Sonsip & Adoption: The Ancient Hindu Law Mentioned About The Following Kinds of Son I.E
Sonsip & Adoption: The Ancient Hindu Law Mentioned About The Following Kinds of Son I.E
Sonsip & Adoption: The Ancient Hindu Law Mentioned About The Following Kinds of Son I.E
The son under the Hindu Law has been assigned utmost importance in the Hindu
Dharamshastras, male issue was treated as necessary for protecting the deceased parents from the
sufferings of the Hell and to perform their funeral obligations.
The ancient Hindu Law mentioned about the following kinds of son i.e.
But, in modern time, our present Hindu Law enactments are concerned with only three
kinds of sons, namely-
Legitimate
Illegitimate
Adoption
ADOPTION
MEANING: According to Manu, adoption is the taking of a son, as a substitute for the failure
of a male issue. Thus it is a transplantation of a son from one family in which he is born to
another family where he is given by the natural parents by way of gift. Adoption is a legally
recognised mode of affiliation as the son of a person, of one who in fact was not his son.
On adoption, ties of the son with his old family are severed and he is taken being born in the new
family, acquiring rights, duties and status in the new family.
Now, in the present scenario, the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 has completely
codified the law of adoption and has materially modified it in correspondence to the needs of
dynamism of Hindu society. Therefore, every adoption shall be made in conformity with this act
and any contravention of the provisions of this act shall be void.
1. The person adopting has the capacity and also the right to take in adoption.
2. The person giving in adoption has the capacity to do so,
3. the person adopted is capable of being taken in adoption and
4. the adoption made in compliance with the other conditions mentioned in this Chapter
Therefore, no adoption is considered valid unless it fulfils the abovementioned conditions under
Section 6 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. According Section 5 of the Act, an
adoption made in contravention of the provisions of Chapter II of the Hindu Adoptions and
Maintenance Act, 1956 is void.
According to Section 7 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, any male Hindu who is
of sound mind and is not a minor has the capacity to take a son or a daughter in adoption. But if
the male Hindu has a wife living at the time of adoption, he shall not adopt except on the consent
of his wife.
In the case of Sarabjeet kabir v. Gurumal Kaur, AIR 2009 NOC 889 (P & H), the Court
upheld that if adoption taken by the husband without the consent of the wife, that adoption will
be illegal.
But the consent of the wife of a male Hindu is not necessary in the following three conditions:-
In Krishna Chandra Sahu v. Pradeep Das, AIR 1982 Orissa 114, the Court held that where
the above three disabilities of wife have not been established the consent of such wife would be
mandatory for a valid adoption. If the consent of wife is not established, the Court will declare
the Adoption null and void.
If a man has more than one wife living at the time of adoption, the consent of all the wives must
be obtained. The Act has given two qualification for a male Hindu to be capable to take a child in
adoption i.e. the person must be of sound mind and he must not be a minor. The man is required
to take consent of the wives or wife, before adoption. Without the consent of wife or wives the
adoption will be void.
A female has also the capacity to adopt any child. Section 8 of the Act provides that any female
Hindu who is of sound mind, who is not minor and who is not married or if married, whose
marriage has been dissolved or whose husband is dead or her husband has renounced the world
finally and conclusively or her husband has become a convert or her husband has been declared
to be of unsound mind by a court of competent jurisdiction has the capacity to take a son or
daughter in adoption.
A woman who is of sound mind and is not a minor can take child in adoption. The woman has no
right to adopt, during the subsistence of the marriage, if the husband not suffering with any of the
disabilities mentioned in Section 8 of the Act. The unmarried and widow woman has also the
right to take in adoption any child.
In the case of Narinderjit Kaur v. Union of India and another, AIR 1997 P&H 280, it was
held that the adoption of a child under the authority of parents is valid. Where a child was given
in adoption willingly by natural parents and was taken in adoption by the adoptive mother
through her attorney, it was held to be a valid adoption. It was also held that subsequent marriage
of adoptive mother does not invalidate the adoption.
However the 2010 amendment of the Section 8 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act,
1956 has brought a radical change in the Hindu Law.
Any female Hindu who is of sound mind and is not a minor has the capacity can take a son or
daughter in adoption,
Provided that, if she has a husband living, she shall not adopt a son or daughter except with, the
consent of her husband unless the husband has completely and finally renounced the world or
has ceased to be a Hindu or has been declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be of
unsound mind.
Section 9 of the Act lays down the capacity of person, who may give the child in adoption to
another. No persons except the father or mother or the guardian of the child shall have the
capacity to give in adoption.
Capacity of the father to give in adoption: If the father is alive, he shall alone have the
right to give in adoption but such right shall not be exercise save with the consent of the
mother.
Capacity of the mother to give in adoption: The mother may give the child in adoption
if the father is dead or had completely and finally renounced the world or has ceased to
be a Hindu or has been declared by a court jurisdiction to be unsound mind.
Capacity of the guardian to give in adoption: Where both the father and mother are
dead or to be unsound mind or had finally renounced the world, is declare by the court
then the guardian of a child may give the child in adoption with the following conditions
laid down by the courts:-
1. That the adoption will be for welfare of the child.
2. That the applicant for permission has not received any payment in consideration
of the adoption.
