Design For Snapfit Revi-10 PDF
Design For Snapfit Revi-10 PDF
Design For Snapfit Revi-10 PDF
1
snap fit joints in plastic parts
Design calculations for
Contents
1. Introduction 3
6. Calculation examples 16
6.1 Barbed leg snap-fit 16
6.2 Cylindrical snap-fit 16
8. Applications 21
8.1 Barbed leg snap-fit 21
8.2 Cylindrical snap-fit 23
8.3 Ball and socket snap-fit 24
9. Explanation of symbols 24
10. Literature 25
1. Introduction 2. Requirements
for snap-fit joints
Snap-fits are formfitting joints which permit great design Snap-fits are used to fix
parts together in a certain
two
flexibility. All these joints basically involve a projecting position. In some cases,important to exclude play
it is
lip, thicker section, lugs or barbed legs moulded on one between the assembled parts (e. g. rattle-free joints
part which engage in a corresponding hole, recess or for automotive applications). The axial forces to be
undercut in the other. During assembly, the parts are transmitted are relatively small. In the majority of appli
elastically deformed. Joints may be non-detachable or cations, the joints are not subject to permanent loads
detachable, depending on design (figs. 4 and 5). Non- (e. g. from internal pressure).
detachable joints can withstand permanent loading even
at high temperatures. With detachable joints, it is neces Special fasteners such as rivets and clips also work on the
sary to test in each individual case the permanent load snap-fit principle. They should be easy to insert, suitable
deformation which can be permitted in the joint. In the for blind fastening, require low assembly force and be
unloaded state, snap-fit joints are under little or no stress able to bridge the tolerances of the mounting hole.
and are therefore not usually leaktight. By incorporating
sealing elements, e.g. O-rings, or by using an adhesive,
leaktight joints can also be obtained.
Hostaform
Acetal copolymer (POM)
Hostacom
Reinforced polypropylene (PP)
Celanex
Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT)
@Vandar
Impact-modified
polybutylene terephthalate (PBT-HI)
lmpet
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
=
registered trademark
The undercut depth H is the difference between the
3. Basic types of snap-fit joint outside edge of the barb and the inside edge of the hole
(% 1):
The parts with an undercut can be cylindrical, spherical
or barbed. There are three corresponding types of snap- undercut depth H =
LI L2 (1)
fit joint:
The leg is deflected by this amount during assembly.
1 .
Barbed leg snap-fit
2. Cylindrical snap-fit In designing a barbed leg, care should be taken to pre
3. Ball and socket snap-fit vent overstressing at the vulnerable point of support
because of the notch effect. The radius r (fig. 1) should
therefore be as large as possible.
3.1 Barbed leg snap-fit
Fig. 3
1, Pj
i
-\ T S (/}
_vu HJ1 t
T t
-1 >~
1
/R
AV*
e2 = + ~^-WO%
,
(5)
i-TC
H
s
Dr,
-100% or e=^^-100%
DK
undercut depth H =
DG DK (2) corresponding socket; the undercut depth H is the differ
ence between the ball diameter DG and the socket open
DG largest diameter of the shaft [mm] ing diameter DK.
DK smallest diameter of the hub [mm]
undercut depth H =
DG DK (7)
The parts are deformed by the amount of this undercut
DG ball diameter [mm]
depth during assembly. The diameter of the shaft is
DK socket opening diameter [mm]
reduced by ADC, and the diameter of the hub increased
by +ZlDK.
Because the shaft is solid and therefore very rigid, the
hole undercut depth H must be overcome by expanding
So the undercut depth can also be described as
the hub. As a result of this diameter change, the hub is
deformed as follows:
H =
ADC + JDK (3)
(9)
depth Hmax. for barbed legs with cross-sections in the
form of segments of a circle is 15% lower than that of
barbed leg length [mm] a rectangular barbed leg cross-section (assumption:
Kg- 9
\ a
'fi
s \
in cross-section A- A
'T n t
Fig. 8: Elongation (fig. 7)
1
The maximum permissible undercut depth Hmax. for
barbed leg snap-fits supported on both sides can be
calculated with the aid of fig. 14, irrespective of the
The maximum deformation (fig. 8) only applies in the material. Fig. 14 applies for emax 6% (see calculation
=
critical region A -
a
2% s 1=50 mm
3
o^ ~13^ max. =
s_
H
i
<^i ~
LU u=L ^|
4^
1 E
X i"
f \ |5
mm
n *iln*L max. = 8%
: \ Vl = 30 mrr [
30
y&^ N Hmax. oj s,
V >
s
X
^
M
20
\
depth x= 20 mn
S Is
KJ ^s V
t
mm
N
s
s
\ 15 mm\
-%
10
s
A
\.
