The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at

www.emeraldinsight.com/0959-0552.htm

IJRDM
38,3 Consumer receptiveness to
international retail market entry
Nicholas Alexander
160 School of Management and Business, Centre for Research in Marketing,
Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK
Received December 2008 Anne Marie Doherty
Revised August 2009
Accepted October 2009
Glamorgan Business School, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, UK
Jason M. Carpenter
Department of Retailing, University of South Carolina, Columbia,
South Carolina, USA, and
Marguerite Moore
College of Textiles, North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
North Carolina, USA

Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a suggested framework for improving the
understanding of consumer receptiveness to incoming international retailers. The consumer
perception of country of origin against consumer receptiveness index (CRI) is proposed as a method to
explore the receptiveness of consumers in the host market to incoming international retailers.
Design/methodology/approach – This paper reviews the international retailing literature,
highlighting the need for specific knowledge regarding consumer receptiveness to incoming
international retailers. A method is proposed to explore how consumers in the host market respond to
incoming international retail firms.
Findings – The literature review indicates that the majority of the extant work investigates the
process from the perspective of the internationalising retailer, while consumer receptiveness to the
international retailer has not been fully considered.
Research limitations/implications – This paper does not present an empirical study.
The consumer perception of country of origin against CRI is presented as a means to suggest and
guide future research in the area.
Practical implications – The paper makes a practical contribution by suggesting a method to
explore how consumers in the host country receive incoming international retailers.
Originality/value – This paper is unique because previous research has provided limited
knowledge of consumer receptiveness to international retailers.
Keywords International trade, Consumer behaviour, Retail trade, Country of origin,
Competitive strategy
Paper type Conceptual paper

International Journal of Retail & Introduction

Distribution Management The internationalisation of retailing is usually considered from the perspective of the
Vol. 38 No. 3, 2010
pp. 160-172 internationalising operation (Alexander and Myers, 2000; Doherty and Alexander,
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
0959-0552
2004, 2006). Research has tended to focus on the process of internationalisation and
DOI 10.1108/09590551011027104 related strategic issues such as entry methods, motivations and direction of activity.
As a consequence, very little attention has been given to the receptiveness of International
consumers in host markets to incoming international retailers; although, the work of retail market
Straughan and Albers-Miller (2001) provides a valuable contribution from a cultural
perspective. Moreover, research on the impact of retail internationalisation on entry
consumer behaviour is also limited (Huddleston et al., 2001; de Mooij and Hofstede,
2002; Moore et al., 2003).
This paper seeks to explore this gap in the literature and highlights areas for future 161
research. That is, it considers consumer receptiveness to incoming international
retailers, what we know of the process and the issues that need to be addressed in order
to develop a greater understanding of this potentially crucial aspect of retail
internationalisation.

