COMPAT

(COMPETITION APPELATE TRIBUNAL)

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

PROF ANUMEHA SAHAI KUNAL SINGH

AMITY LAW SCHOOL (ALS) ROLL NO: A8101816015

LUCKNOW CAMPUS. LLM 2ST SEMISTER

~1~
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I wish to express a sense of gratitude to Professor Miss Anumeha Sahai, Amity law School,
Amity University, Lucknow Campus for his help during the course of this assignment and the
gracious help of all the faculty members who quickly responded to my many request for
reference material.

I also express thanks to my Parents, friends, without the support of whom this Assignment
could not have reached to its finality.

Kunal Singh,
Semester-2 LLM
Enrollment. No. A8101816015

~2~
 TABLE OF CONTENT

Topics Pages

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 4-5

CHAPTER 2: COMPOSITION, QUALIFICATION, TENURE, & DISQUALIFICATION 5-7

CHAPTER 3: APPEALABLE DIRECTIONS, DECISIONS OR ORDERS OF

COMMISSION 8-11

CHAPTER 4: AWARDING COMPENSATION 11

CHAPTER 5: PROCEDURE FOR FILING APPEAL BEFORE TRIBUNAL 11-14

CHAPTER 6: PROCEDURE FOR CLAIM OF COMPENSATION 15-17

CHAPTER 7: CONTRAVENTION OF ORDERS OF TRIBUNAL, APPEAL TO

SUPREME COURT, POWER TO PUNISH FOR CONTEMPT 17-18

CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSION 19

BIBLIOGRAPHY 20

~3~
 CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

The Competition Appellate Tribunal is a statutory organization established under the

provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 to hear and dispose of appeals against any direction
issued or decision made or order passed by the Competition Commission of India under sub-
sections (2) and (6) of section 26, section 27, section 28, section 31, section 32, section 33,
section 38, section 39, section 43, section 43A, section 44, section 45 or section 46 of the
Competition Act, 2002. The Appellate Tribunal shall also adjudicate on claim for
compensation that may arise from the findings of the Competition Commission of India or
the orders of the Appellate Tribunal in an appeal against any findings of the Competition
Commission of India or under section 42A or under sub-section (2) of section 53Q of the Act
and pass orders for the recovery of compensation under section 53N of the Act.

The Central Government has set up the Appellate Tribunal on 15th May, 2009 having its
Headquarter at New Delhi. Honble Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat, former Judge of Supreme
Court, has been appointed as the First Chairperson of the Appellate Tribunal. Besides, the
Chairperson, the Appellate Tribunal shall consist of not more than two Members to be
appointed by the Central Government. The Chairperson of the Appellate Tribunal shall be a
person, who is, or has been a Judge of the Supreme Court or the Chief Justice of a High
Court. A Member of the Appellate Tribunal shall be a person of ability, integrity and standing
having special knowledge of, and professional experience of not less than twenty-five years
in, competition matters, including competition law and policy, international trade, economics,
business, commerce, law, finance, accountancy, management, industry, public affairs,
administration or in any other matter which in the opinion of the Central Government, may be
useful to the Appellate Tribunal.

The Appellate Tribunal shall not be bound by the procedure laid down in the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), but shall be guided by the principles of natural justice and,
subject to the other provisions of this Act and of any rules made by the Central Government.
The Appellate Tribunal shall have, for the purposes of discharging its functions under the Act,
the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of

~4~
1908). Every order made by the Appellate Tribunal shall be enforced by it in the same
manner as if it were a decree made by a court in a suit pending therein. If any person
contravenes, without any reasonable ground, any order of the Appellate Tribunal, he shall be
liable for a penalty of not exceeding rupees one crore or imprisonment for a term up to three
years or with both as the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi may deem fit.

CHAPTER 2: Composition, Qualification, tenure & Disqualification

COMPOSITION OF TRIBUNAL:

The Tribunal shall consist of a Chairperson and not more than two other members to be
appointed by the Central Government.

Qualification:

The Chairperson of the Tribunal shall be a person, who is or has been a Judge of the
Supreme Court or the Chief Justice of a High Court. A member of the Tribunal shall be a
person of ability, integrity and standing having special knowledge of, and professional
experience of not less than twenty five years in, competition matters, including competition
law and policy, international trade, economics, business, commerce, law, finance,
accountancy, management, industry, public affairs, administration or in any other matter
which in the opinion of the Central Government, may be useful to the Tribunal. The
Chairperson and members of the Tribunal shall be appointed by the Central Government from
a panel of names recommended by the Selection Committee.

