Articles

Definition of filtration performance

from EN 779 to ISO 16890

SYLVAIN COURTEY
Head of Ventilation Department
Eurovent Certita Certification

A new ISO standard is about to replace the current EN 779 standard used to characterize
the filtration efficiency of filters now classified from G1 to F9. This new standard incorporates
a different approach from the current standard in terms of classification methodology and will
therefore have a significant impact on the market. It is proposed here to present the main
changes, to detail the future benefits provided by this standard and to consider the impact
on the certification of the filters.

New ISO 16890 - A new way to classify

The convention of using only the filtration efficiency
filters
of particles with a diameter of 0.4m is due to the
Over the past five years, a new approach has been fact that particles of this size are the most difficult to
developed within the ISO standardization working filter. Indeed, for particles with a smaller diameter, the
groups to characterize filter filtration efficiency. This phenomenon of diffusion predominates, whereas for
new approach is to look at filtration efficiency not only particles with a larger diameter, the phenomenon of
for particles with a diameter of 0.4m but to consider interception is predominant (see Figure1 below).
the entire spectrum of particle sizes.

The EN779:2012 standard used today in Europe to

characterize the filtration efficiency of the filters for
the ventilation of buildings defines the filtration classes
according to the average filtration efficiency of the
Filtrationefficiency

particles with a diameter of 0.4m (see Table1 below). Diffusion

Interception
Table 1. Filter classification according to EN 779:2012. Total

Group Class Average efficiency Minimum effi

(Em) at 0,4m ciency at 0,4m
M5 40 Em<60
Medium
M6 60 Em<80
0,1 1 10
F7 80 Em<90 35
Particlediameter(m)
Fine F8 90 Em<95 55
F9 95 Em 70 Figure 1. Particle filtration efficiency according to size.

16 REHVA Journal February2017

 Articles

For most media filtering the minimum efficiency is Table 3. Filter classification according to ISO 16890-1.
around 0.4m.
Object ISO 16890 EN 779:2012
The current system therefore makes it possible to Technical
compare filters between them, but it is not easy to specifications,
Part 1 Chapters 5 - 6
evaluate the effectiveness of a filter with regards to its requirements and
impact on air quality. classification
Efficiency
Part 2 Chapters 7, 8 and 9
measurements
From this observation, it has been suggested to charac-
Definition of the
terize the filters in relation to indicators that have been Part 3 Chapter 10.4
gravimetric efficiency
used for several years in the field of air quality: particulate
matter (PM): PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 which respectively
define the air concentrations in liquid or solid particles Packaging method
to determine the
whose diameter is below 10, 2.5 and 1m. minimum spectral
Part 4 Chapter 11
efficiency of the test
These indicators are used in many health and toxico-
logical studies. They make it possible to classify the
particles according to their dangerousness:
Beyond the new approach of classification of the filters
Particles with a diameter greater than 10m are certain evolutions are to be noted:
retained by the upper airway and are not breathed.
Particles with a diameter of less than 10m (PM10) requirements have been introduced with respect to
can penetrate the bronchi. the test conditions in terms of temperature and rela-
Particles with a diameter below 2.5m (PM2.5) can tive humidity.
penetrate the pulmonary alveoli. the conditioning method for determining the
Particles with a diameter below 1m (PM1) can minimum efficiency makes it possible to test a
penetrate the alveolo-capillary barrier. complete filter and not only the filter media as with
the EN 779:2012.
The new standard therefore classifies filters relative to Fine AC dust is used to determine gravimetric effi-
their filtration efficiency for these different particle sizes ciency as a replacement for standardized dust such
according to Table2. as ASHRAE.

With respect to PM1 the efficiency of a filter classified

as ePM1[80%] will be above 80% and below 85%. Publication of ISO 16890
The four parts of ISO 16890* have been published in
a. Other changes from EN 779:2012. December 2016. It is expected that it will last 18 months
before EN 779: 2012 will be withdrawn, this to allow
The new ISO 16890 standard will be divided into four the manufacturers to adapt their current catalogues.
parts covering all the chapters currently covered by EN
779:2012 according to Table3. 1. Benefits for the end user
a. Towards a universal method?

