India Health of The Nation's States Report 2017 PDF

India: Health of the Nations States
The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative

INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF INDIA
INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH METRICS AND EVALUATION
The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative
INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF INDIA
INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH METRICS AND EVALUATION
Disease Burden Trends in the States of India

1990 to 2016
Contents
Acknowledgements 5
Message by Honble Vice-President of India 7
Message by Honble Minister of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 9
Message by Honble Vice Chairman of NITI Aayog, Government of India 11
Preface 13
Acronyms 15
Glossary of terms 16
Executive Summary 17
About the India State-level Disease Burden Initiative 21
About the Global Burden of Disease Study 22
Introduction 23
Key concepts used in this report 24
Methods used for the analysis 25
Findings 27
Life expectancy 27
Indias epidemiological transition 28
Deaths and their causes 34
Years of life lost due to premature death 39
Years lived with disability 41
Total health loss and its causes 44
Rate of occurrence of diseases 62
Risk factors causing disease burden 64
Disease burden and risk factors profile of each state 77
Andhra Pradesh 79
Arunachal Pradesh 83
Assam 87
Bihar 91
Chhattisgarh 95
Delhi 99
Goa 103
Gujarat 107
Haryana 111
Himachal Pradesh 115
Jammu and Kashmir 119
Jharkhand 123
Karnataka 127
Kerala 131
Madhya Pradesh 135
Maharashtra 139
Manipur 143
Meghalaya 147
Mizoram 151
Nagaland 155
Odisha 159
Punjab 163
Rajasthan 167
India: Health of the Nations States 1

Sikkim 171
Tamil Nadu 175
Telangana 179
Tripura 183
Uttar Pradesh 187
Uttarakhand 191
West Bengal 195
Policy implications of the findings 199
Addressing the major risk factors 199
Child and maternal malnutrition
Unsafe water and sanitation
Air pollution
Risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes
Addressing persistent and increasing disease conditions 201
Under-5 disease burden
Tuberculosis
Other communicable diseases
Other non-communicable diseases
Injuries
Inter-sectoral collaborations 202
Universal coverage and health assurance
Increasing health financing
Improving human resources for health
Strengthening the health information system 204
Better cause of death data
Improved surveillance
Other
Conclusion 207
India State-level Disease Burden Initiative Advisory Board Members 209
India State-level Disease Burden Initiative Contributors 211
2 India: Health of the Nations States

Figures and Tables
Figure 1: Life expectancy by sex in India, 1990 and 2016 27
Figure 2: Contribution of major disease groups to total DALYs in India, 1990 and 2016 28
Figure 3: Epidemiological transition ratios of the states of India, 1990 and 2016 30
Figure 4: Contribution of major disease groups to total deaths in India, 1990 and 2016 34
Figure 5: Death rates of the leading individual causes in the states of India, 2016 37
Figure 6: Leading individual causes of years of life lost by sex in the state groups, 2016 40
Figure 7: Leading individual causes of disability by sex in the state groups, 2016 42
Figure 8: Percent change in all-ages and age-standardised DALYs rate in the state groups, 1990 and 2016 44
Figure 9: Relative age-standardised DALYs rate across the states of India, 2016 45
Figure 10: Change in DALYs number and rate for the leading individual causes in India from 1990 to 2016 48
Figure 11: Comparison of the leading individual causes of DALYs across the state groups, 2016 50
Figure 12: Change in DALYs number for the leading individual causes by sex in India from 1990 to 2016 51
Figure 13: Percent of DALYs by age in the state groups, 2016 53
Figure 14: DALYs rate of the leading individual causes in the states of India, 2016 55
Figure 15: DALYs rate due to diarrhoeal diseases and lower respiratory infections in the states of India, 2016 56
Figure 16: DALYs rate due to ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 57
in the states of India, 2016
Figure 17: DALYs rate due to road injuries in the states of India, 2016 58
Figure 18: Ratio of observed to expected DALYs rate for the leading individual causes in the states of India, 2016 59
Figure 19: Percent DALYs attributable to risk factors in India, 2016 64
Figure 20: Change in DALYs number and rate attributable to risk factors in India from 1990 to 2016 65
Figure 21: Percent DALYs attributable to risk factors in the state groups, 2016 66
Figure 22: Percent DALYs attributable to leading risk factors by sex in the state groups, 2016 67
Figure 23: DALYs rate attributable to risk factors in the states of India, 2016 71
Figure 24: DALYs rate attributable to child and maternal malnutrition and attributable to unsafe water, 72
sanitation, and handwashing in the states of India, 2016
Figure 25: DALYs rate attributable to ambient air pollution and attributable to household air pollution 73
Figure 26: DALYs rate attributable to high blood pressure and attributable to high blood sugar 74
Table 1: Grouping of states of India in this report 32

Table 2: Year of crossover to majority NCDs and injuries burden by the state groups 33
Table 3: Distribution of deaths from major disease groups by age in the state groups, 2016 35
Table 4: Contribution of disease categories to deaths in the state groups, 2016 36
Table 5: Contribution of disease categories to DALYs in the state groups, 1990 and 2016 46
Table 6: Comparison of the percent change in prevalence of leading NCDs and incidence rate 62
of leading injuries with the percent change in their DALYs rate in India from 1990 to 2016
Table 7: Change in summary exposure value of the leading individual risk factors in the state groups 69
from 1990 to 2016

About ICMR
The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) is the apex government body in India for the formu-
lation, coordination, and promotion of biomedical and health research. It is one of the oldest medical
research bodies in the world. Besides the headquarters in New Delhi, ICMR has 32 research institutes,
centres, and units across India. ICMR funds both intramural and extramural research in India. The pri-
orities of ICMR coincide with the national health priorities and have the goal of reducing the total burden
of disease and promoting the health and well-being of Indias population. As part of this agenda, ICMR is
interested in improving the estimates of disease burden and risk factors in India, especially at the subna-
tional levels, for better health planning, policy framing, and fund allocation.
www.icmr.nic.in
About PHFI
The Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI) is a premier public health institution in India with
presence across the country. It collaborates with multiple constituencies including Indian and interna-
tional academia, state and central governments, multi- and bi-lateral agencies, and civil society groups.
The vision of PHFI is to strengthen Indias public health institutional and systems capability and provide
knowledge to achieve better health outcomes for all through strengthening training, research and policy
development in public health. As part of this vision, PHFI has major interest in improving the robustness
of subnational disease burden estimates to inform health action and in evaluating the impact of large-scale
population health interventions.
www.phfi.org
About IHME
The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) is a global health research institute at the
University of Washington in Seattle that provides independent, rigorous, and comparable measurement
of the worlds most important health problems and evaluates the strategies used to address them. IHME
aims to identify the best strategies to build a healthier world by measuring health, tracking program
performance, finding ways to maximise health system impact, and developing innovative measurement
systems to provide a foundation for informed decision-making that will ultimately allocate resources to
best improve population health.
www.healthdata.org

Acknowledgements
The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative is grateful to the Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India for its support
and encouragement of this Initiative. The guidance of the Advisory Board,
chaired by J.V.R. Prasada Rao, was invaluable in advancing the work of
this Initiative. The analysis and interpretation of the findings benefitted
immensely from the contributions of the following 14 expert groups and over
200 collaborators of the India State-level Disease Burden Initiative: Cancer
(Chair A. Nandakumar), Cardiovascular Diseases (Chair D. Prabhakaran),
Chronic Kidney Disease (Chair S.K. Agarwal), Chronic Respiratory Diseases
(Chair Sundeep Salvi), Diabetes (Chair Nikhil Tandon), Dietary Risks (Chair
B. Sesikeran), Environmental Risk Factors (Chair Kalpana Balakrishnan),
Injuries (Chair Rakhi Dandona), Maternal and Child Health (Chair Vinod
Paul), Mental and Neurological Health (Chair Vikram Patel), Musculoskeletal
Disorders (Chair Arvind Chopra), Tobacco Disease Burden (Chair Prakash C.
Gupta), Tuberculosis (Chair Soumya Swaminathan), and Vector Borne and
Neglected Tropical Diseases (Chair A.P. Dash).
This report was prepared by teams at the Indian Council of Medical Research
led by Soumya Swaminathan, the Public Health Foundation of India led by
Lalit Dandona, and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation led by
Christopher Murray. The Disease Burden India Secretariat provided crucial
support for the work of this Initiative.
Funding by the Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health

Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, and
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for the work leading to this report is
gratefully acknowledged.

Message by Honble Vice-President of India

Message by Honble Minister of Health and
Family Welfare, Government of India
Occus autecto omniminis et quis adit lacepe cus millene volupta dent mi,
quam, imagnihil et porrum, sus, te sapici tet, tem quostis mi, officita as
essenis que volest, sitibusda ducienti nus volor assuntem. Natiam essimus,
quo te velest hic tenduci psapid eiunt endit prerchil exero comnias secto
di voluptatium eos consequia voluptat et quam latum quam quati seque
latempos maximaio estiis as eaqui del maiore nonsedi in et del inventi dolo-
riatium soluptas moluptis dit et vellaboreri nimaior suntes sinciis eosam,
omnimpore, sanit optate nos magniminctur sincim voluptur ad magnimi
nvendi beatem qui untiis volore occus accus poribus, que volorem essit
magnis erferrum que litas es ma dis repelibus siminve llorae officil igeniti
onsecatem aceperro mil molore molestem repratem. Opta por ariorem
verion pe pliquae doloriorum que eum utesse sint.
Harum accus solorio remporitius, omnis etur alic tem arum ero ipsunt.
Susti ut as eos id quati debitiis volupta tquam, omnis erfernat.
Ad quid magnihil etur aut quiderro cones repella boribus velluptibus ra
autem fuga. Bus, que et que nis perumet andae accum nos estem et etus il
iur, con ped esecum etur suntur, sit, sed que nobiscitia pa aliciliquia volest
rereictas volorpor autatur sam hilique consedi psundusam que plibus.
Itatium in et laborehent aut eiustor magnimusto delitis sent atia dolorro
molumqui ipsae doloriasse magnam este cuptia cum re, sequiam a alignihit
as vendisi molesti int et voluptas esecerestia con corerferum que ad que pre,
sam in pre pre nienien destrum idem ipit eatinvellaut quaercitecum con re
dolupta dolestrunt labo. Et ommolorem in nobit, si dis ma voluptassit, sam
venihilla doluptae quassinullo beatempos dolorum la voloriatis maio quos
aut aborera temperi oribus am fugia con pel ex et ute provide bitatescit
qui cumenditium eum, coreheni blatur amus dest, susapicit ea dolluptae
dipistiaspe comnimin explitium sinulla nulparum quam nobis num estis
numenias mi, expelig nimporro et laci comnihi lluptat et velis et quo totaes
verum eratus, ut vent.
Aborum rem apelita distet esed es cum liatis ipiducipid moluptatus que rerci
bea dendelenihil il eum re sit venda quam, es maximus antisci isitiam aut pel
il ex et hillaccus mos modictis ped minctet eveniet essim rest, et ex explant
acea dempore libus, to comnietur sum eum quate duci voluptur, asitiossum
hil ima nienit unt moditam voluptat officiis adiscitibus et volupic te serum
eos aped quam quundem porerum quiatquiatus soluptati re cusam, sam ium
rehenihil illant qui dolorest prepro moluptatur?
Us serrupt assimod ipidem que vendam experro in re moditiate qui volo-
riaesti ius auda quatur asperspit, omnihil inciani hicitium nulpa vent ipis
perum laut volupientem qui cullabor repelluptas ea quibus quaturit laboris
dolorumque rae. Itatempos earitat usaepero verchitis estio magni ut omnis
ero et, quodicto ipsume inistem lique lam, sitati unt alita aliquas ut vendam,
consendi volut quasimi llecabor arum facepudae. Um, sinctem imagnihil
imendel in conem fugia

Message by Honble Vice Chairman of NITI Aayog,
Government of India

Preface
For some time now, health planners in India have been seeking better availability
of disease burden data and trends at subnational levels. These are necessary for
informed health policy and programming at the state and district levels, a prereq-
uisite to improve population health based on local trends. Useful trends of some
health indicators for the states of India have been available, but not a complete
understanding of the magnitude and time trends of all major diseases and risk fac-
tors for every state of the country. Computation of a complete matrix of the best
possible estimates for which diseases and risk factors cause the most premature
deaths and disability in each state based on all available data, and how these trends
have changed over time, would be a crucial contributor to the planning of what
needs to be done in each state to maximise population health gains. This exercise
would also highlight the major data gaps that need to be addressed in different
parts of the country for better monitoring of health and disease trends.
Faced with this compromising knowledge gap, a confluence of scientific and

political interests enabled the launch of the India State-level Disease Burden
Initiative in October 2015. This Initiative received strong support from the
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India, and was
launched as a collaboration between the Indian Council of Medical Research,
Public Health Foundation of India, and the Institute for Health Metrics and
Evaluation, with the intent of engaging domain experts and stakeholders across
the country. This Initiative was approved by the Health Ministry Screening
Committee of the Indian Council of Medical Research. The public good impor-
tance of this effort was soon recognised widely, resulting in the engagement of
experts from about a hundred institutions in India as collaborators, and the
support of the top government leadership in accessing crucial data needed for
computing the estimates. The fourteen domain expert groups that were formed
as part of this Initiative contributed their knowledge and skills generously to
bring incisive insights into relevant data, analysis, and findings, which has
certainly resulted in much more reliable findings in this report than would have
otherwise been possible.
After two years of intense collaborative effort that included many leading
health experts and policymakers in India, it is a matter of great satisfaction that
this report is now being presented to the government, policymakers, health
planners, academics, and other stakeholders, elucidating the disease burden and
risk factors trends in every state of the country from 1990 to 2016. We antici-
pate that these estimates will continue to be produced at regular intervals and
with improving accuracy as more data become available, enabling increasingly
more robust monitoring of the progress in health parameters in all parts of
India. We are grateful for the constructive engagement of a large number of
highly skilled people with this effort to produce an open-access public good
knowledge base, which has the potential of making fundamental and long-term
contributions to improving health in every state of the country through provi-
sion of the best possible composite trends of disease burden and risk factors for
policymakers to utilise in their decision-making.
More broadly, in order to achieve its full development potential, India has to
ensure a better health status of its citizens, akin to the optimism and sparkle
seen on the faces of the children on the cover of this report. This can be more
than just rhetoric if public health science and political will come together to
make evidence-based policy making a norm in all parts of the country. We
believe that this Initiative can contribute significantly to this goal. To put

things in perspective, however, many other efforts to strengthen health system
research and implementation science commensurate with the health status
heterogeneity in different parts of India are needed as well. A tangible policy
relevant output from the India State-level Disease Burden Initiative can serve
as an example of how other necessary public health science initiatives can be
established through large-scale collaborative efforts to achieve reduction in
health inequalities between Indians and progress toward a better health status
of all in India.
Soumya Swaminathan Lalit Dandona

Secretary to the Government of India, Director, India State-level Disease Burden Initiative
Department of Health Research,
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare;
Director-General, Indian Council of Medical
Research

Acronyms
CMNNDs Communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases
COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
DALYs Disability-adjusted life years
EAG Empowered Action Group
ETL Epidemiological transition level
GBD Global Burden of Disease
ICMR Indian Council of Medical Research
IHME Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
NCDs Non-communicable diseases
PHFI Public Health Foundation of India
SDI Sociodemographic Index
UT Union territory
WaSH Unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing
YLDs Years lived with disability
YLLs Years of life lost

Glossary of terms
Age-standardisation Risk factors
A statistical technique used to compare populations Potentially modifiable causes of disease and injury.
with different age structures, in which the
characteristics of the populations are statistically Sense organ diseases
transformed to match those of a reference population. A group of diseases that mainly cause hearing loss
Useful because relative over- or underrepresentation and vision loss, but also includes diseases that affect
of different age groups can obscure comparisons of the other sense organs.
age-dependent diseases (e.g., ischaemic heart disease
or neonatal disorders) across populations. Sequelae
Consequences of diseases and injuries.
Attributable burden
The share of the burden of a disease that can be Socio-demographic Index (SDI)
estimated to occur due to exposure to a particular A summary measure that identifies where countries
risk factor. or other geographic areas fall on the spectrum of
development. Expressed on a scale of 0 to 1, SDI
is a composite average of the rankings of the per
Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) capita income, average educational attainment, and
Years of healthy life lost to premature death and fertility rates of all areas in the GBD study.
suffering. DALYs are the sum of years of life lost and
years lived with disability.
Summary exposure value
A measure of a populations exposure to a risk factor
Disability weight that takes into account the extent of exposure by
risk level and the severity of that risks contribution
Number on a scale from 0 to 1 that represents the
to disease burden.
severity of health loss associated with a health state.
Empowered Action Group (EAG) states Uncertainty interval

A range of values that is likely to include the correct
A group of eight states that receive special development
estimate of health loss for a given cause. Narrow
effort attention from the Government of India, namely,
uncertainty intervals indicate that evidence is
Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh,
strong, while wide uncertainty intervals show that
Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.
evidence is weaker.
Epidemiological transition level (ETL) Years of life lost (YLLs)

Based on the ratio of the number of DALYs in a pop-
Years of life lost due to premature mortality.
ulation due to communicable, maternal, neonatal,
and nutritional diseases to the number of DALYs
due to non-communicable diseases and injuries Years lived with disability (YLDs)
together. A decreasing ratio indicates advancing Measure of years lived with disability due to a
epidemiological transition with an increasing rel- disease or injury, weighted for the severity of the
ative burden from non-communicable diseases as disability.
compared with communicable, maternal, neonatal,
and nutritional diseases.
Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study

A systematic, scientific effort to quantify the com-
parative magnitude of health loss due to diseases,
injuries, and risk factors by age, sex, and geogra-
phies for specific points in time.
North-East states
Eight states in the hilly northeastern region of India:
Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya,
Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, and Tripura.

Executive Summary
Introduction
With almost one-fifth of the worlds population living in India, the health status and the drivers of
health loss are expected to vary between different parts of the country and between the states. Accord-
ingly, effective efforts to improve population health in each state require systematic knowledge of the
local health status and trends. While state-level trends for some important health indicators have been
available in India, a comprehensive assessment of the diseases causing the most premature deaths and
disability in each state, the risk factors responsible for this burden, and their time trends have not been
available in a single standardised framework. The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative was launched
in October 2015 to address this crucial knowledge gap with support from the Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare of the Government of India. This is a collaborative effort between the Indian Council of
Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and
experts and stakeholders from about 100 institutions across India. The work of this Initiative is overseen
by an Advisory Board consisting of eminent policymakers and involves extensive engagement of 14
domain expert groups with the estimation process. Based on intense work over two years, this report
describes the distribution and trends of diseases and risk factors for every state of India from 1990 to 2016.
Methods and data

The estimates were produced as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The analytical methods
of this study have been standardised over two decades of scientific work, which has been reported in over
16,000 peer-reviewed publications, making it the most widely used approach globally for disease burden
estimation. These methods enable standardised comparisons of health loss caused by different diseases
and risk factors, between geographic units, sexes, and age groups, and over time in a unified framework.
The key metric used for this comparison is disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is the sum of
the number of years of life lost due to premature death and a weighted measure of the years lived with
disability due to a disease or injury. The use of DALYs to track disease burden is recommended by Indias
National Health Policy of 2017.
Through an elaborate process, all data sources and inputs available to estimate disease burden in every
state and union territory of India were identified and attempts were made to access these data. These
included censuses, vital registration, Sample Registration System, large-scale national household surveys,
other population-level surveys and cohort studies, disease surveillance data, disease programme-level
data, administrative records of health services, disease registries, and a wide range of other studies con-
ducted across India. Access to several important datasets was facilitated by senior government officials.
Data were included in the analysis if they met quality and inclusion criteria.
Health status improving, but major inequalities between states

Life expectancy at birth improved in India from 59.7 years in 1990 to 70.3 years in 2016 for females, and
from 58.3 years to 66.9 years for males. There were, however, continuing inequalities between states, with
a range of 66.8 years in Uttar Pradesh to 78.7 years in Kerala for females, and from 63.6 years in Assam to
73.8 years in Kerala for males in 2016. The per person disease burden measured as DALYs rate dropped
by 36% from 1990 to 2016 in India, after adjusting for the changes in the population age structure during
this period. But there was an almost two-fold difference in this disease burden rate between the states
in 2016, with Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh having the highest rates, and Kerala and Goa the
lowest rates. While the disease burden rate in India has improved since 1990, it was 72% higher per person
than in Sri Lanka or China in 2016. The under-5 mortality rate has reduced substantially from 1990 in all
states, but there was a four-fold difference in this rate between the highest in Assam and Uttar Pradesh as
compared with the lowest in Kerala in 2016, highlighting the vast health inequalities between the states.
Large differences between states in the changing disease profile

Of the total disease burden in India measured as DALYs, 61% was due to communicable, maternal,
neonatal, and nutritional diseases (termed infectious and associated diseases in this summary for sim-
plicity) in 1990, which dropped to 33% in 2016. There was a corresponding increase in the contribution of
non-communicable diseases from 30% of the total disease burden in 1990 to 55% in 2016, and of injuries

from 9% to 12%. Infectious and associated diseases made up the majority of disease burden in most of the
states in 1990, but this was less than half in all states in 2016. However, the year when infectious and associated
diseases transitioned to less than half of the total disease burden ranged from 1986 to 2010 for the various state
groups in different stages of this transition. The wide variations between the states in this epidemiological tran-
sition are reflected in the range of the contribution of major disease groups to the total disease burden in 2016:
48% to 75% for non-communicable diseases, 14% to 43% for infectious and associated diseases, and 9% to 14% for
injuries. Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu have the largest dominance of non-communicable diseases and injuries
over infectious and associated diseases, whereas this dominance is present but relatively the lowest in Bihar,
Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.
Infectious and associated diseases reducing, but still high in many states
The burden of most infectious and associated diseases reduced in India from 1990 to 2016, but five of the ten
individual leading causes of disease burden in India in 2016 still belonged to this group: diarrhoeal diseases,
lower respiratory infections, iron-deficiency anaemia, preterm birth complications, and tuberculosis. The burden
caused by these conditions generally continues to be much higher in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) and
North-East state groups than in the other states, but there were notable variations between the states within
these groups as well. The range of disease burden or DALY rate among the states of India was 9 fold for diar-
rhoeal disease, 7 fold for lower respiratory infections, and 9 fold for tuberculosis in 2016, highlighting the need
for targeted efforts based on the specific trends in each state. The burden also differed between the sexes, with
diarrhoeal disease, iron-deficiency anaemia, and lower respiratory infections higher among females, and tuber-
culosis higher among males. The proportion of total disease burden caused by infectious and associated diseases
was highest among children, which contributed to the disproportionately higher overall disease burden suffered
by the under-5 years age group. For India as whole, the disease burden or DALY rate for diarrhoeal diseases,
iron-deficiency anaemia, and tuberculosis was 2.5 to 3.5 times higher than the average globally for other geogra-
phies at a similar level of development, indicating that this burden can be brought down substantially.
Rising burden of non-communicable diseases in all states

The contribution of most of the major non-communicable disease groups to the total disease burden has
increased all over India since 1990, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases,
mental health and neurological disorders, cancers, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic kidney disease.
Among the leading non-communicable diseases, the largest disease burden or DALY rate increase from 1990
to 2016 was observed for diabetes, at 80%, and ischaemic heart disease, at 34%. In 2016, three of the five leading
individual causes of disease burden in India were non-communicable, with ischaemic heart disease and
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the top two causes and stroke as the fifth leading cause. The range of
disease burden or DALY rate among the states in 2016 was 9 fold for ischaemic heart disease, 4 fold for chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease, and 6 fold for stroke, and 4 fold for diabetes across India. While ischaemic heart
disease and diabetes generally had higher DALY rates in states that are at a more advanced epidemiological
transition stage toward non-communicable diseases, the DALY rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
were generally higher in the EAG states that are at a relatively less advanced epidemiological transition stage. On
the other hand, the DALY rates of stroke varied across the states without any consistent pattern in relation to
the stage of epidemiological transition. This variety of trends of the different major non-communicable diseases
indicates that policy and health system interventions to tackle their increasing burden have to be informed by
the specific trends in each state.
Increasing but variable burden of injuries among states

The contribution of injuries to the total disease burden has increased in most states since 1990. The highest pro-
portion of disease burden due to injuries is in young adults. Road injuries and self-harm, which includes suicides
and non-fatal outcomes of self-harm, are the leading contributors to the injury burden in India. The range of
disease burden or DALY rate varied 3 fold for road injuries and 6 fold for self-harm among the states of India in
2016. There was no consistent relationship between the DALY rates of road injuries or self-harm versus the stage
of epidemiological transition of the states. The burden due to road injuries was much higher in males than in
females. The DALY rate for self-harm for India as a whole was 1.8 times higher than the average globally for other
geographies at a similar level of development in 2016.

Unacceptably high risk of child and maternal malnutrition
While the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition has dropped in India substantially since
1990, this is still the single largest risk factor, responsible for 15% of the total disease burden in India in 2016.
This burden is highest in the major EAG states and Assam, and is higher in females than in males. Child and
maternal malnutrition contributes to disease burden mainly through increasing the risk of neonatal disorders,
nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and other common infections. As
a stark contrast, the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition in India was 12 times higher per
person than in China in 2016. Kerala had the lowest burden due to this risk among the Indian states, but even
this was 2.7 times higher per person than in China. This situation after decades of nutritional interventions in
the country must be rectified as one of the highest priorities for health improvement in India.
Unsafe water and sanitation improving, but not enough yet

Unsafe water and sanitation was the second leading risk responsible for disease burden in India in 1990, but
dropped to the seventh leading risk in 2016, contributing 5% of the total disease burden, mainly through diar-
rhoeal diseases and other infections. The burden due to this risk is also highest in several EAG states and Assam,
and higher in females than in males. The improvement in exposure to this risk from 1990 to 2016 was least in
the EAG states, indicating that higher focus is needed in these states for more rapid improvements. Remarkably,
the per person disease burden due to unsafe water and sanitation was 40 times higher in India than in China
in 2016. The massive effort of the ongoing Swachh Bharat Abhiyan in India has the potential to improve this
situation.
Household air pollution improving, outdoor air pollution worsening

The contribution of air pollution to disease burden remained high in India between 1990 and 2016, with levels of
exposure among the highest in the world. It causes burden through a mix of non-communicable and infectious
diseases, mainly cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and lower respiratory infections. The
burden of household air pollution decreased during this period due to decreasing use of solid fuels for cooking,
and that of outdoor air pollution increased due to a variety of pollutants from power production, industry,
vehicles, construction, and waste burning. Household air pollution was responsible for 5% of the total disease
burden in India in 2016, and outdoor air pollution for 6%. The burden due to household air pollution is highest
in the EAG states, where its improvement since 1990 has also been the slowest. On the other hand, the burden
due to outdoor air pollution is highest in a mix of northern states, including Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab,
Rajasthan, Bihar, and West Bengal. Control of air pollution has to be ramped up through inter-sectoral collabo-
rations based on the specific situation of each state.
Rising risks for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes

Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet,
high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic
heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the
total disease burden in India in 2016. The combination of these risks was highest in Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala,
Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra in 2016, but importantly, the contribution of these risks has increased in
every state of the country since 1990. The other significant contributor to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes,
as well as to cancers and some other diseases, is tobacco use, which was responsible for 6% of the total disease
burden in India in 2016. All of these risks are generally higher in males than in females. The sweeping increase of
the burden due to this combination of risks in every part of the country indicates emphatically that major efforts
need to be put in place to control their impact in every state before the situation gets totally out of control.
Importance of understanding the specific health situation of each state

Understanding the health and disease trends in groups of states at a similar level of development or epidemio-
logical transition is an important intermediate step in teasing apart the heterogeneity of disease and risk factor
epidemiology in India. However, effective action to improve health must finally be based on the specific health
situation of each state. This point is elucidated by significant variations in the burden from leading diseases and
risk factors in 2016 between the following pairs of states that have physical proximity and are at similar levels of
development and epidemiological transition.

The major EAG states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh both have a relatively lower level of development indi-
cators and are at a similar less advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, Uttar Pradesh had 50% higher
disease burden per person from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 54% higher burden from tuberculosis, and
30% higher burden from diarrhoeal diseases, whereas Madhya Pradesh had 76% higher disease burden per person
from stroke. The cardiovascular risks were generally higher in Madhya Pradesh, and the unsafe water and sanitation
risk was relatively higher in Uttar Pradesh.
The two North-East India states of Manipur and Tripura are both at a lower-middle stage of epidemiological transition
but have quite different disease burden rates from specific leading diseases. Tripura had 49% higher per person burden
from ischaemic heart disease, 52% higher from stroke, 64% higher from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 159%
higher from iron-deficiency anaemia, 59% higher from lower respiratory infections, and 56% higher from neonatal
disorders. Manipur, on the other hand, had 88% higher per person burden from tuberculosis and 38% higher from road
injuries. Regarding the level of risks, child and maternal malnutrition, air pollution, and several of the cardiovascular
risks were higher in Tripura.
The two adjoining north Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab both have a relatively higher level of devel-
opment indicators and are at a similar more advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, there were striking
differences between them in the level of burden from specific leading diseases. Punjab had 157% higher per person
burden from diabetes, 134% higher burden from ischaemic heart disease, 49% higher burden from stroke, and 56%
higher burden from road injuries. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh had 63% higher per person burden from
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consistent with these findings, Punjab had substantially higher levels of car-
diovascular risks than Himachal Pradesh.
These examples highlight why it is necessary to understand the specific disease burden trends in each state, over and
above the useful broad insights provided by trends common for groups of states at similar levels of epidemiological
transition, if health action has to be planned for the specific context of each state. The chances of achieving the overall
health targets set by India would be much higher if the biggest health problems and risks in each state are tackled on
priority than with a more generic approach that does not take into account the specific disease burden trends in each
state.
Application of the state-level disease burden findings and future work

The findings in this report of the India State-level Disease Burden Initiative can be used for planning of state health
budgets, prioritisation of interventions relevant to each state, informing the governments Health Assurance Mission
in each state, monitoring of health-related Sustainable Development Goals targets in each state, assessing impact of
large-scale interventions based on time trends of disease burden, and forecasting population health under various sce-
narios in each state. The findings are also available in easily understandable visual graphics in an online open-access
interactive visualisation tool at https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/india.
Future plans of the India State-level Disease Burden Initiative include annual updates of the estimates based on newly
available data, and more disaggregated findings such as the rural-urban estimates planned for next year and sub-state
level estimates subsequently when adequate data become available.
Conclusion
The disease burden and risk factor estimates for every state of India from 1990 to 2016 in this report are the most
comprehensive description of disease epidemiology attempted so far in a single standardised framework for every
part of the country. These included all available data and inputs from a large network of highly skilled collaborators.
This knowledge base can be a crucial aid for more informed policy and interventions to improve population health in
every state and union territory of India and in reducing health inequalities between the states. These findings and the
ongoing work of the India State-level Disease Burden Initiative could provide important inputs for the data-driven and
decentralised health planning and monitoring recommended by the National Health Policy 2017 and the NITI Aayog
Action Agenda 20172020.

About the India State-level Disease Burden Initiative
The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative is a collaboration between the
Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, and
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington,
and experts and stakeholders currently from close to 100 institutions across
India. The goal of this Initiative, which was launched in October 2015, is to
produce the best possible state-level disease burden and risk factors trends
from 1990 onward as part of the Global Burden of Disease study, utilising all
identifiable epidemiological data from India and in close engagement with
the leading health scientists of India. The work of this Initiative is approved
by the Health Ministry Screening Committee of the Indian Council of
Medical Research.
The Advisory Board of this Initiative is chaired by a former Health Secretary

to the Government of India, and includes some of the leading health policy-
makers of the country. This Initiative is built upon extensive collaborations
across India and has 14 domain expert groups that are closely involved with
the estimation process and interpretation of findings. The work of the State-
level Disease Burden Initiative is directly guided by the Secretary to the Gov-
ernment of India, Department of Health Research, and Director General of
Indian Council of Medical Research. This work is coordinated by the Disease
Burden India Secretariat based at the Public Health Foundation of India.
The first comprehensive set of state-level disease burden and risk factors
estimates are being disseminated in this report. An online open-access inter-
active visualisation tool that will bring to life in an easily understandable
manner the disease burden and risk factors trends over time across the
Indian states is also being made available. An extensive engagement with
central and state-level policymakers is anticipated for utilisation of the
findings. The major anticipated utilisation of findings to inform policy
includes planning of state health budgets, prioritisation of interventions rel-
evant to each state, informing the governments Health Assurance Mission
in each state, monitoring of health-related Sustainable Development Goals
targets in each state, assessing the impact of large-scale interventions based
on time trends of disease burden, and forecasting population health under
various scenarios in each state. It is envisaged that the data gaps identified in
this estimation process will inform enhancement of the health information
system of India.
More detailed topic-specific publications and policy reports will also be

produced for major diseases and risk factors for further granular insights to
plan their control. Annual production of state-level disease burden estimates
is planned, with estimates improving with increasing availability of data.
Additional disaggregation of estimates is planned for example, rural-urban
estimates for each state next year, and geospatial mapping at a fine-grid level
for key diseases and risk factors. Capacity-building in India to generate and
analyse large-scale health data using strong methods is anticipated over the
next five years of this work.

About the Global Burden of Disease Study
The history and evolution of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and
Risk Factors Study (GBD), which was initiated over two decades ago for
a comprehensive quantitative assessment of population health, has been
described recently.1 Prior to GBD, previous studies generally examined
single causes or some groups of diseases, which often led to overestimation,
with the sum of the deaths from individual causes being much larger than
the total deaths in a population. The first preliminary GBD results for the
year 1990 were published in the World Banks World Development Report
1993. The construction of the metric disability-adjusted life years (DALYs),
methods, assumptions, and data sources were debated, and the revised GBD
1990 study results were published in The Lancet in 1997. Since that first effort,
four additional cycles of GBD estimates have been published for the years
2010, 2013, 2015, and 2016.

The GBD study can be described as a systematic, scientific effort to quantify
the comparative magnitude of health loss from diseases, injuries, and risks
by age, sex, and population over time. The goal of the study is to provide
decision-makers at the local, regional, national, and global levels with the
best possible and most up-to-date evidence on trends of population health
and their drivers so that decisions are increasingly more evidence-based.
During the past quarter-century, the scope, magnitude, and uses of the GBD
study have increased substantially, as has the global network of collaborators.
GBD 2016 had over 2,500 collaborators from 133 countries and three terri-
tories, half of whom were from low- or middle-income countries. With each
cycle of the GBD study, the granularity of the analysis has increased. GBD
2016 included more than 3.5 billion estimated quantities. Health-related
Sustainable Development Goal indicators are also reported, starting with
GBD 2015. GBD 2016 covered 195 countries and territories, with subna-
tional assessments for 12 countries, calculated for each year since 1990. It is
comprehensive, including 333 diseases and injuries, 2,982 sequelae of these
diseases and injuries, and 84 risks or combinations of risks. The increasing
scope of work is guided by the GBD Scientific Council since 2013 to resolve
scientific issues, decide on the adoption of new methods, diseases, or risks,
and review and critique preliminary findings. In addition, an Independent
Advisory Committee for GBD, chaired by Professor Peter Piot, provides an
overall review of the GBD work and strategic guidance on areas that can be
strengthened. The GBD study has now become an annual assessment of the
state of the worlds health.

