Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Mizuho EconomicOutlook 17.5.29

    Uploaded by

    abra
    The document discusses Japan's Bank of Japan (BOJ) exit strategy from quantitative easing as interest rates rise in other countries. It proposes a "Japanese version of the OK rule" to determine when the BOJ's 2% inflation target is met even if not strictly achieved. It also analyzes the costs of delaying an exit, including higher losses to the BOJ's balance sheet from declining asset values and income. Finally, it presents a three-pillar strategy for the exit incorporating reducing hurdles to achieve the target, preparing for higher costs, and coordinated government and BOJ actions to support the economy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Mizuho EconomicOutlook 17.5.29

    Uploaded by

    abra
    17 views3 pages
    The document discusses Japan's Bank of Japan (BOJ) exit strategy from quantitative easing as interest rates rise in other countries. It proposes a "Japanese version of the OK rule" to determine when the BOJ's 2% inflation target is met even if not strictly achieved. It also analyzes the costs of delaying an exit, including higher losses to the BOJ's balance sheet from declining asset values and income. Finally, it presents a three-pillar strategy for the exit incorporating reducing hurdles to achieve the target, preparing for higher costs, and coordinated government and BOJ actions to support the economy.

    Original Description:

    Economic Outlook

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses Japan's Bank of Japan (BOJ) exit strategy from quantitative easing as interest rates rise in other countries. It proposes a "Japanese version of the OK rule" to determine when the BOJ's 2% inflation target is met even if not strictly achieved. It also analyzes the costs of delaying an exit, including higher losses to the BOJ's balance sheet from declining asset values and income. Finally, it presents a three-pillar strategy for the exit incorporating reducing hurdles to achieve the target, preparing for higher costs, and coordinated government and BOJ actions to support the economy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    17 views3 pages

    Mizuho EconomicOutlook 17.5.29

    Uploaded by

    abra
    The document discusses Japan's Bank of Japan (BOJ) exit strategy from quantitative easing as interest rates rise in other countries. It proposes a "Japanese version of the OK rule" to determine when the BOJ's 2% inflation target is met even if not strictly achieved. It also analyzes the costs of delaying an exit, including higher losses to the BOJ's balance sheet from declining asset values and income. Finally, it presents a three-pillar strategy for the exit incorporating reducing hurdles to achieve the target, preparing for higher costs, and coordinated government and BOJ actions to support the economy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    Market Insight May 29, 2017

    Japanese version of the OK rule and the cost benefits


    of the exit strategy
    Hajime Takata, Chief Economist

    Interest in the BOJs exit strategy is growing now that the US has entered an interest rate hike cycle and with
    the prospect of interest rate hikes by the ECB. However, there are three inconvenient truths that make the exit
    difficult for the BOJ. There have been concerns that ongoing requirement for an excessively high price goal would
    have the risk of a permanent zero. We have inserted a Japanese version of the OK rule into the mix with the 3
    recommendations for the exit. Using a golf analogy, when there is close to being a goal curve, the play is taken to
    be a curve in if those players nearby say it is OK even if the play is not strictly a curve in. So, in relation to the
    BOJs price stability target of 2%, even if the 2% is not strictly achieved yet it is evident that this is the long-term
    direction, a solution can be found if nearby persons say it is OK. Even in golf, the player him or herself is unable
    to say OK, so there will need to be a sense that market players and the government are willing to say OK.
    First and foremost, rushing the exit should not be the objective. However, the cost of maintaining very low
    negative interest rates needs to be calculated. Here, we take the cost to be (1) the risk of damage to the financial
    system when financial institutions are forced to live underwater due to negative interest rates, and (2) the risk of
    the BOJs balance sheet. The following chart illustrates the cost to the BOJs balance sheet. Here, we consider the
    impact on the market value of assets held on the BOJs balance sheet and the BOJ flows (income and expenditure)
    if interest rates rise 1% in 2020. Were interest rates to rise by 1% four years from now, at the end of 2020, rather
    than now, the cost would increase by (1) 1.1 trillion in income and expenditure, and (2) 5.3 trillion in market value

