Final Master Thesis: European Master in Social Work

European Master in Social Work
Final master thesis
Dr. Jolita Buzaityte-Kasalyniene & Drs. Marion Troia

with special thanks to Dr. Nausikaa Schrillia
T1 Final Thesis Student manual

Page 0 of 36
Table of Contents
Page number
I. Part I
1.1 Objectives of the Thesis 3
1.2 Thesis Process and Procedures 4
1.3 Thesis Proposal Outline 4, 5, 6
1.4 Questions for Thinking Through and

Organising the Research process and Thesis 7
1.5 Keeping a Research Log 8

1.6 Assessment
1.6.1 I Text of the Thesis 9

Minimal requirements 9
Plagiarism notes 10
Assessment forms: Quantitative and Qualitative 11, 12, 13
Holistic assessment criteria 14
1.6.2 II The Oral Examination Guidelines 15, 16

Assessment form for oral examination
1.6.3 Resit Procedures 17
1.6.4 Grievance Procedures 17
II. Part II
2.1 Thesis Guide Section by Section 18
2.2 Introduction 19, 20
2.3 Methodology 21, 22
2.4 Results 23
2.5 Discussion 24
2.6 Conclusions 25
2.7 References, Appendices 25
2.8 Checklist 26
References 27

Page 1 of 36
Appendices
Appendix 1 PROFESSONAL PRESENTATION & STYLE HINTS 29
Standards of Professional English

Structuring the Text
Style and Wording of Headings and Sub-Headings
Tables Figures, Charts, Graphs & Numbers
System of Referencing
Report Style & list of general elements of formal style
Appendix 2 KEY TERMS FOR THE PROPOSAL 34
Appendix 3 METHODS LINKS 36
Appendix 4 APA LINKS 38

Page 2 of 36
I. PART I
1.1 Objectives of the Thesis

A principal component of the Masters degree programme is the thesis. It marks the culmination of
your development in skills, knowledge and attitudes related to the competencies used by
professionals in the social work field. You are free to choose a topic. However our preference is that
you investigate a realistic task that will benefit your client organisation.
Whatever the topic is, you will need to conduct the whole process with professionalism over a
sustained period. This is a major academic and professional challenge for you but it also allows you to
demonstrate your capabilities to the full.
The thesis is a testimony of your ability to work independently and professionally while meeting the
master level intellectual and cognitive requirements. It is an opportunity for you to develop specialist
knowledge in an area of social work. Also you will be expected to approach the phenomenon
objectively, critically and creatively from multiple perspectives. The thesis is part of developing into a
truly reflective practitioner.
The thesis topic or assignment is mutually agreed between you and your supervisor. Suggested
general areas to investigate are:
- Intercultural or ethical aspects of Social Work in European contexts
- Comparative Social Work practices across Europe
- European approaches to dealing with Social Inclusion
- New approaches to combating poverty in a European context
- New insights into project management in Social Work in European contexts
- European social policy perspectives
- European social work in a global context
In particular it aims to develop your abilities to:

1. Examine the context of the investigation
2. Define and justify the rational and relevance of the research
3. Define a complex problem area and set out suitable research questions
4. Select, synthesize and critically review up to date, relevant, academic / scientific literature
5. Select and apply appropriate investigatory methods
6. Analyse outcomes from multiple perspectives
7. Exercise critical judgement
8. If possible, produce an advice for the organisation
You will also be required to:

Explain how your findings relate to, build on, or differ from previous work done in relevant
aspects of the field of Social Work.
Consider how the findings might contribute to further research.
If applicable, justify the advice proposed.

Page 3 of 36
1.2 Thesis Process and Procedures
The whole process of thesis preparation can be divided into several stages:
1) Choice of the theme and allocation of a supervisor and reader;
2) Preparation and approval of Thesis Proposal;
3) Preparation of the thesis and submission to the examiners;
4) Assessment of the Thesis.
Each student will have a thesis supervisor from her/ his home university and a thesis reader from a
partner university. The supervisor must have a PhD. Both supervisor and the reader will be examiners
of the thesis. The supervisor will be the first examiner and the reader the second examiner.
The student is responsible for preparation of master thesis. The supervisor provides guidance and
advice. Good communication between student and supervisor during the thesis preparation process
is essential.
In the following the student will be referred to as candidate.
1. A supervisor who will act as guide and first examiner will be allocated to each candidate by
the university in which he/she is enrolled. The area of investigation and supervisor should be
chosen on the basis of mutual interest and agreement between a candidate and a supervisor.
All potential supervisors must hold a doctorate degree (PhD.). The names and special area of
expertise/ specialisations of all potential supervisors from all universities will be posted on
the consortium website. The candidate will approach the supervisor that he/she would like
to have. The theme/title of the thesis should be discussed between candidate and
supervisor. On agreement, the candidate must inform administration of Home University1
through the local coordinator about the choice (title and name of supervisor). This must be
carried out in the first semester of Year 2.
2. A candidate may not have a supervisor who is from a different university. However they will
automatically have a lecturer from another university as the reader/ second examiner. The
candidate is free to express a preference for a specific lecturer from another university in the
consortium for their reader on the basis of that lecturers specialist area of knowledge only.
This request will be taken very seriously and when possible be honoured.
3. The thesis proposal must be submitted in digital form in Week 3 of the second semester.
4. The supervisor will provide feedback on the proposal within 14 days. The reader will not be
in direct contact with the candidate at any time in the process. The reader will give feedback
for the candidate to the supervisor who will decide how to pass that feedback on.
5. The process of supervision will be agreed explicitly between the candidate and the
supervisor. However no supervisor will dedicate more than 15 hours for the entire process.
This includes the meetings with the reader to prepare the final mark and the oral
examination. Both the supervisor and the reader will award a preliminary mark, independent
of each other. The candidate will be able to see these marks and the assessment criteria and
comments before the oral exam.
6. The candidate will submit a draft of thesis three weeks before the final date so that both
examiners have sufficient time to give the candidate feedback.
1
The Home University is the university in which student is primarily enrolled. Partner universities are
universities involved in consortium European Master in Social Work
Page 4 of 36
7. The candidate should consider that the thesis process should take them not more, but not
less, than 672 hours or approximately 17 weeks of full time work. The process is spread out
over 5 calendar months (20 weeks) in the second semester. The deadline for submission of
the final version of the thesis is in Week 24 The candidate should submit a hard copy of the
thesis to the local coordinator and place an electronic version of it on the website of the
consortium.
8. If passed, the oral exam is week 26
9. If failed resit of the written exam is in week 28 and the oral exam in week 35.
10. The number of ECTS for the entire process is 24.
1.3 Thesis Proposal Outline
The first step on the process of a thesis is the making of a research proposal. The word length of the
main text is a minimum of 2,000 and a maximum of 4,000 words. However, depending on the
complexity the outline can be adjusted and extended. The Thesis Proposal needs to be approved by
the supervisor and the reader. The following is a suggested format (see Appendix 2). You are free to
deviate from it.
(Preliminary) Title
The title should be a summary of the research goal and give a clear indication of content and
approach.
I Introduction
Background / Rationale
Background: Describe the client organisation if there is one. Give an overview of relevant information
and facts regarding services, internal organisation, etc. In your discussion also include arguments in
favour of the main problem.
Rationale: If there is no client, define the context and rationale of the study including why it is
relevant and for whom.
Literature Review / Theoretical framework

The literature review should include relevant publications, both analytical and empirical. Obviously,
you should not simply summarize books and articles in your literature review, but instead identify
key issues, researchers theories, experiments, etc. If there is a gap in previous literature / studies
that you will fill then indicate what the gap is.
Further, if you can, do attempt to make a visual representation of how concepts, theories and
models may frame / support the investigation.
Problem definition / Thesis statement

The problem statement is a key part of a proposal. Not only does the problem need to be defined in
terms of its rationale but also in the literature. Thus, if you have identified a gap, link that to the
thesis statement.
The subordinate research questions will follow.
An overview of the rest of the paper will round off this section. This is the end of the introduction.

