03-1 Risk Feb08
03-1 Risk Feb08
03-1 Risk Feb08
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.2
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
We Can Then Decide To:
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.3
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
When would one
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.4
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Accept the Risk and take the Chance
When the odds are low and you feel lucky
When the cost of appraisal is too high
When the risks can not be appraised or
mitigated by planning
When you fail to recognize the risk
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.5
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Appraise A Certain Situation
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.6
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Better to Prepare Contingency Plans
When Appraisal would be too costly, the delays
would be too long, or the Appraisal is not likely to
work
When it is less costly to plan for mitigation of
downside rather than conduct an Appraisal
When taking the risk is unacceptable
Contingency plans are of the form of
If, then we will!
If the first infill well confirms the fluid contacts,
then we will start water injection.
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.7
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Is The Risk Worth Taking?
We can use simple risk weighted NPV:
Risked NPV = POS*NPVsuccess + (1- POS)*NPVfailure
If the Risked NPV is positive, we may take the
risk.
But, if the probability of failure is too high to be
acceptable (even with a positive NPV) one
may decide the risk is unacceptable.
The fear of failure can be larger than the joy of
success.
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.8
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Are Contingency Plans The Way To Go?
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.9
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
The Hardest Part
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.10
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Potential Risks
Reservoir Engineering
Drive Mechanisms properly understood and
defined?
Drives changing with time, does the past equal the
future?
Reservoir fluid behavior understood?
Fluid contacts (original and present) defined? Vary
by fault block? Stratigraphic discontinuities?
Flow barriers? Compartments
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.11
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Potential Risks
Petrophysics
Porosity, permeability and water saturation
properly described?
Lateral and vertical variations correctly mapped?
Alternative possibilities?
Geology
Layering? Shale mapping? Sub-seismic faults
Alternative depositional environments?
Alternative isopach interpretations?
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.12
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Potential Risks
Geophysics
Correct time depth conversion?
Correct processing? Alternatives
Alternative picks and correlations
Tied to well data?
Influence of faults or changes in the shallow rocks?
Well Performance
Sand control, asphaltene & scale formation
Unanticipated fluid problems emulsions, corrosion
Expensive well equipment required corrosion resistant steel?
Needing more lift than planned (opcost and capex)?
Required wellbore replacement
Shallow corrosion
Restrictions or collapse over certain intervals
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.13
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Potential Risks
Processing / Marketing
Sales requirements under new contracts?
Point of sales delivery capacity and quality changed
Future prices
Regulatory / Governmental
(Could be most problematic)
Unplanned permitting requirements?
Changing taxes and royalty takes?
Unknown regulations?
Inflexible regulations?
Political changes or delays for political purposes
Windows of opportunity that might close
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.14
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Define The Probabilities
Must define the probabilities to calculate the expected NPV
Uncomfortable for most people, but it must be done.
Consider the probabilities independent of the impact
Reduces our tendency to minimize the negatives and emphasize the
positives
Can consider the probabilities as a range and see if it makes a difference.
This concern has a 10 20% chance of occurring. (Does it matter if it is
10 or 20? If so, can I better define it?)
Can set it as a scoping parameter:
According to my economics, I can live with this if it is less than a 4%
probability.
Do I think it has less than a 4% chance of occurring? If not, I need to
appraise, prepare a Contingency Plan, or be ready to drop this opportunity
as just being too risky.
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.15
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
Qualitative Assessment of
Uncertainty and Impact
The critical (fatal)
issues are listed in the
(H)
right hand corner as
identified by the bold
line
The important issues
Impact
(M)
are listed within the
square area as
identified by the dashed
line
(L)
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.16
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved
What Did We Miss?
The biggest risks are those things we just didnt think
of.
Involving everyone throughout the process can avoid
the I could have told you that would happen
syndrome.
Both are minimized by:
Involving and listening to differing opinions from a broad
spectrum of people
Spending time on the effort to identify the risks
Keeping an open mind
Forcing ourselves to talk about things that make us
uncomfortable we often minimize in our minds
unfavorable outcomes.
Reservoir Management
Assessing Risk and Uncertainty
3.1.17
2008 PetroSkills LLC, All Rights Reserved