Chapter 8-Junction Design PDF
Chapter 8-Junction Design PDF
Chapter 8-Junction Design PDF
CSMR 1
9/28/2016
CSMR 9/28/2016 2
CSMR 9/28/2016 3
CSMR 9/28/2016 4
A junction, when discussed in the context of
transport, is a location where traffic can
change between different routes,
directions, or sometimes modes, of travel
The word "junction" derives from Latin
iunctus, past participle of iungere, to join.
The word "junction" in this context may also
refer to:
The general locality of a given interchange
A specific interchange on a major road,
e.g. motorway.
CSMR 9/28/2016 5
There are many types of different
junction for road transport and rail
transport (including metro and rapid
transit systems). If many of these are
contained in a small area, and where
passengers can change from one
transport mode to the other in them, it is
said to be a transport hub.
CSMR 9/28/2016 6
A road junction is a location where
vehicular traffic going in different
directions can proceed in a controlled
manner designed to minimize accidents.
In some cases, vehicles can change
between different routes or directions of
travel.
CSMR 9/28/2016 7
However, with the 20th century advent
of road traffic, roads became much
busier and junctions became clogged
with vehicles unable to cross each
other's paths. In modern practice,
bypasses and ring roads are used to
keep through traffic out of major
population centre's.
CSMR 9/28/2016 8
Interchanges are junctions where roads pass above or
below one another, preventing a single point of conflict by
utilising grade separation and slip roads. The terms
motorway junction and highway junction typically refer to
this layout.
Intersections do not use grade separation (they are at-
grade) and roads cross directly. Forms of these junction
types include Roundabouts and traffic circles, priority
junctions, and junctions controlled by traffic lights or signals.
CSMR 9/28/2016 9
In some countries that have right-hand traffic, a
right turn on red is permitted at traffic lights in order
to reduce waiting times. It can be implemented
either by allowing the vehicles to turn right by using
the give way rule, or by providing a separate lane
connecting the two perpendicular roads and
avoiding the junction entirely.
CSMR 9/28/2016 10
CSMR 9/28/2016 11
In the field of road transport, an
interchange is a road junction that
typically uses grade separation, and one
or more ramps, to permit traffic on at
least one highway to pass through the
junction without directly crossing any
other traffic stream.
CSMR 9/28/2016 12
It differs from a standard intersection, at
which roads cross at grade.
Interchanges are almost always used
when at least one of the roads is a
limited-access divided highway
(expressway or freeway), though they
may occasionally be used at junctions
between two surface streets.
CSMR 9/28/2016 13
A complete interchange has enough ramps to
provide access from any direction of any road
in the junction to any direction of any other
road in the junction. Complete interchanges
typically use four to eight dedicated ramps to
connect various directions of travel, but can
require more depending on the interchange
type and the connectivity offered.
CSMR 9/28/2016 14
For example, if a highway interchanged with a
highway containing a collector/express system,
additional ramps could be used to strictly link the
interchanging highway with the collector and
express lanes respectively. For highways with high
occupancy vehicle/HOV lanes, ramps can be
used to service these carriageways directly,
thereby increasing the number of ramps used
CSMR 9/28/2016 15
A cloverleaf interchange is typically a
two-level, four-way interchange
whereby all right turns are handled by
loop ramps (left turns if traveling on
the left).
To go left, vehicles first cross over or
under the targeted route, then bear
right onto a sharply curved ramp that
loops roughly 270 degrees, merging
onto the interchanging road from the
right (from the left if traveling on the
left), and crossing the route just
departed.
The major advantage of cloverleafs is
that they require only one bridge,
which makes such junctions
inexpensive as long as land is plentiful.
A major shortcoming of cloverleafs,
however, is weaving (see definition
above), and the subsequent low-
capacity of this design.