Page 5 of 36
II Research methodology
Primary and secondary data are needed to answer your research questions. For each question, you
have to describe which data-collection methods you are going to apply. Quantitative and qualitative
instruments of data collection are acceptable as well as a combination of both.
You have to explain why each data-collection method is used, and how it is going to be implemented.
This includes sampling and sampling techniques. Also validity issues should be addressed.
This section is not just a description of the methods. On the contrary, it is about the logic of those
data-collection and data analysis methods in relation to the main hypothesis/ problem. You should
be able to demonstrate the appropriateness of your choices.
Please be sure to indicate any potential problems or limitations of the methods.
Appendix 2 identifies key terms for the entire thesis. The methods section of this appendix offers
headings and sub-headings that you can use to structure the methodology.
III Project time-scaling - Scheduling
Keeping a schedule is a key aspect of writing a thesis. Creating a rough timeline or checklist will help
you focus on deadlines, both universitydetermined deadlines and those you have set for yourself. It
is also helpful to put this timeline in a place where you will always see it, in order to be constantly
reminded of your work.
You might consider organizing your timeline into five sections:

1. preparing for the thesis
2. writing the proposal
3. preparation for the research (field work)
4. conducting research
5. writing the thesis
6. revising the thesis
Give yourself enough time for each section and stay on schedule!
The following website may be helpful to you:
The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/dissertation.html
A basic planning chart can look like this. It identifies research activities with appropriate allocation of
deadlines for your fieldwork period. In your planning you should include the required preparation to
contact the gate-keepers or informants etc.
Description of Activity Start of activity End of activity

Activity 1 Start date activity End date activity
1 1
Activity 2 Start date activity End date activity
2 2
Etc. Etc. Etc.
Etc. Etc. Etc.
(As this is a proposal there are no results or discussion sections)

Page 6 of 36
IV Reference list
The reference list should be balanced in terms of relevant sources, like handbooks, periodicals,
research journals, professional magazines, company reports and websites. The APA system of
referencing should be applied.
There are many good websites to help students with APA. See appendix 4 for some links.
1.4 Questions for thinking through and organising the research process and thesis
(adapted from Miller, 2003)
Ask yourself the following questions:

1. Is the problem clearly stated?
2. Are the hypotheses clear and testable?
3. Are the objectives clearly stated?
4. Are the research questions clear and unambiguous?
5. Is the assignment acceptable to the client? (if applicable)
6. How much time do I need to complete the research?
7. Is the assignment trying to do too much? Too little?
8. Can the data be collected from available sources?
9. Will I have access to these sources?
10. What primary data do I need?
11. How do I gather what I need? By questionnaire, survey, interview, policy documents, or
experiment?
12. What do I do if my data collection methods fails?
13. How can the data be displayed? (graphs, charts, tables)
14. How do I analyse my data?
15. What depth is expected? Hence, what analysis will support the topic, not be trivial, and have
the level of complexity required?
16. Will the analyses be sufficient for a relevant, coherent and in-depth discussion of outcomes
or the solutions?
17. Are sample data analyses sufficient for non-trivial conclusions?
18. What statistical tests are possible with the results?
19. What can I do with inconclusive results?
20. How much time do I need to write-up my research?
21. What happens if I fail to collect sufficient data (but have some)?
22. What can I potentially propose for implementation? (forecast specifically)
23. What has my research achieved?: evidence and arguments for outcomes?
1.5 Keeping a Research Log (optional but recommended)
The Log: Ideally you should make or buy a notebook that will be used exclusively as your research log
with a set of tabs. Some students make an electronic file on their own PC. There will be a place on
the Virtual Learning Environment for you to keep the log. This last option is probably the best since
you can share your log files with a fellow student with whom you are in a buddy system to help each
other during the thesis process.
The Entries: No matter what your individual style is, a good log will contain certain key elements,
including, time, date, place, - specific data information, - and personal notes.

Page 7 of 36
Reasons for keeping a Log:
These might be clustered into 3 areas. Each area has its own functions.
I - To keep track of people and organizations that you have contact with.
II - To keep track of the sources you have used and those you still need to locate or contact. To keep
track of various catalogues, indexes, and other electronic tools you have consulted and the search
terms you used in each. To record what you expect to find in a source (including people) and how
the source actually panned out.To bring clarity to your thinking about specific issues and problems
and to try out new ideas. Dont forget that at most universities you can get a training in sourcing
tools such as RefWorks. Also there are handy tools to help with transcribing and analyzing interviews
such as Voice Walker and Atlas-ti.
III -To reflect on actions, events, turning points.

To record frustration, surprise, or excitement as the project unfolds.
Some possible Categories: in 3 Cs
Section 1: Contacts
Who have you spoken to, when, where, and what are their future contact details?
Section 2: Commentary
What models, concepts have come to your attention? What search terms have been helpful? What
ideas are coming up while you are busy with the project? Which ideas are changing and why? Which
ideas are you going to drop?
Section 3 Chronology
If possible once (if you can twice) a week sit down and record the events, activities and turning points
as they happen. What were the high points of this week? What was stimulating and encouraging?
What were low points? How am I feeling at this specific moment in the process? What do I intend to
do next week?
1.6 Assessment
Thesis assessment will be done in two ways: the written text will be evaluated and it will be
defended during an oral examination.
1.6.1 I The text of the thesis

The written thesis will be assed in three steps:
Step 1. The prerequisites set out below as minimal requirement and plagiarism rules must be met. If
these requirements are not met, the examiners will return the thesis to the student without further
assessment. It will be registered as a fail (see Step 1. Minimal Requirements and Plagiarism Notes).
Step 2. The thesis will be evaluated on a quantitative scale followed by some qualitative comments,
by both examiners, independently. These two assessments will be given to the candidate (see Step 2.
ASSESSMENT FORMS).
Step 3. The thesis mark will be agreed by the two examiners in a meeting. It can be adjusted either
up or down in relation to the first independent assessments.

Page 8 of 36
Step 1. Minimal requirements and Plagiarism Notes
MINIMAL REQUIREMENTS
1. On the basis of a first reading of the text, the use of English grammar, spelling and punctuation
appears to be satisfactory. If the language is too poor to follow the assessors will immediately
return it to the student, without further assessment.
2. All of the required sections have been completed. Lay out requirements have been met.
3. The report is within the required range for length : between 20 and 30 thousand words of basic
text, (60 to 70 pages) including the Preface, excluding the Executive Summary TOC, Reference
list, Appendices. There is a comprehensive Executive Summary of up to 3 pages.
4. All references are in correct APA style, on the basis of first reading there is no evidence of
plagiarism.
5. The report is the work of one student, working on their own, it is not co-authored.
6. Originals of references can be produced on demand. Evidence of plagiarism will lead to an
immediate fail.
STRUCTURE & LANGUAGE

