Conceptual Problems: Sustainable Design (Also Called
Conceptual Problems: Sustainable Design (Also Called
Conceptual Problems: Sustainable Design (Also Called
environmentally conscious design, etc.) is the philosophy of designing physical objects, the built
environment, and services to comply with the principles of social, economic, and ecological
sustainabilityThe intention of sustainable design is to "eliminate negative environmental impact completely
through skillful, sensitive design".[1] Manifestations of sustainable design require renewable resources, impact
the environment minimally, and connect people with the natural environment.
Great design is sustainable design: Rather than considering green building design as an externality, architects
must think about it as a set of principles for great design. This includes better user experience and comfort,
doing more with less to enable the building to easily achieve peak performance, and maximizing the effectives
of durable, quality materials. Rather than the well-known edict form follows function, its time to think form
follows environment. [2]
Beyond the "elimination of negative environmental impact", sustainable design must create projects that are
meaningful innovations that can shift behaviour. A dynamic balance between economy and society, intended to
generate long-term relationships between user and object/service and finally to be respectful and mindful of the
environmental and social differences.[3]
Conceptual problems
Diminishing returns
The principle that all directions of progress run out, ending with diminishing returns, is evident in the typical 'S'
curve of the technology life cycle and in the useful life of any system as discussed in industrial ecology and life
cycle assessment. Diminishing returns are the result of reaching natural limits. Common business management
practice is to read diminishing returns in any direction of effort as an indication of diminishing opportunity, the
potential for accelerating decline and a signal to seek new opportunities elsewhere.[citation needed] (see also: law of
diminishing returns, marginal utility and Jevons paradox.)
Unsustainable investment
A problem arises when the limits of a resource are hard to see, so increasing investment in response to
diminishing returns may seem profitable as in the Tragedy of the Commons, but may lead to a collapse. This
problem of increasing investment in diminishing resources has also been studied in relation to the causes of
civilization collapse by Joseph Tainter among others.[4] This natural error in investment policy contributed to the
collapse of both the Roman and Mayan, among others. Relieving over-stressed resources requires reducing
pressure on them, not continually increasing it whether more efficiently or not.[5]
Waste prevention
Plans for Floriade 2012 in Venlo, the Netherlands: "The Greenest Building in the Netherlands - no external fuel,
electricity, water or sewage."
About 80 million tonnes of waste in total are generated in the U.K. alone, for example, each year.[6] And with
reference to only household waste, between 1991/92 and 2007/08, each person in England generated an average
of 1.35 pounds of waste per day.[7]
Experience has now shown that there is no completely safe method of waste disposal. All forms of disposal
have negative impacts on the environment, public health, and local economies. Landfills have contaminated
drinking water. Garbage burned in incinerators has poisoned air, soil, and water. The majority of water treatment
systems change the local ecology. Attempts to control or manage wastes after they are produced fail to eliminate
environmental impacts.
The toxic components of household products pose serious health risks and aggravate the trash problem. In the
U.S., about eight pounds in every ton of household garbage contains toxic materials, such as heavy metals like
nickel, lead, cadmium, and mercury from batteries, and organic compounds found in pesticides and consumer
products, such as air freshener sprays, nail polish, cleaners, and other products.[8] When burned or buried, toxic
materials also pose a serious threat to public health and the environment.
The only way to avoid environmental harm from waste is to prevent its generation. Pollution prevention means
changing the way activities are conducted and eliminating the source of the problem. It does not mean doing
without, but doing differently. For example, preventing waste pollution from litter caused by disposable
beverage containers does not mean doing without beverages; it just means using refillable bottles.
Waste prevention strategies In planning for facilities, a comprehensive design strategy is needed for
preventing generation of solid waste. A good garbage prevention strategy would require that everything brought
into a facility be recycled for reuse or recycled back into the environment through biodegradation. This would
mean a greater reliance on natural materials or products that are compatible with the environment.
Any resource-related development is going to have two basic sources of solid waste materials purchased and
used by the facility and those brought into the facility by visitors. The following waste prevention strategies
apply to both, although different approaches will be needed for implementation:[9]
use products that minimize waste and are nontoxic
consuming less resources means creating less waste, therefore it reduces the impact on the environment.
