AspenPolymersUnitOpsV8 4 Usr
AspenPolymersUnitOpsV8 4 Usr
AspenPolymersUnitOpsV8 4 Usr
Aspen Polymers, Aspen Custom Modeler, Aspen Dynamics, Aspen Plus, Aspen Properties, aspenONE, the
aspen leaf logo and Plantelligence and Enterprise Optimization are trademarks or registered trademarks of Aspen
Technology, Inc., Burlington, MA.
All other brand and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
This software includes NIST Standard Reference Database 103b: NIST Thermodata Engine Version 7.1
This document is intended as a guide to using AspenTech's software. This documentation contains AspenTech
proprietary and confidential information and may not be disclosed, used, or copied without the prior consent of
AspenTech or as set forth in the applicable license agreement. Users are solely responsible for the proper use of
the software and the application of the results obtained.
Although AspenTech has tested the software and reviewed the documentation, the sole warranty for the software
may be found in the applicable license agreement between AspenTech and the user. ASPENTECH MAKES NO
WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THIS DOCUMENTATION,
ITS QUALITY, PERFORMANCE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Contents iii
INITIATO Databank .............................................................................. 26
Segment Databank............................................................................... 26
Polymer Databank ................................................................................ 27
Segment Methodology .................................................................................... 27
Specifying Components................................................................................... 28
Selecting Databanks ............................................................................. 28
Defining Component Names and Types ................................................... 28
Specifying Segments ............................................................................ 29
Specifying Polymers ............................................................................. 29
Specifying Oligomers ............................................................................ 30
Specifying Site-Based Components......................................................... 30
References .................................................................................................... 31
iv Contents
6 End-Use Properties............................................................................................73
Polymer Properties ......................................................................................... 73
Prop-Set Properties ........................................................................................ 73
End-Use Properties ......................................................................................... 74
Relationship to Molecular Structure ........................................................ 75
Method for Calculating End-Use Properties ........................................................ 76
Intrinsic Viscosity ................................................................................. 77
Zero-Shear Viscosity ............................................................................ 77
Density of Copolymer ........................................................................... 78
Melt Index........................................................................................... 78
Melt Index Ratio................................................................................... 79
Calculating End-Use Properties ........................................................................ 79
Selecting an End-Use Property ............................................................... 79
Adding an End-Use Property Prop-Set ..................................................... 79
References .................................................................................................... 79
Contents v
Specifying the Step-Growth Model........................................................ 156
Specifying Reacting Components.......................................................... 156
Listing Built-In Reactions..................................................................... 157
Specifying Built-In Reaction Rate Constants........................................... 157
Assigning Rate Constants to Reactions .................................................. 158
Including User Reactions ..................................................................... 158
Adding or Editing User Reactions.......................................................... 159
Specifying Rate Constants for User Reactions ........................................ 159
Assigning Rate Constants to User Reactions........................................... 159
Selecting Report Options ..................................................................... 160
Selecting the Reacting Phase ............................................................... 160
Specifying Units of Measurement for Pre-Exponential Factors................... 160
Including a User Kinetic Subroutine ...................................................... 161
Including a User Rate Constant Subroutine............................................ 161
Including a User Basis Subroutine ........................................................ 161
References .................................................................................................. 161
vi Contents
Micellar Nucleation ............................................................................. 201
Homogeneous Nucleation .................................................................... 204
Particle Growth .................................................................................. 206
Radical Balance.................................................................................. 207
Kinetics of Emulsion Polymerization ...................................................... 211
Model Features and Assumptions ................................................................... 215
Model Assumptions............................................................................. 215
Thermodynamics of Monomer Partitioning ............................................. 215
Polymer Particle Size Distribution ......................................................... 216
Polymer Particle Properties Calculated ............................................................ 218
User Profiles ...................................................................................... 218
Specifying Emulsion Polymerization Kinetics .................................................... 219
Accessing the Emulsion Model.............................................................. 219
Specifying the Emulsion Model ............................................................. 219
Specifying Reacting Species................................................................. 220
Listing Reactions ................................................................................ 220
Adding Reactions ............................................................................... 221
Editing Reactions ............................................................................... 221
Assigning Rate Constants to Reactions .................................................. 221
Selecting Calculation Options ............................................................... 222
Adding Gel-Effect ............................................................................... 222
Specifying Phase Partitioning ............................................................... 222
Specifying Particle Growth Parameters .................................................. 223
References .................................................................................................. 223
Contents vii
Assigning Rate Constants to Reactions .................................................. 246
References .................................................................................................. 247
viii Contents
Adding or Editing Reactions ................................................................. 287
Specifying Reaction Rate Constants ...................................................... 288
Assigning Rate Constants to Reactions .................................................. 288
Including a User Rate Constant Subroutine............................................ 289
Including a User Basis Subroutine ........................................................ 289
References .................................................................................................. 289
14 Steady-State Flowsheeting............................................................................291
Polymer Manufacturing Flowsheets ................................................................. 291
Monomer Synthesis ............................................................................ 292
Polymerization ................................................................................... 293
Recovery / Separations ....................................................................... 293
Polymer Processing ............................................................................ 293
Modeling Polymer Process Flowsheets ............................................................. 293
Steady-State Modeling Features..................................................................... 294
Unit Operations Modeling Features ....................................................... 294
Plant Data Fitting Features .................................................................. 294
Process Model Application Tools ........................................................... 294
References .................................................................................................. 294
Contents ix
Data Fitting For Polymer Models ..................................................................... 340
Data Collection and Verification............................................................ 341
Literature Review ............................................................................... 341
Preliminary Parameter Fitting............................................................... 342
Preliminary Model Development ........................................................... 343
Trend Analysis ................................................................................... 343
Model Refinement .............................................................................. 344
Steps for Using the Data Regression Tool ........................................................ 345
Identifying Flowsheet Variables ............................................................ 346
Manipulating Variables Indirectly.......................................................... 347
Entering Point Data ............................................................................ 349
Entering Profile Data........................................................................... 350
Entering Standard Deviations .............................................................. 351
Defining Data Regression Cases ........................................................... 352
Sequencing Data Regression Cases ...................................................... 352
Interpreting Data Regression Results .................................................... 352
Troubleshooting Convergence Problems ................................................ 353
17 User Models...................................................................................................359
User Unit Operation Models ........................................................................... 359
User Unit Operation Models Structure ................................................... 359
User Unit Operation Model Calculations ................................................. 360
User Unit Operation Report Writing....................................................... 365
User Kinetic Models ...................................................................................... 365
User Physical Property Models........................................................................ 370
References .................................................................................................. 373
19 Run-Time Environment..................................................................................381
Aspen Polymers Architecture ......................................................................... 381
Installation Issues ........................................................................................ 382
Hardware Requirements...................................................................... 382
Installation Procedure ......................................................................... 382
Configuration Tips ........................................................................................ 382
Startup Files ...................................................................................... 382
Simulation Templates ......................................................................... 382
User Fortran ................................................................................................ 383
User Fortran Templates....................................................................... 383
User Fortran Linking ........................................................................... 383
Troubleshooting Guide .................................................................................. 383
User Interface Problems ...................................................................... 383
Simulation Engine Run-Time Problems ................................................. 385
x Contents
References .................................................................................................. 386
Index ..................................................................................................................507
Contents xi
xii Contents
Introducing Aspen Polymers
Related Documentation
A volume devoted to simulation and application examples for Aspen Polymers
is provided as a complement to this User Guide. These examples are designed
to give you an overall understanding of the steps involved in using Aspen
Polymers to model specific systems. In addition to this document, a number
of other documents are provided to help you learn and use Aspen Polymers,
Aspen Plus, and Aspen Dynamics applications. The documentation set consists
of the following:
Installation Guides
Aspen Engineering Suite Installation Guide
Help
Aspen Polymers has a complete system of online help and context-sensitive
prompts. The help system contains both context-sensitive help and reference
information. For more information about using Aspen Polymers help, see the
Aspen Plus User Guide.
Third-Party
More detailed examples are available in Step-Growth Polymerization Process
Modeling and Product Design by Kevin Seavey and Y. A. Liu, ISBN: 978-0-
470-23823-3, Wiley, 2008.
Technical Support
AspenTech customers with a valid license and software maintenance
agreement can register to access the online AspenTech Support Center at:
http://support.aspentech.com
This Web support site allows you to:
Access current product documentation
Search for tech tips, solutions and frequently asked questions (FAQs)
Search for and download application examples
Search for and download service packs and product updates
Submit and track technical issues
Send suggestions
Report product defects
Polymer Molecular
Bonds
Polymer molecules involve the same chemical bonds and intermolecular
forces as other smaller chemical species. However, the interactions are
magnified due to the molecular size of the polymers. Also important in
polymer production are production rate optimization, waste minimization and
compliance to environmental constraints, yield increases and product quality.
In addition to these considerations, end-product processing characteristics
and properties must be taken into account in the production of polymers
(Dotson, 1996).
Polymerization
The polymerization step is usually the most important step in terms of the
economic viability of the manufacturing process. The desired outcome for this
step is a polymer product with specified properties such as:
Molecular weight distribution
Melt index
Composition
Crystallinity/density
Viscosity
Recovery / Separation
The recovery/separation step can be considered the step where the desired
polymer produced is further purified or isolated from by-products or residual
reactants. In this step, monomers and solvents are separated and purified for
recycle or resale. The important concerns for this step are heat and mass
transfer.
Polymer Processing
The last step, polymer processing, can also be considered a recovery step. In
this step, the polymer slurry is turned into solid pellets or chips. Heat of
vaporization is an important factor in this step (Grulke, 1994).
Summary
In summary, production rate optimization, waste minimization and
compliance to environmental constraints, yield increase, and product quality
are also important issues in the production of polymers. In addition, process
dynamics and stability constitute important factors primarily for reactors.
Component Characterization
Characterization of a polymer component poses some unique challenges. For
example, the polymer component is not a single species but a mixture of
many species. Properties such as molecular weight and copolymer
composition are not necessarily constant and may vary throughout the
flowsheet and with time. Aspen Polymers provides a flexible methodology for
characterizing polymer components (U.S. Patent No. 5,687,090).
Each polymer is considered to be made up of a series of segments. Segments
have a fixed structure. The changing nature of the polymer is accounted for
by the specification of the number and type of segments it contains at a given
processing step.
Each polymer component has associated attributes used to store information
on molecular structure and distributions, product properties, and particle size
when necessary. The polymer attributes are solved/integrated together with
the material and energy balances in the unit operation models.
Polymerization Kinetics
The polymerization step represents the most important stage in polymer
processes. In this step, kinetics play a crucial role. Aspen Polymers provides
built-in kinetic mechanisms for several chain-growth and step-growth type
polymerization processes. The mechanisms are based on well-established
sources from the open literature, and have been extensively used and
Modeling Data
A key factor in the development of a successful simulation model is the use of
accurate thermodynamic data for representing the physical properties of the
system, and of kinetic rate constant data which provide a good match against
observed trends.
In order to provide the physical property models with the parameters
necessary for property calculations, Aspen Polymers has property parameter
databanks available. These include:
Polymer databank containing parameters independent of chain length
Segment databank containing parameters to which composition and chain
length are applied for polymer property calculations
Functional group databank containing parameters for models using a
group contribution approach is also included
This User Guide contains several tabulated parameters which may be used as
starting values for specific property models. Property data packages are also
being compiled for some polymerization processes and will be made available
in future versions.
In addition to physical property data, Aspen Polymers provides users with
ways of estimating missing reaction rate constant data. For example, the data
regression tool can be used to fit rate constants against molecular weight
data.
Process Flowsheeting
Aspen Polymers provides unit operation models, flowsheeting options, and
analysis tools for a complete representation of a process.
Models for batch, semi-batch and continuous reactors with mixing extremes
of plug flow to backmix are available. In addition, other unit operation models
essential for flowsheet modeling are available such as:
Mixers
Flow splitters
Flash tanks
Devolatilization units
Flowsheet connectivity and sequencing is handled in a straightforward
manner.
Several analysis tools are available for applying the simulation models
developed. These include tools for:
Process optimization
Polymer Structure
Polymers can be defined as large molecules or macromolecules where a
smaller constituting structure repeats itself along a chain. For this reason,
polymers tend to exhibit different physical behavior than small molecules also
called monomers. Synthetic polymers are produced when monomers bond
together through polymerization and become the repeating structure or
segment within a chain. When two or more monomers bond together, a
polymer is formed. Small polymer chains containing 20 or less repeating units
are usually called oligomers.
The fact that identifiable segments are found repeatedly along a polymer
chain, provides convenient ways to categorize polymers. Polymers can be
classified based on segment composition or sequence:
Homopolymers - containing one type of repeating unit which can be
mapped into one segment
Characterization Approach
Aspen Polymers allows for the different types of chemical species that may be
found in a polymer system:
Monomers
Solvents
Catalysts
Oligomers
Polymers
Polymer segments are introduced to identify the chemical structure of the
polymer or oligomer repeat unit. In addition, they are used as building blocks
within polymerization reactions, and in the determination of thermodynamic
properties.
More than the chemical structure of the segments is needed in order to define
a polymer. Also needed is the segment composition of the chains. In addition,
properties related to size are needed: degree of polymerization or number of
segments.
References
Grulke, E. A. (1994). Polymer Process Engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Munk, P. (1989). Introduction to Macromolecular Science. New York: John
Wiley and Sons.
Odian, G. (1991). Principles of Polymerization (3rd Ed.). New York: John
Wiley and Sons.
Rudin, A. (1982). The Elements of Polymer Science and Engineering. Orlando:
Academic Press.
Component Categories
When developing a simulation model in Aspen Polymers (formerly known as
Aspen Polymers Plus), users must assign components present in process flow
streams to one of the following categories:
Conventional
Polymer
Oligomer
Segment
Site-based
The following figure illustrates the different categories of components and
their input requirements:
3 Component Classification 21
Conventional Components
Standard conventional components are molecular components such as water.
These components have a fixed molecular structure and participate in phase
equilibrium. Components falling into this category include:
Monomers
Initiators
Chain transfer agents
Solvents
Catalysts
In order to fully specify conventional components, you need only specify pure
component data required for the phase equilibrium calculations. This data
may be entered or retrieved from component databanks.
Polymers
In Aspen Polymers, polymer components represent a distribution of polymeric
species. The average size and composition of the molecules in this distribution
22 3 Component Classification
can change throughout the simulation. Each polymer molecule is considered
to be made up of repeating units or segments. Typically, the segments
correspond to the monomers that are used to grow the polymer.
The structure of polymers depends on the number and type of segments they
contain and the arrangement of segments in linear, branched, or cross-linked
forms.
Component attributes are used to track polymer structural properties (U.S.
Patent No. 5,687,090) such as:
Segment composition
Copolymer composition and average sequence length
Degree of polymerization
Molecular weight
Branching
Moments of molecular weight distribution
Molecular architecture (physical arrangement of segments within the
polymer molecule)
Segments are specified independently from polymers. For each polymer, you
must select the types of component attributes to be included in the simulation
model. If the polymer is present in the process feed streams, you must
provide its properties by initializing the component attributes while specifying
input data for these feed streams.
For more information on component attribute specification, see Polymer
Structural Properties on page 33.
Oligomers
By convention, oligomers are defined as components with two or more
segments and a fixed molecular structure. They can be defined as volatile or
non-volatile. Typically, the oligomer feature is used to allow users to track the
loss of volatile short-chain polymers.
In order to specify oligomers, you must specify their composition in terms of
the number and type of segments they contain. Oligomers do not require
component attributes. For this reason, you may treat a polymer as an
oligomer in cases where you want to process the polymer within a unit
operation model which cannot handle polymer component attribute data.
When using oligomer components, you may specify addition properties
through the following unary property parameters:
Parameter Definition Default
3 Component Classification 23
Note: Not all kinetic models track oligomers as separate components. If a
model does not provide fields for specifying oligomers on its input forms, then
these components are not tracked.
Segments
Segments are the structural units of a polymer or oligomer and are specified
independently from these components. Their structure is fixed throughout a
simulation. Segments typically correspond to the monomers used to grow the
polymer. They are divided into types depending on their location on the
polymer chain:
Repeat units
End groups
Branch point (attached to three or four branches)
Site-Based
Site-based components pertain to multisite reaction kinetic models (Ziegler-
Natta and Ionic). Site-based components include Ziegler-Natta catalysts and
ionic initiators.
Ziegler-Natta Catalysts
Ziegler-Natta catalysts are often used to initiate polymer chain formation in
chain-growth polymerization reactions. Catalysts can be treated as standard
conventional components. Ziegler-Natta catalysts or metallocene catalysts
involve one or more polymerization site types which may be in an activated or
deactivated state.
In order to use Ziegler-Natta catalysts, you must specify the number of site
types and the catalyst properties to be tracked, that is, the site activity.
Catalyst properties are defined as component attributes. You must initialize
the catalyst properties while specifying input data for the streams containing
the catalysts.
For more information on component attribute specification, see Polymer
Structural Properties on page 33.
Ionic Initiators
Ionic initiators are used in anionic and cationic polymerization. The ionic
initiators can be treated as standard conventional components. The
propagating species in ionic polymerization can be:
Free-ions
Ion-pairs
Dormant esters
24 3 Component Classification
In Aspen Polymers, these different species are modeled as different sites of
an ionic initiator. Three different site-based attributes are tracked for an ionic
initiator. For more information, see Ionic Initiator Attributes on page 45.
Component Databanks
The thermodynamic and transport property models needed to perform the
physical property and phase equilibrium calculations during a simulation
require pure component property data. These include:
Molecular weight
Heat capacity
Heat of formation
Heat of vaporization
Vapor pressure
Density
Enter that information while selecting and specifying physical property
models. Normally, you would make use of the pure component databanks and
retrieve data from them for each of the components present in the simulation
model:
Data for conventional components are retrieved from the Pure Component
databank
Data for free-radical initiators are retrieved from the INITIATOR databank
Data for polymers are retrieved from the POLYMER databank
Data for oligomers are retrieved either from the pure component databank
or from the POLYMER databank
Data for segments are retrieved from the SEGMENT databank
Data for PC-SAFT are retrieved from the PC-SAFT databank
Data for POLYPCSF are retrieved from the POLYPCSF databank
Descriptions of the databanks, and the parameters they contain are given in
Appendix A.
Note: Catalysts are often solid components and may not be found in the
PURE11 databank. Normally, you do not need a rigorous representation of
these components.
3 Component Classification 25
An acceptable approach is to assign a monomer alias to the catalyst and then
provide the correct molecular weight and certain parameters which will
prevent the catalyst from vaporizing. If an activity coefficient model is being
used for phase equilibrium representation, the catalysts can be assumed to be
non-volatile by specifying -40 as the first Antoine parameter (PLXANT(1) = -
40).
PC-SAFT Databank
The PC-SAFT databank contains pure and binary parameters used with the
PC-SAFT property method. The parameters are taken from the literature,
including many normal compounds, polar compounds and associating
compounds.
POLYPCSF Databank
The POLYPCSF databank contains pure and binary parameters used with the
POLYPCSF property method. The parameters are taken from the literature,
including many normal compounds, but excluding polar compounds and
associating compounds.
INITIATO Databank
The INITIATO databank contains data for initiator components. Rate
constants in this databank are derived from half-life data in vendor
datasheets published on public web sites. These datasheets generally contain
data at several temperatures, allowing the activation energy and prefactor to
be determined. These rate constants depend on the reaction environment,
and may vary between polar and non-polar solvents. Where multiple sets of
data were available, the data from monomer or organic solvents were used in
preference to data from aqueous solutions.
Molecular weight and other parameters are calculated from structure using
estimation methods from Aspen Plus, except in those few cases where vapor
pressure data was provided in the datasheets.
In the INITIATO databank, components are named using industry-standard
acronyms. Each component is given an alias summarizing the number of each
type of atom: C, H, O, N, P, S, CL, F, etc. For cases where the same alias
matches several components, a counter is added to make the distinction (e.g.
1,-2, etc).
Segment Databank
In the Segment Databank, a segment name comes from the name of the
monomer from which it originates. Therefore, in this databank component
names and aliases follow the same conventions as those for the Pure
Component Databank.
A label is added to the monomer name to identify the segment as either a
repeat unit,-R, an end group,-E, or a branch point, -B (e.g. for butadiene
segments: C4H6R1or BUTADIENER1 corresponding to the repeat unit
26 3 Component Classification
CH2CH=CHCH2, C4H5E1 or BUTADIENEE1 corresponding to the end
group CH=CHCH=CH2 and C4H5B or BUTADIENEB corresponding to the
branch segment CH2 CH CH CH ).
Polymer Databank
The Polymer Databank does not follow the conventional nomenclature. The
polymer aliases are the typical acronyms used in industry or academia, and
the polymer names consist of the repeat unit name enclosed in parentheses
and preceded by the prefix Poly (e.g. PS or POLY(STYRENE) for polystyrene).
Segment Methodology
The segment approach to characterizing components is a fundamental
methodology which affects almost every functionality within Aspen Polymers.
Segments are used as the building blocks for polymers. Once you have
specified the types of segments in the polymer, the segment composition and
degree of polymerization defined as component attributes may be used to
define the size and composition of the polymer.
For oligomers, although component attributes are not used, the number of
each segment must be specified directly.
Most of the Aspen Polymers physical property models calculate polymer and
oligomer properties from segment properties. This is done by taking into
account the degree of polymerization and the segment composition. The
calculated properties should be the same for both oligomers and polymers,
assuming that the oligomer structure and molecular weight were specified
correctly. Note that this is true for mass-based properties only. Mole-based
properties will be different between polymer and oligomer if their apparent
molecular weights are different.
Within the polymerization reaction models, segments also play a key role. As
polymerization progresses, the models map the reacting monomers into the
corresponding segments and return rates of change for the segment
composition.
3 Component Classification 27
Specifying Components
To specify components within your model you need to know the following:
Item For
Selecting Databanks
For an Aspen Polymers simulation, you generally retrieve physical property
data from the following databanks:
Pure component databank (PURE12)
Polymer databank (POLYMER)
Polymer segment databank (SEGMENT)
Initiator databank (INITIATOR)
You can also use other Aspen Plus databanks, user databanks, or in-house
databanks. Appendix A provides descriptions of the polymer and segment
databanks and the parameters they contain.
If you selected a polymer template to start your simulation, the correct
databanks are already specified.
If you did not select a polymer template, or if you want to modify the
databank selection:
1 From the Data Browser, click Components.
2 From the Components folder, click Specifications.
3 On the Selection sheet, click the Databanks tab to open the databank
selection form.
28 3 Component Classification
Component type that sets the category to which the component belongs
and determines the treatment of that component
To access the components specifications input sheet:
1 From the Data Browser, click Components.
2 From the Components folder, click Specifications.
3 On the Selection sheet, click the Databanks tab to set the databanks to
be searched for pure component properties.
To define component names and types:
1 On the Selection sheet, in the Component ID field, specify an ID for
each component.
This ID is used to refer to the component in all subsequent input, and is
also used to identify the component in the simulation report.
2 For polymers, oligomers, and segments, specify the component type in
the Type field.
By default, all components are assumed to be standard conventional
components. For Aspen Polymers simulation you must correctly identify
the component types:
Use For
Specifying Segments
The Type of each polymer or oligomer segment must be specified on the
Polymer Characterization Segments sheet. Segments can be repeat units,
end groups or branch points attached to three or four branches.
To access the segments definition input form:
1 From the Data Browser, click Components.
2 From the Components folder, click Polymers.
3 From the Polymers folder, click Characterization.
To define segments:
On the Segments sheet, assign a type to the segments from the Type
field.
Specifying Polymers
For each polymer you must define the component attributes to be tracked. All
components specified Polymer in the Components Specifications folder
require component attributes.
3 Component Classification 29
To access the polymer input specifications:
1 From the Data Browser, click Components.
2 From the Components folder, click Polymers.
3 From the Polymers folder, click Characterization.
4 From the Characterization form, click the Polymers tab.
To specify component attributes for the polymers in your simulation:
1 In the Polymer ID field, select the polymer.
2 If you want to retrieve a predefined set of component attributes, in Built-
in attribute group select a grouping. The attribute summary table is
filled in.
For a complete discussion of Aspen Polymers component attributes, see
Polymer Structural Properties on page 33.
or
If you do not want to use a predefined set of attributes, or if you want to
change the attribute selection for a given group, click the attribute table
or click Edit to open the attribute list.
3 Click specific attributes to add or remove them from the list.
Repeat these steps for each polymer.
Specifying Oligomers
For each oligomer you must specify an ID and a structure in terms of number
and name of contained segments.
To access the oligomers definition input form:
1 From the Data Browser, click Components.
2 From the Components folder, click Polymers.
3 From the Polymers folder, click Characterization.
4 From the Characterization form, click the Oligomers tab.
To define oligomers:
1 In the Oligomer field, select the oligomer.
2 In the Segment field, enter the name of a segment contained in the
oligomer.
3 Repeat these steps for each oligomer.
You can define as many segments as needed for an oligomer.
30 3 Component Classification
To specify site-based species characteristics:
1 Select the component type: Ziegler-Natta catalyst, ionic initiator, etc.
2 In the Comp ID field, specify the component name.
3 Specify the number of site types in Number of sites for the component.
For Ziegler-Natta catalysts, you must also specify the moles of sites per
gram of catalyst.
4 Select the list of properties or component attributes to be tracked for that
component. Click the attribute list table or Edit to open the attribute list.
5 Click specific attributes to add or remove them from the list for the
component.
References
Bailey, J., & Ollis, D. F. (1986) Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals (2nd
Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brandrup, J., & Immergut, E. H. (Eds.). (1989). Polymer Handbook (3rd Ed.).
New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Danner R. P., & High, M. S. (1992). Handbook of Polymer Solution
Thermodynamics. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
Kroschwitz, J. (Ed.). (1990). Concise Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and
Engineering. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
3 Component Classification 31
32 3 Component Classification
4 Polymer Structural
Properties
This section discusses the use of component attributes for tracking polymer
structural properties in a simulation model.
Topics covered include:
Structural Properties as Component Attributes, 33
Component Attribute Classes, 34
Component Attribute Categories, 35
Component Attribute Initialization, 46
Component Attribute Scale Factors, 50
Specifying Component Attributes, 51
Structural Properties as
Component Attributes
Component attributes provide a convenient framework to associate structural
characterization data to components in a flow stream. They are carried
throughout the flowsheet along with state and composition information, and
effectively extend the stream structure.
Aspen Polymers (formerly known as Aspen Polymers Plus) uses component
attributes as a vehicle for tracking important modeling information for
polymers, ionic initiators and Ziegler-Natta catalysts (U.S. Patent No.
5,687,090). For example, there are component attributes to store:
Segment composition (segment fraction or segment flow)
Copolymer composition and average sequence length
Degree of polymerization (number, weight, and z-average)
Molecular weight (number, weight, and z-average)
Degree of branching (long and short)
Degree of cross-linking (cross-link density)
Molecular architecture (physical arrangement of segments within the
polymer molecule)
Equation for recalculating class 0 attributes only. Class 2 attributes are integrated.
* Although the dimension is NSEG, these attributes only apply to diene segments, other elements
will be set to zero.
i = Segment index
Equation for recalculating class 0 attributes only. Class 2 attributes are integrated.
j
SZMOM 0( j) Zeroth moment of chain ---- 2 NSITE Mole
length distribution at flow
site j
SFMOM 1 ( j ) First moment of chain
length distribution at
1 ( j ) ( i, j )
1
0 NSITE Mole
flow
site j
SSMOM 2( j) Second moment of chain ---- 2 NSITE Mole
length distribution at flow
site j
STMOM 3( j ) Third moment of chain ---- 2 NSITE Mole
length distribution at flow
site j
SSFLOW 1 ( i, j ) Mole flow of segments ---- 2 NSEG, Mole
of type I at site j NSITE flow
SSFRAC Fp ( i, j ) Mole fraction of Fp ( i, j ) 1( i, j ) / 1 ( j ) 0 NSEG; Unitless
segments of type I at NSITE
site j
SEFRAC Fe ( i, j ) Fraction of chain end Fe ( i, j ) 1 ( i, j ) / 1 ( i, j 0 NEND, Unitless
segments of type i at ends NSITE
site j
i = Segment index
j = Site number
Equation for recalculating class 0 attributes only. Class 2 attributes are integrated.
User Attributes
Generic component attributes are available for tracking user-specified data.
These may be used to track additional properties not available through the
pre-defined attributes.
User component attributes are available as Class 0 through Class 2 attributes.
You must supply a Fortran subroutine to return rates of change for Class 2
attributes and recalculate Class 0 attributes. This would typically be a user
kinetic routine.
Component Attribute
Initialization
In cases where polymer is present in the process feed streams, values for the
polymer component attributes must be specified. Enter this information while
specifying the feed stream conditions.
Within Aspen Polymers, material streams are made up of substreams that
carry the flow of material of different types:
Conventional vapor/liquid flow goes into the Mixed substream type
Solid polymer and other solid components which do not participate in
phase equilibrium go into the Cisolid substream type
Most simulations only make use of the Mixed substream. In this substream,
you would enter the conditions, such as temperature and pressure, the
number of phases (2 if both vapor and liquid are present), and the
composition in terms of component flows or fractions (along with the total
stream flow).
If one of the components for which you enter composition data is a polymer
or a catalyst, you must specify its component attributes. Because users are
allowed to specify either Class 0 or Class 2 component attributes, an
initialization mechanism had to be defined to calculate the corresponding
Class 2. Remember that the Class 2 attributes are the ones which are
converged upon during simulation.
SFRAC SFRAC 1
SFLOW / SUM (SFLOW) 2
1 / NSEG 3
ZMOM ZMOM 1
FMOM / DPN 2
FMOM*MWSEG / MWN 3
PDI*FMOM*FMOM / SMOM 4
FMOM SUM (SFLOW) 1
PMASS / MWSEG 2
SMOM SMOM 1
FMOM*DPW 2
FMOM*MWW / MWSEG 3
FMOM*FMOM*PDI / ZMOM 4
ZMOM 5
TMOM TMOM 1
SMOM*DPZ 2
SMOM*MWZ / MWSEG 3
LCB LCB 1
FMOM*FLCB / 1.E3 2
SCB SCB 1
FMOM*FSCB / 1.E3 2
PSDZMOM PSDZMOM 1
PSDFMOM PSDFMOM 1
PMASS / PDENS 2
PSDSMOM PSDSMOM 1
PSDTMOM PSDTMOM 1
LSFRAC LSFRAC 1
LSFLOW / SUM (LSFLOW) 2
1 / NSEG 3
LZMOM LZMOM 1
LPFRA*ZMOM 2
LFMOM / LDPN 3
LFMOM*LMWSEG / LMWN 4
LPDI*LFMOM*LFMOM / LSMOM 5
LFMOM SUM (LSFLOW) 1
LZMOM*LDPN 2
LZMOM*LMWN / LMWSEG 3
LZMOM*LSMOM / LPDI 4
LSMOM LSMOM 1
LFMOM*LDPW 2
LFMOM*LMWW / LMWSEG 3
LFMOM*LFMOM*LPDI / LZMOM 4
Composite Aggregate Polymer Attribute Set
ASFRAC ASFRAC 1
ASFLOW / SUM (ASFLOW) 2
1 / NSEG 3
SSFRAC SSFRAC 1
SSFLOW / SUM (SSFLOW) 2
1 / NSEG 3
SZMOM SZMOM 1
SFMOM / SDPN 2
SFMOM*SMWSEG / SMWN 3
SPDI*SFMOM*SFMOM / SSMOM 4
SFMOM SUM(SSFLOW) 1
SPFRAC*PMASS / SMWSEG 2
SSMOM SSMOM 1
SFMOM*SDPW 2
SFMOM*SMWW / SMWSEG 3
SFMOM*SFMOM*SPDI / SZMOM 4
SZMOM 5
STMOM STMOM 1
SSMOM*SDPZ 2
SSMOM*SMWZ / SMWSEG 3
SLCB SLCB 1
SFMOM*SFLCB / 1.E3 2
SSCB SSCB 1
SFMOM*SFLCB / 1.E3 2
Site Based Live Polymer Attribute Set
LSSFRAC LSSFRAC 1
LSSFLOW / SUM (LSSFLOW) 2
1 / NSEG 3
ASSFRAC ASSFRAC 1
ASSFLOW / SUM (ASSFLOW) 2
1 / NSEG 3
ASZMOM ASZMOM 1
ASPFRA*SZMOM 2
AFSMOM / SADPN 3
ASFMOM*ASMWSEG / SAMWN 4
ASPDI*ASFMOM*ASFMOM / ASSMOM 5
ASFMOM SUM (ASSFLOW) 1
ASZMOM*ASDPN 2
ASZMOM*ASMWN / ASMWSEG 3
DSQRT (ASZMOM*ASSMOM / ASPDI) 4
ASSMOM ASSMOM 1
ASFMOM*ASDPW 2
ASFMOM*ASMWW / ASMWSEG 3
ASFMOM*ASFMOM*ASPDI / ASZMOM 4
PMASS is polymer mass, PDENS is polymer density
Specifying Component
Attributes
There are several categories of components for which you can specify
component attributes:
Polymers
Site-based components
Conventional components
References
Aspen Plus User Guide. Burlington, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Distribution Functions
In the majority of cases, the distribution functions proposed in the literature
are based on a statistical approach and use one of three types of
mathematical functions: binomial, Poisson or Gaussian.
The parameters in these distribution functions can easily be calculated from
the polymer average properties (degree of polymerization, polydispersity
index, etc.). The following are the common distribution functions that have
been applied to the calculation of polymer property distributions:
Schulz-Flory Most Probable (Flory, 1936, 1953; Schulz, 1935, 1939)
Schulz (Schulz, 1935, 1939)
Weibull-Tung Generalized Exponential (Tung, 1956; Weibull, 1951)
Normal (Biesenberger & Sebastian, 1983)
Wesslau Logarithmic Normal (Wesslau, 1956)
Lansing Logarithmic Normal (Lansing, 1935)
Poisson (Biesenberger & Sebastian, 1983)
Zimm (Zimm, 1948)
Stockmayer Bivariate (Stockmayer, 1945)
In addition to these distribution functions, a method using the moments of
distributions is also available (Tompa, 1976). Of these functions, two have
greater importance for Aspen Polymers.
Mole-Fraction Distribution
F ( r ) p r 1 (1 p ) (number distribution)
Weight-Fraction Distribution
W ( r ) rp r 1 (1 p )2 (weight distribution)
Where:
p = Extent of reaction
r = Size of the molecule or number of segments
For addition polymerizations p is the probability that a growing live polymer
molecule will propagate. For step-growth reactions, p is the fractional
conversion of monomer end groups.
From these distributions, the number, weight, and z-average degree of
polymerization are:
1
DPn
(1 p )
(1 p )
DPw
(1 p )
F ( r ) p r 1 (1 p )
PDI 1 p
To generate the distribution, p can be calculated from degree of
polymerization as:
1
p 1
DPn
Note that the polydispersity approaches two as p unity.
and
Density Function
S
F (S) f ( s) ds
s0
Where:
s0 = Initial value of s
f ( s) = Density function
Average Properties
The average properties can be calculated as ratios of the moments. Number
average is the ratio of first to zeroth moment, 1 / 0 . Weight or Volume
average is the ratio of second to first moment, 2 / 1 . Z-average is the ratio
of third to second moment, 3 / 2 .
For the case of chain length distribution the moment frequency distribution is
given by:
m n mQn
PDI 2 0 / 21
A similar definition of moments for the frequency distribution can be applied
to molecular weight. Typically, in Aspen Polymers it is applied to chain length.
Then the average molecular weight values are determined using the average
degree of polymerization and average segment molecular weight.
R K [M ] K
o
r
K p [ M ][ R o r 1 ]
[ M ] K fT [T ] K tc K td [ R o ]
p fm
Where:
R 2K
I d f [ I ] = Initiation rate
Rtc K tc [ R o ]
Rp K p [ M ]
Where:
Rp K p [ Ro ][ M ] = Propagation rate
The equations for the rate of generation and consumption of radicals can be
written as follows:
R 1 R
o
l
o
R 1 1 R
o
r
o
r 1
Therefore:
R R
o
r
o r
Where:
1
1
The rate of production of polymer molecules of chain length r , RFp ( r ) is
given by:
1 d V Pr
r 1
K fm M K fT T K td R o R o r K tc R o s R or s
1
RFP ( r )
V dt 2 s 1
o
Substituting [ R f ] gives:
RFP ( r ) K p R o M r 1 r
2
rRFP r
2 r 1 r r
W (r ) r 1 r r 1
1 2
rR FP
r
r 1
In other words, W(r) is the weight chain length distribution of dead polymer
chains produced in a small time interval t to t+dt, in a batch reactor. W(r) is
also the weight chain length distribution of dead polymer chains produced in a
CSTR operating at steady-state.
If , which is the case when the polymer chains are formed by chain
transfer or by termination by disproportionation, this equation reduces to:
r 1
2
r 1 1
W ( r ) r 2
r
1 1
Where:
1 / (1 ) = Probability of growth for a polymer radical
W ( r ) r 1 r.exp r
2
For most free-radical polymerizations 1 and is of the order
10 6 10 2 .
The weight-average chain length for polymer produced instantaneously is
given by:
2 3 2 3
Pw rW (r )
r 1 2
2
Pn
1 1 1
W (r )
r 1 r 2 2
Copolymerization
The chain length distribution equation on page 63 applies to both homo- and
co-polymerization with two or more monomer types. When chain growth
polymerizations are done with active center types other than radicals
(Ziegler-Natta, metallocene, etc.) = 0 in the equation, and the
instantaneous chain length distribution becomes a single parameter
distribution, which is Florys most probable distribution with a polydispersity
index of 2.0.
This equation is the main expression used in Aspen Polymers to generate
chain length distribution. Within the context of a polymerization reactor, this
expression is valid for the case of linear chains of a homopolymer produced in
a single CSTR at steady-state.
CSTR in Series
For the case of two CSTRs in series, the end product polymer distribution is a
composite that is a weighted average of the distributions of polymer produced
in the first and the second reactor:
m1 m
Wout ( r ) * W1 ( r ) 2 * W2 ( r )
m m
Where:
m m1 m2 = Total mass of polymer produced in the first and second reactor
per unit time
The distribution function in each reactor is given by the chain length
distribution equation on page 63 with the and , varying from reactor 1 to
reactor 2, and independent of time under steady-state operation.
i log10 upper
ri max i, alog
N
point
Where i varies between one and the specified number of points Npoint, and
upper is the user-specified upper bound of the distribution. This spacing
provides good resolution over the entire spectrum of molecular weights, with
emphasis on the low molecular weight species that are more likely to be lost
in fractionation steps. To ensure accuracy, the upper bound should be set at
least five times higher than the observed weight-average degree of
polymerization.
Wrlocal r r 1 exp r
2
For multi-site kinetics (Ziegler-Natta):
W local
j
m j Wrlocal
,j
r
j
mj
For plug-flow reactors, the values of and are calculated at each axial step
during the numerical integration. The local distribution for the reactor is
calculated by summing the instantaneous distributions (from either equations
for Wrlocal given previously) at each step over all the steps from the reactor
inlet (z = 0) to the reactor outlet (z = L).
For single-site kinetics:
Wr , z r z z z z z z r 1 exp r z z
2
L
m z Wr , z
W r
local
z 0
L
m
z 0
z
j ,z
Wr , j , z r j , z j , z j , z j ,z j, z r 1 exp r j , z j, z
2
L
m j,z Wr , j , z
W local
r, j z 0
L
m
z 0
j,z
m k Wr ,k
Wr feed
k 1
N feeds
m
k 1
k
GPC Distributions
If the user selects the GPC Distribution format, the distribution is calculated
as rWr .
W Wi
wi ri 1 ri i 1
2
For GPC curves (distribution stores rWi ):
wi
ri1 ri Wi1 Wi
r ri
2 i 1
Where:
w
i 1
i 1.0
w r ri
wi
Pn Pw 1
2 ri 1 ri
1 2 i i 1
i 1 i 1
w r ri
wi
M n Mw 1
i 1
1
r
2 i 1 r
i
2
i 1
i i 1
The area under the distribution curve and the number- and weight-average
properties of the distribution can be generated by the plot wizard and
displayed on the distribution plots.
For unit operation blocks, the number- and weight-average properties of the
distribution may be verified against the local polymer results, displayed on
the Polymer Results sheet for each reactor.
For streams, the number- and weight-average properties of the distribution
may be verified against the polymer component attributes shown in the
stream table.
Requesting Distribution
Calculations
In order to track distributions in your simulation, you must select the
distribution characteristics. After the simulation is complete you must retrieve
the distribution data for plotting. You can display and plot the distribution
data for the polymerization reactor, or you can display a distribution table for
a stream or for the entire flowsheet.
References
Biesenberger, J. A., & Sebastian, D. H. (1983). Principles of Polymerization
Engineering. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Billmeyer, F. W. (1971). Textbook of Polymer Science. New York: Wiley-
Interscience.
Flory, P. J. (1936). Molecular Size Distribution in Linear Condensation
Polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 58, 1877.
Flory, P. J. (1953). Principles of Polymer Chemistry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press.
Hamielec, A. E. (1992). Polymerization Processes. In B. Elvers, S. Hawkins, &
G. Schulz (Eds.), Ullmanns Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (5th Ed.)
A21, (pp. 324-330). New York: VCH.
Lansing, W. D., & Kramer, E.O. (1935). Molecular Weight Analysis of Mixtures
by Sedimentation Equilibrium in the Svedberg Ultracentrifuge. J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 57, 1369.
Peebles, L. H., Jr. (1971). Molecular Weight Distribution in Polymers. New
York: Wiley-Interscience.
Rodriguez, F. (1989). Principles of Polymer Systems. New York: Hemisphere
Publishing.
Schulz, G. V. (1935). Uber die Beziehung zwischen Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit
und Zusammensetzung des Reaktionsproduktes bei
Makropolymerisationsvorgngen., Z. Physik. Chem., B30, 379.
Schulz, G. V. (1939). Uber die Kinetik der kettenpolymerisationen. V. Der
Einfluss verschiedener Reaktionsarten auf die Polymolekularitt. Z. Physik.
Chem., B43, 25.
Stockmayer, W. H. (1945). J. Chem. Phys., 13, 199.