1. Consistent build up of each section, well developed and coherent paragraphs
2. Secondary sources are strategically chosen, up to date, relevant, in-text citing is synthetic and
grammatically correct
3. Reference list is correct according to APA guidelines
4. Spelling and grammar are reasonably correct
5. Style is appropriately formal
6. Vocabulary is sufficiently precise & varied to carry out the task in a client oriented manner
7. Lay out, font etc. follow APA Style guidelines
Plagiarism notes
You must avoid plagiarism all times. We define plagiarism as:
- Copying other peoples texts more or less literally, without referring to the sources
constitutes plagiarism. Quotations must be appropriately marked within the text.
- Paraphrasing other peoples texts (reproducing other peoples ideas in ones own words),
without referring to the sources constitutes plagiarism.
- Borrowing other peoples ideas without referring to the sources constitutes plagiarism. In
this respect, the following applies:
a. Ideas that are generally accepted and are regarded as common knowledge within the
domain do not have to be acknowledged, unless they are quotations or paraphrases
from specific sources.
b. The source of the ideas should be traceable within reason.
- Quoting (i.e. borrowing more or less literally) excessively from other peoples texts, even
when referring to the sources, is not permissible. In this respect, no more than 10% of the
report may consist of direct quotations.
- Source references/-acknowledgements must also be made within the text, so that it is clear
what information comes from what source.
- The plagiarism rules also apply to non-textual information, such as multimedia, program
lines, scripts, etc

Page 9 of 36
END OF STEP 1 : BOTH EXAMINERS HAVE AGREED THAT MINIMAL REQUIREMENTS
/PREREQUISITES HAVE BEEN MET YES NO
1ST SUPERVISOR/ EXAMINER _________________________________________________
2ND READER/ EXAMINER ____________________________________________________
Step 2. ASSESSMENT FORMS: quantitative and qualitative

CONTENT 5 4 3 2 1 n/a
1 Topic / Issues covered in depth Superficial treatment of topic /
/ Question answered questions not answered
2 Clear understanding of clients Weak grasp of clients problem
problem AND/ OR : AND/OR:
Problem formulation is Problem formulation is too
sufficiently complex, strategic superficial, tactical or narrow,
and multifaceted lack of complexity
3 Introduction is coherent and Introduction weak or inadequate
convincing Rational/ relevance Rational/ relevance are unclear
made clear
4 Relevant, up to date literature Literature is reviewed in a
is reviewed comprehensively, mechanical and disconnected
coherently and critically manner / some literature is not
up to date or relevant
6 Data is validly collected and Data is not validly collected /
presented poorly presented
6 Original thought / Critical Little evidence of originality and/
thinking are evident or critical thinking
7 Evidence of in depth analysis Analysis is mostly descriptive
8 Discussion points are well Discussion points are weakly
supported and convincingly supported by data or are poorly
argued argued
9 Conclusion demonstrates how Conclusion is absent or
the intended aims are achieved inadequate
10 Potential for future research Little indication of future re-
and/or applicability of findings search directions or applicability
for the wider field are evident of findings in wider field
11 Sources accurately quoted Sources repeatedly inaccurately
Reference list is completely quoted / Poor , incomplete or
correct inaccurate reference list

Page 10 of 36
STYLE AND PRESENTATION 5 4 3 2 1 n/a
12 Succinct writing :Text is well Unnecessarily repetitive /
structured : with well unfocussed writing :Text lacks
developed paragraphs coherence Paragraphs are poorly
developed
13 Good lay out i.e. of page Page numbers and section
numbers, section headings, headings are absent or incorrect
font. etc. Captions are absent /
Tables, charts and graphs are inappropriate/ tables are too
correctly presented small or large decimals are not
given correctly
14 Grammar / spelling is correct Grammar / spelling is poor
(English) Style is appropriate (English)/ Style is poor
Total points out of 70 :_______
Conversion Scale from points to percentage:
66 - 70 points 95 - 100% distinction

65 - 69 points 90 - 94 outstanding
60 - 64 points 85 - 89 % Very good
56 - 59 points 80 84 % Very good
51 - 55 points 79- 72 % Very satisfactory
50 - 54 points 71 - 78 % Very satisfactory
49 - 45 points 70 - 65 % satisfactory
44 - 40 points 64 - 58 % pass
39 points 55.7 lowest pass mark
35 points 50 % fail
34 to 11 points 49 to 15 % bad fail
10 points Incomplete / 14 % or below

Page 11 of 36
Qualitative COMMENTS
Section/page
Section/page
Section/ page
General /
throughout
Step 3: Final comments / explanation of adjusted mark:
MARK student__________________________________________________
date:____________________
first examiner __________________________________________

signature_________________________
second examiner:_________________________________________
signature:_________________________
This represents 80% of the final mark

Page 12 of 36
In case the grade is higher than 8, please indicate if the thesis is suitable to put forward for
nomination: Suitable? Yes No
Holistic Assessment Criteria:
FIRST 8.0 + This grade indicates work of very high quality, which demonstrates somethough not
necessarily allof the following:
it shows that the student fully understands and deals with all the points of the topic/question
it gives a well-argued viewpoint supported by evidence (original texts, examples and
documentation in the original language)
it shows the capacity to evaluate evidence and base realistic advice on it (original texts, examples
and documentation in the original language)
it gives an original viewpoint convincingly presented including concrete and feasible proposals
it shows the capacity to adduce evidence from other fields and provides a significant measure of
original illustrative material
it shows independent thought of high quality
it is formally well presented and shows a high degree of literacy
UPPER SECOND CLASS 7.0 7.9 This grade indicates a very competent piece of work, which
demonstrates somethough not necessarily allof the following:
it deals with the points raised by the topic/question
it is coherent and well organised and focuses upon material relevant to the topic/question
it makes critical use of sources
it displays a capacity to evaluate evidence and present realistic advice based on it (as above)
it provides some measure of original illustrative material (as above)
it shows evidence of concrete and feasible proposals
it is formally well presented and written
LOWER SECOND CLASS 5.5 6.9 This grade indicates work of an acceptable standard, including
sound knowledge of the subject, but of uneven quality:
It deals with most of the points raised by the topic/question
it sets out relevant material
it contains discussion of points relevant to the topic/question
it contains some supporting evidence (as above) which may be evaluated only partially
it may omit some relevant material or contain some irrelevant material
it may show inadequacies of presentation and style
the bibliography may be incomplete and/or inconsistent
FAIL below 5.5 The work demonstrates some knowledge and understanding, but contains several
of the following weaknesses:
it addresses very few points relevant to the topic/question, and a considerable amount of the
material is irrelevant to the topic/question
key points of advice are missing including making realistic proposals
it contains inaccurate material relating to important points
assertions are made without supporting evidence
it is too simplistic or too brief
it draws upon too limited a range of material
it lacks clear organisation
it is sloppy in presentation (e.g. inaccurate or incomplete bibliography) and its style lacks
coherence

Page 13 of 36
1.6.2 The oral examination Guidelines
Topic: Presentation and defence of Master Thesis
The oral exams consists of a presentation of 15 minutes and an examination and discussion of the
thesis and its results of 30 minutes.
A Presentation
The candidate prepares a 15 minutes presentation of the master thesis focussing on:
Point of departure description of problem and professional context

Open questions and personal research interests
Theoretical framing of the core thesis
Procedure and choice of empirical research
Explanation of methods used and methodological reflexion
Presentation of data collection and interpretation
The outcomes and their theoretical and practical impacts for the field
Consequences for further research
Critcal self assessment of writing and research process
There should be some visualization of the presentation, candidates are free to chose adequate
methods (power point, poster, flip chart etc.)
B Discussion
After this presentation, there will be an exchange and critical discussion of the presentation (15
minutes).
Teachers might also refer to details of the thesis that remain unclear or they want to make
comments on.
Students will also ask questions and demand eplanations and positioning on part of the teachers.