= 20 mm
\
undercut f
Xj
\.
= 10 rn
SJ
m\
=
\
\
Sk
s 1
8 Sl=15 mmN. s
pbo x s
4
s
s
s
sl
X
= 10
\
mm \
\
S
sv
N
V
permis ble p^ v
\
X 1= 5 mm
\
S.
\
s
v
N
4*
s
Si = 5 mi n
s\
\\
\
\ Maximu op
Ui
5 V
\
X
2 pfo
\ \
S \
I o l^
0 5 0.8 1.0 2345 6mm8 0.5 0.8 1.0 345 6mm 8
Fig. 11: Maximum permissible undercut depth Hn Fig. 13: Maximum permissible undercut depth Hmax.
for Hostaform C 9021 CV 1/30 for Hostacom G 2 N01 and M 2 N01
mm
L max. = 6%
t
P
y ^\ rr
s
x\r 30r on
10 ""
X N \ s
S N \
8 s JV s. S
6
X X ^V 1 = 20 mm \
5 X Sj=15mmS \
s
4
X \ \
Si = 10 mm
X
3
s
N^ \ V
I 2 S
I
X 5 mr n
X X
0.1 1 X s
0.5 0.8 1.0 345 6mm8 1.5 0.8 1.0 345 6mm8
Fig. 14: Barbed leg snap-fit supported on both fibre reinforced Hostacom, fig. 15b), the maximum per
TT
missible elongation (see table 1) should be about a third
sides; relative undercut depth j as a function of barb
of the elongation at break SR.
width and spring leg thickness for emax. = 6%
0.6
0.4
relative spring leg thickness = 0.01
y
0.2
es
3
El- 0.1
0.08
|
TB 0.02
e
0.01
0.008
0.006
IE. SR
0.004 3
0.002 Fig. 16
F
^o
ES '
0.001 /
Barbed
Cylindrical snap-fits,
leg ball and socket snap-fits
Hostaform C 52021
Hostaform C 27021
Hostaform C 13021
Hostaform C 13031
Hostaform C 9021
Hostaform C 2521
Hostaform C 9021 K
Hostaform C 9021 M
Hostaform C 9021 TF
Hostaform T 1020
Hostaform S 9063/S 27063
Hostacom M2 N02
Hostacom M2 N01
Hostacom G2 N01
Hostacom M4 N01
Hostacom G2 N02
Hostacom Ml U01
Hostacom G3 N01
1.5 1.0
Hostacom M4 U01
7500
Es =
f(8) (16) S,
7000 V
This secant modulus ES is used in design calculations for \
snap-fits. Fig. 17 plots the secant modulus against elonga 6500
N
tion e up to the maximum permissible elongation for \\
barbed legs. 6000
r
450(f
v
4.3 Coefficient offriction fj. w
4000
\
\\
In assembling snap-fits, friction has to be overcome. The | 3500
^ ^1\ 25*^.
Mating element materials Coefficient of friction //
1000
^S
^s
l"** *-
-
10
4.4 Assembly angle at and retaining angle a2
Fig. 18: Detachable joint
The assembly angle a\ (figs. 18 and 19), along with the
barb dimensions and coefficient of friction fj, between
the mating elements (table 2), determines the required
assembly force F, (fig. 20). The greater a\ the higher the
assembly force required. With a large assembly angle
(! 45) and high coefficient of friction //, it may no
longer be possible for parts to be assembled. The barb
then shears off rather than being deflected. The recom
mended assembly angle for barbed legs and cylindrical Fig. 19: Non-detachable joint for 2 = 90
snap-fits is i = 15 to 30.
