How To Make H O Q: Ouse F Uality
How To Make H O Q: Ouse F Uality
How To Make H O Q: Ouse F Uality
House Of Quality
REFERENCE FROM :
STUDY PROJECT
DR. RICK EDGEMAN, PROFESSOR & CHAIR
DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO
Japanese/US Engineering
Innovation & QFD
Change Comparison
Introduction of
Design Changes
F irst Product
Japanese
(Using QFD) United States
(Not Using QFD)
out 20-24
out 1-3
months
introduction
months
out 14-17
3 months
in production
market
months
Time
Throughout
WHAT DOES QFD DO?
CONCEPT CUSTOMER
Better Designs in Half the Time!
Traditional Timeline
Plan Design Redesign Manufacture Benefits
PRODUCTION IMPROVE
10:1
PRODUCT
1:1
3
Design
Attributes
Importance Rankings
The H ouse 1
2 5
and
Design Attributes
7
Costs/Feasibility
Establishes the Flowdown
Relates WHAT'S & HOW'S 8
Ranks The Importance Engineering Measures
The House of Quality
Key Elements
Informational
Elements
Production Requirements
Need 1 5
Need 2 5
er
Need 3 3 om nce
st ta
Need 4 Cu4por
Need 5 Im2
Need 6 4
Need 7 1
HOW 1
HOW 2
HOW 3
HOW 4
HOW 5
HOW 6
HOW 7
Key Elements
Xs
Need 1 5
Need 2 5
Need 3 3
WHAT'S HOW'S Need 4 4
Need 5 2
Need 6 4
Need 7 1
Correlation Matrix
Impact Of The Hows On Each Other Matrix
Strong Positive
Information
Positive
Negative
HOW 1
HOW 2
HOW 3
HOW 4
HOW 5
HOW 6
HOW 7
Strong Negative
Need 1 5 H L L M 65
Need 2 5 H 45
Need 3 3 M M L 21
Need 4 4 H 36
Need 5 2 L M 8
Need 6 4 M L H 52
Need 7 1 L M 4
40 psi
3 mils
8 atm
1 mm
12 in.
3 lbs
57 41 48 13 50 6 21
Conflict R esolution
3.Relating Customer & Design Attributes
Symbolically we determine whether there is NO relationship,
a WEAK one, MODERATE one, or STRONG relationship
between each Customer Attribute and each Design Attribute.
The PURPOSE it to determine whether the final Design
Attributes adequately cover Customer Attributes.
LACK of a strong relationship between A customer attribute
and any design attribute shows that the attribute is not
adequately addressed or that the final product will have
difficulty in meeting the expressed customer need.
Similarly, if a design attribute DOES NOT affect any
customer attribute, then it may be redundant or the
designers may have missed some important customer
attribute.
Strength of the Interrelation
Between the Whats and the
Hows
Relationship
Key Elements:
H Strong 9
M Medium 3
L Weak 1
HOW 1
HOW 2
HOW 3
HOW 4
HOW 5
HOW 6
HOW 7
Transfer Function
Y = f(X)
Need 1 5 H L L M
Need 2 5 H
Need 3 3 M ipMs L
Need 4 4 H n sh
at io
Need 5 2 lL M
Need 6 4 M Re L H
Need 7 1 L M
U ntangling The W eb
4. Add Market Evaluation & Key Selling Points
Hows
Note the Units
HOW 1
HOW 2
HOW 3
HOW 4
HOW 5
HOW 6
HOW 7
Need 1 5 H L L M 65
Need 2 5 H 45
Need 3 3 M M L 21
Need 4 4 H 36
Need 5 2 L M 8
Need 6 4 M L H 52
Need 7 1 L M 4
40 psi
3 mils
8 atm
1 mm
12 in.
3 lbs
How Much
3
57 41 48 13 50 6 21
io n
ir ect
et D
g
Information On The HOW'S Tar
Information :
More Is Better
HOW 1
HOW 2
HOW 3
HOW 4
HOW 5
HOW 6
HOW 7
Less Is Better
Specific Amount
Need 1 5 H L L M 65
Need 2 5 H 45
Need 3 3 M M L 21
Need 4 4 H 36
Need 5 2 L M 8
Need 6 4 M L H 52
Need 7 1 L M 4
57 41 48 13 50 6 21
Strength is measured on a 9, 3, 1,
HOW 1
HOW 2
HOW 3
HOW 4
HOW 5
HOW 6
HOW 7
0 Scale
Need 1 CI 45 5 5 15
Need 2 5 45
Need 3 3 9 9 3
Need 4 4 36
Need 5 2 2 6
Need 6 4 12 4 36 e
nc
Need 7 1 1 rta
M
po
m
a lI
c
(CI *Strength) ni
TI = column T
ch 13 50
57 41 e48 6 21
Captured
HOW 1
HOW 2
HOW 3
HOW 4
HOW 5
HOW 6
HOW 7
Is A What Really A How
Need 1 CI H L L M 65
ria
Need 2 5 H 45
Need 3 3 M M L 21rite
C
Need 4 4 H ess 36
2 L en
et M
Need 5 8
4 p l 52
Need 6 M L Hm
Need 7 1 L Co M 4
CC = (CI
row
*Strength)
57 41 48 13 50 6 21
2 Component Attributes
Attributes
Design
3 Process Operations
Component
Attributes
HOWS
WHATS
Th
e
Fo
ur Y
H Critical to Quality
ou Characteristics
se (CTQs)
s of Key Manufacturing
Q
ua Processes
lit X
y
Key Process Variables
Common QFD Pitfalls
QFD On Everything
Set the Right Granularity
Dont Apply To Every Last Project
Inadequate Priorities
Lack of Teamwork
Wrong Participants
Lack of Team Skills
Lack of Support or Commitment
Too Much Chart Focus
Hurry up and Get Done
Failure to Integrate and Implement QFD
Review Current Status
At Least Quarterly
Monthly on 1 Yr Project
Weekly on Small Projects
65
45
21
36
8
52
4
HOW 1
HOW 2
HOW 3
HOW 4
HOW 5
HOW 6
HOW 7
Need 1 5 H L L M 65
Need 2 5 H 45
Need 3 3 M M L 21
Need 4 4 H 36
Need 5
Need 6
Need 7
2
4
1
M
L
L
L H
M
M 8
52
4
The
Static
40 psi
3 mils
8 atm
1 mm
12 in.
3 lbs
57 41 48 13 50 6 21
QFD
Points to Remember
The process may look simple, but requires effort.
Many entries look obviousafter theyre written down.
If there are NO tough spots the first time: It Probably Isnt
B eing D one R ight!!!!
Focus on the end-user customer.
Charts are not the objective. Charts are the m eans for
achieving the objective .
Find reasons to succeed, not excuses for failure.
Remember to follow-up afterward
THANK YOU
End of Session