Tenure:

The Chairperson or a Member of the Tribunal shall hold office as such for a term of five
years from the date on which he enters upon his office and shall be eligible for
reappointment. No Chairperson or other member of the Tribunal shall hold office as such
after he has attained-

in the case of the Chairperson, the age of sixty eight years;

~5~
 in the case of any other member the age of sixty five years

Disqualification:

Sec. 53K of the Act deals with the disqualification of the Chairperson and the members. The
Central Government may, in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, remove from office
of the Chairperson or any other member of the Tribunal who-

a) Has been adjudged an insolvent; or

b) Has engaged at any time, during his term of office, in any paid employment; or

c) Has been convicted of an offence which, in the opinion of the Central Government
involves moral turpitude; or

d) Has become physically or mentally incapable of acting as such Chairperson or other

Member of the Tribunal; or

e) Has acquired such financial or other interest as is likely to affect prejudicially his
functions as such Chairperson or member of the Tribunal;

f) Has so abused his position to render his continuance in office prejudicial to the public
interest.

No Chairperson or a member shall be removed from his office on the ground specified in
clause (e) or (f) except by an order made by the Central Government after an inquiry made in
this behalf by a Judge of the Supreme Court in which such Chairperson or member had been
informed of the charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in
respect of those charges.

~6~
 CHAPTER 3: APPEALABLE DIRECTIONS, DECISIONS OR
ORDERS OF COMMISSION

Sec. 26(2) Where on receipt of a reference from the Central Government or a State
Government or a statutory authority or information received on certain agreements
and dominant position of enterprises, the Commission is of the opinion that there
exists no prima facie case, it shall close the matter forthwith and pass such orders as it
deems fit;
Sec. 26(6) - If, after consideration of the objections or suggestions, if any, the
Commission agrees with the recommendation of the Director General it shall close the
matter forthwith and pass such order as it deems fit;
Sec. 27 - Where after inquiry the Commission finds that any agreement is anti
competitive agreement or action of an enterprise in a dominant position, is in
contravention of Sec. 3 or Section 4 as the case may be, it may pass all or any of the
following orders, namely:

Direct any enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons, as the

case may be, involved in such agreement, or abuse of dominant position, to discontinue and
not to re-enter such agreement or discontinue such abuse of dominant position as the case
may be;

impose such penalty, as it may deem fit which shall be not more than ten per cent of the
average of the turnover for the last three preceding financial years, upon each of such person
or enterprises which are parties to such agreements or abuse; In case any agreement referred
to in Sec. 3 has been entered into by a cartel, the Commission may impose upon each
producer, seller, distributor, trader or service provider included in that cartel, a penalty of up
to three times of its profit for each year of the continuance of such agreement or ten per cent
of the turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement whichever is higher;

direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may
be specified in the order by the Commission;

direct the enterprises concerned to abide by such other orders in the Commission may
pass and comply with the directions, including, payment of costs, if any

Pass such other order of issue such directions as it may deem fit.

~7~
 Sec. 28 It deals with the division of enterprise enjoying dominant position. The
Commission may, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time
being in force, by order in writing, direct division of an enterprise enjoying dominant
position to ensure that such enterprise does not abuse its dominant position. In
particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing powers, the order
may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:

o the transfer or vesting of property, rights, liabilities or obligations;

o the adjustment of contracts either by discharge or reduction of any liability or

obligation or otherwise;

o the creation, allotment, surrender or cancellation of any shares, stocks or

securities;

o the formation of winding up of an enterprise or the amendment of the

memorandum of association or articles of association or any other instruments
regulating the business of any enterprise;

o the extent to which, and the circumstances in which, provisions of the order
affecting an enterprise may be altered by the enterprise and the registration
thereof;

o any other matter which may be necessary to give effect to the division of the
enterprise;

Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any
contract or in any memorandum or articles of association, an officer of a company who
ceases to hold office as such in consequence of the division of an enterprise shall not be
entitled to claim any compensation for such cesser.

Sec. 31 It deals with orders of Commission on certain combinations.

o Where the Commission is of the opinion that any combination does not, or is
not likely to, have an appreciable adverse effect on competition, it shall by

~8~
 order, approve that combination including the combination in respect of which
a notice has been give under Sec. 6(2);

o Where the Commission is of the opinion that the combination has, or is likely
to have, an appreciable adverse effect on competition, it shall direct that the
combination shall not effect;

o Where the Commission is of the opinion that the combination has, or is likely
to have, an appreciable adverse effect on competition but such adverse effect
can be eliminated by suitable modification to such combination; it may
propose appropriate medication to the combination, to the parties to such
combination.