Page 14 of 36
Assessment of oral exam
Presentatiomn and Defence 5 4 3 2 1 n/a
1 Structured presentation of Topic and knowledge interests

topic and knowledge interests remain unclear
2 Theoretical framework around Focus is confined to practical
topic are referred to and phenomenological field
3 Sound and logical explanation No reasons for explanation and
of procedure and research choice of methods are given
methods
4 Clear presentation of the Data is only presented and
outcomes and results of the described, outcomes not clear
research
6 Capability of transfer of results Discussion remains within one
to other problems or fields of practical field no transfer
social work
6 Reflexion on consequences of Further consequences of results
results for practical field and for theoretical and practical
further research debates are lacking
7 Reflexion on strength and of No critical self assessment , no
weaknesses of thesis criutical criticall distance to proceudre
self assessment and findings
Performance 5 4 3 2 1 n/a
8 Quality of Communication: Candidate is hard to understand,

clear, open and directed to speaks to him/herself and is not
audience clear
9 Prompt, clear structured and Answers are incomplete and
complete answers confusing
10 Visualization helps to get an Visualization is not helpful for
overview and furthers underatanding the topic
understanding
Total points out of 50 :_______
Conversion Scale double to get a percentage see above
The oral exam will only take place if the thesis was awarded a mark of 5.5 or above.
The mark for the oral exam has to be given right after the exam.
It has to be at least 5.5
If the oral exam is a fail, there must be abundant feed back after the exam and the possibilty of a
resit in the same semester.
In the transcript there will be one combined mark. This mark consists of 80% for the written part
and 20% for the oral exam)

Page 15 of 36
1.6.3 Resit Procedures of thesis
Resits will only be allowed when the original mark is between 5.0 and 5.4.
The candidate will be given one consultation meeting with the first supervisor to explain the reasons
for the fail mark. The comments of the reader will be included into that session. The candidate will
have four weeks to improve the thesis and re-submit it in the same academic year.
A candidate will not be allowed to ask for a resit if they have been awarded a passing mark of 5.5 or
above, nor if the mark was below a 5.0.
Any candidate whose thesis awarded a 1.0 to 4.9 must re-enrol for the following semester of study.
A new supervisor and reader will be allocated and a new topic of investigation found.
1.6.4 Grievance Procedures
Candidates who do not agree with the mark awarded to their thesis are free to submit a letter of
complaint to the Examination Committee if and only if, they have failed.
If the nature of the grievance is that the candidate has received insufficient supervision, then
evidence of such a lack must be demonstrated. This means that the local coordinator must have been
made of aware of this problem in writing, during the supervision process so that he/she could have
taken steps to repair the problem in a timely fashion.

Page 16 of 36
II. Part II
2.1 Thesis Guide: Section by Section
The report is written in formal English. For the main points of academic/ formal writing you can
consult: Using English for Academic Purposes website http://www.uefap.com/index.htm to refresh
your memory on academic language functions, questions of formality, academic grammar and
vocabulary support as well as APA rules and tutorials (for links see Appendix 4). You must not
plagiarise.
In general the structure of the thesis can be divided in standard parts:
Introduction:
Organisational context/ and or rationale & relevance
Relevant literature for framing of concepts
Problem definition resulting in Thesis statement and/or problem statement and
research questions
Methodology
Results
Discussion
If applicable: Advice, Solutions and Implementation
Conclusions
Written report of the Thesis must also include

Title page,
Preface (optional),
Executive summary,
and Table of contents at the beginning
and Reference list, Appendixes at the end of the whole document.
For recommendations of presentation and style of the report see Appendix 1.
Title page
Do not put a number on the title page but start the numbering with it
Title page includes: Title, Name of student, ID number place, date, names of the supervisor and
the reader, name of university and European Master in Social Work
- Inside back cover: This graduation assignment has been written to fulfil the requirements of the
degree of European Master in Social at . The copyright belongs to the author. Both the
university and the author declare that any information provided by third parties who these
parties do not want to be made public will be kept in confidence.
Preface
This is optional and must not be an essential part of the report. It should be written in the first
person and give any or all of the following: stimulus of the assignment, special circumstances,
limitations, obstacles, acknowledgements (give the full name and title with a short description of
how they helped or supported the student, give external people first then internal such as the
supervisor) any personal comments of the author

Page 17 of 36
Executive summary
- Informative and fluently written; stands on its own independent of the main text
- Is given as a chapter in the graduation proposal but is not numbered
- 3 pages maximum
- An independent summary including answers to the following questions the first 3 questions take
up one third to one half of the length and the last two questions take up two-thirds to one half of
the length of the summary
1 What is the relevance of the research and what is the main area of investigation (include the
problem/ thesis statement) ?
2 What is are the goals of the research?
3 How was the investigation undertaken?
4 What are the main results?
5 What are the main conclusions & recommendations?
Table of Contents
- As clear as possible in terms of layout
- No more than 3 levels of subheadings : use decimals
- Headings must be short : abridged if necessary
- Page numbers must be on the right side of the TOC
- All sections must be listed in detail and formulated in the same wording as in the main text
- The reference list is a separate chapter but is not numbered
- Each appendix has a title and is numbered
2.2 Introduction
Make the importance of the topic clear, create a context. Use the present perfect tense where
appropriate, have a strong opening statement, use supporting illustrations to go from general to
specific. Follow the structure of introductory paragraphs.
A. Background this section can be based on the background information given in the
proposal, but it can add or revise that description.
B. Rationale this can be taken over from the proposal but may be adapted
C. Thesis statement and / or problem definition with research questions.
D. Overview - sequential outline of the structure of the rest of the thesis.
Some extra notes on parts of the introduction:
Organisational Context
A selective, focussed and if possible, critical analysis of the relevant (and only the RELEVANT) internal
& external factors & forces [that is, people, processes & structures] in relation to the problem that
needs solving for the client organisation.
Relevant literature for framing of concepts

The thesis should contain a state- of the- art review of relevant literature and previous research.
IT will not only describe, but provide a critical evaluation of this literature. The end report and its
topic(s) for analysis should be situated in and be an extension of this body of work. So firstly you
need to read widely to find the information and studies that are relevant to your topic. In the thesis
you need to summarise these studies, properly cited. You need to include: who found out what,
when, and how this developed the study of the topic.

Page 18 of 36
Of course the quantity and quality of this section will depend on the nature of the problem and the
issues that it raises for investigation. Academic books and, in particular, the academic research
journals, must be used.
Review [that is synthesize and comment on] key studies, models or theories that help to illuminate
or frame your investigation. Use only those studies that are relevant to your problem and your
approach to investigating it. Do not automatically include literature from your previous studies. Any
study you carry out, whether it is based on quantitative, qualitative or combined methods, cannot
depend completely on your own data, but must be situated in a context of what is already known
about the topic in question. This context is provided in the literature review.
It must not be simply a group of sources presented one after another in an arbitrary list of
abstracts or mini-book reviews.
Remember that the reader will want to know why you have included any particular piece of
research here.
It is not enough just to summarise what has been said: you need to organise and evaluate it.
Think of how you can or will use the ideas and judge them in light of your needs to solve your
problem.
You must also justify its inclusion. For example, does it have a definition of a key term that
you will use in your analysis of results? Does it confirm the findings of another important
source that you are also using? Does it have any limitations or gaps that matter? Constantly,
you need to draw out the relevance and significance of what the sources have provided. It is
no use expecting the reader to locate the relevance or significance themselves. You must
demonstrate this.
You can also review methods that have been used in these studies that are relevant to your
own study.
Try to combine certain key theories or models into a conceptual framework of your own if
possible. At the end of the review it is customary to provide a concluding section that draws
together the main points in a theoretical or conceptual framework. You will finish with a
conclusion, explaining how your research will be supported by the literature. Here, you
should prepare the reader to understand the platform of previous knowledge from which the
original primary research then takes off. (with thanks to Gillett, n.d.)
2.3 Methodology
RESEARCH STRATEGY & CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH RESEARCH WAS CONDUCTED the
methods used should be the same as the methods identified in the proposal only here the past tense
is used instead of the future tense.
Headings:
Research design,
Sample/participants,
Materials (if applicable)
Procedures / process/ stages
Methods of data collection,

