My Juggler Method PDF
My Juggler Method PDF
My Juggler Method PDF
by
Dimitri Vorontzov
Charisma Arts
Part I
Introduction
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Part II
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Part III
Chapter 13
Chapter 14
Chapter 15
Chapter 16
Chapter 17
Chapter 18
Chapter 19
Chapter 20
Part IV
Chapter 21
Part V
Chapter 22
Chapter 23
Chapter 24
Chapter 25
Part VI
Chapter 26
Chapter 27
Part VII
Chapter 28
Chapter 29
Chapter 30
Chapter 31
Chapter 32
Chapter 33
Chapter 34
Part VIII
Chapter 35
Chapter 36
Chapter 37
Chapter 38
Chapter 39
Chapter 40
Chapter 41
Chapter 42
Chapter 43
Chapter 44
Part IX
Chapter 45
Chapter 46
Chapter 47
Chapter 48
Chapter 49
Chapter 50
Chapter 51
Chapter 52
Chapter 53
Chapter 54
Chapter 55
Chapter 56
Chapter 57
Chapter 58
Chapter 59
Part X
Chapter 60
Part I
My Juggler Method
Introduction
There's a Buddhist joke about it. The Master shows a matchbox to a novice disciple and asks: "What is
it?" The disciple says: "Why, it's a matchbox!" "No, no, no!", - says the Master, - "Can't you hear? Listen
to the word: matchbox, matchbox, matchbox... Now listen to this", - and the Master shakes the matchbox,
so his disciple can hear how the matches rattle inside.
I feel like that disciple as I approach the task of explaining the Juggler Method in writing.
Enjoy it
Chapter 1
It absolutely doesn't matter how interesting I am to a woman. What matters is how interesting she is to me.
She has to be interesting enough to deserve my attention, and yet I am a gentleman enough to help her to
show herself to me in the best possible way.
And the more a woman feels that I make her interesting, the more she realizes what a fascinating guy I am
- so I don't have to jump out of my skin to prove my "social value"!
One great thing I've discovered thanks to the Juggler Method is that there are no boring people in the
world. Someone may appear boring because I hadn't yet discovered anything unique about him or her.
And yet, when I do something to help that person to reveal their uniqueness, suddenly the whole new
world opens up to me! Everyone carries a marvelous unexplored universe inside. I like to think of myself
as an explorer, a discoverer of the secret, mysterious, fascinating worlds. I'm the inner world adventurer, a
kind of spiritual Indiana Jones.
An open-ended question is a question that begins with: What..., Which..., How..., Who..., When...,
Where..., or Why...
Such questions make people feel compelled to answer with a well-developed story, sharing their
experience, as opposed to just saying "yes" or "no".
What is one thing that would make this evening memorable for you?
Which of your high school teachers did you have a mad crush on?
Of course there's more to the art of having a meaningful conversation than just asking questions. If I kept
peppering a woman with endless questions, the conversation would become incredibly exhausting for both
of us, and I would make her feel interrogated.
The question-answer-statement structure of the conversation helps me to increase rapport. And each
statement I make consists of two parts:
a) Reward;
b) Relate.
As I've said before, Reward/Relate is the second fundamental element of the Juggler Method. I will
describe it in the next two chapters.
But let me go an extra mile and add the last bit here.
I always speak in the "I" perspective. When I describe my thoughts and feelings, when I share my
experiences with people, I use the word "I" instead of "you" as people do quite often for some vague
psychological reason. It might seem counterintuitive, but saying "I" definitely helps people to relate to
what I'm saying much better.
Chapter 2
One thing I've neglected to mention in the previous chapter (and wrongly so), is the "vacuum".
The "vacuum" is a JM term for a simple and effective way to strongly compel a partner in the interaction
to answer the open-ended question. After asking a woman the open-ended question, I make a strong eye
contact, and freeze my body. I keep silent, I do not move, and do not break the eye contact until the
tension becomes so unbearable to her that she feels obligated to break the silence and just say something.
I usually employ the "vacuum" only in the beginning of my interaction with a woman. Very soon
afterwards there's no need for such powerful way of making her talk, because she enjoys the conversation
with me, and answers my questions very willingly.
Now let's talk about the second fundamental element of the Juggler Method.
2) Reward/Relate
After a woman answers my question, I reward her for answering it, no matter how brief her answer was.
After all, she has made an effort of opening up to me, and this effort is something I had requested from her
in the first place by asking my open-ended question. And of course I want her to make even bigger efforts
further along in the conversation. By rewarding her for each effort, for each little unique thing she shares
with me, I make her feel good about opening up to me, I make her feel appreciated and liked. I sincerely
express my appreciation.
Another important thing about the reward is that by giving it I express my approval. I am the man who
gives approval without seeking approval from others. I'm the approval-giver. So by rewarding a woman
for each effort she makes, I convey the fact that I'm the man in charge.
How do I reward?
When a woman is answering my open-ended question, I listen very carefully and do my best to deduce the
very essence of what she is telling me, the important unique quality of her personality that she is revealing
to me. Than I simply tell her that I like this unique quality that she has just revealed.
For example, a few days ago I've spoken to a young woman in a bookstore. She was wearing a necklace
with a tiny pendant. I liked that necklace. I asked her a very simple open-ended question: "How did you
get it?" I did the "vacuum", and she told me, "Well, I was just passing by the store window and saw the
necklace there, so I stepped in and bought it". I was paying attention to what she was saying, and from her
words I could recognize her spontaneity. This was the unique quality I liked and felt like rewarding. So I
said to her, "I find you spontaneous, and I admire that about you!"
It's so simple - and it works. I also use another, very elegant and powerful form of reward that greatly
shortens the time necessary to build rapport. This type of reward is called Push-Pull. A Push/Pull is
exactly what it sounds like. Imagine pushing a woman very slightly on her shoulders, so she takes one step
back away from you. Then imagine yourself taking her firmly by the forearms and pulling toward
yourself, so close that the two of you share an embrace.
Now think for a moment, how would you do it using just words, without physically pushing her?
This is the Push/Pull. The "Pull" part of the Push-Pull type of Reward brings a woman much closer to me
than if I had just rewarded her directly. That's why the Push-Pull helps me to achieve the rapport faster.
"Oh... You see, I would never marry anyone like you. If I were married to you, our household would go
broke in less than a week! Actually, I am joking. I like your spontaneity!"
I reward with a smile. I reward with my laughter if something she says or does is funny.
In the next chapter I will tell you a few things on how to Relate to your partner in the interaction.
Chapter 3
Let's talk now about the "Relate" part of the Juggler Method statement.
A woman gives me one bit of her unique personal information, to which I relate by giving her one bit of
my unique personal information. The topic is the same and we have similar opinions about it. The rapport
is established. Nice and easy.
However, if our opinions on that topic were opposite, we would end up hating each other's guts within
minutes, despite the fact that we've talked about the same topic.
Let's say, the woman gives me a bit of personal information (she adores cats), but instead of relating to the
topic and telling her I'm allergic to those vicious furry beasts, I pay attention to the emotion of the
adoration she has expressed. I can absolutely relate to adoration. I experience it very regularly.
So when she tells me she adores cats, I say this: "I know exactly what you mean. It's the same with me and
my motorcycle. I adore it because it's small, wild, and cute. Come to think of it, there's something of a
CAT to my DuCATi!"
Sometimes the main emotion embedded in what she is saying is negative. How do I deal with that?
First I relate to the negative emotion she has expressed, and then I switch from the negative emotion to the
opposite positive one.
For example, if a woman tells me about something that had frightened her, I tell her about my last visit to
a dentist. "One of my best friends is a dentist, but I'm generally scared of them since childhood (in my
native country when I was growing up dentists didn't believe in anesthesia). So I went to the dentist and I
was shaking. But surprisingly, it wasn't painful at all, and everyone was very nice to me, and my tooth was
fixed and didn't hurt anymore. When I left the dental office I felt grateful and relieved!"
There are various exercises I practice with my private clients during every one-on-one coaching session.
Those exercises help my clients to develop solid skills in asking open-ended questions, rewarding and
relating. After a few rounds of such exercises a client become so comfortable with the structure of the
Juggler Method that he is amazed at how easily a subtle but real personality transformation can be
achieved in a human being.
In the next couple of chapters I will share with you a few thoughts about the third fundamental element of
the Juggler Method - Escalation.
Chapter 4
In the few earlier chapters we've reviewed two fundamental elements of the method:
1. Make her interesting;
2. Reward/Relate.
In this one I'm going to write to you about the third, and probably the most important element: Escalate.
3) Escalate
Very often, communication to my clients before the coaching sessions, I bump into the description of a
common problem. Clients tell me: "I seem to be unable to escape the "friendly zone", "my interactions
with women never go anywhere", "I run out of things to say", "she is bored and so am I", etc. All those
symptoms point to the same disease: lack of escalation.
Quite simply, escalation is the continuous, conscious, deliberate act of deepening the rapport with a
woman.
Counterintuitively, I believe that the best way to deepen rapport is to break it and make my partner in the
conversation invest her effort into building it. That's why the Push/Pull principle is so important.
It's rude not to escalate. When a man refuses to escalate, a woman feels as if he keeps her at a distance by
being cold, stuck-up and snobbish. A women wants a man to want to become closer to her. She creates
opportunities to do so. A great number of women are conscious about the precise time when they let men
escalate and see if men have what it takes. If a man rejects a woman (by not escalating), she feels
unappreciated as a female - a very insulting and embarrassing position for her, considering how much
effort she invests into expressing her femininity. By escalating I give a woman what she seeks - I confirm
her desirability, I validate her status as a female.
I know from the experience that every woman I talk to expects the escalation, sometimes consciously,
sometimes without even being aware of it. To see what I mean, try talking to random women anywhere
you go - standing in line for movie tickets or waiting to get to a bathroom in a coffee shop, for example,
and escalate every time. You'll be surprised: if you begin the interaction in a friendly way, you will find
yourself able to escalate very far in most cases.
I think even now as you are just reading this, it rings true, because escalation is the natural, and most
importantly, expected way to communicate with women, and having lived in the world for a few years
we're all to a certain degree familiar with the phenomenon. If you just relax into it, it will happen
automatically.
But, paradoxically, you might have to make a conscious, deliberate effort to relax into it.
Escalation is the reason why I ask a woman series of increasingly personal open-ended questions - and I
also combine them with the series of increasingly personal statements.
Escalation is the reason why my body conveys more and more comfort and intimacy in the course of my
interaction with a woman.
Escalation is why I kiss her or ask for a date or a phone number - and so on.
Among the number of actions creating the escalation one is particularly important. I'm talking about the
touch (scientifically nicknamed kinesthetics or short "Kino").
Quite a few men appear to have a problem with touching women. I used to be very troubled about that -
until I've realized that Kino wasn't a problem. It's a solution! (As in "landing the plane with the engine
failure isn't a problem... it's a solution").
Kino is the lube that makes the whole machine of courtship run smoothly, without grinding the sprockets.
Without Kino, the Juggler Method wouldn't do much for you, it just somehow wouldn't work. Quite
simply, it's the touch that makes a woman want to stay in the interaction with you!
There's one thing that I as the instructor have to whisper in my clients' ears again and again as I observe
them interacting with women during our in-field practice: "Tooooouuuuuch heeeeer!"
Touch her. How is it done? I guess I 'll have to show you. But the important principle is this: touching
must escalate.
Start small - by touching her on the forearm, for example. And then gradually proceed to her shoulder, on
the back, on the back of the neck, on the small of her back -- and so on.
One of my favorite variations on Kino is the Hand Kino Escalation: I only touch a woman's hand, and
nothing else. I begin with the back of her hand, than later I hold her hand, then I squeeze it and see if she
squeezes my hand in return, then I put my fingers between hers, I kiss her wrist softly, etc.
Touch is a reward. If I touch a woman after she says or does something cute or when she opens up to me,
it makes her think something like: "Oh... I know why he just touched me. He must have really liked what
I've just said. What a sensitive guy! Oh God, I hope he's straight!" Touching is a polite thing to do. We'd
all been under-touched, under-caressed in childhood, and we definitely don't get enough of it as adults. By
touching a woman I give her what she really needs (and rarely receives from others).
As I said, touching is a Reward - which brings me to another thing I wanted to say: the verbal
Reward/Relate element of the Juggler Method is, in fact, also a form of Escalation! It's all connected.
What do I achieve by Rewarding a woman and Relating to her experiences? I make her want more of the
same, and make her work harder to deserve my Rewards - so she will invest her efforts in building the
rapport that I would deliberately undermine again and again by Push/Pull (the indirect Reward), which is
very effective way of rapidly increasing the level of the rapport.
Another highly important thing is demonstrating the high value. Traditionally it had been done by
bragging, which doesn't really work too well. The Juggler Method offers the alternative: Disqualification
(or DQ).
:-)
I'm kidding of course. The Disqualification is a pattern of true sincerity: "Yes, I really AM imperfect and
I'm okay with that".
There are several typical situations in which Disqualification comes in handy. One of them is "fight
against the Superman".
Courtship and rivalry go hand in hand, and our worst rival is the phantom of the Perfect Man who doesn't
even exist. I don't want to be compared to the imaginary superhero because in this comparison I, the
real-life man, can't win.
In the next chapter I will tell you much more about the third fundamental element of the Juggler Method:
Escalate.
