Szorpciós Izoterma Gyűjtemény
Szorpciós Izoterma Gyűjtemény
Szorpciós Izoterma Gyűjtemény
SORPTION ISOTHERM S
A Catalogu e
SORPTION ISOTHERM S
A Catalogu e
December 1986
Kurt Kielsgaard Hanse n
Sorption Isotherm s
A Catalogu e
1 . udgave, 1 . oplag
December 1986/KKH :es
Building Materials Laborator y
The Technical University of Denmar k
Technical Report 162/8 6
Copyright : The author
Printing : LTT Tryk, DT H
Key word s
Sorption isotherms, data base ,
curve fitting, moistur e
Abstrac t
In the present catalogue sorption isotherms for more than 100 materials ar e
plotted . A page of the catalogue shows both data values and a figure wit h
data points and approximated curves . The data base has been built up usin g
an IBM PC .
V
CONTENT S
Pag e
2 .1 Hygroscopic Moisture 1
2 .4 Temperature Influence 5
5. CATALOGUE SOURCES 8
6. REGISTRATION METHOD 10
7. SUMMARIZING REMARKS 12
8. LITERATURE 13
The present work is part of the project "Moisture in Building Materials" whic h
has been carried out at the Building Materials Laboratory during 1985 an d
1986 . The project has been supported by the Danish Technical Researc h
Council (J . No . 16-3722 .B-153) .
Anders Nielse n
Project Leader
iv
SUMMAR Y
In this catalogue sorption isotherms for more than 100 materials are plotted .
Measured sorption values published in different literature sources are put int o
a data base, and for each set of values the best curve through desorptio n
and adsorption measuring points, respectively, are fitted using the extende d
Posnow equation . A page of the catalogue shows both data values and a
figure with data points and approximated curves .
An IBM PC has been used to build up the data base which is stored on a
diskette marked SORPTION . The necessary data input and plotting program s
for the data base as well as programs for curve fitting of data points are als o
stored on the diskette . The programs have been discussed in a separat e
report where the execution of the programs is described, too .
-1 -
m1 m2
u _ (1)
m2
Using p for the dry density, the water content per m 3 , w, is calculated b y
w = p u (2 )
2 .1 Hygroscopic Moistur e
In air with a certain relative humidity (RH or ) and temperature (T) a po-
rous building material after a while will reach a state of equilibrium with th e
environment, i .e . the partial vapor pressure and the temperature of the wate r
vapor in the pores of the material will be quite the same as in ambient air .
The porous material will exchange water with the ambient air until the poin t
of equilibrium is reached .
I III
100 100 0 10 0
0 100 0 10 0
Relative humidity, - $
The isotherm Types I and II are the most common . Moisture fixation in po-
rous building materials almost always gives S-shaped isotherms of Type II .
- 3 -
The shape of the equilibrium isotherm can be divided into three parts depend -
ing on the type of fixation, see Figure 2 .
At low RH the water molecules are bound in one layer to the surface of th e
pores by hydrogen bond or van der Waal forces . When all surfaces of th e
pores are covered with one layer of molecules, the building of the next laye r
starts . The transition is marked by the fact that the curve is straight . The
thickness of the adsorbed water layer increases to a third or possibly a
fourth layer with an increasing pore humidity . Capillary condensation is th e
last mechanism that takes place . The saturation water vapor pressure abov e
curved surfaces decreases depending on the curvature of the meniscus a s
expressed in the so-called Kelvin equation . This means that at a given R H
all the pores with a certain radius will be filled with water .
Maximum wate r
content, u
ma x
Capillary domain :
Water uptake b y
suction, wate r
pressure o r
condensatio n
Hygroscopi c
moisture .
Water uptak e
fro m
ambient ai r
0 10 0
Relative humidity, - $
At high relative humidities the course of the sorption curve becomes uncertai n
because of different hysteresis phenomena . Experimentally it is very difficul t
to maintain a constant RH above 98% which means an uncertainty in the dif-
ferent experiments reported in the literature . For these reasons the curv e
fitting in the present catalogue stops at 98% RH .
C
a)
Y
C
0
V
1.-
a)
c9
0 10 0
Relative humidity, - $
c
a)
c
0
U
0 10 0
Relative humidity, - %
-5 -
2 .4 Temperature Influenc e
Exampl e
Lime sandstone having a dry density of 1700 kg/m 3 is delivered with a pro-
duction moisture content of 11% related to dry mass . The stones are use d
as an internal wall with a thickness of 110 mm . How much water must b e
dried from 1 m 2 before the wall is in equilibrium with 50% RH, 20 C? O n
the desorption curve an equilibrium moisture content of 1 .5 weight percen t
is found . The amount of water to be removed is Au = 11% - 1 .5% . Per m 2
is calculated
A lot of theories have been put forward concerning calculation of the adsorp-
tion of gases and vapors on solids . Among the most well-known theories ar e
the Langmuir /3/ and the BET isotherms /2/, but also other models will be
mentioned here . The models are useful in curve fitting of experimental sorp-
tion data for use in computer calculations .
Langmuir assumes that the adsorption takes place in a single molecular laye r
(compare with Type I isotherms in Figure 1) . The equation made by Lang-
muir looks like
u = a'b6 (3 )
1+b4)
The BET theory is built on the Langmuir theory, and it postulates that th e
polymolecular adsorption isotherm can be composed by a series of simultane-
ous Langmuir adsorption isotherms built up by single molecular layers . Fro m
the equilibrium condition for the sorption of 1st, 2nd, . . ., n'th layer th e
following equation for the adsorption isotherm can be set u p
n+1 ]
ab'DC 1 -(n +1)4) n + n .
u= +1 ] (4 )
(1 -s) C1 + (b-1)4) - b . cf, n
ab
u = (1-)C1 + (b-1)4) ] (5)
For n = 1, the Langmuir isotherm is found . The BET equation can be use d
to describe the lower part of the isotherm up to about 40% RH .