F] =
assembly force required
11
5.1 Barbed leg snap-fit
5. Design calculations
Fig. 22
for snap-fit joints
The load-bearing capacity of snap-fits under steady
(short-term) stress depends primarily on:
1 .
the mechanical properties of the plastics concerned,
particularly stiffness as expressed by the elastic
modulus ES,
In many cases, it is possible to design the direction of The assembly force FI and pull-out force F2 (fig. 22) for
snap-fit assembly right angles to the actual loading
at barbed legs can be calculated from the formula:
direction F during service (fig. 21). Then the load-bearing
capacity of the joint is not determined by pull-out 3H ES -J // + tan Ii2
force F2 but by the break resistance or shear strength of Fl,2 =
1 1
[N] (17)
jM-tan!^
the vulnerable cross-section. This design technique is
H undercut depth [mm]
most often used with ball and socket snap-fits.
Es secant modulus [N/mm2] (Fig. 17)
J moment of inertia [mm4] (table 3)
Fig. 21 1 barbed leg length [mm]
r i
2
assembly angle
retaining angle
[]
[]
The factor -^ ^
can be taken directly
'
from
l-w-tanai.2
fig. 23.
tr c V- + tan gl,2
Fig. i-i
23: Factor -r^
1 \JL tan 1,2
(from formulae 17, 22 and 25) as a function of
j assembly/retaining angle i, 2
Table 3
^\1
b'h3
i,p.
b leg width [mm]
rectangle xNSN wnere
h
|2 leg height [mm]
semicircle _j ^ 0.110 r4 r radius [mm]
third
0.0522 r4
of a circle |>_
quarter 15 30 45 60 90
^_ 0.0508 r4
of a circle Assembly/retaining angle t ,
2
12
With the retaining angle a2 90, the pull-out force F2
=
Fig. 24
is determined by the shear-stressed area and the
shear strength TB of the plastic used.
Table 4
Hostaform C 52021 65
Ts =
A [N/mm2] (18)
Hostaform C 27021 64
Hostaform C 13021 65 Taking into account ultimate tensile strength OR or
Hostaform C 13031 71 tensile strength 0B (table 4), the following holds true for
Hostaform C 9021 64 shear strength
Hostaform C 2521 62
Hostaform C 9021 K 62 TB = 0.6 CTR (19)
Hostaform C 9021 M 64
Hostaform C 9021 TF 49 or TB = 0.6 OB (20)
Hostaform T 1020 64
F2max. = A TB = b c rB [N] (21)
Hostaform C 9021 GV 1/30 110
Hostaform S 27063 50
Hostaform S 9063 53
5.2 Cylindrical snap-fit
Hostaform S 27064 42
Hostaform S 9064 42
Fig. 25
Hostacom M2 N02 19
Hostacom M2 N01 33
Hostacom M4 N01 33
Hostacom G2 N01 32
Hostacom G2 N02 70
Hostacom G3 N01 80
Hostacom Ml U01 36
Hostacom M4 U01 33
Celanex 2500 65
Celanex 2300 GV 1/30 150
Celanex 2300 GV 3/30 50
Vandar 4602 Z 40
13
The assembly force FI and pull-out force F2 can be calcu
lated from the formula: Fig. Geometry factor
26: K as a function of diameter
ratio
Ji DG
or
DG DK
c r> ->u M+ tan 1,2 rxn
Fu-p.rt.IV2b r
f_ '
[N] (22)
2 retaining angle [] J
H 1
p =
mv + 1
VDGj Fig. 27
K= +1 (24)
fuy-i
loj
Da outside diameter of the hub [mm]
DG outside diameter of the shaft [mm]
1 8 0.07
2 11.4 0.10
3 13.9 0.12
4 15.9 0.14
14
To estimate assembly or pull-out force, the formulae for The relationship between undercut depth H and joint
cylindrical snap-fits are used: pressure p can be described by the following formula (23):
+ tan
Fi =
T-.
F2 =
p n
T^2
D
a
fs~
DG
'
i
l jM-tana
T
r-Nn
[N] (25) P =
rJ'Es'T tN/mm2]
p joint [N/mm2]
pressure H undercut depth [mm]
DG ball diameter [mm] DK socket opening diameter [mm]
a f deformation length divided by the ES secant modulus [N/mm2] (fig. 17)
DG l ball diameter (table 5) K geometry factor
H coefficient of friction (table 2)
a. assembly or retaining angle [] (table 5) my + i
(26)
bJ
K= +1
fAi-
iDj 1
15
6. Calculation examples b) Assembly force FI
and two barbed legs. The hole diameter in the top plate ES = 2800 N/mm2 (fig. 17).
is DK 8 mm. The pull-out force F2 required per barbed
=
leg is 50 N. The barbed legs are to be injection moulded For the Hostaform/steel mating elements, it is assumed
from Hostaform C 9021 and will have a slotted circular that the friction coefficient fi 0.2 (table 2).