3. That no person has given any payment to the applicant for consideration of the
adoption of child.
The father has preferential right to give the child in adoption. If he is unsound mind or suffering
from chronic disease has the right to give a child in adoption. The guardian may give the child in
adoption with the prior permission of the court.
Section 10 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 the following person who fulfil
the conditions are capable for adoption:-
Adoption of an orphan-
Under the present law an orphan could also be taken in adoption. In such cases the guardian of
the orphan can obtain the permission of the court to this event and thereafter could give the child
in adoption.
The case of Balakrishna v. Sadashive-1977, another case of Mayaram v. Jai Naraian -1989
and Kodippa Rama Papal urf Shirke v. Kannappam -1990. It was held that where customs or
traditions allow there a person above 15 years of age or married can be adopted.
Where, as among Maharashtra School and Jains a person of any age can be adopted refer case of
Bishan v. Girish-1986.
Another case of Dev Gonda v. Sham gonad -1992, the Bombay High Court held that any insane
can also be adopted. Further any orphan found child or abandon child may be adopted.
According to Section 11, in every adoption, the following conditions must be complied with:
1. if the adoption is of a son , the adoptive father or mother by whom the adoption is made
must not have a Hindu son, sons son or sons sons son (whether by legitimate blood
relationship or by adoption) living at the time of adoption;
2. if the adoption is of a daughter, the adoptive father or mother by whom the adoption is
made must not have a Hindu daughter or sons daughter (whether by legitimate blood
relationship or by adoption) living at the time of adoption;
3. if the adoption is by a male and the person to be adopted is a female, the adoptive father
is at least 21 years older than the person to be adopted;
4. if the adoption is by a female and the person to be adopted is a male, the adoptive mother
is at least twenty-one years older than the person to be adopted;
5. the same child may not be adopted simultaneously by two or more persons (does not refer
to if both persons are adoptive mother and father) ;
6. the child to be adopted must be actually given and taken in adoption by the parents or
guardian concerned or under their authority with intent to transfer the child from the
family of its birth or in the case of an abandoned child or child whose parentage is not
known, from the place or family where it has been brought up to the family of its
adoption:
Provided that the performance of datta homam shall not be essential to the validity of adoption.
An adopted child shall be deemed to be the child of his or her adoptive father or mother for all
purposes with effect from the date of the adoption and from such date all the ties of the child in
the family of his or her birth shall be deemed to be severed and replaced by those created by the
adoption in the adoptive family:
Provided that- (a) the child cannot marry any person whom he or she could not have married if
he or she had continued in the family of his or her birth;
(b) any property which vested in the adopted child before the adoption shall continue to vest in
such person subject to the obligations, if any, attaching to the ownership of such property,
including the obligation to maintain relatives in the family of his or her birth;
(c) The adopted child shall not divest any person of any estate which vested in him or her before
the adoption.
Section 13 lays down that where there is no agreement to the contrary, an adoption does not
deprive the adoptive father or mother of the power to dispose of his or her property by transfer
inter vivos or by will.
Thus an adoptive parent is in no way restrained in the disposal of their property by reason of
adoption.
Adoptive parents right to disposing off his property is subject to an agreement to the contrary
that might have been entered into at the time of adoption between the adoptive parents and the
natural parents on behalf of the child for his benefit. Under the Act, thus, agreements restricting
the power of alienation of the adoptive parents is void.
(1) Where a Hindu who has a wife living adopts a child, she shall be deemed to be the adoptive
mother.
(2) Where an adoption has been made with the consent of more than one wife, the senior-most in
marriage among them shall be deemed to be the adoptive mother and the others to be step-
mothers.
(3) Where a widower or a bachelor adopts a child, any wife whom he subsequently marries shall
be deemed to be the step-mother of the adopted child.
(4) Where a widow or an unmarried woman adopts a child, any husband whom she marries
subsequently shall be deemed to be the step-father of the adopted child.
Section 15 lays down that no adoption which has been validly made can be cancelled by father
or mother. An adopted child also cannot renounce his/her status as the adopted child and
return to the family of his/her birth.
Section 17 (1) states that no person shall receive and no person shall make or give to any other
person any payment or reward the receipt of which is prohibited by this section.
Section 17 (2) provides that if any person contravenes the provisions of Section 17 (1), he shall
be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.
Finally, Section 17 (3) states that no prosecution under this section shall be instituted without
the previous sanction of the State Government or an officer authorized by the State Government
in this behalf.
The adopted son does not acquire any right in the adopted family. He does not forfeit his right in
the natural family.
Formalities of Adoption:-
(i) The child to be adopted must be actually given and taken in adoption by the parents/guardian.
(ii) Only after the transfer of a boy from one family to another with a ceremony will be valid.
Refer a case of Lakshman Singh Kothari v/s Smt. Rup Kuwar, 1961 the court held that under
the Hindu Law there cannot be a valid adoption unless the adoptive boy is transferred from one
family to another by doing the ceremony of given and taken.