Page 19 of 36
Methods of data analysis,
Limitations.
Follow guidelines and instructions on how to write this section (see Appendixes 2 and 3)
You should provide detailed information on the research design, participants, equipment, materials,
variables, and actions taken by the participants. The method section should provide enough
information to allow other researchers to replicate your experiment or study.
For example:
Design: Describe the type of design used in the experiment. Specify the variables as well as the levels
of these variables. Explain whether your experiment uses a within-groups or between-groups design.
For example:
The experiment used a 3x2 between-subjects design. The independent variables were age
and understanding of second-order beliefs.
Participants: Describe the participants including who they were, how many there were, and how
they were selected. This can be a sample group. It can also be a description of the interviewees in a
qualitative study.
For example:
We randomly selected 100 children from elementary schools near the University of Arizona.
Materials: Describe the materials, measures, equipment, or stimuli used in the experiment. This may
include testing instruments, technical equipments, books, images, or other materials used in the
course of research.
For example:
Two stories form Sullivan et al.s (1994) second-order false belief attribution tasks were used
to assess childrens understanding of second-order beliefs.
Procedure: The next part of your method section should detail the procedures used in your
experiment. Explain what you had participants do, how you collected data, and the order in which
steps occurred.
For example:
An examiner interviewed children individually at their school in one session that lasted 20
minutes on average. The examiner explained to each child that he or she would be told two
short stories and that some questions would be asked after each story. All sessions were
videotaped so the data could later be coded.
Tips:
1. Always write the method section in the past tense. Combine the passive and active voice, but
use the passive more.

Page 20 of 36
2. Provide enough detail that another researcher could replicate your experiment, but focus on
brevity. Avoid unnecessary detail that is not relevant to the outcome of the experiment.
3. Remember to use proper APA format.
4. Place a rough draft of your method section on the Virtual learning Environment. This draft is
for your thesis buddy who give carry out a peer assessment when you do a peer assessment
of his/her section.
5. Proofread your paper for typos, grammar problems, and spelling errors. Dont just rely on
computer spell checkers. Check each section of your paper for agreement with other
sections. If you mention steps and procedures in the method section, these elements should
also be present in the results and discussion sections.
(partially taken from: Cherry, n.d.)
Language Hints
This is usually the section written first. It may well be the shortest one. Still it is very important,
especially in interdisciplinary fields since methods are not as clear cut as in say mathematics. It may
be acceptable to use the 'I' form here. Considering the verb structures note that the passive will be
used a great deal as well as imperatives. There should be few citations and little commentary. You
must be explicit.
The pace should be rather slow, do not assume too much background knowledge, especially if your
approach is breaking new ground. Do justify and explain a lot. You may repeat terminology in this
section for the sake of clarity. Make sure that this section, just like every other section has an
introductory sentence and that the end of the section is rounded off with a short summary of the
main points covered.
2.4 Results
You must display the data that was collected, providing commentary on initial findings. You should
also provide some comment on the validity and significance of each result.
Give a detailed presentation of key results / findings with initial commentary only.
Cluster results in relation to research questions or by key theme.
A clear exposition of the data produced by the methods is required.
Do you give the impression that you fully understand the nature and relative importance of the
findings or is it merely a straightforward re-statement of the data?
Are any limitations of the findings acknowledged? Have you consistently addressed the original
issues for investigation? Are the findings consistently relevant?
Do not forget that qualitative results need to presently in the form of clusters or categories that you
have found in interviews etc. Selected examples of statements made by respondents that illustrate
your categories will add credibility.

Page 21 of 36
The results of the different aspects of the research should be presented with only a small amount
of commentary. Initially, the data should appear in a relatively raw from showing aggregate
totals and listing responses.
In the second part of this section these can then be analysed with comparisons being identified
and interesting, realistic, relevant findings being drawn out.
The extent to which this chapter develops is dependent on the type of data collected.
Hints on Language
The language of probability will be needed you will also need to be able to describe graphs or charts
or other statistical data (both of these types of language are practised in the web links provided ).
Verbs to qualify (weaken) or strengthen clams will need to be used as well (see Swales & Feak, 2004,
Unit 4).
Do not forget that the results sub-section like all other sections needs an introductory sentence and a
concluding sentence. There are several possible opening strategies for the results as Swales & Feak
(2004) have shown. Remember that in general the results sub-section deals with facts by describing
them while the discussion sub-section deals with interpretation. However you may well want to melt
these two into each other so that presentation of raw data goes immediately over into analysis.
Check with your supervisor on this issue as different supervisors may have different preferences.
2.5 Discussion
Discussion/ Interpretation of Results including an indication of validity of results in relation to

research questions (RQs) (confirmed or supported) referring back to the literature to illuminate the
analysis.
Analysis of findings and critical evaluation of the research process

Is the reasoning supported by the facts? Are the distinctions between fact, and opinion,
interpretation and speculation clear? Are there facts and opinions which are inconsistent with the
overall reasoning/argument?
Does the analysis consistently address the original issues for investigation or is it merely an
interpretation of isolated research findings? Is it a balanced statement and interpretation which
acknowledges the possibility of other confounding yet unmeasured variables? Is unnecessary and
unsubstantiated evaluative terminology used?
If the results have led to possible solutions what kind of interim feedback was given?
Hints on Language & Structure

The opening statement of the discussion section varies according to the type of research. Sometimes
the discussion begins with references to the literature, sometimes with a recap of the results. In
terms of language, linking words (connectors) will be used a great deal to connect up ideas, data,
comments and analysis of data.
Since this is the section where the researcher steps back from the data, the language structures
associated with the logical modes of argument such as 'compare and contrast' and 'cause and effect'
will be important. Make sure that the interpretation of results matches the research questions. You
may give a subsection for each research question using the RQ as a heading. Under each subsection
indicate whether your results confirm, reject or do not answer the RQ.

Page 22 of 36
A good way to organise this is to use three moves
Move 1. Points that consolidate the research space that you have occupied (confirm/reject results)
Move 2. Points that limit your results (compare to other research /perhaps refer to methods)
Move 3. Points that identify further areas of research
You should always do Move 1 for each RQ but you can save Moves 2 and 3 for the general
commentary in the concluding section if you like. Alternatively you may use the moves for each RQ
recycling all three moves each time.
If applicable: Advice / Solutions and Implementation
This section must show how the research has led to solutions that are original, realisable and
concrete including all possible consequences of operational implementation for the organisation /
financial, organisational, time etc. factors. It contains the specific recommendations, which are
described in detail with advantages and disadvantages evaluated objectively & critically.
2.6 Conclusions
This section summarise the various elements of the thesis and demonstrate the value and relevance
of the advice/solutions/products. Outcomes of the assignment should be compared with what was
already known and conclusions drawn out. It should also include: limitations of the investigation as
well as the main contribution.
Recommendations for further investigation would be welcome.
Summary of main points from the research and recommendations for future research.
Try to answer the following:
- Are the conclusions supported by the empirical data?
- Does the text return to the original issues for investigation and questions asked?
- Does the text attempt to critically reassess or confirm initial assignments problem statement?
- Does it successfully round off the work admitting both successes and limitations?
Hints on Language & Structure:

In the conclusions it is necessary to become more general and consider the wider implications of
your results. The discussion section, conclusion section and the recommendation sections together
should be structured like the mega-introductory sections were but in the opposite architectural
order, this time the direction is from Specific to General while in the mega-introductory sections
(General into, lit. review, issues and perhaps also methods) the direction is from General to Specific.
The concluding section contains

1. a restatement of the problem statement, and research questions : NOTE there must be no new
information in the conclusion
2. the broader implications, not just for your field but wider social and scientific contributions
3. indication of limitations (if applicable)
Language: The language of generalisation and the language of limitations are needed (see Swales &
Feak)
4. A final linking up to the problem statement to remind the reader what has been accomplished in
relation to it is stylistically satisfying.

