Analyzing The Effectiveness of CRM in Brand Building With Reference To Organized Retail Stores in Indore City
Analyzing The Effectiveness of CRM in Brand Building With Reference To Organized Retail Stores in Indore City
Analyzing The Effectiveness of CRM in Brand Building With Reference To Organized Retail Stores in Indore City
On
Acknowledgement
All the first step of professional life got transformed in to a memorable
experience while doing this study.
Prayatna Jain
MBA (Full Time)IV Sem.
Research Report
To the best of my knowledge and belief this work has not been submitted by
him anywhere else for the award of any degree or diploma.
1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Review Of Literature
6. Research Methodology
8. Conclusion
9. Suggestions
12. References
13. Annexure
Table Of Figures
5. CRM Model
6. Research Process
This research has definitely help out in understanding the Concept of CRM
in far more practical way, After completing the project one easily understand
what are the recent trends in Organized retail stores as far as CRM and
Brand Building is consider. It would also help in determining the degree of
effectiveness for CRM practices.
DEFINITIONS OF CRM
2
Working in partnership with suppliers and
"Partnership"
customers is the key focus, both in consumer and
business-to-business markets.
3
Maximizing customer retention and value, and so
driving up profitability, is the goal. This seems to
"Increasing profits" reflect the popularity of the findings propounded
by Frederick Reich held that increased retention
equals substantially increased profits.
4
Building loyalty with customers, usually defined
"Loyalty"
as maintaining repeat sales, is the central role of
relationship marketing.
5
Managing and enhancing the value to both
"Value"
customer and company within the relationship.
6
The focus on satisfaction received a relatively
"Satisfaction" low level of mentions, yet this is the most popular
customer measure.
Objectives by Burnett
Burnett (2001) argues that the objectives from CRM generally fall into three
categories: cost savings, revenue enhancement, and strategic impact. He
states that the following objectives seems reasonable for a company
implementing CRM:
Objectives by Newell
Newell (2000) states that the key to CRM is identifying what creates value for
the customer and then deliver it. While individual customers have different
views of value, there are many ways to satisfy the each customer. Therefore
the CRM objectives is to:
Identifying those customer values that are pertinent to a particular
segment.
Understanding the relative importance of those values to each customer
segment.
Determining if delivery of those values will affect in a positive manner.
Communicating and delivering the appropriate values to each customer
in ways the customer wants to receive the information.
Measuring results and proving return on investments. (Ibid.)
Objectives by Kalakota & Robinson
Benefits Of CRM :-
Implementing a customer relationship management (CRM) solution might
involve considerable time and expense. However, there are many potential
benefits.A major benefit can be the development of better relations with your
existing customers, which can lead to:
Once your business starts to look after its existing customers effectively,
efforts can be concentrated on finding new customers and expanding your
market. The more you know about your customers, the easier it is to identify
new prospects and increase your customer base.
or
U
N
A
W
A
R
E
Source : ‘Building brands in the Indian market’ by Tapan K. Panda first edition
2004.
According to some recent research (Aaker,Batra,Myers,2002), the relationship
between attitude and purchase behaviors gets stronger as consumers get
more ‘direct’ info. About the brand. Information about a brand obtained through
advertising is relatively less ‘direct’. Hence, CRM can be used to get to the
customer directly involved and thus impact a brand attitude formation that will
surely result in purchase and subsequently, Brand loyalty. CRM can play a
strategic role at various stages of consumer decision making (S Ramesh
Kumar,2002). The stages identified in this concerned are: information stage;
Pre-selling stage; Purchase stage; Usage stage; Service stage; support stage;
and repurchase stage. Therefore, CRM can be said to be impacting brand
attitude at all the stages.
There are good examples of how CRM can be used to boost brand loyalty. For
example, L'Oréal, the world’s largest beauty, skin care and cosmetics
company wanted to broaden the scope of its luxury products marketing to
focus on customers. The firm operates in a highly-competitive marketplace for
luxury beauty products where customer retention is a key performance
indicator.
Above all, be aware that this is a long game. It’s going to take time. Don't
confuse brand awareness with brand loyalty and certainly not with brand
equity. Awareness is step one. If customers don't know you exist, they
certainly won't consider you, but that's very different to having a loyal, long
term relationship. CRM can help, but loyalty comes through experience and
time. CRM technologies must be viewed as enablers that operate within the
context of wider business strategies – valuable as a means to an end, but not
the 'silver bullet' that some might claim to be.
