Stream A - 1 - India

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Title: IMPROVING THE FABRICATION METHOD OF SHEET

METAL COMPONENT FOR LIGHT COMBAT AIRCRAFT

DYNAMIC QUALITY CIRCLE

ARCHITECTS OF DYNAMIC

FROM RIGHT: A.Shankarnarayan, Master Technician Leader


C.Srikanth Technician Dy.Leader
E.Sridhar Technician Member
A.Mugundan Technician Member
A.Syed Sadiq Technician Member
T.H.Raghuraja Manager Facilitator

DYNAMIC QUALITY CIRCLE


Sheet Metal Department
Aircraft Division
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited
Bangalore, Pin: 560 017
Karnataka, India Telephone: 91-80-25225201 Ext 453

INTRODUCTION:
DYNAMIC Quality Circle was started in March 2001, to involve personnel in
Continuous improvement on job related activities etc.

Circle Name: DYNAMIC QC


Our QC Circle consists of 6 members
Average age of our QC Circle members is 32. (Youngest: 24 / Oldest: 41)
QC Circle meeting takes place after working hours ; during working hours
QC Circle meeting is usually held 4 time(s) per month. Each takes 1 Hour 30 Minutes.
Our QC Circle has already completed 28 subjects before this case report.
Visual aids to be used in this presentation: ; LCD projector

1
PROJECT SELECTION PARAMETERS
Long cycle time.
Complication in fabrication.
Assembly held up.
Quality Improvement
Customer Satisfaction.

PROJECT SCHEDULE
Project plan or schedule is the first step in quality improvement and zero
Defect in the component of the project. Accordingly, the circle prepared
the following Milestone Chart, delegating the responsibilities to each member.

PROBLEM DEFINITION
PROJECT : LIGHT COMBAT AIRCRAFT.
PART # : O1L.1E,1180.001/002 AND O1L.1D.1090.002.100/200.
PART NAME : ENGINE BOTTOM AND TOP CONE.
SPECIFICATION : L164 T3 2MM THICK AL ALLOY.

High rejection rate due to mismatching of skin on engine top and bottom cone. Contour of 15mm
Gap found on assembly
WHY, WHY, WHY ANALYSIS

DATA COLLECTION
Data collection was done primarily through
Structured questionnaire and interviews with
Operators and secondarily from database available
in the assembly and inspection department
The data collected is as follows.
It is clear from the table that
.

2
High rejection
Repeated dressing on assembly.
Mismatching of the contour on assembly.

Rejection Analysis
A/C Work order Qty Accp Rej
PV1 81424002544 2each 0 2each
PV2 91051489025 2each 0 2each
PV3 91051489128 2each 0 2each
LSP1 91051489264 2each 0 2each
LSP2 91051489264 2each 0 2each

FINDING OUT ROOT CAUSE DEVELOPING SOLUTIONS


Same reasons listed in causes represent in Pareto
Diagram under VITAL FEW TRIVAIL MANY Converting checking block to
Concept stretch forming tool.
Trimming tool has to be
developed.
Changing hand roll and wheeling
opn to ERCO stretch form
operation.
Dimension of material should be
increased for stretch forming.
Add anneal and solutionise
process.

3
MODIFIED TOOL: REGULAR IMPLEMENTATION

Tool design modified and approved


by tooling dept.
Erco press forming process amended
by planning dept.
Process added by form of anneal and
solutionise.
Reduced standard man hours were
amended by MSD
TRIMMING TOOL: Trimming tool made for final
trimming.

Foreseeing probable resistance

Co-ordination from tool room


for converting hand rolling to
stretch form tool.
Changing. Process with the help
of planning dept.
Convincing Erco stretch
forming operator for trails.
Requesting raw material store
for availability of material for
TRAIL IMPLEMENTATION
trails.
TRAIL 1: 1each was carried on T3
condition (HARD) component got TANGIBLE BENEFITS:
cracked.
TRAIL 2:1each was carried in soft Existing hours per aircraft is 80 hrs.
material by giving 21kg/cm2 contour not Implemented new process smh is
achieved. 32 hrs.
Total hrs saved per aircraft is
TRAIL 3: 1 each was carried by giving
48 hrs.
required pressure of 30kg/cm2 contour
Amount saved per aircraft is
was achieved.
Rs19, 440.
TRAIL 3: 5each was carried on w/o
Saved for 4 aircraft is Rs77, 760.
9105148951 and was offered for
inspection and got confirmed quality. Expected saving for 20 aircraft is
Rs3, 88,880.

4
CONCLUSION
Suggestion made by our QC members was successfully implemented and observed the
Rejection rate was reduced to zero defect and saved SMH of 48 Hrs per aircraft.
We do not believe that our responsibility is over with this achievement. We emphasize the
Need for maintenance and improvement. Quality improvement is just like never
Ending waveseach wave adds force to the next wave.

Dynamic QC has provided a viable platform for maintaining quality, improved group
Morale and better communication skills.

You might also like