The California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, is a sustainable building designed by Renzo
Piano. It opened on September 27, 2008
While the practical application varies among disciplines , some common principles are as follows:
Low-impact materials: choose non-toxic, sustainably produced or recycled materials which require little
energy to process
Energy efficiency: use manufacturing processes and produce products which require less energy
Emotionally durable design: reducing consumption and waste of resources by increasing the durability
of relationships between people and products, through design
Design for reuse and recycling: "Products, processes, and systems should be designed for performance
in a commercial 'afterlife'."[10]
Design impact measures for total carbon footprint and life-cycle assessment for any resource used are
increasingly required and available.^[11] Many are complex, but some give quick and accurate whole-
earth estimates of impacts. One measure estimates any spending as consuming an average economic
share of global energy use of 8,000 BTU (8,400 kJ) per dollar and producing CO2 at the average rate of
0.57 kg of CO2 per dollar (1995 dollars US) from DOE figures.[12]
Sustainable design standards and project design guides are also increasingly available and are vigorously
being developed by a wide array of private organizations and individuals. There is also a large body of
new methods emerging from the rapid development of what has become known as 'sustainability
science' promoted by a wide variety of educational and governmental institutions.
Biomimicry: "redesigning industrial systems on biological lines ... enabling the constant reuse of
materials in continuous closed cycles..."[13]
Service substitution: shifting the mode of consumption from personal ownership of products to
provision of services which provide similar functions, e.g., from a private automobile to a carsharing
service. Such a system promotes minimal resource use per unit of consumption (e.g., per trip driven).[14]
Renewability: materials should come from nearby (local or bioregional), sustainably managed renewable
sources that can be composted when their usefulness has been exhausted.
Robust eco-design: robust design principles are applied to the design of a pollution sources.[15]
The physics principle [16] that accounts for the urge to have sustainability, and for the evolutionary design
in general, is the constructal law.
A model of the new design principles necessary for sustainability is exemplified by the "Bill of Rights for the
Planet" or "Hannover Principles" - developed by William McDonough Architects for EXPO 2000 that was held
in Hannover, Germany.
1. Insist on the right of humanity and nature to co-exist in a healthy, supportive, diverse, and sustainable
conditions.
2. Recognize Interdependence. The elements of human design interact with and depend on the natural
world, with broad and diverse implications at every scale. Expand design considerations to recognizing
even distant effects.
3. Respect relationships between spirit and matter. Consider all aspects of human settlement including
community, dwelling, industry, and trade in terms of existing and evolving connections between spiritual
and material consciousness.
4. Accept responsibility for the consequences of design decisions upon human well-being, the viability of
natural systems, and their right to co-exist.
5. Create safe objects of long-term value. Do not burden future generations with requirements for
maintenance or vigilant administration of potential danger due to the careless creations of products,
processes, or standards.
6. Eliminate the concept of waste. Evaluate and optimize the full life-cycle of products and processes, to
approach the state of natural systems in which there is no waste.
7. Rely on natural energy flows. Human designs should, like the living world, derive their creative forces
from perpetual solar income. Incorporating this energy efficiently and safely for responsible use.
8. Understand the limitations of design. No human creation lasts forever and design does not solve all
problems. Those who create and plan should practice humility in the face of nature. Treat nature as a
model and mentor, not an inconvenience to be evaded or controlled.
9. Seek constant improvement by the sharing of knowledge. Encourage direct and open communication
between colleagues, patrons, manufacturers and users to link long term sustainable considerations with
ethical responsibility, and re-establish the integral relationship between natural processes and human
activity.
These principles were adopted by the World Congress of the International Union of Architects (UIA) in June
1993 at the American Institute of Architects' (AIA) Expo 93 in Chicago. Further, the AIA and UIA signed a
"Declaration of Interdependence for a Sustainable Future." In summary, the declaration states that today's
society is degrading its environment and that the AIA, UIA, and their members are committed to:
Placing environmental and social sustainability at the core of practices and professional responsibilities
Developing and continually improving practices, procedures, products, services, and standards for
sustainable design
Educating the building industry, clients, and the general public about the importance of sustainable
design
Working to change policies, regulations, and standards in government and business so that sustainable
design will become the fully supported standard practice
These activities are an indication that the concept of sustainable design is being supported on a global and
interprofessional scale and that the ultimate goal is to become more environmentally responsive. The world
needs facilities that are more energy efficient and that promote conservation and recycling of natural and
economic resources.[17]
Applications
Applications of this philosophy range from the microcosm small objects for everyday use, through to the
macrocosm buildings, cities, and the Earth's physical surface. It is a philosophy that can be applied in the
fields of architecture, landscape architecture, urban design, urban planning, engineering, graphic design,
industrial design, interior design, fashion design and human-computer interaction.