Since the business has not thought about relationship marketing the visitors
make one purchase and are never seen or heard from again. The business
continues to spend excessive amount of money in order to attract customers
and has very little repeat business. Relationship marketing is about repeat
business.
The advantage of traditional marketing is that it cash its net wide like a fishman
hoping to draw as many customer as possible. The wider the net the more fish
and more markets we can tap into. The disadvantage of traditional marketing is
that most businessman cannot simply keep paying high advertising cost to
maintain an appropriate customer flow.
Relationship and traditional marketing can be best used when in conjunction.
On taps new market and draws in first-time visitors while the other retains them
as long as possible.
The better the relationship, the better the sales results (Hunter & Perreault,
2007). Thus the companies should consider developing their marketing
programs so that it makes sales on the front end and the back end.
Consumers – Who understands the Indian consumer the best will win in the
end. What do we mean by the Indian consumer? Is it the teenager in Mumbai
who commutes by local train, buys fashionable clothes from Linking Road and
watches movies at the multiplex? Or is it the housewife who buys vegetables
from the sabzi mandi and saves up money for chicken on Sundays. Or is it the
fisherman out at sea who uses a cellphone to communicate his catch to the
market on the shore? The Indian consumer is hard to pin down. As someone
wisely said, the Indian consumer shifts loyalties with every 25 kilometers and
with every 10 Rupees. The dimensions to deal with include class, education,
language, caste and local customs in addition to the standard marketing
dimensions used in the West.
Policy – Although most people agree that FDI in Retail is just a matter of time,
what this means is that till FDI is allowed, we will see our domestic players like
The Future Group and Reliance Retail leading the way. What will happen
when FDI is eventually allowed is anyone’s guess. If the examples of Brazil or
China are taken into account, we will see a lot of consolidation with a few (6-8)
large players remaining and several smaller niche players. Retail is a highly
localized business (local preferences, local talent), so there is no guarantee
that a foreign player will do better than an Indian player, as evidenced by
Walmart’s failures in Germany and Korea. Surely, there are interesting times
ahead!
"We believe that India is a rising star at the beginning of a growth cycle, with consumer spending
increasing at a strong rate, and people seeking and demanding a better quality of life. India is going
to be one of the fastest-growing regions of the future. All conditions are right to invest in India." 1
The retailing industry has been present in our country through history and is
considered as one of the largest sectors in the Indian economy, contributing to
around 14% to the GDP, and employing around 7% of the total population..
For decades, retailing in India has been highly fragmented, i.e., unorganized,
due to the presence of huge number of small mom-n-pop stores. While
retailing industry is present for centuries, it is only in the recent times that it
has witnessed so much dynamism and corporate attention. As a result , today
retail industry is much updated and organized. It is the latest bandwagon that
has witnessed hordes of big players like TATA, Birla, Reliance, Pantaloon
Group, etc., leaping into it. The entry of big players in retailing has caused a
major revolution in its marketing strategies and innovations. Now retail sector,
being considered as the most dynamic and attractive sector in India, is going
through a transition phase. For a long time, the corner grocery store was the
only choice available to the consumer. This is slowly giving way to
international formats of retailing. The Indian organized retail industry is valued
at about $300 billion and is expected to grow to $427 billion in 2010 and $637
billion in 2015. Retail Market India today is the second fastest growing
economy of the world after China. Indian economy will grow larger than
Britain's by 2022, Japan by 2032 and by 2050 will become the second largest
economy of the world after China. Indian market has become the most
lucrative market for retail investment in the world. Some of the factors which
have contributed to the growth of organized retail in India are: increase in the
purchasing power of Indians, rapid urbanization, increase in the number of
working women, large number of working young population. Today people look
for better quality product at cheap rate, better service, better ambience for
shopping and better shopping experience.