Tompa, H. (1976). The Calculation of Mole-Weight Distributions from Kinetic
Schemes. In C.H. Bamford & C.F.H. Tipper (Eds.), Comprehensive Chemical
Kinetics, 14A. New York: American Elsevier.
Tung, L. H. (1956). Fractionation of Polyethylene. J. Polymer Sci., 20, 495.
Weibull, W. (1951). A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability. J.
Appl. Mech., 18, 293.
Wesslau, H. (1956). Die Molekulargewichtsverteilung einiger
Niederdruckpolythelene. Makromol. Chem., 20, 111.
Polymer Properties
Polymer properties fall into many categories:
Structural properties
Thermophysical properties - which provide an indication of the
thermodynamic behavior of polymers
Thermochemical properties - which provide information on thermal
stability
Transport properties
Processing and end-use properties - which provide information about
processability and performance during end-use
Polymer structural properties do not provide a direct measure of the
performance of the polymer product during processing or during its end use.
However, there is a relationship between polymer structural properties and
the end use properties. For this reason, it is important to account for such
properties within polymer process simulation models.
Prop-Set Properties
A property set is a collection of thermodynamic, transport, and other
properties that you can use in:
6 End-Use Properties 73
Stream reports
Physical property tables and Analysis
Unit operation model heating/cooling curve reports
Distillation column stage property reports and performance specifications
Reactor profiles
Design specifications and constraints
Calculator and sensitivity blocks
Optimization and Data-Fit blocks
Aspen Plus has several built-in property sets that are sufficient for many
applications. The list of built-in property sets is determined by the Template
you choose when creating a new run.
You can use a built-in property set and modify it to fit your needs, or you can
create your own property sets. To see the built-in sets available or to select
one, use the drop-down list on any property set list box. The list prompts
describe the contents of each built-in property set.
For information on defining a property set, see the Aspen Plus User Guide.
The following table summarizes key property sets for the major
thermophysical and transport properties of interest in polymer process
simulations:
Valid Qualifiers
Property
Set Name
Description Phase Comps. Temp. Pres.
End-Use Properties
The end-use or processing properties of interest for polymers include
properties that describe their performance in the last stage of the polymer
74 6 End-Use Properties
manufacturing process. Also of interest are properties relating to their
performance when they reach the consumer.
The following table summarizes some end-use properties:
Category Property Availability in
Aspen Polymers
6 End-Use Properties 75
Properties Molecular Melt Density
Weight Index
76 6 End-Use Properties
Intrinsic Viscosity
The intrinsic viscosity is given as:
K M w JM w
Where:
= Intrinsic viscosity
Mw = Weight-average molecular weight
Zero-Shear Viscosity
For some ethyl branched paraffinic monodisperse polymers, Arnett and
Thomas reported an empirical correlation for zero-shear viscosity as a
function of molecular weight, number of branched sites per 1000 carbon
atoms, and temperature (Arnett & Thomas, 1980):
d 1 cn bn
3
ln 0 a ln M w e B( n )
T
Where:
0 =Zero shear viscosity in Poise
Mw =Molecular weight
6 End-Use Properties 77
Density of Copolymer
Randall and Ruff presented an empirical correlation for semicrystalline
copolymer density (Randall & Ruff, 1988):
a n
a b1 i i
2
c a i 1
Where:
= Actual density
c = Crystalline density
a = Amorphous density
Melt Index
Karol and colleagues suggested a Quackenbos equation for high density
polyethylene prepared with chromocene-based catalysts (Karol et al., 1973;
Quackenbos, 1969):
MI a bM w cM n
d
Where:
MI = Melt index
a = . 1018
10
b = 0.2
c = 0.8
d = -3.9
Mw = Weight-average molecular weight
78 6 End-Use Properties
Melt Index Ratio
The Quackenbos equation can also be used to correlate melt index ratio.
References
Arnett, R. L. & Thomas, C. P. (1980). Zero-Shear Viscosity of Some Ethyl
Branched Paraffinic Model Polymers. J. Phys. Chem., 84, 649-652.
Aspen Plus User Guide. Burlington, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Bicerano, J. (1996). Prediction of Polymer Properties. New York: Marcel
Dekker.
Foster, G.N. (1993). Short Course: Polymer Reaction Engineering. Ontario,
Canada: McMaster Institute for Polymer Production Technology.
6 End-Use Properties 79
Grulke, E. A. (1994). Polymer Process Engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Hamielec, A. E. (1996), Polymer Reactor Modeling Technology (Course
Notes). Cambridge, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Karol, F. J., Brown, G. L., & Davison, J. M. (1973) Chromocene-Based
Catalysts for Ethylene Polymerization: Kinetic Parameters. J. of Polymer
Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition, 11, 413-424.
Quackenbos, H. M. (1969). Practical Use of Intrinsic Viscosity for
Polyethylenes. J. of Applied Polymer Science, 13, 341-351.
Randall, J. C. & Ruff, C. J. (1988). A New Look at the 'Run Number' Concept
in Copolymer Characterization. Macromolecules, 21, 3446-3454.
Rudin, A. (1982). The Elements of Polymer Science and Engineering. New
York: Academic Press Inc., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Sinclair, K. B. (1983). Characteristics of Linear LPPE and Description of UCC
Gas Phase Process, Process Economics Report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI
International.
80 6 End-Use Properties
7 Polymerization Reactions
Polymerization Reaction
Categories
Over the years, many classifications have been developed for polymerization
reactions. One classification divides them into condensation and addition
polymerization.
Condensation Polymerization
Condensation polymerization results in the elimination of a smaller molecule,
water for example, through the reaction of bi- or polyfunctional monomers.
Addition Polymerization
Addition polymerization, on the other hand, does not produce small molecule
byproducts. The repeating units within the polymer have the same structure
as the monomers from which they originated.
7 Polymerization Reactions 81
The problem with this classification is that while it describes differences in the
molecular structure of the resulting polymer, it does not fully capture the
differences in the reaction mechanism. Furthermore, a given polymer can be
made by more then one pathway, one which would result in an addition
polymer, and one which would result in a condensation polymer, by this
classification.
For example, Nylon-6 can be made through a caprolactam, and therefore be
labeled an addition polymer, or through an -aminohexanoic acid, and in this
case be labeled a condensation polymer.
Step Growth
82 7 Polymerization Reactions
Step-Growth Polymerization
Step-growth polymerization retains the definition given for condensation
polymers for the majority of cases. That is, monomers react with each other
to eliminate small molecules. Step-growth polymers are formed through the
same reaction type occurring between functional groups located on any
combination of monomers, oligomers, or polymer chains. The polymer chains
continue to grow from both ends as polymerization progresses. The reactions
occur at a relatively slow rate and chains grow slowly.
Some examples of step-growth polymers include polyamides, polyesters,
polycarbonates, and polyurethanes (See Polymer Structure in Chapter 2 for a
discussion of polymer types based on molecular structure).
Chain-Growth Polymerization
Chain growth polymers are formed through the addition of monomers to an
active center (free-radical, ion, or polymer-catalyst bond), in a chain
reaction, at a very fast rate. Furthermore, several different types of reaction
occur to initiate, propagate, and terminate polymer growth. Examples of
chain growth polymers include various polyolefins, polyvinyls, and several
copolymers (styrenic copolymers, for example).
7 Polymerization Reactions 83
Chain Growth Polymer Categories
Chain-growth polymerization can be categorized as free-radical, coordination
complex, or ionic, depending on the type and method of formation of the
active center. The following table lists typical commercial chain-growth
polymers:
Polymer Monomers Repeat Unit Reaction Types Applications
84 7 Polymerization Reactions
Chain Growth Reaction Sub-classes
Chain-growth polymerization may take place in bulk phase, solution,
precipitation, suspension, or emulsion:
Bulk polymerization is carried out in the bulk monomer phase without a
solvent
Solution polymerization is carried out in the presence of an inert solvent in
which monomers and polymer are dissolved
Precipitation polymerization is carried out using a solvent to precipitate
out the polymer
Suspension polymerization involves monomers suspended as droplets in a
continuous phase (usually water) to which an oil-soluble initiator is added
Emulsion polymerization involves monomers and micelles dispersed in a
continuous water phase using surfactants. Initiator is added to the
emulsion of partially water soluble monomers in the surfactant solution
There are additional process related classifications that have to do with
reactor geometry. These are discussed in sections covering unit operation
modeling later in this User Guide.
Built-in Models
The polymerization reaction models available in Aspen Polymers are
summarized in the following table:
Model Name Chemistry Processes Polymers
Step-growth
7 Polymerization Reactions 85
Model Name Chemistry Processes Polymers
Generic
In addition to models for the chemistries and process types listed, there is
one model available for generic polymer modification reactions. This model
follows a standard power-law scheme and is used to represent reactions
involving modifications to segments of polymers made through one of the
conventional reaction schemes. One of the standard Aspen Plus reaction
models can also be used in conjunction with the polymerization reaction
models. The standard Aspen Plus reaction models are:
For more information about these models, consult the Aspen Plus User Guide
and Aspen Plus User Models.
User Models
There are cases where the built-in models do not provide the features
necessary to model specific polymerization kinetics. Some of the
polymerization reaction models provide capabilities to incorporate user
reactions. In addition, the USER reaction model provides the capabilities for
defining user kinetic schemes.
The USER reaction model is structured to allow the specification of the
reaction stoichiometry. In addition, there are vectors for entering user real
and integer parameters. This input information along with the reaction vessel
contents, in the form of the stream structure, is made available to a user
supplied Fortran subroutine during calculations.
Note that component attributes are part of the stream structure. There is an
update and initialization scheme to automatically process these attributes.
The user supplied Fortran subroutine can return rates for components and
component attributes.
From the subroutine, Aspen Plus utilities including physical property routines,
math utilities, and stream handling utilities can be accessed. Some of these
utilities are documented in Chapter 4 of Aspen Plus User Models.
References
Aspen Plus User Models. Burlington, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
86 7 Polymerization Reactions
Aspen Plus User Guide. Burlington, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Dotson, N. A, Galvn, R., Laurence, R. L., & Tirrell, M. (1996). Polymerization
Process Modeling. New York: VCH Publishers.
Grulke, E. A. (1994). Polymer Process Engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Hamielec, A. E. (1992). Polymerization Processes. In B. Elvers, S. Hawkins, &
G. Schulz (Eds.), Ullmanns Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (5th Ed.)
A21, (pp. 324-330). New York: VCH.
Odian, G. (1991). Principles of Polymerization, 3rd Ed. New York: John Wiley
& Sons.
Rudin, A. P. (1982). The Elements of Polymer Science and Engineering.
Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Sun, S. F. (1994). Physical Chemistry of Macromolecules. New York: John
Wiley & Sons.
7 Polymerization Reactions 87
88 7 Polymerization Reactions
8 Step-Growth
Polymerization Model
Summary of Applications
Step-growth polymerization can be used to model various polycondensation
and specialty plastic processes. Some of the applicable polymers are
described below:
Aliphatic polycarbonates - Transesterification of diols with lower dialkyl
carbonates, dioxolanones, or diphenyl carbonate in the presence of
catalysts such as alkali metal, tin, and titanium compounds.
Aromatic polycarbonates - Reaction product of bisphenols with carbonic
acid derivatives. May be prepared by transesterification, solution
polymerization, and, most often by interfacial polymerization.
Step-Growth Processes
Several commodity polymers, including polyesters, nylons, and
polycarbonate, are manufactured through step-growth polymerization
processes. This section examines some of the major processes that can be
represented using the step-growth polymerization kinetics model.
Polyesters
Direct Esterification
The direct esterification process involves the reaction of ethylene glycol with
terephthalic acid. The terephthalic acid is mixed with excess ethylene glycol to
form a solid-liquid paste. In the continuous process, the monomer paste is
typically fed to a well-mixed reactor, the primary esterifier, which operates at
temperatures of 250-290 C and pressures ranging from one to several
atmospheres. Typical residence times range from one to four hours in this
stage of the process.
A solid at room temperature, terephthalic acid has limited solubility in the
polymer solution, even at the relatively high process temperatures. Further,
the dissolution rate of TPA may be limited by the solid-liquid mass transfer
rate, especially if the average particle size is large, or when the reactor
operates at high temperatures and pressures.
The following figure illustrates a continuous direct esterification process for
PET:
Glycol Recovery
The ethylene glycol from the esterification distillation columns can be recycled
directly to the esterification reactors, to the paste mixing tank, or, in the case
of high-quality products, it can be collected for further processing to remove
contaminants. The companies which license PET technology use a wide
variety of glycol recovery and recycling schemes. All of these recycling
schemes can be simulated using conventional distillation, flash, and heat
exchanger models available in Aspen Plus.
Esterification Results
The product of the esterification reactors is composed of short-chain
oligomers with some residual monomers. The main oligomer in the product is
Transesterification Process
In the transesterification process, dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) is used
instead of terephthalic acid (TPA). One advantage of this process is the
relatively high solubility of DMT, which eliminates the solid-liquid mass
transfer problem in the first stage of the process. A second advantage is the
low acidity of DMT, which reduces several of the side reaction rates and
results in a higher quality polymer. The limitations of the transesterification
process include increased monomer cost, production of methanol as a by-
product (instead of water), and reduced reactivity in the finishing stages.
The transesterification process produces methanol as a reaction by-product.
The methanol is distilled from ethylene glycol through distillation columns.
Recovered glycol may be recycled to the reactor, the paste mixing tank, or
accumulated for additional processing.
It is desirable to minimize the concentration of methylester ends in the feed
to the polymerization section. Obtaining high conversions is very important in
the DMT process because the reverse reaction of methanol with PET is more
highly favored than the reaction of water and PET. A wide variety of
proprietary reactors are used to effect high end-group conversion during the
transesterification process.
Continuous Polymerization
The continuous polymerization process is the same for the direct esterification
and transesterification processes. Typically, the polymerization section
consists of one or more CSTR reactors (pre-polymerization reactors) followed
by one or more horizontal finishing reactors (polymerization reactors).
These reactors consist of a series of rotating blades or disks which lift polymer
from a pool at the bottom of the reactor into a vapor space over the pool. The
design criteria of these reactors are to maximize surface area generation
while minimizing back-mixing. In polyester processes, the finishing reactors
are almost always limited by the liquid-vapor mass transfer rates. In some
cases, the pre-polymerization reactors are also limited by mass transfer.
The reactors in the polymerization section operate at increasingly higher
temperatures and lower pressures to enhance the devolatilization of excess
glycol and reaction byproducts such as water, methanol, and acetaldehyde.
Reactor residence times range from thirty minutes to four hours depending on
the number and type of reactors in the polymerization section.
Vapor from the polymerization section is scrubbed by spray-condenser loops
composed of a contacting vessel, accumulation tank, pump, and heat
exchanger. In most plants, vacuum is generated through venturi jets
operated by steam or vaporized glycol. In some process configurations, the
condensed glycol and water mixture is recycled to the esterification columns.
Otherwise, the condensate is accumulated and processed to recover glycol.
Final Products
The continuous melt-phase PET processes generally produce polymer with an
average intrinsic viscosity of approximately 0.6 dl/g, which corresponds to a
number-average degree of polymerization near 100 units. This product may
be directly spun as clothing fiber, partially oriented yarn (POY), film, or it may
be cooled and chipped for on- or off-site use.
Recent increases in consumer recycling programs and consumer preference
for unbreakable bottles has created a very large market for polyester bottles.
These bottles are molded from a higher molecular weight polyester chip which
is produced by a solid state process. Fundamentally, the step-growth model
can apply to solid-state polymerization. However, at this time, Aspen
Polymers does not include a solid-state polymerization (SSP) reactor model.
Semi-rigorous SSP models can be developed using a series of CSTR reactors.
Solid phase polymer solutions can be treated as a liquid phase in Aspen
Polymers. The property system switches between liquid-phase property
models and solid-phase property models when the temperature drops below
the melting point of the polymer component.
Nylon-6
Nylon-6 is produced by ring-opening polymerization of -caprolactam. Water
and caprolactam are fed to a primary reactor where the ring-opening reaction
takes place. The primary reactor may be a single (liquid) phase tubular
reactor, CSTR, or one of a variety of proprietary reactors.
The following figure illustrates a continuous melt-phase nylon-6 process:
Nylon-6,6
Nylon-6,6 is manufactured by two types of processes. In the most common
process, dyadic nylon salt is first produced by mixing adipic acid (ADA) in an
aqueous solution of hexamethylene diamine (HMDA). A newer process
involves the direct melt polymerization of the two monomers.
Salt Preparation
In the traditional salting process, the formation of nylon salt ensures
stoichiometric ratios of the two monomers, allowing the production of high
molecular weight polymers. In the salt solution process, solid adipic acid is
dissolved in an aqueous solution of HMDA. The resulting aqueous salt solution
is concentrated by further addition of the monomers and/or by partial
evaporation.
An alternative salting process uses methanol as the primary solvent. Solutions
of adipic acid and HMDA in methanol are prepared separately in continuously
stirred heated tanks. These solutions are mixed in a reactor where the nylon
salt is generated. Most of the nylon salt precipitates out of solution due to the
low solubility of the nylon salt in methanol. A small amount of the salt,
however, remains dissolved in the reactor, resulting in the generation of some
short-chain oligomers. The salt slurry is centrifuged to remove the solid salt.
Methanol is used as a washing solution in the centrifuge to further purify the
salt. The methanol is purified in a distillation column and recycled. The solid
nylon salt is dried and collected for use on- or off-site.
Final Stage
In the final stages of polymerization, wiped-wall evaporators are used to
finish the reaction at high temperatures (up to 300C) and medium vacuum
pressures (760-200 torr). Typical finishing reactor residence times range from
20-60 minutes. The removal of water and excess monomers from the liquid
phase may be limited by the mass transfer rate.
Melt-Phase Polymerization
Recent developments in nylon-6,6 polymerization have led to the
development of continuous melt-phase polymerization processes. Adipic acid
and hexamethylene diamine solutions are fed to a tubular primary reactor,
which operates at very high pressures (approximately 1000 psig),
temperatures around 275C, and residence times of 15-30 minutes. Under
these conditions, boiling does not occur in the reactor.
The pressure is throttled down to 250-350 psig through a series of valves or
tubes of successively larger diameter. The pressure profile must be adjusted
to minimize cooling caused by the rapid evaporation of steam, which can
cause the polymer solution to freeze.
In the final stage, the polymer is brought close to chemical equilibrium (with
dissolved water and excess monomers) in a wiped film evaporator.
Polycarbonate
Polycarbonate is a relatively strong polymer with good optical and mechanical
properties. It is used in several applications including car body parts
(frequently blended with PBT), specialty films, and laser disc media.
Historically, most polycarbonate was produced by interfacial polymerization of
bisphenol-A (BPA) with phosgene. In the interfacial process, the reactions are
relatively fast, but the reaction rate is limited by the mass transfer rates of
the reactants from the bulk liquid phases into the swollen polymer phase.
A limited amount of polycarbonate is produced from BPA and phosgene in a
solution polymerization process. The reaction is carried out by solution
polymerization in pyridine. The pyridine solvent captures chlorine from the
phosgene groups, resulting in pyridine chloride as a reaction by-product.
The monomers, BPA and DPC, are fed in a carefully controlled ratio to a series
of CSTRs. Phenol, which is generated as a reaction by-product, is vaporized in
the reactors and must be condensed and recycled. Distillation columns are
used to recover residual monomers from phenol.
The CSTRs are followed by a series of wiped film evaporators and horizontal
finishing reactors which operate at successively lower pressures to enhance
the removal of residual monomers and phenol. These reactors are limited by
the mass transfer rate of phenol from the melt.
Nucleophilic Reactions
Step-growth polymerization involves reactions between monomers containing
nucleophilic and electrophilic functional groups. Nucleophilic groups are
electron-strong groups, typically alcohols (~OH), amines (~ N H 2 ), or water.
Nucleophilic Substitution
In nucleophilic substitution reactions, a nucleophilic group from one reactant
(the nucleophile) displace a nucleophilic group in the other reactant (the
electrophile), resulting in two new products. (Note: Electrophilic groups are
highlighted in each of the following figures.) Nucleophilic substitution
reactions tend to be highly reversible.
O O
CH OH + HO C HOH + CH3O C
3
Nucleophilic Electrophilic Nucleophilic Electrophilic
Species Species Species Species
Forward Reaction Reverse Reaction
Nucleophilic Addition
In nucleophilic addition reactions, the electrophile and nucleophile combine to
form a new functional group. These reactions are typically irreversible.
O
CH 3OH + O C N CH 3O C NH
Nucleophilic Electrophilic
Species Species
Currently, the step-growth reaction generation algorithm is limited to
condensation reactions. Pseudocondensation reactions must be defined
through the user reaction feature or through the segment-based power-law
reaction model.
In some reverse reactions and re-arrangement reactions, the electrophile
may be a polymer or oligomer. These reactions occur at the bonds which link
two segments together. To fully describe these reactions, the two segments in
the electrophile must be identified. In this case, we refer to the electrophile as
the victim reactant and the nucleophile as the attacking reactant. The
victim reactant includes a nucleophilic segment and an electrophilic segment.
Attacking Victim Victim
Nucleophilic Electrophilic
Nucleophilic
Species Species Species
O O O O
CH3OH + O(CH2)2O C C O(CH2)2OH + CH3O C C
The following table lists the role of electrophiles and nucleophiles in several
step-growth polymerization processes, as well as the typical reacting
CH CH2
Reaction Nomenclature
Polymerization reactions are classified by chemical mechanism, by the
number of reacting components, and by the influence a reaction has on the
chain length distribution. This section describes the basic types of reactions
found in step-growth polymerization and serves as a glossary of reaction
nomenclature.
Intermolecular reactions involve two or more molecules.
Intramolecular reactions involve two sites on the same molecule.
Condensation reactions are polymerization reactions which produce a small
molecule as a by-product. Typically, the condensate is a volatile compound
such as water, methanol, acetic acid, or phenol. Step-growth reactions
involving chlorine end groups result in hydrochloric acid or chlorinated
hydrocarbon condensate products.
Reverse condensation reactions are where condensate molecules cleave an
existing polymer chain, producing two smaller chains. Reverse condensation
reactions near the end of a polymer molecule can generate free monomers.
Pseudocondensation reactions are nucleophilic addition reactions. These
reactions involve rearrangement of atoms in two different functional groups,
resulting in a new functional group. No by-products are produced by
pseudocondensation reactions. Pseudocondensation reactions can involve two
monomers, a monomer and a polymer end group, or two polymer end
groups.
Addition reactions are reactions in which small molecules, including free
monomers, dyadic salts, and cyclic monomers and dimers react with the end
Ring Opening W Cn Pn No
Ring Addition Pn Cm Pn m No
Nucleophilic Ring-Closing Pn Cn W No
Substitution
Cyclodepolymerization Pn Pn m Cm No
Polymerization Stage
The polymerization stage involves chain building reactions. There are two
main growth mechanisms. Condensation reactions occur between two
polymer end groups, releasing water or methanol. Polymerization reactions
occur between diol end groups in different polymer molecules, generating a
molecule of free glycol.
The polymer end group distribution and molecular weight distribution are
randomized by redistribution reactions.
Condensation O O O O
1
HO(CH2)x OH + HO C C OH HO(CH2)x O C C OH + H2O
2
O O O O
3
O(CH2)x OH + HO C C OH O(CH2)x O C C OH + H2O
4
O O O O
5
HO(CH2)x OH + HO C C HO(CH2)x O C C + H2 O
6
O O O O
7
O(CH2)x OH + HO C C O(CH2)x O C C + H2 O
8
Polymerization O O O O
9
O(CH2)x OH + HO(CH2)x O C C OH O(CH2)x O C C OH + HO(CH2)x OH
10
O O O O
11
O(CH2)x OH + HO(CH2)x O C C O(CH2)x O C C + HO(CH2)x OH
12
Rearrangement O O O O
13
O(CH2)x OH + O(CH2)x O C C O(CH2)x O C C + HO(CH2)x O
14
Condensation O O O O
15
HO(CH2)x OH + CH3O C C OCH3 HO(CH2) x O C C OCH3 + CH3OH
16
O O O O
17
O(CH2)x OH + CH3O C C OCH3 O(CH2)x O C C OCH3 + CH3OH
18
O O O O
19
HO(CH2)x OH + CH3O C C HO(CH2)x O C C + CH3OH
20
O O O O
21
O(CH2)x OH + CH3O C C O(CH2)x O C C + CH3OH
22
Polymerization O O O O
23
O(CH2)x OH + HO(CH2)x O C C OCH3 O(CH2)x O C C OCH3 + HO(CH2) x OH
24
End-group O O O O
25
Exchange H2O + CH3O C C HO C C + CH3OH
26
x = 2 for polyethylene-terephthalate
x = 3 for polypropylene-terephthalate
x = 4 for polybutylene-terephthalate
1 EG TPA none
2 H2O T-TPA T-EG
3 T-EG TPA none
4 H2O T-TPA B-EG
5 EG T-TPA none
6 H2O B-TPA T-EG
7 T-EG T-TPA none
8 H2O B-TPA B-EG
9 T-EG T-TPA T-EG
10 EG T-TPA B-EG
11 T-EG B-TPA T-EG
12 EG B-TPA B-EG
13 T-EG B-TPA B-EG
14 T-EG B-TPA B-EG
15 EG DMT none
16 MEOH T-DMT T-EG
17 T-EG DMT none
18 MEOH T-DMT B-EG
19 EG T-DMT none
20 MEOH B-TPA T-EG
21 T-EG T-DMT none
22 MEOH B-TPA B-EG
23 T-EG T-DMT T-EG
24 EG T-DMT B-EG
25 H2O T-DMT none
26 MEOH T-TPA none
Many of the side reactions in the polyester process are not included in the
reaction generation scheme, and must be added to the model as user
reactions. These reactions are:
Reaction
Type Reaction Stoichiometry
DEG Formation U1
HO(CH2)2OH + HO(CH2)2OH HO(CH2)2O(CH2)2OH + H2O
U2
HO(CH2)2OH + HO(CH2)2O HO(CH2)2O(CH2)2O + H2O
U3
O(CH2)2OH + HO(CH2)2O O(CH2)2O(CH2)2O + H2O
Thermal O O U4 O O
Scission C C O(CH2)2O C C OH + H2C CHO
Acetaldehyde O O U5 O O O
Formation C C O(CH2)2OH C C OH + HCCH3
O O U6 O O O
O(CH2)2OH + C C OCH CH2 C C O(CH2)2O + HCCH3
Cyclic Trimer U7 G T
Formation HOT G T G T GH T G + H2 O
U8 G T
U9 G T
HG T G T G T GH T G + HO(CH2)2OH
U10 G T
U11 G T
G T G T G T GH O(CH2)2OH + T G
U12 G T
CL C6H11NO O -Caprolactam
NH
Major Reactions
The major reactions in the nylon-6 melt polymerization process are shown
here:
Reaction Type User-Specified Reactions (Forward and Reverse
Reactions Defined Separately)
U1 forward H2O = 1, CL = 1
U1 reverse ACA = 1
U2 forward H2O = 1, CD = 1 (Multiply group-based pre-exponential factor by 2.0)
U2 reverse Reaction is first order with respect to linear dimer P2 with the following segment
sequence:
T-NH2 :T-COOH
option 1: assume P2 concentration = ACA concentration and use power-law constant
ACA = 1*
option 2: use the following equation, based on the most-probable distribution, to
estimate concentration of P2 The denominator in this equation can be implemented
as a user rate constant, with first-order power-law constants for T-NH2 and T-COOH.
P [T NH
2
[T NH 2]
[ T COOH ]
2] [ R NY 6] [T COOH ] [ R NY 6] 0
U3 forward ACA = 1, CL = 1
U3 reverse See U2 reverse reaction
U4 forward T-NH2 = 1, CL = 1
U4 reverse T-NH2 = 1 (this approximation assumes most T-NH2 end groups are attached to
repeat units)*
U5 forward ACA = 1, CD = 1
U5 reverse Reaction is first order with respect to linear trimer P3 with the following segment
sequence:
T-NH2 : R-NY6 : T-COOH
option 1: assume P3 concentration = ACA concentration and use power-law constant
ACA = 1*
option 2: use the following equation, based on the most-probable distribution, to
estimate concentration of P3 The denominator in this equation can be implemented
as a user rate constant, with first-order power-law constants for T-NH2, R-NY6, and
T-COOH.
P [T NH
2
[ T NH 2]
[ R NY 6]
[T COOH ]
2] [ R NY 6] [ T COOH ] [ R NY 6] [ T COOH ] [ R NY 6] 0
U6 forward T-NH2 = 1, CD = 1
U6 reverse T-NH2 = 1 (this approximation assumes most T-NH2 end groups are attached to
repeat units)*
*
To avoid numerical problems, set power-law exponents to 1 10 8 for reactants which do not
appear in the rate expression
0 = Concentration zeroth moment, mol/L (approximately = 0.5 * ([T-COOH] + [T-NH2])
Note: The component names used in this table are used in the successive
tables to document the reactions.
In the simplified approach, the dissolved salt is treated as an AB monomer
(a monomer with two different types of functional groups). This is
accomplished by defining the repeat unit as an EN-GRP reactive group. The
simplified approach is consistent with the modeling approach described in the
open literature.
Using this approach, the Step-Growth model will generate all of the main
reactions. The solid-liquid phase equilibrium can be represented as a chemical
The detailed modeling approach treats the HMDA and ADA segments as
discreet molecular units. Using this assumption, the dissolved salt is a dimer
made up of one hexamethylene diamine end group and one adipic acid end
group. This approach is more rigorous because it considers every possible
reverse reaction, including terminal monomer loss. To use this approach,
define the HMDA repeat group as a bifunctional nucleophile (NN-GRP), and
the ADA repeat group as a bifunctional electrophile (EE-GRP).
The solid-liquid phase equilibrium (reaction C1) is represented as previously
described. The reactions involving the dissolved salt, U1-U6, must be defined
as user reactions. Reactions 1-7, which do not involve the salt, are generated
by the model automatically.
The reactions for a detailed Nylon-6,6 salt process model are shown here:
Phase Equilibrium Reactions (Use Power-Law
Reaction Type Reaction Kinetics Model)
In the reaction stoichiometry equations above, the colon (:) indicates connections
between segments
A subset of these identifiers can be used to assign the same rate constant to
several different reactions. For example, reactions 3-7 can be lumped
together by specifying T-HMDA as the attacking nucleophilic species and by
leaving the victim species identifiers blank (unspecified).
Each reaction involving the dissolved salt must be defined as a user-reaction
in the Step-Growth model. The forward and reverse reactions are treated as
two separate reactions. The stoichiometry of each reaction was shown
previously in the reactions table for the detailed modeling approach. The
power-law exponents are in the following table.
Several of the reverse reactions require a particular sequence of segments in
order to occur. The concentration of molecules with these particular
sequences can be assumed (for example, assume the linear trimer
concentration is the same as the dissolved salt concentration) or they can be
estimated from statistical arguments. The following table shows both
techniques. The statistical approach is more rigorous, but it requires writing a
user rate-constant or user kinetic subroutine to perform the calculations as
shown.
The power-law exponents for user-specified reactions in the detailed model
are:
P4 [T ADA]
2[ B HMDA]
[T ADA] 2[ B ADA] [T HMDA] 2[ B HMDA]
2[ B ADA] [T HMDA]
0
[T ADA ] 2[ B ADA] [T HMDA ] 2[ B HMDA]
U3 forward DIS-SALT = 1, ADA = 1, multiply group rate constant by 2.0
U3 reverse Reaction is first order with respect to water and polymer molecule P3,aa with the
following segment sequence:
T-ADA : B-HMDA : T-ADA
option 1: assume P3,aa concentration = ADA concentration and use power-law
constants ADA = 1, H2O = 1*
option 2: set power-law exponent for H2O = 1 and use the following equation, based
on the most-probable distribution, to estimate concentration of P3,aa (this equation
can be implemented as a user rate constant).
2
P [T ADA
3,aa
[T ADA]
2[ B HMDA]
] 2[ B ADA] [T HMDA] 2[ B HMDA] 0
P [T HMDA
3,aa
[ T HMDA]
2[ B ADA]
] 2[ B HMDA] [T ADA] 2[ B ADA] 0
U6 reverse H2O = 1, T-ADA = 1, set power law constants for B-ADA, B-HMDA to 1E-10 to avoid
numerical problems
*
To avoid numerical problems, set power-law exponents to 1 10 8 for reactants
which do not appear in the rate expression
These reactions are generated by the Step-Growth model if the HMDA repeat
group is defined as a bifunctional nucleophile (NN-GRP), and the ADA repeat
group as a bifunctional electrophile (EE-GRP).
Side reactions that are not shown may be included in the model as user
reactions.
Rate constants can be assigned to reactions 1-7 using the identifiers for the
detailed model summarized on page 119.
A subset of these identifiers can be used to assign the same rate constant to
several different reactions. For example, reactions 3-7 can be lumped
together by specifying T-HMDA as the attacking nucleophilic species and by
leaving the victim species identifiers blank (unspecified).
PHOH C6H6O OH
Phenol
The following table shows the main reactions in this process. These reactions
are generated by the model if the carbonate group is defined as a bifunctional
electrophile (EE-GRP) and the BPA group as a bifunctional nucleophile
(NN-GRP) .
Reaction Model-Generated Step-Growth Reactions (Define B-BPA as
Type NN-GRP, B-DPC as EE-GRP)
The following table shows how to assign rate constants to each of the
reactions shown in the previous table:
Reaction No. Attacking Victim Victim
Nucleophilic Electrophilic Nucleophilic
Species Species Species
R s,i * Mwi
Rp 1
Mw p
End 1
Repeat 2
Branch-3 3
Branch-4 4
The rate of change of the zeroth moment ( 0 ) is calculated from the rate of
change of the first moment ( 1 ) and the segment type ():
0 1 1
2
t t t
The factor of accounts for the fact that each connection links two
segments (without this correction the points of connection are counted twice).
This method is best illustrated through these examples:
Valid Reaction Type Stoichiometry 1 0
No Initiation M P1 MR +1 +1 0
Yes Branching Pn M Pn 1 R + M B3 + E +1 +1 0
Yes Branching Pn Pm Pn m R + E B3 + R 0 +1 -1
This method lets you specify most classes of reactions. However, special care
must be taken to ensure that the reaction is defined in a manner that is
consistent with the previous equation.
By default, the model solves the zeroth moment (ZMOM) and segment flow
rates (SFLOW attributes) as independent variables. This can cause a
discrepancy between these variables, especially in flowsheets with high
polymer recycle flow rates. This discrepancy, in turn, can lead to convergence
problems in downstream reactors.
0 1 12
This option cannot be invoked if two or more reaction models are referenced
from a single reactor block.
Phase Equilibria
The step-growth model can be used to simulate reactions in single-phase
(vapor or liquid), two-phase (VL), or three-phase (VLL) systems. Each step-
growth reaction model is associated with a particular reaction phase, specified
on the Options sheet. The user can consider simultaneous reactions in
multiple phases by referring to two or more reaction models in a reactor.
Typical applications of this model include melt-phase polymerization and
solution polymerization. Slurry, suspension, and emulsion processes involving
step-growth kinetics can also be simulated with this model.
Interfacial polymerization involves a solvent phase, an organic monomer
phase, and a polymer phase. The reaction rate is usually limited by the rate
of mass transfer of monomers from the organic phase to the reacting polymer
phase. The mass-transfer limits across the liquid-liquid interface are not taken
into account by the standard model. These systems can be simulated by
developing a custom reactor model in Aspen Custom Modeler or Aspen Plus,
or by writing an appropriate concentration basis subroutine for the step-
growth model.
Solid-state polymerization involves crystalline and amorphous solid polymer
phases and a vapor phase. The reaction kinetics may be limited by the rate of
mass transfer of volatile reaction by-products from the amorphous solid phase
to the polymer phase. None of the standard reactor models in Aspen Polymers
are designed for solid-state polymerization. Solid-state polymerization models
can be developed in Aspen Custom Modeler and interfaced to the step-growth
polymerization model through the Aspen Custom Modeler / Aspen Polymers
Interface.
Mass transfer limitations in thin-film or horizontal finishing reactors can be
considered by customizing the Step-Growth model using the available
concentration basis subroutine or by developing an appropriate user reactor
model in Aspen Plus or Aspen Custom Modeler.
Reaction Mechanism
The Step-Growth reaction model applies to condensation polymerization. In
the future the model will be extended to cover pseudocondensation and ring-
addition polymerization. The model accounts for any combination of
monofunctional and bifunctional monomers. Cyclic monomers and
multifunctional monomers, however, are not included in the standard reaction
scheme.
Model Structure
This section outlines the structure of the Step-Growth kinetics model. It
examines the theoretical framework in detail. The assumptions and limits of
the algorithms are documented.
Segments
The preferred method of segmenting the polymer component is to define
segments corresponding to the monomers which are used to produce the
polymer. This technique has two distinct advantages. First, the property
models in Aspen Polymers use the monomer as a reference point for
molecular size. Second, the reaction kinetics usually involve adding
monomers to the end of growing polymer chains. Defining segments
corresponding to the monomers makes it easy to write reactions
corresponding to monomers and segments, for example monomer A
segment A.
The Step-Growth model assumes that the polymer is segmented in this
manner. For monadic polymers such as nylon-6, this technique is
straightforward. This method of segmenting the polymer is a bit unusual for
dyadic polymers, such as PET, because it treats them as alternating
copolymers. Thus, a molecule of PET with 100 PET units is defined as having a
degree of polymerization of 200 in this model (100 terephthalate units and
100 glycol units).
Monofunctional monomers, such as benzoic acid, always correspond to an
end-group segment in the model. Bifunctional monomers can end up inside a
linear polymer chain as a repeat unit, or may be located at the end of the
chain as an end group. Each symmetric bifunctional monomer (diacids, diols,
diamines, etc.) corresponds to one repeat segment and one end-group
segment. Asymmetric bifunctional monomers (monomers with two different
types of end groups) correspond to one repeat unit and two end-group
segments. Multifunctional monomers can correspond to several segments, as
shown:
Each functional group in the model is assigned a name and type. The names
are used to distinguish between different groups with the same chemical
functionality.
The following table shows the types of functional groups found in common
monomers and the condensate products:
Reacting Functional Groups
Monomer Monomer
Leaving Groups Segment Groups
Type Formula
Structure Type Structure Type Structure Type
Reacting Species
Since polymer components do not have a fixed structure, polymerization
reactions must be written in terms of the polymer segments. The segments
and standard components that make up the step-growth reaction network are
referred to as reacting species. Each of these reacting species is made up of
one or more reacting functional groups.
Once the reacting groups are defined, the structure of each reacting species is
specified by defining the number of each reacting group in each reacting
species. It is not necessary to specify a zero when a particular group is not in
the species being defined.
Model-Generated Reactions
There are two steps required to assign rate constants to model generated
reactions. First, the rate constant values are specified in the Step-Growth
Rate Constant form (SG-RATE-CON sentence). Then each set of rate
constants is assigned a number for identification. Once the rate constants sets
are defined, they can be assigned to the generated reactions.
Equation
Eai 1 1 b
T i
Tref specified rate Nucl Elec f n f e P Ci ko i e
RT T Tref
U flagi
i Tref
Eai
Tref unspecified rate Nucl Elec f n f e P Ci ko i e RT
T bi U flagi
i
Nomenclature
A-Nucl-
Reaction Spec A-Elec-Grp V-Elec-Spec V-Elec-Grp V-Nucl-Spec V-Nucl-Grp
1 O O
HO(CH2)2OH ~H in none ~OH in acid
O O
HOC COH C C
alcohol
2 H2O ~H O O O O
~O(CH2)2OH ~O(CH2)2O~
C COH C C
5 HO(CH2)2OH ~H in
O O O O none ~OH in acid
C COH C C
alcohol
6 H2O ~H O O O O
~O(CH2)2OH ~O(CH2)2O~
C C C C
9 HO(CH2)2OH ~H in
O O O O none ~OH in acid
HOC COCH 3 C C
alcohol
10 H2O ~H O O O O
~O(CH2)2OH ~O(CH2)2O~
C COCH 3 C C
11 HO(CH2)2OH ~H in
O O O O none ~OCH3
HOC COCH 3 C C
alcohol
12 CH3OH ~H O O O O
~O(CH2)2OH ~O(CH2)2O~
C COCH 3 C C
It is not necessary to specify all of the reaction identifiers. For example, the
only time it is necessary to specify the attacking nucleophilic species and the
attacking electrophilic group is when this species contains more than one type
of group and the two groups are not equally reactive.
Case 1 Assign rate constant sets 1 and 2 to all of the model-generated reactions
1 1, 2 unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified
Case 2 Assign rate constant sets 1 and 2 to reactions between alcohol groups in ethylene glycol
and any acid groups
Assign rate constant sets 3 and 4 to reactions between alcohol groups in the polymer
and any acid groups
Assign rate constant set 5 to reverse reactions involving methanol
Assign rate constant set 6 to reverse reactions involving water
1 1, 2 HO(CH2)2OH unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified ~OH in
acid
2 3, 4 ~O(CH2)2OH unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified ~OH in
acid
3 5 H2O unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified
4 6 CH3OH unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified unspecified
Case 3 Assign rate constant sets 1 and 2 to reactions between alcohol groups in ethylene glycol
and terephthalic acid
Assign rate constant sets 3 and 4 to all other reactions involving acid groups
Assign rate constant set 5 to reactions between water and glycol end groups
Assign rate constant set 6 to all other reverse reactions involving water
Assign rate constant set 7 to reactions between ethylene glycol and the methylester end
groups in the polymer
Assign rate constant 8 to all other reactions
1 1, 2 unspecified O O unspecified unspecified unspecified
HO(CH2)2OH HOC COH
Eai 1 1 bi
T
R T Tref
U flagi
Tref specified k net ,i [Catalysti ] k o i e
T
ref
Eai
Tref unspecified k net ,i [Catalysti ] k o i e RT
T bi U flag i
Assign User Rate Constants is used: ratem activitym C k j
amj
j i net ,i
C k (m i)
amj
Assign User Rate Constants is not used: ratem j j net ,i
Nomenclature
Symbol Description
You can modify the standard rate expression using the optional user rate
constant feature. The rate constant form includes a parameter called the
user flag which identifies an element in an array of user rate constants. This
array is calculated by a user-written Fortran subroutine. The standard rate
expression is multiplied by the user rate constants as shown.