Review of the literature

The receptiveness of a market to international retail activity has not been adequately
considered in the international retailing literature, although early work by Goldman
(1974) has long suggested that there is the opportunity for a rich seam of research in
this area. In particular, research has not explored consumer response to international
retailers as international entities. That is, research has not considered consumers’
recognition of international retailers as emanating from other markets and measured
the impact this has on the acceptability of that entity to consumers within the host
market. Where such issues are considered, the literature has either taken a company
based perspective and considered consumer response from that vantage point or it has
considered consumers’ response to image questions without addressing consumers’
response to the company as a recognised international operation. Therefore, this
pivotal question has not yet found its way into the literature and been tested within a
consumer context.
That said, certain streams of literature are helpful in considering this important
research question. For example, recently research that explores the divestment process
has, by inference, considered the receptiveness of a market to international retail
activity and international retailers (Cairns et al., 2008); however, the primary focus of
such research has been the internationalisation process rather than the consideration of
market receptiveness to the new market entrant. The work of Bianchi and Mena (2004)
and Bianchi and Arnold (2004) on indigenous retailer response in Chile to incoming US
and European retailers provide notable exceptions. Their work, however, is retailer and
not consumer focused. Likewise, El-Amir and Burt (2008) have explored Sainsbury’s
withdrawal from Egypt by considering the retailer’s perspective as well as consumer
views. Therefore, existing work is either focused solely upon the retailer or focused
upon market withdrawal rather than market entry. Though the literature provides
some insight into various aspects of the internationalization process, it does not
provide an understanding of the consumer’s reaction to incoming retailers.
Another stream of research considers consumer response to marketing issues in the
international retailing context. This work tends to examine consumer behaviour from a
cross-cultural perspective that focuses upon identifying similarities and differences
in consumer groups across nationalities. For example, international products are
considered by Huddleston et al. (2001) with respect to product quality and Polish
consumers’ ethnocentrism. Likewise, cross-border shopping has been considered by
Dmitrovic and Vida (2007) with reference to consumer motivations for choosing
IJRDM domestic versus international retailers. Price perception in different markets has been
38,3 considered by Moore et al. (2003) with respect to US and Polish consumers and by Jin
and Sternquist (2003) with respect to US and Korean consumers. While this research
has clearly highlighted differences between markets and hence the factors that retailers
may need to consider when entering markets, this work has not explored consumer
receptiveness to international retailers as international companies per se.
162 Another stream of research has emerged that looks at retail store and hence brand
images in different markets. However, again this has been primarily focused on
the retailer’s image within a market, rather than the image of the retailer as an
international retailer. McGoldrick and Ho (1992) looked at perceptions of the UK
retailer Marks & Spencer in Hong Kong and later McGoldrick (1998) considered Marks
& Spencer and C&A in France and the UK. In a similar vein, later research by Burt and
Carralero-Encinas (2000) investigated perceptions of Marks & Spencer in Spain and the
UK, while Burt and Mavrommatis (2006) explored the standardisation and positioning
of Dia (Carrefour owned Spanish discount retailer) in Spain and Greece. More recently,
Burt et al. (2007) looked at perceptions of IKEA through photographs taken of the store
by consumers who originate from three different European markets and Johansson and
Thelander (2008) have researched perceptions of IKEA in China, Sweden and the UK.
While valuable outcomes have emerged from this research the focus of the research has
not been the international identity of the retailer: perceptions of country of origin were
considered as part of a wider study in McGoldrick (1998) while in Burt and
Carralero-Encinas (2000) one question from 24 related to the perception of Marks &
Spencer as a British retailer.
Recently, building on research that considers the development of Wal-Mart from
a corporate and retail structural perspective (Arnold and Fernie, 2000; Fernie and
Arnold, 2002; Fernie et al., 2006) work by Pioch et al. (2009, p. 206) has, using
institutional theory, gathered consumer data in order to test the proposition that
“in order to be successful, retailers have to at least comply or better exceed” market
norms. Making a valuable contribution to the literature, it investigates store attributes
across cultures; however, it does not place the international identity and provenance of
the retailer at the heart of the research questions posed to consumers. It employed at the
time of the survey a multinational rather than global operating strategy as defined by
Salmon and Tordjman (1989); therefore, what is being tested are attributes associated
with a store operating in different markets rather than the international identity of the
retailer and the retail brand. Thus, it adopts the same perspective of attribute
perceptions recognised in the literature noted above (Burt and Carralero-Encinas, 2000;
Burt and Mavrommatis, 2006; Burt et al., 2007; Johansson and Thelander, 2008).

