Laf Renie Re 1996
Laf Renie Re 1996
Laf Renie Re 1996
The factor structure and scale characteristics of the shortened version of the Social Competence and
Behavior Evaluation Scale (SCBE; P. J. LaFreniere & J. E. Dumas, 1995) are presented fur a Quebec
sample and 3 U.S. samples, as well as age and gender differences in the prevalence of emotional and
behavioral problems and social competence throughout the preschool years. Principal-components
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
analyses identified 3 factors in all 4 samples: social competence (SC): anger-aggression ( A A ) ; and
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
anxiety-withdrawal (AW). Each 10-itcm scale was shown to have high interrater and test-rctest
reliability, internal consistency, and temporal stability over a 6-month period. Across all samples,
boys were rated substantially higher on AA and lower on SC scales than girls, though no trends
toward a sex difference in AW were evident. A stepwise progression in SC with increasing age was
apparent in all samples. AA and AW behaviors showed a decline in the U.S., but not in the Quebec
sample.
The Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation Scale screening instrument to select samples of high-risk children;
(SCBE, formerly the Preschool Socio-ArTective Profile) is an 80- (b) in longitudinal research to study the development of social
item Likert rating scale developed to assess patterns of social competence: (c) in intervention studies as an outcome measure
competence, emotion regulation and expression, and adjust- to assess treatment effects; and ( d ) in experimental research ad-
ment difficulties in children ages 30 to 78 months (LaFreniere, dressing various issues in social and emotional development.
Dumas, Capuano, & Dubeau, 1992). The questionnaire, typi- For a recent summary of this work, see LaFreniere and Dumas
cally completed by preschool teachers, is composed of eight (1995). In addition to research, educators and clinicians have
scales balanced for positive (competence) and negative used the SCBE to assess the degree and specific features of be-
(emotional or behavioral problems) items, covering an exten- havioral and emotional problems in children in public and
sive array of behaviors commonly seen within a preschool set- private day care and preschool centers, including Head Start
ting. As many emotional and behavioral problems in early- programs.
childhood are rarely directly observed by psychiatrists, psychol- Because the SCBE is now being used for multiple purposes
ogists, or other mental health professionals, it is important to by diverse groups of professionals, we believe that a shortened
obtain reliable and valid information from people who do ob- version of the instrument that retains as many characteristics
serve young children under conditions in which such problems of the original as possible is desirable, because it would enable
typically occur. Once standardized, this information can pro-
researchers and educators to function more efficiently given the
vide an important complement to other sources of infor-
time constraints and other demands they face daily. The short
mation concerning the quality of the child's adaptation in other
form of the SCBE is intended to preserve several important
settings.
characteristics of the original while reducing the overall length
The SCBE has been widely used over the past 8 years in re-
of the instrument from 80 to 30 items. These characteristics
search, educational, and clinical settings in the United States,
include the three-factor structure; the high reliability, internal
Canada, and Europe. Researchers have used the SCBE (a) as a
consistency, and temporal stability of the scales; and the relative
orthogonality of the two factors representing internalizing and
externalizing behavior profiles.
Peter J. LaFreniere. Department of Psychology, University of Maine; We approached the task of constructing the original SCBE
Jean E. Dumas, Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue from a developmental-adaptational perspective, emphasizing
University. the functional significance of affect in regulating social ex-
The development of this short form of the Social Competence and change (Bowlby, 1980; Ekman, 1984; Izard, 1977, 1991; Plut-
Behavior Evaluation involved many people over the past 6 years. We chik, 1980, 1991; Sroufe, 1996). From this perspective emo-
would like to thank especially our research assistants at the University tions signal needs, attitudes, anticipations, and impulses toward
of MontrealFrance Capuano and Diane Dubeauwho were essential
action. Discrclc, primary emotions such as joy, love, anger, fear,
in recruiting a large sample for the initial normalization and validation.
