Chap2 Magee
Chap2 Magee
Chap2 Magee
84
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 85
Temporal bone
Frontal sinus
Ethmoid bone
Concavity for Sphenoid bone
pituitary gland
Nasal septum
Occipital bone
Hard palate
Foramen magnum
Sphenoid sinus
A Mandible
Frontal bone
Parietal bone
Zygomatic bone
Maxilla
Mandible
B
Parietal bone
Frontal bone
Figure 2-1 Bones of the head and face. A, Interior view. B, Anterior view. C, Lateral view. (Redrawn from Jenkins DB: Hollinsheads functional
anatomy of the limbs and back, Philadelphia, 1991, WB Saunders, pp. 332333.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
86 Chapter 2 Head and Face
of the helix and lobule around the outside and the (anvil), and stapes (stirrup)to the cochlea. The cochlea,
triangular fossa, antihelix, concha, tragus (a cartilaginous which is part of the inner ear, transmits the sound waves
projection anterior to external auditory meatus), and anti- to the vestibulocochlear nerve (cranial nerve VIII), which
tragus on the inside (Figure 2-7). The middle ear struc- transmits electrical impulses to the brain for interpreta-
tures consist of the tympanic membrane, or eardrum, tion. The semicircular canals, the other part of the inner
which vibrates when sound hits it and sends vibrations ear, play a significant role in maintaining balance.
through the ossiclescalled the malleus (hammer), incus The external nose, like the external ear, consists pri-
marily of cartilage covered with skin. However, its proxi-
mal portion contains bone covered with skin. Figure 2-8
shows the bone and cartilage makeup of the nose. The
floor of the nose consists of the hard and soft palates and
forms the roof of the mouth (Figure 2-9). Cartilage and
the nasal, frontal, ethmoid, and sphenoid bones form the
roof of the nose. The frontal and maxillary bones form
Frontal sinus the nasal bridge. Three bony structures called turbinates
(superior, middle, and inferior) form the lateral aspects of
the nose, which increase the surface area of the nose and
Ethmoid sinus
thereby warm, humidify, and filter more of the inspired
air. The nose is divided into two chambers (vestibules)
Maxillary sinus by a septum. These chambers are lined with a mucous
membrane containing hairs that collect debris and other
foreign substances from the inspired air. The cribriform
plate of the ethmoid bone contains the sensory fibers of
the olfactory nerve (cranial nerve I) for smell.
PATIENT HISTORY
Figure 2-2 The nasal sinuses. (Modified from Swartz HM: Textbook In addition to the questions listed under Patient History
of physical diagnosis, Philadelphia, 1989, WB Saunders, p. 166.) in Chapter 1, the examiner should obtain the following
TABLE 2-1
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 87
TABLE 2-1
Adapted from Hollinshead WH, Jenkins DB: Functional anatomy of the limbs and back, Philadelphia, 1981, WB Saunders, p. 358; and Reid DC:
Sports injury assessment and rehabilitation, New York, 1992, Churchill Livingstone, p. 860.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
88 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Lacrimal gland
Superior oblique
Superior rectus Puncta
Medial rectus
Lateral rectus Tear sac
Inferior rectus
Inferior oblique
Nasolacrimal duct
Canaliculi
A
Elevation
Extorsion Intorsion
Figure 2-5 The lacrimal apparatus. (Modified from Swartz HM: Text-
book of physical diagnosis, Philadelphia, 1989, WB Saunders, p. 126.)
Abduction Adduction
B Depression
Figure 2-4 Muscles (A) and movements (B) of the eye. (Modified from
Swartz HM: Textbook of physical diagnosis, Philadelphia, 1989, WB
Saunders, pp. 125126.)
Figure 2-6 Cross section of the eye. (Modified from Swartz HM: Textbook of physical diagnosis, Philadelphia, 1989, WB Saunders, p. 132.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 89
Malleus Temporal
bone
Incus
Antihelix
Helix (lobe)
Tragus AURICLE
Cochlea (PINNA)
Stapes Antitragus
Eustachian tube
Lobule
Eardrum
(tympanic membrane)
External auditory meatus
or canal
Figure 2-7 A cross-sectional view through the ear.
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Intraventricular hemorrhage
Apex (tip)
Skull fracture
Penetrating brain injury
Ala nasi Greater alar cartilage
Modified from Jordan BD: Brain injury in boxing. Clin Sports Med 28:561578,
External naris (nostril) 2009.
Philtrum
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
90 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Frontal sinus
Cribriform plate of ethmoid
Nasal bone
Sphenoid sinus
Septal cartilage
Turbinates (superior,
middle, and inferior)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 91
Point of Point of
maximum injury injury Impact
Direction
of head
Direction Direction
of head of head
Impact
TABLE 2-4
Data from Vegso JJ, Torg JS: Field evaluation and management of intracranial injuries. In Torg JS, editor: Athletic injuries to the head, neck and
face, St Louis, 1991, Mosby, pp. 226227.
*These signs and symptoms should only be used as a guide in acute situations.
pre-participation evaluation and have an extensive evaluation method for concussion by including mea-
concussion history taken covering somatic, neurobe- sures of orientation, immediate memory, concentra-
havioral, and cognitive symptoms (Table 2-8).3,12,2126 tion, delayed recall, and other parameters. Lovell and
In 2012, the International Conference on Concus- Burke have developed a similar form for ice hockey.29
sion in Sport updated a Sideline Concussion Assess- These tests are often combined with computerized
ment Tool3rd edition (SCAT3) (Figure 2-11) and neurocognitive testing to try to predict how long
added the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool recovery will take.30,31 Ideally, this neurocognitive
for children ages 5 to 12 years (Child-SCAT3)8 testing should be done individually at preseason
(Figure 2-12). Kelly and Rosenberg12,13 have devel- evaluations to establish a baseline and should be
oped a Standardized Assessment of Concussion updated every 2 years.32,33 If pre-injury values are
(SAC) (Figure 2-13),27,28 which provides a concise not available, normative data may be used.34 An
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
92 Chapter 2 Head and Face
TABLE 2-5
Modified from McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Johnston K, etal: Consensus statement on concussion in sportThe 3rd International Conference on
Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2008. Clin J Sport Med 19(3):189, 2009.
TABLE 2-6
Modified from Sedney CL, Orphanos J, Bailes JE: When to consider retiring an athlete after sports-related concussion. Clin Sports Med 30(1):189
200, 2011.
MTBI, Mild traumatic brain injury.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 93
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
94 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Figure 2-11 Sport Concussion Assessment Tool3rd edition (SCAT3). ( 2013 Concussion in Sport Group. Br J Sports Med 47:259262,
2013.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 95
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
96 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 97
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
98 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Figure 2-12 Sport Concussion Assessment Tool for children ages 5 to 12 years (Child-SCAT3). ( 2013 Concussion in Sport Group. Br J
Sports Med 47:263266, 2013.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 99
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
100 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 101
z
n v
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
102 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Figure 2-13 Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC). (Redrawn from McCrea M, Kelly JP, Kluge J, etal: Standard assessment of concus-
sion in football players. Neurology 48[3]:586588, 1997.)
injuries every 15 to 30 minutes. Manzi and Weaver may experience mild tinnitus (ringing in the ears),
reported that a patient who had sustained a period mild dizziness, and a dull headache with some disori-
of posttraumatic amnesia of less than 60 minutes was entation. Dizziness at the time of injury has been
considered to have sustained a mild head injury.44 If reported to be a sign of risk for protracted recovery.45
the period of posttraumatic amnesia lasted from 1 to The patient who experienced a grade II concussion
24 hours, moderate head injury was considered to may also develop a post-concussion syndrome (i.e.,
have occurred. If the posttraumatic amnesia lasted have continual neurological problems after the con-
for more than 1 week, the patient was considered to cussion), which is observed in about 10% of concus-
have sustained a serious head injury. If the duration sion cases. The signs and symptoms of this syndrome
of the posttraumatic amnesia was more than 7 days, include persistent headaches, especially with exertion;
full return to neurological function was highly inability to concentrate; and irritability. The symp-
unlikely.44 With a grade II concussion, the patient toms may last from several weeks to several years.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 103
TABLE 2-9
From Durand P, Adamson GJ: On-the-field management of athletic head injuries, J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:194, 2004. Adapted with permission
from Macciocchi SN, Barth JT, Littlefield LM: Outcome after mild head injury. Clin Sports Med 17:2736, 1998.
GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; LOC, loss of consciousness; PTA, posttraumatic amnesia.
TABLE 2-10
Data from Maroon JC, Lovell MR, Norwig J, etal: Cerebral concussion in athletes: evaluation and neurophysiological testing. Neurosurg 47:659
672, 2000.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
104 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 105
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
106 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
TABLE 2-14
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
facial nerves
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Eye disorders None Generalized Intensify with Entire During None Impairment Cornea, iris, or Possible Diminished
discomfort sustained cranium and after of eye intraocular vision,
in or around visual effort visual function pain sensitivity to
the eyes effort light
Sinus, ear, and None Dull, persistent Variable Frontal, Variable None Infection, Blockage, None
Chapter 2 Head and Face
Modified from Esposito CJ, Grim GA, Binkley TK: Headaches: a differential diagnosis. J Craniomand Pract 4:320321, 1986.
108 Chapter 2 Head and Face
1. How would you rate the usual pain of your headache on a scale from 0 to 10?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 WORST
NO PAIN
PAIN
NEVER 19% 1019% 2029% 3039% 4049% 5059% 6069% 7079% 8089%90100% ALWAYS
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3. On how many days in the last month did you actually lie down for an hour or more because
of your headaches?
NONE 13 46 79 1012 1315 1618 1921 2224 2527 2831 EVERY DAY
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4. When you have a headache, how often do you miss work or school for all or part of the day?
NEVER 19% 1019% 2029% 3039% 4049% 5059% 6069% 7079% 8089% 90100% ALWAYS
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. When you have a headache while you work (or school), how much is your ability to work reduced?
NOT 19% 1019% 2029% 3039% 4049% 5059% 6069% 7079% 8089% 90100% UNABLE
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TO WORK
REDUCED
6. How many days in the last month have you been kept from performing housework or chores
for at least half of the day because of your headaches?
NONE 13 46 79 1012 1315 1618 1921 2224 2527 2831 EVERY DAY
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. When you have a headache, how much is your ability to perform housework or chores reduced?
NOT 19% 1019% 2029% 3039% 4049% 5059% 6069% 7079% 8089% 90100% UNABLE
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TO PERFORM
REDUCED
8. How many days in the last month have you been kept from non-work activities (family, social
or recreational) because of your headaches?
