryphius, with a dedicntion to Card. Tournon. In
his later yeai-s he produced a collected edition of his works, finely printed by
Isingrinius, Basle, 1546-9, in four volumes. He is best known through a volume
of about 200 Emhlemata. or symbolic epigrams. which, when published with
illustrations, set the fashion of an emblem-literature ', and were soon widely
'
Oerman 1542, into Italian and Spanish 1549, into English 1586. Altogether
about 180 editions of it are known : see an elaborate bibliography by H. Green,
1872.
Of his correspondence much remains. Ten letters exchanged with Erasmus
survive. There are 7 letters to him, 1512-21, in the letter-book of Alex.
Minutianus at Milan (Brera MS. AD. XI. 31). P. Burmann in 31. Gudii Epistolae,
1697. pp. 75-114, printed 27 of his letters, 1518-40, 26 of which are to F. Calvus
(Ep. 581. 3on). Tlie Basle MS. G. II. 14 contains 78 original letters from him
to Boniface Amerbach, 1521-49; of which 14 are printed byGiardini, and many
extz-acts given by Costa. Boniface's replies are to be found in 63 rough drafts in
the Basle MSS. "C. VI». 54 and 73 a few of whieh are printed in Am. E.
; Cian
prints 8 letters to Bembo, 1532-5, communicated by P. de Nolhac from the
Vatican MS. Barb. Lat. 2158 (xxxi. 43) and shows that the letters to Fran.
;
2. praeco] Cf. Epp. 1020. 55-6, 1201. 140 introd. He had been Erasmus'
11-13, 1278, 1293. I>upil inParis in 1501 ; cf. Ep. 140.
7. Pyrrhi] d'AngIeberme see Ep. ; 34,5.
1250] TO ANDREW ALCIATI 613
12.50. 9. Mauors] Cf. Ep. 1248. i^n. tion of the Ochjssey, see Ep. 131. 300.
Milan had been captured ft-om the 13. Gern>ani] Cf. Ep. 1186.2211.
French by the Papal army on 19N0V. ;
15. DecUimatione] Cf. Ep. 1201. 1511.
see Brewer iii. 1809, Creighton v. 161. 1251. 6. rigorem frigoris] For bad
II. nugarum] Perhaps the transla- weather at this time cf. Ep. 1252. 17-18.
614 LETTEES OF ERASMUS [1521
the fly-leaf opposite are the words Sum Danieli Stibari equitis ' ;
'
of a canonry, which had been conferred upon him in early life, and
to beeome eouncillor to the Bishop (p. 306). Four letters written to
him by Melanchthon between 1536 and 1554 survive in which he ;
written over an erasure. The outer words, Sum and equitis ',
' ' '
are by an earlier hand, and between them was a name which has
been so tlioroughly scratched out that even when thechieis supplied,
it is not easily decipherable. But at numerous points throughout the
book are marginal comments in manuscript by the same hand.
616 APPENDIX XIV
which make it possible to identify the writer. Dr. Carl Roth, of the
University Library at Basle, has kindly supplied me with a photo-
graph of an autograph letter (printed below) from the Amorbach
collection and this shows conclusively that the earlier hand is that
;
with Botzheim. But this accord did not last long. Eppendorff's
sympathies were with reform. He hated the monks and friars as
cordially as did Erasmus but in action he was prepared to go much
;
and when to this was added in 1523 the breach between Erasmus
and Hutten, ending in bitter recriminations, Eppendorff was entirely
alienated.
While still at Freiburg he wrote to Boniface Amerbach, 20 March
1522 (Basle MS. G. II. 29. 107 the letter mentioned above)
:
party and its representatives, his admiration for Hutten and Luthex*,
11. p. 296. 2, Concionandi rationem (Ep. 932. 18): Hanc iam con-
scripsit, sed nescio quando sit editurus. 1523.
12. p. 495. 32,3, Germania x^rorsus insanit in Leum (Ep. 1129. 15):
Licentior Erasmi lingua Quasi ad hoc non sis adhortatus,
!
13. p. 623. 7,8, cohihui (Ep. 998. 67): Quasi tu eos non admonueris
epistola vt Leum
etiam hxpidarent
14. p. 529. 12,13, **'^^ nonnunquam fuco doloque hono fallatur (Ep.
1167. 171-2) Nescio certe an hoc pacto in fidei negotio agen-
:
dum sit.
i?' P- 538. 26, JVec addubito quin id aliquanto felicius ilU (Henry viii)
successerit (Ep. 1227. 25-6): Imo
longe infoelitius ; nam
conuitiis Luthe(rum) aggressus est. Ideo indignissime
exceptus et traductus, domestici dedecoris, tantum non stulti
cerebri notatus.
