Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Site Selection Process/Criteria

    Uploaded by

    angela tamana
    This document evaluates three potential sites - A, B, and C - for a new development based on various criteria. Site B scored the highest with 119 points, followed by Site C with 101 points and Site A with 98 points. The criteria included factors like land availability and usage, location accessibility, existing infrastructure and surroundings, environmental conditions, demographics, and more. Site B generally met more of the criteria at an excellent or good level compared to the other sites.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Site Selection Process/Criteria

    Uploaded by

    angela tamana
    7 views1 page
    This document evaluates three potential sites - A, B, and C - for a new development based on various criteria. Site B scored the highest with 119 points, followed by Site C with 101 points and Site A with 98 points. The criteria included factors like land availability and usage, location accessibility, existing infrastructure and surroundings, environmental conditions, demographics, and more. Site B generally met more of the criteria at an excellent or good level compared to the other sites.

    Original Description:

    yes

    Original Title

    Crit3ria

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document evaluates three potential sites - A, B, and C - for a new development based on various criteria. Site B scored the highest with 119 points, followed by Site C with 101 points and Site A with 98 points. The criteria included factors like land availability and usage, location accessibility, existing infrastructure and surroundings, environmental conditions, demographics, and more. Site B generally met more of the criteria at an excellent or good level compared to the other sites.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    7 views1 page

    Site Selection Process/Criteria

    Uploaded by

    angela tamana
    This document evaluates three potential sites - A, B, and C - for a new development based on various criteria. Site B scored the highest with 119 points, followed by Site C with 101 points and Site A with 98 points. The criteria included factors like land availability and usage, location accessibility, existing infrastructure and surroundings, environmental conditions, demographics, and more. Site B generally met more of the criteria at an excellent or good level compared to the other sites.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    SITE SELECTION PROCESS/CRITERIA

    CRITERIA DESCRIPTION SITES


    A B C
    ALONG GENERAL QUIRINO
    TAFT AVENUE MALVAR
    AVAILABILITY LOT AVAILABILITY 5 5 4
    ZONING REQUIREMENTS 5 5 5
    LAND USE 5 5 5
    SITE CONTEXT URBANIZED COMMUNITY 3 4 5
    ECONOMIC VIABILITY 4 5 4
    BUSINESS COMMUNITY 4 5 4
    ACCESSIBILITY TO 3 5 4
    EDUCATIONAL
    UTILITIES TELECOMMUNICATIONS 5 5 5
    ELECTRICITY 5 5 5
    WATER LINES 5 5 5
    SEWER LINES 5 5 4
    SITE FLOOD PLAIN
    CONDITIONS EARTHQUAKE FAULT 3 5 4
    LINES
    ENVIRONMENTAL 4 5 4
    CONDITION
    EXISTING STRUCTURES 3 5 4
    EXISTING VEGETATION 3 2 2
    EXISTING VISTAS 3 4 3
    ROAD RIGHT OF WAY 4 5 4
    NEIGHBORING 3 3 2
    STRUCTURES
    TOPOGRAPHY SITE ELEVATION 2 3 2
    SOIL TYPE/QUALITY 3 5 3
    DEMOGRAPHICS POPULATION 3 5 4
    PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC 3 5 2
    TRANSPORTATION
    PROXIMITY TO MAJOR 4 5 5
    AND MINOR ROADS
    PROXIMITY TO HOSPITAL 4 4 3
    PROXIMITY TO BUSINESS 5 5 5
    DISTRICTS
    TOTAL - 98 POINTS - 119 POINTS - 101 POINTS

    POINTING SYSTEM
    5 EXCELLENT (MOST DESIRABLE)
    4 GOOD
    3 FAIR
    2 POOR
    1 UNACCEPTABLE (LEAST DESIRABLE)

    You might also like