Antentop 2003-03
Antentop 2003-03
Antentop 2003-03
Copyright: Here at ANTENTOP we just ANTENTOP 03 2003 contains huge Contact us: Just email me or
wanted to follow traditions of FREE flow of antenna articles, and several
drop a letter.
information in our great radio hobby historical articles. Hope, you will like
around the world. A whole issue of it. Our pages opened for all
amateurs, so, you are welcome Mailing address:
ANTENTOP may be photocopied, printed,
pasted onto websites. We don't want to always, or as a reader or as a writer. Box 68, 308015, Belgorod, Russia
control this process. It comes from all of Email: [email protected]
us, and thus it belongs to all of us. This
doesn't mean that there are no copyrights. 73! Igor Grigorov, RK3ZK NB: Please, use only plain text
and mark email subject as:
There is! Any work is copyrighted by the
ex: UA3-117-386, UA3ZNW, igor_ant. I receive lots spam, so, I
author. All rights to a particular work are
UA3ZNW/UA1N, UZ3ZK delete ALL unknown me
reserved by the author.
op: UK3ZAM, UK5LAP, messages without reading.
EN1NWB, EN5QRP, EN100GM
ANTENTOP is FREE e-magazine, available FREE at http://www.antentop.bel.ru/
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Editorial
ANTENTOP is FREE e- magazine, made in PDF, Preview: Some articles from "cooking" issue will be
devoted to antennas and amateur radio. Everyone pasted for preview on this site, others no. Because,
may share his experience with others hams on the as I think, it must be something mysterious in every
pages. Your opinions and articles are published issue.
without any changes, as I know, every your word has
the mean. Publishing: If you have something for share with
your friends, and if you want to do it FREE, just send
Every issue of ANTENTOP is going to have 100 me an email. Also, if you want to offer for publishing
pages and this one will be paste in whole on the site. any stuff from your website, you are welcome!
Preview's files will be removed in this case. I do not
know what a term for one issue will need, may be 2-3 Your opinion is important for me, so,
month or so. As I have counted, a whole issue of contact if you want to say something!
ANTENTOP will hold nearly 10 - 20 MB .
I do not know, why the owners do not response me. Are they still alive? Do their companys are a
bankrupt? Or do they move anywhere? Where they are in the end?
Business Advertising: ANTENTOP is not a and, they will do this work, and we will see lots
commercial magazine. Authors and I (Igor Grigorov, interesting articles there.
the editor of the magazine) do not get any profit from So, if you want to put a commercial advertisement in
the issue. But off course, I do not mention from ANTENTOP, please contact with me. A commercial
commercial ads in ANTENTOP. It allows me to do advertisement will do ANTENTOP even greater
the magazine in most great way, allows me to pay interesting and various! I hope, readers do not
some money for authors to compensate their hard mention against such commercial ads.
work. I have lots interesting stuff in Russian, and Book Advertising: I do not think, that Book
owners of the stuff agree to publish the stuff in Advertising is a commercial advertisement. So,
ANTENTOP but I have no enough time to translate Book Advertising is FREE at ANTENTOP. Contact
the interesting stuff in English, however I may pay with me for details.
money to translators,
Mailing address: Box 68, 308015, Belgorod, Russia NB: Please, use only plain text and mark email
Email: [email protected] subject: igor_ant subject as: igor_ant. I receive lots spam and viruses,
so, I delete ALL unknown me messages without
reading.
Table of Contents
Dear friends, I would like to give to you an interesting and reliable antenna theory.
Hours searching in the web gave me lots theoretical information about antennas.
Really, at first I did not know what information to chose for ANTENTOP.
1
Now I want to present you one more very interesting Lecture - it is a 5
Lecture about Loop Antennas. I believe, you cannot find such info
anywhere for free! Very interesting and very useful info for every ham, for
every radio- engineer.
HF Antennas
The present describes a HF loop antenna and its agile coupler which can
be adapted to the new designs of ALE and FH (frequency hopping)
radiosets. The original specification in 1993 was : "a small mobile antenna
and coupler for HF voice and data communications in driving from 0 to
600 km without silent zone, in association with a 125 Watts CW radioset.
Table of Contents
Page
Multirange Vertical Antennas: by Igor Grigorov, RK3ZK
VHF/UHF Antennas
To do the antenna one can very easy as well as the costs are nothing.
You need a box of a sweets- surprise Chupa- Chups, a piece of an old
10 coax, some wire, epoxies, and a little of job. 64
So, go to do it!
Table of Contents
Page
Folding 145-MHz 3-el YAGI for Mountains: Igor, UA6HJG
QRP
Table of Contents
Page
Interferences
23 For several years I use to a home-brew tool, that I made by myself, for 77
puling guys.
Table of Contents
Page
LF 136-kHz
LF-Dummy Load
Several Dummy Loads that were described at LF-Forum:
[email protected]
26 79
History
Radio RBM is one of the most famous Russian military radio that was
used in the WW-II and after the war as a surplus radio. RBM took place
28 in the WW-II, after the war RBM was used as trial radio for military 86-91
teaching centers. Lots of Russian hams know well the radio. I want to
give some information about RBM and its antennas at ANTENTOP.
73! I.G.
29 Historical notes about development of tubes from early years to our days 92-100
in the World and in Russia
Dear friends, I would like to give to you an interesting and reliable antenna theory. Hours searching in the web
gave me lots theoretical information about antennas. Really, at first I did not know what information to chose for
ANTENTOP. Finally, I stopped on lectures Modern Antennas in Wireless Telecommunications written by Prof.
Natalia K. Nikolova from McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Well, I have read many textbooks on Antennas, both, as in Russian as in English. So, I have the possibility to
compare different textbook, and I think, that the lectures give knowledge in antenna field in great way. Here first
lecture Introduction into Antenna Study is here. Next issues of ANTENTOP will contain some other lectures.
I.G.
My Friends, the Intro was given at ANTENTOP- 01- 2003 to Antennas Lectures.
Now I know, that the Lecture is one of popular topics of ANTENTOP- 01 and 02 - 2003. The
both Lecture were downloaded more than 1000 times to December, 15!
Now I want to present you one more very interesting Lecture - it is a Lecture about Loop
Antennas. I believe, you cannot find such info anywhere for free! Very interesting and very
useful info for every ham, for every radio- engineer.
I.G.
www.antentop.org Page-6
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-7
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-8
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-9
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-10
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-11
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-12
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-13
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-14
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-15
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-16
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-17
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-18
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-19
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-20
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-21
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-22
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-23
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Loop Antennas
www.antentop.org Page-24
ANTENTOP- 03- 2003, # 004 Plasma Antenna Technology
Credit Line:
ASI Technology Corporation
http://www.asiplasma.com/
No antenna ringing provides an improved signal to MDA Phase I SBIR Contract DASG60-01-P-0063
noise ratio and reduces multipath signal distortion. May 2001 - This six month work (expanded for an
Reduced radar cross section provides stealth due to additional three months by MDA) focused on using
the non-metallic elements. plasma rather than solid metal as the current
Changes in the ion density can result in medium for an antenna. We illustrated the use of
instantaneous changes in bandwidth over wide controllable apertures (open plasma windows) for
dynamic ranges. far field antenna radiation. Experiments verified our
After the gas is ionized, the plasma antenna has plasma windowing concept.
virtually no noise floor.
While in operation, a plasma antenna with a low
ionization level can be decoupled from an adjacent
high-frequency transmitter.
A circular scan can be performed electronically with
no moving parts at a higher speed than traditional
mechanical antenna structures.
It has been mathematically illustrated that by
selecting the gases and changing ion density that the
electrical aperture (or apparent footprint) of a plasma
antenna can be made to perform on par with a metal
counterpart having a larger physical size.
Our plasma antenna can transmit and receive from
the same aperture provided the frequencies are MDA Phase II SBIR Contract DASG60-02-C-0055
widely separated. April 2002 - This 24 month contract is focusing on
Plasma resonance, impedance and electron charge developing a feasibility prototype high power
density are all dynamically reconfigurable. Ionized antenna based on our windowing concept and to
gas antenna elements can be constructed and design and develop a high power phased array
configured into an array that is dynamically using plasma phase shifters to steer the beam.
reconfigurable for frequency, beamwidth, power, Malibu Research Associates is our subcontractor
gain, polarization and directionality - on the fly. on this project.
A single dynamic antenna structure can use time
multiplexing so that many RF subsystems can share MDA Phase I SBIR Contract DASG60-02-P-0033
one antenna resource reducing the number and size April 2002 - This 6 month contract focused on using
of antenna structures. plasma as a replacement for metal in a frequency
selective surface (FSS) used to filter
Sponsored Work electromagnetic waves. A tunable FSS can absorb
frequencies above the resonant frequency and
To date, plasma antenna technology has been reflect those above to reduce radar vulnerability to
studied and characterized by ASI Technology countermeasures. Plasma is an excellent shield
Corporation revealing favorable attributes in and filter for antenna systems.
connection with antenna applications. Government
sponsored work has included:
Tunable Plasma Frequency Selective This theoretical plot is of the plasma FSS array
Surfaces for Shielding Radar Systems illustrated above. Each dipole element is assumed
to be in length, in diameter. The vertical separation
Schematic representation of an FSS dipole array is taken to be while the lateral separation is taken to
be The plot has the curves for the perfectly
conducting case (high plasma frequency and
density) along with those for several values of the
plasma frequency, which depends on plasma
density. A well-defined reflectivity resonance exists
at 1GHz. This result indicates that appreciable
reflection occurs only for plasma frequencies above
2.5GHz. The results illustrate the essence of the
plasma FSS: a highly reflective band stop filter can
be achieved which can be switched on and off
simply by controlling the properties of the plasma.
1. Higher power - Increased power can be achieved plasma density and can be maintained during
in the plasma antenna than in the corresponding reconfiguration. Estimates indicate a 20db
metal antenna because of lower Ohmic losses. improvement in antenna efficiency.