=
Fig. 28 section:
0.2 0.577
FI = 18.5 N
c) Pull-out force F2
a) The maximum permissible outer fibre elongation is Each element withstands a pull-out force of
chosen to be emax. 1 % For the semicircular cross-
=
2 31.6 N 63 N, which is greater than the required
section, the following applies using formula (10): pull-out force of 50 N.
H =
0.578-^-smax.
6.2 Cylindrical snap-fit
r--^-
The body of a rubber-tyred roller is to be made in two
1 is chosen be 15
to mm
parts which are permanently joined together (fig. 29).
Because of the relatively high stress involved and the fact
H = 0.578 -0.01 that the roller bears directly onto a steel axle, Hostaform
4
is used as the construction material.
H= 0.3mm
16
a) Maximum permissible undercut depth Hmax. b =
H
2 tan i
is 6max. =
4%, according to table 1.
b = 0.55 mm
Fig. 29
The joint pressure p is calculated from formula (23).
H 1
F P"W E*-i
1
<f^
K With ^- ^r 1.5 fig. 26 shows value for K of 3.6.
1Q? a
= =
7r* ^
L>G I"
Qil 0
^: a
c
r The secant
(fig. 17) is Es
modulus for
= 1800 N/mm2.
emax. = 4% for Hostaform
3S^ \
p-0.04.Jff
p = 20 N/mm2
0.2 + 0.577
Fi = 20-yt-16-2 -0.55
So the maximum permissible undercut depth can be 1-0.2-0.577
TT max.
_
p\
100
c) Pull-out force F2
~
16
100
Because the retaining angle 2 90, the joint is perma
=
Hmax. = 0.64 mm nent. The force required to separate the mating elements
DK =
DG-H shear-stressed area A (shear surface).
= 16 -
0.64
=
n 16 0.55
determined from the assembly angle a\ and the undercut
depth H. A = 27.6 mm2
17
So using formula (21), the pull-put force ist: b) Assembly force FI =
pull-out force F2
F2 max.
= A TB For e = 1 %, table 5 gives a retaining angle of 2 8. =
( 14 V
+ 1
\7.92J
-+1
P1_Y_
\7.92j
K=2.94
Es = 4400 N/mm2.
p = 18.89 N/mm2
a) Socket opening diameter DK
The assembly or pull-out force is then (formula 25):
According to table 1 the maximum permissible elon
gation for Hostacom G3 N01 is emax. 1%. =
T^-f a_
A. U +
fJ. T tan
L
Thus
^p-^D-g:-^-
fc' //tan
1
a
using formula (8)
0.4 + 0.14
= 18.89 -;r-82- 0.07-
DG ~
DK 1-0.4-0.14
e =
_
100%
DK
Fi.2 = 152 N
DG
DK =
r>
+ 1
100
6.4 Barbed leg snap-fit supported on both sides
DK =
18
For an assumed spring element thickness of s = 3 mm,
Fig. 31
a spring element thickness ratio of
1
s 3
/ "T"
=
"rf
0-15 is obtained.
*-b-
1 El
p_r
f V) \\ 1 With the aid of undercut ratio of
KP k \ \ \ ,
fig. 14, an
-p
= 0.019
f ir \, l is determined.
J 1
1
1 The undercut H of the barb is then calculated from
1 u 1 H = 0.019 1
= 0.019 20
6max. = 6%
Note:
The width of the barb is assumed to be b = 8 mm. A possible flow line in the region of the spring element
This gives a barb width ratio of could provide a weak point. By increasing wall thickness
at this point, design strength can be improved (see also
19
With cylindrical snap-fits, it should be remembered that
7. Demoulding of the dimensional stiffness ofa tubular part under com
is
pression greater than under tension. The hub of a
snap-fit joints is
snap-fit (fig. 32a) generally easier to demould than the
has to be demoulded after injection moulding. The im through hole and inwardly projecting lip (fig. 32a) or
portant question here is whether the parts can be directly with an outwardly projecting lip (fig. 32b).
demoulded or whether it is necessary to bed the under
cut in slides, followers or collapsible cores. In the more frequent case of a blind hole (fig. 33), the
inner and outer faces of the undercut must be demoulded
There is no general this. The maximum per
answer to in succession. When the mould has opened (A), the
missible deformation values quoted in table 1 can of cylinder 1 is pressed out of the mould cavity by ejector 3.