Chapter 5
More about the third and probably most crucial fundamental element of the Juggler Method - Escalate.
Escalation is a continuous process, there must always be the upward vector. As the ancient Chinese master
of Martial Arts said to his disciple, "there must be a flame under the pot all the time, otherwise the pot
grows cold". I describe the feeling I have when the escalation progresses smoothly as if the continuous
river of escalation is streaming through my and her hearts.
However, there are several phases of escalation in the Juggler Method - and each phase if defined by a
Turning Point of Escalation.
The pre-escalation phase is the Approach. It's the critical phase, because during this phase many men
shoot themselves down. There's even a term coined for the problem: the "Approach Anxiety". In my
opinion, the Approach Anxiety is nothing but a confusion of a man whose mind and body have to deal
with too many tasks at a time: visually identifying the "target" and potential rival males; coming up with a
valid tactic to deal with a possible confrontation; the physical act of approach as such; finding words to
begin the interaction; dealing with the possibility of a rejection; body language; positioning next to the
target (sitting or standing); in-set logistics (who to talk to first, how to move within the set); former or
imaginary negative experiences; etc.
The solution for the so called Approach Anxiety is to remove unnecessary obstructions by giving a full
commitment to one task only: the physical act of approach as such. This act is extremely simple and
requires minimum effort. I don't confuse myself by thinking of what I'm going to say. I will deal with that
after I approach. Instead, I just take the five steps. (Sometimes even the five steps are not necessary. Very
often my target stands right next to me, and all I have to do is just turn toward her - this constitutes the
Approach).
The first Turning Point of Escalation is the Opening. And here's the biggest secret of the so-called
"nightgame" I've ever learned about talking to strangers and turning them into lovers: open with Kino.
Kino comes before the words - and will continue throughout the entire interaction. Before I say anything, I
touch a woman on the outside of the arm (or on the outside of the leg, this option is more intimate and is
of course available only when she is seated) with the back of my hand. I hold the contact for a few
moments (because if I remove my hand instantly it would feel to a woman almost as if I pinched her).
Only after I've touched a woman, I say something.
As for the verbal part of the Opening, there's a bit of a difference there between the so called "nightgame"
(clubs, bars, lounges, etc.) and "daygame" (anywhere else, whether it's day or night). Women in clubs and
bars are open to meeting and interacting with strangers because they are in those places precisely to meet
and interact with strangers. Women in bookstores, health food markets and coffee shops are somewhat
more reserved, so the "daygame" requires a smoother, less obvious opening.
I can think of a hundreds of structures for an improvised verbal openening - and I've tried them all.
But let me share with you my favorite form of the verbal Opening:
Blank Mind Opening is exactly what it sounds like: I clear my mind completely and approach a woman -
and then say the very first thing that comes to my mind.
I highly recommend you to experiment with the Blank Mind Opening - you'll be amazed at what clever
and witty (and sometimes incredibly goofy) things will come out of your mouth!
Kino + verbal Opening begin the first phase of escalation: Neutral. The Neutral phase of escalation is
often wrongly called "Platonic".
It might be irrelevant here, but the term "Platonic Love" comes from Plato's famous philosophical dialog
"Symposium" (A MUST reading for any thinking person). In that dialog Plato gives probably the only
definition of love in the history of human thought that can be considered as valid. Platonic Love is the
complete realization of the unity of souls between the two human beings, in which they both perceive God
in each other. This kind of love means complete trust, complete self-sacrifice, complete compassion,
complete mutual belonging, and it can occur between two people of any gender as sexual partners or
friends. So in the state of Platonic Love sex is an option but not a requirement, therefore essentially the
Platonic Love can either take a form of deepest friendship or deepest romantic relationship. Therefore, the
Platonic Love is the highest achievable form of friendship AND sexual love equally, the absolute form of
love achievable in the material world, and as you can see, it has nothing to do whatsoever with a situation
when the two people hardly know each other and make small talk. That's why I'm absolutely against
calling the first phase of Escalation "Platonic". It's Neutral, okay?
:-)
During the first moments of the Neutral phase the structure of conversation is usually the least important
consideration for me. There's still the inertia of the opening that propels the interaction forward, and it's
more than common that for a few moments I get to answer the questions from the set. They are always
small talk kind of questions: "Where are you from?", "What brought you here tonight?", "How do you like
the place?" etc. If no one in the set asks me those questions, I ask them. And it's also from the very
moment I open I begin to use every opportunity to Disqualify myself - eagerly sharing my vulnerabilities
and gaining respect for that. I'm going to continue doing it throughout the interaction.
The purpose of the Neutral phase is to make the people comfortable with the idea of me becoming a part
of their group. That's why the Neutral phase is extremely important. It's like a graceful dance, when
everyone knows that the talk is quite empty, and yet we talk about weather etc. because on the nonverbal
level we are taking time to get used to each other.
However, I do not want to get stuck in the Neutral phase. I do my best to keep it very short. That's why I
imperceptibly move to asking them very light open-ended questions, and initiate the Question - Answer -
Statement structure of the conversation. This structure will continue throughout the whole interaction.
There's one important open-ended question I always ask a woman during the Neutral phase of the
escalation if she seems to be on her own. I ask this question because I want her to know I'm not going to
make her uncomfortable by being impolite to her companions if they happened to step away for a few
minutes. I call it the "Guardian question": "Who are you here with?"
Finally I arrive to the point when a woman I speak with makes a commitment to the interaction by
revealing a significant bit of the unique personal information for the first time. And this is when I place
the Second Turning Point of Escalation: Statement of Approval. Statement of Approval is, quite simply,
the very first significant verbal Reward that I give to a woman. In fact, I've been Rewarding her lightly
earlier, and every verbal Reward I will make afterwards will also be a statement of approval, but I call this
one the Statement of Approval with the capital letters because it's the very first Reward for the unique
personal information a woman has revealed for the first time, and when I Reward her for it, my Reward
becomes a Turning Point of Escalation - it increases the speed with which I build the rapport. Statement of
Approval begins the second phase of Escalation: Personal.
From this moment on, I ask a woman series of increasingly personal open-ended questions, and apply the
full force of the second fundamental element of the Juggler Method: Reward/Relate (every now and then
using the Push/Pull as an indirect Reward). And among my increasingly personal open-ended questions
there's one I ask once in every interaction somewhere in first third of the Personal phase. It's a
"Relationship Situation Question": What's your relationship situation?"
There are several reasons for asking her: "What's your relationship situation?" One of them is that I am
quite sure that there's a good probability of her currently being in a relationship. I want to be the one to
bring up the topic in a positive way, otherwise she will do that a bit later negatively (as in "I have a
boyfriend so let's just be friends"). I want her to realize that I am aware of the fact that she might have a
boyfriend, and that I'm quite comfortable with it. This question also moves the conversation to the topic of
the relationships. And it's very easy to make a transition from the topic of the relationship to the topic of
human sexuality.
At some point she says or does something that I genuinely find sexy about her. This is when I place the
third Turning Point of Escalation: the Statement of Intent (SOI). I tell her something like this: "I like the
way you .......... (whatever she has just said or done). I find it sexy about you!" I make sure I articulate the
Statement of Intent in such a way that there's no doubts whatsoever she had heard me. And I never hesitate
to repeat it is she asks what was it that I just had said. All three words: "I', "you", and "sexy" must be there
in one sentence. Use your imagination for now to fill in the blanks.
The SOI leads to one of the two possible outcomes. If a woman accepts it - if she reacts to it favorably in
one way or another, or if she hides her reaction, which for me is a sign of acceptance - the rapport grows
exponentially (the line shoots upward), creating the third phase of Escalation: Sexual.
During the Sexual phase the purpose of Kino is to give a woman physical pleasure, to make her feel good.
A little back rub or neck rub, running fingers through her hair, caressing her tenderly anywhere she wants
- now is the time for doing this. I go even more personal with my open-ended questions and my
Reward/Relate statements during the Sexual phase of the Escalation. I ask her questions about sex - and
I'd like you to warm up with the idea of talking with me openly and unapologetically about human
sexuality.
At this point I have to come up with a convenient reason to either move the woman away from the group
of her friends - or move her friends away from the woman. And there are a few more important things I do
here. I build up sexual tension by creating Sexual Barriers. I impose certain obstacles between me and her
- surmountable obstacles, to be sure. Something that seems to prevent us from getting physically closer.
This tactic makes a woman want to overcome the obstacles, and she begins to be very active in the
escalation.
Essentially the Sexual Barriers tactic is a form of Push/Pull in which the Push is designed in such a way
that a woman does her own Pulling. By creating an obstacle I give her a powerful motivation to work on
eliminating that obstacle. The barrier I create has to give her an option of climbing over. May be even
with a little ladder propped against it somewhere in clear view.
1. And finally we arrive to the desired destination: Close. There are various forms of Closing:
2. A number Close - I hand her my cell phone ("Here"), wait until she takes it, and tell her "I want
your phone number")
3. An email close: ("Got a pen and a paper? Wait, I think I do. Here, write your email address please")
4. A kiss Close ("Close your eyes!" - she complies, knowing exactly what's coming - I kiss her)
5. An instant date Close ("I'm hungry. Let's walk and find a pizza place nearby. We can sit there for a
while and get to know each other better!")
6. A date close ("Remember you told me you ride horseback? I'd love to join you sometime!")
7. Two or more of the above together.
One important thing about the Close is that I always stay with a woman for some time after I closed her -
and build more rapport. If I don't stick around more, she might think I was only talking to her to "score".
And another important thing - whatever Turning Point I make - Open, SOA, SOI - and especially in the
Close - I say and do things casually, nonchalantly, not making a big deal out of them. The less "special" I
make my Statement of Intent, for example, or request for a phone number - the higher is the probability
for me to get what I want.
And that's the entire structure of the Juggler Method Escalation for you.
I know it might sound somewhat complicated, but when you see it in practice you'll be amazed how easy
it is.
And the most important principle of the Juggler Method is this: it's all about having fun.
Chapter 6
There is a notion, unfortunately too popular among many courtship instructors, that in order to master any
new skills a man has to get out of his comfort zone. I would not argue with people who hold such opinion,
because the opinion of any person is based on the lifetime of experience that particular person had
collected, and by pronouncing them wrong I would invalidate the entire lives of those guys.
I however hold a different opinion based on my own experience of teaching various skills - from music to
martial arts to creative writing to motorcycling.
I think it is almost impossible to really master any new skill if a student has to deal with the formidable
feeling of being out of the comfort zone AND at the same time with the task of mastering the new skill.
Stay in your comfort zone so you can master the new skill.
Elegant conversational structure is at the very core of the Juggler Method. There is much more to
courtship than just words, but verbal part is important.
You can practice and totally master it without getting out of your chair. Go to one of the popular romance
chat rooms - for example, on AOL or Yahoo. There are sites like Twenties Love, Thirties Love, and so on.
I personally find online conversations with forty- and fifty-something women more enriching, because
those women have a lot of emotional experience, and a hell of a lot more sense of humor than some
younger chicks, but the choice is yours of course.
When you feel like doing it, invite such woman to exchange instant messages with you. And then practice
every element of the conversational structure by having a nice, deep, emotionally meaningful online
conversation with her. There are several benefits to such interaction:
Such method of learning the conversational structure will make you so good at the art of conversation that
when you practice the Juggler Method later in a nightclub or a bookstore all the best things to say will
come to your mind automatically and effortlessly, and you will be able to completely focus on the
nonverbal skills - and stay in the comfort zone while doing that.
Your mastery of the conversational structure of the Juggler Method will become your comfort zone for the
practice of the nonverbal elements. In this way, you will learn the entire method without ever feeling
uncomfortable.
There is another option I would like to introduce to you. I can teach you in-depth every conversational
technique of the Juggler Method over the Internet through the series of Virtual Training sessions. Gmail
is very convenient for such form of teaching and learning because it saves all the chats automatically and
you will be able to re-read every session as many times as you find necessary to ingrain each technique
into your brain. It takes about 8 hours to make all the techniques active and automatic. And you won't
have to leave your chair and come to New York to meet me. You may be in Kenya and still learn the
entire conversational part of the method.
Please contact me if you feel you might be interested in learning the Juggler Method from me via Virtual
Training sessions.
But just in case you cannot afford private coaching with me, which is quite expensive actually, in the next
part of this book I'll provide you with the examples of my Virtual Training sessions with a private client
who agreed to make those sessions public. His real name is replaced with a pen name for privacy sake.
And I know that perhaps I am undermining my commercial success by publishing those sessions... but
then again, perhaps I am not, because the personality of every client I have worked with was completely
unique, and one can only get the basics from the specific challenges faced by "Patrick" from the next six
chapters. It is my strong belief that no matter how good one can be with teaching oneself from a
book, nothing really can replace a one-on-one coaching with a competent instructor.
(Do I make it too obvious that I'm doinmg vicious marketing here?)
And yet, I would like you to judge for yourself. Please be prepared for a bit of mental effort.
So...
Part II
Virtual Training
Chapter 7
DIMITRI: Hm, I like the way you grab the bull by the horns. I'm like this too. When I ride my motorcycle
I never start in the first gear, I always take off in the second. How often have you ridden a motorcycle?
PATRICK: I am not as cool as you are. I have a moped - it's only 50 cc! Not very exciting but it gets me
around town!