Plasmas have a much wider range of power
capability than metals as evident from low powered 5. Reconfiguration and mutifunctionality - The
plasma in fluorescent bulbs to extremely high- plasma antenna can be reconfigured on the fly by
powered plasmas in the Princeton University controlled variation of the plasma density in space
experimental fusion reactors. In this range, a high- and time with far more versatility than any
powered plasma antenna is still low powered plasma. arrangement of metal antennas. This reduces the
Since plasmas do not melt, the plasma antennas can number of required elements reducing size and
provide heat and fire resistance. The higher weight of shipboard antennas. One option is to
achievable power and directivity of the plasma construct controlled density plasma blankets around
antenna can enhance target discrimination and track plasma antennas thereby creating windows (low-
ballistic missiles at the S and X band. density sections of the blanket) for main lobe
transmission or reception and closing windows
2. Enhanced bandwidth - By the use of electrodes (high-density regions in the plasma blanket). The
or lasers the plasma density can be controlled. The plasma windowing effect enhances directivity and
theoretical calculations on the controlled variation of gain in a single plasma antenna element so that an
plasma density in space and time suggest that array will have less elements than a corresponding
greater bandwidth of the plasma antenna can be metal antenna array. Closing plasma windows
achieved than the corresponding metal antenna of where back lobes and side lobes exist eliminates
the same geometry. This enhanced bandwidth can them and reduces jamming and clutter. This
improve discrimination. sidelobe reduction below 40db enhances directivity
and discrimination. In addition, by changing plasma
3. EMI/ECI - The plasma antenna is transparent to densities, a single antenna can operate at one
incoming electromagnetic signals in the low density bandwidth (e.g. communication) while suppressing
or turned off mode. This eliminates or diminishes another bandwidth (e.g. radar).
EMI/ECI thereby producing stealth. Several plasma
antennas can have their electron densities adjusted 6. Lower noise - The plasma antenna has a lower
so that they can operate in close proximity and one collision rate among its charge carriers than a metal
antenna can operate invisible to others. In this antenna and calculations show that this means less
physical arrangement mutual side lobe and back lobe noise.
clutter is highly reduced and hence jamming and
clutter is reduced. 7. Perfect reflector - When the plasma density is
high the plasma becomes a loss-less perfect
4. Higher efficiency and gain - Radiation efficiency reflector. Hence there exist the possibilities of a
in the plasma antenna is higher due to lower Ohmic wide range of lightweight plasma reflector
losses in the plasma. Standing wave efficiency is antennas.
higher because phase conjugate matching with the
antenna feeds can be achieved by adjusting the
Oliver Nichelson
Copyright 2003 333 North 760 East
American Fork, Utah 84003
[email protected]
He also noted:
Contemporary Patents
He adds:
On the receiving side, Curry states that the charge Displacement current, today, is seen as something
gradient can be expected to attenuate substantially at of a virtual current, something different from a "real"
even moderate distance from the point of transmission. or conduction current that flows through a wire.
As an example he notes that if a signal intensity of Tesla, however, understood what is meant by an
10,600 dynes at the point of transmission is reduced electrical current in the same sense as Maxwell -
one billion times the "standing wave of the signal that "all charge is the residual effect of the
energy will therefore be charged with a force polarization of the dielectric"20 and that "the
differential of 1.06 x 10-5 dynes. Each dipole in his variations of electric displacement evidently
example has a capacitance of .0053 microfarads with a constitute electric currents."21 As a Maxwellian,
system capacitance of .00265 microfarads. The Tesla was correct in describing his transmission
voltage developed in the receiving network is .02 volts. system as one using true electric currents.
As noted "this is substantially above the minimum
requirements of signal intensity for the detection of Tesla's wireless electrical energy transmission
electrical signal energies."19 system differed in all three characteristics he claimed
- it was not electromagnetic, it operated through the
This detailed analysis, however, overlooks the earth or water, and conveyed electrical energy by a
important point that electrostatic waves do not current. Once Tesla's communication method is
propagate into the medium in the same way as better understood as a new branch of electrical
electromagnetic waves. In an electromagnetic science that was started over 100 years ago, it will
transmission system, charge is accelerated in an not only have an impact on terrestrial technology, but
elevated conductor, an antenna, to launch waves will have applications in the future for space
omnidirectionally into the air. At a receiver, the communications.
electromagnetic waves induce a current in the
antenna. The variations in the current are processed
by the detection circuitry to replicate the transmitted
information.
The present describes a HF loop antenna and its agile These conditions beeing fulfilled, the loop antennas
coupler which can be adapted to the new designs of deliver a high current and have a high selectivity with
ALE and FH (frequency hopping) radiosets. The a high quality factor (Q-factor), typically 10 times
original specification in 1993 was : "a small mobile higher than the Q-factor of the best traditional
antenna and coupler for HF voice and data couplers designed for 5 to 10 meters whips or 10 to
communications in driving from 0 to 600 km without 40 m dipoles.
silent zone, in association with a 125 Watts CW
radioset. 1.2 On fast frequency tuning
Frequency range 2-12 MHz Channel tuning time < 5ms For future fast ALE procedures the tuning target time
Bandwidth > 3,5 kHz in a military environment" is 50ms, while the "low speed" frequency hopping
Following on from this product other versions with (F.H.) procedures already require a 5ms tuning time,
wider frequency range (3-15 MHz, 3-30 MHz, 2-30 with all calculations and control exchange times
MHz), a higher power and various dimensions and beeing included or already done. This can't be done
shapes for fixed, land-mobile and naval applications using electromechanical tuning. Digital switching
have been developed. devices are cost effective today at low and medium
powers. Their switching time run in milliseconds
1. GENERALITIES using low loss vacuum relays, and in the
microseconds using electronic relays like PIN-diodes.
1.1. on the HF tuned loops But the PIN-diode technology cannot be used in
loops for transmission, due to their inability to
The HF transmission tuned loop antennas which are withstand the high currents and due to the losses
designed for HF transmission have small dimensions they bring (0.5 to 1 W) which would drastically
(< 0,1 ) compared to the wavelength, in order to decrease the overall efficiency at the lowest
conduct a quasi constant current and to be considered frequencies. Vacuum relays, including REED relays,
as magnetic dipoles. Their radiation impedance and are the only technologies available to switch the
efficiency mainly depends on their surface which capacitors of a transmission tuned loop antenna
creates a magnetic flux in the near field and an efficiently.
electromagnetic field in the far field. Their diameter,
height or width (round or square shape) run from 1 to 3
1.3 On the power requirements
meters, and their radiating surface generally do not
exceed 5 m2 in order to coincide with the small Based on the experience of 2 previous generations of
dimensions required. tuned loop antennas, and the proprietary propagation
simulations, it was calculated that two 100W
These types of antennas differ from open antennas radiosets and 4m2 loops having a -15 to + 5dBi
(like whips, horizontal dipoles, log-periodic antennas,) typical gain figure from 2 to 12 MHz would insure
by their impedance which is reactive and can be voice and data communications at any distance from
adapted by capacitor only. Their radiating resistance is 0 to to 600 km at least.
low (< 1 m ) at the lowest frequencies of the range. This mission cannot be fulfiled by any 5 to 10 m whip
As the efficiency is given by the ratio radiating antenna on a medium soil, even in association with a
resistance/ total resistances of the tuned circuit, it is 400W/1 kW radio set: a vertical whip or a bent whip
necessary to minimise the radiating element resistor, on a vehicle in move do not transmit and receive
using a good conductive metal (aluminium, copper), enough energy to cover the typical 50-250 km silent
and to use low loss capacitors. zone.
A 125W radioset combined with a tuned loop antenna - The inductance L is a function of the spiral surface
is sufficient to fulfill the mission requirement using the comprised between the feed bar and the platform.
Near Vertical Incident Signal (NVIS propagation). This
will be further improved due to frequency management Two types of antennas have been compared, type A
and the new generations of HF modems which will and type B, differing by the positions of their
bring a lower threshold of sensibility. capacitors.
Figure 6
Figure 4
Figure 7
C= 3500 to 60 pF
Figure 5 Rc= 0.05 to 2
Figure 10
higher for the Type B than for the Type A antenna. In
a tuned circuit, bandwidths (B) are inversely
proportional to the quality factor (Q), and Q is
proportional to the efficiency (h ); when Q >> 1, h x B
Figure 8
= Rr/2p La = constant If ha and hb are the Type A
and Type B antenna efficiencies , and Ba et Bb their
Its equivalent electrical scheme is given on FIG 9. bandwidths respectively, the applying formulas are
ha Ba = hb Bb, and ha / hb = Bb / Ba When the
measured bandwidth ratios is Bb / Ba = 10 , the
efficiency ratio becomes ha/hb is 10.
Explanation
Observing that Type B antenna optimizes the tuning
in the primary circuit, and that the Q-factors of
primary and secondary are quite different, the energy
Figure 9
transfer in the secondary is not maximized. On the
contrary, in the Type A antenna the tuning brings a
The Type B antenna is modeled in the same way as maximum Q-factor and the current is the highest in
the Type A antenna, and using the same physical the radiating resistor.
parameters. An additional capacitor may be added in
the feed rod to optimize the radioset matching
Conclusion
impedance.
The Type A antenna design brings the best antenna
II.5. Compared performances type A and type efficiency.
B antennas
II.6 Improvement of the design
Comparative simulations
Increasing the bandwith
The compared simulations gave a clear advantage to
the Type A antenna type. As an example, FIG 10 Trials on vehicles were made under strong rain.
shows a +12 dB gain advantage for the Type A Modifications of the tune positions were observed at
antenna at 12 MHz the highest frequencies (FIG 11 )
Such modifications can give an operational problem
Comparative measurements with no possible reset in transmission (in FH mode
principally).
The comparative simulated results were confirmed by
This shifting problem was resolved by widening the
the comparative measured bandwidths Using 2
bandwidth by using two radiating elements in parallel
antennas having the same radiating surface, the
and electrically linked. The simulation of this structure
compared measured bandwidths were 5 to 10 times
II.7. Realisation of a fast tune design A special software was created to define and
memorize the kiCi arrangements which are
The 2-12 MHz.antenna was developed for the required necessary to get all discrete capacitor values and
efficiency and a minimum 3.5 kHz bandwidth recover the possible missing frequency bands. It
independently of the variations in the environment. memorizes the calculated values and the measured
values. A calibration at the first installation or in
With a 2.2m2 radiating surface the half-loop reactance operation in case of a major environment change can
is 2mH at 2 MHz and 3.5mH at 12 MHz. be done in less than 6 seconds.
Figure 12
Figure 13
STAREC has been involved for a long time in the design of specialized antennas, a wide range.of which has
been proved in operation with French and foreign Armed Forces.
This equipment is mainly used in fixed or mobile weapons or telecommunication systems, such as shelters,
trucks, battle tanks, forward armoured vehicles, etc. STAREC is involved in the RITA, ROLAND, PR4 G, HF
Carthage programs.