With more than 16,000 peer-reviewed publications and reports generated
from the GBD work, and references to the GBD study cited more than
700,000 times according to Google Scholar, the GBD study has become the
most extensively used source for health, disease, and risk factors status of
populations around the world. GBD findings have been utilised to inform
prioritisation of specific policy interventions by many governments, and
many global organisations use GBD results extensively. Recent inclusion of
subnational estimates is further enhancing the utility of the GBD study to
inform improvements in population health. Subnational estimates of disease
burden have been reported previously by GBD for Brazil, China, Japan,
Kenya, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, UK, and USA, and are being
reported for India and Indonesia in GBD 2016.
1. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Measuring global health: motivation and evolution of the Global
Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2017; 390: 14601464.

Introduction
India is home to a wealth of cultural, social, and ethnic diversity across its 1.3
billion people. Its 29 states and seven union territories many of which have
populations larger than countries vary widely in terms of their ecology,
economy, and demography, all of which impact health outcomes. Accurate,
comparable data on what is driving health loss is crucial for policymakers as
they strive to make the best decisions possible for improving health.
National-level data can obscure disparities across Indias varied landscape, so
a detailed understanding of health challenges at the state level is necessary
to ensure that policies are responsive to the specific context of each state.
While the central government policies have significant influence on health
initiatives across the country, health is a state subject in the Indian federal
structure, with the majority of public spending on health from the state
budgets. A robust disaggregated understanding of the disease burden and
risk factors trends in each state of India is therefore essential for effective
health system and policy action to improve population health at the state
level.

The Sample Registration Survey of India reports state-level estimates of key
indicators such as neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality rates annually. The
major national surveys in India, the National Family Health Survey, Dis-
trict Level Household Survey, and the Annual Health Survey have provided
valuable periodic data on key health indicators, which are mostly related to
child and reproductive health. The National AIDS Control Organization of
India produces state-level estimates of HIV. In addition, a large number of
studies from many parts of India provide a variety of data on the distribution
of many diseases and risk factors. However, a comprehensive composite
assessment of all major diseases and risk factors together across all states of
India, providing estimates over an extended period of time, which is needed
for an informed health system and policy development in each state, has not
been available so far.

This report provides the first comprehensive set of findings for the distri-
bution of diseases and risk factors across all states of the country from 1990
to 2016. These findings have been produced by the India State-level Disease
Burden Initiative as part of the Global Burden of Disease study collaboration,
utilising all available data identified through an extensive effort involving
over 200 leading health scientists and policymakers in India from about
100 institutions. The generation of these estimates and their interpretation
have benefited from the insights of domain experts through an intensive
collaborative process over two years. The specific state-level findings pre-
sented in this report could serve as important tools for the data-driven and
decentralised health planning, and for the tracking of subnational disease
burden in India using DALYs, as recommended by the National Institution
for Transforming India (NITI Aayog) of the Government of India and the
National Health Policy 2017 released by the Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare.1,2
1. National Institution for Transforming India (NITI Aayog), Government of India.

Three-Year Action Agenda, 2017-18 to 2019-20. http://niti.gov.in/content/three-year-
action-agenda-2017-18-2019-20
2. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. National Health Policy
2017. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2017. http://www.mohfw.nic.
in/documents/policy

Key concepts used in this report
In order to make informed decisions about how best to allocate resources,
policymakers need to understand the relative harm caused by different
health problems across time, geography, age, and sex. In response to this, the
GBD study approach uses methods and metrics that emphasise compara-
bility between different diseases.

Comparing the burden of health problems can be difficult. Some conditions
kill people early in life while others cause death at older ages. Some condi-
tions are not fatal but cause varying degrees of disability. The GBDs prin-
cipal metric, the disability-adjusted life year (DALY), allows decision-makers
to directly compare the seemingly disparate impacts of diseases and injuries,
from heart disease to anaemia to road accidents.

DALYs express the premature death and disability attributable to a par-
ticular cause, and are made up of two components: years of life lost (YLLs)
and years of life lived with disability (YLDs). YLLs measure all the time
people lose when they die prematurely, before attaining their ideal life expec-
tancy. Ideal life expectancy is based on the highest life expectancy observed
in the world for that persons age group. YLDs measure years of life lived
with any short- or long-term condition that prevents a person from living in
full health. They are calculated by multiplying an amount of time (expressed
in years) by a disability weight (a number that quantifies the severity of a
disability).

Adding together YLLs and YLDs yields DALYs, a measure that portrays
in one metric the total health loss a person experiences during their life.
Adding all instances of health loss in a population together and thereby
estimating burden of premature death and disability enables policymakers
and researchers to make comparative, actionable assessments of population
health.

Decision-makers can use DALYs to quickly compare the impact caused by
very different conditions, such as cancer and depression, since the conditions
are assessed using a single, comparable metric. Considering the number of
DALYs instead of causes of death alone provides a more accurate picture of
the main drivers of poor health. Information about changing disease pat-
terns is a crucial input for decision-making, effective resource allocation, and
policy planning.

Beyond providing a comparable and comprehensive picture of causes of pre-
mature death and disability, GBD also estimates the disease burden attrib-
utable to different risk factors. The GBD approach goes beyond risk factor
prevalence, such as the number of smokers or heavy drinkers in a population.
With comparative risk assessment, GBD incorporates both the prevalence
of a given risk factor as well as the relative harm caused by that risk factor. It
counts premature death and disability attributable to high blood pressure,
tobacco and alcohol use, air pollution, poor diet, and other risk factors that
lead to ill-health.

Methods used for the analysis
Details of the methods used for the analysis leading to the findings in this
report are provided in technical papers.1,2,3,4,5,6 A brief summary follows.

Extensive attempts were made to identify and access all data sources that
could contribute to the estimation of disease burden and risk factors at the
population level in every state and union territory of India. The data sources
included censuses; vital registration; Sample Registration System; large-scale
national household surveys such as National Family Health Surveys, District
Level Household Surveys, Annual Health Survey, and surveys conducted by
the National Sample Survey Organization; representative population-level
surveys and cohort studies; surveillance system data on disease burden; pro-
gramme-level data on disease burden from government agencies; adminis-
trative records of health services; disease registries; and a wide range of other
studies conducted across India and systematic reviews of epidemiological
studies. The scope and quality of the data were assessed, and if the inclusion
criteria were met the data were included in the analysis.

The 14 expert groups formed as part of the State-level Disease Burden Ini-
tiative in India, which included many of the leading health experts in India,
engaged intensely to provide guidance on suitable sources of data, accessing
those data, participation in the analytical process, and interpretation of the
findings over a period of two years.

Life expectancy was estimated. Death rates, causes of death, prevalence
and incidence of diseases, exposure to risk factors, and YLLs, YLDs, and
DALYs were estimated for 333 disease conditions and injuries and 84 risk
factors for each state of India, the union territory of Delhi, and the union
territories other than Delhi from 1990 to 2016 as part of the GBD 2016 study.
Standardised methods that have been described in detail in the published
technical papers were used to compute the estimates.

1. GBD 2016 Mortality Collaborators. Global, regional and national under-5 mortality, adult
mortality, age-specific mortality and life expectancy 19702016: a systematic analysis for the
Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 10841150.
2. GBD 2016 Cause of Death Collaborators. Global, regional and national age-sex mortality
for 264 cause of death, 19802016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease
Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 11511210.
3. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional
and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 disease and
injuries for 195 countries, 19902016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease
Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 12111259.
4. GBD 2016 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional and national disability-
adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE)
for 195 countries and territories, 19902016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of
Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 12601344.
5. GBD 2016 Risk factors Collaborators. Global, regional and national comparative risk
assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational and metabolic risks or
clusters of risks, 19902016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study
2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 13451422.
6. India State-level Disease Burden Initiative Collaborators. Nations within a nation:
variations in epidemiological transition across the states of India, 19902016 in the Global
Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Epub 14 November 2017.

Uncertainty intervals were computed around the estimates to indicate the
margin of error that could be expected for each estimate.
Disease burden and risk factors estimates were compared between the states
of India. The DALY estimates for the leading diseases in each state were also
compared with the estimates of those diseases in geographies that had a
similar Socio-demographic Index level that was computed from income level,
educational attainment, and fertility level.

In the GBD approach, when data are scarce for the estimation of a particular
variable, strength is drawn from the covariates that have known association
with that variable in order to make the best possible estimates for all diseases
and risk factors included in the GBD list. This has the advantage of pro-
viding a complete set of estimates for policymakers to help them ascertain
priorities. At the same time, data gaps identified in this process are useful
in informing the generation of relevant data and improving those estimates
subsequently. In summary, the GBD methods enable standardised com-
parison of the burden of diseases and risk factors across ages, sexes, geogra-
phies, and time through the use of all available data.

Findings
Life expectancy
One of the simplest measures for understanding overall health outcomes is
life expectancy at birth. If a country is generally expanding its longevity, it
usually means that people are dying prematurely at lower rates. Around the
world, people are living longer on average and populations are growing older.

In 1990, life expectancy at birth in India was 58.3 years for males and 59.7
years for females. By 2016, life expectancy at birth increased to 66.9 years
for males and 70.3 years for females. India has made substantial progress
in improving the life expectancy at birth. However, life expectancy varied
widely between the states of India. In 2016, the range was from 66.8 years in
Uttar Pradesh to 78.7 years in Kerala for females, and 63.6 years in Assam to
73.8 years in Kerala for males.

While life expectancy is a useful simple measure of a countrys or states
health status, it does not reflect the variations and nuances in health loss
throughout a persons lifespan, the understanding of which is necessary to
minimise health loss at the population level.
Figure 1
Life expectancy by sex in India, 1990 and 2016
58.3
1990
59.7
Year
66.9
2016
70.3
40 50 60 70
Age
Female Male

Indias epidemiological transition
In tandem with its rapid social and economic development, India is under-
going a major epidemiological transition. Over the last 26 years, the coun-
trys disease patterns have shifted: mortality due to communicable, maternal,
neonatal, and nutritional diseases (CMNNDs) has declined substantially and
Indias population is living longer, meaning that non-communicable diseases
(NCDs) and injuries are increasingly contributing to overall disease burden.

Indias health system therefore faces a dual challenge. Although the absolute
burden from diseases such as diarrhoea, lower respiratory infections,
tuberculosis, and neonatal disorders is being reduced, it remains high. At
the same time, the contribution to health loss of non-communicable condi-
tions such as heart disease, stroke, and diabetes is rising. The precise nature
of this challenge, though, varies across the country. While all states have
experienced a change in disease patterns to some degree, clear differences
emerge both in terms of the extent of this change and the rate at which it has
occurred.
Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) are a summary measure of the health

loss burden caused by different conditions, and take into account both pre-
mature mortality and disability in one combined measure.
Figure 2
Contribution of major disease groups to total DALYs in India, 1990 and 2016
Communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases Non-communicable diseases Injuries
1990 2016
8.6% 11.9%
32.7%
30.5%
60.9%
55.4%
India had 33% of the total DALYs from CMNNDs, 55% from NCDs, and 12% from
injuries in 2016. In 1990, this was 61%, 30%, and 9% of DALYs, respectively.

Epidemiological transition ratio is defined as the ratio of DALYs caused by
CMNNDs to those caused by NCDs and injuries. A ratio greater than one indi-
cates a higher burden of CMNNDs than NCDs and injuries, while a ratio less than
one indicates the opposite. The lower the ratio, the greater the contribution of
NCDs and injuries to a states overall disease burden. Most of the states had ratios
more than one in 1990, whereas all states had ratios less than one in 2016. This
means that the proportion of DALYs caused by NCDs and injuries has increased
heavily across the country since 1990, and in 2016 accounted for the majority of
premature death and disability for all states a major shift in drivers of health
loss.
There are wide variations in the epidemiological transition ratio between indi-
vidual states, ranging from 0.16 in Kerala, which is far along in this progression, to
0.74 in Bihar, where the challenge of the double burden of diseases is more acute.
The states with ratio 0.560.75 in 2016 were considered as having the lowest epide-
miological transition level (ETL), those with ratio 0.410.55 as lower-middle ETL,
those with ratio 0.310.40 as higher-middle ETL, and those with ratio 0.30 or less
as highest ETL.

1990 2016
30
Figure 3
Jammu and Kashmir Jammu and Kashmir

[1.14] [0.34]
Himachal Pradesh [1.14] Himachal Pradesh [0.3]

Punjab [1.05] Punjab [0.29]
Uttarakhand Arunachal Pradesh [1.96] Uttarakhand Arunachal Pradesh [0.55]
[1.4] Delhi [1.16] [0.46] Delhi [0.38]
Haryana Sikkim [1.44] Haryana Sikkim [0.45]
[1.34] [0.4]
Rajasthan [2.05] Uttar Pradesh Rajasthan [0.66] Uttar Pradesh

Assam [1.66] Nagaland [1.52] [0.68] Bihar Assam [0.62] Nagaland [0.47]
[2.08]

Bihar
[2.06] [0.74]
Manipur [1.37] Manipur [0.42]
Jharkhand Jharkhand
Gujarat [1.47] Madhya Pradesh [2.05] [2.04] Mizoram [1.18] Gujarat [0.46] Madhya Pradesh [0.6] [0.69] Mizoram [0.53]
Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh
[1.97] Tripura [1.38] [0.6] Tripura [0.45]
Odisha [2.00] Odisha [0.58]
Maharashtra [1.1] Meghalaya [1.98] Maharashtra [0.33] Meghalaya [0.64]
Telangana West Bengal [1.34] Telangana West Bengal [0.33]

[1.33] [0.38]
Goa [0.84] Goa [0.21]

Andhra Pradesh [1.5] Andhra Pradesh [0.37]
Karnataka Karnataka
[1.16] [0.34]
Epidemiological transition ratios of the states of India, 1990 and 2016
Tamil Nadu Tamil Nadu

Kerala [0.49] [1.02] Kerala [0.16] [0.26]
Ratio Ratio
Less than 0.31 Less than 0.31
0.31 0.40 0.31 0.40
0.41 0.55 0.41 0.55
0.56 0.75 0.56 0.75
0.76 1.00 0.76 1.00
The states of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Telangana, and Uttarakhand did not exist 1.01 1.30 1.01 1.30
in 1990, as they were created from existing larger states in 2000 or later. Data
1.31 1.70 1.31 1.70
for these four new states were disaggregated from their parent states based on
their current district composition. These states are shown in the 1990 map for More than 1.70 More than 1.70
comparison with 2016.
The states of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Telangana, and Uttarakhand did not exist in 1990, as they were created from existing larger states in 2000 or later. They are shown in the 1990 map for comparison with 2016.
These findings highlight the fact that Indias states will require very different
policy approaches according to the nature of the disease burden they are facing.
The rest of this report takes a deeper look into the diseases and injuries that are
driving these trends across the states, in order to help decision-makers determine
just what those approaches should be.
The health planning for each state and union territory in India should ideally be
based on its specific disease and risk factors profile. However, it is also useful to
understand disease and risk factors trends among groups of states at similar levels
of development and epidemiological transition.
In India the development efforts are often focused on the relatively less developed
eight north Indian states and eight states in the hilly northeastern region. The
former are referred to as the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states and the
latter the North-East states. The remaining states and union territories are often
referred to as the Other states. We provide the disease and risk factors profile
of each state in this report, but also present trends by these state groups used
in India. In addition, we subdivided states within these groups by their ETL, as
described in the previous section. As the union territories other than Delhi have
relatively smaller populations, these six union territories of Andaman and Nicobar
Islands, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Lakshadweep, and
Puducherry were considered together in the analysis.
The year in which health loss from NCDs and injuries exceeded that from
CMNNDs varied widely between the state groups and sub-groups, ranging from
1986 to 2010 (Table 2). The epidemiological transition ratio dropped below one for
the EAG states group in 2009, for the North-East states group in 2005, and for the
other states group in 1995. This crossover year for India as a whole was 2003.

Table 1
Grouping of states of India in this report
Empowered Action Group (EAG) states
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
Lowest ETL group Madhya Pradesh
Odisha
Rajasthan
Uttar Pradesh
Lower-middle ETL group Uttarakhand
North-East states
Assam
Lowest ETL group
Meghalaya
Arunachal Pradesh
Mizoram
Nagaland
Lower-middle ETL group
Tripura
Sikkim
Manipur
Other states
Lower-middle ETL group Gujarat
Andhra Pradesh
Delhi
Haryana
Jammu and Kashmir
Higher-middle ETL group Karnataka
Maharashtra
Telangana
Union Territories other than Delhi
West Bengal
Goa
Himachal Pradesh
Highest ETL group Kerala
Punjab
Tamil Nadu

Table 2
Year of crossover to majority NCDs and injuries burden by the state groups
State groups (population) Crossover year
India (1,316 million) 2003
EAG states (599 million) 2009
Lowest ETL group (588 million) 2010
Lower-middle ETL group (11 million) 2002
North-East states (52 million) 2005
Lowest ETL group (38 million) 2007
Other states (665 million) 1995
Higher-middle ETL group (446 million) 1996
Higher ETL group (152 million) 1986

Deaths and their causes
Indias epidemiological transition has been driven in part by the fact
that fewer lives are cut short by CMNNDs, and hence more people
survive to develop and die from NCDs or suffer injuries. What one is
likely to die of, though, depends both on age and where one lives. As
such, decision-makers need to understand trends in causes of death
across age groups and states in order to enact effective policies.
Figure 4
Contribution of major disease groups to total deaths in India, 1990 and 2016
1990 2016
8.5%
10.7%
27.5%
53.6% 37.9%
61.8%
The proportion of all deaths in India due to CMNNDs reduced from

53.6% in 1990 to 27.5% in 2016, those due to NCDs increased from 37.9%
to 61.8%, and those due to injuries changed from 8.5% to 10.7%.

Table 3
Distribution of deaths from major disease groups by age in the state groups, 2016
Death rate per 100,000

[percent of total deaths in that age group]
Age group Communicable, maternal,

neonatal, and nutritional Non-communicable Injuries
diseases diseases
0-14 years 277 [82.4] 37 [10.9] 23 [6.7]

15-39 years 76 [34.4] 70 [31.6] 75 [34.0]
EAG states group 40-69 years 278 [21.9] 873 [68.9] 116 [9.2]]
70 plus years 2609 [29.5] 5799 [65.5] 444 [5.0]
All ages 268 [34.6] 426 [55.1] 79 [10.2]
0-14 years 261 [83.0] 32 [10.3] 21 [6.7]
North-East states 15-39 years 77 [33.8] 82 [35.8] 69 [30.3]
group 40-69 years 238 [19.7] 881 [73.0] 88 [7.3]
70 plus years 2466 [27.2] 6260 [69.2] 327 [3.6]
All ages 236 [32.1] 433 [58.8] 67 [9.1]
0-14 years 157.5 [77.2] 30 [14.6] 17 [8.2]
Other states 15-39 years 41.9 [23.1] 68 [37.2] 72 [39.8]
group 40-69 years 133.7 [13.1] 785 [77.2] 98 [9.7]
70 plus years 1304.2 [17.3] 5784 [76.9] 435 [5.8]
All ages 145.3 [20.2] 493 [68.5] 81 [11.3]
0-14 years 225.6 [80.8] 34 [12.0] 20 [7.2]
15-39 years 58.4 [29.1] 69 [34.4] 73 [36.5]
India 40-69 years 195.8 [17.4] 824 [73.2] 105 [9.4]
70 plus years 1867.0 [23.0] 5805 [71.6] 435 [5.4]
All ages 204.6 [27.5] 460 [61.8] 80 [10.7]
The death rate due to NCDs was over two times that due to CMNNDs in
India in 2016. The proportion of deaths and the death rates due to CMNNDs
were higher in EAG and North-East states group as compared with the
Other states group, whereas the proportion of deaths and the death rates
due to NCDs were highest in the Other states group. CMNNDs caused the
predominant proportion of deaths in the age group 0-14 years in all the states
groups. Injuries caused 34%40% of the deaths in the age group 15-39 years
across the three states groups. NCDs were the dominant cause of death in
those 40 years or older. The proportion of deaths in the different age groups
differed widely across the individual states of India: 3%19% of total deaths
in the 0-14 years age group, 7%16% in the 15-39 years age group, 35%44% in
the 40-69 years age group, and 30%52% in those 70 or more years old.

Table 4
Contribution of disease categories to deaths in the state groups, 2016
Percent of deaths to total deaths
Disease categories
North-East
EAG states group Other states group India
states group
(599 million) (665 million) (1316 million)
(52 million)
Communicable, maternal, neonatal,

34.6 32.1 20.2 27.5
and nutritional diseases
HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis 6.4 6.1 4.3 5.4
Diarrhoea, lower respiratory, and other

19.9 17 11.2 15.5
common infectious diseases
Neglected tropical diseases and malaria 1.1 1.2 0.6 0.8
Maternal disorders 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.5
Neonatal disorders 4.9 4.6 2.8 3.8
Nutritional deficiencies 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.5
Other communicable, maternal, neonatal,
1 2.1 0.8 0.9
and nutritional diseases
Non-communicable diseases 55.1 58.8 68.5 61.8
Cancers 7.8 9.5 8.7 8.3
Cardiovascular diseases 21.9 23 34.5 28.1
Chronic respiratory diseases 12.4 9.6 9.6 10.9
Cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases 1.7 3.8 2.4 2.1
Digestive diseases 2.6 3.3 1.7 2.2
Neurological disorders 1.8 1.8 2.4 2.1
Mental and substance use disorders 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Diabetes, urogenital, blood, and
5.2 6.2 7.9 6.5
endocrine diseases
Musculoskeletal disorders 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Other non-communicable diseases 1.3 1.1 0.9 1.1
Injuries 10.2 9.1 11.3 10.7
Transport injuries 2.9 2.4 3 2.9
Unintentional injuries 5 3.9 4.9 4.9
Suicide and interpersonal violence 2.3 2.8 3.4 2.8
Other 0 0 0 0
The disease categories among CMNNDs that caused the highest proportion
of death were diarrhoea, lower respiratory infections, and other common
infectious diseases; HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis; and neonatal disorders.
The proportion of deaths due to these categories were relatively higher in
the EAG and North-East states group as compared with Other states group.
Among NCDs, the category of cardiovascular diseases was the leading cause
of death, followed by chronic respiratory diseases, cancers, and the category
containing diabetes and urogenital disorders. The proportion of deaths due
to cardiovascular diseases and the diabetes category were highest in the
Other states group, whereas the proportion of deaths due to chronic respi-
ratory diseases was highest in the EAG states group.

Figure 5
Death rates of the leading individual causes in the states of India, 2016
ns
ase
thy
eases
se
ctions
atitis
a se
rders
fects
licatio
on
rt dise
alopa
isease
disea
us dis
ry infe
ases
l diso
th de
rt dise
to hep
comp
ise
structi
rs
s
isease
e h ea
ea
ney d
r
fectio
is
th
heart
irato
nceph
eases
ancer
iv
ir
in
s
g
b
l
ital bir
s
s
eonata
is due
atic
n
*
n
cance
s
mic h
gitis
ic kid
oeal d
e
te
nal ob
IDS
injurie
cance
imer d
atal e
titi
nin
r resp
ry dis
rte
e
rm
ach c
rculos
r
o
e
r h
e o
intestitic ileus &
Ischae
COPD
Diarrh
Strok
Lowe
Tube
Diabe
Road
Chron
Suicid
Falls
Asthm
Prete
Alzhe
Hype
Oth
Rheum
HIV/A
Con
Intesti
N
Stom
Other
Hepa
Lung
Urina
Cir
Paraly
Menin
Drow
India 132 64 59 53 38 33 23 19 18 18 16 14 11 11 10 8 8 7 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
EAG States 100 76 81 44 48 44 18 20 13 13 15 17 14 10 10 13 10 6 8 9 7 7 5 6 5 6 4 7 6 5
Lowest ETL group 100 76 81 44 48 43 18 20 13 13 15 17 14 10 10 13 9 6 8 9 7 7 5 6 5 6 4 7 6 5
Bihar 103 55 83 41 41 25 19 14 13 7 12 13 12 8 10 13 11 8 13 6 11 3 5 6 4 3 5 5 4 6
Chhattisgarh 93 40 84 90 48 41 22 18 15 20 15 10 16 9 10 13 10 7 5 8 7 5 6 7 4 10 5 8 4 6
Jharkhand 96 38 120 37 34 38 18 19 15 9 11 9 10 8 8 9 8 8 6 5 7 6 5 6 3 4 6 9 4 7
Madhya Pradesh 122 61 69 56 48 38 19 19 12 18 14 14 16 10 10 14 9 7 7 11 5 5 5 6 5 7 4 7 6 6
Odisha 72 38 129 98 46 43 20 18 24 15 22 9 9 12 11 9 12 12 5 5 8 8 7 10 5 12 4 9 4 5
Rajasthan 95 111 51 32 52 41 10 22 10 12 12 23 16 10 8 13 8 5 5 13 6 7 5 4 4 4 3 4 5 5
Uttar Pradesh 99 97 80 30 53 58 19 22 11 15 17 23 14 10 10 13 9 3 9 11 7 9 6 5 5 7 4 9 7 4
Lower-middle ETL group 120 100 35 33 51 40 24 29 16 13 19 18 9 13 10 7 8 8 5 9 5 9 6 7 7 7 4 7 6 5
Uttarakhand 120 100 35 33 51 40 24 29 16 13 19 18 9 13 10 7 8 8 5 9 5 9 6 7 7 7 4 7 6 5
North-East states 66 55 65 80 43 37 22 16 17 16 9 13 13 9 10 9 9 8 6 6 8 5 8 14 6 4 9 7 4 7
Lowest ETL group 64 60 72 86 45 42 23 16 18 16 9 14 14 9 10 10 9 6 7 6 9 4 9 16 5 4 9 8 4 8
Meghalaya 39 22 41 32 33 35 13 10 12 8 8 5 8 8 6 5 5 3 5 9 7 5 8 5 5 3 9 7 5 3
Assam 66 63 75 91 46 43 23 16 18 16 9 15 15 9 11 11 10 7 7 5 9 4 9 17 5 4 9 8 4 8
Arunachal Pradesh 37 23 35 29 26 25 14 13 11 16 9 5 9 7 5 6 4 11 4 4 5 14 6 11 4 3 10 4 3 4
Mizoram 27 58 35 18 33 19 14 17 14 7 12 10 7 10 5 7 3 11 5 12 5 21 11 6 20 5 7 7 5 3
Nagaland 51 18 17 42 28 22 11 13 12 5 9 4 5 8 6 3 5 14 3 8 4 10 4 8 3 3 9 4 3 4
Tripura 107 67 60 97 45 16 18 15 20 30 7 15 13 12 9 6 9 5 5 3 5 3 6 8 7 5 7 6 3 4
Sikkim 65 31 14 19 38 19 14 12 13 12 15 5 7 8 6 6 4 4 3 6 3 7 6 6 5 4 11 5 3 3
Manipur 69 32 55 62 40 33 33 22 20 13 5 6 6 11 11 4 7 19 3 6 4 4 4 4 11 5 14 2 3 5
Other states 167 55 39 58 28 23 28 19 22 21 18 11 9 12 10 5 7 8 5 4 5 5 6 4 6 4 6 3 4 4
Gujarat 160 64 31 33 31 42 21 17 16 17 17 14 13 11 8 8 7 8 7 5 7 2 6 4 5 4 4 3 6 4
Higher-middle ETL group 154 56 42 69 28 21 23 18 20 22 16 11 9 11 9 5 8 9 5 4 5 6 5 5 5 4 6 3 4 5
Haryana 175 82 41 34 34 35 25 28 18 16 14 15 8 12 10 9 7 6 5 8 5 9 6 4 6 7 5 5 5 4
Delhi 108 22 11 22 19 20 18 14 16 8 10 4 8 7 6 8 7 4 4 6 5 2 6 3 7 4 5 4 4 2
Telangana 135 50 54 44 22 18 19 17 14 22 17 11 10 11 9 3 7 13 5 5 5 8 6 7 3 4 4 2 4 3
Andhra Pradesh 163 56 52 51 26 19 24 20 17 25 19 12 11 11 10 4 8 11 6 6 6 9 6 8 4 5 5 3 4 4
Jammu and Kashmir 143 74 31 39 34 18 16 31 21 9 12 13 6 10 8 6 7 3 5 2 3 13 5 5 10 3 3 3 4 4
Karnataka 169 63 53 57 24 21 42 18 21 31 17 14 11 12 9 5 8 9 7 3 7 8 5 2 5 5 7 3 5 5
West Bengal 146 48 38 118 31 19 16 16 22 24 11 10 8 11 9 5 8 8 4 2 3 6 6 6 7 5 6 3 4 6
Maharashtra 164 64 39 61 32 24 23 18 21 19 19 12 9 12 10 5 7 8 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 9 4 4 5
Union Territories other than Delhi 100 22 13 25 17 18 18 15 22 17 20 4 7 9 16 3 7 7 5 2 4 5 5 3 4 3 6 2 4 3
Highest ETL group 204 44 34 45 25 19 43 22 32 23 24 8 5 16 14 2 7 6 5 3 3 4 6 2 7 4 4 3 4 4
Himachal Pradesh 114 97 33 29 26 22 13 17 17 13 21 16 5 17 9 4 6 6 4 4 4 6 6 3 5 4 3 5 3 2
Punjab 261 47 36 43 30 22 44 29 29 10 16 8 5 15 10 5 7 7 4 7 4 2 8 3 6 6 4 3 4 3
Goa 136 31 14 46 21 11 33 13 19 11 18 5 4 13 7 3 3 7 4 0 2 6 6 1 3 3 12 3 2 4

Tamil Nadu 208 40 41 40 26 24 53 23 35 30 29 8 6 13 16 2 7 5 5 3 4 5 3 2 5 4 4 3 4 5
Kerala 170 39 20 59 17 8 28 14 32 21 18 6 3 22 15 1 5 5 5 0 1 4 11 2 11 2 5 1 3 4
37
Signicantly lower than national mean *COPD is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Indistinguishable from national mean
Signicantly higher than national mean
The leading individual cause of death in India in 2016 was ischaemic heart
disease, the death rate from which was twice as much as the next leading
cause. The other NCDs in the top 10 individual causes of death included
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stroke, diabetes, and
chronic kidney disease. Diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections,
and tuberculosis were the leading CMNND individual causes of death, and
road injuries and suicides were the leading injury individual causes of death
among the top 10 in India. There were wide variations in death rates from
the leading causes between the states. The highest death rate from ischaemic
heart disease among the states was 12 times the lowest rate, and these death
rates were generally higher among the states belonging to the higher epide-
miological transition level groups. On the other hand, the death rate from
COPD was generally higher in the EAG states, with the highest rate nine
times the lowest rate across the states of India. The death rates from diar-
rhoeal diseases and tuberculosis were also higher in the EAG states and had
a 12-fold and seven-fold variation in rates, respectively, between all the states.
The range of death rates from suicide was six-fold across the states.

Years of life lost due to premature death
While deaths are a useful metric for understanding some aspects of popu-
lation health, they do not take into account the amount of life lost when a
person dies. For example, a death at the age of 80 is given the same weight
as a death at the age of 10. In addition to deaths, decision-makers also need
to know how much premature mortality is caused by a particular disease
or injury. Years of life lost (YLLs) is a measure that quantifies the number
of years of life a person loses at the age of their death, based on the highest
life expectancy for their age group anywhere in the world. YLLs therefore
give greater weight to causes of death that kill people at younger ages, such
as common childhood infections, than those that tend to occur later in life,
such as heart disease or stroke.
Ischaemic heart disease was the leading cause of YLLs in the Other states
group by a big margin and was also the leading cause in the EAG states
group, but stroke was the leading cause of YLLs in the North-East states
group. Infectious and neonatal causes were more prominent causes of YLLs
in the EAG and North-East states group than in the Other states group.
Suicide and road injuries were among the leading 10 causes of YLLs in all
state groups, with suicide as a prominent third leading cause in the Other
states group.
In order to ensure that health policies and interventions target those who
need them most, it is also vital that decision-makers understand how specific
diseases and injuries affect females and males differently. Across all three
states groups, ischaemic heart disease caused a much greater proportion of
total YLLs among males than among females, accounting for 14% of pre-
mature mortality for males in India as a whole compared to 10% for females.
Road injuries also caused a higher proportion of YLLs among males than
females. On the other hand, diarrhoeal diseases and lower respiratory infec-
tions were responsible for a higher proportion of YLLs among females. Policy
efforts to address causes of premature mortality in India should therefore
be responsive to these differences and the relative challenges that NCDs,
injuries, and CMNNDs pose along the lines of both sex and different parts of
the country.

Figure 6
Leading individual causes of years of life lost by sex in the state groups, 2016
Females EAG states Males

Ischaemic heart disease
Diarrhoeal diseases
Lower respiratory infections
COPD*
Tuberculosis
Neonatal preterm birth
Other neonatal
Stroke
Road injuries
Suicide
Congenital defects
Neonatal encephalopathy
Intestinal infectious
Asthma
Falls
Diabetes
Chronic kidney disease
Malaria
Meningitis
HIV/AIDS
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20
Percent of total years of life lost Percent of total years of life lost
Females North-East states Males
Stroke
Diarrhoeal diseases
Tuberculosis
COPD*
Suicide
Other neonatal
Road injuries
Hepatitis
Malaria
Congenital defects
Diabetes
Drowning
HIV/AIDS
Asthma
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20
Females Other states Males

Stroke
Suicide
COPD*
Diarrhoeal diseases
Road injuries
Tuberculosis
Diabetes
Falls
Congenital defects
Other neonatal
HIV/AIDS
Asthma
Drowning
Rheumatic heart disease
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20
*COPD is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Years lived with disability
As more Indians live into adulthood and old age, they are increasingly likely
to experience poor health from disabling conditions. This has important
implications for the countrys health system, which will have to care for a
growing number of patients, many of them suffering from chronic condi-
tions. Years lived with disability (YLDs) is a measure that takes into account
both the number of individuals suffering from disability (or non-fatal poor
health as a result of a particular disease or injury), and also the severity of
the disability. The contribution of YLDs to the total disease burden (DALYs)
increased in India from 17% in 1990 to 33% in 2016. The YLD proportion in
2016 was highest in the Other states group at 36% and lowest in the EAG
states group at 30%.