DIMITRI: Wow dude! Great Disqualification! I knew you were a Natural in disguise! (By the way, I've
just Rewarded you).
PATRICK: The fact that that was a DQ didn't occur to me till you told me it was one! Still, I shouldn't
get a big head about it! :-)
DIMITRI: That was another great Disqualification. We're getting somewhere, and we're getting there
fast! Anyway, here's the deal. Let us establish the rules.
DIMITRI: I think you are rather good at it though. You have just Disqualified again! I mean, "I am a bit
confused about DQ" is a DQ. :-)
PATRICK: Okay... But what about just accepting a compliment like a confident person by saying,
simply, "Thank you" ?
DIMITRI: Precisely Patrick, that's exactly what you do. Thank you for pointing out to me that
Disqualification has to begin with "thank you". I tend to explain that stuff rather unsystematically... (What
I just did was the proper full Disqualification, beginning with "thank you", as you had suggested!)
Okay... first things first... We shall talk more about Disqualification in due time...
Now the rules. Please do not interrupt me for a while and just read what I am about to write, okay? There
is no strict format for our dialog. I am going to say whatever comes to my mind, and I encourage you to
say whatever comes to yours. Every time I notice a specific Juggler Method conversational pattern that
you use naturally without realizing that it belongs to the Juggler Method, I will point it out to you. In fact,
practically everything you say belongs to the Juggler Method, so all I have to do is to assign labels so you
can recognize those patterns in your own speech.I am also going to give you certain simple tasks during
our dialog. Then I will comment on how you fulfill the tasks. I will also give you the examples of how I
would fulfill the same tasks - and I will point out some of my own conversational patterns - just like I
already did with the Disqualification in the beginning of our conversation. Deal?
PATRICK: Okay.
DIMITRI: Great. Now, you already know what open-ended questions are all about. So please ask me an
open-ended question.
PATRICK: Okay... here comes... What did you do at the weekend that was fun?
DIMITRI: I think after we talked on the phone last time you invested some considerable effort into
practicing the art of asking open-ended questions... or you are just catching on very quickly. Either way I
respect that about you. It was a damn good open-ended question!
DIMITRI: No problem. It was sincere. And yet, it was a Reward. I have Rewarded you. So here is my
answer to your open-ended question: I was in a car with a friend, we were driving through a snowstorm.
Now I want you to reward me for giving you this little bit of personal information.
PATRICK: Okay. Here's my reply: "Wow, that sounds scary! You're brave!"
DIMITRI: Very good! Perfect Reward! Now I would like you to Relate to my experience by sharing with
me your own that is similar in some way.
Wow Patrick, this is the mama of all awkward pauses. Dude, you suck at Relating!
PATRICK: LOL
What I just did is called a Push/Pull. Please go ahead with relate part of the statement.
PATRICK: I've never driven in a snow storm, but I once got caught out in one, on top of a mountain
while skiing in the Alps. It was really scary because I had fallen and twisted my knee, and my ski didn't
come off.
DIMITRI: Patrick, I'm really amazed at how quickly you are progressing. This was a wonderful Relating!
I am especially glad that you have shared your emotions: "that was scary"! It is so great you did that! It is
just what you need to do!
DIMITRI: Well, yes, it was, and I am glad you have pointed it out. As I've said to you before, you are
catching on very quickly. And yet I was perfectly sincere. You see, the Rewarding and Relating are quite
sincere things. We do those things anyway, we just usually are not particularly aware of doing them.
Awareness is what we work on now. By the way, this entire dialog we are having now will be available
for you on gmail - it's automatically archived.
PATRICK: Cool!
DIMITRI: I really like the way you project emotions even over the instant messenger. this is exactly the
skill we work hard to develop in our clients, and you already have that. Okay, ask me a small open-ended
question.
DIMITRI: Yes, that is exactly what I hoped to receive. Perfect question. Here's my answer: it was a very
tough day. I got into 4 arguments with 4 close friends. Now I would like to be Rewarded.
DIMITRI: Exactly my point, you have to be able to reward anything. This is how I would do it, please
pay attention.
DIMITRI: "Wow Dimitri, you are really fair to your friends! Four friends - four arguments. No one was
left out. I like that about you!" (The last line is optional).
PATRICK: That's genius dude! I love it! I would never be able to just come up with things like that!
How do you think that stuff up on the spot?
PATRICK: Why?!
"I would never be able to just come up with things like that!" - This was Relating through
Disqualification. (Because in fact Disqualification can be used as one of the ways to Relate).
"How do you think that stuff up on the spot?" - this was your next open-ended question. Cool open-ended
question, too! We're definitely getting somewhere.
PATRICK: But I'm actually asking YOU! Not the imaginary woman!
DIMITRI: That's the whole point dude, I am teaching you how to talk to real people! Why would I teach
you to talk to imaginary women? This would be actually scary... No, the true Juggler Method is natural, it
just happens, that's what we are practicing! And that's the answer to your question, too!
DIMITRI: I think so, too. Good boy. I knew you had it in you. I'm like that myself: a boy genius.
PATRICK: LOL! Was that a Reward/Relate thingy?
DIMITRI: YES.
DIMITRI: Okay. Let's wrap it up for now on the high point. Here's the assignment for you. I would like
you to read our dialog again when you have time, just to refresh it in your mind and to see what exactly
we have been practicing together. Deal?
PATRICK: Yep!
PATRICK: Definitely.
PATRICK: Ten-four.
Chapter 8
DIMITRI: Ready?
PATRICK: Oh yes.
PATRICK: It's really dark out there... were you afraid of the dark when you were a kid?
DIMITRI: Nope, it's not an open-ended question. You will get a "yes" or "no" answer to the one you've
asked, and that will be the end of the conversation. My answer is "No". Rephrase it.
PATRICK: When were you most afraid of the dark when you were a kid?!
DIMITRI: Aside from two "when" in one sentence, this is something I can work with. Okay, I remember
something. I hated porridge when I was in the nursery school. One day the nurses put me into a dark room
to force me to eat that disgusting stuff. I felt insulted because they were stronger and could do that to me.
That's the closest I got to being afraid of the dark. (Now I want to be Rewarded).
PATRICK: Here comes. And it didn't break you! You're a tough cookie!
DIMITRI: LOL! Well, you can SOI if you want, but... for now your SOI has to contain "I", "you" and
"sexy" in one sentence... "I find your unbreakable spirit sexy", this sort of thing.
PATRICK: Okay.
DIMITRI: Well?
DIMITRI: WOW!
I'm just kidding. Go ahead, think. I like that about you. (That was a Push/Pull)
DIMITRI: Deal.
PATRICK: One time I almost had to quit one of my Master's courses because the lecturer was really bad
- well I did quit and then I battled the college to get the fees back. It took months of letters and pain, but
eventually the president admitted that the teacher wasn't qualified to teach and refunded me the fees!
Jesus, it was awful Relating.
DIMITRI: You're getting really good at disqualifying yourself... kinda scary actually... No, your Relating
wasn't bad at all. Here's a few "routines" for you, memorize them.
DIMITRI: Yeah... Welcome to the real world... this is Daaaaark Juggler Method. So here comes:
...and so on.
DIMITRI: I am sure you do! So, there's this sentence in the middle that explains that you're about to
share your own experience... Makes the connection between Rewarding and Relating much smoother.
Makes sense so far?
PATRICK: Absolutely.
DIMITRI: This kind of sentence, for example: "I know just what you're talking about" follows the
Reward. it becomes the beginning of the Relate part.
DIMITRI: It means we're done for today! Please make sure to re-read this dialog when you have a few
free minutes, and refresh in your mind what you have learned. Talk later!
Chapter 9
PATRICK: Yep!
DIMITRI: It's maddening. A lot of work. I just had to hang up on my girlfriend because I had no time to
talk to her, and believe you me, she's not happy about it. (Reward me).
PATRICK: You are such a hardworking man - I respect that about you!
PATRICK: I know where you're coming from I am a student and have to study hard most of my time.
DIMITRI: Good. Next question - more personal. (Make it connected to your last statement by the topic).
PATRICK: Youve mentioned your girlfriend. What do you think are the most important things to look
for in a partner?
DIMITRI: This is only my opinion, I might be wrong. Things like beauty of the soul, self-sufficiency,
love, reason, adventurous spirit, idealism. IDEALISM! (R/R)
PATRICK: Wow! I can see that you are a very deep person with very high standards. I find it really
attractive! I feel where you're coming from - I think it's the most amazing feeling when you meet someone
who has this "beauty of the soul" that you're talking about. I met one of them in the Himalayas in Nepal
and she was so adventurous - it was so much fun! I'm such an idealist too! If I had my way, we'd all live in
Heaven!
DIMITRI: Supercool. Next question. Deeper, related to one of your last topics.
PATRICK: Really? Was that good? It feels like I'm just saying what you want to hear, no? Is that the
idea?
DIMITRI: You are making me want to build rapport with you. That's a little odd because I know what
you are doing, but I do feel much friendlier toward you because of the last exchange! So keep going. The
idea is you have to be yourself.
PATRICK: What would you do if you could click your fingers and have your ideal life just happen right
now?
DIMITRI: Hmmm... the structure of your question prompts me to say "I would click my fingers" -
because you could have put it better - but I know what you mean. I would be flying over Atlantic Ocean in
a skycar created by Dr. Moller. (R/R) And keep going without my prompting.
PATRICK: That's amazing - you're such a dreamer! It all sounds so romantic. And you have that spirit of
the explorer thing going on too - I'm very much the same - I read a book about the Apollo Astronauts
when I was 15 and wanted to be one ever since. I dreamed about what it would be like to be walking on
the moon, looking out at the endless blackness and the crescent Earth hanging there... just like Jim
Lovell's daydream in Apollo 13.
DIMITRI: Very good. Let's keep going QAS and escalate me until you find something sexy in what I say,
then I want you to SOI.
PATRICK: What?!
DIMITRI: Which is another way of saying, yes, you got it right. QAS means question-answer-statement.
Duh!
PATRICK: Should I go deeper with a topic already talked about or go on to another you mentioned that I
haven't asked you about yet?
PATRICK: Sorry about QAS - I only realized it was a stupid question after I sent it...
DIMITRI: Cool Disqualification. Keep going. I apologize for being a jerk. I'm like that every now and
then.
DIMITRI: Okay, so I see I do not have to explain about the Push/Pull anymore, looks like you got it.
Took you only three days to catch on. Just kidding, good job, keep on going. (That was a Push/Pull, too).
PATRICK: Dimitri, I take my apology back. You really are a jerk. :-)
DIMITRI: I concur.
DIMITRI: You didnt even have to say you were kidding, etc., because the smile is already a Pull.
PATRICK: Gotcha. Okay, so how did you feel when you've been with someone in the past who made
you feel some of the things we've been talking about?
PATRICK: How did you feel in the past when you were in a relationship that made you really feel love
and fulfillment?
DIMITRI: This question is quite confusing because it's a bit too long, and because the verb "feel" is used
twice. Rephrase it to make it shorter.
PATRICK: But doesnt asking it mean that I don't know the answer and therefore that I've never been in
love and therefore that I'm undesirable?
DIMITRI: No. It means you want to know how it felt in my experience. So, I was in love only once. And
I felt that being in love made me suddenly incredibly wise. I kept it secret and somehow it made me feel
like a hero. Nothing else mattered.
PATRICK: But I can't honestly relate, because I've never been in love! Make it up?
DIMITRI: You've just related though! Only you did it in the advanced way. It is called Anti-Relating.
"I can't relate to feeling in love because I had never been in love" is one of the most powerful ways to
relate sincerity is the key! Great job man!
DIMITRI: You are, quite simply, a Natural Seducer, buddy. In the best possible sense of the words.
PATRICK: I am laughing.
DIMITRI: Okay, break till later. Re-read the chat in your Gmail archive so you can refresh what youve
learned. Be cool.
Chapter 10
DIMITRI: It can be classical or not, but it has to be ecstatic. On the other hand, now that I think of it, I
love serene music, too. It has the other form of ecstasy in it. I guess what I'm saying is I relate to sincere
emotions in music.
PATRICK: Exactly! It doesn't matter whether it's a piano concerto or a Rolling Stones concert. I love that
you get it! I really know what you mean. Who cares if it's a Les Paul or a Steinway Concert Grand! What
were you listening to the first time music made you cry?
DIMITRI: I do not remember the first time. I have some very vague hint of recollection, but it is almost
completely in the fog. I do remember listening to a singer whose voice sounded like my fathers. My
relationship with my father at that period was somewhat cold, and hearing that singer's recording suddenly
made me cry.
PATRICK: Well it's good to express your emotions. It's actually very courageous to be able to do that. I
find that really attractive. I definitely can relate to what you're saying.. at my Grand Uncle's funeral my
Mother's choir sang Va Pensiero by Verdi. Every time I hear it now, I feel ...an indescribable joy and
sadness at the same time.
DIMITRI: Your RR is very good - almost. "Well it's good to express your emotions. It's actually very
courageous to be able to do that." would be a perfect reward - but you made it impersonal, as if you're
talking not about me, but in general. Rephrase it to include "I" and "you".
PATRICK: Well I think it's great that you can express your emotions. I think you are very courageous to
be able to do it.
PATRICK: When was the last time you got totally lost in a book?
