Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 105 views

    Case Laws Pranav

    Uploaded by

    utsav
    This document lists 23 case laws related to the issue of loss of profit in commercial disputes. Some of the key cases cited include Hadley v Baxendale (1854) which established the foreseeability rule for damages, Sapphire International Petroleums Ltd. v. National Iranian Oil Co. (1967) which addressed loss of profit in an international arbitration, and Karaha Bodas Co v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Das Gas Bumi Negara (2004) which summarized the Sapphire case. The document provides an overview of important precedents from multiple jurisdictions around the world governing the calculation and awarding of lost profits.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Case Laws Pranav

    Uploaded by

    utsav
    105 views1 page
    This document lists 23 case laws related to the issue of loss of profit in commercial disputes. Some of the key cases cited include Hadley v Baxendale (1854) which established the foreseeability rule for damages, Sapphire International Petroleums Ltd. v. National Iranian Oil Co. (1967) which addressed loss of profit in an international arbitration, and Karaha Bodas Co v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Das Gas Bumi Negara (2004) which summarized the Sapphire case. The document provides an overview of important precedents from multiple jurisdictions around the world governing the calculation and awarding of lost profits.

    Original Description:

    2633

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document lists 23 case laws related to the issue of loss of profit in commercial disputes. Some of the key cases cited include Hadley v Baxendale (1854) which established the foreseeability rule for damages, Sapphire International Petroleums Ltd. v. National Iranian Oil Co. (1967) which addressed loss of profit in an international arbitration, and Karaha Bodas Co v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Das Gas Bumi Negara (2004) which summarized the Sapphire case. The document provides an overview of important precedents from multiple jurisdictions around the world governing the calculation and awarding of lost profits.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    105 views1 page

    Case Laws Pranav

    Uploaded by

    utsav
    This document lists 23 case laws related to the issue of loss of profit in commercial disputes. Some of the key cases cited include Hadley v Baxendale (1854) which established the foreseeability rule for damages, Sapphire International Petroleums Ltd. v. National Iranian Oil Co. (1967) which addressed loss of profit in an international arbitration, and Karaha Bodas Co v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Das Gas Bumi Negara (2004) which summarized the Sapphire case. The document provides an overview of important precedents from multiple jurisdictions around the world governing the calculation and awarding of lost profits.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    CASE LAWS

    LOSS OF PROFIT

    1. Miga v. Jensen, 96 S.W.3d 207, 213 (Tex. 2002)


    2. Sapphire International Petroleums Ltd. v. National Iranian Oil Co., 35 I.L.R. 136 (1967); 13
    Int'l & Comp. LQ 1011 (1964).
    3. Hadley v Baxendale, (1854) 156 ER 145

    4. Sapphire International Petroleums Ltd. v. National Iranian Oil Co., 35 I.L.R. 136 (1967); 13 Int'l &
    Comp. LQ 1011 (1964)
    5. Summarised in KarahaBodas Co v Perusahaan PertambanganMinyak Das Gas Bumi Negara 364 F.3d
    274 (5th Cir. 2004)
    6. Himpurna v PLN Final Award of May 4 1999, published in 14 Mealey's International
    Arbitration Report (December 1999) pp. A-1 - A 58.

    7. Pathua v PLN 14 Mealey's International Arbitration Report (December 1999) pp. B-1 - B-49
    8. Piscitelli v. Friedenberg, 87 Cal. App. 4th 953, 989 (2001).
    9. Griffin v. Colver, 16 N.Y. 489 (I858); MCCORMACK, DAMAGES 97-99 (1935).

    10. AutopistaConcesionada de Venez., C.A. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venez., ICSID Case no. ARB/00/5,
    Award (7 march , 2017).
    11.KarahaBodas Co v Perusahaan PertambanganMinyak Das Gas Bumi Negara 364 F.3d 274
    (5th Cir. 2004)

    12. 161 U.S. 375, 396 (1896)


    13.Curtis v. Innerarity, 47 U.S. (6 How.) 146, 154 (1848)),
    14.Final Award No. 6281 (ICC 1989),

    15. CompaniadelDesarrollo de Santa Elena v. Costa Rica, 15 ICSID (W. Bank) 96 (2000).
    16.Tidewater Investment SRL and Tidewater Caribe, CA v. The Bolivarian Republic of
    Venezuela, Award, March 13, 2015, at 204-207
    17.McKelvy v. Metal Container Corp., 125 F.R.D. 179 (1989)
    18.Loft v. Lapidus, 936 F.2d 633 (lst Cir. 1991)
    19.Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 614 F.Supp. 289 (D. Ohio 1985).

    ISSUE 3

    20.Renusagar Power Co. v. General Elec. Co., Award No. 19 (High Court Bombay, Oct. 12,
    1989), repnnted in 16 Y.B. Cost. ARB. 553, 561-66 (1991); AMNOIL, 21 ILM 976, 1042
    (1982)
    21.McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States, 37 Fed. Cl. 295 (1997)

    22. Margeson v. Artis, 776 N.W.2d 652 (Iowa 2009).


    23.

    You might also like