Sustainable design is mostly a general reaction to global environmental crises, the rapid growth of economic
activity and human population, depletion of natural resources, damage to ecosystems, and loss of biodiversity.
[18]
In 2013, eco architecture writer Bridgette Meinhold surveyed emergency and long-term sustainable housing
projects that were developed in response to these crises in her book, Urgent Architecture: 40 Sustainable
Housing Solutions for a Changing World.[19][20] Featured projects focus on green building, sustainable design,
eco-friendly materials, affordability, material reuse, and humanitarian relief. Construction methods and
materials include repurposed shipping containers, straw bale construction, sandbag homes, and floating homes.
[21]
The limits of sustainable design are reducing. Whole earth impacts are beginning to be considered because
growth in goods and services is consistently outpacing gains in efficiency. As a result, the net effect of
sustainable design to date has been to simply improve the efficiency of rapidly increasing impacts. The present
approach, which focuses on the efficiency of delivering individual goods and services, does not solve this
problem. The basic dilemmas include: the increasing complexity of efficiency improvements; the difficulty of
implementing new technologies in societies built around old ones; that physical impacts of delivering goods and
services are not localized, but are distributed throughout the economies; and that the scale of resource use is
growing and not stabilizing.
Examples
Beauty and sustainable design
Because standards of sustainable design appear to emphasize ethics over aesthetics, some designers and critics
have complained that it lacks inspiration. Pritzker Architecture Prize winner Frank Gehry has called green
building "bogus,"[22] and National Design Awards winner Peter Eisenman has dismissed it as "having nothing to
do with architecture."[23] In 2009, The American Prospect asked whether "well-designed green architecture" is
an "oxymoron."[24]
Others claim that such criticism of sustainable design is misguided. A leading advocate for this alternative view
is architect Lance Hosey, whose book The Shape of Green: Aesthetics, Ecology, and Design (2012) was the first
dedicated to the relationships between sustainability and beauty. Hosey argues not just that sustainable design
needs to be aesthetically appealing in order to be successful, but also that following the principles of
sustainability to their logical conclusion requires reimagining the shape of everything designed, creating things
of even greater beauty. Reviewers have suggested that the ideas in The Shape of Green could "revolutionize
what it means to be sustainable."[25] Small and large buildings are beginning to successfully incorporate
principles of sustainability into award-winning designs. Examples include One Central Park and the Science
Faculty building, UTS.
According to Jonathan Chapman of the University of Brighton, UK, emotionally durable design reduces the
consumption and waste of natural resources by increasing the resilience of relationships established between
consumers and products."[26] Essentially, product replacement is delayed by strong emotional ties.[27] In his book,
Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences & Empathy, Chapman describes how "the process of
consumption is, and has always been, motivated by complex emotional drivers, and is about far more than just
the mindless purchasing of newer and shinier things; it is a journey towards the ideal or desired self, that
through cyclical loops of desire and disappointment, becomes a seemingly endless process of serial
destruction".[28] Therefore, a product requires an attribute, or number of attributes, which extend beyond
utilitarianism.[29]
According to Chapman, 'emotional durability' can be achieved through consideration of the following five
elements:
Narrative: How users share a unique personal history with the product.
Consciousness: How the product is perceived as autonomous and in possession of its own free will.
Fiction: The product inspires interactions and connections beyond just the physical relationship.
Surface: How the product ages and develops character through time and use.
As a strategic approach, "emotionally durable design provides a useful language to describe the contemporary
relevance of designing responsible, well made, tactile products which the user can get to know and assign value
to in the long-term."[30] According to Hazel Clark and David Brody of Parsons The New School for Design in
New York, emotionally durable design is a call for professionals and students alike to prioritise the
relationships between design and its users, as a way of developing more sustainable attitudes to, and in, design
things.[31]
Creative designers and artists are perhaps the most inventive when it comes to upcycling or creating new
products from old waste. A growing number of designers upcycle waste materials such as car window glass and
recycled ceramics, textile offcuts from upholstery companies, and even decommissioned fire hose to make belts
and bags. Whilst accessories may seem trivial when pitted against green scientific breakthroughs; the ability of
fashion and retail to influence and inspire consumer behaviour should not be underestimated. Eco design may
also use byproducts of industry, reducing the amount of waste being dumped in landfill, or may harness new
sustainable materials or production techniques e.g. fabric made from recycled PET plastic bottles or bamboo
textiles.