Lykow /4/ has given some empirical equations for calculation of isotherms .
A second degree approximation has been suggeste d
A criticism against the shown set of equations says the dividing point of 35 %
RH will not hold for many materials . A variable dividing point in the rang e
of 20-40% RH seems to be more useful .
Further, in the range of 10-90% RH, Lykow assumes the equilibrium moistur e
content can be calculated satisfactorily by use of the following empirical equa-
tion
G
u= (7 )
H-4)
Lykow claims the Posnow equation gives the best approximation in the rang e
30-100% RH . The formula is derived from experiments with woo d
1 1
B In (8 )
u uh
I ) -1
u = uh (1 - (9 )
= exp(A(1 - (L-)
4 -n ) ) (10 )
h
wher e
(u n /u h ) n
non-evaporable water conten t
maximum hygroscopically bound water by adsorptio n
empirically fixed exponen t
relative humidit y
u = water to dry mass ratio
- 8 -
I ) -1/ n
u =u h (1 -
I
= u hexp((- ) ln(1 - )) (12)
n
Equation 12 is applied in this catalogue . A is 0 .34-0 .38 for beech, birch ,
and a standard wood curve from the Technological Institute /13/ for n - 1 .
As mentioned above, d in Equation 9 can be calculated to 0 .30-0 .47 based o n
the values given by Lykow and consequently, when d = A, the two equation s
seem to be identical for n = 1 . The introduction of n into Equation 11 makes
it applicable to describe both the desorption and the adsorption values fo r
most materials in the range 20-98% RH .
RH, the S-shape can be hidden in some cases . Firstly, the equation does no t
include the range 0-20% RH, secondly, the approximation can deviate fro m
measured sorption values for higher relative humidities . For concrete, Ahl-
gren /6/ has measured desorption values which show a jump in the desorptio n
curve, and this jump of course cannot be described by a common expressio n
as Equation 11 .
5 . CATALOGUE SOURCE S
Our main source for the present catalogue is the work of Ahlgren /6/ . Thi s
thesis surveys the literature concerning determination of isotherms for differ -
ent adsorbates and adsorbents . A result of the studies is that the desorptio n
-9 -
Ahlgren has determined a lot of sorption isotherms representing the most util-
ized porous building materials . Both desorption and adsorption isotherms ar e
determined for the majority of the materials . The thorough experimental wor k
and reporting made the measuring results of Ahlgren positively credible an d
most of the measuring results shown in /6/ are included in the present cata-
logue .
Lck /10/ has given sorption values for a series of building materials in ad-
dition to paper, leather, textiles, tobacco, coke, and food . Sorption value s
for a series of these materials are included in the catalogue, but unfortunatel y
the reference does not indicate whether these are desorption or adsorptio n
values .
Also Krischer Ill/ has given sorption values for a series of building material s
in addition to paper, textiles, tobacco, potatoes, coke, and artificial materials .
The temperature dependence for wood and potatoes in particular at tempera -
tures between 20 0 C and 800 C has received special treatment . Sorption value s
for a series of these materials are included in the catalogue, among these the
temperature dependence of the wood curves . Krischer mentions all the sorp-
tion isotherms shown to be desorption curves .
Included in the catalogue are measuring results for lacquer and paint, san d
and gravel, soft rot decayed pine, brick with salt, and impregnated wood .
The references are shown in connection with each curve .
The same material is illustrated by sorption values from various sources . Thi s
gives the possibility to evaluate the precision of the sorption isotherms .
6 . REGISTRATION METHO D
The necessary programs for the data base, i .e . data input and plotting pro-
grams as well as programs for curve fitting of data points are also stored o n
the diskette which is marked SORPTION . The programs are described i n
/12/, which also explains in detail how to operate them . It has been attempte d
to write the programs as a dialogue . The program asks about input, and the
- 11 -
The data input program DATAIND is organized so that the input of data point s
can be made either by using the keyboard of the PC, or via digitizing usin g
an HP plotter as a digitizer table . The sorption values for most of the mate -
rials in the data base are entered via digitizing* . Each material at each tem-
perature level gets a material file in the data base .
The data input is carried out in the following way . Firstly, the title of th e
material, the density, and the temperature are read, in the next place sorp-
tion values (,,u) for desorption and adsorption curves together with possibl e
scanning curves, then possible additional material characteristics, and finall y
reference, date, and initials . if density and temperature are not known, a 0
(zero) must be written in both places . (No 0 C sorption curves appear i n
the present edition of the catalogue .) The desorption values must be entere d
with decreasing , and the adsorption values must be entered with increasin g
, while the scanning curves must be supplied in the measured order . Usin g
this concept for data input, the sorption values are written in the catalogu e
page in the measured order . If the reference does not indicate either desorp-
tion or adsorption values, the sorption values must be put in with increasin g
The curve fitting to create the best curve through desorption and adsorptio n
measuring points, respectively, is performed by the programs DESORPF an d
SORPF using Equation 12 . Using DESORPF, u h , n, and A in Equation 12 ar e
determined directly for desorption values, while SORPF is used for adsorptio n
values and difficult desorption values . In SORPF, u h is iterated, and n an d
A are determined directly . The use of Equation 12 till now has been foun d
suitable to describe the desorption isotherms as well as the adsorption isotherms .
* If the literature reference has given more measurements of u for the same , the input of th e
u-values are done correctly, but a little displaced about the correct (l)-value . This is don e
because in the beginning of the fitting work we tried with a polynomial representation whic h
does not allow more u-values for the same . Unfortunately, the polynomial representation di d
not succeed and was left in favor of the above given exponential model, but the small displace -
ments were not corrected as to be seen in the present catalogue . The small displacements wil l
not have any practical significance .