Sec. 32 It deals with acts taking places outside India but having an effect on
competition in India. The Commission shall, notwithstanding that-

o an agreement has been entered into outside India; or

o any party to such agreement is outside India; or

o any enterprise abusing the dominant position is outside India; or

o a combination has taken place outside India; or

o any party to combination is outside India; or

o any other matter or practice or action arising out of such agreement or

dominant position or combination is outside India

have power to inquire in accordance with the provisions contained in Sec. 19, 20, 26, 29 and
30 of the Act into such agreement or abuse of dominant position or combination if such
agreement or dominant position or combination has, or is likely to have, an appreciable
adverse effect on competition in the relevant market in India and pass such orders as it may
deem fit in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

~9~
 Sec. 33 Where during an inquiry, the Commission is satisfied that an act in
contravention of Sec.3(1) and Sec. 4(1) or Sec. 6 has committed, the Commission
may, by order, temporarily restrain any party from carrying on such act until the
conclusion of such inquiry or until further orders without giving notice to such party,
where it deems it necessary;

Sec. 38 It deals with rectification of orders. It provides that with a view to

rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, the Commission may amend any
order passed by it under the provisions of this Act. The Commission may make an
amendment of its own motion or an amendment for rectifying any mistake which has
been brought to its notice by any party to the order;

CHAPTER 4: AWARDING COMPENSATION

AWARDING COMPENSATION:

Sec.53 N deals with awarding compensation by Tribunal. Claim for compensation, that may
arise from the findings of the Commission or the orders of the Appellate Tribunal in an appeal
against finding of the Commission or under Sec. 42A (compensation in case of contravention
of orders of Commission), or under Sec. 53Q (2) (compensation of in case of contravention
of orders of Appellate Tribunal) may be made to the Appellate Tribunal.

CHAPTER 5: PROCEDURE FOR FILING APPEAL BEFORE

TRIBUNAL

Who can represent before Tribunal?

Sec.53S provides that a person preferring an appeal to the Tribunal may either appear in
person or authorize one or more Chartered Accountants or Company Secretaries or Cost
Accountants or Legal Practitioners or any of its officers to present his or its case before the
Tribunal. The Central Government or a State Government or a local authority or any

~ 10 ~
enterprise preferring an appeal to the Tribunal may authorize one or more Chartered
Accountants or Company Secretaries or Cost Accountants or Legal Practitioners or any of its
Officers to act as Presenting Officers and every person so authorized may present the case
with respect to any appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. The Commission may authorize
one or more Chartered Accountants or Company Secretaries or Cost Accountants or Legal
Practitioners or any of its officers to act as Presenting Officers and every person so authorized
may present the case with respect to any appeal before the Tribunal.

Procedure:

The Central Government or the State Government or a local authority or enterprise or

any person, aggrieved by any direction, decision or order may prefer an appeal to the
Tribunal;

Every appeal shall be filed within a period of sixty days from the date on which a
copy of the direction or decision or order made by the Commission is received by the
Central Government or the State Government or a local authority or enterprise or any
person;

The Tribunal may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period of sixty days
if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing it within that that period;

A memorandum of appeal shall be presented in the Registry or shall be sent by

Registered post addressed to the Registrar of Appellate Tribunal in the Form appended
to the Competition Appellate Tribunal (Form and fee for filing an appeal and fee for
filing compensation applications) Rules, 2009;

A memorandum of appeal sent by post shall be deemed to have been presented on the
day it was received by the Registry;

Every memorandum of appeal shall be in five copies and shall be accompanied with
the certified copy of the direction or decision or order against which the appeal is
filed;

~ 11 ~
 Where a party is represented by an authorized representative, a copy of the
authorization to act as the authorized representative and the written consent thereto
by such authorized representative, shall be appended to memorandum of the appeal;

Every memorandum of appeal presented to the Appellate Tribunal shall be in English

and in case it is on some other Indian language, it shall be accompanied by a copy
translated in English and shall be fairly and legibly type written, lithographed or
printed in double spacing on one side of standard petition paper with an inner margin
of about four centimetres width on top and with a right margin of 2.5 cm, and left
margin of 5 cm, duly paginated, indexed and stitched together in paper book form;

Every memorandum of appeal shall be accompanied with a fee as detailed below

AMOUNT OF PENALTY IMPOSED AMOUNT OF FEES PAYABLE

Less than Rs.20,000/- Rs.1,000/-

Twenty thousand or more rupees but less Rs.2,500/-

than one lakh

One lakh or more rupees Rs.2, 500/- plus Rs.1, 000 for every
additional one lakh of penalty or fraction
thereof, subject to a maximum of Rs.3 lakhs.

