A To Z Orthodontics Vol 8 Cephalometry
A To Z Orthodontics Vol 8 Cephalometry
A To Z Orthodontics Vol 8 Cephalometry
ORTHODONTICS
Volume: 08
CEPHALOMETRY
ISBN: 978-967-5547-97-3
Correspondance:
Orthodontic Unit
Email:
Published by:
PPSP Publication
Jabatan Pendidikan Perubatan, Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan,
Published in Malaysia
1
Contents
1. What is Cephalogram.................................................3
2. Equipments / Apparatus............................................3
3. Types of Cephalostat.................................................3
4. Materials required for Cephalometric tracing.............3
5. Standardized procedure.....3-4
6. Anatomical landmarks use in Cephalometric tracing..5-6
7. Horizontal and Vertical planes.........7-8
8. Various Cephalometric analyses..8
9. Dental assessments.......9
10. Registration point.........9
11. Importance of Cephalometry....................................9-10
12. Short Note on: SNA.....10
13. Short Note on: SNB.....11
14. Short Note on: ANB.11
15. Short Note on: Interincisal Angle12
2
Cephalogram
It is a method of assessing the relationship of cranial, facial and dental structures on radiograph which
are taken in a standardized manner.
Equipments / Apparatus
X-ray source
Cassette holder
1. Broadbent type: 2 X-ray sources and 2 holders. Lateral and posterior anterior x-ray can be done
without moving the subject thats why it is more precise.
2. Highley type: 1 x-ray source and holder. Here subject need to move.
Light box
X-ray
Tracing paper
Geometry Box
Sharp pencil
Eraser
Sharpener
Hand gloves
Procedure
Patients position in such a manner so that the Frankfurt horizontal plane is parallel to the floor.
3
Ear rods should fix the position of the head.
The distance from the mid saggital plane of the patient head to the x-ray tube is fixed at 150
cm / 60 inch / 5ft and the distance from the mid saggital plane to the x-ray film vary from 6-7
inch.
4
4. Superior spinale / point A: the
deepest midline point on the premaxilla
between ANS and sup. Prosthion.
5. Superior prosthion or
supradentale: it is the most anterior-inferior
point on the maxillary alveolar process.
Usually found near the cemento-enamel
junction of the maxillary central incisor.
5
11. Gonion {Go}: most posterior inferior point at the angle of the mandible. It is the bisecting of
the angle formed by mandibular and ramal plane.
6
Horizontal planes:
1. FH plane (Frankfurt horrizontal plane): this plane drawn from porion to orbitale. The name
was given in conference of anthropology held at Frankfurt at the end of 19th century.
2. SN plane (Sella nasion plane): SN plane is easiest to establish with minimum error. SN plane
represents the anterior cranial base. The cranial base undergoes very little change after the age
of 6-7 years. However end point may drift either forward or vertically giving rise to error.
3. Palatal or Maxillary plane: it is the plane paralleling the floor of the nose or it is a line passing
through the ANS and PNS.
7
4. Occlusal plane: it is the plane passing midway between the cusp tips of the upper and lower
first parmanent molar and a point bisecting the over bite anteriorly.
5. Mandibular plane: the mandibular plane constructed as a tangent to the lower border or it is
a plane joining gonion and menton or gonion and gnathion. Any one method should be used
consistently.
Vertical planes:
1. Steiner analysis: SN plane is used as the plane of reference. It is one of the most important analyses.
This analysis was developed and promoted by Cecile Steiner in 1950.
2. Downs analysis: FH plane is used as the plane of reference. It was proposed by Downs. This analysis
indicates whether the dysplasia is in the facial skeleton or in the dentition or both.
3. Tweed analysis: 3 planes are used in this analysis- a. FH plane, b. Mandibular plane and c. Long axis of
lower incisor.
Tweeds findings are A. FMA = 25 degree, B. FMIA = 65 degree and IMPA = 90 degree.