User Subroutines
The Step-Growth model can be customized by applying user-written
subroutines. There are three types of subroutines available. The concentration
basis for the model can be changed through a user basis subroutine. This
subroutine can also be used to calculate the volume (RCSTR and RBatch) or
area (RPlug) of the reacting phase. A user rate-constant subroutine can be
used to extend the standard rate expression for model-generated or user-
specified reactions. A user kinetics routine can be used to add reactions to the
model which are too difficult to represent using the power-law approach, or to
calculate user attributes for polymer characteristics which are not tracked by
Aspen Polymers. These routines can be used together in any combination.
SUBROUTINE USRMTS
1 SOUT, NSUBS, IDXSUB, ITYPE, XMW,
2 IDSCC, NPO, NBOPST, NIDS, IDS,
3 NINTB, INTB, NREALB, REALB, NINTM,
4 INTM, NREALM, REALM, NIWORK, IWORK,
5 NWORK, WORK, NCPM, IDXM, X,
6 X1, X2, Y, DUM1, FLOWL,
7 FLOWL1, FLOWL2, FLOWV, FLOWS, VLQ,
8 VL1, VL2, VV, VSALT, VLIQRX,
9 VL1RX, VL2RX, VVAPRX, VSLTRX, RFLRTN,
* IFLRTN, CRATES, NTCAT, RATCAT, CSS,
1 VBASIS, IPOLY, NSEG, IDXSEG, AXPOS,
2 TIME )
* When using molar concentrations, this parameter is volume of the reacting phase
in m 3 in RCSTR and RBatch or the cross-sectional area of the reacting phase in m3
in RPlug.
Example 1 illustrates how to use the user basis routine to convert the
concentration basis from the standard molar concentration basis (mol/L) to a
mass concentration basis (mol/kg). (Note: the current version of Aspen
Polymers supports several concentration basis through the CONC-BASIS
keyword located on the Options form, we retain this example as a
demonstration). Using these units, the reaction rates are calculated in units of
mol/kg-sec. These rates are multiplied by the holdup basis (VBASIS) for the
reactor in the Step-Growth model. For this reason, the holdup basis must be
consistent with the concentration basis, e.g., it must be in kg. The holdup
basis pertains to the reacting phase, it does not include the phases which do
not react.
Note: This excerpt does not include the argument list and declarations
section of the user basis routine.
The plug flow reactor model in Aspen Plus assumes that the vapor and liquid
move at the same velocity through the reactor (e.g., no-slip conditions). This
assumption is not consistent with the physical reality of polymer finishing
reactors or wiped-film evaporators. The subroutine in Example 2 gets around
the no-slip assumption in RPlug, allowing you to specify the volume occupied
by the liquid phase. In this example, the user specifies the first integer
argument in the RPlug block as 1 and specifies the first real argument as
the volume fraction of the reactor occupied by the liquid phase.
Example 2: A User Basis Routine to Specify Liquid Volume in RPlug
UFRAC = 1.D0
IF ( REALB(1) .NE. RGLOB_RMISS ) UFRAC =
REALB(1)
IF ( INTB(1).EQ.1 ) THEN
Note: This excerpt does not include the argument list and declarations
section of the user basis routine.
SUBROUTINE USRRCS
1 SOUT, NSUBS, IDXSUB, ITYPE, XMW,
2 IDSCC, NPO, NBOPST, NIDS, IDS,
3 NINTB, INTB, NREALB, REALB, NINTR,
4 INTR, NREALR, REALR, NIWORK, IWORK,
5 NWORK, WORK, NCPM, IDXM, X,
6 X1, X2, Y, DUM1, VL,
7 VL1, VL2, VV, VSALT, IPOLY,
8 NSEG, IDXSEG, NOLIG, IDXOLI, NSGOLG,
9 NGROUP, IDGRP, NSPEC, IDXSPC, NFGSPC,
* CSS, CGROUP, TEMP, PRES, NURC,
1 RCUSER, CATWT )
Argument Descriptions
Variable Usage Type Dimension Description
RCUSER Output REAL*8 NURC User rate constant vector (See User
Rate-Constant Subroutine, page 144)
CATWT Input REAL*8 Catalyst weight, kg (in RPLUG,
weight/length)
C 1 (aC bT) I
eff
actual
Where:
[Ceff ] = Effective catalyst concentration, mol/L
T = Temperature, K
a,b = Equation parameters
The net rate expression can thus be written as:
C E* 1 1
R T Tref
rate [Q ]
actual
koe
1 ( a bT ) I
Where:
ko = Pre-exponential factor, (L/mol)/sec
E* = Activation energy
R = Gas law constant
Tref = Reference temperature for ko
C - Component Name -
INTEGER ID_IN(2)
DATA ID_IN /'INHI','BITO'/
SUBROUTINE USRKIS(
1 SOUT, NSUBS, IDXSUB, ITYPE, XMW,
2 IDSCC, NPO, NBOPST, NIDS, IDS,
3 NINTB, INTB, NREALB, REALB,
4 NINTK, INTK, NREALK, REALK, NIWRK,
5 IWRK, NWRK, WRK, NCPMX, IDXM,
6 X, X1, X2, Y, DUMXS,
7 FLOWL, FLOWL1, FLOWL2, FLOWV, DUMFS,
8 VLQ, VLQ1, VLQ2, VVP, VOLSLT,
9 VLIQRX, VL1RX, VL2RX, VVAPRX, VSLTRX,
* IPOLY, NSEG, IDXSEG, NOLIG, IDXOLI,
1 NSGOLG, NGROUP, IDGRP, NSPEC, IDXSPC,
2 NFGSPC, CSS, CGROUP, TEMP, PRES,
3 RFLRTN, IFLRTN, CRATES, NTCAT, RATCAT,
4 NRC, PREEXP, ACTNRG, TEXP, TREF,
5 IUFLAG, NURC, RCUSER )
* Area in RPlug
The user kinetic subroutine returns the rate of change of the reacting species
and the Class 2 component attributes (zeroth moment and segment flow
rates). The subroutine may be applied to calculate user component attributes
(CAUSRA etc.) to track color or other polymer properties which are related to
the thermal history of the polymer.
Example 4 illustrates how the concentration of a color body can be tracked
through user kinetics routine. The example assumes that the polymer color is
proportional to the amount of unknown color bodies which are generated by
side reactions. These unknown side reactions are sensitive to the thermal
history of the polymer, according to an Arrehnius rate expression. The
activation energy and pre-exponential factors of this expression are stored as
the first and second REAL parameters for the user kinetics model.
Example 4: Tracking Polymer Color Using User Attributes in a Step-
Growth User Kinetics Model
INTEGER IDUSRA(2)
DATA IDUSRA /'CAUS','RA '/
C.....GAS CONSTANT IN KCAL/MOL-K...
RGASKC = 1.987D-3
C.....locate CAUSRA attribute: LUSRA points to location in SOUT...
LUSRA = SHS_LCATT( 1, IPOLY, IDUSRA )
C.....LURAT points to this attribute in the RATCAT vector...
LURAT = LUSRA - NCOMP_NVCP
C ----------------------------------------------------------------------
C Get the rate constants from the list of REAL parameters in the
C user-kinetics section of the Step-Growth Subroutine form
C REAL(1) A_CF Color Formation pre-exponential, 1/min
C REAL(2) E_CF Color Formation activation energy, kcal/mol-K
Note: The work array is used to store intermediate results in the calculations.
The size of the work array must be specified in the subroutine form and must
be large enough to avoid overwriting the end of the array.
INCL-COMPS List
The reactor models in Aspen Polymers use mass-balance equations for each
reacting component. In order to make the reactor models fast, components
which do not appear in the reactions are excluded from these calculations.
The list of reacting components is automatically generated by the Step-
Growth model. This list includes the polymer component, listed oligomers,
components which appear in the list of reacting species, components which
appear as products or reactants in the user-specified reactions, and
components in the INCL-COMPS component list.
When user concentration basis or user kinetics subroutines are applied in a
model, these subroutines can include reactions involving components which
do not otherwise appear in the list of reacting components. These
components should be added to the INCL-COMPS list to ensure they appear in
the mass-balance equations.
Packed Vectors
Aspen Plus frequently uses a technique called packing to minimize
simulation time. The user models previously described use packed vectors to
track the mole fractions of each phase (vectors X, X1, X2, and Y). These
vectors contain NCPM elements (Number of Components Present in the Mixed
substream). The component index associated with each element is listed in
the vector IDXM. All other vectors used by the model, including the rates
vectors and the component concentration vectors, are unpacked.
Example 6: Calculating Unpacked Component Concentrations
Calculate unpacked component concentrations of the first liquid phase given
the packed mole fractions of the first liquid phase and the molar volume of
the first liquid phase.
IF ( VL1 .GT. 0.D0 .AND. FLOWL1.GT.0.D0 ) THEN
DO 10 I = 1, NCPM
CSS(I) = X1( IDXM( I ) ) / VL1
10 CONTINUE
END IF
Note: NCPM steps were required to load the concentration vector. Since
NCPM is always less than or equal to NCC (total number of conventional
components), there is a reduction in the required number of steps to perform
the operation.
Specifying Step-Growth
Polymerization Kinetics
Accessing the Step-Growth Model
To access the Step-Growth polymerization kinetic model:
1 From the Data Browser, click Reactions.
2 From the Reactions folder, click Reactions.
3 The Reactions object manager appears.
4 If the kinetic model already exists, double-click the desired Reaction ID in
the object manager or click Edit to get to the input forms.
5 To add a new model, from the Reactions object manager, click New. If
necessary, change the default ID for the reaction.
Use the User Subroutines forms to specify the names and parameters for
optional user subroutines.
Use this sheet To
Kinetics Specify the name of the user kinetics routine and give the
integer and real arguments for the user arrays for this routine
Rate Constants Specify the name of the user kinetics routine, the number of
user rate constants calculated by the routine, and to give the
integer and real arguments for the user arrays for this routine
Basis Specify the name of the user concentration and reacting phase
volume basis routine and give the integer and real arguments
for the user arrays for this routine
Note: Use the Catalyst Species field to associate a rate constant with a
particular catalyst. If you leave this field blank the model drops the catalyst
term from the rate expression.
Use the Catalyst Order field to specify the reaction order with respect to the
catalyst (the model assumes first order by default).
Note: You must specify the Valid Phases keyword for each reactor model
referencing the kinetics to ensure the specified reacting phase exists.
If the Reacting Phase option is set to Liquid-1 or Liquid-2 the model
assumes two liquid phases exist. When the named phase is not present, the
model prints a warning message and sets the reaction rates to zero. There
are two options for handling phase collapse:
Select the Use bulk liquid phase option to force the model to apply the
specified reaction kinetics to the bulk phase when the named phase
disappears.
Select the Suppress warnings option to deactivate the warning
messages associated with phase collapse.
These options are especially convenient when modeling simultaneous
reactions in two liquid phases using two step-growth models. In this situation,
you would typically select the Use bulk liquid option for one phase and not
the other (to avoid double-counting reactions when one phase collapses).
References
Billmeyer, F. W. (1971). Textbook of Polymer Science. New York: Wiley.
Gupta, S. K, & Kumar, A. (1987). Reaction Engineering of Step-Growth
Polymerization. New York: Plenum.
Jacobsen, L. L., & Ray, W. H. (1992). Unified Modeling for Polycondensation
Kinetics. J. Macromol. Sci.-Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys.
Kaufman, H. S., & Falcetta, J. J. (Eds). (1977). Introduction to Polymer
Science and Technology: An SPE Textbook. New York: Wiley.
McKetta, J. J. (Ed.). (1992). Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design,
39 & 40. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Summary of Applications
The free-radical bulk/solution polymerization model is applicable to bulk and
solution polymerization processes. Some examples of applicable polymers
are:
General purpose polystyrene - Made by polymerization of styrene
monomer with or without solvent fed continuously to reactor.
High impact polystyrene - Made by polymerization of an unsaturated
rubber dissolved in styrene in a solution process. Also produced in mass-
suspension processes.
Poly(vinyl chloride) - Produced in bulk polymerization using monomer-
soluble free radical initiators. Most of the homopolymers and copolymers
of vinyl chloride, however, are produced by suspension polymerization.
Poly(vinyl acetate) - Produced industrially by the polymerization of vinyl
acetate in bulk or solution processes. Also produced in suspension and
emulsion processes. Both batch and continuous processes are used.
Free-Radical Bulk/Solution
Processes
Free-radical polymerization accounts for a large proportion (more than 40%
by weight) of the commodity grade polymers. It is employed in the synthesis
of countless homo- and copolymers using monomers that are either
monosubstituted ethylenes RHC CH 2 or 1,1-disubstituted ethylenes
R1 R2C CH2 .
Free-radical polymerization usually takes place with the monomer in the liquid
phase. Several types of processes are used. A solvent or suspending medium
may be used, and the polymer formed may be soluble, insoluble, or swelled
by the monomer and solvent. Commercially important processes for free-
radical polymerization include bulk, solution, suspension, and emulsion
polymerization.
Dni (vinyl ) Polymer chain of length n reacting at an internal double bond of type i
(e.g., a diene segment of type i in the vinyl configuration)
ij
f TDB Fraction of reactions between species i and j resulting in the formation of
a terminal double bond of type i
Ik Standard initiator of type k
Mj Monomer of type j
Pni (cis ) Live polymer chain of length n having an active diene segment of type i
in the cis configuration.
Pni (trans ) Live polymer chain of length n having an active diene segment of type i
in the trans configuration.
R Primary radicals
Xk Inhibitor of type k
Symbol Description
ij
fTDB Fraction of reactions between species i and j resulting in the formation of
a terminal double bond of type i
i Molar fraction of diene segment i in the vinyl configuration (zero for non-
diene segments) (related to VINYLFRA attribute)
k Concentration of undecomposed initiator fragment k in the bulk polymer
(live + dead) (related to FRAGFLOW attribute)
Rate Constant
Ea VP 1 1
k ko exp f g
(3.1)
R R T Tref
Where:
ko = Pre-exponential factor in l/sec for first order reactions,
and m3 / kmol s for second order reactions
Ea = Activation energy in mole-enthalpy units
V = Activation volume in volume/mole units
P = Reaction pressure
R = Universal gas constant
Tref = Reference temperature
Initiation
The initiation step involves the generation of reactive free-radicals followed by
the addition of a monomer molecule (chain initiation) to form chain radicals of
unit length ( P1i ) . The non-chain or primary radicals ( R ) may be generated by
the thermal decomposition of a chemical initiator, a catalyzed initiation
reaction involving electron transfer from ions, or by thermal/radiation induced
mechanisms. Three types of standard initiation reactions are included in the
built-in kinetics:
Initiator decomposition reaction
Induced initiation reaction
Catalyzed initiation reaction
The initiator decomposition reaction accounts for primary radical generation
from the thermal decomposition of chemical initiators.
The induced initiation reaction can be configured to account for the generation
of radicals by thermal and radiation induced mechanisms from the monomers
themselves, with or without the use of a coinitiator or promoter.
The catalyzed initiation reaction can be used to account for redox initiation,
which has found wide application in aqueous emulsion polymerization
systems.
The most commonly used radical generation method is the thermal
decomposition of chemical initiators (usually peroxide or azo compounds)
which decompose to form radicals when heated to an appropriate
temperature. Only small amounts of the chemical initiator (less than 1 wt. %
based on monomer) are needed. However, due to their high activation
energies chemical initiators have a relatively narrow useful temperature range
(approx. 30C) over which the decomposition rates are neither too fast nor
too slow.
Some processes, notably bulk polystyrene polymerization, use initiators with
two active sites. These bifunctional initiators decompose in two stages,
providing greater control over the molecular weight distribution of the
product.
The free-radical model includes two reactions associated with bifunctional
initiators:
Bifunctional initiator decomposition (primary decomposition)
Secondary initiator decomposition (primary decomposition)
The primary decomposition reaction generates a pair of radicals, an
undecomposed initiator fragment, and optional by-products. The
undecomposed fragment is tracked using the FRAGFLOW polymer
component attribute.
The initiator fragment decomposes in the secondary decomposition
reaction, generating a free radical and a polymeric radical.
M j + Ck P1 1 B1 2 B2 R si = k si CCk CM j (h )
j kj kj kj kj aj bj cj
The special initiation reactions generate live polymer directly, thus this
reaction does not contribute to radical generation.
I kB k R k Rk 1,k B1 2,k B2 k
Rbid kbid
k
CIk
k
This rate expression ( Rbid ) describes the rate for the primary decomposition
of bifunctional initiator k. Each primary decomposition reaction generates an
undecomposed fragment. The generation rate of undecomposed fragments is
equal to the initiator decomposition rate:
RF ( k ) kbid
k
C Ik
The user can specify more than one bifunctional initiator to model systems
where multiple initiators with different half-lives are used to control the
initiation rate over the course of the polymerization.
The model assumes that the each site in the bifunctional initiator generates
two radicals. A fraction of the radicals generated by decomposition undergo
radical recombination in the radical-cage, leading to stable byproducts. The
initiator efficiency factor, k , is used to specify the fraction of radicals which
are not destroyed by the cage effect. This factor can be adjusted using a
built-in or user-defined efficiency gel effect correlation.
k
The rate constant kbid is calculated using a modified Arrhenius equation
(Equation 3.1 on page 170) with three parameters: pre-exponential factor,
activation energy and activation volume. As noted previously, the activation
volume accounts for the pressure dependence of the rate constant. This
parameter is typically non-zero only at high pressures.
The rate expression can be modified using an optional built-in or user-defined
gel effect correlation as described later in the text.
To complete the initiation process, the reactive primary radicals ( R , Rk )
react with monomer by the chain initiation reaction to form polymer chain
radicals of unit length. Note that the undecomposed initiator fragment k is
conserved in the polymer chain ( P1 j , k ) . This fragment is eventually destroyed
by the secondary decomposition reaction described in the next sub-section.
The chain initiation reactions are shown below:
Each fragment decomposition event generates a new live end. The model
assumes that the fragments are randomly distributed across the bulk polymer
molecules and that the penultimate segment attached to the fragment
becomes a live end. The generation rate of live ends of type i from the
decomposition of initiator fragment k can be written as:
d 0 ( j ) k k 1
j
k k sid
dt 0 1
The byproduct formation rates are determined by:
Propagation
The chain radicals grow or propagate by the addition of monomer molecules
to form long polymer chains ( Pni ) . The propagation reaction is represented by:
Head-to-Head Propagation
When reactions occur between substituted vinyl monomers or 1,3 dienes, the
repeat units usually join the chain in a head-to-tail configuration, as shown
below (here HTT = head-to-tail). A portion of the monomers may join the
chain in the head-to-head configuration, as shown in the second reaction
below. Head-to-head unions can also result from termination by combination
as described later.
head-to-tail dyad
H HTT Propagation H H2 H
C CH2* + C C C CH2*
R R R R
head-to-head dyad
HTH Propagation H H
C CH* + C C C CH2*
H2 H2
R R R R
The head-to-head dyads disturb the normal regularity of the chain. As a
result, the head-to-head fraction of the polymer can have a strong influence
on the crystallinity of the polymer, and thus influence the mechanical
properties of the final product.
The model can track head-to-head additions using the optional HTH
Propagation reaction. The polymer attributes HTHFLOW and HTHFRAC
(head-to-head flow and fraction) must be included in the list of attributes on
the Polymers, Polymers subform.
The model does not explicitly track normal head-to-tail additions. Instead, the
standard propagation reaction is used to track the total (head-to-head and
head-to-tail) propagation rate. The head-to-head propagation reaction
explicitly tracks the head-to-head propagations. This design allows the user to
fit the overall propagation rate first, and then refine the model by adding
head-to-head additions.
The HTHFLOW attribute is a scalar value. The overall rate of change of the
head-to-head flow Rhth is calculated by summing the head-to-head additions
across all pairs of monomers. Termination by combination also generates
head-to-head pairs as discussed later. The net rate expression for head-to-
head dyads can be written as:
C i j ktcij
Nmon Nmon
Rhth Mi 0j khth
ij
CMj 0i khth
ji
i 1 j 1
Pni Ak Dn R ij
Rtra k tra
ij
C Ak Pni
Pni S k Dn R ij
Rtrs ktrs
ij
CSk Pni
For transfer to agent or solvent the transfer radicals are assumed to have the
same reactivity as the primary radicals formed by initiation. The case where
the transfer radical has a different reactivity than the primary radical may be
added in a future version.
Propagation Terminal
double bond
+ n-1 M segment
P1= Pn=
Where Rtrm
ij
is the rate of consumption of monomer j and live polymer end
groups of type i and the generation rate of live ends of type j. The generation
j
rate of terminal double bonds of type j Rtrm is defined by:
j
Rtrm fTDB
ij ij
ktrm CMj Pni
Termination
Bimolecular termination of radicals may involve primary radicals ( R ) and
chain radicals ( Pnj ) . However, the concentration of primary radicals is usually
much lower than the concentration of chain radicals. Hence, only bimolecular
termination involving chain radicals is included in the built-in kinetic scheme.
In termination, the chain radicals are destroyed and live chains are converted
to dead polymer chains.
Intermolecular termination occurs by one of two mechanisms, combination
(coupling) or disproportionation. Many monomers (e.g. MMA) show both types
of termination while other monomers (e.g. styrene) terminate predominantly
by combination. The mode of termination has a strong influence on the
average polymer chain length and chain length distribution, especially when
chain transfer is not significant. When the combination reaction is dominant,
the polydispersity (in a single CSTR) will approach 1.5. The polydispersity
approaches 2.0 when disproportionation is dominant.
Termination by Combination
In termination by combination, two live polymer end groups react with each
other, forming a single dead chain with a head-to-head segment pair. Each of
these reactions, on average, doubles the molecular weight of the polymer.
The reaction rate depends on the concentration of the live end groups:
Termination by Disproportionation
In disproportionation reactions, the radical at the end of one chain attacks a
hydrogen atom at the second-to-last carbon atom in the second chain,
forming two dead polymer molecules with no net change in molecular weight.
Disproportionation results in one of the dead chains having a saturated end-
group while the other will have an end-group with a terminal double bond. For
example:
Pn Pm Dn= Dm
H CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3
CH C + C CH2 C C + HC CH2
H
C O C O C O C O
The reaction rate depends on the concentration of the live end groups:
Pni Dm Dn Pmj ij
Rtrp ktrp
ij
m j Dm Pni
Where mj represents the number of repeat groups of type j in the molecule to
which the radical is transferred.
Each transfer reaction generates one long chain branch. The optional polymer
component attributes LCB and FLCB are used to track the molar flow rate of
long chain branches and the long chain branching frequency (branch point per
thousand repeat units).
Beta-Scission
A simplified beta-scission reaction is included in the built-in kinetics. It is
limited to reactions where a live chain undergoes scission to form a dead
chain of the same length and a primary radical:
Pni f TDB
i
Dni (1 fTDB
i
) Dn R Rbsi kbsi Pni
This reaction can be used to simulate backbiting reactions which form short-
chain polymer radicals (see Short Chain Branching).
The beta scission reaction usually generates a terminal double bond
corresponding to the live end i. In some special cases, the double bond may
not form or may be unstable. The terminal double bond fraction parameter,
i
f TDB , can be used to specify the fraction of beta-scission reactions which
generate a terminal double bond (by default, this parameter is unity). Thus,
the rate of generation of terminal double bonds from the beta-scission
i
reaction, Rtd , can be defined as:
Rtdi f TDB
ij
k tdij Pni Pn j
Pni M j Pnj(1trans ) j
Rtrans i ktrans
ij
C Mj 0i
ij ij
In the equations above, k cis and k trans are, respectively, the net rate
constants for cis and trans propagation of monomer j onto a chain with a live
end i. The standard reaction scheme does not include any reactions which
consume the cis and trans end groups. Further, the model does not constrain
the cis and trans reaction rates in any manner; the model user must ensure
that the cis and trans propagation rates are lower than the net propagation
rate.
Calculation Method
In the Aspen Polymers free-radical bulk/solution polymerization model, the
polymer chain length distribution averages and molecular structure properties
are calculated using the population balance and method of moments
approach, based on the built-in kinetics shown in the Built-in Free-Radical
Polymerization Kinetic Scheme figure on page 166.
Population balance equations are used to account for the concentration of
live polymer chains and combined polymer chains of length n. The f-th live
and combined polymer chain length distribution moments are defined as
follows:
Nm j
f n Pn Dn
f
n0 j 1
For homopolymerization the index f is a scalar variable and the active
segment superscript j may be dropped for the live polymer moment definition
as there is only one segment type. Hence, for homopolymerization there will
be one zeroth moment, one first moment, one second moment and so on for
the live and combined polymer. However, for copolymerization, the index f
will be a vector whose elements denote the monomer with respect to which
the moment is defined. For copolymerization with respect to every active
segment, there will be one zeroth moment, N m first moments,
N m ( N m -1)
Nm second moments and so on.
2
For example, for copolymerization with three monomers, the vector index f
can have the following values for the first moment:
1 0 0
f = 0 , 1 , 0
0 0 1
representing the first moment with respect to segment one, two and three
respectively. The application of the moment definitions to the live and bulk
polymer population balance equations yields the live and bulk polymer chain
length distribution moment equations. The general moment equations are
listed in the following figures. The various zeroth, first, second, etc. moment
equations can be generated from these by substituting the appropriate values
for the index f.
The live polymer chain length distribution moment equation is shown here:
d if f
NM N CI
c
n j k pij CMj R ktrm CMj 0i k sijk CCkjk CMjjk (h ) jk
ij a b
dt i 1 k 1
N BI
1i 0k
k k sid
k
f
k 1 1 0
f
k ijp CMj j ai k pji C Mi fj j fj
NM f NM
f a
i 1 a 0 a i 1
NM NM
ktrp
ij
f j 0i ktrpji 1i fj
i 1 i 1
NM NM
kscb
ij
if k scb
ji
fj
i 1 i 1
NM f
f j i NM
ktdb
ij
a a f a ktdb 0 f
ji i j
i 1 a 0 i 1
NM f
f j NM
k ij
pdb a f a k pdb
i ji
i 1 fj
i 1 a 0 a i 1
where j contains some terms for reactions leading to the formation of dead
polymer
NM NM NA NS NX
j kbsj ktrm
ji
CMi ktrpji 1i ktrajk C Ak ktrsjk CSk k xjk C Xk
i 1 i 1 k 1 k 1 k 1
The moments with respect to terminal double bonds are approximated:
1 2
1i i0 i2 i0 etc...
0 0
In the final term of the equation, the symbol i represents the molar fraction
of diene segment i in the vinyl configuration (attribute VINYLFRA). This term
is zero for all segments that are not dienes.
d f NM
f
NM
n j k pij CMj R ktrm
ij
CMj 0i k sij CCaj CMj
bj
h cj
dt j 1 i 1
NM f
f f a i N M ji
k ijp CMj j a k p C Mi fj
j 1 a 0 a i 1
NM NM
1 N M f f ij i j
ktcij 0i fj ktc a f a
i 1 j 1 2 i 1 a 0 a
NM NM f
f j i N M N M ij i j N M N M ij i j
ktdb ji
f a a ktdb f 0 ktdb 0 f
i 1 j 1 a 0 a i 1 j 1 i 1 j 1
NM NM f
f j NM NM NM NM
k pdb ji
a f a a 1 i
k ij
i
pdb f 1 j
ij
k pdb 0i 1 f j
i 1 j 1 a 0 i 1 j 1 i 1 j 1
d i , j
dt
k pij 0i C Mj k pji 0j C Mi kitc, j 0i 0j
Phase Equilibrium
The polymerization model currently considers a single-phase system (vapor or
liquid), two-phase system (vapor and liquid), or three-phase (VLL) system
when calculating concentrations for the reaction kinetics. For single-phase
systems, the reacting phase may be either vapor or liquid. In multi-phase
systems, reactions can occur in one or more phases simultaneously. Each
reaction object is associated with a single reacting phase, identified on the
options form.
By default the reacting phase is assumed to be the liquid phase (for VLL
systems, the reacting phase must be specified). Several reaction models can
be referenced from a single reactor block to account for reactions in each
phase.
Gel Effect
Bimolecular termination reactions between chain radicals become diffusion
controlled at high polymer concentrations or high conversion leading to an
initial increase in the polymerization rate and molecular weight. This condition
is known as the gel effect or Trommsdorff effect. At high polymer
concentrations, the increased viscosity of the reaction medium imposes a
diffusional limitation on the polymer chains, which leads to lower effective
termination rates. Typically the termination rate coefficients are affected first
by the gel effect because they involve diffusion of two bulky polymer radicals.
Eventually at high enough conversions, even the propagation, initiation, chain
transfer reactions, and the initiator efficiency are lowered by the gel effect.
Hence, in general it may be necessary to allow gel/glass effects for all the
polymerization reactions in the built-in kinetic scheme.
Several empirical and semi-empirical correlations relating the gel effect factor
to conversion and operating conditions are available in the literature.
Currently two of these have been implemented as built-in correlations. Users
will be able to use these gel effect correlations simply by specifying the
correlation number and the parameters. The built-in correlations are:
Correlation Number 1:
a1
GF
1 a2 X pa3
Where:
Xp = Weight fraction of polymer
Correlation Number 2:
a10
GF
A
1 a9 X p
exp BX p CX p2 DX 3p
With:
A a1 a 2T
B a3 a 4 T
C a5 a 6T
D a 7 a 8T
Where:
X p = Weight fraction of polymer
T = Temperature in Kelvin
This correlation has ten user specified parameters, a1 to a10 .
Users may also include their own gel effect correlation by specifying a
correlation number greater than the number of built-in gel effect correlations
(currently two) . In this case, users must provide the correlation for the gel
effect factor in the form of a Fortran subroutine. The user gel effect
subroutine argument list is documented here:
User Gel Effect Subroutine Arguments
Argument Descriptions
Variable I/O Type-Spec Dimension Description
(i) 1 (i)
i 1
1
DPN i 1
LDPN
0 Nm
( j)
i 1
0
1 ( i ) 1 ( i )
SFRAC( I ) Nm
LSFRAC( I ) Nm
(i)
i 1
1 (i)
i 1
1
Nm
2 0
( j)
j 1
0
PDI LPFRAC
Nm
2
0
i (1)
i 1
0( j)
LEFRAC( I ) Nm
( j)
j 1
0
Structural Properties
Frequently some of the polymer properties are reported in terms of other
properties that are related to these structural properties. These include
properties such as melt flow rate or melt index, viscosity numbers, or K-
values, etc. User-property subroutines can be set up for calculating some of
these polymer properties from the polymer moments and structural
properties.
Specifying Free-Radical
Polymerization Kinetics
Accessing the Free-Radical Model
To access the Free-Radical polymerization kinetic model:
1 From the Data Browser, click Reactions.
2 From the Reactions folder, click Reactions.
The Reactions object manager appears.
3 If the kinetic model already exists, double-click the desired Reaction ID in
the object manager or click Edit to get to the input forms.
4 To add a new model, from the Reactions object manager, click New. If
necessary, change the default ID for the reaction.
5 Select Free-Rad as the reaction type and click OK.
Listing Reactions
The Free-Radical model generates reactions based on the list of reacting
species. You can view the system-generated reactions, then assign rate
constant parameters to these reactions.
You can view a list of the system-generated reactions on the Reactions
sheet. In the Reaction summary listing for each reaction, the first column
indicates the reaction type. The second column lists the reactants, and the
last column lists the products. The Data Browser window can be resized to
better view the reaction listing. Use the following options:
Click To
Adding Reactions
To add a new reaction to the scheme click New to open the Add Reaction
subform:
Editing Reactions
To edit a reaction, click Edit to open the Edit Reaction subform:
1 Modify the Reaction type as needed.
The Reaction scheme for that type is displayed.
2 Modify reactants as needed.
Adding Gel-Effect
Use the Gel-Effect sheet to add gel effect to reactions:
1 To activate the form, click Use Gel Effect.
2 In Sentence ID, enter a unique integer identifier.
3 In the Corr. No. field, specify a gel effect correlation number (use a
number greater than 100 for user-defined gel effect correlations).
4 In Parameters, list the parameters for the gel effect correlation.
When the specified correlation number is larger than the number of built-
in correlations, you must also enter the gel-effect subroutine name in the
Subroutine box.
5 To repeat steps 1-4 for additional gel-effect correlations, in the Sentence
ID field, click New.
Note: You must specify the Valid Phases keyword for each reactor model
referencing the kinetics to ensure the reactor models are consistent with the
reaction models.
References
Arriola, D. J. (1989). Modeling of Addition Polymerization Systems, Ph.D.
Thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI.
Biesenberger, J. A., & Sebastian, D. H. (1983). Principles of Polymerization
Engineering. New York: Wiley.
Billmeyer, F. W. (1971). Textbook of Polymer Science. New York: Wiley-
Interscience.
Choi, K.Y. & Kim, K.J. (1987). Steady State Behavior of a Continuous Stirred
Tank Reactor for Styrene Polymerization with Bifunctional Initiators. Chemical
Engineering Science.
Choi, K.Y., Liang, W.R., and G.D. Lei (1988). Kinetics of Bulk Styrene
Polymerization Catalyzed by Symmetrical Bifunctional Initiators. Journal of
Applied Polymer Science Vol. 35, 1547-1562.
Choi, K.Y., & Lei, G.D. (1987). Modeling of Free-Radical Polymerization of
Bifunctional Initiators. AICHE Journal Vol. 33 No. 12, 2067-2076.
Friis, N., & Hamielec, A. E. (1976). Gel-Effect in Emulsion Polymerization of
Vinyl Monomers. ACS Symp. Ser., 24.
Summary of Applications
The emulsion polymerization model is applicable to emulsion polymerization
processes where nucleation occurs by both the micellar and homogeneous
mechanisms or to seeded polymerization. Some of the applicable polymers
are described below:
Styrene - A component of synthetic rubber and paper coating
Butadiene - Synthetic rubber, impact modifier in ABS and HIPS
Tetrafluroethylene - Polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE), fluoropolymers Viton
Vinylacetate - Polyvinylacetate (PVA) adhesives, paint formulation
Methylmethacrylate - Surface coating applications.
Acrylic Acid - Minor component in paints
2-chloro-1,3-butadiene (chloroprene) - Neoprene rubber
Butyl Acrylate - Surface coatings
Butyl Methacrylate - Comonomer in surface coatings
Vinyl Chloride - PVC used in floor covering and coatings
Emulsion Polymerization
Processes
Emulsion polymerization is an industrially important process for the
production of polymers used as synthetic rubber, adhesives, paints, inks,
coatings, etc. The polymerization is usually carried out using water as the
dispersion medium. This makes emulsion polymerization less detrimental to
the environment than other processes in which volatile organic liquids are
used as a medium.
In addition, emulsion polymerization offers distinct processing advantages for
the production of polymers. Unlike in bulk or solution polymerization, the
viscosity of the reaction mixture does not increase as dramatically as
polymerization progresses. For this reason, the emulsion polymerization
process offers excellent heat transfer and good temperature throughout the
course of polymer synthesis. This process is always chosen when the polymer
product is used in latex form.
Particle Formation
To appreciate the complexities of emulsion polymerization, a basic
understanding of the fundamentals of particle formation and of the kinetics of
the subsequent particle growth stage is required. A number of mechanisms
have been proposed for particle formation. It is generally accepted that any
one of the mechanisms could be responsible for particle formation depending
on the nature of the monomer and the amount of emulsifier used in the
recipe.
The two common mechanisms for particle formation are:
Micellar nucleation
Homogeneous nucleation
With micellar nucleation, micelles, which are aggregates of emulsifier
molecules, act as the site of nucleation.
With homogeneous nucleation, the radicals produced in the aqueous phase
polymerize with dissolved monomer and precipitate out to form precursor
particles. The precipitated precursor particles coagulate with each other until
a stable particle is formed.
Micellar Nucleation
Micellar nucleation is considered to be the primary mechanism for particle
formation (Harkins, 1945; Smith & Ewart, 1948) in those emulsion
polymerization systems for which the monomer is very sparingly soluble in
water, and where the concentration of emulsifier is above the critical micelle
concentration (CMC). As the name implies, the micelles, which are formed
when the emulsifier concentration is above the CMC, act as the site for
particle nucleation.
The reaction mixture consists of water, monomer, emulsifier and a water-
soluble initiator. The monomer is dispersed in the form of droplets in the
water by agitation. The droplets formed are stabilized by the emulsifier
molecules which are adsorbed on the droplet surface. In addition to the
droplets, monomer is also found dissolved in the aqueous medium and
solubilized inside the micelles.
Similarly, the emulsifier is found in three locations: in the micelles, dissolved
in the aqueous medium, and adsorbed on the monomer droplets. Since a
water soluble initiator is used, the initiator molecules will be mainly found
dissolved in the water medium.
When a typical emulsion polymerization recipe is heated, the initiator
dissociates in the aqueous medium and produces initiator radicals. Upon
propagating with monomer in the water phase the initiator radicals form
oligomeric radicals and enter the micelles, which are aggregates of emulsifier
molecules inside which a small amount of monomer is entrapped. The
capturing of a radical by micelle and reaction with the entrapped monomer
signifies the formation of a particle from a micelle. As the propagation takes
Stage I
The time required for particle nucleation to be complete is also called the
nucleation time or the nucleation period, and usually lasts 10-15 minutes in
conventional polymerization systems. This is commonly referred to as the
seed stage, or Stage I, in the emulsion polymerization industry. After the
nucleation or seed stage, the number of particles in the reaction mixture
remains constant if particles do not agglomerate.
Stage II
The stage following the seed stage is called the growth stage or Stage II of
the emulsion polymerization. In Stage II, the polymer particles grow through
a steady diffusion of monomer from the monomer droplets to the particles.
Since the number of particles remains constant and the particles are
saturated with monomer, this stage is marked by a constant rate of
polymerization and could easily be observed on a conversion vs. time plot.
Stage II is considered complete when the monomer droplets are totally
depleted.
Stage III
In Stage III, the monomer finishing stage, the reaction mixture consists of
the monomer swollen polymer particles and the aqueous medium. Further
polymerization of the monomer in the particles takes place. This results in a
decrease of the particle size due to higher density of the polymer compared to
the monomer. During Stage III, the concentration of monomer dissolved in
the aqueous phase falls rapidly, as does the concentration in the polymer
particles. The final product obtained at the end of Stage III is called latex.
The following figure illustrates the stages in a micellar nucleation emulsion
polymerization reaction:
k p M p n MWm 1
v s (3.5)
Na dp p
Where:
f = Initiator efficiency
kd = Rate constant for initiator dissociation
I = Initiator concentration
Na = Avogadro's number
kp = Propagation constant
Homogeneous Nucleation
Homogeneous nucleation is the mechanism for particle formation when
monomers are more water soluble and level of emulsifier is not high enough
for the formation of micelles in the recipe.
The following figure shows a detailed picture of kinetic events that take place
during particle formation by homogeneous nucleation:
dN N a i kde nN / N a
jcr 1
k pw M w
Rhomo
dt N agg k pw M w ktw Rw kap Ap kam Am
R
k
i nN / N a
de 1 jcr 1
w
k pw M w ktw R kap Ap kam Am 1
w
Where:
k pw M w
k pw M w ktw Rw kap Ap kam Am
Refer to the table of page 208 for the explanation of the symbols in the above
equations.
Particle Growth
Stage II, the growth stage, starts after the completion of the seed stage in
the in situ seed process . In the in situ seed process, the micelles are used for
the generation of the seeds. In the case of an external seed process, a well
characterized seed is used as the starting material for emulsion production. If
quality control tests indicate that the particle number and particle size
distribution of the seed particles will not result in the desired end-product
specifications, the batch is normally terminated. Therefore, in the growth
stage it can be assumed that the desired number of particles, with the desired
particle size distribution has already been formed.
It is generally agreed that the growth process is a well understood process
and amenable to control. The growth reaction is responsible for developing
molecular properties (molecular weights, composition, etc.) and morphology
(core-shell, particle size distribution). Since the growth reaction lasts about
Radical Balance
The radical balance in the aqueous phase is controlled by the kinetic events
that are responsible for the radical generation and the radical consumption in
mn Y 2 (3.7)
With:
v s N a2 k a Rw N a2 v
k a Rw (3.8)
N p k tp N p k tp
RI v s N a2
(3.9)
N p ktp
kde v s N a
m (3.10)
ktp
2 N p ktp ktw
Y (3.11)
ka2 v s N a2
The emulsion polymerization model nomenclature is shown here:
Symbol Description
f Initiator efficiency
Particle Phase
Particles containing n free-radicals are depleted in the particle phase in three
analogous ways. By equating the rate of formation to the rate of depletion of
particles containing n free-radicals the recurrence formula is obtained:
(n 2)(n 1) n(n 1)
N n 1 N a / N p N n 1k de n 1 N n 2 ktp N n N a / N p k de n ktp
Na v N a v
(3.12)
This recurrence formula was first developed by Smith and Ewart, in a slightly
modified form (Smith & Ewart, 1948). Equation 3.12 can be solved for the
a 8 (3.14)
The simultaneous solution for n (Equation 3.13) and the stationary steady
state equation for the radical balance in the aqueous phase (Equation 3.6)
completely define the kinetics of the emulsion polymerization.
Activated Initiation
The mechanism for activated initiation is given as:
k kj
I k A j
act
nkj R x *
Where:
Ik = Initiator molecule
dR
R kj
act nkj f kj kact
kj
CIk CA j
dt
Where:
kj
kact = Rate constant for activated initiation
f kj = Efficiency factor
Redox Initiation
The mechanism for redox initiation is given as:
I k Fe nk R Fe Y * (oxidationslow)
k
k ox
Fe Re
k re
Fe x * (reductionfast)
Similar to activated initiation, redox initiation is used in emulsion
polymerization reactions to promote decomposition of initiators at a much
lower temperature. For example, redox initiation is employed in cold rubber
production. It is also used in emulsion polymerization reactions where high
radical flux is needed.
dt k koxk CI k kred CRe
Where:
CFet = Total concentration of the iron in the aqueous phase
Rj N i Rap kap a p CN i CR
k
ap
N i 1
j
Absorption by micelles:
Rj N m N1 Ram kamamCN m CR
am k
j
Desorption:
N i N i 1 R Rde kdeiCN i
dek
Where:
am = Area of a single micelle
Ea VP 1 1
k k o exp
R R T Tref
Where:
ko = Pre-exponential factor in l/sec for first order reactions,
and m3 / kmol s for second order reactions
Ea = Activation energy in mole-enthalpy units
V = Activation volume in volume/mole units
P = Reaction pressure
R = Universal gas constant
T = Reaction temperature
Tref = Reference temperature
The second term in the exponential function contains the activation volume
and is important for high pressure polymerization systems. For detailed
Ea
k ko exp
RT
assuming zero activation volume.