Amount of fee payable in respect of any other appeal against a direction or decision or
order of the Commission under the Act shall be Rs.10,000/-
Such fee may be remitted in the form of Demand Draft drawn in favor of Accounts
Officer, Ministry of Corporate Affairs payable at New Delhi;
The Tribunal may, to advance the cause of justice and in suitable cases, waive
payment of fee or portion thereof, taking into consideration the economic condition or

~ 12 ~
 indigent circumstances of the petitioner or the appellant or applicant or such other
reason, as the case may be, by an order for reasons to be recorded.;
On receipt of an appeal the Tribunal may, after giving the parties to the appeal, an
opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit, confirming,
modifying or setting aside the directions, decisions or order appealed against;
The Tribunal shall not be bound by the procedure laid down in the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 but shall be guided by the principles of Natural Justice and, subject
to the other provisions of this Act and of any rules made by the Central Government,
the Tribunal shall have power to regulate its own procedure including the places at
which they shall have their sitting;
The Tribunal shall, for the purposes of discharging its functions under this Act, the
same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
while trying a suit in respect of the following matters, namely:-
Summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath;
Requiring the discovery and production of documents;
Receiving evidence on affidavits;
Subject to the provisions of Sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
requisitioning any public record or document or copy of such record or document
from any office;
Issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents;
Reviewing its decisions;
Dismissing a representation for default or deciding it ex-parte;
Setting aside any order of dismissal of any representation for default or any order
passed by it ex-parte;
Any other matter which may be prescribed;
Every proceeding before the Tribunal shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings
within the meaning of Section 193 and 228 and for the purposes of Section 196 of the
Indian Penal Code and the Tribunal shall be deemed to be a civil court for the
purposes of Sec. 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973;
If for any reason other than temporary absence, any vacancy occurs in the office of the
Chairperson or a Member of the Tribunal the Central Government shall appoint another
person in accordance with the provisions of this Act to fill the vacancy and the proceedings
may be continued before the Tribunal from the stage at which the vacancy is filled;
In the event of the occurrence of any vacancy in the office of the Chairperson of the
Tribunal by reason of his death or resignation, the senior most member of the Tribunal
shall act as the Chairperson of the Tribunal until the date on which a new Chairperson
appointed in accordance with the provisions of this Act of fill such vacancy enters
upon his office;

~ 13 ~
 When the Chairperson of the Appellate Tribunal is unable to discharge his functions
owing to absence, illness or any other cause, the senior most member or as the case
may be, such one of the members of the Tribunal, as the Central Government may, by
notification, authorize in this behalf, shall discharge the functions of the Chairperson
until the date on which the Chairperson resumes his duties;
No act or proceeding of the Tribunal shall be questioned or shall be invalid merely on
the ground of existence of any vacancy or defect in the constitution of the Tribunal;
The Tribunal shall send a copy of every order made by it to the Commission and the
parties to the appeal;
The appeal filed before the Tribunal shall be dealt with by it as expeditiously as
possible and endeavour shall be made by it to dispose of the appeal within six months
from the date of receipt of the appeal.

CHAPTER 6: PROCEDURE FOR CLAIM OF COMPENSATION

PROCEDURE FOR CLAIM OF COMPENSATION

The Central Government or a State Government or a local authority or any enterprise

or any person may make an application to the Tribunal to adjudicate on claim for
compensation that may arise from the findings of the Commission or the orders of the
Tribunal in an appeal against any finding of the Commission and to pass an order for
the recovery of compensation from any enterprise for any loss or damage shown to
have been suffered, by the Central Government or a State Government or a local
authority or any enterprise or any person as a result of any contravention of the
provisions having been committed by the enterprise;

Where any loss or damage is caused to numerous persons having the same interest,
one or more such persons may, with the permission of the Tribunal, make an
application for permission of the Tribunal make an application for and on behalf of, or
for the benefit of, the persons so interested and thereupon, the provisions of rule 8 of
order 1 of the First Schedule to the Code of Civil Procedure, shall apply subject to the

~ 14 ~
 modification that every reference therein to a suit or decree shall be construed as a
reference to the application before the Tribunal and the order the Tribunal thereon;
An application may be made for compensation before the Tribunal only after either
the Commission or the Tribunal on appeal has determined in a proceeding before it
that violation of the provisions of the Act has taken place, or if provisions of Sec.42A
or Sec. 53Q(2) of the Act are attracted;
Every application made shall be accompanied by the findings of the Commission;
The fee payable shall be as detailed below:

AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION CLAIMED AMOUNT OF FEES PAYABLE