Agile half loop on vehicle
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/starec
Very small dimensions for HF (1.5 to 3m rectangle or Difficult installations (on roof, small areas, ship,...)
diameter)
Half-loop capability to communicate from a moving
Can be radomed vehicle.
Small surface on ground.A ground plane is not Easy and low cost installation.
necessary for loop
Fully capacitive tuning unit, without coil nor magnetic Interesting for certain ships
signature effect
HF/125W fast tuned frame antennas can find a number of applications for point to point, ground to air and
ship to shore applications at any distance to 1000 km.
Figure 3 shows a simple design suitable for 6 - to Distances between the vibrators are 10 -30
17-M. Antenna has the triangular shape. Special centimeters. It is decrease the mutual influence of the
sitting should be used for the antenna design. vibrators to each other.
Vibrators are screwed in the bottom with the help of
strong screws. The design has a small mutual Antenna Adjusting: The antenna is adjusted by
influence for every vibrator against each other. changing lengths of the vibrators. It is not
complicated. One way is to move vibrators relatively
Figure 3 A triangular shape antenna design the metal base, as it is shown in Figure 5. Do it
carefully, because the vibrators have mutual
influence to each other. It needs to do additional
holes on to end of the vibrators for realization of the
way. It is possible to do one of the vibrators. This
method always gives a good result.
Figure 6 A three range antenna tuning with the Figure 7 A simple design suitable for 40 - to 160-M
help of thick wire
I have a small collection of information about old military HF antennas used over the World.
Presently, three old military automobile HF antennas are described at the article. The antennas are
written as it is, i.e., I give all information, that I have had. I know, the information is not complete at
all, but, nevertheless, the information is interesting and it can help somebody to make own car
antennas.
Tuned dipole
Tuned dipole exhibited in Figure 1 was used in army dimensions of the automobile, as it is exhibited in
of the USSR. Scheme for the antenna is shown in Figure 1b. Tuned dipole has high radiation both at
Figure 1a. Tuned dipole made from a strong tube low and high (mostly) angles. It allows the antenna to
that has diameter 15 to 30 mm. The tube is installed make links by earth and reflected from ionosphere
at height of 1-1,5 m above the roof of an automobile wave.
and goes out approximately on 1 meter for overall
Length L of the antenna (see Figure 1a) depends to could reach to 10-15 meters in length. It depends
dimensions of a car, where the antenna is installed, on sizes of the car.
usually the length close to 6 meters. The antenna
feeds with help a short length of a two-wire line, Folded dipole is fed by two-wire ladder line in length
usually the length is equal to 2- 3 meters, an ATU is about 3 meters. The line is connected to an ATU.
used. Antenna is adjusted with help of a symmetrical The antenna is tuned on maxima of RF current to
variometer LT installed at opposite ends of the points A. Folded dipole is tuned in resonance in the
tuned dipole. The antenna is tuned on maxima of RF operation frequencies with help of loading spools LT
current to points A. In such case the antenna together with capacitor C, that made as a
ensures maximum effective work. But in the manual constructing part of the car.
of the antenna is pointed, that the antenna in some
cases can be tuned on maxima of RF voltage on The antenna is intended for 60-90 meters, and
points A. Such set-up for the antenna is possible if usually does not work at other ranges. . Folded
the communication car is placed on a good dipole has strongly radiation to the sky and a little
conducting surface (it can be moist salty soil) or by to the horizon.
operation from natural shelters - holes, ravine.
Inductances of antenna variometer vary from several Dipole with low characteristic impedance
microhenry up to 300 microhenrie. The antenna
works good at 2-25 MHz. Dipole with low characteristic impedance is intended
for a work at wide frequencies range and for
At usage of this antenna in military communication installation on the roof of a communication car that
car, the antenna gives that advantage, that the roof has small dimensions. Figure 4 shows the scheme
of the automobile remains free. It enables to install (Figure 4A) and disposition (Figure 4B) of the dipole
on the roof other antennas, for example, for VHF- on communication car. I must say, that I have seen
UHF ranges some photos, where the antenna was installed
athwart to the roof, as it is shown at Figure 4C. The
Folded dipole antenna is located at the altitude approximately at 1
meter above the roof. Wings of the dipole made as a
Folded dipole was in use within the World War II metal grid has shape, crosswire at the cells soldered.
and till 70s of the 20 century. The dipole is a wire The wing of the dipole has the width in (0,5-1,5)-
folded by meander and loaded to serial coil plus a meters and the length (1,5-2)-meters.
capacitor. Figure 2 shows the disposition of the
folded dipole on communication car. The antenna is Figure 5 shows the scheme of feeding of dipole with
located at the altitude approximately at 1-1,5 meters low characteristic impedance. The antenna is
above the roof. Figure 3 shows the scheme of the connected through a two-wire ladder line in about 2
antenna. Wings of the folded dipole meters length to an ATU. The ATU has a resonance
circuit LF- CR, that is coupled with help of war. The antenna ensures the sure communication
coupling coil LC with a transmitter. With the help with zenith radiation in HF range 2- 4 MHz in radius
of variable of 200-300 km from the antenna. Also this antenna
spool LF and variable capacitor CR this circuit ensures long-distance communication in HF ranges
can be retune in the frequencies range of 2-20 5-20 MHz.
MHz. In the same frequency range the antenna
works. Maxima of RF current in to the antenna is But this antenna had the deficiencies: at the first, it
installed with the help of variable symmetrical has too complicated matching device, at the second
capacitor CT. the antenna takes too much place in the roof of the
car. For these reasons, since of the end of 50s, the
Such antenna was widely used in communication antenna practically is not used in military
cars during the World War-II and some time after the communication cars.
Russian Field Radio Station, 1941, w.w.-II Russian Field Radio Station, 1913, w.w.-I
73! I.G.
Figure 1 shows the design of antenna UA1DZ Figure 2 shows the connection of the two wire
ladder line to the vibrator of the antenna UA1DZ
2. Counterpoises, (10-14) pieces, made of Aluminum Wire, 2. Upper Wire (see Figure 1, item 5) of the
(4- 6)-mm in diameter, or # (2-6)AWG, Two Wire Ladder Line
9.4 meters in length
3. Vibrator of the Antenna UA1DZ
3. Vibrator of the Antenna, made of Aluminum Tube,
(60-130)-mm in diameter, 4. Screw-bolt, M4
9.3 meters in length
4. Base Mast, any hard stuff, wood, plastic, metal tube
(2. 3) meters in length
Figure 3 shows the design of the Base Insulator and Figure 4 shows the design and the connection of two
the connection of counterpoises wire ladder line to coaxial cable
1.Aluminum Plate in Squire Shape, 1. Two Wire Ladder Line, distance between struts
20x20-cm in sizes, near 5 centimeters
holes for counterpoises (item 2, Figure 3 )
2. Connection with help of Screw-bolt
2. Counterpoises, (10-14) pieces, made of Aluminum
Wire, 3. Coaxial Cable
(4- 6)-mm in diameter, or # (2-6)AWG,
9.4 meters in length 4. Fix Coaxial Cable with help of Scotch or with help
of two clamps to T-Plate made of plastic or Textolite
3. Base Mast, any hard stuff, wood, plastic, metal tube
(2. 3) meters in length
General Info
73! UA4PNT
mailto: [email protected]
http://members.aol.com/ve3bmv/Razors.htm http://www.K3BU.us/
"By using a flawed and seriously over-simplified model, You are like to call names, insult people, and argue
the results are totally misleading when applied to rather than take the time to learn basic electronics.
conventional antennas. Repeating misleading This is in any book, including the ARRL Handbook. If
information in article after article does NOT make it you look at HOW an inductor works, the current flowing
correct. It certainly does not make our community more in one terminal ALWAYS equals the current flowing out
skilled or better informed about how things work." the other terminal. "
The base coil is omitted, which "simplifies" or distorts flow in the equivalent part of a full 90-degree-high-
the picture of real current distribution in shortened antenna."
radiator with base loading coil. As we will see later, if
the coil was shown, 1 A current applied at the bottom, So here is qualifier that in long skinny coils, as in
and current measured at the top of the coil, authors helically wound antennas, radiation allows coil current
would have seen the drop across the coil and current to decrease. The problem seems to be that in one case
at the bottom of the radiator (top of coil) would not be 1 the current decreases across the coil (helical), but in
A, but more like shown by the shaded area in Fig. 3. "regular" loading coil that is not allowed, which is false.
(Where was the measurement, verification?)
What is the truth? reflect the reality. As someone said, one measurement
is better than thousands of theories. The question is,
It all started with discussion on the TopBand Reflector how was W8JI measuring the current, and getting
(see the archives on eHam.net for May 2003) with more current than it was applied at the base?
thread "160 m Mobile Antenna Suggestions"
http://lists.contesting.com/_topband/2003- Barry, W9UCW among other arguments and
05/msg00044.html explanations wrote:
"In our measurements, we used long and short coils
Barry, W9UCW pointed out his findings based on real and the current taper was was almost identical if the
life measurements of decreasing current across the topmast capacitance was held the same. If the
loading coils. This agreed with my "unscientific" "make up" was above the coil, there was slightly less
experience, when I fried the loading coil with 600W into taper down of current, due to the larger capacitance
Hustler resonator, melting heat-shrink tubing and wire above. It would also resonate lower in freq. It appears
at the bottom of the coil. There was an exchange of to us that the current decrease in the coil has most to
arguments on the subject of current in the loading do with the section of the quarterwave element that it
coils, with W8JI insisting on constant current across effectively replaces. The actual decrease in our tests
the coil. Unfortunately, the TopBand reflector was always a little more than the decrease calculated
moderator terminated W9UCW responses, so W8JI for the "replaced" section, no matter what coil was
had his famous "right" last word. used. I hope that answers your questions."
Tom, W8JI on his web page "I think your position (W8JI) is clear....that under the
http://www.w8ji.com/mobile_and_loaded_antenna.htm condx described, current reduction in a loading coil
states: can't, won't, never did, never will happen. My
position is that it always does, and I've measured it.
"The modeled current distribution for 1-ampere applied
Neither of these hypotheses will go far to satisfy the
at the base (in 1-foot intervals) is:
real objectives of our study."
1ft= 1.0031
2 ft= 1.0091 Barry, W9UCW was kind to provide proof in the form of
3ft= 1.0178 some measured data and photographs showing the
4ft= 1.0318 antenna setup, loading coil and RF ammeters installed
<Coil> at the top and bottom of the loading coil, which could
5ft= 1.0175 be reversed:
6ft= .97512
"Here are some actual measurements of current
7ft= .92984
below and above loading coils.
