OutlookOnLife Codebook

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 421

ICPSR 35348 Outlook on Life Surveys, 2012

Belinda Robnett
University of California-Irvine

Katherine Tate
Brown University

Codebook

Inter-university Consortium for


Political and Social Research
P.O. Box 1248
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106
www.icpsr.umich.edu
Terms of Use
The terms of use for this study can be found at:
http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/35348/terms

Information about Copyrighted Content


Some instruments administered as part of this study may contain in whole or substantially
in part contents from copyrighted instruments. Reproductions of the instruments are
provided as documentation for the analysis of the data associated with this collection.
Restrictions on "fair use" apply to all copyrighted content. More information about the
reproduction of copyrighted works by educators and librarians is available from the United
States Copyright Office.

NOTICE
WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making
of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions
specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other
reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is
not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a
user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in
excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement.
ICPSR PROCESSING NOTE FOR # 35348
Outlook on Life Surveys, 2012

1) Confidentiality:
 ICPSR has recoded numeric variables with sensitive information using top and
bottom coding methods to protect respondent confidentiality.

 Values that were deemed as indirect identifiers (such as interview date and time)
ICPSR used a series of data coarsening techniques to protect for confidentiality.

2) Question Text:
 Question text was added to the data based on the original data collection
instrument deposited by the Principal Investigator.

3) Value and Variable labels:


 Value and Variable labels were standardized based on the original data
collection instrument deposited by the Principal Investigator.

 Any spelling errors found in the value labels were corrected during ICPSR
processing.

4) Missing Values:
 Missing values were standardized as per the study’s convention.
ICPSR 35348
Outlook on Life Surveys, 2012

Variable Description and Frequencies

Note: Frequencies displayed for the variables are not


weighted. They are purely descriptive and may not be
representative of the study population. Please review any
sampling or weighting information available with the study.

Summary statistics (minimum, maximum, mean, median, and


standard deviation) may not be available for every variable in
the codebook. Conversely, a listing of frequencies in table
format may not be present for every variable in the codebook
either. However, all variables in the dataset are present and
display sufficient information about each variable. These
decisions are made intentionally and are at the discretion of
the archive producing this codebook.

-1-
CASEID: ICPSR Sequential Case Identification Number
Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 1-4 (width: 4; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_CASEID: Case ID (Wave 1)


Case ID

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

2 - 1 0.0 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 1 0.0 %
6 - 1 0.0 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
8 - 1 0.0 %
9 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 1 0.0 %
11 - 1 0.0 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
13 - 1 0.0 %
14 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 1 0.0 %
16 - 1 0.0 %
17 - 1 0.0 %
18 - 1 0.0 %
19 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 1 0.0 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
22 - 1 0.0 %
23 - 1 0.0 %
24 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 1 0.0 %
26 - 1 0.0 %
27 - 1 0.0 %
28 - 1 0.0 %
29 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 1 0.0 %
31 - 1 0.0 %
32 - 1 0.0 %

-2-
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

33 - 1 0.0 %
34 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 1 0.0 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
37 - 1 0.0 %
38 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 1 0.0 %
41 - 1 0.0 %
42 - 1 0.0 %
43 - 1 0.0 %
44 - 1 0.0 %
46 - 1 0.0 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 1 0.0 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
52 - 1 0.0 %
53 - 1 0.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 1195.43
• Minimum: 2.00
• Maximum: 2426.00
• Standard Deviation: 694.17

Location: 5-8 (width: 4; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W2_CASEID2: Case ID (Wave 2)


CaseID from wave 2

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

2 - 1 0.0 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 1 0.0 %
6 - 1 0.0 %

-3-
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

7 - 1 0.0 %
8 - 1 0.0 %
9 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 1 0.0 %
11 - 1 0.0 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
13 - 1 0.0 %
14 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 1 0.0 %
16 - 1 0.0 %
17 - 1 0.0 %
18 - 1 0.0 %
19 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 1 0.0 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
22 - 1 0.0 %
23 - 1 0.0 %
24 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 1 0.0 %
26 - 1 0.0 %
27 - 1 0.0 %
28 - 1 0.0 %
29 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 1 0.0 %
31 - 1 0.0 %
32 - 1 0.0 %
33 - 1 0.0 %
34 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 1 0.0 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
37 - 1 0.0 %
38 - 1 0.0 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 1 0.0 %
41 - 1 0.0 %
42 - 1 0.0 %
43 - 1 0.0 %
44 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 1 0.0 %

-4-
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

46 - 1 0.0 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 1 0.0 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 833.07
• Minimum: 2.00
• Maximum: 1686.00
• Standard Deviation: 482.77

Location: 9-12 (width: 4; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_TM_START: Interview start time (GMT)


Interview start time (GMT)

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

BLANKED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY - ICPSR - 2294 100.0 %


Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 13-47 (width: 35; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: character

W1_TM_FINISH: Interview finish time (GMT)


Interview finish time (GMT)

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

BLANKED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY - ICPSR - 2294 100.0 %


Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 48-82 (width: 35; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: character

-5-
W1_WEIGHT1: Post-Stratification weight: All Cases
Post-Stratification weight: All Cases

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0.0089 - 15 0.7 %
0.0090 - 1 0.0 %
0.0092 - 1 0.0 %
0.0098 - 1 0.0 %
0.0100 - 1 0.0 %
0.0104 - 1 0.0 %
0.0110 - 2 0.1 %
0.0114 - 1 0.0 %
0.0117 - 2 0.1 %
0.0120 - 1 0.0 %
0.0122 - 1 0.0 %
0.0123 - 1 0.0 %
0.0128 - 1 0.0 %
0.0132 - 1 0.0 %
0.0136 - 1 0.0 %
0.0138 - 1 0.0 %
0.0140 - 1 0.0 %
0.0148 - 2 0.1 %
0.0149 - 2 0.1 %
0.0155 - 1 0.0 %
0.0156 - 15 0.7 %
0.0157 - 1 0.0 %
0.0158 - 2 0.1 %
0.0159 - 1 0.0 %
0.0164 - 2 0.1 %
0.0165 - 1 0.0 %
0.0166 - 1 0.0 %
0.0168 - 2 0.1 %
0.0171 - 2 0.1 %
0.0173 - 1 0.0 %
0.0176 - 1 0.0 %
0.0177 - 1 0.0 %
0.0178 - 1 0.0 %
0.0180 - 2 0.1 %
0.0182 - 2 0.1 %
0.0188 - 1 0.0 %

-6-
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0.0189 - 2 0.1 %
0.0190 - 1 0.0 %
0.0192 - 3 0.1 %
0.0195 - 2 0.1 %
0.0197 - 2 0.1 %
0.0200 - 1 0.0 %
0.0201 - 1 0.0 %
0.0203 - 1 0.0 %
0.0205 - 1 0.0 %
0.0209 - 1 0.0 %
0.0213 - 1 0.0 %
0.0216 - 1 0.0 %
0.0219 - 1 0.0 %
0.0220 - 2 0.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 1.0000
• Minimum: 0.0089
• Maximum: 7.4649
• Standard Deviation: 1.3166

Location: 83-88 (width: 6; decimal: 4)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_WEIGHT2: Post-Stratification weight: Total African American and total non-African


American
Post-Stratification weight: Total African American and total non-African American

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0.0448 - 15 0.7 %
0.0454 - 1 0.0 %
0.0464 - 1 0.0 %
0.0492 - 1 0.0 %
0.0504 - 1 0.0 %
0.0524 - 1 0.0 %
0.0554 - 1 0.0 %
0.0555 - 1 0.0 %
0.0573 - 1 0.0 %

-7-
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0.0588 - 2 0.1 %
0.0605 - 1 0.0 %
0.0612 - 1 0.0 %
0.0617 - 1 0.0 %
0.0644 - 1 0.0 %
0.0666 - 1 0.0 %
0.0683 - 1 0.0 %
0.0696 - 1 0.0 %
0.0703 - 1 0.0 %
0.0744 - 1 0.0 %
0.0746 - 1 0.0 %
0.0749 - 1 0.0 %
0.0751 - 1 0.0 %
0.0781 - 1 0.0 %
0.0785 - 15 0.7 %
0.0793 - 1 0.0 %
0.0796 - 1 0.0 %
0.0798 - 1 0.0 %
0.0802 - 1 0.0 %
0.0824 - 2 0.1 %
0.0833 - 1 0.0 %
0.0837 - 1 0.0 %
0.0847 - 1 0.0 %
0.0848 - 1 0.0 %
0.0859 - 2 0.1 %
0.0873 - 1 0.0 %
0.0885 - 1 0.0 %
0.0889 - 1 0.0 %
0.0895 - 1 0.0 %
0.0906 - 1 0.0 %
0.0908 - 1 0.0 %
0.0915 - 1 0.0 %
0.0916 - 1 0.0 %
0.0948 - 1 0.0 %
0.0951 - 1 0.0 %
0.0954 - 1 0.0 %
0.0955 - 1 0.0 %
0.0965 - 3 0.1 %
0.0984 - 2 0.1 %

-8-
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0.0994 - 2 0.1 %
0.1007 - 1 0.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 1.0000
• Minimum: 0.0448
• Maximum: 6.8566
• Standard Deviation: 1.0211

Location: 89-94 (width: 6; decimal: 4)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_WEIGHT3: Post-Stratification weight: Total African American/non-African American by


Male/Female
Post-Stratification weight: Total African American/non-African American by Male/Female

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0.0418 - 15 0.7 %
0.0425 - 1 0.0 %
0.0434 - 1 0.0 %
0.0460 - 1 0.0 %
0.0471 - 1 0.0 %
0.0489 - 1 0.0 %
0.0518 - 1 0.0 %
0.0519 - 1 0.0 %
0.0536 - 1 0.0 %
0.0549 - 1 0.0 %
0.0550 - 1 0.0 %
0.0566 - 1 0.0 %
0.0572 - 1 0.0 %
0.0577 - 1 0.0 %
0.0602 - 1 0.0 %
0.0623 - 1 0.0 %
0.0638 - 1 0.0 %
0.0650 - 1 0.0 %
0.0657 - 1 0.0 %
0.0695 - 1 0.0 %
0.0697 - 1 0.0 %

-9-
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0.0700 - 1 0.0 %
0.0701 - 1 0.0 %
0.0730 - 1 0.0 %
0.0741 - 1 0.0 %
0.0744 - 1 0.0 %
0.0750 - 1 0.0 %
0.0770 - 1 0.0 %
0.0771 - 1 0.0 %
0.0782 - 1 0.0 %
0.0792 - 1 0.0 %
0.0793 - 1 0.0 %
0.0803 - 2 0.1 %
0.0825 - 15 0.7 %
0.0827 - 1 0.0 %
0.0837 - 1 0.0 %
0.0838 - 1 0.0 %
0.0856 - 1 0.0 %
0.0875 - 1 0.0 %
0.0891 - 1 0.0 %
0.0917 - 1 0.0 %
0.0920 - 2 0.1 %
0.0929 - 2 0.1 %
0.0934 - 1 0.0 %
0.0946 - 1 0.0 %
0.0952 - 1 0.0 %
0.0954 - 1 0.0 %
0.0961 - 1 0.0 %
0.0964 - 1 0.0 %
0.0984 - 1 0.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 1.0000
• Minimum: 0.0418
• Maximum: 6.4088
• Standard Deviation: 1.0003

Location: 95-100 (width: 6; decimal: 4)


Variable Type: numeric

- 10 -
W2_TM_START: Interview start time (GMT)
Interview start time (GMT)

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

BLANKED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY - ICPSR - 2294 100.0 %


Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 101-135 (width: 35; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: character

W2_TM_FINISH: Interview finish time (GMT)


Interview finish time (GMT)

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

BLANKED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY - ICPSR - 2294 100.0 %


Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 136-170 (width: 35; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: character

W2_DURATION: Interview duration in minutes


Interview duration in minutes

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 1 0.0 %
1 - 4 0.2 %
2 - 5 0.2 %
3 - 11 0.5 %
4 - 8 0.3 %
5 - 8 0.3 %
6 - 13 0.6 %
7 - 27 1.2 %
8 - 29 1.3 %
9 - 45 2.0 %
10 - 60 2.6 %
11 - 70 3.1 %
12 - 95 4.1 %
13 - 70 3.1 %
14 - 85 3.7 %
15 - 81 3.5 %

- 11 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

16 - 65 2.8 %
17 - 73 3.2 %
18 - 70 3.1 %
19 - 64 2.8 %
20 - 45 2.0 %
21 - 42 1.8 %
22 - 47 2.0 %
23 - 33 1.4 %
24 - 40 1.7 %
25 - 32 1.4 %
26 - 24 1.0 %
27 - 29 1.3 %
28 - 19 0.8 %
29 - 18 0.8 %
30 - 13 0.6 %
31 - 10 0.4 %
32 - 18 0.8 %
33 - 18 0.8 %
34 - 11 0.5 %
35 - 12 0.5 %
36 - 13 0.6 %
37 - 6 0.3 %
38 - 11 0.5 %
39 - 9 0.4 %
40 - 6 0.3 %
41 - 6 0.3 %
42 - 6 0.3 %
43 - 10 0.4 %
44 - 8 0.3 %
45 - 9 0.4 %
46 - 5 0.2 %
47 - 7 0.3 %
48 - 5 0.2 %
49 - 5 0.2 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 12 -
Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 245.25
• Median: 18.00
• Mode: 12.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 19748.00
• Standard Deviation: 1299.50

Location: 171-175 (width: 5; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W2_QFLAG: DATA ONLY: Qualification Flag


DATA ONLY: Qualification Flag

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Qualified 1601 69.8 %


2 Not Qualified 0 0.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 176-177 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_WEIGHT1: Post-Stratification weight: Total respondents


Post-Stratification weight: Total respondents

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0.0098 - 15 0.7 %
0.0105 - 1 0.0 %
0.0112 - 1 0.0 %
0.0113 - 1 0.0 %
0.0115 - 1 0.0 %
0.0119 - 2 0.1 %
0.0126 - 1 0.0 %
0.0127 - 1 0.0 %
0.0129 - 2 0.1 %
0.0131 - 2 0.1 %

- 13 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0.0136 - 1 0.0 %
0.0139 - 1 0.0 %
0.0146 - 1 0.0 %
0.0151 - 1 0.0 %
0.0152 - 1 0.0 %
0.0154 - 3 0.1 %
0.0155 - 1 0.0 %
0.0163 - 1 0.0 %
0.0168 - 1 0.0 %
0.0170 - 1 0.0 %
0.0180 - 2 0.1 %
0.0183 - 2 0.1 %
0.0189 - 1 0.0 %
0.0195 - 1 0.0 %
0.0211 - 1 0.0 %
0.0212 - 1 0.0 %
0.0213 - 1 0.0 %
0.0214 - 1 0.0 %
0.0215 - 8 0.3 %
0.0217 - 1 0.0 %
0.0221 - 1 0.0 %
0.0222 - 1 0.0 %
0.0225 - 1 0.0 %
0.0226 - 1 0.0 %
0.0228 - 1 0.0 %
0.0229 - 1 0.0 %
0.0236 - 1 0.0 %
0.0237 - 2 0.1 %
0.0241 - 2 0.1 %
0.0245 - 1 0.0 %
0.0246 - 1 0.0 %
0.0249 - 1 0.0 %
0.0254 - 1 0.0 %
0.0256 - 2 0.1 %
0.0257 - 2 0.1 %
0.0258 - 2 0.1 %
0.0260 - 1 0.0 %
0.0262 - 1 0.0 %
0.0263 - 1 0.0 %

- 14 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0.0264 - 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 1.0000
• Minimum: 0.0098
• Maximum: 5.4330
• Standard Deviation: 1.2581

Location: 178-183 (width: 6; decimal: 4)


Variable Type: numeric

W2_WEIGHT2: Post-Stratification weight: Total African American and total non-African


American respondents separately
Post-Stratification weight: Total African American and total non-African American respondents separately

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0.0458 - 15 0.7 %
0.0490 - 1 0.0 %
0.0521 - 1 0.0 %
0.0525 - 1 0.0 %
0.0537 - 1 0.0 %
0.0555 - 2 0.1 %
0.0586 - 1 0.0 %
0.0593 - 1 0.0 %
0.0602 - 2 0.1 %
0.0612 - 2 0.1 %
0.0632 - 1 0.0 %
0.0645 - 1 0.0 %
0.0681 - 1 0.0 %
0.0704 - 1 0.0 %
0.0706 - 1 0.0 %
0.0716 - 1 0.0 %
0.0717 - 1 0.0 %
0.0720 - 1 0.0 %
0.0724 - 1 0.0 %
0.0758 - 1 0.0 %

- 15 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0.0785 - 1 0.0 %
0.0791 - 1 0.0 %
0.0840 - 1 0.0 %
0.0841 - 1 0.0 %
0.0851 - 1 0.0 %
0.0854 - 1 0.0 %
0.0882 - 1 0.0 %
0.0908 - 1 0.0 %
0.0984 - 1 0.0 %
0.0986 - 1 0.0 %
0.0993 - 1 0.0 %
0.0999 - 1 0.0 %
0.1001 - 1 0.0 %
0.1003 - 7 0.3 %
0.1010 - 1 0.0 %
0.1030 - 1 0.0 %
0.1035 - 1 0.0 %
0.1047 - 1 0.0 %
0.1054 - 1 0.0 %
0.1062 - 1 0.0 %
0.1067 - 1 0.0 %
0.1101 - 1 0.0 %
0.1103 - 1 0.0 %
0.1104 - 1 0.0 %
0.1123 - 1 0.0 %
0.1124 - 1 0.0 %
0.1141 - 1 0.0 %
0.1146 - 1 0.0 %
0.1162 - 1 0.0 %
0.1185 - 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 1.0000
• Minimum: 0.0458

- 16 -
• Maximum: 6.7558
• Standard Deviation: 1.0366

Location: 184-189 (width: 6; decimal: 4)


Variable Type: numeric

W2_WEIGHT3: Post-Stratification weight: Total African American/non-African American by


Male/Female separately
Post-Stratification weight: Total African American/non-African American by Male/Female separately

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0.0454 - 15 0.7 %
0.0486 - 1 0.0 %
0.0517 - 1 0.0 %
0.0521 - 1 0.0 %
0.0532 - 1 0.0 %
0.0550 - 1 0.0 %
0.0551 - 1 0.0 %
0.0581 - 1 0.0 %
0.0588 - 1 0.0 %
0.0597 - 2 0.1 %
0.0606 - 1 0.0 %
0.0607 - 1 0.0 %
0.0626 - 1 0.0 %
0.0640 - 1 0.0 %
0.0675 - 1 0.0 %
0.0697 - 1 0.0 %
0.0700 - 1 0.0 %
0.0710 - 1 0.0 %
0.0711 - 1 0.0 %
0.0714 - 1 0.0 %
0.0717 - 1 0.0 %
0.0752 - 1 0.0 %
0.0778 - 1 0.0 %
0.0785 - 1 0.0 %
0.0833 - 2 0.1 %
0.0843 - 1 0.0 %
0.0846 - 1 0.0 %
0.0874 - 1 0.0 %
0.0900 - 1 0.0 %
0.0976 - 1 0.0 %
0.0978 - 1 0.0 %

- 17 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0.0985 - 1 0.0 %
0.0991 - 1 0.0 %
0.0992 - 1 0.0 %
0.1009 - 7 0.3 %
0.1017 - 1 0.0 %
0.1021 - 1 0.0 %
0.1042 - 1 0.0 %
0.1045 - 1 0.0 %
0.1053 - 1 0.0 %
0.1054 - 1 0.0 %
0.1058 - 1 0.0 %
0.1091 - 1 0.0 %
0.1094 - 1 0.0 %
0.1112 - 1 0.0 %
0.1115 - 1 0.0 %
0.1131 - 1 0.0 %
0.1132 - 1 0.0 %
0.1137 - 1 0.0 %
0.1170 - 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 1.0000
• Minimum: 0.0454
• Maximum: 6.6978
• Standard Deviation: 1.0339

Location: 190-195 (width: 6; decimal: 4)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_A1: How interested are you in what's going on in government and politics?
How interested are you in what?s going on in government and politics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely interested 389 17.0 %


2 Very interested 679 29.6 %
3 Moderately interested 658 28.7 %

- 18 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

4 Slightly interested 354 15.4 %


5 Not interested at all 198 8.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 16 0.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,278 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 196-197 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_A2: How much have you thought about the upcoming election for president?
How much have you thought about the upcoming election for president?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Quite a lot 910 39.7 %


2 Somewhat a lot 599 26.1 %
3 Somewhat a little 423 18.4 %
4 Only a little 236 10.3 %
5 Not at all 116 5.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 10 0.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,284 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 198-199 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_A4: In 2008, John McCain ran on the Republican ticket against Barack Obama who ran on
the Democratic ticket. Do you remember whether or not you voted in that election?
In 2008, John McCain ran on the Republican ticket against Barack Obama who ran on the Democratic ticket. Do you remember
whether or not you voted in that election?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes, I voted 1783 77.7 %


2 No, didn't vote 502 21.9 %

- 19 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Missing Data
-1 Refused 9 0.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,285 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 200-201 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_A5A: Who did you vote for?


Who did you vote for?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 John McCain 389 17.0 %


2 Barack Obama 1338 58.3 %
3 Other, please specify: 26 1.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 30 1.3 %
. - 511 22.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,753 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 202-203 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_A5A_OTHER_TEXT: [Other] Who did you vote for?


[Other] Who did you vote for?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

- 2277 99.3 %
Barr - 1 0.0 %
Chuck Baldwin - 1 0.0 %
I voted against Obama I wasn;t for anyone the choices were SORRY - 1 0.0 %
Mitt Romney - 1 0.0 %
Private - 1 0.0 %
Ron Paul - 2 0.1 %

- 20 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

The Constitution Party. (Bob Barr) - 1 0.0 %


green party - 1 0.0 %
hillary clinton - 1 0.0 %
independent third party - 1 0.0 %
nader - 1 0.0 %
neither - 1 0.0 %
no comment - 1 0.0 %
none of your damn business - 1 0.0 %
prefer not to say - 1 0.0 %
voted for all other offices, didn't think either of these candidates were qualified for - 1 0.0 %
President, wrote in "none of the above"
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 204-330 (width: 127; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: character

W1_A5B: Who would you have voted for?


Who would you have voted for?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 John McCain 70 3.1 %


2 Barack Obama 283 12.3 %
3 Other, please specify: 13 0.6 %
4 No one/Refused to vote for a candidate 133 5.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 3 0.1 %
. - 1792 78.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 499 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 331-332 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_A5B_OTHER_TEXT: [Other] Who would you have voted for?


[Other] Who would you have voted for?

- 21 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

- 2281 99.4 %
Didn't know anything - 1 0.0 %
God - 1 0.0 %
I can't vote - 1 0.0 %
MICHEL OBAMA - 1 0.0 %
Ron Paul - 1 0.0 %
i don't vote - 1 0.0 %
i had to be 18 - 1 0.0 %
independit party - 1 0.0 %
michael savage - 1 0.0 %
not sure - 1 0.0 %
ron paul - 2 0.1 %
spongebob - 1 0.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 333-352 (width: 20; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: character

W1_A10: How often, if ever, do you discuss politics with your family or friends?
How often, if ever, do you discuss politics with your family or friends?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Never 349 15.2 %


2 Once or twice a month 796 34.7 %
3 Once or twice a week 557 24.3 %
4 Three or four times a week 344 15.0 %
5 Everyday 233 10.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 15 0.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,279 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 353-354 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_A11: How many days in the past week did you watch national news programs on
television or on the Internet?

- 22 -
How many days in the past week did you watch national news programs on television or on the Internet?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 None 516 22.5 %


2 One day 264 11.5 %
3 Two days 284 12.4 %
4 Three days 245 10.7 %
5 Four days 146 6.4 %
6 Five days 242 10.5 %
7 Six days 123 5.4 %
8 Seven days 463 20.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 11 0.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,283 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 8.00

Location: 355-356 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_A12: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as
President?
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as President?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Approve 1570 68.4 %


2 Disapprove 666 29.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 58 2.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,236 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 357-358 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_A12A: Do you [approve/disapprove] strongly or not strongly?


Do you [approve/disapprove] strongly or not strongly?

- 23 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Strongly 1559 68.0 %


2 Not Strongly 654 28.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 23 1.0 %
. - 58 2.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,213 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 359-360 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_B1: How much do government officials care what people like you think?
How much do government officials care what people like you think?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 A great deal 83 3.6 %


2 A lot 203 8.8 %
3 A moderate amount 672 29.3 %
4 A little 780 34.0 %
5 Not at all 532 23.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 24 1.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,270 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 361-362 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_B2: How much can people like you affect what the government does?
How much can people like you affect what the government does?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 A great deal 245 10.7 %


2 A lot 386 16.8 %
3 A moderate amount 631 27.5 %

- 24 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

4 A little 686 29.9 %


5 Not at all 311 13.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 35 1.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,259 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 363-364 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_B3: How often does the federal government do what most Americans want it to do?
How often does the federal government do what most Americans want it to do?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Always 19 0.8 %
2 Most of the time 156 6.8 %
3 About half the time 712 31.0 %
4 Once in a while 1133 49.4 %
5 Never 239 10.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 35 1.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,259 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 365-366 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_B4: Generally speaking, how angry do you feel about the way things are going in the
country these days?
Generally speaking, how angry do you feel about the way things are going in the country these days?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely angry 243 10.6 %


2 Very angry 437 19.0 %
3 Somewhat angry 731 31.9 %

- 25 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

4 A little angry 555 24.2 %


5 Not angry at all 301 13.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 27 1.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,267 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 367-368 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_C1: Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Democrat, a Republican, an


Independent, or something else?
Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Democrat, a Republican, an Independent, or something else?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Republican 331 14.4 %


2 Democrat 1251 54.5 %
3 Independent 555 24.2 %
4 Something else, please specify 108 4.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 49 2.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,245 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 369-370 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_C1_OTHER_TEXT: [Other] Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a


Democrat, a Republican, an Independent, or something else?
[Other] Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Democrat, a Republican, an Independent, or something else?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

- 2187 95.3 %
A deprived/curious person - 1 0.0 %
A little bit Democrat and Independent - 1 0.0 %

- 26 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

American citizen - 1 0.0 %


American voter - 1 0.0 %
Best suited to do the job and live up to what I believe is right - 1 0.0 %
Conservative - 3 0.1 %
Conservative Libertarian - 1 0.0 %
Conservative/libertarian - 1 0.0 %
Free thinker - 1 0.0 %
Green Party - 1 0.0 %
I don't side with either party line but am slightly more liberal - 1 0.0 %
I just don't know - 1 0.0 %
I vote for who ever I feel will be the best person for the job. - 1 0.0 %
I' m in no specific category - 1 0.0 %
Interested bystander - 1 0.0 %
Left Libertarian - 1 0.0 %
Libertarian - 2 0.1 %
Moderate - 1 0.0 %
Monarchist with left-libertarian leanings. - 1 0.0 %
NA - 2 0.1 %
NEUTRAL - 1 0.0 %
NONE - 1 0.0 %
Neutral - 4 0.2 %
No Party - 1 0.0 %
No Preference - 1 0.0 %
No affiliation - 1 0.0 %
No political party - 1 0.0 %
Not sure - 1 0.0 %
Nothing - 2 0.1 %
Nuetral - 1 0.0 %
One of Jehovah's Witnesses I don't vote - 1 0.0 %
Registered Voter - 1 0.0 %
TEA Party - 1 0.0 %
Theocratic - 1 0.0 %
UNAFFILIATED-DONT VOTE - 1 0.0 %
Unhappy Republican - 1 0.0 %
Whoever has the best candidate! - 1 0.0 %
a child of the king - 1 0.0 %
a general skeptic - 1 0.0 %
a inperfect person. - 1 0.0 %
at this time i'm not sure - 1 0.0 %

- 27 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

bipartisan - 1 0.0 %
concerned about the corruption - 1 0.0 %
conservative - 2 0.1 %
conservative democrat - 1 0.0 %
conseveritive - 1 0.0 %
could be republican or democrat this year - 1 0.0 %
do not know - 1 0.0 %
do not vote - 2 0.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 371-434 (width: 64; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: character

W1_C1B: Would you call yourself a strong [Democrat/Republican] or a not very strong
[Democrat/Republican]?
Would you call yourself a strong [Democrat/Republican] or a not very strong [Democrat/Republican]?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strong 996 43.4 %


2 Not very strong 576 25.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 10 0.4 %
. - 712 31.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,572 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 435-436 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_C1C: Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic
Party?
Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic Party?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Closer to the Republican Party 158 6.9 %

- 28 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

2 Closer to the Democratic Party 209 9.1 %


3 Neither 294 12.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 2 0.1 %
. - 1631 71.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 661 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 437-438 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_C2: We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Where would you
place YOURSELF on this 7 point scale?
We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Where would you place YOURSELF on this 7 point scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely liberal 75 3.3 %


2 Liberal 312 13.6 %
3 Slightly liberal 286 12.5 %
4 Moderate; middle of the road 874 38.1 %
5 Slightly conservative 297 12.9 %
6 Conservative 311 13.6 %
7 Extremely conservative 79 3.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 60 2.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,234 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00

Location: 439-440 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_D1: [Barack Obama] How would you rate:


[Barack Obama] How would you rate:

- 29 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0 - 211 9.2 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 5 0.2 %
7 - 3 0.1 %
10 - 11 0.5 %
15 - 113 4.9 %
20 - 5 0.2 %
22 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 5 0.2 %
27 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 92 4.0 %
32 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 2 0.1 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
38 - 1 0.0 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 88 3.8 %
45 - 5 0.2 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 70 3.1 %
55 - 6 0.3 %
56 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 135 5.9 %
65 - 9 0.4 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 2 0.1 %
70 - 236 10.3 %
73 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 31 1.4 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 1 0.0 %
79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 31 1.4 %
84 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 383 16.7 %
86 - 2 0.1 %
87 - 2 0.1 %

- 30 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

88 - 7 0.3 %
89 - 8 0.3 %
90 - 78 3.4 %
92 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 38 1.7 %
96 - 2 0.1 %
98 - 3 0.1 %
99 - 3 0.1 %
100 - 585 25.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 48 2.1 %
998 Don't recognize 56 2.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,190 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 67.47
• Median: 85.00
• Mode: 100.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 33.36

Location: 441-443 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D2: [Mitt Romney] How would you rate:


[Mitt Romney] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 630 27.5 %
1 - 4 0.2 %
2 - 8 0.3 %
3 - 3 0.1 %
4 - 3 0.1 %
5 - 13 0.6 %
7 - 2 0.1 %
8 - 2 0.1 %
10 - 16 0.7 %
11 - 1 0.0 %
12 - 2 0.1 %
15 - 282 12.3 %

- 31 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

18 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 21 0.9 %
22 - 2 0.1 %
23 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 12 0.5 %
29 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 182 7.9 %
35 - 12 0.5 %
37 - 1 0.0 %
38 - 1 0.0 %
39 - 2 0.1 %
40 - 164 7.1 %
45 - 16 0.7 %
46 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 232 10.1 %
54 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 11 0.5 %
60 - 136 5.9 %
62 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 11 0.5 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 118 5.1 %
74 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 15 0.7 %
80 - 10 0.4 %
82 - 1 0.0 %
83 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 109 4.8 %
86 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 18 0.8 %
93 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 4 0.2 %
97 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 38 1.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 53 2.3 %
998 Don't recognize 145 6.3 %

- 32 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,096 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 31.44
• Median: 30.00
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 29.17

Location: 444-446 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D3: [Michelle Obama] How would you rate:


[Michelle Obama] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 148 6.5 %
1 - 2 0.1 %
2 - 1 0.0 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 3 0.1 %
7 - 2 0.1 %
10 - 9 0.4 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 69 3.0 %
16 - 2 0.1 %
20 - 1 0.0 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 4 0.2 %
26 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 60 2.6 %
35 - 3 0.1 %
37 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 63 2.7 %
45 - 4 0.2 %
46 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 156 6.8 %
55 - 7 0.3 %

- 33 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

58 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 113 4.9 %
65 - 7 0.3 %
66 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 151 6.6 %
75 - 17 0.7 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 3 0.1 %
80 - 45 2.0 %
85 - 341 14.9 %
86 - 8 0.3 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
89 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 69 3.0 %
91 - 1 0.0 %
92 - 2 0.1 %
93 - 1 0.0 %
94 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 53 2.3 %
96 - 5 0.2 %
98 - 4 0.2 %
99 - 5 0.2 %
100 - 817 35.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 49 2.1 %
998 Don't recognize 51 2.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,194 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 74.00
• Median: 85.00
• Mode: 100.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 31.17

- 34 -
Location: 447-449 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D4: [Ann Romney] How would you rate:


[Ann Romney] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 335 14.6 %
1 - 2 0.1 %
2 - 5 0.2 %
5 - 6 0.3 %
10 - 23 1.0 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
14 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 165 7.2 %
19 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 19 0.8 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
23 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 10 0.4 %
30 - 105 4.6 %
35 - 5 0.2 %
37 - 1 0.0 %
38 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 112 4.9 %
42 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 12 0.5 %
49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 598 26.1 %
54 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 4 0.2 %
58 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 116 5.1 %
65 - 6 0.3 %
70 - 113 4.9 %
74 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 9 0.4 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
79 - 3 0.1 %

- 35 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

80 - 16 0.7 %
85 - 85 3.7 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
89 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 9 0.4 %
99 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 43 1.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 51 2.2 %
998 Don't recognize 425 18.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,818 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 39.88
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 26.92

Location: 450-452 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D5: [Clarence Thomas] How would you rate:


[Clarence Thomas] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 332 14.5 %
1 - 2 0.1 %
2 - 3 0.1 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 4 0.2 %
5 - 9 0.4 %
6 - 2 0.1 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
8 - 2 0.1 %
9 - 3 0.1 %
10 - 21 0.9 %
12 - 3 0.1 %
13 - 2 0.1 %
15 - 183 8.0 %

- 36 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

16 - 1 0.0 %
19 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 14 0.6 %
25 - 8 0.3 %
29 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 154 6.7 %
34 - 2 0.1 %
35 - 6 0.3 %
40 - 146 6.4 %
45 - 9 0.4 %
50 - 416 18.1 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 7 0.3 %
60 - 119 5.2 %
61 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 12 0.5 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 144 6.3 %
75 - 13 0.6 %
78 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 11 0.5 %
85 - 63 2.7 %
86 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 5 0.2 %
95 - 1 0.0 %
99 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 41 1.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 53 2.3 %
998 Don't recognize 493 21.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,748 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 37.94
• Median: 40.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 27.06

Location: 453-455 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 37 -
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D6: [Paul Ryan] How would you rate:


[Paul Ryan] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 433 18.9 %
1 - 4 0.2 %
2 - 6 0.3 %
3 - 3 0.1 %
4 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 10 0.4 %
6 - 2 0.1 %
8 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 23 1.0 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
14 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 202 8.8 %
17 - 1 0.0 %
19 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 13 0.6 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
23 - 2 0.1 %
25 - 14 0.6 %
30 - 131 5.7 %
32 - 1 0.0 %
33 - 1 0.0 %
34 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 5 0.2 %
37 - 2 0.1 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 115 5.0 %
45 - 5 0.2 %
50 - 318 13.9 %
55 - 5 0.2 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 89 3.9 %
62 - 1 0.0 %
64 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 6 0.3 %
69 - 1 0.0 %

- 38 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

70 - 87 3.8 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 7 0.3 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
79 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 8 0.3 %
81 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 109 4.8 %
90 - 16 0.7 %
95 - 8 0.3 %
99 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 54 2.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 49 2.1 %
998 Don't recognize 547 23.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,698 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 35.30
• Median: 30.00
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 30.00

Location: 456-458 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D7: [Condoleezza Rice] How would you rate:


[Condoleezza Rice] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 105 4.6 %
1 - 1 0.0 %
2 - 3 0.1 %
3 - 2 0.1 %
4 - 3 0.1 %
5 - 2 0.1 %
7 - 3 0.1 %
10 - 11 0.5 %
15 - 117 5.1 %

- 39 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

16 - 3 0.1 %
17 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 9 0.4 %
23 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 8 0.3 %
30 - 113 4.9 %
33 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 6 0.3 %
39 - 2 0.1 %
40 - 139 6.1 %
45 - 8 0.3 %
46 - 1 0.0 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 2 0.1 %
50 - 383 16.7 %
51 - 3 0.1 %
52 - 2 0.1 %
54 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 8 0.3 %
57 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 271 11.8 %
65 - 19 0.8 %
66 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 275 12.0 %
71 - 1 0.0 %
74 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 32 1.4 %
78 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 50 2.2 %
82 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 255 11.1 %
87 - 2 0.1 %
89 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 22 1.0 %
92 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 11 0.5 %
97 - 1 0.0 %

- 40 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

98 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 117 5.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 52 2.3 %
998 Don't recognize 236 10.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,006 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 56.25
• Median: 60.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 25.84

Location: 459-461 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D8: [Sarah Palin] How would you rate:


[Sarah Palin] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 805 35.1 %
1 - 7 0.3 %
2 - 6 0.3 %
3 - 3 0.1 %
4 - 3 0.1 %
5 - 12 0.5 %
6 - 3 0.1 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
8 - 2 0.1 %
10 - 31 1.4 %
11 - 1 0.0 %
12 - 3 0.1 %
14 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 256 11.2 %
18 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 15 0.7 %
22 - 2 0.1 %

- 41 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

25 - 12 0.5 %
27 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 145 6.3 %
32 - 1 0.0 %
33 - 1 0.0 %
34 - 2 0.1 %
35 - 8 0.3 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 156 6.8 %
45 - 7 0.3 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 254 11.1 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 11 0.5 %
60 - 112 4.9 %
61 - 1 0.0 %
62 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 13 0.6 %
70 - 94 4.1 %
74 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 12 0.5 %
80 - 12 0.5 %
85 - 70 3.1 %
90 - 7 0.3 %
95 - 2 0.1 %
99 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 48 2.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 50 2.2 %
998 Don't recognize 116 5.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,128 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 27.12
• Median: 15.00
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 28.63

- 42 -
Location: 462-464 (width: 3; decimal: 0)
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D9: [Hillary Clinton] How would you rate:


[Hillary Clinton] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 108 4.7 %
2 - 3 0.1 %
3 - 2 0.1 %
4 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 7 0.3 %
6 - 1 0.0 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 8 0.3 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 94 4.1 %
20 - 7 0.3 %
22 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 7 0.3 %
29 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 78 3.4 %
35 - 5 0.2 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
37 - 1 0.0 %
38 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 94 4.1 %
45 - 4 0.2 %
50 - 188 8.2 %
55 - 11 0.5 %
57 - 1 0.0 %
58 - 1 0.0 %
59 - 2 0.1 %
60 - 194 8.5 %
62 - 3 0.1 %
65 - 21 0.9 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 3 0.1 %
70 - 314 13.7 %
72 - 2 0.1 %

- 43 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

74 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 48 2.1 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 51 2.2 %
85 - 456 19.9 %
87 - 3 0.1 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
89 - 2 0.1 %
90 - 63 2.7 %
91 - 1 0.0 %
92 - 1 0.0 %
93 - 1 0.0 %
94 - 3 0.1 %
95 - 27 1.2 %
96 - 1 0.0 %
97 - 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 51 2.2 %
998 Don't recognize 62 2.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,181 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 66.75
• Median: 70.00
• Mode: 85.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 28.08

Location: 465-467 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D10: [Jesse Jackson] How would you rate:


[Jesse Jackson] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 309 13.5 %
1 - 5 0.2 %

- 44 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

2 - 3 0.1 %
3 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 11 0.5 %
6 - 1 0.0 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
9 - 2 0.1 %
10 - 17 0.7 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
13 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 178 7.8 %
18 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 11 0.5 %
22 - 2 0.1 %
25 - 7 0.3 %
30 - 148 6.5 %
35 - 2 0.1 %
40 - 135 5.9 %
44 - 2 0.1 %
45 - 12 0.5 %
46 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 3 0.1 %
49 - 2 0.1 %
50 - 383 16.7 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
53 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 14 0.6 %
56 - 1 0.0 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 214 9.3 %
63 - 1 0.0 %
64 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 14 0.6 %
66 - 1 0.0 %
67 - 3 0.1 %
70 - 253 11.0 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
73 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 27 1.2 %
78 - 1 0.0 %

- 45 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 30 1.3 %
83 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 170 7.4 %
86 - 4 0.2 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 2 0.1 %
90 - 8 0.3 %
93 - 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 59 2.6 %
998 Don't recognize 130 5.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,105 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 46.59
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 29.44

Location: 468-470 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D11: [The Republican Party] How would you rate:


[The Republican Party] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 562 24.5 %
1 - 5 0.2 %
2 - 3 0.1 %
3 - 4 0.2 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 18 0.8 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
8 - 1 0.0 %
9 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 33 1.4 %

- 46 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

14 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 255 11.1 %
16 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 22 1.0 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 14 0.6 %
27 - 1 0.0 %
28 - 1 0.0 %
29 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 172 7.5 %
33 - 1 0.0 %
34 - 2 0.1 %
35 - 8 0.3 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
38 - 4 0.2 %
40 - 193 8.4 %
42 - 2 0.1 %
44 - 2 0.1 %
45 - 15 0.7 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 284 12.4 %
51 - 2 0.1 %
54 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 10 0.4 %
60 - 176 7.7 %
62 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 10 0.4 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 160 7.0 %
75 - 21 0.9 %
78 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 14 0.6 %
82 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 72 3.1 %
90 - 9 0.4 %
95 - 2 0.1 %
99 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 22 1.0 %

- 47 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Missing Data
-1 Refused 67 2.9 %
998 Don't recognize 111 4.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,116 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 32.77
• Median: 30.00
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 27.63

Location: 471-473 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D12: [The Democratic Party] How would you rate:


[The Democratic Party] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 135 5.9 %
1 - 3 0.1 %
2 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 8 0.3 %
7 - 3 0.1 %
10 - 12 0.5 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 114 5.0 %
20 - 14 0.6 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 5 0.2 %
29 - 2 0.1 %
30 - 103 4.5 %
34 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 3 0.1 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 130 5.7 %
44 - 1 0.0 %

- 48 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

45 - 12 0.5 %
46 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 205 8.9 %
51 - 4 0.2 %
55 - 14 0.6 %
56 - 1 0.0 %
57 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 243 10.6 %
62 - 1 0.0 %
63 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 18 0.8 %
67 - 1 0.0 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 283 12.3 %
73 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 50 2.2 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
77 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 62 2.7 %
84 - 2 0.1 %
85 - 330 14.4 %
86 - 1 0.0 %
87 - 2 0.1 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 32 1.4 %
91 - 2 0.1 %
92 - 1 0.0 %
94 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 20 0.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 61 2.7 %
998 Don't recognize 88 3.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,145 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 49 -
• Mean: 61.77
• Median: 70.00
• Mode: 85.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 29.17

Location: 474-476 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D13: [Socialists] How would you rate:


[Socialists] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 406 17.7 %
1 - 4 0.2 %
2 - 2 0.1 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 5 0.2 %
6 - 1 0.0 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
9 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 23 1.0 %
13 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 185 8.1 %
20 - 22 1.0 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
22 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 10 0.4 %
30 - 111 4.8 %
33 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 8 0.3 %
38 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 129 5.6 %
45 - 9 0.4 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 554 24.1 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 12 0.5 %
60 - 101 4.4 %
62 - 1 0.0 %
64 - 1 0.0 %

- 50 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

65 - 9 0.4 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 80 3.5 %
71 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 6 0.3 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 11 0.5 %
82 - 1 0.0 %
84 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 37 1.6 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
89 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 5 0.2 %
92 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 2 0.1 %
100 - 16 0.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 72 3.1 %
998 Don't recognize 451 19.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,771 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 34.72
• Median: 40.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 25.51

Location: 477-479 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D14: [Libertarians] How would you rate:


[Libertarians] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 191 8.3 %
1 - 1 0.0 %
2 - 2 0.1 %

- 51 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 5 0.2 %
6 - 2 0.1 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 17 0.7 %
13 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 126 5.5 %
16 - 1 0.0 %
19 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 18 0.8 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 18 0.8 %
30 - 116 5.1 %
32 - 1 0.0 %
33 - 3 0.1 %
35 - 9 0.4 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
38 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 123 5.4 %
43 - 1 0.0 %
44 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 15 0.7 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 621 27.1 %
51 - 4 0.2 %
52 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 16 0.7 %
56 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 162 7.1 %
65 - 6 0.3 %
66 - 3 0.1 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 121 5.3 %
74 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 17 0.7 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 14 0.6 %
85 - 54 2.4 %

- 52 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

86 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 7 0.3 %
95 - 1 0.0 %
98 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 26 1.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 73 3.2 %
998 Don't recognize 502 21.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,719 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 43.32
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 23.47

Location: 480-482 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D15: [Tea Party Activists] How would you rate:


[Tea Party Activists] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 638 27.8 %
1 - 3 0.1 %
2 - 3 0.1 %
3 - 2 0.1 %
4 - 3 0.1 %
5 - 13 0.6 %
7 - 2 0.1 %
9 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 27 1.2 %
13 - 1 0.0 %
14 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 197 8.6 %
16 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 20 0.9 %
22 - 1 0.0 %
23 - 2 0.1 %

- 53 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

25 - 9 0.4 %
30 - 129 5.6 %
31 - 1 0.0 %
32 - 1 0.0 %
34 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 9 0.4 %
37 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 117 5.1 %
41 - 1 0.0 %
42 - 2 0.1 %
44 - 2 0.1 %
45 - 12 0.5 %
47 - 3 0.1 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 352 15.3 %
52 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 10 0.4 %
60 - 115 5.0 %
65 - 8 0.3 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 89 3.9 %
75 - 10 0.4 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 11 0.5 %
85 - 67 2.9 %
86 - 1 0.0 %
87 - 2 0.1 %
90 - 4 0.2 %
95 - 6 0.3 %
99 - 2 0.1 %
100 - 47 2.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 66 2.9 %
998 Don't recognize 295 12.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 54 -
Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 1,933 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 30.81
• Median: 30.00
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 28.91

Location: 483-485 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D16: [Occupy Wall Street Activists] How would you rate:


[Occupy Wall Street Activists] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 338 14.7 %
1 - 3 0.1 %
2 - 3 0.1 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 5 0.2 %
5 - 12 0.5 %
6 - 1 0.0 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
9 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 13 0.6 %
15 - 142 6.2 %
16 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 17 0.7 %
25 - 9 0.4 %
30 - 109 4.8 %
33 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 6 0.3 %
40 - 132 5.8 %
44 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 10 0.4 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 390 17.0 %
51 - 2 0.1 %
55 - 15 0.7 %

- 55 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

56 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 181 7.9 %
64 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 15 0.7 %
67 - 1 0.0 %
68 - 2 0.1 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 142 6.2 %
71 - 1 0.0 %
73 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 27 1.2 %
76 - 2 0.1 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 28 1.2 %
81 - 1 0.0 %
82 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 113 4.9 %
86 - 1 0.0 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 18 0.8 %
95 - 5 0.2 %
99 - 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 76 3.3 %
998 Don't recognize 394 17.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 1,824 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 42.78
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 29.12

Location: 486-488 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 56 -
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D17: [Black Nationalists] How would you rate:


[Black Nationalists] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 203 8.8 %
1 - 1 0.0 %
2 - 1 0.0 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 9 0.4 %
7 - 2 0.1 %
9 - 2 0.1 %
10 - 12 0.5 %
15 - 88 3.8 %
20 - 11 0.5 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 5 0.2 %
30 - 76 3.3 %
35 - 7 0.3 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 66 2.9 %
43 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 7 0.3 %
49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 436 19.0 %
51 - 2 0.1 %
53 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 10 0.4 %
57 - 1 0.0 %
58 - 2 0.1 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 105 4.6 %
65 - 8 0.3 %
66 - 1 0.0 %
67 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 121 5.3 %
74 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 13 0.6 %
78 - 2 0.1 %

- 57 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

80 - 23 1.0 %
83 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 105 4.6 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 2 0.1 %
90 - 8 0.3 %
93 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 2 0.1 %
100 - 85 3.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 78 3.4 %
998 Don't recognize 787 34.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,429 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 47.27
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 28.59

Location: 489-491 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D18: [Feminists] How would you rate:


[Feminists] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 180 7.8 %
1 - 2 0.1 %
2 - 4 0.2 %
5 - 3 0.1 %
6 - 2 0.1 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
9 - 2 0.1 %
10 - 12 0.5 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 109 4.8 %
17 - 1 0.0 %
19 - 1 0.0 %

- 58 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

20 - 18 0.8 %
22 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 9 0.4 %
30 - 95 4.1 %
35 - 7 0.3 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 119 5.2 %
41 - 1 0.0 %
44 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 13 0.6 %
49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 558 24.3 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
52 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 15 0.7 %
56 - 1 0.0 %
58 - 1 0.0 %
59 - 2 0.1 %
60 - 227 9.9 %
63 - 1 0.0 %
64 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 14 0.6 %
66 - 1 0.0 %
67 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 216 9.4 %
75 - 35 1.5 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 35 1.5 %
82 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 157 6.8 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
89 - 2 0.1 %
90 - 19 0.8 %
95 - 7 0.3 %
98 - 1 0.0 %
99 - 3 0.1 %
Missing Data

- 59 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

-1 Refused 75 3.3 %
998 Don't recognize 254 11.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 1,965 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 50.81
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 25.93

Location: 492-494 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D19: [Congressional Black Caucus] How would you rate:


[Congressional Black Caucus] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 151 6.6 %
2 - 3 0.1 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 6 0.3 %
7 - 2 0.1 %
8 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 15 0.7 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 68 3.0 %
20 - 10 0.4 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 8 0.3 %
28 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 70 3.1 %
35 - 5 0.2 %
37 - 1 0.0 %
38 - 1 0.0 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 67 2.9 %
43 - 1 0.0 %

- 60 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

45 - 5 0.2 %
50 - 471 20.5 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
52 - 2 0.1 %
55 - 8 0.3 %
59 - 2 0.1 %
60 - 155 6.8 %
65 - 17 0.7 %
67 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 204 8.9 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
73 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 33 1.4 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 1 0.0 %
79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 31 1.4 %
81 - 2 0.1 %
85 - 199 8.7 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 2 0.1 %
89 - 3 0.1 %
90 - 23 1.0 %
92 - 1 0.0 %
94 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 5 0.2 %
96 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 106 4.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 70 3.1 %
998 Don't recognize 529 23.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 1,695 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 54.61
• Median: 50.00

- 61 -
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 27.23

Location: 495-497 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_D20: [NAACP] How would you rate:


[NAACP] How would you rate:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 136 5.9 %
1 - 4 0.2 %
2 - 2 0.1 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 6 0.3 %
7 - 2 0.1 %
9 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 10 0.4 %
15 - 73 3.2 %
20 - 16 0.7 %
21 - 2 0.1 %
23 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 8 0.3 %
30 - 76 3.3 %
35 - 9 0.4 %
37 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 88 3.8 %
45 - 9 0.4 %
49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 365 15.9 %
52 - 3 0.1 %
54 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 14 0.6 %
60 - 206 9.0 %
65 - 11 0.5 %
66 - 2 0.1 %
67 - 2 0.1 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 259 11.3 %

- 62 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

72 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 34 1.5 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 56 2.4 %
85 - 282 12.3 %
86 - 2 0.1 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
89 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 37 1.6 %
93 - 1 0.0 %
94 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 14 0.6 %
96 - 2 0.1 %
97 - 1 0.0 %
99 - 3 0.1 %
100 - 314 13.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 69 3.0 %
998 Don't recognize 157 6.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,068 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 61.88
• Median: 60.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 28.70

Location: 498-500 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_E1: Which of the following most characterizes your relationship status at this time?
Which of the following most characterizes your relationship status at this time?

- 63 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 In a relationship or married and not dating 1398 60.9 %


2 Dating and looking for serious relationship and/or marital partner 168 7.3 %
3 Casual dating that is not serious only 119 5.2 %
4 Friends with benefits 66 2.9 %
5 One-night stands 14 0.6 %
6 Not interested in dating or pursuing a relationship at this time 492 21.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 37 1.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,257 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00

Location: 501-502 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E2: How optimistic are you that you will develop a serious and/or marital relationship?
How optimistic are you that you will develop a serious and/or marital relationship?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Optimistic 98 4.3 %
2 Neither 56 2.4 %
3 Pessimistic 9 0.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 5 0.2 %
. - 2126 92.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 163 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 503-504 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_E2A: Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or


slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?
Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?

- 64 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Extremely 44 1.9 %
2 Moderately 59 2.6 %
3 Slightly 4 0.2 %
Missing Data
. - 2187 95.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 107 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 505-506 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_E3: Some people engage in interracial relationships, while others do not. Have you dated
outside of your racial group?
Some people engage in interracial relationships, while others do not. Have you dated outside of your racial group?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 956 41.7 %


2 No 1297 56.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 41 1.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,253 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 507-508 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E4: Were you ever willing to date outside of your racial group?
Were you ever willing to date outside of your racial group?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 671 29.3 %


2 No 603 26.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 23 1.0 %
. - 997 43.5 %

- 65 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,274 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 509-510 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_E5_1: [African/African American/Black] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have
you dated?
[African/African American/Black] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you dated?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 651 28.4 %
1 Yes 976 42.5 %
Missing Data
. - 667 29.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,627 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 511-511 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: .

W1_E5_2: [Asian/Asian Americans] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you
dated?
[Asian/Asian Americans] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you dated?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 1074 46.8 %
1 Yes 553 24.1 %
Missing Data
. - 667 29.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,627 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

- 66 -
Location: 512-512 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: .

W1_E5_3: [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have
you dated?
[Latin American/Latino/Hispanic] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you dated?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 703 30.6 %
1 Yes 924 40.3 %
Missing Data
. - 667 29.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,627 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 513-513 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: .

W1_E5_4: [Middle Easterner/Arab American] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or
have you dated?
[Middle Easterner/Arab American] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you dated?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 1297 56.5 %
1 Yes 330 14.4 %
Missing Data
. - 667 29.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,627 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 514-514 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: .

W1_E5_5: [South Asian/South Asian American] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or
have you dated?
[South Asian/South Asian American] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you dated?

- 67 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0 No 1271 55.4 %
1 Yes 356 15.5 %
Missing Data
. - 667 29.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,627 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 515-515 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: .

W1_E5_6: [White/Caucasian (non-Hispanic)] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or
have you dated?
[White/Caucasian (non-Hispanic)] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you dated?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 470 20.5 %
1 Yes 1157 50.4 %
Missing Data
. - 667 29.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,627 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 516-516 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: .

W1_E5_7: [Other race] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you dated?
[Other race] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you dated?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 1416 61.7 %
1 Yes 211 9.2 %
Missing Data
. - 667 29.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 68 -
Based upon 1,627 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 517-517 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: .

W1_E61_A: [African/African American/Black: They are physically attractive] How do you rate
each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[African/African American/Black: They are physically attractive] How do you rate each of the following groups on these
characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 959 41.8 %


2 Agree Somewhat 908 39.6 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 222 9.7 %
4 Disagree Strongly 113 4.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 92 4.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,202 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 518-519 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E61_B: [African/African American/Black: My family, friends, relatives would not approve]


How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[African/African American/Black: My family, friends, relatives would not approve] How do you rate each of the following groups on
these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 229 10.0 %


2 Agree Somewhat 419 18.3 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 501 21.8 %
4 Disagree Strongly 1046 45.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 99 4.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,195 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 69 -
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 520-521 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E61_C: [African/African American/Black: I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic


children] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[African/African American/Black: I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic children] How do you rate each of the following
groups on these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 214 9.3 %


2 Agree Somewhat 377 16.4 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 436 19.0 %
4 Disagree Strongly 1164 50.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 103 4.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,191 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 522-523 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E61_D: [African/African American/Black: I would only want to date this group for sexual
reasons rather than for a serious or potential marital relationship] How do you rate each of the
following groups on these characteristics?
[African/African American/Black: I would only want to date this group for sexual reasons rather than for a serious or potential
marital relationship] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 67 2.9 %


2 Agree Somewhat 177 7.7 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 323 14.1 %
4 Disagree Strongly 1623 70.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 104 4.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,190 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 70 -
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 524-525 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E62_A: [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: They are physically attractive] How do you rate
each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: They are physically attractive] How do you rate each of the following groups on these
characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 800 34.9 %


2 Agree Somewhat 1037 45.2 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 203 8.8 %
4 Disagree Strongly 120 5.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 134 5.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,160 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 526-527 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E62_B: [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: My family, friends, relatives would not approve]


How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: My family, friends, relatives would not approve] How do you rate each of the following groups on
these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 133 5.8 %


2 Agree Somewhat 381 16.6 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 645 28.1 %
4 Disagree Strongly 996 43.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 139 6.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,155 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00

- 71 -
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 528-529 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E62_C: [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic


children] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic children] How do you rate each of the following
groups on these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 129 5.6 %


2 Agree Somewhat 339 14.8 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 465 20.3 %
4 Disagree Strongly 1216 53.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 145 6.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,149 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 530-531 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E62_D: [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: I would only want to date this group for sexual
reasons rather than for a serious or potential marital relationship] How do you rate each of the
following groups on these characteristics?
[Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: I would only want to date this group for sexual reasons rather than for a serious or potential
marital relationship] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 58 2.5 %


2 Agree Somewhat 176 7.7 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 355 15.5 %
4 Disagree Strongly 1558 67.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 147 6.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,147 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00

- 72 -
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 532-533 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E63_A: [Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): They are physically attractive] How do you rate
each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): They are physically attractive] How do you rate each of the following groups on these
characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 837 36.5 %


2 Agree Somewhat 1063 46.3 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 176 7.7 %
4 Disagree Strongly 92 4.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 126 5.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,168 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 534-535 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E63_B: [Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): My family, friends, relatives would not approve]


How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): My family, friends, relatives would not approve] How do you rate each of the following groups on
these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 123 5.4 %


2 Agree Somewhat 337 14.7 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 478 20.8 %
4 Disagree Strongly 1228 53.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 128 5.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,166 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

- 73 -
Location: 536-537 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E63_C: [Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic


children] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic children] How do you rate each of the following
groups on these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 117 5.1 %


2 Agree Somewhat 278 12.1 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 375 16.3 %
4 Disagree Strongly 1382 60.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 142 6.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,152 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 538-539 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E63_D: [Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): I would only want to date this group for sexual
reasons rather than for a serious or potential marital relationship] How do you rate each of the
following groups on these characteristics?
[Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): I would only want to date this group for sexual reasons rather than for a serious or potential
marital relationship] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 78 3.4 %


2 Agree Somewhat 166 7.2 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 313 13.6 %
4 Disagree Strongly 1599 69.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 138 6.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,156 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 540-541 (width: 2; decimal: 0)

- 74 -
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E64_A: [Asian/Asian Americans: They are physically attractive] How do you rate each of
the following groups on these characteristics?
[Asian/Asian Americans: They are physically attractive] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 527 23.0 %


2 Agree Somewhat 1062 46.3 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 384 16.7 %
4 Disagree Strongly 203 8.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 118 5.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,176 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 542-543 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E64_B: [Asian/Asian Americans: My family, friends, relatives would not approve] How do
you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[Asian/Asian Americans: My family, friends, relatives would not approve] How do you rate each of the following groups on these
characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 155 6.8 %


2 Agree Somewhat 393 17.1 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 665 29.0 %
4 Disagree Strongly 952 41.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 129 5.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,165 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 544-545 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

- 75 -
W1_E64_C: [Asian/Asian Americans: I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic children]
How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
[Asian/Asian Americans: I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic children] How do you rate each of the following groups on
these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 145 6.3 %


2 Agree Somewhat 354 15.4 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 475 20.7 %
4 Disagree Strongly 1185 51.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 135 5.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,159 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 546-547 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E64_D: [Asian/Asian Americans: I would only want to date this group for sexual reasons
rather than for a serious or potential marital relationship] How do you rate each of the
following groups on these characteristics?
[Asian/Asian Americans: I would only want to date this group for sexual reasons rather than for a serious or potential marital
relationship] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 73 3.2 %


2 Agree Somewhat 181 7.9 %
3 Disagree Somewhat 360 15.7 %
4 Disagree Strongly 1546 67.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 134 5.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,160 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 548-549 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

- 76 -
W1_E7: Have you had sex with someone outside of your racial group?
Have you had sex with someone outside of your racial group?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 980 42.7 %


2 No 1245 54.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 69 3.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,225 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 550-551 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_E8: Was this in the context of :


Was this in the context of :

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 A committed relationship 404 17.6 %


2 A casual, uncommitted relationship 400 17.4 %
3 A one-night stand 126 5.5 %
4 Other 37 1.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 13 0.6 %
. - 1314 57.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 967 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 552-553 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_E9_A: [African/African American/Black] Have you had sex with any of the following
groups?
[African/African American/Black] Have you had sex with any of the following groups?

- 77 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0 No 1038 45.2 %
1 Yes 1256 54.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 554-554 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_E9_B: [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic] Have you had sex with any of the following
groups?
[Latin American/Latino/Hispanic] Have you had sex with any of the following groups?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 1700 74.1 %
1 Yes 594 25.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 555-555 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_E9_C: [Asian/Asian American] Have you had sex with any of the following groups?
[Asian/Asian American] Have you had sex with any of the following groups?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 1996 87.0 %
1 Yes 298 13.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 556-556 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_E9_D: [Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic)] Have you had sex with any of the following
groups?

- 78 -
[Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic)] Have you had sex with any of the following groups?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 957 41.7 %
1 Yes 1337 58.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 557-557 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_E9_REFUSED: [Refused] Have you had sex with any of the following groups?
[Refused] Have you had sex with any of the following groups?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2049 89.3 %
1 Yes 245 10.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 558-558 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_F1: When you think about your future, are you generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither
optimistic nor pessimistic?
When you think about your future, are you generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither optimistic nor pessimistic?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Optimistic 1225 53.4 %


2 Neither 796 34.7 %
3 Pessimistic 218 9.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 55 2.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,239 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

- 79 -
Location: 559-560 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F1A: Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or


slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?
Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely 421 18.4 %


2 Moderately 843 36.7 %
3 Slightly 170 7.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 9 0.4 %
. - 851 37.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,434 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 561-562 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_F2: And when you think about the future of the United States as a whole, are you
generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither optimistic nor pessimistic?
And when you think about the future of the United States as a whole, are you generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither optimistic
nor pessimistic?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Optimistic 851 37.1 %


2 Neither 823 35.9 %
3 Pessimistic 565 24.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 55 2.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,239 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 563-564 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

- 80 -
W1_F2A: Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or
slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?
Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely 354 15.4 %


2 Moderately 781 34.0 %
3 Slightly 271 11.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 10 0.4 %
. - 878 38.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,406 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 565-566 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_F3: A basic American belief has been that if you work hard you can get ahead and reach
the goals you set and more. Is this true or false today?
A basic American belief has been that if you work hard you can get ahead and reach the goals you set and more. Is this true or
false today?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely true 331 14.4 %


2 Moderately true 641 27.9 %
3 Slightly true 521 22.7 %
4 Neither 275 12.0 %
5 Slightly false 214 9.3 %
6 Moderately false 157 6.8 %
7 Extremely false 111 4.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 44 1.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,250 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00

Location: 567-568 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 81 -
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F4_A: [To own a home ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or hard is it to reach
these goals?
[To own a home ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or hard is it to reach these goals?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very hard 404 17.6 %


2 Somewhat hard 946 41.2 %
3 Somewhat easy 643 28.0 %
4 Very easy 239 10.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 62 2.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,232 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 569-570 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F4_B: [To have a financially secure retirement ] For yourself and people like you, how
easy or hard is it to reach these goals?
[To have a financially secure retirement ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or hard is it to reach these goals?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very hard 733 32.0 %


2 Somewhat hard 1012 44.1 %
3 Somewhat easy 390 17.0 %
4 Very easy 92 4.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 67 2.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,227 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 571-572 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

- 82 -
W1_F4_C: [To send one's children to college ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or
hard is it to reach these goals?
[To send one's children to college ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or hard is it to reach these goals?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very hard 660 28.8 %


2 Somewhat hard 1004 43.8 %
3 Somewhat easy 440 19.2 %
4 Very easy 119 5.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 71 3.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,223 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 573-574 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F4_D: [To become wealthy ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or hard is it to
reach these goals?
[To become wealthy ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or hard is it to reach these goals?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very hard 1258 54.8 %


2 Somewhat hard 755 32.9 %
3 Somewhat easy 164 7.1 %
4 Very easy 52 2.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 65 2.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,229 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 575-576 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F4_E: [To do better than one's parents did ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or
hard is it to reach these goals?
[To do better than one's parents did ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or hard is it to reach these goals?

- 83 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Very hard 290 12.6 %


2 Somewhat hard 869 37.9 %
3 Somewhat easy 801 34.9 %
4 Very easy 270 11.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 64 2.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,230 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 577-578 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F5_A: [To own a home ] For your children or the children of people like yourself, how easy
or hard will it be for your children to reach these goals in the future?
[To own a home ] For your children or the children of people like yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your children to reach
these goals in the future?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very hard 507 22.1 %


2 Somewhat hard 940 41.0 %
3 Somewhat easy 578 25.2 %
4 Very easy 185 8.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 84 3.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,210 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 579-580 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F5_B: [To have a financially secure retirement ] For your children or the children of people
like yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your children to reach these goals in the future?
[To have a financially secure retirement ] For your children or the children of people like yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your
children to reach these goals in the future?

- 84 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Very hard 755 32.9 %


2 Somewhat hard 927 40.4 %
3 Somewhat easy 411 17.9 %
4 Very easy 117 5.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 84 3.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,210 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 581-582 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F5_C: [To send one's children to college ] For your children or the children of children to
reach these goals people like yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your children to reach
these goals in the future?
[To send one's children to college ] For your children or the children of people like yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your
children to reach these goals in the future?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very hard 645 28.1 %


2 Somewhat hard 968 42.2 %
3 Somewhat easy 459 20.0 %
4 Very easy 142 6.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 80 3.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,214 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 583-584 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F5_D: [To become wealthy ] For your children or the children of people like yourself, how
easy or hard will it be for your children to reach these goals in the future?
[To become wealthy ] For your children or the children of people like yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your children to reach
these goals in the future?

- 85 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Very hard 963 42.0 %


2 Somewhat hard 845 36.8 %
3 Somewhat easy 298 13.0 %
4 Very easy 107 4.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 81 3.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,213 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 585-586 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F5_E: [To do better than one's parents did ] For your children or the children of people
like yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your children to reach these goals in the future?
[To do better than one's parents did ] For your children or the children of people like yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your
children to reach these goals in the future?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very hard 484 21.1 %


2 Somewhat hard 893 38.9 %
3 Somewhat easy 647 28.2 %
4 Very easy 186 8.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 84 3.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,210 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 587-588 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_F6: How far along the road to your American Dream do you think you will ultimately get on
a 10-point scale where 1 is not far at all and 10 nearly there?
How far along the road to your American Dream do you think you will ultimately get on a 10-point scale where 1 is not far at all and
10 nearly there?

- 86 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Not far at all in achieving the American Dream 70 3.1 %


2 - 59 2.6 %
3 - 98 4.3 %
4 - 152 6.6 %
5 - 362 15.8 %
6 - 336 14.6 %
7 - 440 19.2 %
8 - 350 15.3 %
9 - 165 7.2 %
10 Nearly there in achieving the American Dream 203 8.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 59 2.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,235 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 6.40
• Median: 7.00
• Mode: 7.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 10.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.19

Location: 589-590 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_G2: Now thinking about the country's economy, would you say that compared to one year
ago, the nation's economy is now better, about the same, or worse?
Now thinking about the country's economy, would you say that compared to one year ago, the nation's economy is now better,
about the same, or worse?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Better 545 23.8 %


2 About the same 1108 48.3 %
3 Worse 590 25.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 51 2.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,243 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 591-592 (width: 2; decimal: 0)

- 87 -
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_G2B: Much better or somewhat better?


Much better or somewhat better?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Much better 88 3.8 %


2 Somewhat better 457 19.9 %
Missing Data
. - 1749 76.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 545 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 593-594 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_G2C: Much worse or somewhat worse?


Much worse or somewhat worse?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Much worse 299 13.0 %


2 Somewhat worse 289 12.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 2 0.1 %
. - 1704 74.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 588 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 595-596 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_G3A: Do you think the economy, in the country as a whole, will be better, about the same,
or worse in 12 months?
Do you think the economy, in the country as a whole, will be better, about the same, or worse in 12 months?

- 88 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Better 751 32.7 %


2 About the same 1106 48.2 %
3 Worse 381 16.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 56 2.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,238 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 597-598 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_G3B: Much better or somewhat better?


Much better or somewhat better?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Much better 175 7.6 %


2 Somewhat better 573 25.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 3 0.1 %
. - 1543 67.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 748 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 599-600 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_G3C: Much worse or somewhat worse?


Much worse or somewhat worse?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

-1 Refused 0 0.0 %
1 Much worse 175 7.6 %
2 Somewhat worse 206 9.0 %
Missing Data
. - 1913 83.4 %

- 89 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 381 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 601-602 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_H1: Society has reached the point where Blacks and Whites have equal opportunities for
achievement.
Society has reached the point where blacks and whites have equal opportunities for achievement.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 237 10.3 %


2 Agree somewhat 465 20.3 %
3 Neither agree nor disagree 499 21.8 %
4 Disagree somewhat 561 24.5 %
5 Disagree strongly 455 19.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 77 3.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,217 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 603-604 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_H2: In comparison to other minority groups, American Indians are well represented and
have advanced a lot.
In comparison to other minority groups, American Indians are well represented and have advanced a lot.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 110 4.8 %


2 Agree somewhat 318 13.9 %
3 Neither agree nor disagree 767 33.4 %
4 Disagree somewhat 508 22.1 %
5 Disagree strongly 504 22.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 87 3.8 %

- 90 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,207 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 605-606 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_H3: The U.S. government is largely responsible for many of the economic and social
problems American Indians experience today.
The U.S. government is largely responsible for many of the economic and social problems American Indians experience today.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 449 19.6 %


2 Agree somewhat 708 30.9 %
3 Neither agree nor disagree 724 31.6 %
4 Disagree somewhat 203 8.8 %
5 Disagree strongly 128 5.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 82 3.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,212 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 607-608 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_H4: Over the past few years, Blacks have gotten less than they deserve.
Over the past few years, Blacks have gotten less than they deserve.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 203 8.8 %


2 Agree somewhat 478 20.8 %
3 Neither agree nor disagree 803 35.0 %
4 Disagree somewhat 381 16.6 %
5 Disagree strongly 342 14.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 87 3.8 %

- 91 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,207 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 609-610 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_H5: Irish, Italians, Jews, and many other minorities overcame prejudice and worked their
way up. Blacks should do the same without any special favors.
Irish, Italians, Jews, and many other minorities overcame prejudice and worked their way up. Blacks should do the same without
any special favors.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 338 14.7 %


2 Agree somewhat 497 21.7 %
3 Neither agree nor disagree 661 28.8 %
4 Disagree somewhat 389 17.0 %
5 Disagree strongly 333 14.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 76 3.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,218 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 611-612 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_H6: It's really a matter of some people not trying hard enough; if Blacks would only try
harder they could be just as well off as Whites.
It?s really a matter of some people not trying hard enough; if blacks would only try harder they could be just as well off as whites.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 198 8.6 %


2 Agree somewhat 435 19.0 %
3 Neither agree nor disagree 630 27.5 %
4 Disagree somewhat 423 18.4 %
5 Disagree strongly 533 23.2 %

- 92 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Missing Data
-1 Refused 75 3.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,219 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 613-614 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_H7: Generations of slavery and discrimination have created conditions that make it
difficult for Blacks to work their way out of the lower class.
Generations of slavery and discrimination have created conditions that make it difficult for blacks to work their way out of the lower
class.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 278 12.1 %


2 Agree somewhat 600 26.2 %
3 Neither agree nor disagree 544 23.7 %
4 Disagree somewhat 413 18.0 %
5 Disagree strongly 382 16.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 77 3.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,217 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 615-616 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_H8: Discrimination against Blacks is no longer a problem in the U.S.


Discrimination against blacks is no longer a problem in the U.S.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 104 4.5 %


2 Agree somewhat 238 10.4 %
3 Neither agree nor disagree 458 20.0 %
4 Disagree somewhat 564 24.6 %

- 93 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

5 Disagree strongly 847 36.9 %


Missing Data
-1 Refused 83 3.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,211 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 617-618 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_I1: How well does the U.S. Congress represent all Americans?
How well does the U.S. Congress represent all Americans?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely well 26 1.1 %


2 Very well 73 3.2 %
3 Moderately well 650 28.3 %
4 A little well 696 30.3 %
5 Not well at all 786 34.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 63 2.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,231 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 619-620 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_I2: How well does the U.S. Congress represent you?


How well does the U.S. Congress represent you?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely well 21 0.9 %


2 Very well 57 2.5 %
3 Moderately well 571 24.9 %
4 A little well 709 30.9 %
5 Not well at all 876 38.2 %

- 94 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Missing Data
-1 Refused 60 2.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,234 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 621-622 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_J1_A: [Provide a guaranteed one year of paid parental leave for mothers and fathers on
the birth or adoption of a child? ] What is your opinion about each of them?
[Provide a guaranteed one year of paid parental leave for mothers and fathers on the birth or adoption of a child? ] What is your
opinion about each of them?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 Very bad proposal 391 17.0 %


1 - 109 4.8 %
2 - 135 5.9 %
3 - 149 6.5 %
4 - 146 6.4 %
5 - 397 17.3 %
6 - 140 6.1 %
7 - 165 7.2 %
8 - 143 6.2 %
9 - 110 4.8 %
10 very good proposal 316 13.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 93 4.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,201 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.85
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 5.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 10.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.38

Location: 623-624 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

- 95 -
W1_J1_B: [Increase legal penalties for sexual harassment? ] What is your opinion about each
of them?
[Increase legal penalties for sexual harassment? ] What is your opinion about each of them?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 Very bad proposal 80 3.5 %


1 - 40 1.7 %
2 - 54 2.4 %
3 - 79 3.4 %
4 - 86 3.7 %
5 - 418 18.2 %
6 - 204 8.9 %
7 - 241 10.5 %
8 - 260 11.3 %
9 - 183 8.0 %
10 very good proposal 558 24.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 91 4.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,203 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 6.83
• Median: 7.00
• Mode: 10.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 10.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.74

Location: 625-626 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_J1_C: [Provide every child until 18 years of age free health insurance? ] What is your
opinion about each of them?
[Provide every child until 18 years of age free health insurance? ] What is your opinion about each of them?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 Very bad proposal 182 7.9 %


1 - 38 1.7 %
2 - 58 2.5 %
3 - 92 4.0 %
4 - 87 3.8 %
5 - 291 12.7 %

- 96 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

6 - 159 6.9 %
7 - 176 7.7 %
8 - 203 8.8 %
9 - 190 8.3 %
10 very good proposal 723 31.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 95 4.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,199 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 6.81
• Median: 8.00
• Mode: 10.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 10.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.21

Location: 627-628 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_J1_D: [Require that an equal number of the top leadership positions in government go to
women? ] What is your opinion about each of them?
[Require that an equal number of the top leadership positions in government go to women? ] What is your opinion about each of
them?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 Very bad proposal 267 11.6 %


1 - 70 3.1 %
2 - 102 4.4 %
3 - 124 5.4 %
4 - 150 6.5 %
5 - 520 22.7 %
6 - 224 9.8 %
7 - 204 8.9 %
8 - 186 8.1 %
9 - 96 4.2 %
10 very good proposal 255 11.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 96 4.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,198 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 97 -
• Mean: 5.24
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 5.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 10.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.01

Location: 629-630 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_J1_E: [Require that American children attend public school for 12 months instead of 9
months? ] What is your opinion about each of them?
[Require that American children attend public school for 12 months instead of 9 months? ] What is your opinion about each of
them?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 Very bad proposal 299 13.0 %


1 - 86 3.7 %
2 - 140 6.1 %
3 - 182 7.9 %
4 - 132 5.8 %
5 - 407 17.7 %
6 - 191 8.3 %
7 - 196 8.5 %
8 - 193 8.4 %
9 - 114 5.0 %
10 very good proposal 266 11.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 88 3.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,206 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 5.09
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 5.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 10.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.17

Location: 631-632 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_J1_F: [Make families with dependent children permanently eligible for welfare any time
they fall below the poverty line? ] What is your opinion about each of them?
[Make families with dependent children permanently eligible for welfare any time they fall below the poverty line? ] What is your
opinion about each of them?

- 98 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0 Very bad proposal 364 15.9 %


1 - 129 5.6 %
2 - 136 5.9 %
3 - 162 7.1 %
4 - 159 6.9 %
5 - 391 17.0 %
6 - 171 7.5 %
7 - 141 6.1 %
8 - 162 7.1 %
9 - 96 4.2 %
10 very good proposal 286 12.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 97 4.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,197 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.78
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 5.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 10.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.30

Location: 633-634 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_J1_G: [Provide free or heavily government subsidized childcare/preschool for poor


families? ] What is your opinion about each of them?
[Provide free or heavily government subsidized childcare/preschool for poor families? ] What is your opinion about each of them?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 Very bad proposal 167 7.3 %


1 - 56 2.4 %
2 - 85 3.7 %
3 - 118 5.1 %
4 - 127 5.5 %
5 - 387 16.9 %
6 - 200 8.7 %
7 - 215 9.4 %
8 - 218 9.5 %
9 - 165 7.2 %

- 99 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

10 very good proposal 462 20.1 %


Missing Data
-1 Refused 94 4.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,200 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 6.17
• Median: 6.00
• Mode: 10.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 10.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.06

Location: 635-636 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_J2: Which of the following statements comes closest to your view concerning same-sex
couples?
Which of the following statements comes closest to your view concerning same-sex couples?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 They should be allowed to legally marry 835 36.4 %


2 They should be allowed to legally form civil unions, but not marry 726 31.6 %
3 They should not be allowed to marry or form civil unions 623 27.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 110 4.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,184 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 637-638 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_J3A_A: [The federal budget deficit ] Compared to 2008 would you say the following is now
better or worse?
[The federal budget deficit ] Compared to 2008 would you say the following is now better or worse?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Much better 33 1.4 %


2 Somewhat better 188 8.2 %

- 100 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

3 About the same 576 25.1 %


4 Somewhat worse 665 29.0 %
5 Much worse 772 33.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 60 2.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,234 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 639-640 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_J3A_B: [Poverty in the U.S. ] Compared to 2008 would you say the following is now better
or worse?
[Poverty in the U.S. ] Compared to 2008 would you say the following is now better or worse?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Much better 25 1.1 %


2 Somewhat better 198 8.6 %
3 About the same 797 34.7 %
4 Somewhat worse 715 31.2 %
5 Much worse 493 21.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 66 2.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,228 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 641-642 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_J3A_C: [Unemployment in the U.S. ] Compared to 2008 would you say the following is
now better or worse?
[Unemployment in the U.S. ] Compared to 2008 would you say the following is now better or worse?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Much better 53 2.3 %

- 101 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

2 Somewhat better 517 22.5 %


3 About the same 557 24.3 %
4 Somewhat worse 543 23.7 %
5 Much worse 567 24.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 57 2.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,237 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 643-644 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_K1_A: [The government in Washington ] How much do you think you can trust the
following institutions?
[The government in Washington ] How much do you think you can trust the following institutions?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Just about always 37 1.6 %


2 Most of the time 475 20.7 %
3 Only some of the time 1286 56.1 %
4 Never 426 18.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 70 3.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,224 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 645-646 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_K1_B: [The police ] How much do you think you can trust the following institutions?
[The police ] How much do you think you can trust the following institutions?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Just about always 163 7.1 %


2 Most of the time 981 42.8 %

- 102 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

3 Only some of the time 864 37.7 %


4 Never 215 9.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 71 3.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,223 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 647-648 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_K1_C: [The legal system ] How much do you think you can trust the following
institutions?
[The legal system ] How much do you think you can trust the following institutions?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Just about always 63 2.7 %


2 Most of the time 749 32.7 %
3 Only some of the time 1172 51.1 %
4 Never 246 10.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 64 2.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,230 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 649-650 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_K1_D: [Public schools ] How much do you think you can trust the following institutions?
[Public schools ] How much do you think you can trust the following institutions?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Just about always 143 6.2 %


2 Most of the time 1044 45.5 %
3 Only some of the time 920 40.1 %
4 Never 121 5.3 %

- 103 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Missing Data
-1 Refused 66 2.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,228 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 651-652 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_K4: On a seven-point scale, do you think that Blacks and other minorities are treated the
same as Whites in the criminal justice system or do not receive equal treatment?
On a seven-point scale, do you think that blacks and other minorities are treated the same as whites in the criminal justice system
or do not receive equal treatment?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Recieve equal treatment 170 7.4 %


2 - 112 4.9 %
3 - 91 4.0 %
4 - 165 7.2 %
5 - 343 15.0 %
6 - 317 13.8 %
7 Do not receive equal treatment 800 34.9 %
9 Not sure 241 10.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 55 2.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,239 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 5.68
• Median: 6.00
• Mode: 7.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.18

Location: 653-654 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_K5: On a scale from 1 to 10, do you think President Obama has done more or less than
other presidents to help Black Americans?
On a scale from 1 to 10, do you think President Obama has done more or less than other presidents to help Black Americans?

- 104 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 President Obama has done less than other presidents to help Blacks 90 3.9 %
2 - 37 1.6 %
3 - 73 3.2 %
4 - 65 2.8 %
5 - 610 26.6 %
6 - 390 17.0 %
7 - 287 12.5 %
8 - 250 10.9 %
9 - 132 5.8 %
10 President Obama has done more than other presidents to help Blacks 269 11.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 91 4.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,203 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 6.32
• Median: 6.00
• Mode: 5.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 10.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.23

Location: 655-656 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L1_A: [A professional association ] Indicate whether you have participated in the


activities of this group in the past 12 months.
[A professional association ] Indicate whether you have participated in the activities of this group in the past 12 months.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 I have participated more than twice 189 8.2 %


2 I have participated once or twice 259 11.3 %
3 I belong to such a group but never participate 124 5.4 %
4 I do not belong to such a group 1657 72.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 65 2.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,229 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

- 105 -
Location: 657-658 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L1_B: [A political party, club, or association] Indicate whether you have participated in the
activities of this group in the past 12 months.
[A political party, club, or association] Indicate whether you have participated in the activities of this group in the past 12 months.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 I have participated more than twice 106 4.6 %


2 I have participated once or twice 214 9.3 %
3 I belong to such a group but never participate 196 8.5 %
4 I do not belong to such a group 1707 74.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 71 3.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,223 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 659-660 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L1_C: [A cultural organization that puts on plays, music or dance concerts, attends
concerts, theater or museums together] Indicate whether you have participated in the
activities of this group in the past 12 months.
[A cultural organization that puts on plays, music or dance concerts, attends concerts, theater or museums together] Indicate
whether you have participated in the activities of this group in the past 12 months.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 I have participated more than twice 176 7.7 %


2 I have participated once or twice 211 9.2 %
3 I belong to such a group but never participate 54 2.4 %
4 I do not belong to such a group 1776 77.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 77 3.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,217 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 661-662 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 106 -
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L2_1: [NAACP] Are you a member of any of the following


groups/organizations/movements?
[NAACP] Are you a member of any of the following groups/organizations/movements?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2117 92.3 %
1 Yes 177 7.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 663-663 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_L2_2: [National Urban League] Are you a member of any of the following
groups/organizations/movements?
[National Urban League] Are you a member of any of the following groups/organizations/movements?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2233 97.3 %
1 Yes 61 2.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 664-664 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_L2_3: [Southern Christian Leadership Conference] Are you a member of any of the
following groups/organizations/movements?
[Southern Christian Leadership Conference] Are you a member of any of the following groups/organizations/movements?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2243 97.8 %
1 Yes 51 2.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 107 -
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 665-665 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_L2_4: [Tea Party Movement] Are you a member of any of the following
groups/organizations/movements?
[Tea Party Movement] Are you a member of any of the following groups/organizations/movements?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2249 98.0 %
1 Yes 45 2.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 666-666 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_L2_5: [Occupy Wall Street Movement] Are you a member of any of the following
groups/organizations/movements?
[Occupy Wall Street Movement] Are you a member of any of the following groups/organizations/movements?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2270 99.0 %
1 Yes 24 1.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 667-667 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_L2_REFUSED: [Refused] Are you a member of any of the following


groups/organizations/movements?
[Refused] Are you a member of any of the following groups/organizations/movements?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 293 12.8 %
1 Yes 2001 87.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 108 -
Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 668-668 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_L3: In the last twelve months, have you worked with others or joined an organization in
your community to do something about some community problem?
In the last twelve months, have you worked with others or joined an organization in your community to do something about some
community problem?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 469 20.4 %


2 No 1766 77.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 59 2.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,235 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 669-670 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L4_A: [Contacted a public official or agency ] Please indicate if you have done any of the
following activities in the last 2 years.
[Contacted a public official or agency ] Please indicate if you have done any of the following activities in the last 2 years.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 581 25.3 %


2 No 1645 71.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 68 3.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,226 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 671-672 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

- 109 -
W1_L4_B: [Attended a protest meeting or demonstration ] Please indicate if you have done
any of the following activites in the last 2 years.
[Attended a protest meeting or demonstration ] Please indicate if you have done any of the following activites in the last 2 years.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 197 8.6 %


2 No 2018 88.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 79 3.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,215 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 673-674 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L4_C: [Taken part in a neighborhood march ] Please indicate if you have done any of the
following activites in the last 2 years.
[Taken part in a neighborhood march ] Please indicate if you have done any of the following activites in the last 2 years.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 116 5.1 %


2 No 2110 92.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 68 3.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,226 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 675-676 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L4_D: [Signed a petition in support of something or against something ] Please indicate if


you have done any of the following activites in the last 2 years.
[Signed a petition in support of something or against something ] Please indicate if you have done any of the following activites in
the last 2 years.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 919 40.1 %

- 110 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

2 No 1304 56.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 71 3.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,223 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 677-678 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L5_A: [Helped in a voter registration drive ] Please indicate whether or not you have
engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years? Have you...
[Helped in a voter registration drive ] Please indicate whether or not you have engaged in these political activities in the last TWO
years? Have you...

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Have 209 9.1 %


2 Have not 2024 88.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 61 2.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,233 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 679-680 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L5_B: [Given people a ride to the polls on election day ] Please indicate whether or not
you have engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years? Have you..
[Given people a ride to the polls on election day ] Please indicate whether or not you have engaged in these political activities in
the last TWO years? Have you..

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Have 200 8.7 %


2 Have not 2024 88.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 70 3.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 111 -
Based upon 2,224 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 681-682 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L5_C: [Given money to a political candidate ] Please indicate whether or not you have
engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years? Have you....
[Given money to a political candidate ] Please indicate whether or not you have engaged in these political activities in the last TWO
years? Have you....

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Have 468 20.4 %


2 Have not 1766 77.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 60 2.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,234 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 683-684 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L5_D: [Attended a fund raiser for a candidate ] Please indicate whether or not you have
engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years? Have you...
[Attended a fund raiser for a candidate ] Please indicate whether or not you have engaged in these political activities in the last
TWO years? Have you...

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Have 211 9.2 %


2 Have not 2023 88.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 60 2.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,234 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 685-686 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

- 112 -
W1_L5_E: [Handed out campaign material or placed campaign material on cars ] Please
indicate whether or not you have engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years ?
Have you...
[Handed out campaign material or placed campaign material on cars ] Please indicate whether or not you have engaged in these
political activities in the last TWO years ? Have you...

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Have 185 8.1 %


2 Have not 2046 89.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 63 2.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,231 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 687-688 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_L5_F: [Signed a petition supporting a candidate who was running for office ] Please
indicate whether or not you have engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years?
Have you...
[Signed a petition supporting a candidate who was running for office ] Please indicate whether or not you have engaged in these
political activities in the last TWO years? Have you...

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Have 578 25.2 %


2 Have not 1655 72.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 61 2.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,233 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 689-690 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_M1: What is your religion?


What is your religion?

- 113 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Baptist any denomination 663 28.9 %


2 Protestant (e.g., Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterian, Episcopal) 386 16.8 %
3 Catholic 330 14.4 %
4 Mormon 19 0.8 %
5 Jewish 29 1.3 %
6 Muslim 15 0.7 %
7 Hindu 3 0.1 %
8 Buddhist 11 0.5 %
9 Pentecostal 107 4.7 %
10 Eastern Orthodox 8 0.3 %
11 Other Christian 354 15.4 %
12 Other non-Christian, please specify: 56 2.4 %
13 None 294 12.8 %
14 Refused 0 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 19 0.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,275 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 13.00

Location: 691-692 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_M1_OTHER_TEXT: [Other] What is your religion?


[Other] What is your religion?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

- 2288 99.7 %
Jehovah's Witness - 1 0.0 %
Open to all possibilities. OTAP - 1 0.0 %
born again christian - 1 0.0 %
isarelite - 1 0.0 %
jehovahs witness - 1 0.0 %
non denominational - 1 0.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 693-723 (width: 31; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: character

- 114 -
W1_M1A: Would you describe yourself as a born-again or evangelical Christian?
Would you describe yourself as a born-again or evangelical Christian?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 833 36.3 %


2 No 1052 45.9 %
3 Not asked 403 17.6 %
4 Refused 0 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 6 0.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,288 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 724-725 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_M5: How often do you attend religious services?


How often do you attend religious services?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 More than once a week 356 15.5 %


2 Once a week 534 23.3 %
3 Once or twice a month 234 10.2 %
4 A few times a year 405 17.7 %
5 Once a year or less 326 14.2 %
6 Never 407 17.7 %
7 Not asked 15 0.7 %
8 Missing/Refused 0 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 17 0.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,277 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00

Location: 726-727 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

- 115 -
W1_M2: What was the racial makeup of your place of worship?
What was the racial makeup of your place of worship?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Mostly Black 736 32.1 %


2 Mostly White 644 28.1 %
3 Mostly Latino 49 2.1 %
4 Mostly Asian 11 0.5 %
5 Something else 108 4.7 %
6 Don't Know 242 10.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 66 2.9 %
. - 438 19.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,790 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00

Location: 728-729 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_M3: Churches or places of worship should be involved in political matters.


Churches or places of worship should be involved in political matters.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly agree 185 8.1 %


2 Somewhat agree 532 23.2 %
3 Somewhat disagree 595 25.9 %
4 Strongly disagree 883 38.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 99 4.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,195 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 730-731 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

- 116 -
W1_M4: Churches or places of worship should allow more women to become members of the
clergy.
Churches or places of worship should allow more women to become members of the clergy.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly agree 648 28.2 %


2 Somewhat agree 892 38.9 %
3 Somewhat disagree 356 15.5 %
4 Strongly disagree 281 12.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 117 5.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,177 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 732-733 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_M6: Aside from attending regular services, in the past 12 months have you been an active
member of your church or place of worship?
Aside from attending regular services, in the past 12 months have you been an active member of your church or place of worship?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 602 26.2 %


2 No 1181 51.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 73 3.2 %
. - 438 19.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,783 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 734-735 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_M7: In the last year, have you heard any discussions of politics at your church or place of
worship?
In the last year, have you heard any discussions of politics at your church or place of worship?

- 117 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Yes 561 24.5 %


2 No 1216 53.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 79 3.4 %
. - 438 19.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,777 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 736-737 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_M8: Have you talked to people about political matters at your church or place of worship?
Have you talked to people about political matters at your church or place of worship?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 426 18.6 %


2 No 1353 59.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 77 3.4 %
. - 438 19.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,779 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 738-739 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_M9: Has a member of the clergy or someone in an official position at your church or place
of worship talked about the need for people to become more involved in politics?
Has a member of the clergy or someone in an official position at your church or place of worship talked about the need for people
to become more involved in politics?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 511 22.3 %


2 No 1258 54.8 %
Missing Data

- 118 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

-1 Refused 87 3.8 %
. - 438 19.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,769 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 740-741 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_M10: Has any local or national political leader spoken at a regular religious service at your
church or place of worship?
Has any local or national political leader spoken at a regular religious service at your church or place of worship?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 269 11.7 %


2 No 1505 65.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 82 3.6 %
. - 438 19.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,774 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 742-743 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_M11: Has a member of the clergy, or someone in an official position at your church or
place of worship, ever suggested that you vote for or against certain candidates in an
election?
Has a member of the clergy, or someone in an official position at your church or place of worship, ever suggested that you vote for
or against certain candidates in an election?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 194 8.5 %


2 No 1584 69.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 78 3.4 %

- 119 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

. - 438 19.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,778 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 744-745 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_M12: What about suggesting that you take action on a political issue such as sign a
petition or write a letter? Did this happen in the last two years?
What about suggesting that you take action on a political issue such as sign a petition or write a letter? Did this happen in the last
two years?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 359 15.6 %


2 No 1419 61.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 78 3.4 %
. - 438 19.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,778 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 746-747 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_N1A: How would you rate people on welfare?


How would you rate people on welfare?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 100 4.4 %
1 - 5 0.2 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 8 0.3 %
9 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 14 0.6 %
12 - 1 0.0 %

- 120 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

15 - 129 5.6 %
20 - 9 0.4 %
25 - 20 0.9 %
27 - 2 0.1 %
30 - 135 5.9 %
34 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 17 0.7 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 225 9.8 %
45 - 15 0.7 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 2 0.1 %
50 - 585 25.5 %
51 - 2 0.1 %
52 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 19 0.8 %
57 - 1 0.0 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 248 10.8 %
65 - 14 0.6 %
66 - 3 0.1 %
67 - 3 0.1 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 232 10.1 %
71 - 1 0.0 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
74 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 30 1.3 %
78 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 27 1.2 %
85 - 122 5.3 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
89 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 14 0.6 %
95 - 3 0.1 %
100 - 125 5.4 %
Missing Data

- 121 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

-1 Refused 84 3.7 %
998 Don't Recognize 82 3.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,128 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 51.72
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 24.00

Location: 748-750 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1B: How would you rate American Indians or Native Americans?


How would you rate American Indians or Native Americans?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 20 0.9 %
2 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 4 0.2 %
7 - 2 0.1 %
8 - 2 0.1 %
10 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 19 0.8 %
20 - 6 0.3 %
25 - 2 0.1 %
30 - 25 1.1 %
35 - 1 0.0 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 40 1.7 %
45 - 3 0.1 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 519 22.6 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
52 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 8 0.3 %
60 - 175 7.6 %
65 - 20 0.9 %
66 - 2 0.1 %

- 122 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 326 14.2 %
71 - 1 0.0 %
74 - 2 0.1 %
75 - 48 2.1 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 3 0.1 %
79 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 54 2.4 %
83 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 359 15.6 %
87 - 3 0.1 %
89 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 47 2.0 %
95 - 13 0.6 %
96 - 1 0.0 %
97 - 1 0.0 %
98 - 2 0.1 %
99 - 3 0.1 %
100 - 344 15.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 103 4.5 %
998 Don't Recognize 124 5.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,067 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 69.93
• Median: 70.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 21.50

Location: 751-753 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1C: How would you rate Latinos?


How would you rate Latinos?

- 123 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0 - 36 1.6 %
1 - 1 0.0 %
2 - 1 0.0 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 2 0.1 %
9 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 4 0.2 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 35 1.5 %
20 - 10 0.4 %
25 - 2 0.1 %
26 - 1 0.0 %
28 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 43 1.9 %
35 - 2 0.1 %
40 - 81 3.5 %
45 - 7 0.3 %
49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 501 21.8 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
53 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 10 0.4 %
58 - 1 0.0 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 218 9.5 %
65 - 20 0.9 %
66 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 342 14.9 %
75 - 41 1.8 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 3 0.1 %
80 - 66 2.9 %
82 - 2 0.1 %
84 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 292 12.7 %

- 124 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

86 - 5 0.2 %
87 - 4 0.2 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 39 1.7 %
95 - 9 0.4 %
98 - 3 0.1 %
99 - 3 0.1 %
100 - 273 11.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 108 4.7 %
998 Don't Recognize 112 4.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,074 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 66.17
• Median: 70.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 22.58

Location: 754-756 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1D: How would you rate Whites?


How would you rate Whites?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 33 1.4 %
2 - 2 0.1 %
3 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 4 0.2 %
6 - 2 0.1 %
7 - 2 0.1 %
8 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 1 0.0 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 28 1.2 %
20 - 2 0.1 %
25 - 3 0.1 %
30 - 26 1.1 %

- 125 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

34 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 1 0.0 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 48 2.1 %
45 - 5 0.2 %
46 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 452 19.7 %
51 - 5 0.2 %
52 - 2 0.1 %
55 - 7 0.3 %
59 - 2 0.1 %
60 - 178 7.8 %
64 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 19 0.8 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 2 0.1 %
70 - 354 15.4 %
71 - 2 0.1 %
72 - 2 0.1 %
74 - 2 0.1 %
75 - 58 2.5 %
76 - 2 0.1 %
78 - 1 0.0 %
79 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 72 3.1 %
81 - 1 0.0 %
84 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 411 17.9 %
87 - 3 0.1 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 63 2.7 %
95 - 13 0.6 %
98 - 2 0.1 %
99 - 2 0.1 %
100 - 289 12.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 108 4.7 %
998 Don't Recognize 73 3.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 126 -
Based upon 2,113 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 69.39
• Median: 70.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 21.91

Location: 757-759 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1E: How would you rate Blacks?


How would you rate Blacks?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 29 1.3 %
1 - 1 0.0 %
2 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 4 0.2 %
7 - 2 0.1 %
8 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 8 0.3 %
15 - 22 1.0 %
20 - 8 0.3 %
24 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 25 1.1 %
35 - 3 0.1 %
40 - 60 2.6 %
43 - 1 0.0 %
44 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 9 0.4 %
49 - 2 0.1 %
50 - 403 17.6 %
51 - 2 0.1 %
55 - 8 0.3 %
56 - 1 0.0 %
59 - 2 0.1 %
60 - 152 6.6 %
62 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 14 0.6 %
67 - 1 0.0 %

- 127 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

68 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 274 11.9 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
73 - 1 0.0 %
74 - 2 0.1 %
75 - 47 2.0 %
76 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 56 2.4 %
85 - 358 15.6 %
88 - 3 0.1 %
89 - 3 0.1 %
90 - 56 2.4 %
92 - 2 0.1 %
93 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 23 1.0 %
96 - 1 0.0 %
98 - 6 0.3 %
99 - 2 0.1 %
100 - 518 22.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 107 4.7 %
998 Don't Recognize 65 2.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,122 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 72.78
• Median: 75.00
• Mode: 100.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 23.53

Location: 760-762 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1F: How would you rate Asians?


How would you rate Asians?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 29 1.3 %

- 128 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 - 1 0.0 %
2 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 2 0.1 %
6 - 3 0.1 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 4 0.2 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 32 1.4 %
20 - 5 0.2 %
25 - 3 0.1 %
28 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 30 1.3 %
36 - 1 0.0 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 61 2.7 %
45 - 6 0.3 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 565 24.6 %
52 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 6 0.3 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 198 8.6 %
62 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 15 0.7 %
69 - 2 0.1 %
70 - 343 15.0 %
72 - 2 0.1 %
75 - 52 2.3 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 3 0.1 %
80 - 63 2.7 %
81 - 1 0.0 %
82 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 289 12.6 %
86 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 2 0.1 %
89 - 1 0.0 %

- 129 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

90 - 44 1.9 %
95 - 11 0.5 %
97 - 1 0.0 %
98 - 3 0.1 %
99 - 2 0.1 %
100 - 262 11.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 109 4.8 %
998 Don't Recognize 127 5.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,058 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 66.42
• Median: 70.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 21.94

Location: 763-765 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1G: How would you rate gays/lesbians?


How would you rate gays/lesbians?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 242 10.5 %
1 - 2 0.1 %
2 - 3 0.1 %
3 - 3 0.1 %
5 - 7 0.3 %
6 - 1 0.0 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 10 0.4 %
15 - 101 4.4 %
19 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 10 0.4 %
23 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 5 0.2 %
30 - 69 3.0 %
32 - 1 0.0 %

- 130 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

35 - 2 0.1 %
40 - 126 5.5 %
42 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 5 0.2 %
47 - 2 0.1 %
49 - 3 0.1 %
50 - 570 24.8 %
51 - 2 0.1 %
53 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 12 0.5 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 138 6.0 %
62 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 17 0.7 %
66 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 2 0.1 %
70 - 196 8.5 %
75 - 38 1.7 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 1 0.0 %
79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 46 2.0 %
85 - 194 8.5 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 33 1.4 %
95 - 7 0.3 %
98 - 2 0.1 %
99 - 2 0.1 %
100 - 214 9.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 106 4.6 %
998 Don't Recognize 109 4.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,079 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 53.61
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00

- 131 -
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 29.65

Location: 766-768 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1H: How would you rate unionized workers?


How would you rate unionized workers?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 79 3.4 %
1 - 3 0.1 %
2 - 2 0.1 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 4 0.2 %
10 - 9 0.4 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 64 2.8 %
20 - 9 0.4 %
22 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 12 0.5 %
30 - 62 2.7 %
35 - 8 0.3 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 125 5.4 %
45 - 6 0.3 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 2 0.1 %
50 - 518 22.6 %
53 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 6 0.3 %
56 - 2 0.1 %
58 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 168 7.3 %
63 - 1 0.0 %
64 - 2 0.1 %
65 - 10 0.4 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 226 9.9 %
72 - 1 0.0 %

- 132 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

74 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 29 1.3 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 1 0.0 %
79 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 54 2.4 %
81 - 1 0.0 %
82 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 257 11.2 %
88 - 3 0.1 %
89 - 2 0.1 %
90 - 38 1.7 %
91 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 13 0.6 %
98 - 1 0.0 %
99 - 3 0.1 %
100 - 238 10.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 101 4.4 %
998 Don't Recognize 220 9.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,973 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 61.22
• Median: 60.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 25.87

Location: 769-771 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1I: How would you rate Congress?


How would you rate Congress?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 312 13.6 %
1 - 2 0.1 %
2 - 5 0.2 %
3 - 1 0.0 %

- 133 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

5 - 11 0.5 %
6 - 1 0.0 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
9 - 2 0.1 %
10 - 42 1.8 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
13 - 2 0.1 %
15 - 260 11.3 %
19 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 35 1.5 %
22 - 2 0.1 %
23 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 26 1.1 %
28 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 216 9.4 %
32 - 1 0.0 %
34 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 17 0.7 %
40 - 295 12.9 %
43 - 1 0.0 %
44 - 2 0.1 %
45 - 25 1.1 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 3 0.1 %
50 - 369 16.1 %
55 - 14 0.6 %
57 - 2 0.1 %
58 - 1 0.0 %
59 - 2 0.1 %
60 - 165 7.2 %
62 - 1 0.0 %
64 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 9 0.4 %
66 - 3 0.1 %
69 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 139 6.1 %
71 - 1 0.0 %
73 - 1 0.0 %

- 134 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

74 - 2 0.1 %
75 - 12 0.5 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 1 0.0 %
79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 17 0.7 %
82 - 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 96 4.2 %
998 Don't Recognize 97 4.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,101 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 36.75
• Median: 40.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 24.55

Location: 772-774 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1J: How would you rate the wealthiest 1%?


How would you rate the wealthiest 1%?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 318 13.9 %
1 - 13 0.6 %
2 - 4 0.2 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 29 1.3 %
6 - 3 0.1 %
8 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 30 1.3 %
11 - 1 0.0 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
13 - 1 0.0 %

- 135 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

14 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 194 8.5 %
17 - 1 0.0 %
18 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 35 1.5 %
25 - 12 0.5 %
28 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 144 6.3 %
32 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 4 0.2 %
38 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 147 6.4 %
41 - 1 0.0 %
44 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 14 0.6 %
49 - 3 0.1 %
50 - 567 24.7 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 12 0.5 %
60 - 117 5.1 %
65 - 7 0.3 %
67 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 3 0.1 %
70 - 122 5.3 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
73 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 17 0.7 %
78 - 3 0.1 %
80 - 17 0.7 %
83 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 99 4.3 %
86 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 10 0.4 %
95 - 1 0.0 %
99 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 86 3.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 109 4.8 %

- 136 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

998 Don't Recognize 152 6.6 %


Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,033 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 40.59
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 27.94

Location: 775-777 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1K: How would you rate the unemployed?


How would you rate the unemployed?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 89 3.9 %
1 - 2 0.1 %
2 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 6 0.3 %
10 - 10 0.4 %
15 - 47 2.0 %
20 - 6 0.3 %
25 - 7 0.3 %
30 - 56 2.4 %
35 - 8 0.3 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 99 4.3 %
41 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 13 0.6 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 573 25.0 %
52 - 2 0.1 %
55 - 17 0.7 %
56 - 1 0.0 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 263 11.5 %

- 137 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

62 - 2 0.1 %
64 - 2 0.1 %
65 - 12 0.5 %
66 - 1 0.0 %
67 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 300 13.1 %
71 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 49 2.1 %
76 - 2 0.1 %
78 - 1 0.0 %
79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 43 1.9 %
81 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 244 10.6 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
89 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 30 1.3 %
95 - 15 0.7 %
98 - 1 0.0 %
99 - 4 0.2 %
100 - 174 7.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 109 4.8 %
998 Don't Recognize 93 4.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,092 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 60.28
• Median: 60.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 23.89

Location: 778-780 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1L: How would you rate unmarried mothers?


How would you rate unmarried mothers?

- 138 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0 - 36 1.6 %
1 - 1 0.0 %
2 - 1 0.0 %
3 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 3 0.1 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
8 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 6 0.3 %
15 - 59 2.6 %
16 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 10 0.4 %
23 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 7 0.3 %
30 - 61 2.7 %
32 - 1 0.0 %
33 - 3 0.1 %
35 - 4 0.2 %
37 - 2 0.1 %
40 - 140 6.1 %
45 - 10 0.4 %
46 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 3 0.1 %
50 - 558 24.3 %
51 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 10 0.4 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 203 8.8 %
61 - 1 0.0 %
65 - 11 0.5 %
67 - 1 0.0 %
70 - 280 12.2 %
73 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 42 1.8 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
78 - 2 0.1 %
79 - 2 0.1 %
80 - 56 2.4 %
85 - 258 11.2 %

- 139 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

87 - 2 0.1 %
88 - 4 0.2 %
89 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 39 1.7 %
91 - 2 0.1 %
95 - 12 0.5 %
98 - 2 0.1 %
99 - 4 0.2 %
100 - 266 11.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 95 4.1 %
998 Don't Recognize 84 3.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,115 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 63.22
• Median: 60.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 23.72

Location: 781-783 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1M: How would you rate undocumented immigrants?


How would you rate undocumented immigrants?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 444 19.4 %
1 - 5 0.2 %
2 - 2 0.1 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 9 0.4 %
6 - 1 0.0 %
7 - 2 0.1 %
10 - 27 1.2 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
14 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 216 9.4 %
16 - 1 0.0 %

- 140 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

17 - 2 0.1 %
20 - 13 0.6 %
22 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 11 0.5 %
30 - 160 7.0 %
35 - 7 0.3 %
40 - 254 11.1 %
44 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 17 0.7 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
48 - 3 0.1 %
49 - 3 0.1 %
50 - 390 17.0 %
51 - 4 0.2 %
55 - 14 0.6 %
56 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 144 6.3 %
65 - 8 0.3 %
66 - 2 0.1 %
70 - 126 5.5 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
74 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 26 1.1 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 23 1.0 %
85 - 68 3.0 %
90 - 7 0.3 %
95 - 3 0.1 %
99 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 56 2.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 105 4.6 %
998 Don't Recognize 129 5.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,060 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 36.75
• Median: 40.00

- 141 -
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 27.57

Location: 784-786 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_N1N: How would you rate public school teachers?


How would you rate public school teachers?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 23 1.0 %
3 - 1 0.0 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 3 0.1 %
6 - 1 0.0 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 5 0.2 %
15 - 28 1.2 %
20 - 1 0.0 %
23 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 5 0.2 %
26 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 32 1.4 %
32 - 1 0.0 %
33 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 3 0.1 %
37 - 2 0.1 %
40 - 68 3.0 %
42 - 1 0.0 %
44 - 2 0.1 %
45 - 4 0.2 %
48 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 209 9.1 %
51 - 2 0.1 %
52 - 1 0.0 %
55 - 11 0.5 %
60 - 219 9.5 %
65 - 11 0.5 %
67 - 1 0.0 %

- 142 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

68 - 2 0.1 %
70 - 343 15.0 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 44 1.9 %
76 - 1 0.0 %
77 - 3 0.1 %
78 - 4 0.2 %
79 - 3 0.1 %
80 - 86 3.7 %
82 - 1 0.0 %
85 - 463 20.2 %
86 - 3 0.1 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 2 0.1 %
89 - 8 0.3 %
90 - 91 4.0 %
94 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 27 1.2 %
96 - 2 0.1 %
97 - 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 89 3.9 %
998 Don't Recognize 61 2.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,144 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 74.07
• Median: 80.00
• Mode: 85.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 21.72

Location: 787-789 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , 998

W1_O1: [Black people should teach their children to fight against racial discrimination as
much as possible] How much emphasis or de-emphasis should Black people place on each
statement in the education of their children?

- 143 -
[Black people should teach their children to fight against racial discrimination as much as possible] How much emphasis or de-
emphasis should Black people place on each statement in the education of their children?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strong de-emphasis 98 4.3 %


2 Some de-emphasis 94 4.1 %
3 No emphasis nor de-emphasis 564 24.6 %
4 Some emphasis 585 25.5 %
5 Strong emphasis 845 36.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 108 4.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,186 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 790-791 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_O3: [Black people should teach their children not think that all Whites are racist] How
much emphasis or de-emphasis should Black people place on each statement in the
education of their children?
[Black people should teach their children not think that all Whites are racist] How much emphasis or de-emphasis should Black
people place on each statement in the education of their children?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strong de-emphasis 119 5.2 %


2 Some de-emphasis 69 3.0 %
3 No emphasis nor de-emphasis 416 18.1 %
4 Some emphasis 522 22.8 %
5 Strong emphasis 1061 46.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 107 4.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,187 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 792-793 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

- 144 -
W1_O4: [Black people should teach their children to avoid behaviors that are characteristic of
Black stereotypes] How much emphasis or de-emphasis should Black people place on each
statement in the education of their children?
[Black people should teach their children to avoid behaviors that are characteristic of Black stereotypes] How much emphasis or
de-emphasis should Black people place on each statement in the education of their children?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strong de-emphasis 109 4.8 %


2 Some de-emphasis 115 5.0 %
3 No emphasis nor de-emphasis 728 31.7 %
4 Some emphasis 586 25.5 %
5 Strong emphasis 641 27.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 115 5.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,179 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 794-795 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_O5: [Black people should teach their children to be careful around the police] How much
emphasis or de-emphasis should Black people place on each statement in the education of
their children?
[Black people should teach their children to be careful around the police] How much emphasis or de-emphasis should Black people
place on each statement in the education of their children?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strong de-emphasis 178 7.8 %


2 Some de-emphasis 181 7.9 %
3 No emphasis nor de-emphasis 793 34.6 %
4 Some emphasis 554 24.1 %
5 Strong emphasis 476 20.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 112 4.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,182 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 796-797 (width: 2; decimal: 0)

- 145 -
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P2: People talk about social classes such as the poor, the working class, the middle class,
the upper-middle class, and the upper class. Which of these classes would you say you
belong to?
People talk about social classes such as the poor, the working class, the middle class, the upper-middle class, and the upper class.
Which of these classes would you say you belong to?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Poor 258 11.2 %


2 Working class 755 32.9 %
3 Middle class 955 41.6 %
4 Upper-middle class 214 9.3 %
5 Upper class 25 1.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 87 3.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,207 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 798-799 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P3: Which of these classes would you say most memebers of your family belong to?
Which of these classes would you say most memebers of your family belong to?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Poor 154 6.7 %


2 Working class 906 39.5 %
3 Middle class 953 41.5 %
4 Upper-middle class 172 7.5 %
5 Upper class 18 0.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 91 4.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,203 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 800-801 (width: 2; decimal: 0)

- 146 -
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P4: Do you consider yourself to be...


Do you consider yourself to be...

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Heterosexual or straight 2142 93.4 %


2 Gay 40 1.7 %
3 Lesbian 17 0.7 %
4 Bisexual 46 2.0 %
5 Other 26 1.1 %
6 Refused 0 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 23 1.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,271 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 802-803 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P4_OTHER_TEXT: [Other] Do you consider yourself to be...


[Other] Do you consider yourself to be...

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

- 2292 99.9 %
Real Human - 1 0.0 %
myself - 1 0.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 804-813 (width: 10; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: character

W1_P5: Do you have any friends or relatives who you know to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, or
transgender?
Do you have any friends or relatives who you know to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 1489 64.9 %

- 147 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

2 No 788 34.4 %
3 Refused 0 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 17 0.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,277 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 814-815 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P5A: How long have you been living here in your current community?
How long have you been living here in your current community?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Less than one year 92 4.0 %


2 One to three years 298 13.0 %
3 Four to ten years 504 22.0 %
4 More than ten years but not entire life 980 42.7 %
5 Entire life 364 15.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 56 2.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,238 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 816-817 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P6: Is anyone in your household on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces, Military
Reserves, or National Guard?
Is anyone in your household on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces, Military Reserves, or National Guard?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes, on active duty 115 5.0 %


2 No, but on active duty in the past 571 24.9 %
3 No, trained for the Reserves or National Guard, but never activated 72 3.1 %

- 148 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

4 No, no one in the household has ever served in the military 1462 63.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 74 3.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,220 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 818-819 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P8: Does anyone in your household currently belong to a union?


Does anyone in your household currently belong to a union?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 378 16.5 %


2 No 1869 81.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 47 2.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,247 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 820-821 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P9: Has anyone in your household ever been arrested for a crime?
Has anyone in your household ever been arrested for a crime?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 399 17.4 %


2 No 1822 79.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 73 3.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,221 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 149 -
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 822-823 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P10: Do you have any friends or relatives having a criminal conviction?


Do you have any friends or relatives having a criminal conviction?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 1013 44.2 %


2 No 1200 52.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 81 3.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,213 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 824-825 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P11: Is anyone in your household currently unemployed?


Is anyone in your household currently unemployed?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 867 37.8 %


2 No 1365 59.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 62 2.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,232 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 826-827 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P13: Are you a citizen of the United States?


Are you a citizen of the United States?

- 150 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Yes 2240 97.6 %


2 No 47 2.0 %
3 Refused 7 0.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 828-828 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P13A: Were you born a United States citizen or are you a naturalized U.S. citizen?
Were you born a United States citizen or are you a naturalized U.S. citizen?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Born a U.S. citizen 2107 91.8 %


2 Naturalized U.S. citizen 96 4.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 37 1.6 %
. - 54 2.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,203 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 829-830 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_P13B: In what year did you become a U.S. citizen? Please enter the full year when you
became a citizen, for example 1962 or 2000.
In what year did you become a U.S. citizen? Please enter the full year when you became a citizen, for example 1962 or 2000.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Before 1960 5 0.2 %


2 1960 to 1969 7 0.3 %
3 1970 to 1979 12 0.5 %
4 1980 to 1989 8 0.3 %
5 1990 to 1999 23 1.0 %
6 2000 to 2009 27 1.2 %

- 151 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

7 2010 or later 5 0.2 %


Missing Data
-1 Refused 9 0.4 %
. - 2198 95.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 87 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00

Location: 831-832 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_P13B_TEXT: Codes
Codes

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

Missing Data
-1 Refused 9 0.4 %
. - 2285 99.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 0 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 833-834 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_P14: Do you presently have any kind of health insurance?


Do you presently have any kind of health insurance?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 1851 80.7 %


2 No 393 17.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 50 2.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,244 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 835-836 (width: 2; decimal: 0)

- 152 -
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P15: Do you personally, or jointly with a spouse, have any money invested in the stock
market right now either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund?
Do you personally, or jointly with a spouse, have any money invested in the stock market right now either in an individual stock or
in a mutual fund?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 915 39.9 %


2 No 1300 56.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 79 3.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,215 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 837-838 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P16A: [Social security] Check any box to designate other sources of income you or
anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Social security] Check any box to designate other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 1618 70.5 %
1 Yes 676 29.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 839-839 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16B: [Worker's Compensation] Check any box to designate other sources of income you
or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Worker's Compensation] Check any box to designate other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have
received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2270 99.0 %

- 153 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Yes 24 1.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 840-840 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16C: [Unemployment compensation] Check any box to designate other sources of


income you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Unemployment compensation] Check any box to designate other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have
received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2109 91.9 %
1 Yes 185 8.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 841-841 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16D: [TANF or Welfare] Check any box to designate other sources of income you or
anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[TANF or Welfare] Check any box to designate other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have received in
2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2242 97.7 %
1 Yes 52 2.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 842-842 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 154 -
W1_P16E: [Food Stamps] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or
anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Food Stamps] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have received in
2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 1941 84.6 %
1 Yes 353 15.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 843-843 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16F: [Free or Reduced School Lunch and/or Breakfast] Check any box to designate from
other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Free or Reduced School Lunch and/or Breakfast] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your
household may have received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2147 93.6 %
1 Yes 147 6.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 844-844 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16G: [Supplemental Security Income (SSI)] Check any box to designate from other
sources of income you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Supplemental Security Income (SSI)] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your household
may have received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2171 94.6 %
1 Yes 123 5.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 155 -
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 845-845 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16H: [Energy Assistance] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you
or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Energy Assistance] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have
received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2174 94.8 %
1 Yes 120 5.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 846-846 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16I: [Poor Housing Assistance] Check any box to designate from other sources of
income you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Poor Housing Assistance] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have
received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2249 98.0 %
1 Yes 45 2.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 847-847 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16J: [Disability Payments] Check any box to designate from other sources of income
you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Disability Payments] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have
received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2147 93.6 %

- 156 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Yes 147 6.4 %


Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 848-848 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16K: [Veterans Payments] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you
or anyone in your household may have received in 2011
[Veterans Payments] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have
received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2198 95.8 %
1 Yes 96 4.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 849-849 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16L: [Survivor Payments] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you
or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Survivor Payments] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have
received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2264 98.7 %
1 Yes 30 1.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 850-850 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 157 -
W1_P16M: [No one in my household received income from any of these sources] Check any
box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have
received in 2011.
[No one in my household received income from any of these sources] Check any box to designate from other sources of income
you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 1306 56.9 %
1 Yes 988 43.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 851-851 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P16_REFUSED: [Refused] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you
or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
[Refused] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 2176 94.9 %
1 Yes 118 5.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 852-852 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_P17: Do you have any biological or adopted children?


Do you have any biological or adopted children?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 1304 56.8 %


2 No 950 41.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 40 1.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 158 -
Based upon 2,254 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 853-854 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P17A: How many biological or adopted children do you have?


How many biological or adopted children do you have?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 One 306 13.3 %


2 Two 481 21.0 %
3 Three 267 11.6 %
4 Four 138 6.0 %
5 Five 51 2.2 %
6 Six 25 1.1 %
7 Seven 11 0.5 %
8 Eight 5 0.2 %
9 Nine 1 0.0 %
10 Ten or More 10 0.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 9 0.4 %
. - 990 43.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,295 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 10.00

Location: 855-856 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_P18: Who provides 60% or more of the financial support for your children?
Who provides 60% or more of the financial support for your children?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 You 752 32.8 %


2 Your children's biological/adoptive father/mother 210 9.2 %
3 Your legal spouse (not the children's biological parent) 26 1.1 %
4 A relative 13 0.6 %
5 State provided support 24 1.0 %

- 159 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Missing Data
-1 Refused 279 12.2 %
. - 990 43.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,025 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 857-858 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_P19: Which of the following best describes where your minor children (under 18) live?
Which of the following best describes where your minor children (under 18) live?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 The children live with both biological/adoptive parents 414 18.0 %


2 The children live equally with me and their other biological/adoptive parent 74 3.2 %
3 The children live with me and a non-biological/adoptive parent 35 1.5 %
4 The children live only with me 206 9.0 %
5 The children live with relatives 36 1.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 539 23.5 %
. - 990 43.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 765 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 859-860 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_P20: Which of the following income groups includes YOUR personal annual income (Do
not include the income of other members of your household)?
Which of the following income groups includes YOUR personal annual income (Do not include the income of other members of
your household)?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Less than $5,000 261 11.4 %


2 $5,000 to $7,499 72 3.1 %

- 160 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

3 $7,500 to $9,999 58 2.5 %


4 $10,000 to $12,499 107 4.7 %
5 $12,500 to $14,999 87 3.8 %
6 $15,000 to $19,999 91 4.0 %
7 $20,000 to $24,999 149 6.5 %
8 $25,000 to $29,999 127 5.5 %
9 $30,000 to $34,999 118 5.1 %
10 $35,000 to $39,999 107 4.7 %
11 $40,000 to $49,999 174 7.6 %
12 $50,000 to $59,999 166 7.2 %
13 $60,000 to $74,999 185 8.1 %
14 $75,000 to $84,999 86 3.7 %
15 $85,000 to $99,999 81 3.5 %
16 $100,000 to $124,999 114 5.0 %
17 $125,000 to $149,999 38 1.7 %
18 $150,000 to $174,999 44 1.9 %
19 $175,000 or more 27 1.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 202 8.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,092 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 19.00

Location: 861-862 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_P21: Does your household subscribe to a digital cable television service?


Does your household subscribe to a digital cable television service?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 1420 61.9 %


2 No 848 37.0 %
3 Not applicable 26 1.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

- 161 -
Location: 863-863 (width: 1; decimal: 0)
Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_Q1: Forward or backward order of Q1


Forward or backward order of Q1

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-4 1160 50.6 %


2 4-1 1134 49.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 864-864 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_Q1_A: Would people in your neighborhood find taking a survey using a computer
connected to Internet difficult or easy?
Would people in your neighborhood find taking a survey using a computer connected to Internet difficult or easy?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very difficult 41 1.8 %


2 Difficult 210 9.2 %
3 Easy 1236 53.9 %
4 Very easy 712 31.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 95 4.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,199 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 865-866 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_Q1_B: Did you find taking this survey using a computer connected to the Internet difficult
or easy?
Did you find taking this survey using a computer connected to the Internet difficult or easy?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very difficult 23 1.0 %

- 162 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

2 Difficult 89 3.9 %
3 Easy 1018 44.4 %
4 Very easy 1107 48.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 57 2.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,237 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 867-868 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1

W1_QA1: Would you say that you have been much more interested, somewhat more
interested, or not much interested in following political campains which involve an African
American candidate?
Would you say that you have been much more interested, somewhat more interested, or not much interested in following political
campains which involve an African American candidate?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Much more interested 350 15.3 %


2 A little more interested 262 11.4 %
3 Equally interested 449 19.6 %
4 Somewhat interested 70 3.1 %
5 Not much interested 100 4.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 47 2.0 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,231 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 869-870 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_QA2: Do you think what happens generally to Black people in this country will have
something to do with what happens in your life?
Do you think what happens generally to Black people in this country will have something to do with what happens in your life?

- 163 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Yes 747 32.6 %


2 No 472 20.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 59 2.6 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,219 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 871-872 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_QA2A: Will it affect you a lot, some, or not very much?


Will it affect you a lot, some, or not very much?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 A lot 229 10.0 %


2 Some 389 17.0 %
3 Not very much 74 3.2 %
4 Don't Know 52 2.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 3 0.1 %
. - 1547 67.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 744 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 873-874 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_QA4A: [Blacks elected to office really don't have the power to change things for Blacks in
this country.] Indicate whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or
disagree strongly with the statement.
[Blacks elected to office really don't have the power to change things for Blacks in this country. ] Indicate whether you agree
strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with the statement.

- 164 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Agree strongly 150 6.5 %


2 Agree somewhat 433 18.9 %
3 Disagree somewhat 410 17.9 %
4 Disagree strongly 213 9.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 72 3.1 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,206 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 875-876 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_QA4B: [Blacks should always vote for Black candidates when they run. ] Indicate whether
you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with the
statement.
[Blacks should always vote for Black candidates when they run. ] Indicate whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree
somewhat, or disagree strongly with the statement.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 63 2.7 %


2 Agree somewhat 147 6.4 %
3 Disagree somewhat 459 20.0 %
4 Disagree strongly 536 23.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 73 3.2 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,205 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 877-878 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_QA4C: [Black people should shop in Black-owned stores whenever possible. ] Indicate
whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
the statement.

- 165 -
[Black people should shop in Black-owned stores whenever possible. ] Indicate whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat,
disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with the statement.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 217 9.5 %


2 Agree somewhat 455 19.8 %
3 Disagree somewhat 292 12.7 %
4 Disagree strongly 244 10.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 70 3.1 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,208 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 879-880 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_QA5D: [Blacks should not have anything to do with Whites if they can help it. ] Indicate
whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
the statement.
[Blacks should not have anything to do with Whites if they can help it. ] Indicate whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat,
disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with the statement.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 17 0.7 %


2 Agree somewhat 64 2.8 %
3 Disagree somewhat 181 7.9 %
4 Disagree strongly 945 41.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 71 3.1 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,207 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 881-882 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

- 166 -
W1_QA6: Some people feel that the 2008 election of Barack Obama signaled a significant shift
in U.S. race relations that showed Blacks now enjoy racial equality. To what extent do you
agree or disagree with that perception?
Some people feel that the 2008 election of Barack Obama signaled a significant shift in U.S. race relations that showed blacks now
enjoy racial equality. To what extent do you agree or disagree with that perception?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree strongly 136 5.9 %


2 Agree somewhat 397 17.3 %
3 Disagree somewhat 373 16.3 %
4 Disagree strongly 301 13.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 71 3.1 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,207 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 883-884 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_QB1: Some people say that over the last 20 years or so, there has been a lot of progress
in getting rid of racial discrimination.Others say there hasn't been much real change for most
Blacks over that time. Which do you agree with most?
Some people say that over the last 20 years or so, there has been a lot of progress in getting rid of racial discrimination. Others say
there hasn?t been much real change for most Blacks over that time. Which do you agree with most?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 A lot of progress 511 22.3 %


2 Not much real change 696 30.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 71 3.1 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,207 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 885-886 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

- 167 -
W1_QB2: Do you think that generally what happens in this country to Black men will have
something to do with what happens in your life?
Do you think that generally what happens in this country to Black men will have something to do with what happens in your life?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 682 29.7 %


2 No 528 23.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 68 3.0 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,210 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 887-888 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_QB2A: Will it affect you a lot, some, or not very much?


Will it affect you a lot, some, or not very much?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 A lot 207 9.0 %


2 Some 418 18.2 %
3 Not very much 54 2.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 3 0.1 %
. - 1612 70.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 679 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 889-890 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_QB3: What about Black women? Do you think that generally what happens in this country
to Black women will have something to do with what happens in your life?
What about Black women? Do you think that generally what happens in this country to Black women will have something to do with
what happens in your life?

- 168 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Yes 735 32.0 %


2 No 480 20.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 63 2.7 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,215 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 891-892 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_QB3A: Will it affect you a lot, some, or not very much?


Will it affect you a lot, some, or not very much?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 A lot 270 11.8 %


2 Some 407 17.7 %
3 Not very much 56 2.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 2 0.1 %
. - 1559 68.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 733 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 893-894 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_ORDER_M13: Forward or backward order of B4


Forward or backward order of B4

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-4 1137 49.6 %


2 4-1 1157 50.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 169 -
Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 895-895 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_M13_A: [God is removed from worldly affairs. ] For believers and non-believers,based on
your personal understanding, what do you think God is like
[God is removed from worldly affairs. ] For believers and non-believers, based on your personal understanding, what do you think
God is like?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly agree 211 9.2 %


2 Somewhat agree 218 9.5 %
3 Somewhat disagree 294 12.8 %
4 Strongly disagree 444 19.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 111 4.8 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,167 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 896-897 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_M13_B: [God is angered by human sin. ]For believers and non-believers,based on your
personal understanding,what do you think God is like
[God?s plan is to make the United States successful. ] For believers and non-believers, based on your personal understanding,
what do you think God is like?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly agree 300 13.1 %


2 Somewhat agree 331 14.4 %
3 Somewhat disagree 249 10.9 %
4 Strongly disagree 266 11.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 132 5.8 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 170 -
Based upon 1,146 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 898-899 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_M13_C: [God is angered by human sin.] For believers and non-believers, based on your
personal understanding, what do you think God is like
[God is angered by human sin. ] For believers and non-believers, based on your personal understanding, what do you think God is
like?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly agree 562 24.5 %


2 Somewhat agree 296 12.9 %
3 Somewhat disagree 149 6.5 %
4 Strongly disagree 163 7.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 108 4.7 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,170 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 900-901 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W1_M13_D: [God has a plan and directs human life. ]For believers and non-believers,based on
your personal understanding,what do you think God is like
[God has a plan and directs human life. ] For believers and non-believers, based on your personal understanding, what do you
think God is like?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly agree 690 30.1 %


2 Somewhat agree 275 12.0 %
3 Somewhat disagree 96 4.2 %
4 Strongly disagree 109 4.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 108 4.7 %
. - 1016 44.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 171 -
Based upon 1,170 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 902-903 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QB1A: Which one of the following best describes what you did in the elections that were
held November 6th?
Which one of the following best describes what you did in the elections that were held November 6th?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Definitely did not vote in the elections 246 10.7 %


2 Definitely voted in person at a polling place on Election Day 749 32.7 %
3 Definitely voted in person at a polling place before Election Day 305 13.3 %
4 Definitely voted by mailing a ballot to elections officials before the election 243 10.6 %
5 Definitely voted in some other way 30 1.3 %
6 Not completely sure whether you voted or not 19 0.8 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 9 0.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,592 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00

Location: 904-905 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QB1B: If you had to guess, would you say that you probably did vote in the elections, or
probably did not vote in the elections?
If you had to guess, would you say that you probably did vote in the elections, or probably did not vote in the elections?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Probably did vote in the elections 4 0.2 %


2 Probably did not vote in the elections 13 0.6 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 2 0.1 %
. - 2275 99.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 172 -
Based upon 17 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 906-907 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QB1C: How about the election for President? Did you vote for a candidate for President?
How about the election for President? Did you vote for a candidate for President?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 3 0.1 %
2 No 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
. - 2290 99.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 4 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 908-909 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QB1D: Who did you vote for?


Who did you vote for?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Democrat 1 0.0 %
2 Republican 1 0.0 %
3 Other; specify 1 0.0 %
Missing Data
. - 2291 99.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 3 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 910-911 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QB1D_TEXT: [Text] Who did you vote for?

- 173 -
[Text] Who did you vote for?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

- 2293 100.0 %
dk - 1 0.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 912-913 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: character

W2_QB2A: How about the elections for other state and local offices, did you vote a straight
ticket or did you vote for candidates from different parties?
How about the elections for other state and local offices, did you vote a straight ticket or did you vote for candidates from different
parties?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Straight ticket - Democratic 676 29.5 %


2 Split ticket - mostly Democratic 292 12.7 %
3 Split ticket - about half and half, NA how split 182 7.9 %
4 Split ticket - mostly Republican 164 7.1 %
5 Straight ticket - Republican 161 7.0 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 126 5.5 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,475 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 914-915 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QB2B: Did you vote in person or by mail?


Did you vote in person or by mail?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 In person 2 0.1 %
2 Mail ballot 0 0.0 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 1 0.0 %
. - 2291 99.9 %

- 174 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 916-917 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QB3: How often would you say you vote?


How often would you say you vote?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Always 851 37.1 %


2 Nearly Always 418 18.2 %
3 Part Of The Time 89 3.9 %
4 Seldom 200 8.7 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 43 1.9 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,558 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 918-919 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QE1: When you think about your future, are you generally optimistic, pessimistic, or
neither optimistic nor pessimistic?
When you think about your future, are you generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither optimistic nor pessimistic?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Optimistic 880 38.4 %


2 Pessimistic 230 10.0 %
3 Neither 460 20.1 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 31 1.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 175 -
Based upon 1,570 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 920-921 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QE1A: Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or


slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?
Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely 329 14.3 %


2 Moderately 655 28.6 %
3 Slightly 125 5.4 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 1 0.0 %
. - 1184 51.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,109 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 922-923 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QE2: And when you think about the future of the United States as a whole, are you
generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither optimistic nor pessimistic?
And when you think about the future of the United States as a whole, are you generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither optimistic
nor pessimistic?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Optimistic 739 32.2 %


2 Pessimistic 391 17.0 %
3 Neither 445 19.4 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 26 1.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,575 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 176 -
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 924-925 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QE2A: Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or


slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?
Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely 339 14.8 %


2 Moderately 611 26.6 %
3 Slightly 174 7.6 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 6 0.3 %
. - 1164 50.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,124 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 926-927 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QE3: How far along the road to your American Dream do you think you will ultimately get
on a 10-point scale where 1 is not far at all and 10 nearly there?
How far along the road to your American Dream do you think you will ultimately get on a 10-point scale where 1 is not far at all and
10 nearly there?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Not far at all in achieving the American Dream 91 4.0 %


2 - 59 2.6 %
3 - 82 3.6 %
4 - 113 4.9 %
5 - 278 12.1 %
6 - 199 8.7 %
7 - 255 11.1 %
8 - 220 9.6 %
9 - 85 3.7 %
10 Nearly there in achieving the American Dream 183 8.0 %
Missing Data

- 177 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

-1 Refused 36 1.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,565 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 6.15
• Median: 6.00
• Mode: 5.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 10.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.46

Location: 928-929 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF1A: Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Disloyal to their racial group 12 0.5 %


2 - 21 0.9 %
3 - 57 2.5 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 494 21.5 %
5 - 354 15.4 %
6 - 366 16.0 %
7 Loyal to their racial group 240 10.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 57 2.5 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,544 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 5.08
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.25

Location: 930-931 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF1B: Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

- 178 -
Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Disloyal to their racial group 11 0.5 %


2 - 11 0.5 %
3 - 48 2.1 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 386 16.8 %
5 - 279 12.2 %
6 - 451 19.7 %
7 Loyal to their racial group 362 15.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 53 2.3 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,548 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 5.40
• Median: 6.00
• Mode: 6.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.27

Location: 932-933 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF1C: Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Disloyal to their racial group 14 0.6 %


2 - 13 0.6 %
3 - 39 1.7 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 415 18.1 %
5 - 316 13.8 %
6 - 376 16.4 %
7 Loyal to their racial group 372 16.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 56 2.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,545 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 179 -
• Mean: 5.34
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.30

Location: 934-935 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF1D: Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Disloyal to their racial group 17 0.7 %


2 - 33 1.4 %
3 - 71 3.1 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 417 18.2 %
5 - 316 13.8 %
6 - 379 16.5 %
7 Loyal to their racial group 310 13.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 58 2.5 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,543 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 5.18
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.36

Location: 936-937 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF2A: Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Oversexed as a group 79 3.4 %


2 - 93 4.1 %
3 - 166 7.2 %

- 180 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

4 Not close to one end or the other 897 39.1 %


5 - 184 8.0 %
6 - 89 3.9 %
7 Undersexed as a group 33 1.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 60 2.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,541 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.92
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.16

Location: 938-939 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF2B: Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Oversexed as a group 73 3.2 %


2 - 84 3.7 %
3 - 188 8.2 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 902 39.3 %
5 - 164 7.1 %
6 - 91 4.0 %
7 Undersexed as a group 38 1.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 61 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,540 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.93
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00

- 181 -
• Standard Deviation: 1.15

Location: 940-941 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF2C: Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Oversexed as a group 97 4.2 %


2 - 121 5.3 %
3 - 195 8.5 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 840 36.6 %
5 - 167 7.3 %
6 - 79 3.4 %
7 Undersexed as a group 42 1.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 60 2.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,541 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.82
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.24

Location: 942-943 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF2D: Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Oversexed as a group 152 6.6 %


2 - 164 7.1 %
3 - 236 10.3 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 752 32.8 %
5 - 117 5.1 %
6 - 82 3.6 %
7 Undersexed as a group 37 1.6 %

- 182 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Missing Data
-1 Refused 61 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,540 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.59
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.34

Location: 944-945 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF3A: Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Like men more than women 119 5.2 %


2 - 181 7.9 %
3 - 156 6.8 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 705 30.7 %
5 - 214 9.3 %
6 - 118 5.1 %
7 Like women more than men 45 2.0 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 63 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,538 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.81
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.39

Location: 946-947 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

- 183 -
W2_QF3B: Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Like men more than women 191 8.3 %


2 - 247 10.8 %
3 - 143 6.2 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 668 29.1 %
5 - 158 6.9 %
6 - 98 4.3 %
7 Like women more than men 36 1.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 60 2.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,541 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.51
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.48

Location: 948-949 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF3C: Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Like men more than women 47 2.0 %


2 - 61 2.7 %
3 - 122 5.3 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 681 29.7 %
5 - 243 10.6 %
6 - 261 11.4 %
7 Like women more than men 127 5.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 59 2.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 184 -
Based upon 1,542 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.49
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.36

Location: 950-951 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF3D: Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Like men more than women 24 1.0 %


2 - 45 2.0 %
3 - 74 3.2 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 619 27.0 %
5 - 207 9.0 %
6 - 338 14.7 %
7 Like women more than men 231 10.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 63 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,538 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.87
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.38

Location: 952-953 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF4A: Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Prefer to be Self-supporting 230 10.0 %


2 - 314 13.7 %

- 185 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

3 - 279 12.2 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 515 22.4 %
5 - 120 5.2 %
6 - 52 2.3 %
7 Prefer to live off welfare 34 1.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 57 2.5 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,544 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.18
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.44

Location: 954-955 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF4B: Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Prefer to be Self-supporting 191 8.3 %


2 - 211 9.2 %
3 - 205 8.9 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 479 20.9 %
5 - 224 9.8 %
6 - 140 6.1 %
7 Prefer to live off welfare 98 4.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 53 2.3 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,548 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.74
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00

- 186 -
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.67

Location: 956-957 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF4C: Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Prefer to be Self-supporting 345 15.0 %


2 - 411 17.9 %
3 - 212 9.2 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 417 18.2 %
5 - 74 3.2 %
6 - 52 2.3 %
7 Prefer to live off welfare 37 1.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 53 2.3 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,548 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.85
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.51

Location: 958-959 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF4D: Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Prefer to be Self-supporting 199 8.7 %


2 - 228 9.9 %
3 - 222 9.7 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 512 22.3 %
5 - 203 8.8 %
6 - 114 5.0 %

- 187 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

7 Prefer to live off welfare 74 3.2 %


Missing Data
-1 Refused 49 2.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,552 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.60
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.61

Location: 960-961 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF5A: Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Fragile 59 2.6 %
2 - 82 3.6 %
3 - 177 7.7 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 573 25.0 %
5 - 332 14.5 %
6 - 235 10.2 %
7 Strong 95 4.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 48 2.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,553 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.37
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.38

Location: 962-963 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

- 188 -
W2_QF5B: Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Fragile 11 0.5 %
2 - 19 0.8 %
3 - 57 2.5 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 489 21.3 %
5 - 321 14.0 %
6 - 337 14.7 %
7 Strong 313 13.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 54 2.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,547 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 5.17
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.30

Location: 964-965 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF5C: Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Fragile 22 1.0 %
2 - 17 0.7 %
3 - 69 3.0 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 534 23.3 %
5 - 337 14.7 %
6 - 405 17.7 %
7 Strong 164 7.1 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 53 2.3 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 189 -
Based upon 1,548 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.95
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.24

Location: 966-967 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF5D: Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Fragile 14 0.6 %
2 - 12 0.5 %
3 - 61 2.7 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 486 21.2 %
5 - 321 14.0 %
6 - 408 17.8 %
7 Strong 244 10.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 55 2.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,546 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 5.13
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.25

Location: 968-969 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF6A: Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Excellent Parents 121 5.3 %


2 - 335 14.6 %

- 190 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

3 - 317 13.8 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 616 26.9 %
5 - 89 3.9 %
6 - 61 2.7 %
7 Poor Parents 9 0.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 53 2.3 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,548 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.28
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.24

Location: 970-971 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF6B: Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Excellent Parents 134 5.8 %


2 - 269 11.7 %
3 - 265 11.6 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 597 26.0 %
5 - 170 7.4 %
6 - 74 3.2 %
7 Poor Parents 39 1.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 53 2.3 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,548 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.50
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00

- 191 -
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.39

Location: 972-973 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF6C: Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Excellent Parents 81 3.5 %


2 - 211 9.2 %
3 - 350 15.3 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 701 30.6 %
5 - 140 6.1 %
6 - 53 2.3 %
7 Poor Parents 12 0.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 53 2.3 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,548 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.53
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.15

Location: 974-975 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF6D: Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Excellent Parents 64 2.8 %


2 - 111 4.8 %
3 - 223 9.7 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 669 29.2 %
5 - 248 10.8 %
6 - 156 6.8 %

- 192 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

7 Poor Parents 81 3.5 %


Missing Data
-1 Refused 49 2.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,552 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.11
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.35

Location: 976-977 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF7A: Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Dissagreeable 20 0.9 %
2 - 21 0.9 %
3 - 109 4.8 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 768 33.5 %
5 - 341 14.9 %
6 - 212 9.2 %
7 Aggreeable 74 3.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 56 2.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,545 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.50
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.09

Location: 978-979 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

- 193 -
W2_QF7B: Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Dissagreeable 54 2.4 %
2 - 82 3.6 %
3 - 226 9.9 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 734 32.0 %
5 - 243 10.6 %
6 - 140 6.1 %
7 Aggreeable 60 2.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 62 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,539 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.10
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.24

Location: 980-981 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF7C: Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Dissagreeable 28 1.2 %
2 - 41 1.8 %
3 - 112 4.9 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 805 35.1 %
5 - 327 14.3 %
6 - 172 7.5 %
7 Aggreeable 55 2.4 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 61 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 194 -
Based upon 1,540 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.36
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.09

Location: 982-983 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF7D: Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Dissagreeable 52 2.3 %
2 - 89 3.9 %
3 - 221 9.6 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 803 35.0 %
5 - 235 10.2 %
6 - 107 4.7 %
7 Aggreeable 42 1.8 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 52 2.3 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,549 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.01
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.16

Location: 984-985 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF8: Do you think of yourself as a feminist or not?


Do you think of yourself as a feminist or not?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 288 12.6 %


2 No 1251 54.5 %

- 195 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 62 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,539 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 986-987 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QF9: How concerned are you personally about women's rights?


How concerned are you personally about women's rights?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very Concerned 362 15.8 %


2 Somewhat Concerned 710 31.0 %
3 Not Very Concerned 358 15.6 %
4 Not Concerned At All 134 5.8 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 37 1.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,564 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 988-989 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QF10A: Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Feminine 10 0.4 %
2 - 9 0.4 %
3 - 37 1.6 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 481 21.0 %
5 - 207 9.0 %

- 196 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

6 - 490 21.4 %
7 Masculine 313 13.6 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 54 2.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,547 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 5.32
• Median: 6.00
• Mode: 6.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.26

Location: 990-991 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF10B: Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Feminine 12 0.5 %
2 - 13 0.6 %
3 - 60 2.6 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 531 23.1 %
5 - 306 13.3 %
6 - 430 18.7 %
7 Masculine 190 8.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 59 2.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,542 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 5.05
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.21

Location: 992-993 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 197 -
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF10C: Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Feminine 262 11.4 %


2 - 464 20.2 %
3 - 260 11.3 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 490 21.4 %
5 - 54 2.4 %
6 - 7 0.3 %
7 Masculine 4 0.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 60 2.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,541 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.77
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.21

Location: 994-995 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QF10D: Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?
Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Feminine 203 8.8 %


2 - 376 16.4 %
3 - 290 12.6 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 535 23.3 %
5 - 104 4.5 %
6 - 18 0.8 %
7 Masculine 16 0.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 59 2.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %

- 198 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,542 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.05
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.29

Location: 996-997 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QG_1: [More people of different races marrying each other. ] Please indicate if you think
each of the following trends is generally a good thing for our society, a bad thing for our
society, or doesn't make much difference
[More people of different races marrying each other.] Please indicate if you think each of the following trends is generally a good
thing for our society, a bad thing for our society, or doesn?t make much difference

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Good thing for our society 433 18.9 %


2 Doesn't make much difference 970 42.3 %
3 Bad thing for our society 158 6.9 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 40 1.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,561 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 998-999 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QG_2: [More women not ever having children.] Please indicate if you think each of the
following trends is generally a good thing for our society, a bad thing for our society, or
doesn't make much difference
[More women not ever having children.] Please indicate if you think each of the following trends is generally a good thing for our
society, a bad thing for our society, or doesn?t make much difference

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Good thing for our society 243 10.6 %

- 199 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

2 Doesn't make much difference 838 36.5 %


3 Bad thing for our society 473 20.6 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 47 2.0 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,554 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 1000-1001 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QG_3: [More single women deciding to have children without a male partner to help raise
them.] Please indicate if you think each of the following trends is generally a good thing for
our society, a bad thing for our society, or doesn't make much difference
[More single women deciding to have children without a male partner to help raise them.] Please indicate if you think each of the
following trends is generally a good thing for our society, a bad thing for our society, or doesn?t make much difference

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Good thing for our society 66 2.9 %


2 Doesn't make much difference 541 23.6 %
3 Bad thing for our society 946 41.2 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 48 2.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,553 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 1002-1003 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QH1: Discrimination against women is no longer a problem in the U.S. Do you agree
strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree
strongly?
Discrimination against women is no longer a problem in the U.S. Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly?

- 200 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Agree strongly 103 4.5 %


2 Agree somewhat 310 13.5 %
3 Neither agree nor disagree 342 14.9 %
4 Disagree somewhat 580 25.3 %
5 Disagree strongly 230 10.0 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 36 1.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,565 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 1004-1005 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QH2: Do you think what happens generally to WOMEN in this country will have something
to do with what happens in your life?
Do you think what happens generally to WOMEN in this country will have something to do with what happens in your life?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 685 29.9 %


2 No 453 19.7 %
3 Don't know 426 18.6 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 37 1.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,564 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 1006-1007 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QH2A: Will it affect you a lot, or not very much?


Will it affect you a lot, or not very much?

- 201 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 A lot 141 6.1 %


2 Some 433 18.9 %
3 Not very much 84 3.7 %
4 Don't Know 24 1.0 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 3 0.1 %
. - 1609 70.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 682 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1008-1009 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QI1: Which number from 1 to 7 best represents how you think government should work?
Which number from 1 to 7 best represents how you think government should work?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 People make all decisions on their own 93 4.1 %


2 - 139 6.1 %
3 - 250 10.9 %
4 - 739 32.2 %
5 - 247 10.8 %
6 - 59 2.6 %
7 Elected officials make all decisions on their own 27 1.2 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 47 2.0 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,554 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.77
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.21

Location: 1010-1011 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

- 202 -
W2_QI2: How does the government in Washington actually work?
How does the government in Washington actually work?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 People make all decisions on their own 32 1.4 %


2 - 22 1.0 %
3 - 68 3.0 %
4 - 399 17.4 %
5 - 358 15.6 %
6 - 425 18.5 %
7 Elected officials make all decisions on their own 250 10.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 47 2.0 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,554 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 5.13
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 6.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.34

Location: 1012-1013 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QI3: A law has been proposed that would limit members of Congress to no more than 12
consecutive years of service in that office. Do you favor or oppose such a law?
A law has been proposed that would limit members of Congress to no more than 12 consecutive years of service in that office. Do
you favor or oppose such a law?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Favor 1271 55.4 %


2 Oppose 269 11.7 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 61 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,540 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

- 203 -
Location: 1014-1015 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QI4_A: Our government would run better if decisions were left up to successful business
people.
Our government would run better if decisions were left up to successful business people.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 64 2.8 %


2 Agree Somewhat 293 12.8 %
3 Neither Agree or Disagree 537 23.4 %
4 Disagree Somewhat 358 15.6 %
5 Disagree Strongly 304 13.3 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 45 2.0 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,556 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 1016-1017 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QI4_B: Our government would run better if decisions were left up to nonelected,
independent experts rather than politicians or the people.
Our government would run better if decisions were left up to nonelected, independent experts rather than politicians or the people.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 41 1.8 %


2 Agree Somewhat 319 13.9 %
3 Neither Agree or Disagree 608 26.5 %
4 Disagree Somewhat 346 15.1 %
5 Disagree Strongly 237 10.3 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 50 2.2 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,551 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 204 -
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 1018-1019 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QI4_C: Our government would run better if decisions were left up to election officials
representing ordinary citizens who come from both lower and upper classes.
Our government would run better if decisions were left up to election officials representing ordinary citizens who come from both
lower and upper classes.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 239 10.4 %


2 Agree Somewhat 640 27.9 %
3 Neither Agree or Disagree 488 21.3 %
4 Disagree Somewhat 118 5.1 %
5 Disagree Strongly 68 3.0 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 48 2.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,553 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 1020-1021 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QI4_D: The U.S. government is largely responsible for many of the economic and social
problems the poor experience today.
The U.S. government is largely responsible for many of the economic and social problems the poor experience today.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Agree Strongly 297 12.9 %


2 Agree Somewhat 485 21.1 %
3 Neither Agree or Disagree 483 21.1 %
4 Disagree Somewhat 202 8.8 %
5 Disagree Strongly 86 3.7 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 48 2.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 205 -
Based upon 1,553 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 1022-1023 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QDISP11: We'd like to get your feelings toward several groups of Americans.Please rate
each group using the feeling thermometer. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean
that you feel favorable, or warm, toward the group. Ratings between 0 degrees
We'd like to get your feelings toward several groups of Americans.Please rate each group using the feeling thermometer. Ratings
between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean that you feel favorable, or warm, toward the group. Ratings between 0 degrees

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

-1 REFUSED 0 0.0 %
Missing Data
. - 2294 100.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 0 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

Location: 1024-1025 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , .

W2_J1_A: [How would you rate people with AIDS/HIV?] Please rate each group using the
feeling thermometer.
[How would you rate people with AIDS/HIV?] Please rate each group using the feeling thermometer.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 36 1.6 %
1 - 121 5.3 %
5 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 9 0.4 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 42 1.8 %
20 - 3 0.1 %
25 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 58 2.5 %
34 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 2 0.1 %
40 - 133 5.8 %
42 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 9 0.4 %

- 206 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

49 - 1 0.0 %
50 - 374 16.3 %
55 - 9 0.4 %
58 - 1 0.0 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 174 7.6 %
65 - 11 0.5 %
66 - 2 0.1 %
69 - 2 0.1 %
70 - 187 8.2 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
73 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 20 0.9 %
80 - 27 1.2 %
85 - 157 6.8 %
86 - 1 0.0 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 10 0.4 %
95 - 2 0.1 %
97 - 1 0.0 %
99 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 126 5.5 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 72 3.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,529 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 54.76
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 27.15

Location: 1026-1028 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_J1_B: [How would you rate people in jail?] Please rate each group using the feeling
thermometer.

- 207 -
[How would you rate people in jail?] Please rate each group using the feeling thermometer.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 137 6.0 %
1 - 97 4.2 %
2 - 3 0.1 %
5 - 4 0.2 %
6 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 20 0.9 %
14 - 3 0.1 %
15 - 215 9.4 %
16 - 1 0.0 %
18 - 2 0.1 %
20 - 30 1.3 %
21 - 1 0.0 %
25 - 11 0.5 %
26 - 1 0.0 %
29 - 1 0.0 %
30 - 217 9.5 %
35 - 11 0.5 %
39 - 1 0.0 %
40 - 234 10.2 %
42 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 18 0.8 %
49 - 3 0.1 %
50 - 252 11.0 %
55 - 6 0.3 %
58 - 2 0.1 %
60 - 104 4.5 %
65 - 5 0.2 %
68 - 1 0.0 %
69 - 2 0.1 %
70 - 81 3.5 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 7 0.3 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 9 0.4 %
85 - 28 1.2 %
86 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 2 0.1 %
95 - 1 0.0 %

- 208 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

99 - 1 0.0 %
100 - 22 1.0 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 63 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,538 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 34.99
• Median: 40.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 23.58

Location: 1029-1031 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_J1_C: [How would you rate gay males?] Please rate each group using the feeling
thermometer.
[How would you rate gay males?] Please rate each group using the feeling thermometer.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 142 6.2 %
1 - 93 4.1 %
2 - 2 0.1 %
3 - 2 0.1 %
5 - 8 0.3 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 11 0.5 %
15 - 70 3.1 %
16 - 1 0.0 %
20 - 8 0.3 %
25 - 5 0.2 %
30 - 85 3.7 %
33 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 4 0.2 %
40 - 116 5.1 %
42 - 1 0.0 %
43 - 2 0.1 %
44 - 1 0.0 %

- 209 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

45 - 7 0.3 %
46 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 2 0.1 %
50 - 396 17.3 %
55 - 8 0.3 %
58 - 1 0.0 %
59 - 1 0.0 %
60 - 106 4.6 %
65 - 7 0.3 %
69 - 2 0.1 %
70 - 141 6.1 %
75 - 20 0.9 %
77 - 1 0.0 %
80 - 27 1.2 %
85 - 116 5.1 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 22 1.0 %
93 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 3 0.1 %
98 - 3 0.1 %
99 - 2 0.1 %
100 - 112 4.9 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 67 2.9 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,534 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 48.64
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 29.69

Location: 1032-1034 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_J1_D: [How would you rate lesbian females?] Please rate each group using the feeling
thermometer.

- 210 -
[How would you rate lesbian females?] Please rate each group using the feeling thermometer.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 134 5.8 %
1 - 101 4.4 %
2 - 3 0.1 %
4 - 1 0.0 %
5 - 4 0.2 %
7 - 1 0.0 %
10 - 13 0.6 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
13 - 1 0.0 %
15 - 77 3.4 %
16 - 2 0.1 %
20 - 8 0.3 %
25 - 8 0.3 %
30 - 80 3.5 %
31 - 1 0.0 %
34 - 1 0.0 %
35 - 6 0.3 %
40 - 115 5.0 %
42 - 1 0.0 %
43 - 1 0.0 %
45 - 11 0.5 %
47 - 1 0.0 %
49 - 3 0.1 %
50 - 382 16.7 %
55 - 8 0.3 %
57 - 1 0.0 %
58 - 2 0.1 %
60 - 116 5.1 %
65 - 3 0.1 %
69 - 2 0.1 %
70 - 148 6.5 %
72 - 1 0.0 %
75 - 20 0.9 %
80 - 25 1.1 %
85 - 104 4.5 %
87 - 1 0.0 %
88 - 1 0.0 %
90 - 24 1.0 %

- 211 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

93 - 1 0.0 %
95 - 5 0.2 %
98 - 1 0.0 %
99 - 2 0.1 %
100 - 115 5.0 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 65 2.8 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,536 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 48.42
• Median: 50.00
• Mode: 50.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 100.00
• Standard Deviation: 29.70

Location: 1035-1037 (width: 3; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QK1: How widespread do you believe the problem of racism is against Blacks among
police officers in this country?
How widespread do you believe the problem of racism is against blacks among police officers in this country?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very Common 423 18.4 %


2 Fairly Common 713 31.1 %
3 Fairly Rare 332 14.5 %
4 Very Rare 77 3.4 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 56 2.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,545 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1038-1039 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

- 212 -
W2_QK2: Would you favor or oppose a law requiring mandatory life imprisonment for anyone
convicted of a serious crime for the third time?
Would you favor or oppose a law requiring mandatory life imprisonment for anyone convicted of a serious crime for the third time?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly Favor 517 22.5 %


2 Somewhat Favor 450 19.6 %
3 Neither Favor nor Oppose 361 15.7 %
4 Somewhat Oppose 144 6.3 %
5 Strongly Oppose 73 3.2 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 56 2.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,545 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 1040-1041 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QK3: If you could choose between the following two approaches, which one do you think
is the better penalty for murder-the death penalty, or life imprisonment?
If you could choose between the following two approaches, which one do you think is the better penalty for murder-the death
penalty, or life imprisonment?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Death penalty 744 32.4 %


2 Life imprisonment 791 34.5 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 66 2.9 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,535 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1042-1043 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

- 213 -
W2_QK3A: How strongly do you feel about [the death penalty/ life imprisonment]?
How strongly do you feel about [the death penalty/ life imprisonment]?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Very Strongly 682 29.7 %


2 Somewhat Strongly 702 30.6 %
3 Not Strongly At All 145 6.3 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 6 0.3 %
. - 759 33.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,529 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 1044-1045 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QL1A: [LESBIAN WOMEN] A score of 1 means that you think all the people in this group
are feminine. A score of 7 means that you think most people in the group are masculine.
[LESBIAN WOMEN] A score of 1 means that you think all the people in this group are feminine. A score of 7 means that you think
most people in the group are masculine.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Feminine 37 1.6 %
2 - 47 2.0 %
3 - 94 4.1 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 832 36.3 %
5 - 273 11.9 %
6 - 161 7.0 %
7 Masculine 98 4.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 59 2.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,542 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.38
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00

- 214 -
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.19

Location: 1046-1047 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QL1B: [GAY MEN] A score of 1 means that you think all the people in this group are
feminine. A score of 7 means that you think most people in the group are masculine.
[GAY MEN] A score of 1 means that you think all the people in this group are feminine. A score of 7 means that you think most
people in the group are masculine.

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Feminine 155 6.8 %


2 - 234 10.2 %
3 - 331 14.4 %
4 Not close to one end or the other 729 31.8 %
5 - 66 2.9 %
6 - 21 0.9 %
7 Masculine 6 0.3 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 59 2.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,542 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.26
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.15

Location: 1048-1049 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QL2A: [Work with children ] Gays and lesbians should be allowed to:
[Work with children ] Gays and lesbians should be allowed to:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly Agree 447 19.5 %


2 Somewhat Agree 541 23.6 %
3 Somewhat Disagree 305 13.3 %
4 Strongly Disagree 237 10.3 %
Missing Data

- 215 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

-1 REFUSED 71 3.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,530 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1050-1051 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QL2B: [Become Clergy/Ministers/Priests/Rabbis/Imams ] Gays and lesbians should be


allowed to:
[Become Clergy/Ministers/Priests/Rabbis/Imams ] Gays and lesbians should be allowed to:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly Agree 359 15.6 %


2 Somewhat Agree 392 17.1 %
3 Somewhat Disagree 304 13.3 %
4 Strongly Disagree 476 20.7 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 70 3.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,531 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1052-1053 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QL2C: [Have and Raise Children ] Gays and lesbians should be allowed to:
[Have and Raise Children ] Gays and lesbians should be allowed to:

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly Agree 427 18.6 %


2 Somewhat Agree 477 20.8 %
3 Somewhat Disagree 310 13.5 %
4 Strongly Disagree 320 13.9 %
Missing Data

- 216 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

-1 REFUSED 67 2.9 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,534 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1054-1055 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QL3: Some people believe that homosexuality is immoral. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with this perspective?
Some people believe that homosexuality is immoral. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this perspective?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly Agree 430 18.7 %


2 Somewhat Agree 411 17.9 %
3 Somewhat Disagree 299 13.0 %
4 Strongly Disagree 382 16.7 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 79 3.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,522 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1056-1057 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QL4: Do you favor or oppose laws to protect homosexuals against job discrimination?
Do you favor or oppose laws to protect homosexuals against job discrimination?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Strongly Favor 565 24.6 %


2 Somewhat Favor 326 14.2 %
3 Neither Favor nor Oppose 469 20.4 %
4 Somewhat Oppose 67 2.9 %
5 Strongly Oppose 112 4.9 %

- 217 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 62 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,539 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 1058-1059 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QM8: How concerned are you about the spread of HIV/AIDS in your community?
How concerned are you about the spread of HIV/AIDS in your community?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely Concerned 300 13.1 %


2 Very Concerned 317 13.8 %
3 Somewhat Concerned 572 24.9 %
4 Not Concerned At All 353 15.4 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 59 2.6 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,542 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1060-1061 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QM9: Where would you place yourself on this scale?


Where would you place yourself on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Government sees to it every person has a job and a good standard of living 140 6.1 %
2 - 107 4.7 %
3 - 201 8.8 %
4 - 485 21.1 %
5 - 250 10.9 %

- 218 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

6 - 185 8.1 %
7 Government lets each person get ahead on her/his own 176 7.7 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 57 2.5 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,544 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.20
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.69

Location: 1062-1063 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QM10: Where would you place yourself on this scale?


Where would you place yourself on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Government should help minority groups 149 6.5 %


2 - 136 5.9 %
3 - 224 9.8 %
4 - 487 21.2 %
5 - 218 9.5 %
6 - 169 7.4 %
7 Minority groups should help themselves 148 6.5 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 70 3.1 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,531 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 4.04
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.68

Location: 1064-1065 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 219 -
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QM11: Where would you place yourself on this scale?


Where would you place yourself on this scale?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Government should help poor people 231 10.1 %


2 - 205 8.9 %
3 - 286 12.5 %
4 - 458 20.0 %
5 - 194 8.5 %
6 - 102 4.4 %
7 Poor people should help themselves 67 2.9 %
Missing Data
-1 Refused 58 2.5 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,543 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.49
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.61

Location: 1066-1067 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -1 , .

W2_QM12: In the future, how willing should the United States be to use military force to solve
international problems?
In the future, how willing should the United States be to use military force to solve international problems?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Extremely Willing 80 3.5 %


2 Very Willing 172 7.5 %
3 Somewhat Willing 685 29.9 %
4 Not Very Willing 409 17.8 %
5 Never Willing 68 3.0 %
6 Don't Know 130 5.7 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 57 2.5 %
. - 693 30.2 %

- 220 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,544 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00

Location: 1068-1069 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QN1: Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you
can't be too careful in dealing with people?
Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you can't be too careful in dealing with people?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Most people can be trusted 598 26.1 %


2 Can't be too careful 947 41.3 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 56 2.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,545 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1070-1071 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QN2: Do you think more people would try to take advantage of you if they got the chance
or would they try to be fair?
Do you think more people would try to take advantage of you if they got the chance or would they try to be fair?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Take advantage 818 35.7 %


2 Try to be fair 725 31.6 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 58 2.5 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,543 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 221 -
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1072-1073 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QN3: Do you have any neighbors that you know and talk to regularly?
Do you have any neighbors that you know and talk to regularly?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Yes 1064 46.4 %


2 No 498 21.7 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 39 1.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,562 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1074-1075 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QN4: About how many neighbors do you talk to regularly? Would that be just one, two or
three, four or five, or more than five?
About how many neighbors do you talk to regularly? Would that be just one, two or three, four or five, or more than five?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Just one 110 4.8 %


2 Two or three 538 23.5 %
3 Four or five 227 9.9 %
4 More than five 183 8.0 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 6 0.3 %
. - 1230 53.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,058 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1076-1077 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 222 -
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QO1: President Obama's election as the nation's first African American president...
President Obama's election as the nation's first African American president...

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Improved American race relations 475 20.7 %


2 Worsened American race relations 227 9.9 %
3 Neither improved nor worsened America race relations 844 36.8 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 55 2.4 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,546 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 1078-1079 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QO2: President Obama's election as the nation's first African American president...
President Obama's election as the nation's first African American president...

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Enhanced the public image of Blacks 716 31.2 %


2 Diminished the public image of Blacks 102 4.4 %
3 Neither enhanced nor diminished the public image of Blacks 722 31.5 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 61 2.7 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,540 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 1080-1081 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_QO3: President Obama's election as the nation's first African American president made
government...
President Obama's election as the nation's first African American president made government...

- 223 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 More responsive to the problems of Blacks and other minorities 400 17.4 %
2 Less responsivcde to the problems of Blacks and other minorities 103 4.5 %
3 Neither more nor less responsive to the problems of Blacks and other minorities 1031 44.9 %
Missing Data
-1 REFUSED 67 2.9 %
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,534 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 1082-1083 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W1_ORDER_A1: Forward or backward order of A1


Forward or backward order of A1

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-5 1157 50.4 %


2 5-1 1137 49.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1084-1084 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_A2: Forward or backward order of A2


Forward or backward order of A2

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-5 1164 50.7 %


2 5-1 1130 49.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1085-1085 (width: 1; decimal: 0)

- 224 -
Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_A12: Forward or backward order of A12


Forward or backward order of A12

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-2 1167 50.9 %


2 2-1 1127 49.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1086-1086 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_B1: Forward or backward order of B1


Forward or backward order of B1

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-5 1149 50.1 %


2 5-1 1145 49.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1087-1087 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_B2: Forward or backward order of B2


Forward or backward order of B2

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-5 1140 49.7 %


2 5-1 1154 50.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1088-1088 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
- 225 -
W1_ORDER_B3: Forward or backward order of B3
Forward or backward order of B3

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-5 1094 47.7 %


2 5-1 1200 52.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1089-1089 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_B4: Forward or backward order of B4


Forward or backward order of B4

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-5 1145 49.9 %


2 5-1 1149 50.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1090-1090 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_C2: Forward or backward order of C2


Forward or backward order of C2

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-7 1123 49.0 %


2 7-1 1171 51.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1091-1091 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 226 -
W1_ORDER_E2: Forward or backward order of E2
Forward or backward order of E2

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-3 1107 48.3 %


2 3-1 1187 51.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1092-1092 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_E2A: Forward or backward order of E2A


Forward or backward order of E2A

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-3 1118 48.7 %


2 3-1 1176 51.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1093-1093 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_F1: Forward or backward order of F1


Forward or backward order of F1

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-3 1100 48.0 %


2 3-1 1194 52.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1094-1094 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 227 -
W1_ORDER_F1A: Forward or backward order of F1A
Forward or backward order of F1A

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-3 1140 49.7 %


2 3-1 1154 50.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1095-1095 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_F2: Forward or backward order of F2


Forward or backward order of F2

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-3 1162 50.7 %


2 3-1 1132 49.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1096-1096 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_F2A: Forward or backward order of F2A


Forward or backward order of F2A

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-3 1161 50.6 %


2 3-1 1133 49.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1097-1097 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 228 -
W1_ORDER_F3: Forward or backward order of F3
Forward or backward order of F3

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-7 1183 51.6 %


2 7-1 1111 48.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1098-1098 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_F4: Forward or backward order of F4


Forward or backward order of F4

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-4 1137 49.6 %


2 4-1 1157 50.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1099-1099 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_F5: Forward or backward order of F5


Forward or backward order of F5

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-4 1143 49.8 %


2 4-1 1151 50.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1100-1100 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 229 -
W1_ORDER_G2: Forward or backward order of G2
Forward or backward order of G2

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-3 1145 49.9 %


2 3-1 1149 50.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1101-1101 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_G3A: Forward or backward order of G3A


Forward or backward order of G3A

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-3 1161 50.6 %


2 3-1 1133 49.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1102-1102 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_H1: Forward or backward order of H1


Forward or backward order of H1

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-5 1115 48.6 %


2 5-1 1179 51.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1103-1103 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 230 -
W1_ORDER_I1: Forward or backward order of I1
Forward or backward order of I1

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-5 1179 51.4 %


2 5-1 1115 48.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1104-1104 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_J1: Forward or backward order of J1


Forward or backward order of J1

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-11 1146 50.0 %


2 11-1 1148 50.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1105-1105 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_J3A: Forward or backward order of J3A


Forward or backward order of J3A

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-5 1148 50.0 %


2 5-1 1146 50.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1106-1106 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 231 -
W1_ORDER_K1: Forward or backward order of K1
Forward or backward order of K1

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-4 1145 49.9 %


2 4-1 1149 50.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1107-1107 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_L4_A: Order of L4_a shown


Order of L4_a shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 564 24.6 %
2 - 584 25.5 %
3 - 580 25.3 %
4 - 566 24.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.50
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1108-1108 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_L4_B: Order of L4_b shown


Order of L4_b shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 580 25.3 %
2 - 570 24.8 %
3 - 574 25.0 %
4 - 570 24.8 %

- 232 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.49
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1109-1109 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_L4_C: Order of L4_c shown


Order of L4_c shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 550 24.0 %
2 - 578 25.2 %
3 - 579 25.2 %
4 - 587 25.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.52
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1110-1110 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_L4_D: Order of L4_d shown


Order of L4_d shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 600 26.2 %
2 - 562 24.5 %
3 - 561 24.5 %
4 - 571 24.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 233 -
• Mean: 2.48
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.13

Location: 1111-1111 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_L5_A: Order of L5_a shown


Order of L5_a shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 371 16.2 %
2 - 401 17.5 %
3 - 378 16.5 %
4 - 395 17.2 %
5 - 383 16.7 %
6 - 366 16.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.49
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.69

Location: 1112-1112 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_L5_B: Order of L5_b shown


Order of L5_b shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 375 16.3 %
2 - 386 16.8 %
3 - 397 17.3 %
4 - 402 17.5 %
5 - 356 15.5 %
6 - 378 16.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 234 -
• Mean: 3.48
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.69

Location: 1113-1113 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_L5_C: Order of L5_c shown


Order of L5_c shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 388 16.9 %
2 - 382 16.7 %
3 - 380 16.6 %
4 - 377 16.4 %
5 - 397 17.3 %
6 - 370 16.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.49
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 5.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.71

Location: 1114-1114 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_L5_D: Order of L5_d shown


Order of L5_d shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 413 18.0 %
2 - 387 16.9 %
3 - 374 16.3 %
4 - 362 15.8 %
5 - 394 17.2 %
6 - 364 15.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 235 -
• Mean: 3.45
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.72

Location: 1115-1115 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_L5_E: Order of L5_e shown


Order of L5_e shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 362 15.8 %
2 - 362 15.8 %
3 - 386 16.8 %
4 - 382 16.7 %
5 - 366 16.0 %
6 - 436 19.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 3.58
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 6.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.72

Location: 1116-1116 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_L5_F: ORDER OF L5_F shown


Order of L5_f

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 385 16.8 %
2 - 376 16.4 %
3 - 379 16.5 %
4 - 376 16.4 %
5 - 398 17.3 %
6 - 380 16.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 236 -
• Mean: 3.51
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 5.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.71

Location: 1117-1117 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_M3: Forward or backward order of M3


Forward or backward order of M3

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-4 1125 49.0 %


2 4-1 1169 51.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1118-1118 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W1_ORDER_O1: Forward or backward order of O1


Forward or backward order of O1

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 1-5 1164 50.7 %


2 5-1 1130 49.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1119-1119 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W2_ORDER_QB3_1: [Always ] Order of How often would you say you vote?
[Always ] Order of How often would you say you vote?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 760 33.1 %
4 - 841 36.7 %

- 237 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.58
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.50

Location: 1120-1120 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W2_ORDER_QB3_2: [Nearly Always ] Order of How often would you say you vote?
[Nearly Always ] Order of How often would you say you vote?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

2 - 760 33.1 %
3 - 841 36.7 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.53
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 2.00
• Maximum: 3.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.50

Location: 1121-1121 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W2_ORDER_QB3_3: [Part Of The Time ] Order of How often would you say you vote?
[Part Of The Time ] Order of How often would you say you vote?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

2 - 841 36.7 %
3 - 760 33.1 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %

- 238 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.47
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 2.00
• Maximum: 3.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.50

Location: 1122-1122 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W2_ORDER_QB3_4: [Seldom ] Order of How often would you say you vote?
[Seldom ] Order of How often would you say you vote?

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 841 36.7 %
4 - 760 33.1 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.42
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.50

Location: 1123-1123 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

W2_ORDER_QE1A: Order of Question for QE1A


Order of Question for QE1A

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 optimistic 880 38.4 %


2 pessimistic 230 10.0 %
Missing Data
. - 1184 51.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,110 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 239 -
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1124-1125 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QE2A: Order of Question for QE2A


Order of Question for QE2A

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 optimistic 739 32.2 %


2 pessimistic 391 17.0 %
Missing Data
. - 1164 50.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,130 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1126-1127 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF1_A: Order of F1A shown


Order of F1A shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 361 15.7 %
2 - 375 16.3 %
3 - 427 18.6 %
4 - 438 19.1 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.59
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1128-1129 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 240 -
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF1_B: Order of F1B shown


Order of F1B shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 405 17.7 %
2 - 392 17.1 %
3 - 407 17.7 %
4 - 397 17.3 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.50
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1130-1131 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF1_C: Order of F1C shown


Order of F1C shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 399 17.4 %
2 - 414 18.0 %
3 - 371 16.2 %
4 - 417 18.2 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.50
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.13

- 241 -
Location: 1132-1133 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF1_D: Order of F1D shown


Order of F1D shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 436 19.0 %
2 - 420 18.3 %
3 - 396 17.3 %
4 - 349 15.2 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.41
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1134-1135 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF2_A: Order of F2A shown


Order of F2A shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 392 17.1 %
2 - 404 17.6 %
3 - 413 18.0 %
4 - 392 17.1 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.50
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00

- 242 -
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1136-1137 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF2_B: Order of F2B shown


Order of F2B shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 367 16.0 %
2 - 409 17.8 %
3 - 412 18.0 %
4 - 413 18.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.54
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1138-1139 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF2_C: Order of F2C shown


Order of F2C shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 422 18.4 %
2 - 392 17.1 %
3 - 382 16.7 %
4 - 405 17.7 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.48

- 243 -
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.13

Location: 1140-1141 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF2_D: Order of F2D shown


Order of F2D shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 420 18.3 %
2 - 396 17.3 %
3 - 394 17.2 %
4 - 391 17.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.47
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1142-1143 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF3_A: Order of F3A shown


Order of F3A shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 404 17.6 %
2 - 395 17.2 %
3 - 404 17.6 %
4 - 398 17.3 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 244 -
Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.50
• Median: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1144-1145 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF3_B: Order of F3B shown


Order of F3B shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 400 17.4 %
2 - 364 15.9 %
3 - 432 18.8 %
4 - 405 17.7 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.53
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1146-1147 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF3_C: Order of F3C shown


Order of F3C shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 417 18.2 %
2 - 421 18.4 %
3 - 353 15.4 %
4 - 410 17.9 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 245 -
Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.47
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.13

Location: 1148-1149 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF3_D: Order of F3D shown


Order of F3D shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 380 16.6 %
2 - 421 18.4 %
3 - 412 18.0 %
4 - 388 16.9 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.50
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.10

Location: 1150-1151 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF4_A: Order of F4A shown


Order of F4A shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 399 17.4 %
2 - 421 18.4 %
3 - 397 17.3 %
4 - 384 16.7 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %

- 246 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.48
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1152-1153 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF4_B: Order of F4B shown


Order of F4B shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 404 17.6 %
2 - 381 16.6 %
3 - 418 18.2 %
4 - 398 17.3 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.51
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1154-1155 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF4_C: Order of F4C shown


Order of F4C shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 399 17.4 %
2 - 414 18.0 %
3 - 402 17.5 %

- 247 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

4 - 386 16.8 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.48
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1156-1157 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF4_D: Order of F4D shown


Order of F4D shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 399 17.4 %
2 - 385 16.8 %
3 - 384 16.7 %
4 - 433 18.9 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.53
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.14

Location: 1158-1159 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF5_A: Order of F5A shown


Order of F5A shown

- 248 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 - 417 18.2 %
2 - 356 15.5 %
3 - 429 18.7 %
4 - 399 17.4 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.51
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.13

Location: 1160-1161 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF5_B: Order of F5B shown


Order of F5B shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 388 16.9 %
2 - 386 16.8 %
3 - 414 18.0 %
4 - 413 18.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.53
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1162-1163 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF5_C: Order of F5C shown

- 249 -
Order of F5C shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 387 16.9 %
2 - 430 18.7 %
3 - 394 17.2 %
4 - 390 17.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.49
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1164-1165 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF5_D: Order of F5D shown


Order of F5D shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 409 17.8 %
2 - 429 18.7 %
3 - 364 15.9 %
4 - 399 17.4 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.47
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1166-1167 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

- 250 -
W2_ORDER_QF6_A: Order of F6A shown
Order of F6A shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 373 16.3 %
2 - 415 18.1 %
3 - 401 17.5 %
4 - 412 18.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.53
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1168-1169 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF6_B: Order of F6B shown


Order of F6B shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 415 18.1 %
2 - 377 16.4 %
3 - 382 16.7 %
4 - 427 18.6 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.51
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.14

Location: 1170-1171 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 251 -
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF6_C: Order of F6C shown


Order of F6C shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 402 17.5 %
2 - 388 16.9 %
3 - 398 17.3 %
4 - 413 18.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.51
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.13

Location: 1172-1173 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF6_D: Order of F6D shown


Order of F6D shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 411 17.9 %
2 - 421 18.4 %
3 - 420 18.3 %
4 - 349 15.2 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.44
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.09

- 252 -
Location: 1174-1175 (width: 2; decimal: 0)
Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF7_A: Order of F7A shown


Order of F7A shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 362 15.8 %
2 - 367 16.0 %
3 - 434 18.9 %
4 - 438 19.1 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.59
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1176-1177 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF7_B: Order of F7B shown


Order of F7B shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 419 18.3 %
2 - 405 17.7 %
3 - 396 17.3 %
4 - 381 16.6 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.46
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00

- 253 -
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1178-1179 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF7_C: Order of F7C shown


Order of F7C shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 397 17.3 %
2 - 414 18.0 %
3 - 379 16.5 %
4 - 411 17.9 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.50
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1180-1181 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF7_D: Order of F7D shown


Order of F7D shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 423 18.4 %
2 - 415 18.1 %
3 - 392 17.1 %
4 - 371 16.2 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.44

- 254 -
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1182-1183 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF10_A: Order of F10A shown


Order of F10A shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 393 17.1 %
2 - 407 17.7 %
3 - 412 18.0 %
4 - 389 17.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.50
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11

Location: 1184-1185 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF10_B: Order of F10B shown


Order of F10B shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 393 17.1 %
2 - 400 17.4 %
3 - 396 17.3 %
4 - 412 18.0 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 255 -
Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.52
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1186-1187 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF10_C: Order of F10C shown


Order of F10C shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 424 18.5 %
2 - 413 18.0 %
3 - 390 17.0 %
4 - 374 16.3 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.45
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.12

Location: 1188-1189 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_QF10_D: Order of F10D shown


Order of F10D shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 391 17.0 %
2 - 381 16.6 %
3 - 403 17.6 %
4 - 426 18.6 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %

- 256 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.54
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.13

Location: 1190-1191 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

W2_ORDER_M10_M11: Order of M10/M11 shown


Order of M10/M11 shown

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 M10/M11 794 34.6 %


2 M11/M10 807 35.2 %
Missing Data
. - 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 1,601 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1192-1193 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1 , .

PPAGE: Age
Age

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

18 - 36 1.6 %
19 - 22 1.0 %
20 - 35 1.5 %
21 - 35 1.5 %
22 - 40 1.7 %
23 - 26 1.1 %
24 - 43 1.9 %
25 - 39 1.7 %

- 257 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

26 - 27 1.2 %
27 - 31 1.4 %
28 - 26 1.1 %
29 - 37 1.6 %
30 - 26 1.1 %
31 - 30 1.3 %
32 - 27 1.2 %
33 - 22 1.0 %
34 - 24 1.0 %
35 - 30 1.3 %
36 - 27 1.2 %
37 - 33 1.4 %
38 - 30 1.3 %
39 - 40 1.7 %
40 - 33 1.4 %
41 - 44 1.9 %
42 - 50 2.2 %
43 - 29 1.3 %
44 - 44 1.9 %
45 - 34 1.5 %
46 - 42 1.8 %
47 - 37 1.6 %
48 - 45 2.0 %
49 - 44 1.9 %
50 - 54 2.4 %
51 - 37 1.6 %
52 - 55 2.4 %
53 - 53 2.3 %
54 - 56 2.4 %
55 - 63 2.7 %
56 - 51 2.2 %
57 - 49 2.1 %
58 - 42 1.8 %
59 - 48 2.1 %
60 - 55 2.4 %
61 - 54 2.4 %
62 - 49 2.1 %
63 - 54 2.4 %
64 - 49 2.1 %

- 258 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

65 - 54 2.4 %
66 - 39 1.7 %
67 - 46 2.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 48.90
• Median: 51.00
• Mode: 55.00
• Minimum: 18.00
• Maximum: 81.00
• Standard Deviation: 16.46

Location: 1194-1195 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

PPAGECAT: Age - 7 Categories


Age - 7 Categories

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 18-24 237 10.3 %


2 25-34 289 12.6 %
3 35-44 360 15.7 %
4 45-54 457 19.9 %
5 55-64 514 22.4 %
6 65-74 329 14.3 %
7 75+ 108 4.7 %
99 Under 18 0 0.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00

Location: 1196-1197 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

PPAGECT4: Age - 4 Categories


Age - 4 Categories

- 259 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 18-29 397 17.3 %


2 30-44 489 21.3 %
3 45-59 710 31.0 %
4 60+ 698 30.4 %
99 Under 18 0 0.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1198-1199 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

PPEDUC: Education (Highest Degree Received)


Education (Highest Degree Received)

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 No formal education 6 0.3 %


2 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th grade 1 0.0 %
3 5th or 6th grade 4 0.2 %
4 7th or 8th grade 22 1.0 %
5 9th grade 19 0.8 %
6 10th grade 35 1.5 %
7 11th grade 53 2.3 %
8 12th grade NO DIPLOMA 79 3.4 %
9 HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE - high school DIPLOMA or the equivalent (GED) 700 30.5 %
10 Some college, no degree 490 21.4 %
11 Associate degree 192 8.4 %
12 Bachelors degree 414 18.0 %
13 Masters degree 215 9.4 %
14 Professional or Doctorate degree 64 2.8 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 14.00

Location: 1200-1201 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

- 260 -
PPEDUCAT: Education (Categorical)
Education (Categorical)

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Less than high school 219 9.5 %


2 High school 700 30.5 %
3 Some college 682 29.7 %
4 Bachelor's degree or higher 693 30.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1202-1203 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPETHM: Race / Ethnicity


Race / Ethnicity

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 White, Non-Hispanic 814 35.5 %


2 Black, Non-Hispanic 1278 55.7 %
3 Other, Non-Hispanic 46 2.0 %
4 Hispanic 123 5.4 %
5 2+ Races, Non-Hispanic 33 1.4 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 1204-1205 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPGENDER: Gender
Gender

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Male 1032 45.0 %


2 Female 1262 55.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 261 -
Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00

Location: 1206-1207 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPHHHEAD: Household Head


Household Head

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 422 18.4 %
1 Yes 1872 81.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 1208-1209 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPHHSIZE: Household Size


Household Size

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 489 21.3 %
2 - 839 36.6 %
3 - 401 17.5 %
4 - 309 13.5 %
5 - 133 5.8 %
6 - 76 3.3 %
7 - 26 1.1 %
8 - 12 0.5 %
9 - 5 0.2 %
10 - 1 0.0 %
12 - 1 0.0 %
13 - 1 0.0 %
14 - 1 0.0 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 262 -
• Mean: 2.66
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 14.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.52

Location: 1210-1211 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPHOUSE: Housing Type


Housing Type

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 A one-family house detached from any other house 1400 61.0 %


2 A one-family house attached to one or more houses 217 9.5 %
3 A building with 2 or more apartments 583 25.4 %
4 A mobile home 88 3.8 %
5 Boat, RV, van, etc. 6 0.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00

Location: 1212-1213 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPINCIMP: Household Income


Household Income

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Less than $5,000 127 5.5 %


2 $5,000 to $7,499 64 2.8 %
3 $7,500 to $9,999 61 2.7 %
4 $10,000 to $12,499 68 3.0 %
5 $12,500 to $14,999 62 2.7 %
6 $15,000 to $19,999 98 4.3 %
7 $20,000 to $24,999 109 4.8 %
8 $25,000 to $29,999 140 6.1 %
9 $30,000 to $34,999 108 4.7 %
10 $35,000 to $39,999 132 5.8 %
11 $40,000 to $49,999 162 7.1 %

- 263 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

12 $50,000 to $59,999 181 7.9 %


13 $60,000 to $74,999 235 10.2 %
14 $75,000 to $84,999 129 5.6 %
15 $85,000 to $99,999 145 6.3 %
16 $100,000 to $124,999 200 8.7 %
17 $125,000 to $149,999 125 5.4 %
18 $150,000 to $174,999 63 2.7 %
19 $175,000 or more 85 3.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 19.00

Location: 1214-1215 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPMARIT: Marital Status


Marital Status

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Married 1063 46.3 %


2 Widowed 118 5.1 %
3 Divorced 280 12.2 %
4 Separated 58 2.5 %
5 Never married 585 25.5 %
6 Living with partner 190 8.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00

Location: 1216-1217 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPMSACAT: MSA Status


MSA Status

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 Non-Metro 268 11.7 %

- 264 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Metro 2026 88.3 %


Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 1218-1219 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPREG4: Region 4 - Based on State of Residence


Region 4 - Based on State of Residence

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Northeast 398 17.3 %


2 Midwest 499 21.8 %
3 South 994 43.3 %
4 West 403 17.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00

Location: 1220-1221 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPREG9: Region 9 - Based on State of Residence


Region 9 - Based on State of Residence

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 New England 82 3.6 %


2 Mid-Atlantic 316 13.8 %
3 East-North Central 366 16.0 %
4 West-North Central 133 5.8 %
5 South Atlantic 563 24.5 %
6 East-South Central 173 7.5 %
7 West-South Central 258 11.2 %
8 Mountain 102 4.4 %
9 Pacific 301 13.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

- 265 -
Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00

Location: 1222-1222 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

PPRENT: Ownership Status of Living Quarters


Ownership Status of Living Quarters

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Owned or being bought by you or someone in your household 1451 63.3 %


2 Rented for cash 781 34.0 %
3 Occupied without payment of cash rent 62 2.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00

Location: 1223-1224 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPSTATEN: State
State

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

11 ME 8 0.3 %
12 NH 3 0.1 %
13 VT 4 0.2 %
14 MA 39 1.7 %
15 RI 5 0.2 %
16 CT 23 1.0 %
21 NY 140 6.1 %
22 NJ 69 3.0 %
23 PA 107 4.7 %
31 OH 103 4.5 %
32 IN 38 1.7 %
33 IL 108 4.7 %
34 MI 80 3.5 %
35 WI 37 1.6 %
41 MN 26 1.1 %
42 IA 15 0.7 %

- 266 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

43 MO 55 2.4 %
44 ND 5 0.2 %
45 SD 5 0.2 %
46 NE 15 0.7 %
47 KS 12 0.5 %
51 DE 9 0.4 %
52 MD 77 3.4 %
53 DC 10 0.4 %
54 VA 71 3.1 %
55 WV 10 0.4 %
56 NC 88 3.8 %
57 SC 43 1.9 %
58 GA 123 5.4 %
59 FL 132 5.8 %
61 KY 23 1.0 %
62 TN 54 2.4 %
63 AL 61 2.7 %
64 MS 35 1.5 %
71 AR 14 0.6 %
72 LA 33 1.4 %
73 OK 22 1.0 %
74 TX 189 8.2 %
81 MT 2 0.1 %
82 ID 5 0.2 %
83 WY 5 0.2 %
84 CO 25 1.1 %
85 NM 3 0.1 %
86 AZ 30 1.3 %
87 UT 8 0.3 %
88 NV 24 1.0 %
91 WA 46 2.0 %
92 OR 21 0.9 %
93 CA 227 9.9 %
94 AK 2 0.1 %
Total 2,294 100%

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, please
analyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

- 267 -
• Minimum: 11.00
• Maximum: 95.00

Location: 1225-1226 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPT01: Presence of Household Members - Children 0-1


Presence of Household Members - Children 0-1

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 2186 95.3 %
1 - 102 4.4 %
2 - 6 0.3 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 0.05
• Median: 0.00
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 2.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.23

Location: 1227-1228 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPT1317: Presence of Household Members - Children 13-17


Presence of Household Members - Children 13-17

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 1969 85.8 %
1 - 256 11.2 %
2 - 55 2.4 %
3 3 or more 14 0.6 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 0.18
• Median: 0.00
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 3.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.48

Location: 1229-1229 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 268 -
PPT18OV: Presence of Household Members - Adults 18+
Presence of Household Members - Adults 18+

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 - 626 27.3 %
2 - 1137 49.6 %
3 - 321 14.0 %
4 - 144 6.3 %
5 5 or more 66 2.9 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 2.08
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.96

Location: 1230-1230 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

PPT25: Presence of Household Members - Children 2-5


Presence of Household Members - Children 2-5

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 - 2057 89.7 %
1 - 197 8.6 %
2 - 35 1.5 %
3 3 or more 5 0.2 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 0.12
• Median: 0.00
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 3.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.39

Location: 1231-1231 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

PPT612: Presence of Household Members - Children 6-12


Presence of Household Members - Children 6-12

- 269 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

0 - 1947 84.9 %
1 - 232 10.1 %
2 - 99 4.3 %
3 3 or more 16 0.7 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Mean: 0.21
• Median: 0.00
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 3.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.54

Location: 1232-1232 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

PPWORK: Current Employment Status


Current Employment Status

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

1 Working - as a paid employee 1050 45.8 %


2 Working - self-employed 142 6.2 %
3 Not working - on temporary layoff from a job 29 1.3 %
4 Not working - looking for work 249 10.9 %
5 Not working - retired 482 21.0 %
6 Not working - disabled 194 8.5 %
7 Not working - other 148 6.5 %
Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 7.00

Location: 1233-1234 (width: 2; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric
(Range of) Missing Values: -2 , -1

PPNET: HH Internet Access


HH Internet Access

Value Label Unweighted %


Frequency

0 No 507 22.1 %

- 270 -
Value Label Unweighted %
Frequency

1 Yes 1787 77.9 %


Total 2,294 100%

Based upon 2,294 valid cases out of 2,294 total cases.

• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 1.00

Location: 1235-1235 (width: 1; decimal: 0)


Variable Type: numeric

- 271 -
Appendix C: Unweighted Data Frequencies
NOTE: Variables which indicate the order of questions/response categories are
not included in the following frequency listing.

W1_CaseID Case ID from wave 1

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value
Total 2294 100.0 100.0 100.0

W2_CaseID2 CaseID from wave 2

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value 1601 69.8 100.0 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W1_tm_start Interview start time (GMT)

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value
Total 2294 100.0 100.0 100.0

W1_tm_finish Interview finish time (GMT)

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value
Total 2294 100.0 100.0 100.0

W1_weight1 Post-Stratification weight: Total respondents

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value
Total 2294 100.0 100.0 100.0
W1_weight2 Post-Stratification weight: Total African American and total non-African
American

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value
Total 2294 100.0 100.0 100.0

W1_weight3 Post-Stratification weight: Total African American/non-African American by


Male/Female

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value
Total 2294 100.0 100.0 100.0

W2_tm_start Interview start time (GMT)

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value 1601 69.8 100.0 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_tm_finish Interview finish time (GMT)

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value 1601 69.8 100.0 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_duration Interview duration in minutes

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value 1601 69.8 100.0 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QFLAG DATA ONLY: Qualification Flag

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value 1601 69.8 100.0 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_weight1 Post-Stratification weight: Total respondents

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value 1601 69.8 100.0 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_weight2 Post-Stratification weight: Total African American and total non-African


American respondents separately

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value 1601 69.8 100.0 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_weight3 Post-Stratification weight: Total African American/non-African American by


Male/Female separately

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value 1601 69.8 100.0 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W1_A1 How interested are you in what’s going on in government and politics?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 16 .7 .7 .7
1 Extremely interested 389 17.0 17.0 17.7
2 Very interested 679 29.6 29.6 47.3
3 Moderately interested 658 28.7 28.7 75.9
4 Slightly interested 354 15.4 15.4 91.4
5 Not interested at all 198 8.6 8.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_A2 How much have you thought about the upcoming election for president?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 10 .4 .4 .4
1 Quite a lot 910 39.7 39.7 40.1
2 Somewhat a lot 599 26.1 26.1 66.2
3 Somewhat a little 423 18.4 18.4 84.7
4 Only a little 236 10.3 10.3 94.9
5 Not at all 116 5.1 5.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_A4 In 2008, John McCain ran on the Republican ticket against Barack Obama who ran on
the Democratic ticket. Do you remember whether or not you voted in that election?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 9 .4 .4 .4
1 Yes, voted 1783 77.7 77.7 78.1
2 No, didn’t vote 502 21.9 21.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_A5A Who did you vote for?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 30 1.3 1.7 1.7
1 John McCain 389 17.0 21.8 23.5
2 Barack Obama 1338 58.3 75.0 98.5
3 Other, please specify: 26 1.1 1.5 100.0
Total 1783 77.7 100.0
Missing System 511 22.3
Total 2294 100.0
W1_A5A_Other_TEXT [Other] Who did you vote for?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 2277 99.3 99.3 99.3
Barr 1 .0 .0 99.3
Chuck Baldwin 1 .0 .0 99.3
green party 1 .0 .0 99.4
hillary clinton 1 .0 .0 99.4
I voted against Obama I 1 .0 .0 99.5
wasn;t for anyone the
choices were SORRY
independent third party 1 .0 .0 99.5
Mitt Romney 1 .0 .0 99.6
nader 1 .0 .0 99.6
neither 1 .0 .0 99.7
no comment 1 .0 .0 99.7
none of your damn 1 .0 .0 99.7
business
prefer not to say 1 .0 .0 99.8
Private 1 .0 .0 99.8
Ron Paul 2 .1 .1 99.9
The Constitution Party. 1 .0 .0 100.0
(Bob Barr)
voted for all other offices, 1 .0 .0 100.0
didn't think either of these
candidates were qualified
for President, wrote in
"none of the above"

Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_A5B Who would you have voted for?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 3 .1 .6 .6
1 John McCain 70 3.1 13.9 14.5
2 Barack Obama 283 12.3 56.4 70.9
3 Other, please specify: 13 .6 2.6 73.5
4 No one/Refused to vote 133 5.8 26.5 100.0
for a candidate
Total 502 21.9 100.0
Missing System 1792 78.1
Total 2294 100.0
W1_A5B_Other_TEXT [Other] Who would you have voted for?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 2281 99.4 99.4 99.4
Didn't know anything 1 .0 .0 99.5
God 1 .0 .0 99.5
I can't vote 1 .0 .0 99.6
i don't vote 1 .0 .0 99.6
i had to be 18 1 .0 .0 99.7
independit party 1 .0 .0 99.7
michael savage 1 .0 .0 99.7
MICHEL OBAMA 1 .0 .0 99.8
not sure 1 .0 .0 99.8
ron paul 2 .1 .1 99.9
Ron Paul 1 .0 .0 100.0
spongebob 1 .0 .0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_A10 How often, if ever, do you discuss politics with your family or friends?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 15 .7 .7 .7
1 Never 349 15.2 15.2 15.9
2 Once or twice a month 796 34.7 34.7 50.6
3 Once or twice a week 557 24.3 24.3 74.8
4 Three or four times a 344 15.0 15.0 89.8
week
5 Everyday 233 10.2 10.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_A11 How many days in the past week did you watch national news programs on
television or on the Internet?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 11 .5 .5 .5
1 None 516 22.5 22.5 23.0
2 One day 264 11.5 11.5 34.5
3 Two days 284 12.4 12.4 46.9
4 Three days 245 10.7 10.7 57.5
5 Four days 146 6.4 6.4 63.9
6 Five days 242 10.5 10.5 74.5
7 Six days 123 5.4 5.4 79.8
8 Seven days 463 20.2 20.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_A12 Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as
President?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 58 2.5 2.5 2.5
1 Approve 1570 68.4 68.4 71.0
2 Disapprove 666 29.0 29.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_A12A Do you [approve/disapprove] strongly or not strongly?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 23 1.0 1.0 1.0
1 Strongly 1559 68.0 69.7 70.8
2 Not Strongly 654 28.5 29.2 100.0
Total 2236 97.5 100.0
Missing System 58 2.5
Total 2294 100.0

W1_B1 How much do government officials care what people like you think?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 24 1.0 1.0 1.0
1 A great deal 83 3.6 3.6 4.7
2 A lot 203 8.8 8.8 13.5
3 A moderate amount 672 29.3 29.3 42.8
4 A little 780 34.0 34.0 76.8
5 Not at all 532 23.2 23.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_B2 How much can people like you affect what the government does?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 35 1.5 1.5 1.5
1 A great deal 245 10.7 10.7 12.2
2 A lot 386 16.8 16.8 29.0
3 A moderate amount 631 27.5 27.5 56.5
4 A little 686 29.9 29.9 86.4
5 Not at all 311 13.6 13.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_B3 How often does the federal government do what most Americans want it to do?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 35 1.5 1.5 1.5
1 Always 19 .8 .8 2.4
2 Most of the time 156 6.8 6.8 9.2
3 About half the time 712 31.0 31.0 40.2
4 Once in a while 1133 49.4 49.4 89.6
5 Never 239 10.4 10.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_B4 Generally speaking, how angry do you feel about the way things are going in the
country these days?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 27 1.2 1.2 1.2
1 Extremely angry 243 10.6 10.6 11.8
2 Very angry 437 19.0 19.0 30.8
3 Somewhat angry 731 31.9 31.9 62.7
4 A little angry 555 24.2 24.2 86.9
5 Not angry at all 301 13.1 13.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_C1 Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Democrat, a Republican, an


Independent, or something else?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 49 2.1 2.1 2.1
1 Republican 331 14.4 14.4 16.6
2 Democrat 1251 54.5 54.5 71.1
3 Independent 555 24.2 24.2 95.3
4 Something else, please 108 4.7 4.7 100.0
specify
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_C1_Other_TEXT [Other] Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a


Democrat, a Republican, an Independent, or something else?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Response 107 4.7 100.0 100.0
Missing System 2187 95.3
Total 2294 100.0
W1_C1B Would you call yourself a strong [Democrat/Republican] or a not very strong
[Democrat/Republican]?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 10 .4 .6 .6
1 Strong 996 43.4 63.0 63.6
2 Not very strong 576 25.1 36.4 100.0
Total 1582 69.0 100.0
Missing System 712 31.0
Total 2294 100.0

W1_C1C Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic
Party?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 2 .1 .3 .3
1 Closer to the Republican 158 6.9 23.8 24.1
Party
2 Closer to the Democratic 209 9.1 31.5 55.7
Party
3 Neither 294 12.8 44.3 100.0
Total 663 28.9 100.0
Missing System 1631 71.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_C2 We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Where would you
place YOURSELF on this 7 point scale?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 60 2.6 2.6 2.6
1 Extremely liberal 75 3.3 3.3 5.9
2 Liberal 312 13.6 13.6 19.5
3 Slightly liberal 286 12.5 12.5 32.0
4 Moderate; middle of the 874 38.1 38.1 70.1
road
5 Slightly conservative 297 12.9 12.9 83.0
6 Conservative 311 13.6 13.6 96.6
7 Extremely conservative 79 3.4 3.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_D1 [Barack Obama] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 48 2.1 2.1 2.1
0 211 9.2 9.2 11.3
3 1 .0 .0 11.3
4 1 .0 .0 11.4
5 5 .2 .2 11.6
7 3 .1 .1 11.7
10 11 .5 .5 12.2
15 113 4.9 4.9 17.1
20 5 .2 .2 17.3
22 1 .0 .0 17.4
25 5 .2 .2 17.6
27 1 .0 .0 17.7
30 92 4.0 4.0 21.7
32 1 .0 .0 21.7
35 2 .1 .1 21.8
36 1 .0 .0 21.8
38 1 .0 .0 21.9
39 1 .0 .0 21.9
40 88 3.8 3.8 25.8
45 5 .2 .2 26.0
47 1 .0 .0 26.0
48 1 .0 .0 26.1
50 70 3.1 3.1 29.1
55 6 .3 .3 29.4
56 1 .0 .0 29.4
60 135 5.9 5.9 35.3
65 9 .4 .4 35.7
68 1 .0 .0 35.7
69 2 .1 .1 35.8
70 236 10.3 10.3 46.1
73 1 .0 .0 46.2
75 31 1.4 1.4 47.5
76 1 .0 .0 47.6
78 1 .0 .0 47.6
79 2 .1 .1 47.7
80 31 1.4 1.4 49.0
84 1 .0 .0 49.1
85 383 16.7 16.7 65.8
86 2 .1 .1 65.9
87 2 .1 .1 66.0
88 7 .3 .3 66.3
89 8 .3 .3 66.6
90 78 3.4 3.4 70.0
92 1 .0 .0 70.1
95 38 1.7 1.7 71.7
96 2 .1 .1 71.8
98 3 .1 .1 71.9
99 3 .1 .1 72.1
100 585 25.5 25.5 97.6
998 Don't recognize 56 2.4 2.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D2 [Mitt Romney] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 53 2.3 2.3 2.3
0 630 27.5 27.5 29.8
1 4 .2 .2 29.9
2 8 .3 .3 30.3
3 3 .1 .1 30.4
4 3 .1 .1 30.6
5 13 .6 .6 31.1
7 2 .1 .1 31.2
8 2 .1 .1 31.3
10 16 .7 .7 32.0
11 1 .0 .0 32.0
12 2 .1 .1 32.1
15 282 12.3 12.3 44.4
18 1 .0 .0 44.5
20 21 .9 .9 45.4
22 2 .1 .1 45.5
23 1 .0 .0 45.5
25 12 .5 .5 46.0
29 1 .0 .0 46.1
30 182 7.9 7.9 54.0
35 12 .5 .5 54.5
37 1 .0 .0 54.6
38 1 .0 .0 54.6
39 2 .1 .1 54.7
40 164 7.1 7.1 61.9
45 16 .7 .7 62.6
46 1 .0 .0 62.6
48 1 .0 .0 62.6
50 232 10.1 10.1 72.8
54 1 .0 .0 72.8
55 11 .5 .5 73.3
60 136 5.9 5.9 79.2
62 1 .0 .0 79.3
65 11 .5 .5 79.7
68 1 .0 .0 79.8
69 1 .0 .0 79.8
70 118 5.1 5.1 85.0
74 1 .0 .0 85.0
75 15 .7 .7 85.7
80 10 .4 .4 86.1
82 1 .0 .0 86.1
83 1 .0 .0 86.2
85 109 4.8 4.8 90.9
86 1 .0 .0 91.0
90 18 .8 .8 91.8
93 1 .0 .0 91.8
95 4 .2 .2 92.0
97 1 .0 .0 92.0
100 38 1.7 1.7 93.7
998 Don't recognize 145 6.3 6.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D3 [Michelle Obama] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 49 2.1 2.1 2.1
0 148 6.5 6.5 8.6
1 2 .1 .1 8.7
2 1 .0 .0 8.7
3 1 .0 .0 8.8
4 1 .0 .0 8.8
5 3 .1 .1 8.9
7 2 .1 .1 9.0
10 9 .4 .4 9.4
12 1 .0 .0 9.5
15 69 3.0 3.0 12.5
16 2 .1 .1 12.6
20 1 .0 .0 12.6
21 1 .0 .0 12.6
25 4 .2 .2 12.8
26 1 .0 .0 12.9
30 60 2.6 2.6 15.5
35 3 .1 .1 15.6
37 1 .0 .0 15.6
40 63 2.7 2.7 18.4
45 4 .2 .2 18.6
46 1 .0 .0 18.6
48 1 .0 .0 18.7
50 156 6.8 6.8 25.5
55 7 .3 .3 25.8
58 1 .0 .0 25.8
60 113 4.9 4.9 30.7
65 7 .3 .3 31.0
66 1 .0 .0 31.1
69 1 .0 .0 31.1
70 151 6.6 6.6 37.7
75 17 .7 .7 38.4
76 1 .0 .0 38.5
78 2 .1 .1 38.6
79 3 .1 .1 38.7
80 45 2.0 2.0 40.7
85 341 14.9 14.9 55.5
86 8 .3 .3 55.9
87 1 .0 .0 55.9
88 1 .0 .0 56.0
89 1 .0 .0 56.0
90 69 3.0 3.0 59.0
91 1 .0 .0 59.1
92 2 .1 .1 59.2
93 1 .0 .0 59.2
94 1 .0 .0 59.2
95 53 2.3 2.3 61.6
96 5 .2 .2 61.8
98 4 .2 .2 61.9
99 5 .2 .2 62.2
100 817 35.6 35.6 97.8
998 Don't recognize 51 2.2 2.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D4 [Ann Romney] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 51 2.2 2.2 2.2
0 335 14.6 14.6 16.8
1 2 .1 .1 16.9
2 5 .2 .2 17.1
5 6 .3 .3 17.4
10 23 1.0 1.0 18.4
12 1 .0 .0 18.4
14 1 .0 .0 18.5
15 165 7.2 7.2 25.7
19 1 .0 .0 25.7
20 19 .8 .8 26.5
21 1 .0 .0 26.6
23 1 .0 .0 26.6
25 10 .4 .4 27.1
30 105 4.6 4.6 31.6
35 5 .2 .2 31.9
37 1 .0 .0 31.9
38 1 .0 .0 32.0
40 112 4.9 4.9 36.8
42 1 .0 .0 36.9
45 12 .5 .5 37.4
49 1 .0 .0 37.4
50 598 26.1 26.1 63.5
54 1 .0 .0 63.6
55 4 .2 .2 63.7
58 1 .0 .0 63.8
60 116 5.1 5.1 68.8
65 6 .3 .3 69.1
70 113 4.9 4.9 74.0
74 1 .0 .0 74.1
75 9 .4 .4 74.5
76 1 .0 .0 74.5
77 1 .0 .0 74.5
79 3 .1 .1 74.7
80 16 .7 .7 75.4
85 85 3.7 3.7 79.1
87 1 .0 .0 79.1
89 1 .0 .0 79.2
90 9 .4 .4 79.6
99 1 .0 .0 79.6
100 43 1.9 1.9 81.5
998 Don't recognize 425 18.5 18.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D5 [Clarence Thomas] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 53 2.3 2.3 2.3
0 332 14.5 14.5 16.8
1 2 .1 .1 16.9
2 3 .1 .1 17.0
3 1 .0 .0 17.0
4 4 .2 .2 17.2
5 9 .4 .4 17.6
6 2 .1 .1 17.7
7 1 .0 .0 17.7
8 2 .1 .1 17.8
9 3 .1 .1 18.0
10 21 .9 .9 18.9
12 3 .1 .1 19.0
13 2 .1 .1 19.1
15 183 8.0 8.0 27.1
16 1 .0 .0 27.1
19 1 .0 .0 27.2
20 14 .6 .6 27.8
25 8 .3 .3 28.1
29 1 .0 .0 28.2
30 154 6.7 6.7 34.9
34 2 .1 .1 35.0
35 6 .3 .3 35.2
40 146 6.4 6.4 41.6
45 9 .4 .4 42.0
50 416 18.1 18.1 60.1
51 1 .0 .0 60.2
55 7 .3 .3 60.5
60 119 5.2 5.2 65.6
61 1 .0 .0 65.7
65 12 .5 .5 66.2
69 1 .0 .0 66.3
70 144 6.3 6.3 72.5
75 13 .6 .6 73.1
78 1 .0 .0 73.1
80 11 .5 .5 73.6
85 63 2.7 2.7 76.4
86 1 .0 .0 76.4
90 5 .2 .2 76.6
95 1 .0 .0 76.7
99 1 .0 .0 76.7
100 41 1.8 1.8 78.5
998 Don't recognize 493 21.5 21.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D6 [Paul Ryan] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 49 2.1 2.1 2.1
0 433 18.9 18.9 21.0
1 4 .2 .2 21.2
2 6 .3 .3 21.4
3 3 .1 .1 21.6
4 2 .1 .1 21.7
5 10 .4 .4 22.1
6 2 .1 .1 22.2
8 1 .0 .0 22.2
10 23 1.0 1.0 23.2
12 1 .0 .0 23.3
14 1 .0 .0 23.3
15 202 8.8 8.8 32.1
17 1 .0 .0 32.2
19 1 .0 .0 32.2
20 13 .6 .6 32.8
21 1 .0 .0 32.8
23 2 .1 .1 32.9
25 14 .6 .6 33.5
30 131 5.7 5.7 39.2
32 1 .0 .0 39.3
33 1 .0 .0 39.3
34 1 .0 .0 39.4
35 5 .2 .2 39.6
37 2 .1 .1 39.7
39 1 .0 .0 39.7
40 115 5.0 5.0 44.7
45 5 .2 .2 44.9
50 318 13.9 13.9 58.8
55 5 .2 .2 59.0
59 1 .0 .0 59.1
60 89 3.9 3.9 62.9
62 1 .0 .0 63.0
64 1 .0 .0 63.0
65 6 .3 .3 63.3
69 1 .0 .0 63.3
70 87 3.8 3.8 67.1
72 1 .0 .0 67.2
75 7 .3 .3 67.5
77 1 .0 .0 67.5
79 1 .0 .0 67.6
80 8 .3 .3 67.9
81 1 .0 .0 68.0
85 109 4.8 4.8 72.7
90 16 .7 .7 73.4
95 8 .3 .3 73.8
99 1 .0 .0 73.8
100 54 2.4 2.4 76.2
998 Don't recognize 547 23.8 23.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D7 [Condoleezza Rice] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 52 2.3 2.3 2.3
0 105 4.6 4.6 6.8
1 1 .0 .0 6.9
2 3 .1 .1 7.0
3 2 .1 .1 7.1
4 3 .1 .1 7.2
5 2 .1 .1 7.3
7 3 .1 .1 7.5
10 11 .5 .5 7.9
15 117 5.1 5.1 13.0
16 3 .1 .1 13.2
17 1 .0 .0 13.2
20 9 .4 .4 13.6
23 1 .0 .0 13.6
25 8 .3 .3 14.0
30 113 4.9 4.9 18.9
33 1 .0 .0 19.0
35 6 .3 .3 19.2
39 2 .1 .1 19.3
40 139 6.1 6.1 25.4
45 8 .3 .3 25.7
46 1 .0 .0 25.8
47 1 .0 .0 25.8
48 1 .0 .0 25.9
49 2 .1 .1 25.9
50 383 16.7 16.7 42.6
51 3 .1 .1 42.8
52 2 .1 .1 42.9
54 1 .0 .0 42.9
55 8 .3 .3 43.2
57 1 .0 .0 43.3
60 271 11.8 11.8 55.1
65 19 .8 .8 55.9
66 1 .0 .0 56.0
70 275 12.0 12.0 68.0
71 1 .0 .0 68.0
74 1 .0 .0 68.0
75 32 1.4 1.4 69.4
78 2 .1 .1 69.5
79 1 .0 .0 69.6
80 50 2.2 2.2 71.8
82 1 .0 .0 71.8
85 255 11.1 11.1 82.9
87 2 .1 .1 83.0
89 1 .0 .0 83.0
90 22 1.0 1.0 84.0
92 1 .0 .0 84.0
95 11 .5 .5 84.5
97 1 .0 .0 84.6
98 1 .0 .0 84.6
100 117 5.1 5.1 89.7
998 Don't recognize 236 10.3 10.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D8 [Sarah Palin] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 50 2.2 2.2 2.2
0 805 35.1 35.1 37.3
1 7 .3 .3 37.6
2 6 .3 .3 37.8
3 3 .1 .1 38.0
4 3 .1 .1 38.1
5 12 .5 .5 38.6
6 3 .1 .1 38.8
7 1 .0 .0 38.8
8 2 .1 .1 38.9
10 31 1.4 1.4 40.2
11 1 .0 .0 40.3
12 3 .1 .1 40.4
14 1 .0 .0 40.5
15 256 11.2 11.2 51.6
18 1 .0 .0 51.7
20 15 .7 .7 52.3
22 2 .1 .1 52.4
25 12 .5 .5 52.9
27 1 .0 .0 53.0
30 145 6.3 6.3 59.3
32 1 .0 .0 59.3
33 1 .0 .0 59.4
34 2 .1 .1 59.5
35 8 .3 .3 59.8
36 1 .0 .0 59.9
39 1 .0 .0 59.9
40 156 6.8 6.8 66.7
45 7 .3 .3 67.0
47 1 .0 .0 67.0
50 254 11.1 11.1 78.1
51 1 .0 .0 78.2
55 11 .5 .5 78.6
60 112 4.9 4.9 83.5
61 1 .0 .0 83.6
62 1 .0 .0 83.6
65 13 .6 .6 84.2
70 94 4.1 4.1 88.3
74 1 .0 .0 88.3
75 12 .5 .5 88.8
80 12 .5 .5 89.4
85 70 3.1 3.1 92.4
90 7 .3 .3 92.7
95 2 .1 .1 92.8
99 1 .0 .0 92.9
100 48 2.1 2.1 94.9
998 Don't recognize 116 5.1 5.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D9 [Hillary Clinton] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 51 2.2 2.2 2.2
0 108 4.7 4.7 6.9
2 3 .1 .1 7.1
3 2 .1 .1 7.1
4 2 .1 .1 7.2
5 7 .3 .3 7.5
6 1 .0 .0 7.6
7 1 .0 .0 7.6
10 8 .3 .3 8.0
12 1 .0 .0 8.0
15 94 4.1 4.1 12.1
20 7 .3 .3 12.4
22 1 .0 .0 12.5
25 7 .3 .3 12.8
29 1 .0 .0 12.8
30 78 3.4 3.4 16.2
35 5 .2 .2 16.4
36 1 .0 .0 16.5
37 1 .0 .0 16.5
38 1 .0 .0 16.6
40 94 4.1 4.1 20.7
45 4 .2 .2 20.8
50 188 8.2 8.2 29.0
55 11 .5 .5 29.5
57 1 .0 .0 29.6
58 1 .0 .0 29.6
59 2 .1 .1 29.7
60 194 8.5 8.5 38.1
62 3 .1 .1 38.3
65 21 .9 .9 39.2
68 1 .0 .0 39.2
69 3 .1 .1 39.4
70 314 13.7 13.7 53.1
72 2 .1 .1 53.1
74 1 .0 .0 53.2
75 48 2.1 2.1 55.3
76 1 .0 .0 55.3
79 2 .1 .1 55.4
80 51 2.2 2.2 57.6
85 456 19.9 19.9 77.5
87 3 .1 .1 77.6
88 1 .0 .0 77.7
89 2 .1 .1 77.8
90 63 2.7 2.7 80.5
91 1 .0 .0 80.6
92 1 .0 .0 80.6
93 1 .0 .0 80.6
94 3 .1 .1 80.8
95 27 1.2 1.2 82.0
96 1 .0 .0 82.0
97 1 .0 .0 82.0
98 3 .1 .1 82.2
99 4 .2 .2 82.3
100 343 15.0 15.0 97.3
998 Don't recognize 62 2.7 2.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D10 [Jesse Jackson] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 59 2.6 2.6 2.6
0 309 13.5 13.5 16.0
1 5 .2 .2 16.3
2 3 .1 .1 16.4
3 2 .1 .1 16.5
5 11 .5 .5 17.0
6 1 .0 .0 17.0
7 1 .0 .0 17.0
9 2 .1 .1 17.1
10 17 .7 .7 17.9
12 1 .0 .0 17.9
13 1 .0 .0 18.0
15 178 7.8 7.8 25.7
18 1 .0 .0 25.8
20 11 .5 .5 26.2
22 2 .1 .1 26.3
25 7 .3 .3 26.6
30 148 6.5 6.5 33.1
35 2 .1 .1 33.2
40 135 5.9 5.9 39.1
44 2 .1 .1 39.1
45 12 .5 .5 39.7
46 1 .0 .0 39.7
48 3 .1 .1 39.8
49 2 .1 .1 39.9
50 383 16.7 16.7 56.6
51 1 .0 .0 56.7
53 1 .0 .0 56.7
55 14 .6 .6 57.3
56 1 .0 .0 57.4
59 1 .0 .0 57.4
60 214 9.3 9.3 66.7
63 1 .0 .0 66.8
64 1 .0 .0 66.8
65 14 .6 .6 67.4
66 1 .0 .0 67.5
67 3 .1 .1 67.6
70 253 11.0 11.0 78.6
72 1 .0 .0 78.7
73 1 .0 .0 78.7
75 27 1.2 1.2 79.9
78 1 .0 .0 79.9
79 2 .1 .1 80.0
80 30 1.3 1.3 81.3
83 1 .0 .0 81.4
85 170 7.4 7.4 88.8
86 4 .2 .2 89.0
87 1 .0 .0 89.0
88 2 .1 .1 89.1
90 8 .3 .3 89.5
93 1 .0 .0 89.5
95 3 .1 .1 89.6
96 1 .0 .0 89.7
98 1 .0 .0 89.7
99 1 .0 .0 89.8
100 105 4.6 4.6 94.3
998 Don't recognize 130 5.7 5.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D11 [The Republican Party] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 67 2.9 2.9 2.9
0 562 24.5 24.5 27.4
1 5 .2 .2 27.6
2 3 .1 .1 27.8
3 4 .2 .2 27.9
4 1 .0 .0 28.0
5 18 .8 .8 28.8
7 1 .0 .0 28.8
8 1 .0 .0 28.9
9 1 .0 .0 28.9
10 33 1.4 1.4 30.3
14 1 .0 .0 30.4
15 255 11.1 11.1 41.5
16 1 .0 .0 41.5
20 22 1.0 1.0 42.5
21 1 .0 .0 42.5
25 14 .6 .6 43.2
27 1 .0 .0 43.2
28 1 .0 .0 43.2
29 1 .0 .0 43.3
30 172 7.5 7.5 50.8
33 1 .0 .0 50.8
34 2 .1 .1 50.9
35 8 .3 .3 51.3
36 1 .0 .0 51.3
38 4 .2 .2 51.5
40 193 8.4 8.4 59.9
42 2 .1 .1 60.0
44 2 .1 .1 60.1
45 15 .7 .7 60.7
47 1 .0 .0 60.8
48 1 .0 .0 60.8
50 284 12.4 12.4 73.2
51 2 .1 .1 73.3
54 1 .0 .0 73.3
55 10 .4 .4 73.8
60 176 7.7 7.7 81.4
62 1 .0 .0 81.5
65 10 .4 .4 81.9
68 1 .0 .0 82.0
70 160 7.0 7.0 88.9
75 21 .9 .9 89.8
78 1 .0 .0 89.9
80 14 .6 .6 90.5
82 1 .0 .0 90.5
85 72 3.1 3.1 93.7
90 9 .4 .4 94.1
95 2 .1 .1 94.2
99 1 .0 .0 94.2
100 22 1.0 1.0 95.2
998 Don't recognize 111 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D12 [The Democratic Party] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 61 2.7 2.7 2.7
0 135 5.9 5.9 8.5
1 3 .1 .1 8.7
2 1 .0 .0 8.7
4 1 .0 .0 8.8
5 8 .3 .3 9.1
7 3 .1 .1 9.2
10 12 .5 .5 9.8
12 1 .0 .0 9.8
15 114 5.0 5.0 14.8
20 14 .6 .6 15.4
21 1 .0 .0 15.4
25 5 .2 .2 15.6
29 2 .1 .1 15.7
30 103 4.5 4.5 20.2
34 1 .0 .0 20.3
35 3 .1 .1 20.4
36 1 .0 .0 20.4
40 130 5.7 5.7 26.1
44 1 .0 .0 26.2
45 12 .5 .5 26.7
46 1 .0 .0 26.7
50 205 8.9 8.9 35.7
51 4 .2 .2 35.8
55 14 .6 .6 36.4
56 1 .0 .0 36.5
57 1 .0 .0 36.5
60 243 10.6 10.6 47.1
62 1 .0 .0 47.2
63 1 .0 .0 47.2
65 18 .8 .8 48.0
67 1 .0 .0 48.0
68 1 .0 .0 48.1
69 1 .0 .0 48.1
70 283 12.3 12.3 60.5
73 1 .0 .0 60.5
75 50 2.2 2.2 62.7
76 1 .0 .0 62.7
77 2 .1 .1 62.8
79 2 .1 .1 62.9
80 62 2.7 2.7 65.6
84 2 .1 .1 65.7
85 330 14.4 14.4 80.1
86 1 .0 .0 80.1
87 2 .1 .1 80.2
88 1 .0 .0 80.3
90 32 1.4 1.4 81.6
91 2 .1 .1 81.7
92 1 .0 .0 81.8
94 1 .0 .0 81.8
95 20 .9 .9 82.7
97 1 .0 .0 82.7
99 2 .1 .1 82.8
100 306 13.3 13.3 96.2
998 Don't recognize 88 3.8 3.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D13 [Socialists] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 72 3.1 3.1 3.1
0 406 17.7 17.7 20.8
1 4 .2 .2 21.0
2 2 .1 .1 21.1
3 1 .0 .0 21.1
5 5 .2 .2 21.4
6 1 .0 .0 21.4
7 1 .0 .0 21.4
9 1 .0 .0 21.5
10 23 1.0 1.0 22.5
13 1 .0 .0 22.5
15 185 8.1 8.1 30.6
20 22 1.0 1.0 31.6
21 1 .0 .0 31.6
22 1 .0 .0 31.6
25 10 .4 .4 32.1
30 111 4.8 4.8 36.9
33 1 .0 .0 37.0
35 8 .3 .3 37.3
38 1 .0 .0 37.4
40 129 5.6 5.6 43.0
45 9 .4 .4 43.4
47 1 .0 .0 43.4
50 554 24.1 24.1 67.6
51 1 .0 .0 67.6
55 12 .5 .5 68.1
60 101 4.4 4.4 72.5
62 1 .0 .0 72.6
64 1 .0 .0 72.6
65 9 .4 .4 73.0
69 1 .0 .0 73.1
70 80 3.5 3.5 76.5
71 1 .0 .0 76.6
75 6 .3 .3 76.9
77 1 .0 .0 76.9
78 2 .1 .1 77.0
79 1 .0 .0 77.0
80 11 .5 .5 77.5
82 1 .0 .0 77.6
84 1 .0 .0 77.6
85 37 1.6 1.6 79.2
87 1 .0 .0 79.3
89 1 .0 .0 79.3
90 5 .2 .2 79.5
92 1 .0 .0 79.6
95 2 .1 .1 79.6
100 16 .7 .7 80.3
998 Don't recognize 451 19.7 19.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_D14 [Libertarians] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 73 3.2 3.2 3.2
0 191 8.3 8.3 11.5
1 1 .0 .0 11.6
2 2 .1 .1 11.6
3 1 .0 .0 11.7
4 2 .1 .1 11.8
5 5 .2 .2 12.0
6 2 .1 .1 12.1
7 1 .0 .0 12.1
10 17 .7 .7 12.9
13 1 .0 .0 12.9
15 126 5.5 5.5 18.4
16 1 .0 .0 18.4
19 1 .0 .0 18.5
20 18 .8 .8 19.3
21 1 .0 .0 19.3
25 18 .8 .8 20.1
30 116 5.1 5.1 25.2
32 1 .0 .0 25.2
33 3 .1 .1 25.3
35 9 .4 .4 25.7
36 1 .0 .0 25.8
38 1 .0 .0 25.8
40 123 5.4 5.4 31.2
43 1 .0 .0 31.2
44 1 .0 .0 31.3
45 15 .7 .7 31.9
48 1 .0 .0 32.0
50 621 27.1 27.1 59.0
51 4 .2 .2 59.2
52 1 .0 .0 59.2
55 16 .7 .7 59.9
56 1 .0 .0 60.0
60 162 7.1 7.1 67.0
65 6 .3 .3 67.3
66 3 .1 .1 67.4
69 1 .0 .0 67.5
70 121 5.3 5.3 72.8
74 1 .0 .0 72.8
75 17 .7 .7 73.5
76 1 .0 .0 73.6
80 14 .6 .6 74.2
85 54 2.4 2.4 76.5
86 1 .0 .0 76.6
90 7 .3 .3 76.9
95 1 .0 .0 76.9
98 1 .0 .0 77.0
100 26 1.1 1.1 78.1
998 Don't recognize 502 21.9 21.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D15 [Tea Party Activists] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 66 2.9 2.9 2.9
0 638 27.8 27.8 30.7
1 3 .1 .1 30.8
2 3 .1 .1 31.0
3 2 .1 .1 31.0
4 3 .1 .1 31.2
5 13 .6 .6 31.7
7 2 .1 .1 31.8
9 1 .0 .0 31.9
10 27 1.2 1.2 33.0
13 1 .0 .0 33.1
14 1 .0 .0 33.1
15 197 8.6 8.6 41.7
16 1 .0 .0 41.8
20 20 .9 .9 42.6
22 1 .0 .0 42.7
23 2 .1 .1 42.8
25 9 .4 .4 43.2
30 129 5.6 5.6 48.8
31 1 .0 .0 48.8
32 1 .0 .0 48.9
34 1 .0 .0 48.9
35 9 .4 .4 49.3
37 1 .0 .0 49.3
40 117 5.1 5.1 54.4
41 1 .0 .0 54.5
42 2 .1 .1 54.6
44 2 .1 .1 54.7
45 12 .5 .5 55.2
47 3 .1 .1 55.3
48 1 .0 .0 55.4
49 1 .0 .0 55.4
50 352 15.3 15.3 70.7
52 1 .0 .0 70.8
55 10 .4 .4 71.2
60 115 5.0 5.0 76.2
65 8 .3 .3 76.6
68 1 .0 .0 76.6
70 89 3.9 3.9 80.5
75 10 .4 .4 81.0
76 1 .0 .0 81.0
77 1 .0 .0 81.0
80 11 .5 .5 81.5
85 67 2.9 2.9 84.4
86 1 .0 .0 84.5
87 2 .1 .1 84.6
90 4 .2 .2 84.7
95 6 .3 .3 85.0
99 2 .1 .1 85.1
100 47 2.0 2.0 87.1
998 Don't recognize 295 12.9 12.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D16 [Occupy Wall Street Activists] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 76 3.3 3.3 3.3
0 338 14.7 14.7 18.0
1 3 .1 .1 18.2
2 3 .1 .1 18.3
3 1 .0 .0 18.4
4 5 .2 .2 18.6
5 12 .5 .5 19.1
6 1 .0 .0 19.1
7 1 .0 .0 19.2
9 1 .0 .0 19.2
10 13 .6 .6 19.8
15 142 6.2 6.2 26.0
16 1 .0 .0 26.0
20 17 .7 .7 26.8
25 9 .4 .4 27.2
30 109 4.8 4.8 31.9
33 1 .0 .0 32.0
35 6 .3 .3 32.2
40 132 5.8 5.8 38.0
44 1 .0 .0 38.0
45 10 .4 .4 38.4
47 1 .0 .0 38.5
49 1 .0 .0 38.5
50 390 17.0 17.0 55.5
51 2 .1 .1 55.6
55 15 .7 .7 56.3
56 1 .0 .0 56.3
60 181 7.9 7.9 64.2
64 1 .0 .0 64.3
65 15 .7 .7 64.9
67 1 .0 .0 65.0
68 2 .1 .1 65.0
69 1 .0 .0 65.1
70 142 6.2 6.2 71.3
71 1 .0 .0 71.3
73 1 .0 .0 71.4
75 27 1.2 1.2 72.5
76 2 .1 .1 72.6
77 1 .0 .0 72.7
78 2 .1 .1 72.8
79 1 .0 .0 72.8
80 28 1.2 1.2 74.0
81 1 .0 .0 74.1
82 1 .0 .0 74.1
85 113 4.9 4.9 79.0
86 1 .0 .0 79.1
87 1 .0 .0 79.1
88 1 .0 .0 79.2
90 18 .8 .8 79.9
95 5 .2 .2 80.2
99 1 .0 .0 80.2
100 60 2.6 2.6 82.8
998 Don't recognize 394 17.2 17.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D17 [Black Nationalists] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 78 3.4 3.4 3.4
0 203 8.8 8.8 12.2
1 1 .0 .0 12.3
2 1 .0 .0 12.3
3 1 .0 .0 12.4
5 9 .4 .4 12.8
7 2 .1 .1 12.9
9 2 .1 .1 12.9
10 12 .5 .5 13.5
15 88 3.8 3.8 17.3
20 11 .5 .5 17.8
21 1 .0 .0 17.8
25 5 .2 .2 18.0
30 76 3.3 3.3 21.4
35 7 .3 .3 21.7
36 1 .0 .0 21.7
40 66 2.9 2.9 24.6
43 1 .0 .0 24.6
45 7 .3 .3 24.9
49 1 .0 .0 25.0
50 436 19.0 19.0 44.0
51 2 .1 .1 44.1
53 1 .0 .0 44.1
55 10 .4 .4 44.6
57 1 .0 .0 44.6
58 2 .1 .1 44.7
59 1 .0 .0 44.7
60 105 4.6 4.6 49.3
65 8 .3 .3 49.7
66 1 .0 .0 49.7
67 1 .0 .0 49.7
69 1 .0 .0 49.8
70 121 5.3 5.3 55.1
74 1 .0 .0 55.1
75 13 .6 .6 55.7
78 2 .1 .1 55.8
80 23 1.0 1.0 56.8
83 1 .0 .0 56.8
85 105 4.6 4.6 61.4
87 1 .0 .0 61.4
88 2 .1 .1 61.5
90 8 .3 .3 61.9
93 1 .0 .0 61.9
95 2 .1 .1 62.0
100 85 3.7 3.7 65.7
998 Don't recognize 787 34.3 34.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_D18 [Feminists] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 75 3.3 3.3 3.3
0 180 7.8 7.8 11.1
1 2 .1 .1 11.2
2 4 .2 .2 11.4
5 3 .1 .1 11.5
6 2 .1 .1 11.6
7 1 .0 .0 11.6
9 2 .1 .1 11.7
10 12 .5 .5 12.2
12 1 .0 .0 12.3
15 109 4.8 4.8 17.0
17 1 .0 .0 17.1
19 1 .0 .0 17.1
20 18 .8 .8 17.9
22 1 .0 .0 18.0
25 9 .4 .4 18.4
30 95 4.1 4.1 22.5
35 7 .3 .3 22.8
36 1 .0 .0 22.8
40 119 5.2 5.2 28.0
41 1 .0 .0 28.1
44 1 .0 .0 28.1
45 13 .6 .6 28.7
49 1 .0 .0 28.7
50 558 24.3 24.3 53.1
51 1 .0 .0 53.1
52 1 .0 .0 53.1
55 15 .7 .7 53.8
56 1 .0 .0 53.8
58 1 .0 .0 53.9
59 2 .1 .1 54.0
60 227 9.9 9.9 63.9
63 1 .0 .0 63.9
64 1 .0 .0 63.9
65 14 .6 .6 64.6
66 1 .0 .0 64.6
67 1 .0 .0 64.6
70 216 9.4 9.4 74.1
75 35 1.5 1.5 75.6
76 1 .0 .0 75.6
78 2 .1 .1 75.7
79 1 .0 .0 75.8
80 35 1.5 1.5 77.3
82 1 .0 .0 77.3
85 157 6.8 6.8 84.2
87 1 .0 .0 84.2
89 2 .1 .1 84.3
90 19 .8 .8 85.1
95 7 .3 .3 85.4
98 1 .0 .0 85.5
99 3 .1 .1 85.6
100 76 3.3 3.3 88.9
998 Don't recognize 254 11.1 11.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D19 [Congressional Black Caucus] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 70 3.1 3.1 3.1
0 151 6.6 6.6 9.6
2 3 .1 .1 9.8
4 1 .0 .0 9.8
5 6 .3 .3 10.1
7 2 .1 .1 10.2
8 1 .0 .0 10.2
10 15 .7 .7 10.9
12 1 .0 .0 10.9
15 68 3.0 3.0 13.9
20 10 .4 .4 14.3
21 1 .0 .0 14.3
25 8 .3 .3 14.7
28 1 .0 .0 14.7
30 70 3.1 3.1 17.8
35 5 .2 .2 18.0
37 1 .0 .0 18.0
38 1 .0 .0 18.1
39 1 .0 .0 18.1
40 67 2.9 2.9 21.1
43 1 .0 .0 21.1
45 5 .2 .2 21.3
50 471 20.5 20.5 41.8
51 1 .0 .0 41.9
52 2 .1 .1 42.0
55 8 .3 .3 42.3
59 2 .1 .1 42.4
60 155 6.8 6.8 49.2
65 17 .7 .7 49.9
67 1 .0 .0 50.0
70 204 8.9 8.9 58.8
72 1 .0 .0 58.9
73 1 .0 .0 58.9
75 33 1.4 1.4 60.4
76 1 .0 .0 60.4
77 1 .0 .0 60.5
78 1 .0 .0 60.5
79 2 .1 .1 60.6
80 31 1.4 1.4 61.9
81 2 .1 .1 62.0
85 199 8.7 8.7 70.7
87 1 .0 .0 70.7
88 2 .1 .1 70.8
89 3 .1 .1 71.0
90 23 1.0 1.0 72.0
92 1 .0 .0 72.0
94 1 .0 .0 72.1
95 5 .2 .2 72.3
96 1 .0 .0 72.3
100 106 4.6 4.6 76.9
998 Don't recognize 529 23.1 23.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_D20 [NAACP] How would you rate:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 69 3.0 3.0 3.0
0 136 5.9 5.9 8.9
1 4 .2 .2 9.1
2 2 .1 .1 9.2
3 1 .0 .0 9.2
4 2 .1 .1 9.3
5 6 .3 .3 9.6
7 2 .1 .1 9.7
9 1 .0 .0 9.7
10 10 .4 .4 10.2
15 73 3.2 3.2 13.3
20 16 .7 .7 14.0
21 2 .1 .1 14.1
23 1 .0 .0 14.2
25 8 .3 .3 14.5
30 76 3.3 3.3 17.8
35 9 .4 .4 18.2
37 1 .0 .0 18.3
40 88 3.8 3.8 22.1
45 9 .4 .4 22.5
49 1 .0 .0 22.5
50 365 15.9 15.9 38.4
52 3 .1 .1 38.6
54 1 .0 .0 38.6
55 14 .6 .6 39.2
60 206 9.0 9.0 48.2
65 11 .5 .5 48.7
66 2 .1 .1 48.8
67 2 .1 .1 48.9
68 1 .0 .0 48.9
70 259 11.3 11.3 60.2
72 1 .0 .0 60.2
75 34 1.5 1.5 61.7
77 1 .0 .0 61.8
78 2 .1 .1 61.9
79 2 .1 .1 61.9
80 56 2.4 2.4 64.4
85 282 12.3 12.3 76.7
86 2 .1 .1 76.8
87 1 .0 .0 76.8
88 1 .0 .0 76.9
89 1 .0 .0 76.9
90 37 1.6 1.6 78.5
93 1 .0 .0 78.6
94 1 .0 .0 78.6
95 14 .6 .6 79.2
96 2 .1 .1 79.3
97 1 .0 .0 79.3
99 3 .1 .1 79.5
100 314 13.7 13.7 93.2
998 Don't recognize 157 6.8 6.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_E1 Which of the following most characterizes your relationship status at this time?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 37 1.6 1.6 1.6
1 In a relationship or 1398 60.9 60.9 62.6
married and not dating
2 Dating and looking for 168 7.3 7.3 69.9
serious relationship and/or
marital partner
3 Casual dating that is not 119 5.2 5.2 75.1
serious only
4 Friends with benefits 66 2.9 2.9 77.9
5 One-night stands 14 .6 .6 78.6
6 Not interested in dating 492 21.4 21.4 100.0
or pursuing a relationship
at this time
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E2 How optimistic are you that you will develop a serious and/or marital relationship?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 5 .2 3.0 3.0
1 Optimistic 98 4.3 58.3 61.3
2 Neither 56 2.4 33.3 94.6
3 Pessimistic 9 .4 5.4 100.0
Total 168 7.3 100.0
Missing System 2126 92.7
Total 2294 100.0

W1_E2a Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or


slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Extremely 44 1.9 41.1 41.1
2 Moderately 59 2.6 55.1 96.3
3 Slightly 4 .2 3.7 100.0
Total 107 4.7 100.0
Missing System 2187 95.3
Total 2294 100.0
W1_E3 Some people engage in interracial relationships, while others do not. Have you dated
outside of your racial group?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 41 1.8 1.8 1.8
1 Yes 956 41.7 41.7 43.5
2 No 1297 56.5 56.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E4 Were you ever willing to date outside of your racial group?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 23 1.0 1.8 1.8
1 Yes 671 29.3 51.7 53.5
2 No 603 26.3 46.5 100.0
Total 1297 56.5 100.0
Missing System 997 43.5
Total 2294 100.0

W1_E5_1 [African/African American/Black] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have
you dated?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 651 28.4 40.0 40.0
1 Yes 976 42.5 60.0 100.0
Total 1627 70.9 100.0
Missing System 667 29.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_E5_2 [Asian/Asian Americans] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you
dated?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 1074 46.8 66.0 66.0
1 Yes 553 24.1 34.0 100.0
Total 1627 70.9 100.0
Missing System 667 29.1
Total 2294 100.0
W1_E5_3 [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have
you dated?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 703 30.6 43.2 43.2
1 Yes 924 40.3 56.8 100.0
Total 1627 70.9 100.0
Missing System 667 29.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_E5_4 [Middle Easterner/Arab American] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or
have you dated?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 1297 56.5 79.7 79.7
1 Yes 330 14.4 20.3 100.0
Total 1627 70.9 100.0
Missing System 667 29.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_E5_5 [South Asian/South Asian American] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or
have you dated?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 1271 55.4 78.1 78.1
1 Yes 356 15.5 21.9 100.0
Total 1627 70.9 100.0
Missing System 667 29.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_E5_6 [White/Caucasian (non-Hispanic)] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or
have you dated?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 470 20.5 28.9 28.9
1 Yes 1157 50.4 71.1 100.0
Total 1627 70.9 100.0
Missing System 667 29.1
Total 2294 100.0
W1_E5_7 [Other race] Which racial and ethnic groups would you or have you dated?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 1416 61.7 87.0 87.0
1 Yes 211 9.2 13.0 100.0
Total 1627 70.9 100.0
Missing System 667 29.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_E61_A [African/African American/Black: They are physically attractive] How do you rate
each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 92 4.0 4.0 4.0
1 Agree Strongly 959 41.8 41.8 45.8
2 Agree Somewhat 908 39.6 39.6 85.4
3 Disagree Somewhat 222 9.7 9.7 95.1
4 Disagree Strongly 113 4.9 4.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E61_B [African/African American/Black: My family, friends, relatives would not approve]


How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 99 4.3 4.3 4.3
1 Agree Strongly 229 10.0 10.0 14.3
2 Agree Somewhat 419 18.3 18.3 32.6
3 Disagree Somewhat 501 21.8 21.8 54.4
4 Disagree Strongly 1046 45.6 45.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E61_C [African/African American/Black: I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic


children] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 103 4.5 4.5 4.5
1 Agree Strongly 214 9.3 9.3 13.8
2 Agree Somewhat 377 16.4 16.4 30.3
3 Disagree Somewhat 436 19.0 19.0 49.3
4 Disagree Strongly 1164 50.7 50.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_E61_D [African/African American/Black: I would only want to date this group for sexual
reasons rather than for a serious or potential marital relationship] How do you rate each of
the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 104 4.5 4.5 4.5
1 Agree Strongly 67 2.9 2.9 7.5
2 Agree Somewhat 177 7.7 7.7 15.2
3 Disagree Somewhat 323 14.1 14.1 29.3
4 Disagree Strongly 1623 70.7 70.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E62_A [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: They are physically attractive] How do you rate
each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 134 5.8 5.8 5.8
1 Agree Strongly 800 34.9 34.9 40.7
2 Agree Somewhat 1037 45.2 45.2 85.9
3 Disagree Somewhat 203 8.8 8.8 94.8
4 Disagree Strongly 120 5.2 5.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E62_B [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: My family, friends, relatives would not approve]


How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 139 6.1 6.1 6.1
1 Agree Strongly 133 5.8 5.8 11.9
2 Agree Somewhat 381 16.6 16.6 28.5
3 Disagree Somewhat 645 28.1 28.1 56.6
4 Disagree Strongly 996 43.4 43.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E62_C [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic


children] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 145 6.3 6.3 6.3
1 Agree Strongly 129 5.6 5.6 11.9
2 Agree Somewhat 339 14.8 14.8 26.7
3 Disagree Somewhat 465 20.3 20.3 47.0
4 Disagree Strongly 1216 53.0 53.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E62_D [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic: I would only want to date this group for sexual
reasons rather than for a serious or potential marital relationship] How do you rate each of
the following groups on these characteristics?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 147 6.4 6.4 6.4
1 Agree Strongly 58 2.5 2.5 8.9
2 Agree Somewhat 176 7.7 7.7 16.6
3 Disagree Somewhat 355 15.5 15.5 32.1
4 Disagree Strongly 1558 67.9 67.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E63_A [Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): They are physically attractive] How do you rate
each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 126 5.5 5.5 5.5
1 Agree Strongly 837 36.5 36.5 42.0
2 Agree Somewhat 1063 46.3 46.3 88.3
3 Disagree Somewhat 176 7.7 7.7 96.0
4 Disagree Strongly 92 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E63_B [Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): My family, friends, relatives would not approve]


How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 128 5.6 5.6 5.6
1 Agree Strongly 123 5.4 5.4 10.9
2 Agree Somewhat 337 14.7 14.7 25.6
3 Disagree Somewhat 478 20.8 20.8 46.5
4 Disagree Strongly 1228 53.5 53.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E63_C [Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic


children] How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 142 6.2 6.2 6.2
1 Agree Strongly 117 5.1 5.1 11.3
2 Agree Somewhat 278 12.1 12.1 23.4
3 Disagree Somewhat 375 16.3 16.3 39.8
4 Disagree Strongly 1382 60.2 60.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_E63_D [Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic): I would only want to date this group for sexual
reasons rather than for a serious or potential marital relationship] How do you rate each of
the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 138 6.0 6.0 6.0
1 Agree Strongly 78 3.4 3.4 9.4
2 Agree Somewhat 166 7.2 7.2 16.7
3 Disagree Somewhat 313 13.6 13.6 30.3
4 Disagree Strongly 1599 69.7 69.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E64_A [Asian/Asian Americans: They are physically attractive] How do you rate each of
the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 118 5.1 5.1 5.1
1 Agree Strongly 527 23.0 23.0 28.1
2 Agree Somewhat 1062 46.3 46.3 74.4
3 Disagree Somewhat 384 16.7 16.7 91.2
4 Disagree Strongly 203 8.8 8.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E64_B [Asian/Asian Americans: My family, friends, relatives would not approve] How do
you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 129 5.6 5.6 5.6
1 Agree Strongly 155 6.8 6.8 12.4
2 Agree Somewhat 393 17.1 17.1 29.5
3 Disagree Somewhat 665 29.0 29.0 58.5
4 Disagree Strongly 952 41.5 41.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E64_C [Asian/Asian Americans: I have concerns about having bi-racial/ethnic children]


How do you rate each of the following groups on these characteristics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 135 5.9 5.9 5.9
1 Agree Strongly 145 6.3 6.3 12.2
2 Agree Somewhat 354 15.4 15.4 27.6
3 Disagree Somewhat 475 20.7 20.7 48.3
4 Disagree Strongly 1185 51.7 51.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E64_D [Asian/Asian Americans: I would only want to date this group for sexual reasons
rather than for a serious or potential marital relationship] How do you rate each of the
following groups on these characteristics?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 134 5.8 5.8 5.8
1 Agree Strongly 73 3.2 3.2 9.0
2 Agree Somewhat 181 7.9 7.9 16.9
3 Disagree Somewhat 360 15.7 15.7 32.6
4 Disagree Strongly 1546 67.4 67.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E7 Have you had sex with someone outside of your racial group?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 69 3.0 3.0 3.0
1 Yes 980 42.7 42.7 45.7
2 No 1245 54.3 54.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E8 Was this in the context of :

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 13 .6 1.3 1.3
1 A committed relationship 404 17.6 41.2 42.6
2 A casual, uncommitted 400 17.4 40.8 83.4
relationship
3 A one-night stand 126 5.5 12.9 96.2
4 Other 37 1.6 3.8 100.0
Total 980 42.7 100.0
Missing System 1314 57.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_E9_a [African/African American/Black] Have you had sex with any of the following
groups?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 1038 45.2 45.2 45.2
1 Yes 1256 54.8 54.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E9_b [Latin American/Latino/Hispanic] Have you had sex with any of the following
groups?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 1700 74.1 74.1 74.1
1 Yes 594 25.9 25.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_E9_c [Asian/Asian American] Have you had sex with any of the following groups?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 1996 87.0 87.0 87.0
1 Yes 298 13.0 13.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E9_d [Caucasian/White (non-Hispanic)] Have you had sex with any of the following
groups?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 957 41.7 41.7 41.7
1 Yes 1337 58.3 58.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_E9_Refused [Refused] Have you had sex with any of the following groups?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2049 89.3 89.3 89.3
1 Yes 245 10.7 10.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F1 When you think about your future, are you generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither
optimistic nor pessimistic?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 55 2.4 2.4 2.4
1 Optimistic 1225 53.4 53.4 55.8
2 Neither 796 34.7 34.7 90.5
3 Pessimistic 218 9.5 9.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F1A Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or


slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 9 .4 .6 .6
1 Extremely 421 18.4 29.2 29.8
2 Moderately 843 36.7 58.4 88.2
3 Slightly 170 7.4 11.8 100.0
Total 1443 62.9 100.0
Missing System 851 37.1
Total 2294 100.0
W1_F2 And when you think about the future of the United States as a whole, are you
generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither optimistic nor pessimistic?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 55 2.4 2.4 2.4
1 Optimistic 851 37.1 37.1 39.5
2 Neither 823 35.9 35.9 75.4
3 Pessimistic 565 24.6 24.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F2A Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or


slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 10 .4 .7 .7
1 Extremely 354 15.4 25.0 25.7
2 Moderately 781 34.0 55.2 80.9
3 Slightly 271 11.8 19.1 100.0
Total 1416 61.7 100.0
Missing System 878 38.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_F3 A basic American belief has been that if you work hard you can get ahead and reach
the goals you set and more. Is this true or false today?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 44 1.9 1.9 1.9
1 Extremely true 331 14.4 14.4 16.3
2 Moderately true 641 27.9 27.9 44.3
3 Slightly true 521 22.7 22.7 67.0
4 Neither 275 12.0 12.0 79.0
5 Slightly false 214 9.3 9.3 88.3
6 Moderately false 157 6.8 6.8 95.2
7 Extremely false 111 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F4_A [To own a home ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or hard is it to reach
these goals?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 62 2.7 2.7 2.7
1 Very hard 404 17.6 17.6 20.3
2 Somewhat hard 946 41.2 41.2 61.6
3 Somewhat easy 643 28.0 28.0 89.6
4 Very easy 239 10.4 10.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_F4_B [To have a financially secure retirement ] For yourself and people like you, how
easy or hard is it to reach these goals?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 67 2.9 2.9 2.9
1 Very hard 733 32.0 32.0 34.9
2 Somewhat hard 1012 44.1 44.1 79.0
3 Somewhat easy 390 17.0 17.0 96.0
4 Very easy 92 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F4_C [To send one’s children to college ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or
hard is it to reach these goals?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 71 3.1 3.1 3.1
1 Very hard 660 28.8 28.8 31.9
2 Somewhat hard 1004 43.8 43.8 75.6
3 Somewhat easy 440 19.2 19.2 94.8
4 Very easy 119 5.2 5.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F4_D [To become wealthy ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or hard is it to
reach these goals?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 65 2.8 2.8 2.8
1 Very hard 1258 54.8 54.8 57.7
2 Somewhat hard 755 32.9 32.9 90.6
3 Somewhat easy 164 7.1 7.1 97.7
4 Very easy 52 2.3 2.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F4_E [To do better than one’s parents did ] For yourself and people like you, how easy or
hard is it to reach these goals?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 64 2.8 2.8 2.8
1 Very hard 290 12.6 12.6 15.4
2 Somewhat hard 869 37.9 37.9 53.3
3 Somewhat easy 801 34.9 34.9 88.2
4 Very easy 270 11.8 11.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_F5_A [To own a home ] For your children or the children of people like yourself, how
easy or hard will it be for your children to reach these goals in the future?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 84 3.7 3.7 3.7
1 Very hard 507 22.1 22.1 25.8
2 Somewhat hard 940 41.0 41.0 66.7
3 Somewhat easy 578 25.2 25.2 91.9
4 Very easy 185 8.1 8.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F5_B [To have a financially secure retirement ] For your children or the children of
people like yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your children to reach these goals in the
future?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 84 3.7 3.7 3.7
1 Very hard 755 32.9 32.9 36.6
2 Somewhat hard 927 40.4 40.4 77.0
3 Somewhat easy 411 17.9 17.9 94.9
4 Very easy 117 5.1 5.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F5_C [To send one’s children to college ] For your children or the children of people like
yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your children to reach these goals in the future?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 80 3.5 3.5 3.5
1 Very hard 645 28.1 28.1 31.6
2 Somewhat hard 968 42.2 42.2 73.8
3 Somewhat easy 459 20.0 20.0 93.8
4 Very easy 142 6.2 6.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F5_D [To become wealthy ] For your children or the children of people like yourself, how
easy or hard will it be for your children to reach these goals in the future?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 81 3.5 3.5 3.5
1 Very hard 963 42.0 42.0 45.5
2 Somewhat hard 845 36.8 36.8 82.3
3 Somewhat easy 298 13.0 13.0 95.3
4 Very easy 107 4.7 4.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F5_E [To do better than one’s parents did ] For your children or the children of people
like yourself, how easy or hard will it be for your children to reach these goals in the future?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 84 3.7 3.7 3.7
1 Very hard 484 21.1 21.1 24.8
2 Somewhat hard 893 38.9 38.9 63.7
3 Somewhat easy 647 28.2 28.2 91.9
4 Very easy 186 8.1 8.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_F6 How far along the road to your American Dream do you think you will ultimately get
on a 10-point scale where 1 is not far at all and 10 nearly there?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 59 2.6 2.6 2.6
1 1 - Not far at all in 70 3.1 3.1 5.6
achieving the American
Dream
22 59 2.6 2.6 8.2
33 98 4.3 4.3 12.5
44 152 6.6 6.6 19.1
55 362 15.8 15.8 34.9
66 336 14.6 14.6 49.5
77 440 19.2 19.2 68.7
88 350 15.3 15.3 84.0
99 165 7.2 7.2 91.2
10 10 - Nearly there in 203 8.8 8.8 100.0
achieving the American
Dream
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_G2 Now thinking about the country's economy, would you say that compared to one year
ago, the nation's economy is now better, about the same, or worse?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 51 2.2 2.2 2.2
1 Better 545 23.8 23.8 26.0
2 About the same 1108 48.3 48.3 74.3
3 Worse 590 25.7 25.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_G2B Much better or somewhat better?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Much better 88 3.8 16.1 16.1
2 Somewhat better 457 19.9 83.9 100.0
Total 545 23.8 100.0
Missing System 1749 76.2
Total 2294 100.0

W1_G2C Much worse or somewhat worse?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 2 .1 .3 .3
1 Much worse 299 13.0 50.7 51.0
2 Somewhat worse 289 12.6 49.0 100.0
Total 590 25.7 100.0
Missing System 1704 74.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_G3A Do you think the economy, in the country as a whole, will be better, about the same,
or worse in 12 months?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 56 2.4 2.4 2.4
1 Better 751 32.7 32.7 35.2
2 About the same 1106 48.2 48.2 83.4
3 Worse 381 16.6 16.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_G3B Much better or somewhat better?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 3 .1 .4 .4
1 Much better 175 7.6 23.3 23.7
2 Somewhat better 573 25.0 76.3 100.0
Total 751 32.7 100.0
Missing System 1543 67.3
Total 2294 100.0
W1_G3C Much worse or somewhat worse?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Much worse 175 7.6 45.9 45.9
2 Somewhat worse 206 9.0 54.1 100.0
Total 381 16.6 100.0
Missing System 1913 83.4
Total 2294 100.0

W1_H1 Society has reached the point where blacks and whites have equal opportunities for
achievement.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 77 3.4 3.4 3.4
1 Agree strongly 237 10.3 10.3 13.7
2 Agree somewhat 465 20.3 20.3 34.0
3 Neither agree nor 499 21.8 21.8 55.7
disagree
4 Disagree somewhat 561 24.5 24.5 80.2
5 Disagree strongly 455 19.8 19.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_H2 In comparison to other minority groups, American Indians are well represented and
have advanced a lot.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 87 3.8 3.8 3.8
1 Agree strongly 110 4.8 4.8 8.6
2 Agree somewhat 318 13.9 13.9 22.4
3 Neither agree nor 767 33.4 33.4 55.9
disagree
4 Disagree somewhat 508 22.1 22.1 78.0
5 Disagree strongly 504 22.0 22.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_H3 The U.S. government is largely responsible for many of the economic and social
problems American Indians experience today.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 82 3.6 3.6 3.6
1 Agree strongly 449 19.6 19.6 23.1
2 Agree somewhat 708 30.9 30.9 54.0
3 Neither agree nor 724 31.6 31.6 85.6
disagree
4 Disagree somewhat 203 8.8 8.8 94.4
5 Disagree strongly 128 5.6 5.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_H4 Over the past few years, Blacks have gotten less than they deserve.

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 87 3.8 3.8 3.8
1 Agree strongly 203 8.8 8.8 12.6
2 Agree somewhat 478 20.8 20.8 33.5
3 Neither agree nor 803 35.0 35.0 68.5
disagree
4 Disagree somewhat 381 16.6 16.6 85.1
5 Disagree strongly 342 14.9 14.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_H5 Irish, Italians, Jews, and many other minorities overcame prejudice and worked their
way up. Blacks should do the same without any special favors.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 76 3.3 3.3 3.3
1 Agree strongly 338 14.7 14.7 18.0
2 Agree somewhat 497 21.7 21.7 39.7
3 Neither agree nor 661 28.8 28.8 68.5
disagree
4 Disagree somewhat 389 17.0 17.0 85.5
5 Disagree strongly 333 14.5 14.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_H6 It’s really a matter of some people not trying hard enough; if blacks would only try
harder they could be just as well off as whites.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 75 3.3 3.3 3.3
1 Agree strongly 198 8.6 8.6 11.9
2 Agree somewhat 435 19.0 19.0 30.9
3 Neither agree nor 630 27.5 27.5 58.3
disagree
4 Disagree somewhat 423 18.4 18.4 76.8
5 Disagree strongly 533 23.2 23.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_H7 Generations of slavery and discrimination have created conditions that make it
difficult for blacks to work their way out of the lower class.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 77 3.4 3.4 3.4
1 Agree strongly 278 12.1 12.1 15.5
2 Agree somewhat 600 26.2 26.2 41.6
3 Neither agree nor 544 23.7 23.7 65.3
disagree
4 Disagree somewhat 413 18.0 18.0 83.3
5 Disagree strongly 382 16.7 16.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_H8 Discrimination against blacks is no longer a problem in the U.S.

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 83 3.6 3.6 3.6
1 Agree strongly 104 4.5 4.5 8.2
2 Agree somewhat 238 10.4 10.4 18.5
3 Neither agree nor 458 20.0 20.0 38.5
disagree
4 Disagree somewhat 564 24.6 24.6 63.1
5 Disagree strongly 847 36.9 36.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_I1 How well does the U.S. Congress represent all Americans?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 63 2.7 2.7 2.7
1 Extremely well 26 1.1 1.1 3.9
2 Very well 73 3.2 3.2 7.1
3 Moderately well 650 28.3 28.3 35.4
4 A little well 696 30.3 30.3 65.7
5 Not well at all 786 34.3 34.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_I2 How well does the U.S. Congress represent you?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 60 2.6 2.6 2.6
1 Extremely well 21 .9 .9 3.5
2 Very well 57 2.5 2.5 6.0
3 Moderately well 571 24.9 24.9 30.9
4 A little well 709 30.9 30.9 61.8
5 Not well at all 876 38.2 38.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_J1_A [Provide a guaranteed one year of paid parental leave for mothers and fathers on
the birth or adoption of a child? ] What is your opinion about each of them?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 93 4.1 4.1 4.1
1 0 - Very bad proposal 391 17.0 17.0 21.1
21 109 4.8 4.8 25.9
32 135 5.9 5.9 31.7
43 149 6.5 6.5 38.2
54 146 6.4 6.4 44.6
65 397 17.3 17.3 61.9
76 140 6.1 6.1 68.0
87 165 7.2 7.2 75.2
98 143 6.2 6.2 81.4
10 9 110 4.8 4.8 86.2
11 10 - Very good 316 13.8 13.8 100.0
proposal
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_J1_B [Increase legal penalties for sexual harassment? ] What is your opinion about each
of them?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 91 4.0 4.0 4.0
1 0 - Very bad proposal 80 3.5 3.5 7.5
21 40 1.7 1.7 9.2
32 54 2.4 2.4 11.6
43 79 3.4 3.4 15.0
54 86 3.7 3.7 18.7
65 418 18.2 18.2 37.0
76 204 8.9 8.9 45.9
87 241 10.5 10.5 56.4
98 260 11.3 11.3 67.7
10 9 183 8.0 8.0 75.7
11 10 - Very good 558 24.3 24.3 100.0
proposal
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_J1_C [Provide every child until 18 years of age free health insurance? ] What is your
opinion about each of them?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 95 4.1 4.1 4.1
1 0 - Very bad proposal 182 7.9 7.9 12.1
21 38 1.7 1.7 13.7
32 58 2.5 2.5 16.3
43 92 4.0 4.0 20.3
54 87 3.8 3.8 24.1
65 291 12.7 12.7 36.7
76 159 6.9 6.9 43.7
87 176 7.7 7.7 51.4
98 203 8.8 8.8 60.2
10 9 190 8.3 8.3 68.5
11 10 - Very good 723 31.5 31.5 100.0
proposal
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_J1_D [Require that an equal number of the top leadership positions in government go to
women? ] What is your opinion about each of them?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 96 4.2 4.2 4.2
1 0 - Very bad proposal 267 11.6 11.6 15.8
21 70 3.1 3.1 18.9
32 102 4.4 4.4 23.3
43 124 5.4 5.4 28.7
54 150 6.5 6.5 35.3
65 520 22.7 22.7 57.9
76 224 9.8 9.8 67.7
87 204 8.9 8.9 76.6
98 186 8.1 8.1 84.7
10 9 96 4.2 4.2 88.9
11 10 - Very good 255 11.1 11.1 100.0
proposal
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_J1_E [Require that American children attend public school for 12 months instead of 9
months? ] What is your opinion about each of them?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 88 3.8 3.8 3.8
1 0 - Very bad proposal 299 13.0 13.0 16.9
21 86 3.7 3.7 20.6
32 140 6.1 6.1 26.7
43 182 7.9 7.9 34.7
54 132 5.8 5.8 40.4
65 407 17.7 17.7 58.2
76 191 8.3 8.3 66.5
87 196 8.5 8.5 75.0
98 193 8.4 8.4 83.4
10 9 114 5.0 5.0 88.4
11 10 - Very good 266 11.6 11.6 100.0
proposal
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_J1_F [Make families with dependent children permanently eligible for welfare any time
they fall below the poverty line? ] What is your opinion about each of them?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 97 4.2 4.2 4.2
1 0 - Very bad proposal 364 15.9 15.9 20.1
21 129 5.6 5.6 25.7
32 136 5.9 5.9 31.6
43 162 7.1 7.1 38.7
54 159 6.9 6.9 45.6
65 391 17.0 17.0 62.7
76 171 7.5 7.5 70.1
87 141 6.1 6.1 76.3
98 162 7.1 7.1 83.3
10 9 96 4.2 4.2 87.5
11 10 - Very good 286 12.5 12.5 100.0
proposal
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_J1_G [Provide free or heavily government subsidized childcare/preschool for poor


families? ] What is your opinion about each of them?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 94 4.1 4.1 4.1
1 0 - Very bad proposal 167 7.3 7.3 11.4
21 56 2.4 2.4 13.8
32 85 3.7 3.7 17.5
43 118 5.1 5.1 22.7
54 127 5.5 5.5 28.2
65 387 16.9 16.9 45.1
76 200 8.7 8.7 53.8
87 215 9.4 9.4 63.2
98 218 9.5 9.5 72.7
10 9 165 7.2 7.2 79.9
11 10 - Very good 462 20.1 20.1 100.0
proposal
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_J2 Which of the following statements comes closest to your view concerning same-sex
couples?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 110 4.8 4.8 4.8
1 They should be allowed 835 36.4 36.4 41.2
to legally marry
2 They should be allowed 726 31.6 31.6 72.8
to legally form civil unions,
but not marry
3 They should not be 623 27.2 27.2 100.0
allowed to marry or form
civil unions
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_J3A_A [The federal budget deficit ] Compared to 2008 would you say the following is
now better or worse?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 60 2.6 2.6 2.6
1 Much better 33 1.4 1.4 4.1
2 Somewhat better 188 8.2 8.2 12.2
3 About the same 576 25.1 25.1 37.4
4 Somewhat worse 665 29.0 29.0 66.3
5 Much worse 772 33.7 33.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_J3A_B [Poverty in the U.S. ] Compared to 2008 would you say the following is now better
or worse?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 66 2.9 2.9 2.9
1 Much better 25 1.1 1.1 4.0
2 Somewhat better 198 8.6 8.6 12.6
3 About the same 797 34.7 34.7 47.3
4 Somewhat worse 715 31.2 31.2 78.5
5 Much worse 493 21.5 21.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_J3A_C [Unemployment in the U.S. ] Compared to 2008 would you say the following is
now better or worse?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 57 2.5 2.5 2.5
1 Much better 53 2.3 2.3 4.8
2 Somewhat better 517 22.5 22.5 27.3
3 About the same 557 24.3 24.3 51.6
4 Somewhat worse 543 23.7 23.7 75.3
5 Much worse 567 24.7 24.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_K1_A [The government in Washington ] How much do you think you can trust the
following institutions?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 70 3.1 3.1 3.1
1 Just about always 37 1.6 1.6 4.7
2 Most of the time 475 20.7 20.7 25.4
3 Only some of the time 1286 56.1 56.1 81.4
4 Never 426 18.6 18.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_K1_B [The police ] How much do you think you can trust the following institutions?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 71 3.1 3.1 3.1
1 Just about always 163 7.1 7.1 10.2
2 Most of the time 981 42.8 42.8 53.0
3 Only some of the time 864 37.7 37.7 90.6
4 Never 215 9.4 9.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_K1_C [The legal system ] How much do you think you can trust the following
institutions?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 64 2.8 2.8 2.8
1 Just about always 63 2.7 2.7 5.5
2 Most of the time 749 32.7 32.7 38.2
3 Only some of the time 1172 51.1 51.1 89.3
4 Never 246 10.7 10.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_K1_D [Public schools ] How much do you think you can trust the following institutions?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 66 2.9 2.9 2.9
1 Just about always 143 6.2 6.2 9.1
2 Most of the time 1044 45.5 45.5 54.6
3 Only some of the time 920 40.1 40.1 94.7
4 Never 121 5.3 5.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_K4 On a seven-point scale, do you think that blacks and other minorities are treated the
same as whites in the criminal justice system or do not receive equal treatment?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 55 2.4 2.4 2.4
1 1 - Receive equal 170 7.4 7.4 9.8
treatment
22 112 4.9 4.9 14.7
33 91 4.0 4.0 18.7
44 165 7.2 7.2 25.9
55 343 15.0 15.0 40.8
66 317 13.8 13.8 54.6
7 7 - Do not receive equal 800 34.9 34.9 89.5
treatment
9 Not sure. 241 10.5 10.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_K5 On a scale from 1 to 10, do you think President Obama has done more or less than
other presidents to help Black Americans?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 91 4.0 4.0 4.0
1 1 - President Obama has 90 3.9 3.9 7.9
done less than other
presidents to help blacks
22 37 1.6 1.6 9.5
33 73 3.2 3.2 12.7
44 65 2.8 2.8 15.5
55 610 26.6 26.6 42.1
66 390 17.0 17.0 59.1
77 287 12.5 12.5 71.6
88 250 10.9 10.9 82.5
99 132 5.8 5.8 88.3
10 10 - President Obama 269 11.7 11.7 100.0
has done more than other
presidents to help blacks
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L1_a [A professional association ] Indicate whether you have participated in the


activities of this group in the past 12 months.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 65 2.8 2.8 2.8
1 I have participated more 189 8.2 8.2 11.1
than twice
2 I have participated once 259 11.3 11.3 22.4
or twice
3 I belong to such a group 124 5.4 5.4 27.8
but never participate
4 I do not belong to such a 1657 72.2 72.2 100.0
group
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_L1_b [A political party, club, or association] Indicate whether you have participated in the
activities of this group in the past 12 months.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 71 3.1 3.1 3.1
1 I have participated more 106 4.6 4.6 7.7
than twice
2 I have participated once 214 9.3 9.3 17.0
or twice
3 I belong to such a group 196 8.5 8.5 25.6
but never participate
4 I do not belong to such a 1707 74.4 74.4 100.0
group
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L1_c [A cultural organization that puts on plays, music or dance concerts, attends
concerts, theater or museums together] Indicate whether you have participated in the
activities of this group in the past 12 months.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 77 3.4 3.4 3.4
1 I have participated more 176 7.7 7.7 11.0
than twice
2 I have participated once 211 9.2 9.2 20.2
or twice
3 I belong to such a group 54 2.4 2.4 22.6
but never participate
4 I do not belong to such a 1776 77.4 77.4 100.0
group
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L2_1 [NAACP] Are you a member of any of the following


groups/organizations/movements?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2117 92.3 92.3 92.3
1 Yes 177 7.7 7.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L2_2 [National Urban League] Are you a member of any of the following
groups/organizations/movements?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2233 97.3 97.3 97.3
1 Yes 61 2.7 2.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L2_3 [Southern Christian Leadership Conference] Are you a member of any of the
following groups/organizations/movements?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2243 97.8 97.8 97.8
1 Yes 51 2.2 2.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L2_4 [Tea Party Movement] Are you a member of any of the following
groups/organizations/movements?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2249 98.0 98.0 98.0
1 Yes 45 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L2_5 [Occupy Wall Street Movement] Are you a member of any of the following
groups/organizations/movements?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2270 99.0 99.0 99.0
1 Yes 24 1.0 1.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L2_Refused [Refused] Are you a member of any of the following


groups/organizations/movements?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 293 12.8 12.8 12.8
1 Yes 2001 87.2 87.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L3 In the last twelve months, have you worked with others or joined an organization in
your community to do something about some community problem?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 59 2.6 2.6 2.6
1 Yes 469 20.4 20.4 23.0
2 No 1766 77.0 77.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_L4_a [Contacted a public official or agency ] Please indicate if you have done any of the
following activities in the last 2 years.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 68 3.0 3.0 3.0
1 Yes 581 25.3 25.3 28.3
2 No 1645 71.7 71.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L4_b [Attended a protest meeting or demonstration ] Please indicate if you have done
any of the following activites in the last 2 years.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 79 3.4 3.4 3.4
1 Yes 197 8.6 8.6 12.0
2 No 2018 88.0 88.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L4_c [Taken part in a neighborhood march ] Please indicate if you have done any of the
following activites in the last 2 years.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 68 3.0 3.0 3.0
1 Yes 116 5.1 5.1 8.0
2 No 2110 92.0 92.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L4_d [Signed a petition in support of something or against something ] Please indicate if


you have done any of the following activites in the last 2 years.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 71 3.1 3.1 3.1
1 Yes 919 40.1 40.1 43.2
2 No 1304 56.8 56.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L5_a [Helped in a voter registration drive ] Please indicate whether or not you have
engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years? Have you...
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 61 2.7 2.7 2.7
1 Have 209 9.1 9.1 11.8
2 Have not 2024 88.2 88.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_L5_b [Given people a ride to the polls on election day ] Please indicate whether or not
you have engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years? Have you..
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 70 3.1 3.1 3.1
1 Have 200 8.7 8.7 11.8
2 Have not 2024 88.2 88.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L5_c [Given money to a political candidate ] Please indicate whether or not you have
engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years? Have you....
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 60 2.6 2.6 2.6
1 Have 468 20.4 20.4 23.0
2 Have not 1766 77.0 77.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L5_d [Attended a fund raiser for a candidate ] Please indicate whether or not you have
engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years? Have you...
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 60 2.6 2.6 2.6
1 Have 211 9.2 9.2 11.8
2 Have not 2023 88.2 88.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L5_e [Handed out campaign material or placed campaign material on cars ] Please
indicate whether or not you have engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years ?
Have you...
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 63 2.7 2.7 2.7
1 Have 185 8.1 8.1 10.8
2 Have not 2046 89.2 89.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_L5_f [Signed a petition supporting a candidate who was running for office ] Please
indicate whether or not you have engaged in these political activities in the last TWO years?
Have you...
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 61 2.7 2.7 2.7
1 Have 578 25.2 25.2 27.9
2 Have not 1655 72.1 72.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_M1 What is your religion?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 19 .8 9.6 9.6
1 Baptist—any 48 2.1 24.4 34.0
denomination
2 Protestant (e.g., 28 1.2 14.2 48.2
Methodist, Lutheran,
Presbyterian, Episcopal)
3 Catholic 24 1.0 12.2 60.4
4 Mormon 2 .1 1.0 61.4
6 Muslim 1 .0 .5 61.9
9 Pentecostal 6 .3 3.0 65.0
10 Eastern Orthodox 2 .1 1.0 66.0
11 Other Christian 31 1.4 15.7 81.7
12 Other non-Christian, 6 .3 3.0 84.8
please specify:
13 None 30 1.3 15.2 100.0
Total 197 8.6 100.0
Missing System 2097 91.4
Total 2294 100.0

W1_M1_Other_TEXT [Other] What is your religion?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 2288 99.7 99.7 99.7
born again christian 1 .0 .0 99.8
isarelite 1 .0 .0 99.8
Jehovah's Witness 1 .0 .0 99.9
jehovahs witness 1 .0 .0 99.9
non denominational 1 .0 .0 100.0
Open to all possibilities. 1 .0 .0 100.0
OTAP
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_M1a Would you describe yourself as a born-again or evangelical Christian?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 7 .3 3.7 3.7
1 Yes 61 2.7 32.6 36.4
2 No 119 5.2 63.6 100.0
Total 187 8.2 100.0
Missing System 2107 91.8
Total 2294 100.0
W1_M5 How often do you attend religious services?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 17 .7 7.9 7.9
1 More than once a week 24 1.0 11.2 19.1
2 Once a week 36 1.6 16.7 35.8
3 Once or twice a month 21 .9 9.8 45.6
4 A few times a year 45 2.0 20.9 66.5
5 Once a year or less 27 1.2 12.6 79.1
6 Never 45 2.0 20.9 100.0
Total 215 9.4 100.0
Missing System 2079 90.6
Total 2294 100.0

W1_M2 What was the racial makeup of your place of worship?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 66 2.9 3.6 3.6
1 Mostly Black 736 32.1 39.7 43.2
2 Mostly White 644 28.1 34.7 77.9
3 Mostly Latino 49 2.1 2.6 80.5
4 Mostly Asian 11 .5 .6 81.1
5 Something else 108 4.7 5.8 87.0
6 Don’t know 242 10.5 13.0 100.0
Total 1856 80.9 100.0
Missing System 438 19.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_M3 Churches or places of worship should be involved in political matters.

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 99 4.3 4.3 4.3
1 Strongly agree 185 8.1 8.1 12.4
2 Somewhat agree 532 23.2 23.2 35.6
3 Somewhat disagree 595 25.9 25.9 61.5
4 Strongly disagree 883 38.5 38.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_M4 Churches or places of worship should allow more women to become members of the
clergy.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 117 5.1 5.1 5.1
1 Strongly agree 648 28.2 28.2 33.3
2 Somewhat agree 892 38.9 38.9 72.2
3 Somewhat disagree 356 15.5 15.5 87.8
4 Strongly disagree 281 12.2 12.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_M6 Aside from attending regular services, in the past 12 months have you been an active
member of your church or place of worship?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 73 3.2 3.9 3.9
1 Yes 602 26.2 32.4 36.4
2 No 1181 51.5 63.6 100.0
Total 1856 80.9 100.0
Missing System 438 19.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_M7 In the last year, have you heard any discussions of politics at your church or place of
worship?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 79 3.4 4.3 4.3
1 Yes 561 24.5 30.2 34.5
2 No 1216 53.0 65.5 100.0
Total 1856 80.9 100.0
Missing System 438 19.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_M8 Have you talked to people about political matters at your church or place of worship?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 77 3.4 4.1 4.1
1 Yes 426 18.6 23.0 27.1
2 No 1353 59.0 72.9 100.0
Total 1856 80.9 100.0
Missing System 438 19.1
Total 2294 100.0
W1_M9 Has a member of the clergy or someone in an official position at your church or place
of worship talked about the need for people to become more involved in politics?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 87 3.8 4.7 4.7
1 Yes 511 22.3 27.5 32.2
2 No 1258 54.8 67.8 100.0
Total 1856 80.9 100.0
Missing System 438 19.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_M10 Has any local or national political leader spoken at a regular religious service at
your church or place of worship?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 82 3.6 4.4 4.4
1 Yes 269 11.7 14.5 18.9
2 No 1505 65.6 81.1 100.0
Total 1856 80.9 100.0
Missing System 438 19.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_M11 Has a member of the clergy, or someone in an official position at your church or
place of worship, ever suggested that you vote for or against certain candidates in an
election?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 78 3.4 4.2 4.2
1 Yes 194 8.5 10.5 14.7
2 No 1584 69.0 85.3 100.0
Total 1856 80.9 100.0
Missing System 438 19.1
Total 2294 100.0

W1_M12 What about suggesting that you take action on a political issue such as sign a
petition or write a letter? Did this happen in the last two years?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 78 3.4 4.2 4.2
1 Yes 359 15.6 19.3 23.5
2 No 1419 61.9 76.5 100.0
Total 1856 80.9 100.0
Missing System 438 19.1
Total 2294 100.0
W1_N1a How would you rate people on welfare?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 84 3.7 3.7 3.7
0 100 4.4 4.4 8.0
1 5 .2 .2 8.2
3 1 .0 .0 8.3
5 8 .3 .3 8.6
9 1 .0 .0 8.7
10 14 .6 .6 9.3
12 1 .0 .0 9.3
15 129 5.6 5.6 15.0
20 9 .4 .4 15.3
25 20 .9 .9 16.2
27 2 .1 .1 16.3
30 135 5.9 5.9 22.2
34 1 .0 .0 22.2
35 17 .7 .7 23.0
39 1 .0 .0 23.0
40 225 9.8 9.8 32.8
45 15 .7 .7 33.5
47 1 .0 .0 33.5
48 1 .0 .0 33.6
49 2 .1 .1 33.7
50 585 25.5 25.5 59.2
51 2 .1 .1 59.2
52 1 .0 .0 59.3
55 19 .8 .8 60.1
57 1 .0 .0 60.2
59 1 .0 .0 60.2
60 248 10.8 10.8 71.0
65 14 .6 .6 71.6
66 3 .1 .1 71.8
67 3 .1 .1 71.9
68 1 .0 .0 71.9
70 232 10.1 10.1 82.0
71 1 .0 .0 82.1
72 1 .0 .0 82.1
74 1 .0 .0 82.2
75 30 1.3 1.3 83.5
78 2 .1 .1 83.6
79 2 .1 .1 83.7
80 27 1.2 1.2 84.8
85 122 5.3 5.3 90.1
88 1 .0 .0 90.2
89 1 .0 .0 90.2
90 14 .6 .6 90.8
95 3 .1 .1 91.0
100 125 5.4 5.4 96.4
998 Don't recognize 82 3.6 3.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1b How would you rate American Indians or Native Americans?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 103 4.5 4.5 4.5
0 20 .9 .9 5.4
2 1 .0 .0 5.4
5 4 .2 .2 5.6
7 2 .1 .1 5.7
8 2 .1 .1 5.8
10 1 .0 .0 5.8
15 19 .8 .8 6.6
20 6 .3 .3 6.9
25 2 .1 .1 7.0
30 25 1.1 1.1 8.1
35 1 .0 .0 8.1
39 1 .0 .0 8.2
40 40 1.7 1.7 9.9
45 3 .1 .1 10.0
48 1 .0 .0 10.1
50 519 22.6 22.6 32.7
51 1 .0 .0 32.7
52 1 .0 .0 32.8
55 8 .3 .3 33.1
60 175 7.6 7.6 40.8
65 20 .9 .9 41.6
66 2 .1 .1 41.7
69 1 .0 .0 41.8
70 326 14.2 14.2 56.0
71 1 .0 .0 56.0
74 2 .1 .1 56.1
75 48 2.1 2.1 58.2
76 1 .0 .0 58.2
77 1 .0 .0 58.3
78 3 .1 .1 58.4
79 1 .0 .0 58.5
80 54 2.4 2.4 60.8
83 1 .0 .0 60.9
85 359 15.6 15.6 76.5
87 3 .1 .1 76.6
89 1 .0 .0 76.7
90 47 2.0 2.0 78.7
95 13 .6 .6 79.3
96 1 .0 .0 79.3
97 1 .0 .0 79.4
98 2 .1 .1 79.5
99 3 .1 .1 79.6
100 344 15.0 15.0 94.6
998 Don't recognize 124 5.4 5.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1c How would you rate Latinos?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 108 4.7 4.7 4.7
0 36 1.6 1.6 6.3
1 1 .0 .0 6.3
2 1 .0 .0 6.4
3 1 .0 .0 6.4
4 1 .0 .0 6.5
5 2 .1 .1 6.5
9 1 .0 .0 6.6
10 4 .2 .2 6.8
12 1 .0 .0 6.8
15 35 1.5 1.5 8.3
20 10 .4 .4 8.8
25 2 .1 .1 8.8
26 1 .0 .0 8.9
28 1 .0 .0 8.9
30 43 1.9 1.9 10.8
35 2 .1 .1 10.9
40 81 3.5 3.5 14.4
45 7 .3 .3 14.7
49 1 .0 .0 14.8
50 501 21.8 21.8 36.6
51 1 .0 .0 36.7
53 1 .0 .0 36.7
55 10 .4 .4 37.1
58 1 .0 .0 37.2
59 1 .0 .0 37.2
60 218 9.5 9.5 46.7
65 20 .9 .9 47.6
66 1 .0 .0 47.6
69 1 .0 .0 47.7
70 342 14.9 14.9 62.6
75 41 1.8 1.8 64.4
76 1 .0 .0 64.4
77 1 .0 .0 64.5
78 2 .1 .1 64.6
79 3 .1 .1 64.7
80 66 2.9 2.9 67.6
82 2 .1 .1 67.7
84 1 .0 .0 67.7
85 292 12.7 12.7 80.4
86 5 .2 .2 80.6
87 4 .2 .2 80.8
88 1 .0 .0 80.9
90 39 1.7 1.7 82.6
95 9 .4 .4 83.0
98 3 .1 .1 83.1
99 3 .1 .1 83.2
100 273 11.9 11.9 95.1
998 Don't recognize 112 4.9 4.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1d How would you rate Whites?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 108 4.7 4.7 4.7
0 33 1.4 1.4 6.1
2 2 .1 .1 6.2
3 2 .1 .1 6.3
5 4 .2 .2 6.5
6 2 .1 .1 6.6
7 2 .1 .1 6.7
8 1 .0 .0 6.7
10 1 .0 .0 6.8
12 1 .0 .0 6.8
15 28 1.2 1.2 8.0
20 2 .1 .1 8.1
25 3 .1 .1 8.2
30 26 1.1 1.1 9.4
34 1 .0 .0 9.4
35 1 .0 .0 9.5
39 1 .0 .0 9.5
40 48 2.1 2.1 11.6
45 5 .2 .2 11.8
46 1 .0 .0 11.9
50 452 19.7 19.7 31.6
51 5 .2 .2 31.8
52 2 .1 .1 31.9
55 7 .3 .3 32.2
59 2 .1 .1 32.3
60 178 7.8 7.8 40.0
64 1 .0 .0 40.1
65 19 .8 .8 40.9
68 1 .0 .0 40.9
69 2 .1 .1 41.0
70 354 15.4 15.4 56.5
71 2 .1 .1 56.5
72 2 .1 .1 56.6
74 2 .1 .1 56.7
75 58 2.5 2.5 59.2
76 2 .1 .1 59.3
78 1 .0 .0 59.4
79 1 .0 .0 59.4
80 72 3.1 3.1 62.6
81 1 .0 .0 62.6
84 1 .0 .0 62.6
85 411 17.9 17.9 80.6
87 3 .1 .1 80.7
88 1 .0 .0 80.7
90 63 2.7 2.7 83.5
95 13 .6 .6 84.0
98 2 .1 .1 84.1
99 2 .1 .1 84.2
100 289 12.6 12.6 96.8
998 Don't recognize 73 3.2 3.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1e How would you rate Blacks?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 107 4.7 4.7 4.7
0 29 1.3 1.3 5.9
1 1 .0 .0 6.0
2 2 .1 .1 6.1
5 4 .2 .2 6.2
7 2 .1 .1 6.3
8 1 .0 .0 6.4
10 8 .3 .3 6.7
15 22 1.0 1.0 7.7
20 8 .3 .3 8.0
24 1 .0 .0 8.1
25 1 .0 .0 8.1
30 25 1.1 1.1 9.2
35 3 .1 .1 9.3
40 60 2.6 2.6 11.9
43 1 .0 .0 12.0
44 1 .0 .0 12.0
45 9 .4 .4 12.4
49 2 .1 .1 12.5
50 403 17.6 17.6 30.1
51 2 .1 .1 30.2
55 8 .3 .3 30.5
56 1 .0 .0 30.6
59 2 .1 .1 30.6
60 152 6.6 6.6 37.3
62 1 .0 .0 37.3
65 14 .6 .6 37.9
67 1 .0 .0 38.0
68 1 .0 .0 38.0
69 1 .0 .0 38.1
70 274 11.9 11.9 50.0
72 1 .0 .0 50.0
73 1 .0 .0 50.1
74 2 .1 .1 50.2
75 47 2.0 2.0 52.2
76 2 .1 .1 52.3
80 56 2.4 2.4 54.8
85 358 15.6 15.6 70.4
88 3 .1 .1 70.5
89 3 .1 .1 70.6
90 56 2.4 2.4 73.1
92 2 .1 .1 73.1
93 1 .0 .0 73.2
95 23 1.0 1.0 74.2
96 1 .0 .0 74.2
98 6 .3 .3 74.5
99 2 .1 .1 74.6
100 518 22.6 22.6 97.2
998 Don't recognize 65 2.8 2.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_N1f How would you rate Asians?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 109 4.8 4.8 4.8
0 29 1.3 1.3 6.0
1 1 .0 .0 6.1
2 1 .0 .0 6.1
4 2 .1 .1 6.2
5 2 .1 .1 6.3
6 3 .1 .1 6.4
7 1 .0 .0 6.5
10 4 .2 .2 6.6
12 1 .0 .0 6.7
15 32 1.4 1.4 8.1
20 5 .2 .2 8.3
25 3 .1 .1 8.4
28 1 .0 .0 8.5
30 30 1.3 1.3 9.8
36 1 .0 .0 9.8
39 1 .0 .0 9.9
40 61 2.7 2.7 12.5
45 6 .3 .3 12.8
47 1 .0 .0 12.8
50 565 24.6 24.6 37.4
52 1 .0 .0 37.5
55 6 .3 .3 37.8
59 1 .0 .0 37.8
60 198 8.6 8.6 46.4
62 1 .0 .0 46.5
65 15 .7 .7 47.1
69 2 .1 .1 47.2
70 343 15.0 15.0 62.2
72 2 .1 .1 62.2
75 52 2.3 2.3 64.5
77 1 .0 .0 64.6
78 2 .1 .1 64.6
79 3 .1 .1 64.8
80 63 2.7 2.7 67.5
81 1 .0 .0 67.6
82 1 .0 .0 67.6
85 289 12.6 12.6 80.2
86 1 .0 .0 80.3
88 2 .1 .1 80.3
89 1 .0 .0 80.4
90 44 1.9 1.9 82.3
95 11 .5 .5 82.8
97 1 .0 .0 82.8
98 3 .1 .1 83.0
99 2 .1 .1 83.0
100 262 11.4 11.4 94.5
998 Don't recognize 127 5.5 5.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1g How would you rate gays/lesbians?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 106 4.6 4.6 4.6
0 242 10.5 10.5 15.2
1 2 .1 .1 15.3
2 3 .1 .1 15.4
3 3 .1 .1 15.5
5 7 .3 .3 15.8
6 1 .0 .0 15.9
7 1 .0 .0 15.9
10 10 .4 .4 16.3
15 101 4.4 4.4 20.7
19 1 .0 .0 20.8
20 10 .4 .4 21.2
23 1 .0 .0 21.3
25 5 .2 .2 21.5
30 69 3.0 3.0 24.5
32 1 .0 .0 24.5
35 2 .1 .1 24.6
40 126 5.5 5.5 30.1
42 1 .0 .0 30.2
45 5 .2 .2 30.4
47 2 .1 .1 30.5
49 3 .1 .1 30.6
50 570 24.8 24.8 55.4
51 2 .1 .1 55.5
53 1 .0 .0 55.6
55 12 .5 .5 56.1
59 1 .0 .0 56.1
60 138 6.0 6.0 62.2
62 1 .0 .0 62.2
65 17 .7 .7 62.9
66 1 .0 .0 63.0
69 2 .1 .1 63.1
70 196 8.5 8.5 71.6
75 38 1.7 1.7 73.3
77 1 .0 .0 73.3
78 1 .0 .0 73.4
79 2 .1 .1 73.5
80 46 2.0 2.0 75.5
85 194 8.5 8.5 83.9
87 1 .0 .0 84.0
88 1 .0 .0 84.0
90 33 1.4 1.4 85.4
95 7 .3 .3 85.7
98 2 .1 .1 85.8
99 2 .1 .1 85.9
100 214 9.3 9.3 95.2
998 Don't recognize 109 4.8 4.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1h How would you rate unionized workers?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 101 4.4 4.4 4.4
0 79 3.4 3.4 7.8
1 3 .1 .1 8.0
2 2 .1 .1 8.1
3 1 .0 .0 8.1
5 4 .2 .2 8.3
10 9 .4 .4 8.7
12 1 .0 .0 8.7
15 64 2.8 2.8 11.5
20 9 .4 .4 11.9
22 1 .0 .0 11.9
25 12 .5 .5 12.5
30 62 2.7 2.7 15.2
35 8 .3 .3 15.5
39 1 .0 .0 15.6
40 125 5.4 5.4 21.0
45 6 .3 .3 21.3
48 1 .0 .0 21.3
49 2 .1 .1 21.4
50 518 22.6 22.6 44.0
53 1 .0 .0 44.0
55 6 .3 .3 44.3
56 2 .1 .1 44.4
58 1 .0 .0 44.4
60 168 7.3 7.3 51.7
63 1 .0 .0 51.8
64 2 .1 .1 51.9
65 10 .4 .4 52.3
68 1 .0 .0 52.4
69 1 .0 .0 52.4
70 226 9.9 9.9 62.2
72 1 .0 .0 62.3
74 1 .0 .0 62.3
75 29 1.3 1.3 63.6
77 1 .0 .0 63.6
78 1 .0 .0 63.7
79 1 .0 .0 63.7
80 54 2.4 2.4 66.1
81 1 .0 .0 66.1
82 1 .0 .0 66.2
85 257 11.2 11.2 77.4
88 3 .1 .1 77.5
89 2 .1 .1 77.6
90 38 1.7 1.7 79.3
91 1 .0 .0 79.3
95 13 .6 .6 79.9
98 1 .0 .0 79.9
99 3 .1 .1 80.0
100 238 10.4 10.4 90.4
998 Don't recognize 220 9.6 9.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1i How would you rate Congress?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 96 4.2 4.2 4.2
0 312 13.6 13.6 17.8
1 2 .1 .1 17.9
2 5 .2 .2 18.1
3 1 .0 .0 18.1
5 11 .5 .5 18.6
6 1 .0 .0 18.7
7 1 .0 .0 18.7
9 2 .1 .1 18.8
10 42 1.8 1.8 20.6
12 1 .0 .0 20.7
13 2 .1 .1 20.7
15 260 11.3 11.3 32.1
19 1 .0 .0 32.1
20 35 1.5 1.5 33.7
22 2 .1 .1 33.7
23 1 .0 .0 33.8
25 26 1.1 1.1 34.9
28 1 .0 .0 35.0
30 216 9.4 9.4 44.4
32 1 .0 .0 44.4
34 1 .0 .0 44.5
35 17 .7 .7 45.2
40 295 12.9 12.9 58.1
43 1 .0 .0 58.1
44 2 .1 .1 58.2
45 25 1.1 1.1 59.3
47 1 .0 .0 59.3
48 1 .0 .0 59.4
49 3 .1 .1 59.5
50 369 16.1 16.1 75.6
55 14 .6 .6 76.2
57 2 .1 .1 76.3
58 1 .0 .0 76.3
59 2 .1 .1 76.4
60 165 7.2 7.2 83.6
62 1 .0 .0 83.7
64 1 .0 .0 83.7
65 9 .4 .4 84.1
66 3 .1 .1 84.2
69 1 .0 .0 84.3
70 139 6.1 6.1 90.3
71 1 .0 .0 90.4
73 1 .0 .0 90.4
74 2 .1 .1 90.5
75 12 .5 .5 91.0
76 1 .0 .0 91.1
78 1 .0 .0 91.1
79 2 .1 .1 91.2
80 17 .7 .7 91.9
82 1 .0 .0 92.0
85 57 2.5 2.5 94.5
89 2 .1 .1 94.6
90 3 .1 .1 94.7
91 1 .0 .0 94.7
95 1 .0 .0 94.8
100 23 1.0 1.0 95.8
998 Don't recognize 97 4.2 4.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1j How would you rate the wealthiest 1%?


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 109 4.8 4.8 4.8
0 318 13.9 13.9 18.6
1 13 .6 .6 19.2
2 4 .2 .2 19.4
3 1 .0 .0 19.4
4 1 .0 .0 19.4
5 29 1.3 1.3 20.7
6 3 .1 .1 20.8
8 1 .0 .0 20.9
10 30 1.3 1.3 22.2
11 1 .0 .0 22.2
12 1 .0 .0 22.3
13 1 .0 .0 22.3
14 1 .0 .0 22.4
15 194 8.5 8.5 30.8
17 1 .0 .0 30.9
18 1 .0 .0 30.9
20 35 1.5 1.5 32.4
25 12 .5 .5 33.0
28 1 .0 .0 33.0
30 144 6.3 6.3 39.3
32 1 .0 .0 39.3
35 4 .2 .2 39.5
38 1 .0 .0 39.5
40 147 6.4 6.4 45.9
41 1 .0 .0 46.0
44 1 .0 .0 46.0
45 14 .6 .6 46.6
49 3 .1 .1 46.8
50 567 24.7 24.7 71.5
51 1 .0 .0 71.5
55 12 .5 .5 72.1
60 117 5.1 5.1 77.2
65 7 .3 .3 77.5
67 1 .0 .0 77.5
69 3 .1 .1 77.6
70 122 5.3 5.3 83.0
72 1 .0 .0 83.0
73 1 .0 .0 83.0
75 17 .7 .7 83.8
78 3 .1 .1 83.9
80 17 .7 .7 84.7
83 1 .0 .0 84.7
85 99 4.3 4.3 89.0
86 1 .0 .0 89.1
88 1 .0 .0 89.1
90 10 .4 .4 89.5
95 1 .0 .0 89.6
99 1 .0 .0 89.6
100 86 3.7 3.7 93.4
998 Don't recognize 152 6.6 6.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1k How would you rate the unemployed?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 109 4.8 4.8 4.8
0 89 3.9 3.9 8.6
1 2 .1 .1 8.7
2 2 .1 .1 8.8
5 6 .3 .3 9.1
10 10 .4 .4 9.5
15 47 2.0 2.0 11.6
20 6 .3 .3 11.8
25 7 .3 .3 12.1
30 56 2.4 2.4 14.6
35 8 .3 .3 14.9
39 1 .0 .0 15.0
40 99 4.3 4.3 19.3
41 1 .0 .0 19.3
45 13 .6 .6 19.9
47 1 .0 .0 19.9
50 573 25.0 25.0 44.9
52 2 .1 .1 45.0
55 17 .7 .7 45.7
56 1 .0 .0 45.8
59 1 .0 .0 45.8
60 263 11.5 11.5 57.3
62 2 .1 .1 57.4
64 2 .1 .1 57.5
65 12 .5 .5 58.0
66 1 .0 .0 58.0
67 1 .0 .0 58.1
70 300 13.1 13.1 71.1
71 1 .0 .0 71.2
75 49 2.1 2.1 73.3
76 2 .1 .1 73.4
78 1 .0 .0 73.5
79 2 .1 .1 73.5
80 43 1.9 1.9 75.4
81 1 .0 .0 75.5
85 244 10.6 10.6 86.1
88 1 .0 .0 86.1
89 1 .0 .0 86.2
90 30 1.3 1.3 87.5
95 15 .7 .7 88.1
98 1 .0 .0 88.2
99 4 .2 .2 88.4
100 174 7.6 7.6 95.9
998 Don't recognize 93 4.1 4.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1l How would you rate unmarried mothers?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 95 4.1 4.1 4.1
0 36 1.6 1.6 5.7
1 1 .0 .0 5.8
2 1 .0 .0 5.8
3 2 .1 .1 5.9
5 3 .1 .1 6.0
7 1 .0 .0 6.1
8 1 .0 .0 6.1
10 6 .3 .3 6.4
15 59 2.6 2.6 8.9
16 1 .0 .0 9.0
20 10 .4 .4 9.4
23 1 .0 .0 9.5
25 7 .3 .3 9.8
30 61 2.7 2.7 12.4
32 1 .0 .0 12.5
33 3 .1 .1 12.6
35 4 .2 .2 12.8
37 2 .1 .1 12.9
40 140 6.1 6.1 19.0
45 10 .4 .4 19.4
46 1 .0 .0 19.4
48 1 .0 .0 19.5
49 3 .1 .1 19.6
50 558 24.3 24.3 43.9
51 1 .0 .0 44.0
55 10 .4 .4 44.4
59 1 .0 .0 44.5
60 203 8.8 8.8 53.3
61 1 .0 .0 53.4
65 11 .5 .5 53.8
67 1 .0 .0 53.9
70 280 12.2 12.2 66.1
73 1 .0 .0 66.1
75 42 1.8 1.8 68.0
76 1 .0 .0 68.0
78 2 .1 .1 68.1
79 2 .1 .1 68.2
80 56 2.4 2.4 70.6
85 258 11.2 11.2 81.9
87 2 .1 .1 82.0
88 4 .2 .2 82.1
89 1 .0 .0 82.2
90 39 1.7 1.7 83.9
91 2 .1 .1 84.0
95 12 .5 .5 84.5
98 2 .1 .1 84.6
99 4 .2 .2 84.7
100 266 11.6 11.6 96.3
998 Don't recognize 84 3.7 3.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1m How would you rate undocumented immigrants?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 105 4.6 4.6 4.6
0 444 19.4 19.4 23.9
1 5 .2 .2 24.1
2 2 .1 .1 24.2
3 1 .0 .0 24.3
5 9 .4 .4 24.7
6 1 .0 .0 24.7
7 2 .1 .1 24.8
10 27 1.2 1.2 26.0
12 1 .0 .0 26.0
14 1 .0 .0 26.1
15 216 9.4 9.4 35.5
16 1 .0 .0 35.5
17 2 .1 .1 35.6
20 13 .6 .6 36.2
22 1 .0 .0 36.2
25 11 .5 .5 36.7
30 160 7.0 7.0 43.7
35 7 .3 .3 44.0
40 254 11.1 11.1 55.1
44 1 .0 .0 55.1
45 17 .7 .7 55.8
47 1 .0 .0 55.9
48 3 .1 .1 56.0
49 3 .1 .1 56.1
50 390 17.0 17.0 73.1
51 4 .2 .2 73.3
55 14 .6 .6 73.9
56 1 .0 .0 74.0
60 144 6.3 6.3 80.3
65 8 .3 .3 80.6
66 2 .1 .1 80.7
70 126 5.5 5.5 86.2
72 1 .0 .0 86.2
74 1 .0 .0 86.3
75 26 1.1 1.1 87.4
76 1 .0 .0 87.4
77 1 .0 .0 87.5
80 23 1.0 1.0 88.5
85 68 3.0 3.0 91.5
90 7 .3 .3 91.8
95 3 .1 .1 91.9
99 1 .0 .0 91.9
100 56 2.4 2.4 94.4
998 Don't recognize 129 5.6 5.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_N1n How would you rate public school teachers?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 89 3.9 3.9 3.9
0 23 1.0 1.0 4.9
3 1 .0 .0 4.9
4 1 .0 .0 5.0
5 3 .1 .1 5.1
6 1 .0 .0 5.1
7 1 .0 .0 5.2
10 5 .2 .2 5.4
15 28 1.2 1.2 6.6
20 1 .0 .0 6.7
23 1 .0 .0 6.7
25 5 .2 .2 6.9
26 1 .0 .0 7.0
30 32 1.4 1.4 8.4
32 1 .0 .0 8.4
33 1 .0 .0 8.5
35 3 .1 .1 8.6
37 2 .1 .1 8.7
40 68 3.0 3.0 11.6
42 1 .0 .0 11.7
44 2 .1 .1 11.8
45 4 .2 .2 11.9
48 1 .0 .0 12.0
49 1 .0 .0 12.0
50 209 9.1 9.1 21.1
51 2 .1 .1 21.2
52 1 .0 .0 21.3
55 11 .5 .5 21.8
60 219 9.5 9.5 31.3
65 11 .5 .5 31.8
67 1 .0 .0 31.8
68 2 .1 .1 31.9
70 343 15.0 15.0 46.9
72 1 .0 .0 46.9
75 44 1.9 1.9 48.8
76 1 .0 .0 48.9
77 3 .1 .1 49.0
78 4 .2 .2 49.2
79 3 .1 .1 49.3
80 86 3.7 3.7 53.1
82 1 .0 .0 53.1
85 463 20.2 20.2 73.3
86 3 .1 .1 73.4
87 1 .0 .0 73.5
88 2 .1 .1 73.5
89 8 .3 .3 73.9
90 91 4.0 4.0 77.9
94 1 .0 .0 77.9
95 27 1.2 1.2 79.1
96 2 .1 .1 79.2
97 1 .0 .0 79.2
98 4 .2 .2 79.4
99 3 .1 .1 79.5
100 409 17.8 17.8 97.3
998 Don't recognize 61 2.7 2.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_O1 [Black people should teach their children to fight against racial discrimination as
much as possible] How much emphasis or de-emphasis should Black people place on each
statement in the education of their children?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 108 4.7 4.7 4.7
1 Strong de-emphasis 98 4.3 4.3 9.0
2 Some de-emphasis 94 4.1 4.1 13.1
3 No emphasis nor de- 564 24.6 24.6 37.7
emphasis
4 Some emphasis 585 25.5 25.5 63.2
5 Strong emphasis 845 36.8 36.8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_O3 [Black people should teach their children not think that all Whites are racist] How
much emphasis or de-emphasis should Black people place on each statement in the
education of their children?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 107 4.7 4.7 4.7
1 Strong de-emphasis 119 5.2 5.2 9.9
2 Some de-emphasis 69 3.0 3.0 12.9
3 No emphasis nor de- 416 18.1 18.1 31.0
emphasis
4 Some emphasis 522 22.8 22.8 53.7
5 Strong emphasis 1061 46.3 46.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_O4 [Black people should teach their children to avoid behaviors that are characteristic
of Black stereotypes] How much emphasis or de-emphasis should Black people place on
each statement in the education of their children?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 115 5.0 5.0 5.0
1 Strong de-emphasis 109 4.8 4.8 9.8
2 Some de-emphasis 115 5.0 5.0 14.8
3 No emphasis nor de- 728 31.7 31.7 46.5
emphasis
4 Some emphasis 586 25.5 25.5 72.1
5 Strong emphasis 641 27.9 27.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_O5 [Black people should teach their children to be careful around the police] How much
emphasis or de-emphasis should Black people place on each statement in the education of
their children?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 112 4.9 4.9 4.9
1 Strong de-emphasis 178 7.8 7.8 12.6
2 Some de-emphasis 181 7.9 7.9 20.5
3 No emphasis nor de- 793 34.6 34.6 55.1
emphasis
4 Some emphasis 554 24.1 24.1 79.3
5 Strong emphasis 476 20.7 20.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P2 People talk about social classes such as the poor, the working class, the middle
class, the upper-middle class, and the upper class. Which of these classes would you say
you belong to?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 87 3.8 3.8 3.8
1 Poor 258 11.2 11.2 15.0
2 Working class 755 32.9 32.9 48.0
3 Middle class 955 41.6 41.6 89.6
4 Upper-middle class 214 9.3 9.3 98.9
5 Upper class 25 1.1 1.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P3 Which of these classes would you say most memebers of your family belong to?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 91 4.0 4.0 4.0
1 Poor 154 6.7 6.7 10.7
2 Working class 906 39.5 39.5 50.2
3 Middle class 953 41.5 41.5 91.7
4 Upper-middle class 172 7.5 7.5 99.2
5 Upper class 18 .8 .8 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_P4 Do you consider yourself to be...

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 23 1.0 11.7 11.7
1 Heterosexual or straight 162 7.1 82.2 93.9
2 Gay 3 .1 1.5 95.4
3 Lesbian 3 .1 1.5 97.0
4 Bisexual 2 .1 1.0 98.0
5 Other, please specify: 4 .2 2.0 100.0
Total 197 8.6 100.0
Missing System 2097 91.4
Total 2294 100.0

W1_P4_Other_Text [Other] Do you consider yourself to be...

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 2292 99.9 99.9 99.9
myself 1 .0 .0 100.0
Real Human 1 .0 .0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P5 Do you have any friends or relatives who you know to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, or
transgender?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 17 .7 8.7 8.7
1 Yes 143 6.2 73.3 82.1
2 No 35 1.5 17.9 100.0
Total 195 8.5 100.0
Missing System 2099 91.5
Total 2294 100.0

W1_P5A How long have you been living here in your current community?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 56 2.4 2.4 2.4
1 Less than one year 92 4.0 4.0 6.5
2 One to three years 298 13.0 13.0 19.4
3 Four to ten years 504 22.0 22.0 41.4
4 More than ten years but 980 42.7 42.7 84.1
not entire life
5 Entire life 364 15.9 15.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_P6 Is anyone in your household on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces, Military
Reserves, or National Guard?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 74 3.2 3.2 3.2
1 Yes, on active duty 115 5.0 5.0 8.2
2 No, but on active duty in 571 24.9 24.9 33.1
the past
3 No, trained for the 72 3.1 3.1 36.3
Reserves or National
Guard, but never activated
4 No, no one in the 1462 63.7 63.7 100.0
household has ever served
in the military
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P8 Does anyone in your household currently belong to a union?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 47 2.0 2.0 2.0
1 Yes 378 16.5 16.5 18.5
2 No 1869 81.5 81.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P9 Has anyone in your household ever been arrested for a crime?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 73 3.2 3.2 3.2
1 Yes 399 17.4 17.4 20.6
2 No 1822 79.4 79.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P10 Do you have any friends or relatives having a criminal conviction?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 81 3.5 3.5 3.5
1 Yes 1013 44.2 44.2 47.7
2 No 1200 52.3 52.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_P11 Is anyone in your household currently unemployed?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 62 2.7 2.7 2.7
1 Yes 867 37.8 37.8 40.5
2 No 1365 59.5 59.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P13 Are you a citizen of the United States?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 7 .3 4.1 4.1
1 Yes 159 6.9 92.4 96.5
2 No 6 .3 3.5 100.0
Total 172 7.5 100.0
Missing System 2122 92.5
Total 2294 100.0

W1_P13A Were you born a United States citizen or are you a naturalized U.S. citizen?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 37 1.6 1.7 1.7
1 Born a U.S. citizen 2107 91.8 94.1 95.7
2 Naturalized U.S. citizen 96 4.2 4.3 100.0
Total 2240 97.6 100.0
Missing System 54 2.4
Total 2294 100.0
W1_P13B In what year did you become a U.S. citizen? Please enter the full year when you
became a citizen, for example 1962 or 2000.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 9 .4 9.4 9.4
1945 1 .0 1.0 10.4
1949 1 .0 1.0 11.5
1954 1 .0 1.0 12.5
1956 1 .0 1.0 13.5
1958 1 .0 1.0 14.6
1963 1 .0 1.0 15.6
1965 3 .1 3.1 18.8
1966 1 .0 1.0 19.8
1967 2 .1 2.1 21.9
1970 2 .1 2.1 24.0
1973 2 .1 2.1 26.0
1974 1 .0 1.0 27.1
1975 1 .0 1.0 28.1
1976 2 .1 2.1 30.2
1977 1 .0 1.0 31.3
1978 3 .1 3.1 34.4
1981 2 .1 2.1 36.5
1983 1 .0 1.0 37.5
1985 2 .1 2.1 39.6
1986 1 .0 1.0 40.6
1988 1 .0 1.0 41.7
1989 1 .0 1.0 42.7
1990 5 .2 5.2 47.9
1991 3 .1 3.1 51.0
1992 1 .0 1.0 52.1
1993 1 .0 1.0 53.1
1994 1 .0 1.0 54.2
1995 5 .2 5.2 59.4
1996 2 .1 2.1 61.5
1997 3 .1 3.1 64.6
1998 2 .1 2.1 66.7
2000 5 .2 5.2 71.9
2001 3 .1 3.1 75.0
2002 3 .1 3.1 78.1
2003 1 .0 1.0 79.2
2004 4 .2 4.2 83.3
2005 3 .1 3.1 86.5
2006 2 .1 2.1 88.5
2008 1 .0 1.0 89.6
2009 5 .2 5.2 94.8
2010 1 .0 1.0 95.8
2011 3 .1 3.1 99.0
2012 1 .0 1.0 100.0
Total 96 4.2 100.0
Missing System 2198 95.8
Total 2294 100.0

W1_P13B_TEXT Codes

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 9 .4 100.0 100.0
Missing System 2285 99.6
Total 2294 100.0

W1_P14 Do you presently have any kind of health insurance?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 50 2.2 2.2 2.2
1 Yes 1851 80.7 80.7 82.9
2 No 393 17.1 17.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P15 Do you personally, or jointly with a spouse, have any money invested in the stock
market right now—either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 79 3.4 3.4 3.4
1 Yes 915 39.9 39.9 43.3
2 No 1300 56.7 56.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16A [Social security] Check any box to designate other sources of income you or
anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 1618 70.5 70.5 70.5
1 Yes 676 29.5 29.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16B [Worker’s Compensation] Check any box to designate other sources of income you
or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2270 99.0 99.0 99.0
1 Yes 24 1.0 1.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_P16C [Unemployment compensation] Check any box to designate other sources of
income you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2109 91.9 91.9 91.9
1 Yes 185 8.1 8.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16D [TANF or Welfare] Check any box to designate other sources of income you or
anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2242 97.7 97.7 97.7
1 Yes 52 2.3 2.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16E [Food Stamps] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or
anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 1941 84.6 84.6 84.6
1 Yes 353 15.4 15.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16F [Free or Reduced School Lunch and/or Breakfast] Check any box to designate from
other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2147 93.6 93.6 93.6
1 Yes 147 6.4 6.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16G [Supplemental Security Income (SSI)] Check any box to designate from other
sources of income you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2171 94.6 94.6 94.6
1 Yes 123 5.4 5.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_P16H [Energy Assistance] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you
or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2174 94.8 94.8 94.8
1 Yes 120 5.2 5.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16I [Poor Housing Assistance] Check any box to designate from other sources of
income you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2249 98.0 98.0 98.0
1 Yes 45 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16J [Disability Payments] Check any box to designate from other sources of income
you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2147 93.6 93.6 93.6
1 Yes 147 6.4 6.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16K [Veterans’ Payments] Check any box to designate from other sources of income
you or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2198 95.8 95.8 95.8
1 Yes 96 4.2 4.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16L [Survivor Payments] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you
or anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2264 98.7 98.7 98.7
1 Yes 30 1.3 1.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_P16M [No one in my household received income from any of these sources] Check any
box to designate from other sources of income you or anyone in your household may have
received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 1306 56.9 56.9 56.9
1 Yes 988 43.1 43.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P16_Refused [Refused] Check any box to designate from other sources of income you or
anyone in your household may have received in 2011.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 2176 94.9 94.9 94.9
1 Yes 118 5.1 5.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P17 Do you have any biological or adopted children?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 40 1.7 1.7 1.7
1 Yes 1304 56.8 56.8 58.6
2 No 950 41.4 41.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P17A How many biological or adopted children do you have?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 9 .4 .7 .7
1 One 306 13.3 23.5 24.2
2 Two 481 21.0 36.9 61.0
3 Three 267 11.6 20.5 81.5
4 Four 138 6.0 10.6 92.1
5 Five 51 2.2 3.9 96.0
6 Six 25 1.1 1.9 97.9
7 Seven 11 .5 .8 98.8
8 Eight 5 .2 .4 99.2
9 Nine 1 .0 .1 99.2
10 Ten or More 10 .4 .8 100.0
Total 1304 56.8 100.0
Missing System 990 43.2
Total 2294 100.0
W1_P18 Who provides 60% or more of the financial support for your children?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 279 12.2 21.4 21.4
1 You 752 32.8 57.7 79.1
2 Your children's 210 9.2 16.1 95.2
biological/adoptive
father/mother
3 Your legal spouse (not 26 1.1 2.0 97.2
the children's biological
parent)
4 A relative 13 .6 1.0 98.2
5 State provided support 24 1.0 1.8 100.0
Total 1304 56.8 100.0
Missing System 990 43.2
Total 2294 100.0

W1_P19 Which of the following best describes where your minor children (under 18) live?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 539 23.5 41.3 41.3
1 The children live with 414 18.0 31.7 73.1
both biological/adoptive
parents
2 The children live equally 74 3.2 5.7 78.8
with me and their other
biological/adoptive parent
3 The children live with me 35 1.5 2.7 81.4
and a non-
biological/adoptive parent
4 The children live only 206 9.0 15.8 97.2
with me
5 The children live with 36 1.6 2.8 100.0
relatives
Total 1304 56.8 100.0
Missing System 990 43.2
Total 2294 100.0
W1_P20 Which of the following income groups includes YOUR personal annual income (Do
not include the income of other members of your household)?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 202 8.8 8.8 8.8
1 Less than $5,000 261 11.4 11.4 20.2
2 $5,000 to $7,499 72 3.1 3.1 23.3
3 $7,500 to $9,999 58 2.5 2.5 25.9
4 $10,000 to $12,499 107 4.7 4.7 30.5
5 $12,500 to $14,999 87 3.8 3.8 34.3
6 $15,000 to $19,999 91 4.0 4.0 38.3
7 $20,000 to $24,999 149 6.5 6.5 44.8
8 $25,000 to $29,999 127 5.5 5.5 50.3
9 $30,000 to $34,999 118 5.1 5.1 55.4
10 $35,000 to $39,999 107 4.7 4.7 60.1
11 $40,000 to $49,999 174 7.6 7.6 67.7
12 $50,000 to $59,999 166 7.2 7.2 74.9
13 $60,000 to $74,999 185 8.1 8.1 83.0
14 $75,000 to $84,999 86 3.7 3.7 86.7
15 $85,000 to $99,999 81 3.5 3.5 90.3
16 $100,000 to $124,999 114 5.0 5.0 95.2
17 $125,000 to $149,999 38 1.7 1.7 96.9
18 $150,000 to $174,999 44 1.9 1.9 98.8
19 $175,000 or more 27 1.2 1.2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_P21 Does your household subscribe to a digital cable television service?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 26 1.1 2.2 2.2
1 Yes 577 25.2 49.3 51.5
2 No 567 24.7 48.5 100.0
Total 1170 51.0 100.0
Missing System 1124 49.0
Total 2294 100.0

W1_Order_Q1 Forward or backward order of Q1

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 1-4 1160 50.6 50.6 50.6
2 4-1 1134 49.4 49.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
W1_Q1_A Would people in your neighborhood find taking a survey using a computer
connected to Internet difficult or easy?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 95 4.1 4.1 4.1
1 Very difficult 41 1.8 1.8 5.9
2 Difficult 210 9.2 9.2 15.1
3 Easy 1236 53.9 53.9 69.0
4 Very easy 712 31.0 31.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_Q1_B Did you find taking this survey using a computer connected to the Internet difficult
or easy?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 57 2.5 2.5 2.5
1 Very difficult 23 1.0 1.0 3.5
2 Difficult 89 3.9 3.9 7.4
3 Easy 1018 44.4 44.4 51.7
4 Very easy 1107 48.3 48.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_QA1 Would you say that you have been much more interested, somewhat more
interested, or not much interested in following political campains which involve an African
American candidate?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 47 2.0 3.7 3.7
1 Much more interested 350 15.3 27.4 31.1
2 A little more interested 262 11.4 20.5 51.6
3 Equally interested 449 19.6 35.1 86.7
4 Somewhat interested 70 3.1 5.5 92.2
5 Not much interested 100 4.4 7.8 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_QA2 Do you think what happens generally to Black people in this country will have
something to do with what happens in your life?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 59 2.6 4.6 4.6
1 Yes 747 32.6 58.5 63.1
2 No 472 20.6 36.9 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0
W1_QA2A Will it affect you a lot, some, or not very much?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 3 .1 .4 .4
1 A lot 229 10.0 30.7 31.1
2 Some 389 17.0 52.1 83.1
3 Not very much 74 3.2 9.9 93.0
4 Don’t know 52 2.3 7.0 100.0
Total 747 32.6 100.0
Missing System 1547 67.4
Total 2294 100.0

W1_QA4a [Blacks elected to office really don’t have the power to change things for Blacks in
this country. ] Indicate whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or
disagree strongly with the statement.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 72 3.1 5.6 5.6
1 Agree strongly 150 6.5 11.7 17.4
2 Agree somewhat 433 18.9 33.9 51.3
3 Disagree somewhat 410 17.9 32.1 83.3
4 Disagree strongly 213 9.3 16.7 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_QA4b [Blacks should always vote for Black candidates when they run. ] Indicate whether
you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with the
statement.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 73 3.2 5.7 5.7
1 Agree strongly 63 2.7 4.9 10.6
2 Agree somewhat 147 6.4 11.5 22.1
3 Disagree somewhat 459 20.0 35.9 58.1
4 Disagree strongly 536 23.4 41.9 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0
W1_QA4c [Black people should shop in Black-owned stores whenever possible. ] Indicate
whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
the statement.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 70 3.1 5.5 5.5
1 Agree strongly 217 9.5 17.0 22.5
2 Agree somewhat 455 19.8 35.6 58.1
3 Disagree somewhat 292 12.7 22.8 80.9
4 Disagree strongly 244 10.6 19.1 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_QA5d [Blacks should not have anything to do with Whites if they can help it. ] Indicate
whether you agree strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
the statement.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 71 3.1 5.6 5.6
1 Agree strongly 17 .7 1.3 6.9
2 Agree somewhat 64 2.8 5.0 11.9
3 Disagree somewhat 181 7.9 14.2 26.1
4 Disagree strongly 945 41.2 73.9 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_QA6 Some people feel that the 2008 election of Barack Obama signaled a significant shift
in U.S. race relations that showed blacks now enjoy racial equality. To what extent do you
agree or disagree with that perception?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 71 3.1 5.6 5.6
1 Agree strongly 136 5.9 10.6 16.2
2 Agree somewhat 397 17.3 31.1 47.3
3 Disagree somewhat 373 16.3 29.2 76.4
4 Disagree strongly 301 13.1 23.6 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0
W1_QB1 Some people say that over the last 20 years or so, there has been a lot of progress
in getting rid of racial discrimination. Others say there hasn’t been much real change for
most Blacks over that time. Which do you agree with most?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 71 3.1 5.6 5.6
1 A lot of progress 511 22.3 40.0 45.5
2 Not much real change 696 30.3 54.5 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_QB2 Do you think that generally what happens in this country to Black men will have
something to do with what happens in your life?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 68 3.0 5.3 5.3
1 Yes 682 29.7 53.4 58.7
2 No 528 23.0 41.3 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_QB2A Will it affect you a lot, some, or not very much?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 3 .1 .4 .4
1 A lot 207 9.0 30.4 30.8
2 Some 418 18.2 61.3 92.1
3 Not very much 54 2.4 7.9 100.0
Total 682 29.7 100.0
Missing System 1612 70.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_QB3 What about Black women? Do you think that generally what happens in this
country to Black women will have something to do with what happens in your life?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 63 2.7 4.9 4.9
1 Yes 735 32.0 57.5 62.4
2 No 480 20.9 37.6 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0
W1_QB3A Will it affect you a lot, some, or not very much?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 2 .1 .3 .3
1 A lot 270 11.8 36.7 37.0
2 Some 407 17.7 55.4 92.4
3 Not very much 56 2.4 7.6 100.0
Total 735 32.0 100.0
Missing System 1559 68.0
Total 2294 100.0

W1_Order_M13 Forward or backward order of B4

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 1-4 1137 49.6 49.6 49.6
2 4-1 1157 50.4 50.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W1_M13_A [God is removed from worldly affairs. ] For believers and non-believers, based on
your personal understanding, what do you think God is like…
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 111 4.8 8.7 8.7
1 Strongly agree 211 9.2 16.5 25.2
2 Somewhat agree 218 9.5 17.1 42.3
3 Somewhat disagree 294 12.8 23.0 65.3
4 Strongly disagree 444 19.4 34.7 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_M13_B [God’s plan is to make the United States successful. ] For believers and non-
believers, based on your personal understanding, what do you think God is like…
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 132 5.8 10.3 10.3
1 Strongly agree 300 13.1 23.5 33.8
2 Somewhat agree 331 14.4 25.9 59.7
3 Somewhat disagree 249 10.9 19.5 79.2
4 Strongly disagree 266 11.6 20.8 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0
W1_M13_C [God is angered by human sin. ] For believers and non-believers, based on your
personal understanding, what do you think God is like…
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 108 4.7 8.5 8.5
1 Strongly agree 562 24.5 44.0 52.4
2 Somewhat agree 296 12.9 23.2 75.6
3 Somewhat disagree 149 6.5 11.7 87.2
4 Strongly disagree 163 7.1 12.8 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0

W1_M13_D [God has a plan and directs human life. ] For believers and non-believers, based
on your personal understanding, what do you think God is like…
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 Refused 108 4.7 8.5 8.5
1 Strongly agree 690 30.1 54.0 62.4
2 Somewhat agree 275 12.0 21.5 84.0
3 Somewhat disagree 96 4.2 7.5 91.5
4 Strongly disagree 109 4.8 8.5 100.0
Total 1278 55.7 100.0
Missing System 1016 44.3
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QB1A Which one of the following best describes what you did in the elections that were
held November 6th?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 9 .4 .6 .6
1 Definitely did not vote in 246 10.7 15.4 15.9
the elections
2 Definitely voted in 749 32.7 46.8 62.7
person at a polling place
on Election Day
3 Definitely voted in 305 13.3 19.1 81.8
person at a polling place
before Election Day
4 Definitely voted by 243 10.6 15.2 96.9
mailing a ballot to elections
officials before the election

5 Definitely voted in some 30 1.3 1.9 98.8


other way
6 Not completely sure 19 .8 1.2 100.0
whether you voted or not
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QB1B If you had to guess, would you say that you probably did vote in the elections, or
probably did not vote in the elections?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 2 .1 10.5 10.5
1 Probably did vote in the 4 .2 21.1 31.6
elections
2 Probably did not vote in 13 .6 68.4 100.0
the elections
Total 19 .8 100.0
Missing System 2275 99.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QB1C How about the election for President? Did you vote for a candidate for President?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Yes 3 .1 75.0 75.0
2 No 1 .0 25.0 100.0
Total 4 .2 100.0
Missing System 2290 99.8
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QB1D [Text] Who did you vote for?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Democrat 1 .0 33.3 33.3
2 Republican 1 .0 33.3 66.7
3 Other; specify 1 .0 33.3 100.0
Total 3 .1 100.0
Missing System 2291 99.9
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QB1D_Text

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 2293 100.0 100.0 100.0
dk 1 .0 .0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

W2_QB2A How about the elections for other state and local offices, did you vote a straight
ticket or did you vote for candidates from different parties?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 126 5.5 7.9 7.9
1 Straight ticket - 676 29.5 42.2 50.1
Democratic
2 Split ticket - mostly 292 12.7 18.2 68.3
Democratic
3 Split ticket - about half 182 7.9 11.4 79.7
and half, NA how split
4 Split ticket - mostly 164 7.1 10.2 89.9
Republican
5 Straight ticket – 161 7.0 10.1 100.0
Republican
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QB2B Did you vote in person or by mail?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 1 .0 33.3 33.3
1 In person 2 .1 66.7 100.0
Total 3 .1 100.0
Missing System 2291 99.9
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QB3 How often would you say you vote?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 43 1.9 2.7 2.7
1 Always 851 37.1 53.2 55.8
2 Nearly Always 418 18.2 26.1 81.9
3 Part Of The Time 89 3.9 5.6 87.5
4 Seldom 200 8.7 12.5 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QE1 When you think about your future, are you generally optimistic, pessimistic, or
neither optimistic nor pessimistic?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 31 1.4 1.9 1.9
1 Optimistic 880 38.4 55.0 56.9
2 Pessimistic 230 10.0 14.4 71.3
3 Neither 460 20.1 28.7 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QE1A Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or


slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 1 .0 .1 .1
1 Extremely 329 14.3 29.6 29.7
2 Moderately 655 28.6 59.0 88.7
3 Slightly 125 5.4 11.3 100.0
Total 1110 48.4 100.0
Missing System 1184 51.6
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QE2 And when you think about the future of the United States as a whole, are you
generally optimistic, pessimistic, or neither optimistic nor pessimistic?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 26 1.1 1.6 1.6
1 Optimistic 739 32.2 46.2 47.8
2 Pessimistic 391 17.0 24.4 72.2
3 Neither 445 19.4 27.8 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QE2A Are you extremely [optimistic/pessimistic], moderately [optimistic/pessimistic], or
slightly [optimistic/pessimistic]?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 6 .3 .5 .5
1 Extremely 339 14.8 30.0 30.5
2 Moderately 611 26.6 54.1 84.6
3 Slightly 174 7.6 15.4 100.0
Total 1130 49.3 100.0
Missing System 1164 50.7
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QE3 How far along the road to your American Dream do you think you will ultimately get
on a 10-point scale where 1 is not far at all and 10 nearly there?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 36 1.6 2.2 2.2
1 1 - Not far at all in 91 4.0 5.7 7.9
achieving the American
Dream
22 59 2.6 3.7 11.6
33 82 3.6 5.1 16.7
44 113 4.9 7.1 23.8
55 278 12.1 17.4 41.2
66 199 8.7 12.4 53.6
77 255 11.1 15.9 69.5
88 220 9.6 13.7 83.3
99 85 3.7 5.3 88.6
10 10 - Nearly there in 183 8.0 11.4 100.0
achieving the American
Dream
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF1A Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 57 2.5 3.6 3.6
1 Disloyal to their racial 12 .5 .7 4.3
group 1
22 21 .9 1.3 5.6
33 57 2.5 3.6 9.2
4 Not close to one end or 494 21.5 30.9 40.0
the other 4
55 354 15.4 22.1 62.1
66 366 16.0 22.9 85.0
7 Loyal to their racial 240 10.5 15.0 100.0
group 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF1B Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 53 2.3 3.3 3.3
1 Disloyal to their racial 11 .5 .7 4.0
group 1
22 11 .5 .7 4.7
33 48 2.1 3.0 7.7
4 Not close to one end or 386 16.8 24.1 31.8
the other 4
55 279 12.2 17.4 49.2
66 451 19.7 28.2 77.4
7 Loyal to their racial 362 15.8 22.6 100.0
group 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF1C Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 56 2.4 3.5 3.5
1 Disloyal to their racial 14 .6 .9 4.4
group 1
22 13 .6 .8 5.2
33 39 1.7 2.4 7.6
4 Not close to one end or 415 18.1 25.9 33.5
the other 4
55 316 13.8 19.7 53.3
66 376 16.4 23.5 76.8
7 Loyal to their racial 372 16.2 23.2 100.0
group 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF1D Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 58 2.5 3.6 3.6
1 Disloyal to their racial 17 .7 1.1 4.7
group 1
22 33 1.4 2.1 6.7
33 71 3.1 4.4 11.2
4 Not close to one end or 417 18.2 26.0 37.2
the other 4
55 316 13.8 19.7 57.0
66 379 16.5 23.7 80.6
7 Loyal to their racial 310 13.5 19.4 100.0
group 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF2A Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 60 2.6 3.7 3.7
1 Oversexed as a group 1 79 3.4 4.9 8.7
22 93 4.1 5.8 14.5
33 166 7.2 10.4 24.9
4 Not close to one end or 897 39.1 56.0 80.9
the other 4
55 184 8.0 11.5 92.4
66 89 3.9 5.6 97.9
7 Undersexed as a group 33 1.4 2.1 100.0
7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF2B Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 61 2.7 3.8 3.8
1 Oversexed as a group 1 73 3.2 4.6 8.4
22 84 3.7 5.2 13.6
33 188 8.2 11.7 25.4
4 Not close to one end or 902 39.3 56.3 81.7
the other 4
55 164 7.1 10.2 91.9
66 91 4.0 5.7 97.6
7 Undersexed as a group 38 1.7 2.4 100.0
7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF2C Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 60 2.6 3.7 3.7
1 Oversexed as a group 1 97 4.2 6.1 9.8
22 121 5.3 7.6 17.4
33 195 8.5 12.2 29.5
4 Not close to one end or 840 36.6 52.5 82.0
the other 4
55 167 7.3 10.4 92.4
66 79 3.4 4.9 97.4
7 Undersexed as a group 42 1.8 2.6 100.0
7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF2D Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 61 2.7 3.8 3.8
1 Oversexed as a group 1 152 6.6 9.5 13.3
22 164 7.1 10.2 23.5
33 236 10.3 14.7 38.3
4 Not close to one end or 752 32.8 47.0 85.3
the other 4
55 117 5.1 7.3 92.6
66 82 3.6 5.1 97.7
7 Undersexed as a group 37 1.6 2.3 100.0
7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF3A Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 63 2.7 3.9 3.9
1 Like men more than 119 5.2 7.4 11.4
women 1
22 181 7.9 11.3 22.7
33 156 6.8 9.7 32.4
4 Not close to one end or 705 30.7 44.0 76.5
the other 4
55 214 9.3 13.4 89.8
66 118 5.1 7.4 97.2
7 Like women more than 45 2.0 2.8 100.0
men 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF3B Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 60 2.6 3.7 3.7
1 Like men more than 191 8.3 11.9 15.7
women 1
22 247 10.8 15.4 31.1
33 143 6.2 8.9 40.0
4 Not close to one end or 668 29.1 41.7 81.8
the other 4
55 158 6.9 9.9 91.6
66 98 4.3 6.1 97.8
7 Like women more than 36 1.6 2.2 100.0
men 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF3C Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 59 2.6 3.7 3.7
1 Like men more than 47 2.0 2.9 6.6
women 1
22 61 2.7 3.8 10.4
33 122 5.3 7.6 18.1
4 Not close to one end or 681 29.7 42.5 60.6
the other 4
55 243 10.6 15.2 75.8
66 261 11.4 16.3 92.1
7 Like women more than 127 5.5 7.9 100.0
men 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF3D Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 63 2.7 3.9 3.9
1 Like men more than 24 1.0 1.5 5.4
women 1
22 45 2.0 2.8 8.2
33 74 3.2 4.6 12.9
4 Not close to one end or 619 27.0 38.7 51.5
the other 4
55 207 9.0 12.9 64.5
66 338 14.7 21.1 85.6
7 Like women more than 231 10.1 14.4 100.0
men 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF4A Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 57 2.5 3.6 3.6
1 Prefer to be Self- 230 10.0 14.4 17.9
supporting 1
22 314 13.7 19.6 37.5
33 279 12.2 17.4 55.0
4 Not close to one end or 515 22.4 32.2 87.1
the other 4
55 120 5.2 7.5 94.6
66 52 2.3 3.2 97.9
7 Prefer to live off welfare 34 1.5 2.1 100.0
7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF4B Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 53 2.3 3.3 3.3
1 Prefer to be Self- 191 8.3 11.9 15.2
supporting 1
22 211 9.2 13.2 28.4
33 205 8.9 12.8 41.2
4 Not close to one end or 479 20.9 29.9 71.1
the other 4
55 224 9.8 14.0 85.1
66 140 6.1 8.7 93.9
7 Prefer to live off welfare 98 4.3 6.1 100.0
7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF4C Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 53 2.3 3.3 3.3
1 Prefer to be Self- 345 15.0 21.5 24.9
supporting 1
22 411 17.9 25.7 50.5
33 212 9.2 13.2 63.8
4 Not close to one end or 417 18.2 26.0 89.8
the other 4
55 74 3.2 4.6 94.4
66 52 2.3 3.2 97.7
7 Prefer to live off welfare 37 1.6 2.3 100.0
7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF4D Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 49 2.1 3.1 3.1
1 Prefer to be Self- 199 8.7 12.4 15.5
supporting 1
22 228 9.9 14.2 29.7
33 222 9.7 13.9 43.6
4 Not close to one end or 512 22.3 32.0 75.6
the other 4
55 203 8.8 12.7 88.3
66 114 5.0 7.1 95.4
7 Prefer to live off welfare 74 3.2 4.6 100.0
7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF5A Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 48 2.1 3.0 3.0
1 Fragile 1 59 2.6 3.7 6.7
22 82 3.6 5.1 11.8
33 177 7.7 11.1 22.9
4 Not close to one end or 573 25.0 35.8 58.7
the other 4
55 332 14.5 20.7 79.4
66 235 10.2 14.7 94.1
7 Strong 7 95 4.1 5.9 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF5B Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 54 2.4 3.4 3.4
1 Fragile 1 11 .5 .7 4.1
22 19 .8 1.2 5.2
33 57 2.5 3.6 8.8
4 Not close to one end or 489 21.3 30.5 39.4
the other 4
55 321 14.0 20.0 59.4
66 337 14.7 21.0 80.4
7 Strong 7 313 13.6 19.6 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF5C Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 53 2.3 3.3 3.3
1 Fragile 1 22 1.0 1.4 4.7
22 17 .7 1.1 5.7
33 69 3.0 4.3 10.1
4 Not close to one end or 534 23.3 33.4 43.4
the other 4
55 337 14.7 21.0 64.5
66 405 17.7 25.3 89.8
7 Strong 7 164 7.1 10.2 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF5D Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 55 2.4 3.4 3.4
1 Fragile 1 14 .6 .9 4.3
22 12 .5 .7 5.1
33 61 2.7 3.8 8.9
4 Not close to one end or 486 21.2 30.4 39.2
the other 4
55 321 14.0 20.0 59.3
66 408 17.8 25.5 84.8
7 Strong 7 244 10.6 15.2 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF6A Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 53 2.3 3.3 3.3
1 Excellent parents 1 121 5.3 7.6 10.9
22 335 14.6 20.9 31.8
33 317 13.8 19.8 51.6
4 Not close to one end or 616 26.9 38.5 90.1
the other 4
55 89 3.9 5.6 95.6
66 61 2.7 3.8 99.4
7 Poor parents 7 9 .4 .6 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF6B Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 53 2.3 3.3 3.3
1 Excellent parents 1 134 5.8 8.4 11.7
22 269 11.7 16.8 28.5
33 265 11.6 16.6 45.0
4 Not close to one end or 597 26.0 37.3 82.3
the other 4
55 170 7.4 10.6 92.9
66 74 3.2 4.6 97.6
7 Poor parents 7 39 1.7 2.4 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF6C Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 53 2.3 3.3 3.3
1 Excellent parents 1 81 3.5 5.1 8.4
22 211 9.2 13.2 21.5
33 350 15.3 21.9 43.4
4 Not close to one end or 701 30.6 43.8 87.2
the other 4
55 140 6.1 8.7 95.9
66 53 2.3 3.3 99.3
7 Poor parents 7 12 .5 .7 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF6D Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 49 2.1 3.1 3.1
1 Excellent parents 1 64 2.8 4.0 7.1
22 111 4.8 6.9 14.0
33 223 9.7 13.9 27.9
4 Not close to one end or 669 29.2 41.8 69.7
the other 4
55 248 10.8 15.5 85.2
66 156 6.8 9.7 94.9
7 Poor parents 7 81 3.5 5.1 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF7A Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 56 2.4 3.5 3.5
1 Disagreeable 1 20 .9 1.2 4.7
22 21 .9 1.3 6.1
33 109 4.8 6.8 12.9
4 Not close to one end or 768 33.5 48.0 60.8
the other 4
55 341 14.9 21.3 82.1
66 212 9.2 13.2 95.4
7 Agreeable 7 74 3.2 4.6 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF7B Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 62 2.7 3.9 3.9
1 Disagreeable 1 54 2.4 3.4 7.2
22 82 3.6 5.1 12.4
33 226 9.9 14.1 26.5
4 Not close to one end or 734 32.0 45.8 72.3
the other 4
55 243 10.6 15.2 87.5
66 140 6.1 8.7 96.3
7 Agreeable 7 60 2.6 3.7 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF7C Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 61 2.7 3.8 3.8
1 Disagreeable 1 28 1.2 1.7 5.6
22 41 1.8 2.6 8.1
33 112 4.9 7.0 15.1
4 Not close to one end or 805 35.1 50.3 65.4
the other 4
55 327 14.3 20.4 85.8
66 172 7.5 10.7 96.6
7 Agreeable 7 55 2.4 3.4 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF7D Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 52 2.3 3.2 3.2
1 Disagreeable 1 52 2.3 3.2 6.5
22 89 3.9 5.6 12.1
33 221 9.6 13.8 25.9
4 Not close to one end or 803 35.0 50.2 76.0
the other 4
55 235 10.2 14.7 90.7
66 107 4.7 6.7 97.4
7 Agreeable 7 42 1.8 2.6 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF8 Do you think of yourself as a feminist or not?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 62 2.7 3.9 3.9
1 Yes 288 12.6 18.0 21.9
2 No 1251 54.5 78.1 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF9 How concerned are you personally about women's rights?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 37 1.6 2.3 2.3
1 Very Concerned 362 15.8 22.6 24.9
2 Somewhat Concerned 710 31.0 44.3 69.3
3 Not Very Concerned 358 15.6 22.4 91.6
4 Not Concerned At All 134 5.8 8.4 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF10A Where would you rate WHITE WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 54 2.4 3.4 3.4
1 Feminine 1 10 .4 .6 4.0
22 9 .4 .6 4.6
33 37 1.6 2.3 6.9
4 Not close to one end or 481 21.0 30.0 36.9
the other 4
55 207 9.0 12.9 49.8
66 490 21.4 30.6 80.4
7 Masculine 7 313 13.6 19.6 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QF10B Where would you rate BLACK WOMEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 59 2.6 3.7 3.7
1 Feminine 1 12 .5 .7 4.4
22 13 .6 .8 5.2
33 60 2.6 3.7 9.0
4 Not close to one end or 531 23.1 33.2 42.2
the other 4
55 306 13.3 19.1 61.3
66 430 18.7 26.9 88.1
7 Masculine 7 190 8.3 11.9 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF10C Where would you rate WHITE MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 60 2.6 3.7 3.7
1 Feminine 1 262 11.4 16.4 20.1
22 464 20.2 29.0 49.1
33 260 11.3 16.2 65.3
4 Not close to one end or 490 21.4 30.6 95.9
the other 4
55 54 2.4 3.4 99.3
66 7 .3 .4 99.8
7 Masculine 7 4 .2 .2 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QF10D Where would you rate BLACK MEN in general on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 59 2.6 3.7 3.7
1 Feminine 1 203 8.8 12.7 16.4
22 376 16.4 23.5 39.9
33 290 12.6 18.1 58.0
4 Not close to one end or 535 23.3 33.4 91.4
the other 4
55 104 4.5 6.5 97.9
66 18 .8 1.1 99.0
7 Masculine 7 16 .7 1.0 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QG_1 [More people of different races marrying each other.] Please indicate if you think
each of the following trends is generally a good thing for our society, a bad thing for our
society, or doesn’t make much difference
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 40 1.7 2.5 2.5
1 Good thing for our 433 18.9 27.0 29.5
society
2 Doesn't make much 970 42.3 60.6 90.1
difference
3 Bad thing for our society 158 6.9 9.9 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QG_2 [More women not ever having children.] Please indicate if you think each of the
following trends is generally a good thing for our society, a bad thing for our society, or
doesn’t make much difference
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 47 2.0 2.9 2.9
1 Good thing for our 243 10.6 15.2 18.1
society
2 Doesn't make much 838 36.5 52.3 70.5
difference
3 Bad thing for our society 473 20.6 29.5 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QG_3 [More single women deciding to have children without a male partner to help raise
them.] Please indicate if you think each of the following trends is generally a good thing for
our society, a bad thing for our society, or doesn’t make much difference
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 48 2.1 3.0 3.0
1 Good thing for our 66 2.9 4.1 7.1
society
2 Doesn't make much 541 23.6 33.8 40.9
difference
3 Bad thing for our society 946 41.2 59.1 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QH1 Discrimination against women is no longer a problem in the U.S. Do you agree
strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree
strongly?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 36 1.6 2.2 2.2
1 Agree strongly 103 4.5 6.4 8.7
2 Agree somewhat 310 13.5 19.4 28.0
3 Neither agree nor 342 14.9 21.4 49.4
disagree
4 Disagree somewhat 580 25.3 36.2 85.6
5 Disagree strongly 230 10.0 14.4 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QH2 Do you think what happens generally to WOMEN in this country will have something
to do with what happens in your life?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 37 1.6 2.3 2.3
1 Yes 685 29.9 42.8 45.1
2 No 453 19.7 28.3 73.4
3 Don't know 426 18.6 26.6 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QH2a Will it affect you a lot, or not very much?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 3 .1 .4 .4
1 A lot 141 6.1 20.6 21.0
2 Some 433 18.9 63.2 84.2
3 Not very much 84 3.7 12.3 96.5
4 Don’t know 24 1.0 3.5 100.0
Total 685 29.9 100.0
Missing System 1609 70.1
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QI1 Which number from 1 to 7 best represents how you think government should work?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 47 2.0 2.9 2.9
1 People make all 93 4.1 5.8 8.7
decisions on their own 1
22 139 6.1 8.7 17.4
33 250 10.9 15.6 33.0
44 739 32.2 46.2 79.2
55 247 10.8 15.4 94.6
66 59 2.6 3.7 98.3
7 Elected officials make all 27 1.2 1.7 100.0
decisions on their own 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QI2 How does the government in Washington actually work?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 47 2.0 2.9 2.9
1 People make all 32 1.4 2.0 4.9
decisions on their own 1
22 22 1.0 1.4 6.3
33 68 3.0 4.2 10.6
44 399 17.4 24.9 35.5
55 358 15.6 22.4 57.8
66 425 18.5 26.5 84.4
7 Elected officials make all 250 10.9 15.6 100.0
decisions on their own 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QI3 A law has been proposed that would limit members of Congress to no more than 12
consecutive years of service in that office. Do you favor or oppose such a law?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 61 2.7 3.8 3.8
1 Favor 1271 55.4 79.4 83.2
2 Oppose 269 11.7 16.8 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QI4_A Our government would run better if decisions were left up to successful business
people.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 45 2.0 2.8 2.8
1 Agree Strongly 64 2.8 4.0 6.8
2 Agree Somewhat 293 12.8 18.3 25.1
3 Neither Agree or 537 23.4 33.5 58.7
Disagree
4 Disagree Somewhat 358 15.6 22.4 81.0
5 Disagree Strongly 304 13.3 19.0 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QI4_B Our government would run better if decisions were left up to nonelected,
independent experts rather than politicians or the people.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 50 2.2 3.1 3.1
1 Agree Strongly 41 1.8 2.6 5.7
2 Agree Somewhat 319 13.9 19.9 25.6
3 Neither Agree or 608 26.5 38.0 63.6
Disagree
4 Disagree Somewhat 346 15.1 21.6 85.2
5 Disagree Strongly 237 10.3 14.8 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QI4_C Our government would run better if decisions were left up to election officials
representing ordinary citizens who come from both lower and upper classes.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 48 2.1 3.0 3.0
1 Agree Strongly 239 10.4 14.9 17.9
2 Agree Somewhat 640 27.9 40.0 57.9
3 Neither Agree or 488 21.3 30.5 88.4
Disagree
4 Disagree Somewhat 118 5.1 7.4 95.8
5 Disagree Strongly 68 3.0 4.2 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QI4_D The U.S. government is largely responsible for many of the economic and social
problems the poor experience today.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 48 2.1 3.0 3.0
1 Agree Strongly 297 12.9 18.6 21.5
2 Agree Somewhat 485 21.1 30.3 51.8
3 Neither Agree or 483 21.1 30.2 82.0
Disagree
4 Disagree Somewhat 202 8.8 12.6 94.6
5 Disagree Strongly 86 3.7 5.4 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QDISP11 "We'd like to get your feelings toward several


groups of Americans.Please rate each group using the
feeling thermometer. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100
degrees mean that you feel favorable, or warm, toward the
group. Ratings between 0 degrees
Frequency Percent
Missing System 2294 100.0
W2_J1_A [How would you rate people with AIDS/HIV?] Please rate each group using the
feeling thermometer.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 72 3.1 4.5 4.5
0 36 1.6 2.2 6.7
1 121 5.3 7.6 14.3
5 1 .0 .1 14.4
10 9 .4 .6 14.9
12 1 .0 .1 15.0
15 42 1.8 2.6 17.6
20 3 .1 .2 17.8
25 1 .0 .1 17.9
30 58 2.5 3.6 21.5
34 1 .0 .1 21.5
35 2 .1 .1 21.7
40 133 5.8 8.3 30.0
42 1 .0 .1 30.0
45 9 .4 .6 30.6
49 1 .0 .1 30.7
50 374 16.3 23.4 54.0
55 9 .4 .6 54.6
58 1 .0 .1 54.7
59 1 .0 .1 54.7
60 174 7.6 10.9 65.6
65 11 .5 .7 66.3
66 2 .1 .1 66.4
69 2 .1 .1 66.5
70 187 8.2 11.7 78.2
72 1 .0 .1 78.3
73 1 .0 .1 78.3
75 20 .9 1.2 79.6
80 27 1.2 1.7 81.3
85 157 6.8 9.8 91.1
86 1 .0 .1 91.1
87 1 .0 .1 91.2
88 1 .0 .1 91.3
90 10 .4 .6 91.9
95 2 .1 .1 92.0
97 1 .0 .1 92.1
99 1 .0 .1 92.1
100 126 5.5 7.9 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_J1_B [How would you rate people in jail?] Please rate each group using the feeling
thermometer.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 63 2.7 3.9 3.9
0 137 6.0 8.6 12.5
1 97 4.2 6.1 18.6
2 3 .1 .2 18.7
5 4 .2 .2 19.0
6 1 .0 .1 19.1
10 20 .9 1.2 20.3
14 3 .1 .2 20.5
15 215 9.4 13.4 33.9
16 1 .0 .1 34.0
18 2 .1 .1 34.1
20 30 1.3 1.9 36.0
21 1 .0 .1 36.0
25 11 .5 .7 36.7
26 1 .0 .1 36.8
29 1 .0 .1 36.9
30 217 9.5 13.6 50.4
35 11 .5 .7 51.1
39 1 .0 .1 51.2
40 234 10.2 14.6 65.8
42 1 .0 .1 65.8
45 18 .8 1.1 67.0
49 3 .1 .2 67.1
50 252 11.0 15.7 82.9
55 6 .3 .4 83.3
58 2 .1 .1 83.4
60 104 4.5 6.5 89.9
65 5 .2 .3 90.2
68 1 .0 .1 90.3
69 2 .1 .1 90.4
70 81 3.5 5.1 95.4
72 1 .0 .1 95.5
75 7 .3 .4 95.9
77 1 .0 .1 96.0
80 9 .4 .6 96.6
85 28 1.2 1.7 98.3
86 1 .0 .1 98.4
90 2 .1 .1 98.5
95 1 .0 .1 98.6
99 1 .0 .1 98.6
100 22 1.0 1.4 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_J1_C [How would you rate gay males?] Please rate each group using the feeling
thermometer.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 67 2.9 4.2 4.2
0 142 6.2 8.9 13.1
1 93 4.1 5.8 18.9
2 2 .1 .1 19.0
3 2 .1 .1 19.1
5 8 .3 .5 19.6
7 1 .0 .1 19.7
10 11 .5 .7 20.4
15 70 3.1 4.4 24.7
16 1 .0 .1 24.8
20 8 .3 .5 25.3
25 5 .2 .3 25.6
30 85 3.7 5.3 30.9
33 1 .0 .1 31.0
35 4 .2 .2 31.2
40 116 5.1 7.2 38.5
42 1 .0 .1 38.5
43 2 .1 .1 38.7
44 1 .0 .1 38.7
45 7 .3 .4 39.2
46 1 .0 .1 39.2
49 2 .1 .1 39.4
50 396 17.3 24.7 64.1
55 8 .3 .5 64.6
58 1 .0 .1 64.6
59 1 .0 .1 64.7
60 106 4.6 6.6 71.3
65 7 .3 .4 71.8
69 2 .1 .1 71.9
70 141 6.1 8.8 80.7
75 20 .9 1.2 81.9
77 1 .0 .1 82.0
80 27 1.2 1.7 83.7
85 116 5.1 7.2 90.9
87 1 .0 .1 91.0
88 1 .0 .1 91.1
90 22 1.0 1.4 92.4
93 1 .0 .1 92.5
95 3 .1 .2 92.7
98 3 .1 .2 92.9
99 2 .1 .1 93.0
100 112 4.9 7.0 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_J1_D [How would you rate lesbian females?] Please rate each group using the feeling
thermometer.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 65 2.8 4.1 4.1
0 134 5.8 8.4 12.4
1 101 4.4 6.3 18.7
2 3 .1 .2 18.9
4 1 .0 .1 19.0
5 4 .2 .2 19.2
7 1 .0 .1 19.3
10 13 .6 .8 20.1
12 1 .0 .1 20.2
13 1 .0 .1 20.2
15 77 3.4 4.8 25.0
16 2 .1 .1 25.2
20 8 .3 .5 25.7
25 8 .3 .5 26.2
30 80 3.5 5.0 31.2
31 1 .0 .1 31.2
34 1 .0 .1 31.3
35 6 .3 .4 31.7
40 115 5.0 7.2 38.9
42 1 .0 .1 38.9
43 1 .0 .1 39.0
45 11 .5 .7 39.7
47 1 .0 .1 39.7
49 3 .1 .2 39.9
50 382 16.7 23.9 63.8
55 8 .3 .5 64.3
57 1 .0 .1 64.3
58 2 .1 .1 64.5
60 116 5.1 7.2 71.7
65 3 .1 .2 71.9
69 2 .1 .1 72.0
70 148 6.5 9.2 81.3
72 1 .0 .1 81.3
75 20 .9 1.2 82.6
80 25 1.1 1.6 84.1
85 104 4.5 6.5 90.6
87 1 .0 .1 90.7
88 1 .0 .1 90.8
90 24 1.0 1.5 92.3
93 1 .0 .1 92.3
95 5 .2 .3 92.6
98 1 .0 .1 92.7
99 2 .1 .1 92.8
100 115 5.0 7.2 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QK1 How widespread do you believe the problem of racism is against blacks among
police officers in this country?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 56 2.4 3.5 3.5
1 Very Common 423 18.4 26.4 29.9
2 Fairly Common 713 31.1 44.5 74.5
3 Fairly Rare 332 14.5 20.7 95.2
4 Very Rare 77 3.4 4.8 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QK2 Would you favor or oppose a law requiring mandatory life imprisonment for anyone
convicted of a serious crime for the third time?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 56 2.4 3.5 3.5
1 Strongly Favor 517 22.5 32.3 35.8
2 Somewhat Favor 450 19.6 28.1 63.9
3 Neither Favor nor 361 15.7 22.5 86.4
Oppose
4 Somewhat Oppose 144 6.3 9.0 95.4
5 Strongly Oppose 73 3.2 4.6 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QK3 If you could choose between the following two approaches, which one do you think
is the better penalty for murder-the death penalty, or life imprisonment?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 66 2.9 4.1 4.1
1 Death penalty 744 32.4 46.5 50.6
2 Life imprisonment 791 34.5 49.4 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QK3A How strongly do you feel about [the death penalty/ life imprisonment]?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 6 .3 .4 .4
1 Very Strongly 682 29.7 44.4 44.8
2 Somewhat Strongly 702 30.6 45.7 90.6
3 Not Strongly At All 145 6.3 9.4 100.0
Total 1535 66.9 100.0
Missing System 759 33.1
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QL1A [LESBIAN WOMEN] A score of 1 means that you think all the people in this group
are feminine. A score of 7 means that you think most people in the group are masculine.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 59 2.6 3.7 3.7
1 Feminine 1 37 1.6 2.3 6.0
22 47 2.0 2.9 8.9
33 94 4.1 5.9 14.8
4 Not close to one end or 832 36.3 52.0 66.8
the other 4
55 273 11.9 17.1 83.8
66 161 7.0 10.1 93.9
7 Masculine 7 98 4.3 6.1 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QL1B [GAY MEN] A score of 1 means that you think all the people in this group are
feminine. A score of 7 means that you think most people in the group are masculine.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 59 2.6 3.7 3.7
1 Feminine 1 155 6.8 9.7 13.4
22 234 10.2 14.6 28.0
33 331 14.4 20.7 48.7
4 Not close to one end or 729 31.8 45.5 94.2
the other 4
55 66 2.9 4.1 98.3
66 21 .9 1.3 99.6
7 Masculine 7 6 .3 .4 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QL2A [Work with children ] Gays and lesbians should be allowed to:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 71 3.1 4.4 4.4
1 Strongly Agree 447 19.5 27.9 32.4
2 Somewhat Agree 541 23.6 33.8 66.1
3 Somewhat Disagree 305 13.3 19.1 85.2
4 Strongly Disagree 237 10.3 14.8 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QL2B [Become Clergy/Ministers/Priests/Rabbis/Imams ] Gays and lesbians should be


allowed to:
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 70 3.1 4.4 4.4
1 Strongly Agree 359 15.6 22.4 26.8
2 Somewhat Agree 392 17.1 24.5 51.3
3 Somewhat Disagree 304 13.3 19.0 70.3
4 Strongly Disagree 476 20.7 29.7 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QL2C [Have and Raise Children ] Gays and lesbians should be allowed to:

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 67 2.9 4.2 4.2
1 Strongly Agree 427 18.6 26.7 30.9
2 Somewhat Agree 477 20.8 29.8 60.6
3 Somewhat Disagree 310 13.5 19.4 80.0
4 Strongly Disagree 320 13.9 20.0 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QL3 Some people believe that homosexuality is immoral. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with this perspective?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 79 3.4 4.9 4.9
1 Strongly Agree 430 18.7 26.9 31.8
2 Somewhat Agree 411 17.9 25.7 57.5
3 Somewhat Disagree 299 13.0 18.7 76.1
4 Strongly Disagree 382 16.7 23.9 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QL4 Do you favor or oppose laws to protect homosexuals against job discrimination?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 62 2.7 3.9 3.9
1 Strongly Favor 565 24.6 35.3 39.2
2 Somewhat Favor 326 14.2 20.4 59.5
3 Neither Favor nor 469 20.4 29.3 88.8
Oppose
4 Somewhat Oppose 67 2.9 4.2 93.0
5 Strongly Oppose 112 4.9 7.0 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QM8 How concerned are you about the spread of HIV/AIDS in your community?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 59 2.6 3.7 3.7
1 Extremely Concerned 300 13.1 18.7 22.4
2 Very Concerned 317 13.8 19.8 42.2
3 Somewhat Concerned 572 24.9 35.7 78.0
4 Not Concerned At All 353 15.4 22.0 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QM9 Where would you place yourself on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 57 2.5 3.6 3.6
1 Government sees to it 140 6.1 8.7 12.3
every person has a job
and a good standard of
living 1
22 107 4.7 6.7 19.0
33 201 8.8 12.6 31.5
44 485 21.1 30.3 61.8
55 250 10.9 15.6 77.5
66 185 8.1 11.6 89.0
7 Government lets each 176 7.7 11.0 100.0
person get ahead on
her/his own 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QM10 Where would you place yourself on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 70 3.1 4.4 4.4
1 Government should help 149 6.5 9.3 13.7
minority groups 1
22 136 5.9 8.5 22.2
33 224 9.8 14.0 36.2
44 487 21.2 30.4 66.6
55 218 9.5 13.6 80.2
66 169 7.4 10.6 90.8
7 Minority groups should 148 6.5 9.2 100.0
help themselves 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QM11 Where would you place yourself on this scale?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 58 2.5 3.6 3.6
1 Government should help 231 10.1 14.4 18.1
poor people 1
22 205 8.9 12.8 30.9
33 286 12.5 17.9 48.7
44 458 20.0 28.6 77.3
55 194 8.5 12.1 89.4
66 102 4.4 6.4 95.8
7 Poor people should help 67 2.9 4.2 100.0
themselves 7
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QM12 In the future, how willing should the United States be to use military force to solve
international problems?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 57 2.5 3.6 3.6
1 Extremely Willing 80 3.5 5.0 8.6
2 Very Willing 172 7.5 10.7 19.3
3 Somewhat Willing 685 29.9 42.8 62.1
4 Not Very Willing 409 17.8 25.5 87.6
5 Never Willing 68 3.0 4.2 91.9
6 Don't Know 130 5.7 8.1 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QN1 Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you
can't be too careful in dealing with people?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 56 2.4 3.5 3.5
1 Most people can be 598 26.1 37.4 40.8
trusted
2 Can't be too careful 947 41.3 59.2 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QN2 Do you think more people would try to take advantage of you if they got the chance
or would they try to be fair?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 58 2.5 3.6 3.6
1 Take advantage 818 35.7 51.1 54.7
2 Try to be fair 725 31.6 45.3 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QN3 Do you have any neighbors that you know and talk to regularly?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 39 1.7 2.4 2.4
1 Yes 1064 46.4 66.5 68.9
2 No 498 21.7 31.1 100.0
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QN4 About how many neighbors do you talk to regularly? Would that be just one, two or
three, four or five, or more than five?
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 6 .3 .6 .6
1 Just one 110 4.8 10.3 10.9
2 Two or three 538 23.5 50.6 61.5
3 Four or five 227 9.9 21.3 82.8
4 More than five 183 8.0 17.2 100.0
Total 1064 46.4 100.0
Missing System 1230 53.6
Total 2294 100.0
W2_QO1 President Obama's election as the nation's first African American president...

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 55 2.4 3.4 3.4
1 Improved American race 475 20.7 29.7 33.1
relations
2 Worsened American 227 9.9 14.2 47.3
race relations
3 Neither improved nor 844 36.8 52.7 100.0
worsened America race
relations
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QO2 President Obama's election as the nation's first African American president...

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 61 2.7 3.8 3.8
1 Enhanced the public 716 31.2 44.7 48.5
image of blacks
2 Diminished the public 102 4.4 6.4 54.9
image of blacks
3 Neither enhanced nor 722 31.5 45.1 100.0
diminished the public
image of blacks
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0

W2_QO3 President Obama's election as the nation's first African American president made
government...
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid -1 REFUSED 67 2.9 4.2 4.2
1 More responsive to the 400 17.4 25.0 29.2
problems of blacks and
other minorities
2 Less responsive to the 103 4.5 6.4 35.6
problems of blacks and
other minorities
3 Neither more nor less 1031 44.9 64.4 100.0
responsive to the problems
of blacks and other
minorities.
Total 1601 69.8 100.0
Missing System 693 30.2
Total 2294 100.0
PPAGE Age

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value
Total 2294 100.0 100.0 100.0

ppagecat Age - 7 Categories

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 18-24 237 10.3 10.3 10.3
2 25-34 289 12.6 12.6 22.9
3 35-44 360 15.7 15.7 38.6
4 45-54 457 19.9 19.9 58.5
5 55-64 514 22.4 22.4 81.0
6 65-74 329 14.3 14.3 95.3
7 75+ 108 4.7 4.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

ppagect4 Age - 4 Categories

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 18-29 397 17.3 17.3 17.3
2 30-44 489 21.3 21.3 38.6
3 45-59 710 31.0 31.0 69.6
4 60+ 698 30.4 30.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
PPEDUC Education (Highest Degree Received)

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 No formal education 6 .3 .3 .3
2 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th 1 .0 .0 .3
grade
3 5th or 6th grade 4 .2 .2 .5
4 7th or 8th grade 22 1.0 1.0 1.4
5 9th grade 19 .8 .8 2.3
6 10th grade 35 1.5 1.5 3.8
7 11th grade 53 2.3 2.3 6.1
8 12th grade NO 79 3.4 3.4 9.5
DIPLOMA
9 HIGH SCHOOL 700 30.5 30.5 40.1
GRADUATE - high school
DIPLOMA or the
equivalent (GED)

10 Some college, no 490 21.4 21.4 61.4


degree
11 Associate degree 192 8.4 8.4 69.8
12 Bachelors degree 414 18.0 18.0 87.8
13 Masters degree 215 9.4 9.4 97.2
14 Professional or 64 2.8 2.8 100.0
Doctorate degree
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPEDUCAT Education (Categorical)

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Less than high school 219 9.5 9.5 9.5
2 High school 700 30.5 30.5 40.1
3 Some college 682 29.7 29.7 69.8
4 Bachelor's degree or 693 30.2 30.2 100.0
higher
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPETHM Race / Ethnicity

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 White, Non-Hispanic 814 35.5 35.5 35.5
2 Black, Non-Hispanic 1278 55.7 55.7 91.2
3 Other, Non-Hispanic 46 2.0 2.0 93.2
4 Hispanic 123 5.4 5.4 98.6
5 2+ Races, Non-Hispanic 33 1.4 1.4 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
PPGENDER Gender

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Male 1032 45.0 45.0 45.0
2 Female 1262 55.0 55.0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPHHHEAD Household Head

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 422 18.4 18.4 18.4
1 Yes 1872 81.6 81.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPHHSIZE Household Size

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 489 21.3 21.3 21.3
2 839 36.6 36.6 57.9
3 401 17.5 17.5 75.4
4 309 13.5 13.5 88.8
5 133 5.8 5.8 94.6
6 76 3.3 3.3 98.0
7 26 1.1 1.1 99.1
8 12 .5 .5 99.6
9 5 .2 .2 99.8
10 1 .0 .0 99.9
12 1 .0 .0 99.9
13 1 .0 .0 100.0
14 1 .0 .0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
PPHOUSE Housing Type

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 A one-family house 1400 61.0 61.0 61.0
detached from any other
house
2 A one-family house 217 9.5 9.5 70.5
attached to one or more
houses
3 A building with 2 or more 583 25.4 25.4 95.9
apartments
4 A mobile home 88 3.8 3.8 99.7
5 Boat, RV, van, etc. 6 .3 .3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPINCIMP Household Income

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Less than $5,000 127 5.5 5.5 5.5
2 $5,000 to $7,499 64 2.8 2.8 8.3
3 $7,500 to $9,999 61 2.7 2.7 11.0
4 $10,000 to $12,499 68 3.0 3.0 13.9
5 $12,500 to $14,999 62 2.7 2.7 16.7
6 $15,000 to $19,999 98 4.3 4.3 20.9
7 $20,000 to $24,999 109 4.8 4.8 25.7
8 $25,000 to $29,999 140 6.1 6.1 31.8
9 $30,000 to $34,999 108 4.7 4.7 36.5
10 $35,000 to $39,999 132 5.8 5.8 42.2
11 $40,000 to $49,999 162 7.1 7.1 49.3
12 $50,000 to $59,999 181 7.9 7.9 57.2
13 $60,000 to $74,999 235 10.2 10.2 67.4
14 $75,000 to $84,999 129 5.6 5.6 73.1
15 $85,000 to $99,999 145 6.3 6.3 79.4
16 $100,000 to $124,999 200 8.7 8.7 88.1
17 $125,000 to $149,999 125 5.4 5.4 93.5
18 $150,000 to $174,999 63 2.7 2.7 96.3
19 $175,000 or more 85 3.7 3.7 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
PPMARIT Marital Status

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Married 1063 46.3 46.3 46.3
2 Widowed 118 5.1 5.1 51.5
3 Divorced 280 12.2 12.2 63.7
4 Separated 58 2.5 2.5 66.2
5 Never married 585 25.5 25.5 91.7
6 Living with partner 190 8.3 8.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPMSACAT MSA Status

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 Non-Metro 268 11.7 11.7 11.7
1 Metro 2026 88.3 88.3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPREG4 Region 4 - Based on State of Residence

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Northeast 398 17.3 17.3 17.3
2 Midwest 499 21.8 21.8 39.1
3 South 994 43.3 43.3 82.4
4 West 403 17.6 17.6 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

ppreg9 Region 9 - Based on State of Residence

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 New England 82 3.6 3.6 3.6
2 Mid-Atlantic 316 13.8 13.8 17.3
3 East-North Central 366 16.0 16.0 33.3
4 West-North Central 133 5.8 5.8 39.1
5 South Atlantic 563 24.5 24.5 63.6
6 East-South Central 173 7.5 7.5 71.2
7 West-South Central 258 11.2 11.2 82.4
8 Mountain 102 4.4 4.4 86.9
9 Pacific 301 13.1 13.1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
PPRENT Ownership Status of Living Quarters

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Owned or being bought 1451 63.3 63.3 63.3
by you or someone in your
household
2 Rented for cash 781 34.0 34.0 97.3
3 Occupied without 62 2.7 2.7 100.0
payment of cash rent
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPSTATEN State

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 11 ME 8 .3 .3 .3
12 NH 3 .1 .1 .5
13 VT 4 .2 .2 .7
14 MA 39 1.7 1.7 2.4
15 RI 5 .2 .2 2.6
16 CT 23 1.0 1.0 3.6
21 NY 140 6.1 6.1 9.7
22 NJ 69 3.0 3.0 12.7
23 PA 107 4.7 4.7 17.3
31 OH 103 4.5 4.5 21.8
32 IN 38 1.7 1.7 23.5
33 IL 108 4.7 4.7 28.2
34 MI 80 3.5 3.5 31.7
35 WI 37 1.6 1.6 33.3
41 MN 26 1.1 1.1 34.4
42 IA 15 .7 .7 35.1
43 MO 55 2.4 2.4 37.5
44 ND 5 .2 .2 37.7
45 SD 5 .2 .2 37.9
46 NE 15 .7 .7 38.6
47 KS 12 .5 .5 39.1
51 DE 9 .4 .4 39.5
52 MD 77 3.4 3.4 42.9
53 DC 10 .4 .4 43.3
54 VA 71 3.1 3.1 46.4
55 WV 10 .4 .4 46.8
56 NC 88 3.8 3.8 50.7
57 SC 43 1.9 1.9 52.5
58 GA 123 5.4 5.4 57.9
59 FL 132 5.8 5.8 63.6
61 KY 23 1.0 1.0 64.6
62 TN 54 2.4 2.4 67.0
63 AL 61 2.7 2.7 69.7
64 MS 35 1.5 1.5 71.2
71 AR 14 .6 .6 71.8
72 LA 33 1.4 1.4 73.2
73 OK 22 1.0 1.0 74.2
74 TX 189 8.2 8.2 82.4
81 MT 2 .1 .1 82.5
82 ID 5 .2 .2 82.7
83 WY 5 .2 .2 83.0
84 CO 25 1.1 1.1 84.0
85 NM 3 .1 .1 84.2
86 AZ 30 1.3 1.3 85.5
87 UT 8 .3 .3 85.8
88 NV 24 1.0 1.0 86.9
91 WA 46 2.0 2.0 88.9
92 OR 21 .9 .9 89.8
93 CA 227 9.9 9.9 99.7
94 AK 2 .1 .1 99.8
95 HI 5 .2 .2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPT01 Presence of Household Members - Children 0-1

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 2186 95.3 95.3 95.3
1 102 4.4 4.4 99.7
2 6 .3 .3 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPT1317 Presence of Household Members - Children 13-17

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 1969 85.8 85.8 85.8
1 256 11.2 11.2 97.0
2 55 2.4 2.4 99.4
3 11 .5 .5 99.9
4 3 .1 .1 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
PPT18OV Presence of Household Members - Adults 18+

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 626 27.3 27.3 27.3
2 1137 49.6 49.6 76.9
3 321 14.0 14.0 90.8
4 144 6.3 6.3 97.1
5 42 1.8 1.8 99.0
6 18 .8 .8 99.7
7 3 .1 .1 99.9
8 1 .0 .0 99.9
10 1 .0 .0 100.0
12 1 .0 .0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPT25 Presence of Household Members - Children 2-5

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 2057 89.7 89.7 89.7
1 197 8.6 8.6 98.3
2 35 1.5 1.5 99.8
3 5 .2 .2 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPT612 Presence of Household Members - Children 6-12

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 1947 84.9 84.9 84.9
1 232 10.1 10.1 95.0
2 99 4.3 4.3 99.3
3 11 .5 .5 99.8
4 4 .2 .2 100.0
5 1 .0 .0 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0
PPWORK Current Employment Status

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 Working - as a paid 1050 45.8 45.8 45.8
employee
2 Working - self-employed 142 6.2 6.2 52.0
3 Not working - on 29 1.3 1.3 53.2
temporary layoff from a job
4 Not working - looking for 249 10.9 10.9 64.1
work
5 Not working - retired 482 21.0 21.0 85.1
6 Not working - disabled 194 8.5 8.5 93.5
7 Not working - other 148 6.5 6.5 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

PPNET HH Internet Access

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 0 No 507 22.1 22.1 22.1
1 Yes 1787 77.9 77.9 100.0
Total 2294 100.0 100.0

DIST113 113th Congressional District

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Value 2170 94.6 100.0 100.0
Missing System 124 5.4
Total 2294 100.0

You might also like