course be applied equally well parts during
to demould- It takes core 2 along with it until stop 4 is reached (B).
ing. Problems usually arise from the introduction of Through further movement of the ejector, the cylinder
deformation forces into the component. These can result is stripped from the core. Expansion of the hub by an
in local stretching of the part or cause the ejector to press amount corresponding to undercut depth is not pre
Fig. 32 Fig. 33
plastic part
_ A
\
<
split core
\\\\\\\\\\ ^*
plastic part
20
Photo 2 shows Hostaform fasteners which considerably
8. Applications facilitate assembly, particularly in mass production.
Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are used to fix interior trim in cars.
8.1 Barbed leg snap-fit No. 4 is a cable holder as used in washing machines and
dishwashers. No. 5 is a clip with a similar function. Here
Photo 1 shows examples of snap-fits in which the defor- the snap-fit is secured by driving a pin into the hollow
mability of the cylindrical snap-fit has been increased by shank (expanding rivet). The clips for fixing car exterior
means of slots. In the top half of the picture there are trim (no. 6) work on the same principle. No. 7 shows
two rollers with Hostaform bearings for dishwashers. the hinge fixing for a detergent dispenser tray flap on a
In the left roller, each barbed leg is deflected by washing machine.
f = 0.75 during assembly. With a barbed leg length
mm
f-h
=1 = 0.058 = 5.f
non-detachable.
Photo 1 Photo 2
21
In photo 3 another application from the automotive Photo 5 shows that non-cylindrical housing parts can
industry is shown. This is a Hostaform plug box which also be joined by barbed
legs. This air filter intake is
snap-fits into the fascia panel. The part is made in two made from Hostacom G2 N01 In assembling the two
.
symmetrical halves which are inserted into each other. halves, the barbed legs are not deflected but the mount
ing holes are elastically deformed.
Photo 4 shows a Hostaform release lever for a car boot
lid, which is secured by two pairs of barbed legs.
Photo 3 Photo 5
22
8.2 Cylindrical snap-fit Photo 7 shows adjuster for a
an car, which is similar in
design to the previous example. It is controlled by the
Photo 6 shows pneumatic positioning device for con
a carburettor vacuum. Here, too, a rubber diaphragm is
trolling the flaps in air conditioning systems. The two secured by the snap-fit joint connecting the two halves.
Hostaform halves are snap-fitted together, thereby at the
same time forming a seal by means of an O-ring. The The assembly diameter is DG 60.8 mm and the under
=
operating pressure is 0.2 to 0.8 bar. The undercut depth cut depth H 1.6 mm. Assuming that during assembly
=
Photo 6 Photo 7
23
8.3 Ball and socket snap-fit 9. Explanation of symbols
Photo 8 shows parts of a carburettor linkage made from
Hostaform. The ball, with a diameter of DG 7.8 mm, =
7.5 mm = 0.3 mm
Da mm outside diameter of hub
F2 N pull-out force
H J_
N/mm2 joint pressure p =
^= Es
K
mm wall thickness
o
assembly angle
o
retaining angle
% elongation
% maximum permissible elongation
%/min rate of elongation
coefficient of friction (table 2)
N/mm2 tensile strength (table 4)
N/mm2 ultimate tensile strength (table 4)
N/mm2 shear strength
24
10. Literature
Engineering plastics
Design Calculations Applications
[1] H. Schmidt: Fgen durch Schnappverbindungen,
VDI-Z, No. 5, 1972 Publications so far in this series:
[2] K. Oberbach, D. Schauf: Schnappverbindungen
aus Kunststoff, Verbindungstechnik, Nos. 6, 7 A. Engineering plastics
and 8, 1977 A. 1.1 Grades and properties -
Hostaform
[3] W. W. Chow: Snap-fit design concepts. A. 1.2 Grades and properties -
Hostacom
Modern Plastics International, August 1977 A. 1.4 Grades and properties -
Hostalen GUR
A. 1.5 Grades and properties -
Celanex,
Vandar, Impet
A.2.1 Calculation principles
A.2.2 Hostaform -
Characteristic values and
calculation examples
A.2.3 Hostacom -
Characteristic values and
calculation examples
25
World-Class Engineering Polymers Contact Information
2009 Ticona