NONE 13 46 79 1012 1315 1618 1921 2224 2527 2831 EVERY DAY
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
9. When you have a headache, how much is your ability to engage in non-work activities (family,
social or recreational) reduced?
NOT 19% 1019% 2029% 3039% 4049% 5059% 6069% 7079% 8089% 90100% UNABLE
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TO PERFORM
REDUCED
Figure 2-14 Headache Disability Questionnaire. (From Niere K, Quin A: Development of a headache-specific disability questionnaire for patients
attending physiotherapy. Man Ther 14:4551, 2009.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 109
ability. In addition, the examiner can ask the patient TABLE 2-15
to name several important people from the present
Common Visual Eye Symptoms and Disease States
in reverse chronological order (e.g., the last three
presidents of the United States) or to give the names Visual Symptom Associated Causes
of some familiar capital cities. Finally, the patient Loss of vision Optic neuritis
should be tested on his or her ability to comprehend Detached retina
abstract relations. For example, the examiner may Retinal hemorrhage
quote a common proverb, such as A bird in the Central retinal vascular
hand is worth two in the bush, and then ask the occlusion
patient to explain what the expression means. Patients Spots No pathological significance*
with organic mental impairment and certain patients Flashes Migraine
with schizophrenia may give a concrete answer, Retinal detachment
failing to recognize the abstract principle involved.44 Posterior vitreous detachment
Loss of visual field or Retinal detachment
The ability to conceptualize, abstract, plan ahead,
presence of shadows Retinal hemorrhage
and formulate rational judgments of problems or
or curtains
events is largely a function of the frontal lobes. Glare, photophobia Iritis (inflammation of the iris)
15. Can the patient talk normally? Patients with lesions Meningitis (inflammation of
of the parietal lobe have difficulty communicating the meninges)
and understanding what is occurring around them. Distortion of vision Retinal detachment
Dysarthria indicates defects in articulation, enuncia- Macular edema
tion, or rhythm of speech. It usually results from Difficulty seeing in dim Myopia
extraneural problems, such as poor-fitting dentures, light Vitamin A deficiency
malformation of the oral structures, or impairment of Retinal degeneration
the musculature of the tongue, palate, pharynx, or Colored haloes around Acute narrow angle glaucoma
lips because of incoordination, weakness, or abnor- lights Opacities in lens or cornea
Colored vision changes Cataracts
mal innervation. It is characterized by slurring, slow-
Drugs (digitalis increases
ness of speech, indistinct speech, and breaks in normal yellow vision)
speech rhythm. Dysphonia is a disorder of vocaliza- Double vision Extraocular muscle paresis or
tion characterized by the abnormal production of paralysis
sounds from the larynx. Dysphonia is usually caused
by various abnormalities of the larynx itself or of its From Swartz MH: Textbook of physical diagnosis, Philadelphia, 1989,
innervation. The principal complaint of dysphonia is WB Saunders, p. 132.
hoarseness, ranging from mild roughness of the voice *May precede a retinal detachment or be associated with fertility drugs.
to an inability to produce sound. Dysphasia denotes
the inability to use and understand written and
spoken words as a result of disorders involving corti- something is affecting the free movement of the eyes
cal centers of speech or their interconnections in (Tables 2-15 and 2-16).
the dominant cerebral hemisphere. With all of these 18. Does the patient wear glasses or contact lenses? If the
conditions, the peripheral mechanisms for speech patient wears glasses, are the lenses treated (hard-
remain intact. ened) or made of polycarbonate? If they are hard-
16. Does the patient have any allergies, or is the patient ened, how long ago were they treated? If the patient
receiving any medication? Allergies may affect the wears contact lenses, are they hard, soft, or extended-
eyes and nose, as may medications. Medications wear lenses? Did the patient wear eye protectors? If
themselves may mask some symptoms. so, what type were they? Are the patients eyes water-
17. Is the patient having any problems with the eyes? Mon- ing? Is there any pain in the eyes? Small perforating
ocular diplopia (blurred vision when looking with injuries may be painless. If the patient complains of
one eye) may result from hyphema, a detached lens, flashes of bright light, a curtain falling in front of
or other trauma to the globe of the eye.57 Binocular the eye, or floating black specks, these findings may
diplopia (blurred vision when looking through both indicate retinal detachment. These questions tell the
eyes) occurs in 10% to 40% of patients with a zygoma examiner whether the eyewear or eyes need to be
fracture. It may be caused by soft-tissue entrapment, examined in greater detail.
neuromuscular injury (intraorbital or intramuscular), 19. Is the patient having any problem with hearing? Does
hemorrhage, or edema. It disappears when one eye the patient complain of an earache? If so, when was
is closed. Double vision, which occurs when the good the onset, and what is the duration of the earache?
eye is closed, indicates that some structure of the Does the patient complain of pain or a discharge
eye is injured. If it occurs with both eyes open, from the ear? Is the earache associated with an upper
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
110 Chapter 2 Head and Face
TABLE 2-16 much, how often, and for how long? Does the patient
have any nasal discharge, and if so, is its character
Common Nonvisual Eye Symptoms and Disease States
watery, mucoid, purulent, crusty, or bloody? Does
Nonvisual Symptom Associated Causes the discharge have any odor (indicative of infection),
Itching Dry eyes and is it unilateral or bilateral? Does the patient
Eye fatigue exhibit any associated nasal symptoms, such as sneez-
Allergies ing, nasal congestion, itching, or mouth breathing?
Tearing Emotional states Does the patient complain of a nosebleed, and has
Hypersecretion of tears the patient had many nosebleeds? If so, how frequent
Blockage of drainage are the nosebleeds, what is the amount of the bleed-
Dryness Sjgren syndrome ing, and what appears to be causing the bleeding?
Decreased secretion as a result Positive responses to any of these questions indicate
of aging that the nose must be examined in greater detail.
Sandiness, grittiness Conjunctivitis
21. If the examiner is concerned about the mouth and
Fullness of eyes Proptosis (bulging of the
teeth or the temporomandibular joints, questions
eyeball)
Aging changes in the lids related to these areas can be found in Chapter 4. It
Twitching Fibrillation of orbicularis oculi is important, however, to ensure that the patients
Eyelid heaviness Fatigue dental occlusion and biting alignment have not been
Lid edema altered. Are all the teeth present, and are they sym-
Dizziness Refractive error metrical? Is there any swelling or bleeding around the
Cerebellar disease teeth? Are the teeth mobile, or is part of a tooth
Blinking Local irritation missing? Is the pulp exposed? Each of these questions
Facial tic helps determine whether the teeth have been injured.
Lids sticking together Inflammatory disease of lids or Teeth that have been avulsed, if intact, should be
conjunctivae reimplanted as quickly as possible. If reimplanted
Foreign body sensation Foreign body
after cleansing (rinsed in saline solution or water)
Corneal abrasion
within less than 30 minutes, the tooth has a 90%
Burning Uncorrected refractive error
Conjunctivitis chance of being retained. If it is not possible to reim-
Sjgren syndrome plant the tooth, it should be kept moist in saline, or
Throbbing, aching Acute iritis (inflammation of the patient should keep it between the gum and
the iris) cheek while dental care is sought.
Sinusitis (inflammation of the 22. Questions concerning the neck and cervical spine can
sinuses) be found in Chapter 3.
Tenderness Lid inflammations
Conjunctivitis
Iritis OBSERVATION
Headache Refractive errors
For proper observation5861 of the head and face, any hat,
Migraine
helmet, mouth guard, or face guard should be removed.
Sinusitis
Drawing sensation Uncorrected refractive errors If a neck injury is suspected or if the patient presents an
emergency situation, the examiner may take the time to
From Swartz MH: Textbook of physical diagnosis, Philadelphia, 1989,
remove only those items that are interfering with immedi-
WB Saunders, p. 133. ate emergency care. If a neck injury is suspected, extreme
caution should be observed when removing the item.
When assessing the head and face, the examiner must also
observe and assess the posture of the cervical spine and
respiratory tract infection, swimming, or trauma? The the temporomandibular joints; see Chapters 3 and 4 for
patient should also be questioned on his or her detailed descriptions of observation of these areas.
method of cleaning the ear. If there appears to be a When observing the head and face, it is essential that
hearing loss, the patient should be asked whether the the examiner look at the face to note the position and
hearing loss came on quickly or slowly, whether the shape of the eyes, nose, mouth, teeth, and ears and look
patient hears best on the telephone (amplified sound) for deformity, asymmetry, facial imbalance, swelling, lac-
or in a quiet or noisy environment, and whether erations, foreign bodies, or bleeding during rest, with
speech is heard soft or loud. Does the patient use a movement, or with different facial expressions.62 One
hearing aid? should also note, as much as possible, the individuals
20. Is the patient having any problems with the nose? Has normal facial expression. A patients facial expression
the patient used nose drops or spray? If so, how often reflects the patients general feeling and well-being.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 111
A dazed or vacant look often indicates problems. While tissues (such as, the eyelids, eyebrows, cheeks, lips, nose,
talking to the patient, the examiner should watch for any and chin) should be inspected for lacerations, bruising,
asymmetry of facial motion or change in facial expression or hematoma (Figures 2-16 and 2-17). The eyes should
when the patient answers; slight facial asymmetry is be level. For example, a zygoma fracture causes the eye
common. In addition, small degrees of paralysis may not on the affected side to drop (Figure 2-18). The two eyes
be obvious unless one attempts an exaggerated expres- should be compared for prominence or retraction (Figure
sion. If some facial paralysis is suspected, the examiner 2-19). If there appears to be any bulging, especially uni-
should ask the patient to make exaggerated facial expres- laterally, the examiner should tilt the patients head
sions that will demonstrate the paralysis. If facial asym- forward or back and, looking from above, compare each
metry is present, one should note whether all of the cornea with the lid below, noting whether one or both
features on one side of the face are affected or only a corneas bulge beyond the lid margins. If one or both eyes
portion of the face is affected. For example, with facial appear to bulge, the examiner can use a pocket ruler to
nerve (cranial nerve VII) paralysis, the entire side of the roughly measure the distance from the angle of the eye
face is affected, although the most noticeable differences to the corneal apex.