- 12 -
page using the program UDTEGN . The catalogue page shows both sorptio n
values and a figure with data points and curves . The scanning points ar e
bound together with straight lines because DESORPF and SORPF are not cre-
ated for curve fitting of these points .
7 . SUMMARIZING REMARK S
A data base for sorption isotherms has been built up by use of an IBM P C
with the appurtenant catalogue plotted as this report . The necessary data
input and plotting programs in addition to programs for curve fitting of data
points are given in a separate report /12/ also describing the execution o f
the programs . By putting the sorption catalogue on a PC one gets the ad -
vantage of updating and easy distribution to other interested institutes .
The curve fitting to create the best curve through desorption and adsorptio n
measuring points, respectively, has been difficult because the literature ha s
discussed the sorption isotherms only for selected materials . This repor t
refers to some mathematical models describing the isotherms, and it show s
that the model made by Freiesleben Hansen can be considered as a furthe r
development of the Posnow equation . The use of the above model has bee n
found suitable to describe both the desorption and the adsorption isotherms .
In some cases a few more sorption values would give a more precise curv e
fitting .
Different sources are used in the catalogue . As a principal rule the meas-
ured desorption and adsorption values and the scanning points given by th e
reference are put into the material file of the data base, and these data point s
are then used in the curve fitting . In older literature often only a sorptio n
curve is given, but neither measuring results nor an indication about desorp-
tion or adsorption are stated . Nevertheless, such sorption curves are in-
cluded in the catalogue primarily to present as many materials as possible ,
but also to show the link to the food science (Luck /10/ and Krischer /11 /) .
Ahlgren /6/ has been the main source . His results include determination o f
the desorption isotherm, drying of the samples, and the determination of th e
adsorption isotherms . The thorough experimental work and reporting mak e
the measuring results of Ahlgren positively credible, and most of the meas-
uring results shown in /6/ are included in this catalogue .
- 13 -
8 . LITERATUR E
/3/ Langmuir, I ., Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol . 40, 1918 .
/12/ Hansen, Kurt Kielsgaard : "Sorption Isotherms" . Program and User Docu-
mentation for the Programs DATAIND, SORPF, DESORPF, and UDTEG N
from the diskette SORPTION (in Danish), Building Materials Laboratory ,
Technical University of Denmark, Technical Report 163/86, 1986 .
- 14 -
CELLULAR CONCRET E
CELLULAR CONCRET E \C\CELCON20 .23 0
CELLULAR CONCRET E \C\CELCON20 .47 5
CELLULAR CONCRET E \C\CELCON20 .50 0
CELLULAR CONCRET E \C\CELCON20 .50 1
CELLULAR CONCRET E \C \C ELCON 20 .51 0
CEMENT MORTA R
CEMENT MORTAR w/c = 0 .7 0 \C\CEMMOR20 .07 0 *
CEMENT MORTAR w/c = 0 .8 0 \C\CEMMOR20 .08 0 *
CONCRET E
CONCRETE w/ c 0 .4 0 \C\CONCRE20 .04 0
CONCRETE w/ c 0 .4 4 \C\CONCRE20 .04 4
CONCRETE w/ c 0 .4 8 \C\CONCRE20 .04 8
CONCRETE w/ c 0 .5 2 \C\CONCRE20 .05 2
CONCRETE w/ c 0 .5 5 \C\CONCRE20 .05 5
CONCRETE w/ c 0 .5 8 \C\CONCRE20 .05 8
CONCRETE w/ c 0 .6 1 \C\CONCRE20 .06 1
CONCRETE w/ c 0 .6 5 \C\CONCRE20 .06 5
CONCRETE w/ c 0 .6 6 \C\CONCRE20 .06 6
CONCRETE w/c 0 .72 \C\CONCRE20 .07 2
COR K
COR K \C\COR K
CORK AND CORK MEAL \C\CORK 020 .200 0
- 15 -
DRYING MATERIAL S
MAGNESI UMPERCHLORAT E \M_U\MAGNESPE .80 0 0
SILICAGEL inorganic \M U \SILICAGE
EXPANDED CLA Y
EXPANDED CLAY \D K \EXPCLA20 .910 0
GYPSU M
GYPSU M \ D K\GYPSU M
GYPSU M \D_- K\GYPSUMK .13 4 0
PLASTER OF PARI S \M U \PLASTE20 .12 4 0
LEATHE R
LEATHE R \L\LEATHE R
LIGHT-WEIGHT CONCRET E
LIGHT-WEIGHT CONCRET E \L \LWCONC2 0
LIGHT-WEIGHT CONCRETE \L\LWCONC20 .640 0
LIGHT-WEIGHT CONCRETE \L\LWCONC20 .670 0
LIGHT-WEIGHT CONCRETE \L\LWCONC20 .120 0
SIPOREX \M_U\SIPOREXK .760 0
YTONG Siporex \V Z \YTONGKRI .520 0
MINERAL WOOL
GLASS WOO L \D_K\GLWOOL20 .018 0
GLASS WOO L \D_K\GLASWOO L
ROCK WOOL \M_U\ ROWOOL20 . 042 0
RUBBE R
RUBBER \M_U\RUBBE R
- 17 -
SANDSTON E
SANDSTONE red \M U \SANDST20 .270 0
TEXTIL E
ACETATE \A B\ACETAT E
COTTON \C\COTTO N
JUTE \D_K \JUT E
JUTE WEB \D K \JUTWEB20 .100 0
LINEN \L\LINE N
6-POLYAMID \M_U\ POLYAMI D
SILK \M_U \SIL K
WOOL \ V_Z \WOO L
WOOL \V Z \WOOLLY K
WOOD, IMPREGNATED
PINE IMPR . W . B .F .P . \A_B\ BOLFPRO F
PINE IMPR . W . BOLIDEN K33 \A_B\BOLIDK3 3
PINE IMPR . W . C .F . \C \CELCURE F
PINE IMPR . W . K33+M \DJK \K33MINA L
PINE IMPR . W . MINALITH \MU\MINALITH .510 0
0 .5
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
L
a)
a
12
c
a)
6
20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
94 .8 95 .2 80 .3 79 .9 60 .1 40 .0 39 .6 20 .2 20 . 0
u 11 .8 11 .4 9 .7 9 .4 8 .2 7 .0 6 .9 5 .0 4 .5
Approximation :
u= 1 .20E+01*exp ((-1/1 .17) *ln (1-ln () / 9 .00E-01) )
a) 12
a.