8ft = .89522
92" mast, using a HI-Q coil (openwound airdux, 2
Measuring the current into and out of the loading coil 1/2"d) with small thermocouple type meters
with a small thermocouple RF meter, I detect no mounted on the insulated coil support. First for
difference This is in close agreement with the model. " 40m, moving the coil in the mast from base to
center to top (with hat) and reresonating.
and "conclusion"...
Base --100ma below & 66ma above
Clearly there is no basis to the claim current is high Center --100ma below & 45ma above
only in the first few turns of an inductor, or that current Top --100ma below & 37ma above
tapers in relationship to "electrical degrees". The most Then, same test but for 30m
accurate way to state the effect would be to say:
"When the loading coil is short and the capacitance of Base --100ma below & 75ma above
the antenna beyond the coil is reasonable (in this case Center --100ma below & 60ma above
3000 ohms Xc or less), there is an immeasurable Top --100ma below & 52ma above
reduction in current in the coil."
On a long, skinny 160 resonator with 25pf of top
First, there is a problem in his modeling with current hat and whip, mounted on an 8' mast, I read 100ma
increasing from the base towards the coil. That should below and 65ma above the coil.
be the flag telling him that 2 + 2 is not sometimes 4.04.
Second, EZNEC has no provision for incorporating Because of the constant claim that this must be
physical length of coil. It just considers LC parameters. due to the fact that the coil is so big compared to a
Roy Lewallen, W7EL, author of EZNEC and Richard wavelength, I measured the in and out current on
Clark, KB7QHC recommend workarounds to replace a TOROIDAL loading coil used on a 20m mobile
the coil with cylinder of similar size or breaking the coil antenna. It was a 78" base mast (including spring
to number of physical segments with appropriate and mount) with a 38" top whip (including 12" of
inductances. W8JI "findings and measurements" hardly alum. tubing for adjustment).
Below --100ma & Above --79ma Here is the coil in center loaded radiator, 100 mA
meters at both ends of the coil. The bottom one is
When I moved the coil to the top of the mast and showing full deflection (with power adjusted to) - 100
made a horizontal "X" top hat to resonate it back mA while at the same time the top ammeter is showing
on the same freq, I got 45 mA as described above. The meters were mounted
Below --100ma & Above --47ma that way so that they could do a test and then just turn
the coil assembly upside down and do another test to
So, It happens even in a totally shielded loading make sure results were the same and that no
coil with miniscule power going thru it! Kirchoff anomalies crept in. Results were always identical.
has no laws about current being the same on both
ends of inductors. His current law is about one
POINT in a circuit and his voltage law is about a
closed loop."
... and some significant difference W9UCW in field
strength measured between the base and center
loading coil:
"The actual difference in signal strength between
top and base loading of a 9' antenna is about 16 db
(measured) on 75m, but Tom calculates 8db on
160. That's because he assumes the same current
in the coil. Actually it's worse on 160 than 75."
Barry's pictures are worth a thousand words:
This is not the first time that W8JI is wrong. His typical
modus operandi is first to attack and ridicule the
opponent, then the exchange of arguments ensues.
When he realizes he is wrong, rather than admitting,
he clouds the issue with his "arguments". After staying
quiet for a while, he then emerges, pretending to be
the expert on the subject with corresponding postings
on his web page, without giving credit to the originator.
Normally this is called plagiarism.
More info from Cecil, W5DXP on the subject: Now here is something that might blow some minds.
The inductive stub above is ten feet long. That's about
"Yuri Blanarovich wrote: 1/8WL on 20m. A 1/8WL shorted stub equals +jZ0. The
results of running the above antenna on 20m is that the
What I was looking for is to see 1. if anyone else current through R1 is 185 degrees out of phase with
MEASURED the current in loading coils, and what the current through R2. At the time when the current
results they arrived at (and if we are wrong, then through R2 is flowing toward the end of the antenna,
where did we go wrong). 2. If this is right than to have the current through R1 is flowing toward the feedpoint.
modeling software implement it with least error. I Wonder what Kirchhoff would say about that. If you
would like to use that for optimizing, say, loaded replace the stub with a coil of the same reactance, not
elements for receiving arrays on low bands, optimizing much changes.
mobile antennas, loaded multielement beams, etc.
Tell W8JI to stop using lumped circuit analysis
Hi Yuri, when he should be using distributed circuit
try this out for your argument in the other group. Using analysis. :-)
EZNEC:
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp"
Example 1: 102' CF dipole with loading coils in the
W5DXP:
center of each arm to cause the antenna to resonate Yuri, my latest posting sheds more light. Apparently,
on 3.76 MHz. I get XL=j335 ohms. W8JI doesn't realize that there are two superposing
currents phasor-adding together to get the net current
Example 2: Replace the above loading coils with series and the phase distribution between those two current
inductive stubs hanging down. Ten foot stubs with six waves are opposite because they are traveling in
inch spacing between the wires is what I used. What opposite directions. This is a characteristic of standing-
happens to the current across that six inch gap is wave antennas.
obvious from the current plot using EZNEC. Hint:
There is a step function across that six inch gap just as See what happens when one tries to ignore the
there will be with a six inch coil. component waves?
Then ask: Why doesn't EZNEC treat these two cases Because the two currents are traveling in opposite
the same way? directions, any phase delay through the coil shifts the
phase of the two currents IN OPPOSITE
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp"
DIRECTIONS. Thus the total relative phase shift effect
through a 10 degree coil is 20 degrees.
and ...
Mark, NM5K wrote:
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
Dunno...I finally got up enough courage to wade thru
There is too much reliance now going on modeling
program results, ignoring some realities. a bunch of that myself. Both had some decent points..
But....Just using my built in "BS" filter only, which
Yuri, rarely seems to fails me, and ignoring all other
here is a modeling result that you might like. :-) I took a influences, I still have to side with Tom. I still think the
102' dipole and loaded it in the center of each leg with current is fairly constant.
an inductive stub that made the dipole resonant on
3.76 MHz. I added a one ohm series 'load' to each side
of the stub. Drawing one leg of the dipole, it looks like W5DXP:
this:
The key to understanding is to realize that the net
----------R2-+ +-R1----------FP--- ... other half current is the phasor sum of the forward current and
|| reflected current (on a standing- wave antenna).
| | inductive Assume a 10 degree phase delay through the coil on
| | stub the frequency of operation. Ifwd-in and Iref-out are on
+-+ the same side of the coil. Ifwd-out and Iref-out are on
the other side of the coil.
EZNEC reports 0.85 amps through R1 and 0.57 amps Ifwd-in--> coil Ifwd-out-->
through R2, a difference of 33%. If one could model -----------------------////////////-------------------------
the inductive loading reactance as an actual physical <--Iref-out <--Iref-in
coil instead of a lumped single point impedance,
results would be similar to the above. Assume that |Ifwd-in| = |Ifwd-out| which satisfies
Kirchhoff
Assume that |Iref-in| = |Iref-out| which satisfies Ifwd-out lags Ifwd-in by 10 degrees. Iref-in leads Iref-
Kirchhoff out by 10 degrees. So current on the right side of the
coil equals Ifwd-out at -10 degrees plus Iref-in at +10
Ifwd-in + Iref-out = net current on left side of the coil degrees, NOT a current maximum point.
Ifwd-out + Iref-in = net current on right side of the Therefore, in this example, net current on the left side
coil of the coil
cannot possibly be equal to net current on the right
Ifwd-out lags Ifwd-in by 10 degrees side of the coil.
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
Iref-out lags Iref-in by 10 degrees (Iref-in leads Iref- and summarized by W4JLE:
out) If we feed an antenna at the current point, the
Now let's assume that Ifwd-in and Iref-out are in phase. current decreases as the voltage increases along
the antenna element from feed point to end..
So current on the left side of the coil equals Ifwd-in at
zero degrees plus Iref-out at zero degrees which is a That being said, a coil replacing a segment of an
current maximum point. antenna (in order to physically shorten it) will
exhibit the same properties (relating to currents) as
Ask yourself: Can we have a current maximum point the segment it replaced.
on both sides of the coil? I trust that answer is obvious.
It is not an article, so it is early still to write scientific More info one can find in the internet:
treatises on this subject. It is while a test, supervision, www.qsl.net/w0kph
analysis, searching of answers to many questions. My http: // www.eh-antenna.com/
experience can encourage ones, and others I will http: // www.eheuroantenna.com/
disappoint. I think, a EH- antenna can compete to any
dipole, IV or GP, EH-antenna can work both at a field, Schematic of the antenna is below.
and at restricted urban conditions.
But I have done my own design that you can see on connection. Variable capacitors have max capacity of
the pictures. 55-pF. The cylinders have diameter of 80-mm, height
of 200-mm, and made of a bronze sheet of 0,5-mm
Picture 1 shows two antennas, conical one for 10 thickness. Using such antenna details, it was possible
meters is made by UA3AO, cylindrical antenna, to cover a frequency range from 10 up to 30 MHz.
retuning from 30 up to 10 meters is made by myself. I
have used two variometers from old military Russian If you have not such variometer, you can try to tune the
surplus radio -140 for my antenna. The variometer antenna to separately ranges. For example, for 20
gives 0,65 - 6,9-H or 2,8-29-H, it depends from the meters: L1=10 coils (3-H), copper wire of diameter of
1.81-mm (#13 AWG), 30 mm, L2=16 coils (6-H)
To do the antenna one can very easy as well as the Sweets- surprise Chupa- Chups
costs are nothing. You need a box of a sweets-
surprise Chupa- Chups, a piece of an old coax,
some wire, epoxies, and a little of job.
So, go to do it!
Insert 6 /4 counterpoises.
73!
All portable hand held radios have a short rubber 145 MHz Rubber Duck
duck antenna. Some of the rubber duck antennas
are rather long and if it is not necessary to
communicate on a far distance, the long antenna
just hinders to use a hand- held. I decided to make a
short rubber duck antenna that is convenient for
daily usage and for short distance communication.
73!