will occur around one eye and one side of the mouth. If Immediate referral for further examination by a spe-
only one side of the mouth is involved, then a problem cialist is required for an embedded corneal foreign body;
with the trigeminal nerve (cranial nerve V) should haze or blood in the anterior chamber (hyphema);
be suspected. Any changes in the shape of the face or decreased or partial vision; irregular, asymmetric, or poor
unusual features (such as, masses, edema, puffiness, pupil action; diplopia or double vision; laceration of the
coarseness, prominent eyes, amount of facial hair, exces- eyelid or impaired lid function; perforation or laceration
sive perspiration, or skin color) should be noted. Eye of the globe; broken contact lens or shattered eyeglass in
puffiness is often one of the earliest signs of edema in the the eye; unexplained eye pain that is stabbing or deep and
face. Skin color may include cyanosis, pallor, jaundice, or throbbing; blurred vision that does not clear with blink-
pigmentation, and each may be indicative of different ing; loss of all or part of the visual field; protrusion of one
systemic problems. eye relative to the other; an injured eye that does not
The examiner should view the patient from the front, move as fully as the uninjured eye; or abnormal pupil size
side, behind, and above, noting the area behind the ears, or shape. A teardrop pupil usually indicates iris entrap-
at the hairline, and around the crown of the head as well ment in a corneal or scleral laceration. In addition, the
as on the face (Figure 2-15). An examiner who suspects eyes should be observed from the lateral aspect. The
a skull (cranial vault) injury should look behind the ears, normal distance from the cornea to the angle of the eye
at the hairline, and around the crown of the head for any is 16mm or less. The distances between the upper and
deformity, bruising, or laceration. lower lids should be the same for both eyes. When the
Viewing from the front, the examiner should observe eyes open, the superior eyelid should cover a portion of
the patients hairline, noting any abnormalities. The soft the iris but not the pupil itself. If it covers more of the
A B C
Figure 2-15 Views of the head and face. A, Anterior. B, Side. C, Posterior.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
112 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Figure 2-19 A severe glancing or direct blow to this right eye has
resulted in a ruptured globe. Note the depressed eye. (From Pashby TJ,
Pashby RC: Treatment of sports eye injuries. In Schneider RC, etal,
editors: Sports injuries: mechanisms, prevention and treatment, Balti-
more, 1985, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins p. 589.)
Figure 2-17 Contusion to the forehead caused by a racquetball ball. Figure 2-20 Black eye (periorbital ecchymosis).
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 113
A B
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
114 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 115
Figure 2-24 Fracture of the neck of the condyle on the right (upper
arrows) with fracture through the mandible on the same side (lower
arrow). When one fracture is shown in the mandible, search carefully
for the second. (From ODonoghue DH: Treatment of injuries to
athletes, Philadelphia, 1984, WB Saunders, p. 115.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
116 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Figure 2-29 View of the patient from above to look for bilateral sym-
metry of the face.
looking for a possible fracture of the zygoma (Figure temporomandibular joints, and these joints are discussed
2-30). The deformity is easier to detect if the examiner in Chapter 4.
carefully places the index fingers below the infraorbital
margins along the zygomatic bodies and then gently
Examination of the Head
pushes into the edema to reduce the effect of the edema
(Figure 2-31). Many problems in the head and face may be problems
referred from the cervical spine, temporomandibular
joint, or teeth. However, if one suspects a head injury, it
EXAMINATION is necessary to keep a close watch on the patient, noting
The examination of the head and face differs from any changes and when these changes occur. The examiner
the orthopedic assessment of other areas of the body should implement a Neural Watch so that any changes
because the assessment does not involve joints. The only that occur over time can be determined easily (Table
joints that could be included in the assessment are the 2-17). The testing should occur at 15- or 30-minute
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 117
Facial asymmetry
Loss of cheek prominence
Palpable steps
Infraorbital rim (zygomaticomaxillary suture)
(zygomaticotemporal suture)
Hypoesthesia/anesthesia Figure 2-31 Method of assessing posterior displacement of the zygo-
Cheek, side of nose, upper lip, and teeth on the injured side
matic complex from behind the patient. The examiner should firmly but
carefully depress the fingers into the edematous soft tissues while palpat-
Compression of the infraorbital nerve as it courses along the
ing along the infraorbital areas. (Modified from Ellis E: Fractures of the
floor of the orbit to exit into the face via the foramen beneath zygomatic complex and arch. In Fonseca RJ, Walker RV, editors: Oral
the orbital rim and maxillofacial trauma, Philadelphia, 1991, WB Saunders, p. 443.)
TABLE 2-17
Modified from American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: Athletic training and sports medicine, Park Ridge, IL, 1984, AAOS, p. 399.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
118 Chapter 2 Head and Face
TABLE 2-18
Modified from McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, etal: Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on
Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med 47(5):250258, 2013.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 119
TABLE 2-19
Modified from Warren WL, Bailes JE, Cantu RC: Guidelines for safe return to play after athletic head and neck injuries. In Cantu RC, editor:
Neurologic athletic head and spine injuries, Philadelphia, 2000, WB Saunders.
CT, Computed tomography.
by vomiting (sometimes projectile vomiting). Finally, an It is important when examining the unconscious or
expanding intracranial lesion causes increased weakness conscious patient for a possible head injury to determine
on the side of the body opposite that on which the lesion the individuals level of consciousness, which may be
has occurred. determined using the Glasgow Coma Scale (Table
Signs and symptoms that indicate a good possibility of 2-20). The first test relates to eye opening. Eye opening
recovery from a head injury, especially after the patient may occur spontaneously, in response to speech, or in
experiences unconsciousness, include response to noxious response to pain, or there may be no response at all. Each
stimuli, eye opening, pupil activity, spontaneous eye of these responses is given a numerical value: spontaneous
movement, intact oculovestibular reflexes, and appropri- eye opening, 4; response to speech, 3; response to pain,
ate motor function responses. Neurological signs that 2; and no response, 1. Spontaneous opening of the eyes
indicate a poor prognosis after a head injury include non- indicates functioning of the ascending reticular activating
reactive pupils, absence of oculovestibular reflexes, severe system. This finding does not necessarily mean that the
extension patterns or no motor function response at all, patient is aware of the surroundings or of what is happen-
and increased intracranial pressure.44 ing, but it does imply that the patient is in a state of
arousal. A patient who opens his or her eyes in response
to the examiners voice is probably responding to the
stimulus of sound, not necessarily to the command to
open the eyes. If unsure, the examiner may use different
Signs and Symptoms of an Expanding sound-making objects (e.g., bell, horn) to elicit an appro-
Intracranial Lesion priate response.
The second test involves motor response; the patient
Altered state of consciousness is given a grade of 6 if there is a response to a verbal
Nystagmus command. Otherwise, the patient is graded on a 5-point
Pupil inequality
scale depending on the motor response to a painful stimu-
Irregular eye movements
Abnormal slowing of heart
lus (see Table 2-20). When scoring motor responses, it is
Irregular respiration the ease with which the motor responses are elicited that
Severe headache constitutes the criterion for the best response. Commands
Intractable vomiting given to the patient should be simple, such as, Move
Positive expanding intracranial lesion tests (lateralizing) your arm. The patient should not be asked to squeeze
Positive coordination tests the examiners hand, nor should the examiner place
Decreasing muscle strength something in the patients hand and then ask the patient
Seizure to grasp it. This action may cause a reflex grasp, not a
response to a command.44
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
120 Chapter 2 Head and Face
TABLE 2-20
*The Glasgow Coma Scale, which is based on eye opening and verbal and motor responses, is a practical means of monitoring changes in level of
consciousness. If responses on the scale are given numerical grades, the overall responsiveness of the patient can be expressed in a score that is the
summation of the grades. The lowest score is 3, and the highest is 15.
If the patient does not give a motor response to a Decerebrate posturing, which has a poorer prognosis,
verbal command, then the examiner should attempt to involves extension, adduction, and hyperpronation of the
elicit a motor response to a painful stimulus. It is the type arms, whereas the lower limbs are the same as for decor-
and quality of the patients reaction to the painful stimu- ticate posturing.78 Decerebrate rigidity is usually bilateral.
lus that constitute the scoring criteria. The stimulus If the patient exhibits no reaction to the painful stimulus,
should not be applied to the face, because painful stimu- a value of 1 is given. It is important to be sure the no
lus in the facial area may cause the eyes to close tightly response is caused by a head injury and not a spinal cord
as a protective reaction. The painful stimulus may consist injury leading to lack of feeling or sensation. Any differ-
of applying a knuckle to the sternum, squeezing the tra- ence in reaction between limbs should be carefully noted;
pezius muscle, or squeezing the soft tissue between the this finding may indicate a specific focal injury.44
thumb and index finger (Figure 2-32). If the patient In the third test, verbal response is graded on a 5-
moves a limb when the painful stimulus is applied to more point scale to measure the patients speech in response to
than one point or tries to remove the examiners hand simple questions, such as Where are you? or Are you
that is applying the painful stimulus, the patient is local- winning the game? For verbal responses, the patient who
izing, and a value of 5 is given. If the patient withdraws converses appropriately and shows proper orientation,
from the painful stimulus rapidly, a normal reflex with- being aware of oneself and the environment, is given a
drawal is being shown, and a value of 4 is given. grade of 5. The patient who is confused is disoriented
However, if application of a painful stimulus creates and unable to completely interact with the environment;
a decorticate or decerebrate posture (Figure 2-33), an this patient is able to converse using the appropriate
abnormal response is being demonstrated, and a value of words and is given a grade of 4. The patient exhibiting
3 is given for the decorticate posture (injury above red inappropriate speech is unable to sustain a conversation
nucleus) or a value of 2 is given for decerebrate posture with the examiner; this person would be given a grade of
(brain stem injury). Decorticate posturing results 3. A vocalizing patient only groans or makes incompre-
from lesions of the diencephalon area, whereas decere- hensible sounds; this finding leads to a grade of 2. Again,
brate posturing results from lesions of the midbrain. the examiner should note any possible mechanical reason
With decorticate posturing, the arms, wrists, and fingers for the inability to verbalize. If the patient makes no
are flexed, the upper limbs are adducted, and the legs sounds and thus has no verbal response, a grade of 1 is
are extended, medially rotated, and plantar flexed. assigned.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 121
A B
C D
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
122 Chapter 2 Head and Face
TABLE 2-21
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 123
Figure 2-35 Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. Examiner adds up only error points, not positive responses. For example, if patient remem-
bers the first name but not the last name, he or she would get 1 error point. (Modified from Levin HS, ODonnell VM, Grossman RG: The
Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test: a practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. J Nerve Ment Dis 167[11]:677, 1979.)
patient to bring the finger to the nose or the heel of the and hands on iliac crests. The examiner counts the number
foot to the opposite knee with the eyes closed (Figure of errors for each test (Table 2-22). Provided one has a
2-36). The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) has baseline score, a score of three or more errors than base-
been developed as an objective test for balance. The test line indicates balance impairment.25,7982 These tests and
has six partsthree on a solid floor and three on a foam others described under Special Tests assess balance and
surface (Figure 2-37). On each surface, three progressive coordination.
stances are attempted: double leg stance, single leg stance, Muscle tone and strength may also play a role in assess-
and heel-to-toe tandem stance. Each of the six stances is ing the patient for head injury. Increased unilateral muscle
evaluated for 20 seconds with the patient closing the eyes tone usually implies contralateral cerebral peduncle
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
124 Chapter 2 Head and Face
A
Facial Examination
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 125
A B C
D E F
Figure 2-37 Stances for the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS). A, Double leg stance on a solid floor. B, Single leg stance on a solid floor.