Figure 7
Leading individual causes of disability by sex in the state groups, 2016
Iron-deciency anaemia
Sense organ diseases
Low back & neck pain
Migraine
Skin diseases
Other musculoskeletal
Depressive disorders
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Oral disorders
Falls
Protein-energy malnutrition
Diarrhoeal diseases
Osteoarthritis
Haemoglobinopathies
Schizophrenia
Congenital defects
Gynaecological diseases
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16
Figure 7
Percent of total years lived with disability Percent of total years lived with disability
Leading individual causes of years
Communicable, of life
maternal, lost and
neonatal, by nutritional
sex in the state groups,
diseases 2016
Non-communicable diseases Injuries
Females North-East states
Sense organ diseases includes mainly hearing and visual loss. Males
*COPD is chronic obstructive
Iron-deciency pulmonary disease.
anaemia
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Drug use disorders
Schizophrenia
Diarrhoeal diseases
Haemoglobinopathies
Other mental & substance
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16
Percent
Figure 7 of total years lived with disability Percent of total years lived with disability
Leading individual causes of years
Communicable, of life
maternal, lost and
neonatal, by nutritional
sex in the state groups,
diseases 2016
Non-communicable diseases Injuries
Females
Other
Sense organ diseases includesstates
mainly hearing and visual loss. Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Schizophrenia
Road injuries
Drug use disorders
Other mental & substance
Diarrhoeal diseases
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16

Sense organ diseases includes mainly hearing and vision loss.

The majority of the leading individual causes of YLDs in 2016 were NCDs,
but iron-deficiency anaemia was the top cause across all three state
groups, accounting for 11% of all disability in India in 2016. Its effects were
most severe among females, contributing to 15% of YLDs in the EAG and
North-East states group and 12% in the Other states group. The NCD condi-
tions that were the leading contributors to disability burden in all three state
groups included sense organ diseases (hearing and vision loss), lower back
and neck pain, migraine, depressive disorders, skin diseases, and muscu-
loskeletal disorders. Among these, migraine and depressive disorders were
responsible for a higher proportion of YLDs among females than among
males in all three state groups. As many of these diseases are not fatal, these
rankings highlight the importance of looking specifically at YLDs to identify
major individual causes of poor health in the population, as these may be
overlooked by focusing on mortality. As Indias population structure moves
further toward a higher proportion of elderly, these diseases will likely make
an increasingly important contribution to the countrys disease burden and
will require stronger efforts to address them.

Total health loss and its causes
For a complete assessment of the burden caused by health problems, we can
evaluate the impact of different diseases and injuries by taking into account
both premature mortality and disability in one combined measure: disabili-
ty-adjusted life years (DALYs). DALYs provide a more comprehensive look at
the drivers of overall health loss in India and its states.
Figure 8
Percent change in all-ages and age-standardised DALYs rate in the state groups, 1990 and 2016
India EAG states North-East states Other states
0
Percent change from 1990 to 2016
-20%
-33.4%
-36.2% -35.9%
-40% -37.9%
-39.4%
-40.2%
-43.1%
-47.2%
-60%
All ages Age-standardised
The limit bars indicate 95% uncertainty interval around estimates.
The DALY rate reduced significantly by 43% in India from 1990 to 2016. This
reduction was relatively higher in the EAG states group. After adjusting for the
changes in population age structure during this period, the age-standardised
DALY rate dropped by 36% in India, suggesting a reduction in the disease burden
per person over this period.

Figure 9
Relative age-standardised DALYs rate across the states of India, 2016
(1.81)
(1.77)
(1.71)
(1.64) (1.63)
(1.63) (1.61)
(1.59) (1.59)
(1.56)
(1.51)
1.50 (1.49) (1.48)
(1.47) (1.46)
(1.43)
(1.41) (1.41) (1.4)
(1.37) (1.37)
(1.35) (1.34) (1.34)
(1.31)
(1.26)
(1.23)
(1.21)
(1.17)
(1.04)
(1.00)
1.00
Ratio
0.50
0.00
m
h
arh
ark a
nd
Ra har
Ha n
tar na
nd
Ka ra
ka
An gha t
a
m est sh
Ka al
ir
l P ab
M sh
ah ipur
M ra
m m
Te adu
na
nd
S i
er ikkim
l P lhi
h
a
a
lh
M ara
ish
lay
Go
ral
es
es
es
m
nd ng
pu
t
sa
a
ata
e
j
th
rya
ga
ac n De
ha
ha
sh
ala
un
r
sg
Bi
sh
ad
rad
ad
rad
rad
Ke
j
il N
D
izo
an
Od
As
u a Be
Gu
jas
Tri
lan
ara
ak
rn
tti
ag
P
Pr
Pr
aP
Hi tha
ha
N
Jh
tar
ra
Ta
ha
ha
hy
Ut
Ch
M
dh
Ut
ac
ad
th
un
m
M
so
m
Ar
rie
Ja
to
rri
EAG states North-East states Other states
Te
ion
Un
The ratio shown on the top of each bar is the ratio of each state age-standardised DALY rate to the DALY rate of Kerala.
The range of DALY rates varied almost two-fold across the states in 2016, after
adjusting for the population structure of the states. Assam and the EAG states had
the highest DALY rates. The lowest DALY rates were in Kerala and Goa.

Table 5
Contribution of disease categories to DALYs in the state groups, 1990 and 2016
46
Percent of DALYs, 1990 Percent of DALYs, 2016
EAG states North-East states Other states EAG states North-East states Other states
India India
group group group group group group
(864 million) (1,316 million)
(369 million) (32 million) (463 million) (599 million) (52 million) (665 million)
Communicable, maternal, neonatal, and
67.1 61.9 54.2 60.9 39.9 37 24.9 32.7
nutritional diseases
HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis 5.3 5.5 4.8 5.1 4.8 4.7 3.6 4.2
Diarrhoea, lower respiratory, and other

38.9 31.7 27.2 33.2 16.6 13.8 8.6 12.7
common infectious diseases

Neglected tropical diseases and malaria 2.8 2.7 1.3 2.1 2 1.9 1.1 1.5
Maternal disorders 1.4 2.3 1.3 1.4 0.8 0.9 0.4 0.6
Neonatal disorders 12.9 14 15 13.9 9.5 9.1 6.2 7.9
Nutritional deficiencies 4.2 3.6 3.4 3.8 5 4.5 4.2 4.6
Other communicable, maternal,
1.6 2.1 1.3 1.5 1.2 2.2 0.9 1.1
neonatal, and nutritional diseases
Non-communicable diseases 25.4 30.5 35.9 30.5 48.9 52.5 62.4 55.4
Cancers 2 2.6 2.6 2.3 4.6 5.6 5.4 5
Cardiovascular diseases 4.9 5.9 9 6.9 10.9 11.5 17.7 14.1
Chronic respiratory diseases 4.4 4.8 4.6 4.5 6.7 5.5 6.1 6.4
Cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases 0.6 1.7 1.1 0.9 1.2 2.8 1.8 1.6
Digestive diseases 1.4 1.9 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.3 1.2 1.5
Neurological disorders 1.7 1.9 2.3 2 3.2 3.4 4.1 3.6
Mental and substance use disorders 2.4 3 3.5 2.9 4.8 5.4 6.4 5.6
Diabetes, urogenital, blood, and
2.1 2.6 3.2 2.6 4.6 5.2 6.7 5.6
endocrine diseases
Musculoskeletal disorders 1.9 2.1 2.7 2.3 3.9 4.1 5.4 4.6
Other non-communicable diseases 4.1 4.1 5.9 4.9 7.2 6.7 7.7 7.4
Injuries 7.4 7.6 9.9 8.6 11.2 10.5 12.7 11.9
Transport injuries 1.5 1.4 2 1.7 3.2 2.7 3.5 3.3
Unintentional injuries 4.4 3.9 4.9 4.6 5.5 4.7 5.4 5.4
Suicide and interpersonal violence 1.4 2.2 2.9 2.1 2.5 3.1 3.8 3.1
Other 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0
The proportion of DALYs due to CMNNDs dropped substantially in all
three state groups between 1990 and 2016, making up 25% to 40% of the total
DALYs in 2016. There were large declines in the proportion of health loss
from diarrhoea, lower respiratory infections, and other common infec-
tions, and from neonatal disorders. These proportions, however, continued
to be higher in the EAG and North-East states groups than in the Other
states group. Conversely, the proportion of DALYs due to NCDs increased
substantially in all three state groups during this period to 49%-62% of the
total DALYs in 2016. This proportion continued to be highest in the Other
states group for most of the NCD categories. The proportion of DALYs due
to injuries also increased in all three state groups, contributing to 11%-13% of
the total DALYs in 2016. For India as whole, the disease categories that were
responsible for more than 5% of the total DALYs in 2016 included cardiovas-
cular diseases; diarrhoea, lower respiratory infections, and other common
infectious diseases; neonatal disorders; chronic respiratory diseases;
diabetes, urogenital and endocrine diseases; mental and substance abuse
disorders; unintentional injuries; and cancers.

Figure 10
Change in DALYs number and rate for the leading individual causes in India from 1990 to 2016
Communicable, maternal, Non-communicable diseases Injuries same or increase decrease
Mean % change number Mean % change DALY
Leading causes 1990 Leading causes 2016 of DALYs 1990-2016 rate 1990-2016
Diarrhoeal diseases [12.4%] 1 1 Ischaemic heart disease [8.7%] 104.1% 33.9%

Lower respiratory infect [9.8%] 2 2 COPD [4.8%] 36.3% -10.5%*
Preterm birth complications [5.5%] 3 3 Diarrhoeal diseases [4.6%] -67.7% -78.8%
Tuberculosis [5.0%] 4 4 Lower respiratory infect [4.3%] -61.5% -74.7%
Measles [4.2%] 5 5 Stroke [3.5%] 52.9% 0.4%*
Ischaemic heart disease [3.7%] 6 6 Iron-deciency anemia [3.5%] 41.8% -6.9%
Other neonatal disorders [3.6%] 7 7 Preterm birth complications [3.4%] -46.3% -64.8%
COPD [3.1%] 8 8 Tuberculosis [3.2%] -44.5% -63.5%
Neonatal encephalopathy [3.0%] 9 9 Sense organ diseases [2.9%] 85.3% 21.7%
Iron-deciency anemia [2.1%] 10 10 Road injuries [2.9%] 65.1% 8.3%
Congenital defects [2.0%] 11 11 Self-harm [2.5%] 29.8% -14.8%*
Stroke [2.0%] 12 12 Low back & neck pain [2.3%] 66.1% 9.0%
Tetanus [1.8%] 13 13 Diabetes [2.2%] 174.2% 80.0%
Self-harm [1.7%] 14 14 Other neonatal disorders [2.1%] -49.7% -67.0%
Intestinal infectious diseases [1.6%] 15 15 Migraine [2.1%] 69.1% 11.0%
Road injuries [1.5%] 16 16 Skin diseases [1.9%] 55.0% 1.7%*
Sense organ diseases [1.3%] 17 17 Falls [1.8%] 41.3% -7.2%*
Meningitis [1.3%] 18 18 Congenital defects [1.8%] -20.9%* -48.1%
Asthma [1.3%] 19 19 Other musculoskeletal [1.6%] 79.7% 18.0%
Low back & neck pain [1.2%] 20 20 Chronic kidney disease [1.6%] 71.0% 12.2%
Falls [1.1%] 21 21 Depressive disorders [1.6%] 65.1% 8.4%
Protein-energy malnutrition [1.1%] 22 22 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.5%] -56.1% -71.2%
Skin diseases [1.1%] 23 23 Asthma [1.3%] -15.1%* -44.3%
Migraine [1.1%] 24 24 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.2%] -37.1% -58.7%
Malaria [1.1%] 25 25 HIV/AIDS [1.1%] 1,004.6% 625.0%
Drowning [1.0%] 26 26 Anxiety disorders [0.9%] 61.9% 6.2%
Neonatal haemolytic [0.9%] 27 27 Meningitis [0.8%] -46.7% -65.0%
Neonatal sepsis [0.9%] Rheumatic heart disease [0.8%] 2.5%* -32.7%
Depressive disorders [0.9%] Protein-energy malnutrition [0.7%] -42.3% -62.1%
Chronic kidney disease [0.8%] Drowning [0.7%] -36.0% -58.0%
Other musculoskeletal [0.8%] Malaria [0.7%]
Diabetes [0.7%] Neonatal sepsis [0.6%]
Rheumatic heart disease [0.7%] Measles [0.4%]
Anxiety disorders [0.5%] Neonatal haemolytic [0.3%]
HIV/AIDS [0.1%] 102 109 Tetanus [0.1%]
*Change not signicant

COPD is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
The percent gure in bracket next to each cause is DALYs

from that cause out of the total DALYs.
Self-harm refers to suicide and the nonfatal outcomes of self-harm.
When looking at the leading individual causes of DALYs in India, most

NCDs have risen in rank since 1990. Ischaemic heart disease and COPD were
the top two causes of DALYs in 2016, up from sixth and eighth place, respec-
tively, in 1990. Diabetes showed a particularly dramatic increase, from 35th
place to 13th. The number of DALYs caused by ischaemic heart disease rose
by 104% over this period and those caused by diabetes a striking 174%. Large
increases in DALYs are evident for the majority of non-communicable condi-
tions, including sense organ diseases, low back and neck pain, and depressive
disorders. Injuries have seen similar rises in their relative ranking, with road
injuries the 10th leading individual cause of health loss in 2016, followed by
self-harm in 11th place. Road injuries caused 65% more DALYs in 2016 than
they did in 1990. These trends are indicative not just of a population that is
increasing in age and therefore living long enough to develop and suffer from
chronic diseases, but also of the impact of lifestyle changes that come with a
rapidly industrialising, urbanising society from changes in diet and activity
levels to more traffic on the roads.
In contrast, the CMNNDs that led the rankings in 1990 have seen notable
declines. Diarrhoeal disease and lower respiratory infections, which were
Indias top two individual causes of DALYs in 1990, dropped to third and
fourth place in 2016. Other conditions, such as preterm birth complications,
tuberculosis, and vaccine-preventable diseases like measles, also saw a drop

in rank. The number of DALYs caused by diarrhoeal diseases fell by 68% over
this period, while preterm birth complications caused 46% less DALYs in
2016 than in 1990. This represents Indias significant achievement in ensuring
more children survive and thrive during their first weeks, months, and years
of life. However, there is a striking outlier to this progress: Iron-deficiency
anaemia showed an increase in both rank and health loss caused, suggesting
a need for renewed policy attention to this cause.

Figure 11
Comparison of the leading individual causes of DALYs across the state groups, 2016
Rank Leading causes EAG states Leading causes North-East states Leading causes Other states
1 Ischaemic heart disease [6.3%] Diarrhoeal diseases [5.3%] Ischaemic heart disease [11.5%]
2 Diarrhoeal diseases [6.2%] Stroke [5.3%] COPD* [4.6%]
3 Lower respiratory infect [5.8%] Lower respiratory infect [5.0%] Stroke [4.1%]
4 COPD* [5.0%] Ischaemic heart disease [4.3%] Iron-deciency anaemia [3.4%]
5 Tuberculosis [3.9%] COPD* [4.0%] Sense organ diseases [3.3%]
6 Neonatal preterm birth [3.7%] Neonatal preterm birth [3.7%] Self-harm [3.2%]
7 Iron-deciency anaemia [3.6%] Tuberculosis [3.5%] Road injuries [3.0%]
8 Other neonatal [2.9%] Iron-deciency anaemia [3.5%] Neonatal preterm birth [3.0%]
9 Stroke [2.8%] Sense organ diseases [2.5%] Diarrhoeal [3.0%]
10 Road injuries [2.7%] Road injuries [2.4%] Diabetes [2.8%]
11 Sense organ diseases [2.6%] Self-harm [2.3%] Lower respiratory infect [2.8%]
12 Congenital defects [2.1%] Other neonatal [2.2%] Low back & neck pain [2.7%]
13 Low back & neck pain [1.9%] Diabetes [2.0%] Tuberculosis [2.4%]
14 Skin diseases [1.8%] Migraine [2.0%] Migraine [2.3%]
15 Self-harm [1.8%] Neonatal encephalopathy [1.9%] Chronic kidney disease [2.1%]
16 Migraine [1.8%] Low back & neck pain [1.9%] Falls [2.0%]
17 Falls [1.7%] Skin diseases [1.9%] Skin diseases [2.0%]
18 Diabetes [1.7%] Hepatitis [1.8%] Depressive disorders [2.0%]
19 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.7%] ] Chronic kidney disease [1.6%] Other musculoskeletal [1.9%]
20 Intestinal infectious [1.6%] Other musculoskeletal [1.6%] Congenital defects [1.5%]
21 Other musculoskeletal [1.4%] Congenital defects [1.6%] Neonatal encephalopathy [1.3%]
22 Asthma [1.4%] Depressive disorders [1.5%] HIV/AIDS [1.2%]
23 Depressive disorders [1.3%] Malaria [1.3%] Other neonatal [1.2%]
24 Chronic kidney disease [1.2%] Falls [1.2%] Asthma [1.1%]
25 Protein-energy malnutrition [1.0%] Asthma [1.2%] Anxiety disorders [1.0%]
26 Malaria [1.0%] HIV/AIDS [1.1%] Oral disorders [0.8%]
27 Meningitis [0.9%] Drowning [1.1%] Rheumatic heart disease [0.8%]
28 HIV/AIDS [0.9%] Intestinal infectious [1.0%] Intestinal infectious [0.7%]
29 Animal contact [0.9%] Cirrhosis hepatitis B [0.9%] Meningitis [0.7%]
30 Rheumatic heart disease [0.9%] Anxiety disorders [0.9%] Hypertensive heart disease [0.7%]
Communicable, maternal, Non-communicable diseases Injuries


The percent gure in bracket next to each cause is DALYs from that
cause out of the total DALYs.
However, these trends have not been uniform throughout the country. The
relative rankings of causes of disease burden vary markedly among the three
state groups. CMNND causes have not been superseded by NCD causes
to the same extent everywhere in India, and generally ranked much higher
in the EAG and North-East states groups than they did in the Other states
group. Diarrhoeal diseases remained the leading cause of health loss in the
North-East states group and second in the EAG states group, with lower
respiratory infections in third place for both of these groups. In contrast,
these conditions were in ninth and eleventh place in the Other states group.
Moreover, the proportion of health loss caused by CMNNDs tended to be
greater in the EAG and North-East states groups than in the Other states
group, with the heaviest burden in the EAG states group.
Alongside variations between state groups, decision-makers should also be

aware of differences in the causes of health loss among females and males.

Figure 12
Figure 12
Females Males
Leading causes 1990 Leading causes 2016 Leading causes 1990 Leading causes 2016
Diarrhoeal diseases [14.8%] 1 1 Ischaemic heart disease [6.6%] Diarrhoeal diseases [10.1%] 1 1 Ischaemic heart disease [10.4%]
Lower respiratory infect [10.3%] 2 2 Diarrhoeal diseases [5.5%] Lower respiratory infect [9.4%] 2 2 COPD [5.2%]
Preterm birth complications [4.9%] 3 3 Iron-deciency anemia [4.9%] Preterm birth complications [6.0%] 3 3 Road injuries [4.3%]
Measles [4.2%] 4 4 Lower respiratory infect [4.7%] Tuberculosis [5.8%] 4 4 Lower respiratory infect [4.0%]
Tuberculosis [4.1%] 5 5 COPD [4.4%] Ischaemic heart disease [4.4%] 5 5 Diarrhoeal diseases [3.9%]
Other neonatal disorders [3.2%] 6 6 Stroke [3.4%] Measles [4.2%] 6 6 Tuberculosis [3.8%]
Ischaemic heart disease [2.9%] 7 7 Preterm birth complications [3.2%] Other neonatal disorders [4.0%] 7 7 Stroke [3.6%]
among males and females, India
Iron-deciency anemia [2.8%] 8 8 Sense organ diseases [3.2%] COPD [3.4%] 8 8 Preterm birth complications [3.5%]
COPD [2.7%] 9 9 Migraine [2.7%] Neonatal encephalopathy [3.4%] 9 9 Self-harm [2.6%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.5%] 10 10 Low back & neck pain [2.7%] Road injuries [2.2%] 10 10 Sense organ diseases [2.6%]
Congenital defects [1.9%] 11 11 Tuberculosis [2.5%] Congenital defects [2.1%] 11 11 Diabetes [2.3%]
Stroke [1.9%] 12 12 Self-harm [2.4%]* Stroke [2.1%] 12 12 Iron-deciency anemia [2.2%]
Self-harm [1.8%] 13 13 Diabetes [2.2%] Tetanus [2.0%] 13 13 Other neonatal disorders [2.0%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [1.6%] 14 14 Skin diseases [2.1%] Intestinal infectious diseases [1.7%] 14 14 Low back & neck pain [1.9%]
Tetanus [1.6%] 15 15 Other neonatal disorders [2.1%] Self-harm [1.6%] 15 15 Falls [1.9%]
Low back & neck pain [1.4%] 16 16 Congenital defects [2.1%]* Iron-deciency anemia [1.5%] 16 16 Chronic kidney disease [1.8%]
Sense organ diseases [1.4%] 17 17 Depressive disorders [2.0%] Asthma [1.4%] 17 17 Skin diseases [1.7%]
Meningitis [1.4%] 18 18 Other musculoskeletal [1.9%] Meningitis [1.3%] 18 18 Congenital defects [1.6%]*
Migraine [1.3%] 19 19 Falls [1.8%] Sense organ diseases [1.3%] 19 19 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.6%]
Protein-energy malnutrition [1.3%] 20 20 Chronic kidney disease [1.4%] Drowning [1.3%] 20 20 Migraine [1.5%]
Asthma [1.3%] 21 21 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.4%] Falls [1.2%] 21 21 Other musculoskeletal [1.4%]
Malaria [1.2%] 22 22 Asthma [1.4%]* Neonatal hemolytic [1.1%] 22 22 Depressive disorders [1.3%]
Skin diseases [1.2%] 23 23 Road injuries [1.2%] Skin diseases [1.0%] 23 23 HIV/AIDS [1.3%]
Falls [1.1%] 24 24 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.1%] Protein-energy malnutrition [1.0%] 24 24 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.2%]
Maternal hemorrhage [1.0%] 25 25 Anxiety disorders [1.1%] Chronic kidney disease [1.0%] 25 25 Asthma [1.2%]*
Depressive disorders [1.0%] 26 26 Rheumatic heart disease [1.0%]* Low back & neck pain [0.9%] 26 26 Drowning [0.9%]
Whooping cough [0.9%] 27 27 Protein-energy malnutrition [0.9%] Malaria [0.9%] 27 27 Alcohol use disorders [0.9%]
Neonatal sepsis [0.9%] 28 28 Gynecological diseases [0.9%] Neonatal sepsis [0.9%] 28 28 Interpersonal violence [0.8%]
Other musculoskeletal [0.8%] 29 29 Breast cancer [0.9%] Animal contact [0.8%] 29 29 Meningitis [0.8%]
Encephalitis [0.8%] 30 30 Malaria [0.9%]* Hepatitis [0.8%] 30 30 Cirrhosis hepatitis B [0.8%]
Rheumatic heart disease [0.8%] 31 31 Meningitis [0.8%] Migraine [0.8%] 31 31 Animal contact [0.8%]*
Change in DALYs number for the leading individual causes by sex in India from 1990 to 2016
Road injuries [0.7%] 34 32 HIV/AIDS [0.8%] Other musculoskeletal [0.7%] 33 33 Hepatitis [0.7%]
Chronic kidney disease [0.7%] 35 34 Encephalitis [0.7%]* Diabetes [0.7%] 34 37 Protein-energy malnutrition [0.6%]
Diabetes [0.7%] 36 35 Neonatal sepsis [0.7%]* Depressive disorders [0.7%] 36 47 Malaria [0.6%]*
Anxiety disorders [0.6%] 40 48 Maternal hemorrhage [0.5%] Interpersonal violence [0.6%] 39 48 Neonatal sepsis [0.6%]
Gynecological diseases [0.4%] 45 54 Measles [0.4%] Alcohol use disorders [0.5%] 42 61 Neonatal hemolytic [0.3%]
Breast cancer [0.3%] 52 81 Whooping cough [0.2%]* Cirrhosis hepatitis B [0.4%] 48 62 Measles [0.3%]

Change in number of DALYs and percent change in rate for the leading individual causes from 1990 to 2016
HIV/AIDS [0.0%] 112 111 Tetanus [0.1%] HIV/AIDS [0.1%] 90 100 Tetanus [0.1%]
51

*Change not signicant. COPD is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
The percent gure in bracket next to each cause is DALYs from
that cause out of the total DALYs.
While ischaemic heart disease was the leading individual cause of DALYs for
both sexes combined in 2016, for males this was followed by COPD and road
injuries, with both conditions seeing rapid increases in ranking since 1990.
For females, diarrhoeal diseases and iron-deficiency anaemia were in second
and third place, with anaemia climbing from eighth place over this period.
This shows that females continue to suffer a higher burden from CMNNDs,
while several leading NCDs and injuries cause a higher burden among males.
This is also evident when looking at the proportion of health loss caused by
each condition. Anaemia, for example, caused 4.9% of DALYs among females
in 2016 as compared with 2.2% among males, and the proportion of DALYs
from diarrhoea and lower respiratory infections was responsible for a larger
percent of DALYs among females. A notable exception to this trend is tuber-
culosis, which ranks as the sixth leading cause of DALYs for males and 11th
for females, and also causes substantially more health loss for males than
females. On the other hand, ischaemic heart disease caused 10.4% of DALYs
among males and 6.6% among females in 2016 despite being the leading
cause for both.
Different disease profiles are associated with different age groups, and so
looking at the age structure of Indias disease burden illuminates patterns
that are of utility to policymakers as they seek to target interventions.

Figure 13
Percent of DALYs by age in the state groups, 2016
EAG states
25
[2.26]
20
Percent of total DALYs
15
10
[2.13]
[1.68]
[1.11] [1.35] [2.64]
[0.55] [0.6] [0.67] [0.79] [0.9]
5 [0.45] [3.26]
[0.33] [0.32] [3.51]
[4.35]
[4.11]
0
)
1%
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
3%
1%
0.
.2
.8
(8
.5
.5
.7
.8
.2
.6
.1
.1
.4
.9
.5
.3
(1
1.
(1
10
(8
(7
(6
(5
(4
(4
(3
(3
(2
(1
(0
(0
(0
29
19
(1
14
24
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
+
5(
to
o9
to
85
to
r
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
25
de
15
5t
10
20
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Un
North-East states
25
20 [2.31]
15
10
[1.16] [1.45] [1.79]

[0.62] [0.69] [0.82] [0.94] [2.21]
[0.57]
5 [0.47] [2.82]
[3.32]
[0.33] [0.32] [3.58]
[4.46]
[5.7]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
4%
8%
4%
4%
.5
.2
.3
.3
.2
.4
.5
.5
.6
.7
.2
.9
.5
.2
0.
9.
9.
9.
(8
10
(8
(7
(6
(5
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(0
(0
(0
(1
9(
4(
9(
r5
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
+
4(
o9
85
de
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
5t
to
Un
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
10
Other states
25
20
15
[1.68]
10
[1.35] [1.69] [2.12]

[1.11] [2.59]
[0.8] [0.92]
[0.6] [0.68]
[0.55] [3.19]
5 [3.53]
[0.46]
[0.3] [0.31] [4.46]

[4.37]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
(7
(8
.4
.8
.3
.2
.5
.6
.8
.1
.5
.6
.6
.6
.7
.2
.6
.4
(8
(8
(9
(9
(8
(7
(6
(6
(5
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(0
(0
r5
o9
14
19
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
+
de
5t
85
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
Un
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Age
The number in the bracket on top of each vertical bar is the ratio of percent DALYs to population for that age group.
The number in parentheses after each age group on the x-axis is the percent of population in that age group.

There are different patterns of health loss across the lifespan. Age groups
under-5 and 45 plus years suffered a higher proportion of the total DALY
burden as compared with their proportion in the population across all three
state groups of India in 2016, as shown by the ratios in the figure. However,
the relative magnitude of the disease burden across the age groups differs
between the state groups. While the under-5 age group had the highest
proportion of DALYs in all state groups, this ranged between 23% of the total
DALYs in the EAG states group, 19% in the North-East states group, and
12% in the Other states group. On the other hand, the proportion of DALYs
in the middle and older age groups was highest in the Other states group.
CMNNDs were responsible for the vast majority of the DALYs proportion
among children under 5, which reduced with increasing age up to the middle
ages, followed by a modest increasing trend in the older age groups. For India
as a whole, the proportion of DALYs due to NCDs was more than half of the
total starting with the 30-34 year age group, increasing to 79% in the 65-69
year age group. The proportion of total DALYs due to injuries was highest in
the 15-39 year age groups, ranging from 18% to 28%.
It is necessary to assess patterns of health loss across each state of India in

order to inform health policy and interventions that address the specific
situation of each state.
Figure 14

Figure 14
DALYs rate of the leading individual causes in the states of India, 2016
ons
s
trition
se
ations
isease
ase
fects
mia
s
lopath
order
ses
isease
ers
infecti
pain
eletal
disea
mplic
malnu
ous d
ers
th de
y dise
y an e
disea
isease
tal dis
eart d
isease
cepha
s
neck
disord
is
irator
n
heart
irth co
infecti
nergy
cienc
kidne
b
l
ic
ital bir
s
disord
e a se s

a
atic h
nary d tive
organ
ers
a
neona
ssive
m
gitis
ic
oeal d
is
e
te
ack &
m
n
ine
IDS
injurie
ty
arm
e
atal e
ning
in-e
r resp
e
r
rculos
e
r
r
n
ti
-d
e
e
ro
th
pulmoic obstruc
disordmusculosk
Ischa
Chron
Diarrh
Lowe
Strok
Iron
Prete
Tube
Sense
Road
Self-h
Low b
Diabe
O
Migra
Skin d
Falls
Con
Oth
Ch
Depre
Neon
Asthm
Intes
HIV/A
Anxie
Menin
Rheum
Prote
Drow
India 3062 1700 1642 1537 1243 1235 1195 1126 1023 1009 884 806 792 736 733 684 652 638 584 583 581 532 450 417 375 310 288 286 265 262
EAG States 2382 1923 2351 2195 1061 1376 1413 1493 974 1040 692 729 643 1098 692 697 644 788 537 453 485 641 533 616 332 292 358 326 374 288
Lowest ETL group 2376 1917 2354 2182 1061 1376 1411 1487 975 1030 692 729 638 1098 692 696 645 787 537 453 486 641 531 612 331 292 355 325 371 286
Bihar 2431 1452 2827 2378 1032 1610 1287 871 947 773 369 695 611 1150 659 661 576 1205 509 446 424 972 423 402 432 290 311 385 292 345
Chhattisgarh 2347 1219 2193 1933 2142 1196 1624 1362 1086 920 999 797 776 1109 731 712 646 515 576 537 468 660 339 523 406 250 246 351 396 330
Jharkhand 2313 1146 3420 1577 932 1471 1147 1322 925 1018 467 720 632 801 680 686 538 571 526 492 486 607 343 357 432 321 256 296 315 391
Madhya Pradesh 2883 1599 1835 2090 1293 1335 1582 1294 985 997 903 764 741 1212 707 700 601 707 551 441 496 428 448 714 381 243 358 320 415 354
Odisha 1766 1177 2978 1555 2259 1246 989 1382 1082 913 765 847 730 780 739 710 810 488 612 792 739 689 329 338 625 316 236 380 241 263
Rajasthan 2343 2570 1490 2706 775 1397 1640 1400 970 1171 614 663 443 1159 710 687 506 524 544 359 474 528 679 846 288 328 326 261 344 313
Uttar Pradesh 2313 2402 2380 2240 734 1319 1458 1991 955 1170 788 719 651 1144 682 714 721 841 523 402 462 592 665 720 188 292 447 313 449 210
Uttarakhand 2773 2410 1059 1962 793 1008 1056 1284 996 1481 654 814 795 619 734 747 698 554 569 517 505 462 552 620 413 317 369 266 309 280
North-East states 1592 1482 1944 1828 1935 1282 1370 1304 908 879 840 699 740 791 727 697 457 575 578 595 563 702 444 385 418 318 239 312 223 401
Lowest ETL group 1583 1582 2231 1976 2113 1451 1487 1508 911 884 824 677 762 913 724 699 470 633 583 610 572 809 476 393 351 310 253 343 254 461
Meghalaya 957 767 1344 1500 791 1218 960 1255 769 579 429 658 468 430 693 714 433 523 506 437 581 646 284 637 193 301 299 207 223 174
Assam 1638 1653 2309 2018 2229 1472 1534 1531 923 911 859 678 787 955 727 698 473 642 590 625 571 824 493 371 365 311 249 355 257 486
Arunachal Pradesh 957 786 1204 1210 739 887 1023 888 758 717 819 671 527 531 699 713 469 469 502 412 608 448 251 249 592 303 232 150 197 247
Mizoram 663 1624 919 1306 455 678 933 639 885 903 335 763 513 622 733 689 547 492 554 473 467 476 383 780 609 312 261 91 112 162
Nagaland 1167 648 526 1087 993 537 746 762 763 722 254 689 440 263 723 728 458 325 514 438 503 350 257 527 793 313 181 188 82 243
Tripura 2330 1676 1464 1847 2259 1197 1411 545 1004 816 1547 811 734 574 748 672 387 490 600 644 513 455 518 185 291 319 201 310 198 239
Sikkim 1526 961 606 1527 488 954 893 644 808 712 629 713 549 494 707 677 684 364 517 444 500 311 303 398 213 303 214 158 141 150
Manipur 1568 1021 1364 1159 1488 463 827 1024 947 1125 657 797 947 324 752 678 320 341 582 632 610 366 240 400 1010 415 178 232 68 272
Other states 3790 1516 981 922 1352 1104 986 781 1076 992 1061 883 930 406 770 672 675 508 627 699 669 421 375 241 410 326 230 249 169 227
Gujarat 3736 1694 959 1257 830 1228 1390 1453 994 927 867 830 729 669 744 671 700 705 587 537 536 661 444 306 459 290 328 254 243 236
Higher-middle ETL group 3514 1530 1048 932 1606 1114 1040 714 1060 943 1105 869 807 412 769 675 640 494 631 652 666 425 385 228 449 329 227 263 169 242
Haryana 4244 2091 1109 1311 814 1293 950 1157 951 1473 796 805 817 748 734 693 582 511 580 584 703 432 485 522 317 315 292 246 309 207
Delhi 2569 921 485 799 561 925 900 850 834 826 403 722 869 696 763 691 519 438 580 536 475 451 192 423 238 322 233 247 159 95
Telangana 3257 1442 1391 780 1051 1055 1142 585 1068 930 1113 877 733 286 769 660 723 473 598 492 786 439 381 292 706 326 202 243 148 173
Andhra Pradesh 4023 1585 1292 951 1214 1294 1150 611 1065 1066 1246 878 841 320 768 655 753 572 615 580 790 559 434 354 570 325 236 292 136 218
Jammu and Kashmir 3256 1976 821 1268 906 953 814 583 950 1614 464 779 586 489 728 670 528 513 556 683 490 302 403 147 167 315 215 238 122 204
Karnataka 3892 1726 1228 777 1349 1106 1210 746 1123 950 1522 876 1202 451 785 670 689 696 618 677 619 614 445 167 471 325 267 295 217 257
West Bengal 3203 1377 993 1074 2821 1157 894 669 1067 857 1207 871 600 420 774 685 498 395 624 715 570 309 376 139 433 341 215 290 157 307
Maharashtra 3658 1638 927 937 1341 1077 1044 808 1071 916 920 892 788 414 763 679 687 448 680 679 734 369 376 242 387 326 218 222 184 243
Union Territories other than Delhi 2321 818 443 608 629 990 876 691 890 862 899 825 784 225 774 682 773 468 563 708 633 363 228 147 372 326 245 244 78 166
Highest ETL group 4487 1292 781 671 986 987 665 598 1181 1066 1075 960 1377 209 789 659 775 461 641 922 729 301 299 193 296 337 183 210 110 185
Himachal Pradesh 2463 2176 749 825 656 813 710 673 1103 912 630 915 512 391 777 675 807 389 607 515 593 377 442 256 332 331 163 179 69 118
Punjab 5758 1335 881 887 979 1093 650 656 1082 1425 481 902 1314 422 768 672 588 457 636 850 505 368 293 434 376 298 220 237 118 140
Goa 2933 1089 402 614 1058 645 542 351 1098 758 559 976 1090 297 794 660 718 385 632 613 613 230 249 21 414 271 114 99 130 192