The recent years have witnessed rapid transformation and vigorous profits in
Indian retail stores across various categories. This can be contemplated as a
result of the changing attitude of Indian consumers and their overwhelming
acceptance to modern retail formats. Asian markets witness a shift in trend
from traditional retailing to organized retailing driven by the liberalizations on
Foreign Direct Investments. For example, in China there was a drastic
structural development after FDI was permitted in retailing. India has entered a
stage of positive economic development which requires liberalization of the
retail market to gain a significant enhancement. Domestic consumption market
in India is estimated to grow approximately 7 to 8% with retail accounting for
60% of the overall segment. Of this 60%, organized retail is just 5% which is
comparatively lesser than other countries with emerging economies. In
developed countries organized retailing is the established way of selling
consumer products. Despite the low percentage, Indian textile industry has
grown noticeably in organized retailing of textile products. The negative phase
in exports may have compelled the Indian textile retailers to explore the
opportunities in the domestic market substantially causing the outstanding
growth in the concerned segment. These indications give a positive notion that
organized retailing has arrived in the Indian market and is here to stay. It is
expected to grow 25-30 per cent annually. India is on the radar screen in the
retail world and global retailers and at their wings seeking entry into the Indian
retail market. The market is growing at a steady rate of 11-12 percent and
accounts for around 10 percent of the country’s GDP.
A vast majority of India's young population favors branded garments. With the
influence of visual media, urban consumer trends have spread across the rural
areas also. The shopping spree of the young Indians for clothing, favorable
income demographics, increasing population of young people joining the
workforce with considerably higher disposable income, has unleashed new
possibilities for retail growth even in the rural areas. Thus, 85% of the retail
boom which was focused only in the metros has started to infiltrate towards
smaller cities and towns. Tier-II cities are already receiving focused attention
of retailers and the other smaller towns and even villages are likely to join in
the coming years. This is a positive trend, and the contribution of these tier-II
cities to total organized retailing sales is expected to grow to 20-25%.
As a result Indore’s organized retail market is being served by ‘n’ no’s of small
and big organized stores in the form of Supar Bazaars , Mega Stores or Hyper
Markets all over the city. Today, almost all the major brands are available here
and including more than 50 brands having their own exclusive outlets . Few of
the giant retail stores which are doing well here are Big Bazaar & Food Bazaar
(6 stores) , Vishal (5 outlets) , Reliance Fresh (13 outlets), More megastore ,
Pantaloons, Provogue, Koutons and the list is uncountable.
Availability and cost of retail space is one major area where Government
intervention is necessary. Liberalizing policy guidelines for FDI needs focus as
well. Proper training facilities for meeting the increasing requirements of
workers in the sector would need the attention of both Government and the
industry. Competition for experienced personnel would lead to belligerence
between retailers and higher rates of attrition, especially during the phase of
accelerated growth of the retail industry. The process of avoiding middlemen
and providing increased income to farmers through direct procurement by
retail chains need the attention of policy makers. Taking care of supply chain
management, mass procurement arrangements and inventory management
are areas that need the focus of entrepreneurs.
(Current Perspective)
Few years ago, there was a hue and cry over the entry of organized retailers
like Subhiksha, Reliance Retail and Wal-Mart. Oh, how things have changed!
Subhiksha has downed its shutters for many months now and financial results
of Reliance Retail are flat.
The global recession cannot be blamed for this debacle, because organized
retailer Wal-Mart is doing quite well in these times in the United States, which
is the epicenter of the global recession. The sales of Wal-Mart are reported to
have increased by eight per cent even though profits are a trifle down. If the
troubles of organized retailers were due to global recession, Wal-Mart too
should have shown signs of distress.
Why have organized retailers in India not been able to cater to the lower
classes? The reason appears to be much greater spread of business capacity
among the Indian people. The capacity required to run a kirana shop is
available aplenty in India. Organized retail is not able to compete with these
shops. According to a study undertaken by leading economic research
organization ICRIER, our kirana shops have many special abilities. They are
located near the consumer who is provided with the required goods in his
vicinity. He saves the cost of going to the air-conditioned shop of the
organized retailer located far away. One can see the shopkeepers making a
note of an item that is not in their stock. Then they locate the supplier and get
that item. This ability to provide desired goods takes away the attraction of
going to the organized retailer.
Kirana shopkeepers provide goods on credit. They have the ability to keep a
record of credit given, to remember the date when the borrower gets his salary
and to make collection of the dues. Kirana shops are able to sell items in
pieces. One can obtain one sheet of A4 paper from the street corner stationary
shop. The shopkeeper has such low cost of service that he makes profit from
selling one sheet of paper for 50 paisa ! The overhead costs of the organized
retailer prohibit such small sales. One would have to buy a whole ream from
the organized retailer. Kirana shops are open from 6 am to 10 pm. Often
owner husband and wife take turns. Both have capacity to manage the shop.