C, Heal to toe tandem stance on a solid floor. D, Double leg stance on a foam surface. E, Single leg stance on a foam surface. F, Heel to toe
tandem stance on a foam surface.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
126 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Fracture
line
A
A
Fracture
line
B
Stabilize Fracture
line
C
Figure 2-40 Le Fort fractures. A, Le Fort I. B, Le Fort II. C, Le
Fort III.
Uneven line
of teeth
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 127
Eye Examination
Figure 2-42 An orange halo will form around the blood on a gauze pad
if cerebrospinal fluid is present.
examiner asks the patient to move through the six cardi-
nal positions of gaze (Figure 2-43). The examiner holds
the patients chin steady with one hand and asks the
eardrum has not been perforated, blood may be visible patient to follow the examiners other hand while the
behind it. Skull fractures may also result in blurred or examiner traces a large H in the air. The examiner
double vision, loss of smell (anosmia), dizziness, tinnitus, should hold the index finger or pencil approximately
and nausea and vomiting as well as signs and symptoms 25cm (10 inches) from the patients nose. From the
of concussion. Orbital floor fractures or dislocations are midline, the finger or pencil is moved approximately
often accompanied by anesthesia of the skin in the midface 30cm (12 inches) to the patients right and held. It is
or anesthesia of the cheek, lip, maxillary teeth, and then moved up approximately 20cm (8 inches) and held,
gingiva.84 Zygoma fractures are detected by observation moved down 40cm (16 inches) (20cm relative to
(see Figure 2-31). They may also cause unilateral epi- midline) and held, and moved slowly back to midline.
staxis, double vision, and anesthesia and be associated The same movement is repeated on the other side. The
with eye injuries. Mouth opening may also be affected. examiner should observe movement of both eyes, noting
After major trauma has been ruled out, the examiner whether the eyes follow the finger or pencil smoothly.
may test the muscles of the face (Table 2-23) especially The examiner should also observe any parallel movement
if injury to these structures is suspected. Excluding the of the eyes in all directions. If the eyes do not move in
temporomandibular joint, the muscles of the face are dif- unison or if only one eye moves, something is affecting
ferent from most muscles in that they move the skin and the action of the muscles. One of the most common
soft tissues rather than joints. For example, the frontalis causes of one eyes not moving after trauma to the eye is
muscle may be weak if the eyebrows do not raise sym- a blowout fracture of the orbital floor (Figure 2-44).
metrically. The corrugator muscle draws the eyebrows Because the inferior muscles become caught in the
medially and downward (frowning). The orbicularis oris fracture site, the affected eye demonstrates limited move-
muscle approximates and compresses the lips, whereas the ment (Figure 2-45), especially upward. The patient with
zygomaticus muscles raise the lateral angle of the mouth this type of fracture may also demonstrate depression of
(smiling). the eye globe, blurred vision, double vision, and conjunc-
tival hemorrhage.
Occasionally, when looking to the extreme side, the
Examination of the Eye5962
eyes will develop a rhythmic motion called end-point nys-
If the eyelids are swollen shut, the examiner should tagmus. Nystagmus is a rhythmic movement of the eyes
initially assume that the globe has been ruptured. A with an abnormal slow drifting away from fixation and
penetrating wound of the eyelid should be assessed care- rapid return. With end-point nystagmus, there is a quick
fully, because it may be associated with a globe injury. motion in the direction of the gaze followed by a slow
The examiner should not force the eyelid open, because return. This test differentiates end-point nystagmus from
intraocular pressure can force extrusion of the ocular pathological nystagmus, in which there is a quick move-
contents if the globe has been ruptured. The patient ment of the eyes in the same direction regardless of gaze.
should also be instructed not to squeeze the eyelids tight, Pathological nystagmus exists in the region of full binocu-
because this action can increase the intraocular pressure lar vision, not just at the periphery. Cerebellar nystagmus
from a normal value of 15mm Hg up to approximately is greater when the eyes are deviated toward the side of
70mm Hg. the lesion.
To examine the normal functioning of the eye muscles While testing the cardinal positions, the examiner
and several of the cranial nerves (II, III, IV, and VI), the should also watch for lid lag. Normally, the upper lid
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
128 Chapter 2 Head and Face
TABLE 2-23
Adapted from Liebgott B: The anatomical basis of dentistry, St Louis, 1986, Mosby, pp. 242243.
Inferior Superior Superior Inferior covers the top of the iris, rising when the patient looks
oblique, rectus, rectus, rectus,
CN III CN III CN III CN III
up and quickly lowering as the eye lowers. With lid lag,
the upper lid delays lowering as the eye lowers.
Medial
Peripheral vision, or the visual field (peripheral limits
rectus,
CN III of vision), can be tested with the confrontation test
Lateral Lateral (Figure 2-46). The patient is asked to cover the right eye
rectus, rectus, while the examiner covers his or her own left eye so that
CN VI CN VI the open eyes of the examiner and of the patient are
directly opposite each other. While the examiner and the
Superior Inferior Inferior Superior patient look into each others eye, the examiner fully
oblique, rectus, rectus, oblique, extends his or her right arm to the side, midway between
CN IV CN III CN III CN IV the patient and the examiner, and then moves it toward
Figure 2-43 The six cardinal fields of gaze, showing eye muscles and them with the fingers waving. The patient tells the exam-
cranial nerves involved in the movement. iner when he or she first sees the moving fingers. The
examiner then compares the patients response with
the time or distance at which the examiner first noted the
fingers. The test is then repeated to the other side.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 129
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
130 Chapter 2 Head and Face
A B C
Figure 2-47 Eversion of the eyelid. A, Grasping eyelash. B, Putting moistened cotton-tipped applicator over eyelid. C, Everting eyelid over the
cotton-tipped applicator.
Figure 2-48 A lower lid laceration (arrow). (From Pashby TJ, Pashby
RC: Treatment of sports eye injuries. In Schneider RC, etal, editors:
Sports injuries: mechanisms, prevention and treatment, Baltimore,
1985, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, p. 576.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 131
Cornea
Anterior chamber
Iris
Lens
Normal angle
Narrow angle
Figure 2-51 Normal and narrow corneal angle (depth of anterior
chamber). (Modified from Swartz HM: Textbook of physical diagnosis,
Philadelphia, 1989, WB Saunders, p. 144.)
B
Figure 2-50 Corneal abrasion. A, Without fluorescein. B, With fluo-
rescein. (From Torg JS: Athletic injuries to the head, neck and face,
Philadelphia, 1982, Lea & Febiger, p. 262.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
132 Chapter 2 Head and Face
A B
Figure 2-53 Cover-uncover test for mild ocular deviation. As patient gazes at a specific point (A), examiner covers one eye and looks for move-
ment in uncovered eye (B).
who wears glasses or contact lenses should be tested both If available, a nasal speculum and light may be used to
without and with the corrective lenses. The test is done inspect the nasal cavity. The nasal mucosa and turbinates
quickly so that the patient cannot memorize the chart. can be inspected for color, foreign bodies, and abnormal
Visual acuity is recorded as a fraction in which the numer- masses (e.g., polyp). The nasal septum should be in
ator indicates the distance of the patient from the chart midline and straight and is normally thicker anteriorly
(e.g., 20 ft) and the denominator indicates the distance than posteriorly. If the nasal cavities are asymmetric, it
at which the normal eye can read the line. Thus, 20/100 may indicate a deviated septum. If the patient demon-
means the patient can read at 20 ft what the average strates a septal hematoma, it must be treated fairly quickly,
person can read at 100 ftthe smaller the fraction, the because the hematoma may cause excessive pressure on
worse the myopia (nearsightedness). Patients with cor- the septum, making it avascular. This avascularity can
rected vision of less than 20/40 should be referred to the result in a saddle nose deformity owing to necrosis and
appropriate specialist.63 Intraocular examination with an absorption of the underlying cartilage (Figure 2-54).
ophthalmoscope, if available, may reveal lens, vitreous, or Illumination of the frontal and maxillary sinuses may
retinal damage. be performed if sinus tenderness is present or infection
is suspected. The examination must be performed in a
completely darkened room. To illuminate the maxillary
Examination of the Nose5965
sinuses, the examiner places the light source lateral to the
Patency of the nasal passages can be determined by patients nose just beneath the medial aspect of the eye.
occluding one of the patients nostrils by pushing a finger The examiner then looks through the patients open
against the side of the nostril. The patient is then asked mouth for illumination of the hard palate. To illuminate
to breathe in and out of the opposite nostril with the the frontal sinuses, the examiner places the light source
mouth closed. The process is repeated on the other side. against the medial aspect of each supraorbital rim. The
Normally, no sound is heard, and the patient can breathe examiner looks for a dim red glow as light is transmitted
easily through the open nostril. just below the eyebrow. The sinuses usually show differ-
ing degrees of illumination. The absence of a glow indi-
cates either that the sinus is filled with secretions or that
it has never developed.
Nasal Examination
Examination of the Teeth5965
Patency The examiner should observe the teeth to see if they are
Nasal cavities in normal position and whether any teeth are missing,
Sinuses chipped, or depressed (see Figure 2-25). Using the gloved
Fracture
index finger and thumb, the examiner applies mild pres-
Nasal discharge (bloody, straw-colored, clear)
sure to each tooth, pressing inward toward the tongue
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 133
Ear Examination
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
134 Chapter 2 Head and Face
responds appropriately. The procedure is repeated in and downward, the test is considered positive for an
the other ear. The patient should be able to hear whis- expanding intracranial lesion on the side opposite the
pered words in each ear at a distance of 30 to 60cm side with the drift.