CSMR 9/28/2016 16
Cloverleafs also require considerable
land consumption, hence they
appear mostly in the United States,
Canada (mainly parclos, or partial
cloverleaf interchanges), Germany,
and the Netherlands. In Germany,
the standard design is to separate all
turning traffic into a parallel
carriageway so that the extra road
space can help minimize the
problem of weaving. Collector and
distributor roads are similar, but are
usually separated from the main
carriageway by a divider, such as a
guard rail or Jersey barrier.
Cloverleafs are more often found
along older highways, in rural areas,
and within cities with low population
densities.
CSMR 9/28/2016 17
A stack interchange is a four-way
interchange whereby left turns
are handled by semi-directional
flyover/under ramps. To go left
(right in countries with left-hand
drive), vehicles first turn slightly
right (on a right-turn off-ramp) to
exit, then complete the turn via a
ramp which crosses both
highways, eventually merging
with the right-turn on-ramp traffic
from the opposite quadrant of
the interchange. A stack
interchange, then, has two pairs
of left-turning ramps, of which
can be stacked in various
configurations above or below
the two interchanging highways.
CSMR 9/28/2016 18
Stacks do not suffer from the
problem of weaving but require
massive construction work for
their flyovers. A standard stack
interchange includes roads on
four levels. This is not only
expensive but also creates an
eyesore among local residents,
leading to considerable NIMBY
(Not In My Back Yard) opposition.
Large stacks with multiple levels
are often colloquially described
as Mixmasters or spaghetti bowls
due to their complex
appearance, being compared
to boiled spaghetti.
CSMR 9/28/2016 19
In the late 1960s, partial
cloverleaf interchange (parclo)
designs modified for freeway
traffic emerged, eventually
leading to the cloverstack
interchange. Its ramps are longer
to allow for higher ramp speeds,
and loop ramp radii are made
larger as well. The large loop
ramps eliminate the need for a
fourth, and sometimes a third
level in a typical stack
interchange, as only two
directions of travel use
flyover/under ramps.
CSMR 9/28/2016 20
Cloverstacks are cheaper to build
than stack interchanges and are
less of an eyesore for local
residents. By using the loop ramps
in opposite quadrants, weaving is
also eliminated. However,
cloverstacks require a lot of land
to construct and the loop ramps
are not as efficient as
flyover/under ramps in terms of
traffic flow. The cloverstack
design is becoming more and
more popular, and is commonly
used to upgrade cloverleaf
interchanges to increase their
capacity and eliminate weaving.
CSMR 9/28/2016 21
A further alternative found
often in the United Kingdom
is called a roundabout
interchange. This is a normal
roundabout except one
(two-level) or both (three-
level) mainlines pass under
or over the whole thing. The
ramps of the interchanging
highways meet at a
roundabout or rotary on a
separated level above,
below, or in the middle of the
two highways.
CSMR 9/28/2016 22
Roundabout interchanges are much more
economical in use of materials and land than
other interchange designs, as the junction
does not normally require more than three
bridges to be constructed. However, their
capacity is limited when compared to other
interchanges and can become congested
easily with high traffic volumes.
A variation of this interchange has been
proposed by a Ukrainian engineer Viktor
Petruk. The claimed advantages of this type
of interchange are: low number of conflict
points, short car paths on the circle, and
relatively small overall size that allows it to be
used in dense urban environment.
Unfamiliarity of clockwise traffic flows on
roundabouts is its most frequently cited
drawback.
CSMR 9/28/2016 23
Trumpet interchanges
have been used where
one highway terminates
at another highway.
These involve at least one
loop ramp connecting
traffic either entering or
leaving the terminating
expressway with the far
lanes of the continuous
highway.
CSMR 9/28/2016 24
These interchanges are useful for
highways as well as toll roads, as they
concentrate all entering and exiting
traffic into a single stretch of roadway,
where toll booths can be installed. A
double-trumpet interchange version
can be found where a toll road meets
another toll road or a free highway.
Trumpet interchanges are named as
such due to their resemblance to
trumpets. The bell of a trumpet can
be seen where the terminating
highway begins to interchange with
the continuous highway, and the
resemblance to the tubing is seen
along the connecting loop ramps.
