Varicocele A Review
Varicocele A Review
Varicocele A Review
ABSTRACT
The link between varicocele and infertility was first reported by Celsius in the first century AD, but it was
not widely acknowledged until Tulloch and colleagues reported the improvement of sperm parameters
in 26 of 30 patients undergoing varicocelectomy. The World Health Organization also reported that
varicocele was present in 25% of patients with abnormal sperm parameters and 12% of patients with
normal sperm parameters. Varicocele is the most frequently encountered surgical disease causing
male infertility.
In 2009, a meta-analysis suggested that Not all patients improve after a successful
varicocele repair did not improve the likelihood varicocelectomy. Patients with a disease history
of conception.26 After the meta-analysis <2 years and who have high-grade varicoceles are
was published, it was greatly criticised for more likely to improve following varicocelectomy.
heterogeneity among enrollment and having Patients with a total motile sperm count <5 million,
who have genetic disorders, altered follicle-
normal semen parameters of patients suffering
stimulating hormone (FSH)/testosterone levels,
from infertility.27-29 Furthermore, the study included
small testis volume, or concomitant metabolic
one of the most debatable topics in urology, the
syndrome have worse treatment outcomes.44-46
subclinical varicocele, which will be discussed in
more detail below. In contrast to this meta-analysis, COMPLICATIONS
several papers published in subsequent years
advocated the use of varicocelectomy to improve Recurrence rates can be as high as 29% with
sperm parameters and reported improvement of high ligations and about 2% with microscopic
sperm parameters and paternity rates.30 techniques. When optical enhancement is not an
option, hydrocele may be observed in 7-10% of
Subinguinal varicocelectomy can yield high cases following varicocelectomy. Following the
improvement rates: 75.2% improvement in semen improvement of the technique with microscopy,
parameters and 45.5% in pregnancy rates.31 one of the most feared complications, testicular
Abdel-Meguid et al.30 treated patients with atrophy, is encountered at a rate of only 1%.
varicocelectomy and followed their progress. They Ilioinguinal nerve damage may be seen with the
revealed a significant improvement in the treatment loss of sensation in the scrotum and inner thigh.
arm of the study, and a 3.04-times higher rate of Haematoma and infections may be encountered
spontaneous pregnancy.30 There is a debate as in about 2-5% of cases.46,47
to whether varicocele repair improves pregnancy
Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia
rates. Nilsson et al.32 reported the first comparative
study of varicocele repair and did not reveal a The need for varicocelectomy in patients
significant difference in pregnancy rates among with non-obstructive azoospermia is debatable.
patients treated with varicocele repair. Krause and Palpable varicocele can be found in approximately
colleagues33 conducted a study of 65 men treated 4-14% of cases.48 Even after varicocele repair, most
with sclerotherapy and revealed no significant of these men will be subfertile.48 One of the most
comprehensive meta-analyses was conducted
improvement compared with those who received
by Weedin and colleagues,49 and stated that
no treatment. However, both studies have been
39% of a total of 233 patients had motile
criticised for low cohort size and poor follow-up.
sperm in semen analysis performed after
On the other hand, Okuyama et al.34 compared successful varicocelectomy. They concluded that
patients treated using Palomo repair with histopathological examination was a key factor
those who received no treatment and revealed in treatment success, with those with maturation
arrest being the most likely to benefit from
significantly higher pregnancy rates in the
surgery, whereas Sertoli-cell-only syndrome had
treatment arm (30% versus 18%; p<0.05). Schlegel35
the worst outcome (p<0.001). Daitch et al.50
wrote a review on varicocele treatment outcomes
proposed a higher rate of pregnancy following
and revealed a 33% pregnancy rate in patients surgical repair. Esteves et al.51 reported
with varicocele repair compared with 16% in the better outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm
no-treatment group. Varicocele can cause scrotal injection therapy.
pain and some surgeons prefer surgery to treat
this painful disease. In several studies pain Patients with Subclinical Varicocele
was shown to be resolved with conservative Subclinical varicocele is defined as varicocele
treatment (e.g. oral anti-inflammatory medicine that is only diagnosed radiologically. Several
and limiting physical activity) in 5-15% of investigators have conducted trials concerning
patients.36,37 Several studies reported success rates treatment of subclinical varicocele and do not
between 75-91%.38-44 recommend treatment.28,29,52 Both the European
REFERENCES
1. Zerhouni EA et al. Elevated pressure 8. Grasso Leanza F et al. [Volocimetric experimentally varicocele-induced
in the left renal vein in patients with evaluation of spermatic vessels with echo adolescent rats. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(5
varicocele: preliminary observations. J color doppler in patients with idiopathic Suppl):2247-52.
Urol. 1980;123(4):512-3. varicocele]. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 14. Mieusset R et al. Association of
2. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size 1997;49(4):179-82. scrotal hyperthermia with impaired
and results of varicocelectomy in selected 9. Turner TT, Miller DW. Protein synthesis spermatogenesis in infertile men. Fertil
subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil and secretion by the rat seminiferous Steril. 1987;48(6):1006-11.
Steril. 1970;21(8):606-9. tubule in vivo not affected by experimental 15. Turner TT et al. Experimental varicocele
varicocele. J Urol. 1996;156(5):1881-7. does not affect the blood-testis barrier,
3. Herman JR. Varicocele: some
interesting early approaches. Urology. 10. Sofikitis N, Miyagawa I. Left epididymal electrolyte concentrations, or
adrenalectomy in varicocelized rats does testicular blood gas concentrations. Biol
1978;12(4):498C-498D.
not inhibit the development of varicocele- Reprod. 1987;36(4):926-32.
4. Tulloch WS. Varicocele in subfertility. related physiologic alterations. Int J Fertil 16. Stahl P, Schlegel PN. Standardization
Results of treatment. 1955. J Urol. Menopausal Stud. 1993;38(4):250-5. and documentation of varicocele
2002;167(2 Pt 2):1184-5; discussion 1186.
11. Lerchl A et al. Diurnal variations in evaluation. Curr Opin Urol. 2011;21(6):
5. Agarwal A et al. Efficacy of scrotal temperature of normal men and 500-5.
varicocelectomy in improving semen patients with varicocele before and 17. Hirsh AV et al. The Doppler assessment
parameters: new meta-analytical after treatment. Int J Androl. 1993;16(3): of varicoceles and internal spermatic
approach. Urology. 2007;70(3):532-8. 195-200. vein reflux in infertile men. Br J Urol.
6. Braedel HU et al. A possible ontogenic 12. Shafik A, Bedeir GA. Venous tension 1980;52(1):50-6.
etiology for idiopathic left varicocele. J patterns in cord veins. I. In normal 18. Punekar SV et al. Post-surgical
Urol. 1994;151(1):62-6. and varicocele individuals. J Urol. recurrent varicocele: efficacy of internal
7. Shiraishi K, Naito K. Increased expression 1980;123(3):383-5. spermatic venography and steel-coil
of Leydig cell haem oxygenase-1 preserves 13. Tek M et al. The effect of vascular embolization. Br J Urol. 1996;77(1):124-8.
spermatogenesis in varicocele. Hum endothelial growth factor on 19. Jungwirth A et al. Guidelines on
Reprod. 2005;20(9):2608-13. spermatogenesis and apoptosis in male infertility. European Association of