Psyc1022 Topic 5
Psyc1022 Topic 5
Psyc1022 Topic 5
5: ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING
EXPERIMENTAL PRODCEDURES
• Unconditioned stimuli and responses
o Food (Unconditioned stimulus) = automatically elicits a response in the dog, no
conditioning required
o Salivation (unconditioned response) = occurs automatically (involuntary reflex) in
response to food, no conditioning is required
• Conditioned stimuli and responses
o Experimenter (conditioned stimulus) = over time, experimenter comes to elicit a
response in the dog, conditioning is required
o Salivation (conditioned response) = occurs in response to the experimenter,
conditioning is required
insight learning
• Thorndike theorised that the satisfying consequences of getting the food increased the
probability of whatever response the cat was making just before it got food
o When first in the box, the cat did many things with no success
o On each trial, the behaviours that immediately preceded the food became more and
more frequent
o As trials went on, behaviours that occurred just before the consequence of food
occurred, were carried out more frequently
• Result: the time needed to get out of the box decreased gradually across trials – only
behaviours the cat made in the box were those that opened the door and let the cat out to
eat
“Of several responses made to the same situation, those which are accompanied or closely followed
by satisfaction to the animal ... will, other things being equal, be more firmly connected with the
situation ...; those which are accompanied or closely followed by discomfort will ... have their
connections with the situations weakened ... The greater the satisfaction or discomfort, the greater
the strengthening or weakening of the bond.”
B.F. SKINNER
• Invented the ‘Skinner box’ (Operant chamber)
o Allows ‘sophisticated puzzles’ to be arranged
o Under computer control which enables a variety of reinforcers (e.g. food, water,
sexual partner) to be administered and responses (lever presses, chain pulls, wheel
spinning) to be recorded
• “A hungry rat is placed in a semi-soundproof box. For several days bits of food are
occasionally delivered into a tray by an automatic dispenser. The rat soon goes to the tray
immediately upon hearing the sound of the dispenser. A small horizontal section of a lever
protruding from the wall has been resting in its lowest position, but it is now raised slightly so
that when the rat touches it, it moves downward. In doing so, it closes an electric circuit and
operates the food dispenser. Immediately after eating the delivered food, the rat begins to
press the lever fairly rapidly. The behaviour has been strengthened or reinforced by a single
consequence.” (Skinner, 1938)
TOPIC 5: ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING
SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT
• Demonstrated when the animal acquires new response/action (i.e. lever pressing) to obtain
an outcome
o An outcome may be receiving a reward (food) or avoiding an aversive event (electric
shock)
o Outcome reinforce (strengthen) the behaviours that caused them to occur
• Schedules of reinforcement: refer to the programmed relationship between the response and
the outcome
o The outcome can be available upon making a response after a certain period of
time (interval) or given a particular number of responses (ratio)
o The value of the interval or ration may be fixed at a single value (1) or variable
across the range of values (20), e.g. a light switch changes the state of the bulb
(illumination) on a fixed ration 1 schedule (a single response (flicking the light switch)
is required to cause the outcome (illumination))
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
• Does the animal possess knowledge of the causal relationship between the response (lever
press) and the outcome (food), and undertakes the response voluntarily based upon their
expectation concerning the current value of the outcome?
• Tony Dickinson: Outcome devaluation procedure
o Following the devaluation procedure, rats reduced lever pressing for the devalued,
they volunteered not to lever press
o Thus, instrumental action is voluntarily selected based upon animals’ knowledge of
the causal relationship between the response and the outcome (belief), combined
with knowledge of the current value of the outcome (desire)
PAVLOVIAN-INSTRUMENTAL INTERACTIONS
• Pavlovian conditioning: learning about predictive relationships between CS and US, enabling
organisms to anticipate the US from the CS
• Instrumental conditioning: learning about the causal relationship between responses and
outcomes enabling voluntary action to be undertaken in anticipation of obtaining that
outcome (US)
• Pavlovian-Instrumental Transfer (PIT): Pavlovian CSs not only elicit reflexes (URs), but also
voluntary instrumental responses (R) directed at the same US with which a CS is paired
o Pavlovian training: the rat learns that a CS (sound) predicts a food US (cheese)
o Instrumental training: rat learns that an instrumental response (R) produces the same
food outcome (US)
o PIT stage: presenting the CS causes the rat to increase the lever pressing response
(R) for food
§ These data indicate that the CS retrieved an expectation of the food US,
which in turn activated the voluntary instrumental response (R) directed at
obtaining that food
TOPIC 5: ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING
APPLICATION TO ADDICTION
• US: drug effect (e.g. ‘high’)
• CS: drug related cues (e.g. pub/bar, drug-use tools, packaging, injecting rooms)
• Pavlovian conditioning: the drug cue CS comes to elicit a cascade of physiological reflexes in
anticipation/expectation of taking the drug
• “Instrumental” drug-seeking behavior (e.g. walking to the pub or dealers house, ordering and
handing over money) is regarded as voluntary instrumental behavior and is acquired because
it ultimately leads to the drug effect (the outcome or US)
• PIT: drug cues (CS) retrieve an expectation of the drug effect (US) and can not only elicit
involuntary reflexes (UR), but can also elicit voluntary instrumental responses (R) which lead
to the drug and ultimately, consumption