DIMITRI: A while ago. To be honest with you, and I feel ashamed to admit it, I rarely get lost in the
intellectual kind of stuff. Last time I got lost in something it was probably Harry Potter part 6. Promise not
to laugh.
PATRICK: Just kidding. Come here, give me a hug! Was that a Pull?
DIMITRI: Yes!
DIMITRI: It's not the only form of push-pull obviously; I'm just giving you a primitive example, easy to
understand. In most cases you don't have to do the Pull part - your smile and friendly vibe do it! In The
Departed" Matt Damons character does it several times. His characters Push/Pull technique is not
particularly subtle, and I wouldnt call that character an overwhelmingly sincere guy, but when the
technique is obvious, it sometimes easier to learn it. Anyway, lets proceed from Harry Potter 6.
PATRICK: Okay. That's cool that you still have a little kid in you somewhere! I love that about you - so
cute. But yeah, I know exactly what you mean, I feel bad sometimes that I can't focus on the tough topics
and yet I have no problems browsing through comic books! I enjoy them! Damn it, this doesnt bring me
any closer to an SOI!
DIMITRI: Well, you could have just said: That's cool that you still have a little kid in you somewhere! I
find it incredibly sexy about you! or That's cool that you still have a little kid in you somewhere! For
some reason it totally turns me on now... you better stop doing it! even though the later example strikes
me as a little cheesy.
Okay, let me give you a little more theory. There are certain obligatory questions you want to ask in the
beginning of the interaction. Together they are called "information gathering ". We talked about that on
the phone remember?
etc. This sort of questions. When you begin the interaction, you have a choice. You can make small talk,
or make something that seems like small talk but helps you to figure out the social situation. Obviously
the latter is better. That's why all the information gathering questions information must be asked very
early in the interaction - instead of saying things like "How do you like this bar?" and "What's the best
thing about living in New York?" So - ASK THOSE QUESTIONS!
DIMITRI: Thats it for now. Youre making incredibly rapid progress. I really like that about you.
PATRICK: Thanks, but you never know, I might slow down as rapidly.
DIMITRI: Shut up. :-) (Push/Pull) Okay, you better get some rest and re-read this dialog later. Bye.
Chapter 11
DIMITRI: How about "What's your name?" - "Who are you here with?" - "What are you plans for later
tonight?" - "Who's driving you home?"
PATRICK: What? You haven't answered yet? I didn't receive your answer.
DIMITRI: I'm Dimitri, pleasure meeting you! - That's the answer to your question: "What's your
name?" REWARD ME!
PATRICK: It's great to meet you too - I like your friendly vibe!
DIMITRI: Brilliant. You did the reverse structure: Relate/Reward - but it's perfectly fine. Now begin
gathering information: "Who are you here with? - etc.
PATRICK: That's cool no let me change that. I think it's great that you feel comfortable enough with
yourself to hang out on your own - so many people don't - but I guess you're just a confident person. I like
that about you - I find it sexy actually :-)
DIMITRI: Good! RELATE! (Talk about your self-reliance, not in a bar).
PATRICK: I know where you're coming from... sometimes I find it refreshing to just get away from the
group - and go out exploring on your own. I went backpacking around the world on my own for that very
reason!
DIMITRI: Perfect. Now Push/Pull me in any way you want. Just for the heck of it!
PATRICK: I bet you're really arrogant too - confident people are like that sometimes...
DIMITRI: Very good! Great Push. Now how would you Pull me?
PATRICK: :-) ?
PATRICK: Actually, there were times when I felt really lonely and so not confident when I was traveling
alone that I would just sit in a bar on my own and drink and wish I could work up the courage to go talk to
some of the other backpackers there...
DIMITRI: Great. Here's another conversational structure for you: placing Sexual Barriers.
DIMITRI: Yes it is! Let me give you an example I heard from one of my instructors during the Charm
School I took as a client. Its a little too by the book, but it is simple, and therefore good for our
purposes: "I wish I could cover your whole body with kisses... but we're in a bar and your friends are
staring..." I would like you to use this example as a model and give me your own, totally original version
of the Sexual Barrier.
PATRICK: I feel so connected to you right now - I just want to grab you and kiss the hell out of you, but
may be we shouldn't - we're in a public venue - it wouldnt be very appropriate.
Chapter 12
PATRICK: You're a mechanic, too? A multi-talented person! I can't really relate to that - I'm not
particularly amazing at anything. Can I combine DQ with relate like that?
DIMITRI: Yes you can. You may also add something along these lines: I like that a lot about you
(Or rephrase it in any way you want). It is important to focus the reward by making your feelings very
clear.
DIMITRI: Well, I share the apartment with my lover, and I try to be loyal to her, I really do, only it
doesnt work. I have an on-and-off relationship with another woman, and something tells me this second
relationship is about to be over soon. I am also courting a young and very innocent Russian girl, and I
have no idea where this will take me, but I want to explore it because I like her. My romantic life is a
mess.
PATRICK: Wow! Well, it certainly seems like you have an exciting love life - you're adventurous and
like to explore sexuality - I find that very sexy about you. I feel the same - as far as my desires are
concerned, but I again, I can't really relate because I don't have multiple lovers!
DIMITRI: Okay Patrick, lets stop for a moment. You did everything perfectly well, including the SOI,
only I would like you to be able to create longer escalation so you can really connect through emotions
before you make you SOI. So let me explain something to you.
DIMITRI: HmEscalation has two important aspects, and both of those aspects have something to do
with emotions. Or may be I should say Escalation has quite a few important aspects, but out of all of them
we are going to consider only two now. One of them is Relating to her emotions by telling her about your
experience of the same emotions. The second aspect of the escalation is a little trickier.
DIMITRI: A woman makes a decision to have sex with a man based on certain emotions she
experiences. These emotions are the obligatory condition for her to make that choice. If she does not
experience certain specific motions, sex is not likely to happen. Are you with me so far?
PATRICK: Yes.
DIMITRI: So the conclusion is this. If you want a woman to have sex with you, you must give her the
emotions you want her to experience, in a certain sequence. You must hand her these emotions on a
platter.
DIMITRI: Well, there are several channels for transferring the emotional states. (By the way, a lot of this
material comes from my friend Javier, who is a great dancer and a great expert in psychology). I explain
about some of the state-inducing channels during my private coaching sessions. Unfortunately, I would
not be able to teach you these techniques very well in this chat, because I would have to show you how I
do that. But to give you an example of such channels, you can convey the emotion via the tone of your
voice, or through your body language.
PATRICK: I think I understand what you mean. But how would I convey excitement to a woman if I'm
not really excited - fake it?
DIMITRI: If you must - yes. FAKE IT! Let me explain about faking it. God is perfect, human beings are
not. No matter how hard you try, you cannot be 100 percent successful in anything. You may be 95
percent successful, but there will always be a little bit of failure in each of your success. Don't ever beat
yourself up if you are 95 percent sincere because it's the maximum you can achieve.
DIMITRI: And you shouldnt beat yourself up either if you're 35 percent sincere (usually referred as
"faking it") - because we all have good days and bad days.
Well?
PATRICK: What?!
PATRICK: Ah yes. This thing that you said about being 35 percent sincere and not beating myself up I
really liked it about you. It told me a lot about your personality!
DIMITRI: Too late, dude. Were now enemies forever. Anyway, you must give to a woman certain
emotions in a certain sequence. Right now, being on the Instant Messenger, we're only dealing with "How
to give her those emotions through words" - separate from the tone of voice and body language.
1. Direct question;
2. Indirect question;
3. Direct statement;
4. Indirect statement.
1. Direct question: "When was the last time you felt perfectly free?"
2. Indirect question: "What was the last time something was so funny that you couldn't suppress your
laughter and didnt care if anyone was listening?
3. Direct statement: "I feel free every time I breathe fresh air, because it reminds me that I quit
smoking and am now free from the addiction! Its a big thing for me!"
4. Indirect statement: I feel great riding my motorcycle as fast as I can along the empty highway, not
caring about anything in the whole world!"
Now - what would you like to ask me about the techniques I've just described?
DIMITRI: You ask deep questions, my young disciple. In this case the difference is that when you are
being indirect you DO NOT NAME the emotion you're giving to a woman. Instead, you describe how this
emotion feels, without naming it. For example, instead of saying "I feel free", you describe freedom in
some specific details. That's why I personally like indirect statements better. All 4 ways of conveying
emotions are good, and yet I personally prefer DIRECT questions and INDIRECT statements. Also known
as general questions and specific statements.
DIMITRI: Because if you ask her "In what situation did you feel the most relaxed?" - she has a great
choice of situations to choose from as opposed to "How often do you take your time enjoying the hot
tub?" But its my personal choice, you might like indirect questions better - I know many guys who are
good with indirect questions.
PATRICK: Right - seems a little advanced for me at this stage - I'm still struggling with coming up with
any question at all!
DIMITRI: Good Disqualification! So, what emotions do we need to convey to a beautiful female stranger
in order to have sex with her? Let me put you through a little Socratic questioning here.
PATRICK: Okay.
DIMITRI: So do you think a woman is more likely to have sex with you when she feels safe - or when
she freaks out because she finds you creeeeeeepy?
DIMITRI: Cool. So ask me a direct open-ended question that would make me feel safe.
PATRICK: When was the last time you felt really, totally safe and protected?
DIMITRI: Good. This was rather simple, wasnt it? Now ask me the INDIRECT question about the same
emotion.
PATRICK: So I just try to describe the emotion of safety without actually saying the word safe?
PATRICK: When was the last time you felt like you completely forgot about all the pressures of the
world - your job, traffic, kids, deadlines - all that stuff and just felt totally liberated and free? Oops,
liberated and free is kinda the same thing.
DIMITRI: Yep, and even though the question itself was very good, but it was a) Direct and b) About the
emotion of freedom not about safety.
PATRICK: How did you feel when you were in the womb?
DIMITRI: Patrick, I believe you have just demonstrated the quality of a genius. Now make the direct
statement along the lines of "I usually feel safe when
PATRICK: I feel so safe when I'm in the arms of someone who I care about - I think it's a wonderful
feeling.
DIMITRI: Perfect. Now indirect statement along the lines of: "Yeah, I know what you mean. That's how
I feel when I curl up in a ball in bed with a good book" (Followed by... "So... what do you like to do in
bed?")
PATRICK: LOL!
DIMITRI: That was Rob's style. Very contagious.
PATRICK: Yeah, it's such a sweet feeling - I know why you like it. I love to just climb into bed and feel
warm and listen to the wind blowing the rain against the window. Sometimes my cat jumps up on the bed
and starts purring in my ear!
DIMITRI: BRILLIANT! So, she feels safe now. But there's safety - and safety. What would you choose -
that she feels safe because she has karate black belt 12th level and can tear you in half with her bare hands
- or because she feels friendly toward you?
DIMITRI: My point is, friendly is a good emotion to hand to her. Direct question, please?
PATRICK: What do you like to do with your best friend when you guys hang out?
DIMITRI: Well, okay, it was semi-direct. Now give me totally indirect one along these lines: "When was
the first time you realized you wanted to give random gifts of kindness to people around you?"
PATRICK: When did you realize that you wanted to do volunteer work just to help people for the sake of
helping them?
DIMITRI: Yes. Or you might ask it like this: "When did you get the closest to volunteering, etc. - just in
case she never actually volunteered. Now give me direct statement.
PATRICK: I feel great when I'm with friends, just hanging out, relaxing and having fun and laughing.
PATRICK: I love spending time with people who care about me and who really get who I am at the
deepest level.
DIMITRI: You got it. I think you get the idea of how you can make a woman experience certain emotion
through words, so now let's just run through the list of needed emotions very quickly. It doesnt matter if
its noun or adjective now. Comfort.
PATRICK: - relaxed
DIMITRI: In he beginning, yes, but not all the time. Eventually you want her to feel tense in a certain
way freedom -
PATRICK: - exhilarated -
DIMITRI: - intoxicated with you - in love - desperately craving pleasure (give her a candy and take away
at the last moment; then 5 minutes later be about to kiss her - and pull back at the last moment, then later
well, you know... and so on)
DIMITRI: - cock-hungry --
DIMITRI: And so on. Okay, you get the idea. That was Escalation. Do that to a girl and she wont find
herself capable of saying no. All right then, gotta go. Talk tomorrow.
DIMITRI: No problem. Make sure to re-read this chat when you have a few minutes.
Part III
Effortless Courtship
Chapter 13
There is a man who in his early adolescence has made an unconscious decision to avoid women.
Having avoided women for a certain period of time, he naturally begins to feel deprived of sexual relief
and female companionship.
The desperate cravings for sexual relief and female companionship motivates him to approach a woman.
The woman flees the man because he, in his desperation, has come across as a potential aggressor and has
sabotaged himself.
At the time when the woman escapes him, he feels much more desperate than before he approached her.
Because the woman's escape and the feeling of extreme despair coincide in time, the man's mind connects
the two, and he begins to believe he feels desperate because this particular woman has "rejected" him.
Immediately after the woman is gone, the man feels considerably better.
The absence of the woman and the feeling of calm coincide in time, and the man's mind connects the two:
he begins to believe that he feels good when he does not approach women and feels bad when he
approaches them.
His earlier choice to avoid women is reinforced by what he wrongly perceives as objective experience.