4- )
rn
.r., 10
a)
I B
c 6
a)
~
c
0
U
a)
~
L
~
2
N
.~
O
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - X
+ measured desorption value s
95 .1 94 .6 79 .9 79 .6 59 .9 59 .6 39 .9 40 .3 19 .9 20 . 5
u 13 .2 12 .2 9 .6 9 .5 8 .6 8 .4 7 .8 7 .4 6 .1 5 .5
Approximation :
u= 1 .54E+01xexp ((-1/3 .99) xln (1-ln () / 4 .48E-02) )
No scanning value s
0 . 5
n
c 0 . 4
"
0 . 3
u
cu 0 . 2
c_ 0
~
.,-,
0. 1
0E
0 .0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
~ ---
IIIIIIIIII
0 . 8
a
1
~- - -
--
0
0 .5
+ . ' 0
~ 0 I
+ 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
a, 0 . 8
0.
L 0.7
.,,r
n
3 0.6 u
0
0 .5
D
+
n
N 0.1
0
e 0 .0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
m 0 . 4
.~,
cu
3
0 .3 1
0
E 0 .0 i
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
.c 0 . 7
on
0 . 6
0 . 5
c 0 . 4 ----r- - J
L 0 . 2 - -f
m 0 . 1
.~ ,
0
E 0 . 0t ! I
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
C-
a) 2 0
O.
0
R
0
E 0 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
20
C-
M ~ --- - ~ - ~ -
~
O.
~ -- - ------
--l -
/11L---
1
-1--
~%
~
/~
~ r/
-+~- ;
~r_I O - o Ir i ~ / ?
~-. --
u . .
. -,-._-
...----~+- ._
~
~
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity $ - %
+ measured desorption value s
90 .9 75 .2 54 .7 33 .0 17 . 9
u 20 .8 8 .2 4 .9 3 .3 2 . 5
Approximation :
u= 2 .51E+02xexp ((1/1 .24) xln (1ln () / 4 .52E-03) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
20
.w 15
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
90 .8 74 .3 54 .6 32 .5 17 . 6
u 17 .5 7 .2 4 .6 3 .1 2 . 1
Approximation :
u= 1 .64E+02*exp ((1/1 .31) *ln (1ln () / 5 .30E03) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
L
25
o)
. r.,
a.)
20
D
15
C
O
-IJ
10
U
N
L
-;--,
u)
O
E
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
98 .3 92 .0 76 .1 55 .6 32 .8 17 . 8
u 34 .1 14 .4 6 .7 4 .5 2 .7 2 . 3
Approximation :
u= 8 .29E+Oixexp ((-1/1 .57) *ln (1-ln (C/ 5 .65E-03) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
L
o
a 30
~
_
c:n
Tl; 25
E 0 b
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
97 .7 91 .1 75 .1 54 .9 33 .1 17 . 8
u 39 .0 16 .4 6 .5 3 .6 2 .8 2 . 3
Approximation :
u= 9 .27E+01xexp ((-1/1 .24) Eln (1-ln () / 1 .20E-02) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
0.
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - X
+ measured desorption value s
98 .1 90 .3 75 .6 55 .3 34 .7 19 .8 5 . 7
u 20 .2 13 .9 7 .4 4 .9 3 .5 2 .7 1 . 0
Approximation :
u= 2 .32E+01*exp ((-1/1 .15) xln (1ln (0)/ 1 .18E-01) )
+
4-1
rn 4
a)
II I
0 20 40 60 80 i0 0
No scanning value s
0
0
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
relatv lgnedvessg %
+ measured desorption value s
94 .9 95 .4 80 .1 80 .4 60 .0 60 .4 39 .9 40 .4 19 .5 20 . 1
u 5 .84 5 .41 4 .64 4 .06 3 .01 2 .75 2 .04 1 .79 0 .92 0 .78
Approximation :
u= 6 .07E+00xexp ((-1/0 .31) xln (1-ln () / 2 .05E+00) )
No scanning value s
a) 3
~ 2
aCi
-4-)
0
c
u
n) 1
c.
r
=
4-,
u) I
o
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
+
4
4
~
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity 0 - %
+ measured desorption value s
0 97 .6 98 .1 94 .4 95 .1 89 .6 89 .4 80 .0 79 .3 65 .3 65 .6 45 .6 45 .0 20 .0 20 . 5
u 4 .41 4 .09 4 .12 3 .93 3 .97 3 .68 3 .60 3 .26 3 .18 2 .96 2 .66 2 .42 1 .35 1 .2 1
Approximation :
u= 0 .00E+00xexp ((1/1 .00) xln (1ln (0) / 1 .00E+00) )
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
94 .7 95 .0 84 .9 84 .6 65 .3 65 .8 45 .1 45 .7 19 .9 20 . 2
u 4 .67 4 .47 3 .95 3 .75 3 .05 2 .90 2 .26 2 .12 1 .00 0 .88
Approximation :
u= 4 .76E+00*exp ((-1/0 .18) *ln (1-ln () / 4 .85E+00) )
No scanning value s
~
~ 4
...,
a)
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
,4
a)
3 ,. .