A 50-Ohms coaxial cable is used with the antenna advantage one antenna above other one. The essence
without any symmetrical devices. The cable goes of this method is simple. You take a dipole as the
along the boom and get out from the tail. For exemplary antenna and do compare the dipole with the
antenna folding you can loose screws, turn antenna experimental antenna.
vibrator along the boom, and again strength the
screws. Antenna director and reflector is removed Being on the southern slope of Elbrus- mountain at
from the boom and hide inside the boom. height of 4000 meters I use the method with help of
Turkish ham station TA7T. The distance between me
Coaxial cable has the length of 1100-mm. The cable and TA7T was approximately 500-kms. I hardly heard
is laid inside the boom and get out from the tail. It is TA7T by my exemplary dipole but I had 59 with the
need to protect from weather the place where the YAGI. It is near 10 dB in real gain!
coaxial cable is soldered to the vibrator. RF socket
also must be protected from weather and dirty at
transportation of the antenna. Antenna has weight of
0.4-KG. Practical measured (by device SWR-121)
SWR is: at 144.7=1.3:1, 145.2=1:1, 145.7=1.6:1.
Figure 1
very conveniently as the antenna is always ready to The coaxial cable has length of 50-mm. The place of the
operation. You can hold the antenna by its tail and soldering of the coaxial cable to the vibrator must be
direct the antenna to your correspondent at protected from the weather. Antenna has weight of 150
operation. gram. 150, real gain of 6-7 dB above half-wave dipole.
Figure 1 shows the design of the antenna. The SWR is: at 433-MHz =1.8:1, at 435-MHz =1.4:1, at 438-
boom is made of an ebonite rod of 412-mm length MHz=1:1, at 440-MHz=1.5:1 ( it as measured by device
SWR-121).
and of 8-mm diameter. Antenna elements are made
of a copper wire of 2- mm (#12 AWG) diameter. 50 Commentary:
Ohms coaxial cable is soldered to antenna vibrator I recommend to use the antenna with low-power UHF
without any symmetrical and matching devices. The radio (10-mWtts) for a range 433-434. I have 30- 50
coaxial cable goes along the boom and get out from kms of distance (at direct vision) using the antenna with
the antenna tail. Antenna elements are fastened to such station. Also I recommend to use the antenna with
the boom by epoxies. The antenna can place above usual UHF radios, be sure, you easy will skip more than
or inside a tourist backpack. 100-kms!
Figure 1
antenna. Boom is made of iron L-plate 25x25-mm. All Director-I- 649-mm. (-20).
the four ovals are fastened to the boom by struts made
of insulation stuff such as tree, hetinax, etc. Antenna is Director- II - 639-mm. (-20-mm).
fastened by the tail, that is behind the struts.
Figure 2 shows the design of the Driven Element. RF
Perimeter of elements (ovals): socket is soldered directly by the ends of the oval.
Three holes is drilled at each strut. One holes is in the
Reflector- 727-mm. (-20-mm for soldering). center for fastened the strut to the boom, two holes are
at the ends for bimetal oval. Antenna reflectors and
Driven Element- 653-mm (+10-mm distance for a RF directors have the same design as the Driven Element
socket). only difference is its ends soldered together.
Figure 2
Antenna has weight of 900 gram. SWR is: at 430-MHz made of iron L-plate having not the same dimensions
you would do correction lengths of antenna elements. I
=1.2:1, at 435-MHz =1:1, at 440-MHz=1.3:1 SWR was
metered by device SWR-121. If you will use boom want to pay attention, that the antenna is more
laborious than YAGI, but it work much better.
When an antenna is intended for mountains it must strip drying by oil. Perimeter of all ovals is increased
follow such additional requirements as: on 20-mm compare to previous design. All struts are
1. Light weight. made from un- foiled PC-board. Antenna elements
2. To have folding design and to take a are made of 2-mm diameter soft copper wire (# 12
little place in a backpack. AWG). Soldered parts must be protected from the
3. Antenna should be conveniently to weather.
hold in a hand, to fasten to a tree or
stick. . Antenna has weight 400 gram. Other characteristics
4. Tolerance to a dirty, water and snow. are as the previous design has. The antenna is tested
5. Possibility to repair in field conditions. at 1997 and at 2000 in the mountain Elbrus and the
6. antenna shows good result. I made QSOs in distance
So, the boom of the trip antenna is made of a wooden of 200-300 kms with 59 for both ends!
At 1101Z I heard no body calling. . I waited for a few The weather in Volgograd is very unstable now. Friday
minutes more. Then a few sations from Siberia and the high was +19 C, Saturday it was only +5 C.
Europe started calling. They probably heard the pile-
up for 3D2NC, whose signal peaked at 569. After Victor, RZ4AA, shares QRP experiences with me. He
about 30 contacts his signal dropped and I couldn't said "After every contest I always hear HF. Usually
hear him any more. I was interested in how well he propagation is better than before the contests. The
was heard in Siberia so I sent an e-mail to contesters have gone back to their other rigs and then it
UA0_____ asking how well the European station is possible to work 5 watts QRP DX without any
was heard there. problems." Last weekend he had about 20 QRP QSOs
into South America (LU, CX and PY) using 5 watts and
On 20 meters signals from far Europe were 559 and dipole antenna up about 5 meters. He worked one LU
on 15 meters they were 579. The frequency of 3D2 station who was also running QRP and they both
is free now. Is somebody calling QRL ? I waited and exchanged RST of 579!
heard CQ CQ de A3JJ A3JJ K. Immediately a few
stations called him. A3JJ answered a Dutch station I next listened to 21.00 MSK. I heard the Switzerland
and giving "... de EA3JJ". After first QSO the pile-up contest. The propagation was improving some now. I
disappeared. tuned to the DX window and heard someone transmitting
"...ON /QRP. His RST here was 589 and he was talking
Today I heard RZ6HX/QRP on 21 MHz. to Belgium, but I couldn't hear the Belgian station. He
told the Belgian station that he was usng a K2 txcvr.
72! Alexei, UA4ARL/qrp When he said 73 and gave his call sign, I was surprised
to hear VK9XK! I gave him a call and he came back to
me on the first try. He gave my RST as 599. His QTH
was Christmas Island. Grear FUN!
If several ranges are suffered from the incidental the resonance to frequency of the reflected RF -
reflected RF- energy, then several proper traps are energy. If the reflected RF-energy has not enough
installed on the coaxial cable. In this case the first power to make the LED glow, the trap can be tuned
from the antenna trap should be tuned to the most with the help of an RF-voltmeter that should be
high frequency range. disposed near by the trap.
Empty plastic bottles of soft drinks are used for forms If you have a good radio - ground try to connect the
to the traps. A Scotch fixes coils of the trap. The ground to upper, or to bottom side of the trap.
diameter of the trap could be differed to plus/minus Instead of a radio - ground you may try a device
20 % compare indicated in Table 1. The trap is Artificial Ground connected to thick copper wire by
placed where the coaxial cable entered in to the a length of 5-20 meters. In some cases radio
shack. One turn of copper wire in diameter 1 mm ground does not give any effect. Try the connection
loaded to a LED (Light Emitting Diode) is coiled in experimentally way.
above the trap. LED shows when the trap is tuned to
By Bill H. in Chicagoland
[email protected]
In my business as a masonry restoration contractor, I Each Mod has it's advantageous and
used many types of anchor systems. I also use many disadvantages. The glumpy type (glumpy is a
types of epoxies. technical term <wink>_can be mixed to the
desired amount. The drippy type is either used
The anchors I liked best and were specified by the
all at once or throw the rest away.
engineers were made by Rawl. For a tower base, you
would want as long an anchor as possible, and obviously,
a diameter similar to the specified J bolt size. Now as for purchasing...I bought my supplies
from a firm that specialized in caulking and
Reason for wanting as long an anchor as possible is to epoxies.
have as much concrete mass above/around the bolt. Hilti has it's version (read higher priced) and is
sold at special Hilti stands in selected Home
As for the epoxies, I've used two basic types, Hi-Mod and Depots.
Lo-Mod. The Modulus refers to its flowing or clumpiness. Check your Yellow Pages for locations near
Sika is the brand I used most. Comes in two parts. Also you.
comes in both Modulus types.
If you drill a hole into concrete, and wish to smear the I never trusted using simple threaded rod and
epoxy around the expansion bolt, they you want a epoxy epoxy in the type of work I did, securing large
that does not flow or drip. This type comes in two cans, sections of stone to Chicago Landmarked
you mix the appropriate proportions, allow to sit for the building. I only used expansion bolts.
instructed amount and then basically glob the epoxy onto Hardware store threaded rod is of unknown
the expansion bolt. The other type of epoxy frequently strength. I would not use it on my own tower.
comes in a caulking gun type tube that has both activator Expansion bolts come with a engineering spec
and product in the same tube but separated by a thin foil sheet.
barrier. You mix this type in that tube by pushing the
attached plunger back and forth the instructed number of
All that being said...I have no relationship with
times. The bolt gets inserted into the concrete, and then
you use the plunger to drip the epoxy into the hole and let the products/brands mentioned above, just
it seep down around the expansion bolt. years of experience.
If I was to anchor a tower base to an existing
concrete base, I would use
this system.
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
The phenomenon, hysteresis at a coaxial cable, for help. But, before that I tried the transmitter in the air.
was opened randomly. What is the phenomenon? It impossible, but far radio station heard me! I again
metered the power at antenna terminal of the coaxial
We know, when a coaxial cable hangs for a long cable. It was 8 Watts. So, the losses drop from 10 to 2
time at an opened air, losses of the coaxial cable dB. I cannot explain the phenomenon, I only observed
start to increase. For HF- ranges it does not and used it.
matter, but at VHF ranges the signal starts to fade.
However, at those times a SWR in the coaxial I proved the phenomenon in practically way. For this
cable is not aggravated, and on the contrary, a purpose, losses at old coaxial cables, that were enough
SWR even is improving. It is obviously the long time laying in crude places or hanging on opened
reflected wave cannot reach to the SWR meter air, were measured on frequency of 144 MHz. Then the
because the wave faded in the losses coaxial coaxial cables had been vigorous shook and tapped by
cable. But a transceiver cannot catch far radio a wooden hammer. Well, losses in the coaxial cables
signals. dropped on to 2- 6 dB.
Such matter was with me, when one service VHF- I have mentioned, at coaxial cables with polyethylene
radio, that was served by me begun to work not insulator that are at an opened air the phenomenon is
properly. I found, that the coaxial cable weaken observed usually in the middle of winter or in the end of
radio signal more the 10 dB. I just metered the spring. Do you have any idea about it?
power at the transmitter output, it were 10 Watts,
and at end of the coax feedline, it were 2.8 Watts. It allows me to recommend, for decreasing losses at
Then I tried to remove the bad coaxial cable from a hanged at an opened air coaxial cables, time to time to
cable shaft, but I could not remove the cable, shake up the coaxial cables. Before usage of old coaxial
although I very vigorously shook the cable. cables for construction of feeder systems, the coaxial
cables must be vigorously shook and tapped at all of the
So, I could not remove the cable, and I connected length by a wooden hammer.
the old cable to the transmitter and decided to go
Different ways apply for fastening guys to a mast or Takes a kapron cord. From this one do loops for
to antenna elements. The common way is to drill
fastening guys, as it is shown at Figure 1. (where Dt is -
holes in the tips. It, undoubtedly, results to easing of diameter of a tube).
rigidity of towers and antennas both. At the same
time it is possible to apply "sparing" method of Several loops is put to the chosen place on a mast or on
fastening of guys. antenna elements and attached to these ones by usual
threads. Here we do attach a binding cord as it is Further, using cordlike binding, we adhere loops to a
shown in Figure 2. tube as it is shown in Figure 3.