(12 to 24 inches) and respond correctly at least 50% of Neurological Control TestLower Limb. The examiner
the time.58,59 asks the patient to sit on the edge of a table or in a chair
with his or her legs extended in front and not touching
Conductive hearing loss implies that the patient the ground. The patient closes his or her eyes for approxi-
experiences a reduction of all sounds rather than difficulty mately 20 to 30 seconds. If the examiner notes that one
in interpreting sounds. Sensorineural or perceptual leg tends to move or drift, the test is considered positive
hearing loss indicates that the patient has difficulty inter- for an expanding intracranial lesion on the side opposite
preting the sounds. that with the drift.
To examine the internal structure of the ear, the exam- Romberg Test. The examiner asks the patient to
iner may use an otoscope if one is available. In this case, stand with feet together and arms by the sides with the
the examiner would observe the canal as well as the eyes open. The examiner notes whether the patient has
eardrum (tympanic membrane), noting any blockage, any problem with balance. The patient then closes his or
excessive wax, swelling, redness, transparency (usually her eyes for at least 20 seconds, and the examiner notes
pearly gray), bulging, retraction, or perforation of the any differences. A positive Romberg test is elicited if the
eardrum. patient sways or falls to one side when the eyes are closed,
and this reaction indicates an expanding intracranial
lesion, possible disease of the spinal cord posterior
Special Tests
columns, or proprioceptive problems.
Examiners perform only those special tests that they Walk or Stand in Tandem Test. Patients with expand-
think will have value in helping to confirm a diagnosis. ing intracranial lesions demonstrate increasing difficulty
For example, the tests for expanding intracranial lesions in walking in tandem (walking the line) or standing in
would not be performed with a facial injury unless an tandem (one foot in front of other). Standing in tandem
associated injury to the brain or other neurological tissues is more difficult to perform than walking in tandem.
is suspected.
For the reader who would like to review them, the Tests for Coordination
reliability, validity, specificity, sensitivity, and odds ratios Balance Error Scoring System. See earlier discussion
of some of the special tests used for the head and face are of BESS on p. 123.
available on the Evolve website. Finger Drumming Test. The patient drums the index
and middle finger of one hand up and down as quickly
Tests for Expanding Intracranial Lesions as possible on the back of the other hand. The test is
For each of these tests, the patient must be able to stand repeated with the opposite hand. The examiner compares
normally when the eyes are open. the two sides for coordination and speed.
Neurological Control TestUpper Limb. The exam- Finger-Thumb Test. The patient touches each finger
iner asks the patient to stand with his or her arms with the thumb of the same hand. The normal or unin-
forward flexed 90 and eyes closed. The patient holds jured side is tested first, followed by the injured side. The
this position for approximately 30 seconds. If the exam- examiner compares the two sides for coordination and
iner notes that one arm tends to move or drift outward timing.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 134.e1
APPENDIX 2-1
Reliability, Validity, Specificity, and Sensitivity of Special/Diagnostic Tests Used
in the Head and Face
CALORIC TEST
Sensitivity
To recognize presence of spontaneous and positional nystagmus warm monothermal test 97%, cool monothermal test
89%87
FINGER-TO-NOSE TEST
Reliability Validity
Intrarater dymetria k = 0.54, tremor k = 0.18, Time of Correlation with coin pick up r = 0.77, pouring water
execution ICC = 0.9789 r = 0.70 to 0.84, pick up phone r = 0.70 to 0.8490
Interrater dymetria k = 0.36, tremor k = 0.26, Time of
execution ICC = 0.9189
Interrater kinetic tremor: For starting position specify
k = 0.37 to 0.64, no starting position specified k = 0.4 to
0.57, arm 90 degrees of abduction and elbow extended
k = 0.38 to 0.66, arm 90 degrees of abduction touching
nose for 5sec k = 0.33 to 0.6490
Intention tremor: for starting position specify k = 0.67 to
0.83, no starting position specified k = 0.63 to 0.84, arm
90 degrees of abduction and elbow extended k = 0.55
to 0.87, arm 90 degrees of abduction touching nose for
5sec k = 0.61 to 0.8390
RINNE TEST
Sensitivity
72.9% using a force of 72.9% (accuracy is 76%)97
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
134.e2 Chapter 2 Head and Face
APPENDIX 2-1
Reliability, Validity, Specificity, and Sensitivity of Special/Diagnostic Tests Used
in the Head and Facecontd
ROMBERG TEST
Reliability Validity
Between morning and afternoon p > 0.84, five Association with sway speed r = 0.4699
consecutive days p > 0.7898
Interrater: Eyes open ICC = 0.99, eyes close
ICC = 0.9996
Test-retest: Eyes open ICC = 0.90, eyes close
ICC = 0.7696
SIT-TO-STAND
Reliability
Interrater ICC = 0.9896
Test-retest ICC = 0.9296
87. Jacobson CP, Means ED: Efficacy of a monothermal warm water caloric screening test. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 94:377381, 1985.
88. Arceneaux JM: Validity and reliability of rapidly alternating movements tests. Int J Neurosci 89:281286, 1997.
89. Swaine BR, Sullivan SJ: Reliability of the cores for the finger to nose tests in adults with traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther 73(2):7178, 1993.
90. Feys PG, Davies-Smith A, Jones R, et al: Intention tremor rated according to different finger-to-nose test protocols: a survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
84:7982, 2003.
91. Juarez VJ, Lyons M: Interrater reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale. J Neurosci Nurs 27(5):283286, 1995.
92. Pettigrew LEL, Wilson JTL, Teasdale GM: Reliability of rating on the Glasgow Outcome Scales from in-person and telephone structured interviews.
J Head Trauma Rehabil 18(3):252258, 2003.
93. Rowley G, Fielding K: Reliability and accuracy of the Glasgow Coma Scale with experienced and inexperienced users. Lancet 337:535538, 1991.
94. Fielding K, Rowley G: Reliability of assessments by skilled observers using the Glasgow Coma Scale. Aust J Adv Nurs 7(4):1317, 1990.
95. Gill MR, Reiley DG, Green SM: Interrater reliability of Glasgow Coma Scale scores in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 43(2):215223,
2004.
96. Franchignoni F, Tesio L, Martino MT, et al: Reliability of four simple, quantitative tests of balance and mobility in health elderly females. Aging Clin
Exp Res 10(1):2631, 1998.
97. Johnston DF: A new modification of the Rinne test. Clin Otolaryngol 17:322326, 1992.
98. Thyssen HH, Brynskov J, Jansen EC, et al: Normal ranges and reproducibility for the quantitative Rombergs test. Acta Neurol Scand 66:100104, 1982.
99. Geer F, Letz R, Green RC: Relationships between quantitative measures and neurologists clinical rating of tremor and standing steadiness in two epi-
demiological studies. Neurotoxicology 21(5):753760, 2000.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 135
Patient
30 cm 13 cm
30 cm 13 cm
Figure 2-57 Past pointing. (Redrawn from Reilly BM: Practical strate-
gies in outpatient medicine, Philadelphia, 1991, WB Saunders, p. 195.)
Watch tick Watch tick
Finger twitching Finger twitching
CONDUCTIVE LOSS
Tuning fork > 512cos Weber (midline) opposite hand with the posterior aspect of the fingers.
Rinne (air >> bone) The movement is repeated several times with both sides
being tested. The examiner compares the two sides for
coordination and speed.
Hand-Thigh Test. The patient pats his or her thigh
with the hand as quickly as possible. The uninjured side
Air >> bone is tested first. The patient may be asked to supinate and
pronate the hand between each hand-thigh contact to
30 cm 13 cm make the test more complex. The examiner watches for
speed and coordination and compares the two sides.
Heel-to-Knee Test. The patient, who is lying
Watch tick
Finger twitching
supine with the eyes open, takes the heel of one foot
Whispered voice and touches the opposite knee with the heel and then
slides the heel down the shin. The test is repeated with
NORMAL the eyes closed, and both legs are tested. The test can
Figure 2-56 Bedside hearing tests and results with sensorineural or con- be repeated several times with increasing speed; the
ductive loss in left ear and with normal hearing. examiner notes any differences in coordination or the
presence of tremor. Normally, the test should be accom-
Finger-to-Nose Test. The patient stands or sits with plished easily, smoothly, and quickly with the eyes open
the eyes open and brings the index finger to the nose. and closed.
The test is repeated with the eyes closed. Both arms are Past Pointing Test. The patient and examiner face
tested several times with increasing speed. Normally, the each other. The examiner holds up both index fingers
tests should be accomplished easily, smoothly, and quickly approximately 15cm (6 inches) apart. The patient is
with the eyes open and closed. asked to lift the arms over the head and then bring the
Hand Flip Test. The patient touches the back of arms down to touch the patients index fingers to the
the opposite, stationary hand with the anterior aspect of examiners index fingers (Figure 2-57). The test is
the fingers, flips the test hand over, and touches the repeated with the patients eyes closed. Normally, the test
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
136 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 137
TABLE 2-24
Modified from Dutton M: Orthopedic examination, evaluation, and intervention, New York, 2004, McGraw Hill, p. 1130. Adapted from House
JW, Brackmann DE: Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93:146147, 1985.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
138 Chapter 2 Head and Face
forehead is palpated by gentle rotary movements of the The frontal and maxillary sinuses should be inspected
fingers, feeling the movement of the skin and the occipi- for swelling. To palpate the frontal sinuses, the examiner
tofrontalis muscle underneath. Normally, the skin of the uses the thumbs to press up under the bony brow on each
forehead moves freely and is smooth and even with no side of the nose (Figure 2-61, A). The examiner then
tender areas. The examiner then palpates around the eye presses under the zygomatic processes using either the
socket or orbital rim, moving over the eyebrow and supra- thumbs or index and middle fingers to palpate the maxil-
orbital rims, around the lateral side of the eye, and along lary sinuses (Figure 2-61, B). No tenderness or swelling
the zygomatic arch to the infraorbital rims, looking for over the soft tissue should be present. The sinus areas may
deformity, crepitus, tenderness, and lacerations (Figure also be percussed to detect tenderness. A light tap directly
2-60, A and B). The orbicularis oculi muscles surround over each sinus with the index finger can be used to detect
the orbit, and the medial side of the orbital rim and nose tenderness.
are then palpated for tenderness, deformity, and fracture. The examiner then moves inferiorly to palpate the jaw.
The nasal bones, including the lateral and alar cartilage, The examiner palpates the mandible along its entire
are palpated for any crepitus or deviation (Figure 2-60, C). length, noting any tenderness, crepitus, or deformity. The
The septum should be inspected to see if it has widened, examiner, using a rubber glove, may also palpate along
possibly indicating a septal hematoma, which often occurs the mandible interiorly, noting any tenderness or pain
with a fracture. It should also be determined whether the (Figure 2-60, D). The outside hand may be used to sta-
patient can breathe through the nose or smell. bilize the jaw during this procedure. The mandible may
A B C
D E
Figure 2-60 Palpation of the face. A, Upper orbital rim. B, Lower orbital rim. C, Nose. D, Mandible. E, Maxilla.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 139
A B
Figure 2-61 A, Palpation of frontal sinuses. B, Palpation of maxillary sinuses.