Tamil Nadu 4788 1246 920 714 938 1199 727 754 1184 1121 1435 949 1628 165 790 655 921 474 638 1026 857 348 296 183 271 314 196 229 125 218
Kerala 3309 1187 438 380 1153 515 548 228 1273 706 928 1039 1094 87 807 653 624 454 658 858 679 138 284 14 270 420 133 161 80 167
55

Signicantly lower than national mean Self-harm refers to suicide and the nonfatal outcomes of self-harm.
Diarrhoeal diseases Lower respiratory infections
56
Figure 15
Himachal Pradesh Himachal Pradesh

Punjab Punjab
Arunachal Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh
Uttarakhand Uttarakhand
Delhi Delhi
Haryana Sikkim Haryana Sikkim
Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh

Assam Nagaland Assam Nagaland

Bihar Bihar
Manipur Manipur
Jharkhand Jharkhand
Gujarat Madhya Pradesh Mizoram Gujarat Madhya Pradesh Mizoram
Tripura Tripura
Odisha Odisha
Maharashtra Meghalaya Maharashtra Meghalaya
Telangana West Bengal Telangana West Bengal
Goa Goa
Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka Karnataka

Kerala Kerala
DALYs per 100,000 DALYs per 100,000

Less than 800 Less than 750
8001199 750999
DALYs rate due to diarrhoeal diseases and lower respiratory infections in the states of India, 2016
12001599 10001249
16001999 12501499
20002399 15001749
24002799 17501999
28003199 20002499
3200 or more 2500 or more

Ischaemic heart disease Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Figure 16

Punjab Punjab

Delhi Delhi

Bihar Bihar
Manipur Manipur
Jharkhand Jharkhand
Tripura Tripura
Odisha Odisha
Goa Goa
Karnataka Karnataka

Kerala Kerala
DALYs rate due to ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

15001999 10001249
20002499 12501499
25002999 15001749
30003499 17501999

35003999 20002249
57
Figure 17
DALYs rate due to road injuries in the states of India, 2016
Jammu and Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Punjab
Arunachal Pradesh
Uttarakhand
Delhi
Haryana Sikkim
Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh

Bihar
Assam Nagaland DALYs per 100,000
Manipur Less than 600
Jharkhand
Gujarat Madhya Pradesh Mizoram 600749
750899
Chhattisgarh
Tripura
Odisha 9001049
Maharashtra Meghalaya
10501199
Telangana West Bengal
1200 or more
Goa
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Tamil Nadu
Kerala

Figure 18
Ratio of observed to expected DALYs rate for the leading individual causes in the states of India, 2016
ns
ns
fectio
licatio
isease
emia
pain
ses
tory in
ases
e
comp
isease
tructiv
c y an
disea
eart d
neck
ise
l
eonata
a
th
cien
nary d
s
respir
oeal d
is
ic obs
organ
mic h
injurie
rm bir
ack &
rculos
arm
s te
e
n
e
pulmo
Ischae
Diarrh
r
Chron
Iron-d
Low b
Diabe
Sense
Other
Lowe
Prete
Strok
Self-h
Road
Tube
India 1.22 2.28 2.47 0.90 0.74 3.00 0.87 3.61 1.30 0.69 1.78 0.83 0.95 2.41
Bihar 1.12 1.87 0.91 0.49 0.60 2.19 0.51 0.91 1.26 0.49 0.83 0.89 0.81 1.67
Chhattisgarh 0.96 1.61 2.41 0.94 1.26 2.59 1.04 3.52 1.39 0.61 2.08 0.86 0.93 3.14
Jharkhand 0.98 1.49 2.56 0.59 0.54 2.75 0.63 2.56 1.19 0.66 1.00 0.83 0.76 1.86
Madhya Pradesh 1.21 2.09 1.44 0.81 0.76 2.54 0.89 2.61 1.27 0.65 1.93 0.87 0.89 2.90
Odisha 0.73 1.55 2.75 0.68 1.33 2.53 0.59 3.15 1.39 0.60 1.61 0.94 0.87 2.03
Rajasthan 0.99 3.35 1.17 1.05 0.45 2.66 0.92 2.82 1.25 0.76 1.32 0.75 0.53 2.77
Uttar Pradesh 0.99 3.11 1.54 0.74 0.43 2.32 0.75 3.43 1.24 0.75 1.72 0.84 0.79 2.44
Uttarakhand 1.04 3.37 3.00 1.77 0.49 3.19 1.04 6.82 1.25 1.10 1.22 0.75 0.99 2.81
Meghalaya 0.38 1.03 2.02 0.88 0.47 2.96 0.70 4.03 0.97 0.40 0.87 0.68 0.56 1.41
Assam 0.67 2.19 2.54 0.98 1.32 3.19 0.99 3.96 1.18 0.61 1.78 0.73 0.94 2.71
Arunachal Pradesh 0.38 1.06 1.92 0.74 0.44 2.21 0.76 2.98 0.96 0.49 1.64 0.69 0.63 1.79
Mizoram 0.25 2.25 2.33 1.09 0.28 2.04 0.86 3.09 1.11 0.66 0.63 0.72 0.63 2.65
Nagaland 0.43 0.92 1.83 1.14 0.62 1.89 0.82 4.90 0.96 0.56 0.46 0.61 0.56 1.35
Tripura 0.94 2.24 1.94 1.01 1.34 2.78 0.98 1.60 1.28 0.55 3.16 0.85 0.88 1.77
Sikkim 0.58 1.33 1.53 1.28 0.30 2.87 0.83 3.11 1.02 0.52 1.19 0.67 0.68 2.11
Manipur 0.61 1.39 2.76 0.83 0.90 1.27 0.69 4.12 1.20 0.80 1.28 0.78 1.15 1.23
Gujarat 1.45 2.32 2.05 0.93 0.50 3.44 1.18 6.11 1.25 0.66 1.68 0.81 0.89 2.61
Haryana 1.57 2.97 3.67 1.33 0.50 4.43 1.02 7.09 1.19 1.13 1.44 0.72 1.04 3.72
Delhi 0.85 1.45 3.71 1.47 0.37 5.19 1.78 13.09 1.03 0.79 0.62 0.51 1.26 6.55
Telangana 1.27 1.97 2.81 0.56 0.63 2.88 0.95 2.35 1.35 0.66 2.17 0.86 0.89 1.08
Andhra Pradesh 1.61 2.13 1.94 0.56 0.72 3.14 0.84 1.96 1.35 0.73 2.51 0.91 1.01 1.05
Jammu and Kashmir 1.28 2.68 1.48 0.84 0.54 2.48 0.64 2.14 1.20 1.13 0.92 0.78 0.71 1.75
Karnataka 1.51 2.37 2.63 0.58 0.82 3.10 1.03 3.14 1.42 0.68 2.95 0.85 1.47 1.76
West Bengal 1.28 1.84 1.40 0.61 1.68 2.75 0.63 2.06 1.36 0.58 2.45 0.91 0.72 1.33
Maharashtra 1.34 2.35 3.40 1.02 0.84 3.89 1.19 5.46 1.34 0.72 1.64 0.78 1.01 2.19
UTs other than Delhi 0.82 1.22 2.28 0.85 0.40 4.35 1.24 6.60 1.11 0.73 1.50 0.66 1.06 1.49
Himachal Pradesh 0.90 3.13 2.89 0.93 0.41 3.01 0.83 4.77 1.38 0.72 1.11 0.79 0.66 2.14
Punjab 2.15 1.88 2.77 0.86 0.60 3.64 0.68 3.83 1.36 1.08 0.88 0.81 1.66 2.04
Goa 0.98 1.70 2.84 1.07 0.69 3.42 1.00 4.92 1.37 0.71 0.88 0.71 1.56 2.60
Tamil Nadu 1.78 1.76 2.89 0.70 0.58 4.00 0.76 4.41 1.49 0.85 2.62 0.85 2.05 0.80
Kerala 1.18 1.74 1.96 0.48 0.73 2.07 0.71 1.88 1.59 0.58 1.59 0.86 1.45 0.52
0.66 or less 1.01-1.33 2.01-3.00

0.67-1.00 1.34-2.00 >3.00


Among the leading CMNND individual causes, the DALY rate for diar-
rhoeal diseases was highest in Jharkhand, Odisha, and Bihar, followed by
Uttar Pradesh and Assam in 2016. The DALY rate for lower respiratory
infections was highest in Rajasthan, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh,
and Assam, followed by Uttarakhand and Chhattisgarh. Bihar, Assam, and
Jharkhand had the highest DALY rate for iron-deficiency anaemia, followed
by Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh. The DALY rate for neo-
natal preterm birth complications was highest in Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh,
Madhya Pradesh, and Assam. For tuberculosis the DALY rate was highest
in Uttar Pradesh, followed by Assam, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Odisha, Chhat-
tisgarh, Jharkhand, and Madhya Pradesh. The wide range of DALY rates for
the leading CMNND causes across the states of India are highlighted by the
finding that the range of DALY rates was nine-fold for diarrhoeal diseases,
seven-fold for lower respiratory infections, and nine-fold for tuberculosis.
Another way in which policymakers can assess the relative success of a state
or country in confronting the burden of a particular disease is by com-
paring its observed DALY rate with the DALY rate that would be expected
on average for geographic units globally that are at a similar level of devel-
opment. This can be done using the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) level
as a measure of development, which is based on income level, educational
attainment, and fertility level. Diarrhoeal diseases, iron-deficiency anaemia,
tuberculosis, and other neonatal disorders had higher DALY rates in almost
all states as compared with the average globally for their respective SDI
levels. For India as a whole, the DALY rate for diarrhoeal diseases was 2.5
times, for iron-deficiency anaemia 3.0 times, for tuberculosis 3.5 times, and
for other neonatal disorders 2.4 times higher than the average globally for its
SDI level.
Among the leading NCD individual causes, the DALY rate for ischaemic
heart disease was highest in Punjab and Tamil Nadu, followed by Haryana,
Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Gujarat, and Maharashtra. For COPD, the
highest DALY rates were in Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh, fol-
lowed by Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, and Jammu and Kashmir. The DALY
rate for stroke was highest in West Bengal, followed by Odisha, Tripura,
Assam, and Chhattisgarh. Tamil Nadu had the highest DALY rate for dia-
betes, followed by Punjab, Karnataka, Kerala, Goa, and Manipur. The range
of DALY rates across the states of India was nine-fold for ischaemic heart
disease, four-fold for COPD, six-fold for stroke, and four-fold for diabetes.
The DALY rate for COPD was higher in most states as compared with the
average globally for their respective SDI levels, and it was 2.3 times higher in
India than the average globally for its SDI level. Punjab stood out as having
over two times the DALY rate for ischaemic heart disease than the average
globally for its SDI level.
Among the leading injuries individual causes, the DALY rate for road injuries
was highest in Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Haryana, and Punjab,
followed by Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. For self-harm, the highest DALY
rates were in Tripura, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu, followed by Andhra
Pradesh, West Bengal and Telangana. The range of DALY rates across the
states of India was three-fold for road injuries and six-fold for self-harm.
The DALY rate for suicide in India as a whole was 1.8 times higher than the
average globally for its SDI level.

These state-specific DALY rates highlight that there are some broad trends
across the EAG, North-East, and Other states groupings, and across the
various epidemiological transition level groupings. However, there are
many variations within these groupings. This points to the utility of these
groupings as an intermediate step in understanding broad disease trends
in groups of states, but at the same time emphasises the need for titrating
health policy and interventions to the specific disease burden situation in
each state.

Rate of occurrence of diseases
The net changes in disease burden over time are influenced by several
factors, including (i) ageing of the population that can lead to higher
numbers of persons with conditions that are more common in the older age
groups, (ii) changes in exposure to risk factors that could influence the rate
of occurrence of diseases or injuries, and (iii) improvements in development
and health care that could reduce the likelihood of premature mortality
or disability once a disease or injury has occurred. It is therefore useful to
compare the changes in the rate of occurrence of diseases or injuries on the
one hand, and the changes in the final disease burden caused by them over
time. This is particularly useful in understanding the increasing overall
disease burden due to NCDs and injuries.
Table 6
Comparison of the percent change in prevalence of leading NCDs and incidence rate of leading
injuries with the percent change in their DALYs rate in India from 1990 to 2016

Age-standardised Age-standardised
Non-communicable diseases Prevalence DALY rate
prevalence DALY rate
Ischaemic heart disease 53 33.9 9.4 2.2
COPD 29.2 -10.5 -5 -35.9
Cerebrovascular disease 53.9 0.4 12.2 -25.7
Sense organ diseases 21.2 21.7 -0.9 -4.4
Low back & neck pain 9.3 9 -11.2 -11.6
Diabetes 64.3 80 29.3 39.6
Migraine 8.5 11 -2.7 -0.7
Skin diseases 4.9 1.7 4.5 5.3
Congenital defects -13.6 -48.1 -8.1 -20.3
Other musculoskeletal 17.8 18 -2 -1.3
Chronic kidney disease 26.1 12.2 -4.3 -8.3
Depressive disorders 11.1 8.4 -6.2 -7.9
Asthma 8.6 -44.3 -3.8 -53.6
Anxiety disorders 6.4 6.2 -4 -3.6
Rheumatic heart disease -1.1 -32.7 -10.8 -39.8
Age-standardised Age-standardised
Injuries Incidence rate DALY rate
incidence rate DALY rate
Road injuries 55.8 8.3 43.4 3.9
Self-harm 4.8 -14.8 -3.2 -19.5
Falls 6.3 -7.2 -0.4 -12.6
Drowning -27.3 -58 -20.4 -48.2

The prevalence of most leading NCDs increased in India from 1990 to 2016,
but the age-standardised prevalence remained similar for many NCDs and
increased for diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, ischaemic heart disease, and
skin diseases. This indicates that the overall increase in NCD prevalence
in India is a mixed phenomenon, with ageing of the population causing an
increase in many NCDs, along with an additional increase due to exposure
to risk factors for the causes that have an age-standardised increase in
prevalence. The percent increase in prevalence was more than or similar to
the percent change in the DALY rates for most of the leading NCDs, indi-
cating that while the prevalence has been increasing on the one hand, the
improvements in health interventions have countered the increase in disease
burden to some degree. However, progress in the control of NCDs needs a
much bigger and more organised effort in order to achieve stronger declining
trends in the DALY rates of most NCDs.
Among the leading causes of injuries, the percent increase in the incidence
rate of road injuries from 1990 to 2016 was quite high even after adjusting for
the changes in the population age structure during this period. However, the
increase the DALY rate for road injuries was quite modest. There was a slight
increase in the prevalence of suicide and falls, but a decrease in the DALY
rate. This again indicates the impact of improving health interventions.

Risk factors causing disease burden
Risk factors are the drivers of diseases and injuries that cause premature
death and disability. If the relevant risk factors are addressed successfully,
much of Indias disease burden could be reduced.
Figure 19
Percent DALYs attributable to risk factors in India, 2016
Air pollution
Dietary risks
High systolic blood pressure
High fasting plasma glucose
Tobacco use
Unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing
High total cholesterol
High body-mass index
Alcohol and drug use
Occupational risks
Impaired kidney function
Unsafe sex
Other environmental risks
Low physical activity
Low bone mineral density
Sexual abuse and violence
0 5 10 15
HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis Nutritional deciencies Chronic respiratory Mental and substance use Transport injuries
diseases disorders
Diarrhea, lower respiratory, Other communicable, maternal, Cirrhosis and other Diabetes, urogenital, blood, Unintentional injuries
and other common infectious diseases neonatal, and nutritional diseases chronic liver diseases and endocrine diseases
Maternal disorders Cancers Digestive diseases Musculoskeletal disorders Suicide and interpersonal violence
Neonatal disorders Cardiovascular diseases Neurological disorders Other non-communicable Forces of nature, conict and terrorism,
diseases and executions and police conict
Child and maternal malnutrition was Indias leading risk factor for health
loss in 2016, causing 14.6% of the countrys total DALYs. This is due largely
to the contribution that malnutrition makes to the high-burden conditions
such as neonatal disorders and nutritional deficiencies as well as diarrhoea,
lower respiratory infections, and other common infections.
Air pollution was the second leading risk factor in India as a whole. This risk
factor encompasses both outdoor air pollution from a variety of sources as
well as household air pollution that mainly results from burning solid fuels
in the home for cooking and heat. Outdoor air pollution caused 6.4% of
Indias total DALYs in 2016, while household air pollution caused 4.8%. Com-
bined, they make a substantial contribution to Indias burden of cardiovas-
cular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and lower respiratory infections.

The behavioural and metabolic risk factors associated with the rising burden
of NCDs have become quite prominent in India. Dietary risks, which include
diets low in fruit, vegetables, and whole grains, but high in salt and fat, were
Indias third leading risk factor, followed closely by high blood pressure and
high blood sugar (high fasting plasma glucose). These risks drive health
loss mainly from cardiovascular disease and diabetes, and also from cancer
in the case of dietary risks. Despite the increasing global awareness of the
health risks it poses, tobacco use, including smoking, secondhand smoke,
and smokeless tobacco, remains a major risk factor in India and caused 5.9%
of the total DALYs in 2016.
Unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing was the second leading risk
factor in 1990, but its ranking dropped to seventh in 2016. However, it is even
now responsible for 4.6% of the disease burden through diarrhoeal diseases
and other infections.
In line with Indias epidemiological transition, the composition of risk

factors that drives its disease burden has also changed over time. This is a
process linked to socioeconomic development. While the burden of poor
health attributable to risks such as malnutrition and unsafe water, sanitation,
and handwashing has fallen since 1990, it still remains quite high. At the
same time, the burden caused by risks such as unhealthy diets, high blood
pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and high body mass index is on
the rise.
Figure 20
Figure 20
Changeinin
Change DALYs
DALYsnumber and rate
number andattributable to risk factors
rate attributable in India
to risk fromin
factors 1990 to 2016
India from 1990 to 2016
Behavioural risks Environmental/occupational risks Metabolic risks
Mean % change number Mean % change

Leading causes 1990 Leading causes 2016 of DALYs 1990-2016 DALY rate 1990-2016
Malnutrition [35.5%] 1 1 Malnutrition [14.6%] -64.3% -76.6%

WaSH* [12.8%] 2 2 Air pollution [9.8%] -23.6% -49.9%
Air pollution [11.1%] 3 3 Dietary risks [8.9%] 70.8% 12.1%
Dietary risks [4.5%] 4 4 High blood pressure [8.5%] 89.3% 24.2%
Tobacco use [4.4%] 5 5 High fasting plasma glucose [6.0%] 127.9% 49.6%
High blood pressure [3.9%] 6 6 Tobacco use [5.9%] 14.7% -24.7%
High fasting plasma glucose [2.3%] 7 7 WaSH* [4.6%] -69.0% -79.6%
Occupational risks [2.0%] 8 8 High total cholesterol [4.1%] 106.2% 35.3%
High total cholesterol [1.7%] 9 9 High body mass index [3.6%] 281.6% 150.5%
Alcohol & drug use [1.7%] 10 10 Alcohol & drug use [3.6%] 80.6% 18.5%
Impaired kidney function [1.4%] 11 11 Occupational risks [3.0%] 32.4% -13.1%
High body mass index [0.8%] 12 12 Impaired kidney function [2.8%] 76.4% 15.8%
Other environmental [0.5%] 13 13 Unsafe sex [1.1%] 214.4% 106.4%
Low physical activity [0.4%] 14 14 Other environmental [1.0%] 63.4% 7.2%
Unsafe sex [0.3%] 15 15 Low physical activity [0.9%] 109.6% 37.6%
Low bone mineral density [0.2%] 16 16 Low bone mineral density [0.6%] 127.4% 49.3%
Sexual abuse & violence [0.2%] 17 17 Sexual abuse & violence [0.3%] 48.0% -2.9%
The percent gure in bracket next to each risk factor is DALYs attributable to that risk factor out of the total DALYs.
* WaSH is unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing.
The large increases in DALYs caused by metabolic risks such as high blood
pressure, high blood sugar, and high body mass index, alongside behavioural
ones such as dietary risks, warrant serious attention from policymakers.
These trends indicate that strong strategies will need to be implemented to
curb their trajectory, in order to prevent and control NCDs in India. Tackling
environmental risk factors, such as outdoor air pollution, will also be an
important part of this effort. While the total burden from air pollution in
India declined between 1990 and 2016, this was largely driven by efforts to
reduce the use of solid fuels in households. Outdoor air pollution continues
to pose a significant and growing challenge to population health.

Given that Indias states differ widely in both their level of development and
disease burden, it follows that the profile of health risks their populations
face would also be very different. In order to more effectively reduce the
disease burden in India, it is necessary to understand the variations in health
risk factors across the states of India and also how these differ between the
two sexes.
Figure 21
Percent DALYs attributable to risk factors in the state groups, 2016
Air pollution
Dietary risks
High systolic blood pressure
Tobacco use
Unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing
Alcohol and drug use
0 5 10 15
EAG states North-East states Other states
Considering broad state groupings, the proportion of total DALYs due

to child and maternal malnutrition was much higher in the EAG and
North-East states groups than in the Other states group in 2016. The pro-
portion for air pollution was also higher in the EAG states group. On the
other hand, the proportion of total DALYs due to dietary risks, high systolic
blood pressure, high fasting plasma glucose, high cholesterol, and high body
mass index was highest in the Other states group in 2016.

Figure 22
Percent DALYs attributable to leading risk factors by sex in the state groups, 2016

Malnutrition*
Air pollution
Dietary risks
WaSH
High blood pressure
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40
Percent of total DALYs Percent of total DALYs
Females North-East states Males

Malnutrition*
Air pollution
High blood pressure
Dietary risks
Tobacco use
WaSH
Alcohol & drug use
High body mass index
Occupational risks
40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40
Females Other states Males

Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
Tobacco use
High body mass index
Alcohol & drug use
40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40
Behavioural Environmental/occupational Metabolic
*Malnutrition is child and maternal malnutrition.

WaSH is unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing.

While child and maternal malnutrition was the leading risk factor in the
EAG and North-East states groups in 2016, it was third in the Other states
group, overtaken by dietary risks and high blood pressure. Unsafe sanitation
remained the fourth leading risk in the EAG and sixth in the North-East, but
did not feature in the top 10 risks for Other states. Though malnutrition is a
serious risk for both sexes, it was a much bigger contributor to health loss for
females than for males across all three state groups. Similarly, unsafe water,
sanitation, and handwashing, another risk factor associated with lower levels
of socioeconomic development, was a much more significant risk for females.
India has had a long history of efforts to reduce malnutrition and improve
sanitation, and these findings bolster the case for further strengthening
programmes that provide focused nutritional support and safe sanitation to
women and children, particularly girls.
Conversely, dietary risks, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high choles-
terol, and high body mass index all ranked higher and caused considerably
more health loss in the Other states group than in the EAG and North-East
states groups. Males tend to face a relatively higher burden from risk factors
associated with NCDs, with a greater proportion of their health loss caused
by dietary risks and high blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol as
compared with females. Alcohol and drug use and tobacco use were also
much larger contributors to disease burden among males, suggesting a need
for more targeted preventive measures for these risks. These trends can be
seen across all three state groups.

Table 7
Change in summary exposure value of the leading individual risk factors in the state groups from 1990 to 2016
Summary exposure value 2016 Percent change from 1990 to 2016

Percent
Other EAG North-East
contribution EAG states North-East Other states
Risk factor states India states states India
to DALYs in group states group group
group group group
India, 2016
Short gestation for birth weight 6.5 11.6 11.5 12.2 11.9 2.3 3.4 2.8 2.5
Low birth weight for gestation 3.4 8.7 8.7 8.3 8.5 -0.6 -0.7 -1.8 -1.1
Child wasting 3.3 8.5 8.4 9.7 9.1 -31.8 -28.9 -22.9 -27.3
Iron deficiency 3.6 14.8 14.8 13.8 14.3 1.6 -1.1 0.9 1.3
Unsafe water source 3.3 38.2 26.2 26.9 32 -11.2 -20.8 -23.9 -16.9
Unsafe sanitation 2.5 59.9 47.2 36 47.3 -32.1 -40.7 -55.1 -43.5
Ambient particulate matter
6.4 78 54.4 60.5 68.2 14.7 21.6 16.7 16.6
pollution
Household air pollution from
4.8 38.4 28.2 17.9 27.6 -40.1 -52.9 -66 -52.2
solid fuels
High systolic blood pressure 8.5 22.2 24.3 24.2 23.3 0.6 3.5 7.7 4.3
High fasting plasma glucose 6 2.8 2.7 4.1 3.5 46.3 19.9 36.8 37.4
High total cholesterol 4.1 9.8 8.7 13.3 11.5 11 16.6 19 14.8
High body mass index 3.6 3.7 5.2 5.7 4.8 87.3 105.9 148.2 119.8
Impaired kidney function 2.8 4.8 4.8 5.3 5 4.8 5.1 4.1 4.1
Diet low in fruits 2.8 74.4 71.7 71.9 73 -16.4 -19.1 -16.2 -16.4
Diet low in nuts and seeds 2.3 88.2 88.9 64.7 76.4 -3.9 -3.1 -22 -12.2
Smoking 4.5 9.1 11.4 8.8 9 -20.8 -19.9 -24.8 -22.9
Alcohol use 2.9 3.1 3.6 4 3.6 71.6 86.5 84.5 76.7
This list includes the individual risk factors that contributed more than 2% of DALYs in India, 2016

It is useful to understand the changes in peoples exposure to health risk
factors that have taken place over time in different parts of the country
in order to set priorities for interventions and tailor appropriate policy
responses. Summary exposure value is a measure that estimates exposure to
a particular risk, taking into account both the severity of exposure and the
size of the population that is exposed to it. Instead of classifying exposure
to a risk as either present or not present, summary exposure value allows
for the estimation of continuous risk exposure, or exposure that happens at
different times and in different amounts. This is important because in reality
people are exposed to many risk factors intermittently or continuously,
rather than all at once or not at all. The summary exposure value metric also
takes into account the severity of exposure to a risk factor, since some risk
factors are more likely to lead to health problems than others.
Among the leading components of child and maternal malnutrition, the

summary exposure value for child wasting reduced from 1990 to 2016 in
India by 27%. On the other hand, the summary exposure values for short
gestation, low birth weight, and iron deficiency did not change much during
this period in any of the three states groups. The summary exposure value
of unsafe sanitation reduced from 1990 to 2016 in India by 44% and that of
unsafe water by 17%.This reduction was least in the EAG states group where
the magnitude of exposure to these risks continued to be the highest.
Looking at the two different types of air pollution, there were divergent
trends in the summary exposure value. Exposure to household air pollution
from solid fuels has dropped by 52% in India since 1990. This decrease was
lowest in the EAG states group and intermediate in the North-East states
group, and the magnitude of this exposure also remained highest in the
EAG states groups and intermediate in the North-East states group in 2016.
On the other hand, the summary exposure value of outdoor air pollution
increased by 17% in India from 1990 to 2016. The magnitude of this exposure
was higher in the EAG states group as compared with the North-East and
Other states groups.
The summary exposure value for high body mass index increased by 120%,
for high blood sugar increased by 37%, and for cholesterol by 15% for India as
a whole from 1990 to 2016. These increases were observed in all three state
groups. The exposure level of high blood pressure was relatively higher than
these risks in 2016, but the change in its level since 1990 was modest. The
exposure level of smoking decreased during this period in all three state
groups, but that of alcohol use increased across all three state groups.

It is important to understand the scale of health loss attributable to indi-
vidual risk factors across states. Looking at the rate of DALYs caused by each
risk factor for each state gives a better sense of exactly how much health loss
each causes.
Figure 23
DALYs rate attributable to risk factors in the states of India, 2016
ssure
ose
ce
ks
ensity
nction
a gluc
violen
ashin ation,
tal ris
d pre
index
use
terol
ity
eral d
nal
ney fu
plasm
nmen
it
l activ
c bloo
e and
drug
g
al risk
and h water, san
holes
malnuand mater
mass
in
e
enviro
ed kid
llution
one m
trition
hysica
s
ol and
g
l abus
pation
co us
systoli
total c
ry risk
andw
sex
fastin
body
Unsafe
Unsafe
Impair
Tobac
Air po
Low b
Low p
Sexua
Other
Alcoh
Child
Dieta
Occu
High
High
High
High
India 5169 3469 3159 3000 2112 2081 1626 1464 1262 1260 1069 978 403 358 336 217 105
EAG States 6978 4099 2498 2338 1662 2108 2389 1061 940 1192 1062 754 363 346 256 201 96
Lowest ETL group 7344 4337 2702 2563 1808 2206 2617 1121 1022 1302 1136 844 405 374 272 222 107
Bihar 8045 4308 2580 2362 1407 1780 2928 1006 564 862 982 737 439 367 241 161 102
Chhattisgarh 6364 3667 3054 3085 2093 1735 2224 1292 1154 1224 988 957 439 384 280 210 103
Jharkhand 6005 3117 2407 2405 1564 1023 3332 804 835 902 927 772 440 314 230 171 98
Madhya Pradesh 6663 3809 2899 2760 2150 2214 1879 1375 956 1285 1041 810 413 351 372 200 100
Odisha 4960 3201 2720 2979 2018 1565 2904 821 1234 1472 965 1188 562 383 249 276 150
Rajasthan 7331 4528 2292 2052 1289 2317 1570 1309 969 1186 1128 622 312 253 217 168 79
Uttar Pradesh 7195 4390 2273 2013 1613 2445 2421 935 1005 1303 1136 663 256 358 230 217 85
Lower-middle ETL group 4818 3300 2622 2680 1958 3141 970 1381 1691 1302 1140 831 432 314 405 253 94
Uttarakhand 4818 3300 2622 2680 1958 3141 970 1381 1691 1302 1140 831 432 314 405 253 94
North-East states 5946 3052 2509 2762 1814 2242 1914 762 1172 1471 958 923 396 309 193 136 100
Lowest ETL group 6749 3329 2634 2903 1849 2258 2205 737 1328 1537 978 951 345 326 190 136 102
Meghalaya 4720 1798 1416 1431 1064 1878 1294 466 490 1331 726 593 197 194 112 101 71
Assam 6928 3464 2741 3032 1918 2292 2285 761 1402 1555 1000 983 358 338 196 139 104
Arunachal Pradesh 4139 1436 1308 1394 1108 1375 1099 426 557 1097 721 565 531 179 111 125 120
Mizoram 3408 1585 1070 983 1030 3255 848 301 510 1200 891 575 575 166 125 169 87
Nagaland 2607 1408 1546 1893 1063 1129 510 663 504 1347 695 646 621 184 139 118 69
Tripura 5131 3598 3069 3363 2303 2746 1478 1157 849 1254 1092 1079 298 327 286 134 93
Sikkim 3703 1620 1473 1803 1232 1472 478 747 996 1095 847 634 220 200 157 160 68
Manipur 2494 1822 2264 2369 1993 2316 1287 876 905 1469 889 916 878 307 204 139 109
Other states 3478 2933 3805 3615 2540 2043 917 1881 1558 1305 1084 1184 440 373 419 239 113
Gujarat 5013 3102 3544 3090 1987 2108 879 1844 786 1364 1079 930 456 302 343 217 79
Higher-middle ETL group 3556 3016 3697 3540 2247 2048 993 1753 1327 1312 1079 1142 472 361 376 220 116
Haryana 4603 3928 3587 3298 2189 3032 981 2281 1701 1658 1166 1031 320 289 391 214 111
Delhi 3473 1890 2246 2118 2281 1619 370 1364 1532 1243 894 796 291 230 244 149 77
Telangana 3596 2710 3134 2747 1871 1578 1330 1598 1446 974 1064 894 627 372 322 255 124
Andhra Pradesh 4050 3007 3992 3655 2234 2085 1238 2044 1858 1146 1099 1049 546 401 572 259 140
Jammu and Kashmir 3296 3029 3162 3001 1634 3039 787 1551 1580 1003 1072 1070 209 258 300 185 66
Karnataka 3766 2871 3392 3692 2931 1946 1149 1885 849 1463 1167 1156 541 466 398 232 110
West Bengal 3445 3761 4311 4252 1945 2834 1010 1731 1054 1261 1097 1319 440 328 301 172 111
Maharashtra 3382 2816 3745 3387 2316 1570 835 1728 1474 1487 1052 1173 444 350 395 243 124
Union Territories other than Delhi 2760 1355 2196 2409 1991 1336 380 1181 1845 1374 833 983 378 207 230 233 98
Highest ETL group 2375 2443 4260 4113 3657 1815 712 2177 2507 1192 1087 1440 366 451 578 304 120
Himachal Pradesh 2614 2318 2251 2470 1321 1838 678 1255 967 1153 1126 793 380 249 242 256 68
Punjab 3016 3523 4920 5167 3370 1633 793 2232 2971 1228 1222 1482 415 325 545 242 85
Goa 1945 1482 2552 2938 2400 825 272 1432 1915 1306 937 994 375 226 318 254 88
Tamil Nadu 2676 2412 4815 4106 4336 1878 862 2396 2699 1278 1069 1557 369 592 654 354 159
Kerala 1212 1698 3060 3646 3015 1867 363 1896 2070 991 1016 1313 318 316 526 263 80
Signicantly lower than national mean


Child and maternal malnutrition Unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing
72
Figure 24

Punjab Punjab
Delhi Delhi


Bihar Bihar
Manipur Manipur
Jharkhand Jharkhand
Tripura Tripura
Odisha Odisha
Goa Goa
Karnataka Karnataka
unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing in the states of India, 2016

Kerala Kerala
DALYs rate attributable to child and maternal malnutrition and attributable to

20002999 400799
30003999 8001199
40004999 12001599
50005999 16001999
60006999 20002399
70007999 2400 or more
8000 or more
Ambient air pollution Household air pollution
Figure 25

Punjab Punjab
Delhi Delhi

Bihar Bihar
Manipur Manipur
Jharkhand Jharkhand
Tripura Tripura
Odisha Odisha
Goa Goa
Karnataka Karnataka

Kerala Kerala

12501499 750999
15001749 10001249
17501999 12501499
20002249 15001749

22502499 17501999
73
25002749 20002249

DALYs rate attributable to ambient air pollution and attributable to household air pollution in the states of India, 2016
High blood pressure High blood sugar
74
Figure 26

Punjab Punjab
Delhi Delhi

Assam Assam

Nagaland Nagaland
Bihar Bihar
Manipur Manipur
Jharkhand Jharkhand
Tripura Tripura
Odisha Odisha
Goa Goa
Karnataka Karnataka

Kerala Kerala

15001999 11001499
20002499 15001899
25002999 19002299
30003499 23002699
35003999 27003099
DALYs rate attributable to high blood pressure and attributable to high blood sugar in the states of India, 2016

The DALY rates attributable to child and maternal malnutrition and to
unsafe water and sanitation tended to be higher in the EAG states group
and Assam. The rate for malnutrition was highest in Bihar, Rajasthan, and
Uttar Pradesh, and for unsafe water and sanitation was highest in Jharkhand,
Bihar, and Odisha in 2016.
For household air pollution, too, the DALY rate in 2016 was higher in the
EAG states and Assam, with the highest rates in Rajasthan, Bihar, and Uttar
Pradesh. The DALY rate pattern for outdoor air pollution was more mixed,
with the highest rates in Haryana and Uttar Pradesh, followed by Punjab,
Rajasthan, Bihar, and West Bengal.
Considering the DALY rates attributable to unhealthy diet, high blood

pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and high body mass index in
2016, all of these were among the highest in Punjab and Tamil Nadu; four
of these were high in Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra; three of
these were high in Karnataka and West Bengal; and two of these were high
in Goa and Haryana. The DALY rate attributable to tobacco use was highest
in Mizoram, Uttarakhand, Jammu and Kashmir, Haryana, West Bengal, and
Tripura.