Observation of consumer receptiveness

Consumer receptiveness and academic perception of consumer receptiveness has been
addressed in wider studies. Hollander’s (1970) commentary on expatriate communities
or the importance of market of origin issues such as notions of “Britishness” for certain
luxury products (Hollander, 1970; Alexander, 1989; Moore et al., 2000; Hutchinson et al.,
2007) appears in the literature. However, while relevant to the question considered here,
the research is not wholly focused on consumer receptiveness of such factors or
characteristics. The existing literature only takes us so far in addressing the central
question of consumer receptiveness to international retailers including their perception
and reaction to those retailers. The literature has tended to recognise the importance of International
receptiveness, but tended to circumvent the central question. Yet, observation of the retail market
realities of consumer receptiveness shows that this is clearly a very real aspect of
the retail internationalisation process. entry
Negative public reception of international retailers is an observable feature of the
internationalisation and international divestment process. The media has extensively
covered negative public reaction to some international retail ventures such as 163
Sainsbury in Egypt in the 2001, and Carrefour in China in 2008. The direct consumer or
lobby group response to Sainsbury in Egypt is clear in the following extract from a
news report: “London-based supermarket chain J. Sainsbury P.L.C. has found itself the
target of such an unofficial boycott in recent months, as protesters demonstrated
outside its store in Cairo, Egypt” (Veysey and Schwartz, 2001, p. 15). Another report
suggests “Sainsbury was targeted this year because extremists believed, incorrectly,
that it was owned by a Jewish family” (Hatfield, 2001, p. 14). Likewise in China, reports
indicated that “supermarket chain Carrefour” had “borne the brunt of the anti-French
sentiment in China” after protestors disrupted the carrying of the Olympic flame in
Paris (Hon, 2008). The report goes on to say “internet users here are calling on Chinese
consumers to boycott Carrefour stores across China”. Both of these examples of
negative consumer reception and indeed collective negative behaviour related to a
retailer’s actual or perceived ethnic origin has manifested itself in different ways but
the trigger point has been the same; international retailers recognised as such by
consumers in the host market. This activity is not unrecognised in the literature;
however, as noted above it has appeared as an aspect of divestment activity.
Evidence of positive public reception of international retailers is again available and
has also received extensive coverage in the media. However, in contrast to negative
consumer reception, consumers’ positive receptiveness of international retail
operations would appear to be subsumed within an interest in the arrival of a new
concept and not necessarily a new “international” retailer. For example, Abercrombie
& Fitch’s arrival in London, in 2007, Whole Foods Market’s opening of 80,000 square
feet store on Kensington High St, London in 2008 and Tesco’s arrival in California in
2008. Coverage of such consumer reception has been media driven while analytical
academic coverage has not appeared in the retail management literature.

Discussion
The market or country of origin literature is vast in itself; however, the market of origin
literature is remarkably silent on the issue of consumer receptiveness to international
retailers as international retailers. This raises two questions.
First, do consumers know which retailers are international? As far as this question is
concerned, a number of observations may be made. Although, there is very limited
work on this question, the international retailing literature assumes consumers have
some perception and this perception is influential. McGoldrick (1998), as part of a wider
survey of retailer images in different markets, found French consumers strongly
associated the UK retailer Marks & Spencer with the UK and consumers in the retailer’s
domestic market also strongly associated the retailer with the UK. However, in contrast,
McGoldrick (1998) found C&A’s market of origin was not clearly recognised by the
same consumers; it was clear in both France and the UK that C&A was not a domestic
retailer. Similarly, McGoldrick (1998, p. 193) remarked that “Woolworths in the United
IJRDM Kingdom tended to be regarded as British by most consumers, even while still under
38,3 U.S. ownership” (Mitton, 1987). Therefore, McGoldrick’s research suggests
international retailers may be distinguished by market of origin in three ways:
international and from a correctly identified market, international and from
an incorrectly identified market and incorrectly identified as domestic in origin.
Second, does “international” or “market of origin” matter to consumers in the retail
164 context? Again the limited but available research would suggest that this does matter.
The work of Straughan and Albers-Miller (2001), considering data from Australia,
France, South Korea and the USA, is pivotal in this regard. For them, “culture is an
important indicator of domestic store loyalty” so that “high levels of risk aversion (high
UAI) or a strong collective (low IDV) will find consumers exhibiting greater opposition
in the form of home country loyalty” (Straughan and Albers-Miller, 2001, p. 533). In the
light of their findings it is worthy to note that one market where the literature
(Bianchi and Mena, 2004; Bianchi and Arnold, 2004) has recognised domestic retailers’
ability to resist international activity is Chile, where on Hofstede’s index the market has
a high UAI score of 86 and a low IDV score of 23. However, they approach the question
from a different perspective to the one under consideration here. Zarkada-Fraser and
Fraser’s (2002) findings also support the idea that market of origin does matter in the
retail consumer context. They examined store patronage for hypothetical foreign- and
domestic-owned supermarkets between Australian and Greek-Australian women
(25-40 years with young children). They found a higher support for a supermarket if
C-O-O is Australian not American (90 per cent against 77 per cent). They found only
32 per cent of their consumers were likely to recommend a foreign store to friends
compared with 96 per cent for the Australian supermarket. They explored ethnic
background and store patronage, conceptualising migrant consumers as hostile,
independent, obligated and empathetic with each type demonstrating different
approaches to the “foreign” retailer.