So the man avoids women for some more time. However, his cravings for sexual relief and female
companionship have not been satisfied, and they continues to grow, until the man builds up a strong
motivation to approach a woman again.
This time he is more tentative, and simultaneously more aggressive due to his earlier negative experience,
and of course his desperation scares the new woman away.
The chain continues, and all the while the man's cravings for sexual relief and female companionship
becomes exponentially stronger.
Millions of such men spend their entire lives in misery, and believing that their misery is the inevitable
part of life.
The chain of self-reinforcing despair keeps those people in psychological slavery. This chain must be
broken.
Chapter 14
One of the most crucial reasons why the chain of despair continues to exist is the notion of a man as a
taker.
Women are conditioned to think of men in this way despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary
and, more importantly, it is also men's attitude toward themselves.
A man thinks that a woman has something he needs and that he must get it from her.
A woman thinks that she has something a man needs and that he would inevitable try to take it away from
her.
The behavior of a man who considers himself as a taker reinforces the wrong belief in a woman's mind.
He is aggressive and greedy. She doesn't want anything taken away from her and immediately becomes
defensive, reinforcing in a man the belief that she indeed must have something that he needs, so he must
invest more effort into getting it. He becomes even more aggressive and greedy.
The notion of a man as a taker is wrong and useless. It must be eliminated and replaced by the opposite
notion: men must see themselves as generous, joyful givers.
"I have something a woman craves. I am generously and joyfully giving it to her".
When I say that a man has something a woman craves, and he generously and joyfully gives it to her, I
mean two things.
A man gives to a woman the feeling of sexual relief, which she craves from a man much more intensely
than a man craves it from her.
And - much more importantly! - a man gives to a woman the joy of male companionship, which she
craves as intensely as the man craves the female companionship from a woman. You might ask: what
about those men and women who only want sex from each other?
If there were men and women who only wanted sexual relief, they could achieve it in perfect solitude by
pleasing themselves. And in many cases men and women are much better at giving themselves sexual
relief than any of the partners they could have.
There's no such thing as "just sex". It's always a combination - in various proportions - of sexual relief and
the feeling of companionship with the person of the opposite gender. Somehow a man has what a woman
craves and a woman has what a man craves - and by giving those things to each other we become
complete.
Chapter 15
In a woman's mind, the two things are inseparable and support one another. That's why being appreciated
as a woman makes her feel better appreciated as a person, and being appreciated as a person makes her
feel more completely appreciated as a woman.
So when a man gives himself to a woman, he must do it with the purpose of satisfying her most
fundamental cravings: he must make her feel good as a woman and make her feel good as a person.
Everything related to giving a woman the feeling of sexual relief makes her feel appreciated as a woman.
Everything related to giving a woman the male companionship makes her feel appreciated as a person.
I can say it in many different ways, but they all mean the same thing.
A woman craves to feel appreciated for being sexual and for who she really is.
She craves to be liked for her body and for her soul.
She craves a man to make her body and her soul feel good.
Give a woman what she craves and she will give herself to you.
Chapter 16
If you want to connect with a woman, you must make her feel appreciated as a woman and as a person. It's
essential to give her strong feeling that you like her body AND her soul.
To rephrase it, you must make a woman feel LOVED and RESPECTED.
It's equally essential that she makes you feel appreciated as a man and as a person. You must feel
confident that she likes your body AND your soul.
You should stay with a woman only if she LOVES and RESPECTS you.
If you make her body and soul feel good and she makes your body and soul feel good, the two of you
connect on two levels: physical and spiritual.
When I say things like "soul" and "spiritual" I do not mean that you and her must belong to a fanatical,
radical sect in order to be together. Not at all. In fact, you do not even have to be religious. By "spiritual" I
mean "everything that is there but you cannot touch it": thoughts, hopes, dreams, emotions - things that
are quite real but not physical. "Spiritual" is the best word I know to characterize those things. Call it
"inner world" if you like.
Here's what happens when either physical or spiritual side or the relationship is neglected.
If you and a woman make each other feel appreciated as human beings but by mutual agreement ignore
each other's bodies, you might end up being true friends, but even the friendship in many cases might
never be complete because of the lack of physical intimacy. And when forced to make a choice, either you
or her might prefer a lover's interests over those of a friend.
If both of you admire each other spiritually, but only one of you makes the other feel physically
appreciated, the person whose body is neglected suffers the pangs of unrequited love. It's often referred to
as "just friends" situation. In fact, of course, it has very little to do with friendship, because the true
friendship must be always fair.
If you tell a woman you like her body, and at the same time make her feel ignored as a person, you're not
very likely to have sex with her. Period.
Most women - even the ones who might only be interested in a one-night stand with you - deeply
RESENT being used for sex. It makes them see themselves as sexually desperate and destroys their
self-respect. Make a woman feel like a non-entity, and it's good-bye.
On the other hand, even if by an accident you do "score" the impersonal sex with a woman (which might
happen if she is very drunk, sexually desperate, on the peak of her ovulation, or simply likes you for your
looks) - such "victory" would not do much good for you. Because in such situation YOU would be the one
who feels used. You would feel like a male slut. It's an awful feeling which can ruin your self-respect and
may even cause impotence. If you have sex with a woman without having true heart-to-heart connection
with her, I wouldn't even call it sex. You would miss out on the emotional intimacy, which is exactly what
makes sex so uniquely pleasurable. After such miserable experience you would feel more frustrated and
sexually anxious than before. Trust me.
What you want is the opposite: the marvelous feeling of being in charge of your life and in charge of your
relationship with a woman of your choice. You want to feel respected and loved.
That's why it's absolutely necessary to make a woman feel appreciated as a sexual being AND as a
spiritual being, and that's why it is equally necessary that she appreciates you as a sexual AND spiritual
being as well.
To make a woman feel appreciated as a sexual and spiritual being you must FIND OUT who she is as a
sexual and spiritual being.
To give a woman a chance to appreciate you as a sexual and spiritual being you must help her to FIND
OUT who you are as a sexual and spiritual being.
How do you find out who she is sexually and spiritually, and how do you help her to find out who you are
sexually and spiritually?
Both things are very simple. I will tell you about them in detail in one of the following chapters.
Chapter 17
Here's another very powerful reason for finding out as much as possible - and as quickly as possible! -
about a woman you are facing: you do not want to get yourself into a relationship with a wrong woman.
You must not spend more time with such woman than it's necessary for figuring out she would be wrong
for you.
I am not trying to intrude upon your choice of a romantic partner, I'm not telling you who to choose. But I
am telling you that you indeed must choose.
It's crucial to be the chooser, it's crucial to be selective about who you let into your life. If you and a
woman are not mutually compatible as both sexual and spiritual beings, then she is not the right woman
for you and you are not the right man for her. You'll be better off staying away from each other, to avoid
inevitable heartbreak and waste of precious months or possibly years of your lives. By sticking around the
wrong woman you would deprive yourself of the chance of meeting your true love, and deprive that
fantastic woman, your beloved - who might be right around the corner - of meeting you.
Of course, even if there is such thing as perfection in the universe, it's very rare. Obviously you do not
discard someone because their eyes are not of that particular hue of hazel or gray that you had dreamed of
as a teenager. Use your common sense.
But if your intuition tells you that something is not right - trust your intuition and immediately bring the
issue out in the open.
No compromises.
There's tragic irony in the fact that people stuck in a corrupt relationship tend to deny their unhappiness at
any given moment. They get so good at denial they are not even consciously aware of their frustration
most of the time. They hope that the situation would somehow change, they do nothing to change it, and
in the meantime they get entangled in the emotional mess. Years and sometimes decades later something
suddenly jolts them into awakening, and they have to deal with the horrifying realization of their
irreparably wrecked destinies.
It's the "butterfly effect", when a single wrong step would lead to a chain of consequences that might turn
your life in a very undesirable direction. And at the moment of taking that first step you wouldn't even be
conscious where that path might take you in the end.
That's why when you experience strong sexual attraction to a woman you must FIND OUT who she is as a
person, and figure out what kind of a relationship you want to have with her, before acting on the impulse.
Chapter 18
Or "Hi!" Or "Hey!"
Or "How do you do?" - if you're in Great Britain. Or "Happy birthday!" - if you're a guest at her birthday
party. Or "How do you know our host?" - if she is a guest like yourself.
Or you may say nothing at all and just salute her with the glass of wine or water in your hand. Or wave at
her. Or just smile. Or stop smiling if you were smiling. Or nod. Or wink. Or tilt your head and rise your
eyebrows, looking at her. Or take off your hat, place it against your heart, and bow. Or close and open
your eyes. Or give her a soft playful version of the military salute. Or touch the outside of her upper arm
lightly with the back of your hand and hold it there for a moment.
You can greet a woman in a foreign language. Or even in gibberish. Or in a sign language. Or you can
throw a paper airplane at her. Or write a note and hand it to her. Or light her cigarette if you are both
smokers. Or explain to her why and how she needs to quit, in a non-patronizing way. Or hand her
something she had dropped. Or hand her something she hadn't dropped but you presume she did. Or ask
her anything - time, directions, her name.
Or notice something unique about her - the way she looks or behaves, or it could be even the smell of her
perfume - then free-associate on what you have noticed, and make a poetic comment or a comical
misinterpretation. For example if she wears something that looks like leopard skin, ask her how was the
safari.
Or give her an instant nickname and greet her with it: "Hey Squirrel!"
Or figure out form her body language or form the situation what she feels or what she thinks about, and
make a comment on that. Or on the weather.
Or if you want to approach a woman in a bookstore, notice what section of the bookstore she's in, and ask
her the simplest question about the theme of that section. If you and she are in "Cooking", ask her: "What
do you think about cooking?" If she is in poetry, ask her: "What do you like about poetry?" If she is in
"Self-Improvement", ask her "How do you think I can improve myself?"
Or tell her about the great book you've discovered in that store and recommend to read.
Treat the entire world as a bookstore. Notice what "section" of that universal bookstore you've met her in,
and ask her a question about the theme of that section. Share the "book" you've found on the "universal
shelf". You are that book.
Or erase all the thoughts completely from your mind before approaching her - make it absolutely blank -
and when you're already facing her, say the very first thing that comes to your mind. Whatever you say is
going to be good.
Or go bold and tell her calmly and confidently that you find her extremely interesting as a woman and
would like to find out more about her as a person - and ask her to give you a few minutes for a
conversation. (If she is busy, tell her you'd like to be able to speak with her some other time when she
finds it convenient, and that you'd like her to give you her phone number.)
There are countless ways to greet a woman, and the particulars are absolutely irrelevant.
If you understand the essence of the greeting, you'll be able to come up with the best situation-specific
greeting every time you need one.
Whatever the situation, all you need to do is to express your wish to communicate with a woman in any
way you find suitable.
No matter what you say or do, the subtext of the greeting, the information you transmit is always the
same: "I WANT TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOU".
Any other information contained in your greeting either won't register by her mind at all, or may actually
interfere with her ability to understand the most important part of your message: "I WANT TO
COMMUNICATE WITH YOU".
That's why I would not recommend to greet a woman with anything too smart or too complicated. You're
a stranger to her yet, and you don't want to confuse her. Keep it simple. Do not try to be too creative.
Other than that, any greeting would do the job, because no matter what you say or do, the only thing you
actually say to a woman when you greet her is this: "I WANT TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOU".
You may even start speaking with her without any greeting.
Chapter 19
Sometimes after you greet a woman you must change the subject.
It's necessary if you've greeted a woman with anything that is not directly related to who she is or who you
are.
Let me explain.
For example, if you greet a woman in a travel section of a bookstore with a question "What do you think
of Indonesia?" you do not want to get stuck in the topic of Indonesia or even travel, because the question
you've asked was only a humorous excuse for talking with her.
A woman knows immediately that asking her opinion of Indonesia you in fact expressed your wish to
communicate. She knows you've approached her to give her your warmth and kindness, and that foreign
countries have very little to do with it.
So do not deceive her expectations, and after a brief exchange of small talk boldly change the subject.
Chapter 20
You need to find out who she is as a woman and as a person, so you can make her feel loved and
respected, and so you can be confident that she is the right woman for you.
You learn to be curious about who she is as a woman and as a person. You ask her to tell you and to show
you who she is. You listen and watch. You do your best to understand.
You also need to help a woman to find out who you are as a man and as a person, so she can make you
feel loved and respected, and so she can be confident that you are the right man for her.
You help her to become curious about who you are as a man and as a person. You tell her and show her
who you are. You do your best to be understood.
CURIOSITY
Remember this: CURIOSITY is the fundamental principle of the human mating dance. When you
MASTER THE POWER OF CURIOSITY you will achieve the absolute mastery of courtship. Later I will
explain what I mean.
You have probably noticed a few subtleties in the above paragraphs. Those subtleties are not accidental. I
choose my words very carefully. I say "you learn to be curious about who she is" instead of "you become
curious about who she is". I say "you help a woman to find out who you are" instead of "you let her know
who you are". I also say "you help her to become curious about who you are" instead of "you make her
curious about who you are".
I say "you help a woman to find out who you are" because she must invest her effort in finding out who
you are. If you simply make the information available to her, she might not be interested in processing that
information.
I say "you help her to become curious about who you are" because, as a human being, she has the right to
choose what she wants, and saying "you make her curious" would imply a certain degree of psychological
manipulation, which in courtship should be avoided when possible.