At the figures are designated: L - Loop for fastening, After the ending of binding we pass the end of binding
B - Beginning of binding cord, End - End of binding cord in Helping Loop and strongly pull for the beginning
of binding cord. After that do melt of the Beginning and
ord, HL Helping Loop.
the End the binding rope, and that is all.
http://www.antentop.bel.ru/
For several years I use to a home-brew tool, that I bimetal of diameter of 4-6 mm, steel rope, wire rope.
made by myself, for puling guys. I made it of 8 mm Picture shows how the tool holds the guy.
of steel plate. The tool holds any guys, for example,
A winch is attached to the hole in the tool and placed Everyone can design the tool to needed sizes,
by the place where the guy is fastened. proceeding from own needs. Force of capture is defined
by a difference of shoulders of cross levers to which
You can very easy move the tool onto a guy. The fasten plates. Plates have longitudinal gnowing -through
tool does not bite a guy at pulling. When a guy has at the place where it hold a guy.
been pulled, the tool removed by unscrewing the
bottom plate.
When experimenting on the LF-band chokes with 12x12x15mm. I have measured the Q of some of them
inductances of some mH are often needed. They are and it was between 10 and 25.
not so easy to get in these days. Those in the junk-
box from the tube era are often quite big. Caution: Yes, of course you have to be careful not to
apply any force on the glass part of the lamp. I have
Do you have low-energy lamps that are not working taken between 5 and 10 lamps apart and used the
any more ? Before giving them away to recycling do method of holding the socket with a glove firmly against
the following: a piece of wood. Then using a small screwdriver to
carefully bend the socket into two parts. By doing in this
Carefully disassemble the electronic part with a way no force is applied to the glass. When the socket is
screwdriver. Inside there (among some other things) divided into two parts it is an easy matter with a small
is a choke with an inductance of 1.8-17mH sidecutter to cut the wires going to the filaments.
(depending of the power and the make of the lamp).
They chokes are very small, approximately Happy recycling !
regards
Uwe/dj8wx
Therefore I guess (I have not tried it yet, no need to Dummy Load from John, G3PAI
do so) for such a small band like 136 kHz it should
be possible to build a dummy load using ordinary About 30 years ago, Ongar Radio station to the north-
wirewound resistors (preferably DALE or similars east of London had a number of nine kilowatt HF ISB
because of their easy mounting on a cooler surface) transmitters. For dummy loads they used carbon tubes
because their inductance could be cancelled by a about a foot long and an inch or two in diameter.
suitable capacitance in parallel, or by several Resistance was 75 ohms and they were cooled by
distributed capacitors within the parallel resistor pumping water through them. I had a box of such
arrangement. It should be rather simple to determine resistors, but they went missing in a house move.
the capacitance needed, a VSWR meter designed
for LF should do it. 73
John Rabson G3PAI
Caution: Nobody should respect such a load to also
absorb harmonics of the transmitter frequency, All of these Dummy Loads were described
because it is a tuned load. Harmonics may see a
at LF-Forum:
short circuit, depending of the Q of the load, and will
be reflected. This special behaviour of the tuned
load does not matter, of course, if a low-pass filter is [email protected]
added to the tank circuit of the transmitter.
73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB
73! I.G.
Ed, RU6LA
2003
1.10-2.11.03 At the RSGB HF convention at Manchester, UK Laurence KL1X-GM4DMA received the Nevada
Cup for his innovation and general helpfulness to LFers in 2002-2003 season
25.07.03 First Alaska's WD2XDW beacon. Laurence KL1X (BP41XD) has started a beacon tests in
137.7738kHz at 2W ERP
30.06.03 RIP 73kHz and last QSO on this band (Peter G3LDO - Mike G3XDV)
15.05.03 FCC refuses 136kHz. The USA will not have a 136kHz allocation in the near future. Next WRC
2007?
13.03.03 First 2-way QSO Europe - Asia (RU6LA@UA9OC - RU6LWZ QRSS & CW)
15.02.03 First reception of Europe signal in Alaska (Laurence KL1X RX Laurie G3AQC)
3.01.03 First reception in South America on 136kHz (LU8EDR and LU8DYK RX Marcelo LW2ETU)
2002
18.12.02 First reception of Europe signal in North America on Jason (John W1TAG RX Jim M0BMU)
Nov. 02 In first Dexter W4DEX takes regular plots of HBG(HB Switzerland) on 75kHz reception of
Europe signal in North America
Nov. 02 For a conference of 1-st region IARU in San-Marino for the first time is officially recommended
Band Plan for the 136kHz band. Also there was an offer on amateur distribution about 500kHz.
For this purpose the small Working Group was created with the purpose of consideration 10kHz
of a site between 470 and 490kHz
4..5.11.03 First Indonesian CW beacon. YB3AQF in Surabaya has started 2-day's CW beacon tests in
137.0kHz
13.10.02 At the RSGB HF convention at Egham, Surrey, UK Jim M0BMU received the Nevada Cup for
his innovation and general helpfulness to LFers in 2001-2002 season
2001
1.12.01 First reception of Oceania signal in North America on 136kHz (Dexer W4DEX RX ZL6QH
beacon)
13-14.10.01 At the RSGB HF convention at Old Windsor, UK Alan G3NYK received the Nevada cup for his
innovation and general helpfulness to LFers in 2000-2001 season. Peter Bobek awards were
presented to G3AQC, G3LDO and M0BMU (also to be sent to VE1ZJ, VA3LK and VE1ZZ) for
their Trans-Atlantic successes
13.10.01 First repeater: RX 136kHz band to 145MHz USB TX. Crawley Club G3WSC - MB7LF
Oct 01 First ZL New Zeland, ZL6QH has received permission to transmit in 136kHz band
1.08.01 First reception of Oceania signal in North America on 184.4kHz (Steve VE7SL RX ZL6QH
beacon)
21.11.01 First reception of Europe signal in North America on 73kHz in QRSS (John W1TAG RX Laurie
G3AQC)
15.03.01 DARC, RSBG and AMRAD - the sponsors of the Trans-Atlantic Challenge have decided to
present awards to Larry VA3LK, Laurie G3AQC, Jack VE1ZZ, John VE1ZJ and Peter G3LDO
for their contacts
9.03.01 First reception of Europe signal in North America on WOLF (John W1TAG RX Jim M0BMU)
WOLF - A new mode developed by Stewart KK7KA is being tried on 136 at present
5...19.02.01 Firsts 2-way QSOs North America - Europe (Larry VA3LK - Laurie G3AQC 5..19 Feb and John
VE1ZJ / Jack VE1ZZ - Peter G3LDO 13 Feb)
2000
31.12.00 First 2-way narrow audio (Slow-Voice) QSO (Markus DF6NM - Geri DK8KW)
27.12.00 Alberto I2PHD has started project FFT software "ARGO" Beta 1, build 110
21.12.00 First reception of North America signal in Europe (Peter G3LDO RX Jack VE1ZZ)
14-15.10.00 At the RSGB HF convention at Old Windsor, UK David G0MRF received the Nevada Cup for his
innovation and general helpfulness to LFers. David was also presented with a Peter Bobek
award for his trans-Atlantic crossband contact with VE1ZJ
Sep 00 Wolf DL4YHF has started project FFT software "Spectrum Lab" or SpecLab
15.09.00 In first Alan G3NYK takes regular plots of CFH (Halifax Nova Scotia, 137kHz) reception of North
America signal in Europe
10.09.00 First reception of Europe signal in North America (John VE1ZJ RX David G0MRF/p)
27.07.00 Brian CT1DRP has permission to operate in the CEPT band from both his QTHs until November
2001
23.07.00 First 2-way QSO in North America (Mitch VE3OT & Larry VA3LK)
1.07.00 Three German stations; DJ2LF, DF6NM and DK8KW have been issued with permits to operate
between 8.9 and 9.0 kHz
26.06.00 Petr OK1FIG has built a new front end for the Spectrogram engine "EasyGram"
7.04.00 Larry VA3LK has a special permit to operate the 136kHz band from VO1. This is with a view to
what he has called "Transatlantic II", an attempt at the first transatlantic QSO on amateur LF at
Nov 2000
Mar 00 First attemp 2-way QSO VK / ZL on 165-190kHz (ZL6HQ & special AX2TAR - VK7ZAL) Signals
were heard both ways at various times but no QSO took place
Jan 00 RadCom (RSGB) has published a Band plan in 136kHz band (in October 1999 Geri DK8KW has
presented similar on RSGB HF Convention )
1-2.01.00 First transmission the VLF radio station in Grimeton for HAMs. The frequency is 17.2 kHz and
the call sign is SAQ
1999
5.12.99 First 2-way DFCW QSO (Rik ON7YD & Marcus DF6NM)
9-10.10.99 At the RSGB HF convention at Windsor, UK Dave G3YXM received the Nevada Cup (the RSGB
Experimenters Award sponsored by Nevada of Portsmouth) for his innovation and general
helpfulness to LFers in 1998-1999 season.
June 99 LF forum in Friedrichshafen (DL) has accepted the decision to found award for the first
transatlantic QSO on LF in memory to Peter Bobek DJ8WL/DA0LF(SK Apr 99) , for
his work on 160m and 136kHz
22.03. 99 First 2-way PSK31QSO on 137kHz (Reino OH1TN & Riso OH3LYG)
4.02.99 FCC has granted a one-year experimental license to the Amateur Radio Research and
Development Corporation (AMRAD) to conduct tests on the frequency 136.75 kHz using the call
sign WA2XTF..."
Feb 99 First commercial 136 rig by Nevada, now have stock of the "Ropex" 136 TX. It is crystal
controlled, runs on 12V and produces 30 or 130W of RF. It costs less than 200.