Page 23 of 36
2.7 References & Appendices
References
There should be a concise reference list. References should be presented according to the APA
system (see Appendix 4).
Appendices
Appendices should have a clear function to support the text. References to the appendices should be
made within the text. The project proposal plans and sub-plans can be put here. Also SPSS details
from surveys, transcripts from interviews and interview question protocol can be placed in the
appendix.
2.8 Checklist (This is an adaptation of a checklist of Coen Sijtstra , 2005).
Content Descriptors
Length 20,000 to 30,000 words of basic text (include word count)
Lay out Professional and attractive: Times New Roman 12 or Arial
11 point font (1.5 spacing) correct use of headings see
details below
Title page All relevant dates & names, confidentiality and originality
statements see no.4 below
Preface [ not required] see 5. below
Executive Summary see 6. below 3 to 5 pages; must meet all requirements
TOC APA format see notes below
Introduction From general to specific Sufficiently descriptive Aims are
relevant and significant Problem statement is derived
Description/ justification and logic of from aims with clear boundaries Overview of the rest of
the research proposal the report is set out in a fluent manner Concrete, logical
& transparent means of measuring , Reliable, feasible,
valid
Situation analysis / Organisation Relevant data
background
Concepts and conceptual frameworks Only relevant theories and models / well chosen and
used with discrimination Must be up to date /important
communication or organisation theories for the task at
hand are not missing - dictionary definitions are usually
insufficient
Methods Possible Headings for a methods section
Purpose & design; Subjects;
Types of data (measurement instruments) ;
Methods of data collection; Procedures
Methods of data analysis ; Limitations
Results / Discussion including Clear, readable, credible, valid reliable all details in the
Objective description and appendix; full transcriptions are not required.
interpretation Evidence of critical analysis
Conclusions Summarise the answers to the problem statement and
research questions. No new information in the conclusion

Page 24 of 36
Advice / Recommendations Client oriented/ fitting to this client concrete, realistic,
operational (feasible to implement) individual & original
vision creative
In text citing : paraphrasing, direct According to APA rules see no. below and APA rules See
quotes, and summaries no. 9 below & Appendix
See Reference list According to APA
Appendices Relevant data that would disturb the flow of reading the
main text
Figures, tables, charts, etc. According to APA Style guidelines: with captions and
proper referencing See no. 9 below & Appendix
Style Text is flowing, consistent, precise & fluent, in character :
Style and vocabulary are appropriately formal
Language Professional and rich vocabulary : only minor grammatical
errors
In-text rhetorical structuring Logical organisation within sections. Sections and
paragraphs are unified, and well developed Text is
coherent, all sections are interrelated; explicit signposting
to indicate the links between sections is carried out
throughout the text
Depth of analysis and creativity of Must meet Master competencies in cognitive terms:
solutions descriptive and/or informative presenting of one
dimensional issues is not sufficient, there must be
comparative analysis/ critical thinking of complex /
multidimensional issues & reflective evaluation
References
Cherry, K. (n.d.) How to write a method section. About.com Retrieved, 12 April, 2011, from
http://psychology.about.com/od/psychologywriting/ht/method.htm.
Gillett, A. (n.d.) Using English for academic purposes. Retrieved, 15 September, 2009, from,
http://www.uefap.com/writing/writfram.htm.
Miller, K. (2003). Dissertation guide university of Geneva masters in tourism management.

Unpublished educational text adapted with permission from the author, Leeuwarden: Christelijke
Hogeschool Nederland.
Sijtstra, C. (2005). Afstudeer Opdracht van de Opleiding MER. Unpublished educational text adapted
with permission from the author, Groningen: Hanze University Groningen.
Strunk , W. (1918). Elements of style. Librivox edition Retrieved, 24 September, 2011,

from http://librivox.org/the-elements-of-style-by-william-strunk-jr/.
Swales, J.M., Feak, C. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks & skills (Second
Edition). Michigan Series in English for Academics & Professional Purposes, Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press.

Page 25 of 36
Appendix 1 PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATION & STYLE HINTS
Standard of Professional English

We will automatically deduct marks if spelling mistakes which a 'spell check' programme would have
found are included. 'Grammar check' facilities, included on most modern writing programmes, can
also be useful, but will usually only warn you of possible problems. You still have to have a sufficient
command of English writing to be able to correct possible grammatical and style shortcomings.
Structuring the Text

- Logical structure see above notes on sections
Systematic and balanced chapters and sections with well developed and unified paragraphs not
choppy with too many short chapters (the maximum is 8).
- Each chapter or section has its own mini introductory paragraph. This introduction not only
states the order of topics or points covered in the chapter but also its relevance for the main
question/ problem statement and why it is necessary to have this chapter in this particular place
in the text. Indicate its relations to earlier chapters and subsequent chapters . Thus, in principle
the readers must always know why they are reading this particular slice of the whole at this
specific moment. This is what gives unity, coherence and flow to the text which it is vital to the
readability of the report.
Style and Wording of Headings and Sub-headings
A systematic mode of headings should be employed in writing dissertations, namely:
CHAPTER 1: CHAPTER TITLE (left hand margin, justified, capitals, NOT

underlined)
SECTION HEADINGS (as for CHAPTER)
Sub-Section headings (left hand margin, justified, lower case)
Sub sub-section headings

(centred, lower case, underlined)
Headings are written without full stops.
Typically, a chapter may include two or three sections, each with one or two sub-sections.
The structure chosen by you will be reflected in the section titles and headings. Keep the following
guidelines in mind:
1. Only longer reports, require a table of contents (called a TOC) as well as internal headings. In that
case, make sure that the TOC headings and headings in the report are exactly the same.
2. Numbered headings and sub-headings are used to structure your ideas, this means there should
be some logic to that structure (see examples below). Most readers cannot follow the logic of
headings such as "2.5.3.13 - Important Conclusions" and "2.5.3.14: Further Important
Conclusions". In fact, Module Assignment Reports usually require headings on three levels at
most. The minimum number of sub-headings per level is two (i.e. if there is a 1.1, there must be
a 1.2).
3. Make sure the amount of text is in proportion with the number of headings. There should be at
least a full paragraph to each heading, but at least 1 heading per page.

Page 26 of 36
4. Use parallel construction: i. e. write all the headings in the same grammatical farm (e.g. not
development and presenting the new service; but "developing and presenting the new service").
5. Make the difference in heading levels clear by using a combination of variation in font size, bold
type, underlining, or italics.
6. Choose a descriptive (topical) style, question style or summary style and consistently use only
that style within any one report. Examples of three different styles are shown below. Think about
the effect each style has on the reader.
Descriptive (topical) style: This style is good if the sub-topics are quite simple and straightforward.
Heading : I. Industry Characteristics
Sub-heading 1.1 Annual Sales
1.2 Profitability
1.3 Growth Rate
Question style: This style is probably the easiest .