Less than One lakh rupees Rs.1,000/-

More than One lakh rupees Rs.1,000/- plus Rs.1,000/- for every
additional one lakh rupees of
compensation claimed or fraction
thereof, subject to a maximum of
Rs.3,00,000/-

Such fee may be remitted in the form of Demand Draft drawn in favor of Accounts
Officer, Ministry of Corporate Affairs payable at New Delhi;
The Tribunal may, to advance the cause of justice and in suitable cases, waive
payment of fee or portion thereof, taking into consideration the economic condition or
indigent circumstances of the petitioner or the appellant or applicant or such other
reason, as the case may be, by an order for reasons to be recorded.;
The Tribunal may, after an inquiry made into the allegations mentioned in the
application pass an order directing the enterprise to make payment to the applicant, of
the amount determined by it as reasonable from the enterprise as compensation for the
loss or damage caused to the applicant as a result of any contravention of the
provisions having been committed by such enterprise.
The inquiry shall be for the purpose of determining the eligibility and quantum of
compensation due to a person applying for the same and not for examining afresh the

~ 15 ~
 findings of the Commission or the Tribunal on whether any violation of the Act has
taken place;
The Tribunal may obtain the recommendations of the Commission before passing an
order of compensation.

EXECUTION OF ORDERS OF TRIBUNAL:

Every order may be Tribunal shall be enforced by it in the same manner as if it were a decree
made by a court in a suit pending therein, and it shall be lawful for the Tribunal to send in
case of the inability to execute such order, to the court within the local limits of whose
jurisdiction-

in the case of an order against a company, the registered office of the company is
situated; or
in the case of an order against any other person, place where the person concerned
voluntarily resides or carries on business personally works for gain, is situated.
The Tribunal may transmit order made by it to a civil court having local jurisdiction
and such civil court shall execute the order as if it were a decree made by that court.

CHAPTER 7: CONTRAVENTION OF ORDERS OF TRIBUNAL, APPEAL TO

SUPREME COURT, POWER TO PUNISH FOR CONTEMPT

CONTRAVENTION OF ORDERS OF TRIBUNAL:

If any person contravenes without any reasonable ground, any order of the Tribunal, he shall
be liable for a penalty of not exceeding Rs. 1 crore or imprisonment for a term up to three
years or with both as the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi may deem fit. The Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi shall not take cognizance of any offence punishable save on a
complaint made by an officer authorized by the Tribunal. Any person may make an
application to the Tribunal for an order for the recovery of compensation from any enterprise
for any loss or damage shown to have been suffered by such person as a result of the said
enterprise contravening, without any reasonable ground, any order of the Tribunal or delaying
in carrying out such orders of the Tribunal.

APPEAL TO SUPREME COURT:

~ 16 ~
The Central Government or any State Government or the Commission or any statutory
authority or any local authority or any enterprise or any person aggrieved by any decision or
order of the Tribunal may file an appeal to the Supreme Court within sixty days from the date
of communication of the decision or order of the Tribunal to them. The Supreme Court may,
if it is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal
within the said period allow it to be filed after the expiry of the said period of sixty days.

POWER TO PUNISH FOR CONTEMPT:

The Tribunal shall have, and exercise, the same jurisdiction, powers and authority in respect
of contempt of itself as a High Court has and may exercise and for this purpose the provisions
of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 shall have effect subject to modification that-

the reference therein to a High Court shall be considered as including a reference to

the Tribunal;
The references to Advocate General in Section 15 of the said Act shall be construed as
a reference to such Law Officer as the Central Government may, by notification,
specify in this behalf.

~ 17 ~
 CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION

The COMPAT body under the Competition Act 2002, is sufficiently thorough and fastidiously
cut out to meet the necessities of the rising number of cases in India, which has unfolded
upon the skyline of Indian monetary framework. It is in synchronization with other
arrangement of strategies, for example, changed exchange approach, loose FDI standards,
FEMA, deregulation and so forth, that would guarantee consistency in general rivalry
strategy an also a proper justice to the parties involved in the cases. It's simply a question of
time when the Act is made viable and CCI gets to be distinctly practical, which would, thusly,
encourage understand our yearning to make up for lost time with the worldwide economy. Be
that as it may, the Act is genuinely intelligent of changing monetary milieu of our nation and
is all around prepared to advance reasonable rivalry and deal with impinging market
rehearses, encourage a residential players versus untouchables, shield the premiums of
customers and in this way, guarantee just and dynamic quality of justice to the parties
involved in the cases.

~ 18 ~
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

WEBSITES:

http://compat.nic.in/
http://www.cci.gov.in/
http://www.legallyindia.com/tag/competition-appellate-tribunal-
compat

~ 19 ~