and sadness are evident in infancy and generally shared across
Finally, we express our gratitude to several hundred preschool teachers,
without whom this work would have been impossible. cultures. They are widely recognized, not just as common ver-
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Peter bal labels for emotional experience but as core species-specific
LaFreniere, Department of Psychology, University of Maine. 5742 Clar- motivational systems that shape or organize both behavior and
ence Cook Little Hall. Orono. Maine 04469-5742. development across the life span (Fischer, Shaver, & Carnochan,
369
370 LAI KTNIERE AND DUMAS
1990; Sroufe, 1996; Sroufe, Schork, Motti, Lawroski. & La- scales in terms of etiology, temporal stability, or external corre-
Frcnierc, 1984). lates may be attributed to the initial differences in the psycho-
Il is apparent from observational research in children's pre- metric characteristics of the scales rather than to substantive
school groups that affective expression and emotion regulation differences in the phenomenon under investigation. In contrast,
serve important relationship functions. Characteristic patterns the SCBE-30 is designed to produce a measure of internalizing
of emotion provide an important cue for observers interested in behavior that is as robusl psychometrically as its externalizing
the ongoing adjustment of the child to the milieu. For example, counterpart, and relatively orthogonal to it.
in a recent study considerable differences were found in pre- Our clinical objective is to provide an instrument capable of
schoolers' ability to modulate negative affect arising from frus- describing behavioral tendencies for the purpose of socializa-
tration at losing a competitive encounter with a peer tion and education. One consequence of this orientation is our
(LaFrenicre, 1996). Although many of these children were able emphasis on assessing the quality of the child's adaptation
to maintain a positive interaction with their partner, two dis- rather than sampling only the child's problem behaviors. The
tinct patterns of maladaptive behavior were identified. Children inclusion of a reliable, valid, and developmentally sensitive in-
who were rated by teachers as angry-aggressive expressed more dex of social competence allows teachers to orient classroom
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
negative affect after having lost a competition and were less able intervention efforts toward the child's strengths as well as v u l -
to share a limited resource with the same peer in a subsequent nerabilities. Second, this emphasis allows for more refined de-
encounter. It appeared that these children were unable to regu- scription of developmental deviance by focusing on the pres-
late a moderate level of negative affect. Their concern with the ence or absence of positive behavior as well as problem behavior.
results of the competition led to more conflicts of interest, in- Finally, this focus may also enhance prediction of later disorder
creased competitiveness, and interpersonal conflicts with their because early investigators have reported better prediction from
partner. In contrast, children rated as anxious-withdrawn indexes of competence and ego maturity rather than from the
seemed to disconnect from their partner following the competi- absence of problems and symptoms (Kohlberg, I .aCrosse. &
tion. Their affective expression, although not more negative, Ricks, 1972).
was not contingent on their partner's behavior or affect. Re- In this study we report the factor structure and scale charac-
search on the developmental processes underlying emotional teristics of the shortened version of the SCBE as well as age and
competence is just beginning to gather momentum; its ultimate gender differences in the prevalence of emotional and behav-
success will depend on how successfully researchers meet the ioral problems and social competence throughout the preschool
methodological challenges that have long hindered progress in years.
this area. The development of the SCBE-30 is one attempt to
meet this challenge. Method
Like its predecessor, the SCBE-30 is designed to capture this
affective quality of the child's relationships with teachers and Participants
peers. Specifically, we aim to provide ( a ) a standardized descrip- The database consisted of four distinct samples: three recruited in
tion of affect and behavior in context that is reliable, valid, and regions ol the United States representing the Midwest (Indiana). West
useful for preschool teachers; (b) an efficient screening instru- (Colorado), and Northeast (Maine), and the original French Canadian
ment that differentiates specific types of behavioral-emotional sample from Montreal, Quebec, for a total of 2,646 participants. See
problems; (c) a developmentally appropriate assessment of fable 1. The Quebec sample consisted o T 9 1 0 preschool children re-
children's positive social adaptation or competence; ( d ) mea- cruited from 80 different preschool classrooms from the Montreal met-
sures of high and approximately equivalent internal consis- ropolitan area. The Indiana sample consisted of 854 preschool children
recruited from 50 different preschool classrooms from the Indianapolis
tency, reliability, and stability; and (e) measures sensitive to be-
and Lafayette areas; the Colorado sample of 439 preschool children was
havioral change over time for the purpose of program evalua-
drawn from 30 classrooms from the Boulder and Denver areas: and the
tion or prospective-longitudinal research.