Heading : I. What is the nature of the industry?
Sub-heading : 1.1 What are the annual sales?
1.2 Is the industry profitable?
1.3 What is the pattern of growth?
Summary style: This style is more difficult because you have to know the results before you write the
relevant heading.
Heading I. The airline industry is stagnating.
Sub-heading 1.1 Market is large.
1.2 Profit margins are narrow.
1.3 Growth is modest
N:B: In some kinds of reports (especially financial ones) there are Sub-sub headings, but for a
module assignment report this is not necessary.
1.3.1 Sales growth under 0.5% a year.
1.3.2 Growth in profits is flat.
Tables Figures, Charts, Graphs and Numbers

Tables should be used sparingly, with large tables on a separate page (or in the appendices), small
tables centred in the text. A useful numbering system is Chapter/Table number (e.g. Table 2.2).
Tables and graphs should be given a clear heading, as should figures and diagrams. There must be a
correct APA reference for all tables etc. taken from outside sources using 8 point font.
Numbers
Remember that, in English, full stops and commas are used the opposite way to the system used in
some European countries when writing numbers.
E. g. one million two hundred and eighty-four thousand six hundred and three dollars and fifty cents,
is written as follows:
i.e. in German or Dutch in English
$1.284.603,50 $1,284,603.50
In addition, Three dollars and zero cents is:
i.e. in German or Dutch in English
$3,00 $3.00

Page 27 of 36
System of Referencing: a very brief reminder
As you know, a systematic mode of referencing should be employed throughout the report. The APA
Style of in-text citing and referencing should be used. Just to remind you a few points are highlighted
below.
Whenever an idea is drawn from a source, but not directly quoted, it must be referenced using the
surname of the author and the date of publication. E.g. (Smith, 2005). If you have used more than
one item published by the same author in the same year, these are distinguished by the insertion of a
letter. E.g. (Smith, 2005a).
Whenever direct quotations are used, these must include the surname of the author, the year of
publication and the page number(s) where the quotation may be located. e.g (Smith 1999, p. 29).
All sources referenced in the body of the text must be clearly and fully identified in the References
list at the end of the Dissertation in the following manner. (Books and Journal articles may be
included in the same list, but are shown differently) The following examples are fictional but correct
in form.
For books:
Smith, J. F.(2009).Graduation theses are fun. London: Fantastic Books.
For articles:
Smith, J. F. (2010). The skills of conducting interviews with over stressed policy makers. Journal of
Social Policy Research, 10(7), 167-192.
For references that are used not from the original but from some other source:
(Brown, 2001, cited in Smith, 2010, p. 170)
For electronic sources:

Smith, J. F. (2000). How to write a really nice masters thesis in one month, Retrieved 12
December, 2002, from, http://www.graduatewriting.com/J.F.Smith.htm
Report Style
The importance of style for your final report can hardly be overemphasized. There are many websites
with guidelines and many good books as well. Check the academic writing blackboard pages for a
selection of them. Think about Strunks Classic Elements of Style and do not forget what Swales and
Feak demonstrate in Chapter one on the significance of writing in the appropriate genre and of the
many examples of writing throughout their book. In the first place do not use the first person unless
you have a very good reason to do so. Avoid subjective, opinionated language and aim for a neutral
and objective style. The use of the passive is common in texts of social scientists writers and you
must master the passive voice to achieve the correct tone.
Also do not use the second person pronoun (you) at any time and avoid informal commentary words
like Naturally Of course etc. Informal English may begin sentences with and, or, but, and so, this is
considered too chatty in formal writing. Use of formal linking words is very effective to improve
formality. For example, use: therefore, thus, by contrast, nevertheless rather than ****so, still.
Informality is also seen in the use of exclamation marks and question marks, which are not commonly
used in formal English. Formal English `does it with language'.

Page 28 of 36
Table 1 A Comparison of Formal and Informal Writing Styles
Formal Informal
Use External reports, or when (some of) Internal reports, where all readers are
the readers do not know the writer known to the writer
very known to the writer well
Legally-required documents
Effect Impression of objectivity, accuracy, Feeling of friendliness, warmth, and
professionalism and fairness personal involvement.
Distance created between writer and

reader
Characteristics Avoids the first person whenever Use of the first person (e. g. I, we, etc.)
possible
No contractions (e. g. Cannot instead Use of contractions (e. g. Cant, dont)

of can't)
A wide variety of linking words Mostly simple conjunctions
Use of the passive voice the research Emphasis on active voice verbs (e. g. I
(e.g. the study was carried out) carried out the study)
Almost complete absence of humour Occasional use of humour and figures

and figures of speech/ Emotionally of speech/ less restrained
restrained
Relatively long, complex sentences Relatively short, simple sentences
General Formal Style:

What makes up a writers style? Look up guidelines on any of the following that you do not understand.
1. Language level
Sentence length and sentence complexity
Paragraph length
Spelling
Contractions (do not belong in formal writing)
Simplifications
Word choice
Discourse level
Genre
Word order
Active/passive tenses
Personal/impersonal
Direct/indirect
Variety

Page 29 of 36
2. Contents level
Objective: reporting/argumentative/entertaining
Information density
Focused on the main arguments or loosely built up
Any tricks (these do not belong in formal writing)

Repetition
Rhetorical questions
Charged examples
Leading (of course)
Degree of personal involvement?
Exclamation marks, questions, italics for emphasis
3. Compare the two examples the first is formal the second is informal.
Approximately 50 people will be interviewed We will interview about50 people.
facilitate make easier
discover find out
investigate look into
postpone put off
This investigation discusses the communication betweenIn this investigation I will discuss ...
This is very unlikely / I do not believe this
This is discussed in Chapter 6 / I will discuss this in Chapter 6
This stakeholder is said to be rich/ They say he is a rich stakeholder.
not unpleasant / pleasant, nice

dispense with someone's services / fire someone
Interestingly, there was no difference / I found it interesting to see that ...

Page 30 of 36
Appendix 2 KEY TERMS FOR THE PROPOSAL
Background and problem definition

Background of the organisation
Name of organisation and basic facts : (in an abridged form)
KEY Internal organisation/ structures and Key actors( in an abridged form)
KEY External forces (economic, social, etc. people. processes . products)
Non- disclosure agreement
Organisational supervision
Main issues/ Relevance

Thesis/ Problem statement
Research questions
Phase in the policy cycle (if applicable)
Stages, including consulting moments (if applicable)
Key research concepts/ terms
Research methodology /Possible Headings for a methods section
Purpose & design

General statement and explanation of whether the study uses a quantitative or qualitative design or
some combination of these. Limitations of the design can be explained here as well.
Subjects (this can be presented here or later under the types of data if the research is qualitative)
Sample description
Who will be studied? Age, gender, etc.
How many subjects will be studied?
Is this representative , if so why, if not why not?
Other?
Types of data (measurement instruments)

Documentary data
Primary source documents (brochures, policy docs. etc)
Secondary sources (earlier studies, models etc.)
Empirical data
Experimentation
Surveys
Interviews ( individual or group)
Structured
Semi-structured
Focus groups
Participant observation
Actions i.e. an intervention like a workshop
Video recordings of interventions etc.
Methods of data collection

Selected from data bases, library search etc.
Face to face with a protocol / without protocol
Individual interviewer / multiple interviewers

Page 31 of 36
By phone , email, mail shot, or social media sites
By presentation at fairs, events
Participant observation as outsider or leader of actions
Procedures
Frequency of data collection
Time frame of data collection
Sequence of data collection
Transcriptions of interviews or discussions
Keeping a journal of field notes (records of actions and immediate observations on actions)
Methods of data analysis

SPSS / survey data analysis
Documents Thematic / key words & phrases analysis
Documents Content analysis / Media analysis
Interview key terms, recurring themes analysis
Observation analysis : field notes, observation protocols
Limitations
Stages or cycles of research (if applicable)
Anticipated Problems
Researchers role in the research
Project time scaling