Kirana shops make home delivery. They have the ability to extract various
types of work from one employee. He sweeps the shop, arranges goods in the
window, undertakes home delivery, brings goods from the transporter and
recovers outstanding loans. Organized players have to employ a number of
persons for each of these functions.
The buyer likewise appears to have greater capacity in India. She can easily
compare the price offered by competing stores, to calculate the cost of
travelling to a cheaper store located far away, and the benefits from special
schemes. She is not lured by the temptations. The combination of high-
capacity kirana shops and high-capacity buyers has enabled the shops to face
competition from organized retailers.
The underlying factor that operates behind all these is mental capacity. Small
shops in the United States seem to lack this ability. It is noteworthy that
Gujaratis own a large number of small retail shops in the United States. They
have the business capacity to manage these shops. But the American
consumer appears to lack the ability to make these various calculations. Thus
the same Gujarati is successful in India and not so in America.
Mainstream economists think otherwise. The main reason being suggested for
the failure of Subhiksha is rapid expansion at breakneck speed. This
explanation is not acceptable. If this were the case, other organized retailers
like Reliance that have expanded at a slower pace should have done well.
That is not the case. All organized retailers in India are in trouble. Another
explanation being offered is that organized retailers relied on special schemes
to tempt the customer to buy goods that he may not truly need. This appears
to be true. But why did they have to rely on such schemes? Because they
were not able to sell the goods in routine conditions, it would seem.
The ICRIER study points out that the average price realization for cauliflower
farmers selling directly to organized retailers is about 25 per cent higher than
their proceeds from the mandi. So far so good. The question, however, is this:
Were the organized retailers able to successfully sell those cauliflowers to the
consumers? Obviously not. Otherwise they would not be in trouble. The higher
price paid by organized retailers to the farmers should, therefore, not be seen
as an advantage that they have. Rather it may be that farmers are unwilling to
sell to organized retailers at the same price as in the mandi. Perhaps
organized retailers have more stringent quality specifications. They would
specify the minimum size of the flower, maximum number of leaves, length of
the stick, etc. In comparison the middleman in the mandi will help the farmer
sell his goods of varying quality. Organized retailers are perhaps paying higher
price because the farmer is unwilling to sell to them at the lower price! It is
their inability to manage variation in quality that forces them to buy at higher
price.
The goal of this review is to identify research and articles published over the
past ten years related to CRM with relevance to sales management. The ten-
year time frame was chosen because it encapsulates the rise to prominence of
CRM and much of the technology that aids in implementation of CRM
concepts. The review includes both empirical studies and conceptual articles.
In 1960s, Theodre Levitt suggested that the purpose of every business was
to create and keep customers. He suggested that corporations should view the
entire business process as consisting of closely held integrated effort to
discover, create, arouse and satisfy customer needs.
Berry (1983) defines customer relationship management as attracting,
maintaining and enhancing customer relationships in multiservice
organizations. Berry stressed that the attraction of new customers should be
viewed only as intermediate step in the marketing process. Solidifying the
relationship, transforming in different customers into loyal ones and serving
customers as clients should also to be considered as marketing. He outlined
five strategy elements for practicing customer relationship management:
developing a core service around which to build a customer relationship,
customizing the relationship to the individual customer, augmenting the core
service with extra benefits, pricing services to encourage customer loyalty and
marketing to employees so that they, in turn, will perform well for customers.
Lovelock (1983) points out that many services by their very nature require an
on-going membership (e.g. insurance, banking etc). Even when membership
is not required, customers may seek on–going relationships with service
providers to reduce perceived risk in evaluating service characterized by
intangibility and credence properties. Customers are more likely to form
relationships with individuals and with the organizations they represent than
with goods. Services are performances where the employees play a major role
in shaping the service experience. The service setting is especially conducive
to customers forming relationships with individual service providers.
Simon Caufield (1999) in his research paper Does CRM really pays?
Concludes that “Customized to your specific business and applied with insight.