Research agenda
Research such as that by McGoldrick (1998) and Straughan and Albers-Miller (2001),
would suggest that both questions are important and that consumers know to varying
degrees which retailers are international and that, in some contexts, “international”
or “market of origin” does matter to consumers in the retail context. This in itself
generates further questions and a research agenda.

Country of origin
First, it is important to understand consumers’ perceptions of international retailers
with respect to their country of origin. That is building on McGoldrick’s (1998)
identification of different levels of recognition and Straughan and Albers-Miller’s
(2001) work which justifies an indexation of different markets’ receptiveness to
international retailers, it is possible to conceptualise consumer receptiveness along the
lines shown in Figure 1.
In Figure 1, the vertical axis describes consumers’ perception of the retailer’s
country of origin:
(a) international retailer’s country of origin distinct and recognizable;
(b) international retailer’s country of origin indistinct but international status
recognizable;
 Perceived
International
C-O-O retail market
entry
7 8
a

International 165
b 5 6

3 4
c

Domestic

d 1 2

Low Consumer High

receptiveness index

Figure 1.
Consumer perception of
Culture/socio- country of origin against
Firm influences Market influences CRI
economic influences

(c) domestic market perceived as international retailer’s country of origin; and

(d) domestic market perceived as domestic retailer’s country of origin.
Categories (a) and (b) show that the consumer is aware that the retailer has an
international status but only in category (a) are retailers correctly identified by their
market of origin. Categories (c) and (d) identify retailers that consumers perceive to be
domestic in origin; although, category (c) actually contains retailers that have
international countries of origin.