You want to be curious about who she is. You want her to be curious about who you are. How can these
two things be achieved?
Let's begin with helping her to get curious about you - because it's easier.
Imagine a man unskilled in courtship. When such man meets a woman he likes, he thinks - mistakenly -
than in order to attract that woman he must impress her. So he begins to brag desperately, trying to tell her
as quickly as he can everything he believes she might find interesting about him. He talks non-stop, and
quickly buries the woman under a huge heap of unsolicited personal information. She is bored.
Even if that woman is polite enough to continue the conversation with the ungraceful man a little longer,
there's not much else he can speak with her about. He is not curious about who she is. And since he has
already told her everything he finds interesting about himself, the rest of what he speaks about can only
make her feel even more bored. Little by little the conversation peters out. Finally she finds an excuse to
leave - and never comes back.
It might seem to you that the second part contradicts the requirement of helping a woman to find out who
you are. In fact, it doesn't. Because you help a woman to find out more about you precisely by revealing as
little as possible about who you are.
Let me explain to you the meaning of this apparent paradox. It has something to do with the simple nature
of CURIOSITY. We can only be curious about something we know a little about. We are not curious
about things that are completely familiar, neither are we curious about things which we know nothing
about - because having no knowledge about those things, we are not even aware of their existence.
Think of what you've read two paragraphs above. "Find out as much as possible about her" means your
curiosity about her. "Reveal as little as possible about yourself" is the best way to motivate her curiosity
about you.
It's good to be a little mysterious when you talk with a woman. It makes her WANT to find out more
about you.
Of course I don't mean that you must behave in the exaggeratedly enigmatic manner, or that you should
refuse answering her questions at all cost. That would be a ridiculous pretense.
What I mean is this: you tell her only things that absolutely must be told now, and keep the rest for later.
WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT YOURSELF, BE CONCISE. Don't get entangled in a net of
unnecessary, irrelevant details. Think what you want to say before you say it, and let only the most
essential things come out of your mouth. Provide two or three sharp, bright details that best characterize
the situation you are describing. The rest would be redundant - and boring.
Women also know very well that unwise and insincere men tend to present their best sides early in the
courtship, only to turn horribly disappointing soon afterwards. A man who does not do anything to
impress a woman is much more impressive to a woman, because she finds him genuine.
Additionally, a man who appears average when he meets a woman, and then blossoms unexpectedly into a
rare flower, creates the much more powerful impression.
TELL YOUR STORIES ONE SMALL BIT AT A TIME. Don't force your entire narrative upon a
woman. Instead, say what can be said in one short sentence, then shut up, and check her reaction. If she
wants you to continue telling your story, do so. If you as much as suspect that she doesn't, change the
subject immediately or - better! - use this opportunity to find out more about her. Because finding out
about her is more important for the purposes of courtship than finishing your story. You will be able to
finish that story later, when you are already a couple. On the other hand, if you choose to finish the story
against her will, you might never become a couple. What is more important to you? You are the one who
makes the choice.
Keep in mind that giving the information one small bit at a time is what makes any story interesting. And
you must deliver those bits in such way that a woman realizes that you only show her the "tip of the
iceberg". Delivering a bit of information in a way that shows that there's more to it, and then cutting it off,
is what motivates a woman's curiosity.
By following the Three Principles of Personal Storytelling you help a woman to become curious about
you, and thus you help her to find out who you are.
This time around it's your job to discover little unique things about a woman you are interested in. Those
things are the small bits of information that would motivate your curiosity about her.
You might discover those unique things in something she says or does, or even in something she wears. In
the tone of her voice. In the tiniest subtlety of her expression. In her posture. In the hint of a smile hiding
in the corner of her mouth.
It is your task to pay closest attention to details, and to be able to recognize the little unique things that
disguise huge revelations. Than you should ask her questions about those unique things.
When you ask a woman about her experiences, make it easy for her not only to tell you who she is, but to
show it to you. And when you share your experiences with a woman, use both verbal and nonverbal
means of communication. Tell and show. Do not go over the top with the demonstrations, though. Use
common sense.
To be understood by a woman, you must make an effort of speaking very clearly and audibly. To
understand what she tells you, you must listen attentively, and ask her to repeat what she had said to you
in case you suspect you might have misunderstood her words.
Part IV
Love
Chapter 21
What is love?
I bet you expect me to utter a love-cannot-be-defined kind of platitude, but I actually do have the answer.
In fact, I have more than one, and I find each of them to be true.
Not being a Christian, I however do very much like the famous, phenomenologically pure description of
love provided by Paul the Apostle in his First Epistle to the Corinthians.
1 Corinthians 13:4-8
4 Love suffers long, and is kind; love does not envy; love does not parade itself, is not puffed up;
5 Does not behave rudely, does not seek its own, is not provoked, thinks no evil;
7 Bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
Love suffers long, and is kind. Love never fails. Those lines remain in my mind, they have staying power.
I would like to believe that the man who wrote those lines was writing them as he experienced love.
I quoted those passages from the Gideons Bible I found in my hotel room.
I do not have the Symposium by Plato at hand where I am now, so I will have to quote it by heart, and yet
I think I remember the necessary passage correctly. In that philosophical dialog Socrates defines love as
the "desire to give birth into beauty".
Notice how important the beauty is. Even on the most materialistic level a man seeks physical beauty in a
woman he wishes to impregnate! A woman seeks beauty in the man she wants to be with - only for her the
beauty of his body may be secondary, and the beauty of his action takes the first place. She wants to bring
a child into a beautiful world - the place where she lives and where her child will live must be beautiful.
As we become more mature and our perception of beauty deepens and becomes less materialistic, we
eventually realize that the beauty of a human being is different from that of an inanimate object. A beauty
of a piece of furniture, of an automobile, of nature as a whole is defined by their physical appearance as
well as their function (for example, ability to accelerate quickly and to move fast is the part of the beauty
of an automobile). The beauty of a human being, however, is defined by the soul. Body is irrelevant. A
true judge of human beauty estimates the aesthetic qualities of the soul: kindness, courage, discipline,
reason, and so on. Such is the true beauty of a human being, the true one-to-ten scale - even though within
material reality, unfortunately, the body is often taken into the account.
Where does all beauty in the world has its source? In God. God is pure Beauty. Every single beautiful
thing we see or hear, every single beautiful quality of a human soul comes from God, is a reflection of the
Absolute Idea of Beauty, which is God.
The true Love therefore is a desire of a soul to unite with God - desire to give birth - and be born - into
Beauty.
Soul is God in me. My desire to unite with God is my desire to unite with my true Self. God is who I was
before I was conceived. There is God in me and the same God in you. When I look at you I see my true
Self. When I love you, when I am loved by you, we see the same God in each other - what we see might
be distorted, tarnished by our mundane experience, and yet deep there God is what we see. Tragically,
achieving unity with God through unity with each other is almost impossible in the material universe.
That is where the terrible longing of being in love comes from.
Sufi mystic Al-Hallaj, like Christ a thousand years earlier, was crucified in 922 for saying, I am God. He
described love through a parable.
There was a moth once who lived in a forest. Every night she flew to a clearing where a cabin stood, in
which a hermit lived. The hermit spent night after night reading by the light that came from the flame in
the lamp. The flame was covered with the glass lampshade. The moth fell in love with the flame. The
invisible barrier of the glass lampshade separated the moth from her beloved, the flame. So the moth spent
night after night beating her wings against the glass lampshade till morning. Other moths in the forest
could not understand such passion. Look at yourself, you are all banged up, who needs love like that, they
said laughing to the moth in love. But she never listened to them, and flew to the clearing again as the
dusk fell. Then one day as she was beating her wings against the glass, the lampshade shattered. The moth
flew straight into the flame, and she became the flame. The perfect unity of the lovers had been achieved.
Writer Alexander Green had apparently found all verbal definitions of love limited. In his novel "Scarlet
Sails", a little girl asks her father about love.
Like this!
I think to love a woman means to take action motivated by my wish to make her happy, on her own terms.
She is a human being, she has her own idea of happiness, based on her experience. She might have the
wrong idea from my point of view, and I might do something kind to convince her that my idea of
happiness would be better for her - and yet ultimately she is the one who has to decide what happiness
means for her. She makes the choice what she wants her life to be like.
Attachment is neurotic and destructive. Compassion, emotional generosity, kindness are creative and
healthy.
I love a woman, so I want her to be happy. But she chooses her happiness. If she is happy with me, my
love is fulfilled. If she is truly happy without me - or with someone other than me - my love is fulfilled.
Part V
Destroying the Illusions
Chapter 22
Probably the most dangerous illusion about the courtship that we must dispel is the illusory notion that a
man has to do something special to be with a woman he likes.
This wrong notion is rooted so deeply in the psyche of a modern man, that it might take me quite a
number of paragraphs to help you see the beautiful truth. And yet it is worth every word.
I will have to begin from afar. Please be patient and I promise you will understand why it is necessary.
The purpose of the society is survival of the species. The society does not care about your personal
survival, nor does it care about you as a spiritual individual. In fact, society does not want you to be a
spiritual individual, because having a personality would make you unique, and being unique would give
you the personal goals that might be far different from the social goal of survival of the species. To be on
the safe side, the society wants to tune down your individuality, so you do not jeopardize the survival of
the human race by your rebellion. The society survives at your expense.
To be able to tune down your individual traits and make you uniform with everyone else, the society
employs the myth of being special, at the same time actively brainwashing you, like everyone else, into
being ordinary.
What society announces as ordinary is in fact special. What society announces as special is in truth
ordinary. Society inverses the truth.
For example, having a thousand one-night stands is a sign of a very ordinary person, and yet the society
glorifies it. Sharing your entire life with a single romantic partner and making that life meaningful is
indeed something special, and yet society makes it look like it is ordinary and undesirable.
Why am I saying that having a thousand one-night stands is a sign of ordinary person? Because a man
who dedicates himself entirely to "scoring" is not capable of living meaningfully. Such man cannot think
about anything besides "scoring", and effectively spends his entire life behaving like an animal.
Why do you think the overwhelming majority of Hollywood films is so technically superb yet based on
such miserably stupid stories? Clearly it is because the society is aware of the brainwashing, hypnotizing
power of the big screen in the dark room, and employs this power to tune down the personalities of each
individual member of the audience. If movies can be technically superb, surely they can be creatively
superb as well - only it is not to the benefit of the society, and that is why truly brilliant works of film can
only be discovered in the tiny, run-down, dilapidated old theaters.
It is not a fault of the particular individual or individuals. There is no conspiracy. The society is
self-organizing. It is within each of us.
I was brought up in a totalitarian society, in which people were supposed to live in the identical houses,
wear identical clothing, say identical words and have identical thoughts. That society - Soviet Union - is
no more. If you look up the photos of modern North Korea, you will get an idea of what my childhood
was like. That kind of life was perfectly simple - and perfectly absurd. The society simply TOLD each
individual what to think and what to do. The totalitarian society played the "direct game" on me and
everyone around me.
Western society, on the other hand, is democratic. It is based on the idea of the individual freedom, and is
supported by the free trade. This society cannot tell each person what to think and what to do. It would
provoke immediate rebellion.
And yet the Western society still needs to fulfill its function: to tune down each individual mind for the
goal of the survival if the species. So instead of telling people what to think and do, the society presents
certain bits of information to people in such a way that those bits of information put together can lead to
certain predictable and controlled conclusions.
Lifestyle modeling plays huge part in the works of the Western society, and advertisement is one of the
aspects of the lifestyle modeling.
Let me put it this way: without the flow of information about products for sale our society the way we
know it would collapse, and it is advertisement that provides the flow.
Advertisement is everywhere.
Today I saw a poster of the tennis player Marina Sharapova advertising expensive male wristwatch on a
bus stop shed. If you are not familiar, Marina is a cute and athletic Siberian girl, and you better believe
me, she was not wearing a bra under her undone tennis shirt on that poster.
Put two and two together, silly consumers, and you will know what kind of watch you must own so one
day you can be around a fun girl like Marina.
You must own a cool car to be with Marina. You must own a cool house to be with Marina. You must
own cool clothes to be with Marina. You must go to a cool gym to be with Marina. You must be a doctor
or a lawyer to afford paying for the cool stuff that will make you attractive for Marina.
Sounds familiar?
To put all this in one sentence, ever since you were born, the Western free trade democratic society have
been teaching you this:
You must do something special to deserve sexual fulfillment. The way you are, you do not deserve it!
Is it not frightening that we all are given the neurotic belief about one of our fundamental biological
necessities?
So the guy works his heart out half his life, climbing up the social ladder, hating himself, and when he
gets the cool job and cool house and cool car and so on - he has no idea how to even talk to a girl!
One of my good friends, a church minister, got into a religious dispute with me, insisting that Christ could
not possibly experience failure because Christ is God, and God always achieves success.
My friend is a great guy, and he is tremendously educated in theology, and yet even he measures God by
the standards handed to us by the Western free trade society. Success is hurray, failure is boo!
It works both ways, too: a woman must look special to be with a man like Tiger Woods. She has to wear
something special, her make-up must be special, her body must look a certain way, she has to pay for
plastic surgery and so on. She has to look like Marina.