Judgment and precision of focused objectives, CRM initiatives pay –off by
changing, or taking advantage of. Customers behavior and profitability, and
how these differ be segment n his research paper says that Customized to
your specific business and applied with insight. Judgment and precision of
focused objectives, CRM initiatives pay –off by changing, or taking advantage
of. Customer’s behavior and profitability, and how these differ be segment ”
Anderson (1996); Ingram, LaForge, and Leigh (2002); Leigh and Marshall
(2001). Further, each stresses the effect that CRM-related strategies and
technologies will have effect on the sales organization. Anderson (1996)
recognizes that SFA and electronic sales channels dramatically reshape not
only the role of the salesperson but the role of personal selling within the firm.
While not couching such trends in terms of CRM, Anderson's (1996) "blending
of sales and marketing" notion closely parallels the relationship management
activities prevalent in CRM. Sales force roles that are touted as irreplaceable
by advanced technology include anticipating new customer needs and
developing long-term strategies in partnership with customers.
Gefen, 2002; Reinartz & Kumar, 2003; Rowley & Dawes, 2000 The benefits
of customer loyalty to a provider of either services or products are numerous,
and thus organizations are eager to secure as significant a loyal customer
base as possible Recent developments in Internet technology have given the
Internet a new role: to facilitate the link between CRM and customer loyalty.
This has also been argued by Fournier (1998) who stated that, committed
customers can be viewed as organizational assets who are likely to be a
source of favorable word-of-mouth referrals and are resistant to
competitor’s offers.
Leigh and Marshall (2001) highlights that the sales function will increasingly
be viewed as the firm's means of "partnering" with customers. This redefines
the sales function whereby strategic account management will be the
objective, which will require CRM-related processes and technologies such as
lifetime customer value analysis.
Customer Relationship Management is the establishment development,
maintenance and optimization of long term mutually valuable relationships
between consumers and the organizations. Successful customer relationship
management focuses on understanding the needs and desires of the
customers and is achieved by placing these needs at the heart of the business
by integrating them with the organization’s strategy, people, technology and
business processes (Fox & Stead, 2001)
Patton (2001) argues that, the strategy and the objective of CRM
initiative and software is to help organizations keep track of their customers
and boost revenue by increasing customer loyalty. He went on to say that,
another strategy of CRM is to develop customer loyalty and sales per
customer to increase the bottom line.
Scullin, Allotra, Lloyd and Fjermestad (2002) amended that CRM can
bring greater efficiency and cost reduction in an organization. For
example, they indicated that, the integration of customer data into a single
database by an organization allows the company to do marketing teams,
sales force and other departments within the company to share information
and work toward common corporate objectives by using the same underlying
statistics. They further state that, CRM helps improve customer service
and support. They argue that for instance, it helps the organization to
receive more accurately, update and close even the very remote orders.
Again they lamented that, it also helps to view customer service
agreements, search for proven solutions and best practices, and subscribe to
products-related information and software patches and access knowledge
tools useful in completing service orders.
One of the benefits that Scullin, Allotra, Lloyd and Fjermestad (2002)
believe can be derived from CRM initiatives is increased customer loyalty. This
they say can be seen in this aspect, for example, information captured by CRM
system helps a company to identify the actual costs of winning and retaining
individual customers. Also having the data allows the firm to focus its time
and resources on its most profitable customers. Moreover, they say that,
classifying one’s best customer in this way allows an organization to manage
them more efficiently as a premium group, with the understanding that it is
neither necessary nor advisable to treat all customers in the same way
because each customer is different and has his or her own unique needs and
demands. Further more, Scullin, Allotra, Lloyd and Fjermestad (2002)
hammered that more effective marketing can be realized as a result of CRM
initiatives. They argue that, for example, having detailed customer satisfaction
from an eCRM system can allow a company to predict the kind of products
that a customer is likely to buy as well as the timing of purchases. Again they
continue to say that, CRM allows for more targeted campaigns and also
tracking of campaign effectiveness. Moreover, they add that, customer data
can be analyzed from multiple perspectives to discover which elements of a
marketing campaign received the greatest impact on sales and profitability.
Prof Arun Saxena (2006) in his research paper CRM in service sector
today’s customer is empowered by information and choice. This presents new
challenges to companies, who in their quest to acquire retain and service
customers are adopting CRM in a big way, and changing their business
approach from being ‘product centric’ to ‘customer centric’. The role of CRM is
to provide a wide range of touch-points through which a customer can interact
with the company. The objective of this paper is to explore the efficiency and
effectiveness of CRM in the service sectors, (with special reference on), which
calls for a more personalized service than ever before.