Consumer receptiveness
In developing the consumer receptiveness index (CRI), we can look to the potential of
Fishbein and Ajzen’s (1975) theory of reasoned action (TORA) for possible guidance.
The TORA model underpins a great majority of research into variables that affect
consumer behaviour including marketing stimuli (Vaidyanathan et al., 2000), brand
and product choice (Ozsomer and Altaras, 2008; Choo et al., 2004), channel choice
(Barkhi et al., 2008), advertising (Wiley et al., 2007) and other objects or events that
affect consumers and markets (Sheppard et al., 1988). The basic structure of the TORA
model presents four major components: beliefs, attitudes, behavioural intentions and
behaviour.
IJRDM The horizontal axis in Figure 1 represents consumer receptiveness that ranges from
38,3 low to high degrees of receptiveness towards international retailers among consumers
in the host market. Consumer receptiveness is an indicator of individual or group
response. That is, in this context, the willingness of the individual or group to accept
retailers based in other markets operating in the individual or group’s domestic
market. Consumer receptiveness is expressed in terms of beliefs, attitudes, knowledge
166 and behaviour. Low levels of consumer receptiveness are reflected by negative beliefs
and attitudes, knowledge gaps and negative behaviours including avoidance and
negative word-of-mouth towards the incoming retailer. High levels of consumer
receptiveness towards the incoming retailer are reflected by positive beliefs and
attitudes, accurate knowledge and positive behaviours including approach and
positive word-of-mouth.
The literature suggests that consumer receptiveness can be influenced by factors
related to the internationalizing firm and/or its product offering as well as factors in the
host market’s business environment including cultural/socio-economic conditions and
the degree of international market exposure. Each of these influences can impact
consumer beliefs, attitudes, knowledge levels and behaviours in different manners.
Together they provide the opportunity to develop a CRI. A CRI is therefore the sum of
the influences – consumer beliefs, attitudes, knowledge and behaviours – that make
individuals or societies more or less willing to accept international operations. Thus, if
consumers display high levels of CRI then they are willing to accept international
operations and indeed, in some circumstances, may seek them out. In such
circumstances incoming retailers may wish to adopt a market position that emphasises
an international market of origin. The following sections discuss the potential influence
of these factors in terms of the proposed model of consumer receptiveness.
Influence of the retail brand and product categories. It is important to understand
how different retailer characteristics affect consumers’ perceptions. For example, the
literature (Hollander, 1970; Alexander, 1989; Moore et al., 2000; Hutchinson et al., 2007)
would suggest that luxury goods retailers are well placed to benefit from international
associations and that an association with a particular market may be beneficial in
certain international markets. On this basis, in Figure 1 luxury goods retailers would
tend to be located in category (a) or, possibly, (b). Conversely, the observational
evidence would suggest that food retailers (Sainsbury and Carrefour) are vulnerable to
international associations, especially where interest groups are able to leverage
consumer opposition. Therefore, in the examples given above, Carrefour in China was
correctly identified by its market of origin and fell into category (a). Sainsbury’s market
of origin was incorrectly identified but its international status was recognised placing
the company in category (b) as far as some consumers in the Egyptian market were
concerned. There may be characteristics, such food and non-food merchandise ranges,
that fundamentally affect consumer receptiveness.
Retailers in category (c) are retailers that are international in origin but consumers
consider them to be of domestic provenance. As noted above, McGoldrick gives
Woolworths in the UK as a classic example of such an association. Retailers that fall
into this category may either not emphasise their country of origin or actively seek to
avoid associations with the market. Therefore, consumers may equally not have any
clear reason for associating the retailer with any market other than their own
environment either through familiarity or limited engagement with that aspect of the International
retailer’s brand message. retail market
Category (d) contains those retailers that are correctly identified as domestic in
origin and are therefore easily defined. However, domestic retailers raise an intriguing entry
question. That is, there may be some retailers that are domestic in origin that
consumers perceive to have international associations. These retailers may be seen to
fall into category (b); that is, they are seen to be international and are incorrectly 167
attributed to a country of origin. For example, individual UK consumers might have
associations with the Burberry brand that suggest it originates – albeit incorrectly –
in the USA. Conversely, the name Abercrombie & Fitch might create Scottish
resonance for UK consumers, who might consequently consider the brand to be
domestic in origin. Where a language is shared, or is part of a language group, this may
be a relatively common misperception. For example, Zara is based in Spain; however
the name might suggest Italian origins to some consumers. Likewise, a retailer may
have a name that suggests international associations because it looks or sounds as if it
originates in a market that uses a particular language, whereas in fact the company’s
origins are domestic. For example, the UK niche retailer of maternity and baby goods,
Jo Jo Maman Bébé might be thought to be a retailer originating in France on the basis
of the language resonances to be found in the brand name.
Cultural and socio-economic influences. It is also important to understand how the
socio-economic characteristics of a retailer’s customers affect general cultural
receptiveness levels. This may be particularly important in understanding the
sequence of international retailer market entry rates as retailers respond to changing
receptiveness within society. It may, for example, be more appropriate for a retailer to
acquire an indigenous operation where consumer market receptiveness is low and
hence occupy position 3 in Figure 1. Here, the international retailer utilises a domestic
fascia and/or brand to avoid negative consumer reception.
Influence of international market exposure. Related to the role of socio-economic
influences and receptiveness to foreign retail entrants, it is also important to
understand how exposure to international products and international retailers affects
willingness among consumers to accept or reject international retailers. This is clearly
a theme that emerges from Straughan and Albers-Miller’s (2001) research. Such
exposure may be defined by international trade between markets, the presence and
importance of internal brands in the market or travel by consumers in international
markets.
Consumer perspective. Given the increasing significance of emerging markets to
international retailers this is likely to become an increasingly important question.
Consumers who have been exposed to international products may seek out
international fascias and brands in their home market.
Overall, a fundamental question emerges that relates to the benefits derived by
consumers from international offerings in their domestic market and the competitive
gap that exists within the market. That is, where customers are willing to embrace
international innovation, irrespective of their perceptions of the retailer as originating
from another market. This may highlight important characteristics of the competitive
environment in the host market and the retail structural characteristics of the market.
Retail perspective. In this context, retailers with particular market associations and
strong luxury brands would tend to enter the market at position 8 in Figure 1.
IJRDM However, in emerging markets, incoming retailers that appeal to a mass market, and
38,3 by inference, customers less exposed to international products, may have to be
circumspect with respect to their international associations and thereby enter the
market at position 3; a decision that would have important implications for their
choice of entry methods.
In addition, it is also important to understand how and why retailers communicate
168 market of origin associations within their marketing communications. This raises
further questions regarding brand identity and by implication other issues such as
market entry strategy and market selection. Specifically, where retailers see limited
advantage in international market associations or positive benefits in avoiding such
associations, how does that affect market selection and choice of entry mode?