Seduction community has all the characteristics of a society. It is based on the principles of the free trade,
only like any micro-society within the bigger society, it is somewhat more totalitarian. To the best of my
knowledge, the community had been created in the eighties almost single-handedly by the man who has a
near-psychotic belief that the only way to get a woman to have sex with him is to hypnotize her. This man
has the following approach to life in general: if he wants something from someone, he will hypnotize and
manipulate this person into providing that. I think that man came up with the idea of using the NLP to
create the community of people who could be hypnotized into purchasing his products for as long as they
live, and he cemented his market by creating the community language.
Later of course the creator and ruler of the pick-up community had to deal with quite a few parasites -
equally or more talented self-promoters who began to fish in the same marketing pool, feeding on the
ever-present sociobiological problems of sexual frustration and gender warfare. It is my strong belief that
the pick-up community, directed by the community leaders, is continuously brainwashing the huge army
of insecure men for the purpose of creating stable, easy-to-manipulate market for their products and
services. The community gives such men the illusory validation and illusory fulfillment, by channeling all
their efforts into a vain activity that requires bits of fake knowledge those man otherwise would not need.
The leaders need you to keep "sarging". The leaders don't want you to settle down with a woman, ever. To
be sure, what you learn from them will get you laid - but what a classic community-brainwashed PUA
does not realize is that he would get laid anyway by just going out there and talking to a woman. In fact,
the leaders invest a lot of effort into making the courtship seem very difficult, and they give a lot of false
advice because if the man becomes successful and sees that the whole thing is very simple and he did not
even need any of the things he paid for - he would never come back to spend more money.
Understand this:
A MAN DOES NOT NEED TO DO ANYTHING SPECIAL IN ORDER TO HAVE SEX WITH A
WOMAN HE FINDS ATTRACTIVE!
You already have all those skills. Every single one of them.
You just need to find those skills within yourself. We can help you with that, but we will not make you do
anything special, and we will not tell you what success means for you. You are going to have to find out
for yourself.
I might be mistaken but I think it was Michelangelo who said, I see the beautiful sculpture in the slab of
marble. All I have to do is free it from imprisonment.
One thing that comes to my mind now is that when a woman is being tricked into seeking self-validation
through sex with a man who crashed her self-esteem, emotionally blackmailed her, hypnotized, or
otherwise manipulated her into having sex with him, then it's technically a rape.
There are way too many women out there who made themselves sexually available to men who messed
with their minds. These women's perceptions of the world had been altered and distorted, they had been
mentally traumatized by insecure men. Sometimes forever.
I do not hate and do not despise women whose emotional damage expresses itself often in their inability to
remain loyal to one man, in their mistrust to men in general. And on the other hand, I do not despise men
who are so insecure in their manhood that they need hundreds and thousands of one-night stands to regain
the illusion of being in charge.
I think that carrying a self-imposed label of a PUA, speaking in the community slang, validating oneself
by the number of intravaginal penetrations, and many other childish games men choose to play are all
symptoms of a deep neurosis. I think truly secure men do not let anyone manipulate their minds. And I
also think that truly secure men do not want to have more women in their lives than necessary to make
them happy. I think having too many women in one's life leads to unhappiness - directly (by undermining
the ability to create deep, truly meaningful connection with anyone and making a man cynical about the
very act of communication) and indirectly (by taking away the time that would otherwise will be used
much more constructively). I think one loving woman is enough for the lifetime of happiness. I think the
true art lies in finding that unique relationship and keeping it alive through the years. And being loyal.
I think having a quickie in a bathroom with a woman I have talked to for a few minutes, and never seeing
that woman again will not make any positive change in my life or in hers. It definitely won't make me a
better person, and it wouldn't be something to make me respect myself better or to deserve for me the
respect of other men. What would make me respect myself is my ability to overcome and eliminate fear,
and do what I otherwise wouldn't be able to do (that is, if I allowed myself to succumb to that fear).
It is only to that degree I think what I do now professionally as a courtship instructor makes any sense.
I find it difficult to imagine the men I truly respect being so obsessed with their sexual inferiority
complexes that they would entirely give up their spiritual life and dedicate their whole existence to having
a steady supply of pussy.
What make a man whose only purpose in life is seeking physical pleasure different from an animal?
I might have just made a few enemies, but make no mistake: the so called Inner Game - which is, quite
simply, the feeling of self-respect - is what I'm talking about here.
Show me a stronger mind frame than the one I have just shared with you.
Chapter 23
The so-called Approach Anxiety does not exist. It is an illusion, maintained in the minds of thousands of
gullible men to make courtship appear difficult to them, so that they purchase more seduction products
and services, and sink deeper in their despair.
Anxiety is one of the forms of fear. Specifically, it is the fear of the uncertain future.
The Approach Anxiety, therefore, must be the fear of the uncertain future related to or triggered by the
process of moving toward someone or something.
Before we discuss the true nature of the phenomenon that have been wrongly labeled as the Approach
Anxiety, let us talk about fear in general.
It will take a lot of words; the working draft of this article took ten pages in print, but please bear with me.
This is a tough illusion to dispel, and yet when it is finally dispelled, I promise that the beauty of the truth
will astonish you.
Let us discuss the fear from the point of view of the psychological archetype defined by his ability to face
and handle that emotion: the Hero.
The Hero is intimately familiar with the nature of the fear. The Hero knows certain secrets about fear that
a coward does not know. These are the secrets that I am about to reveal to you.
1) Artificial Fear;
2) Natural Fear.
Let me expand.
1) The Artificial Fear is man-made. It is also known as intimidation, or suspense. This type of fear is
usually characterized by dramatic build-up with unexpected leaps to considerably higher levels of
intensity.
I would like to give you an example of my encounter with an unsuccessful attempt to create the Artificial
Fear.
A few weeks ago I walked up to a group of attractive and friendly women on a street and greeted them. As
I usually do, I touched one of the women on the upper arm with the back of my hand as I was making the
introduction.
All of a sudden a man appeared out of nowhere, like a troll out of a tobacco-box. Without any proper
exchange of pleasantries, he pushed me in the chest, and yelled in my face: Get lost, she is my wife!
The man did not seem very intimidating - if anything, he was amusing - so I stayed. I smiled, offered him
my hand for a handshake, and introduced myself. I told him that I would never dare to intrude upon his
relationship. The man ignored my hand, he was shaking in fury, yelling incoherently, and splattering me
with saliva.
I reached to his shoulder to clarify my friendliness and to pacify him with the touch. The man went
berserk. I would not be able to quote his verbal response here: what if there are ladies reading my article? I
felt sorry for his wife: she was so attractive, and greeted me so friendly when I approached her. She
definitely deserved a better man.
A moment later, two more men appeared synchronously on both sides of me, like hunting velociraptors in
Jurassic Park. One of them was flexing his muscles and scowling at me in a rather comical way, the other
tried to act like a bully from a Hitchcock movie: he grinned dramatically and told me that if I try to touch
his friend one more time, he will kill me.
It was rather funny, so I played along. I immediately touched the guy: You mean, if I touch him like this?
You are going to kill me for that?
The movie bully stopped grinning. He wanted to be taken seriously. Walk away, or you are dead, he said.
His pal on my other side was puffing himself up, trying to come up with something equally smart to say.
The disgruntled husband in front of me was gasping in righteous indignation.
I do not enjoy it when people who have no business telling me what to do give me orders, so I stayed with
them a while longer, behaving as friendly as I could. I left only when I grew bored.
I must emphasize that from the moment the first man appeared till the moment his friend threatened to kill
me only thirty seconds or so had elapsed. In a few paragraphs I will explain why I find it so important.
I do not exactly fit the archetype of the Hero. I have been motivated by fear throughout my life. And yet,
during the interaction I had just described, I had experienced no fear whatsoever, despite the fact that my
would-be-opponents tried to intimidate me.
What kept me calm was my recently acquired understanding of the nature of Artificial Fear.
Why would someone try to motivate my behavior by fear? - Because this person believes that a man can
be easily motivated by fear.
Why does that person believe that a man can be easily motivated by fear? - Because that person himself is
easily motivated by fear.
To rephrase it, WHEN SOMEONE TRIES TO INTIMIDATE ME, TO TRIGGER FEAR IN ME, I
KNOW THAT HE IS A COWARD. He tries to create Artificial Fear because he is afraid of me. If I feel
no fear for a few moments, his fear will take over. And why would I be afraid of someone who is afraid of
me? That would be comical.
2) The Natural Fear does not involve the process of intimidation. It is a biologically pre-programmed
reaction to a dangerous situation. The crucial characteristic of such dangerous situation is that it happens
suddenly and without warning.
About two months ago I was waiting for a traffic light to change, sitting astride my motorcycle, enjoying
the quiet peaceful morning and the mastery of my ride. The light turned green, I took off, shifted to the
third gear, and was suddenly rammed by a passing Buick that veered off into my lane. No warning.
My bike span around, I flew out of the saddle like a rag doll, and the funniest part was, while it was
happening, I felt excited like a kid in a toy store. I did not feel any pain when my thumb broke against the
spinning front wheel, and I remember saying loudly WOW as the parked cars were tumbling around me,
and thinking, "This is interesting, I feel the pavement even through the leather!" as I was sliding on my
back.
Then I jumped up on my feet, saw my thumb bent back in the joint, and set it right without thinking. It did
not hurt when I did it. I looked around and saw my bike twisted as if King Kong was playing with it.
But it was too late, the dangerous situation was already over, and I had to find a way to comfort the
terrified old lady behind the steering wheel of the unscratched Buick, and a bunch of bloodthirsty Mexican
construction workers on the corner, clearly disappointed that they had not witnessed death. (I remember
flipping a bird at them). I also had to come up with a legal way to get a few thousand dollars to repair my
bike.
My point is, the Natural Fear is instantaneous, and more often than not is experienced after the event. And
it is quite all right to be afraid when the bad thing had already happened, as long as you can be active
enough to handle the consequences.
Before I reveal to you the most essential characteristic of fear, and before I tell you exactly how to achieve
total control over fear, I would like to introduce another important concept: that of Resistance.
Here's how you are going to get things done from now on. Remember the following four steps as a model
for your behavior.
The reason why most people are not as successful in achieving what they want as they could be is because
they refuse to face the reality of resistance. They have unrealistic expectations. They choose to believe that
it's enough to want something and to take action in order to achieve what they want. So when they
encounter resistance, they back off.
Resistance happens.
Resistance happens whenever you want something, right after you take action to achieve what you want.
Put a book on your desk, try to move it along the surface, and you will experience resistance.
It's what you do AFTER the resistance that makes all the difference.
EXPECT RESISTANCE.
When you experience resistance, don't worry about it. It's just the way it's supposed to be, and it cannot be
otherwise. Resistance is normal. Resistance is the law of the Universe.
If you do not experience Resistance right after you take action to achieve what you want, it only means
that the resistance is delayed, and you will encounter somewhat stronger Resistance after a certain time
interval elapses.
Take action to overcome the Resistance, and you will achieve what you want.
If I were training you for a fight against a professional heavyweight boxer, I would tell you that in order to
overcome his resistance to your attacks you must punch harder and faster than your opponent, move
around him in a random pattern he wouldn't be able to predict, and look for every spot in his upper body
you can use as a target.
But I am not training you to be a boxer. Courtship is not about destroying the opponent. It is not about
jumping out of the trench and sticking a bayonet in her guts. Courtship is about love. Victory in courtship
is achieved by the means of love.
That's all there is to it. A non-heroic man can be brave until he meets the resistance to his courage. Then
his courage is gone, and he is no longer brave.
The Hero remains brave in the face of resistance - he remains brave just a little longer.
Think of it: most of the truly frightening situations that require action last for a minute or two! Two
minutes later it is all over, and there is nothing to fear. And within those two minutes there is probably
only a second or two that are truly frightening, the rest is quite tolerable.
In fact, in most situations of the Natural Fear the frightening situation lasts only a split second, and is
already over before you begin to experience the fear.
And I have already explained to you that the Artificial Fear is ridiculous in its very essence because it is
always being induced by cowards. The Artificial Fear disappears completely when you accept the truth.
The Hero is not a man who is brave throughout his entire life. The Hero is a man who can remain brave
for just those extra two seconds within minutes. Then he can relax and not be brave anymore.
A hero is also a man who is ready to be brave for that split second anytime in his life. Wake him up at
night and he is ready to be brave for a split second.
It is incredibly easy to be a Hero. Only I want you to be a very special kind of the Hero. Not only I want
you to be a man who is brave longer, I also want you to be a man who is KIND LONGER.
To explain what I mean, let me show you what happens to a man who does not know the secrets that I am
teaching you.
He wants to meet a woman. He takes action: he approaches a woman because he thinks that she has
something he must get from her. She resists his approach - not because she is a bad person, but simply
because resistance is the universal law. The man has not expected her resistance. He immediately becomes
ANGRY, and leaves. He thinks he has been rejected. In fact, he has just sabotaged himself.
And now let me show you exactly how it is going to be for you.
You want to meet a woman. You take action: you approach a woman, knowing very well that you can
give her something she craves. You expect her resistance as something perfectly normal. You know her
resistance will not bother you. She resists your approach - and she might even expect you to get angry.
Instead, you react to her resistance with KINDNESS. She is disarmed by your kindness, and is curious
about you. For her you are unlike most men she has ever met. She begins to see you for who you are: the
Hero. She wants to find out more about you.