Table with columns or other presentation of the schedule broken down into phases room is set
aside for contingencies that could cause delays like illness
For Example: Colour Key = one background colour for each activity
Project Week no.- Calendar week no. Activities - Deadline - Remarks Contingency
Reference list
According APA, for examples see appendix 4

Page 32 of 36
Appendix 3 METHODS LINKS
on line books, manuals, guides to research methods and evaluation.

http://gsociology.icaap.org/methods/books.htm
Most of these sites describe social research methods, or evaluation methods, including survey
methods, qualitative methods. These are listed in 2 main sections: General Methods, and
Evaluation. Many of the evaluation guides are also general methods guides. Each section is further
subdivided into academic sites, government sites, or private organization or individual sites. This
organization is used because there are a lot of sites, and this was one way to organize them. Within
sections, sites are listed in no particular order.
I General Research Methods sites
Academic sites
Lecture notes on research methods http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/308/308lects.htm brief
guide with links.
PPA 696 Research Methods http://www.csulb.edu/~msaintg/ppa696/696menu.htm#PPA 696 very

nice overview on different research methods.
The research process http://www.ryerson.ca/~mjoppe/rp.htm brief guides to topics in research.
Research Methods WWW tutorial http://sociology.camden.rutgers.edu/main.htm tutorial on

some basics of research methods. Not yet complete.
Educational research lectures

http://www.southalabama.edu/coe/bset/johnson/dr_johnson/2lectures.htm actually brief
outlines of general methods, including qualitative, historical, statistical analysis, etc....
Susan Losh's home page http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~slosh//Index.htm lists a class:

basic research methods guides http://edf5481-01.fa02.fsu.edu/Overview.html introduction to
different methods, eg, surveys, focus groups, some less structured methods.
CLIS 705 INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH IN LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE SYLLABUS

http://www.libsci.sc.edu/bob/class/clis705/Clis705syll.htm
has pdf files (of powerpoint slides) on some research methods basics
Trochim, William M. The Research Methods Knowledge Base,

http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.htm . General research methods text,
with chapters on topics such as survey construction, sampling, and a chapter on evaluation.
If its a method, its probably here.
Research methods guide

http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/index.cfm?guides_active=empirical&category1=18&category2=1
9 written by students, brief guides to case methods, surveys, content analysis, reliability and
validity, etc.
Research methods in the social sciences http://sesd.sk.ca/psychology/Psych20/page27.html a nice

brief summary of different methods in social sciences. Another version is here

Page 33 of 36
http://sesd.sk.ca/psychology/Psych20/Ejournals/interactions__research_methods.htm on one
page.
The research room http://www.uh.edu/~srama/index.htm This " is your reference source for
information and resources about conducting social science research."
Methods Used in Instructional Assessment and Evaluation

http://www.utexas.edu/academic/diia/assessment/iar/how_to/methods/index.php brief
description and how to's for document analysis, experiments, focus groups, interviews, surveys.
On line research methods http://www.geog.le.ac.uk/orm/site/home.htm aimed at understanding

how to do research on line.
The University of Texas at Austin

http://www.utexas.edu/academic/diia/assessment/iar/how_to/methods/index.php has these
guides on how to do various methods like interviews, surveys, observation, focus groups, etc.
Specifically for Instructional Assessment and Evaluation, but these show how to do the general
methods.
Private organizations or people
Audience Dialogue's techniques http://www.audiencedialogue.org/techniques.html includes
guides on many different methods, such as questionnaire, fieldwork, sampling, etc. One section is
Know your audience http://www.audiencedialogue.org/kya.html This is part of the audience dialog
site http://www.audiencedialogue.org/index.html
school sociology methods

http://www.scool.co.uk/topic_principles.asp?loc=pr&topic_id=22&subject_id=64&ebt=282&ebn=&e
bs=&ebl=&elc=13 brief descriptions of different methods such as participant observation,
experiments, sampling, comparative methods, and secondary data analysis. This is at s-
cool, http://www.s-cool.co.uk/http://www.s-cool.co.uk/default.asp then click on A level methods,
then sociology, then methods.
Methods for Social Researchers in Developing Countries http://srmdc.net/ "This site has been
prepared specifically for beginning researchers in developing countries."

Page 34 of 36
Appendix 4 APA LINKS
There are hundreds of links for APA. These are just a few selected to offer some choices. We also
have several Guides in PDF.
A guide to referencing in APA style by the Communications Learning Centre (CLC) Central
Queensland University
Check out the link: http://library.osu.edu/sites/guides/apagd.php Retrieved, 10 October, 2009.
Please download the RTF of the University Library guide to APA referencing from RMIT University :
mams.rmit.edu.au/szq3g615ahbdz.rtf
The APA tutorial of the University of Southern Mississippi is a good way to check your knowledge. It
also uses the 6th edition of the APA Manual
http://lib.usm.edu/legacy/tutorials/apatutorial/tutorialindex.html
Purdue Online Writing Labs start page for many sources for APA
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
An interactive APA citations site from the university of Ballarat in Australia
http://guerin.ballarat.edu.au/aasp/is/library/assignment_research/referencing/apa.php
From a great Community College site in Connecticut :
A Guide for Writing Research Papers-APA Style (Capital Community College):

http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/apa/ (including *Guide to Grammar and Writing:
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/)
APA style sheet (PDF file): http://www.libs.uga.edu/ref/apastyle.html

Page 35 of 36

Final Master Thesis: European Master in Social Work

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Master Thesis: European Master in Social Work

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Master Thesis: European Master in Social Work

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

European Master in Social Work

Final master thesis

Dr. Jolita Buzaityte-Kasalyniene & Drs. Marion Troia

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

1.1 Objectives of the Thesis 3

1.2 Thesis Process and Procedures 4

1.3 Thesis Proposal Outline 4, 5, 6

1.4 Questions for Thinking Through and

1.5 Keeping a Research Log 8

1.6.1 I Text of the Thesis 9

1.6.2 II The Oral Examination Guidelines 15, 16

1.6.3 Resit Procedures 17

1.6.4 Grievance Procedures 17

2.1 Thesis Guide Section by Section 18

2.2 Introduction 19, 20

2.3 Methodology 21, 22

2.7 References, Appendices 25

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

Appendix 1 PROFESSONAL PRESENTATION & STYLE HINTS 29

Standards of Professional English

Appendix 2 KEY TERMS FOR THE PROPOSAL 34

Appendix 3 METHODS LINKS 36

Appendix 4 APA LINKS 38

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

1.1 Objectives of the Thesis

In particular it aims to develop your abilities to:

You will also be required to:

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

In the following the student will be referred to as candidate.

1.3 Thesis Proposal Outline

Literature Review / Theoretical framework

Problem definition / Thesis statement

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

Please be sure to indicate any potential problems or limitations of the methods.

III Project time-scaling - Scheduling

You might consider organizing your timeline into five sections:

Description of Activity Start of activity End of activity

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

Ask yourself the following questions:

1.5 Keeping a Research Log (optional but recommended)

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

III -To reflect on actions, events, turning points.

Some possible Categories: in 3 Cs

1.6.1 I The text of the thesis

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

STRUCTURE & LANGUAGE

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

/PREREQUISITES HAVE BEEN MET YES NO

1ST SUPERVISOR/ EXAMINER _________________________________________________

2ND READER/ EXAMINER ____________________________________________________

Step 2. ASSESSMENT FORMS: quantitative and qualitative

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

Conversion Scale from points to percentage:

66 - 70 points 95 - 100% distinction

T1 Final Thesis Student manual

Step 3: Final comments / explanation of adjusted mark:

first examiner __________________________________________

This represents 80% of the final mark

T1 Final Thesis Student manual