Research implications
Given the issues discussed above, a first stage research agenda emerges. Empirical
testing of research hypotheses is required in order to understand the proposed
relationships indicated above and the factors most important to the development
of a CRI.
First, an understanding of levels of consumer awareness of retailers’ markets of
origin is required. That is, do consumers recognise the international market of origin of
retailers and how do the characteristics of the retailer affect recognition levels? Second,
an integrated understanding of consumer perceptions of retailer country of origin are
also required in order to assess the relationship between retailer recognition and home
market evaluation. Third, consumer beliefs, attitudes, knowledge and behaviour need
to be considered with reference to the first and second points noted here. Fourth,
cultural factors need to be considered in order to ascertain the manner in which culture
may or may not fundamentally underpin and hence structure consumer response.
These four fundamental research considerations provide a focus for research
activity. Initially, using existing and adapted constructs, consumer awareness and
perceptions need to be considered. On the basis of the initial research hypotheses, and
the testing of those hypotheses, refinement of the constructs employed will be required
and further testing undertaken. Exploring consumer perceptions of retailers emanating
from a range of countries, as well as the collection of data from consumers based in a
range of countries, would provide rich data sets from which to advance current
understanding.

Conclusion
While there is reference in some of the international retailing literature to aspects of
consumer receptiveness, it is remarkably limited and in many cases reliant on media
coverage and observation rather than academic research findings. This paper has
sought to begin the process of redressing the balance in the literature in order to better
understand the way consumer markets embrace, or ultimately reject, international
retail operations. In this there is a research agenda that has remained an under
explored and elusive question that is implicit within research on international retail
activity since Hollander’s (1970) exploration of the fundamental characteristics of
international retailing.
Given the current state of the literature, the interaction between country of origin
perception and consumer receptiveness of the international retailer provides a starting
point for dissecting the process of consumer acceptance/rejection of the incoming International
retailer on the basis of the company’s home market. The conceptual model suggests retail market
that characteristics related to the internationalizing retailer and its products, as well as
socio-economic and market level factors can impact consumer receptiveness both along entry
with and above and beyond country of origin perceptions. The suggested model is
grounded in several different streams of literature and is intended to provide an
academic approach to understanding the concept of consumer receptiveness within the 169
context of country of origin. Owing to the developmental nature of the conceptual
model, it is entirely possible that additional factors influence consumer responsiveness
beyond country of origin and the macro and micro environment issues set forth in the
paper. In order to further approach these gaps, additional conceptual work and
empirical work is necessary.