Conrad Chang (2007) it is still all about the customer. At the end of the day,
the end-to-end solutions need to satisfy what really matters – the customer. It
is vital that enterprises know their corporate objectives and directions and
invest accordingly in the relevant CRM solutions that match their needs.
Enterprises in fast growing and niche areas would require a different set of
solutions than those that serve mature and slow-growing markets.
Objective Of Research
The research process is cyclical since conclusion from the study often
generates new problems and new ideas that need to be further investigated.
(Ibid) In this study the research process presented above has been followed to
a quite great extent. However, some adaptations had to be made in order to fit
to the specific situation for this research.
Research Design
Type of Research
In the research we have gone with two types of research. Before conducting
the interviews with the objects, knowledge within CRM had been obtained.
Thereby, descriptive research was used when asking questions about the
CRM approach. However, since there still was interest in identification of new
variables regarding CRM systems, exploratory research was used when
asking questions about CRM requirements and CRM functionality. Exploratory
research was performed since little knowledge about the problem area
existed. In order to increase the knowledge about CRM and CRM
systems secondary data was studied, as well as literature regarding
theories relevant for the problem area.
Research Approach
Research Strategy
For this study, In the first phase of the research Experience Survey was the
most appropriate strategy to be used, As per the literature Experience survey is
a technique in which individuals who are knowledgeable about a particular
research problem are surveyed. The purpose with the experience study is to
help formulate the problem and clarify concepts, rather than develop
conclusive evidence. (Zikmund, 2000). Similarly In our study, it helped in
understanding the basic elements and functionality of CRM software and tools
and their impact over the administration.
After the target population has been defined it’s time to identify the sampling
frame, which is a representation of the elements of the target population. The
sampling frame for this study is the list of retailers in various malls and the
directory listing the firms in an industry.
When taking a sample there are two major techniques to choose between,
these are probability versus Non-Probability sampling.
In this step the sample size is selected, implying that the number of units
included in the study is selected. According to Zikmund (2000) it’s difficult to
determine the size of the sample, and in order to make the right decision
different factors must be considered. The nature of the research is such a
factor. For exploratory research, using a qualitative approach, the sample
design is usually small. Limitations of money and time also influence the
selection of sample size.
For determining the optimum sample size we have used the sample size
calculators , which gave the following result on 95% level of confidence for the
population size of 10000 retail stores ( both organized vs unorganized) and the
confidence interval of 10.
As far as test is concerned, I have used here one of the Non- parametric test i.e.
Chi-Square test. Chi-Square (x2) is a test which describes the magnitude of
difference between observed frequencies and the frequencies expected under
certain assumptions. With the help of x2-test, it is possible to find out whether
such differences are significant or are insignificant and could have arisen due to
fluctuations of sampling. Here we have calculated the expected frequencies as
per the Normal theoretical frequency distribution.
The first problem occurred already when defining the research problem and
when formulating the research questions, and it showed to be one of the most
difficult tasks during the research. It is very important to make an appropriate
problem definition since it has great impact on whether the result of the
study will be in line with the purpose of the study. The research problem and
the research questions were thereby revised several times during the study
and were finally approved by the guide.
Original Expected
(Oi –Ei) (Oi – Ei)2 (Oi – Ei)2/E
(Oi) (Ei)
Answer no.
1 132 200 -68 4624 23.12
2 157 200 -43 1849 9.245
3 223 200 23 529 2.645
4 277 200 77 5929 29.645
5 211 200 11 121 0.605
Total 1000 1000 65.26
Level of Significance 5%
Degree of freedom
(5-1) = 4
(n-1)
From the above we can see that the calculated value of the chi-square through
the test is 69.26 which is greater than the tabulated value of chi-square for 5%
level of significance and 4 degree of freedom (as per the rule) considered to be
standard is 9.488. So our null hypothesis ( H0 ) is rejected. And the alternate
hypothesis (H1 ) is accepted i.e. H1 = There is significant relationship between
CRM and Customer Satisfaction.
Original Expected
(Oi –Ei) (Oi – Ei)2 (Oi – Ei)2/E
(Oi) (Ei)
Answer no.