15-18.01.99 First Transatlantic beacon tests (members of AMRAD are RX and europians HAMs are TX)
and foto
Jan 99 First reception of Europe signal in Africa (Rik ON7YD/EA8 RX Marco IK1ODO in QRSS)
1998
Nov 98 Rik ON7YD has started project software for TX QRS V 1.08
Sep 98 At the RSGB HF convention John G3TDZ received the Datong Electronics Cup for his
innovation and general helpfulness to LFers
24.08. 98 First 2-way SSTV QSO on 136kHz (Reino OH1TN & Riso OH3LYG)
24.08. 98 First 2-way SSB QSO on 136kHz (Reino OH1TN & Riso OH3LYG)
1997
Sep 97 At the RSGB HF convention Andy G4JNT received the Datong Electronics Cup (the RSGB
Experimenters Award sponsored by Datong Electronics ltd) for his innovation and general
helpfulness to LFers
23.08. 97 First "DX" 2-way QSO on 73kHz. (Andy G4JNT& Peter G3LDO at 57km distance)
3.08.97 First 2-way QRSS QSO (Andy G4JNT & G3PLX on 72.09kHz., QRSS100 at 393km distance)
22.04. 97 First 2-way CW QSO on 137kHz (Reino OH1TN & Riso OH3LYG)
Apr 97 Official CEPT/ERC Recommendation 62-01E (WGFM meeting in Mainz): "...band 135.7-137.8
kHz may be used with a maximum e.r.p. of 1 Watt on a secondary basis by the Amateur Service
in CEPT countries"
12.04. 97 First "DX" QSX QSO on 73kHz. (G3YGF RX Andy G4JNT at 100km distance)
14.02. 97 First 2-way QSO on 73kHz. (Mike G3XDV & Peter G3LDO/p at 175m distance, CW)
1996
Dec 96 At the WGFM meeting: 135.7-137.8 kHz (one of channal of Trans-Europian electric power
systems at 139kHz)
Sep 96 WGFM-PT22 were summarised in the document FM(96)123 135.7-141.4 kHz to WGFM meeting
Feb 96 At the WGFM (Working Group Frequency Management - of the CEPT-ERC) meeting the
proposal was re-issued. The WGFM invited its monitoring sub-group PT-22 to search for an
alternative in the 130-150 kHz area
1995
Dec 95 At the WGFM (Working Group Frequency Management - of the CEPT-ERC) meeting (Sofia), the
German administration referred to the IARU recommendation and announced the proposal for
the Europian harmonised secondary amateur segment 142-147kHz
199?
??? VK Australia gets LF (165-190kHz) band - ?
1990
??? ZL New Zeland gets LF (165-190kHz) band - 5w EIRP
1979
??? Concluding the preparatory ITU-CCIR studies to WARC-79 the desirability of LF small
secondary access was emphasised by SPM-WARC79 (Special Preparatory Meeting -of the ITU
to WARC); however WARC-79 ran out of time and the subject was left unresolved
1974
Jan 74 The Long Wave Club of America (LWCA) "was organized in January, 1974 to promote both
DXing and experimenting on frequencies below 550 kHz..."
1965
??? First? beacon on 187kHz under FCC part 15 (Dexter W4DEX)
19??
??? W United States gets LF (160-190kHz) band - beacons limited to 1w output and a 15 meter
antenna under FCC part 15
1901
12.12.01 First Transatlantic reception (G.Marconi in St John's, Newfoundland, Canada RX Poldhu Cove
in Cornwall, England) 3425km
1895
Guglielmo Marconi(25.04.1874-20.07.1937) and A.S.Popov(16.03.1859-31.12.1905) started with
LF
Credit Line:
http://136.73.ru/
Radio RBM is one of the most famous Russian military radio that was used in the WW-II and after the war as a
surplus radio. RBM took place in the WW-II, after the war RBM was used as trial radio for military teaching
centers. Lots of Russian hams know well the radio. I want to give some information about RBM and its antennas
at ANTENTOP.
73! I.G.
History: Radio RBM, firstly named as RB (Radio, WW- II. USSR, Leningrad Front, 1943.
Base), was designed before the WW-II, in the 1938, Radio RB
in the Research Center of Communication of Red
Army, by a special research group guided by colonel
Sosunov. Special variant of RB named as RB-40,
that had low weight because it was made in an
aluminum cabinet was produced from end of 1939
for spy and partisan. It was made near 1000 RB-40,
but then its producing was stopped because the
aviation need aluminum. In the 1942 some
modifications were done in the radio, and RB was
named as RBM (Radio, Base, Modified). In the 1943
both with RBM was produced RBM-5 that has 5
watts power compare to 1 watt that RBM has. After
WW-II other modification of RBM named as RBM- 1
was produced. RBM-1 was produced until end of
50s. Some samples of RBM-1 was produced for
export (see picture with Latin letters on the front
panel).
Russian RBM-1
Schematic of RBM-1
Ground Dipole Antenna does communication near Note: The distance of communication is shown for
17 kms on AM and near 35 kms on CW. daytime at middle level of interferences. At nighttime and
at high level of interferences the distance of
Mast Antenna does communication near 30 kms on communication is decreased in two times.
AM and near 50 kms on CW.
Credit Line:
http://www.cqham.ru/
http://www.oldradio.onego.ru/
http://www.battlefield.ru/
in the marking, which was usually a factory number of of 2 and 4V direct heating appeared (UB-107, UB-
design, served for division of the valves of the same 110, SB-154 etc.). The receivers using such valves
category. According to this system the valves models were battery-supplied. From 1935 the so-called 4-V
R-5, "Micro", MDS, PT-19, KT-2 were renominated as "super"-series of glass valves with indirect heating
P-7, PT-2, ST-6, ST-19 and VT-14 (in Russian appeared , which was installed in the AC-supply
transcription). direct-amplification radios (E4S, EKL) and in the first
Soviet superheterodynes (TsRL). In 1931 the first
In early 1930's a series of economical glass valves home penthode SO-113 of this series was produced.
The main drawback of this marking system was that it In 1937 our electro-vacuum industry started mass
defined the valves rather approximately. For instance, production of quite a new type of valves. There were
one and the same valve could be referred to the the tubes in metallic cases - 6A8, 6G7, 6J7, 6K7,
category of both receiving and amplifying valves. From 6L7, 6F5, 6F6, 6S5, 6X6, 5C4 (in Russian
the other side, the valves that strongly differ from one transcription) and also the glass electronic optical
another, such as triodes, tetrodes with "cathode grid", tuning indicator 6E5 - similar to the contemporary
tetrodes with a screening grid, AF penthodes and both American tubes (6A8, 6Q7, 6J7, 6K7, 6L7, 6F5, 6F6,
kinds of RF penthodes ("varimu" and with short 6C5, 6H6, 5Z4, 6E5). The metallic valve 6L6
characteristics) were put into the same category ("C") (Russian AF power tetrode) and the glass versions
of special valves. Produced in 1937 penthode model of the 5Z4 and 6L6 tubes were produced somewhat
SO-183 and a double diode-penthode SO-193 were later and still later the cheaper glass analogues of
also included in the same category. Besides, the many other metallic valves appeared. The marking
existing system of marking did not make it possible to system of all those valves was more precise than
define if a given valve was used in a battery radio or it that of 1929. The name of the valve was shorter and
had an indirect heating cathode. its purpose and properties were defined more
exactly.
EKL -34
E K L - 34
The 5-tube R-set of direct amplification "EKL-34" was
produced by Leningrad Kozitsky Works (earlier
spelled "Kazitsky") from 1934 and was an improved
version of the "EKL-4" set. The difference was a
better technology and characteristics. In the author's
collection the set has the serial number 3903.
BASIC TECHNICAL DATA.
Set of tubes: SO-124, SO-118, SO-118, UO-104,
VO-166
Tuning range:
MW 225-720 m; LW 680-2000 m
Sensitivity - 40-300 mcV/m
Power output 0.8 W
Power consumption 65 W
Dimensions 520420260 mm .
The AC-switch of lever-type is placed on the left side EKL 34, inner look
of the base. The vertical moving dial of 20x25 mm
has a pointing in fixed units, a light, a wire pointer.
Beside the dial there is the control handle of the 3-
section tuning capacitor . The two knobs on the base
control volume and positive feedback. Wire
potentiometers wound on wooden rings are used for
control. In the center a small lever with horizontal
move is the band selector. The two levers to the left
serve for fine tuning of RF coils for maximum
sensitivity during listening. The set has a couple of
adapter terminals to connect with a gramophone.
The switching of the AC voltage of 110-127-220 V is
made by resetting of the jumpers
on the net transformer. The loudspeaker has a 3- with the aereal. A SO-118 tube works as the
section field coil. The outer side of the glued paper detector. The first AF step is built on a similar tube.
cone is made of natural leather. The output audio step is working on a direct heating
triode UO-104. The scheme is sourced on a rectifier
VO-116. All the resistors are carbonic ("Kaminsky"
The R-set is built according to the structure of direct
type). The filter caps are paper-made (Leningrad
amplification 1-V-2 with controlled positive feedback
using tubes of the indirect 4-volts heating. The RF "Krasnaya Zarya" Works), the rest are of open
construction made of mica.
amplifier on a tetrode SO-124 has the cap coupling
We should note, that even the latter system of marking showed the number of outer terminals
marking was not quite consistent. For instance, one (including the filament and the outlet of the metallic
and the same letter "F" was used to denominate a case). That hindered denomination of new valves
high-gain triode and an output AF penthode (6F5 and similar to the earlier produced ones with the same
6F6). Initially the figure taking the third place in the number of
electrodes. And in 1940 a new project of marking of The European valves with a "spider" base. 4V
radio valves was worked out , which eliminated this indirect heating. End 1930's. Photo shows valves:
drawback. The most parameters of the system were AK2, AL4, AF3, ABC1, AZ1 made by the "Valvo"
close to the international one. The first figure and "Telefunken.". It is interesting to note the
approximately showed the heating voltage, the letter in screening caps used for such valves ("Tefag"
the second place described the basic purpose of the chassis).
valve or its construction. The figure in the third place
did not have a special meaning and then served for
division of the valves of the same purpose and
construction. For description of the valves' outer
design (except the usual metallic ones) another letter
was added: "C" - a glass valve of usual size, "M" -
glass, mini-sized, "J" - glass, of "acorn" type, etc.