Diagnostic Imaging
Plain Film Radiography
Common x-rays taken involving the head and face are
outlined in the following box.
also be tapped with a finger along its length to see if signs Anteroposterior View. The examiner should note the
of tenderness are elicited. The muscles of the cheek (buc- normal bone contours, looking for fractures of the various
cinator) and mouth (orbicularis oris) should be palpated bones (Figures 2-65 and 2-66; see Figure 2-63).
at the same time. Lateral View. The examiner should again note bony
The maxilla may be palpated in a similar fashion, both contours, looking for the possibility of fractures (Figure
internally and externally, noting position of the teeth, 2-67).
tenderness, and any deformity (Figure 2-60, E). The
examiner may grasp the teeth anteriorly to see if the Computed Tomography
teeth and mandible or maxilla move in relation to Computed tomography scans help to differentiate
the rest of the face, which may indicate a Le Fort fracture between bone and soft tissue and give a more precise view
(Figure 2-62). of fractures (Figures 2-68 and 2-69). The Canadian
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
140 Chapter 2 Head and Face
Figure 2-63 Normal anteroposterior view of the head and face showing
a depressed parietal skull fracture (large arrow) with multiple bony
fragments into the brain (small arrows). (From Albright JP, etal:
Head and neck injuries in sports. In Scott WN, etal, editors: Principles
of sports medicine, Baltimore, 1984, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
p. 53.)
A B
Figure 2-65 Incomplete fracture of angle of mandible on the left side (arrows). A, Anteroposterior view. B, Lateral view. (From ODonoghue DH:
Treatment of injuries to athletes, Philadelphia, 1984, WB Saunders, p. 114.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 141
Figure 2-66 Plain posteroanterior view showing blowout fracture of the Figure 2-67 Lateral radiograph of the nasal bones demonstrating a nasal
orbit (arrows). (From Paton D, Goldberg MF: Management of ocular fracture (arrow). (From Torg JS: Athletic injuries to the head, neck and
injuries, Philadelphia, 1976, WB Saunders, p. 70.) face, Philadelphia, 1982, Lea & Febiger, p. 229.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
142 Chapter 2 Head and Face
A B
Figure 2-70 Magnetic resonance images showing blowout fracture. Sagittal (A) and coronal (B) T1-weighted scans demonstrate a blowout
fracture of the right orbit with depression of the orbital floor (white arrows) into the superior maxillary sinus. The inferior rectus muscle (long arrow)
is clearly identified and is not entrapped by the floor fracture. (From Harms SE: The orbit. In Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, editors: Clinical magnetic
resonance imaging, Philadelphia, 1990, WB Saunders, p. 619.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 143
Maxillary sinus
Medulla
Nasolacrimal duct
Orbital fat
Maxillary sinus
Lateral pterygoid
muscle
Clivus
Medullary cistern Pyramid
Medulla Olive
Mastoid sinus
Figure 2-71 T1-weighted axial magnetic resonance images of the head and brain at two levels. PICA, Posterior inferior cerebellar artery. (From
Greenberg JJ, etal: Brain: indications, techniques, and atlas. In Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, editors: Clinical magnetic resonance imaging, Philadel-
phia, 1990, WB Saunders, p. 384.)
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
144 Chapter 2 Head and Face
*When examining the head and face, if only one area has been injured (e.g., the nose), then only that area needs to be examined, provided the examiner is certain that
adjacent structures have not also been injured. After any examination, the patient should be warned of the possibility of exacerbation of symptoms as a result of the
assessment.
CASE STUDIES
When doing these case studies, the examiner should list the appropriate questions to be asked and why they are being
asked, identify what to look for and why, and specify what things should be tested and why. Depending on the patients
answers (and the examiner should consider different responses), several possible causes of the patients problem may
become evident (examples are given in parentheses). A differential diagnosis chart should be made up (see Table 2-25 as
an example). The examiner can then decide how different diagnoses may affect the treatment plan.
1. A 27-year-old man was playing football. He was riding hit another car that had run a red light.
received a knee to the head, rendering him The womans face hit the dashboard, and she
unconscious for approximately 3 minutes. How received a severe facial injury. Describe your
would you differentiate between a first-time, assessment plan for this patient (Le Fort fracture
fourth-degree concussion and an expanding versus mandibular fracture).
intracranial lesion? 4. An 83-year-old man tripped in the bathroom and
2. A 13-year-old boy received an elbow in the hit his chin against the bathtub, knocking himself
nose and cheek while play-wrestling. The nose unconscious. Describe your assessment plan for
is crooked and painful and bled after the injury, this patient (cervical spine lesion versus mandibular
and the cheek is sore. Describe your assessment fracture).
plan for this patient (nasal fracture versus zygoma 5. An 18-year-old woman was playing squash. She
fracture). was not wearing eye protectors and was hit in the
3. A 23-year-old woman was in an automobile eye with the ball. Describe your assessment plan
accident. She was a passenger in the front seat and for this patient (ruptured globe versus blowout
was not wearing a seat belt. The car in which she fracture).
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 145
CASE STUDIEScontd
6. A 15-year-old boy was playing field hockey. He match, which he lost. Describe your assessment
was not wearing a mouth guard and was hit in the plan for this patient (cauliflower ear versus
mouth and jaw by the ball. There was a large external otitis).
amount of blood. Describe your assessment plan 8. A 17-year-old female basketball player comes to
for this patient (tooth fracture versus mandible you complaining of eye pain. She says she received
fracture). a finger in the eye when she went up to get the
7. A 16-year-old male wrestler comes to you ball. Describe your assessment plan for this patient
complaining of ear pain. He has just finished a (hyphema versus corneal abrasion).
TABLE 2-25
REFERENCES
1. Jordan BD: Brain injury in boxing. Clin Sports Med Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med 47:250 16. Makdissi M, Davis G, Jordan B, et al: Revisiting the
28:561578, 2009. 258, 2013. modifiers: how should the evaluation and manage-
2. McAlindon RJ: On field evaluation and management 9. McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Johnston K, et al: Consen- ment of acute concussions differ in specific groups.
of head and neck injured athletes. Clin Sports Med sus statement on concussion in sport3rd Interna- Br J Sports Med 47:314320, 2013.
21:114, 2002. tional Conference on Concussion in Sport, held in 17. Gronwell D, Wrightson P: Cumulative effect of con-
3. McCrory P, Johnston K, Meeuwisse W, et al: Summary Zurich, November 2008. Clin J Sports Med 19:185 cussion. Lancet 2:995997, 1975.
and agreement statement of the 2nd International 195, 2009. 18. McCrory PR, Berkovic SF: Second impact syndrome.
Conference on Concussion in Sport, Prague 2004. 10. Sedney CL, Orphanos J, Bailes JE: When to consider Neurology 50:677683, 1998.
Clin J Sports Med 15:4855, 2005. retiring an athlete after sports-related concussion. 19. Evans RW: The post concussion syndrome: 130 years
4. Albright JP, Van Gilder J, El Khoury G, et al: Head Clin Sports Med 30:189200, 2011. of controversy. Seminars in Neurology 14:3239,
and neck injuries in sports. In Scott WN, Nisonson B, 11. Wojtys EM, Hovda D, Landry G, et al: Concussion in 1994.
Nicholas JA, editors: Principles of sports medicine, sports. Am J Sports Med 27:676686, 1999. 20. dHemecourt P: Subacute symptoms of sports-related
Baltimore, 1984, Williams & Wilkins. 12. Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH: Diagnosis and management concussion: outpatient management and return to
5. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemkeen K, et al: The Cana- of concussion in sports. Neurology 48:575580, play. Clin Sports Med 30:6372, 2011.
dian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. 1997. 21. Lovell MR, Collins MW: Neuropsychological assess-
Lancet 357:13911396, 2001. 13. Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH: Practice parameter: the man- ment of the college football player. J Head Trauma
6. Harmon KG, Drezner JA, Gammons M, et al: American agement of concussions in sports: report of the Rehabil 13:926, 1998.
Medical Society for Sports Medicine position state- quality standards subcommittee. Neurology 48:581 22. LaBotz M, Martin MR, Kimura IF, et al: A comparison
ment: concussion in sport. Br J Sports Med 47:15 585, 1997. of a preparticipation evaluation history form and a
26, 2013. 14. Covassin T, Elbin RJ: The female athlete: the role of symptom-based concussion survey in the identifica-
7. Putukian M: The acute symptoms of sport-related gender in the assessment and management of sport tion of previous head injury in collegiate athletes. Clin
concussion: diagnosis and on-field management. Clin related concussion. Clin Sports Med 30:125131, J Sports Med 15:7378, 2005.
Sports Med 30:4961, 2011. 2011. 23. Piland SG, Motl RW, Guskiewicz KM, et al:
8. McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al: Consen- 15. Meehan WP, Taylor AM, Proctor M: The pediatric Structural validity of a self-report concussion-related
sus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th Inter- athlete: younger athletes with sport-related concus- symptoms scale. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:2732,
national Conference on Concussion in Sport held in sion. Clin Sports Med 30:133144, 2011. 2006.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
146 Chapter 2 Head and Face
24. Maroon JC, Lovell MR, Norwig J, et al: Cerebral con- football players. Am J Sports Med 39:23112318, 70. Cantu RC: Return to play guidelines after concussion.
cussion in athletes: evaluation and neurophysiological 2011. In Cantu RC, editor: Neurologic athletic head and
testing. Neurosurg 47:659672, 2000. 46. Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Collins MW, et al: Does the spine injuries, Philadelphia, 2000, WB Saunders.
25. Broglio SP, Guskiewicz KM: Concussion in sports: the level of consciousness predict neurophysiological 71. Gall B, Parkhouse W, Goodman D: Heart rate
sideline assessment. Sports Health 1(6):361369, decrements after concussion? Clin J Sports Med variability of recently concussed athletes at rest
2009. 9:193198, 1999. and exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:12691274,
26. Makdissi M, Darby D, Maruff P, et al: Natural history 47. Levin HS, ODonnell VM, Grossman RG: The Galveston 2004.
of concussion in sport-markers of severity and impli- orientation and amnesia test: a practical scale to 72. Kelly JP, Nichols JS, Filley CM, et al: Concussion in
cations for management. Am J Sports Med 38:464 assess cognition after head injury. J Nerv Ment Dis sports: guidelines for the prevention of catastrophic
471, 2010. 167:675684, 1979. outcome. JAMA 266:28672869, 1991.