-_= - ,
:: t- - -- - ~_ ~
-
- + --
J~
-
. I
~
-- - - ----- I 1
- ~ -- ~- --i -
-
0
E 0 I
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
4 98 .5 97 .7 94 .9 95 .4 90 .2 89 .7 79 .9 80 .5 65 .4 64 .9 45 .3 44 .9 20 .1 20 . 5
u 5 .60 5 .44 5 .23 4 .99 4 .99 4 .75 4 .65 4 .34 3 .98 3 .76 3 .24 2 .95 1 .75 1 .7 3
Approximation :
u= 5 .41E+00xexp ((-1/ 0 .27) xln (1-ln (4) / 4 .51E+00) )
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity -
No scanning value s
~
..0
CT
.~,
4
a)
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
relatv lgnedvessg %
No scanning value s
I 1
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity 4 - %
+ measured desorption value s
97 .6 98 .2 95 .0 94 .7 89 .9 90 .3 80 .0 79 .5 64 .9 65 .3 45 .1 44 .6 19 .7 20 . 1
u 5 .04 4 .77 4 .64 4 .39 4 .33 4 .09 3 .86 3 .54 3 .33 3 .13 2 .60 2 .44 1 .36 1 .3 4
Approximation :
u= 4 .84E+00xexp ((-1/0 .62) )Eln (1-ln () / 1 .45E+00) )
No scanning value s
dJ +
v
..-~ 4
a)
.~,
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity t - %
+ measured desorption value s
97 .5 98 .2 94 .9 95 .3 90 .1 89 .6 79 .9 80 .6 65 .4 65 .9 45 .7 45 .9 20 .8 21 . 0
u 4 .43 4 .32 4 .07 3 .96 3 .80 3 .65 3 .23 3 .09 2 .64 2 .54 1 .93 1 .81 1 .04 0 .9 7
Approximation :
u= 4 .43E+00xexp ((-1/0 .74) xln (1-ln (0)/ 8 .24E-01) )
No scanning value s
5
a)
a
~
.c
4
.'.,
a)
~ +
c
a) 2
c
0
+
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity 4 %
+ measured desorption value s
97 .9 97 .5 94 .4 94 .9 90 .0 90 .0 79 .9 80 .1 64 .7 65 .3 45 .4 44 .9 20 .0 20 . 5
u 4 .59 4 .45 4 .14 4 .01 3 .68 3 .68 3 .18 3 .04 2 .61 2 .48 1 .87 1 .76 0 .94 0 .9 1
Approximation :
u= 4 .59E+00xexp ((1/0 .89) xln (1ln (0)/ 5 .74E01) )
No scanning value s
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
x measured sorption value s
0 .1 9 .4 19 .5 29 .5 39 .5 49 .9 59 .8 69 .9 79 .9 90 . 2
u 0 .00 0 .54 0 .82 0 .98 1 .10 1 .26 1 .47 1 .73 2 .02 2 .3 4
Approximation :
u= 2 .60E+00xexp ((-1/0 .66) xln (1-ln () / 1 .23E+00) )
No scanning value s
10
c
4' 8
a)
4.)
c 6
0
E.)
~L 4
N
.~,
2
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity $ - %
+ measured desorption value s
95 .1 84 .8 65 .0 45 .1 26 . 0
u 19 .5 13 .1 8 .4 5 .8 3 . 8
Approximation :
u= 2 .56E+01xexp ((-1/1 . 40) Mln (1-ln () / 1 .08E-01) )
Notes :
a
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
Notes :
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
91 .5 79 .7 59 .7 39 .4 19 .6 7 .9 0 . 2
u 22 .4 21 .4 18 .9 15 .2 9 .5 4 .9 -0 . 1
Approximation :
u= 0 .00E+00Mexp ((-1/1 .00) Xln (1-ln () / 1 .00E+00) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
0.5
0 .4 -
0.3
--
0
0.2
0. 1 ---~'~ 0
~-
0 .0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
98 .1 98 .5 94 .7 95 .4 84 .5 85 .2 65 .2 65 .6 43 .9 43 .5 20 .3 20 . 5
u 0 .53 0 .43 0 .38 0 .33 0 .26 0 .21 0 .16 0 .12 0 .15 0 .12 0 .11 0 .0 7
Approximation :
u= 6 .05E-01)exp ((-1/2 .20) %ln (1-ln () / 2 .35E-02) )
No scanning value s
ai 8 }
a
.1-)
.0 7 +
CY)
o+
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity 0 - %
+ measured desorption value s
97 .9 95 .1 84 .5 65 .1 44 .5 20 . 0
u 7 .98 7 .02 5 .56 4 .75 4 .04 1 .9 8
Approximation :
u= 8 .02E+00xexp ((-1/1 .62) Xln (1-ln () / 2 .80E-01) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
12
o.
4-, 0
) 10
..,
a)
I 8
c 6
a)
~
c
0 4
U
a)
L
D 2
4-,
u)
. .-I
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
~O. 1 2
4-)
rn 10
.,.i
a)
3
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - % relatv lgnedvessg %
measured sorption value s
0 .2 9 .9 19 .8 30 .3 40 .2 50 .3 60 .0 69 .9 79 .9 89 . 8
u 0 .0 0 .8 1 .7 2 .5 3 .5 4 .6 6 .0 7 .5 9 .2 10 .9
Approximation :
u= 1 .31E+01xexp ((-1/0 .23) xln (1-ln () / 2 .54E+00) )
No scanning value s
m 40
a
L 35
~
.~,
30
o
25 +
0.) 10 +
~ +
5
.ru)., +
0 +
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
relatv lgnedvessg %
+ measured desorption value s
93 .4 92 .0 90 .5 88 .5 85 .3 82 .0 77 .1 75 .3 63 .5 61 .0 50 .5 45 .7 43 .1 35 .7 31 .4 2 1
u 49 .9 44 .9 39 .8 34 .8 29 .7 24 .9 21 .5 20 .7 16 .3 15 .6 13 .3 12 .7 12 .0 10 .9 10 .2 !