Maine sample of 443 preschool children was recruited from 20 class-
A major impetus for our research program is to develop an rooms from the Bangor and Orono areas. For analytical purposes, age
instrument capable of addressing an important issue in pro- was treated as a categorical variable by classifying participants into four
spective longitudinal research of children at risk for later disor- groups:.? year olds ( 30 to 42 months): 4 year olds (43 to 54 months): 5
ders. As research goals become more precise and investigators war olds ( 55 1066 months); and 6 icw<Vt/v(6~to 78 months). A child
seek to understand both differential etiologies and sequelae of was thus designated, for example, a 3 year old if he or she was w i t h i n 6
developmental disorders, greater discriminant validity is being
demanded of measures used to evaluate various problem be-
haviors across various ages. Scales produced through tradi- Table 1
tional factor analytic techniques inevitably yield variables com- Gender and Ages oj Participants in Four Samples
posed of unequal numbers of items, and consequently, quite
different psychometric characteristics. Typically, a large first Gender Age (years)
factor representing conduct disorder is found to be more in-
Sample Girls Boys 6
ternally consistent, reliable, and stable than a much smaller fac-
tor representing emotional disorder or anxiety (e.g., Behar. Quebec 415 495 910 251 350
1977; Behar & Stringfield, 1974; Hinshaw, Morrison, Carte, & Indiana 440 414 854 44 160 404 246
Cornsweet, 1987; Hogan, Quay, Vaughn, & Shapiro. 1989). Colorado 210 229 439 46 155 172 66
Maine 213 230 443 88 190 126 39
Subsequent comparisons demonstrating differences between
SCBE-30 371
months of exactly 3 years of age at the time of the assessment. In the identical 10-item factors accounting for 52.9% and 49.8% of the
American sample, the four most populous ethnic groups in the United variance, respectively. Each factor was composed of conceptu-
StatesWhite (72%), Black ( 1 8 % ) , Hispanic ( 7 % ) , and Asian Ameri- ally homogenous items tapping affective characteristics (e.g.,
can (3%)are well represented, with minority groups approximately
"irritable" "gets mad easily") and social behaviors involving
equal to the 1993 national norms provided in the Statistical Abstract of
peers (e.g.. "bullies younger children") or adults (e.g., "defiant
the United States(U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1991).
when reprimanded"). The first factor to emerge in each was
Teacher Evaluations labeled Anger-Aggression (AA), and it accounted for 29.2% and
26.7% of the variance, respectively; the second factor, Social
All children were evaluated by one or two classroom teachers at the
Competence (SC), accounted for an additional 16.9% and
end of the fall session or during the spring session using the SCBE, which
15.2% of the variance, respectively; and the third factor, Anxi-
has a Likert-type 6-point response format: never, rarely, sometimes, of-
ten, frequently, and always. All children were evaluated whose parents ety-Withdrawal (AW), explained an additional 6.8% and 7.9%
consented to their participation (approximately 70-80% across all of the variance, respectively. Subsequent analyses confirmed the
samples) and who had been enrolled in the day care or preschool for at presence of the same three factors in all U.S. samples, account-
least 2 months. ing for 54.0% of the total variance for the Indiana sample, 52.4%
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
Table 2
Factor Loadings ofSCBE-30 Items for Four Samples
Original SCBE
SCBE-30 Quebec Indiana Colorado Maine
item no. Item no. Subscale (A'=910) (N = 8 5 4 ) (A'= 439) (A'=443)
Anger-Aggression
Social Competence
1 35 Calm .73 .67 .53 .76
2 45 Prosocial .72 .70 .72 .76
3 39 Calm .69 .66 .74 .80
4 58 Integrated .68 .60 .66 .60
5 43 Prosocial .66 .6! .73 .64
6 17 Joyful .65 .45 .60 .49
7 66 Cooperative .65 .49 .60 .60
8 50 Calm .63 .55 .68 .59
9 60 Prosocial .58 .63 .58 .63
10 63 Cooperative .57 .53 .65 .60
A n x iety-With drawal
1 36 Isolated .70 .78 .70 .72
2 34 Isolated .69 .80 .60 .80
3 24 Depressive .67 .67 .67 .62
4 28 Anxious .66 .75 .69 .78
5 49 Isolated .64 .66 .51 .69
6 23 Anxious .62 .74 .75 .75
7 57 Isolated .54 .67 .57 .65
8 1| Anxious .50 .50 .57 .66
9 6 Depressive .49 .53 .35 .45
10 2 Depressive .49 .63 .45 .62
Hole. SCBE-30 - Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation Scale: Short Form.
cantly and negatively correlated with both AA (r = -.37, -.57, Her. Given the uneven distribution of age groups in the three
-.58, -.54) and AW (r = -.38, -.42, -.43, -.30) in all four American samples (see Table 1), they were combined to form
samples. a single sample with more substantial cell sizes for the 3- and 6
year old groups. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, the main effect
Age and Gender Effects for age for the SC scale was significant in both the French Cana-
dian, F( 2, 905) = 17.78, p < . 0 0 1 , and the combined American
To assess age and gender differences, 2 (Gender) x 4 (Age)
ANOVAs were conducted using the three scales described ear-
Table 4
Internal Consistency of SCBE-30 Scales for Four Samples
Table 3
Interrater Agreement of SCBE-30 Scales for Three Samples Cronbach's alpha
Anger-Aggression .83 .91 .79 Anger- Aggression .92 .92 .92 .92
Social Competence .85 .83 .87 Social Competence .90 .86 .90 .88
Anxiety-Withdrawal .86 .78 .88 Anxiety- Withdrawal .85 77 .81 .84
Note. SCBE-30 - Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation Scale: Note. SCBE-30 = Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation Scale:
Short Form. Short Form.
SCBE-30 373
Discussion
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
samples, F(3, 1729) = 41.75, p < .001, with teachers reporting Principal-components analyses clearly identified three fac-
greater social competence in older participants. One-way tors in all four samples representing social competence, anger-
ANOVAs, using Duncan's correction for multiple comparisons, aggression, and anxiety-withdrawal, respectively. Each factor-
revealed a stepwise progression in social competence for age scale, composed of 10 items, was shown to have high interrater
groups for both sexes in both samples ( 3 < 4 < 5 < 6 ; p < and test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and temporal
.05). Age effects in problem behaviors were evident in the U.S. stability over a 6-month period. It is noteworthy that each scale
sample but not in the Quebec sample. A stepwise progression was virtually synonymous with the corresponding scale from
in the decline of angry-aggressive behavior was found in the the original SCBE, despite the significant reduction from 80 to
U.S. sample for boys, whereas U.S. girls showed a decline in AA 30 items. This finding permits confidence in applying the exten-
behavior after age 4 (5, 6 < 3, 4; p < .05). In addition, an age sive validation studies of the original (LaFreniere et al., 1992)
effect was significant in the U.S. sample for anxious-withdrawn to the new, abbreviated version.
behavior, ^(3, 1729) = 13.16.p < .001. Duncan tests revealed The Social Competence scale taps a broad range of behaviors
an overall decline in teacher reports of AW after age 4 (5, 6 < 3, designed to assess the positive qualities of the child's adaptation
4; p < .05) for girls and a similar effect for boys, although no rather than specific behavioral competencies. Asa developmen-
difference was found between 4 and 5 year old boys). In con- tal construct, social competence refers to behaviors that indi-
trast, no significant main effects for age were found in either A A cate a well-adjusted, flexible, emotionally mature, and generally
or AW in the Quebec sample. prosocial pattern of social adaptation. In previous validation
There were main effects for gender for the SC F( 1, 905) = work with the SCBE-80 (LaFreniere et al., 1992), the socially
51.07, p < .001 (Quebec); F(\, 1729) = 43.92, p < .001 competent group received the most positive nominations and
(U.S.)and AA scalesF(\, 905) = 26.18, p < .001 the least negative nominations from peers, and it was highest in
(Quebec); F( I, 1729) = 53.01, p< .001 (U.S.)for both sam- sociometric status. Because of its qualitative dimension, socio-
ples, with teachers assessing girls as more socially competent metric status is one of the most robust correlates of teacher rat-
and less aggressive than boys. In addition, there was a significant ings of social competence in preschoolers. Other research has
Age X Gender interaction for the AA scale in the Quebec sam- shown that socially competent preschoolers score high on as-
ple, F( 2, 905) = 3.24, p = .040, but not in the overall American sessments of ego resiliency, express high levels of positive affect
sample. French Canadian boys and girls were not initially and relatively low levels of negative affect, and are well liked and
different at 3 years on that scale; however, older boys were rated appreciated by their teachers as well as by peers (LaFreniere &
as significantly more aggressive than older girls. In contrast to Sroufe, 1985;Sroufeetal., 1984; Waters &Sroufe, 1983).
the foregoing pattern of results, there were no significant gender The second scale, Anger-Aggression, may be considered a
differences in teacher evaluations on the AW scale in either sam- preschool equivalent of previous broadband syndromes labeled
ple. The means and standard deviations for both the United variously as conduct disorder (Peterson, 1961; Quay, 1983) or
States and Quebec samples are presented in Appendixes A and externalizing symptoms (Achenbach & Edelbrock, 1981). The
B, respectively. items on this scale describe angry, aggressive, selfish, and oppo-
sitional behaviors. It is interesting that emotion regulation and
affective expression were shown to be as central as aggressive
Construct Validity
behavior to this scale. Indeed, the item with the highest factor
Because of the extensive construct validation of the original loading in all four samples was "irritable, gets mad easily," and
80-item SCBE (Dumas & LaFreniere, 1993; Dumas, LaFren- poor frustration tolerance and defiance were among the other
iere, & Serketich, 1995; LaFreniere et al., 1992; LaFreniere & high loadings. Children with extreme scores on this scale tend
Dumas, 1992), Pearson correlations were computed between to express their negative emotions in ways that hurt or at least
these latter three indexes and their corresponding 10-item scales disturb others. They function poorly in social situations, where
from the SCBE-30. As expected, these correlations were ex- they require almost constant supervision, often to protect oth-
tremely high (.92- .97), reflecting the high degree of conceptual ers from their outbursts. The angry-aggressive group "was pre-
unity retained in the short version. In addition, for a large pro- viously shown to be the most interactive with peers but also the
374 LAFRENIERE AND DUMAS
ANGER-AGGRESSION than girls. It is also likely that a greater proportion of these chil-
dren respond to these conditions with externalizing behaviors.
26-| If both of these propositions were true, then we would expect
a much higher percentage of disruptive behavior problems in
24- boysa fact that is easily substantiated but rarely explained
(Dumas, 1994; Richman, Stevenson, & Graham, 1982; Rutter
& Garmezy, 1983). It may also be argued that boys are geneti-
22-
cally predisposed toward higher levels of aggressive or disruptive
Girls behavior; however, in our view of adaptation, the environment
20- must also be part of the equation.
Boys
Regarding age differences, developmental trends toward a
stepwise progression in social competence for boys and girls was
clearly evident in both samples, in line with theoretical expec-
tations. Similar to the validation criterion for IQ items, we view
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Figure 2. Age and gender differences in SCBE-30 scales for the Que-
5 years bec sample. SCBE-30 = Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation
Scale: Short Form.
376 LAFRENIERE AND DUMAS
on (he cumulative probabilities in the raw score distribution Replication and validation within a kindergarten sample. Journal of
rather than directly on the mean and standard deviation of the Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 309-327.
raw scores, transforming the original distribution to tit a nor- Hogan. A. L.. Quay, II. C.. Vaughn, S., & Shapiro, S. K.. ( 1989). Re-
vised Behavior Problem Checklist: Stability, prevalence, and inci-
mal curve, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
dence- of behavior problems in kindergarten and first-grade children.
From research findings (LaFreniere & Dumas, 1995) and clin-
Psychological Assessment. 1, 103-1 1 1 .
ical experience, and in accord with many instruments of this Izard, C. L. (1977). Unman emotions New York: Plenum Press.
genre, we have found that the lowest 10% of the children seem Izard, C. F.. ( 1 9 9 1 ) . The1 psychology of emotions New York: Plenum
to set themselves apart from the rest of the children in signifi- Press.
cant ways. Because a percentile rank of 10% corresponds to a /' Kohlberg. I.., LaCrosse, J., & Ricks, D. ( 1 9 7 2 ) . The predictability of
score of 37 (90% equals 63T), it is recommended that 37Tand adult mental health from childhood behavior. In B. B. Wolman< Ed.}.
63T be used as the clinical cutting points in the process of form- Manual of child psychopathohgy. New York: McGraw Hill.
ing interpretative hypotheses. At no time should the SCBE be Kohn. M., & Rosman. B. L. ( 1972). A social competence scale and
symptom checklist for the preschool child: Factor dimensions, their
used as the sole basis for any clinical decisions regarding inter-
cross-instrument generality, and longitudinal persistence. Develop-
vention with the child. Rather, interpretations based on the pro-
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
file should be viewed as hypotheses that require further corrob- LaFreniere, P. J. ( 1 9 9 6 ) . Cooperation among peers as a conditional
oration from other data sources, as well as the exercise of sound strategy: The influence of family ecology and kin relations. Ittlerna-
professional judgement. For more extensive information con- tionalJownal of Behavioral Development, 19( 1 ) . 39-52.
cerning clinical applications, see LaFreniere and Dumas LaFreniere, P. J., & Dumas, J. E. (1992). A transactional analysis of
(1995). early childhood anxiety and social withdrawal. Development and t'sy-
ckopallm/ogy. 4. 385-402.
LaFreniere, P. J., & Dumas. J. E. ( 1 9 9 5 ) . Social competence and behav-
ior evaluation (preschool ed.). Los Angeles: Western Psychological
References
Services.
Achenbach. T. M. & Edelbrock, C. S. (1981 ). Behavioral problems and LaFreniere, P. J.. Dumas, J., Capuano. F. & Dubeau. D. ( 1992). The
development and validation of the preschool soeio-affectivc profile.
competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children
Psychological Assessment: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psy-
aged four through sixteen. Manogruphsof the Society for Research in
chology. 4, 442-450.
Child Development, 46 ( I , Serial No. 188).
LaFreniere. P. J., & Sroufe, L. A. ( 1 9 8 5 ) . Profiles of peer competence:
Asher. S. R.. & Dodge (1986). Identifying children who are rejected by
Interrelations among measures, influence of social ecology, and rela-
their peers. Di'velopmental Psychology. 22, 444-449.
tion to attachment history. Developmental Psychology, 21. 56-69.
Behar, L. (1977). The Preschool Behavior Questionnaire. Journal of
Peterson. D. R. ( 1 9 6 1 ) . Behavior problems of middle childhood.
Abnormal Child Psychology, 5. 265-275.
Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 205-209.
Behar. I... & Slringfield, S. ( 1974). A behavior rating scale tor the pre-
Plutchik. R. (1980). Emotion' A psychoevollttionary synthesis New
school child. Developmental Psychology; 10, 601-610.
York: Harper & Row.
Bowlby, J. ( 1 9 8 0 ) . Attachment and loss: I'ol. 3. Loss. New York: Basic-
Plutchik. R. ( 1 9 9 1 ) . Emotions and evolution. In K. T. Strongman
Books.
(Ed.). International revie\v of studies on emotion. Vol. 1. New York:
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt. J. B. ( 1 9 9 0 ) . Peer group be-
Wiley.
havior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer re- Quay, H. C. (1983 ). A dimensional approach to behavior disorder: The
jection in childhood: Origins, consequences, and intervention (pp. 17- Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Srhool Psychology Review. 12,
59). New York: Cambridge University Press. 244-249.
Dumas. J. E. ( 1994). Conduct disorder. In R. J.Corsini ( Ed.), Encyclo- Richman. N., Stevenson. J. S., & Graham, P.j. ( 1 9 8 2 ) . Preschool lo
pedia olpsychology(2nA. ed.; Vol. 2, pp. 289-293). New York: Wiley. school: A behavioral study. London: Academic Press.
Dumas, J. F.. & LaFreniere. P. J. ( 1 9 9 3 ) . Mother-child relationships Rutter. M., &Garmezy, N. ( 1 9 8 3 ) . Developmental psychopathology. In
as sources of support or stress: A comparison of competent, average, P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 4. Socialisa-
aggressive, and anxious dyads: Child Development. 64. 1732-1754. tion, personality and social development (4th ed.: pp. 776-911). New
Dumas. J. E.. LaFreniere. P. J.. & Serketich. W. J. ( 1 9 9 5 ) . Balance of York: Wiley.
power: A transactionat analysis of control in mother-child dyads in- Sroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emo-
volving socially competent, aggressive, and anxious children. Journal tional life in the early years. New York: Cambridge University Press.
of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 104-113. Sroufe. L. A., Schork, E., Motti, I . , Lawroski. N., & LaFreniere. P. .1.
Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In K. R. ( 1984). The role of affect in social competence. In C. E. Izard. J.
Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.). Approaches lo emotion (pp. 319-344). Kagan. & R. Zajonc (Eds.). Emotions, cognition and behavior (pp.
Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum. 289-319). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Fischer. K. W., Shaver, P. R.. & Carnochan, P. ( 1990). How emotions United Stales Bureau of the Census ( 1 9 9 1 ) . Statistical A bslrael o! the
develop and how they organise development. Cognition and Emotion. United States: 1991 (111th Edition). Washington, DC: U.S. Govern-
4.81-127. ment Printing Office.
Hinshaw, S. P., Morrison. D. C., Carte. E. T., & Cornswccl, C'. ( 1 9 8 7 ) . Waters, E.. & Sroufe. L. A. (1983). A developmental perspective on
Factorial dimensions of the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist: competence. Developmental Review, 3, 79-97.
SCBE-30 377
Appendix A
Girls Boys
Social Competence
3 year olds 35.51 7.59 32.30 9.05
4 year olds 39.35 8.95 36.93 9.06
5 year olds 41.11 9.07 38.57 9.23
6 year olds 43.65 6.66 40.68 9.10
Anxiety-Withdrawal
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Note. SCBE-30 - Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation Scale: Short Form.
Appendix B
Girls Boys
Age group M SD M SD
Social Competence
3 year olds 37.27 7.46 35.58 8.06
4 year olds 40.76 7.19 36.48 8.11
5 year olds 42.51 6.92 38.06 7.05
Anxiety- Withdrawal
3 year olds 20.69 6.54 20.89 6.26
4 year olds 19.79 5.72 20.19 6.90
5 year olds 20.43 6.49 21.10 6.94
Anger- Aggression
3 year olds 22.73 7.38 23.43 8.32
4 year olds 21.11 7.21 24.89 9.23
5 year olds 21.69 8.18 25.33 8.95
Note. SCBE-30 = Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation Scale: Short Form.