References
Alexander, N. (1989), “The internal market of 1992: attitudes of leading retailers”, Retail &
Distribution Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 13-15.
Alexander, N. and Myers, H. (2000), “The internationalisation process”, International Marketing
Review, Vol. 17 Nos 4/5, pp. 334-53.
Arnold, S. and Fernie, J. (2000), “Wal-Mart in Europe: prospects for the UK”, International
Marketing Review, Vol. 17 Nos 4/5, pp. 416-32.
Barkhi, R., Belanger, F. and Hicks, J. (2008), “A model of the determinants of purchasing from
virtual stores”, Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, Vol. 18 No. 3,
pp. 177-96.
Bianchi, C. and Arnold, S. (2004), “An institutional perspective on retail internationalization
success: Home Depot in Chile”, International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer
Research, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 149-69.
Bianchi, C. and Mena, J. (2004), “Defending the local market against foreign competitors:
the example of Chilean retailers”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution
Management, Vol. 32 No. 10, pp. 495-504.
Burt, S. and Carralero-Encinas, J. (2000), “The role of store image in retail internationalisation”,
International Marketing Review, Vol. 17 Nos 4/5, pp. 433-53.
Burt, S. and Mavrommatis, A. (2006), “The international transfer of store brand image”,
International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 16 No. 4,
pp. 395-413.
Burt, S., Johansson, U. and Thelander, A. (2007), “Retail image as seen through consumers’ eyes:
studying international retail image through consumer photographs of stores”,
International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 17 No. 5,
pp. 447-67.
Cairns, P., Doherty, A.M., Alexander, N. and Quinn, B. (2008), “Understanding the international
retail divestment process”, Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 1-18.
Choo, H., Chung, J.E. and Pysarchik, D.T. (2004), “Antecedents to new food product purchasing
behaviour among innovator groups in India”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38
Nos 5/6, pp. 608-25.
de Mooij, M. and Hofstede, G. (2002), “Convergence and divergence in consumer behaviour:
implications for international retailing”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 78 No. 1, pp. 61-9.
Dmitrovic, T. and Vida, I. (2007), “An examination of cross-border shopping behaviour in
South-East Europe”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41 Nos 3/4, pp. 382-95.
IJRDM Doherty, A.M. and Alexander, N. (2004), “Relationship development in international retail
franchising: case study evidence from the UK fashion sector”, European Journal of
38,3 Marketing, Vol. 38 Nos 9/10, pp. 1215-35.
Doherty, A.M. and Alexander, N. (2006), “Power and control in international retail franchising”,
European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 40 Nos 11/12, pp. 1292-316.
El-Amir, A. and Burt, S. (2008), “Sainsbury’s in Egypt: the strange case of Dr Jekyll and
170 Mr Hyde?”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 36 No. 4,
pp. 300-22.
Fernie, J. and Arnold, S. (2002), “Wal-Mart in Europe: prospects for Germany, the UK and
France”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 30 No. 2,
pp. 92-102.
Fernie, J., Hahn, B., Gerhard, U., Pioch, E. and Arnold, S. (2006), “The impact of Wal-Mart’s entry
into the German and UK grocery markets”, Agribusiness, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 247-66.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to
Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Goldman, A. (1974), “Outreach of consumers and the modernization of urban food retailing in
developing countries”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 8-16.
Hatfield, S. (2001), “Life of US multinationals must go on despite obstacles”, Advertising Age,
17 September, p. 14.
Hollander, S.H. (1970), Multinational Retailing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Hon, C. (2008), “Appeals for calm in China amid French boycott calls”, The Straits Times,
Singapore, April, p. 18.
Huddleston, P., Good, L. and Stoel, L. (2001), “Consumer ethnocentrism, product necessity and
Polish consumers’ perceptions of quality”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution
Management, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 236-46.
Hutchinson, K., Alexander, N., Quinn, B. and Doherty, A.M. (2007), “Internationalization motives
and facilitating factors: qualitative evidence from smaller specialist retailers”, Journal of
International Marketing, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 96-122.
Jin, B. and Sternquist, B. (2003), “The influence of retail environment on price perception:
an exploratory study of US and Korean students”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 20
No. 6, pp. 643-60.
Johansson, U. and Thelander, A. (2008), “International retail image: a comparative study of three
countries”, paper presented at 15th International Conference on Recent Advances in
Retailing and Services Science, Zagreb, 14-17 July.
McGoldrick, P. (1998), “Spatial and temporal shifts in the development of international retail
images”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 189-96.
McGoldrick, P. and Ho, J. (1992), “International positioning: Japanese department stores in
Hong Kong”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 26 Nos 8/9, pp. 61-73.
Mitton, A. (1987), “Foreign retail companies operating in the UK: strategy and performance”,
Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 29-31.
Moore, C., Fernie, J. and Burt, S. (2000), “Brands without boundaries: the internationalisation of
the designer retailer’s brand”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 8, pp. 919-37.
Moore, M., McGowan Kennedy, K. and Fairhurst, A. (2003), “Cross-cultural equivalence of price
perceptions between US and Polish consumers”, International Journal of Retail &
Distribution Management, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 268-79.
Ozsomer, A. and Altaras, S. (2008), “Global brand purchase likelihood: a critical synthesis and an International
integrated conceptual framework”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 4,
pp. 1-28. retail market
Pioch, E., Gerhard, U., Fernie, J. and Arnold, S. (2009), “Consumer acceptance and market success: entry
Wal-Mart in the UK and Germany”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution
Management, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 205-25.
Salmon, W. and Tordjman, A. (1989), “The internationalization of retailing”, International 171
Journal of Retailing, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 3-16.
Sheppard, B., Hartwick, J. and Warshaw, P.R. (1988), “The theory of reasoned action:
a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future
research”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 325-43.
Straughan, R. and Albers-Miller, N. (2001), “An international investigation of cultural and
demographic effects on domestic retail loyalty”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 18
No. 5, pp. 521-41.
Vaidyanathan, R., Aggarwal, P., Stem, D.E. Jr, Muehling, D.D. and Umesh, U.N. (2000),
“Deal evaluation and purchase intention: the impact of aspirational and market-based
internal reference prices”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 9 No. 3,
pp. 179-93.
Veysey, H. and Schwartz, P. (2001), “Clashes prompt look at risks”, Business Insurance,
26 February, p. 15.
Wiley, J.B., Krishanous, J. and Cavana, E. (2007), “An experimental study of female Tweeners’
evaluative beliefs regarding ads, attitude toward the ad, and purchase intent for fashion
apparel”, Young Consumers, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 119-27.
Zarkada-Fraser, A. and Fraser, C. (2002), “Store patronage prediction for foreign-owned
supermarkets”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 30 No. 6,
pp. 282-99.