18. p. 571. 1-3, tofa illius vita nihil erat nisi sacra concio, etc. (Ep.
12 II. 98): Talis est Lutherus ter maximus.
The orthodox provoke his ire, and he singles out the name
freely
of Egmondanus (Ep. »878. i^n) for abusive comment, frequently
supplying the clue to his identity.
34. p. 664. Y6-9 (Ep. 1232. 89-98): O vtinam pro hac heresi habe-
remus siue Basilidis siue Manichei
These marginalia were no doubt written for the most part during
the period of Eppendorff's close association with Erasmus in 1522-3 ;
Heine notes against his first copy that the address was written by
Erasmus himself, the rest of the letter being by a secretary, it may
reasonably be inferred that it was copied directly from the Madrid
autograph, which has just the condition he describes.
Of the seventeen letters in the second section, which may be
four are between John Vergara and Stunica, and are printed below
and there are six others, one of which (No. xx) is by Benedictus
Arias Montanus.
As to the i^rovenience of this series of seventeen, by the earlier
hand, there are no clear indications. Two of them ^ were doubtless
copied from the ms. which Heine had at Madrid ; since their
originals are there. But the only other clue to origin is in a note
by the copyist, on a separate sheet 'Copiada del tomo 412, folio
:
Studies on ihe Complut. Polyglot, 1872, pp. 24-32. About the end of
^ Nos. VIII (printed by Prof. Bonilla 541-8) and xiii (Lond. xix. 32, LB.
in Eevue Hispanique. xvii, 1907, pp. 962).
622 APPENDIX XV
Aug. 1520 he set out from Alcala for Eome, where he arrived
on 9 Feb. 1521: see his Itinerarimn dedicated to his brother,
Joannes Stunica. who was a Knight of the Order of Santiago, Kome,
M. Silber, 1522 (reprinted bj^ Andr. Schottus, Hispaniae Bihliotheca.
1608, pp. 624-49). Silber also printed for him in the same year an
Epistola to Adrian vi (Panzer viii. 265). Stunica continued at Rome
his attacks upon Erasmus' work and in consequence his name
;
(vt fit) stili vulneribus conficiantur, solus Enismus, et^w /3e\ov<; positus
90 et veluti in orchestra sedens, gladiatores contemplatur, laudibus
vtrinque faustisque acclamationibus oneratus. Nemo iam librum,
nemo orationem, nemo pagellam in publicum edit, qui non statim
eaptata occasione Erasmi nomen, et quidem literis maiusculis con-
scriptum, adiunctis honestissimis elogiis, veluti impetrandae veniae
THE HEINE COLLECTION 625
but his letter has been lost. The mention (11. 102-7) of Jo. Eberlin of Giinzburg's
XV Bicndtgenossen is noticeable.]
en laqual inter cetera dezia, Hispanus ille est Stunica qui in Anno-
"
aqui muy gran commodidad a causa de las librerias Griegas que aqui ay.
que me hazen mucho al proposito para obruir a esse barbaro. Y deter-
mino de le responderdesta manera, mostrarprimeroquan indoctaraente
45 nie respondio en essa su Apologia en laqual inter cetera deditaopera
supprirne lo que yo dixe y esta de molde y despues desto mostrar los
;
50 tan buen libro que a Erasmo le retinan las oreias. Pei'o por que
este es poco para lo que el mere^e. siendo como es tan impio y tan
blasphemo, tengole vrdido otro libro y aun qui^a compuesto, aunque
no esta publicado en el qual muestro al summo Pontifi^e a quien en
;
prouea, por que no soy yo solo el que le concita estas tragedias, saluo
muchos: entre los quales es vn senor destacorte ecclesiastico y letrado
-Italiano, el qual leyo todas quantas obras a hecho Erasrao, no a otro
fin sino a espulgai'le las irapiedades. et vt quasi de foueis proiiceret
65 serpentes. Yanoto, segun he sabido, raas de ^ien lugares, y puestos en
escrito, los presento al Papa Leon, y el Papa los dio a vn ^ierto
letrado desta corte, que yo no he podido saber quien es, y le mando que
escriuiesse contra ellos. Esto tened por rauy <,ierto que passa ansi.