27. McCrea M, Kelly JP, Kluge J, et al: Standardized 48. Brandt J: The Hopkins verbal learning test: develop- 73. Macciocchi SN, Barth JT, Littlefield LM: Outcome
assessment of concussion in football players. Neurol- ment of a new memory test with six equivalent forms. after mild head injury. Clin Sports Med 17(1):2736,
ogy 48:586588, 1997. Clin Neuropsychologist 5:125142, 1991. 1998.
28. McCrea M, Kelly JP, Randolph C, et al: Standardized 49. Maddocks D, Saling M: Neurophysiological deficits 74. Polin RS, Alves WM, Jane JA: Sports and head inju-
assessment of concussion (SAC): On-site mental following concussion. Brain Inj 10:99103, 1996. ries. In Evans RW, editor: Neurology and trauma,
status evaluation of the athlete. J Head Trauma 50. Putukian M, Echemendia RJ: Managing successive Philadelphia, 1996, WB Saunders.
Rehabil 13:2735, 1998. minor head injuries: which tests guide return to play? 75. Cantu RC: Return to play guidelines after a head
29. Lovell MR, Burke CJ: Concussions in ice hockey: the Phys Sportsmed 24(11):2538, 1996. injury. Clin Sports Med 17(1):4560, 1998.
National Hockey League program. In Cantu RC, editor: 51. Johnson EW, Kegel NE, Collins MW: Neurophysiologi- 76. Fick DS: Management of concussion in collision
Neurologic athletic head and spine injuries, Philadel- cal assessment of sports-related concussion. Clin sports: guidelines for the sidelines. Postgrad Med
phia, 2000, WB Saunders. Sports Med 30:7388, 2011. 97:5360, 1995.
30. Lau BC, Collins MW, Lovell MR: Sensitivity and speci- 52. Solomon GS, Dott S, Lovell MR: Long-term neurocog- 77. Cantu RC: Second-impact syndrome. Clin Sports Med
ficity of subacute computerized neurocognitive nitive dysfunction in sports: what is the evidence? 17:3744, 1998.
testing and symptom evaluation in predicting out- Clin Sports Med 30:165177, 2011. 78. Topel JL: Examination of the comatose patient. In
comes after sport-related concussion. Am J Sports 53. Echemendia RJ, Iverson GL, McCrea M, et al: Weiner WJ, Goetz CG, editors: Neurology for the non-
Med 39:12091216, 2011. Advances in neurophysiological assessment of sport- neurologist, Philadelphia, 1989, JB Lippincott.
31. Schatz P, Putz BO: Cross-validation of measures used related concussion. Br J Sports Med 47:294298, 79. Riemann BL, Guskiewicz KM, Shields EW: Relation-
for computer-based assessment of concussion. Appl 2013. ship between clinical and forceplate measures of
Neuropsychol 13(3):151159, 2006. 54. Niere K, Quin A: Development of a headache-specific postural stability. J Sports Rehab 8:7182, 1999.
32. Elbin RJ, Schatz P, Covassin T: One year test-retest disability questionnaire for patients attending physio- 80. Valovich-McLeod TC, Barr WB, McCrea M, et al: Psy-
reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high therapy. Man Ther 14:4551, 2009. chometric and measurement properties of concus-
school athletes. Am J Sports Med 39:23192324, 55. Maddocks DL, Dicker GD, Saling MM: The assess- sion assessment tools in youth sports. J Athl Train
2011. ment of orientation following concussion in athletes. 41:399408, 2006.
33. Moser RS, Schatz P, Neidzwski K, et al: Group vs Clin J Sports Med 5:3235, 1995. 81. McCrea M, Barr WB, Guskiewicz K, et al: Standard
individual administration affects baseline neurocogni- 56. McCrea M, Kelly JP, Kluge J, et al: Standardized regression-based methods for measuring recovery
tive test performance. Am J Sports Med 39:2325 assessment of concussion in football players. Neurol- from sport-related concussion. J Int Neuropsychol
2330, 2011. ogy 48:586588, 1997. Soc 11:5869, 2005.
34. Schmidt JD, Register-Mihalik JK, Mihalik JP, et al: 57. Stilger VG, Alt JM, Robinson TW: Traumatic hyphema 82. Guskiewicz KM, Ross SE, Marshall SW: Postural sta-
Identifying impairments after concussion: normative in an intercollegiate baseball player: a case report. bility and neuropsychological deficits after concus-
data vs individualized baselines. Med Sci Sports J Athl Train 34:2528, 1999. sion in collegiate athletes. J Athl Train 36:263273,
Exerc 44:16211628, 2012. 58. Seidel HM, Ball JW, Dains JE, et al: Mosbys guide to 2001.
35. Lovell MR, Collins MW: Neurophysiological assess- physical examination, St Louis, 1987, Mosby. 83. Fonseca RJ, Walker RV: Oral and maxillofacial
ment of the college football players. J Head Trauma 59. Swartz MH: Textbook of physical diagnosis, Philadel- trauma, Philadelphia, 1991, WB Saunders.
Rehabil 13(2):926, 1998. phia, 1989, WB Saunders. 84. Pollock RA, Dingman RO: Management and recon-
36. Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Collins MH, et al: Measurement 60. Reilly BM: Practical strategies in outpatient medicine, struction of athletic injuries of the face, anterior neck,
of symptoms following sports-related concussion: Philadelphia, 1984, WB Saunders. and upper respiratory tract. In Schneider RC, Kennedy
reliability and normative data for the post-concussion 61. Novey DW: Rapid access guide to the physical exami- JC, Plant ML, editors: Sports injuries: mechanisms,
scale. Appl Neuropsychol 13:166174, 2006. nation, Chicago, 1988, Year Book Medical. treatment and prevention, Baltimore, 1985, Williams
37. Schatz P, Sandel N: Sensitivity and specificity of the 62. Kelly JP: Maxillofacial injuries. In Zachazewski JE, & Wilkins.
online version of ImPACT in high school and collegiate Magee DJ, Quillen WS, editors: Athletic injuries and 85. Simpson JF, Magee KR: Clinical evaluation of the
athletes. Am J Sports Med 11:321326, 2013. rehabilitation, Philadelphia, 1996, WB Saunders. nervous system, Boston, 1973, Little, Brown.
38. Cantu RC: Concussion severity should not be deter- 63. Pashby TJ, Pashby RC: Treatment of sports eye inju- 86. House JW, Brackmann DE: Facial nerve grading
mined until all post concussion symptoms have ries. In Fu FH, Stone DA, editors: Sports injuries: system: otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg 93:146147,
abated. Lancet 3:437438, 2004. mechanisms, prevention, and treatment, Baltimore, 1985.
39. Hinton-Bayre AD, Geffen G: Severity of sports-related 1994, Williams & Wilkins. 87. Jacobson CP, Means ED: Efficacy of a monothermal
concussion and neurophysiological test performance. 64. Durand P, Adamson GJ: On-the-field management warm water caloric screening test. Ann Otol Rhinol
Neurology 59:10681070, 2002. of athletic head injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Laryngol 94:377381, 1985.
40. Mrazik M, Ferrara MS, Peterson CL, et al: Injury 12:191145, 2004. 88. Arceneaux JM: Validity and reliability of rapidly alter-
severity and neurophysiological and balance out- 65. Cantu RC: Guidelines for return to contact sports after nating movements tests. Int J Neurosci 89:281286,
comes of four college athletes. Brain Inj 14:921931, cerebral concussion. Phys Sportsmed 14:7583, 1997.
2000. 1986. 89. Swaine BR, Sullivan SJ: Reliability of the cores for the
41. Collins MW, Grindell SH, Lovell MR, et al: Relationship 66. Robert WO: Who plays? Who sits? Managing concus- finger to nose tests in adults with traumatic brain
between concussion and neurophysiological perfor- sions on the sidelines. Sportsmed 20:6672, injury. Phys Ther 73(2):7178, 1993.
mance in college football players. JAMA 282:964 1992. 90. Feys PG, Davies-Smith A, Jones R, et al: Intention
970, 1999. 67. Leblanc KE: Concussions in sports: guidelines for tremor rated according to different finger-to-nose test
42. Bleiberg J, Cernich A, Cameron K, et al: Duration of return to competition. Am Fam Phys 50:801808, protocols: a survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:79
cognitive impairment after sports concussion. Neuro- 1994. 82, 2003.
surgery 54:10731080, 2004. 68. Macciocchi SN, Barth JT, Alves W, et al: Neurophysi- 91. Juarez VJ, Lyons M: Interrater reliability of the
43. Torg JS: Athletic injuries to the head, neck and face, ological functioning and recovery after mild head Glasgow Coma Scale. J Neurosci Nurs 27(5):283
St Louis, 1991, Mosby Year Book. injury in collegiate athletes. Neurosurg 39:510514, 286, 1995.
44. Manzi DB, Weaver PA: Head injury: the acute care 1996. 92. Pettigrew LEL, Wilson JTL, Teasdale GM: Reli-
phase, Thorofare, NJ, 1987, Slack. 69. Macciocchi SN, Barth JT, Littlefield LM: Outcome ability of rating on the Glasgow Outcome Scales
45. Lau BC, Kontos AP, Collins MW, et al: Which on- after sports concussion. In Cantu RC, editor: Neuro- from in-person and telephone structured inter-
field signs/symptoms predict protracted recovery logic athletic head and spine injuries, Philadelphia, views. J Head Trauma Rehabil 18(3):252258,
from sport-related concussion among high school 2000, WB Saunders. 2003.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Head and Face 147
93. Rowley G, Fielding K: Reliability and accuracy of the department. Ann Emerg Med 43(2):215223, 98. Thyssen HH, Brynskov J, Jansen EC, et al: Normal
Glasgow Coma Scale with experienced and inexperi- 2004. ranges and reproducibility for the quantitative Rom-
enced users. Lancet 337:535538, 1991. 96. Franchignoni F, Tesio L, Martino MT, et al: Reliability bergs test. Acta Neurol Scand 66:100104, 1982.