Approximation :
u= 3 .72E+02Mexp ((1/1 .67) Xln (1ln () / 2 .43E03) )
No scanning value s
O. 14
:4
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
RYE rozs 0 kg /m 3 20 .0 * C
~ nedvessg tartalom m%
c~
" 30
L
N
a
4-) 25
L
o)
.,1
~
3 20
15
c
a)
~
10
C)
20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
nedvessg tartalom m% 4
d 12
C.
-P 4
rn
.~ ,
10
a)
a
c 6
a,
~
c
0 4
U
a)
C_
4-, 2
.~ ,
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
40
a
r~ 35
.~,
30
25
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
L
G 20
CI
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
relatv lgnedvessg %
m measured sorption value s
24 .9 30 .3 40 .1 50 .0 60 .2 70 .1 80 .1 90 .2 93 . 7
u 9 .2 9 .9 11 .1 12 .4 13 .6 15 .1 17 .1 20 .1 22 .4
Approximation :
u= 2 .66E+01)(exp ((1/2 .53) *ln (1ln () / 1 .09E01) )
No scanning value s
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity $ %
relatv lgnedvessg %
x measured sorption value s
14 .7 19 .7 29 .7 39 .6 50 .0 59 .8 70 .2 80 .1 90 . 5
u 0 .41 0 .50 0 .65 0 .77 0 .89 1 .02 1 .17 1 .35 1 .5 1
Approximation :
u= 1 .68E+00xexp ((-1/0 .59) xln (1-ln () / 1 .53E+00) )
No scanning value s
L 7 i
Q)
4
a) 6
4
5
+'
c 4
a)
~
c 3
0
u
~ 2
+
L
++
n
.r.,
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
U)
.~,
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
KAOLIN 0 kg/m 3 0 .0 0 C
~
c
a)
U
-1-
c
)
0
U
+
a) +
L
d- )
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
90 .7 80 .0 60 .5 40 .4 24 .7 19 . 7
u 1 .35 1 .21 1 .00 0 .74 0 .49 0 .4 0
Approximation :
u= 0 .00E+OOxexp ((-1/1 .00) xln (1-ln () / 1 .00E+00) )
No scanning value s
KIESELGUHR
perlit, zeolit
0 kg/m 3 O .0 6 C
nedvessg tartalom m%
C-
a)
O.
3
s
a)
.~
a)
I 2
4)
C
QI
.~
C
0
c~ 1
a)
C-
+
n
-1--)
U3
., .-i
O
E 0
0 20 40 60 60 10 0
No scanning value s
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
GYPSUM
Gipsz
0 kg/m 3 O .O C
~ nedvessg tartalom m%
c
a)
U
L
a)
O.
1
-1.-
Ql 2
.-I
a)
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
a)
nedvessg tartalom m%
U
+
0
L.)
+
p
O
E 1
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
.__
0 20 40 60! 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
nedvessg tartalom m%
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
nedvessg tartalom m%
~
c
a)
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
nedvessg tartalom m%
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
relatv lgnedvessg %
No scanning value s
nedvessg tartalom m%
L
N
a
3
4J
01
..1
Q]
0
0
0
0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
nedvessg tartalom m%
I( !
-+--- _-. _ L {
_ _ i (
0
t
0
I ~ j
~ i
0
!
1
0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
relatv lgnedvessg %
No scanning value s
nedvessg tartalom m%
0
0
0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
nedvessg tartalom m%
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
nedvessg tartalom m%
I
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
C-
a)
~a 3
L
n
r
. r .,
a)
3
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
LEATHER Br 0 kg/m 3 0 .0 0 C
nedvessg tartalom m% *
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
measured sorption value s
0 .0 9 .9 20 .2 30 .4 40 .3 50 .1 60 .0 70 .0 80 .1 89 . 7
u 0 .0 3 .8 7 .4 10 .4 13 .0 15 .6 18 .1 20 .8 23 .8 28 . 6
Approximation :
u= 3 .14E+01mexp ((-1/0 .29) *ln (1-ln () / 2 .98E+00) )
No scanning value s
4J
.c
.,i 8
a~
3
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
4-)
m
.~,
8
au
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
a) 20
d
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
-I-)
i
. .,
8
a) +
J--
+
0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
94 .9 94 .7 84 .9 85 .1 65 .1 64 .9 45 .2 45 .3 45 .3 45 .6 65 .2 64 .7 85 .2 85 . 5
u 6 .6 6 .2 5 .7 5 .5 4 .9 4 .7 4 .5 4 .3 u 4 .3 4 .5 4 .4 4 .5 4 .7 4 . 9
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
YTONG Sipore x
Ytong
520 kg/m 3 50 .0 0 C
.4-0 I f
c
a)
nedvessg tartalom m%
U
L 10
CU
C.
d-1
Q)
,-~
a)
+
1
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
nedvessg tartalom m%
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
nedvessg tartalom m%
L
a1
0.
~
L
01
., 1
a1
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
-1- J
~ 2
.~,
a)
O
E p
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - %
relatv lgnedvessg %
+ measured desorption value s
90 .3 80 .1 60 .1 40 .2 19 .9 0 . 1
u 1 .6 1 .0 0 .5 0 .4 0 .2 0 . 0
Approximation :
u= 3 .29E+00xexp ((1/1 .07) *ln (1ln () / 8 .57E-02) )
No scanning value s
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
nedvessg tartalom m%
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
nedvessg tartalom m%
0
.
~
~ ,,
~/ :
A
i -- T,
+1---- - 4-- ,
1I
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
U
a) 0 .2
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
3-)
-C
.ri
1
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity 0 %
+ measured desorption value s relatv lgnedvessg %
94 .7 80 .0 60 .1 40 .0 20 . 1
u 11 .0 7 .4 4 .9 3 .4 2 . 2
Approximation :
u= 1 .32E+01xexp ((1/1 . 18) xln (1ln () / 2 .26E01) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
C-
a)
Q.