THE HEINE COLLECTION 627
la 2^ ni la 3'' —
por vender, segun pare^e, la primei'a —
si se pudiesse
,
diera su pago, si viuiera, por que de alla de Alemaiia era auisado que
Erasmo de secreto sentiebat cum Lutero y le emendaua y polia sus no
libros. Y
aunque desto Erasmo se enbio a excusar, no se satisfizo el
Pontifi^e y por esso holgo mucho, quando vido mis Annotationes
;
contra Erasrao, y las leyo y las loo por que veays si es verdad lo que
:
CoMMODioKE tempore libelli abs te missi vna cum litteris tuis reddi
nobis non potuerunt absolueram enim paucis ante diebus recrimina-
;
1277, 1312 show indubitably that John Vergara is the writer. The year-date
is confirmed by the inten-al mentioned (1. 3) since the close of the former
coxTespondence.]
Ep. 1554. IX. Erasmus to J. Alemannus. Ante annum . . . 24 Feb. 1525, Basle.
Ep. 1684. XIV. Erasmus to (J. Vergara) . . . torqueat stilum . . . 29 Mar. 1526, Basle.
XXIV. Alvar Gomez to Pedro de Soto. Dum nuper , . . 12 Nov. 1559, Toledo.
1 VIII and XIII were no doubt copied used, by a secretary's haud which
from the Madrid MS. Est. 18, gr. i. 5, resembles that of viii, 'Reuerendissimo
S. 9, 23. A possible
clue to origin is in Christo patri ac D. D. Alfonso
that the address-sheet of viii, which is Manrrico, Archiepiscopo Hispalensi,
missing in the Madrid MS., is most domino meo plurimum obseruando.
probably to be found at Simancas (Est. In Hispania.' But it is to be noted
1553) f* 427) in the address-sheet of
: that this address does not appear in
a letter written on paper with the the copy by the earlier hand in Heine's
watermark such as Erasmus frequently collection.
POSTSCKIPT
I ani much indebted both to Prof. Bonilla of the University of
Madrid for endeavouring to trace the originals of the Heine collection
in Spain and to Dr. Schnorr von Carolsfeld, Director of the Staats-
;
bibliothek at Munich, for making inquiries recently for the ms. copies
which Dr. Friedrich communicated to us. Unhappily these also
cannot now be found so that it has been necessary to rely on our
:
Agge, A., 511 ; p. 557 and II, p. 428. Antimachus, III, p. 27.
Agricola, R., p. 106. Arnold, Edward, p. 286.
AJamire, III, p. 141. Arnoldi, J., IV, p. 449.
Alard, 433, 485, 676 II, p. 269. ;
Arnoldus, B., II, p. 224.
Albert of Brandenburg, 661. 745. Artolbius, II, p. 280.
968. 98S, 1009, 1033, 1101, 1152 ;
Assendelft, H. of, IV, p. 126.
III, p. 84. Asulanus, Andr., 589 ;
p. 448.
Alciati, 1250 ; IV, p. 611. Fran., 770 ; p. 448.
Alcyonius, II, p. 315. Ateca, G. of, III, p. 547.
Aldus, 207, 209, 212, 213 ; p. 437. Aucuparius, II, p. 8.
Aleander, 256 p. 502. ;
Ammonius, 218. 219, 220. 221, 226, Banisius, 700, 709, 716, 970 ; III,
228, 232. 233, 234. 236, 238, 239, p. 124.
240, 243, 245, 246, 247, 248. 249. Barbarus. H., p. 293.
250. 255, 262,273, 280, 281, 282, Barbiiius, N., 613.
283, 295, 360, 378, 389. 414, P.,443, 565, 608. 621, 652, 695,
427, 429, 451, 452, 453, 455, 466, 752, 794, 803, 847, 1216, 1225,
475. 478, 479, 483, 498,505,517, 1235, 1245; II, p. 283.
539, 551, 552; p. 455. Barland, Adr.. 492, 510, 646, 647,
Amoenus, G., p. 442. 1050, 1051, 1163, 1204; II,
Amorbach, Ba., 1207 II, p. 66. ; p. 3S6.
Bo., 408. 862, 1020, 10S4, 1201 ; II, C. 492.
P- 337. Bartholinus, R., 547, 548, 549 ; II,
Br., 331, 420, 439. 464, 557, 595, p. 498.