Model Assumptions
The emulsion polymerization process is extremely complex and involves
phenomena for which a complete theoretical understanding has not been
reached. Important assumptions are made in the emulsion polymerization
model:
The reaction mixture is perfectly mixed
Particles are formed by the micellar or the homogeneous mechanism
No agglomeration or breakage of particles occurs
No secondary nucleation occurs
All particles have the same average number of radicals and hence the
same volumetric growth rate
The particle size distribution is unimodal, with moments of PSD sufficient
to describe the PSD
There are no mass transfer limitations on the polymerization reactions
Molecular weight is controlled by chain transfer reactions
k i2 k i1 / k iLL
k iLL values are only available when there is sufficient monomer present in the
swollen polymer particles to form a separate monomer phase if polymer were
removed. If the 3-phase flash does not detect a separate monomer phase,
k iLL values will not be available, and the algorithm will transfer all monomer
from the aqueous phase to the polymer phase.
In addition, there are two rigorous phase equilibrium approaches to handle
the thermodynamics of monomer partitioning. The first rigorous approach
assumes the presence of two liquid phases. The distribution of water,
monomers, and polymers is determined by isofugacity relationships, and the
fugacities of various species are computed by the physical property option set
chosen for the system. The second approach performs rigorous four phase
(vapor-liquid-liquid-polymer) flash calculations based on a newly available
flash algorithm.
F v , t v F v , t
kam Am N a R w v v m Rhomo v v h (3.15)
t v
In Equation 3.15 the right-hand side represents the nucleation of particles
from miceller and homogeneous nucleation. Refer to the table on page 208
for an explanation of the variables used. The volumetric growth rate is v for
a single unswollen particle (Equation 3.5):
k p M p n MWm
v (3.16)
Na dp
The general population balance equation can be converted to the equivalent
moment equations. The j-th moment of the particle size distribution is given
as:
j j F ( , j )d (3.17)
0
User Profiles
In addition to the polymer properties reported through the component
attributes, other model calculations are reported through User Profile
variables. The following user profile variables may be requested from the
model:
Specifying Emulsion
Polymerization Kinetics
Accessing the Emulsion Model
To access the Emulsion polymerization kinetic model:
1 From the Data Browser, click Reactions.
2 From the Reactions folder, click Reactions.
The Reactions object manager appears.
3 If the kinetic model already exists, double-click the desired Reaction ID in
the object manager or click Edit to get to the input forms.
4 To add a new model, from the Reactions object manager, click New. If
necessary, change the default ID for the reaction.
5 Select Emulsion as the reaction type and click OK.
Use the Phases forms to enter information related to phase partitioning and
particle growth. Use the following options:
Use this sheet To
Listing Reactions
The Emulsion model generates reactions based on the list of reacting species.
You can view the system-generated reactions, then assign rate constant
parameters to these reactions.
You can view a list of the system-generated reactions on the Specifications
Reactions sheet. In the Reaction summary listing for each reaction, the first
column indicates the reaction type. The second column lists the reactants,
and the last column lists the products. The Data Browser window can be
resized to better view the reaction listing. Use the following options:
Click To
Adding Reactions
To add a new reaction to the scheme, click New to open the Add Reaction
subform:
1 In Reaction type, select a type for the new reaction.
The Reaction scheme for that type is displayed.
2 In other reactant (for example, Initiator, Catalyst) fields, enter the
reactants of the categories allowed for that reaction type.
3 Click Cancel to discard the new reaction
or
Click New to add a new reaction
or
Editing Reactions
To edit a reaction, click Edit to open the Edit Reaction subform:
1 Modify the Reaction type as needed.
The Reaction scheme for that type is displayed.
2 Modify reactants as needed.
Adding Gel-Effect
Use the Gel-Effect sheet to add gel effect to reactions:
1 Enter a unique integer identifier in No.
2 In the Reaction field, specify the reaction to which you would like to
apply gel effect.
3 In the Corr. No. field, specify a gel effect correlation number.
4 In Parameters, list the parameters for the gel effect correlation.
References
Barton, J., & Capek, I. (1994). Radical Polymerization in Disperse Systems.
New York: Ellis Harwood.
Blackley, D. C. (1975). Emulsion Polymerization: Theory and Practice.
London: Applied Science Publishers Ltd.
Gilbert, R. G. (1995). Emulsion Polymerization: A Mechanistic Approach.
Boston: Academic Press.
Hamielec, A. E., & Tobita, H. (1992). Polymerization Processes. In Ullmans
Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, A21, 305. New York: VCH Publishers.
Harkins, W. D. (1945). J. Chem. Phys., 13, 301.
Odian, G. (1991). Principles of Polymerization, 3rd. Ed. New York: John Wiley
& Sons.
OToole, J. T. (1965). Kinetics of Emulsion Polymerization. J. Appl. Polym.
Sci., 9, 1291.
Poehlein, G. W. (1986). Emulsion Polymerization. In H.F. Mark, N. M. Bikales,
C. G. Overberger, and G. Menges, (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Polymer Science &
Technology, 6, 1. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Ponnuswamy, S. R., & Hamielec, A. E. (1997). Emulsion Polymerization:
Theory and Practice. Lecture notes for intensive short course on polymer
reaction engineering held at Burlington, ON, Canada, April 28-30.
Smith, W. V., & Ewart, R. H. (1948). J. Chem. Phys., 16, 592.
Summary of Applications
The Ziegler-Natta polymerization model is applicable to processes utilizing
coordination catalysts for the production of stereospecific polymers.
Some examples of applicable polymers are:
Linear low density polyethylene - Ethylene is copolymerized with an alpha-
olefin, such as 1-butene, 1-hexene, or 1-octene. Commercial processes
include low pressure, slurry-phase processes, solution-phase processes,
low pressure, gas phase processes.
High density polyethylene - Ethylene homopolymers or copolymers with
high alpha olefins with density 0.940 g / cm 3 and higher. Commercial
Ziegler-Natta Processes
Ziegler-Natta polymerization accounts for a significant fraction of the
polyethylene polymers and all the polypropylene homopolymers and
copolymers produced commercially. The commercial production of these
polyolefins is done exclusively by continuous processes using several different
processes and reactor types operating over a wide range of conditions.
High density polyethylene (HDPE) and linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE)
are produced via catalyzed polymerization processes. The operating
conditions for the catalyzed processes are relatively less severe compared to
the high pressure processes for LDPE production. The pressure generally
ranges from 10-80 atm while the temperatures range from 80-110C. The
pressure and temperature may be as high as 200 atm and 250C in some of
the solution polymerization processes.
Catalyst Types
There is a variety of catalysts used for ethylene polymerization including
supported and unsupported heterogeneous catalyst systems and
homogeneous catalyst systems. The Ziegler-Natta transition metal (Ti) based
catalysts are the most widely used.
However, there are numerous variations of these catalysts. Some vanadium
based catalysts are also used. Chromic oxide on silica catalysts are used in
the Phillips loop reactor process, while the Union Carbide Unipol process may
use either Ziegler-Natta (Ti) or chromium compounds on silica catalysts.
More recently, several manufacturers have been developing commercial
processes using metallocene based catalysts, mainly zirconium and titanium.
These catalysts are believed to be single site catalysts that are capable of
producing high yields, combined with narrow molecular weight and copolymer
composition distributions.
All commercial isotactic polypropylene homopolymer (PP) is manufactured
using heterogeneous Ziegler-Natta catalyst systems. The catalyst consists of
a solid transition metal halide, usually TiCl3 , with an organoaluminum
compound cocatalysts, such as diethylaluminum chloride (DEAC), or a MgCl2
supported TiCl4 . AlEt3 catalyst.
Bulk Loop - fluid --- Supported Ti 60-80 30-40 20 1-2 Ethylene & Himont
(Liquid bed others Mitsui
Pool)
+
Second
Stage
CSTR - --- Supported Ti 60-75 30-40 30-40 2 Ethylene Sumitomo
CSTR
CSTR - --- Unsupported 40-75 30-40 20 2-5 Ethylene Dart
stirred or supported El Paso
horizontal Ti
bed
Diluent CSTR Liquid Ti/V 0-20 5-20 --- 1 Ethylene, Montedison
Slurry monomers Butene, Dutral
& diluents dienes
Multistage Fluid bed - --- Supported Ti 60-80 20 20 3-5 Ethylene & Sumitomo
Gas fluid bed others Union
Carbide
Vertical --- Unsupported 70-90 20 20 4 Ethylene & BASF
stirred bed of supported others ICI
- stirred Ti
USI
bed
Horizontal --- Supported Ti 70-90 20 20 4 Ethylene & AMOCO
stirred bed others Chisso
-
horizontal
stirred bed
Reaction Steps
There are a few key elementary reactions that apply to almost all catalyzed
addition polymerization systems. These include the three basic reaction steps:
Chain initiation
Propagation
Chain transfer (spontaneous and to small molecules such as monomer,
solvent and chain transfer agents)
For chromium and metallocene catalyst systems, additional reactions for long
chain branching via terminal double bond polymerization must also be
included.
In addition to the polymerization reactions, there are reactions affecting the
catalyst active sites on which the polymerization reactions take place. These
include catalyst site activation, inhibition and deactivation. The catalyst
reactions and the polymerization reactions occur simultaneously during the
polymerization.
A comprehensive kinetic scheme for the catalyzed multi-site homo- and
copolymerization of any number of monomers has been built into Aspen
Polymers.
Catalyst States
The multi-site catalyst states and the types of reactions affecting them are
shown here:
Site Types
In the figure, potential sites and dead sites are considered to be independent
of site type. The user specifies the number of site types to be included for a
particular simulation.
A vacant site is an active site that does not have a polymer or other
molecule attached to it.
A propagation site has a growing polymer molecule attached to it.
Inhibited sites have small molecules such as hydrogen or poisons
attached, temporarily blocking it from becoming propagation sites. The
small molecule may dissociate from an inhibited sited, which then
becomes a vacant site once again. Therefore, the site inhibition reaction is
considered reversible.
Am Cocatalysts m
Em Electron donor m
Mj Monomer j
Nm Number of monomers
Xn Inhibitor n
0,i
k Zeroth moment of live polymer with respect to active
segment of type i and active site of type k
Polymerization Mechanism
The catalyst active site is attached to one end of a live polymer chain via a
metal-carbon bond. It is generally accepted that polymerization proceeds via
Copolymerization Mechanism
For copolymerization, the built-in kinetic scheme allows the user to specify
the number of monomer types used. Similarly the user has the flexibility to
specify the number of each type of reactive species present in the
polymerization: catalysts, cocatalysts, chain transfer agents, solvents, etc.
The user is able to tailor the built-in kinetics to model a specific catalyzed
polymerization system by selecting a subset of the reactions shown in the
Built-In Ziegler-Natta Catalysts and Polymerization Kinetic Scheme figure on
page 232. However, it is important that the subset include a chain initiation,
propagation, and at least one chain transfer or active site deactivation
reaction to produce dead polymer.
Rate Expressions
The rate expression for each reaction is generally written as a product of the
rate constant and the concentrations of the reacting species. In many of the
reactions, one of the reacting species is a polymer chain while the other is a
small molecule such as monomer, chain transfer agent, cocatalyst, etc. A
reaction order with respect to the small reacting molecule is included for
some of the reactions. This reaction order has a default value of one.
The rate constants for each reaction at sites of type k are calculated at the
reaction temperature using the Arrhenius equation shown below. The user
specified rate constant parameters are pre-exponential factor ( kok ) , activation
energy ( Ea k ) at sites of type k, and the reference temperature.
Rate Constant
E ak 1
k = k o exp -
k k 1
R T Tref
Where:
Catalyst Pre-Activation
Some of the chromium catalysts used in these processes exhibit slow
activation with induction period. This slow activation can be modeled by
catalyst preactivation reaction. The precatalyst goes to catalyst that further
undergoes site activation, initiation and propagation.
Chain Initiation
Chain initiation involves the reaction of a monomer molecule at a vacant
active site to form a live polymer molecule of unit length at that site. This
reaction converts a vacant active site to a propagation site. The chain
initiation reaction is shown below:
Propagation
The live polymer at each active site type grow or propagate through the
addition of monomer molecules to form long polymer chains. The propagation
reaction is represented by:
0k, j CMi
O kpaMi
Pnk,i M j Pnk i ,i k
R paij k paij
k
(atactic propagation)
k
but uses a different rate constant ( k paij ) . When the atactic propagation
reaction is included in the simulation, the main propagation reaction should
be considered to account for the formation of all polymer whether it is
isotactic or atactic. Hence the main propagation reaction is also termed the
total propagation. The atactic propagation reaction only accounts for the
formation of atactic polymer. The atactic content of the polymer is then
calculated from the ratio of atactic to total polymer.
Site Deactivation
The catalyst site deactivation step involves the deactivation of active sites,
vacant and propagation, to form dead sites. Depending on the catalyst
system and operating conditions, the deactivation rate may be high or low.
There are several different site deactivations reactions included in the built-in
kinetic scheme. They include site deactivation by cocatalyst, by electron
donors, by hydrogen, by monomer, by poisons, and spontaneous site
deactivation. Different catalyst systems tend to be deactivated by a different
subset of the reactions.
The deactivation rate constants are assumed to be dependent only on the site
type and not on the polymer segment attached to a site. Therefore, the same
rate constant is applied to both vacant and propagation sites of the same
type. Note that deactivation rates shown in the Built-In Ziegler-Natta
Catalysts and Polymerization Kinetic Scheme figure on page 232 are per unit
of active (vacant and propagation) site concentration.
Cocatalyst Poisoning
For some catalyst systems, additional amounts of cocatalysts are fed to the
reactor to counteract the effect of any poisons present . This is modeled as a
cocatalyst poisoning reaction in the built-in kinetics. The product of this
reaction is designated as a byproduct in the list of reactive species. The
byproduct is considered to be inert and does not participate in any reaction.
Phase Equilibria
The polymerization model currently considers a single-phase system (vapor or
liquid), two-phase system (vapor and liquid), or three-phase (VLL) system
when calculating concentrations for the reaction kinetics. For single-phase
systems, the reacting phase may be either vapor or liquid. In multi-phase
systems, reactions can occur in one or more phases simultaneously. Each
reaction object is associated with a single reacting phase, identified on the
options form.
By default the reacting phase is assumed to be the liquid phase (for VLL
systems, the reacting phase must be specified). Several reaction models can
be referenced from a single reactor block to account for reactions in each
phase.
Rate Calculations
The Ziegler-Natta polymerization kinetic model supplies to the reactor models
the reaction rates for the components and the rate of change of polymer
attributes (e.g. the chain length distribution moments) . The component
reaction rates are computed from the kinetic scheme by summing over all
reactions that involve the component. The site based moment rates are
derived from a population balance and method of moments approach similar
to that described in the Calculation Method section on page 185.
Specifying Ziegler-Natta
Polymerization Kinetics
Accessing the Ziegler-Natta Model
To access the Ziegler-Natta polymerization kinetic model:
1 From the Data Browser, click Reactions.
2 From the Reactions folder, click Reactions.
The Reactions object manager appears.
3 If the kinetic model already exists, double-click the desired Reaction ID in
the object manager or click Edit to get to the input forms.
4 To add a new model, from the Reactions object manager, click New. If
necessary, change the default ID for the reaction.
5 Select Ziegler-Nat as the reaction type and click OK.
Note: The TDB segment should be of type end segment and should not be
used as a repeat segment for a particular monomer (see Step 2).
4 Continue listing other types of reacting species, for example, solvents,
transfer agents, etc.
5 Select the Generate Reactions option if you want the reactions to be
generated automatically.
After going through the reaction generation once, it is recommended that
you turn off this feature. Otherwise, the reaction generation is performed
repeatedly.
Listing Reactions
The Ziegler-Natta model generates reactions based on the list of reacting
species. You can view the system-generated reactions, then assign rate
constant parameters to these reactions.
You can view a list of the system-generated reactions on the Reactions
sheet. In the Reaction summary listing for each reaction, the first column
indicates the reaction type. The second column lists the reactants, and the
last column lists the products. The Data Browser window can be resized to
better view the reaction listing. Use the following options:
Click To
Editing Reactions
To edit a reaction, click Edit to open the Edit Reaction subform:
1 Modify the Reaction type as needed.
The Reaction scheme for that type is displayed.
2 Modify reactants as needed.
References
Albright L. F. (1985). Processes for Major Addition-Type Plastics and Their
Monomers, 2nd Ed. Florida: Krieger Pub.
Brockmeier, N. F. (1983). Latest Commercial Technology for Propylene
Polymerization. In R.P. Quirk (Ed.), Transition Metal Catalyzed
Polymerizations - Alkenes and Dienes. New York: Academic Pub.
Choi, K-Y, & Ray, W. H. (1985a). Recent Developments in Transition Metal
Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization - A Survey. I. Ethylene Polymerization. J.
Macromol. Sci. Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys., C25 (1), 1.
Choi, K-Y, & Ray, W. H. (1985b). Recent Developments in Transition Metal
Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization - A Survey. II. Propylene Polymerization. J.
Macromol. Sci. Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys., C25 (1), 57.
Debling, J. A., Han, G. C., Kuijpers, F., Verburg, J., Zacca, J., & Ray, W. H.
(1994). Dynamic Modeling of Product Grade Transition for Olefin
Polymerization Processes. AIChE J., 40, No. 3, 506.
Nowlin, T. E. (1985). Low Pressure Manufacture of Polyethylene. Prog. Polym.
Sci., 11, 29.
Short, J. N. (1983). Low Pressure Ethylene Polymerization Processes. In R.P.
Quirk (Ed.), Transition Metal Catalyzed Polymerizations - Alkenes and Dienes.
New York: Academic Pub.
Xie, T., McAuley, K.B., Hsu, J. C. C., & Bacon, D. W. (1994). Gas Phase
Ethylene Polymerization: Production Processes, Polymer Properties, and
Reactor Modeling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33, 449.
This section covers the ionic polymerization kinetic model available in Aspen
Polymers (formerly known as Aspen Polymers Plus). The cationic, anionic and
group transfer addition polymerization kinetics can be modeled using this
model.
Topics covered include:
Summary of Applications, 249
Ionic Processes, 250
Reaction Kinetic Scheme, 250
Model Features and Assumptions, 258
Polymer Properties Calculated, 259
Specifying Ionic Polymerization Kinetics, 260
Summary of Applications
Some examples of applicable polymers are given in below:
Polystyrene - Anionic polymerization is used to produce narrow molecular
weight distribution polystyrenes in small quantities. Cationic
polymerization is used to produce low molecular weight polystyrenes for
coatings and glues. Block copolymers of styrene and butadiene are
produced commercially with anionic polymerization.
Polyisobutylene - Low-to-medium molecular weight poly isobutylene is
produced commercially by polymerization of high purity isobutylene in
isobutane or hexane diluent using aluminum chloride or hexane trifluoride
as a catalyst.
Polybutene - Polybutenes are produced in solution by copolymerizing
isobutylene and n-butene using aluminum chloride or hexane trifluoride as
a catalyst.
Polybutadiene - Block copolymers of styrene and butadiene are produced
commercially with anionic polymerization.
Polyoxides - Examples are poly ethylene oxide (PEO) and poly propylene
oxide (PPO). Continuous tubular or column reactors or semibatch
Ionic Processes
Many specialty polymers are manufactured by ionic polymerization processes.
For the description of a specific ionic process, refer to the References section.
Ionic polymers fall in the category of addition polymers, i.e., the reactive
species grow in length by continuous addition of monomer units. However,
there are several features that distinguish the ionic polymerization processes
from other addition polymerization processes like free-radical and Ziegler-
Natta:
Different propagating species are often present in ionic processes. These
species may be free ions, tight ion pairs, loose ion pairs, dormant esters,
etc. Moreover the propagating species are often in equilibrium.
Association or aggregation phenomena is common in BuLi type of
initiators for anionic polymerization. The associated initiator is not reactive
and is in equilibrium with its dissociated form. The association phenomena
also takes place with growing polymer chains, which reduces the actual
number of chains growing at any given time. This phenomena affects both
the conversion and polymer properties.
Exchange reaction takes place between live and dormant polymer. The
active species transfer from one polymer to another. This reaction controls
the molecular weight distribution of the final polymer. If the exchange
reaction rate constant >> propagation rate constant, then for increasing
monomer conversion the polydispersity approaches a limiting value of 1.0.
Ionic reactions are a strong function of solvent, initiator and operating
conditions and are susceptible to poisons.
Chain transfer and termination reactions may be negligible or absent in
certain polymerization processes thus leading to formation of living
polymers.
Reaction Steps
There are a few key elementary reactions that apply to all ionic
polymerization systems. These include the three basic reaction steps:
Formation of active species
Chain initiation
Initiator Attributes
The initiator in ionic model has three attributes which are solved along with
moment equations:
AI m Associated initiator, m
Cn Catalyst, n
Ip Initiator, p
Mj Monomer, j
Xm Exchange agent, m
The ionic model is a terminal model, implying that the rate constants are
functions of only terminal segment of the polymer chain.
Rate Constant
Ea i 1 1
k i k io exp -
R T Tref
Where:
ko = Pre-exponential factor in 1/sec for first order reactions
and m3/kmol-sec for second order reactions
Ea = Activation energy in mole enthalpy units
R = Universal constant
T = Reaction temperature in Kelvin
Tref = Reference reaction temperature in Kelvin (default is
1E38)
AI m n m,p I p
The association and dissociation of initiator is observed in alkyl-Lithium type
of initiators in nonpolar solvents for anionic polymerization. n-butyl-Li exists
as hexamer whereas s-BuLi and t-BuLi exist as tetramers for styrene
polymerization. The dissociated initiator further reacts with monomer to form
growing polymer with unit chain length in chain initiation step. This reaction
can also be used to represent self-ionization of some strong acids
Chain Initiation
The active species incorporate monomer to form propagating species with
unit chain length:
P0i M j P i
j,j
The initiator (in dissociated form) directly reacts with monomer to form
propagating species with unit chain length. A counter-ion may be formed
( d I 2 1) :
I m + M j Pi j,j + d I 2 CIi
The transfer active species incorporate monomer to form propagating species
with unit chain length:
P0t,i M j P i
j,j
Propagation
The growing polymer with an active species at the end of the chain may grow
or propagate through the addition of monomer molecules to form long
polymer chains. The propagation reaction is represented by:
Pn,ki M j Pn+i j , j
where monomer j is being added to a polymer chain of length n, with an
active segment of type k and active species of type i. The resulting polymer
chain will be of length n+1 and the active segment will be of type j. The
Copolymerization
For copolymerization, there will be N m * N m * N site propagation reactions that
may have different reactivities. For example, with two monomers and three
site types, the monomer being added could be monomer 1 or monomer 2
while the active segment type could be segments from monomer 1 or
monomer 2 at each site type. As a result, there will be twelve rate constants
( k ip , kj ) , where the subscript k refers to the active segment type while the
second subscript j refers to the propagating monomer type. The superscript i
refers to active species type.
For the terminal model the rate of propagation is dependent only on the
concentration of live polymer with active segment k on active species i and
the concentration of the propagating monomer j.
Association or Aggregation
The propagating species initiated by alkyl-Lithium type of initiators in anionic
polymerization also exhibit the association phenomena like the initiator. The
association of live polymeric species is usually dimeric in nature. The
i
associated polymer Qn m, k is tracked as a separate polymer and does not
participate in any other reactions:
Exchange
Exchange reactions exchange the growing active species between two
different growing polymers. If both free ions and ion pairs are growing, then
the counter-ion can exchange between the two polymeric species. There can
be exchange reaction between dormant polymer (with ester as growing
species which does not propagate) and ion pairs/free ions. The exchange
reaction can also take place between an exchange agent (e.g., alcohol end
group in solvent or starter) and a growing polymer. If exchange reaction with
a small molecule does not produce a P0 species, then d EXA 0 . The exchange
between growing species and dormant species takes place in polyether
polyols (propylene oxide). The dormant species can be an alcohol:
Pn,ki + Pm,p
j
Pn,kj + Pm,p
i
Chain Transfer
There are four types of chain transfer reactions:
Spontaneous
Monomer
Dormant polymer formation
Chain transfer agent
Spontaneous chain transfer can lead to formation of a dead polymer molecule
and an active species caused by proton loss, e.g., cationic polymerization of
poly isobutylene:
Spontaneous Pn,k Dn + P0
i i i
Chain transfer to monomer can take place with hydride abstraction from an
olefin, for example, cationic polymerization of polyisobutylene and butyl
rubber:
Chain Termination
The growing polymer chain with ion pairs as active species can be
spontaneously terminated by combination with counter ion (bTCI 0) , e.g.,
cationic polymerization of polystyrene, tetrahydrofuran, polyisobutylene. A
growing free ion active species can terminate by reacting with its own counter
ion (bTCI 1) :
Coupling
Coupling reactions are encountered in thermo-plastic elastomer production.
For example, to make styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) TPE, styrene is added
first, and then half of the butadiene is added. Introducing a coupling agent to
this reaction system will form SBS polymer. In this example i=j=1 and k=2.
Phase Equilibria
The polymerization model currently considers a single-phase system (vapor or
liquid), two-phase system (vapor and liquid), or three-phase (VLL) system
when calculating concentrations for the reaction kinetics. For single-phase
systems, the reacting phase may be either vapor or liquid. In multi-phase
systems, reactions can occur in one or more phases simultaneously. Each
reaction object is associated with a single reacting phase, identified on the
options form.
By default the reacting phase is assumed to be the liquid phase (for VLL
systems, the reacting phase must be specified). Several reaction models can
be referenced from a single reactor block to account for reactions in each
phase.
Rate Calculations
The ionic polymerization kinetic model supplies to the reactor models the
reaction rates for the components and the rate of change of polymer
attributes (e.g. the chain length distribution moments) :
The component reaction rates are computed from the kinetic scheme by
summing over all reactions that involve the component.
Dissociated Aggregate
Polymer,
i
Q if ,k n f Qni m,k
n m, k
n m
Bulk Polymer
if n f Pni,k Qni ,k Dni
Nseg
k k
Nseg Nseg
k
i
f ,k if ,k n f Dni
k n
Adding Reactions
To add a new reaction to the scheme, click New to open the Add Reaction
subform:
1 In Reaction type, select a type for the new reaction.
The Reaction scheme for that type is displayed.
2 In other reactant (for example, Initiator, Catalyst) fields enter the
reactants of the categories allowed for that reaction type.
3 Click Cancel to discard the new reaction
or
Click New to add a new reaction
or
Editing Reactions
To add or edit a reaction, click Edit to open the Edit Reaction subform:
1 Modify the Reaction type as needed.
The Reaction scheme for that type is displayed.
2 Modify reactants as needed.
References
Biesenberger, J. A., & Sebastian, D. H. (1983). Principles of Polymerization
Engineering. New York: Wiley.
Bikales, M., Overberger, & Menges. (1985). Encyclopedia of Polymer Science
and Engineering, 2nd Ed. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Chang, C. C., Miller, J. W., & Schorr, G. R. (1990). Fundamental Modeling in
Anionic Polymerization Processes. J. of Appl. Pol. Sci., 39, 2395-2417.
Chang, C. C., Halasa, A. F., & Miller, J. W. (1993). The Reaction Engineering
of the Anionic Polymerization of Isoprene. J. of Appl. Pol. Sci., 47, 1589-1599.
Compton, R. G. (Ed.). (1992). Mechanism and Kinetics of Addition
Polymerizations. Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics, 31.
Fathi, H., Hamielec, A. E., & Davison, E. J. (1996). Modelling of Anionic
Solution Polymerization of Butadiene - The Effects of Chain Termination and
Long Chain Branching on Molecular Weight Distribution Development. Polymer
Reaction Eng., 4, No. 4.
Summary of Applications
The segment-based power-law reaction model can be used to simulate
polymerization reactions using a simple power-law type rate expression. This
may be useful when simulating new processes that do not fit well into the
other built-in models in Aspen Polymers, or when a very detailed mechanistic
reaction model is not necessary.
The segment-based power-law model is the best choice for simulating step-
growth addition processesfor example, the production of polyurethane.
This model may also be used to represent processes involving changes to
polymer segments. The underlying kinetics are basic power law reactions in
which segments and monomeric components may participate. Some
examples of applicable polymers are:
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) - Alcoholysis of polyvinylacetate
Chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) - Chlorination of polyethylene
Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) - Recovery of methylmethacrylate from
PMMA
Polyisobutylene - Chain scission of polyisobutylene
Reaction Categories
Regardless of the end effect of the polymer modification reaction, the events
taking place fall into one of two categories based on the site where they occur
on the polymer chain. The reactions may take place on:
Side groups
Polymer backbone: scission, depolymerization, cross-linking, or bond
changes
There are some fundamental issues that distinguish reacting polymers from
their low molecular weight counterparts. One obvious characteristic of
reacting polymers is the potential for steric hindrance. A reacting side group
may be too close to the polymer chain, for example. There may also be
changes in solubility as reaction progresses.
Furthermore, crystallinity has an effect on the polymer reactivity; in general,
for a semicrystalline polymer, only the amorphous region is able to react.
Conventional Species
Reactions involving all non polymeric species fall under this category.
Monomeric components may react among themselves to produce
intermediate species. These reactions are represented as Category I in the
Segment Based Model Reaction Categories figure on page 268.
CH3
C O
O OH
CH CH2 + CH3OH CH CH2 + CH3CO2CH3
Another example is the chlorination of polyethylene to produce chlorinated
polyethylene (CPE):
Chain Scission
A common polymer degradation reaction is chain scission. In this case, bonds
are broken along the polymer chain resulting in shorter polymer molecules
with lower molecular weight. Chain scission may be induced by several
factors. One example is the scission of polyisobutylene upon oxidation:
CH3 CH3
CH2 C CH2 CH2 C + CH2
CH2 CH2
Depolymerization
Depolymerization is the reverse of the propagation step of a polymerization
reaction. In such reactions, monomer molecules are lost from the polymer
chain. Depolymerization is often considered a degradation reaction. There
are, however, cases where it is brought on by design to recover monomer
from scrap polymer. An example depolymerization reaction is that of
polymethyl methacrylate to regenerate methyl methacrylate:
Propagation
Propagation reactions involve the addition of monomers to the end of a
growing polymer chain. Propagation is illustrated as Category V in the
Segment Based Model Reaction Categories figure on page 268.
Combination
There are other mechanisms through which polymer segments react with
each other. Some of these reactions, grouped as combination reactions,
include kinetic events where two polymer molecules combine into one. These
reactions are represented as Category VI in the Segment Based Model
Reaction Categories figure on page 268.
Branch Formation
Branch formation occurs when a polymer molecule attaches to another
polymer chain, converting a repeat unit to a branch point. Monomers can also
react with repeat units to initiate branch formation. Branch formation is
illustrated as Category VII in the Segment Based Model Reaction Categories
figure on page 268.
Cross Linking
Cross linking occurs when a repeat unit in one chain reacts with a repeat unit
in another chain, forming a cross link (branch 4) segment. Cross linking is
illustrated as Category VIII in the Segment Based Model Reaction Categories
figure on page 268.
Eai 1 1 bi
T
R T Tref
U flagi
Tref specified i
k net ,i [Catalysti ] ko i e
T
ref
Eai
Tref unspecified * k net ,i [Catalysti ] i k o i e RT
T bi U flag i
ratem activity m C k
a mj
Assign User Rate Constants is used:
j j i net ,i
ratem C k
a mj
Assign User Rate Constants is not used: net ,m
j j
Nomenclature
Symbol Description
* The concentration basis may be changed to other units using the Concentration basis field on the
Specs sheet or using the optional concentration basis subroutine.
** The reference temperature may be specified globally on the Specs sheet or locally for each rate
constant set on the Rate-Constants sheet. If global and local reference temperatures are both
unspecified then this form of the equation is applied.
Where:
Fracs,i = Segment mole fraction
Mwsegavg = Nseg
Average segment molecular weight = SFRAC(i)* Mw
1
i
R s,i * Mwi
Rp 1
Mw p
End 1
Repeat 2
Branch-3 3
Branch-4 4
0 1 1
2
t t t
The factor of accounts for the fact that each connection links two
segments (without this correction the points of connection are counted twice).
This method is best illustrated through these examples:
Valid Reaction Type Stoichiometry 1 0
No Initiation M P1 MR +1 +1 0
Yes Branching Pn M Pn 1 R + M B3 + E +1 +1 0
Yes Branching Pn Pm Pn m R + E B3 + R 0 +1 -1
User Subroutines
The segment-based power-law model can be customized by applying user-
written subroutines. There are two types of subroutines available. The
concentration and holdup basis for the model can be changed through a user
basis subroutine. A user rate-constant subroutine can be used to extend the
standard reaction rate expression. These routines can be used together in any
combination.
SUBROUTINE USBBAS
1 SOUT, NSUBS, IDXSUB, ITYPE, XMW,
2 IDSCC, NPO, NBOPST, NIDS, IDS,
3 NINTB, INTB, NREALB, REALB, NINTM,
4 INTM, NREALM, REALM, NIWORK, IWORK,
5 NWORK, WORK, NCPM, IDXM, X,
6 X1, X2, Y, DUM1, FLOWL,
7 FLOWL1, FLOWL2, FLOWV, FLOWS, VLQ,
8 VL1, VL2, VV, VSALT, VLIQRX,
9 VL1RX, VL2RX, VVAPRX, VSLTRX, RFLRTN,
* IFLRTN, CRATES, NTCAT, RATCAT, CSS,
1 VBASIS, IPOLY, NSEG, IDXSEG, AXPOS,
2 TIME )
Argument Descriptions
Variable Usage Type Dimension Description
* When using molar concentrations, this parameter is volume of the reacting phase in m 3
in RCSTR and RBatch or the cross-sectional area of the reacting phase in m 2 in RPlug.
Note: The argument lists for the segment-based user basis routine and step-
growth user basis routine are identical. Both types of models can reference
the same basis routines.
Example 1 illustrates how to use the user basis routine to convert the
concentration basis from the standard molar concentration basis (mol/L) to a
mass concentration basis (mol/kg). (Note: the current version of Aspen
Polymers supports several concentration basis through the BASIS keyword
located on the Specs sheet. This example is a demonstration). Using these
units, the reaction rates are calculated in units of mol/kg-sec. These rates are
multiplied by the holdup basis (VBASIS) for the reactor in the segment-based
power-law model. The holdup basis must be consistent with the concentration
basis, e.g., in this case it must be in kg. The holdup basis pertains to the
reacting phase, it does not include the phases that do not react.
Example 1: A User Basis Routine For the Mass-Concentration Basis
Xi
Ci
M Liquid
Ci = Mass-concentration of component i
Note: This excerpt does not include the argument list and declarations
section of the user basis routine.
The plug flow reactor model in Aspen Plus assumes that the vapor and liquid
move at the same velocity through the reactor (e.g., no-slip conditions). This
assumption is not consistent with the physical reality of polymer finishing
reactors or wiped-film evaporators. The subroutine in Example 2 circumvents
the no-slip assumption in RPlug, allowing you to specify the volume occupied
by the liquid phase. In this example, you specifiy the first integer argument in
the RPlug block as 1 and the first real argument as the volume fraction of
the reactor occupied by the liquid phase.
Example 2: A User Basis Routine to Specify Liquid Volume in RPlug
UFRAC = 1.D0
IF ( REALB(1) .NE. RGLOB_RMISS ) UFRAC =
REALB(1)
IF ( INTB(1).EQ.1 ) THEN
C - unpack the mole fraction vector into the
molar concentrations...
CALL SHS_UNPACK ( X , NCPMX, IDXM, CSS )
C - concentration = mole fraction divided by molar
volume of phase
DO 20 I = 1, NCOMP_NCC
CSS(I) = CSS(I) / VLQ
20 CONTINUE
C - multiply total reactor volume by user-specified
volume fraction -
VBASIS = ( VLIQRX + VVAPRX ) * UFRAC
Note: This excerpt does not include the argument list and declarations
section of the user basis routine.
SUBROUTINE USBRCN
1 SOUT, NSUBS, IDXSUB, ITYPE, XMW,
2 IDSCC, NPO, NBOPST, NIDS, IDS,
3 NINTB, INTB, NREALB, REALB, NINTR,
4 INTR, NREALR, REALR, NIWORK, IWORK,
5 NWORK, WORK, NCPM, IDXM, X,
6 X1, X2, Y, DUM1, VL,
7 VL1, VL2, VV, VSALT, IPOLY,
8 NSEG, IDXSEG, NCC, CSS, TEMP,
9 PRES, NURC, 1 RCUSER, CATWT )
Argument Descriptions
Variable Usage Type Dimension Description
C 1 (aC bT) I
eff
actual
Where:
T = Temperature, K
a,b = Equation parameters
The net rate expression can thus be written as:
C E* 1 1
R T Tref
rate [Q ]
actual
koe
1 ( a bT ) I
Where:
ko = Pre-exponential factor, (L/mol)/sec
E* = Activation energy
R = Gas law constant
Tref = Reference temperature for ko
Packed Vectors
Aspen Plus frequently uses a technique called packing to minimize
simulation time. The user models previously described use packed vectors to
track the mole fractions of each phase (vectors X, X1, X2, and Y). These
vectors contain NCPM elements (Number of Components Present in the Mixed
substream). The component index associated with each element is listed in
the vector IDXM. All other vectors used by the model, including the rates
vectors and the component concentration vectors, are unpacked.
Calculating Unpacked Component Concentrations
Calculate unpacked component concentrations of the first liquid phase given
the packed mole fractions of the first liquid phase and the molar volume of
the first liquid phase.
IF ( VL1 .GT. 0.D0 .AND. FLOWL1.GT.0.D0 ) THEN
DO 10 I = 1, NCPM
CSS(I) = X1( IDXM( I ) ) / VL1
10 CONTINUE
END IF
Note: NCPM steps were required to load the concentration vector. Since
NCPM is always less than or equal to NCC (total number of conventional
components), there is a reduction in the required number of steps to perform
the operation. Using packed arrays for calculations reduces overhead by
eliminating the need to check for zero values when carrying out mathematical
operations.
Use the User Subroutines forms to specify the names and parameters for
optional user basis and rate constant subroutines.
Use this sheet To
Rate Constants Specify the name of the user kinetics routine, the number of
user rate constants calculated by the routine, and to give the
integer and real arguments for the user arrays for this routine
Basis Specify the name of the user concentration and holdup basis
routine and give the integer and real arguments for the user
arrays for this routine
Note: You must specify the Valid Phases keyword for each reactor model
referencing the kinetics to ensure the specified reacting phase exists.
If the Reacting Phase option is set to Liquid phase 1 or Liquid phase 2
the model assumes two liquid phases exist. When the named phase is not
present, the model prints a warning message and sets the reaction rates to
zero. There are two options for handling phase collapse:
Select the Use bulk liquid phase option to force the model to apply the
specified reaction kinetics to the bulk phase when the named phase
disappears.
Select the Suppress warnings option to deactivate the warning
messages associated with phase collapse.
These options are especially convenient when modeling simultaneous
reactions in two liquid phases using two step-growth models. In this situation,
one would typically select the Use bulk liquid option for one phase and not
the other (to avoid double-counting reactions when one phase collapses).
In both cases the attribute rates of change are mapped to the component
attributes associated with the user-specified reacting site number (e.g.,
SSFLOW(i,j), SZMOM(i,j), etc.)
Note: Reaction rates are defined on a molar basis (moles per volume per
time). The time units for the pre-exponential factors are specified directly on
the Rate Constant form.
By default, the concentration units are assumed to be in SI units (kmole/m3
or mole/L).
You can change the concentration basis to other units using the
Concentration Basis field of the Specs sheet. Alternately, you may apply a
user basis subroutine.
4 In the Tref field, enter the reference temperature. If this field is left blank
the reference temperature will default to the user-specified global
reference temperature on the Specs form.
5 If desired, specify a Catalyst Species and Catalyst Order.
6 If desired, specify a user rate constant element number on the User Flag
field (For details, see the User Rate-Constant Subroutine on page 144).
Note: Use the Catalyst Species field to associate a rate constant with a
particular catalyst. If you leave this field blank (empty) the model drops the
catalyst concentration term from the rate expression.
Use the Catalyst Order field to specify the reaction order with respect to the
catalyst (the model assumes first order by default).
References
Biesenberger, J. A., & Sebastian, D. H. (1983). Principles of Polymerization
Engineering. New York: Wiley.
Polymer Manufacturing
Flowsheets
Polymer production processes are usually divided into the following major
steps:
Monomer synthesis and purification
Polymerization
Recovery/separation
Polymer processing
The modeling issues of interest in each of these steps were discussed in
Chapter 1, and are summarized in the following figure. The focus here is on
the various unit operations required in these processing steps.
Polymerization
The polymerization step is the most important step in terms of capital and
operating costs. The desired outcome for this step is a polymer product with
specified properties (e.g. molecular weight distribution, melt index, viscosity,
crystallinity) for given operating conditions. The obstacles that must be
overcome to reach this goal depend on the type of polymerization process.
Polymerization processes may be batch, semi-batch, or continuous. In
addition, they may be carried out in bulk, solution, suspension, or emulsion.
Bulk continuous systems provide better temperature and molecular weight
control at the expense of conversion; batch systems offer less control over
molecular weight. In addition, they may result in a high viscosity product and
require high temperatures and pressures. Solution systems also provide good
temperature control but have associated with them the cost of solvent
removal from the polymer.
In summary, for the polymerization step, the mechanisms that take place
during the reaction introduce changes in the reaction media which in turn
make kinetics and conversion, residence time, agitation, and heat transfer the
most important issues for the majority of process types.
Recovery / Separations
The recovery/separation step is the step where the desired polymer produced
is further purified or isolated from by-products or residual reactants. In this
step, monomers and solvents are separated and purified for recycle or resale.
The important issues for this step are phase equilibrium, heat and mass
transfer.
Polymer Processing
The last step, polymer processing, can also be considered a recovery step. In
this step, the polymer slurry is turned into solid pellets or chips. Heat of
vaporization is an important issue in this step (Grulke, 1994).