94. Fielding K, Rowley G: Reliability of assessments by of four simple, quantitative tests of balance and 99. Geer F, Letz R, Green RC: Relationships between
skilled observers using the Glasgow Coma Scale. mobility in health elderly females. Aging Clin Exp Res quantitative measures and neurologists clinical
Aust J Adv Nurs 7(4):1317, 1990. 10(1):2631, 1998. rating of tremor and standing steadiness in two epi-
95. Gill MR, Reiley DG, Green SM: Interrater reliability 97. Johnston DF: A new modification of the Rinne test. demiological studies. Neurotoxicology 21(5):753
of Glasgow Coma Scale scores in the emergency Clin Otolaryngol 17:322326, 1992. 760, 2000.
SUGGESTED READINGS
Ad Hoc Committee on Classification of Headache: Clas- Gorman BD: Ophthalmology and sports medicine. In Scott Reid DC: Sports injury assessment and rehabilitation, New
sification of headache. Arch Neurol 6:173176, 1962. WN, Nisonson B, Nicholas JA, editors: Principles of York, 1992, Churchill Livingstone.
American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: Athletic train- sports medicine, Baltimore, 1984, Williams & Wilkins. Rimel RW, Giordani B, Barth JT, et al: Disability caused by
ing and sports medicine, Chicago, 1991, AAOS. Greenberg MS, Springer PS: Diagnosis and management minor head injury. Neurosurg 9:221228, 1981.
Becser N, Borim G, Sjaastad O: Extracranial nerves in of oral injuries. In Torg JS, editor: Athletic injuries to the Root JD, Jordan BD, Zimmerman RD: Delayed presenta-
the posterior part of the head: anatomic variation and head, neck and face, St Louis, 1991, Mosby Year Book. tion of subdural hematoma. Phys Sportsmed 21:6168,
their possible clinical significant. Spine 23:14351441, Halling AH: The importance of clinical signs and symptoms 1993.
1988. in the evaluation of facial fractures. Athletic Training Ross RJ, Casson IR, Siegel O, et al: Boxing injuries: neu-
Booher JM, Thibodeau GA: Athletic injury assessment, 17:102103, 1982. rologic, radiologic and neuropsychologic evaluation.
St Louis, 1989, Mosby. Handler SD: Diagnosis and management of maxillofacial Clin Sports Med 6:4151, 1987.
Boyd-Monk H: Examining the external eye. Nursing injuries. In Torg JS, editor: Athletic injuries to the head, Rousseau AP: Ocular trauma in sports. In MacKenzie
80:5863, 1980. neck and face, Philadelphia, 1982, Lea & Febiger. Freeman HM, editor: Ocular trauma in Sports, New
Bruce R, Fonseca RJ: Mandibular fractures. In Fonseca Havener WH, Makley TA: Emergency management of York, 1979, Appleton-Century-Crofts.
RJ, Walker RV, editors: Oral and maxillofacial trauma, ocular injuries. Ohio State Med J 71:776779, 1975. Roy S, Irvin R: Sports medicine: prevention, evaluation,
Philadelphia, 1991, WB Saunders. Hayward R: Management of acute head injuries, Oxford, management and rehabilitation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,
Brucker AJ, Kozart DM, Nichols CW, et al: Diagnosis and 1980, Blackwell Scientific. 1983, Prentice-Hall.
management of injuries to the eye and orbit. In Torg Hildebrandt JR: Dental and maxillofacial injuries. Clin Sandusky JC: Field evaluation of eye injuries. Athletic
JS, editor: Athletic injuries to the head, neck and face, Sports Med 1:449468, 1982. Training 16:254258, 1981.
St Louis, 1991, Mosby Year Book. Hollinshead WH, Jenkins DB: Functional anatomy of the Schneider RC: Head and neck injuries in football: mecha-
Bruno LA, Gennarelli TA, Torg JS: Head injuries in athlet- limbs and back, Philadelphia, 1981, WB Saunders. nisms, treatment and prevention, Baltimore, 1973,
ics. In Welsh RP, Shephard RJ, editors: Current therapy Hugenholtz H, Richard MT: Return to athletic competition Williams & Wilkins.
in sports medicine 1985-1986, St Louis, 1985, Mosby. following concussion. Can Med Assoc J 127:827829, Schneider RC, Peterson TR, Anderson RE: Football. In
Bruno LA, Gennarelli TA, Torg JS: Management guidelines 1982. Schneider RC, Kennedy JC, Plant ML, editors: Sports
for head injuries in athletics. Clin Sports Med 6:1729, Jenkins DB: Hollinsheads functional anatomy of the limbs injuries: mechanisms, prevention and treatment,
1987. and back, Philadelphia, 1991, WB Saunders. Baltimore, 1985, Williams & Wilkins.
Burde RM: Eye movements and vestibular system. In Jordan BD: Head injury in sports. In Jordan BD, Tsairis P, Schuller DE, Bruce RA: Ear, nose, throat, and eye. In
Pearlman AL, Collins RC, editors: Neurological patho- Warren RF, editors: Sports neurology, Rockville, MD, Strauss RH, editor: Sports medicine, ed 2, Philadelphia,
physiology, New York, 1984, Oxford University Press. 1989, Aspen. 1991, WB Saunders.
Caillet R: Head and face pain syndromes, Philadelphia, Kinderknecht J: Head injuries. In Zachazewski JE, Magee Schultz RC, de Camara DL: Athletic facial injuries. JAMA
1992, FA Davis. DJ, Quillen WS, editors: Athletic injuries and rehabilita- 252:33953398, 1984.
Cantu RC: Guidelines for return to contact sports after tion, Philadelphia, 1996, WB Saunders. Scott WN, Nisonson B, Nicholas JA, editors: Principles of
a cerebral concussion. Phys Sportsmed 14:7583, Kulund DN: The injured athlete, Philadelphia, 1988, JB sports medicine, Baltimore, 1984, Williams & Wilkins.
1986. Lippincott. Shell D, Carico GA, Patton RM: Can subdural hematoma
Cantu RC, editor: Neurologic athletic head and neck inju- Kumamoto DP, Jacob M, Nickelsen D: Oral trauma: on result from repeated minor head injury? Phys
ries. Clin Sports Med 17(1):182, 1998. field assessment. Phys Sportsmed 23:5362, 1995. Sportsmed 21:7484, 1993.
Cox MS, Schepens CL, MacKenzie Freeman HM: Retinal Lampert PW, Hardman JM: Morphological changes in Sinn DP, Karas ND: Radiographic evaluation of facial inju-
detachment due to ocular contusion. Arch Ophthal brains of boxers. JAMA 251:26762679, 1984. ries. In Fonseca RJ, Walker V, editors: Oral and maxil-
76:678685, 1966. Lew D, Sinn DP: Diagnosis and treatment of midface frac- lofacial trauma, Philadelphia, 1991, WB Saunders.
Crovitz HF, Daniel WF: Length of retrograde amnesia after tures. In Fonseca RJ, Walker RV, editors: Oral and maxil- Sitler M: Nasal septal injuries. Athletic Training 21:1012,
head injury: a revised formula. Cortex 23:695698, lofacial trauma, Philadelphia, 1991, WB Saunders. 1986.
1987. Liebgott B: The anatomical basis of dentistry, St Louis, Solon RC: Maxillofacial trauma. In Scott WN, Nisonson B,
Diamond GR, Quinn GE, Pashby TJ, et al: Ophthalmologic 1986, Mosby. Nicholas JA, editors: Principles of sports medicine,
injuries. Clin Sports Med 1:469482, 1982. Mueller FD: Catastrophic head and neck injuries. Phys Baltimore, 1984, Williams & Wilkins.
Easterbrook M, Cameron J: Injuries in racquet sports. In Sportsmed 7:710714, 1979. Starkey C, Ryan J: Evaluation of orthopedic and athletic
Schneider RC, Kennedy JC, Plant ML, editors: Sports Nasher LM: A systems approach to understanding injuries, Philadelphia, 1996, FA Davis.
injuries: mechanisms, treatment and prevention, and assessing orientation and balance disorders, Untevharnscheidt F: Boxing injuries. In Schneider RC,
Baltimore, 1985, Williams & Wilkins. Clackamas, OR, 1987, NeuroCom International. Kennedy JC, Plant ML, editors: Sports injuries: mecha-
Edelman RR, Hesselink JR: Clinical magnetic resonance ODonoghue DH: Treatment of injuries to athletes, nisms, prevention and treatment, Baltimore, 1985,
imaging, Philadelphia, 1990, WB Saunders. Philadelphia, 1984, WB Saunders. Williams & Wilkins.
Ellis E: Fractures of the zygomatic complex and arch. In Pashby RC, Pashby TJ: Ocular injuries in sports. In Welsh Vegso JJ, Lehman RC: Field evaluation and management
Fonseca RJ, Walker RV, editors: Oral and maxillofacial RP, Shephard RJ, editors: Current therapy in sports of head and neck injuries. Clin Sports Med 6:115,
trauma, Philadelphia, 1991, WB Saunders. medicine 1985-1986, St Louis, 1985, Mosby. 1987.
Fahey TD: Athletic training: principles and practice, Palo Paton D, Goldberg MF: Management of ocular injuries, Vegso JJ, Torg JS: Field evaluation and management of
Alto, CA, 1986, Mayfield. Philadelphia, 1976, WB Saunders. intracranial injuries. In Torg JS, editor: Athletic injuries
Foreman SM, Croft AC: Whiplash injuries: the cervical Pavlov H: Radiographic evaluation of the skull and facial to the head, neck and face, Philadelphia, 1982, Lea &
acceleration/deceleration syndrome, Baltimore, 1988, bones. In Torg JS, editor: Athletic injuries to the head, Febiger.
Williams & Wilkins. neck and face, St Louis, 1991, Mosby Year Book. Vinger PF: How I manage corneal abrasions and lacera-
Frost DE, Kendall BD: Applied surgical anatomy of the Powers MP: Diagnosis and management of dentoalveolar tions. Phys Sportsmed 14:170179, 1986.
head and neck. In Fonseca RJ, Walker RV, editors: injuries. In Fonseca RJ, Walker RV, editors: Oral Wester I: Bells palsy: the present status of electrodiagno-
Oral and maxillofacial trauma, Philadelphia, 1991, WB and maxillofacial trauma, Philadelphia, 1991, WB sis and treatment. Physiother Can 23:218221, 1971.
Saunders. Saunders. Zagelbaum BM, Hochman MA: A close look at a red eye:
Garrison DW: Cranial nerves: a systems approach, Proctor MR, Cantu RC: Head and neck injuries in young diagnosing vision-threatening causes. Phys Sportsmed
Springfield, IL, 1986, Charles C Thomas. athletes. Clin Sports Med 19(4):693715, 2000. 23:8592, 1995.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universite de Sherbrooke - Canada Consortium January 12, 2017.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.