Table 2. Filter classification according to ISO 16890-1. The adoption of this new standard may perhaps make
it possible to harmonize worldwide the method of char-
acterizing the efficiency of filters. Today two systems
Group Initial efficiency in Discharged efficiency
PMx PMx predominate:

ePM10 50% (PM10) 50% (PM10) In Europe, the method EN 779:2012 is the only one
In North America, the ASHRAE 52.2 method is
ePM2.5 50% (PM2.5) 50% (PM2.5) used exclusively
In Asia the European and American systems coexist.
ePM1 50% (PM1) 50% (PM1) *
At CEN level in Europe this ISO standard is indicated as EN-ISO 16890 and
when published on national level the letters of the National Standard Body are
added, like e.g. DIN-EN-ISO 16890

REHVA Journal February2017 17

 Articles

A clearer link between filter

In the future, the new ISO standard is intended to
efficiency and indoor air quality
be the universally used method. However, there is no
indication that this will be the case, a standard being As indicated earlier, concentrations of PM10 and to a
of a voluntary nature. However, we can say that this lesser extent PM2.5 and PM1 are now widely used for
standard will be the future reference in Europe as it assessing air quality. The European Airbase project
has already been decided that it will replace the current gathers data from more than 8000 continuous PM10
EN779: 2012. Similarly in Asia there is a good chance measurement stations in Europe (see Figure2 below).
that they will become the benchmark except in the WHO defines guidelines for maximum levels of concen-
markets where US players are predominant. trations not to be exceeded for PM10 and PM2.5.

However, in North America doubts remain about the The use of efficiency referring to these indicators will
possible use of this ISO standard. Indeed, the ASHRAE enable end-users to more easily assess their needs based
methods have been established for a long time and the on outdoor air quality and their objectives in terms of
United States has shown some reluctance throughout indoor air quality.
the validation process of this ISO standard.

Figure2. Location of continuous PM10 measurements in Europe (Source: Airbase).

18 REHVA Journal February2017

 Articles

2. What impact on the certification of filters for

Evolution and next steps
ventilation? The first four parts of the new ISO 16890 standard
a. The Eurovent certification for filters: cover all the chapters covered today by the European
i. The certification programme Eurovent standard EN 779. Thus it does not define a method for
Certified Performance for Air Filters M5 calculating the average annual energy consumption as
F9 was launched in 2006. This certification defined in document Eurovent 4 / 21. A revision of the
is based on tests carried out by independent latter must therefore be carried out in order to integrate
ISO 17025 laboratories, according to EN the new provisions of ISO 16890. A Eurovent working
779:2012 (which replaced EN 779:2002). group dedicated to this project was recently set up, and
This programme covers the certification of met for the first time in December 2015. A first revision
all relevant performances of filters used for project is planned for February 2016.
general ventilation, namely:
The Eurovent certification of filters will then be able to
The filtration class evolve towards the new standard once it has replaced
The initial pressure drop the standard EN 779.
The initial efficiency
The minimum efficiency Conclusion
The new ISO 16890 Standard will have a signifi-
These performances related to the Standard cant impact on all the actors of filtration. In the first
EN 779:2012 add up to the performances place manufacturers will have to characterize all their
related to the energy efficiency as defined products according to this new method. Knowing
in the Standard Eurovent 4/21. that standardized dust will also change this implies a
significant effort on their part, the old standardized
Annual energy consumption dust being used for decades.
Energy efficiency class
Secondly, buyers will have to completely revise their
All certified data are available on current requirements based on the well-known filtra-
www.eurovent-certification.com. tion classes M5, M6, F7, F8 and F9. It is expected
that a transition period will be required (with dual
ii. In 2016 this certification programme covers labeling of products) before the new efficiency classes
25 manufacturers representing 25 brands are integrated by buyers. A major effort will have to be
and more than 2300 references. According made by all the players (notably the manufacturers) to
to the latest figures from Eurovent Market communicate effectively on these changes. The fact that
Intelligence, this programme covers 87% of the vast majority of products available on the market
the French market and 75% of the European are certified will facilitate this transition by providing
market. clear and controlled information.

References
ISO 16890-1, Air filters for general ventilation Part 1: Technical specifications, requirements and classification system based
upon particular matter efficiency (ePM).
ISO 16890-2, Air filters for general ventilation Part 2: Measurement of fractional efficiency and air flow resistance.
ISO 16890-3, Air filters for general ventilation Part 3: Determination of the gravimetric efficiency and the air flow resistance
versus the mass of test dust captured
ISO 16890-4, Air filters for general ventilation Part 4: Conditioning method to determine the minimum fractional test efficiency
EN 779:2012, Particulate air filters for general ventilation Determination of the filtration performance.
Eurovent 4/21 2014: Calculation method for the energy use related to air filters in general ventilation systems
ANSI/ASHRAE 52.2 2007, Method of testing general ventilation air-cleaning devices for removal efficiency by particle size
Airbase The European Air Quality Database, http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/airbase-the-european-air-quality-
database-8
OMS guidelines for air quality: particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide, Global update 2005. http://www.
euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/78638/E90038.pdf

REHVA Journal February2017 19