    [ Chart 1: Increase in BOJ cost by delaying the exit ]

    Cost of exit Increased cost of ongoing easing


    (Units: trillion yen)
    Delayed cost
    End of FY2016 (1) End of FY2020 (2)
    ((2) (1))
    Deterioration in income and expenditure from
    a 1% hike in the interest rate paid on current 3.1 4.2 1.1
    account deposits
    Decline in market value for assets held by the
    bank from a 1% hike in the interest rate paid 23.5 28.8 5.3
    on current account deposits
    (of which, bonds) (27.1) (39.1) (+12.0)
    (of which, equities) (-3.6) (-10.3) (-6.7)
    Note: - indicates an increase in market value
    Source: Made by Mizuho Research Institute Ltd. (MHRI) based upon the Bank of Japan

    1
    Market Insight May 29, 2017

    of assets. Therefore, both alternatives will need to be debated when determining the future exit, given the cost of
    bringing forward the exit and the continually growing cost accrued by delaying the exit.
    Therefore, while it is very hard to predict the exit given the assumption of the three inconvenient truths, we
    provide the following three proposals.

    [ Chart 2: Three pillars for the exit strategy and cost benefit of monetary easing ]

    2% price stability Excessively high hurdle


    target

    Lower target due to lower global inflation


    OK Rule

    Additional cost due to protracted easing


    Reduce hurdle for exit
    to achievable level
    Completion
    Roadmap of
    Costs of monetary easing Abenomics
    Prepare for increased
    costs caused by Action towards the exit
    higher interest rates

    Commitment from the government for joint action on


    restorative measures
    Accord strategy
    Cost of the exit shared by the government, the BOJ,
    Benefits of monetary easing and financial institutions

    Certain sustainable
    Boost economic resilience together
    economic growth

    Bold monetary
    easing Lower growth ceiling

    Source: Made by MHRI

    This chart indicates a roadmap towards the exit taking account of the costs and benefits of monetary easing.
    An underlying concern is the absence of a rise in the necessary economic levels to reach the exit, given the
    continuation of the excessively high price stability target. The OK rule referred to above is a practical approach
    to realizing the excessively high price target. At the same time, it is hard to lift the actual economy itself through
    monetary policy alone, and it will be vital for the government and the BOJ to take unified measures in a Japanese
    style accord.
    Another point highlighted by the inconvenient truths is the 5 jinxes. In past interest rate hike cycles of
    Japan, the US, and Europe, the BOJ has always been the last to hike rates. So, an interest rate hike by the BOJ
    assumes continuation of US rate hikes. Once the US cuts rates the grace period for Japan to hike rates will be
    over. When Japan hiked interest rates and headed for the exit in the 4th cycle (the 2000 dot.com boom) and the
    5th cycle (the 2006 subprime boom), it was pulled along by the global economic boom. This time, the 6th cycle
    has begun with interest rate hikes in the US, but there are no signs of global economic momentum as there was
    during the 4th cycle (2000) and 5th cycle (2006). The BOJ has set an excessively high price stability target, and
    there is an absence of economic momentum, so there are concerns that the BOJ will be unable to move towards
    the exit during this 6th grace period. There are also concerns of there being a permanent zero given the inability
    to predict if the BOJ would be able to reach the exit even if there were a 7th cycle when the US once again starts

    2
    Market Insight May 29, 2017

    to hike interest rates. However, recognizing that there is a certain cost from ongoing super low interest rates, we
    believe it is time to create a menu of realistic policy options. There are a number of versions for the calculations
    provided on the first page, and we believe it is important to lift the taboo on having wide ranging debate on
    issues including such menu.

    This publication is compiled solely for the purpose of providing readers with information and is in no way

    meant to encourage readers to buy or sell financial instruments. Although this publication is compiled on

    the basis of sources which we believe to be reliable and correct, the Mizuho Research Institute does not

    warrant its accuracy and certainty. Readers are requested to exercise their own judgment in the use of

    this publication. Please also note that the contents of this publication may be subject to change without

    prior notice.

    You might also like