CSMR 9/28/2016 25
A half-clover interchange is essentially half a
cloverleaf interchange, constructed to
connect in just three directions instead of
four. These are rarely used due to the traffic
weaving that they cause and the large
amount of land that they consume, but they
can be built in areas where the connecting
ramp along the loop of a trumpet
interchange is not feasible due to building
developments or physical limitations. Half-
clovers are designed to be readily
upgraded to full cloverleafs if the
terminating highway is ever extended past
the through highway. A notable example of
a half-clover interchange is with M-47 and
U.S. Route 10 near Midland, Michigan, since
M-47 was the relic of a scrapped plan to
extend a freeway further north. Interstate 75
to its east near Bay City, Michigan, a more
important destination, made this highway
unnecessary.
CSMR 9/28/2016 26
diamond interchange is an
interchange involving four
ramps where they enter and
leave the freeway at a small
angle and meet the non-
freeway at almost right angles.
These ramps at the non-
freeway can be controlled
through stop signs, traffic
signals, or turn ramps. Diamond
interchanges are inexpensive
to build and require little land
but are prone to congestion
and accidents if there is high
traffic.
CSMR 9/28/2016 27
CSMR 9/28/2016 28
CSMR 29
9/28/2016
An intersection is the location where two or more roads meet or
cross each other.
CSMR 30
9/28/2016
An intersection serves to:
disperse traffic
reduce accidents
change the direction of traffic
give right of ways
control speed
CSMR 32
9/28/2016
The types of diverging:
CSMR 33
Mutual diverging Multiple diverging
9/28/2016
Merging:
CSMR 34
9/28/2016
The types of merging:
CSMR 35
9/28/2016
Mutual merging Multiple merging
Crossing:
The road user may have to cross the paths of vehicles in all
the intervening flows that come in between his points of
entry and exit from the intersection.
If the angle between the road user and the flow across is
considerably lower than 90, it is an opposed crossing.
If the directions of both flows are apparently in the same
direction with an included angle much smaller than 90, it is
an oblique crossing.
CSMR 36
9/28/2016
Right crosing Left crosing
CSMR 38
9/28/2016
Crossing conflict
The number of potential conflict points at an intersection
depends on:
CSMR 39
9/28/2016
Priority control of traffic at junctions is one of the most widely used
ways of resolving the conflict between merging and crossing
vehicles.
Utilizes the Give Way and Stop signs
Priority control is used at unsignalized at-grade intersections.
Involves a major road and a minor road.
Sometimes called Major-Minor Junctions.
The major road is assigned a permanent priority of traffic
movement over that of the other roads.
The minor road is where vehicles have to give way to vehicles on
the major road.
The Stop and Give Way signs are positioned atCSMR
the minor 40
approach. 9/28/2016
Example:
Two roads, Jalan Hussein and Jalan Jalan Onn (U4)
Volume = 400 veh/hr
Onn cross each other at grade.
Jalan Hussein has road standard U3 B
while Jalan Onn has road standard
U4.
A
CSMR 42
9/28/2016
SIMPLE JUNCTIONS
Crossroads Intersection
T-Intersection (Shepherds
CSMR
Crook) 47
9/28/2016
Types of at-grade intersection:
Staggered Junction
CSMR 48
9/28/2016
T-Junction Skew Junction
CSMR 49
9/28/2016
Transformation from a Y to
A roundabouts
a T- intersection
CSMR 50
9/28/2016
Intersection (split roundabout) Y - Junction
CSMR 51
9/28/2016
Three type as below:
Unchannelised and Unflared
Flared
Channelised
CSMR 53
9/28/2016
Flare
A Flared Staggered Intersections CSMR 54
9/28/2016
Channelised Intersections
CSMR 55
9/28/2016
An at-grade intersection is the location where two or more roads
CSMR 56
A Channelised Intersection 9/28/2016
a grade separated intersection is the location where two
or more roads (traffic streams) meet or cross each other at
different levels.
CSMR 57
9/28/2016
A grade separations may be warranted;
to prevent accidents.