1 200 150 -50 2500 12.5
2 200 166 -34 1156 5.78
3 200 212 12 144 0.72
4 200 263 63 3969 19.845
5 200 209 9 81 0.405
1000 39.25
Level of Significance 5%
Degree of freedom
(5-1) = 4
(n-1)
From the above we can see that the calculated value of the chi-square through
the test is 39.25 which is greater than the tabulated value of chi-square for 5%
level of significance and 4 degree of freedom (as per the rule) considered to be
standard is 9.488. So our null hypothesis ( H0 ) is rejected. And the alternate
hypothesis (H1 ) is accepted i.e. H1 = There is significant relationship between
CRM and Brand Loyalty.
In other words, CRM plays a vital role in affecting Brand Loyalty. So if CRM will
be used in any organized retail store it will definitely result in higher amount of
Brand Loyalty amongst the customers.
Conclusion
After completion of the research study, It seem to be that the objective of the
study have successfully achieved. The results and the findings of the study
favors the theory of the literature which supports CRM’s effective role in Building
Brands and increasing Customer loyalty , Customer lifetime value , and further
result in higher customer satisfaction.
To have a check over the theory’s concepts a chi-square test was also
conducted on the raw data collected from the market. And as a result our null
hypothesis 1 - There is no significant relationship between CRM and Brand building and
our null hypothesis 2 - There is no significant relationship between CRM and Customer
satisfaction. were rejected as their value 39.25 and 65.26 is much higher than
the expected tabulated value 9.488, which simply proves that there is a
significant relationship between CRM and brand building and CRM and
Customer Satisfaction.
Also our third objective ‘To study the conceptual framework of CRM in
organized retail’ is also fulfilled by the study with the help of primary and
secondary data collected during the study. It clearly gives us the information
related to past, present and expected future of both CRM as well as Organized
retail in this market not only in combined form but also in isolation.
With respect to all the activities performed during the research starting from
research design to data analysis and interpretation, one can easily conclude
that CRM and Organized retail both are the emerging fields of today’s
dynamic environment and both keeps a high amount of potential and scope in
nearby future too. And the role of CRM in supporting and developing
Organized retail cannot be ignored at all.
Suggestions
It works with the nine strategic elements of CRM , or in other words nine
aspects of CRM performance and functionality. It comprises of the following :-
CP = Customer Prospecting
IM = Interactive Management
CE = Customer Experience
PZ = Personalization
LP = Loyalty Progress
These two not only simplify the work at the seller’s side but also provide easy
interactive interface to the customers resulting in higher customer satisfaction
and their effective participation. In other words, despite of proper mgmt. of the
nine elements (mentioned above) of CRM functionality, there should be a
proper utilization of technology in the form of E-CRM and Sales force
automation.
iii) Better results :-If a manufacturer or service provider act as watch- dog
over all the activities in an optimum way and keep eye over the proper
implementation of the model’s element, it would result in higher customer
satisfaction due to the proper approach made by the seller in form of
customer prospecting (CP) , Interactive Management (IM) and the
personalization (PZ) with an easy Industrial customer interface through
technological tools like Electronic customer relationship management (E-CRM)
and sales force automation (SFA).
In totality we can say there would be longer Customer life cycle and higher
customer lifetime value which improves the achievement of the objectives of
both- the firm and the customer providing higher satisfaction.
As you consider how to be successful with CRM, use the acronym SMART to
take advantage of what I have learned from studying numbers of literatures and
doing the research projects.
S Define your Strategy for customer value, including both the value
you deliver to customers and what you expect to receive in return.
Putting customers first is good business. If you work at CRM, it can deliver the ROI
and differentiated relationships you’ll need to succeed in today’s competitive
marketplace
After concluding this research, I have come up with a number of issues I feel
can be beneficial to the company manager interested in receiving knowledge in
this area. These recommendations are listed below:
Another topic for further research it would be interesting to study the outcome
of CRM in a customer relationship in terms of satisfaction, trust, value, and
loyalty.
In writing this research, a number of different issues has come up, which I
feel would be interesting to see future research done upon. Hence, I am
presenting a list of suggestions for future researches that we think are suitable
topic for a future thesis.
