Status Report: Updating RD/RDT Reservoir Model: Depositional Study

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Status Report: Updating RD/RDT Reservoir Model

Client: KNOC Vietnam Date: 20/11/2015 Weekly Report # 01


Sedimentologist Joe Lambiase Client Contact: Mr. Kim Hyunjoon
Geomodeler Trung Doan Mr. Jeong Jae Hyok
Geophysicist Hien Dao Mr. Trinh Nguyen
Field RD-RDT Basin: Nam Con Son Basin
Project Status: Depositional Setting, Stratigraphic Architecture and Reservoir Geometry
Well & Seismic Data review

A. Work done in this week

Depositional Study:
• Interpreted the depositional facies and stratigraphy in the RDT-2P and RD-2X cores and compared
it to the Weatherford interpretation
• Partially completed a similar interpretation for the RD-1X core
• Looked at well log signatures in the B3 sand of 10 wells to determine sand body orientation and
extent
• Started to do the same for the O and N sand
Geophysical Study
• Seismic reviewing and analyzing some attributes to assist depositional study
• Rock physic model review to check if we can use previous reservoir characterization work for
properties modeling.
Geomodeling:
• Flow unit analysis from core at RD-1XST, RD-2X and RDT-2P, define Flow unit along all of the wells
to be used in Permeability modeling, Irreducible water saturation.

B. Work Planned for next week

• Update structural model, horizon model based on updated seismic, well marker -> create new grid
• Finalize fence diagrams for B3, O and N intervals from the core and log data.
• Build conceptual model: cartoon of depositional settings, analog outcrop, sand body geometry…
• Continue seismic attributes analysis

C. Challenges/ Issues need to be awared

 It is difficulty to extrapolate the core facies to the uncored intervals because in RDT-2P and RD-2X
for which we have core photos (RD-1X photos is taken in 19 Nov), the facies are tide-dominated
and transgressive (see the slides for detail), which means that the sand bodies are very small and
laterally discontinuous plus the standard coarsening upward = progradational does not apply.
Weatherford simply applied the standard assumptions and interpreted everything. That is one
approach but not necessarily accurate. The challenge is a wide range of log patterns and they
change rapidly both vertically and laterally (see the attached logs for the B3 sand in the closely-
spaced development wells). We suspect that the depositional setting was a low energy, possibly
irregular, coastline with a complex distribution of sedimentary environments that shift frequently in
response to minor relative sea level changes, making it extremely difficult to interpret or model the
uncored sands.
 The new conceptual model can be significantly different than previous interpretation in term of sand
geometry. A discussion on modeling technique selection will be needed after conceptual model
building.

D. Project Timeline

• Project follow timelines as below


• Final presentation as per time line is at 8 Jan 2016
Week
NO Activity Mans Days Total
W1 W2 W3 W4
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
1 - Data Gathering Review and QC
1 Seismic Data (data collection, loading and QC) 1 1 1
Mandays 1

2 - Seismic Attribute Analysis


1 Multiple Seismic Attributes Generation 1 3 3
Evaluate the possibility to incorporate offset well data,
2 extending the correlation between well and seismic from RD/RDT area to RDM area 1 8 8
3 Mapping reservoir extension using seismic attributes if applicable 1 3 3
4 Milestone Review#1 Seismic Interpretation 1 1 1
Mandays 15

3 - Selection of Modeling Approaches, Building Conceptual Model


using Analogs
1 Evaluation the correlation of seismic attribute and offset well data. 1 4 4

Evaluation the similarity of RDM and RD/RDT geological settings, selecting modeling
2 parameters which can be used as analog from RD/RDT area to RDM area 1 4 4
3 Selection of modeling approaches 1 3 3
Mandays 11
4 - Building Geological Model
4.1 Generation of 3D Grid
Fault Modeling, Horizon Modeling (seismic referenced surface)
1 Isochore Modeling 1 6 6
2 Making Grid (Cells) 1 2 2
3 Quality control - QC meeting 1 1 1
Mandays 9
4.2 Property Modeling
1 Data Analysis 1 1 1
2 Lithofacies modeling contrained by depositional conceptual model or seismic attributes 1 2 2
2 Reservoir Properties Modeling (Vshale, Porosity, Permeability and Sw) 1 2 2
3 Quality control - QC meeting 1 1 1
Mandays 6
4.3 Volumetric & Uncertainty Analysis
1 Volumetric Calculation (3D), defining key uncertainty 1 1 1
Total Mandays 2
4.4 Prepare the deliverables and reporting
1 Upscaled to simulation grid 1 1 1
2 Reporting 1 3 3
Manday 4
Project Total Man days 46

You might also like