Sustainable architecture
Sustainable architecture is the design of sustainable buildings. Sustainable architecture attempts to reduce the
collective environmental impacts during the production of building components, during the construction
process, as well as during the lifecycle of the building (heating, electricity use, carpet cleaning etc.) This design
practice emphasizes efficiency of heating and cooling systems; alternative energy sources such as solar hot
water, appropriate building siting, reused or recycled building materials; on-site power generation - solar
technology, ground source heat pumps, wind power; rainwater harvesting for gardening, washing and aquifer
recharge; and on-site waste management such as green roofs that filter and control stormwater runoff. This
requires close cooperation of the design team, the architects, the engineers, and the client at all project stages,
from site selection, scheme formation, material selection and procurement, to project implementation.[32]
Sustainable architects design with sustainable living in mind.[33] Sustainable vs green design is the challenge that
designs not only reflect healthy processes and uses but are powered by renewable energies and site specific
resources. A test for sustainable design is can the design function for its intended use without fossil fuel
unplugged. This challenge suggests architects and planners design solutions that can function without pollution
rather than just reducing pollution. As technology progresses in architecture and design theories and as
examples are built and tested, architects will soon be able to create not only passive, null-emission buildings,
but rather be able to integrate the entire power system into the building design. In 2004 the 59 home housing
community, the Solar Settlement, and a 60,000 sq ft (5,600 m2) integrated retail, commercial and residential
building, the Sun Ship, were completed by architect Rolf Disch in Freiburg, Germany. The Solar Settlement is
the first housing community worldwide in which every home, all 59, produce a positive energy balance.[34]
An essential element of Sustainable Building Design is indoor environmental quality including air quality,
illumination, thermal conditions, and acoustics. The integrated design of the indoor environment is essential and
must be part of the integrated design of the entire structure. ASHRAE Guideline 10-2011 addresses the
interactions among indoor environmental factors and goes beyond traditional standards.[35]
Concurrently, the recent movements of New Urbanism and New Classical Architecture promote a sustainable
approach towards construction, that appreciates and develops smart growth, architectural tradition and classical
design.[36][37] This in contrast to modernist and globally uniform architecture, as well as leaning against solitary
housing estates and suburban sprawl.[38] Both trends started in the 1980s. The Driehaus Architecture Prize is an
award that recognizes efforts in New Urbanism and New Classical Architecture, and is endowed with a prize
money twice as high as that of the modernist Pritzker Prize.[39]
TACOS
Main articles: Sustainable landscape architecture, Sustainable landscaping, and Sustainable gardening
Some designers and gardeners such as Beth Chatto also use drought-resistant plants in arid areas (xeriscaping)
and elsewhere so that water is not taken from local landscapes and habitats for irrigation. Water from building
roofs may be collected in rain gardens so that the groundwater is recharged, instead of rainfall becoming surface
runoff and increasing the risk of flooding.
Areas of the garden and landscape can also be allowed to grow wild to encourage bio-diversity. Native animals
may also be encouraged in many other ways: by plants which provide food such as nectar and pollen for insects,
or roosting or nesting habitats such as trees, or habitats such as ponds for amphibians and aquatic insects.
Pesticides, especially persistent pesticides, must be avoided to avoid killing wildlife.
Soil fertility can be managed sustainably by the use of many layers of vegetation from trees to ground-cover
plants and mulches to increase organic matter and therefore earthworms and mycorrhiza; nitrogen-fixing plants
instead of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers; and sustainably harvested seaweed extract to replace micronutrients.
Sustainable landscapes and gardens can be productive as well as ornamental, growing food, firewood and craft
materials from beautiful places.
Sustainable landscape approaches and labels include organic farming and growing, permaculture, agroforestry,
forest gardens, agroecology, vegan organic gardening, ecological gardening and climate-friendly gardening.
Sustainable agriculture
Environmental Health,
Economic Profitability,
A variety of philosophies, policies and practices have contributed to these goals. People in many different
capacities, from farmers to consumers, have shared this vision and contributed to it. Despite the diversity of
people and perspectives, the following themes commonly weave through definitions of sustainable agriculture.
There are strenuous discussions among others by the agricultural sector and authorities if existing
pesticide protocols and methods of soil conservation adequately protect topsoil and wildlife. Doubt has risen if
these are sustainable, and if agrarian reforms would permit an efficient agriculture with fewer pesticides,
therefore reducing the damage to the ecosystem.