CSMR 59
9/28/2016
There are many types and forms of interchanges and ramp
layouts.
T and Y interchange
Diamond interchange
Partial and full cloverleafs
Directional interchange
CSMR 60
9/28/2016
At-grade intersections present drivers with several points of conflict
with other vehicles
Traffic
an intersection should
accommodate with comfort and
safety at design peak traffic
volume.
Economics
variation to existing
intersections should be
justified by commensurate
benefits to traffic
CSMR 66
9/28/2016
Factor Influencing at-Grade Intersection Design
Human Factors
2%
Vehicle
12%
Source : Treat (1980)
CSMR 9/28/2016 68
Three aspects;
Driver
Driver training
Blood alcohol limits
Speed limits
Driver license restrictions
Road -the only one the traffic engineer has control
over
Design
Maintenance
operational
Vehicle
Vehicle design has improved
Air bags
Better tires
9/28/2016 CSMR 69
Factors Present in Crashes which Result
in Fatalities:
Single Vehicle Run-Off-Road - 38 %
Speeding Related - 30 %
Intersections - 23 %
Pedestrian and Bicyclist - 13 %
CSMR 9/28/2016 70
Crashworthy Devices
CSMR 9/28/2016 71
Safety Features for
Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Variable
Speed Limits
CSMR 9/28/2016 73
Principles of Intersection Design
Important that operational characteristics of capacity and delay is
satisfied, safety is a prime consideration intersection design.
CSMR 74
9/28/2016
Conflicts
CSMR 75
9/28/2016
???
9/28/2016 CSMR 76
Traffic conflicts occur where the path of
traffic movement crosses.
CSMR 9/28/2016 77
One weaving movement does not change lanes
CSMR 9/28/2016 78
Two Lane Undivided Street
Side Street
CSMR 9/28/2016 79
Two Lane Undivided Street
Side Street
CSMR 9/28/2016 80
Reduced conflicts from 32 to 4
Note: Add 4 conflicts to each for four lane roadways
40 conflicts with
Four Lane on
major street
9/28/2016 CSMR 81
Two lane roadway with raised median (left turn egress only
from intersection or driveway)
9/28/2016 CSMR 82
Two lane roadway with raised median (left turn egress only from
intersection or driveway)
9/28/2016 CSMR 83
Two lane roadway with raised median (left turn ingress only
into driveway)
9/28/2016 CSMR 84
Two lane roadway with raised median (left turn ingress only into
intersection or driveway)
9/28/2016 CSMR 85
Limit the number of conflict points
Pedestrian safety
CSMR 9/28/2016 86
Area of Conflicts
CSMR 87
9/28/2016
Area of Conflicts
CSMR 88
9/28/2016
Area of Conflicts
preference should be given to the major traffic movements to
allow them a direct free flowing alignment.
this principle:
reduces the conflict area
reduces the time of crossing a conflicting traffic stream
provides the most favourable condition for drivers to judge
relative positions and relative speeds of vehicles
CSMR 90
9/28/2016
Area of Conflicts
CSMR 91
9/28/2016
Control of Speed
CSMR 92
9/28/2016
Control of Speed
crossing maneuvres that produce high potential relative speeds
should be made approximately at right angles to minimise driver
estimation errors.
CSMR 94
9/28/2016
BASIC DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR SAFE LAYOUTS OF
AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS
CSMR 95
9/28/2016
BASIC DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR SAFE LAYOUTS OF
AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS
CSMR 96
9/28/2016
BASIC DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR SAFE LAYOUTS OF
AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS
CSMR 97
9/28/2016
BASIC DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR SAFE LAYOUTS OF
AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS
CSMR 98
9/28/2016
BASIC DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR SAFE LAYOUTS OF
AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS
CSMR 100
9/28/2016
BASIC DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR SAFE LAYOUTS OF
AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS
11. Provide good safe locations for the installation of traffic control
devices:
traffic signs and signals should be properly located so that it
does not pose as obstructions to traffic, and can be seen be
road users
CSMR 102
9/28/2016
General Characteristics of Traffic Islands
CSMR 103
9/28/2016
General Characteristics of Traffic Islands
These islands can be formed by using raised curbs, pavement
markings, or the pavement edges.
