Language Tudor
Language Tudor
Language Tudor
Language Classroom
Ian Tudor
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
P U B L I S H E D B Y T H E P R E S S S Y N D I C AT E O F T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A M B R I D G E
The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1RP, United Kingdom
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Introduction 1
3 Visions of language 49
3.1 The language is the language: Or is it? 49
3.2 Language as a linguistic system 50
3.3 Language as doing things: The functional perspective 57
3.4 Language as self-expression 65
3.5 Language as culture and ideology 69
3.6 Overview 75
4 Visions of learning 77
4.1 The diversity of the learning experience 77
4.2 Experiential learning 78
v
Contents
References 215
Index 226
vi
Abbreviations
vii
Introduction
This is a book about language teaching which is meant for teachers and
other language educators involved in the practical realisation of
language teaching programmes or in organising teacher education
courses. It rests on the belief that language teaching is a complex,
dynamic activity, and that this complexity is frequently underestimated
both in the popular imagination and in much of the of®cial discourse of
language teaching. The goal of the book is to explore the complexity of
language teaching as it is lived out in classrooms and, in this way, to
provide teachers and other language educators with guidelines for
exploring the dynamics of their own teaching situations, and, thus, of
developing what Elliott (1993a) refers to as `situational understandings'.
Few practising teachers would consider as particularly remarkable the
suggestion that language teaching is a complex activity: many, in fact,
would see it as a statement of the obvious. I feel, however, that this
point deserves to be made for at least two reasons. First, although
practising language teachers are well aware of the complexity of their
task, the same cannot always be said for the other actors who, in one
way or another, play a role in the endeavour of language education;
these are, for example, political and educational authorities, the man-
agement or administration of teaching institutions, clients, sponsors,
parents, and many others. This may result from ignorance in the sense
that these actors may simply be unaware of the precise details of what
teaching entails. It may also, however, result from a more or less
conscious will not to see or acknowledge the realities of teaching:
the elegance of clear, rationally formulated curricula or the con®dent
claims of current `best practice' having a greater attraction than the
complex and often untidy nature of teaching as it is lived out in real
classrooms. And yet, it is often within frameworks set up by these
actors that teachers have to live out their tasks in the classroom. If only
for this reason, then, there is a good justi®cation for recalling the
complex nature of language teaching. Second, and more fundamentally,
there is the question of whether the complexity of language teaching is
1
Introduction
2
Introduction
3
Introduction