References
Dotson, N. A, Galvn, R., Laurence, R. L., & Tirrell, M. (1996). Polymerization
Process Modeling. New York: VCH Publishers.
Grulke, E. A. (1994). Polymer Process Engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
This section summarizes some typical usage of the Aspen Plus unit operation
models to represent actual unit operations found in industrial polymerization
processes.
Topics covered include:
Summary of Aspen Plus Unit Operation Models, 295
Distillation Models, 301
Reactor Models, 302
Mass-Balance Reactor Models, 302
Equilibrium Reactor Models, 304
Kinetic Reactor Models, 304
Treatment of Component Attributes in Unit Operation Models, 335
Dupl
The Dupl block copies one inlet stream to two or more outlet streams. By
design, the mass flow rate and attribute rates out of this block will be greater
than the flow rates into the block, violating mass and attribute conservation
principles.
Frequently, the Dupl block is used as a shortcut to reduce the simulation time
required to model a process consisting of two or more parallel process lines.
For example, consider the process shown here:
Operating Conditions
R1A R1B R2A R2B R3A R3B
Temperature, 250 250 260 260 270 265
C
Pressure, torr 760 760 1200 1200 1500 1700
Volume, liter 2000 2000 1500 1500 1000 1200
Flash2
The Flash2 block carries out a phase-equilibrium calculation for a vapor-liquid
split. The chemistry feature of this block can be used to extend the phase
equilibrium to vapor-liquid-solid systems. The free-water option can be used
to extend the phase equilibrium calculations to include a free water phase in
addition to the organic liquid phase.
The Flash2 model can be used to simulate simple flash drums with any
number of feed streams. The model is also a good tool for representing spray
condensers, single-stage distillations, knock-back condensers, decanters, and
other types of equipment which effectively operate as one ideal stage.
The Flash2 model assumes a perfect phase split, but an entrainment factor
can be specified to account for liquid carryover in the vapor stream. The
entrainment factor is specified by the user, it is not calculated by the model.
If a correlation between the vapor flow rate and the entrainment rate is
available, this correlation can be applied to the model using a Fortran block
which reads the vapor flow rate calculated by the Flash block, calculates the
entrainment rate, and writes the resulting prediction back to the Flash block.
Note that this approach creates an information loop in the model which must
be converged.
The Flash2 block does not fractionate the polymer molecular weight
distribution. Instead, the molecular weight distribution of the polymer in each
product stream is assumed to be the same as the feed stream.
Flash3
The Flash3 block carries out phase-equilibrium calculations for a vapor-liquid-
liquid splits. The liquid phases may be organic-organic (including polymer-
monomer) or aqueous-organic. For aqueous-organic systems, the Flash3
model is more rigorous than the Flash2/free water approach described above.
The key difference is that the Flash3 model considers dissolved organic
compounds in the aqueous phase while the free water approach assumes a
pure water phase.
Generally, three-phase flashes are more difficult to converge than two-phase
flashes. Three-phase flash failures may indicate bad binary interaction
parameters between the components. The problem may also stem from
bogus vapor pressures or heats of formation. In general, it is a good idea to
study two-phase splits for the system in question before attempting to model
a three-phase decanter or reactor.
As with the two-phase flash, the three-phase flash is more stable if
temperature and pressure are specified. Other options, such as duty and
vapor fraction, are more difficult to converge. Temperature estimates may aid
convergence in duty-specified reactors.
FSplit
The flow splitter block, FSplit, is used to represent valves or tanks with
several outlets. The outlet flow rates can be specified on a mass, mole, or
volume basis, or they can be specified as a fraction of the feed stream. In
general, the fraction specifications are best because they are independent of
the feed stream flow rates. This makes the model more flexible and reliable
when using tools like SENSITIVITY or DESIGN-SPEC which might directly or
indirectly manipulate the stream which is being split. The FSplit block can also
be used with reactor models to account for back-mixing.
The FSplit block assumes that the class 2 polymer attributes split according to
mass mixing rules. For example, if the outlet stream is split 60:40, then the
class 2 attributes, such as the segment flow rates, are also split 60:40. This
approach is identical to assuming that the properties of the polymer in each
outlet stream are the same as the properties of the polymer in the inlet
stream.
Heater
Heater can be used to represent heaters, coolers, mixers, valves, or tanks.
The Heater block allows you to specify the temperature or heat duty of the
unit, but does not carry out rigorous heat exchange equations. Any number of
feed streams can be specified for the Heater block. This block follows the
same mixing rules as the Mixer model.
Mixer
The mixer block, Mixer, is used to mix two or more streams to form a single
mixed outlet. The mixer block can be used to represent mixing tanks, static
mixers, or simply the union of two pipes in a tee. The Mixer model assumes
ideal, adiabatic mixing. The pressure of the mixer can be specified as an
absolute value or as a drop relative to the lowest feed stream pressure.
The Mixer model is functionally equal to the Heater model, except it only
allows adiabatic mixing. For this reason, the Heater model may be a better
choice for modeling mixing tanks.
The Mixer block assumes that the class 2 polymer attributes are additive. For
example if stream A and B are mixed to form stream C, and the zeroth
moments of a polymer in stream A and B are 12 kmol/sec and 15
kmol/sec, then the polymer in the product stream has a zeroth moment of
12+15=27 kmol/sec.
Mult
The Mult block is used to multiply the flow rate of a stream. A common
application of this block is to collapse two parallel process line models into a
In this process, the A and B lines consist of identical equipment with the
same operating conditions. The Mult blocks HALF and TWICE are used to
divide the feed stream flow rate by two after R1, representing the split
between lines, and to double the product flow rate, representing the junction
of the parallel lines into a single line at R3. This technique avoids the
duplicate calculations for R2 A and B reactors, which should give the same
results. This technique can save a great deal of simulation time.
Pump
The Pump block changes the pressure of a stream. This block can be used to
represent an actual pump, or it can be used to represent pressure increases
due to liquid head in standpipes.
Pipe
The Pipe model is used to calculate pressure drops in pipelines. The
algorithms in this model are not designed for non-ideal fluids such as
polymers, so the pipe model should be used with caution in polymer process
models. A better option to calculate pressure drops in polymer pipelines is to
use RPlug with a user-written pressure-drop subroutine.
Sep2
The Sep2 block is a generic separation model that allows component
fractionation between two product streams. The products can be split
according to flow rate or fractional specifications. The Sep2 block is commonly
used to represent distillation columns or other separation equipment when
the product stream purity is well known and the details of the separation
process are not important. Compared to the Sep block, the Sep2 block has
more flexible input options, but it only allows two outlet streams.
The Sep2 block does not fractionate the polymer molecular weight
distribution. Instead, the molecular weight distribution of the polymer in each
product stream is assumed to be the same as the feed stream.
Distillation Models
Aspen Plus includes several shortcut distillation models (DISTL, SFRAC, etc.)
which can be used to represent distillation columns. These blocks do not
fractionate the polymer molecular weight distribution. Instead, the molecular
weight distribution of the polymer in each product stream is assumed to be
the same as the feed stream. The class-2 component attributes in each
product stream are set proportional to the mass flow rate of the attributed
component in each product stream.
With the exception of the RadFrac model, the rigorous distillation models in
Aspen Plus do not account for component attributes.
RadFrac
The RadFrac block is a rigorous multistage distillation model for two- and
three-phase systems. RadFrac allows polymer feed streams at any tray, but it
does not account for polymerization reaction kinetics. The molecular weight
distribution and other polymer properties are not fractionated between the
phases. Instead, the class-2 component attributes of the polymer components
are split at each stage in proportion to the polymer component mass
fractions. For example, if 90% of the polymer fed to a given tray goes to the
liquid phase leaving that tray, then 90% of the zeroth moment and other
class-2 attributes are assigned to the liquid phase on that tray.
RYield
The RYield reactor model is used to represent reaction equipment when
reaction kinetics are unknown or are unimportant, and the reactions result in
a product distribution with a known yield.
RYield calculates the product stream flow rates based on user-specified
reaction stoichiometries and yield distributions. The reaction stoichiometry
statements may include monomers, oligomers, or polymers, but may not
include segments. Instead, the segment information (SFLOW or SFRAC) must
be specified as component attributes in the COMP-ATTR sentence.
If polymer components are involved in any of the reactions, use the COMP-
ATTR form to specify molecular weight values (MWN, MWW or PDI) or degree
of polymerization (DPN, DPW or PDI ) for the polymer products. Specify the
SFRAC attribute for homopolymers or copolymers with a known product
polymer composition. For copolymers with product compositions which
depend on the feed flow rates of monomers or polymer segments, specify
dummy values for the SFLOW attribute and use a user-written Fortran block
to predict product segment flow rates which are consistent with the calculated
yield. Write the calculated results into the product stream of the RYield block.
When some of the specified reactions involve polymers, the reaction
stoichiometry must be written in a manner consistent with the reference
RGibbs
The RGibbs model uses the Gibbs free energy minimization technique to
determine the composition of each phase. This algorithm cannot predict the
product of equilibrium polymerization reactions. Polymer phase equilibrium,
however, can be predicted by the model. The RGibbs phase equilibrium
algorithm assumes that the composition and molecular weight distribution of
a polymer component is equal in each of the product phases. The class-2
component attributes of the polymer component are set in proportion to the
mass flow of the polymer component in each of the product phases. The mass
flow rates in the product phases are set by the Gibbs free energy
minimization algorithm.
To properly split component attributes among the RGibbs solution phases, use
the "Phase equilibrium only" option. With this the model can predict multiple
liquid phases such as three liquid phases. Surface tension effects are not
considered. If you are certain that there will be no vapor phase, uncheck the
"Include vapor phase" box to speed up calculations. Use one outlet stream for
each predicted phase, to separate out the component attributes of that
phase.
Pressure
Pressure can be specified as an absolute value or as a pressure drop relative
to the feed stream with the lowest pressure. In Aspen Plus, pressure drops
are expressed as non-positive pressure specifications given in absolute
pressure units.
Residence Time
The RCSTR model allows you to specify the effective hold-up in several
different ways. For single-phase reactors, you can specify the total reactor
volume or the total residence time. If the residence time is specified, then the
estimated reactor volume should be specified to improve the residence-
time/volume loop convergence (RT-LOOP).
When two or more condensed phases are present, the RCSTR model assumes
that each condensed phase has the same residence time. This no-slip
assumption implies that the volume ratios of the condensed phases in the
reactor are equal to the volume flow ratios of the condensed phases exiting
the reactor.
For multiphase reactors, specify the condensed phase volume or residence
time in addition to the total reactor volume. Do not specify the total residence
time, as this residence time is the average of the vapor and liquid phases. If
the reacting phase residence time is specified, provide an estimate for the
reacting phase volume. This will improve the reactor convergence. If
residence time convergence is troublesome, try adjusting the volume step
size.
Multiphase Reactors
The RCSTR model can be used to simulate single- or multiple-phase reactors.
The valid-phases keyword is used to define the number and type of fluid
phases present in the reactor.
Amorphous solid polymers are treated as a liquid phase in Aspen Polymers
(formerly known as Aspen Polymers Plus). Crystalline solids can be addressed
by defining a CISOLID substream to track the flow rate of each inert
crystalline solid.
Dissolving or crystallizing solids can be captured using the Chemistry feature
to define chemical equilibrium reactions between the solid and fluid phases.
Note, however, that the current version of RCSTR does not allow components
to appear in both kinetic reactions and in chemistry equilibrium reactions.
RCSTR Algorithm
The RCSTR model uses a trial-and-error technique to solve the mass and
energy balance equations. Trial-and-error solutions are difficult to reach when
the reaction rates are high, the variables cover several orders of magnitude,
when many equations must be solved simultaneously, and when the variables
are strongly related to each other. All of these conditions are found in
polymerization reaction kinetics, making reactor convergence especially
challenging.
A good understanding of the design of the RCSTR model is required in order
to troubleshoot convergence problems. Otherwise, it may be difficult to
The outer-most loop involves the volume and residence time of the CSTR.
There are many options for specifying the characteristic volume of a
multiphase CSTR. The following table shows the various calculations for
volume and residence times in RCSTR:
VR f jv j Vj
R Vj VR j
F v j f j fv k k Ff j v j
j k
VR R F v j f j ** f jv j Vj
Vj VR j
j
f v
k
k k
Ff j v j
VR Vj
R V j specifed *
Fvj f j j
Ff j v j
j
Specifications: Total reactor volume (Vol), key phase volume fraction (Ph-
vol-frac)
VR Vj
R V j rjVR
Fvj f j j
Ff j v j
j
Specifications: Total reactor volume (Vol), key phase residence time (Ph-
res-time)
VR
R V j j Ff j v j ** j specified
F v j f j
j
VR R F v j f j ** V j rjVR j
Vj
j Ff j v j
* If more than one condensed phase is present, and the key phase is liquid, then
the specified volume applies to the sum of the condensed phase volumes.
** This equation is solved by trial-and-error technique.
EB LOOP
The second loop is the energy balance conservation equation (EB-LOOP). In
this loop, the reactor temperature is adjusted to match the specified reactor
duty. If the temperature is specified instead of the duty, this loop is by-
passed.
Since the reaction rates are very sensitive to temperature, large changes in
the reactor temperature between energy-balance iterations (EB-ITER) may
cause the mass-balance loop (MB-LOOP) to diverge. This problem can be
solved by providing a good temperature estimate (T-EST) in the ESTIMATES
form. If the problem persists, the maximum temperature step size (Max-
Tstep) should be reduced (the default, 50C, is rather large).
MB-LOOP
The next loop is the mass-balance loop (MB-LOOP). This loop uses a
multivariable solver to converge the conservation equations for component
mole flow and for the class two component attributes.
Two solvers are available: Broyden and Newton. The Broyden algorithm tends
to be relatively fast, but it may be unstable if the number of components and
attributes is large and the reaction rates are high. The Newton algorithm
tends to be slower, but more stable for many classes of problems. The
Newton algorithm calculates the response of each variable to each other
variable by perturbing the variables one at a time by a very small amount.
These perturbation steps require lots of simulation time, which makes each
iteration of the Newton algorithm slow.
The number of mass-balance iterations (MB-Maxit) is defined on the
convergence form. By default, the model allows 50 mass-balance iterations.
This default is sufficient for the Newton algorithm, but is usually too small for
the Broyden algorithm. For polymer reaction kinetics, the number of required
mass-balance iterations may be as high as 500.
Ri Fi in Fi out j Gi , jV j
For the component mole balance equations:
Si Si Si Si
R
Maximum error = MAX i i MB TOL
Si
A secondary criteria is the root-mean-square scaled error, or RMS error:
2
1 R
RMS Error =
Ni
i Si
i
The CSTR mass-balance algorithm iterates until the maximum error falls
below the specified mass-balance tolerance or the maximum number of mass-
balance iterations is reached. If the maximum error criteria is reached, and
the RMS error is decreasing by a factor of ten on each iteration, the CSTR
model continues to iterate until the RMS error reaches the specified function
tolerance (FUNC-TOL). This allows the model to reach very tight convergence
tolerances when the convergence behavior is good.
By default, the component scaling option is used. With this option, the
minimum scaling factors depend on the value of the TRACE parameter. The
trace scaling factor is effectively a minimum mole fraction. For components
with concentrations below the trace level, the scaling factors are set to a
minimum value.
The default scaling factors for component attributes are defined as constants
in an Aspen Plus Table Building System (TBS) data file, COMPATTR.DAT.
Although the default scaling factors are set to appropriate values for most
classes of reaction kinetics, the optimal values for a particular type of kinetics
may be different than the defaults. The default attribute scaling factors can be
adjusted using the Components Scaling form.
The scaling factors should make the scaled values as close to unity as
possible. For this reason, the scale factors are set to the predicted values
from previously converged passes through the RCSTR block. On the first pass
through the flowsheet, the scaling factors will be set to the estimated value
for the variable. Thus, component flow and component attribute estimates
can be used to set the initial scale factors.
The scaling factors for component attribute values are normalized with the
total mole flow rate of the outlet stream. This keeps the scaling factors
reasonable for models of any type of process, from bench scale to production
scale units.
flash convergence without errors. If errors occur, try using the default value,
1 105 . If errors persist, the most likely cause is a physical property problem.
Initialization Options
The convergence behavior of the RCSTR model depends on how the model is
initialized. There are three initialization options for the RCSTR model.
Solver InitializationDo not use integration
By default, the solver algorithm initializes itself using previously saved
simulation results (retention). This saves time if the RCSTR block is inside
a flowsheet recycle loop, where the block will be run several times in
succession. It also saves time if the block is inside a sensitivity,
optimization, design-spec, or data-fit study.
Alternately, the user can force the model to restart from estimates every
time by checking the restart flag on the block-options form.
When retention is not available, or when the restart option is active, the
model uses user-specified estimates to initialize the solver algorithm.
Estimates can be provided for the reactor volume, phase volume, reactor
temperature, component flow rates, and component attribute values. The
component attribute estimates can be specified using class-2 or class-0
attribute values.
If estimates are not provided, the model initializes the variables using the
mixed feed stream (for example, the initial value of a component flow rate
may be set to the total flow rate of that component in all feed streams to
the reactor).
Integration InitializationAlways use integration
In the integration algorithm, the RCSTR is treated as a dynamic stirred-
tank reactor. The conservation equations are numerically integrated from
an initial condition to the steady-state condition. The initial compositions
in the reactor are set equal to those in the feed stream.
If temperature is specified in the reactor, then the temperature profile
during initialization can be ramped from the feed stream temperature to
the specified temperature over the interval of several residence times. If
duty is specified, then the duty can be ramped from adiabatic conditions
to the specified duty. Ramping allows the reactor to cold-start for
improved integration performance.
The numerical integration carries forward until the residual terms
(accumulation terms) drop below the specified mass-balance tolerance. At
this point, the model enters the solver and continues until the model
converges.
Note: By default, the RCSTR model does not use integration (e.g., the trial
and error solution algorithm starts directly from the user-specified initial
guesses or from retention values). Optionally, the RCSTR model can be
initialized using an integration approach or a hybrid approach that uses
integration only when retention values are not available.
Mass balance not converged in maximum Check the specified rate constants in the kinetic
number of iterations, the maximum error is models, especially activation energies. Verify
varying erratically between iterations, and the the units of the activation energies. Verify flow
history file shows some reaction rates or rates of catalysts and initiators in the feed
attribute rates are much larger than others (or streams to the reactor. If using user kinetics,
are erratic between iterations). check your subroutine for errors. Verify the
reactor volume (residence time).
Mass balance not converged in maximum Try using the Newton algorithm with good initial
number of iterations. Reaction rates are very guesses. If this fails, delete the initial guesses
high, as expected. and try using the integration initialization.
Mass balance not converged in maximum Try adjusting the trace parameter in order-of-
number of iterations. Some reacting magnitude steps from the default ( 1 103 )
components (catalysts, initiators) are present in down to the concentration of the trace
very small quantities. components. If this fails, reset trace to the
default value and try integration initialization.
Energy balance loop does not converge, or Verify that the reactor converges with the
mass-balance loop does not converge after the temperature specified. If not, see items listed
second energy balance loop iteration, or above, otherwise,
temperature step-size cutting (T-CUT) iterations provide a better temperature estimate (T-Est).
appear in the diagnostic messages If the problem persists, try adjusting the
maximum temperature step-size (Max-Tstep)
from 50C to 10C or even 5C.
Residence time loop does not converge, or Verify that the reactor converges with the
mass-balance loop does not converge after the residence time specified. If not, see items listed
second residence-time loop. above, otherwise, provide better volume
estimates. If the problem persists, try adjusting
the maximum volume step-size (Max-Vstep).
Verify that the correct residence time is
specified (condensed-phase residence time for
two-phase reactors).
Verify two phases exist if the reactor valid
phases=vapor-liquid.
Flash failures appear during the mass-balance This may be a physical property problem; it
loop; the step-size cutting (X-CUT) diagnostic may reflect overly-tight flash tolerances; or the
message appears. flash may be unstable when starting from
retention values Loosen the local and global
flash tolerance levels or increase the maximum
number of flash iterations.
Reactor converges but an error message says Check the molecular weights of each reactant
that the mass-balance does not close and product. Verify that reaction stoichiometry
is correct.
RPlug
The RPlug model represents an ideal plug-flow reactor with one or more
phases. The model assumes perfect radial mixing within and between the
phases, phase equilibrium, and no-slip conditions between the phases (e.g.,
the phases all have the same residence time). Dead zones, back-mixing, and
other types of non-ideal plug-flow behavior can be represented using RPlug in
combination with other blocks. The RPlug model does not allow multiple feed
Temperature
RPlug allows many options for specifying the reactor duty or temperature:
Type Specifications Calculations
RPlug allows one process stream and one heat media stream. Reactions can
occur only in the process stream. Heat transfer calculations are carried out
between the process stream and the heat media stream. The heat media
stream represents a thermal fluid stream or a heating stream and the heat
media stream flows co- or counter-current to the process stream.
If a heat media stream is not specified, the model assumes a constant heat
media temperature and solve for the process fluid temperature.
The heat transfer rate or heat transfer coefficient value is calculated as a
function of axial position, stream conditions, etc., by a user-written Fortran
subroutine. This feature is used to develop rigorous models non-reactive heat
exchangers.
Residence Time
The RPlug model assumes a cylindrical geometry. The length, diameter, and
number of tubes are specified. The process fluid is assumed to move through
the tubes, and the thermal fluid is assumed to flow on the outside of the
tubes.
The total reactor volume cannot be specified, but the aspect ratio
(length/diameter) has no influence on the model predictions. Thus, the
diameter can be set to 1.12838 units, which corresponds to an area of 1.0000
units2 . With this area, the length in units and volume in units3 have the same
numerical value, thus the specified length is equal to the volume.
The phase volumes cannot be specified independently. Instead, the RPlug
model assumes that the phases move through the reactor without slipping
past each other. This assumption is valid for situations where one phase is
dispersed as droplets or bubbles in a second, continuous phase, such as dew
in a vapor phase or small gas bubbles in a liquid phase. This assumption is
not valid for multiphase plug flow reactors with controlled levels.
With this assumption in place, the reactor residence time is equal to the
residence time of each phase present in the reactor. The residence time is
calculated by numerical integration.
One work-around for the no-slip assumption is to write a user kinetic
subroutine (or a step-growth mass-transfer routine) which calls the flash
model directly. Then, specify the reactor as liquid-only and set the diameter
to the hydraulic diameter of the reactor.
Calculating Residence Time
Equation to Calculate Residence Time in RPlug:
zL
D 2N dz
4 F
z0 z j f j,z v j,z
Where:
= Reactor residence time
D = Tube diameter
N = Number of tubes
Z = Axial position in reactor of length L
Fz = Total molar flow rate of process stream at axial location z
Multiphase Reactors
The RPlug models have one process fluid outlet stream that contains all of the
phases exiting the reactor. As shown here, a flash block is used in conjunction
with these blocks to split the liquid and vapor phases from the mixed outlet
stream of the reactor:
Enthalpy 105 (SI units) x total mass flow The larger of:
Enthalpy at 2
Cutoff
Component Mole The scaling factor at z = 0 to 1.0 is set to The scaling factor at z = z + z is
Flows 0.1 x total mass flow set to the larger of:
Component mass flow at z
Cutoff
Scaling factors are updated at
each step
Class 2 Attributes The scaling factor at z = 0 to 1.0 is set to The scaling factor at z = z + z is
the larger of: set to the larger of:
Attribute value in inlet stream Attribute value at z
(Attribute scaling factor from the TBS Cutoff
table) x (mole flow rate of the attributed Scaling factors are updated at
component in the inlet) each step
(Cutoff) x (total mole flow rate at the
inlet) x (Attribute scaling factor from the
TBS table)
Scaling factors are held constant
The static scaling method uses a constant set of scaling factors throughout
the reactor. The dynamic scaling method updates the scaling factors based on
the previously converged step. The scaling factors are never set lower than
the specified minimum scale factor.
The static scaling method may result in faster integration for many types of
problems, but there are potential numerical problems when using this
method. Consider an irreversible reaction A B in a plug-flow reactor in
which component B is not present in the feed. The scaling factor for
component A will be set very large and the scaling factor for B will be set
to the minimum scaling factor. This will result in relatively loose tolerance for
the mass balance in A and tight tolerance for the mass balance in B.
Further, as the reaction approaches completion the component B will have a
large flow rate but a small scaling factor. This makes the conservation
equation for B difficult to solve, which will result in small integration steps.
Consider the same situation with dynamic scaling. The initial scaling factors
are the same as the static case. With each new step, however, the scaling
factors are updated to the variable values from the previous step. This keeps
the scaled variables close to one throughout the integration. For example:
Solver cannot converge Try reducing the initial step size by orders of magnitude from the
for initial step default ( 10-2 ) to 10-8 . If the problem persists, try increasing the cutoff
parameter from 10-10 to 10-5 . If the problem still persists, verify the
values and units of the rate constants in the kinetic model. Verify the
heat-transfer coefficient if applicable. Verify the temperature,
composition, and flow rates of the feed streams. Check the history file
diagnostics for unusually high reaction rates.
Integration error: non- This problem is usually related to infeasible reaction kinetics. If using a
negativity violation. user kinetic routine, verify the code, otherwise, a zeroth-order reactant
may be completely consumed. Check the history file diagnostics; look
for the component flow rate or attribute element which has a value of
zero and a negative rate of change.
Integration error: Try increasing the cutoff parameter from 10-10 to 10-5 . If the problem
maximum number of persists, try different combinations of scaling method and corrector
steps is reached method. As a last resort, try increasing the number of steps to 5000. If
the problem still continues, search for errors in the kinetics; check the
diagnostics for unreasonable reaction rates.
Integration error: Tighten the flash tolerance to a value below the corrector tolerance.
corrector tolerance Loosen the integration tolerance to 1 10-3 . Increase the corrector
cannot be achieved tolerance ratio to 0.2, 0.3, 0.5. If the problem continues, verify the
kinetics and heat-transfer parameters. Check history diagnostics.
Flash failures appear This may be a physical property problem; it may reflect overly-tight
during the integration flash tolerances, loosen the local and/or global flash tolerance levels or
increase the maximum number of flash iterations.
RBatch
RBatch is a rigorous model for batch and semi-batch reactors. Any number of
continuous feed streams can be specified in addition to a batch charge
stream. Optionally, a vapor vent may be considered. The RBatch model does
not have a vent condenser option; Aspen Custom Modeler is required to
rigorously model batch polymerization reactors with vent condensers or
overhead columns.
The RBatch model assumes feed and product accumulator holding tanks with
continuous outlets. The accumulator concept provides a bridge between the
continuous steady-state modeling environment in Aspen Plus and the
inherently dynamic nature of batch reactors. The conversion between
continuous streams and discreet charges and dynamic product accumulations
is controlled by specified cycle times and continuous feed stream profiles
specified in the reactor.
Temperature
RBatch allows many options for specifying the reactor duty or temperature, as
summarized here:
Type Specifications Calculations
T-SPEC Reactor temperature The model reports the temperature profile, and
the instantaneous and cumulative duty profiles.
T-PROFILE Reactor temperature as a The model reports the temperature profile, and
function of time. Linear the instantaneous and cumulative duty profiles.
interpolation is used to determine
temperatures between specified
points.
T-COOL- Heat media stream temperature. The temperature of the reactor is determined
SPEC Overall heat-transfer coefficient. from the energy balance at each time step. The
model reports the temperature profile, and the
Heat exchange surface area.
instantaneous and cumulative duty profiles.
DUTY- Instantaneous heat duty The temperature of the reactor is determined
SPEC (assumed constant for entire from the energy balance at each time step. The
cycle). Set the duty to zero to model reports the temperature profile.
model an adiabatic reactor.
DUTY- Instantaneous heat duty as The temperature of the reactor is determined
PROFILE function of time. Linear from the energy balance at each time step. The
interpolation is used to determine model reports the temperature profile, and the
duty between specified points. instantaneous and cumulative duty profiles.
USER- Heat transfer subroutine name The user routine returns the instantaneous heat
DUTY duty at each time step. The temperature of the
reactor is determined from the energy. The
model reports the temperature profile, and the
instantaneous and cumulative duty profiles.
t
d Tt Tt s
K Tt Tt s 0 Tt Tt dt KD dt
K
Qt M t
reactor s
I
Where:
Qt = Instantaneous heat duty (J/sec)
t = Time (sec)
K = Proportional gain (J/kg-K)
I = Integral time (sec)
D = Derivative time (sec)
By default, the proportional gain is 2500 J/kg-K, which results in very tight
control at the expense of excessive simulation time. The speed of the model
can be increased by reducing the gain (try a value of 25 J/kg-K).
Pressure
If the reactor volume is not specified, the RBatch model assumes the reactor
operates as a closed system with a variable volume. The pressure at the
reactor is specified as constant value or as a time-varying profile.
If the reactor volume is specified, and there is a vent stream attached to the
reactor, the flow rate of the vent stream is determined from the specified
pressure or pressure profile. The vent flow is positive when the calculated
reactor pressure exceeds the specified reactor pressure.
If the reactor volume is specified, there is no vent stream attached to the
reactor, and the pressure profile is not specified, then the pressure is
determined by the temperature and molar volume of the material inside the
reactor.
If the reactor volume is controlled, a pressure controller model can be linked
to a continuous feed stream. The flow rate of the feed stream is adjusted to
maintain a constant pressure inside the vessel. The continuous feed stream
flow rate can decrease to zero, but it cannot reverse direction if the pressure
t
d Pt Pt s
Ft K Pt Pt s Pt Pt s dt KD
K
I 0 dt
Where:
Ft = Instantaneous flow rate (kmol/sec)
Reactor Volume
If the reactor pressure is not specified, then RBatch will predict the reactor
pressure based on a specified reactor volume. The pressure will be
manipulated by a trial-and-error algorithm to satisfy the specified volume.
If pressure and volume are both specified, you must either attach a vent
stream to the reactor or attach a continuous make-up stream and pressure
controller to the reactor.
Residence Time
The residence time of the reactor is controlled by user-specified stop criteria.
You can specify whether RBatch should halt the reaction when the stop
criterion variable is approached from above or below. If several stop criteria
are specified, RBatch stops at the first stop criteria it reaches.
In addition to stop criteria, you must specify a maximum time for the reactor.
This prevents runaway calculations in the event that none of the stop criteria
are feasible.
The stop criteria may include one or more of the following:
A maximum reaction time
A maximum or minimum component mole or mass fraction in the reactor
The amount of material (mass, moles, or volume) in the reactor or vent
accumulator
A maximum vent flow rate
A maximum or minimum reactor temperature, pressure, or vapor fraction
The value of a Prop-Set property (includes user Prop-Set properties or
system properties such as viscosity, etc.)
Cycle Time
RBatch is a dynamic batch reactor model that is interfaced into the Aspen Plus
continuous steady-state modeling environment. The interface requires
converting batch charges and accumulator inventories into continuous stream
flow rates. The cycle time is used to convert the batch charge flow rate into
the initial reactor inventory. The cycle time is also used to convert the vent
accumulator inventory and the reactor inventory into vent and reactor
product streams.
For example, assuming a reactor has a cycle time of two hours and that no
continuous feed streams are specified, then:
If the batch charge stream is set to 50 kg/hour, the initial reactor
inventory is 100 kg.
If at the end of the reaction cycle, the vent accumulator contains 30 kg of
material, the time-averaged continuous vent stream flow rate is 15 kg/hr.
The composition of the time-averaged vent stream will be the same as the
final composition in the vent accumulator.
The final reactor inventory will be 70 kg, and the time-averaged reactor
product flow rate will be 35 kg/hr.
RBatch allows you to specify a feed time and down time instead of the cycle
time. In this case, the time-averaged batch charge stream is divided by the
feed time to calculate the initial batch inventory. The time-averaged product
flow rates are based on the cycle time, which is calculated from the sum of
the feed time, the down time, and the reaction time. This option is not
recommended unless it is used to correct the mass balance for the influence
of time-varying continuous feed streams.
Enthalpy 5
10 (SI units) x mass holdup Enthalpy at previous time step
Component Mass The scaling factor for each component The scaling factor at t = t + t is set to the
Inventory In inventory equation is set to: larger of:
Reactor and Vent 0.1 * (mass of batch charge stream) Component mass flow at t
Accumulator
Scaling factors are held constant Cutoff
Scaling factors are updated at each step
Class 2 Attribute The scaling factor of each component The scaling factor at t = t + t is set to the
Inventory in attribute is set to: larger of:
Reactor and Vent (Attribute scaling factor from the TBS Attribute inventory at time = t
Accumulator table) x (cycle time) (this is the attribute Cutoff
inventory at time = 0)
Scaling factors are updated at each step
Scaling factors are held constant
The static scaling method uses a constant set of scaling factors throughout
the reactor. The dynamic scaling method updates the scaling factors based on
the previously converged step. The cutoff parameter is the minimum scaling
factor used in dynamic scaling.
Solver cannot converge for Try reducing the initial step size by orders of magnitude from the
initial step default ( 10-1 ) to 10-8 . If the problem persists, try increasing the cutoff
parameter from 10-10 to 10-5 . If the problem still persists, verify the
values and units of the rate constants in the kinetic model. Verify the
heat-transfer coefficient if applicable. Verify the temperature,
composition, and flow rates of the feed streams. Check the history
file diagnostics for unusually high reaction rates.
Integration error: non- This problem is usually related to infeasible reaction kinetics. If using
negativity violation. a user kinetic routine, verify the code, otherwise, a zeroth-order
reactant may be completely consumed. Check the history file
diagnostics; look for the component flow rate or attribute element
that has a value of zero and a negative rate of change.
Integration error: maximum Try increasing the cutoff parameter from 10-10 to 10-5 . If the problem
number of steps is reached persists, try different combinations of scaling method and corrector
method. As a last resort, try increasing the number of steps to 5000.
If the problem still continues, search for errors in the kinetics; check
the diagnostics for unreasonable reaction rates.
Integration error: corrector Tighten the flash tolerance to a value below the corrector tolerance.
tolerance cannot be Loosen the integration tolerance to 1 10-3 . Increase the corrector
achieved tolerance ratio to 0.2, 0.3, 0.5. If the problem continues, verify the
kinetics and heat-transfer parameters. Check history diagnostics.
Flash failures appear during This may be a physical property problem; it may reflect overly-tight
the integration flash tolerances, loosen the local and/or global flash tolerance levels
or increase the maximum number of flash iterations.
Reactor converges but an Set the cycle time instead of the feed time.
error message says that the Check the molecular weights of each reactant and product.
mass-balance does not close
Verify that reaction stoichiometry is correct.
Treatment of Component
Attributes in Unit Operation
Models
As described in previous chapters, Aspen Polymers includes two classes of
component attributes. Class-2 attributes are primary conserved quantities
and always have flow-type units (attribute value / unit time). These attributes
include the zeroth moment of the polymer (polymer molecule flow rate), the
Dupl All attributes in feed stream are copied to each outlet stream.
FSplit Class 2 attributes divide in proportion to flow rate of attributed component. Class 0
SSplit attributes are recalculated for each outlet stream.
Sep Fout
Equation to calculate outlet stream attributes: Aout A
Sep2 Fin in
F = Flow rate of attributed component (in = mixed feed, out = outlet)
A = Class-2 component attribute value (in = mixed feed, out = outlet)
Flash2 Class 2 attributes divide in proportion to flow rate of attributed component. Class 0
Flash3 attributes are recalculated for each outlet stream.
Polymer components are not fractionated by the phase equilibrium models used by
these blocks.
Fout
Equation to calculate outlet stream attributes: Aout A
Fin in
F = Flow rate of attributed component (in = mixed feed, out = outlet)
A = Class-2 component attribute value (in = mixed feed, out = outlet)
When multiple substreams exist, the model distributes polymer attributes between
substreams using the same rule.
Mult Class 2 attributes multiply in proportion to flow rate of attributed component. Class 0
attributes are recalculated for each outlet stream.
Fout
Equation to calculate outlet stream attributes: Aout A
Fin in
F = Flow rate of attributed component (in = mixed feed, out = outlet)
A = Class-2 component attribute value (in = mixed feed, out = outlet)
RadFrac Component attribute conservation equations are included in this model at the tray-by-
tray level. The class-2 attributes are calculated at each tray by the following equation:
Fout
Aout A
Fin in
F = Flow rate of attributed component (in = mixed feed to tray, out = outlet from tray)
A = Class-2 component attribute value (in = mixed feed to tray, out = outlet from
tray)
The RadFrac model does not allow polymer reaction kinetics.
MultiFrac This unit operation block does not consider component attributes. Polymers must be
converted to oligomer components if polymer fractionation is to be considered in this
model.
Reactor Models
RStoic If user specified attributes in the COMP-ATTR form, they are used for the product
RYield stream. Otherwise, class 2 attributes divide in proportion to the flow rate of the
attributed component. Class 0 attributes are recalculated for each outlet stream.
Fout
Equation to calculate outlet stream attributes: Aout A
Fin in
F = Flow rate of attributed component (in = mixed feed, out = outlet)
A = Class-2 component attribute value (in = mixed feed, out = outlet)
RGibbs Polymer and heterogeneous catalyst components may not participate in the reactions in
REquil these blocks. The class 2 attributes divide in proportion to the flow rate of the attributed
component. Class 0 attributes are recalculated for each outlet stream.
Fout
Equation to calculate outlet stream attributes: Aout A
Fin in
F = Flow rate of attributed component (in = mixed feed, out = outlet)
A = Class-2 component attribute value (in = mixed feed, out = outlet)
RCSTR When using Aspen Polymers reaction kinetics, these models calculate the class-2
RPlug component attributes using standard conservation equations. These models can be used
with a user-written Fortran subroutine through the USER reaction option. If the user
RBatch
kinetics include component attributes, then the COMP-ATTR field in the user kinetics
form of the reactor model must be set to yes. In RCSTR, initial guesses for the outlet
attribute values can be specified in the COMP-ATTR form.
* This also applies to any block that allows multiple feed streams and uses an implied mixer to
calculate the net feed stream.
Literature Review
Before you regress process data, it is a good idea to collect information about
the process. Sources of data include in-house lab data, databanks, trade
journals, conference notes, polymer handbooks, on-line electronic databases,
experimental designs, and so on.
The open and in-house process literature may contain a wealth of information
about key model parameters. Further, these sources may provide additional
sources of fundamental data which can be used to independently evaluate
model parameters.
Simulation studies described in trade journals are an excellent source of
insight and know-how related to model development. These studies
frequently point out which assumptions are valid and which parameters are
Trend Analysis
Use the preliminary model to carry out trend evaluation studies. The
sensitivity feature can be used to examine the influence of process variables
on the model predictions. Compare these trends against process data. If the
Model Refinement
The Data-Fit tool is the best choice for refining the fit between the model
predictions and the process data, especially when several sets of data are
available. Data-Fit can adjust several model parameters simultaneously,
capturing subtle interactions among the parameters to get the best overall
match between the process data and model predictions.
When the model predictions cannot match the process data, the assumptions
in the model may be too broad. Perhaps the process is limited by heat- or
mass-transfer, or a reactor is not ideally mixed. Maybe there are additional
side reactions that should be considered in the model, or the rate expression
needs to be modified to account for some unusual aspect of reaction kinetics.
These issues can be addressed during the model refinement process by
adding new layers of detail to the model. Avoid adding more detail than
necessary, however, because model fitting is a process of diminishing returns.
Model refinement is an open-ended process. The model parameters can be
tuned more accurately as more data become available from the process. Bad
data points are easier to spot when there are more sets of data to compare.
It is impossible for a simulation model to match process data perfectly. There
are several sources of error that lead to differences between the model
results and process data, including:
Variations in process operating conditions due to disturbances, excursions
from steady state, control system actions, etc.
Imperfect calibration of flow meters, level controllers, etc.
Analytical error in lab measurements
Simplifications and assumptions in the model, such as ideal mixing,
isothermal and isobaric vessels, phase equilibrium, etc.
Errors in the model parameters.
* The pressure variable is treated as a pressure drop if the specified value is non-
positive.
** Specify location (RPlug) or stage number (RadFrac / MulitFrac)
*** Basis can be MOLE, MASS, or STDVOL - the variable specified in the data set
must match the variable specified in the column .
Some measured data, such as polymer melt index and intrinsic viscosity, are
not predicted by the standard property sets in Aspen Polymers. The best way
to include these properties in a data regression is to write a user Prop-Set
property subroutine. Each user property can be linked to a property set.
Property sets can be accessed as stream-property variables.
If you are fitting component attribute or user Prop-Set property profiles, you
must treat the measured variables as point data for the reactor outlet stream.
Use the reactor length or stop-time as an additional point data. Each profile
point must be treated as a separate data case in the data set.
Using this expression, the net rate constant, knet , is sensitive to the activation
energy, Eact . If the activation energy is adjusted a little bit, a large
adjustment must be made to the pre-exponential factor to offset this
difference. In other words, the activation energy controls the magnitude of
the reaction rate as well as the temperature sensitivity of the reaction rate.
A better approach is to use the modified Arrehnius expression:
Eact 1 1
R T Tref
knet ko exp
The parameter Tref is a reference temperature that typically represents the
middle of the temperature range used to estimate the activation energy.
Using this formula, the net rate constant, knet , remains constant at the
reference temperature regardless of the value of the activation energy. With
this approach, the pre-exponential factor, ko , controls the magnitude of the
reaction rate at the reference temperature. The activation energy, Eact ,
controls the temperature sensitivity of the rate constant. This makes it much
easier to fit the model.
DATA-SET DS-1
DEFINE CAT MASS-FLOW STREAM=CATALYST SUBSTREAM=MIXED COMPONENT=CAT
DEFINE TEMP BLOCK-VAR BLOCK=CSTR1 SENTENCE=PARAM VARIABLE=TEMP
DEFINE VISC STREAM-PROP STREAM=PRODUCT PROPERTY=INT-VISC
DEFINE CONV STREAM-PROP STREAM=PRODUCT PROPERTY=CONVERSN
USE STD-DEV 0.001 0.1 0.002 0.0050 /
DATA 0.025 290.0 0.844 0.8550 /
DATA 0.023 295.0 0.842 0.8700 /
DATA 0.055 280.0 0.850 0.9050 /
DATA 0.033 292.0 0.835 0.9000
STEP-GROWTH MYMODEL
RATE-CON 1 PRE-EXP=9.67D14 ACT-ENERGY=41.0
RATE-CON 2 PRE-EXP=3.25D0 ACT-ENERGY=0.0
etc
CALCULATOR INITIAL
DEFINE P1 PARAMETER 1
DEFINE P2 PARAMETER 2
P1 = 1.0D0
P2 = 1.0D0
EXECUTE FIRST
CALCULATOR ADJUST
DEFINE P1 PARAMETER 1
DEFINE P2 PARAMETER 2
DEFINE EXP1 REACT-VAR REACTION=MYMODEL VAR=PRE-EXP SENT=RATE-CON ID1=1
DEFINE EXP2 REACT-VAR REACTION=MYMODEL VAR=PRE-EXP SENT=RATE-CON ID2=2
C specify base case pre-exponential factors for side rxn 1 and 2
F BASE1 = 9.67D14
F BASE2 = 3.25D0
C calculate pre-exponential factors using correction factors
REGRESSION FIT-1
DATA DS-1
VARY PARAMETER 1 LABEL=CORRECT FACTOR RXN #1
LIMITS 0.1 10.0
VARY PARAMETER 2 LABEL=CORRECT FACTOR RXN #2
LIMITS 0.1 10.0
Note: For more information on user models, see your Aspen Plus User Models
documentation.
Stream Processing
In order to perform its calculations the user model must be able to read and
process the Aspen Plus stream structure. The stream structure is documented
in Aspen Plus User Models. Example 1 shows a USER2 model routine.
Note: The data in the streams coming in and out of the model are stored in
SI units.
Note: The data coming in and out of the model are stored in SI units.
C------------------------------------------------------------------
C GET REACTING PHASE SPECIFIC MOLAR VOLUME, SVOL ASSUMING IT IS
C LIQUID
C
CALL SHS_CPACK (SOUT, NCK, IDX, X, TOTFLO)
CALL PPMON_VOLL (
+ TEMP, PRES, X, NCK, IDX, NBOPST, 4, 1, SVOL, DV, KER)
VFLOW1 = SLIQRX
C
C
C GET VOLUME OF REACTING PHASE, VFLOW
C-----------------------------------------------------------------
C
C.....CALCULATE MOLAR CONCENTRATIONS OF COMPONENTS AND CLASS 2
C ATTRIBUTES
DO 50 I = 1, NC
CONC(I) = XX(I)/SVOL
50 CONTINUE
IF(LZMOM .GT. 0 .AND. VFLOW .GT. RGLOM_RMIN)
ZMOM=SOUT(LZMOM+1)/VFLOW
C------------------------------------------------------------------
C INITIALIZE THE RATES FOR COMPONENTS TO ZERO
C
DO 100 I = 1, NC
RATES(I) = 0D0
100 CONTINUE
C
C------------------------------------------------------------------
C LOAD REACTION RATE CONSTANTS FROM THE REALR
DO 200 I = 1, NR
AK(I) = REALR(I)
200 CONTINUE
C
C------------------------------------------------------------------
C CALCULATE REACTION RATES FOR COMPONENTS
C
DO 300 I = 1, NC
DO 310 J = 1, NC
M = COMPUTE CORRECT INDEX
RATES(I) = RATES(I) - AK(M) * CONC(I)*CONC(J)*VFLOW
300 CONTINUE
C
C
C CALCULATE RATES FOR CLASS-2 ATTRIBUTE EXAMPLE
C------------------------------------------------------------------
DO 400 I = 1, NTCAT
RATCAT(I) = 0D0
400 CONTINUE
C
C INITIALIZE ATTRIBUTES OF INTEREST IN THIS WAY
C FOR ARRAY ATTRIBUTES THIS GIVES FIRST LOCATION IN ARRAY
C RACAT(LZMOM - (NC+9) + 1) = 0
RETURN
END
Note: The data coming in and out of the model are stored in SI units.
C----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBROUTINE HL2U (T ,P ,Z ,N ,IDX ,
1 IRW ,IIW ,KCALC ,KOP ,NDS ,
2 KDIAG ,QMX ,DQMX ,KER )
C
C----------------------------------------------------------------------
C HV2U IS A USER MIXTURE ENTHALPY SUBROUTINE
C
C THIS USER SUBROUTINE CALCULATES THE LIQUID ENTHALPY OF A BINARY
C MIXTURE CONTAINING ONE POLYMER AND ONE SOLVENT.
C
C
C NAME OF MODULE: HL2U
C
C
IMPLICIT NONE
C
DIMENSION Z(N), IDX(N), KOP(10)
DIMENSION D(15)
References
Aspen Plus User Models. Burlington, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Aspen Plus System Management. Burlington, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
This section discusses the tools available for applying Aspen Polymers
(formerly known as Aspen Polymers Plus) features to solve real-life problems.
The topics covered include:
Example Applications for a Simulation Model, 375
Application Tools Available in Aspen Polymers, 376
Model Variable Accessing, 378
CALCULATOR
Calculator blocks provide a mechanism for you to incorporate Fortran
statements or Microsoft Excel spreadsheets into the flowsheet calculations.
This can be used to calculate and set input variables based on special user
inputs. For this reason, calculator blocks can be used as feed-forward
DESIGN-SPEC
Design-Spec blocks allow you to set a process variable that is normally
calculated during the simulation. For each specification, you must identify
which process variable can be adjusted to meet that specification. For this
reason, Design-Spec blocks can be used as feedback controllers.
To use this block you must specify which model variables must be fixed, what
values they must be fixed at, and which model input variables can be
manipulated. You can include Fortran statements in Design-Spec blocks.
An example use of a Design-Spec block would be to set a maximum amount
for impurities in a product stream.
SENSITIVITY
Sensitivity blocks provide a mechanism for you to analyze the effect of
operating variables, which you select on the process. This block generates a
matrix of manipulated variables versus sampled variables. If there is more
than one manipulated variable, the sensitivity analysis is performed for each
combination of manipulated variables. It is recommended that you use
multiple Sensitivity blocks if you do not want to combine the manipulated
variables.
To use this block you must specify which are the manipulated variables, which
are the sampled variables, and how they must be tabulated. You can include
Fortran statements in Sensitivity blocks.
An example use of a Sensitivity block would be to determine the effect of
reactor temperature or pressure on the polymer product properties.
OPTIMIZATION
Optimization blocks provide a mechanism for you to minimize or maximize an
objective function calculated using key process variables. To define the
objective function you would use Fortran statements.
To use this block you must define the objective function, specify manipulated
variables, and define constraints, if any.
Notes:
1. Component attributes may be accessed in several ways. They may be
accessed through STREAM-VEC or through SUBSTRM-VEC. In this case,
users are responsible for locating the desired attribute and attribute
element within the stream or substream vector. See the table that follows
for the MIXED substream vector structure.
2. Component attributes may also be accessed with COMPATTR-VAR. With
COMPATTR-VAR, users must provide the element number for attributes
value1
Values for component attribute 2 of component 1
(polymer or other attributed component)
value ncat1
value1
Values for component attribute 1 of component 2
(polymer or other attributed component)
value ncat1
References
Aspen Plus User Guide. Burlington, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Convergence and Optimization in Aspen Plus, Course notes. Burlington, MA:
Aspen Technology, Inc.
Installation Procedure
Refer to the Aspen Engineering Suite Installation Guide, Aspen Polymers
chapter for information on how to install Aspen Polymers on your system.
Configuration Tips
Startup Files
The information needed to launch the main Aspen Plus application window is
recorded in startup files. These files define the type of simulation, default
settings for the user interface, hosts for the simulation engine, run settings,
etc. One type of startup file is used to define defaults for the type of
simulation. This is the simulation template.
Simulation Templates
Simulation templates are available to help you get started setting up your
model. These templates typically contain options such as unit sets, physical
property method selection, and Table File Format (TFF) selection for stream
result tables. Polymer simulation templates are available. You can create your
own personal template to allow faster definition of a new simulation model.
User Fortran
User Fortran Templates
There are several ways for you to customize your models by adding
calculations in Fortran. The End-Use Properties section of Chapter 2 described
how to setup a user Prop-Set for calculating end-use properties. Chapter 4
described how to setup user unit operation models, user kinetic models, and
user property models. Templates are available for your use in creating the
Fortran files used in these features. You will find these templates in the
following location:
Version Location
Windows %asptop%\user
Troubleshooting Guide
Following are tips to help you diagnose and resolve problems you may run
into while setting up or running Aspen Polymers.
The polymer input forms The installation was not You must locate your installation CD and do an
cannot be found on the complete. incremental installation of Aspen Polymers.
GUI. Select Aspen Polymers from the product list and
chose the subcomponents button to select the
Aspen Polymers steady state installation option.
Aspen Polymers is installed but Enable Aspen Polymers. From the Tools menu,
not enabled. select Options. On the Startup tab there is a
box entitled Enable forms for layered
products. Make sure you select Aspen
Polymers
A file created without You visited the polymer record You must enable Aspen Polymers (From the
using polymer features while creating the file, then Tools menu, Select Options, click on the Startup
appears incomplete in later switched off Aspen tab). In the Data Browser, select Polymers
the components record. Polymers. (Polymers will appear as incomplete), right
mouse click, select Delete.
Windows crashes during An invalid operation was Usually, when you crash, a backup file is
input specifications. performed either by the Aspen created. Startup Aspen Plus again, then you
Plus program or by another should be able to recover your file. If the invalid
program running operation was caused by Aspen Plus, repeat the
simultaneously. input steps that lead to the crash, verify that it
is reproducible, and submit the problem to
Technical Support.
Windows crashes during The simulation engine Export an input summary. Run the input
simulation calculations. encountered an error that could summary alone, then examine the run history
not be transferred to the GUI. for simulation errors. Change the input
specifications associated with the error and
rerun.
Aspen Plus ran out of resources Free-up some disk space and run again. Also,
to create run files. This can consult the Aspen Plus System Management
happen especially for large reference manual. An entire section is devoted
simulations. You may see error to managing virtual memory on Win95/98 and
messages referring to the WinNT.
amount of virtual memory
available.
Aspen Plus ran out of memory Make some disk space available or increase the
to load dynamic link libraries. amount of memory available to the application,
then run again.
Windows crashes after Aspen Plus could not load the If you are running on a remote hosts, there
simulation is complete. simulation results. may have been a communication failure at the
end of the simulation calculations. You can
submit the run again or you can manually load
the results file (.SUM) from the remote host.
If you are running on a local PC host, Aspen
Plus may have run out of memory to load the
results. Make some disk space available or
increase the amount of memory available to the
application and run again.
If the load failure was not due to any of the
above, there may be some information
recorded in the results file (.SUM) that is
causing the problem. Contact Technical Support
and be prepared to supply the results file
and/or your saved simulation file.
During simulation The application could not find If the license error message refers to "Feature 10".
calculations an error a valid free license to complete This means that you do not have a license for Aspen
message occurs for a the simulation. Plus itself. If you are using a licensed installation,
license failure. then this could be a temporary license failure. This
can happen for multi-user sites, or if you are using a
license manager located on a network. In that case,
you simply need to try again later.
If you are using an installation with a single
activator, then your license key file may be
corrupted, the port where the activator is plugged in
could be damaged, or the activator could be
damaged. To correct your license key files, perform
a license key installation again. If the problem is
your activator, contact Technical Support to have it
replaced.
If the license error message refers to another
feature number, you may still have run into a
temporary license failure (see above). In that case,
try again. If this was not a temporary license failure,
then you created a simulation file which uses
features for which you are not licensed. If the
message refers to "Feature 15", then you are trying
to use Aspen Polymers without a valid license. Other
feature numbers refer to specific add-on products.
You must contact AspenTech to obtain a valid Aspen
Polymers license.
A message box See "Windows crashes during See "Windows crashes during simulation
comes up stating simulation calculations" under calculations" under User Interface Problems. See
that an error User Interface Problems. See also "After one run a subsequent run following an
occurred in the also "After one run a input change crashes" later in this section.
Aspen Plus engine. subsequent run following an
input change crashes" later in
this section.
A run history Aspen Plus ran out of See "Windows crashes during simulation
message appears resources to load dynamic link calculations" under User Interface Problems.
referring to a libraries.
dynamic load module
error.
You are referencing user Compile the user Fortran and place it in your run
Fortran and do not have the directory.
compiled object file in your
working directory. The working
directory is the location from
which you opened an existing
file. If you created a file from a
template or opened an existing
file from a floppy or a write
protected area (e.g. \xmp or
\app) the working directory is
as specified in Tools Options
Startup.
A run history You ran out of virtual memory See the Aspen Plus System Management, which
message appears space to load the run files. discusses virtual memory management.
which refers to
"Virtual Memory
Exhausted".
After one run a The problem size has changed Usually after the crash you should be able to recover
subsequent run as a result of the input or for your file and run with the input change. To prevent
following an input other reasons Aspen Plus this from happening for the same run, reinitialize the
change crashes. unsuccessfully tried to reuse simulation before making repeated runs. This is still
the previous run data space. a problem that should be reported to Technical
Usually an error message Support.
appears which states that a
"Fatal error has been
encountered".
References
Aspen Engineering Suite Installation Guide for Windows. Burlington, MA:
Aspen Technology, Inc.
Aspen Plus System Management. Burlington, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Aspen Plus User Guide. Burlington, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
POLYMER Databank
POLYMER contains property parameters for polymers.
Note that a generic polymer component is available in the databank for
custom designed polymers.
MW
MWSEG
NSEG
For the generic polymer component MW is set to 1.
ABS Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene
BR-1 Poly(butadiene)
CA-1 Cellulose-acetate
Cellulose Cellulose
Chitosan Chitosan
CPE Chlorinated-Poly(ethylene)
CTA Cellulose-triacetate
Dextran Dextran
EVA Ethylene-vinyl-acetate
EEA Ethylene-ethyl-acrylate
EPR Ethylene-propylene
HDPE High-density-Poly(ethylene)
Heparin Heparin
Hyaluronic Hyaluronic-Acid
I-PB Isotactic-Poly(1-butene)
I-PMMA Isotactic-Poly(methyl-methacryl)
I-PP Isotactic-Poly(propylene)
Keratan Keratan-Sulfate
LDPE Low-density-poly(ethylene)
LLDPE Linear-low-density-poly(ethylene)
NBR Nitrile-butadiene-rubber
NYLON6 Nylon-6
NYLON66 Nylon-66
PAA Poly(acrylic-acid)
P(ACA&S) Poly(acrylamide-styrene)
PALA Poly(alanine)
PAMIDE Poly(amide)
PAMS Poly(alpha-methylstyrene)
P(AMS&AN) Poly(a-methylstyrene-AN)
PAN Poly(acrylonitrile)
PARA Poly(acrylamide)
PARG Poly(arginine)
PASN Poly(asparagine)
PASP Poly(aspartic-acid)
PB-1 Poly(1-butene)
PBA Poly(n-butyl-acrylate)
PBMA Poly(n-butyl-methacrylate)
P(BMA&S) Poly(n-butyl-methac-styrene)
PBS-1 Poly(butadiene-styrene)
PBT Poly(butylene-terephthalate)
PC-1 Poly(carbonate)
P(C&DMS) Poly(carbonate-dimet-siloxane)
PCHMA Poly(cyclohexyl-methacrylate)
PCYS Poly(cysteine)
PD-1 Poly(decene-1)
PDMA Poly(decyl-methacrylate)
PDMS Poly(dimethylsiloxane)
P(DMS&S) Poly(dimethylsiloxane-styrene)
PE Poly(ethylene)
PEA Poly(ethyl-acrylate)
PEEK Poly(ether-ether-ketone)
PEG Poly(ethylene-glycol)
P(EG&PG) Poly(eth-glycol-prop-glycol)
PEMA Poly(ethyl-methacrylate)
PEO Poly(ethylene-oxide)
P(EO&POX) Poly(eth-oxide-prop-oxide)
P(E&P) Poly(ethylene-propylene)
PET Poly(ethylene-terephthalate)
P(E&VAC) Poly(ethylene-vinyl-acetate)
PGLN Poly(glutamine)
PGLU Poly(glutamic-acid)
PGLY Poly(glycine)
PH Poly(heptene-1)
PHA Poly(n-hexyl-acrylate)
PHENOXY Phenoxy
PHIS Poly(histidine)
PHMA Poly(n-hexyl-methacrylate)
PI Poly(imide)
PIB Poly(isobutylene)
PIBMA Poly(isobutyl-methacrylate)
PILE Poly(isoleucine)
PIP-1 Poly(isoprene)
PLEU Poly(leucine)
PLYS Poly(lysine)
PMA Poly(methyl-acrylate)
P(MAA&MMA) Poly(methac-acid-met-methac)
P(MAA&S) Poly(methac-acid-styrene)
P(MAA&VAC) Poly(methac-acid-vin-acetate)
PMET Poly(methionine)
PMMA Poly(methyl-methacrylate)
PMMS Poly(m-methylstyrene)
PMP Poly(4-methyl-1-pentene)
PMVPD Poly(2-methyl-5-vinylpyridine)
PNA Poly(sodium-acrylate)
POCS Poly(o-chlorostyrene)
POE Poly(oxyethylene)
POLYMER Generic polymer component
POM Poly(oxymethylene)
POMS Poly(o-methylstyrene)
POP Poly(oxypropylene)
PP Poly(propylene)
PPA Poly(n-propyl-acrylate)
PPBRS Poly(p-bromostyrene)
PPEMA Poly(n-pentyl-methacrylate)
PPG Poly(propylene-glycol)
PPHE Poly(phenylalanine)
PPO Poly(phenylene-oxide)
PPMA Poly(n-propyl-methacrylate)
PPMOS Poly(p-methoxystyrene)
PPMS Poly(p-methylstyrene)
PPOX Poly(propylene-oxide)
PPRO Poly(proline)
PPS Poly(phenylene-sulfide)
PS-1 Poly(styrene)
PSBMA Poly(sec-butyl-methacrylate)
PSER Poly(serine)
PSF Poly(sulfone)
P(S&VP) Poly(sytrene-vinylpyrrolidone)
P(S&VPD) Poly(styrene-4-vinylpyridine)
PT-1 Poly(tetrahydrofuran)
PTFE Poly(tetrafluoroethylene)
PTHR Poly(threonine)
PTRP Poly(tryptophan)
PTYR Poly(tyrosine)
PU-1 Poly(urethane-fiber)
PVA Poly(vinyl-alcohol)
PVAC Poly(vinyl-acetate)
P(VAC&VAL) Poly(vin-acetate-vin-alcohol)
PVAL Poly(valine)
PVAM Poly(vinyl-amine)
PVC Poly(vinyl-chloride)
PVCAC Poly(vin-chloride-vin-acetate)
PVDC Poly(vinylidene-chloride)
PVDF Poly(vinylidene-fluoride)
PVF Poly(vinyl-fluoride)
PVI Poly(vinyl-isobutyl-ether)
PVME Poly(vinyl-methyl-ether)
PVO Poly(vinylpropionate)
PVP Poly(vinylpyrrolidone)
PVPD Poly(4-vinyl-pyridine)
SAN Styrene-acrylonitrile
SBR Styrene-butadiene-rubber
UF Urea-formaldehyde
SEGMENT Databank
SEGMENT contains property parameters for polymer segments.
Note that a special nomenclature was devised to identify polymer segments.
The segment name consists of the name of the monomer from which it
originates, followed by a label to identify it as a repeat unit (-R) or an end
group (-E). In cases where several molecular structures are possible, a
numeric subscript is used to differentiate the isomers. A similar convention is
used for assigning component aliases.
O
CO-R Carbonyl-R
C
C2H2-R-1 cis-Vinylene-R
C2H2-R-2 trans-Vinylene-R
CH CH
C2H3O-E-2 Vinyl-alcohol-E
OH
CH CH
C2H4N-E Vinylamine-E-1
NH2
O
C2H4NO-E Glycine-E-1
NH2 CH2 C
O
C2H4NO2-E Glycine-E-2 NH CH2 C
OH
CH2 CH
C2H4O-R-3 Vinyl-alcohol-R
OH
CH2 CH
C2H5N-R Vinylamine-R
NH2
CH2 CH2
C2H5O-E-1 Ethylene-oxide-E-1
OH
CH2 CH2
C2H6N-E Ethyleneamine-E
NH2
CH3
C2H6OSi-R Dimethyl siloxane-R Si O
CH3
CH3
C2H7OSi-E Dimethyl siloxane-E Si OH
CH3
O O
C3H2O2-R Malonic -acid-R
CCH2C
CH CH
C3H2O2Na-E Sodium acrylate-E-1 C
O ONa
CH2 CH
C3H3N-R Acrylonitrile-R
C N
CH CH
C3H3NO-R Acrylamide-R-1 C
O NH
CH CH
C3H3O2-E Acrylic acid-E-1 C
O OH
CH2 CH
C3H3O2Na-R Sodium-acrylate-R C
O ONa
O O
C3H303-E Malonic-acid-E
CCH2COH
CH CH
C3H4NO-E Acrylamide-E-1 C
O NH2
CH2 CH
C3H4NO-B Acrylamide-B C
O NH
O
N C
C3H4N2O-B Urea-formaldehyde-R
N CH2
CH2
CH2 CH
C3H4O2-R Acrylic-acid-R C
O OH
CH2 CH2
C3H4O2Na-E Sodium-acrylate-E-2 C
O ONa
CH CH
C3H5-E Propylene-E-1
CH3
CH2 CH2
C3H5NO-R-1 Acrylamide-R-2 C
O NH
CH2 CH
C3H5NO-R-2 Acrylamide-R-3 C
O NH2
O
C3H5NO-R-3 Alanine-R NH CH C
CH3
O
NH CH C
C3H5NOS-R Cysteine-R
CH2
SH
O
NH CH C
C3H5NO2-R Serine-R
CH2
OH
CH2 CH2
C3H5O2-E Acrylic-acid-E-2 C
O OH
CH2 CH
C3H6-R Propylene-R
CH3
CH2 CH2
C3H6NO-E-1 Acrylamide-E-2 C
O NH2
O
C3H6NO-E-2 Alanine-E-1 NH2 CH C
CH3
O
NH2 CH C
C3H6NOS-E Cysteine-E-1
CH2
SH
O
C3H6NO2-E-1 Alanine-E-2 NH CH C
CH3 OH
O
NH2 CH C
C3H6NO2-E-2 Serine-E-1
CH2
OH
O
NH CH C
C3H6NO2S-E Cysteine-E-2
CH2 OH
SH
O
NH CH C
C3H6NO3-E Serine-E-2
CH2 OH
OH
O CH2 CH
C3H6O-R-1 Oxypropylene-R
CH3
CH2 CH O
C3H6O-R-2 Propylene-oxide-R
CH3
CH2 CH
C3H6O-R-3 Vinyl-methyl-ether-R O
CH3
O CH2 CH O
C3H6O2-R Propylene-glycol-R
CH3
CH2 CH2
C3H7-E Propylene-E-2
CH3
HO CH2 CH
C3H7O-E-1 Oxypropylene-E
CH3
CH2 CH OH
C3H7O-E-2 Propylene-oxide-E
CH3
C3H7O-E-i i-Propanol-E ~OCH(CH3)2
C3H7O-E-n n-Propanol-E ~O(CH2)2CH3
O CH2 CH OH
C3H7O2-E Propylene-glycol-E
CH3
C3H7O2-E-1 1,3-Propanediol-E ~O(CH2)3OH
OCHCH2OH
C3H7O2-E-P 1,2-Propanediol-E-P
CH3
OCH2CHCH3
C3H7O2-E-S 1,2-Propanediol-E-S
OH
O O
C C
C4H2O2-R-cis Maleic-acid-R
C C
H H
O
H C
C4H2O2-R-tra Fumaric-acid-R C C
C H
O
O O
C COH
C4H3O3-E-cis Maleic-acid-E
C C
H H
O
H COH
C4H3O3-E-tra Fumaric-acid-E C C
C H
O
O O
C4H4O2-R Succinic-acid-R
C(CH2)2C
O
NH CH C
C4H5NO3-R Aspartic-acid-R CH2
C
O OH
C CH2
C4H5O2-E-1 Methyl-acrylate-E-1 C
O OCH3
CH3
C4H5O2-E-2 Methyl-acrylic-acid-E-1
CH C
C
O OH
CH CH
C4H5O2-E-3 Vinyl-acetate-E-1 O
C CH3
O
O O
C4H5O3-E Succinic-acid-E
C(CH2)2COH
CH2 CH
C4H6-R-2 Butadiene-R-2
CH CH2
O
NH2 CH C
C4H6NO3-E Aspartic-acid-E-1 CH2
C
O OH
O
NH CH C
OH
C4H6NO4-E Aspartic-acid-E-2 CH2
C
O OH
O
NH CH C
C4H6N2O2-R Asparagine-R CH2
C
O NH2
CH2 CH
C4H6O2-R-1 Methyl-acrylate-R C
O O CH3
CH3
CH2 C
C4H6O2-R-2 Methyl acrylic-acid-R
C
O OH
CH2 CH
C4H6O2-R-3 Vinyl-acetate-R O
C CH3
O
CH CH
C4H7-E-1 1-Butene-E
C2H5
CH3
C4H7-E-2 Isobutylene-E CH C
CH3
O
NH CH C
C4H7NO2-R Threonine-R CHOH
CH3
O
NH2 CH C
C4H7N2O2-E Asparagine-E-1 CH2
C
O NH2
O
NH CH C
C4H7N2O3-E Asparagine-E-2 OH
CH2
C
O NH2
CH2 CH2
C4H7O2-E-1 Methyl-acrylate-E-2 C
O O CH3
CH3
C4H7O2-E-2 Methyl-acrylic-acid-E-2
CH2 CH
C
O OH
CH3
C4H7O2-E-3 Methyl-acrylic-acid-E-3
C CH3
C
O OH
CH2 CH2
C4H7O2-E-4 Vinyl-acetate-E-2 C
O O CH3
CH2 CH
C4H8-R-1 1-Butene-R
C2H5
CH3
C4H8-R-2 Isobutylene-R CH2 C
CH3
O
NH2 CH C
C4H8NO2-E Threonine-E-1
CHOH
CH3
O
NH CH C
C4H8NO3-E Threonine-E-2
OH
CHOH
CH3
O O
C5H6O2-R Glutaric-acid-R
C(CH2)3C
O
C5H7NO-R Proline-R C
N
O
NH CH C
C5H7NO3-R Glutamic-acid-R C2H4
C
O OH
CH3
C5H7O2-E-1 Methyl-methacrylate-E-1
CH C
C
O O CH3
CH CH
C5H7O2-E-2 Ethyl-acrylate-E-1 C
O O C2H5
CH CH
C5H7O2-E-3 Vinyl-propionate-E-1 O
C C2H5
O
O O
C5H7O3-E Glutaric-acid-E
C(CH2)3COH
CH2 C CH CH2
C5H8-R Isoprene-R
CH3
O
C5H8NO-E Proline-E-1 C
HN
O
C5H8NO2-E Proline-E-2 C OH
N
O
NH2 CH C
C5H8NO3-E Glutamic-acid-E-1 C2H4
C
O OH
O
NH CH C
C5H8NO4-E Glutamic-acid-E-2 C2H4 OH
C
O OH
O
NH CH C
C5H8N2O2-R-1 Glutamine-R C2H4
C
O NH2
O O
C5H8N2O2-R-2 Trimethylene-diisocyanate-R C C
NH C3H6 NH
CH3
C CH2
C5H8O2-R-1 Methyl-methacrylate-R
C
O OCH3
CH2 CH
C5H8O2-R-2 Ethyl-acrylate-R C
O O C2H5
CH2 CH
C5H8O2-R-3 Vinyl-propionate-R O
C C2H5
O
CH CH
C5H9-E 1-Pentene-E-1
C3H7
O
NH CH C
C5H9NO-R Valine-R
CH
CH3 CH3
O
NH CH C
C5H9NOS-R Methionine-R C2H4
S
CH3
O
NH2 CH C
C5H9N2O2-E Glutamine-E-1 C2H4
C
O NH2
C5H9N2O3-E Glutamine-E-2
CH3
CH2 CH
C5H9O2-E-1 Methyl-methacrylate-E-2
C
O O CH3
CH3
C CH3
C5H9O2-E-2 Methyl-methacrylate-E-3
C
O OCH3
CH2 CH2
C5H9O2-E-3 Ethyl-acrylate-E-2 C
O O C2H5
CH2 CH2
C5H9O2-E-4 Vinyl-propionate-E-2 O
C C 2H5
O
CH2 CH
C5H10-R 1-Pentene-R
C3H7
C5H10NO-E Valine-E-1
O
NH2 CH C
C5H10NOS-E Methionine-E-1 C2H4
S
CH3
O
NH CH C
C5H10NO2-E Valine-E-2 OH
CH
CH3 CH3
O
NH CH C
C5H10NO2S-E Methionine-E-2 OH
C 2H4
S
CH3
C6H4S-R Phenylene-sulfide-R S
C6H5O-E Phenol-E O
C6H5S-E-1 Phenylene-sulfide-E-1 S
C6H5S-E-2 Phenylene-sulfide-E-2 SH
NH NH
C6H6N2-R-M m-Phenylene-diamine-R
NH NH
C6H6N2-R-O o-Phenylene-diamine-R
C6H6N2-R-P p-Phenylene-diamine-R NH NH
NH NH2
C6H7N2-E-M m-Phenylene-diamine-E
NH NH2
C6H7N2-E-O o-Phenylene-diamine-E
C6H7N3O-R Histidine-R
CH CH O
C6H8NO-E Vinylpyrrolidnone-E-1 N C
C6H8N3O-E Histidine-E-1
C6H8N3O2-E Histidine-E-2
O O
C6H8O2-R Adipic-acid-R
C (CH2)4 C
CH2 CH
O
C6H9NO-R Vinylpyrrolidnone-R N C
CH C CH3
C6H9O2-E-1 Ethyl-methacrylate-E-3 C
O O C2H5
CH CH
C6H9O2-E-2 n-Propyl-acrylate-E-1 C
O O C3H7
O O
C6H9O3-E Adipic-acid-E
C (CH2)4 C OH
CH2 CH
CH2
C6H10-R 1,4-Hexadiene-R CH
CH
CH3
CH2 CH2
O
C6H10NO-E Vinylpyrrolidnone-E-3 N C
CH3
C6H10O2-R-1 Ethyl-methacrylate-R-1
CH2 C
C
O O C2H5
CH2 CH
C6H10O2-R-2 n-Propyl-acrylate-R
C
O O C3H7
CH2OH
C6H10O3-R Amylose-R O
O
CH2OH
O
C6H10O5-R-1 Cellulose-R O
OH OH
O CH2
O
C6H10O5-R-2 Dextran-R HO
OH OH
CH CH
C6H11-E-1 4-Methyl-1-pentene-E-1 CH3
CH2 CH
CH3
CH CH
C6H11-E-2 1-Hexane-E-1
C4H9
C6H11NO-R-1 Caprolactam-R
O
NH (CH2)5 C
O
NH CH C
C6H11NO-R-2 Isoleucine-R
CH C2H5
CH3
O
NH CH C
C6H11NO-R-3 Leucine-R CH2
CH CH3
CH3
CH CH
CH3
C6H11O-E Vinyl-isobutyl-ether-E-1
O
CH2 CH
CH3
CH3
CH2 CH
C6H11O2-E-1 Ethyl-methacrylate-E-1
C
O O C2H5
CH3
C6H11O2-E-2 Ethyl-methacrylate-E-2
CH3 C
C
O O C2H5
CH2 CH2
C6H11O2-E-3 n-Propyl-acrylate-E-2 C
O O C 3H7
CH2OH
C6H11O3-E Amylose-E C O
HO
CH2OH
O
C6H11O5-E Cellulose-E-1 HO
OH OH
CH2OH
O
C6H11O6-E-1 Cellulose-E-2 O OH
OH OH
CH2 O
O
C6H11O6-E-2 Dextran-E-2 HO OH
OH OH
CH2 CH
C6H12-R-1 1-Hexane-R
C4H9
CH2 CH CH3
C6H12-R-2 4-Methyl-1-pentene-R CH2 CH
CH3
O
C6H12NO-E-1 Caprolactam-E-1
NH2 (CH2)5 C
O
NH2 CH C
C6H12NO-E-2 Isoleucine-E-1
CH
CH3 C2H5
O
NH2 CH C
C6H12NO-E-3 Leucine-E-1
CH2 CH CH3
CH3
O
C6H12NO2-E-1 Caprolactam-E-2 NH (CH2)5 C
OH
O
NH CH C
C6H12NO2-E-2 Isoleucine-E-2 OH
CH
CH3 C2H5
O
NH CH C
C6H12NO2-E-3 Leucine-E-2
OH
CH2
CH CH3
CH3
O
C6H12N2O-R Lysine-R NH CH C
C4H8 NH2
O
NH CH C
CH2
CH2
C6H12N4O-R Arginine-R
CH2
NH
C NH
NH2
CH2 CH
CH3
C6H12O-R Vinyl-isobutyl-ether-R O CH2 CH
CH3
CH3 CH
CH3
C6H13-E-2 4-Methyl-1-pentene-E-3 CH2 CH
CH3
CH3 CH
C6H13-E-3 1-Hexane-E-2
C4H9
O
C6H13N2O-E Lysine-E-1 NH2 CH C
C4H8 NH2
O
C6H13N2O2-E Lysine-E-2
NH CH C
OH
C4H8 NH2
O
NH2 CH C
CH2
CH2
C6H13N4O-E Arginine-E-1
CH2
NH
C NH
NH2
O
NH CH C OH
CH2
CH2
C6H13N4O2-E Arginine-E-2
CH2
NH
C NH
NH2
CH2 CH2
C6H13O-E Vinyl-isobutyl-ether-E-2 O CH3
CH2 CH
CH3
O
C7H5O-E Benzoic-acid-E C
O
C7H5O2-E Phenylcarbonate-E C
O
CH CH
C7H6N-E 4-Vinyl-pyridine-E-1
CH2 CH
C7H7N-R 4-Vinyl-pyridine-R
CH2 CH2
C7H8N-E 4-Vinyl-pyridine-E-2
N
O O
C7H10O2-R Pimelic-acid-R
C(CH2)5C
CH CH
C7H11O2-E-1 n-Butyl-acrylate-E-1 C
O O C4H9
CH3
CH C
C7H11O2-E-2 n-Propyl-methacrylate-E-1
C
O O C3H7
O O
C7H11O3-E Pimelic-acid-E
C(CH2)5COH
CH2 CH
C7H12O2-R-1 n-Butyl-acrylate-R C
O O C4H9
CH3
CH2 C
C7H12O2-R-2 n-Propyl-methacrylate-R
C
O O C3H7
CH CH
C7H13-E 1-Heptene-E-1
C5H11
CH2 CH2
C7H13O2-E-1 n-Butyl-acrylate-E-2 C
O O C4H9
CH3
CH2 CH
C7H13O2-E-2 n-Propyl-methacrylate-E-2
C
O O C3H7
CH3
CH3 C
C7H13O2-E-3 n-Propyl-methacrylate-E-3
C
O O C3H7
CH2 CH
C7H14-R 1-Heptene-R
C5H11
CH2 CH2
C7H15-E-1 1-Heptene-E-2
C5H11
CH3 CH
C7H15-E-2 1-Heptene-E-3
C 5H11
O O
C8H4O2-R Terephthalate-R
C C
O
C
C8H4O2-R-1 Phthalate-R O
C
O C
C8H4O2-R-2 Isophthalate-R
O
C
O O
C8H5O3-E Terephthalic-acid-E
C C OH
O
C
C8H5O3-E-1 Phthalic-acid-E O
C OH
O C
C8H5O3-E-2 Isophthalic acid-E
O
C OH
CH CH
C8H6Br-E p-Bromostyrene-E-1
Br
CH CH
C8H6Cl-E-1 o-Chlorostyrene-E-1 Cl
CH CH
C8H6Cl-E-2 p-Chlorostyrene-E-1
Cl
CH CH
C8H7-E Styrene-E-1
CH2 CH
C8H7Br-R p-Bromostyrene-R
Br
CH2 CH
C8H7Cl-R-1 o-Chlorostyrene-R Cl
CH2 CH
C8H7Cl-R-2 p-Chlorostyrene-R
Cl
CH2 CH
C8H8-R Styrene-R
CH2 CH2
C8H8Br-E p-Bromostyrene-E-2
Br
CH2 CH2
C8H8Cl-E-1 o-Chlorostyrene-E-2 Cl
CH2 CH2
C8H8Cl-E-2 p-Chlorostyrene-E-2
Cl
CH CH
C8H8N-E 2-Methyl-5-vinylpyridine-E-1
N
CH3
CH3
C8H8O-R Phenylene-oxide-R O
CH3
CH2 CH2
C8H9-E Styrene-E-2
CH2 CH
C8H9N-R 2-Methyl-5-vinylpyridine-R
N
CH3
CH2 CH2
C8H10N-E 2-Methyl-5-vinylpyridine-E-2
N
CH3
O O
C8H12O2-R Suberic-acid-R
C(CH2)6C
O
CH2 O C CH3
C8H12O6-R Cellulose-acetate-R O
O
OH OH
CH3
CH C
C8H13O2-E-1 n-Butyl-methacrylate-E-1
C
O O C4H9
CH3
CH C
C8H13O2-E-2 Isobutyl-methacrylate-E-1 CH3
C
O O CH2 CH CH3
CH3
CH C
C8H13O2-E-3 sec-Butyl-methacrylate-E-1 CH3
C
O O CH C2H5
O O
C8H13O3-E Suberic-acid-E
C(CH2)6COH
O
CH2 O C CH3
C8H13O6-E Cellulose-acetate-E O
OH
OH OH
O O
C8H14N2O2-R Hexamethylene-diisocyanate-R
C NH (CH2)6 NH C
CH3
C8H14O2-R-1 n-Butyl-methacrylate-R
CH2 C
C
O O C4H9
CH3
C8H14O2-R-2 Isobutyl-methacrylate-R
CH2 C
CH3
C
O O CH2 CH CH3
CH3
C8H14O2-R-3 sec-Butyl-methacrylate-R
CH2 C
CH3
C
O O CH C2H5
CH CH
C8H15-E 1-Octene-E-1
C 6H13
CH3
CH2 CH
C8H15O2-E-1 n-Butyl-methacrylate-E-2
C
O O C4H9
CH3
C8H15O2-E-2 n-Butyl-methacrylate-E-3
CH3 C
C
O O C4H9
CH3
CH2 CH
C8H15O2-E-3 Isobutyl-methacrylate-E-2 C CH3
O O CH2 CH
CH3
CH3
CH3 C
C8H15O2-E-4 Isobutyl-methacrylate-E-3
C CH3
O O CH2 CH
CH3
CH3
CH2 CH
C8H15O2-E-5 sec-Butyl-methacrylate-E-2
CH3
C
O O CH C2H5
CH3
C8H15O2-E-6 sec-Butyl-methacrylate-E-3
CH3 C
CH3
C
O O CH C2H5
CH2 CH
C8H16-R 1-Octene-R
C6H13
CH2 CH2
C8H17-E-1 1-Octene-E-2
C6H13
CH3 CH
C8H17-E-2 1-Octene-E-3
C6H13
O O
C9H7O3-E Dimethyl-terephthalate-E
C C O CH3
CH3
CH C
C9H9-E-1 Alpha-Methylstyrene-E-1
CH CH
C9H9-E-2 m-Methylstyrene-E-1
CH3
CH CH
C9H9-E-3 o-Methylstyrene-E-1 CH3
CH CH
C9H9-E-4 p-Methylstyrene-E-1
CH3
O
NH CH C
C9H9NO-R Phenylalanine-R CH2
O
NH CH C
CH2
C9H9NO2-R Tyrosine-R
OH
CH CH
C9H9O-E p-Methoxystyrene-E-1
OCH3
CH3
CH2 C
C9H10-R-1 alpha-Methylstyrene-R
CH2 CH
C9H10-R-2 m-Methylstyrene-R
CH3
CH2 CH
C9H10-R-3 o-Methylstyrene-R CH3
CH2 CH
C9H10-R-4 p-Methylstyrene-R
CH3
O
NH2 CH C
C9H10NO-E Phenylalanine-E-1 CH2
O
NH CH C
C9H10NO2-E-1 Phenylalanine-E-2 CH2 OH
O
NH2 CH C
CH2
C9H10NO2-E-2 Tyrosine-E-1
OH
O
NH CH C
CH2 OH
C9H10NO3-E Tyrosine-E-2
OH
CH2 CH
C9H10O-R p-Methoxystyrene-R
OCH3
CH3
CH2 CH
C9H11-E-1 alpha-Methylstyrene-E-2
CH3
CH3 C
C9H11-E-2 alpha-Methylstyrene-E-3
CH2 CH2
C9H11-E-3 m-Methylstyrene-E-2
CH3
CH2 CH2
C9H11-E-4 o-Methylstyrene-E-2 CH3
CH2 CH2
C9H11-E-5 p-Methylstyrene-E-2
CH3
CH2 CH2
C9H11O-E p-Methoxystyrene-E-2
OCH3
CH CH
CH2
C9H12-R Ethylidene-norbornene-R CH CH
CH2 C
CH CH3
O O
C9H14O2-R Azelaic-acid-R
C(CH2)7C
CH CH
C9H15O2-E-1 n-Hexyl-acrylate-E-1 C
O O C6H13
CH3
CH C
C9H15O2-E-2 n-Pentyl-methacrylate-E-1
C
O O C5H11
O O
C9H15O3-E Azelaic-acid-E
C(CH2)7COH
CH2 CH
C9H16O2-R-1 n-Hexyl-acrylate-R C
O O C6H13
C9H16O2-R-2 n-Pentyl-methacrylate-R
CH CH
C9H17-E 1-Nonene-E-1
C7H15
CH2 CH2
C9H17O2-E-1 n-Hexyl-acrylate-E-2 C
O O C 6H13
CH3
C9H17O2-E-2 n-Pentyl-methacrylate-E-2
CH2 CH
C
O O C5H11
CH3
C9H17O2-E-3 n-Pentyl-methacrylate-E-3
CH3 C
C
O O C5H11
CH2 CH
C9H18-R 1-Nonene-R
C7H15
CH2 CH2
C9H19-E-1 1-Nonene-E-2
C7H15
CH3 CH
C9H19-E-2 1-Nonene-E-3
C 7H15
CH CH
CH
CH2 CH
C10H12-R Dicyclopentadiene-R CH CH
CH2 CH
CH
CH3
CH C
C10H15O2-E Cyclohexyl-methacrylate-E-1
C
O O
CH3
CH2 C
C10H16O2-R Cyclohexyl-methacrylate-R
C
O O
O O
C10H16O2-R-1 Sebacic-acid-R
C(CH2)8C
CH3
CH2 CH
C10H17O2-E-1 Cyclohexyl-methacrylate-E-2
C
O O
CH3
CH3 C
C10H17O2-E-2 Cyclohexyl-methacrylate-E-3
C
O O
CH3
CH C
C10H17O2-E-3 n-Hexyl-methacrylate-E-1
C
O O C6H13
O O
C10H17O3-E Sebacic-acid-E
C(CH2)8COH
CH3
CH2 C
C10H18O2-R n-Hexyl-methacrylate-R
C
O O C6H13
CH CH
C10H19-E 1-Decene-E-1
C8H17
CH3
CH2 CH
C10H19O2-E-1 n-Hexyl-methacrylate-E-2
C
O O C6H13
CH3
CH3 C
C10H19O2-E-2 n-Hexyl-methacrylate-E-3
C
O O C6H13
CH2 CH
C10H20-R 1-Decene-R
C8H17
CH2 CH2
C10H21-E-1 1-Decene-E-2
C8H17
CH3 CH
C10H21-E-2 1-Decene-E-3
C 8H17
O
NH CH C
C11H10N2O-R Tryptophan-R CH2
O
NH2 CH C
C11H11N2O-E Tryptophan-E-1 CH2
O
NH CH C
OH
C11H11N2O2-E Tryptophan-E-2 CH2
CH CH
C11H21-E 1-Undecene-E-1
C9H19
CH2 CH
C11H22-R 1-Undecene-R
C9H19
CH2 CH2
C11H23-E-1 1-Undecene-E-2
C9H19
CH3 CH
C11H23-E-2 1-Undecene-E-3
C 9H19
C12H6O2-R 2,6-Napthalene-diacid-R
C12H7O3-E 2,6-Napthalene-diacid-E
O
CH2 O C CH3
O
C12H16O8-R Cellulose-triacetate-R
O
O O
CH3 C O O C CH3
O
CH2 O C CH3
C12H17O8-E Cellulose-triacetate-E O
HO
O O
CH3 C O O C CH3
CH2OH OH NH2
O
C12H22N2O8-R Chitosan-R O O
O
OH NH2 CH2OH
CH CH
C12H23-E 1-Dodecene-E-1
C10H21
CH2OH OH NH2
O
C12H23N2O8-E Chitosan-E-1 O OH
O
OH NH2 CH2OH
CH2OH OH NH2
O
C12H23N2O9-E Chitosan-E-2 HO O O
O
OH NH2 CH2OH
CH2 CH
C12H24-R 1-Dodecene-R
C10H21
CH2 CH2
C12H25-E-1 1-Dodecene-E-2
C10H21
CH3 CH
C12H25-E-2 1-Dodecene-E-3
C10H21
C13H9O3-E 2,6-Napthalene-dimethylester-E
CH2OH CH2OH
O O
C14H23NO10-R Heparin-R HO O
O
O OH OH NH C CH3
CH2OH CH2OH
O O
C14H24NO10-E Heparin-E-1 HO O
O
OH OH OH NH C CH3
CH2OH CH2OH
O O
C14H24NO11-E Heparin-E-2 HO O OH
O
O OH OH NH C CH3
CH3
CH C
C14H25O2-E Decyl-methacrylate-E-1
C
O O C 10H21
CH3
CH2 C
C14H26O2-R Decyl-methacrylate-R
C
O O C10H21
CH3
C14H27O2-E-1 Decyl-methacrylate-E-2 CH2 CH
C
O O C10H21
CH3
C14H27O2-E-2 Decylmethacrylate-E-3
CH3 C
C
O O C10H21
CH3
C15H14O2-R Bisphenol-A-R O C O
CH3
CH3
C15H15O2-E Bisphenol-A-E O C OH
CH3
Solvent Dependency
Decomposition rates are lowest in solvents that act as radical scavengers,
such as poly chlorinated organic compounds (e.g., TCE). Initiators used for
bulk-phase vinyl chloride polymerizations are typically in these types of
compounds since they closely mimic the solvent environment during
Concentration Dependency
At high initiator concentrations there is an induced initiation effect. Primary
radicals attack and split un-decomposed initiator molecules. This reduces the
measured half-life time and efficiency of the initiator. All of the data reported
in the following table are based on measurements at relatively low initiator
concentrations (0.2 molar or less). Although the standard decomposition rate
expressions do not account for induced initiator, the user may modify the rate
expression using a gel effect term.
Temperature Dependency
Initiator decomposition rates are reported in several formats including rate
constants, half-life times at specified temperatures, and half-life temperatures
at specified times. These data are all related to each other through the
following equations:
E E1
k Tref A exp kT kTref exp 1
RT R T Tref
ref
ln(0.5) E
kT T60
t 1 ,T ln(0.5)
2 R ln
3600 A
Where:
A = Pre-exponential factor (1/sec)
These equations were applied to the published raw data to allow the rate
constants to be published in a concise format here.
ID Long Name Trade Name(s) Formula / Molecular Structure MW CAS No kref (1/s) A (1/sec) kcal/mol GJ/kmol 1 min 1 hr 10 hr Solvent Source
ABAH 2,2-azo-bis(2- Vazo 56 (DuPont) C8H20N6Cl2 271.19264 2997-92-4 3.3436E-05 6.44E+14 29.4 0.12300 110.5 73.7 55.9 Water DuPont
amidinopropane) V-50 (Wako Chem) HCl HN NH HCl
dihydrochloride N N
H 2N NH2
VAZO68 4,4-azo-bis Vazo 68 (DuPont) C12H22N2O4 258.31776 2638-94-0 7.3642E-06 5.12E+12 27.2 0.11380 132.7 88.7 68.0 Water DuPont
(4-cyanovaleric acid) HOOC
N N
COOH
VA61 2,2-azo-bis[2-(2- VA-061 (Wako Chem) C12H22N6 250.34712 20858-12-2 1.3404E-03 1.00E+15 27.2 0.11400 78.4 45.0 28.9 Acidic water Wako
imidazolin-2-yl)propane] N N
N N
N HN
H
VA86 2,2-Azobis[2-methyl-N-(2- VA-086 C12H24N4O4 288.34712 61551-69-7 6.7869E-06 7.95E+14 30.6 0.12800 123.9 86.0 67.7 Water Wako
hydroxyethyl)propionamide] O O
N N
HOH 2CH 2C NH HN CH2 CH2 OH
VAZO44 2,2-azo-bis(N,N- Vazo 44 (DuPont) C12H24Cl2N6 323.26840 27776-21-2 1.3564E-04 8.10E+12 25.6 0.10700 103.3 63.0 44.0 Water DuPont
dimethylene VA-44 (WakoChem) N N
isobutyramidine) N N 2HCl
dihydrochloride
N HN
H
VA46B 2,2-azo-bis[2-(2- VA-046B (Wako Chem) C12H30N6O10S2 482.53664 20858-12-2 1.4388E-03 1.18E+17 30.4 0.12700 75.9 46.0 31.4 Water Wako
imidazolin-2-yl)propane N N
disulfate dihydrate H2SO4
N N
N H2 O
HN
H
VA41 2,2-azo-bis[2-(5-methyl- VA-041 (WakoChem) C14H26Cl2N6 349.30628 n/a 2.7035E-04 2.53E+15 28.9 0.12100 91.3 57.4 41.0 Water Wako
2-imidazolin-2-yl)propane] N N
dihydrochloride
N N
N N
H H
HCl HCl
VA58 2,2-azobis[2-(3,4,5,6- VA-058 (WakoChem) C14H28Cl2N6 351.32216 102834-39-0 2.5342E-05 1.44E+15 30.1 0.12600 111.8 75.5 58.0 Water Wako
tetrahydropyrimidin-2- N N
yl)propane] dihydrochloride N N 2HCl
NH HN
VA57 2,2-azobis[N-(2- VA-057 (WakoChem) C14H34N6O8 414.45960 n/a 2.8824E-05 5.56E+14 29.4 0.12300 112.0 74.9 57.0 Water Wako
carboxyethyl)-2- HOO C
HN
N N
NH
CO OH 4 H 2O
methylpropionamidine] HN NH
tetrahydrate
ID Long Name Trade Name(s) Formula / Molecular Structure MW CAS No kref (1/s) A (1/sec) kcal/mol GJ/kmol 1 min 1 hr 10 hr Solvent Source
VA85 2,2-Azobis{2-methyl-N-[2- VA-085 (Wako Chem) C16H32N4O4 344.45464 n/a 7.8450E-07 6.41E+13 30.4 0.12700 148.2 105.4 85.0 Water Wako
(1-hydroxybuthyl)] O O
propionamide} H 3CH 2 C N N CH2 CH3
NH HN
HOH2 C CH2 OH
VA60 2,2-azo-bis{2-[1-(2- VA-060 (Wako Chem) C16H32Cl2N6O2 411.37472 11858-13-0 1.9254E-05 9.56E+15 31.5 0.13200 111.7 76.9 60.0 Water Wako
hydroxyethyl)-2-imidazolin- N N
2-yl]propane} N N 2HCl
dihydrochloride
N N
CH 2 CH 2 OH CH 2 CH 2OH
V30 1-cyano-1-methyl- V-30 (Wako Chem) C5H8N4O 140.14488 10288-28-5 4.4161E-08 1.86E+15 34.5 0.14430 164.9 123.9 104.0 Toluene Wako
ethylazofomamide CN
N N CONH2
AIBN 2,2'-azo-bis-isobutyronitrile Vazo 64 (DuPont) C8H12N4 164.21024 78-67-1 1.0464E-05 2.74E+15 31.1 0.13023 118.3 82.0 64.4 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
Perkadox AIBN
(AkzoNobel) NC N N CN
AMBN 2,2'-azo-bis(2- Vazo 67 (DuPont) C10H16N4 192.26400 13472-08-7 8.4357E-06 1.38E+15 30.8 0.12893 121.2 84.0 66.0 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
methylbutyronitrile) Perkadox AMBN CN CN
(AkzoNobel)
V-59 (Wako Chem) C 2H5 N N C 2H 5
V601 dimethyl 2,2'-azobis (2- V-601 (Wako Chem) C10H18N2O4 230.26400 2589-57-3 8.5556E-06 6.99E+14 30.4 0.12700 122.1 84.3 66.0 Toluene Wako
methylpropionate) O O
H 3CO N N OCH3
ACCN 1,1-azo-di-(hexa Vazo 88 (DuPont) C14H20N4 244.33976 2094-98-6 5.4449E-07 1.07E+16 34.0 0.14219 140.2 103.0 84.9 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
hydrobenzenenonitrile) Perkadox ACCN NC
(AkzoNobel)
V-40 (Wako Chem) N N
CN
AMVN 2,2'-azo-bis(2,4-dimethyl Vazo 52 (DuPont) C14H24N4 248.37152 4419-11-8 1.0349E-04 1.78E+14 27.8 0.11630 102.1 65.0 47.2 Toluene DuPont
valeronitrile) V-65 (Wako Chem)
VF096 2,2'-azo-bis[N-(2- VF-096 (Wako Chem) C14H24N4O2 280.37032 129136-92-1 1.5480E-07 4.67E+14 32.7 0.13700 157.8 116.1 96.0 Toluene Wako
propenyl)-2- O O
methylpropionamide]
N N
NH HN
ID Long Name Trade Name(s) Formula / Molecular Structure MW CAS No kref (1/s) A (1/sec) kcal/mol GJ/kmol 1 min 1 hr 10 hr Solvent Source
AMOMVN 2,2'-azo-bis(4-methoxy- V-70 (Wako Chem) C16H28N4O2 308.42408 15545-97-8 1.1718E-03 1.26E+15 27.5 0.11500 79.4 46.1 30.0 Toluene Wako
2,4-dimethyl valeronitrile) CN CN
H 3CO H 2C N N CH 2 OCH3
VAM110 2,2'-azo-bis(N-butyl-2- Vam-100 (Wako Chem) C16H32N4O2 312.45584 n/a 2.3941E-08 4.40E+14 33.9 0.14200 174.2 130.9 110.0 Toluene Wako
methylpropionamide) O O
N N
C 4 H9 NH HN C 4 H 9
VAM111 2,2'-azo-bis(N-cyclohexyl- Vam-110 (Wako Chem) C20H36N4O2 364.53160 n/a 3.4427E-08 1.71E+13 31.5 0.13200 181.3 133.7 111.0 Toluene Wako
2-methylpropionamide) O O
N N
NH HN
Diacyl Peroxides
PP dipropionyl peroxide C6H10O4 146.14300 3248-28-0 4.3006E-05 1.14E+15 30.5 0.12760 119.1 81.9 63.9 Benzene Polymer
O Handbook
O
O
O
SAP succinic acid peroxide Luperox SAP (Atofina) C8H10O8 234.16260 123-23-9 8.7924E-06 4.89E+10 24.0 0.10043 142.3 91.0 67.4 Acetone Atofina
SUCP-70-W (Degussa) O O
HO O
O OH
O O
IBP diisobutyryl peroxide Trigonox 187-C30 C8H14O2 142.19796 3437-84-1 2.7220E-03 3.42E+14 26.1 0.10906 72.7 39.0 22.8 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel) O
O
O
O
BP dibenzoyl peroxide Luperox AFR40 (Atofina) C14H10O4 242.23100 94-36-0 3.8607E-06 3.40E+14 30.4 0.12721 130.3 91.0 72.1 Benzene Atofina
O O
O O
DCLBP bis(2,4-dichlorobenzoyl) DCLBP (Degussa) C16H6Cl2O4 333.12664 133-14-2 4.2163E-05 3.95E+14 28.9 0.12100 109.1 72.0 54.1 Benzene Degussa
peroxide O O
Cl Cl
O O
Cl Cl
ID Long Name Trade Name(s) Formula / Molecular Structure MW CAS No kref (1/s) A (1/sec) kcal/mol GJ/kmol 1 min 1 hr 10 hr Solvent Source
OMBP bis(ortho-methylbenzoyl) Perkadox 20 (Akzo C16H14O4 270.28476 3034-79-5 1.5072E-05 6.85E+13 28.4 0.11900 120.9 81.0 61.9 Benzene Degussa
peroxide Nobel) O O
OMBP (Degussa)
O O
PMBP bis(para-methylbenzoyl) PMBP (Degussa) C16H14O4 270.28476 895-95-2 5.1895E-06 2.06E+14 29.9 0.12500 128.6 89.0 70.0 Benzene Degussa
peroxide O O
O O
OP dioctanoyl peroxide Trigonox SE-8 C16H30O4 286.41180 762-16-3 1.3761E-05 2.36E+15 30.8 0.12905 116.3 80.0 62.4 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel) O
O (CH2) 6CH 3
H 3C(CH2) 6 O
O
INP bis(3,5,5- Trigonox 36 C18H34O4 314.46556 3851-87-4 2.0300E-05 2.70E+15 30.7 0.12835 112.8 77.0 59.6 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
trimethylhexanoyl) peroxide (AkzoNobel) O O
Luperox 219 (AtoFina) O O
DP didecanoyl peroxide Luperox DEC (Atofina) C20H38O4 342.51932 762-12-9 1.4646E-05 8.34E+14 30.1 0.12600 117.2 80.0 62.0 Benzene Degussa
Perkadox SE-10 O
(AkzoNobel)
O C 9H19
C 9H 19 O
O
LP dilauroyl peroxide Luperox LP (Atofina) C24H46O4 398.62684 105-74-8 1.7414E-05 3.84E+14 29.5 0.12337 116.9 79.0 60.8 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
Laurox (AkzoNobel) O
O C 11H23
C 11H 23 O
O
Peroxycarbonates
BPIC tert-butylperoxy isopropyl Trigonox BPIC C8H16O4 176.21264 2372-21-6 7.0005E-08 2.44E+16 35.9 0.15015 154.9 117.0 98.5 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
carbonate O
O O O
ID Long Name Trade Name(s) Formula / Molecular Structure MW CAS No kref (1/s) A (1/sec) kcal/mol GJ/kmol 1 min 1 hr 10 hr Solvent Source
IPPC diisopropyl IPPC (Degussa) C8H16O6 208.21144 105-64-6 1.6931E-04 7.70E+14 28.4 0.11900 96.3 61.0 44.0 Benzene Degussa
peroxydicarbonate O
O O
O O
O
NPPC di-n-propyl Luperox 221 (AtoFina) C8H16O6 208.21144 16066-38-9 1.4752E-04 3.56E+15 29.5 0.12362 96.1 62.0 45.5 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxydicarbonate Trigonox NPP-CK85 O
(AkzoNobel)
O O
O O
O
SBPC di-secbutyl Luperox 225 (AtoFina) C10H16O6 232.23344 19910-65-7 1.2919E-04 3.38E+15 29.6 0.12385 97.2 63.0 46.4 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxydicarbonate Trigonox SBP O
(AkzoNobel)
O O
O O
O
TBPIC tert-butylperoxy- Trigonox BPIC (Akzo) C11H20O6 248.27620 2372-21-6 7.0005E-08 2.44E+16 35.9 0.15015 154.9 117.0 98.5 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
isopropylcarbonate Luperox TBIC (AtoFina) O
TBPIC (Degussa)
O
O O
TBPEHC tert-butylperoxy 2- Trigonox 117 C13H26O4 246.34704 12/4/3443 6.4441E-08 3.95E+16 36.3 0.15172 154.4 117.0 98.7 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
ethylhexyl carbonate (AkzoNobel) C 4H9
Luperox TBEC (AtoFina)
O O
O C 2H 5
O
CHPC dicyclohexyl CHPC (Degussa) C14H22O6 286.32508 1561-49-5 1.9626E-04 3.30E+16 30.8 0.12900 91.9 59.9 44.2 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxydicarbonate O (Polymer
Handbook)
O O
O O
O
TAPEHC tert-amylperoxy 2- Trigonox 131 C14H28O4 260.37392 70833-40-8 1.2326E-07 2.29E+16 35.5 0.14841 150.5 113.0 94.7 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
ethylhexyl carbonate (AkzoNobel) C 2H5
Luperox TAEC (AtoFina) C 2H 5
O O
C 4H 9 O
O
EHPC di(2-ethylhexyl) Luperox 223 (AtoFina) C18H34O6 346.46436 16111-62-9 1.1396E-04 1.80E+15 29.3 0.12245 98.9 64.0 47.1 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxydicarbonate Trigonox EHP O
(AkzoNobel) O O
O O
O
ID Long Name Trade Name(s) Formula / Molecular Structure MW CAS No kref (1/s) A (1/sec) kcal/mol GJ/kmol 1 min 1 hr 10 hr Solvent Source
BCHPC Di(4-tert-butylcyclohexyl) Perkadox 16 C22H38O6 398.54012 15520-11-3 1.1205E-04 7.34E+15 30.2 0.12639 97.7 64.0 47.6 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxydicarbonate (AkzoNobel)
O O
O
O
O O
MYPC Dimyristyl Perkadox 26 C30H58O6 514.78692 53220-22-7 9.9164E-05 3.06E+15 29.7 0.12430 99.5 65.0 48.3 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxydicarbonate (AkzoNobel) O
C 14H 29 O O C H
O O 14 29
O
CEPC dicetyl peroxydicarbonate Perkadox 24 C34H66O6 570.89444 26322-14-5 9.9270E-05 2.85E+15 29.7 0.12410 99.6 65.0 48.2 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel) O
C 16H 33 O O C H
O O 16 33
O
Alkyl Peroxides
DTBP di-tert-butyl peroxide Trigonox B (AkzoNobel) C8H18O2 146.22972 110-05-4 3.7905E-09 4.36E+15 36.7 0.15346 182.9 141.0 120.7 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
Luperox DI (AtoFina)
O O
DTAP di-tert-amyl peroxide Trigonox 201 C10H22O2 174.28348 10508-09-5 2.1965E-08 3.99E+15 35.5 0.14835 168.7 128.0 108.3 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel)
Luperox DTA (AtoFina)
O O
BCUP tert-butylcumyl peroxide Trigonox T (AkzoNobel) C13H20O2 208.30060 3457-61-2 1.0091E-08 1.12E+15 35.1 0.14698 178.8 136.0 115.3 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
BCUP (Degussa)
O O
DCUP dicumyl peroxide Perkadox BC C18H22O2 270.37148 80-43-3 1.0731E-08 9.28E+15 36.5 0.15267 172.2 132.0 112.4 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel)
Luperox 500 (AtoFina)
O O
DTBCP di-tert-butyl cumyl peroxide C26H38O2 382.58652 3.6200E-09 3.05E+15 36.5 0.15260 184.4 142.0 121.4 Toluene Warson
(1980)
O O
Hydroperoxides
ID Long Name Trade Name(s) Formula / Molecular Structure MW CAS No kref (1/s) A (1/sec) kcal/mol GJ/kmol 1 min 1 hr 10 hr Solvent Source
TBHP tert-butyl hydroperoxide Trigonox A (AkzoNobel) C4H10O2 90.12220 75-91-2 2.1276E-12 3.09E+17 44.5 0.18600 226.9 185.0 164.4 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
Luperox TBH (AtoFina)
TBHP (Degussa)
O OH
TAHP tert-amyl hydroperoxide Trigonox TAHP (Akzo) C5H12O2 104.14908 3425-61-4 6.2470E-09 6.14E+07 24.4 0.10200 234.1 190.0 153.0 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
TAHP (AtoFina)
C2H 5 O OH
TMBHP 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl Trigonox TMBH C8H18O2 146.22972 5809-08-5 9.0052E-11 9.13E+18 44.2 0.18500 172.7 153.0 135.0 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
hydroperoxide (AkzoNobel) O OH
CUHP cumene hydroperoxide Trigonox K (AkzoNobel) C9H12O2 152.19308 80-15-9 1.8527E-09 1.13E+12 31.7 0.13256 221.8 166.0 139.8 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
Luperox CU (AtoFina)
CUHP (Degussa)
O OH
IPCHP isopropylcumyl Trigonox M (AkzoNobel) C12H18O2 194.27372 26762-93-6 5.6157E-09 2.28E+12 31.4 0.13144 207.1 154.0 129.0 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
hydroperoxide
O OH
Peroxyesters
TBPA tert-butyl peroxyacetate Trigonox F (AkzoNobel) C6H12O3 132.15948 107-71-1 5.7708E-08 1.51E+16 35.7 0.14936 157.5 119.0 100.2 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
Luperox 7 (AtoFina) O
O
O
TAPA tert-amyl peroxyacetate Trigonox 133 C7H14O3 146.18636 690-83-5 2.5042E-07 1.53E+17 36.3 0.15171 141.3 106.0 88.7 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel) O
Luperox 555 (AtoFina)
C 2H 5 O O
TBPIB tert-butyl peroxyisobutyrate Trigonox 41 C8H16O3 160.21324 109-13-7 1.3027E-06 2.02E+15 32.3 0.13516 136.3 98.0 79.5 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel) O
O
O
ID Long Name Trade Name(s) Formula / Molecular Structure MW CAS No kref (1/s) A (1/sec) kcal/mol GJ/kmol 1 min 1 hr 10 hr Solvent Source
TBPPI tert-butyl peroxypivalate Trigonox 25 C9H18O3 174.24012 927-07-1 2.8161E-05 6.72E+14 29.5 0.12359 111.9 75.0 57.2 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel) O
Luperox 11 (AtoFina)
TBPPI (Degussa) O O
TBPEA tert-butyl Trigonox 27 C10H20O3 188.26700 2550-33-6 2.4603E-06 2.52E+15 32.0 0.13400 130.6 93.0 74.8 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxydiethylacetate (AkzoNobel) O
O O
TAPPI tert-amyl peroxypivalate Trigonox 125 C10H20O3 188.26700 29240-17-3 3.8733E-05 4.16E+15 30.5 0.12776 107.0 72.0 55.0 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel) O
Luperox 554 (AtoFina)
TAPPI (Degussa) O O C 2 H5
TBPB tert-butyl peroxybenzoate Triganox C (AkzoNobel) C11H14O3 194.23036 614-45-9 3.5920E-08 2.10E+16 36.2 0.15159 160.5 122.0 103.2 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
Luperox P (AtoFina) O
TBPB (Degussa)
O
O
TBPN7 tert-butyl Trigonox 257 C11H22O3 202.29388 110-05-4 8.0391E-05 2.17E+14 28.1 0.11756 104.2 67.0 49.1 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxyneoheptanoate (AkzoNobel) O
O O C 3 H7
TAPB tert-amyl peroxybenzoate Trigonox 127 C12H16O3 208.25724 4511-39-1 7.3536E-08 8.27E+15 35.1 0.14702 157.0 118.0 99.0 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel) O
Luperox TAP (AtoFina)
TAPB (Degussa) O
O
C 2 H5
TBPEH tert-butylperoxy-2- Trigonox 21 C12H24O3 216.32076 3006-82-4 4.1442E-06 1.59E+14 29.8 0.12490 131.1 91.0 71.7 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
ethylhexanoate (AkzoNobel) O
Luperox 26 (AtoFina)
O C 4 H9
O
C 2H 5
TMBPPI 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl Trigonox 425 C13H26O3 230.34764 22288-41-1 9.0908E-05 2.41E+14 28.1 0.11750 103.0 66.0 48.2 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxypivalate (AkzoNobel) O
O
O
ID Long Name Trade Name(s) Formula / Molecular Structure MW CAS No kref (1/s) A (1/sec) kcal/mol GJ/kmol 1 min 1 hr 10 hr Solvent Source
TAPEH tert-amyl peroxy-2- Trigonox C13H26O3 230.34764 686-31-7 3.3205E-06 1.72E+15 31.6 0.13211 128.7 91.0 72.7 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
ethylhexanoate 121(AkzoNobel) O
Luperox 575 (AtoFina)
TAPEH (Degussa) O C4 H 9
O
C 2H 5
C 2 H5
TBPIN tert-butylperoxy-3,5,5- Trigonox 42S C13H26O3 230.34764 13122-18-4 1.6062E-07 1.90E+15 33.6 0.14078 154.0 114.0 94.6 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
trimethyl-hexanoate (AkzoNobel)
O
O
O
TBPND tert-butyl Trigonox 23 C14H28O3 244.37452 26748-41-4 1.1742E-04 1.49E+14 27.6 0.11547 101.2 64.0 46.2 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxyneodecanoate (AkzoNobel) O C 2 H5
Luperox 10 (AtoFina)
TBPND (Degussa) O O C 4 H9
C 2 H5
DMHBPEH 1,1-dimethyl-3- Luperox 665 (AtoFina) C14H28O4 260.37392 95732-35-7 1.0997E-05 3.49E+13 28.2 0.11800 125.0 84.0 64.4 TCE AtoFina
hydroxybutyl peroxy-2- C2H 5
ethylhexanoate OH
O
C 4H 9 O
O
TAPND tert-amyl Trigonox 123 C15H30O3 258.40140 68299-16-1 1.7016E-04 1.46E+14 27.3 0.11438 97.9 61.0 43.3 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxyneodecanoate (AkzoNobel) O C 2H 5
Luperox 546 (AtoFina)
C 2 H5 O O C 4H 9
C 2H 5
CUPN7 cumyl peroxyneoheptanoate Trigonox 197 C16H24O3 264.36476 130097-36-8 2.4772E-04 3.27E+14 27.6 0.11557 93.8 58.0 40.8 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel) O
Luperox 288 (AtoFina)
O O C C2 H 5
C 2H 5
TMBPEH 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl Trigonox 421 C16H32O3 272.42828 22288-43-3 6.0205E-06 1.55E+14 29.6 0.12380 127.8 88.0 68.9 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxy-2-ethylhexanoate (AkzoNobel) O
C 4H 9 O
O
C2 H 5
DMHBPND 1,1-dimethyl-3- Luperox 610 (AtoFina) C16H32O4 288.42768 95718-78-8 4.0233E-04 1.14E+14 26.6 0.11131 90.4 54.0 36.6 a- AtoFina
hydroxybutyl C2H 5 methylstyrene
peroxyneodecanoate C 4H 9 OH
O
O
C 2H 5
O
ID Long Name Trade Name(s) Formula / Molecular Structure MW CAS No kref (1/s) A (1/sec) kcal/mol GJ/kmol 1 min 1 hr 10 hr Solvent Source
TMBPND 1,1,3,3,-tetramethylbutyl Triganox 423 C18H36O3 300.48204 51240-95-0 2.8151E-04 4.02E+14 27.7 0.11579 92.5 57.0 39.9 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
peroxyneodecanoate (AkzoNobel) C2 H 5
C 4H 9
O
O
C 2H 5
O
CUPND cumyl peroxyneodecanoate Trigonox 99 C19H30O3 306.44540 26748-47-0 3.1832E-04 2.95E+14 27.4 0.11459 91.7 56.0 38.8 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
(AkzoNobel) O C 2H 5
Luperox 188 (AtoFina)
CUPND (Degussa) O O C4 H 9
C 2H 5
C-C Initiators
DMDPB 2,3-dimethyl-2,3- Perkadox 30 C18H22O2 270.37148 1889-67-4 6.1389E-18 7.57E+18 55.0 0.23019 304.5 259.0 236.4 Chlorobenzene AkzoNobel
diphenylbutane (AkzoNobel)
Sulfonyl Peroxides
ACHSP acetyl Lupersol 228Z (AtoFina) C8H14O5S 222.26216 3179-56-4 7.3692E-04 7.27E+17 32.0 0.13390 80.1 51.0 36.6 Toluene Warson
cyclohexanesulphonyl O O (1980)
peroxide
S O O
O
Specifying Components
This section describes the input language for specifying components.
Naming Components
Following is the input language used to name components.
Input Language for Components
POLYMERS
PARAM kwd=value
SEGMENTS seg-id seg-type /
OLIGOMERS olig-id seg-id number /
POLYMERS poly-id /
CATALYSTS cat-id mol-site /
INITIATORS ini-id/
ATTRIBUTES comp-id attr-list /
DISTRIBUTION polyid disttype NPOINTS=value
FUNCLOG=YES/NO
UPPER=value
POLYMERS
POLYMERS SAN ; DEFINE SEGMENTS IN
POLYSTYRENE
SEGMENTS STYSEG REPEAT/
ACNSEG REPEAT ; DEFINE TYPE OF SEGMENTS
PRESENT
; DEFINE ATTRIBUTES FOR POLYMERS
ATTRIBUTES SAN DPN DPW PDI MWN MWW ZMOM FMOM SMOM SFLOW SFRAC
&
LDPN LZMOM LFMOM LSFLOW LSFRAC LEFLOW LEFRAC
LPFRAC
DISTRIBUTION PS CHAIN-SIZE NPOINTS=100 UPPER=9999
Specifying Component
Attributes
This section describes the input language for specifying component
attributes..
STREAM sid
SUBSTREAM ssid keyword=value
basis-FLOW cid flow / . . .
basis-FRAC cid frac / . . .
COMP-ATTR cname cattrname (value-list) / . . .
ATTR-SCALING
SCALING COMP=comp-id ATTR=attr-id
SCALE-FACTOR=scale UPPER-BOUND=upper
ATTR-SCALING
SCALING PP LSEFLOW SCALE=1E-008 UPPER=1.E35
SCALING PP LZMOM SCALE=1E-008 UPPER=1.E35
SCALING PP LSZMOM SCALE=1E-008 UPPER=1.E35
SCALING TICL4 CVSFLOW SCALE=1E-008 UPPER=1.E35
SCALING TICL4 CPSFLOW SCALE=1E-008 UPPER=1.E35
Requesting Distribution
Calculations
See Specifying Component Characterization Inputs on page 448.
Use the USER-PROPERTY paragraph to define the property. This property can
be referenced in the Prop-Set paragraph in the same way as built-in
properties. You must supply a Fortran subroutine to calculate the value of the
user Prop-Set properties.
PROP-DATA
PROP-LIST paramname [setno] / . . .
PVAL cid value-list / value-list / . . .
PROP-LIST paramname [setno] / . . .
BPVAL cid1 cid2 value-list / value-list / . . .
COMP-LIST cid-list
CVAL paramname setno 1 value-list
COMP-LIST cid2-list
BCVAL paramname setno 1 cid1 value-list /
1 cid1 value-list / . . .
PROP-DATA
IN-UNITS SI
PROP-LIST PLXANT / TB
PVAL HOPOLY -40.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1D3 / 2000.0
PVAL COPOLY -40.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1D3 / 2000.0
PROP-DATA
IN-UNITS SI
PROP-LIST MW
PVAL HOPOLY 1.0
PVAL COPOLY 1.0
PVAL ABSEG 192.17
PVAL ASEG 76.09
PVAL BSEG 116.08
PROP-DATA
IN-UNITS SI
PROP-LIST DHCONM / DHSUB / TMVK / TGVK
PVAL HOPOLY -3.64261D4 / 8.84633D4 / 1.0 / 0.0
PVAL COPOLY -3.64261D4 / 8.84633D4 / 1.0 / 0.0
PROP-DATA
IN-UNITS SI
PROP-LIST GMRENB / GMRENC
BPVAL MCH ASEG -92.0 / 0.2
BPVAL ASEG MCH 430.0 / 0.2
ESTIMATE [option]
STRUCTURES
method SEG-id groupno nooccur / groupno nooccur /...
The main keywords for specifying property parameter estimation inputs are
the ESTIMATE and the STRUCTURES paragraphs. A brief description of the
input language for these paragraphs follows. For more detailed information
please refer to the Aspen Physical Property System Physical Property Data
documentation.
option Option=ALL Estimate all missing parameters (default)
method Polymer property estimation method name
SEG-id Segment ID defined in the component list
groupno Functional group number (group IDs listed in Appendix B of
Volume 2 of this User Guide)
nooccur Number of occurrences of the group
ESTIMATE ALL
STRUCTURES
VANKREV ABSEG 115 1 ;-(C6H4)-
VANKREV BSEG 151 2 / 100 2 ; -COO-CH2-CH2-COO-
VANKREV ABSEG 115 1 / 151 2 / 100 2 ;-(C6H4)-COO-CH2-CH2-COO-
Specifying Step-Growth
Polymerization Kinetics
Following is the input language for the STEP-GROWTH REACTIONS paragraph.
Input Language for Step-Growth Polymerization
The keywords for specifying rate constant parameters for the built-in
reactions, and for specifying user reactions are described here.
Input Language Description for Step-Growth Polymerization
Specifying Free-Radical
Polymerization Kinetics
Following is the input language for the FREE-RAD REACTIONS paragraph. The
reaction keywords and rate coefficient parameters for free-radical
polymerization are given. Users may select a subset of the built-in reactions
for a given simulation.
Specifying Emulsion
Polymerization Kinetics
Following is the input language for the EMULSION REACTIONS paragraph.
Users are able to select the phases in which the reactions are occurring and
also define the kinetics of particle absorption, desorption, and termination.
Specifying Ziegler-Natta
Polymerization Kinetics
Following is the input language for the part of the polymerization REACTIONS
paragraph specific to Ziegler-Natta kinetics. Ziegler-Natta inputs may be used
to define the reaction kinetics for a wide variety of homo- and co-polymers
produced by catalyzed polymerization, including HDPE. A subset of the built-in
kinetics can be defined for a simulation by including the reaction keywords for
the desired reactions and specifying the rate coefficient parameters for these
reactions. The reaction keywords and rate coefficient parameters for Ziegler-
Natta polymerization are also provided. Currently for two phase systems the
polymerization reactions are applied to the liquid phase in the reactor. For gas
phase polymerization systems the solid polymer, or the amorphous part of
the polymer, is modeled as a liquid.
Input Language for Ziegler-Natta Polymerization
SPECIES POLYMER=polymerid
STOIC reactionno compid coef / ...
RATE-CON reactionno pre-exp act-energy [t-exp] [TREF=ref-temp] &
[CATALYST=cid CAT-ORDER=value] [USER-RC=userid] / ...
POWLAW-EXP reactionno compid exponent /
[ASSIGN reactionno [ACTIVITY=value] RC-SETS=setno-list]
SUBROUTINE RATECON=rcname MASSTRANS=mtname
USER-VECS NINTRC=nintrc NREALRC=nrealc NINTMT=nintmt NREALMT=nrealmt &
NIWORKRC=niwork NWORKRC=nwork NIWORKMT=niwork NWORKMT=nwork &
NURC=nurc
INTRC value-list
REALRC value-list
INTMT value-list
REALMT value-list
Specifying Segment-Based
Polymer Modification Reactions
The input language for the SEGMENT-BAS REACTIONS paragraph is described
here.
Input Language for Segment-Based Polymer Modification Reactions
C k e
ij R T Tref
rate j j oi
References
Aspen Physical Property System Physical Property Data. Burlington, MA:
Aspen Technology, Inc.
Aspen Plus User Models. Burlington, MA: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Index 507
component attribute treatment in handling in unit operations 336
unit operations 33537 initialization scheme 4750
component databanks 387429 initializing in streams 451
configuring 38182 input language 45153
data fitting 294, 33940 live polymers 39, 48
decomposition rate parameters polymers 3637
43133 required 44, 47
emulsion model 199223 scale factors 50
end-use properties 75 scaling 453
features 5, 913 site-based aggregate polymers
files 382 43, 50
flowsheets 293 site-based bulk polymers 49
fortran utilities 445 site-based live polymers 42, 49
free-radical polymerization site-based polymers 40
model 16398 specifying conventional
input language 447504 component 451
installation 382 user 45, 46
ionic model 24963 variables for data regression 346
key parameters 342 Ziegler-Natta 44
kinetic rate constant parameters Average properties 5859
43144
model definition 12 B
polyester technology package 95
property approach 58 Backbone modifications 269
reaction models 85 Batch reactors 330
segment approach 27 Beta-scission 183
segment-based reaction model Bifunctional initiator decomposition
26590 171
steady-state features 294 Bifunctional initiators 174, 175
steady-state modeling 29194 Bimodal distributions 56
step-growth polymerization Bivariate distributions 55
model 89162 Block length 35
templates 382 Branch formation 270
troubleshooting 38386 Branching
unit operation models 295338 degree of 33
unit operations 294 free-radical polymerization 192
user models 86, 35973 frequency 35
user subroutines 14055, 274 number of chains 35
84 reactions 240
Ziegler-Natta model 22547 Broyden solver 311
Aspen PolyQuest 96 Bulk
AspenTech support 3 free-radical polymerization 163
AspenTech Support Center 3 98
Association reactions 256 polymer chain 169
Attributes See also Component polymer chain length moment
attributes equation 187
aggregate polymers 40, 48 polymerization 164
bulk polymers 47 Bulk polymerization 85
calculation methods 47 Butadiene 199
catalyst 45 Butyl acrylate 199
508 Index
Butyl methacrylate 199 precipitation 85
solution 85
C suspension 85
Characterizing
Calculator block 376 approach 19
Catalyst sites components 10, 12, 27
inhibited 231 Chlorinated polyethylene 265
propagation 231 Chloroprene 199
types 231 Class 0 component attributes 34,
vacant 231 45, 335
Catalysts Class 1 component attributes 34
poisoning 240 Class 2 component attributes 34,
preactivation 237 4546, 313, 335
site activation 237 CMC See Critical micelle
types 22629 concentration
Ziegler-Natta 24, 226 Cocatalysts
Ziegler-Natta reactions 230 poisoning 240
Catalyzed initiation reaction 173 Combination reactions 104, 270
Categorizing polymers 19 Component attributes
Chain about 20
initiation for ionic 255 aggregate polymer 34
initiation for Ziegler-Natta 237 available 3644
scission 269 calculation methods 47
termination 257 categories 35
Chain length class 0 34, 45
average properties 59 class 0 treatment in unit
distribution 20, 35, 5961, 65 operations 335
first moment 47 class 1 34
instantaneous weight distribution class 2 34, 4546, 313
63 class 2 treatment in unit
instanteous number-average 63 operations 335
weight-average 63 classes 34
zeroth moment 47 composite 35
Chain size 55 copolymer composition 33
Chain transfer degree of branching 33
dormant polymer formation 257 degree of cross-linking 33
ionic reactions 257 degree of polymerization 23, 33
spontaneous 239, 257 emulsion polymerization 218
to agent 239, 257 for aggregate polymers 40, 48
to cocatalysts 239 for blocks 52
to electron donor 239 for bulk polymers 47
to hydrogen 239 for catalysts 34, 44, 45
to monomer 179, 239, 257 for composite aggregate
to polymer 181 polymers 36
to small molecules 178, 239 for composite live polymers 35
to solvent 178, 239 for composite polymers 35
to transfer agent 178 for ionic initiators 33, 45
Chain-growth polymerization for live polymers 39, 48
bulk 85 for polymer properties 33
commercial polymers 84 for polymers 3536, 3637
comparison to step-growth 82 for site-based aggregate
emulsion 85 polymers 36, 43, 50
overview 83 for site-based bulk polymers 49
Index 509
for site-based live polymers 36, conventional 22
42, 49 databanks 387429
for site-based polymers 36, 40 defining 12
43 defining types 29
for site-based species 44 fortran utilities 360
for streams 52 input language 44751
for structural properties 33 ionic initiators 24
for Ziegler-Natta catalysts 33 naming 29, 447
free-radical polymerization 191 oligomers 23
initialization 46, 52 POLYMER databank 38791,
initialization scheme 47 38891
input language 45153 polymers 22
ionic polymerization 260 pure component databank 387
live polymer 34 segment approach 27
molecular architecture 33 SEGMENT databank 392429
molecular weight 33 segments 24
required 44, 47 site-based 24
scale factors 50 specifying 28
segment composition 33 specifying catalysts 44851
segment-based reaction model specifying oligomers 44851
273 specifying polymers 44851
sequence length 33 specifying step-growth 156
specifying 5153 Composition 8
specifying conventional 52 Condensation polymerization 81,
specifying conventional 126
attributes 451 Condensation reactions 103
specifying scale factors 53 Configuring
specifying scaling factors 453 Aspen Polymers 38182
step-growth polymerization 124 Consumption of radicals 6162
structural properties tracked 23 Continuous polymerization 92
types 35 Conventional components 22
unit operation model treatment Conventional species 268
33537 Convergence
user-specified 45 for RCSTR 308
Ziegler-Natta 44 improving 51
Ziegler-Natta polymerization 244 initialization options (RCSTR)
Component databanks 314
about 25 parameter tuning 354
for initiators 26 RBatch troubleshooting 33135
for PC-SAFT 26 RCSTR troubleshooting 31517
for polymers 11, 27 RPlug troubleshooting 32327
for POLYPCSF 26 scaling factors (RBatch) 332
for pure components 25 scaling factors (RCSTR) 313
for segments 11, 26 scaling factors (RPlug) 323
selecting 28 solver method (RBatch) 334
Components solver method (RPlug) 325
adding reacting 154 step size (RBatch) 334
catalysts 24 step size (RPlug) 325
categories 2125 troubleshooting data regression
characterizing 12 35355
510 Index
Conversion data verification 341
energy balance 311 features 294
Copolymer literature search 340, 341
density 78 model development 340, 343
Copolymerization 64 model refinement 341, 344
free-radical 16398 parameters 34243
ionic 24963 preliminary fit 340, 34243
ionic propagation 256 procedure 34044
user input for ionic model 254 trend analysis 341, 343
user input for Ziegler-Natta Data regression See also Data
model 236 fitting
Ziegler-Natta 22547 activation energy 356
Copolymers 16 base-case model 345
Coupling reactions 258 choosing parameters 355
CPE See Chlorinated polyethylene convergence problems 35355
Critical micelle concentration 201 data sets 345
Cross linking 270 defining cases 345, 351
Cross-link formation 184 entering data 345
Cross-linking 33, 35 entering operating conditions
Crystalline polymers 16 345
Crystallinity 8 flowsheet variables 37880
Custom fortran blocks 347
prop-sets 76 interpreting results 35253
Custom models See User models, manipulating variables 347
See User models point data 349
customer support 3 procedure 34044, 34558,
Cycle time 331 34558
Cyclodepolymerization reactions profile data 350
104 Prop-Sets 347
scaling fitted parameters 356
D sensitivity studies 355
sequencing cases 352
DAMP-FAC 311 standard deviation 351
Damping factor 311 troubleshooting 35355
Data tuning 354
collection 341 Databanks
defining regression cases 351 component 25, 387429
fitting 33940 functional group 11
interpreting regression results INITIATOR 26
352 PC-SAFT 26
literature search 340, 341 polymer 11
point 345 POLYMER 27, 38791
profile 345 POLYPCSF 26
regression 33940 pure component 25, 387
review 340 segment 11
sequencing regression cases 352 SEGMENT 26, 391429
trend analysis 341, 343 selecting 28
verification 341 Dead polymer 35
Data fitting See also Data Dead polymer chain 169
regression Dead sites 45
applications 339 Dead zones 308, 321
data collection 341 Defining
data review 340 additional simulation options 13
Index 511
components 12 plotting data 70
feed streams 13 plug flow reactors 66
flowsheet options 12 polymer 65
global simulation options 12 procedure 67
polymerization kinetics 13 specifying calculations 6971
property models 13 specifying characteristics 69
regression cases 351 streams 67
UOS model operating conditions structural property 5572
13 tracking 65
Degree of verification 68
branching 33, 55 Distribution calculations
cross-linking 33 specifying input language 454
polymerization 33, 57 Dupl
Density about 29698
as polymer property 8 attribute handling 336
function 5859 Duty
of copolymer 78 in RBatch 327
Depolymerization 269 in RCSTR 305
Design-spec block 377 in RPlug 318
Desorption 213 Dyads 35
Developing free-radical rate equation 187
models 12 Dynamic models 10, 13
Direct esterification 90
Displaying E
distribution data for reactors 70
distribution data for streams 70 EB-LOOP 311
distribution data tables 70 e-bulletins 3
Disproportionation 180 Editing
Distillation models emulsion reactions 221
about 301 free-radical reactions 195
available 296 ionic reactions 261
RadFrac 301 segment-based reactions 287
Distribution user step-growth reactions 159
average properties and moments Ziegler-Natta reactions 246
5859 Elastomers 16
calcuations 454 Electrophilic reactions 101
chain length 65 Emulsion polymerization
copolymerization 64 absorption 213
displaying data table 70 accessing model 219
displaying for reactors 70 activated initiation 211
displaying for streams 70 adding reactions 221
functions 56, 58 applications 199
GPC 67, 68 aqueous phase 208
in process models 58 assigning rate constants 221
kinetic reactors 65 attributes 218
method of instantaneous built-in reaction listing 220
properties 6064 chain growth 85
moment equation 187 desorption 213
moments 5859 editing reactions 221
particle size 21618 homogeneous nucleation 2046
512 Index
industrial processes 200 Energy balance conversion 311
input language 47784 Entering
kinetics 200215, 211 point data 349
kinetics scheme (figure) 204 profile data 350
latex 202 standard deviations 351
latex reactions 207 Equilibrium
micellar nucleation 2014 for ionic polymerization 258
model 199223 for Ziegler-Natta polymerization
model assumptions 215 243
model features 21518 phase 188
monomer partitioning 21516 reactions with counter-ion 256
nomenclature 208 reactor models 304
nucleation time 203 Equilibrium models
particle growth 201, 206 RGibbs 304
particle number 203 RYield 304
particle phase 210 Esterification
particle size distribution 21618 batch process 94
population balance equation 217 direct 90
products produced 200 operating conditions 93
properties calculated 218 results 91
radical balance 20711 secondary 91
rate constant 214 Estimating
rate of particle formation 206 property parameters 459
reactions 204 Ethylene
redox initiation 212 process types 227
seed process 206 Ethylene-propylene 226, 229
Smith-Ewart theory 211 Exchange reactions 256
specifying calculation options
222 F
specifying gel-effect 222
specifying model 219 Features 5, 913
specifying particle growth Feed streams
parameters 223 defining 13
specifying phase partitioning 222 with polymers 23, 46
specifying reacting species 220 Files
stage I (seed) 202 startup 382
stage II (growth) 202, 206 Fitting
stage III (finishing) 202 activation energy 356
user profiles 218 choosing parameters 355
End group reformation reactions Flash2
104 about 298
End-use properties attribute handling 336
about 7379 input variables 347
adding a Prop-Set 79 results variables 347
calculating 76, 79 Flash3
density of copolymer 78 about 298
input language 45456 attribute handling 336
intrinsic viscosity 77 input variables 347
melt index 78 results variables 347
melt index ratio 79 Flowsheeting options 11
relationship to structure 75 Flowsheets
selecting 79 basic unit operation models 295
zero-shear viscosity 77 calculation procedure 376
Index 513
calculator block 376 to enforce assumptions 347
design-spec block 377 to manipulate process variables
distillation models 296, 301 348
Dupl block 29698 to scale paramters 357
equilibrium reactor models 304 Fortran utilities
Flash2 block 298 component handling 360
Flash3 block 298 stream handling 360
fractionation models 296 Fractionation models 296
FSplit block 299 Free-radical iniators
Heater block 299 decomposition rate parameters
incorporating spreadsheets 376 43133
kinetic reactor models 30435 Free-radical polymerization
mass-balance reactor models accessing model 193
3024 adding reactions 194
Mixer block 299 applications 163
model configuration tools 376 beta-scission reactions 183
78 bifunctonal initiator
Mult block 299 decomposition reaction 174,
optimization 377 175
Pipe block 300 branching 192
polymer process 293 built-in reaction listing 194
process studies 37678 bulk 164
Pump block 300 bulk polymer chain length
RadFrac block 301 moment equation 187
RBatch block 32735 calculation method 185
RCSTR block 30417 catalyzed initiation reaction 173
reactor models 296, 302 chain transfer reactions 178
REquil block 304 dyads 187
RGibbs block 304 editing reactions 195
RPlug block 31727 gel effect 170
RStoic block 302 gel effect 18889
RYield block 303 induced initiation reaction 173
sensitivity study 377 industrial processes 164
Sep block 301 initiation reactions 171
Sep2 block 301 initiator decomposition reaction
setting fixed variables 377 172
steady-state 29194 input language 46777
stream manipulators 295 kinetics 16583
unit operation models 295338 kinetics nomenclature 166
variables 37880 kinetics scheme (figure) 165
variables for data regression live polymer chain length
37880 moment equation 186
Fortran model 16398
arguments 445 model assumptions 18590
linking 383 model features 18590
monitors 360 modifying the rate expression
templates 383 170
utilities 360, 445 moment-property relationship
Fortran blocks equation 191
in data regression 347 parameters 19093
514 Index
pendent double bond help desk 3
polymerization 184 Heterogeneous catalysts 226
phase equilibrium 188 High density polyethylene
propagation reactions 176 about 225
properties calculated 19093 processes 227
quasi-steady-state High impact polypropylene 229
approximation 188 HIPP See High impact
rate constant 170 polypropylene
reactions 165 Hold-up
solution 164 in RCSTR 305
specifying calculation options Homogeneous catalysts 226
196 Homogeneous nucleation
specifying gel-effect 196 particle formation 201
specifying model 193 process 2046
specifying reacting species 194 rate of particle formation 206
specifying reactions 195 Homopolymers 15
specifying user profiles 197
structural properties 192 I
termination reactions 17879
user profile properties 192 INCL-COMPS 154
Frequency function 5859 Induced initiation reaction 173
FSplit Industrial applications
about 299 polymer production steps 291
attribute handling 336 93
Functional group databank 11 polymer production steps
(figure) 291
Industrial processes
G
emulsion polymerization 200
Gas-phase process 227 free-radical polymerization 164
Gear integrator 323, 332 ionic polymerization 250
Gel effect model uses 375
built-in correlations 189 segment-based reaction model
free-radical 170 266
free-radical polymerization 188 step-growth polymerization 90
89 Ziegler-Natta polymerization 226
specifying 196, 222 Inhibited sites 231
user specified correlations 189 Inhibition
user subroutine arguments 189 catalyst sites 45, 240
Gel effect subroutine Initators
free-radical 170 for ionic polymerization 254
Gel permeation chromatography 67 Initialization
Generation of radicals 61 hybrid option 315
Glycol recovery 91 integration option 314
GPC 67 options for RCSTR 314
solver option 314
H Initiation
activated 211
HDPE See High density catalyzed 171
polyethylene decomposition rate 171
Heat exchangers 307 free-radical 172, 174, 175
Heater free-radical polymerization 171
about 299 induced 171
attribute handling 337 ionic 45, 251
Index 515
reaction for catalyzed 173 weight chain length 6364
reaction for decomposition 172 Interfacial processes 84
reaction for induced 173 Intermolecular reactions 103
redox 212 Intramolecular reactions 103
INITIATOR databank Intrinsic viscosity 77
about 26 Ionic initiator 24
Initiators Ionic initiators
databank 26 component attributes 33
free-radical 43133 properties tracked 45
ionic 24 Ionic polymerization
Injection ports 322 accessing model 260
Input language active species formation 254
attribute scaling factors 453 adding reactions 261
catalysts 44851 aggregation 256
component attributes 45153 applications 249
components 44751 assigning rate constants 262
conventional component association 256
attributes 451 built-in reaction listing 261
distribution calculations 454 chain initiation 255
emulsion 47784 chain termination 257
end-use properties 45456 chain transfer 257
for Aspen Polymers 447504 comparison to other addition
free-radical 46777 processes 250
ionic 494501 copolymerization steps 254, 256
oligomers 44851 coupling 258
physical properties 45660 editing reactions 261
polymers 44851 equilibrium with counter-ion 256
property data 458 exchange 256
property methods 456 industrial processes 250
property parameter estimation initiator attributes 251
459 initiator types 254
prop-set 45456 input language 494501
segment-based reactions 5015 kinetics scheme 25058
step-growth 46067 kinetics scheme (figure) 252
streams 451 model 24963
Ziegler-Natta 48493 model assumptions 25859
Input variables model features 25859
Flash2 347 nomenclature 253
Flash3 347 phase equilibria 258
MultiFrac 347 polymers tracked 251
RadFrac 347 propagation 255
RBatch 346 properties calculated 25960
RCSTR 346 rate calculations 258
RPlug 347 rate constants 254
standard deviations 351 reactions 252
Installing specifying model 260
Aspen Polymers 382 specifying reacting species 260
Instantaneous
number-average 63
properties 58, 6064, 65
516 Index
K L
Kinetic models Latex
RBatch 32735 definition 202
RCSTR 30417 number of particles per liter 203
RPlug 31727 reactions 207
Kinetics Linear condensation polymers 57
data fitting 33940 Linear low density polyethylene
decomposition rate parameters about 225
43133 processes 227, 228
defining polymerization 13 Linking
emulsion (input language) 477 fortran 383
84 Liquid enthalpy
emulsion polymerization 200 user subroutine (example) 371
215, 211 Liquid process 228
free-radical (input language) Live
46777 polymer chain 169
free-radical polymerization 165 polymer chain length moment
83 equation 186
ionic (input language) 494501 Live polymer 34, 35
ionic polymerization 25058 LLDPE See Linear low density
mechanisms 10 polyethylene
melt polycarbonate 12224 Local work arrays 155, 284
multi-site 65, 66 Low density polyethylene 164
nylon reactions 11122 Low molecular weight polymer 57
parameter influence on 342
polyester reactions 10511 M
polymerization 81
rate constant parameters 431 Mass balance 311
44 Mass-balance models
reactor models 30435 RStoic 302
segment-based reaction model RYield 303
270 Material streams 46
single-site 65, 66 MB-LOOP 311
specifying emulsion 21923 Melt index 8, 78
specifying free-radical 19397 Melt index ratio 79
specifying ionic 26062 Melt polycarbonate
specifying step-growth 5153 rate constants 123
specifying step-growth (input reaction components 122
language) 46067 reaction kinetics 12224
specifying Ziegler-Natta 24447 step-growth reactions 123
step-growth polymerization 101 Melt-phase
24 nylon-6,6 processes 122
user fortran arguments 445 polymerization 100
user models 36569 processes 84
user subroutine (example) 366 Metallocene catalysts 226
user subroutines 149 Method of instantaneous properties
Ziegler-Natta (input language) 58, 6064, 65
48493 Method of moments 58, 185
Ziegler-Natta polymerization Methylmethacrylate 199
23042 Micellar nucleation 2014
MIXED
substream variables 380
Mixer
Index 517
about 299 Moments of chain length
attribute handling 337 distribution
Mixing first 39, 47
non-ideal in RCSTR 306 Monomers
non-ideal in RPlug 320 corresponding segment formulas
Modeling 127
applications 89, 163, 199, 225, definition 15
249, 265 functional groups 129
data fitting 294, 33940 partitioning 21516
enforcing assumptions 347 purification 292
features 294 synthesis 29293, 292
nylon 96100 Most-probable distribution 57, 114,
nylon-6,6 116 120, 131
polycarbonates 100101 Mult
polyesters 9096 about 299
polymer phase change 303 attribute handling 336
polymer processes 293 MultiFrac
steady-state 29194 attribute handling 337
tools 294 input variables 347
unit operations 294, 295338 results variables 347
Models Multimodal distributions 56
accessing variables 37880
analysis tools 37678 N
application tools 37580
base case 345 Newton solver 311
calculations for user models Nomenclature
36065 for emulsion model 208
defining 12 for free-radical model 166
developing 340, 343 for ionic model 253
parameter fitting 34243 for segment-based reaction
possible uses 375 model 271
process studies 37678 for step-growth model 103
refining 341, 344 for Ziegler-Natta model 234
structure for user models 359 POLYMER databank 38891
trend analysis 341, 343 SEGMENT databank 391
unit operation 11 Nucleation
user 35973 homogeneous 201, 2046
USER2 routine 362 micellar 2014
Molecular structure period 202
SEGMENT databank 392429 time 202
Molecular weight time (equation) 203
as component attribute 33 Nucleophilic reactions
distribution 8, 58 about 101
number-average 78 nomenclature 103
weight-average 35, 78 Number average
Moment equations chain length distribution 63
bulk polymer 187 degree of polymerization 57
general 186 Number-average
live polymer 186 degree of polymerization 35
relationship to properties 191 Nylon
518 Index
aqueous salt solutions 98 Particle growth
melt-phase polymerization 100 in emulsion polymerization 206
production process 96100 specifying parameters 223
salt preparation 98 PBT See Polybutylene
Nylon-6 terephthalate
production process 96 PC-SAFT
rate constants 113 databank 26
reaction components 112 PC-SAFT databank
reaction kinetics 111 about 26
step-growth reactions 112 PEN See Polyethylene naphthalate
user-specified reactions 113 Pendent double bond
Nylon-6,6 polymerization 184
melt-phase polymerization 122 PET See Polyethylene terephthalate
modeling approaches 116 Phase equilibria
production process 98 ionic polymerization 258
rate constants 118, 119 step-growth polymerization 126
reaction components 116 Ziegler-Natta polymerization 243
reaction kinetics 115 Phase equilibrium
step-growth reactions 117 free-radical polymerization 188
user-specified reactions 119 Phase partitioning
specifying 222
O Physical properties
calculations in user models 364
Occupied sites 45 fitting parameters 34243
Oligomers input language 45660
as components 23 user models 37073
definition 15 user subroutine (example) 371
fractionation 131 Pipe 300
segments 24 Plant data fitting 33940
specifying 30 Plot
Optimization 377 distribution data 70
Orienticity 35 PMMA See Polymethyl
methacrylate
P Point data
about 345
Packed vectors 155, 284
entering 349
Parameters
Polyamides 90
data fitting 33940
Polybutadiene 249
decomposition rate 43133
Polybutene 249
estimating property 459
Polybutylene terephthalate 95
fitting 340, 34243
Polycarbonates
for free-radical polymerization
aliphatic 89
19093
aromatic 89
influence of kinetics 342
production process 100101
integer 154, 284
reaction kinetics 12224
kinetic rate constant 43144
Polydispersity
POLYMER property 387
index 63
real 154, 284
Polyesters
scaling 356
assigning rate constants 109
SEGMENT property 391
polyester technology package 95
to manipulate process variables
production process 9096
348
reaction components 106
tuning for data regression 354
reaction kinetics 10511
Index 519
side reactions 109 aggregate 34, 35
step-growth reactions 108 aliphatic polycarbonates 89
user-specified reactions 110 amorphous 16
Polyethylene aromatic polycarbonates 89
chlorinated 265 as components 23
low density 164 average properties and moments
Polyethylene naphthalate 95 5859
Polyethylene terephthalate branched 16
batch processes 9395 bulk polymer chain length
continuous step-growth moment equation 187
polymerization 9093 butadiene 199
solid-state models 96 butyl acrylate 199
Polyisobutylene 249, 265 butyl methacrylate 199
Polymer chain by chemical structure 18
bulk 169 by physical structure 16
dead 169 by property 18
definition 169 chain-growth 84
live 169 characterizing 19
POLYMER databank chlorinated polyethylene 265
about 11, 27, 387 chloroprene 199
components 38891 component attribute sets 3536
nomenclature 38891 component attributes 33, 35
Polymerization component characterization 10
addition 81 crystalline 16
bulk 85 data fitting procedure 34044
chain-growth 82, 83 data regression procedure 345
condensation 81 58
condensation polymerization 126 dead 35
continuous 92 definition 6
degree of 33 elastomers 16
emulsion 85, 199223 emulsion properties calculated
free-radical 16398 218
interfacial 84 end-use properties 7379
ionic 24963 ethylene-propylene 226
kinetics 10, 13, 81 free-radical properties calculated
manufacturing step 293 19093
melt phase 84 high density polyethylene 225
precipitation 85 high-impact polystyrene 163
process overview 67 ionic properties calculated 259
process types 84 60
reaction types 81 ladder 16
reactions 81 linear 16
solid-state 84 linear condensation 57
solution 84, 85 linear low density polyethylene
step-growth 82, 83, 89162 225
suspension 85 live 34, 35
Ziegler-Natta 22547 live polymer chain length
Polymers moment equation 186
acrylic acid 199 low density polyethylene 164
addition 57 low molecular weight 57
520 Index
mass 124, 273 tracking structural properties 33
method of instantaneous vinyl chloride 199
properties 58, 60, 65 vinylacetate 199
method of moments 58 Ziegler-Natta properties
methylmethacrylate 199 calculated 243
mole fraction 272 Polymethyl methacrylate 164, 265
monomer purification 292 Polyoxides 249
monomer synthesis 29293, 292 POLYPCSF
network 16 databank 26
nomenclature 38891 POLYPCSF databank
phase change 303 about 26
polyamides 90 Polypropylene
polybutadiene 249 about 226
polybutene 249 process types 228
polyesters 90 Polypropylene terephthalate 95
polyisobutylene 249, 265 Polystyrene 163, 164, 249
polymerization step 293 Polyurethanes 90
polymethyl methacrylate 164, Polyvinyl acetate 163
265 Polyvinyl alcohol 164, 265
polyoxides 249 Polyvinyl chloride 163
polypropylene 226 Population balance
polystyrene 163, 164, 249 equation for emulsion
polyurethanes 90 polymerization 217
polyvinyl acetate 163 equation for free-radical
polyvinyl alcohol 164, 265 polymerization 185
polyvinyl chloride 163 Potential sites 44
processing 67 Power-law reaction model See
processing step 293 Segment-based reaction
production rate 63 model:about
production steps 29193 PPT See Polyproylene terephthalate
properties 19 Precipitation polymerization 85
properties tracked 35 Pressure
property distributions 5572 drop 305, 319
property parameters 387 in RBatch 328
prop-sets 74 in RCSTR 305
purification 29293 in RPlug 319
reacting 266 Process modeling
recovery 9, 293 data fitting 294
segment-based properties dynamic 10, 13
calculated 273 features 294
segments 24, 391 flowsheets for polymer processes
separation 9, 293 293
specifying 29 issues for polymers 79
star 16 steady-state 10, 13, 29194
step-growth 83 tools 294
structural properties 23 unit operations 294
structure 15 Processing
structure of 1519 polymers 293
styrene 199 Profile data
synthesis 293 about 345
tetrafluroethylene 199 data sets 350
thermoplastics 16 entering 350
thermosets 16 RBatch 350
Index 521
RPlug 350 Property methods
Propagation input language 456
depolymerization 269 Property parameter databanks 11
free-radical polymerization 176 Property set See also Prop-Sets
ionic polymerization 255 Prop-Sets
segment-based reaction model adding 79
270 custom 76
sites 231 defining 74
Ziegler-Natta polymerization 238 for data regression 347
Properties for polymers 74
average polymer 5859 properties 73
branching 23 uses 73
chain size 55 Propylene
composition 8 processes 228, 229
copolymer composition 23, 55 Pseudocondensation reactions 103
copolymerization 64 Pump 300
crystallinity/density 8 Pure components
degree of branching 55 databank 25, 387
degree of polymerization 23 Purification
density of copolymer 78 monomer 292
end-use 7379 process step 29293
estimating parameters 459 PVA See Polyvinyl alcohol
for polymers 58
input language 45660 Q
intrinsic viscosity 77
melt index 8, 78 QSSA See Quasi-steady-state
melt index ratio 79 approximation
method of instantaneous 60 Quasi-steady-state approximation
molecular structure 23 188
molecular weight 23
molecular weight 8 R
moments of molecular weight
RadFrac
distribution 23
about 301
particle size 55
attribute handling 337
polymer structural 33, 55
input variables 347
prop-set 73
results variables 347
segment composition 23
Radiation initiation reaction 173
specifying data 458
Radicals
viscosity 8
absorption 210
zero-shear viscosity 77
balance 20711
Property distributions
consumption of 6162
bimodal 56
depletion 208
bivariate 55
desorption 210
most-probable 57
generation 208
multimodal 56
generation of 61
Schulz-Flory 56
rate of production 208
Stockmayer bivariate 58
termination 210
structural 5572
Random scission 104
types 55
Rate constant parameters
unimodal 56
data-fitting 294
522 Index
Rate constants troubleshooting convergence
assigning to emulsion reactions 33135
221 volume 329
assigning to ionic reactions 262 RCSTR
assigning to step-growth about 30417
reactions 158, 159 algorithm 308
assigning to Ziegler-Natta attribute handling 337
reactions 246 calculation loops 309
data fitting 339 calculation table 309
emulsion 214 common problems 316
for melt polycarbonate 123 component scaling 313
for model generated reactions condensed phases 305
135 convergence 308
for nylon-6 113 duty 305
for nylon-6,6 118, 119 effective hold-up 305
for polyesters 109 external heat exchanger 307
for user-specified reactions 139, horizontal partition 306
288 hybrid initialization 315
free-radical 170 initialization options 314
ionic 254 input variables 346
kinetic parameters 43144 integration initialization 314
segment-based 270 multiphase 305
specifying for segment-based non-ideal mixing 306
power-law reactions 288 pressure 305
specifying for step-growth user residence time 305
reactions 159 results variables 346
step-growth 153 scaling options 313
user subroutines 144, 279 single-phases 305
Ziegler-Natta 236 solver initialization 314
Rate expression substream scaling 313
step-growth 133, 138 temperature 305
RBatch troubleshooting convergence
about 32735 31517
attribute handling 337 vertical partition 307
batch reactors 330 with dead zone 308
common problems 335 Reacting phase
cycle time 331 specifying for segment-based
duty 327 power-law model 286
dynamic scaling 332 specifying for step-growth 160
hybrid scaling options 333 Reacting polymers 266
input variables 346 Reaction models
pressure 328 Aspen Plus 86, 35965
profile data 350 available 35965
residence time 329 basic unit operation 295
results variables 346 built-in 85
scaling options 332 custom 86
semi-batch reactors 330 distillation 296, 301
solver method 334 Dupl 29698
specifying user profiles 197 equilibrium 304
static scaling options 332 Flash2 298
step size 334 Flash3 298
streams 330 fractionation 296
temperature 327 FSplit 299
Index 523
generic 86 catalyst site activation 237
Heater 299 catalyzed initiation 171, 173
kinetic 30435 chain initiation (free-radical 171
mass-balance 3024 chain initiation (ionic) 255
Mixer 299 chain initiation (Ziegler-Natta)
Mult 299 237
Pipe 300 chain scission 269
Pump 300 chain termination (free-radical)
RadFrac 301 17879
RBatch 32735 chain termination (ionic) 257
RCSTR 30417 chain transfer (free-radical) 178
reactor 296, 302 chain transfer (ionic) 257
REquil 304 chain transfer (Ziegler-Natta)
RGibbs 304 239
RPlug 31727 chain-growth 83
RStoic 302 classifying 81
RYield 303 cocatalyst poisoning 240
Sep 301 combination 104, 270
Sep2 301 condensation 103
stream manipulators 295 conventional species 268
treatment of component coupling 258
attributes 33537 cross linking 270
Reactions cyclodepolymerization 104
active species 254 depolymerization 269
adding emulsion 221 editing emulsion 221
adding free-radical 194 editing free-radical 195
adding ionic 261 editing ionic 261
adding segment-based 287 editing segment-based 287
adding user 159 editing user 159
adding Ziegler-Natta 246 editing Ziegler-Natta 246
addition 103 electrophilic 101
aggregation 256 emulsion polymerization 204
assigning emulsion rate end group reformation 104
constants 221 equilibrium with counter-ion 256
assigning ionic rate constants exchange 256
262 for step-growth polymerization
assigning step-growth rate 126
constants 158 free-radical polymerization 165
assigning user rate constants homogeneous nucleation 204
159 including user 158
assigning Ziegler-Natta rate induced initiation 171, 173
constants 246 Inhibition 181
association 256 initiator decomposition 171, 172
backbone 269 intermolecular 103
beta-scission 183 intramolecular 103
bifunctional initiator ionic polymerization 252
decomposition 174, 175 latex 207
branching (segment-based) 270 melt polycarbonate kinetics 122
branching (Ziegler-Natta) 240 24
catalyst preactivation 237 micellar nucleation 201
524 Index
micellar nucleation (figure) 202 types affecting catalyst states
modification See Segment-based 230
reaction model user-specified step-growth 138
nucleophilic 101 40
nylon-6 kinetics 111 viewing emulsion 220
nylon-6,6 kinetics 115 viewing free-radical 194
particle growth 206 viewing ionic 261
polyester kinetics 10511 viewing segment-based 287
polymerization 81 viewing step-growth 157
propagation (free-radical) 176 viewing Ziegler-Natta 245
propagation (ionic) 255 Ziegler-Natta polymerization 232
propagation (segment-based) Reactor models
270 about 302
propagation (Ziegler-Natta) 238 available 296
pseudocondensation 103 data sets 350
radiation initiation 173 equilibrium 304
radical balance 207 input variables 346
rearrangement 104 kinetic 30435
reverse condensation 103 mass-balance 3024
ring addition 104 results variables 346
ring closing 104 Reactors
ring opening 104 condensed phase RCSTR 305
side group 269 convergence problems for
site deactivation 239 RBatch 33135
site inhibition 240 convergence problems for RCSTR
specifying segment-based 285 31517
89 convergence problems for RPlug
specifying user rate constants 32327
159 displaying distribution data 70
spontaneous initiation 173 distribution 65
step-growth 83 horizontal partition 306
step-growth functional groups multiphase RCSTR 305
128 multiphase RPlug 320
step-growth polymerization 104 RCSTR algorithm 308
step-growth rate constants 157 single-phase RCSTR 305
58 vertical partition 307
supplied by emulsion model 215 with dead zones 308, 321
18 with external heat exchanger
supplied by free-radical model 307
18590 with injection ports 322
supplied by ionic model 258 Rearrangement reactions 104
supplied by segment-based Recovery/separation 9, 293
model 273 Redox initiation 212
supplied by step-growth model Regression See Data regression
13337 Reports
supplied by Ziegler-Natta model for user models 365
243 step-growth options 160
terminal double bond 240 REquil
termination (free-radical) 178 about 304
79 attribute handling 337
termination (ionic) 257 Residence time
thermal initiation 173 RBatch 329
RCSTR 305
Index 525
RPlug 319 about 303
Results variables RYield
Flash2 347 attribute handling 337
Flash3 347
MultiFrac 347 S
RadFrac 347
RBatch 346 Salt
RCSTR 346 aqueous solutions 98
RPlug 347 preparation 98
standard deviations 351 Scale factors
Reverse condensation reactions about 50
103 specifying 53
Rgibbs Scaling
about 304 factors 453
RGibbs Scaling factors
attribute handling 337 component (RCSTR) 313
Ring addition reactions 104 dynamic (RBatch) 332
Ring closing reactions 104 dynamic (RPlug) 323
Ring opening reactions 104 hybrid (RBatch) 333
Routines hybrid (RPlug) 325
USER2 362 RBatch 332
RPlug RCSTR 313
about 31727 RPlug 323
attribute handling 337 static (RBatch) 332
common problems 326 static (RPlug) 323
duty 318 substream (RCSTR) 313
dynamic scaling 323 Schulz-Flory distribution 56
hybrid scaling 325 Scission 104, 269
input variables 347 Secondary esterification 91
multiphase 320 Seed process 206
non-ideal mixing 320 Segment approach 27
pressure 319 SEGMENT databank
profile data 350 about 11, 26, 391
residence time 319 components 392429
results variables 347 nomenclature 391
scaling options 323 Segment flow 35
solver method 325 Segment fraction 35
specifying user profiles 197 Segment-based model
static scaling options 323 assigning rate constants 288
step size 325 including user rate constant
temperature 318 subroutine 289
troubleshooting convergence Segment-based power-law model
32327 specifying reacting phase 286
with dead zone 321 user subroutines 27484
with injection ports 322 Segment-based reaction model
Rstoic about 26590
about 302 accessing 285
RStoic adding reaction schemes 287
attribute handling 337 adding reactions 287
Ryield applications 265
526 Index
assumptions 272 attribute handling 336
backbone modifications 269 Separation/recovery 9, 293
branch formation 270 Side group modifications 269
chain scission 269 Simulations
combination 270 dynamic 10
conventional species 268 templates 382
cross linking 270 Site activation 237
depolymerization 269 Site deactivation 239
editing reactions 287 Site inhibition 240
features 272 Site-based components
including user basis subroutine about 24
289 attributes 44
industrial processes 266 specifying 30
input language 5015 Slurry process 227, 228
kinetics 270 Smith-Ewart theory 211
mole fraction conversion 272 Solid-state models 96
nomenclature 271 Solid-state processes 84
propagation 270 Solution polymerization 85, 164
properties calculated 273 Solution process 227
rate calculations 273 Solution processes 84
rate constants 270 Solver methods
reaction categories 26772 RBatch 334
reactions allowed 26772 RPlug 325
side group modifications 269 Specifying
specifying model 285 additional simulation options 13
specifying pre-exponential units Aspen Polymers options 38182
288 attribute scaling factors (input
specifying rate constants 288 language) 453
specifying reaction settings 285 catalysts 44851
Segments component attributes 5153
composition 15, 33 component attributes (input
copolymers 16 language) 45153
definition 24 component attributes in blocks
homopolymers 15 52
methodology in Aspen Polymers component attributes in streams
27 52
mole fraction 272 component names 447
molecular structure 392429 components 12, 28
nomenclature 391 components (input language)
property parameters 391 44751
sequence 15 conventional component
specifying 29 attributes 52, 451
structure 15 data fit 34044
types 24 data regression 34558
Semi-batch reactors 330 databanks 28
Semi-crystalline copolymer density distribution calculations 6971
78 distribution calculations (input
Sensitivity blocks 377 language) 454
Sep distribution characteristics 69
about 301 emulsion calculation options 222
attribute handling 336 emulsion kinetics 21923
Sep2 emulsion kinetics (input
about 301 language) 47784
Index 527
emulsion model 219 segments 29
emulsion rate constants 221 site-based components 30
emulsion reacting species 220 standard deviations 351
end-use properties 79 step-growth components 156
end-use properties (input step-growth kinetics 5153
language) 45456 step-growth kinetics (input
feed streams 13 language) 46067
fixed process variables 377 step-growth model 156
flowsheet options 12 step-growth rate constants 157
free-radical calculation options 58, 158, 159
196 step-growth reacting phase 160
free-radical kinetics 19397 step-growth report options 160
free-radical kinetics (input stream attributes 451
language) 46777 UOS model operating conditions
free-radical model 193 13
free-radical reacting species 194 user models 35973
gel-effect 196, 222 user profiles 197
global simulation options 12 user step-growth reactions 158
ionic kinetics 26062 Ziegler-Natta kinetics 24447
ionic kinetics (input language) Ziegler-Natta kinetics (input
494501 language) 48493
ionic model 260 Ziegler-Natta model 244
ionic rate constants 262 Ziegler-Natta rate constants 246
ionic reacting species 260 Ziegler-Natta reacting species
oligomers 30, 44851 245
particle growth parameters 223 Spontaneous initiation reaction 173
phase partitioning 222 Spreadsheets
physical properties (input incorporating in flowsheets 376
language) 45660 SSplit
point data 349 attribute handling 336
polymerization kinetics 13 Standard deviations 351
polymers 29, 44851 Starting
pre-exponential units 160, 288 Aspen Polymers 38182
profile data 350 Startup files 382
property data 458 Steady-state models
property models 13 data fitting 294
reacting phase 286 features 294
regression cases 351 flowsheeting 29194
scale factors 53 tools 294
segment-based reaction model unit operation 295338
285 unit operations 294
segment-based reaction rate Step-growth polymerization
constants 288 accessing model 155
segment-based reaction scheme adding user reactions 159
287 addition processes 266
segment-based reaction settings applications 89
285 Aspen PolyQuest 96
segment-based reactions 28589 assigning rate constants 135,
segment-based reactions (input 139, 158, 159
language) 5015 batch PET 9395
528 Index
built-in reaction listing 157 solution 84
commercial polymers 83 specifying components 156
comparison to chain-growth 82 specifying model 156
continuous PET 9093 specifying pre-exponential units
editing user reactions 159 160
electrophilic reactions 101 specifying rate constants 157
functional groups 128, 129 58, 159
including user basis subroutine specifying reacting phase 160
161 specifying report options 160
including user kinetic subroutine specifying subroutines 161
161 user reactions 138
including user rate constant user subroutines 14055
subroutine 161 Stockmayer bivariate distribution
including user reactions 158 58
industrial processes 90 Stoichiometry
input language 46067 step-growth 132
interfacial 84 Streams
kinetics 10124 continuous batch charge 330
melt phase 84 defining feed 13
melt polycarbonate reaction displaying distribution data 70
kinetics 12224 distributions 67
model 89162 initializing attributes 451
model features 12427 manipulating 295
model predictions 124 MIXED variables 380
model structure 12755 processing in user models 361
model-generated reactions 133 RBatch 330
37 time-averaged continuous
nomenclature 103 reactor product 331
nucleophilic reactions 101 time-averaged continuous vent
nylon 96100 product 331
nylon-6 reaction kinetics 111 time-varying continuous feed
nylon-6,6 reaction kinetics 115 330
oligomer fractionation 131 variables for data regression 346
overview 83 Structure
PBT 95 of components 22
PEN 95 of monomers 15
phase equilibria 126 of oligomers 15, 23
polycarbonates 100101 of polymers 1519, 19, 23
polyester reaction kinetics 105 of segments 15, 24
11 propertyend-use relationship 75
polyester technology package 95 Styrene 199
polyesters 9096 Subroutines
PPT 95 fortran arguments 445
rate constants 122, 133, 153 including user basis 161, 289
rate constants example 153 including user kinetic 161
rate expression 133, 138 including user rate constant 161,
reacting groups 127 289
reacting species 127, 130 local work arrays 155, 284
reaction mechanism 126 updating component list 154
reaction stoichiometry 132 user 14055, 27484
reactions 104 user basis 140, 272, 275
solid-state 84 user forms 156
solid-state models 96 user gel effect 189
Index 529
user kinetic (example) 366 convergence (RCSTR) 31517
user kinetics 149 convergence (RPlug) 32327
user property (example) 371 data regression convergence
user rate constant 144, 279 35355
support, technical 3 diagnostic messages 365
Suspension polymerization 85 RBatch common problems 335
Synthesis RCSTR common problems 316
monomer 292 RPlug common problems 326
polymer 293 simulation engine 385
user interface 383
T
U
tacticity 35
TDB See Terminal double bond Unimodal distributions 56
technical support 3 Unit operation models 11
Temperature Unit operations
in RBatch 327 Aspen Plus models 35965
in RCSTR 305 available models 35965
in RPlug 318 basic models 295
Templates calculations 364
custom 382 diagnostics 365
fortran 383 distillation models 296, 301
simulation 382 Dupl 29698
Terminal double bond reactions equilibrium reactor models 304
240 features 294
terminal double bonds 35 Flash2 298
Terminal models Flash3 298
free-radical 169 fractionation models 296
Ziegler-Natta 236 FSplit 299
Terminal monomer loss 104 Heater 299
Termination input variables 346
between chain radicals 181 kinetic reactor models 30435
bimolecular 181 mass-balance reactor models
by combination 180 3024
disproportionation 180 Mixer 299
free-radical polymerization 178 Mult 299
79 Pipe 300
inhibition 181 property calculations 364
Tetrafluroethylene 199 Pump 300
Thermal initiation reaction 173 RadFrac 301
Thermoplastics 16 RBatch 32735
Thermosets 16 RCSTR 30417
Tips reactor models 296, 302
configuration 382 reports 365
data regression 35355 REquil 304
Transesterification 92 results variables 346
Trommsdorff effect 188 RGibbs 304
Troubleshooting RPlug 31727
Aspen Polymers 38386 RStoic 302
convergence (RBatch) 33135 RYield 303
530 Index
Sep 301 fortran linking 383
Sep2 301 User subroutines
steady-state models 295338 segment-based power-law model
stream processing 361 27484
treatment of component step-growth polymerization 140
attributes 33537 55
user model calculations 36065 USER2
user model structure 359 about 359
user models 35965 model routine 362
variables for data regression 346
USER 359, 365 V
User attributes
properties tracked 45 Vacant sites 44, 231
User fortran Variables
arguments 445 accessing flowsheet 37880
linking 383 indirect manipulation 347
templates 383 input 346, 349, 350
User models results 346, 349, 350
about 35973 standard deviations 351
calculations 36065 Vectors
component list 154 packed 155, 284
diagnostics calculations 365 Viewing
integer parameters 154, 284 emulsion reactions 220
kinetic 36569 flowsheet variables 37880
packed vectors 155, 284 free-radical reactions 194
physical property 37073 ionic reactions 261
property calculations 364 segment-based reactions 287
real parameters 154, 284 step-growth reactions 157
reports 365 Ziegler-Natta reactions 245
stream processing 361 Vinyl chloride 199
structure 359 Vinylacetate 199
unit operation 35965 Viscosity
unit operation calculations 364 as polymer property 8
USER block 359 intrinsic 77
USER2 block 359 zero-shear 77
User profiles Volume
for emulsion polymerization 218 in RBatch 329
specifying 197
User prop-sets 76 W
User reactions
web site, technical support 3
adding step-growth 159
Weight average
assigning rate constants for
chain length 63
step-growth 159
degree of polymerization 57
editing step-growth 159
for polyesters 110
nylon-6 113 Z
nylon-6,6 119 Z-average
specifying rate constants for degree of polymerization 57
step-growth 159 Z-average degree of
specifying step-growth 158 polymerization 35
step-growth polymerization 138 Zero-shear viscosity 77
40 Ziegler-Natta
User routines component attributes 44
Index 531
Ziegler-Natta catalysts site inhibition 240
about 24 site types 231
attributes 44 slurry process 227, 228
component attributes 33 solution process 227
dead sites 45 specifying model 244
inhibited sites 45 specifying reacting species 245
occupied sites 45 steps 235
potential sites 44 terminal double bond 240
properties tracked 44
specifying 24
vacant sites 44
Ziegler-Natta polymerization
accessing model 244
adding reactions 246
applications 225
assigning rate constants 246
built-in reaction listing 245
catalyst preactivation 237
catalyst reactions 230
catalyst site activation 237
catalyst states 230
catalyst types 226
chain initiation 237
chain transfer to small molecules
239
cocatalyst poisoning 240
copolymerization steps 236
editing reactions 246
ethylene processes 227
gas-phase process 227, 228
industrial processes 226
input language 48493
kinetics scheme 23042
kinetics scheme (figure) 232
liquid process 228
model 22547
model assumptions 243
model features 243
nomenclature 234
phase equilibria 243
polyethylene processes 227
polypropylene process types 228
propagation 238
properties calculated 243
propylene processes 228, 229
rate calculations 243
rate constants 236
rate expressions 236
reactions 232
site deactivation 239
532 Index