In accordance with the new marking system some The valves with a T-type base (8 pins). Left - the
valves (in particular, the glass mini-sized ones metallic valve EF14 made by "Telefunken
worked out in 1938) got a new marking. For instance, G.m.b.H." for military purposes (WWII) with the
the valve model SB-242 should be marked 2A1M, the inscription "Wehrmacht". Then follow the UCL11,
SO-241 - as 2K1M etc. But the new marking was not EYY13 and the vacuum impulses counter N3 made
generally accepted because the radio works by the "Dressler"
continued production of valves with the old marking.
Only mini-sized valves of a later design (2K2M,
2J2M) were marked in a new way.
6N7S (one triode), 6F6, 6J7 and 6K7 was used in the Octal (8 pins) valves of the metallic series. They
substitutes. The electric data (except heating voltage) have a directing spigot on the base. In the USSR
and the base were the same as in old valves. Such their production started in 1937. Valves with 6,3V
valves are very rare now. indirect heating were most widely used. Photo
shows Soviet valves 6F6, 6A7, 6K3, 6G7, 6X6,
In 1946/47 the "metallic" series was extended by quite 6L7. They were popular in the USSR till end
a number of new valves. In particular, the newly 1950's.
produced so called "single-base valves" appeared,
which were similar to the American 6SA7, 6SK7,
6SQ7 and later - the 6SR7 and 6SJ7. They did not
have a control grid terminal in the upper cap any
more, but due to a special construction of the base the
inter-electrode capacity did not increase at that. The
letter "S" in the second position of the marking stands
for "single-base". During the first years the valves
were produced under their "native" marking, but later
they were designated as 6A7, 6K3, 6G2, 6J8 (in
Russian transcription). In the author's collection there
are such valves with a Latin marking produced in late
1940's and a Soviet valve of the same period 6V6-GT Soviet octal valves in the bottles. 6,3
- the ancestor of the well-known AF output tetrode (12,6)V indirect heating. Enjoyed a wide spread in
6P6S (in Russian). The "legendary" 6P3S valve had the USSR somewhat later than metallic ones, often
also undergone several modifications. Its history being their cheaper equivalents. Among them we
begins with the metallic 6L6 valve (Russian) of 1937 can point out a group of valves with a high heating
make. The first version of the home "in glass" 6L6 was tension for series connection of the filaments in
no good because of overheating of the under-sized transformerless shemes (see "Rekord-47"). Photo
case. The valve 6P3 (Russian, made of glass, though shows valves 6P3, 6N7S, 5C3S, 6P6S, 6F5M,
not having the "S" at the end of the marking) produced 6F6S, 6E5, horizontally - 30C6S.
in early 1950's did not show the required quality. Only
in mid-1950's its construction was improved. That was
the "classical" 6P3S already. It is produced even now
with slight improvements and bears the marking of
6P3S-E and is a valve highly thought of among the
audiophiles.
The two-anode direct heating 5C3S kenotrone has
also a long history. Among its predecessors there are
both the old German valve of the "numeral" series
RGN1064 and our VO-166. Similar valves existed in
the European "A"-series (AZ1), and also in the US
(5U4G, RCA80).
Home-produced valves of higher durability with metallic rings over the bases:
30P1S, 6G7S, 6X6S, 6A10S, 6S2S, 6N8S,
5Z4S.
The valves produced abroad. Photo shows valves: 6F6 by the "Kentucky Radiotrones", EM34 by the
"Philips" (a tuning indicator with two diametricaly set sectors), 5U4G by the "Sylvania Thorn Colour
Television Laboratories Ltd.", 6X5 by the "Tung-Sol Electric Inc.", 6K7 by the "Kentucky Radiotrones",
RGN1064 by the "Telefunken".
In mid 1950's the construction of the octal valves The glass analogs of the European metallic valves
was modernized. With no more fastening of the with outer screening coating. On the photo: 6SQ7
holders of electrodes on the so-called "crest-pod" 6SJ7.
(left) a conciderable decrease of the valves sizes
was made possible (right). On the photo: two
different versions of the 5691 tube made by the
RCA.
Glass valves with Loctal base - 9 pins having a lock in a metallic spigot. 1940-50's. Photo
shows the Soviet 4P1L valve (in the center). In particular, such valves were used in the
"Philips 208U" radio.
Glass valves with the "Rimlock" base. 8 pins, Valves with the Noval base with 9 or 7
diameter 18 mm. On the tube's glass base there is a (Heptal) pins, known in the USSR as "finger-shape"
direction "nose". Photo shows 6,3 V valves of valves. Diameter 18 and 16 mm. A gap in the pins
indirect heating produced by the "Philips" taken from located by circumference served for direction while
a "Philips 320A" receiver: ECH42, EBC41, EAF42, setting the tube. They gained a wide spread in the
EL41, AZ41. Valves of such a design were not made USSR from late 1950's as substitutes for octal
in the USSR. valves and became the last series of tubes used in
home radio devices.
Battery valves with the Heptal base. Have 1,1 (2,2) The home-produced TV valves with the Magnoval
V direct heating. Home produced tubes are known base. Not used in R-sets. On the photo: 6D22S,
from end 1940's and were installed both in table-top 6P41S, GP-5, 6P45S, 6P42S.
(the "Rodina-52") and portable battery powered
radios. Photo shows valves: 2P1P, 1A2P, 1B2P,
1K1P, 2P2P.
We have seen with our own eyes the eclipse of the Unfortunately it does not work now because of
whole epoch - the epoch of the Soviet Union. And wasting of the materials, of which resistors and caps
somehow imperceptibly the things of our common are made. In case of need I reconstruct my radios
surrounding became pieces of antique. It seems carefully. Fortunately, we can still find here old spare
quite recently thatwe tried persistantly to get rid of parts and materials to use them for restoring.
bulky valve radio receivers and buy light and Working with my collection brings me a kind of
portable "transistors" instead. Generations change energy.Every R-set was some time "a favourite of
in technology but even now who of the people over the family" and the spirit of old times hides under
35 does not feel nostalgic of the scale and the every chassis and revives in the soft radiation of the
"green eye" of an old radio gleaming in the tubes.
darkness...
The idea of making a homepage reflecting my
I have a feeling I was interested in old radios collection has come to me in the summer of 1998.
through all my life.May be it is genetic memory? And since then the volume of information on the site
My grandfather, a journalist by education, took a has been increasing and the design of the pages
great interest in radio broadcasting in 1930's. He has changed not once (for the better, I presume).
was also an active listener.I remember him sitting For over a year I have attained a kind of an
at the radio set trying to tune in some DX station "intermediate finish": now on the pages those
through the mess of statics. It was my grandad interested can find not only the photos but also the
who gave me my first radio set as a present in diagrams and technical data of all the radios
early 70's. It was a big and heavy multy-band set included in the site. In the halls of the virtual gallery
trying to tune in some DX station through the mess the music of those half-forgotten years can now be
of statics. It was my grandad who gave me my first listened to. "The Tube Souls" forum is open on the
radio set as a present in early 70's. It was a big site that (I hope) will become a place of contacts
and heavy multy-band set in a wooden cabinet between valve radio fans and collectors. Marking the
model "October". Frankly, I was only 7 then and it virtual museum with a special award of the biggest
did not become the first piece of my collection - Russian site on museums www.museum.ru was a
after some time it was lost. My present collection is pleasant result.
about 3 years old.A receiver of the same model as
my very first one is most precious to me. Besides During 1998 my collection was enlarged by some
some radios made in this country in 1930-50's I rare exhibits owing to information in the World Wide
also have some R-sets produced by Phillips, Web. But the contents of the site have gone beyond
Mende, Tefag , RCA. A radio of direct amplification the limits of the exhibition. The growing interest of
"EKL-34" made in Leningrad in 1934 is the oldest Russian and foreign visitors of the virtual gallery for
of them all. the history of this country's radio industry, the
attention of the
press have confirmed my intension to convert the site In conclusion the author calls for the visitors of the
into a complete database on all the models of tube virtual museum to express their opinions and
home radios produced in this country which include remarks. Welcoming every criticism, I hope that the
not only the technical characteristics but also a intercourse with the visitors will enable me to upkeep
description my virtual gallery as a constantly attractive resource
in the Russian section of the Web.
of the exhibits, so to say, from the first hands. The
volume of material piled up during the work on the Yours sincerely,
collection makes this project quite realistic. Vitaly Brousnikin,
[email protected]
ANTENTOP is FREE e- magazine, made in PDF, I do not know, why the owners do not response me.
devoted to antennas and amateur radio. Everyone Are they still alive? Do their companys are a
may share his experience with others hams on the bankrupt? Or do they move anywhere? Where they
pages. Your opinions and articles are published are in the end?
without any changes, as I know, every your word has
the mean. I have a big collection of pictures, I have got the pictures
in others way, from FREE websites, from commercial
A little note, I am not a native English, so, of CDs, intended for FREE using, and so on... I use to the
course, there are some sentence and grammatical pictures (and seldom, some stuff from closed websites)
mistakes there Please, be indulgent! in ANTENTOP. If the owners still are alive and have the
right, please, contact with me, I immediately remove any
Publishing: If you have something for share with Copyright stuff, or, necessary references will be made
your friends, and if you want to do it FREE, just send there.
me an email. Also, if you want to offer for publishing
any stuff from your website, you are welcome! Business Advertising: ANTENTOP is not a
commercial magazine. Authors and I (Igor Grigorov,
Copyright: Here, at ANTENTOP, we just follow the editor of the magazine) do not receive any profit from
traditions of FREE flow of information in our great the issue. But off course, I do not mention from
radio hobby around the world. A whole issue of commercial ads in ANTENTOP. It allows me to do the
ANTENTOP may be photocopied, printed, pasted magazine in most great way, allows to pay some money
onto websites. We don't want to control this process. for authors to compensate their hard work. I have lots
It comes from all of us, and thus it belongs to all of interesting stuff in Russian, and owners of the stuff
us. This doesn't mean that there are no copyrights. agree to publish the stuff in ANTENTOP but I have no
There is! Any work is copyrighted by the author. All enough time to translate the interesting stuff in English,
rights to a particular work are reserved by the author. however I may pay money to translators, and they will do
Copyright Note: Dear friends, please, note, I this work, and we will see lots interesting articles there.
respect Copyright. Always, when I want to use some
stuff for ANTENTOP, I ask owners about it. But So, if you want to put a commercial advertisement in
sometimes my efforts are failed. I have some very ANTENTOP, please contact with me. A commercial
advertisement will do ANTENTOP even greater
interesting stuff from closed websites, but I can not
go to touch with their owners as well as I have no interesting and various! I hope, readers do not mention
response on some my emails from some owners. against such commercial ads.
BEWARE: