Ultrapure Water Reprint
Ultrapure Water Reprint
Ultrapure Water Reprint
P
retreatment to remove sus- tions periodically caused excursions in clar- portion at least must flow along the surface
pended solids from raw ifier performance, such that effluent turbid- to carry away the suspended solids. This
makeup water is a require- ities might exceed 1.0 NTU. In these cases, stream is known as the reject.
ment for the potable water we would see quick fouling of RO pre-filters The membranes in the unit we tested are
industry, but it is also a crit- and an increase in RO membrane differential configured such that the raw water flows
ical application in many pro- pressures. The Unit 1 clarifier was particu- from outside to in, with the reject flowing
cess industries, including larly troublesome in this regard. along the outside surface of the fibers. The
steam-generating electric utilities. In the In autumn 2004, based on reliable infor- basic water flow path is outlined in Figure 2.
1980s and 1990s, reverse osmosis (RO) ex- mation from colleagues within the power Raw water enters tank T-1 for feed to the
ploded in popularity as a retrofit technique industry, we tested a Pall Aria 4 microfil- membranes. A level control gauge in the
ahead of existing deionizers at power sta- ter (MF) in the Unit 1 makeup water system tank modifies inlet valve operation such that
tions. Reverse osmosis membranes, whose to ascertain if it would produce cleaner water the tank maintains a constant level. Pump P-
pore sizes are only angstroms in diameter, for RO feed, and how in turn this would 1 (rated at 20 HP) moves the raw water to the
will remove most dissolved ions from water, affect downstream equipment. Whereas most membranes. This pump is controlled by a
thus greatly reducing the load on down- RO systems, for power plant applications at variable frequency drive (VFD) to adjust the
stream ion exchange units. least, use spiral-wound membranes, the MF output based on the flowrate requested by the
At Kansas City Power & Light Companys at La Cygne is of hollow-fiber configuration, operator. The feed to the membranes passes
La Cygne generating station, an RO system in which each module contains thousands of through a basket strainer to remove any large
was placed in the Unit 1 (820 megawatts spaghetti-sized hollow fiber tubes. To pro- solids that might otherwise foul the mem-
[MW], supercritical boiler) makeup water duce the 300-gpm flow required by Unit 1 brane surfaces. The permeate flows directly
system in the 1980s. As part of a major and auxiliary systems, 24-membrane mod- to an existing storage tank, while the reject
upgrade in the 1990s, an RO unit and down- ules (Figure 1) were necessary. flows back to tank T-1. Thus, no water is lost
stream ion exchange system replaced the The MF process, like RO, operates via during normal operation. The standard mode
original flash evaporator in the Unit 2 (720 cross-flow filtration, in which the raw water of operation for our system is 10 to 15
MW, drum boiler) makeup train. Both RO flows parallel to the membrane surface. Water minutes of water production followed by a 1-
systems were designed for 75% recovery that passes through the membranes and is minute air scrub/reverse flush (AS/RF) to
with a maximum product water flowrate of purified is known as permeate. Not all water remove solids that collect on the membrane
200 gallons per minute (gpm). passes through each membrane, as a small surfaces.
Even though both La Cygne makeup water
systems were fitted with RO units, they con-
tinued to operate with the original clarifier/
sand filters for suspended solids removal.
By the early 2000s, combined chemical costs
for the two clarifiers had easily exceeded
$100,000 annually, with labor and routine
equipment repair costs adding considerably
to that amount. When each clarifier operated
properly, effluent turbidity could be lowered
to around 0.3 nephelometric turbidity units
(NTU). However, upsets in lake water chem-
istry or chemical feed equipment malfunc-
By Brad Buecker
Kansas City Power & Light