632, 705, S02 ; II, p. 66. Bartolinus, L., 1187 IV, p. 445. ;
796, 867, 1014, 1063, 1206 ; II, Bullock, H., 449, 456, 579, 580,
p. 60. 777, 826, 890 p. 465. :
Ant. of, jun., 760, 969; III, Caelius Calcagninus, III, p. 26.
p. 197. Caelius Rhodiginus, 949 II, p. 348. ;
De la Parra, J., 917 : III, p. 491. Frederick of Saxony, 586, 939, 963,
Delft, AegidiuB of, II, p. 323. 979,
Delius, p. 234. Frick, II 20, 1148; IV, p. 299.
Deloj^nes, 494, 535 II, p. 405. ; Fridericus, H., IV, p. 4S3.
Dorp, 304, 337, 347, 438, 496, 509, Friend, A, 31, 59, 65. 86, 125.
536, 696, 852, 1044 II, p. II. ; Froben, H., 1226 III, p. 443-;
Draco, 871, 942 III. p. 406. ; J., 419, 602, 629, 635, 795, 801,
Driedo of Turnhout, IV, p. 390. 885 ; II, p. 250.
Duchesne, IV, p. 447. J. E., III. p. 57.
Dunghersheym, H,, 554; II, p. 506. Frowik, III, p. 63,
Dunkirk, Secretary of, 792 (?).
Gaguin, 43, 44, 45, 46, 67, 6S. 121,
Eck, 769, 844
J., ; III, p. 208. 122 ; p. 146.
L., II, p. 191. Gallinarius, II, p. 22,
Edmund, 165, 168. Gattinara, 1150, 1197 ;
IV, p. 359.
Egli, 405 : II, p. 254. Gaverius, III, p. 148.
Egmont, Charles of, II, p. 577. Gaza, Th,, p. 473.
Flor. of, 1018 p. 395. ;
Gebwiler, II, p, 8.
Max. of, IV, p. 75. Geldenhauer, 487, 645, 682, 714,
Egnatius, J. Bapt., 58S ; p. 523. 727, 759, 811, 812, 837, 1141;
Eicholtz, 866 ; III, p, 390, n, P- 379-
Elizabeth, 2. George of Saxony, 514, 586, 1125.
Ellenbog, 395, 402 : II, p. 209. Gerard, Corn., 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,
Emser, 527, 553; II, p. 504. 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 27», 28, 29,
Eugelbrecht, A,, IV, p. 266. 30, 36, 37. 40, 78 p. 92. ;
Eobanus, 874, 982 ; III, p. 411, Gerbell, 342, 343, 349, 351, 35^, S^^^,
Episcopus, G., IV, p. 204. 383, 883; II, p. 120.
INDEX OF COEKESPONDENTS
Ghisbert, p. Z'^^. Hermann, H., 1131 III, p.
; 444.
Gigli, 521, 567, 649, 1070, 1181; Hermonymus, G., p. 7.
II, p. 442. Hertogenbosch, Nic. of, 1232 ; III,
264, 265, 294, 312,
Gilles, P., 184,
P- 33-
332, 356, 448, 476, 477, 491,516, Hexapolitanus, 482.
526, 616, 637, 6S1, 684, 687, 702, Hillen, IV, p. 143.
708, 712, 715, 736, 754, 788, Hochstrat, J., 1006 p. 556. ;
Guillard, 1212; II, p. 150. Kloster, G. of, 1116; II, jd. 422.
Knopken, 1177 IV, p. 431. ;
Halsey, T., 254 ; p. 500. Lang, J., 872, 983, 1128; III,
Harenaceus, J., 570. p. 408.
Harst, 1215 IV, p. 532.
; M., II, p. 502.
Hatten. 882 II, p. 144. ; Langen, R., p. 197.
Hattstein, IV, p. 277. Larke, T., p. 548.
Hegendorfer, 1168 IV, p. 411. ; Lascaris, Const., p. 367.
Hegius, p. 105. J., 836; p. 523.
Heldung, II, p. 8. Lasky, H., IV, p. 600.
Henner, III, p. 419. Latimer, W., 417, 520, 540 ; p. 438.
Henry 104, 204, 206, 272,
viii, Latomus, 1059(?); IIT, p. 519
339, 657, 834, 964, 1098. Laurentii, IV, p. 397.
Henry of Bavaria, III, p. 29. Laurinus, J., p. 432.
Herman,\V., 33, 34,35.36, ,8,39,81, M., 651, 666, 717, 740, 763, 789,
83, 84, 92, 142, 172,178 p. 128. : 809, 840 ; p. 432.
INDEX OF CORRESPONDENTS
Lee, E.,765, 998, 1037, 1061 ; III, Meghen, P., p. 471.
p. 203. Melanchthon, 454, 910, 947, 1113;
W., IV, p. 143. II, p. 319.