Despite of taking care of all the minute details during the study. There are few
limitations I have gone through during the study, which was uncontrollable and
may affect the study knowingly and unknowingly. I have listed all the limitations
which might affect the study:-
The Population size was very large and seems to uncountable , hence
after studying few major areas and through consultations of few experts it
was assumed to 10000 (an approx. figure).
While collecting Data the major problem which was found that almost
95% of small retailers were now aware about the term Customer
relationship management. Although many of them knowingly or
unknowingly were using few techniques favoring CRM functionality. It
arose difficulties in data collection.
While collecting Data, it was found that many of retailers were unable to
answer all the question on their own, either they understand the questions
or they were not sure about their answers.
Non availability of the executives for the interview, result in leaving few big
retailers which might have been important for the study.
References
Dear respondent,
Name:-…………………………………………………………………………………
Occupation:-…………………………………………………………………………..
Contact No:-……………………………………………………………………………
Scales to measure
S.No Questions 1 2 3 4 5
1 With the CRM practices were you able to attract, and
convert more customer visits into deals during the
seasonal promotions as compared to previous years?
2 With the practice of CRM have you been able to better
use the details of the customer database for promotion
of specific products and services to focused targets?
3 Has the practice of CRM, helped the store in improved
value selling and reduced price sell during seasonal
promotions?
4 With the CRM practices were you able to segment or
class customers by key value criteria?
5 Were you able to communicate the product features,
benefits, discounts, schemes etc to your customers
well in time and achieved the sales target?
6 Once visiting the store does your customer feel an
emotional connection / attachment to the store?
7 Has the customer been spending more, less or prefer
maintain current spending levels?
8 Does the customer plan to buy the product again in
future from the store?
9 Has the customer purchased the product consistently
in the past from the store?
10 Does the customer consider himself as a positive
reference for the store?
11 Do you agree that CRM has enabled to identify
customer trends with CRM practices?
12 Were you able to identify individual customer
deviations, after implanting CRM system?
13 Were you able to distinguish the best and/or most
profitable customers with the database formed with the
CRM system?
14 Has CRM enabled you to identify unique customer
attributes or characteristics?
15 With the CRM system the Business processes are
regularly simplified to enhance customer experience?
16 With the CRM has your retail store created a joint
venture with the customers?
17 Has CRM enabled you to identifies the most profitable
customers for the organization?
18 Is there any enhancement into the management of the
leads after practicing CRM?
19 Does you policy include customer satisfaction goals?
20 Does the company uses customer satisfaction surveys
to understanding customer needs?
Annexure 2 : Chi-Square Distribution ( Table )
Degrees of Probability, p
Freedom 0.99 0.95 0.05 0.01 0.001
1 0.000 0.004 3.84 6.64 10.83
2 0.020 0.103 5.99 9.21 13.82
3 0.115 0.352 7.82 11.35 16.27
4 0.297 0.711 9.49 13.28 18.47
5 0.554 1.145 11.07 15.09 20.52
6 0.872 1.635 12.59 16.81 22.46
7 1.239 2.167 14.07 18.48 24.32
8 1.646 2.733 15.51 20.09 26.13
9 2.088 3.325 16.92 21.67 27.88
10 2.558 3.940 18.31 23.21 29.59
11 3.05 4.58 19.68 24.73 31.26
12 3.57 5.23 21.03 26.22 32.91
13 4.11 5.89 22.36 27.69 34.53
14 4.66 6.57 23.69 29.14 36.12
15 5.23 7.26 25.00 30.58 37.70
16 5.81 7.96 26.30 32.00 39.25
17 6.41 8.67 27.59 33.41 40.79
18 7.02 9.39 28.87 34.81 42.31
19 7.63 10.12 30.14 36.19 43.82
20 8.26 10.85 31.41 37.57 45.32
21 8.90 11.59 32.67 38.93 46.80
22 9.54 12.34 33.92 40.29 48.27
23 10.20 13.09 35.17 41.64 49.73
24 10.86 13.85 36.42 42.98 51.18
25 11.52 14.61 37.65 44.31 52.62
26 12.20 15.38 38.89 45.64 54.05
27 12.88 16.15 40.11 46.96 55.48
28 13.57 16.93 41.34 48.28 56.89
29 14.26 17.71 42.56 49.59 58.30
30 14.95 18.49 43.77 50.89 59.70