About the authors

Nicholas Alexander is a Professor of International Marketing and Director of the Centre for
Research in Marketing at Aberystwyth University. He holds a PhD from the University of Ulster.
He has published research in various areas including international retail marketing, relationship
marketing and financial services marketing. His consulting experience for government and
industry is primarily in international retail marketing and strategy. In addition to the
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management he has recently published in the
Journal of International Marketing, Journal of Services Marketing, Journal of Marketing
Management, European Journal of Marketing and the International Marketing Review. His
current research is focused on international retail marketing, branding and marketing history.
Nicholas Alexander is the corresponding author and can be contacted at: [email protected]
Anne Marie Doherty is a Professor of Marketing and Director of the Centre for Research on
Consumption, Markets and Culture at the University of Glamorgan. She holds a PhD in
Marketing from the University of Strathclyde. Her areas of research expertise are international
retail marketing, market entry mode strategy, particularly franchising and fashion marketing.
Her work has been published in journals such as the Journal of Business Research, Journal of
International Marketing, European Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Management and
the International Marketing Review. She was awarded the European Journal of Marketing
Outstanding Reviewer of the Year Award 2009. Her co-authored book, with Professor Nicholas
Alexander, on International Retailing is published by Oxford University Press.
Jason M. Carpenter is an Assistant Professor of Retailing at The University of South Carolina.
He holds a PhD in Retail and Consumer Sciences from The University of Tennessee. His areas of
IJRDM research expertise are consumer shopping value and retail format choice. His work has been
published in numerous academic journals such as Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services,
38,3 International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management and the Journal of Product & Brand
Management.
Marguerite Moore, PhD, is an Associate Professor at the North Carolina State University
College of Textiles. She teaches in the area of brand management and marketing and her
research focuses on retail strategy and analytical techniques. Her work appears in the Journal of
172 Marketing Channels, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Product and Brand Management,
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Marketing Intelligence and Planning
and other scholarly outlets.

To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: [email protected]

Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints