Status Report: Updating RD/RDT Reservoir Model: Depositional Study
Status Report: Updating RD/RDT Reservoir Model: Depositional Study
Status Report: Updating RD/RDT Reservoir Model: Depositional Study
Depositional Study:
• Interpreted the depositional facies and stratigraphy in the RDT-2P and RD-2X cores and compared
it to the Weatherford interpretation
• Partially completed a similar interpretation for the RD-1X core
• Looked at well log signatures in the B3 sand of 10 wells to determine sand body orientation and
extent
• Started to do the same for the O and N sand
Geophysical Study
• Seismic reviewing and analyzing some attributes to assist depositional study
• Rock physic model review to check if we can use previous reservoir characterization work for
properties modeling.
Geomodeling:
• Flow unit analysis from core at RD-1XST, RD-2X and RDT-2P, define Flow unit along all of the wells
to be used in Permeability modeling, Irreducible water saturation.
• Update structural model, horizon model based on updated seismic, well marker -> create new grid
• Finalize fence diagrams for B3, O and N intervals from the core and log data.
• Build conceptual model: cartoon of depositional settings, analog outcrop, sand body geometry…
• Continue seismic attributes analysis
It is difficulty to extrapolate the core facies to the uncored intervals because in RDT-2P and RD-2X
for which we have core photos (RD-1X photos is taken in 19 Nov), the facies are tide-dominated
and transgressive (see the slides for detail), which means that the sand bodies are very small and
laterally discontinuous plus the standard coarsening upward = progradational does not apply.
Weatherford simply applied the standard assumptions and interpreted everything. That is one
approach but not necessarily accurate. The challenge is a wide range of log patterns and they
change rapidly both vertically and laterally (see the attached logs for the B3 sand in the closely-
spaced development wells). We suspect that the depositional setting was a low energy, possibly
irregular, coastline with a complex distribution of sedimentary environments that shift frequently in
response to minor relative sea level changes, making it extremely difficult to interpret or model the
uncored sands.
The new conceptual model can be significantly different than previous interpretation in term of sand
geometry. A discussion on modeling technique selection will be needed after conceptual model
building.
D. Project Timeline
Evaluation the similarity of RDM and RD/RDT geological settings, selecting modeling
2 parameters which can be used as analog from RD/RDT area to RDM area 1 4 4
3 Selection of modeling approaches 1 3 3
Mandays 11
4 - Building Geological Model
4.1 Generation of 3D Grid
Fault Modeling, Horizon Modeling (seismic referenced surface)
1 Isochore Modeling 1 6 6
2 Making Grid (Cells) 1 2 2
3 Quality control - QC meeting 1 1 1
Mandays 9
4.2 Property Modeling
1 Data Analysis 1 1 1
2 Lithofacies modeling contrained by depositional conceptual model or seismic attributes 1 2 2
2 Reservoir Properties Modeling (Vshale, Porosity, Permeability and Sw) 1 2 2
3 Quality control - QC meeting 1 1 1
Mandays 6
4.3 Volumetric & Uncertainty Analysis
1 Volumetric Calculation (3D), defining key uncertainty 1 1 1
Total Mandays 2
4.4 Prepare the deliverables and reporting
1 Upscaled to simulation grid 1 1 1
2 Reporting 1 3 3
Manday 4
Project Total Man days 46