Sec. 99 A Reinsurance Is Presumed To Be A Contract of Indemnity Against Liability, and Not Merely Against Damage
Sec. 99 A Reinsurance Is Presumed To Be A Contract of Indemnity Against Liability, and Not Merely Against Damage
Sec. 99 A Reinsurance Is Presumed To Be A Contract of Indemnity Against Liability, and Not Merely Against Damage
Example:
A insured his building against fire with One Co, One Co., in turn, reinsured its risk with
Two Co. The building insured by A was burned but One Co.(insurer) could not pay because it
was insolvent.
One Co., may collect from Two Co. (reinsurer) because reinsurance is a contract of
indemnity against liability of the insurer.
Example:
A insured his building against fire with One Co. for P1,000,000.00. One Co. obtained a
reinsurance policy from Two Co. for P1,200,000.00. The house was totally burned.
Since, the liability of One Co. to A was only P1,000,000 in as much as A cannot recover
more than the damage he suffered, it followed that Two Co. was liable to One Co. for only P1M,
because the reinsurers liability is measured by the reinsureds liability to the original insured.
Sec. 100 The original insured has no interest in a contract of reinsurance.
Art. 1311 xxx If a contract should contain some stipulation in favor of a third person, he may demand its
fulfillment provided he communicated his acceptance to the obligor before its revocation. A mere
incidental benefit or interest of a person is not sufficient. The contracting parties must have clearly and
deliberately conferred a favor upon a third person. (1257a)
Art. 1293. Novation which consists in substituting a new debtor in the place of the original one, may be
made even without the knowledge or against the will of the latter, but not without the consent of the
creditor. Payment by the new debtor gives him the rights mentioned in Articles 1236 and 1237. (1205a)