Is Photography Art
Is Photography Art
Is Photography Art
This may seem a pointless question today. Surrounded as we are by thousands of photographs, most of
us take for granted that, in addition to supplying information and seducing customers, camera images
also serve as decoration, afford spiritual enrichment, and provide significant insights into the passing
scene. But in the decades following the discovery of photography, this question reflected the search for
ways to fit the mechanical medium into the traditional schemes of artistic expression
From the maze of conflicting statements and heated articles on the subject, three main positions
about the potential of camera art emerged. The simplest, entertained by many painters and a section of
the public, was that photographs should not be considered art because they were made with
a mechanical device and by physical and chemical phenomena instead of by human hand and spirit; to
some, camera images seemed to have more in common with fabric produced by machinery in a mill
than with handmade creations fired by inspiration. The second widely held view, shared by painters,
some photographers, and some critics, was that photographs would be useful to art but should not be
considered equal in creativeness to drawing and painting. Lastly, by assuming that the process was
comparable to other techniques such as etching and lithography, a fair number of individuals realized
that camera images were or could be as significant as handmade works of art and that they might have a
positive influence on the arts and on culture in general.
Artists reacted to photography in various ways. Many portrait painters - miniaturists in particular
- who realized that photography represented the handwriting on the wall became involved with
daguerreotyping or paper photography in an effort to save their careers; some incorporated it with
painting, while others renounced painting altogether. Still other painters, the most prominent among
them the French painter, Jean- Auguste-Dominique Ingres, began almost immediately to use
photography to make a record of their own output and also to provide themselves with source material
for poses and backgrounds, vigorously denying at the same time its influence on their vision or its
claims as art.
The view that photographs might be worthwhile to artists was enunciated in considerable detail
by Lacan and Francis Wey. 1he latter, an art and literary critic, who eventually recognized that camera
images could be inspired as well as informative, suggested that they would lead to greater naturalness
in the graphic depiction of anatomy, clothing, likeness, expression, and landscape. By studying
photographs, true artists, he claimed, would be relieved of menial tasks and become free to devote
themselves to the more important spiritual aspects of their work
Wey left unstated what the incompetent artist might do as an alternative, but according to the
influential French critic and poet Charles Baudelaire, writing in response to an exhibition of photography
in 1859, lazy and untalented painters would become photographers. Fired by a belief in art as an
imaginative embodiment of cultivated ideas and dreams, Baudelaire regarded photography as a very
humble servant of art and science; a medium largely unable to transcend external reality. For this
critic, photography was linked with the great industrial madness of the time, which in his eyes
exercised disastrous consequences on the spiritual qualities of life and art.
Eugene Delacroix was the most prominent of the French artists who welcomed photography as help-
mate but recognized its limitations. Regretting that such a wonderful invention had arrived so late in
his lifetime, he still took lessons in daguerreotyping, and both commissioned and collected photographs.
Delacroixs enthusiasm for the medium can be sensed in a journal entry noting that if photographs were
used as they should be, an artist might raise himself to heights that we do not yet know.
The question of whether the photograph was document or art aroused interest in England also. The
most important statement on this matter was an unsigned article that concluded that while
photography had a role to play, it should not be constrained into competition with art; a more
stringent viewpoint led critic Philip Gilbert Hamerton to dismiss camera images as narrow in range,
emphatic in assertion, telling one truth for ten falsehoods.
These writers reflected the opposition of a section of the cultural elite in England and France to
the cheapening of art which the growing acceptance and purchase of camera pictures by the middle
class represented. Technology made photographic images a common sight in the shop windows of
Regent Street and Piccadilly in London and the commercial boulevards of Paris. In London, for example,
there were at the time some 130 commercial establishments where portraits, landscapes, and
photographic reproductions of works of art could be bought. This appeal to the middle class convinced
the elite that photographs would foster a desire for realism instead of idealism, even though some
critics recognized that the work of individual photographers might display an uplifting style and
substance that was consistent with the defining characteristics of art.
Questions 27-30: Choose the correct letter, A, B, C ,or D. Write your answer in boxes 27-30 on your
sheet.
28 What public view about artist was shared by the French and the English?
30 What was the result of the widespread availability of photographs to the middle classes?
Questions 31-34; Complete the summary of Paragraph 3 using the list of words, A-G, below.
CAMERA ART
In the early days of photography, opinions on its future were 31 ............................ , but three clear
views emerged. A large number of artists and ordinary people saw photographs as 32 ............................
to paintings because of the way they were produced. Another popular view was that photographs could
have a role to play in the art world, despite the photographer being less 33............................... Finally, a
smaller number of people suspected that the impact of photography on art and society could
be 34...........................
Questions 35-40: Look at the following statements and the list of people, A-E, below. Match each
statement with the correct person. Write the correct letter, A-E, in boxes 35-40 on your answer sheet.
40. He felt photography was part of the trend towards greater mechanisation.