Disease burden and risk factors profile of each state
The following key findings are illustrated for each state of India and the union
territory of Delhi to inform policymakers of the most pressing disease burden and
risk factors that need to be addressed to improve population health:
1. Life expectancy by sex in 1990 and 2016

2. Under-5 mortality rate from 1990 to 2016
3. Leading causes of death by age in 2016
4. Leading causes of years of life lost due to premature death by sex in 2016
5. Leading causes of years lived with disability by sex in 2016
6. Changes in leading individual causes of DALYs from 1990 to 2016
7. Age-distribution of DALYs in 2016
8. Changes in risk factors contributing to DALYs from 1990 to 2016
9. Leading risk factors contributing to DALYs by sex in 2016

78
Andhra Pradesh
1990 life expectancy 2016 life expectancy
Females: 58.4 years Males: 57.7 years Females: 71.9 years Males: 67.3 years
How much did the under-5 mortality rate change from 1990 to 2016?
Under-5 mortality
Under-5 mortality rate, both rate, both sexes
sexes combined, combined, 1990-2016
1990-2016
Andhra Pradesh under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Andhra Pradesh
150
Deaths per 1,000 live births
100
50
39.2
33.7
33.4
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
What caused the most deaths in different age groups in 2016?

Whatcontribution
Percent causedofthe most
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent age 2016
in 2016?
group, both sexes, groups
Percent contribution of top 10 causes of death by age group, both sexes, 2016
014 years [7.6% of total deaths] 1539 years [11.7% of total deaths]
1.5% 3.8%
HIV/AIDS & tuberculosis
1.2%
5.8% 9.9% 11% Diarrhoea/LRI*/other
8.5% NTDs & malaria

29.1% 9.6% 2.5%
Maternal disorders
1%
19.9%
2.1% Neonatal disorders
1.2% 5.8%
Nutritional deciencies

2.5%
14.9% 9.2% Cancers
Cardiovascular diseases
42.1% 11.3%
Chronic respiratory diseases
3.2% Cirrhosis
3.7%
Digestive diseases
Neurological disorders
4069 years [43.7% of total deaths] 70+ years [37% of total deaths]
Diabetes/urog/blood/endo
2% 2.9% Other non-communicable
2.8%
Transport injuries
4.6% 5.7%
5.2%
7.7% 4.6% Unintentional injuries
17.7% 8%
2.9%
Suicide & violence
11.7% 4.4%
7% 1.4% Other causes of death
6.5% 1%
3.1% *LRI is lower respiratory infections.

NTDs are neglected tropical diseases.

Urog is urogenital diseases.
14.1%
9.8%
Endo is endocrine diseases.
40% 36.8%
Andhra Pradesh 79
Proportion of total disease burden from:
Premature death: 64.4% | Disability or morbidity: 35.6%
What caused the most years of life lost, by sex, in 2016?

Top 15 causes of YLLs, ranked by percent for both sexes combined, 2016
Females Males

Suicide
Diarrhoeal diseases
Stroke
COPD*
Preterm birth complications
Road injuries
Tuberculosis
HIV/AIDS
Diabetes
Congenital birth defects
Falls
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20
Percent of total years of life lost due to premature mortality Percent of total years of life lost due to premature mortality
What caused the most years lived with disability, by

*COPD is sex,
chronic in 2016?
obstructive pulmonary disease.
Top 15 causes of YLDs, ranked by percent for both sexes combined, 2016
Females Males
Sense organ diseases*
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Anxiety disorders
Falls
Oral disorders
Osteoarthritis
Road injuries
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16

*Sense organ diseases includes mainly hearing and vision loss.
80 Andhra Pradesh
CMNNDs: 27.0% | NCDs: 59.7% | Injuries: 13.3%
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
anddisability combined
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Change in top 15 causes of DALYs, both sexes, ranked by number of DALYs, 19902016
Leading causes of DALYs 1990 Leading causes of DALYs 2016
Diarrhoeal diseases [16.4%] 1 1 Ischaemic heart disease [11.6%]

Lower respiratory infections [8.1%] 2 2 COPD [4.6%]
Preterm birth complications [6.6%] 3 3 Iron-deciency anaemia [3.7%]
Ischaemic heart disease [4.4%] 4 4 Diarrhoeal diseases [3.7%]
Tuberculosis [4.1%] 5 5 Self-harm [3.6%]*
Measles [3.8%] 6 6 Stroke [3.5%]*
Neonatal encephalopathy [3.7%] 7 7 Preterm birth complications [3.3%]
COPD [2.4%] 8 8 Road injuries [3.1%]
Congenital birth defects [2.4%] 9 9 Sense organ diseases [3.1%]
Self-harm [2.3%] 10 10 Lower respiratory infections [2.7%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [2.2%] 11 11 Low back & neck pain [2.5%]
Other neonatal disorders [2.2%] 12 12 Diabetes [2.4%]
Stroke [2.0%] 13 13 Depressive disorders [2.3%]
Neonatal haemolytic disease [1.6%] 14 14 Migraine [2.2%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [1.5%] 15 15 Falls [2.2%]*
Road injuries [1.5%] 16 18 Tuberculosis [1.8%]
Sense organ diseases [1.3%] 18 20 Congenital birth defects [1.6%]
Low back & neck pain [1.2%] 19 22 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.6%]
Falls [1.2%] 20 24 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.0%]
Depressive disorders [1.1%] 22 27 Other neonatal disorders [0.9%]
Migraine [1.1%] 23 49 Neonatal haemolytic disease [0.4%]
Diabetes [0.7%] 34 82 Measles [0.2%]


The percent gure in brackets next to each cause is Sense organ diseases includes mainly hearing and vision loss.
DALYs from that cause out of total DALYs.
What caused the most death and disability combined across age groups in 2016?
What caused
Percent thebymost
of DALYs death both
age group, and disability
sexes, 2016combined across age groups in 2016?
Percent of DALYs by age group, both sexes, 2016
[1.75]
10
[2.07]
[1.36] [1.66]
[2.59]
[1.1]
[0.8] [0.92]
[0.61] [0.68]
[3.11]
[0.55]
5
[0.46]
[3.55]
[0.31]
[0.3] [4.04]
[4.51]
0
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
%)
%)
1%
7%
(9
(9
(7
(3
(8
(8
(9
(9
(8
(4
(4
(1
(1
(6
(5
(2
(<
5(
19
24
44
69
o9
14
29
34
39
59
64
79
84
49
54
74
+
r
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
Un
15
20
40
65
10
25
30
35
55
60
75
80
45
50
70
Age
Andhra Pradesh 81
What risk factors are driving the most death and disability combined?
Contribution of top 10 risks to DALYs number, both sexes, ranked by number of DALYs, 199
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralofoftop
top1010
risks to to
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
Environmental/occupational sexes, ranked
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016
or increase decrease
Behavioural Environmental/occupational Metabolic same or increase decrease
Risk factors 1990 Risk factors 2016

Malnutrition* [36.9%]
Malnutrition* [36.9%] 1
1 1 Malnutrition* [11.7%]
1 Malnutrition* [11.7%]
[16.4%] [16.4%]
WaSHWaSH

2 2 2 Dietary risks [11.5%] 2 Dietary risks [11.5%]
Air pollution [9.5%] 3
Air pollution [9.5%] 3 3 High blood pressure [10.5%]
3 High blood pressure [10.5%]
Dietary risks [5.1%] 4 4 Air pollution [8.7%]
High blood pressure [4.4%] 5 5 High fasting plasma glucose [6.4%]
HighTobacco
blooduse pressure
[4.2%] [4.4%]
6 5 6 Tobacco use [6.0%] 5 High fasting plasma glucose [6.4%]
Tobacco
High total cholesterol use [4.2%]
[2.3%] 7 6 7 6 Tobacco use [6.0%]
High total cholesterol [5.9%]
High fasting plasma glucose [2.2%] 8 8 High body-mass index [5.4%]
High total cholesterol [2.3%] 7 7 High total cholesterol [5.9%]
Occupational risks [1.9%] 9 9 WaSH [3.6%]
Alcohol & drug use [1.4%] 10
[2.2%] 8 10 Alcohol & drug use [3.3%]8 High body-mass index [5.4%]
Occupational
High body-mass risks [1.9%]
index [0.6%] 13 9 11 Occupational risks [3.2%]9 WaSH [3.6%]
Alcohol & drug use [1.4%] 10 10 Alcohol & drug use [3.3%]
The percent gure in bracket next to each risk is DALYs from that risk out of total DALYs. *Malnutrition is child and maternal malnutrition.
High body-mass index [0.6%] 13 11 Occupational
WaSH is unsafe water, sanitation, risks
[3.2%]
and handwashing.

How did the risk factors differ by sex in 2016?

Percent of total DALYs attributable to top 10 risks, ranked by percent for both sexes combined, 2016
Females Males
Malnutrition*
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Air pollution
Tobacco use
WaSH
Alcohol & drug use
12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12
Percent of years of life lost and years lived with disability Percent of years of life lost and years lived with disability

82 Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Under-5 mortality
Under-5 mortality rate,
rate, both sexes both 1990-2016
combined, sexes combined, 1990-2016
Arunachal Pradesh under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Arunachal Pradesh
150
100
50
39.2
32.5
30.6
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year

Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent age 2016
in 2016?
1.8%
4.6%
1.3%
5.3% 14.9% 12.4% Diarrhoea/LRI*/other
6.6% NTDs & malaria

1.6%
7.9% Maternal disorders
35.1%
4.2% 16.3%
Neonatal disorders
1.3%
4.6%
7.6% Other communicable diseases

7.1%
Cancers
4.2% 7.6%
34% 8.7% Cardiovascular diseases
8.5% 4.4%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
4069 years [39.5% of total deaths] 70+ years [29.7% of total deaths]
Other non-communicable
2.9% 4.9% 3.7% Transport injuries

8.7% 8.4% 4.1%
Unintentional injuries
7.7% 3.5% 9.1%
21.5% Suicide & violence
7%
5.2% Other causes of death
3.1% 2.6%
*LRI is lower respiratory infections.
2.7%
21.8%

9.7%
10.7%
11.1%
6.6%
20.5% 24.4%

Females Males

Diarrhoeal diseases
Tuberculosis
Suicide
Stroke
Road injuries
HIV/AIDS
Other neonatal disorders
Hepatitis
COPD*
Stomach cancer
Cirrhosis due to hepatitis B
7.5 5 2.5 0 0 2.5 5 7.5


*COPD is sex,
chronic in 2016?
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Oral disorders
Falls
Schizophrenia
Diarrhoeal diseases
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

84 Arunachal Pradesh
How
How have
have the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?
Change
Change in top 15 causes
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbyby number
number of of DALYs,
DALYs, 19902016
19902016

Diarrhoeal diseases [15.3%] 1 1 Lower respiratory infections [4.3%]

Lower respiratory infections [9.2%] 2 2 Diarrhoeal diseases [4.3%]
Malaria [6.8%] 3 3 Preterm birth complications [3.7%]*
Tuberculosis [5.8%] 4 4 Ischaemic heart disease [3.4%]
Measles [4.0%] 5 5 Tuberculosis [3.2%]
Hepatitis [2.8%] 7 7 Self-harm [2.9%]
Other neonatal disorders [2.6%] 8 8 COPD [2.8%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.2%] 9 9 Sense organ diseases [2.7%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [1.6%] 10 10 Stroke [2.6%]
Self-harm[1.5%] 11 11 Road injuries [2.6%]
COPD [1.5%] 12 12 Skin diseases [2.5%]
Meningitis [1.5%] 13 13 Migraine [2.5%]
Ischaemic heart disease [1.4%] 14 14 Low back & neck pain [2.4%]
Road injuries [1.4%] 15 15 Depressive disorders [2.2%]
Stroke [1.4%] 16 17 Other neonatal disorders [1.9%]*
Sense organ diseases [1.3%] 17 18 Hepatitis [1.9%]
Low back & neck pain [1.2%] 19 23 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.6%]*
Skin diseases [1.2%] 20 29 Malaria [1.0%]
Migraine [1.1%] 23 36 Meningitis [0.8%]*
Depressive disorders [1.0%] 26 54 Measles [0.4%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
20
[2.01]
15
10
[0.72] [0.81] [0.94] [1.32] [1.63]

[1.09]
[0.52] [0.65] [2.04]
[2.49]
5 [0.36]
[0.35]
[3.11]
[3.73]
[4.27]
[4.94]
[5.52]
0
)
)
1%
)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
%)
%)
)
1%
1%
1%
2%
0%
(9
(6
(4
(1
(7
(5
(3
(1
(1
(9
(8
(2
(<
(<
(1
(1
(1
(1
24
44
54
74
39
49
59
69
79
29
34
64
84
19
o9
14
r5
+
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
de
to
5t
to
to
20
40
50
70
35
45
55
65
75
25
30
60
Un
80
15
10
Age
Contribution
Behaviouralof
Contribution oftop
top10
10risks
riskstoto
DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [15.2%]
WaSHWaSH

2 2 2 Air pollution [5.1%] 2 Air pollution [5.1%]
Tobacco use [3.6%] 4 4 Tobacco use [4.9%]
Dietary risks [2.3%] 5 5 Dietary risks [4.7%]
Dietary[2.2%]
High blood pressure risks [2.3%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose Dietary risks [4.7%]
High bloodrisks
Occupational pressure
[1.9%] [2.2%]
7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 High fasting plasma glucose [4.0%]
Occupational risks [1.9%] 7 7 WaSH [3.9%]
High fasting plasma glucose [1.4%] 9 9 Occupational risks [2.6%]
Alcohol & drug use
Impaired kidney function [0.9%] 10
[1.6%] 8 10 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]Alcohol & drug use [3.9%]
Impaired kidney function [0.9%] 10 10 Impaired
WaSH is unsafe water, sanitation, kidney function
and handwashing. [2.0%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
High blood pressure
Tobacco use
Dietary risks
WaSH
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

86 Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Under-5 mortality
Under-5 mortality rate, bothrate, both sexes
1990-2016
Assam under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Assam
150
100
50 52.2
39.2
37.8
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
What caused the
Percent contribution of topmost deaths
10 causes inage
of death by different
group, bothage
sexes, groups
2016 in 2016?
014 years [13% of total deaths] 1539 years [13.6% of total deaths]
1.1%
3.8%
5.3% 12% 15.7% Diarrhoea/LRI*/other
1.1%
5.7%
0.9% NTDs & malaria
2.9% 10.3% Maternal disorders

35% 1.8%
5.6%

8.4%
5.6% Cancers
4.1%
38.1% 8.5% Cardiovascular diseases
11% 5.2%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
2.8% 2.6% Other non-communicable

3.1%
Transport injuries
3.8%
7.7% 6.8%
7.7%
9.2% 7%
2.3% 22.6% 3.3% Suicide & violence
4.3% 3.2% 1.6% Other causes of death
5.4%
15%
6.9% 16.5%
10.5%

28.7% 28.9%
Assam 87

Females Males
Diarrhoeal diseases
Stroke
Tuberculosis
COPD*
Suicide
Hepatitis
Road injuries
Diabetes
9 6 3 0 0 3 6 9
What caused the most years lived with disability, by sex, in 2016?
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Schizophrenia
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

88 Assam
How
How have
have the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?
Change
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbyby number
number of of DALYs,
DALYs, 19902016
19902016

Diarrhoeal diseases [14.0%] 1 1 Diarrhoeal diseases [5.8%]

Lower respiratory infections [7.9%] 2 2 Stroke [5.6%]
Tuberculosis [5.6%] 3 3 Lower respiratory infections [5.1%]
Preterm birth complications [4.9%] 4 4 COPD [4.1%]*
Measles [4.7%] 5 5 Ischaemic heart disease [4.1%]
Other neonatal disorders [4.1%] 6 6 Preterm birth complications [3.8%]*
COPD [3.4%] 7 7 Tuberculosis [3.8%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [3.2%] 8 8 Iron-deciency anaemia [3.7%]
Stroke [3.0%] 9 9 Other neonatal disorders [2.4%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [2.4%] 10 10 Sense organ diseases [2.3%]
Ischaemic heart disease [1.7%] 11 11 Road injuries [2.3%]
Self-harm [1.6%] 12 12 Self-harm [2.2%]*
Asthma [1.5%] 13 13 Hepatitis [2.1%]
Malaria [1.4%] 14 14 Neonatal encephalopathy [2.1%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [1.4%] 15 15 Diabetes [2.0%]
Hepatitis [1.3%] 18 23 Asthma [1.2%]*
Sense organ diseases [1.1%] 20 26 Malaria [1.2%]*
Road injuries [1.1%] 21 27 Intestinal infectious diseases [0.9%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
[2.4]
20
15
10
[1.13] [1.41] [1.75]

[0.61] [0.68] [0.8] [0.93] [2.16]
[0.57]
[2.71]
5 [0.46]
[3.27]
[0.33] [0.32] [3.71]
[4.13]
[4.41]
0
)
%)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
)
%)
1%
9%
0%
0%
(8
(9
(9
(9
(7
(6
(6
(5
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(1
(<
5(
(1
(1
34
19
24
29
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
79
84
74
14
o9
+
r
de
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
5t
to
Un
30
15
20
25
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
75
80
70
10
Age
The number in parentheses after each age group on the x-axis is the percent of population in that age group. Assam 89
Contribution
Behaviouralof
Contribution oftop
top10
10risks
riskstoto
DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [14.1%]
WaSHWaSH

Tobacco use [4.4%] 4 4 Dietary risks [6.9%]
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose Tobacco use [5.7%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [3.6%]
7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 WaSH [5.7%]
High fasting plasma glucose [2.1%] 7 7 High fasting plasma glucose [4.8%]
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks [1.9%] 9 9 High body-mass index [3.5%]
Impaired kidney function [1.3%] 10 10 Occupational
[2.5%]
and handwashing.
High body-mass index [1.0%] 11 11 Impaired kidney function [2.5%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
High blood pressure
Dietary risks
Tobacco use
WaSH
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

WaSH
is unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing.
90 Assam
Bihar
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Bihar under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Bihar
150
100
66.4
50
45.8
39.2
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
0.9%
1.1% HIV/AIDS & tuberculosis
3.1%
NTDs & malaria

9.5%
0.9% 8.2% Maternal disorders
13.4%
39.5% 2.4% Neonatal disorders
1.5%
10.4% Nutritional deciencies
7.2%
5.7% Cancers
9%
31.8%
3.9% Cardiovascular diseases
12.8% 3.9%
4.1%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
Transport injuries
2.5% 3.6%
6.3% 5.5%
4.5% Unintentional injuries
6.9%
11.9% 23.2% 3.6% 1.6% Suicide & violence
6.7% 1.4%
Other causes of death
2.4%
11% 3.9%
5.4% 16.4%

12.1%
33.3% 33.1%
Bihar 91

Females Males
Diarrhoeal diseases
COPD*
Stroke
Tuberculosis
Road injuries
HIV/AIDS
Intestinal infectious diseases
Diabetes
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

*COPD is sex,
chronic in 2016?
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Falls
Diabetes
Haemoglobinopathies
Diarrhoeal diseases
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

92 Bihar
How
How have
have the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?
Change
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbyby number
number of of DALYs,
DALYs, 19902016
19902016


Lower respiratory infections [12.3%] 2 2 Ischaemic heart disease [6.6%]
Measles [7.0%] 3 3 Lower respiratory infections [6.4%]
Tuberculosis [3.8%] 5 5 COPD [3.9%]
Ischaemic heart disease [2.8%] 7 7 Congenital birth defects [3.3%]*
COPD [2.7%] 8 8 Other neonatal disorders [3.1%]*
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.6%] 9 9 Stroke [2.8%]
Leishmaniasis [2.5%] 10 10 Neonatal encephalopathy [2.6%]*
Congenital birth defects [2.1%] 12 12 Tuberculosis [2.4%]
Tetanus [1.8%] 13 13 Road injuries [2.1%]
Falls [1.3%] 14 14 Low back & neck pain [1.9%]
Stroke [1.3%] 15 15 Skin diseases [1.8%]
Sense organ diseases [1.2%] 17 18 Falls [1.6%]*
Low back & neck pain [1.1%] 20 35 Leishmaniasis [0.7%]
Road injuries [1.1%] 22 41 Measles [0.6%]
Skin diseases [1.0%] 25 101 Tetanus [0.1%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
[2.41]
20
10
[2.03]
[1.61] [2.56]
[0.35] [0.6] [0.66] [0.76] [0.87] [1.05] [1.3]
[0.33] [0.45] [0.54] [3.11]
[3.54]
[4.05]
[4.43]
0
)
)
1%
)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
1%
3%
2%
2%
(4
(9
(8
(8
(8
(6
(5
(4
(3
(3
(2
(1
(1
(<
(<
(1
(1
(1
49
19
24
29
34
39
44
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
o9
r5
14
+
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
de
to
5t
to
45
15
20
25
30
35
40
50
55
60
65
70
75
Un
80
10
Age
The number in parentheses after each age group on the x-axis is the percent of population in that age group. Bihar 93
Contribution
Behaviouralof
Contribution oftop
top10
10risks
riskstoto
DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [14.9%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
pollution [12.7%] 3 3 High blood pressure [5.0%]
3 WaSH [7.9%]
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose High blood pressure [6.4%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [2.8%]
7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 Tobacco use [4.8%]
Occupational risks [1.9%] 7 7 High fasting plasma glucose [3.8%]
[1.5%] 8 10 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]High total cholesterol [2.7%]
High total cholesterol [1.3%] 9 9 Occupational risks [2.7%]
Alcohol & drug use [1.2%] 10 10 Alcohol
WaSH is unsafe water, sanitation, & drug use
[2.3%]
and handwashing.


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
WaSH
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Tobacco use
Occupational risks
Alcohol & drug use
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

WaSH
94 Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Chhattisgarh under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Chhattisgarh
150
100
50
46.9
39.2
37.8
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
014 years [12% of total deaths] 1539 years [12% of total deaths]
1.4% 3.2%
4.8% 10.8% Diarrhoea/LRI*/other

1% 12.8%
5.1%
1.6% NTDs & malaria
32% 2.9% 12% Maternal disorders
16.1%
Neonatal disorders
3.3%
5.6%
9.9%
5.8% 11.4%
Cancers
41.3%

3.6%
4.7% Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
4069 years [41.9% of total deaths] 70+ years [34.1% of total deaths] Diabetes/urog/blood/endo
3.2% Other non-communicable
Transport injuries
2.8% 4% 4%
4.4% 8.1%
26.5% 3.3%
2.8% 0.8%
11.6% 4% *LRI is lower respiratory infections.
2.7% 9.7%


7.2%
6.1%
33.5% 31.4%
Chhattisgarh 95

Females Males

Stroke
Diarrhoeal diseases
Tuberculosis
Suicide
Road injuries
COPD*
Malaria
Diabetes
12 9 6 3 0 0 3 6 9 12
What caused the most years lived with disability,

*COPD by sex,obstructive
is chronic in 2016? pulmonary disease.
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Falls
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Intestinal nematodes
Osteoarthritis
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

96 Chhattisgarh
How
How have
have the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?
Change
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbyby number
number of of DALYs,
DALYs, 19902016
19902016


Preterm birth complications [6.7%] 3 3 Stroke [5.5%]
Other neonatal disorders [5.2%] 4 4 Lower respiratory infections [5.0%]
Malaria [4.8%] 5 5 Preterm birth complications [4.2%]
Tuberculosis [4.6%] 6 6 Tuberculosis [3.5%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [3.8%] 7 7 COPD [3.1%]
Measles [3.4%] 8 8 Iron-deciency anaemia [3.1%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [2.2%] 10 10 Sense organ diseases [2.8%]
Ischaemic heart disease [2.1%] 11 11 Self-harm [2.6%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [1.8%] 12 12 Road injuries [2.4%]
Protein-energy malnutrition [1.6%] 13 13 Low back & neck pain [2.0%]
Congenital birth defects [1.6%] 14 14 Diabetes [2.0%]
COPD [1.5%] 15 15 Migraine [1.9%]
Sense organ diseases [1.3%] 17 17 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.7%]
Self-harm [1.3%] 19 20 Malaria [1.5%]
Road injuries [1.2%] 20 22 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.4%]
Low back & neck pain [1.0%] 24 23 Congenital birth defects [1.3%]*
Migraine [0.9%] 27 26 Protein-energy malnutrition [1.0%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
[2.17]
20
15
10
[1.1] [1.38] [1.7] [2.12]

[0.9] [2.65]
[0.55] [0.78]
[0.59] [0.66]
5 [3.2]
[0.45]
[3.63]
[0.31] [0.31]
[4.09]
[4.43]
0
)
)
1%
1%
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
0%
0%
0%
(7
(6
(5
(1
(9
(9
(8
(8
(7
(4
(3
(2
(1
(<
(<
(1
(1
(1
44
49
54
74
r5
24
29
34
39
59
64
69
79
84
+
o9
14
19
de
85
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
5t
to
to
Un
40
45
50
70
20
25
30
35
55
60
65
75
80
10
15
Age
The number in parentheses after each age group on the x-axis is the percent of population in that age group. Chhattisgarh 97
Contribution
Behaviouralof
Contribution oftop
top10
10risks
riskstoto
DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [11.4%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose WaSH [5.7%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [3.6%]
7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%]

6 High fasting plasma glucose [5.4%]
High fasting plasma glucose [1.6%] 7 7 Tobacco use [4.5%]
Occupational risks
High total cholesterol [1.1%] 10 10 High
WaSH is unsafe water, sanitation, body-mass
and index
[3.0%]
handwashing.
High body-mass index [0.6%] 12 11 Occupational risks [2.5%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
High blood pressure
Dietary risks
WaSH
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

WaSH
98 Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Delhi under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Delhi
150
100
50
39.2
31.4
12.7
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016

4%
28.3% 8.2% NTDs & malaria

1.3% 8.4%
2.3% 0.9% 2.5%
Neonatal disorders
1.5%
9.1% 8.1% Nutritional deciencies
2.5%
12.4% Cancers
14.9%
45% 5.2% 5.7%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
Transport injuries
6.1% 5.2% 3.4% 4.3%
3.4%
11.6%
Suicide & violence
9% 9%
19.8% 4.8%
2.2%
1.9%
4.2% 1.2% *LRI is lower respiratory infections.


6.3% 9.5%
43.2%
35.6%
Delhi 99

Females Males

Tuberculosis
Road injuries
Stroke
COPD*
Suicide
Diarrhoeal diseases
Diabetes
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

*COPDby sex,obstructive
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
Diabetes
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Falls
Schizophrenia
Drug use disorders
12.5 10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5

100 Delhi
How
How have
have the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?
Change
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbyby number
number of of DALYs,
DALYs, 19902016
19902016


Diarrhoeal diseases [6.9%] 2 2 Iron-deciency anaemia [3.4%]
Preterm birth complications [5.7%] 3 3 COPD [3.4%]
Ischaemic heart disease [5.3%] 5 5 Diabetes [3.2%]
Tuberculosis [5.2%] 6 6 Tuberculosis [3.2%]
Meningitis [2.6%] 8 8 Road injuries [3.1%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [2.5%] 9 9 Lower respiratory infections [3.0%]
Congenital birth defects [2.3%] 10 10 Migraine [2.8%]
Road injuries [2.2%] 12 12 Other neonatal disorders [2.6%]*
Measles [1.8%] 14 14 Other musculoskeletal disorders [2.1%]
Sense organ diseases [1.6%] 15 15 Stroke [2.1%]
Stroke [1.6%] 16 18 Diarrhoeal diseases [1.8%]
Skin diseases [1.5%] 17 20 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.7%]
Migraine [1.5%] 18 21 Congenital birth defects [1.6%]*
Low back & neck pain [1.5%] 19 22 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.6%]
Diabetes [1.3%] 22 29 Meningitis [0.9%]
Other musculoskeletal disorders [1.2%] 24 105 Measles [0.1%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
16
[2.23]
12
8
[0.73]
[0.65] [0.85] [1.18] [1.46] [1.82]
[0.98]
[0.59] [2.25]
[2.8]
[0.49]
4 [3.35]
[0.37] [0.36]
[3.84]
[4.52]
[5.22]
0
)
)
1%
%)
)
%)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
1%
0%
0%
1%
(9
(7
(9
(9
(8
(7
(6
(5
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(<
(<
(1
(1
(1
14
r5
o9
19
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
34
24
29
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
to
to
to
to
Un
10
15
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
30
20
25
Age
The number in parentheses after each age group on the x-axis is the percent of population in that age group. Delhi 101
Contribution
Behaviouralof
Contribution oftop
top10
10risks
riskstoto
DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

Air pollution
WaSH
[15.2%] [7.4%]
2 2 2 Air pollution [5.1%] 2 High fasting plasma glucose [8.5%]
Air pollutionWaSH
[7.7%] [6.2%]
3 3 3 High blood pressure [5.0%]
3 Dietary risks [8.4%]
Dietary risks [5.5%] 4 4 High blood pressure [7.9%]
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [4.7%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose Air pollution [7.0%]
OccupationalTobacco use [4.4%]
risks [1.9%] 7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 Tobacco use [6.0%]
Alcohol & drug use
High total cholesterol [2.7%] 9 9 Alcohol & drug use [4.6%]
Occupational risks [2.0%] 10 10 Occupational
[3.3%]
and handwashing.
High body-mass index [1.8%] 11 12 WaSH [1.4%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Air pollution
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16
102 Delhi
Goa
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Goa under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Goa
150
100
50
39.2
16
13.5
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
2.9%
5% 1.6% 8%
22% 4.5% NTDs & malaria

15.1%
12.4%
Neonatal disorders
2.7% 1.4% 8.3% Nutritional deciencies

2% 1.2% 13.4%
Cancers
12.1%
42.1% 5.1%
2.5% Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
3.6% 1.4% 2.1% Other non-communicable

1.9%
Transport injuries
4.9% 2.8%
4.5% 9.6% 5.3%
7.5% 12.3% Suicide & violence

14.4%
5.6%
1.3%
2.4%

9.5%

9.5%
6.6%
37.4% 42.8%
Goa 103

Females Males

Stroke
Diabetes
Road injuries
COPD*
Suicide
HIV/AIDS
Falls
Cirrhosis due to alcohol use
Tuberculosis
Cirrhosis due to hepatitis C
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

*COPD is sex,
chronic in 2016?
Females Males

Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Falls
Oral disorders
Anxiety disorders
Osteoarthritis
Schizophrenia
12 9 6 3 0 0 3 6 9 12

104 Goa
How have
How have the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Change causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbybynumber
numberof of
DALYs, 19902016
DALYs, 19902016

Diarrhoeal diseases [7.0%] 2 2 Sense organ diseases [4.1%]
Preterm birth complications [6.0%] 3 3 Diabetes [4.1%]
Ischaemic heart disease [5.6%] 4 4 COPD [4.1%]
Congenital birth defects [4.0%] 5 5 Stroke [4.0%]*
Other neonatal disorders [3.9%] 6 6 Low back & neck pain [3.6%]
Tuberculosis [3.8%] 7 7 Migraine [3.0%]
Neonatal haemolytic disease [2.8%] 8 8 Road injuries [2.8%]
Stroke [2.8%] 9 9 Falls [2.7%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.6%] 10 10 Skin diseases [2.5%]
COPD [2.6%] 11 11 Iron-deciency anaemia [2.4%]
Self-harm [2.2%] 12 12 Other musculoskeletal disorders [2.4%]
Sense organ diseases [2.1%] 13 13 Lower respiratory infections [2.3%]
Low back & neck pain [2.0%] 14 14 Depressive disorders [2.3%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [1.9%] 15 15 Chronic kidney disease [2.3%]
Road injuries [1.8%] 16 16 Self-harm [2.1%]*
Migraine [1.8%] 17 17 Preterm birth complications [2.0%]
Skin diseases [1.8%] 18 20 Diarrhoeal diseases [1.5%]
Falls [1.7%] 19 21 Congenital birth defects [1.4%]
Depressive disorders [1.4%] 21 22 Tuberculosis [1.3%]
Chronic kidney disease [1.3%] 22 26 Other neonatal disorders [1.1%]
Other musculoskeletal disorders [1.3%] 24 31 Neonatal encephalopathy [0.9%]
Diabetes [1.2%] 25 60 Neonatal haemolytic disease [0.4%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
10.0
[1.11] [1.62]
[2.01]
[1.3]
7.5 [2.49]
[1.07]
[0.78] [0.89]
[0.67]
[2.95]
[0.59]
[3.39]
5.0
[0.53]
[0.44]
[4.05]
2.5
[0.3] [4.81]
[0.27]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
1%
(8
(6
(7
(6
(4
(2
(1
(6
(8
(9
(9
(8
(7
(7
(6
(3
(1
(<
r5
o9
19
59
64
74
79
14
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
69
84
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
Un
15
55
60
70
75
10
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
65
80
Age
The number in parentheses after each age group on the x-axis is the percent of population in that age group. Goa 105
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

Air pollution
WaSH
[15.2%] [8.1%]
2 2 2 Air pollution [5.1%] 2 Dietary risks [9.6%]
Air pollutionWaSH
[7.7%] [7.0%]
Dietary risks [6.6%] 4 4 Malnutrition* [7.3%]
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [6.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose High body-mass index [7.2%]
risks [1.9%] 7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 Air pollution [5.6%]
High fasting plasma glucose [3.2%] 7 7 High total cholesterol [5.4%]
Alcohol & drug use [2.5%] 9 9 Impaired kidney function [3.7%]
[3.5%]
and handwashing.
Impaired kidney function [2.1%] 11 11 Tobacco use [3.1%]



Females Males
High blood pressure

Dietary risks
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
10 5 0 0 5 10
106 Goa
Gujarat
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Gujarat under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Gujarat
150
100
50
39.2
37.1
28.5
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.3%
3.9%
5.4% Diarrhoea/LRI*/other
15.1% 11.5%
NTDs & malaria
28.9% 9.5%
7.6% 15.4%
1.3%

4.3%
14.7% Cancers
10.6%
3% 4.1% Chronic respiratory diseases
2.6% Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
2%
Transport injuries
9.2% 5.4% 4.5% 4.6%
6.2% 2.6% 13.4% 7.9%
Suicide & violence
6.7% 4.3% 1.5%
12.5% 5.8%
2.7%

12% 17.1%

36.6% 37.8%
Gujarat 107

Females Males

Tuberculosis
COPD*
Suicide
Diarrhoeal diseases
Road injuries
Stroke
Falls
HIV/AIDS
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

*COPD is sex,
chronic in 2016?
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Anxiety disorders
Falls
Oral disorders
Haemoglobinopathies
Osteoarthritis
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

108 Gujarat
How
How have
have the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?
Change
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbyby number
number of of DALYs,
DALYs, 19902016
19902016


Preterm birth complications [6.4%] 3 3 Tuberculosis [4.2%]
Tuberculosis [5.9%] 4 4 Preterm birth complications [4.1%]
Ischaemic heart disease [4.6%] 5 5 Lower respiratory infections [3.7%]
Other neonatal disorders [4.1%] 6 6 Iron-deciency anaemia [3.6%]
Measles [3.4%] 8 8 Diarrhoeal diseases [2.8%]
Congenital birth defects [2.5%] 10 10 Self-harm [2.5%]
Meningitis [1.8%] 12 12 Stroke [2.4%]
Asthma [1.5%] 13 13 Migraine [2.2%]
Self-harm[1.5%] 14 14 Diabetes [2.1%]
Sense organ diseases [1.4%] 15 15 Congenital birth defects [2.1%]*
Road injuries [1.4%] 19 19 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.9%]
Low back & neck pain [1.3%] 20 24 Asthma [1.3%]*
Migraine [1.2%] 23 25 Meningitis [1.0%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
[2.07]
15
10
[1.36] [1.69]
[1.09] [2.09]
[0.68] [0.9]
[0.6] [0.79]
[2.6]
[0.55]
5 [3.12]
[0.45]
[3.53]
[0.32] [0.32]
[4.09]
[4.55]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
1%
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9
(7
(7
(3
(1
(9
(6
(5
(4
(2
(1
(1
(9
(<
o9
14
24
29
34
39
44
64
84
19
49
54
59
69
74
79
r5
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
Un
10
20
25
30
35
40
60
80
15
45
50
55
65
70
75
Age
The number in parentheses after each age group on the x-axis is the percent of population in that age group. Gujarat 109
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [11.3%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
3 Air pollution [9.1%]
Dietary risks [4.7%] 4 4 High blood pressure [9.0%]
Tobacco
High blood pressure use [4.4%]
[2.2%] 6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [4.0%]
Alcohol & drug use [2.1%] 9 9 Occupational risks [3.1%]
Occupational risks [2.1%] 10 10 Impaired
Impaired kidney function [1.3%] 11 11 WaSH [2.6%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Dietary risks
Air pollution
High blood pressure
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15
110 Gujarat
Haryana
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Haryana under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Haryana
150
100
50
39.2
34.6
22.9
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.2%
4.1%

1.1%
35% 1.4% 13% Maternal disorders
9.1%
15.8%
Cancers
3.1% 37.3% 16.2% Cardiovascular diseases
4.3% Chronic respiratory diseases

2.6%
2.9% Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

3.6% 1.1%
3.6% Transport injuries
6.6% 5.1%
6% 3.8%
14.6% 8.3%
4.2%
14.2% 1.8% Other causes of death
2.2%
7.7%
2.9%

18.9%
13.2%
34.1%
35.3%
Haryana 111

Females Males

COPD*
Road injuries
Tuberculosis
Diarrhoeal diseases
Suicide
Stroke
Diabetes
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

*COPD is sex,
chronic in 2016?
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Road injuries
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16

112 Haryana
How
How have
have the leading causes
the leading causesofofdeath
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?