For more information on the subject of sustainable agriculture: "UC Davis: Sustainable Agriculture Research
and Education Program".[40]
Automobiles, home appliances and furnitures can be designed for repair and disassembly (for recycling), and
constructed from recyclable materials such as steel, aluminum and glass, and renewable materials, such as
Zelfo, wood and plastics from natural feedstocks. Careful selection of materials and manufacturing processes
can often create products comparable in price and performance to non-sustainable products. Even mild design
efforts can greatly increase the sustainable content of manufactured items.
Absorption refrigerator
Passive cooling
Renewable heat
Disposable products
Detergents, newspapers and other disposable items can be designed to decompose, in the presence of air, water
and common soil organisms. The current challenge in this area is to design such items in attractive colors, at
costs as low as competing items. Since most such items end up in landfills, protected from air and water, the
utility of such disposable products is debated.
Energy sector
Sustainable technology in the energy sector is based on utilizing renewable sources of energy such as solar,
wind, hydro, bioenergy, geothermal, and hydrogen. Wind energy is the world's fastest growing energy source; it
has been in use for centuries in Europe and more recently in the United States and other nations. Wind energy is
captured through the use of wind turbines that generate and transfer electricity for utilities, homeowners and
remote villages. Solar power can be harnessed through photovoltaics, concentrating solar, or solar hot water and
is also a rapidly growing energy source.[41]
The availability, potential, and feasibility of primary renewable energy resources must be analyzed early in the
planning process as part of a comprehensive energy plan. The plan must justify energy demand and supply and
assess the actual costs and benefits to the local, regional, and global environments. Responsible energy use is
fundamental to sustainable development and a sustainable future. Energy management must balance justifiable
energy demand with appropriate energy supply. The process couples energy awareness, energy conservation,
and energy efficiency with the use of primary renewable energy resources.[42]
Sustainable manufacturing can be defined as the creation of a manufactured product trough a concurrent
improvement in the resulting effect on factory and product sustainability. The concept of sustainable
manufacturing demands a renewed design of production systems in order to condition the related sustainability
on product life cycle and Factory operations.
Designing sustainable production systems imply, on the one hand, the analysis and optimization of intra-
factory aspects that are related to manufacturing plants. Such aspects can regard the resource
consumption restrain, the process efficiency, the ergonomics for the factory workers, the elimination of
hazardous substances, the minimization of factory emissions and waste as well as internal emissions, the
integrated management of information in the production facilities, and the technological updating of
machines and plants.
Other inter-factories aspects concern the sustainable design of manufactured products, product chain
dematerialisation, management of the background and foreground supply chains, support of circular
economy paradigm, and the labelling for sustainability.
Water sector
Sustainable water technologies have become an important industry segment with several companies now
providing important and scalable solutions to supply water in a sustainable manner.
Beyond the use of certain technologies, Sustainable Design in Water Management also consists very
importantly in correct implementation of concepts. Among one of these principal concepts is the fact normally
in developed countries 100% of water destined for consumption, that is not necessarily for drinking purposes, is
of potable water quality. This concept of differentiating qualities of water for different purposes has been called
"fit-for-purpose".[43] This more rational use of water achieves several economies, that are not only related to
water itself, but also the consumption of energy, as to achieve water of drinking quality can be extremely energy
intensive for several reasons.
Terminology
In some countries the term sustainable design is known as ecodesign, green design or environmental design.
Victor Papanek, embraced social design and social quality and ecological quality, but did not explicitly combine
these areas of design concern in one term. Sustainable design and design for sustainability are more common
terms, including the triple bottom line (people, planet and profit).[citation needed]
In the EU, the concept of sustainable design is referred to as ecodesign. Little discussions have however taken
place over the importance of this concept in the run-up to the circular economy package, that the European
Commission will be tabling by the end of 2015. To this effect, an Ecothis.EU campaign was launched to raise
awareness about the economic and environmental consequences of not including eco-design as part of the
circular economy package.[44]
Sustainable technologies
Sustainable technologies use less energy, fewer limited resources, do not deplete natural resources, do not
directly or indirectly pollute the environment, and can be reused or recycled at the end of their useful life.[45]
There is significant overlap with appropriate technology, which emphasizes the suitability of technology to the
context, in particular considering the needs of people in developing countries. However, the most appropriate
technology may not be the most sustainable one; and a sustainable technology may have high cost or
maintenance requirements that make it unsuitable as an "appropriate technology," as that term is commonly
used.