L
01
N
3
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity $ %
relatv lgnedvessg %
No scanning value s
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
97 .6 94 .5 84 .4 64 .8 43 .1 20 . 0
u 4 .17 2 .92 2 .15 1 .71 1 .44 1 .0 0
Approximation :
u= 1 .40E+01xexp ((-1/3 .14) xln (1-ln () / 5 .11E-04) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
GLASS WOOL
veggyapot
0 kg/m 3 O .0 0 C
nedvessg tartalom m%
0 . 8
a
L
n
r
0 . 7
. .~
0 .6
0.5
D
C 0 . 4
a.)
~
. 3
0
c.>
a) 0 .2
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
a)
o.
-P
o .)
L
.~
a)
7
.4.J
C
a)
O
E Q
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
a) 8
o.
4-1
.c 7
o)
cu 6
c 4
a)
4-)
c 3
o
c_,
a) 2
L
4-1
1
.H
0
E
0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
m 8
a
4-3
.c 7
o,
o) 6
4-3
c 4
4-J
c 3
0
Q1 2
C..
U)
.~ ,
0
s 0
0 20 40 6o 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Lan) 12
.i-)
) 10
.,i
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
0 .5
C 0 . 4
a)
d- P
0 .3
20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
No scanning value s
Notes :
ACETATE
acett 0 kg/m 3 0 .0 0 C
nedvessg tartalom m%
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - % relatv lgnedvessg %
4 measured sorption value s
42 .2 50 .6 60 .6 70 .5 80 .3 90 . 6
u 1 .89 2 .49 3 .35 4 .10 4 .94 5 .6 0
Approximation :
u= 0 .00E+005exp ((-1/1 .00) Eln (1-ln () / 1 .00E+00) )
No scanning value s
~ 16
n
)k
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
4-1
0
.~,
0
E Q
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity 0 - %
measured sorption value s
0 .2 10 .0 20 .3 30 .8 40 .9 50 .5 60 .7 70 .5 80 .4 90 .0 92 . 6
u 0 .1 4 .1 5 .7 7 .1 8 .5 9 .9 11 .8 14 .0 17 .0 20 .5 21 . 4
Approximation :
u= 2 .45E+01*exp ((-1/0 .81) xln (1-ln () / 6 .44E-01) )
No scanning value s
0
~ 0
0 20 40 60 60 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity $ - %
+ measured desorption value s
94 .5 79 .3 59 .3 39 .2 19 . 7
u 30 .0 19 .7 12 .4 8 .6 5 . 9
Approximation :
u= 3 .68E+01)exp ((-1/1 .17) *1n (1-In () / 2 .11E-01) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
~a 12
.r., 1 0
)
a)
4-i
C
0
L)
a)
L
~
N
r l
0
E l ~ ~ I I I
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
measured sorption value s
0 .0 9 .6 20 .0 30 .2 40 .2 50 .2 60 .3 70 .4 80 .2 89 . 8
u 0 .00 1 .93 3 .30 4 .25 4 .90 5 .54 6 .17 7 .13 8 .22 9 .97
Approximation :
u= 1 .09E+01)(exp ((1/0 .64) 3ln (1ln () / 1 .28E+00) )
No scanning value s
6-POLYAMID poliamid
0 kg /m 3 20 .0 0 C
C 9 nedvessg tartalom m%
m
U
m 8
a
4.) 7
t
01
...~
a) 6
,. ,
c 4
o.i
4-i
c 3
0
~
+' 1
.r.,
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity 0 - %
+ measured desorption value s
0 91 .0 80 .5 60 .2 39 .9 19 .9 0 . 0
u 7 .92 6 .34 4 .16 2 .75 1 .66 0 .0 2
Approximation :
u= 9 .50E+00xexp ((-1/0 .64) xln (1-ln (0)/ 7 .51E-01) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
N 20
O.
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
W 20
O.
0 20 40 60 BO 10 0
No scanning value s
a) 2 0
O.
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
x measured sorption value s
10 .0 20 .0 30 .0 40 .0 50 .0 60 .0 70 .0 80 .0 90 . 0
u 4 .7 7 .0 8 .9 10 .8 12 .8 14 .9 17 .2 19 .9 23 .4
Approximation :
u= 2 .67E+01Mexp ((-1/0 .72) min (1-ln () / 9 .84E-01) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
+, 15
c
a)
4J
10
U
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
L { - - - - -- - - -- -- - -- ----
I
n.
~
- ~ , .~ -- ~
~ ---
3 20
_
D
15 -j - -- -
I
-
---
- .. .~ .- -
f
~- - _ _ - -- - - - -- - - - -- -
-- -- - - - - - - -_ - --
I- - - - - ----- ~-- - -
`
1 I ~1 1 l
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
4, 15
c
a)
4J
10
U
a)
5
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
C_
a)
n
25
t
.r ,
a)
20
~
+) 15
c
a)
~
10
U
a)
C_
d- )
Cf)
e--f
o
E
0
relative humidity - % relatv lgnedvessg %
+ measured desorption value s
95 .0 94 .8 94 .6 89 .8 90 .4 89 .8 79 .8 80 .3 80 .5 65 .4 65 .8 66 .1 45 .1 45 .6 45 .8 1 !