Leo, A., 854, 868; III, p. 352. Mellus, I\ , p. 271.
Leo X, 162, 335, 33S, 339, 384, 446, Merliberch. 1130.
466, 517,518, 519,566, 864,1007, Metz Chapter, 997.
1143, iiSo. Meyner. 1122 IV, p. 302.;
Malaise, Nic. of, 894 ; III, p. 432. Neueuahr, Herm. of. 442, 636, 703,
Manius, 1147. 722, 878, 1078, 1082 II, p. 282. ;
Paliurus, 316, 599, 626 II, p. ^8. ; Rociiefort, G., II, p. 367.
Paludanus,J.,180,197,497 ; p. 398. Rogeras, Servatius, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
Pannonius, J., III, p. 536. 11, 13, 15, 92, 142, 185, 189, 200,
Papinius. 975, 984 III, p. 600. ; 203. 296 p. 77. :
Pins, J. de, III, p. 510. Ruthall, 192, 325, 437, 974 ; p. 423.
Pirckheimer, Charitas, II, p. 239. Ruze, 926, 928 11, p. 402. ;
Reuchlin, 290, 300, 324, 418, 457, Snoy, R., 458; p. 421.
471. 562, 713, 1155 p. 555. ;
Spagnuoli, Bapt., p. 157.
INDEX OF CORRESPONDENTS
Spalatinus, 711, 978,
501, 1001, Viandalus, IV, p. 590.
1119; II, p.
415. Vianensis, III, p. 72.
Spancren, Ph. of, p, 558. Villinger, 1149 : IV, p. 358.
Sparcheford, 644 ; III, p. 65. Vincent, Auguetine, 131, 136, 156 ;
Sturm, 11, p. 8.
StuviuB, IV, p. 589. Waele, W. de, II, p. 6.
Swyneshed, IV, p. 273. Walteri, L.. II, p. 470.
Warham. 188, 208, 214, 240» (III,
Taleus, III, p. 206. 285. 286, 293, 396,
p. xxxii, 261,
Tate, 1246 IV, p. 606.
;
425, 46;, SS8, 596(?), 781, 893,
Tayspil, 1221 IV. p. 547.
;
1205, 1228: p. 417.
Textoris, III, p. 410. Watson, 450, 512, 576 p. 533. ;
Thale, 1224. Welles, IV, p. 431.
Theimseke. II, p. 243. Wentford, 196, 241, 277, 772, 833 ;
Theodoric. Fran., 10, 12, 14, 41.
p. 428.
186 ; p. 84. Werner, N., 48, 50, 74, 77, 171;
Theodorici, J., of Hoom, 940 ;
III,
p. 158.
P- 532- Werter, 875; III, p. 412.
Theodorici, V.. 1196 IV, p. 463.
;
Wertem, T. de, II, p. 431.
Thuengen. C. of, 1124 IV, p. 306.
;
Whitford, 89. 191; p. 225.
Tones, IV, p. 333. Wied, H. of, III, p. 295.
Tongres, Arnold of, II, p. 494. Wildenauer (Egranus), III, p. 409.
Trebizond, Geo. of, p. 135. Wiltshire, III, p. 244.
Trachses, II, p. 145. Wimpfeling, 224, 302, 305, 382, 385,
Tschudi. P. and V., II. p. 384. 1067 ; p. 463-
Tunstall, 571, 572, 5S3, 607, 642, Winckel, 1 p. 73.
;
643, 663, 675, 832, 886, 1029 Wingfield, Eich.. 791 ; II, p. 174.
p. 438. Robt., II, p. 60.
Turzo, J„ 850, 943, 1047, 1137 ;
III,
Wolsev, 284. 297, 348. 577, 658,
P- 343- 967^ 1031. 1060, 1112, 1132.
S., 1242, 1243 IV, p. 599. :
AVychman, 1231 ; IV, p. 571.
Tusanus. III, p. 281.
Tutor, 152, 157, 159, 170, 1013; Ximenes, II, p. 488.
P- 356.
Yonge, 268 ;
p. 520.
Ursinus Velius. 85 1, 944 II, p. 499. :
Urswick, 193, 416 p. 424- Zasius, 303. 306, 307, 310, 313, 317,
;
'-jj
M-=i-_-f
rs-civ ^-6i
NAne s
BRAD yALTQN
PA Erasmus, Desiderius
8511 Opus epistolarum
A2
1906