Preterm birth complications [4.4%] 6 6 Tuberculosis [3.2%]*
Tuberculosis [4.3%] 7 7 Diarrhoeal diseases [3.1%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [2.5%] 9 9 Preterm birth complications [2.6%]
Measles [2.5%] 10 10 Diabetes [2.3%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [2.5%] 11 11 Stroke [2.3%]
Road injuries [2.0%] 12 12 Low back & neck pain [2.2%]
Congenital birth defects [1.8%] 13 13 Self-harm [2.2%]
Asthma [1.7%] 14 14 Other neonatal disorders [2.1%]
Self-harm [1.6%] 15 15 Migraine [2.0%]
Sense organ diseases [1.5%] 16 21 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.4%]
Stroke [1.4%] 18 22 Congenital birth defects [1.4%]*
Low back & neck pain [1.3%] 19 23 Asthma [1.3%]*
Migraine [1.1%] 23 24 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.2%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
16
[1.81]
12
8 [2.2]
[1.8]
[1.45]
[0.97] [1.18]
[0.7] [0.84] [2.75]
[0.57] [0.62]
[0.46] [3.29]
4 [3.71]
[0.3] [0.31] [4.22]
[4.58]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
0%
0%
1%
(5
(9
(8
(7
(6
(4
(3
(1
(1
(8
(9
(9
(2
(1
(5
(1
(1
(<
49
o9
34
39
44
59
64
74
84
r5
14
29
69
79
54
19
24
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
to
to
Un
45
30
35
40
55
60
70
80
10
25
65
75
50
15
20
Age
The number in parentheses after each age group on the x-axis is the percent of population in that age group. Haryana 113
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [15.0%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
Tobacco use [5.1%] 4 4 High blood pressure [9.1%]
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [3.3%]
7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 High total cholesterol [6.3%]
High total cholesterol [2.2%] 7 7 High fasting plasma glucose [6.1%]
Occupational risks
[2.2%] 8 10 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]High body-mass index [4.7%]
High fasting plasma glucose [2.1%] 9 9 Alcohol & drug use [4.6%]
Alcohol & drug use [1.9%] 10 10 Occupational
[3.2%]
and handwashing.


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15
114 Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Himachal Pradesh under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Himachal Pradesh
150
100
50
39.2
27.2
20.9
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.2%
4.4% 1.8%
6.3%
NTDs & malaria
30.6% 8.9% 8%
Maternal disorders
0.9% 15.4%
1.4% 8.2%

9.9%
2.4% 11.8%
Cancers
40.6% 3% Cardiovascular diseases

14.4%
2.8%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

0.8%
Transport injuries
3.1% 5%
5.8% 5.5%
6.1% 4.8% 13.4% 6.2%
Suicide & violence

6.1% 6%
16.4% 2.9% 2.1%
2.7%



16.2% 25.8%
28.4%
30.4%


Females Males

COPD*
Road injuries
Tuberculosis
Suicide
Diarrhoeal diseases
Stroke
Falls
Asthma
HIV/AIDS
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

Females Males

Migraine
COPD*
Skin diseases
Falls
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Diabetes
Osteoarthritis
Schizophrenia
12 9 6 3 0 0 3 6 9 12

116 Himachal Pradesh

How
How have
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?


COPD [5.3%] 3 3 Sense organ diseases [3.9%]
Tuberculosis [4.8%] 4 4 Low back & neck pain [3.2%]
Preterm birth complications [4.1%] 6 6 Lower respiratory infections [2.9%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [3.9%] 7 7 Iron-deciency anaemia [2.9%]
Other neonatal disorders [3.2%] 8 8 Falls [2.8%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [2.0%] 9 9 Migraine [2.7%]
Sense organ diseases [1.9%] 10 10 Diarrhoeal diseases [2.7%]
Stroke [1.8%] 11 11 Preterm birth complications [2.5%]
Measles [1.8%] 12 12 Skin diseases [2.4%]
Asthma [1.7%] 14 14 Stroke [2.3%]*
Low back & neck pain [1.7%] 15 15 Self-harm [2.2%]*
Falls [1.7%] 16 20 Asthma [1.6%]
Road injuries [1.6%] 17 21 Other neonatal disorders [1.4%]
Self-harm [1.6%] 18 22 Congenital birth defects [1.4%]
Migraine [1.5%] 20 97 Measles [0.1%]


What caused
What causedthethemost
mostdeath and
death disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
Percent
12.5 of DALYs by age group, both sexes, 2016
[1.69]
10.0
[1.62]
[1.3] [2.0]
7.5
[1.07]
[2.49]
[0.78] [0.89]
[0.68]
[2.94]
[0.6]
[0.54] [3.38]
5.0
[0.45]
[4.02]
[4.67]
[0.32]
[0.32]
2.5
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
(8
(8
(7
(2
(6
(9
(9
(6
(2
(1
(9
(9
(6
(5
(4
(1
(8
(1
39
14
44
74
r5
19
24
54
69
79
29
34
49
59
64
84
o9
+
85
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
Un
35
10
40
70
15
20
50
65
75
25
30
45
55
60
80
Age
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [14.9%]
WaSHWaSH

2 2 2 Air pollution [5.1%] 2 High blood pressure [8.7%]
Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
Tobacco
[2.2%] 6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [4.7%]
Occupational risks [2.7%] 7 7 High total cholesterol [4.4%]
High fasting plasma glucose [1.9%] 10 10 High
and index
[3.4%]
handwashing.


Females Males
Malnutrition*
High blood pressure
Air pollution
Dietary risks
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
12.5 10 7.5 5 2.5 0 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5

118 Himachal Pradesh

Jammu and Kashmir
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Jammu and Kashmir under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Jammu and Kashmir
150
100
50
39.2
32.1
31
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016

6.6% 11.2%
7.5%
NTDs & malaria
32% 3.2% 10.2%
1% 7.6% Neonatal disorders

1.7%

15.4%
2.5%
Cancers

36.4% 4.9%
2.6%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

3.8% 1.1%
4.5%
4.9% 7.6%
Suicide & violence
4.1% 1.5%
14.9% 7.3%
7.5%
2%

19.2%

14.4%
36% 37.4%


Females Males

Road injuries
COPD*
Stroke
Diarrhoeal diseases
Tuberculosis
Suicide
Stomach cancer
Diabetes
Falls
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

*COPD is sex,
chronic in 2016?
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Road injuries
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

120 Jammu and Kashmir

How
How have
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?


Tuberculosis [4.0%] 6 6 Sense organ diseases [3.1%]
Road injuries [3.4%] 7 7 Stroke [3.0%]*
Other neonatal disorders [3.0%] 8 8 Diarrhoeal diseases [2.7%]
Measles [2.8%] 9 9 Preterm birth complications [2.7%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.6%] 10 10 Low back & neck pain [2.6%]
Stroke [2.2%] 11 11 Migraine [2.4%]
Congenital birth defects [2.1%] 12 12 Chronic kidney disease [2.3%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [2.0%] 13 13 Skin diseases [2.2%]
Neonatal haemolytic disease [1.6%] 14 14 Diabetes [1.9%]
Sense organ diseases [1.5%] 15 15 Tuberculosis [1.9%]
Low back & neck pain [1.4%] 16 18 Congenital birth defects [1.7%]
Chronic kidney disease [1.3%] 19 20 Other neonatal disorders [1.6%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
[1.88]
10
[1.5] [1.86] [2.33]

[0.98] [1.2]
[0.72] [0.85]
[0.65]
[0.59] [2.9]
[3.51]
[0.49]
5
[0.34] [3.98]
[0.33]
[4.62]
[5.15]
0
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
)
1%
7%
1%
0%
1%
(9
(9
(7
(6
(5
(5
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(1
(8
(1
5(
(1
(1
(<
24
29
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
34
o9
14
19
r
+
de
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
5t
to
to
Un
20
25
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
30
10
15
Age

Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

Air pollution
WaSH
[15.2%] [12.4%]
Air pollution [7.7%]
WaSH 3
[11.7%] 3 3 High blood pressure [5.0%]
3 Tobacco use [10.0%]
Tobacco use [7.2%] 4 4 Air pollution [10.0%]
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [4.8%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Dietary risks
Tobacco use
Air pollution
High blood pressure
Occupational risks
10 5 0 0 5 10
122 Jammu and Kashmir

Jharkhand
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Jharkhand under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Jharkhand
150
100
50 45
43.1
39.2
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.3%
3.7% 1.4%
14.1% 13.4%
1% NTDs & malaria
5.9%
1.6% 9% Maternal disorders
2%
39.4% 15% Neonatal disorders
10.3%
5.4% Cancers
32.8% 11%
4.1%
3.7% Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

8.4% 5.3% 4.1% 3.6%
6.5%
3.4% 2.7%
Suicide & violence
16.1% 6.6% 1.1%
4.1% 33.2%


11%
8.6%
5.6%
27.2%
28.9%
Jharkhand 123

Females Males
Diarrhoeal diseases
Tuberculosis
Road injuries
Stroke
COPD*
Suicide
HIV/AIDS
Drowning
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16

Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Oral disorders
Falls
Diarrhoeal diseases
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

124 Jharkhand
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Change in
Change in top
top 15
15 causes
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbybynumber
numberof of
DALYs, 19902016
DALYs, 19902016

Tuberculosis [5.2%] 4 4 Iron-deciency anaemia [4.2%]
Other neonatal disorders [3.9%] 6 6 Preterm birth complications [3.3%]
Tetanus [3.1%] 7 7 COPD [3.3%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.9%] 8 8 Road injuries [2.9%]
Ischaemic heart disease [2.7%] 9 9 Stroke [2.7%]
Malaria [1.7%] 11 11 Other neonatal disorders [2.3%]
Leishmaniasis [1.7%] 12 12 Low back & neck pain [2.0%]
Drowning [1.7%] 13 13 Skin diseases [1.9%]
Road injuries [1.5%] 16 16 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.7%]
COPD [1.5%] 17 17 Congenital birth defects [1.6%]*
Sense organ diseases [1.2%] 20 24 Drowning [1.1%]
Low back & neck pain [1.0%] 24 29 Malaria [0.9%]*
Skin diseases [1.0%] 26 44 Measles [0.5%]
Migraine [0.9%] 28 57 Leishmaniasis [0.4%]
Diabetes [0.6%] 38 99 Tetanus [0.1%]


What caused
Percent thebymost
of DALYs death both
[2.25]
20
15
10
[2.21]
[1.76] [2.79]
[0.71] [0.83] [1.43]
[0.64] [0.95] [1.15]
[0.35] [0.59] [3.38]
5 [0.34] [0.48]
[3.85]
[4.38]
[4.77]
0
)
)
1%
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
)
)
1%
4%
2%
9%
(9
(8
(8
(8
(7
(5
(5
(4
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(<
(<
(1
(1
5(
19
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
o9
14
+
r
de
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
to
5t
to
Un
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
10
Age
Jharkhand 125
Contribution
Behaviouralof
Contribution oftop
top10
10risks
riskstoto
DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [14.1%]
WaSHWaSH

2 2 2 Air pollution [5.1%] 2 WaSH [9.5%]
Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [3.3%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
risks [1.9%] 7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 High fasting plasma glucose [4.5%]
Occupational risks
[1.6%] 8 10 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]Occupational risks [2.6%]
Impaired kidney function [1.1%] 10 10 High
and index
[2.4%]
handwashing.
High body-mass index [0.5%] 12 12 Impaired kidney function [2.2%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
WaSH
Air pollution
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Tobacco use
Occupational risks
Alcohol & drug use
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

126 Jharkhand
Karnataka
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Karnataka under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Karnataka
150
100
50
39.2
32.2
28.5
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.2%
4.6% 1.4%

2.3%
6.5%
1.3%
1.3%
13.9%
8.2% Cancers

44.9% 10.1%
4.5%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

3.4%
Transport injuries
4.8% 4.8% 3.9%
2.5%
16.1%

7% 3.9% 1.3%
4% 1.1% *LRI is lower respiratory infections.


10.6% 13.9%
36.8%
37.2%
Karnataka 127

Females Males

Suicide
Stroke
COPD*
Diarrhoeal diseases
Road injuries
Diabetes
Tuberculosis
HIV/AIDS
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

Females Males

Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Anxiety disorders
Falls
Oral disorders
Osteoarthritis
Schizophrenia
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

128 Karnataka
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Change in
Change in top
top 15
15 causes
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbybynumber
numberof of
DALYs, 19902016
DALYs, 19902016

Lower respiratory infections [6.6%] 3 3 Self-harm [4.3%]
Ischaemic heart disease [4.8%] 4 4 Stroke [3.8%]
Measles [3.8%] 7 7 Diabetes [3.4%]
Congenital birth defects [3.0%] 10 10 Road injuries [2.7%]
Self-harm[2.9%] 11 11 Low back & neck pain [2.5%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [2.1%] 13 13 Lower respiratory infections [2.2%]
Asthma [1.5%] 15 15 Congenital birth defects [2.0%]
Road injuries [1.3%] 18 23 Other neonatal disorders [1.3%]
Migraine [1.2%] 21 24 Asthma [1.3%]


What caused
Percent thebymost
of DALYs death both
[1.73]
10
[1.7] [2.1]
[1.36]
[1.11] [2.65]
[0.8] [0.92]
[0.6] [0.68]
[3.17]
[0.54]
5
[0.44] [3.6]
[0.3] [4.12]
[0.29]
[4.58]
0
%)
)
%)
%)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
7%
0%
0%
1%
(6
(8
(7
(5
(4
(3
(2
(8
(8
(1
(1
(8
(9
(4
5(
(1
(1
(<
49
34
44
54
59
69
74
14
39
79
84
o9
19
64
24
29
r
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
to
to
Un
45
30
40
50
55
65
70
10
35
75
80
15
60
20
25
Age
Karnataka 129
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [11.7%]
WaSHWaSH

Dietary risks [5.2%] 4 4 High fasting plasma glucose [8.3%]
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [4.7%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose Air pollution [8.2%]
Occupational risks
High total cholesterol [2.2%] 9 9 Occupational risks [3.3%]
Alcohol & drug use [1.8%] 10 10 Impaired
Impaired kidney function [1.6%] 11 11 WaSH [3.3%]
The percent gure in brackets next to each risk is DALYs from that risk out of total DALYs. *Malnutrition is child and maternal malnutrition.


Females Males
Malnutrition*
High blood pressure
Dietary risks
Air pollution
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
10 5 0 0 5 10
130 Karnataka
Kerala
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Kerala under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Kerala
150
100
50
39.2
19.1
12.8
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.5%
1.4%
2% 7.4% 8.2%
18.4% 6.9% 4.6%
NTDs & malaria
2.5% 24.4%
Neonatal disorders
21.2%
14.8%
7.3% Cancers
36.2% 3.5% 3.6%

1.7% 1.8%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
4.2% 3.3% Transport injuries

4.2% 3.9% 4.5%
3% 11.4%
21.5%
6.9%

1% NTDs are neglected tropical diseases.

6.4% 9.3%
45.7%
37.8%
Kerala 131

Females Males

Stroke
Suicide
COPD*
Road injuries
Diabetes
Falls
Diarrhoeal diseases
Other cancers
Tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer
Hypertensive heart disease
25 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25

Females Males

Migraine
Diabetes
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Schizophrenia
12 9 6 3 0 0 3 6 9 12

132 Kerala
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Change in
Change in top
top 15
15 causes
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbybynumber
numberof of
DALYs, 19902016
DALYs, 19902016
Ischaemic heart disease [7.1%] 1 1 Ischaemic heart disease [12.2%]

Congenital birth defects [6.1%] 2 2 Sense organ diseases [4.6%]
Self-harm [3.7%] 5 5 Diabetes [4.0%]
COPD [3.7%] 6 6 Low back & neck pain [3.8%]
Stroke [3.5%] 7 7 Self-harm [3.4%]*
Diarrhoeal diseases [3.0%] 8 8 Chronic kidney disease [3.2%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.8%] 9 9 Migraine [2.9%]
Sense organ diseases [2.7%] 10 10 Road injuries [2.6%]
Low back & neck pain [2.5%] 11 11 Depressive disorders [2.5%]
Tuberculosis [2.4%] 12 12 Other musculoskeletal disorders [2.4%]
Migraine [2.1%] 13 13 Skin diseases [2.4%]
Skin diseases [2.0%] 14 14 Falls [2.3%]
Road injuries [2.0%] 15 15 Preterm birth complications [2.0%]
Diabetes [1.8%] 17 17 Congenital birth defects [1.7%]
Depressive disorders [1.8%] 18 18 Diarrhoeal diseases [1.6%]
Chronic kidney disease [1.8%] 19 20 Lower respiratory infections [1.4%]
Falls [1.6%] 21 30 Tuberculosis [0.8%]
Other musculoskeletal disorders [1.6%] 22 42 Neonatal encephalopathy [0.5%]


What causedthe
What caused themost
most death
death and
and disability
disability combined
combined across
across age groups
age groups in 2016?
in 2016?
Percent
Percent of
of DALYs by age group,
group, both
both sexes,
sexes,2016
2016
12
[1.56]
[1.94]
9 [1.25]
[2.39]
[1.02]
[3.24]
[0.85] [2.84]
6 [0.91] [0.74]
[0.63]
[0.56]
[0.51]
[3.9]
[4.67]
[0.42]
3
[0.29]
[0.25]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
6%
(7
(7
(8
(8
(7
(3
(2
(7
(7
(7
(7
(2
(1
(8
(8
(5
(1
5(
19
o9
29
34
59
69
79
14
44
49
54
74
84
24
39
64
+
r
85
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
Un
15
25
30
55
65
75
10
40
45
50
70
80
20
35
60
Age
Kerala 133
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

Air pollution
WaSH
[15.2%] [9.3%]
Air pollution
Dietary[7.7%] 3
risks [8.1%] 3 3 High blood pressure [5.0%]
High blood pressure [7.9%] 4 4 High body-mass index [7.6%]
Tobacco
[2.2%] 6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose High total cholesterol [7.0%]
High fasting plasma
Occupational glucose
risks [1.9%] [5.9%]
7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 Tobacco use [6.9%]
High total cholesterol [4.0%] 7 7 Air pollution [6.2%]
WaSH [3.3%] 8 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]Impaired kidney function [4.8%]

Impaired kidney function [0.9%] 10 10
Occupational risks [3.0%] 9 9 Malnutrition* [4.4%]
[3.7%]
and handwashing.


Females Males
High blood pressure

Dietary risks
Tobacco use
Air pollution
Malnutrition*
Occupational risks
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16
134 Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Madhya Pradesh under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Madhya Pradesh
150
100
50 45.2
43.9
39.2
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1% 3.3%
1% HIV/AIDS & tuberculosis

11.9%
7% 0.8% NTDs & malaria
1.5%
36.1% 11.7% 15.6%
Maternal disorders
3.4%
Neonatal disorders

11.2%
Cancers
3.7% 11.9%
37% Cardiovascular diseases
11%
3% Chronic respiratory diseases
3.6% Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
4069 years [37.7% of total deaths] 70+ years [37.3% of total deaths] Diabetes/urog/blood/endo

7.8% 5.9% 3.8%
3% 6.9%
9.7% 2.3%
0.7%
3.2%
13.2% 2.5%
14.3%
6.5%
11.5%
32.9% 32.9%
Madhya Pradesh 135


Females Males

Diarrhoeal diseases
Stroke
Tuberculosis
COPD*
Suicide
Road injuries
Falls
Diabetes
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Haemoglobinopathies
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16

136 Madhya Pradesh

How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Change in
Change in top
top 15
15 causes
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbybynumber
numberof of
DALYs, 19902016
DALYs, 19902016

Preterm birth complications [6.1%] 3 3 Diarrhoeal diseases [4.9%]
Ischaemic heart disease [2.6%] 7 7 Tuberculosis [3.4%]
COPD [2.6%] 8 8 Stroke [3.4%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [2.5%] 9 9 Other neonatal disorders [3.2%]
Protein-energy malnutrition [2.1%] 11 11 Sense organ diseases [2.6%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [1.9%] 12 12 Self-harm [2.4%]
Stroke [1.7%] 13 13 Low back & neck pain [2.0%]
Meningitis [1.6%] 15 15 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.9%]
Self-harm [1.2%] 19 16 Congenital birth defects [1.9%]*
Road injuries [1.0%] 22 25 Protein-energy malnutrition [1.1%]
Low back & neck pain [1.0%] 24 27 Meningitis [1.0%]


What causedthe
What caused themost
most death
death and
and disability
disability combined
combined across
across age groups
age groups in 2016?
in 2016?
Percent
Percent of
group, both
both sexes,
sexes,2016
2016
[2.24]
20
15
10
[1.36] [1.68] [2.08]

[0.9] [1.1] [2.59]
[0.54] [0.67] [0.78]
[0.6] [3.13]
5 [0.44]
[0.32] [0.31] [3.54]
[4.03]
[4.4]
0
)
)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
1%
0%
0%
0%
(9
(8
(8
(7
(6
(5
(4
(4
(3
(2
(2
(1
(1
10
(<
(1
(1
(1
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
5(
14
o9
19
+
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
r
85
de
5t
to
to
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Un
10
15
Age
Madhya Pradesh 137
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

Air pollution
WaSH
[15.2%] [13.0%]
WaSH 3
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [3.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose [1.8%] 7 7 WaSH [5.0%]
Occupational risks
High total cholesterol [1.2%] 10 10 Occupational
[2.8%]
and handwashing.


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Tobacco use
WaSH
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

138 Madhya Pradesh

Maharashtra
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Maharashtra under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Maharashtra
150
100
50
39.2
27.5
21.6
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016

4.2% 1.5%
10.7% 11%
26.1% NTDs & malaria
8.8% 7.6%
16.2%
1.4% 5.5%
1.8%
2.9%
10.2%
Cancers

45.4% 6.1%
2.1% 4.5% Chronic respiratory diseases
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
2.4%
Transport injuries
5.4% 5.8% 2.9% 4.6%
14.8% 7.9%
Suicide & violence
11.5% 4.3% 1.5%
7.5% 5.6% 1.5% Other causes of death

15.4%

10%
37.8% 39.7%
Maharashtra 139

Females Males

Stroke
COPD*
Suicide
Diarrhoeal diseases
Road injuries
Tuberculosis
Falls
Diabetes
HIV/AIDS
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Haemoglobinopathies
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

140 Maharashtra
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Change in
Change in top
top 15
15 causes
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbybynumber
numberof of
DALYs, 19902016
DALYs, 19902016

Preterm birth complications [7.3%] 2 2 COPD [5.0%]*
Ischaemic heart disease [5.2%] 5 5 Sense organ diseases [3.3%]
COPD [4.1%] 6 6 Preterm birth complications [3.2%]
Other neonatal disorders [3.4%] 7 7 Lower respiratory infections [2.9%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.6%] 8 8 Diarrhoeal diseases [2.8%]
Measles [2.6%] 9 9 Self-harm [2.8%]
Stroke [2.6%] 10 10 Road injuries [2.8%]
Road injuries [2.0%] 13 13 Diabetes [2.4%]
Self-harm [2.0%] 14 14 Migraine [2.3%]
Asthma [1.6%] 15 15 Depressive disorders [2.2%]
Sense organ diseases [1.6%] 16 20 Congenital birth defects [1.4%]
Low back & neck pain [1.4%] 17 21 Other neonatal disorders [1.3%]
Migraine [1.3%] 19 23 Asthma [1.2%]
Depressive disorders [1.2%] 23 24 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.1%]


What causedthe
What caused themost
most death
death and
and disability
disability combined
combined across
across age groups
age groups in 2016?
in 2016?
Percent
Percent of
group, both
both sexes,
sexes,2016
2016
12.5
[1.6]
10.0
[2.61]
[1.69] [2.08]
[1.36]
7.5
[0.92] [1.11]
[0.68] [0.81] [3.14]
[0.6]
[0.54]
5.0 [3.61]
[0.45]
[0.31] [4.15]
[0.29]
2.5
[4.66]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
0%
1%
(1
(9
(9
(7
(7
(6
(5
(4
(4
(2
(1
(7
(8
(3
(8
(9
(1
(<
29
34
64
74
79
84
39
44
49
54
59
r5
14
69
o9
19
24
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
to
Un
25
30
70
75
80
10
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
15
20
Age
Maharashtra 141
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

Air pollution
WaSH
[15.2%] [9.8%]
Air pollutionWaSH
[7.7%] [8.9%]
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [5.1%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose High fasting plasma glucose [7.1%]
risks [1.9%] 7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 High total cholesterol [5.3%]
Alcohol & drug use
High total cholesterol [2.4%] 9 9 High body-mass index [4.5%]
Occupational risks [2.2%] 10 10 Impaired
[3.6%]
and handwashing.
Impaired kidney function [1.9%] 11 11 Occupational risks [3.2%]


Females Males
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15
142 Maharashtra
Manipur
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Manipur under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Manipur
150
100
50
39.2
29.3
24.8
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
2.2% 0.9%
4.2% 1.9%
18.1%
NTDs & malaria
5.9% 1.2% 15.1% Maternal disorders
1.5%
37%
Neonatal disorders
10.8%

1.9% 4.6%
12.2% Cancers
36.1% 9.6%
8.2% 4.8%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

2.7%
9.4% 5.3% 4.9%
3.8% 11.9%
24.1%
1.5%
12.3% 3% *LRI is lower respiratory infections.

10.2%
9.2% Endo is endocrine diseases.
6.4%

5.7%
28.7% 29.1%
Manipur 143

Females Males

Stroke
Diarrhoeal diseases
Road injuries
Tuberculosis
HIV/AIDS
Suicide
Diabetes
COPD*
Interpersonal violence
10 7.5 5 2.5 0 0 2.5 5 7.5 10


Females Males

Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Oral disorders
Falls
Drug use disorders
Osteoarthritis
10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0


144 Manipur
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Change in
Change in top
top 15
15 causes
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbybynumber
numberof of
DALYs, 19902016
DALYs, 19902016

Measles [3.7%] 5 5 Road injuries [3.7%]
Stroke [2.7%] 6 6 Tuberculosis [3.4%]
Ischaemic heart disease [2.6%] 8 8 HIV/AIDS [3.4%]
Tetanus [2.5%] 10 10 Diabetes [3.1%]
COPD [2.2%] 11 11 Preterm birth complications [2.8%]*
Intestinal infectious diseases [2.1%] 12 12 Low back & neck pain [2.6%]
Road injuries [1.9%] 13 13 Migraine [2.5%]
Sense organ diseases [1.7%] 14 14 Skin diseases [2.2%]
Whooping cough [1.6%] 15 15 Self-harm [2.2%]
Low back & neck pain [1.5%] 17 23 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.3%]
Migraine [1.4%] 20 28 Other neonatal disorders [1.1%]
Self-harm [1.4%] 21 70 Measles [0.3%]
Diabetes [1.2%] 25 74 Whooping cough [0.2%]*
HIV/AIDS [0.1%] 93 101 Tetanus [0.1%]


What caused
Percent thebymost
of DALYs death both
[1.53]
10
[1.52] [1.89]
[0.67] [0.9] [1.24]

[0.76] [1.03] [2.34]
[0.6]
[2.93]
[0.49]
5 [3.51] [4.02]
[0.31]
[0.28] [4.64]
[5.18]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
)
)
)
)
)
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
1%
(9
(9
(7
(6
(5
(5
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(1
(1
(1
(1
(1
5(
(<
o9
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
19
29
14
24
r
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
to
to
to
to
Un
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
15
25
10
20
Age
Manipur 145
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [12.1%]
WaSHWaSH

Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [4.0%]
7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 Air pollution [6.1%]
High fasting plasma glucose [2.9%] 7 7 Alcohol & drug use [4.9%]
Alcohol & drug use [2.2%] 8 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]WaSH [4.3%]

Impaired kidney function [0.9%] 10 10
Occupational risks [2.1%] 9 9 Impaired kidney function [3.0%]
Impaired kidney function [1.7%] 10 10 High
and index
[3.0%]
handwashing.


Females Males
Malnutrition*
High blood pressure
Tobacco use
Dietary risks
Air pollution
Alcohol & drug use
WaSH
10 7.5 5 2.5 0 0 2.5 5 7.5 10


146 Manipur
Meghalaya
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Meghalaya under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Meghalaya
150
100
50
39.2
36.3
33.3
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.5%
3.5%
3.8%
12.8% 14.1%
6.4% 1%
1.7% NTDs & malaria
0.9%
Maternal disorders
13.5% 10.1%
4.7% 7.3%
30.4%
7.7% 7% Cancers
8.8% 5% Cardiovascular diseases

11.2% 9%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

2.7%
9.4% 5.5% 6.1%

5.1%
23.4%
5% Other causes of death
3.9%
8.2%
9.6%

24.9%
6.1%
10.3%
20.6% 25.7%
Meghalaya 147

Females Males

Diarrhoeal diseases
Tuberculosis
Malaria
Stroke
Oesophageal cancer
Road injuries
Suicide
COPD*
10 7.5 5 2.5 0 0 2.5 5 7.5 10


Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Diabetes
Falls
Asthma
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16

148 Meghalaya
How
How have
have the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?
Change
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbyby number
number of of DALYs,
DALYs, 19902016
19902016


Malaria [7.3%] 3 3 Tuberculosis [4.3%]
Preterm birth complications [4.4%] 5 5 Preterm birth complications [3.3%]*
Neonatal encephalopathy [3.5%] 6 6 Ischaemic heart disease [3.3%]
Measles [3.1%] 7 7 Malaria [2.8%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [2.7%] 8 8 Stroke [2.7%]
Tetanus [1.5%] 13 13 Low back & neck pain [2.2%]
Stroke [1.5%] 14 14 Neonatal encephalopathy [2.2%]*
Neonatal sepsis [1.4%] 15 15 Intestinal infectious diseases [2.2%]
Sense organ diseases [1.4%] 18 24 Other neonatal disorders [1.5%]*
Skin diseases [1.3%] 19 31 Neonatal sepsis [0.9%]*
Low back & neck pain [1.2%] 21 56 Measles [0.4%]
Migraine [1.2%] 22 118 Tetanus [0.1%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
Percent of
Percent of DALYs
DALYs by
by age
age group,
group, both
both sexes,
sexes,2016
2016
[2.27]
20
15
10
[0.54] [0.65] [0.69]

[0.77] [0.91] [1.28] [1.58]
[1.04]
[1.98]
[0.38] [0.37] [2.44]
5 [3.05]
[3.63]
[4.14]
[4.75]
[5.32]
0
)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
)
2%
3%
0%
1%
1%
1%
(9
(8
(6
(5
(5
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(1
(9
(1
(1
(1
(1
(<
(<
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
r5
14
o9
24
19
84
+
de
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
5t
to
to
to
to
Un
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
10
20
15
80
Age
Meghalaya 149
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [12.9%]
WaSHWaSH

2 2 2 Air pollution [5.1%] 2 Tobacco use [6.4%]
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [2.2%]
7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 Alcohol & drug use [4.5%]
Alcohol & drug use [1.9%] 7 7 WaSH [4.4%]
Occupational risks
[1.7%] 8 10 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]High fasting plasma glucose [3.6%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Tobacco use
Air pollution
High blood pressure
Dietary risks
Alcohol & drug use
WaSH
Occupational risks
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

WaSH
150 Meghalaya
Mizoram
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Mizoram under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Mizoram
150
100
50
39.2
30.6
26.2
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016

3.7%
6.6% 0.9% 13.8% 15.7%
1.3% NTDs & malaria
30.6% 1.3%
7.8%
13.8%
Neonatal disorders
34% 11.7% Cancers

15.8% 10.3%
4.6% 5.7% 4.4% Chronic respiratory diseases
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
3.2%
Transport injuries
5.9% 7.3% 3.3% 4%
8.9% 8.2%
19.9%
Suicide & violence
6.6% 5.3%
4.7% 3.9%
2%
5.9%
30% 15%

12.3% 21%
11.8% 14.1%
Mizoram 151

Females Males
Malaria
COPD*
Road injuries
Diarrhoeal diseases
Tuberculosis
HIV/AIDS
Stomach cancer
Tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer
Stroke
10 7.5 5 2.5 0 0 2.5 5 7.5 10


Females Males

Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Oral disorders
Falls
Drug use disorders
Schizophrenia
10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0


152 Mizoram
How
How have
have the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
anddisability
disability combined
combined changed
changed from
from 1990
1990 to 2016?
to 2016?
Change
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbyby number
number of of DALYs,
DALYs, 19902016
19902016


Diarrhoeal diseases [6.7%] 2 2 Malaria [4.7%]*
Malaria [5.1%] 3 3 Lower respiratory infections [4.4%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [4.6%] 4 4 Preterm birth complications [3.2%]*
Preterm birth complications [3.7%] 6 6 Road injuries [3.0%]
COPD [3.2%] 7 7 Sense organ diseases [3.0%]
Other neonatal disorders [3.1%] 8 8 Intestinal infectious diseases [2.6%]
Congenital birth defects [2.1%] 11 11 Skin diseases [2.3%]
Sense organ diseases [1.8%] 12 12 Iron-deciency anaemia [2.3%]
Skin diseases [1.8%] 13 13 Ischaemic heart disease [2.2%]
Low back & neck pain [1.7%] 14 14 Tuberculosis [2.2%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [1.7%] 15 15 Other neonatal disorders [2.1%]*
Migraine [1.7%] 16 22 Congenital birth defects [1.7%]*
Ischaemic heart disease [1.3%] 20 23 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.6%]*


What causedthe
What caused themost
most death
death and
and disability
disability combined
combined across
across age groups
age groups in 2016?
in 2016?
Percent
Percent of
group, both
both sexes,
sexes,2016
2016
20
[1.95]
15
10
[1.45]
[0.73] [1.18] [1.83]
[0.58] [0.65]
[0.86] [0.97]
[2.25]
5 [0.48] [2.81]
[3.37] [3.85]
[0.32] [0.33]
[4.46]
[5.02]
0
)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
(2
(9
(2
(9
(9
(9
(7
(6
(5
(5
(4
(1
(1
(<
(1
(1
(1
(<
64
r5
69
14
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
74
79
o9
19
24
84
+
de
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
5t
to
to
to
Un
60
65
10
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
70
75
15
20
80
Age
Mizoram 153
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

Air pollution
WaSH
[15.2%] [8.3%]
2 2 2 Air pollution [5.1%] 2 Tobacco use [11.0%]
Air pollution
Tobacco [7.7%] 3
use [7.3%] 3 3 High blood pressure [5.0%]
WaSH [7.3%] 4 4 Alcohol & drug use [4.1%]
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
Alcohol &risks
Occupational drug use [2.4%]
[1.9%] 7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 High fasting plasma glucose [3.5%]
Occupational risks [2.4%] 7 7 High blood pressure [3.3%]
High blood pressure


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Tobacco use
Air pollution
Alcohol & drug use
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Occupational risks
WaSH
Unsafe sex
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

154 Mizoram
Nagaland
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Nagaland under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Nagaland
150
100
50
39.2
28.9
22.1
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
3.8%
1.3%
4.2%
5.4% 13.8%
Diarrhoea/LRI*/other
17.1%
1% NTDs & malaria
5.4% 1.3%
3.6% 10%

4%
6.8% 9.2% Cancers

31.8%
5.7% 10% 4.3%
8%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
Transport injuries
8.8% 6.7% 3.8% 4%
6.5% 2.9% 8.5%
6.8%
3.5% 3%
18.9% 9.2%
9.2%


8.8%
5.1%
34.9%
27.9%
Nagaland 155

Females Males

Stroke
HIV/AIDS
Tuberculosis
Road injuries
Diarrhoeal diseases
Hepatitis
COPD*
Malaria
10 7.5 5 2.5 0 0 2.5 5 7.5 10


*COPD is sex,obstructive
chronic in 2016? pulmonary disease.
Females Males

Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Falls
Oral disorders
Drug use disorders
Iodine deciency
10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0


156 Nagaland
How have the leading causes of death and disability combined changed from 1990 to 2016?
How have the leading causes of death and disability combined changed from 1990 to 2016?

Tuberculosis [4.8%] 3 3 Stroke [3.9%]
Preterm birth complications [4.1%] 4 4 HIV/AIDS [3.1%]
Measles [3.7%] 5 5 Sense organ diseases [3.0%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [2.9%] 6 6 Tuberculosis [3.0%]
Hepatitis [2.6%] 7 7 Preterm birth complications [2.9%]*
Ischaemic heart disease [2.5%] 9 9 Migraine [2.8%]
Malaria [2.4%] 10 10 Road injuries [2.8%]
Tetanus [2.4%] 12 12 COPD [2.6%]
Neonatal haemolytic disease [1.9%] 13 13 Iron-deciency anaemia [2.1%]
COPD [1.8%] 14 14 Intestinal infectious diseases [2.1%]
Road injuries [1.7%] 16 21 Hepatitis [1.5%]
Sense organ diseases [1.6%] 17 22 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.4%]*
Skin diseases [1.5%] 21 24 Malaria [1.3%]*
Low back & neck pain [1.5%] 22 30 Other neonatal disorders [1.0%]*
Iron-deciency anaemia [1.2%] 26 59 Measles [0.5%]
HIV/AIDS [0.1%] 94 103 Tetanus [0.1%]


What causedthe
What caused themost
most death
death and
and disability
disability combined
combined across
across age groups
age groups in 2016?
in 2016?
Percent of
Percent of DALYs by age group,
group, both
both sexes,
sexes,2016
2016
16
[2.16]
12
8
[0.66] [0.74] [0.84]
[0.55] [0.98] [1.34] [1.65]
[1.11]
[2.07]
[0.37] [2.55]
[0.35] [3.17]
4
[3.81] [4.35]
[5.12]
[5.8]
0
)
)
)
%)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
)
)
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
6%
(9
(8
(7
(6
(5
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(1
(<
(<
(1
(1
(1
(1
5(
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
24
14
o9
19
84
+
r
de
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
5t
to
to
to
to
Un
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
20
10
15
80
Age
The number in parentheses after each age group on the x-axis is the percent of population in that age group. Nagaland 157
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

Air pollution
WaSH
[15.2%] [10.0%]
Air pollutionWaSH
[7.7%] [8.1%]
High blood pressure [4.1%] 4 4 Air pollution [5.6%]
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose Alcohol & drug use [5.3%]
Alcohol & drug use [2.3%] 7 7 High fasting plasma glucose [4.2%]
Occupational risks
and handwashing.[2.6%]
High total cholesterol [1.3%] 11 12 WaSH [9.5%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
High blood pressure
Dietary risks
Air pollution
Alcohol & drug use
Tobacco use
Occupational risks
10 5 0 0 5 10
158 Nagaland
Odisha
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Odisha under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Odisha
150
100
50
40.8
39.2
38.5
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.4%
3.5%
5% Diarrhoea/LRI*/other
1.1% 13% 14.9%
5.7%
1.9%
Maternal disorders
12.4%
3.8%
3.8% 9.5% Other communicable diseases
12.7% 5.9% Cancers

38.1% 9%
5.4%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
Transport injuries
8.3% 7.8% 2.6% 5% Unintentional injuries

5.1%
7.7%
Suicide & violence
14.6%
3.7%
3.5%
5% 8.1%
12.3%
2.4%
5.6%
6.3%
0.8% 26.5%
27.9%
Odisha 159

Females Males
Diarrhoeal diseases
Stroke
Tuberculosis
Malaria
Road injuries
Suicide
COPD*
HIV/AIDS
Falls
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Falls
Oral disorders
Diarrhoeal diseases
Osteoarthritis
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

160 Odisha
How have
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Change in
Change in top
top 15
15 causes
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbybynumber
numberof of
DALYs, 19902016
DALYs, 19902016

Malaria [4.4%] 5 5 Tuberculosis [3.5%]
Preterm birth complications [4.1%] 7 7 Malaria [3.1%]*
Neonatal encephalopathy [3.6%] 8 8 COPD [3.0%]*
Stroke [2.7%] 9 9 Sense organ diseases [2.8%]
COPD [2.2%] 10 10 Preterm birth complications [2.5%]
Tetanus [1.8%] 11 11 Road injuries [2.3%]
Congenital birth defects [1.7%] 12 12 Low back & neck pain [2.2%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [1.7%] 13 13 Falls [2.1%]
Ischaemic heart disease [1.5%] 14 14 Chronic kidney disease [2.0%]
Hepatitis [1.4%] 15 15 Other neonatal disorders [2.0%]
Falls [1.0%] 23 24 Congenital birth defects [1.2%]
Low back & neck pain [1.0%] 24 25 Hepatitis [1.0%]
Road injuries [0.9%] 28 83 Measles [0.2%]
Chronic kidney disease [0.9%] 30 131 Tetanus [0.1%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
Percent of
Percent of DALYs
DALYs by
by age
age group,
group, both
both sexes,
sexes,2016
2016
[1.8]
15
10
[2.05]
[1.65]
[1.33]
[1.08] [2.58]
[0.89]
[0.78] [3.13]
[0.59] [0.65]
5 [0.54]
[3.55]
[0.44]
[0.3] [0.3] [4.03]
[4.37]
0
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
1%
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9
(8
(7
(7
(6
(5
(4
(4
(2
(2
(1
(1
(<
o9
r5
14
19
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
Un
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Age
Odisha 161
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [13.7%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
Tobacco use [3.6%] 4 4 WaSH [7.4%]
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [3.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
OccupationalDietary risks [3.2%]
Alcohol & drug use [1.7%] 7 7 Tobacco use [4.0%]
[3.0%]
and handwashing.


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
High blood pressure
WaSH
Dietary risks
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12

WaSH
162 Odisha
Punjab
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Punjab under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Punjab
150
100
50
39.2
29.4
23.6
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016

2.1%
5.1%
8.2% NTDs & malaria
9.3%
1.2%
9.2%
1.4%
1.6%
2% 21.7%
Cancers
16.2%
38.2%
5.5%
3.1% Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

3.6% 1%
4.4%
5.5%
11.6%
10.9% 5.5%
4.4%
1.3%
1.8%
3%
9.4%
6.9%
44.2% 46.6%
Punjab 163

Females Males

Road injuries
Stroke
Diabetes
COPD*
Diarrhoeal diseases
Tuberculosis
Suicide
HIV/AIDS
30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Road injuries
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

164 Punjab
How have
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Change in
Change in top
top 15
15 causes
causesof
ofDALYs,
DALYs,both
bothsexes,
sexes,ranked
rankedbybynumber
numberof of
DALYs, 19902016
DALYs, 19902016

Lower respiratory infections [6.5%] 3 3 COPD [4.0%]*
Preterm birth complications [4.1%] 4 4 Diabetes [3.9%]
Other neonatal disorders [3.5%] 7 7 Stroke [2.9%]
Congenital birth defects [2.7%] 9 9 Lower respiratory infections [2.6%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [2.5%] 10 10 Diarrhoeal diseases [2.6%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [2.4%] 11 11 Chronic kidney disease [2.5%]
Meningitis [1.7%] 15 15 Preterm birth complications [1.9%]
Chronic kidney disease [1.4%] 18 21 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.3%]
Skin diseases [1.4%] 19 22 Other neonatal disorders [1.3%]
Diabetes [1.3%] 21 35 Meningitis [0.7%]


Percent
What of DALYs
caused thebymost
age group,
death both sexes, 2016
and disability combined across age groups in 2016?
[1.58]
[2.08]
[1.36] [1.68]
[2.61]
[1.1]
[0.9]
[0.68] [0.79] [3.15]
6 [0.6]
[0.55]
[3.57]
[0.44]
[4.12]
3
[0.3] [4.61]
[0.29]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
6%
0%
(8
(8
(9
(9
(8
(7
(7
(6
(5
(4
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(1
5(
(1
o9
14
19
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
+
24
r
85
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
Un
10
15
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
20
Age
Punjab 165
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [12.8%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
Dietary risks [8.3%] 4 4 High fasting plasma glucose [10.0%]
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [7.3%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose Malnutrition* [8.9%]
risks [1.9%] 7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 High body-mass index [8.8%]
[3.4%] 8 10 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]Tobacco use [4.8%]
Occupational risks [2.4%] 9 9 Impaired kidney function [4.4%]
High body-mass index [2.4%] 10 10 Alcohol
[3.6%]
and handwashing.
Impaired kidney function [2.3%] 11 11 Occupational risks [3.6%]



Females Males
High blood pressure

Dietary risks
Air pollution
Malnutrition*
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15
166 Punjab
Rajasthan
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Rajasthan under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Rajasthan
150
100
50 45
44
39.2
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.1% 2.9%
0.7% 12.4% 10.7%
4.7% 1.2%
2.3% NTDs & malaria
10.9%

6.1%
6.4%
36.6% Cancers
14.2%

2.9%
3.6% 2.9% Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

3.8% 0.8%
3.9%
8.8% 5.1%
1.6%
8.8% 2.1% 4%
2.2%
13.5%

20.4%

30.4%
24.1%
27.5%
Rajasthan 167

Females Males

COPD*
Diarrhoeal diseases
Tuberculosis
Road injuries
Stroke
Suicide
Asthma
Falls
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15
Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16

168 Rajasthan
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Lower respiratory infections [14.0%] 1 1 Lower respiratory infections [7.4%]

Diarrhoeal diseases [13.0%] 2 2 COPD [7.0%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [3.1%] 8 8 Road injuries [3.2%]
Ischaemic heart disease [2.7%] 9 9 Other neonatal disorders [3.2%]*
Tetanus [2.2%] 11 11 Intestinal infectious diseases [2.3%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.0%] 12 12 Stroke [2.1%]
Asthma [1.6%] 13 13 Migraine [1.9%]
Road injuries [1.5%] 14 14 Skin diseases [1.9%]
Meningitis [1.4%] 15 15 Asthma [1.9%]*
Sense organ diseases [1.3%] 16 19 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.4%]*
Stroke [1.2%] 18 28 Meningitis [0.9%]*


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
Percent of
Percent of DALYs by age group,
group, both
both sexes,
sexes,2016
2016
25 [2.34]
20
15
10
[1.36] [1.68] [2.09]

[0.89] [1.09] [2.59]
[0.54] [0.59] [0.66] [0.77]
[0.45] [3.11]
5
[0.33] [0.32] [3.51]
[4.0]
[4.38]
0
)
)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
)
0%
0%
1%
1%
1%
(9
(8
(8
(6
(6
(5
(4
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(1
(1
(1
(1
(1
(<
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
r5
19
o9
14
+
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
de
5t
to
to
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Un
15
10
Age
.0The number in parentheses after each age group on the x-axis is the percent of population in that age group.
Rajasthan 169
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [13.8%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [2.7%]
7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 WaSH [4.3%]
Occupational risks [2.0%] 7 7 High total cholesterol [3.6%
Alcohol & drug use
[1.6%] 8 10 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]High fasting plasma glucose [3.5%]
High total cholesterol [1.5%] 9 9 Alcohol & drug use [3.2%]
High fasting plasma glucose [1.5%] 10 10 Occupational
[3.1%]
and handwashing.


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
Tobacco use
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
WaSH
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
25 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25

170 Rajasthan
Sikkim
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Sikkim under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Sikkim
150
100
50
39.2
26.2
22.5
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year
Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.3%
4.2%
4.8% 9% Diarrhoea/LRI*/other
11.5%
1.6%
5.7% NTDs & malaria
1.8% 9.7%
1% Maternal disorders
14.6%
38.9%
9.8% 8.7% Other communicable diseases
Cancers
36.9% 10.5%
10.9%

2.7%
3.1% Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
Transport injuries
2.6%
5.7% 6% 5.2%
7.1%
7.4%
18.9% 3.2%
9.7% 2.7%
3.3%
11.5%

13.6%
7.8%
25.4% 29.1%
Sikkim 171

Females Males

Suicide
Tuberculosis
Road injuries
COPD*
Diarrhoeal diseases
Stroke
Falls
Cirrhosis due to hepatitis C
12.5 10 7.5 5 2.5 0 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5

Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Falls
Oral disorders
Asthma
Schizophrenia
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

172 Sikkim
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?

Tuberculosis [5.6%] 3 3 COPD [3.7%]
Ischaemic heart disease [3.0%] 6 6 Sense organ diseases [3.1%]
Hepatitis [2.0%] 10 10 Falls [2.6%]
Measles [1.8%] 11 11 Skin diseases [2.6%]
Intestinal infectious diseases [1.8%] 12 12 Tuberculosis [2.5%]
Falls [1.6%] 13 13 Self-harm [2.4%]*
Self-harm [1.5%] 14 14 Diarrhoeal diseases [2.3%]
Sense organ diseases [1.5%] 15 15 Diabetes [2.1%]
Low back & neck pain [1.4%] 17 18 Other neonatal disorders [1.9%]
Skin diseases [1.3%] 19 22 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.5%]
Road injuries [1.3%] 21 30 Hepatitis [1.0%]


What caused
Percent thebymost
of DALYs death both
[1.65]
15
10
[0.67] [0.76]
[0.62] [0.89] [1.54] [1.94]
[1.03] [1.25]
[0.52] [2.4] [2.99]
5
[0.36] [3.58]
[4.1]
[0.34]
[4.85]
[5.5]
0
)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
)
)
)
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1%
(9
(9
(7
(6
(5
(4
(3
(2
(2
(1
(1
(<
(1
(1
(1
(1
(1
(<
o9
59
34
39
44
49
54
64
69
74
79
r5
14
29
24
19
84
+
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
de
to
to
to
to
to
55
30
35
40
45
50
60
65
70
75
Un
10
25
20
15
80
Age
Sikkim 173
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [12.0%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [3.9%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
OccupationalDietary risks [3.7%]
Occupational risks [2.3%] 7 7 Alcohol & drug use [4.2%]
Alcohol & drug use
WaSH is unsafe water, sanitation, total
and cholesterol
[2.8%]
handwashing.


Females Males
Malnutrition*
High blood pressure
Air pollution
Dietary risks
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15
174 Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Tamil Nadu under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Tamil Nadu
150
100
50
39.2
23.5
21.3
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year

Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.1%
4.3%
7%
6.9% NTDs & malaria
27.1%
13% 25%
Neonatal disorders

2.8% 1.2%
1%
8.6% Cancers

39.7% 13%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

3.4%
1% Transport injuries
4.6% 4.9%
4.9% 14%
10.9% 14.8%
12.2%
4.1%

2.3%
1.4%
6.4% 8.3%
40.4% 39.6%
Tamil Nadu 175


Females Males

Suicide
Diabetes
Road injuries
Stroke
Diarrhoeal diseases
COPD*
Tuberculosis
Falls
Hypertensive heart disease
20 10 0 0 10 20

*COPD is sex,
chronic in 2016?
Females Males
Migraine
Diabetes
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Falls
Oral disorders
Osteoarthritis
Schizophrenia
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

176 Tamil Nadu

How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?

Lower respiratory infections [6.9%] 2 2 Diabetes [4.9%]
Preterm birth complications [6.8%] 3 3 Self-harm [4.3%]*
Ischaemic heart disease [6.6%] 4 4 COPD [3.7%]*
Congenital birth defects [3.7%] 7 7 Road injuries [3.3%]
Self-harm [3.6%] 8 8 Chronic kidney disease [3.1%]
Measles [2.6%] 9 9 Low back & neck pain [2.8%]
COPD [2.5%] 10 10 Stroke [2.8%]*
Iron-deciency anaemia [2.4%] 11 11 Falls [2.7%]*
Stroke [2.2%] 12 12 Diarrhoeal diseases [2.8%]
Other neonatal disorders [2.2%] 13 13 Depressive disorders [2.5%]
Chronic kidney disease [1.8%] 15 15 Tuberculosis [2.3%]
Falls [1.7%] 16 16 Preterm birth complications [2.2%]
Sense organ diseases [1.6%] 17 17 Lower respiratory infections [2.1%]
Diabetes [1.4%] 20 22 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.0%]
Depressive disorders [1.2%] 22 42 Other neonatal disorders [0.5%]
Migraine [1.2%] 23 100 Measles [0.1%]


10.0
[1.68]
[2.08]
[1.35]
[1.2]
[1.1]
7.5 [2.59]
[0.91]
[0.78]
[3.12]
[0.66]
[0.58]
[3.58]
5.0
[0.53]
[0.44]
[4.14]
2.5 [0.29]
[0.27] [4.64]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
1%
(7
(7
(7
(8
(8
(9
(9
(8
(7
(7
(6
(5
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(<
r5
o9
14
19
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
Un
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Age
Tamil Nadu 177

Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [10.9%]
WaSHWaSH

2 2 2 Air pollution [5.1%] 2 High fasting plasma glucose [12.9%]
Dietary risks [7.7%] 4 4 High body-mass index [8.1%]
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [5.9%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High fasting plasma glucose Malnutrition* [8.0%]
risks [1.9%] 7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 Air pollution [7.2%]
[3.2%] 8 10 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]Tobacco use [5.6%]
Impaired kidney function [2.6%] 9 9 Impaired kidney function [4.7%]
Occupational risks [2.0%] 10 10 Alcohol
[3.8%]
and handwashing.



Females Males
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15
178 Tamil Nadu

Telangana
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Telangana under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Telangana
150
100
50
39.2
30.6
29.3
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year

Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
2.4% 3.4%
13% 10%
NTDs & malaria
8.7%
1%
1.2% 20.5%
Neonatal disorders
2.5%
5.9%
9.1% Cancers
13.5%
2.4%
2.8% Cirrhosis
3.3%
Digestive diseases

3% 5.2%
8.5% 4.8% 7.3%
19%
Suicide & violence
4.6% 1.5%
12.2% 1%

14.3%
10%
38.1% 35.3%
Telangana 179

Females Males

Diarrhoeal diseases
Suicide
Stroke
COPD*
Road injuries
HIV/AIDS
Tuberculosis
Falls
Diabetes
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

Females Males

Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Falls
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Road injuries
Osteoarthritis
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

180 Telangana
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?

Preterm birth complications [7.2%] 3 3 Diarrhoeal diseases [4.4%]
Ischaemic heart disease [4.9%] 4 4 Preterm birth complications [3.6%]
Measles [4.4%] 5 5 Self-harm [3.5%]*
COPD [2.8%] 8 8 Stroke [3.3%]*
Self-harm [2.6%] 9 9 Road injuries [2.9%]
Other neonatal disorders [2.2%] 11 11 Depressive disorders [2.5%]
Stroke [2.2%] 12 12 Lower respiratory infections [2.5%]
Neonatal haemolytic disease [1.6%] 14 14 Diabetes [2.3%]
Sense organ diseases [1.5%] 15 15 Falls [2.3%]
Road injuries [1.5%] 17 19 Tuberculosis [1.9%]
Falls [1.3%] 19 22 Neonatal encephalopathy [1.4%]
Migraine [1.2%] 22 26 Other neonatal disorders [0.9%]
Depressive disorders [1.2%] 23 52 Neonatal haemolytic disease [0.4%]


Percent
What of DALYs
caused thebymost
age group,
death both sexes, 2016
and disability combined across age groups in 2016?
[1.69]
10
[2.07]
[1.35] [1.66]
[2.6]
[1.1]
[0.8] [0.92]
[0.61] [0.69]
[3.12]
[0.55]
5
[0.46]
[3.57]
[0.32]
[0.31] [4.14]
[4.7]
0
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
%)
1%
7%
(8
(9
(9
(9
(9
(8
(7
(6
(5
(4
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(8
(<
5(
14
19
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
o9
+
r
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
Un
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Age
Telangana 181
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [13.5%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [4.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
risks [1.9%] 7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 High total cholesterol [5.1%]
Occupational risks
High total cholesterol [2.3%] 9 9 WaSH [4.2%]
High body-mass index [1.8%] 10 10 Occupational


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Air pollution
Tobacco use
WaSH
Occupational risks
10 5 0 0 5 10

182 Telangana
Tripura
Females: 61.6years Males: 58.9 years Females: 71.5 years Males: 66.3 years
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Tripura under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Tripura
150
100
50
40.4
39.2
35.1
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year

Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.1%
4.2%
13%
0.9% 8.7%
6.1% NTDs & malaria
1.9%
25.2%
14% Other communicable diseases
6.7% Cancers
38.4% 4.6%
7% Cardiovascular diseases
4.2% 8.7%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

3.7%
2.5% 2% Transport injuries
6%
20.1% 4%
7% Suicide & violence
2.7% 1.2%
12.5%
3.9%
5.2%
16.7%


11.2%
36.6% 37%
Tripura 183

Females Males

Stroke
Suicide
Diarrhoeal diseases
COPD*
Road injuries
Malaria
Tuberculosis
Asthma
12 9 6 3 0 0 3 6 9 12

Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Falls
Asthma
Osteoarthritis
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

184 Tripura
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?

Diarrhoeal diseases [10.7%] 2 2 Stroke [6.5%]
COPD [3.8%] 4 4 COPD [4.8%]
Stroke [3.5%] 5 5 Self-harm [4.5%]
Self-harm [2.8%] 9 9 Sense organ diseases [2.9%]
Tuberculosis [2.7%] 11 11 Low back & neck pain [2.3%]
Malaria [2.5%] 12 12 Migraine [2.1%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [2.2%] 13 13 Diabetes [2.1%]
Asthma [1.7%] 14 14 Skin diseases [1.9%]
Neonatal sepsis [1.7%] 15 15 Chronic kidney disease [1.9%]
Sense organ diseases [1.5%] 18 17 Other neonatal disorders [1.7%]
Low back & neck pain [1.3%] 20 18 Tuberculosis [1.6%]
Road injuries [1.3%] 21 19 Malaria [1.5%]*
Skin diseases [1.2%] 22 20 Asthma [1.5%]*
Chronic kidney disease [0.9%] 28 25 Neonatal sepsis [1.0%]*


What caused
Percent thebymost
of DALYs death both
[2.15]
15
10
[1.37] [1.71]
[0.78] [1.1]
[0.59] [0.67] [0.9] [2.1]
[0.54] [2.63]
5 [3.16]
[0.45] [3.59]
[0.32] [4.11]
[0.33]
[4.56]
0
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
0%
1%
(9
(9
(9
(9
(8
(6
(6
(5
(4
(3
(2
(1
(1
(9
(1
(8
(1
(<
14
19
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
o9
84
r5
24
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
to
Un
10
15
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
20
Age
Tripura 185
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

Air pollution
WaSH
[15.2%] [12.3%]
WaSH 3
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [4.8%]
Occupational risks
Alcohol & drug use [1.6%] 9 9 High total cholesterol [3.3%]
[3.1%]
and handwashing.
High total cholesterol [1.5%] 11 11 Impaired kidney function [3.1%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
High blood pressure
Dietary risks
Tobacco use
WaSH
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

186 Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Uttar Pradesh under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Uttar Pradesh
150
100
50 48.7
48.3
39.2
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year

Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1% 3.3%

5%
1.5%
12.5%
4.9%
6.4% Cancers
33.7%
3% 9%
3.3% 3.5% Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases

0.7%
Transport injuries
10.3% 5.1% 5.1% 4.1%
3.2% 6.2%
3.5%
24.5%
2.2%
12.7%
21.1%

6.2%
18.8%
23.7% 24%
Uttar Pradesh 187


Females Males

Diarrhoeal diseases
COPD*
Tuberculosis
Road injuries
Suicide
Stroke
Asthma
Falls
12 9 6 3 0 0 3 6 9 12

Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Falls
Oral disorders
Haemoglobinopathies
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16

188 Uttar Pradesh

How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?
Diarrhoeal diseases [15.7%] 1 1 COPD [6.1%]

Tetanus [4.6%] 4 4 Lower respiratory infections [5.7%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.5%] 9 9 Other neonatal disorders [2.9%]*
Iron-deciency anaemia [1.8%] 12 12 Self-harm [2.0%]
Protein-energy malnutrition [1.7%] 13 13 Stroke [1.9%]
Asthma [1.6%] 14 14 Falls [1.8%]
Congenital birth defects [1.5%] 15 15 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.8%]
Road injuries [1.5%] 16 19 Asthma [1.7%]*
Self-harm [1.1%] 19 24 Protein-energy malnutrition [1.1%]
Falls [1.0%] 21 33 Measles [0.7%]
Stroke [1.0%] 22 68 Tetanus [0.3%]


What causedthe
What caused themost
most death
death and
and disability
disability combined
combined across
across age groups
age groups in 2016?
in 2016?
Percent of
Percent of DALYs
DALYs by
by age
age group,
group, both
both sexes,
sexes,2016
2016
25
[2.26]
20
15
10
[2.17]
[1.74]
[1.41] [2.71]
[0.46] [0.56] [0.79] [0.92] [1.12]
[0.6] [0.67] [3.28]
5
[0.32] [0.31]
[3.71]
[4.15]
[4.44]
0
)
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
1%
1%
1%
1%
10
(9
(8
(7
(6
(5
(5
(4
(3
(3
(2
(1
(1
(1
(1
(1
(1
(<
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
5(
o9
14
19
+
r
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
de
5t
to
to
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Un
10
15
Age
Uttar Pradesh 189
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [16.2%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
Tobacco use [4.1%] 4 4 WaSH [6.1%]
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [2.1%]
7 6 7 WaSH [3.9%] 6 High blood pressure [5.1%]
Occupational risks [1.8%] 7 7 High fasting plasma glucose [4.1%]
Alcohol & drug use
and index
[2.5%]
handwashing.
High body-mass index [0.7%] 12 11 High total cholesterol [2.4%]


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
Tobacco use
WaSH
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20

190 Uttar Pradesh

Uttarakhand
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
Uttarakhand under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as Uttarakhand
150
100
50
46.2
39.2
24.9
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year

Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.2%
4.3% 2.3%
NTDs & malaria

6.7% 1.1% 10% 12.6% Maternal disorders
2.3%
9.5%
10.4%
Cancers

4%
2.9%
2.6%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
1.1%
8.1% 5.4% 4.6%
7.1% 4.2% 15.9% 8%
Suicide & violence
6.8% 4.6%
14% 2.8% 2.2%
7.3%



16.6% 23.1%
27%
28.2%
Uttarakhand 191

Females Males

COPD*
Road injuries
Tuberculosis
Diarrhoeal diseases
Stroke
Suicide
Falls
Diabetes
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

Females Males
Iron-deciency anemia
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Diabetes
Anxiety disorders
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Schizophrenia
12.5 10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5

192 Uttarakhand
How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?

Tuberculosis [7.1%] 3 3 Lower respiratory infections [5.5%]
Tetanus [3.5%] 7 7 Preterm birth complications [3.0%]*
Road injuries [2.5%] 10 10 Low back & neck pain [2.3%]
Neonatal encephalopathy [2.4%] 11 11 Diabetes [2.2%]
Measles [2.2%] 12 12 Stroke [2.2%]
Iron-deciency anaemia [2.1%] 13 13 Skin diseases [2.1%]
Asthma [1.5%] 15 15 Falls [2.0%]
Sense organ diseases [1.4%] 17 17 Intestinal infectious diseases [1.7%]
Skin diseases [1.3%] 19 18 Other neonatal disorders [1.7%]
Falls [1.2%] 21 21 Asthma [1.6%]*


What caused
Percent thebymost
of DALYs death both
[2.21]
15
10
[2.08]
[1.34] [1.67]
[2.6]
[1.09]
[0.54] [0.66] [0.78] [0.89]
[0.45] [0.59] [3.11]
5
[3.53]
[0.33] [0.31]
[4.02]
[4.45]
0
)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
%)
)
)
)
)
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
8%
(8
(8
(7
(6
(5
(5
(4
(4
(2
(2
(1
(1
(<
(1
(1
(1
(1
5(
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
14
19
24
o9
+
r
de
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
5t
to
to
to
Un
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
10
15
20
Age
Uttarakhand 193
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

[15.2%] [12.9%]
WaSHWaSH

Air Air
pollution [7.7%] 3
Dietary[2.2%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
High bloodrisks
[1.9%] [4.0%]
Occupational risks
High total cholesterol [1.7%] 10 10 Occupational
[3.2%]
and handwashing.


Females Males
Malnutrition*
Air pollution
Tobacco use
High blood pressure
Dietary risks
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16
194 Uttarakhand
West Bengal
Under-5 mortality
1990-2016
West Bengal under-5 rate India under-5 rate Comparative average rate globally for similar
Socio-demographic Index as West Bengal
150
100
50
39.2
34.2
30.4
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2016
Year

Whatcontribution
top 10 causesdeaths
of death byin
agedifferent
in 2016? age 2016
1.3%
4.6%
7.5%
7.3% NTDs & malaria
1.5% 20.6%
1.8%

3.7% 15.7% 8.9% Cancers

38.6% 4.3%
Cirrhosis
Digestive diseases
4069 years [42% of total deaths] 70+ years [40.1% of total deaths]

2.7%
Transport injuries
4.5% 5.5% 2.6%
6.1% 3.3% 14% Unintentional injuries
7.3%
3.8% 1.7%
Suicide & violence
12.9% 1%
6.5%
3.4%

8%

44.6% 47.2%
West Bengal 195


Females Males

Stroke
Suicide
Diarrhoeal diseases
COPD*
Road injuries
Tuberculosis
HIV/AIDS
Diabetes
Drowning
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

Females Males
Migraine
Skin diseases
COPD*
Anxiety disorders
Diabetes
Oral disorders
Falls
Osteoarthritis
Schizophrenia
15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15

196 West Bengal

How have
How have the
the leading
leading causes
causesofofdeath
deathand
disability changed
combined from
changed 1990
from to 2016?
1990 to 2016?

Diarrhoeal diseases [7.7%] 2 2 Stroke [8.5%]
Measles [5.9%] 4 4 Self-harm [3.7%]*
Stroke [4.0%] 7 7 Sense organ diseases [3.2%]
Self-harm [2.8%] 9 9 Preterm birth complications [2.7%]
Congenital birth defects [1.6%] 13 13 Chronic kidney disease [2.2%]
Road injuries [1.5%] 14 14 Skin diseases [2.1%]
Tetanus [1.5%] 15 15 Tuberculosis [2.0%]
Sense organ diseases [1.4%] 18 21 Other neonatal disorders [1.3%]
Chronic kidney disease [1.2%] 22 25 Neonatal encephalopathy [0.9%]


What caused
What causedthe
themost
mostdeath
deathand disability
and combined
disability across
combined age groups
across in 2016?
age groups in 2016?
Percent of
Percent of DALYs
DALYs by
by age
age group,
group, both
both sexes,
sexes,2016
2016
12.5
[1.75]
10.0
[1.74]
[1.39]
7.5 [1.12] [2.16]

[0.93]
[0.8] [2.73]
[0.61] [0.69]
[0.56]
[3.29]
2.5
[0.46] [3.76]
[0.32] [4.31]
[0.32]
2.5
[4.81]
0.0
)
%)
%)
)
%)
%)
)
%
1%
(9
(9
(9
(9
(8
(8
(7
(6
(6
(5
(3
(2
(2
(1
(1
(6
(8
(<
14
19
24
29
34
39
44
49
54
59
64
69
74
79
84
r5
o9
+
de
5t
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
85
Un
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Age
West Bengal 197
Contribution
Contribution
Behaviouralof
oftop
top1010risks toto
risks DALYs number,
DALYs bothboth
number,
sexes, by number
ranked
Metabolic of DALYs,
by number 1990-2016
of DALYs,
same 1990-2016

Air pollution
WaSH
[15.2%] [12.0%]
Air pollutionWaSH
[7.7%] [8.5%]
Dietary risks [6.2%] 4 4 Malnutrition* [10.4%]
High
High blood
blood pressure
pressure [2.2%] [5.7%]
6 5 6 5 [4.0%]
[2.1%] 8 10 Impaired kidney function8 [2.0%]Impaired kidney function [4.0%]
Impaired kidney function [2.0%] 9 9 Alcohol & drug use [3.8%]
[3.3%]
and handwashing.


Females Males
Dietary risks
High blood pressure
Air pollution
Malnutrition*
Tobacco use
Alcohol & drug use
Occupational risks
16 12 8 4 0 0 4 8 12 16
198 West Bengal

Policy implications of the findings
India has been able to achieve a 36% reduction in per capita disease burden
from 1990 to 2016, measured as DALY rate per person after adjusting for the
changes in age structure during this period. However, there was an almost
two-fold range of per capita disease burden across the states of India in 2016,
adjusting for differences in age structure between the states, with Kerala and
Goa having the lowest rates and Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh
having the highest rates. India's age-standardised DALY rate was 72% higher
and Kerala's was 12% higher than in either Sri Lanka or China in GBD 2016.
These findings highlight major inequalities in disease burden across the
states of India, and that neighbouring Sri Lanka, with population 21 million,
as well as China, with population 1.4 billion, have been able to achieve a
much lower disease burden level than India.
In 2016, 55% of the total disease burden in India was caused by NCDs, 33%
by CMNNDs, and 12% by injuries. The burden of CMNNDs has decreased
and that of NCDs increased across all states in India from 1990 to 2016.
However, there are wide variations between the states, with the contribution
of NCDs to the total disease burden ranging from 48% to 75%, CMNNDs
ranging from 14% to 43%, and injuries ranging from 9% to 14% across the
states in 2016. Even with a decreasing burden of CMNNDs, it is important
to note that for diarrhoeal diseases, iron-deficiency anaemia, and tubercu-
losis, the DALY rates are higher than would be expected in most states for
their development level (Socio-demographic Index). The per capita health
loss from the individual diseases varies widely between states, with a range
of over five-fold for five of the 10 leading individual causes, i.e., ischaemic
heart disease, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, stroke, and
tuberculosis.
The striking health status and disease inequalities between the states of
India documented in this report are driven by variations in the exposure
to major risk factors as well as broader development factors. The key to
reducing these inequalities, and thereby the overall disease burden in India,
is to successfully address these risks and determinants in each state of the
country in accordance with their magnitude and trajectory. The findings
presented in this report provide a useful reference for the distribution of dis-
eases and risk factors in each state of the country, which can be an important
aid in the data-driven and decentralised health planning recommended by
two important recent policy documents in India, the NITI Aayog Action
Agenda 20172020 and the National Health Policy 2017.
The following major policy-relevant issues arise from the findings presented
in this report. These include issues related to specific risks and disease
conditions, as well as broader cross-cutting policy action required to reduce
health inequalities between the states. The following sections highlight key
issues but are not comprehensive descriptions of each issue. The latter would
be more suitable for detailed topic-specific reports and publications that will
be produced subsequently.
Addressing the major risk factors

The very high burden of child and maternal malnutrition in many states
of India should be considered an emergency situation, as this is not com-

mensurate with Indias aspirations for further rapid social and economic
progress. Besides causing considerable disease burden, malnutrition blunts
intellectual growth in children, thereby robbing the country of its future
brain power. Several major nutritional enhancement programmes have been
in place in India for a long time. These include the Integrated Child Devel-
opment Services since 1975 and the Mid Day Meal Scheme for schoolchildren
since 1995. The National Food Security Act was enacted in 2013 for nutri-
tional security of the population. The fact that child and maternal malnu-
trition continues to be the single largest risk factor for health loss in India
in 2016 points to the need for drastic and rapid action on this front. Several
EAG states and Assam face the highest burden due to child and maternal
malnutrition. There is a seven-fold range in the per capita DALYs due to
child and maternal malnutrition among the states of India, highlighting
the huge variations across the country. For India as a whole, the per capita
disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition is a striking 12 times
higher than in China. Interestingly, even the lowest per capita burden in the
Indian state of Kerala is 2.7 times higher than in China and 1.7 times higher
than in Sri Lanka.
Unsafe water and sanitation

The disease burden from unsafe water and sanitation dropped from 13%
of the total burden in 1990 to 5% of the total in 2016, but this too is unac-
ceptably high. The EAG states and Assam again have the highest disease
burden from this risk factor. The Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, launched in
India in 2014 with very large investments, could improve this situation.
Combining infrastructure development to address this risk with behaviour
change would increase the likelihood of benefits, and close monitoring of
the impact of the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan versus the disease burden trends
in each state over the next few years would enable increasing efforts where
they are most needed. Again, for reference the per capita disease burden due
to unsafe water and sanitation in India is a massive 40 times higher than in
China and 12 times higher than in Sri Lanka. Within India there is a wide
variation as well, with the per capita burden ranging 12-fold across the states.
The lowest burden is in Goa, although it is seven times higher than in China
as a whole, suggesting that huge improvements should be possible across the
states of India.
Air pollution
People living in India have one of the highest levels of exposure to air pol-
lution globally. Progress has been made in India in reducing household air
pollution from solid fuels, yet this remains a significant problem, particularly
in the EAG states and Assam. Continuing efforts to reduce the use of solid
fuels, as is being done through the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojna to enhance
access to cooking gas for the poor, will be needed for some time to come.
Outdoor air pollution, on the other hand, has increased across all of India.
Concerted efforts are needed to curb the sources of this pollution, including
power production, industry, vehicles, construction, and open burning. These
efforts are needed across all states through strategic long-term planning
involving the relevant sectors. Several EAG states have quite high levels of
both household and outdoor air pollution, and a corresponding high burden
of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as well. Controlling air pollution
has to be one of the highest priorities for improving the health of Indias
population that would impact generations to come. Improved and more
detailed monitoring of the ambient air pollution levels would be important
in monitoring progress.

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes
Unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and
overweight together contribute about a quarter of the total disease burden
in India presently, as compared with a little over a tenth of the total disease
burden in 1990. This phenomenal increase is responsible for the increasing
dominance of NCDs in every state of the country, particularly ischaemic
heart disease, stroke, and diabetes, though to a variable extent. All of these
risks are already very high in Punjab and Tamil Nadu, and most of these
risks are high in Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Karnataka. The per capita
burden of ischaemic heart disease and diabetes is relatively lower in the EAG
and North-East states than in the Other states group at present, but the per
capita burden of stroke is a mixed situation, with some of these states having
a high burden. In any case, the increasing trajectory of these risks across all
states of India is ominous. If effective interventions to blunt this trajectory
are not taken quickly, the EAG states in particular will be faced with rela-
tively high burden from communicable and childhood disease on the one
hand due to a continuing momentum, and from these non-communicable
diseases on the other hand due to increasing risk exposure. Tobacco use is
also a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, causing 6% of the total
disease burden in India in 2016. Policy action commensurate with a potential
explosion of ischaemic heart disease, diabetes, and stroke is needed without
delay across all states of the country.
Addressing persistent and increasing disease conditions

Under-5 disease burden
The under-5-year age group in India presently suffers 18% of the total disease
burden across all ages, measured as DALYs. This proportion is even higher in
the EAG states group (23%), which is over two times the contribution of this
age group to the total population, indicating the unreasonably high disease
burden in this age group. Deaths and ill-health in neonates in the first month
of life make up about half of the total under-5 disease burden in India. In
comparison, both the neonatal death rate and the under-5 death rate in India
are about five times higher than in Sri Lanka. There is wide variation among
the Indian states as well, with the under-5 mortality rate ranging four-fold
between the highest in Assam and Uttar Pradesh versus the lowest in Kerala.
Reduction in the under-5 disease burden in India has to be unambiguously
one of the highest health priorities through focused action in each state,
especially those where this continues to be high.
Tuberculosis
India has an exceptionally high burden of tuberculosis, contributing the
largest number of new cases annually of any country in the world. For
almost all states of India, the burden of tuberculosis is much higher than the
average burden for the similar socio-demographic level globally. The range
of per capita disease burden due to tuberculosis among the states of India is
nine-fold. The state with the lowest burden, Kerala, has twice the per capita
burden as Sri Lanka and China, and India as a whole has about 10 times
the per capita burden from tuberculosis as either of these two countries. A
National Strategic Plan for Tuberculosis Elimination has been announced
recently by the Revised National Control Programme of India. Effective
implementation and assessing progress against evolving tuberculosis burden
trends are needed to curtail the continuing very high suffering from this
disease across India.

Several other communicable diseases have reduction targets mentioned in
the National Health Policy 2017 and the NITI Aayog Action Agenda 2017
2020, which include HIV/AIDS, malaria, kala azar (visceral leishmaniasis),
leprosy, and lymphatic filariasis. Estimates for each of these are produced
by the India State-level Disease Burden Initiative for 1990 to 2016. These are
available in an online open-access visualisation tool at vizhub.healthdata.
org/gbd-compare/india. Estimates of these diseases over the next few years
in each state would help monitor the progress in reducing their burden.
Other non-communicable diseases

Besides cardiovascular disease and diabetes, referred to above, the other
major NCDs that need particular attention are chronic respiratory disorders,
mental health disorders, and cancers. The relative contribution of all of
these conditions to the disease burden in India has increased substantially
since 1990. This increase has occurred across all three state groups but
varies considerably between the states. Each of these groups of conditions
requires systematic and large-scale interventions to be put in place, which
are currently far from adequate in most states of India. Specific estimates
for these diseases and their risk factors, which are provided for each state
in this report and the open-access online visualisation tool, can be useful in
planning for their control.
Injuries
The control of injuries has not been a high priority in India. The incidence
of road injuries has increased by about half since 1990 in India, leading to its
higher ranking in the contribution to disease burden. The relative contri-
bution of road injuries to the disease burden has increased across all three
groups of states. The contribution of suicide to the disease burden in India
has also gone up in the ranking during this period. There is a six-fold vari-
ation between the states in the DALY rate from self-harm, and for India as a
whole this rate is about two times higher than the global level for a similar
level of sociodemographic development. Reduction in the burden due to both
road injuries and suicide requires effective multi-sectoral interventions that
need to be developed in each state of the country. The state-specific esti-
mates for these and other injuries could be used for planning their control
and monitoring progress over time.
Inter-sectoral collaborations
A major issue with interventions to improve population health in India
has been the relative deficiency of the necessary inter-sectoral collabora-
tions. Most of the leading risk factors contributing to the disease burden
in India can be addressed fully only through inter-sectoral collaborations.
For example, child and maternal malnutrition has to be dealt with through
linkages between a number of efforts being made by the Ministry of Women
and Child Development, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food, and Public
Distribution, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of
Health and Family Welfare, as well as a variety of non-governmental players.
Similarly, air pollution can be effectively dealt with only if the efforts of the
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Ministry of Power,
Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Ministry of Road Transport and
Highways, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare, and a variety of non-governmental partners come together.
The group of risk factors that influence the increasing burden of cardiovas-
cular disease and diabetes have to be dealt with through collaborative efforts
between the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Ministry of Consumer

Affairs, Food, and Public Distribution, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers
Welfare, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, and a range of non-govern-
mental partners.
Besides the sectors noted above, several others impact health as well. These
include education, working conditions, and social protection. Improved
understanding of the influence of the variety of sectors on health would help
achieve better population health levels in India. Given the social, cultural,
and economic diversity between the states of India, these linkages should
ideally be understood and addressed in the context of each state. These
broader determinants would also have to be taken into account when the
findings of the State-level Disease Burden Initiative are utilised in attempts
to improve population health in each state.
Universal coverage and health assurance

The National Health Policy 2017 and the NITI Aayog Action Agenda 2017
2020 have emphasised that India must achieve universal health coverage and
assure health care for all. Achievement of this highly desirable goal requires
a variety of actions articulated in these two policy documents. Of these, the
following two major cross-cutting actions could be informed by the state-
level findings presented in this report.
Increasing health financing

The National Health Policy has recommended increasing public spending on
health in the states to more than 8% of the state government budget by 2020.
Health is a state subject in India, and states contribute a larger proportion of
the public spending on health than the centre. The aspiration of increasing
state spending on health is a good investment in human capital. The mag-
nitude of health spending and how this is utilised could benefit from the
specific disease burden and risk profile of each state. For example, the annual
Project Implementation Plan of each state could be informed by the findings
presented in this report.
Improving human resources for health

Suitable human resources for addressing the evolving disease burden
through more emphasis on public and preventive health, and through
improved linkages between the primary and higher care levels, have been
emphasised in the above two 2017 policy documents of the government.
Within this broader goal, titration of a suitable balance between the various
types and levels of health personnel can be informed by the specific disease
and risk factors profile of each state.

Strengthening the health information system
Better cause of death data
Of the total disease burden in India in 2016, two-thirds was due to pre-
mature death and one-third due to disability. A robust cause of death
reporting system is needed for disease burden estimates. Only 22% of the
deaths in India in 2015 had their cause reported in the Medical Certification
of Cause of Death (MCCD) system, overseen by the Office of the Registrar
General of India, the majority of which were from urban public sector
hospitals. This proportion varies widely between the states. The Sample
Registration System (SRS) has been providing cause of death data from rep-
resentative samples of the population in each state, using the verbal autopsy
approach in which the cause of death is inferred from information obtained
from someone close to the deceased. Verbal autopsy in general can provide
reasonable cause of death distribution data at the population level. The cause
of death data from the last SRS sampling cycle, 20042013, were provided by
the Office of the Registrar General of India for utilisation in the State-level
Disease Burden Initiative. This has made the disease burden estimates in this
report stronger. However, it is essential to improve the scope of the MCCD
system to cover the majority of deaths in India in the long run. The SRS was
introduced in India some four decades ago as an interim arrangement until
the Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) system covering birth and
death registration as well as medically certified causes of death got more
established. While the SRS continues to provide quite useful data from a
representative sample of about 0.7% of the countrys population, it should not
be considered a substitute for a fully functional CRVS system. India needs
to effectively plan and invest to make the CRVS system much stronger in
all states of the country, including good-quality cause of death data for the
majority of deaths, as a very high priority.
Improved surveillance
Disease surveillance is the cornerstone of tracking evolution of the trends
of disease conditions and risk factors in populations. It is needed to monitor
established diseases as well as emerging diseases and risk factors. An ade-
quate health system response to both acute and chronic diseases is generally
not possible without an adequate disease surveillance system including
disease registries. Disease surveillance has typically been weak in India.
Exceptions in recent times include polio and HIV, and cancer registries have
provided crucial data from parts of the country. The Integrated Disease
Surveillance Programme was started in India over a decade ago with much
hope, but it did not reach the level of functioning needed to significantly
uplift disease surveillance systematically across India. The importance of
disease surveillance has been reiterated in both the National Health Policy
2017 and the NITI Action Agenda 20172020. What is needed as one of the
highest priorities in health in India currently is development of a scientif-
ically sound surveillance system covering all disease conditions and risk
factors of interest, as well as a practically feasible implementation plan
backed by financial and human resources. The success of this seems likely
only if planning for this is done for every state of the country, taking into
account the specific disease and risk factor profile and context of each state.
The findings of the India State-level Disease Burden Initiative could be a
useful guide for such planning.

Other
Another important aspect of the health information system that needs
significant improvement in India is better documentation in health facility
records and utilisation of these data to understand health outcomes. This
requires enhancement of information technology infrastructure across
all states of India for more systematic documentation of health services
provision, as well as corresponding training of health personnel, both in
the public and private sectors. The data gaps related to disease sequelae and
outcomes identified through the work of the India State-level Disease Burden
Initiative could inform enhancement of this aspect of the health information
system of India.

Conclusion
The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative findings in this report are the most
detailed mapping of the magnitude, age and sex distribution, and trends since 1990
for the whole range of diseases and risk factors in every state of the country. These
findings are based on all available data obtained through extensive efforts of a
large network of collaborators, and use of the standardised methods of the Global
Burden of Disease study that enable comparisons across diseases, risk factors, age,
sex, time, and geographies.
Although variations in diseases and risk factors have been anticipated between
the states of India, this is the first time that a comprehensive compilation of
all estimates in a single standardised framework has been made possible for
every state in India. Besides presenting the findings in this report, the technical
details are presented in a scientific paper published in the journal The Lancet,
and visual graphics of the findings are available in an online open-access inter-
active visualisation tool at vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/india. All three
outputs the report, the technical paper, and the visualization tool are being
released on the same day in November 2017. Together, these outputs provide a
valuable resource for policymakers, health managers, academics, health pro-
viders, agencies supporting health, other stakeholders, and the public at large
to understand the heterogeneity of disease burden and risk factors across the
states of India, which can be utilised in a variety of ways in the effort to improve
the health of people living in each state and union territory of the country.
The major areas in which policy utilisation of the India State-level Disease
Burden Initiative findings could be useful include planning of state health
budgets, prioritisation of interventions relevant to each state, informing the
governments Health Assurance Mission in each state, monitoring of
health-related Sustainable Development Goals targets in each state, assessing
impact of large-scale interventions based on time trends of disease burden, and
forecasting population health under various scenarios in each state. The 1990 to
2016 state-level disease burden findings, and the subsequent annual updates in
the trends by the India State-level Disease Burden Initiative, as well as avail-
ability of more disaggregated findings such as rural-urban estimates planned
for next year, can be crucial contributors to the data-driven and decentralised
health planning and monitoring recommended by the National Health Policy
2017 and the NITI Aayog Action Agenda 20172020. The availability of detailed
and comprehensive estimates for disease burden and risk factors for every state
of the country is a major advancement which would enable the planning of
specific action needed to reduce health inequalities and inequities between the
states, as well as between the sexes and age-groups within each state.

India State-level Disease Burden Initiative Advisory Board Members
J.V.R. Prasada Rao (Chair), Former Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India
C.K. Mishra, Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India
Manoj Jhalani, Additional Secretary & Managing Director National Health Mission, Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare, Government of India
Sanjeeva Kumar, Additional Secretary, National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare, Government of India
N.S. Dharmshaktu, Principal Advisor, Directorate General of Health Services, Government of India
Alok Kumar, Adviser, NITI Aayog, Government of India
Rajani R. Ved, Executive Director, National Health Systems Resource Centre
Hendrik J. Bekedam, World Health Organization Representative to India
Bilali Camara, India Country Director, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS
Swarup K. Sarkar, Director, Department of Communicable Diseases, World Health Organization Regional
Office for South-East Asia
R.O. Budnah, Director, Health Services Medical Institutions, Government of Meghalaya
P.V. Dave, Additional Director, Public Health, Government of Gujarat
S. Aruna Kumari, Director, Health Services, Government of Andhra Pradesh
K. Kolandaswamy, Director, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu
Padmakar Singh, Director General, Medical and Health, Government of Uttar Pradesh
Gyanendra K. Tripathy, Director, Public Health, Government of Odisha
Lalit Dandona (Member Secretary), Director, India State-level Disease Burden Initiative
Heads of the institutions leading this Initiative
Soumya Swaminathan, Director General, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
K. Srinath Reddy, President, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, National Capital Region, India

Christopher Murray, Director, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, USA

India State-level Disease Burden Initiative Contributors
Contributors listed in alphabetical order by last name
Rizwan S. Abdulkader, Tirunelveli, India Aloke G. Ghoshal, Kolkata, India

Ashkan Afshin, Seattle, USA Scott Glenn, Seattle, USA
Sanjay K. Agarwal, New Delhi, India Saurabh Goel, New Delhi, India
Ashutosh N. Aggarwal, Chandigarh, India N. Gopalakrishnan, Chennai, India
Rakesh Aggarwal, Lucknow, India Randeep Guleria, New Delhi, India
Anurag Agrawal, New Delhi, India Prakash C. Gupta, Mumbai, India
Sandra Albert, Shillong, India Rajeev Gupta, Jaipur, India
Atul Ambekar, New Delhi, India R.K. Das Gupta, New Delhi, India
Ranjit M. Anjana, Chennai, India Subodh S. Gupta, Wardha, India
Monika Arora, Gurugram, India Tarun Gupta, Kanpur, India
Narendra K. Arora, New Delhi, India M.D. Gupte, Pune, India
Rashmi Arora, New Delhi, India G. Gururaj, Bengaluru, India
Shally Awasthi, Lucknow, India S. Harikrishnan, Trivandrum, India
Damodar Bachani, Gurugram, India N.K. Hase, Mumbai, India
Kalpana Balakrishnan, Chennai, India Simon I. Hay, Seattle, USA
Anup Barman, Guwahati, India Manoranjan Hota, New Delhi, India
Kalpana Baruah, New Delhi, India Harish Iyer, New Delhi, India
Ashish Bavdekar, Pune, India Veena Iyer, Gandhinagar, India
Shahina Begum, Mumbai, India Saurabh Jain, New Delhi, India
Gufran Beig, Pune, India Sudhir K. Jain, New Delhi, India
Anil Bhansali, Chandigarh, India P. Jambulingam, Puducherry, India
Deeksha Bhardwaj, Gurugram, India K.S. James, New Delhi, India
Anurag Bhargava, Mangalore, India M.S. Jawahar, Chennai, India
Eesh Bhatia, Lucknow, India P. Jeemon, Trivandrum, India
Kelly Bienhoff, Seattle, USA Jacob Jose, Vellore, India
Simon Brooker, Seattle, USA P.L. Joshi, New Delhi, India
Vineet Chadha, Bengaluru, India Tushar K. Joshi, New Delhi, India
Joy Kumar Chakma, New Delhi, India Vasna Joshua, Chennai, India
H.K. Chaturvedi, New Delhi, India Atul Juneja, New Delhi, India
Pankaj Chaturvedi, Mumbai, India Ravi Kannan, Silchar, India
Arvind Chopra, Pune, India Lalit Kant, New Delhi, India
D.J. Christopher, Vellore, India Rajni Kant, New Delhi, India
Lalit Dandona, Gurugram, India Umesh Kapil, New Delhi, India
Rakhi Dandona, Gurugram, India Anita Kar, Pune, India
Shyamashree Das, New Delhi, India Chittaranjan Kar, Cuttack, India
Siddharth K. Das, Lucknow, India Nicholas J. Kassebaum, Seattle, USA
A.P. Dash, Thiruvarur, India Amal C. Kataki, Guwahati, India
Puneet Dewan, New Delhi, India Kiran Katoch, Agra, India
Sagnik Dey, New Delhi, India Tanvir Kaur, New Delhi, India
Subhojit Dey, Gurugram, India Tripti Khanna, New Delhi, India
R.S. Dhaliwal, New Delhi, India Sunil D. Khaparde, New Delhi, India
A.C. Dhariwal, New Delhi, India Pradeep Khasnobis, New Delhi, India
Preet K. Dhillon, Gurugram, India Ajay Khera, New Delhi, India
Neeraj Dhingra, New Delhi, India Sanjay Kinra, London, UK
Rajesh Dikshit, Mumbai, India Parvaiz A. Koul, Srinagar, India
Eliza Dutta, Gurugram, India Anand Krishnan, New Delhi, India
Christina Fitzmaurice, Seattle, USA Anil Kumar, New Delhi, India
Melissa Furtado, Gurugram, India Avdhesh Kumar, New Delhi, India
Emmanuela Gakidou, Seattle, USA G. Anil Kumar, Gurugram, India
P. Gangadharan, Cochin, India Raman K. Kumar, Cochin, India
Parthasarathi Ganguly, Gandhinagar, India Rashmi Kumar, Lucknow, India
Peter Gething, Oxford, UK R. Vijai Kumar, Hyderabad, India
Alakendu Ghosh, Kolkata, India Sanjiv Kumar, New Delhi, India
Raj S. Ghosh, New Delhi, India Sathish Kumar, Bengaluru, India

Sunil Kumar, Ahmedabad, India Asma Rahim, Kozhikode, India
Anura V. Kurpad, Bengaluru, India Neena Raina, New Delhi, India
Hmwe H. Kyu, Seattle, USA Sreebhushan Raju, Hyderabad, India
Laishram Ladusingh, Mumbai, India Siddarth Ramji, New Delhi, India
Shiv Lal, New Delhi, India Thara Rangaswamy, Chennai, India
Avula Laxmaiah, Hyderabad, India Paturi V. Rao, Hyderabad, India
Stephen S. Lim, Seattle, USA Raghuram Rao, New Delhi, India
Derek Lobo, Manipal, India Reeta Rasaily, New Delhi, India
Rakesh Lodha, New Delhi, India Goura K. Rath, New Delhi, India
Thingnganing Longvah, Hyderabad, India H.K.T. Raza, Jabalpur, India
Jayaram Madala, Hyderabad, India K. Srinath Reddy, Gurugram, India
P.A. Mahesh, Mysore, India Robert C. Reiner, Seattle, USA
Rajesh Malhotra, New Delhi, India C.R. Revankar, Mumbai, India
Matthews Mathai, Liverpool, UK Gregory A. Roth, Seattle, USA
Ashish J. Mathew, Vellore, India Sarit K. Rout, Bhubaneswar, India
Joseph L. Mathew, Chandigarh, India Ambuj Roy, New Delhi, India
Manu R. Mathur, Gurugram, India Nupur Roy, New Delhi, India
Prashant Mathur, Bengaluru, India Yogesh Sabde, Bhopal, India
Dileep Mavalankar, Gandhinagar, India K.S. Sachdeva, New Delhi, India
Sanjay Mehendale, New Delhi, India Harsiddha Sadhu, Ahmedabad, India
Ravi Mehrotra, Noida, India Rajesh Sagar, New Delhi, India
Geetha R. Menon, New Delhi, India Damodar Sahu, New Delhi, India
Ahmed J. Mohamed, New Delhi, India Sundeep Salvi, Pune, India
B.V. Murali Mohan, Bengaluru, India Parag Sancheti, Pune, India
Dinesh Mohan, New Delhi, India Mari J. Sankar, New Delhi, India
Viswanathan Mohan, Chennai, India Dipika Saraf, New Delhi, India
Ajit Mukherjee, New Delhi, India Sanjeev B. Sarmukaddam, Pune, India
Satinath Mukhopadhyay, Kolkata, India Sakthivel Selvaraj, Gurugram, India
Pallavi Muraleedharan, Gurugram, India P.K. Sen, New Delhi, India
Manoj Murhekar, Chennai, India Suresh Seshadri, New Delhi, India
Christopher J.L. Murray, Seattle, USA B. Sesikeran, Hyderabad, India
G.V.S. Murthy, Hyderabad, India Meenakshi Sharma, New Delhi, India
Parul Mutreja, Gurugram, India Rajendra Sharma, Mumbai, India
Mohsen Naghavi, Seattle, USA Ravendra K. Sharma, Jabalpur, India
Nitish Naik, New Delhi, India R.S. Sharma, New Delhi, India
Sanjeev Nair, Trivandrum, India Chander Shekhar, New Delhi, India
Saritha Nair, New Delhi, India Anita Shet, Baltimore, USA
Sreenivas A. Nair, New Delhi, India D.K. Shukla, New Delhi, India
Lipika Nanda, Bhubaneswar, India Rajan Shukla, Hyderabad, India
A. Nandakumar, Bengaluru, India Sharvari R. Shukla, Pune, India
Romi S. Nongmaithem, Imphal, India Gagandeep Singh, Ludhiana, India
Anu M. Oommen, Vellore, India Jitenkumar Singh, New Delhi, India
Arvind Pandey, New Delhi, India Lucky Singh, New Delhi, India
Rajendra Pandey, Kolkata, India Manjula Singh, New Delhi, India
Jeyaraj D. Pandian, Ludhiana, India Narinder P. Singh, New Delhi, India
Sapan Pandya, Ahmedabad, India Neeru Singh, Jabalpur, India
Sreejith Parameswaran, Puducherry, India Shalini Singh, New Delhi, India
Vikram Patel, Gurugram, India Virendra Singh, Jaipur, India
Sanghamitra Pati, Bhubaneswar, India Anju Sinha, New Delhi, India
Vinod K. Paul, New Delhi, India Dhirendra N. Sinha, Patna, India
C. Ponnuraja, Chennai, India V. Sreenivas, New Delhi, India
Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Gurugram, India R.K. Srivastava, New Delhi, India
Kameshwar Prasad, New Delhi, India P.K. Srivastava, New Delhi, India
Narayan Prasad, Lucknow, India A. Srividya, Puducherry, India
Manorama Purwar, Nagpur, India Jeffrey D. Stanaway, Seattle, USA
Kirankumar Rade, New Delhi, India R. Sujatha, Chennai, India
Manju Rahi, New Delhi, India Dipika Sur, Kolkata, India

Vanita Suri, Chandigarh, India
Rajaraman Swaminathan, Chennai, India
Soumya Swaminathan, New Delhi, India
L. Swasticharan, New Delhi, India
P.N. Sylaja, Trivandrum, India
Babasaheb Tandale, Pune, India
Nikhil Tandon, New Delhi India
J.S. Thakur, Chandigarh, India
Kavumpurathu R. Thankappan, Trivandrum, India
Nihal Thomas, Vellore, India
G.S. Toteja, New Delhi, India
Suryakant Tripathi, Lucknow, India
Srikanth Tripathy, Chennai, India
K. Vaitheeswaran, Bengaluru, India
Neena Valecha, New Delhi, India
Chris M. Varghese, Gurugram, India
Mathew Varghese, Bengaluru, India
Santosh Varughese, Vellore, India
S. Venkatesh, New Delhi, India
K. Venugopal, Thiruvalla, India
Lakshmi Vijayakumar, Chennai, India
R.N. Visweswara, Bengaluru, India
Theo Vos, Seattle, WA, USA
Haidong Wang, Seattle, USA
Harvey Whiteford, Brisbane, Australia
Joan E. Williams, Seattle, USA
Denis Xavier, Bengaluru, India
Geetika Yadav, New Delhi, India
Chittaranjan S. Yajnik, Pune, India
Geevar Zachariah, Thrissur, India
Sanjay Zodpey, Gurugram, India


India Health of The Nation's States Report 2017 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

India Health of The Nation's States Report 2017 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

India Health of The Nation's States Report 2017 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

India: Health of the Nations States

The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative

Disease Burden Trends in the States of India

India: Health of the Nations States 1

2 India: Health of the Nations States

Table 1: Grouping of states of India in this report 32

India: Health of the Nations States 3

4 India: Health of the Nations States

Funding by the Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health

India: Health of the Nations States 5

India: Health of the Nations States 7

India: Health of the Nations States 9

India: Health of the Nations States 11

Faced with this compromising knowledge gap, a confluence of scientific and

India: Health of the Nations States 13

Soumya Swaminathan Lalit Dandona

14 India: Health of the Nations States

COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

DALYs Disability-adjusted life years

EAG Empowered Action Group

ETL Epidemiological transition level

GBD Global Burden of Disease

ICMR Indian Council of Medical Research

IHME Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation

NCDs Non-communicable diseases

PHFI Public Health Foundation of India

SDI Sociodemographic Index

WaSH Unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing

YLDs Years lived with disability

YLLs Years of life lost

India: Health of the Nations States 15

Empowered Action Group (EAG) states Uncertainty interval

Epidemiological transition level (ETL) Years of life lost (YLLs)

Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study

16 India: Health of the Nations States

Methods and data

Health status improving, but major inequalities between states

Large differences between states in the changing disease profile

India: Health of the Nations States 17

Rising burden of non-communicable diseases in all states

Increasing but variable burden of injuries among states

18 India: Health of the Nations States

Unsafe water and sanitation improving, but not enough yet

Household air pollution improving, outdoor air pollution worsening

Rising risks for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes

Importance of understanding the specific health situation of each state

India: Health of the Nations States 19

Application of the state-level disease burden findings and future work

20 India: Health of the Nations States

The Advisory Board of this Initiative is chaired by a former Health Secretary

More detailed topic-specific publications and policy reports will also be

India: Health of the Nations States 21

22 India: Health of the Nations States

1. National Institution for Transforming India (NITI Aayog), Government of India.

India: Health of the Nations States 23

24 India: Health of the Nations States

India: Health of the Nations States 25

26 India: Health of the Nations States

India: Health of the Nations States 27