u 27 .3 27 .1 26 .8 23 .8 23 .6 22 .3 19 .7 19 .6 19 .2 15 .2 14 .9 14 .7 11 .7 11 .6 11 . 2
Approximation :
u = 3 .10E+01xexp ((-1/1 .45) xln (1-ln () / 2 .25E-01) )
Notes :
20
7
r, 15
c
a)
~
10
U T
a)
7 S
4-3 L
u)
.r.,
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
20
/
, 15
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity $ - %
+ measured desorption value s
95 .1 95 .6 89 .8 90 .0 80 .0 80 .3 65 .2 65 .4 65 .1 45 .3 45 .1 19 .9 20 .2 20 . 5
u 27 .9 27 .6 24 .5 24 .3 20 .0 19 .9 15 .3 15 .1 14 .8 11 .2 11 .0 6 .5 6 .3 6 . 1
Approximation :
u= 3 .09E+01xexp ((-1/1 .05) x1n (1-ln () / 3 .83E-01) )
Notes :
rn 40
.r .,
a)
35
30
+, 25
c
~ 20
c
0
u 15
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relatv lgnedvessg %
relative humidity - %
+ measured desorption value s
99 .9 97 .2 91 .8 82 .7 58 .1 23 .2 10 . 7
u 56 .1 34 .4 28 .7 21 .8 15 .8 8 .8 7 . 0
Approximation :
u= 5 .68E+01xexp ((1/2 .81) )Eln (1ln () / 1 .19E02) )
No scanning value s
Notes :
L
a)
n
4-, 25
t
~
.H
a)
20
15
c
a)
4-)
10
U
a)
c_
n 5
4-)
.~,
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
fa 20C-on
WOOD 20C 0 kg/m 3 20 .O 0 C
4-1
C nedvessg tartalom m%
a)
30
4
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
fa 40C-on
WOOD 40 C 0 kg/m 3 40 .O e C
nedvessg tartalom m%
L
a)
Q. 4
.JJ 25
t
n
r
.~ ,
a)
20
fi
n
.,-c1 15
a)
~
10
U
a)
L
5
d-1
u)
.~,
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
15
c
a)
~
10
U
a)
L
~
O
,.-,
o +
E
0 20 40 80 10 0
relative humidity - % relatv lgnedvessg %
+ measured desorption value s
99 .9 98 .7 95 .0 89 .1 79 .2 69 .1 59 .0 49 .1 39 .3 29 .3 19 .4 9 .6 0.0
u 26 .7 23 .7 19 .7 16 .2 12 .6 10 .1 8 .4 6 .9 5 .6 4 .4 3 .3 2 .0 0 .0
Approximation :
u= 2 .59E+01xexp ((-1/1 .24) xln (1-ln () / 1 .54E-01) )
No scanning value s
WOOD 80 C fa 80C-on
0 kg/m 3 80 .0 0 C
-P
c nedvessg tartalom m%
a)
"
L
30 ~
,
- - - -~
N
O.
-p 25
n
r
.~,
4
a)
20
C
a)
~
c
10
U
a)
L
-p
N
.~
O t
E _ I ~ 1 ~ l
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - X relatv lgnedvessg %
+ measured desorption values
99 .7 99 .4 97 .8 88 .9 78 .9 68 .9 59 .0 49 .0 39 .2 29 .3 19 .5 9 .6 0. 1
u 25 .7 23 .7 19 .7 13 .7 10 .6 8 .5 6 .9 5 .5 4 .4 3 .6 2 .6 1 .4 0 .1
Approximation :
u= 2 .49E+01)exp ((1/1 .35) *ln (1 1n () / 9 .94E 02) )
No scanning value
: Density not
sNote indicated .
4-J 25
t
n
r
.~,
a)
20
4-J 1 5
c
a)
4-,
10
U
a)
`_
5
4-1
u)
.~,
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - X
+ measured desorption value s
90 .6 90 .4 86 .3 86 .2 82 .3 82 .3 79 .0 78 .9 59 .0 58 .9 39 .2 39 .2 19 .5 9 .6 9 . 5
u 18 .0 17 .6 15 .4 15 .1 14 .3 14 .0 13 .1 12 .7 9 .3 8 .8 6 .3 5 .9 4 .1 2 .7 2 .4
Approximation :
u= 2 .32E+01xexp ((-1/1 .10) xln (1-ln () / 2 .71E-01) )
No scanning value s
~
ct)
a
+) 25
t
n
r
.,,
a)
20
n
4, 15
c
a)
.4J
10
U
a)
n
`" 5
~
u)
.~,
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity -
+ measured desorption value s
88 .9 88 .8 79 .0 78 .9 19 .5 19 .3 9 .5 9 .6 6 .1 6 .3 4 .5 4 .7 3 . 2
u 14 .9 14 .5 12 .1 11 .7 3 .4 3 .0 2 .1 1 .8 1 .6 1 .3 1 .1 0 .9 0 . 9
Approximation :
u= 1 .80E+01xexp ((-1/0 .54) xln (1-ln () / 9 .88E-01) )
No scanning value s
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
LaCli 16
n 2
ri
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
BOARD porous
deszka, przus
300 kg/m 3 20 .O e C
nedvessg tartalom m%
20
-I-J
15
-1-
C
)
0
~ 10
a)
C.-
-I-J
fN
.~
0
E
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
U
n)
L
4-)
O
O
E
0
No scanning value s
Notes :
nedvessg tartalom m%
a)
20
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
Notes :
15
C
a)
d- 1
10
U
0
E 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
Notes :
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
80
- _
o --t-
0 (l
I
0
( I
~
i l
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
L
a)
a
+J 25
t
~
.,1
a)
20
1
n
4, 15
c
a)
-4J
10
c.)
a)
c_
n 5
.4J
u)
. r. ,
0
e 0
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
12 0 - --}- - -
10 0 . ! -- --- ;- ----- -- -
80 __
60
40 ~ -~ - - I----~-
20
~ i
-
-
----i - ~
I -- - - ~- - ! -r--
i
i
~
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s
.r., 12 0
)
m
i 100
= 80
~
c
a' 60
c
0
U
0
~ l 0 I
I
0 20 40 60 80 10 0
relative humidity - % relatv lgnedvessg %
No scanning value s
a 120
-0
0 U
0
20 40 60 80 10 0
No scanning value s