Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 533 views

    Nd-YLF Vs Nd-YAG

    Uploaded by

    coreyarice1980
    Nd:YLF is sometimes proposed as an alternative to Nd:YAG for lasing. While Nd:YLF can produce higher pulse energies at low frequencies under 2 kHz, its performance decreases significantly at higher frequencies. Additionally, Nd:YLF rods exhibit oval beam profiles, non-uniform performance between crystals, and lower durability due to brittleness and solubility in water. Nd:YLF also has different thermal and polarization properties than Nd:YAG that require new laser designs. Therefore, while Nd:YLF may be suitable for some scientific uses, it is not well-suited for industrial applications due to increased maintenance needs.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Nd-YLF Vs Nd-YAG

    Uploaded by

    coreyarice1980
    533 views2 pages
    Nd:YLF is sometimes proposed as an alternative to Nd:YAG for lasing. While Nd:YLF can produce higher pulse energies at low frequencies under 2 kHz, its performance decreases significantly at higher frequencies. Additionally, Nd:YLF rods exhibit oval beam profiles, non-uniform performance between crystals, and lower durability due to brittleness and solubility in water. Nd:YLF also has different thermal and polarization properties than Nd:YAG that require new laser designs. Therefore, while Nd:YLF may be suitable for some scientific uses, it is not well-suited for industrial applications due to increased maintenance needs.

    Original Title

    Nd-YLF vs Nd-YAG

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Nd:YLF is sometimes proposed as an alternative to Nd:YAG for lasing. While Nd:YLF can produce higher pulse energies at low frequencies under 2 kHz, its performance decreases significantly at higher frequencies. Additionally, Nd:YLF rods exhibit oval beam profiles, non-uniform performance between crystals, and lower durability due to brittleness and solubility in water. Nd:YLF also has different thermal and polarization properties than Nd:YAG that require new laser designs. Therefore, while Nd:YLF may be suitable for some scientific uses, it is not well-suited for industrial applications due to increased maintenance needs.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    533 views2 pages

    Nd-YLF Vs Nd-YAG

    Uploaded by

    coreyarice1980
    Nd:YLF is sometimes proposed as an alternative to Nd:YAG for lasing. While Nd:YLF can produce higher pulse energies at low frequencies under 2 kHz, its performance decreases significantly at higher frequencies. Additionally, Nd:YLF rods exhibit oval beam profiles, non-uniform performance between crystals, and lower durability due to brittleness and solubility in water. Nd:YLF also has different thermal and polarization properties than Nd:YAG that require new laser designs. Therefore, while Nd:YLF may be suitable for some scientific uses, it is not well-suited for industrial applications due to increased maintenance needs.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Nd:YLF as an Alternative to Nd:YAG

    Advantages and Disadvantages

    Nd:YLF often is proposed as an alternative lasing medium to Nd:YAG. Their emission


    wavelengths are nearly the same (1047 nm and 1053 nm for Nd:YLF vs 1064 nm for
    Nd:YAG). However, there are a number of deficiencies in the inherent performance of Nd:YLF
    that make it difficult for industrial use.

    1. Pulse Energy: The sole benefit of Nd:YLF is its greater pulse energy performance at
    low Q-switch frequencies < 2 kHz, up to 2 times the pulse energy capability of Nd:YAG.
    However, at pulse rates > 2 kHz, the pulse energy (and average power) performance of
    Nd:YLF decreases significantly.

    2. Beam Roundness: The output beam profile of a Nd:YLF laser tends to be oval, not
    circular. It may be possible to use external optics to correct the oval beam profile and
    make it circular, but this will be effective for only one output power level. If the laser is
    operated at a different power level, the beam will again become oval.

    3. Performance Uniformity: Nd:YLF laser rods exhibit a significant level on non-uniformity


    from one crystal to another. This means that uniform performance from one laser to
    another will be difficult to achieve without laser rod selection, which will be costly.

    This also means that when a Nd:YLF laser rod must be replace, the new crystal may not
    exhibit the same performance as the original crystal.

    Lee Laser s experience with Nd:YAG shows highly repeatable performance from one
    crystal to another inside the same optical resonator.

    4. Crystal Solubility: Nd:YLF material is slightly soluble in water. The outside surface of
    the Nd:YLF crystal will slowly dissolve in the cooling water, which can cause water seal
    problems. The crystal eventually must be replaced. Nd:YLF crystal lifetime is 1-2 years.

    Nd:YAG exhibits no such solubility deficiency.

    5. Thermal Focusing: Nd:YLF material exhibits completely different thermal focusing


    characteristics than Nd:YAG. A laser designed for Nd:YAG cannot simply accept a
    Nd:YLF laser rod of the same dimensions. The performance will be totally different.
    Therefore, it will be necessary to design a new laser optical resonator for use with a
    Nd:YLF crystal.
    2

    6. Crystal Hardness: Nd:YLF is considerably softer and more brittle than is Nd:YAG.
    Nd:YLF laser crystals are highly vulnerable to fracture. The technique that Lee Laser
    uses to grasp Nd:YAG rods cannot be used for Nd:YLF, at the risk of breaking the ends of
    the Nd:YLF laser rod.

    One of the major reasons that Nd:YAG has remained the crystal of choice for industrial
    use for more than 30 years is its high durability in an industrial operating environment.

    7. Thermal Shock Resistance: Nd:YLF exhibits five times (5X) the thermal expansion of
    Nd:YAG. As such, it is more sensitive to thermal shock and fracture such as might occur
    if an arc lamp were to suddenly fail.

    8. Self Polarization: Nd:YLF crystals that are used inside a laser optical resonator are self
    polarizing. This means that the output beam is inherently polarized. This can be a clear
    benefit when generating the fundamental output wavelengths of 1047 and 1053 nm.
    However, when used with a second harmonic generator to produce the half wavelengths
    of 523 and 526 nm, the planes of polarization must be exactly matched to extract
    maximum output power.

    Nd:YAG is not self-polarizing. It is common to use a Brewster or other intracavity


    polarizer inside the optical resonator of an Nd:YAG laser for TEMoo-mode generation.
    However, for multimode generation, polarization of a Nd:YAG laser results in significant
    (up to 50 %) loss of output power.

    In summary, Nd:YLF offers some interesting performance benefits, especially for scientific
    investigations where high pulse energy at low pulse rate is desirable. Nd:YLF requires more
    care and supervision which generally is not a problem in a laboratory environment. However,
    for industrial use, Nd:YLF will be more problematic and requires frequent attention to maintain
    its performance edge.

    Lee Laser believes that it is not in our best interest to pursue the use of Nd:YLF for most
    industrial applications.

    You might also like