Discipline: Effective School Practices: BY GEORGE BEAR, PHD, NCSP, University of Delaware, Newark
Discipline: Effective School Practices: BY GEORGE BEAR, PHD, NCSP, University of Delaware, Newark
Discipline: Effective School Practices: BY GEORGE BEAR, PHD, NCSP, University of Delaware, Newark
Practices
BY GEORGE BEAR, PHD, NCSP, University of Delaware, Newark
Traditionally, with respect to school discipline, American educators have had two distinct aims: (a) to help
create and maintain a safe, orderly, and positive learning environment, which often requires the use of
discipline to correct misbehavior; and (b) to teach or develop self-discipline. Both aims are equally
important and should always be included in the development and evaluation of school discipline practices.
Whereas the first is generally viewed as an immediate aim (to stop misbehavior and bring about
compliance), the second is viewed as long term (to develop autonomy and responsible citizenship). Both
aims are reciprocally related in that each promotes the other. Both also serve a preventive function. That is,
by correcting misbehavior and developing self-discipline, schools help prevent the future occurrence of
behavior problems.
DEVELOPING SELF-DISCIPLINE
Self-discipline is seen in socially and morally responsible behavior that is motivated primarily by intrinsic
factors, not solely by the anticipation of external rewards or fear of punishment. Research shows that self-
discipline promotes positive relations with others and a positive school climate, fosters academic
achievement, and promotes self-worth and emotional well-being. Strategies for developing self-discipline
S4H182 | Discipline
ing misbehavior, effective educators tend to use one of typically in combination with replacement techniques
two general types of behavioral techniques: punitive that teach or strengthen desired behaviors. The latter
and replacement. would include techniques that emphasize social and
emotional competencies and positive teacherstudent
Punitive techniques. These various forms of punish- relations, such as joint social problem-solving and
ment range from unpleasant verbal reprimands, the evil induction, where the focus is on the impact of ones
eye, proximity control (i.e., standing near the student), behavior on others.
and taking away privileges (e.g., recess) to much harsher
forms such as suspension, expulsion, removal to an REMEDIATING AND RESPONDING TO CHRONIC AND
alternative education program, and corporal punishment SERIOUS BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS
(i.e., spanking, which is allowed in approximately half of For the majority of students in most schools (i.e., the
the states, although most professional organizations universal tier), the above strategies and techniques are
oppose it). generally sufficient for developing self-discipline and for
preventing and correcting behavior problems. Students
Replacement techniques. These strategies are with chronic or serious behavior problems, and especially
intended to achieve the same goals as punitive those shown to be resistant to interventions, require
methods, but focus on teaching or strengthening desired more comprehensive and intensive services, resources,
behaviors that might replace the undesired behavior. and supports.
Common replacement techniques include direct instruc-
tion, positive reinforcement, modeling, social problem- Similar but More Intensive Strategies
solving, conflict resolution, and anger management The strategies and techniques used for chronic and
training. serious behavior problems differ more in intensity than
design, relative to the strategies described above for
Punishment: Limitations and Alternatives more everyday discipline issues. That is, many of the
Educators who are most effective in correcting misbe- same techniques are used, but delivered in a more
havior use both punitive and replacement techniques. frequent and systematic fashion (e.g., requiring a class-
room aide or smaller class size).
Limitations of punishment. Effective educators
clearly recognize the limitations of punishment: (a) It More Targeted and Intensive Strategies
teaches students what not to do and fails to teach Other strategies, however, are more specific to this
desired or replacement behavior; (b) its effects often are group of intervention-resistant students, and more
short term; (c) it teaches students to aggress toward or congruent with an intensive (Tier 3) level of supports
punish others; (d) it fails to address the multiple factors and interventions. Such services and supports should be:
that typically contribute to a students behavior; (e) it is
likely to produce undesirable side effects (e.g., anger, N Comprehensive, targeting multiple risk and protective
retaliation, dislike toward the teacher or school, social factors
withdrawal); (f) it creates a negative classroom and N Broad-based, adopting a system in which a network of
school climate; and (g) it can be reinforcing (i.e., negative mental health specialists, educators, and others in the
reinforcement), such as in time-out and suspension, by community work together with students and their
allowing students to avoid or escape from situations they families
find aversive (e.g., academic work, peer rejection, a harsh N Evidence-based
and uncaring teacher). N Intensive, sustained over time, and implemented with
fidelity
Alternatives to punishment. Due to these limita- N Individualized
tions, when correcting misbehavior, effective educators N Cognizant of the importance of early intervention,
work hard to avoid using punishment. Instead, they focus including interventions provided at an early age as
on strategies for developing self-discipline and for well as those provided when indicators of behavior
preventing misbehavior. When correcting misbehavior, problems first appear
they are much more likely to use mild forms of
punishment, such as physical proximity, taking away These interventions, services, and supports address not
privileges, verbal reprimands, and the evil eye than only the needs of students with chronic behavior problems,
harsh forms of punishment such as suspension. When but also those who may have no history of behavior
punishment is used, it is used fairly, judiciously, in the problems but nevertheless exhibit a serious behavior
context of a caring and supportive relationship, and problem requiring immediate intervention, supports, and
S4H184 | Discipline