4. Sassouni analysis: this analysis emphasizes vertical and horizontal proportion. Plane are used: a. SN
plane, b. FH plane, c. Palatal plane, d. Occlusal plane and e. Mandibular plane. If the plane are nearly
parallel so that they converge far behind the face.
5. Wits analysis: it is based on projection of point A and B to Occlusal plane along which the linear
difference between these two points is measured. Usually the projection intersects at very nearly the
same point. The magnitude of discrepancy in class II can be estimated by how many mm, point A is
infront of point B and vice versa for class III.
6. Ricketts analysis
7. Mcnamaras analysis
8
Dental assessments:
Registration point:
If a perpendicular line is drawn from sella to bolton nasion plane then the midpoint of that
perpendicular line is known as registration point.
Importance of Cephalometry
1. for the study of growth and development: Serial radiograph is taken with standardized head position
enable the study growth of jaw and dentition.
2. for diagnosis:
a. To assess the resting lip posture, position of tongue, soft palate and posterior pharyngeal wall.
9
b. To assess the relation of lower lip to upper one.
Assessment of prognosis:
a. Assessment of change in upper and lower angulations and position needed for achieving normal
overbite and overjet.
SNA ANGLE
Mean value: 82
10
SNB ANGLE
Definition: It is the angle b/w the SN plane and a line joining nasion to point B.
ANB ANGLE
Definition This angle is formed by the intersection of lines joining nasion to point A and nasion to point
B.
Indicates It denotes the relative position of the maxilla and mandible each other on skeletal bases.
MEAN VALUE
SK Class II - >4
Angle May be
1. Average.
2. Increased.
3. Decreased.
11
INTER INCISAL ANGLE
Definition:
Average value:
Importance:
The value of this angle helps us to know about the inter incisal
relationship.
Decreased angle => protruded incisors. Class I bi max. Protrusion, Class II div 1 case.
12
Bibilography:
1. Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics The art and science. 4th edition. 2009
4. Iida J. Lecture/class notes. Professor and chairman, Dept. of Orthodontics, School of dental
science, Hokkaido University, Japan.
7. McNamara JA, Brudon, WI. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1st edition, Needham
Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2001
9. Mohammad EH. Essentials of Orthodontics for dental students. 3rd edition, 2002
10. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th edition, Mosby Inc., St.Louis,
MO, USA, 2007
11. Sarver DM, Proffit WR. In TM Graber et al., eds., Orthodontics: Current Principles and
Techniques, 4th ed., St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby, 2005
13. T. M. Graber, R.L. Vanarsdall, Orthodontics, Current Principles and Techniques, "Diagnosis and
Treatment Planning in Orthodontics", D. M. Sarver, W.R. Proffit, J. L. Ackerman, Mosby, 2000
14. Thomas M. Graber, Katherine W. L. Vig, Robert L. Vanarsdall Jr. Orthodontics: Current Principles
and Techniques. Mosby 9780323026215, 2005
15. William R. Proffit, Raymond P. White, David M. Sarver. Contemporary treatment of dentofacial
deformity. Mosby 978-0323016971, 2002
16. William R. Proffit, Henry W. Fields, and David M. Sarver. Contemporary Orthodontics. Mosby
978-0323040464, 2006
17. Yoshiaki S. Lecture/class notes. Associate Professor and chairman, Dept. of Orthodontics, School
of dental science, Hokkaido University, Japan.
18. Zakir H. Lecture/class notes. Professor and chairman, Dept. of Orthodontics, Dhaka Dental
College and hospital.
13
Dedicated To
14
Acknowledgments
I wish to acknowledge the expertise and efforts of the various
teachers for their help and inspiration:
15
Dr. Mohammad Khursheed Alam
has obtained his PhD degree in Orthodontics from Japan in 2008.
He worked as Asst. Professor and Head, Orthodontics
department, Bangladesh Dental College for 3 years. At the same
time he worked as consultant Orthodontist in the Dental office
named Sapporo Dental square. Since then he has worked in
several international projects in the field of Orthodontics. He is
the author of more than 50 articles published in reputed journals.
He is now working as Senior lecturer in Orthodontic unit, School
of Dental Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
16