CSMR 105
9/28/2016
General Characteristics of Traffic Islands
CSMR 106
9/28/2016
General Characteristics of Traffic Islands
Island Formed by Pavement Edges.
These islands are usually unpaved and are used mainly at
rural intersections where there is space for large intersection
curves.
CSMR 107
9/28/2016
TRAFFIC-CONTROL SIGNALS
CSMR 108
9/28/2016
INTRODUCTION TO TRAFFIC SIGNALS
CSMR 109
9/28/2016
INTRODUCTION TO TRAFFIC SIGNALS
CSMR 110
9/28/2016
ADVANTAGES OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL
CSMR 111
9/28/2016
DISADVANTAGES OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL
CSMR 112
9/28/2016
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
CSMR 113
9/28/2016
FIXED / PRE-TIMED SIGNALS
Advantages
CSMR 115
9/28/2016
TRAFFIC ACTUATED SIGNALS
These signals are designed so that the phase and cycle can be
changed according to traffic demand.
Advantages
CSMR 117
9/28/2016
TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING (BASIC TERMINOLOGY)
Approach A lane or group of lanes through which traffic enters the intersection
Cycle One complete sequence (for all approaches) of signal indications (green, amber,
red)
Cycle time The total time for the signal to complete one sequence of signal indication
Interval A period of time during which all signal indications remain constant
Change The amber plus red intervals that provide for clearance of the intersection before
interval conflicting traffic movements are released
Green time The time within a cycle in which an approach has the green indication
Lost time Time during which the intersection is not effectively used by any approach
Effective The time that is effectively available to the permitted traffic movements.
green It is the equivalent time during which the actual flow can be maintained at the
saturation flow level.
Taken to be the green time plus the change interval minus the lost time for the
approach
Effective red The time during which a given traffic movement is effectively not permitted to move.
It is the cycle length minus the effective green time.
Saturation The maximum flow that could pass through an intersection, from a given approach if
flow that approach were allocated all of the cycle time as effective green with no lost
time.
CSMR 118
Lane capacity The maximum flow that can pass through an intersection9/28/2016
under prevailing roadway
and traffic conditions, given the effective green time allocated to the approach.
It is the saturation flow multiplied by the ratio of effective green to cycle length.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING (BASIC TERMINOLOGY)
Signal timing The operating characteristics of the signal with the parameters
being cycle length and the effective green and red times
allocated to the intersection approach
Pre-timed Signal A signal whose signal timing is fixed over specified time
periods and does not change in response to traffic flow
variation
Traffic phase A part of the cycle time allocated to any traffic movement or any
combination of traffic movements receiving the right of way.
Any change in the right of way marks the beginning of a new
phase.
Intergreen period The time between the end of the green period of the phase
losing the right of way and the beginning of the green period of
the phase gaining the right of way.
Thus, it includes amber time plus any all-red time between the
two green periods. CSMR 119
9/28/2016
TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING: DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Saturation flow (S) is the maximum flow that can cross the stop line
of an approach where there is a continuous green indication and
a continuous queue of vehicles on the approach.
S , is expressed in passenger car unit per hour (pcu/hr).
Where there is no on-street parking,
i) where effective approach width, W 5.5 m
S = 525 x W
ii) where effective approach width, W < 5.5 m, S can be
obtained from the following table:
CSMR 120
9/28/2016
(2) DETERMINATION OF Y
y=q/S
CSMR 121
9/28/2016
If Y > 0.85, it is suggested that the geometric design and the layout
of the intersection or the number of lanes be improved.
CSMR 122
9/28/2016
Lane group North South East West
Car 280 245 580 690
Flow
Motorbike 150 112 150 100
(pcu/hr)
Bus 50 40 47 40
Heavy vehicle 60 58 49 60