I have a personal rule about a woman's consistent resistance. I would like to share this rule with you.
I would allow a "tough" woman to resist me three times in a row, and I react with increasing kindness to
each bit of her resistance. Then I would allow her to resist me ONE MORE TIME, simply to give this
relationship an extra chance - and react even more kindly. If after that she resists me again, I politely leave
her alone: she is not the right woman for me. Why would I continue wasting my time with her when I can
effortlessly meet a woman who has better character?
I would like you to choose your own proportion. Make it "5 + 1" or "7 + 1" or "1 + 1" rule, and always
follow your intuition - sometimes you might want to give her a second extra chance. Just remember that
you do not have to stay around a woman if it is no fun. There is a great gal somewhere out there for you
who can make you really happy.
Please realize that every now and then you will find it pointless to continue a conversation with a woman
you have met. This is also normal. The material world is imperfect, and it is wise to expect imperfection
in the results of what you do. The notion of a man who can "seduce" any woman in the world is an
illusion. I will tell you more about it in one of the following chapters. There are quite a few illusions we
must destroy so we can see the truth.
Now let us get back to the illusion of the so-called Approach Anxiety.
I have spent so much ink describing the emotion of fear to you because it is my strong belief that the
so-called Approach Anxiety is not even fear.
You can trust me on that. I know what fear is about. The phenomenon known as Approach Anxiety is not
that.
Back when I used to have it, it felt very different from fear.
Here is my main thesis: the phenomenon popularly called the Approach Anxiety is not anxiety at all. We
are dealing with a case of social misinterpretation of a very different type of emotion, which has nothing
to do with fear.
Some of the leaders of the seduction community had attempted to justify the wrong label by explaining
that in their opinion the so-called Approach Anxiety is a psychobiological response genetically
pre-programmed in the ancient tribal society when a man could have been killed for approaching a woman
that belonged to the leader of the tribe. I find this explanation false, because according to this very
explanation only the descendants of the tribal leaders could have survived to our age, and these
descendants by definition could not have such response genetically pre-programmed because their
predecessors, the tribal leaders, would not have to deal with the threat of being killed, due to the fact that
they were the ones who did all the scaring and murdering.
The leaders of the seduction community also insist that the so-called Approach Anxiety is bound to occur
every time a man wants to approach an attractive woman. Practice proves that statement false; I personally
know a number of men who have reported no negative emotions at the moment they engage a woman in
an interaction. Many of those men have been my private clients or the students of the Charm School. I am
one of such men. My friend and co-instructor Rob Overman is a great example of such man.
Think of a man who did not have a chance to learn the simple secrets I am revealing to you in this article,
and who therefore believes that he is afraid or anxious to approach women. When such man sees a woman
he likes - on a street, in a coffee shop, on a train, in a bar - he immediately feels the strong urge to get to
know her. Such urge is perfectly natural. I would like you to notice that it contains the great element of
curiosity, which is, as I have mentioned elsewhere, a fundamental underlying emotion of the human
mating dance.
Then a marvelous thing happens: the body of that man does its best to prepare him for the ritual. The
natural chemicals rush suddenly into his blood stream to tune up his brain; to make him more flirtatious,
and more resourceful; to boost his energy level; to make his skin glow; to make him more agile,
younger-looking, more attractive, and more vigorous; to guarantee his ability to please a woman. His mind
is ready to come up with the best things to say and do, to give the woman the most ingenious reasons why
she absolutely must get to know that man. He is bursting, trembling with energy like a tightly loaded
spring ready to be released, like a racing car at the start line, like a space rocket seconds before the launch.
What he experiences is a unique and very strong form of SEXUAL TENSION. This tension builds up
incredibly fast, so two or three seconds later it reaches the almost unbearable level. The man is ready to
approach the woman at his best.
And then this ignorant fool ruins everything. Instead of accepting gratefully the powerful help given to
him by his own body, he chooses to misinterpret his extreme sexual tension as something very different:
fear.
He chooses to be afraid.
The mind, eager to be helpful, shifts from "joyful anticipation" to "fight for survival". Instead of helping
the man to attract the woman, the mind begins to work hard to come up with the most ingenious reasons
why he should not approach her: "May be she is married... may be she does not want to be disturbed just
now... may be if I stare at her long enough she will notice me and approach me... may be I should go find
a bathroom first and check in a mirror if I have something between my teeth..."
He rejects something that could have been his chance for great happiness, and throws it into the garbage.
The spring is never released. The car race is lost at the start. The rocket is never launched.
The tension is never relieved properly, and the man turns his own mind against himself. All the wonderful
energy he has built up to approach a woman is now inversed and invested into the feelings of
self-contempt and self-loathing. And his hyped-up mind entertains itself now with dozens of great reasons
why that man deserves to feel so miserable, why he is inherently unlikable, and why he should never even
think of approaching a woman again: "Waste of time... it will only make me feel awful... women are not
worth it... I must focus on more important things in my life... the French Existentialists were right, the true
human connection is impossible".
He might even blame the woman for acting aloof and being cold-hearted and cruel for not reacting
positively to his attempts to make an eye contact.
Such is the behavior of an ignorant man. But you are not him: you know and understand the truth.
The emotion you experience when facing a woman you find attractive is called SEXUAL TENSION. It is
a very positive emotion, provided to you as HELP. It is also the same exact emotion you will create in a
woman in order to make her welcome the idea of having sex with you.
In many situations a woman experiences sexual tension later into the interaction, due to certain gender
differences in psychology. In some other situations she will experience such tension just when you make
eye contact, before you even walk up to her. However, my point is, the tension a woman experiences is the
same very tension that so many men choose to mislabel as fear. It has nothing to do with fear.
Then you keep this tension at its peak, and connect to your feelings.
You feel like a racing car at the start line, the motor of your heart revving joyfully in the anticipation of
the inevitable victory.
You feel like a space rocket moments before the launch, ready to soar, your powerful engines roaring in
your chest.
Then you tell yourself: "GO". You unleash yourself. You take the five steps toward the woman, who
might make you incredibly happy.
And as soon as you take those steps, THE TENSION IS REPLACED BY THE INTOXICATING
FEELING OF RELIEF. All the energy you have accumulated is being channeled into the beautiful
mating dance the two of you are about to begin. And you do not have to do anything special: your energy
will do the job for you.
After two or three approaches you will get hooked on that feeling of relief. You will begin approaching
women just to re-experience the exhilaration.
This is how you are going to approach women from now on.
Chapter 24
I choose to believe that the Universe has no being. I find this belief more beautiful than the opposite, I fins
it more consistent and more effective.
I foresee your questions: What in the world does this have to do with courtship? If the Universe has no
being, what is the point of courtship at all?
Please be patient. I will try my best to communicate my thoughts, and I hope we will understand each
other.
Materialism says that the matter is all there is, that there is no such thing as soul, spirit, God, etc. All those
things, according to materialism, are he false labels placed upon the instincts, brain chemistry, and
physical laws.
Idealism says that not only soul does exist, but soul is the only thing that is real.
Time has no being. The past has no being, it is no more. The future has no being, it is not yet. The present
is elusive, and shrinks into non-being.
The space would not be perceptible without time. The space is formed by time. But if time is an illusion,
so must be the space.
Space and time are not reality. They are only the grid, the system of conventional coordinates, they are
with us like the language we speak. The purpose is to simplify the perception, but unfortunately those
things do not serve the purpose. They only make the perception false. But without the grid, everything
disappears!
I like idealism. Possibility for the idealism in courtship is what had attracted me to Charisma Arts in the
first place. I like the form of courtship in which the soul of a woman is what really counts. At least this is
what I think we teach, in the majority of cases. This is what I think makes Charisma Arts absolutely
unique.
Idealism removes anxiety and fear. When a man knows that he is immortal (because the only thing that is
real about him, his soul, has never been born and will never die), he achieves real courage.
According to idealism, there is no real difference between the subject and the object. There is no real
difference between me and a woman I am speaking with. Our souls are intimately connected from before
we had been born, and they are already more intimately connected than our bodies ever can, sex or no sex.
Therefore, no one is a stranger to no one. When I speak to someone, it is God in me speaking to God in
the other person. And it is the same God. In reality, I and a woman I speak with are the same thing.
And by the way, there is no difference between me and you, the reader. I am also you, as you are me.
Idealism says that the nature has no reality. Traditional materialistic Western culture has imposed a
paradoxical belief in us that nature is intoxicatingly pleasant, while at the same time being dangerous and
corrupt. But if we believe that nature is not real, how can it be corrupt - and how can it be so pleasant as to
take our mind from infinitely more important things? Therefore, idealism removes the sense of guilt, and
replaces it with the true ethics based on compassion and love.
And we do need compassion and love in the courtship. We let it occur without compassion and love way
too long.
We can also comfortably get rid of all the theories that treat a human being as a sick animal. Who cares
what our cavemen predecessors felt or did in their caves? We are not them. Who had ever managed to
prove they existed, in the first place? (And I am talking about deeper, philosophical meaning of the proof,
the one that that goes beyond the materialistic science). Why complicate the reality by dragging the past
out of its well-forgotten grave? Why not deal with the immediate situation instead?
Idealism presumes that it does not matter how the body looks, true courtships becomes possible on the
spiritual level, when the matters of the body are cast away. We can only get close to being happy when the
body looses its value, anyway.
We can get rid of all socially imposed notions about ourselves, and finally see a clear picture by pursuing
the Truth.
We can see that money is not important, either.
We can finally completely forgive ourselves and the others for the past. In fact, we do not even have
anything to forgive because the past had never taken place. It is but a delusion of our mind.
We can choose who we want to be and be who we want to be, without long struggle and gradual progress,
because the timeline loses any meaning when there is no past and no future. Why create the time and why
wait when all the things we want to achieve are simple and can be achieved instantly?
To achieve contact with someone - REAL contact! - we just need to take off the masks and see the great
unity of souls.
Chapter 25
When I am told that some man can seduce any woman he chooses to, I wince.
From that moment on I will have to consider that man a liar. And I sure prefer him to be a liar, because if
he is not deceiving himself or others, it means he can only be a rapist.
What I am about to tell you is basic, and yet the illusory notion of the Absolute Seducer is so deeply
rooted in the psyche of the modern man that to get rid of it I have to explain the most elementary things.
Any woman has her own ideas of what she wants, who she wants to share her life with, what kind of a
man she wants to have a relationship with, what kind of a man she wants to spend her time with, who and
for what reason she finds sexually desirable, and so on.
Even the most charismatic man in the world may find himself in a situation when a woman he is courting
just is not into him.
There are three possible things a man can do when a woman makes it very clear that she does not find him
desirable as a romantic partner.
1) A man can accept her will with respect to her as a human being, and treat her as a noble friend would.
This is the way of a true man. The true man knows that a woman might yet change her mind, and he
knows the importance and power of noble friendship. On the other hand, the true man knows that he
would never do things to make a woman feel inferior, and he knows that a woman is responsible for her
own choices.
or
2) A man can get upset, walk away, and begin to hate the woman for having rejected him, and to hate
himself for being unlikable. This is the way of a victim. Happens too often, unfortunately.
or
3) A man can do something to architect a certain set of circumstances and/or influence the mind of a
woman in such ways that her will, even though she has not changed it, is no longer considered valid. Then
he finds away to go around what she really wants, and she ends up having sex with him. Then he is gone
to pursue another woman. This is the way of the rapist.
Threat of physical violence, lies, mind games, emotional blackmail, psychological manipulation, tricky
behavior of various sorts, all these things work in the same way, because they all presume that the will of
a woman is irrelevant, and all those things qualify a man who uses them as a rapist.
For example, even a moderately trained hypnotist can probably make a woman have sex with him while
she is under the influence of his speech patterns, but the fact that she would not show resistance would not
make him less of a rapist. Because he would be doing something to a woman ignoring her will.
From the perspective of the individual will of a woman, using a gun to threaten her and using tricks and
gimmicks to fool her into the submission, are more or less the same.
The truth is, the way of the victim and the way of the rapist are related. They are both weak ways. Only
the victim is infinitely superior, because at least the victim does not act on his frustration. He is helpless,
but he does not ruin lives.
I wonder how many men out there believe that they have changed and finally achieved success in their
romantic lives, while in fact they have transformed themselves from victims to rapists. It is a nightmare.
I suspect that the famous seducers of the past were none others that glorified rapists. And I suspect that so
are some of the famous seducers of our age.
We should become true men. We should love and respect women. We should make women feel safe with
us.
My friend and co-instructor Rob often says, "I do not believe in the Golden Rule; I believe in the Platinum
Rule. The Golden Rule implies treating the others as we want to be treated; the Platinum Rule means
treating the others as they want to be treated."
Part VI
Fundamental Principles
Chapter 26
Those few principles are rooted in one: the principle of Alpha Nice.
There is a rather widespread notion that Alpha Nice is a Juggler Method tactic for dealing with the
aggressive male interference. This notion is partly correct, but too narrow.
Yes, Alpha Nice does work very consistently when, say, our client who wisely chose New York as the
location for his one-on-one private coaching or Charm School bootcamp (if you can make it there
you'll make it anywhere) has a fascinating conversation with a woman he likes - and discovers suddenly
that there is a pissed-off man nearby who had always wanted to talk to that woman exactly the way our
client does now, but could not muster up the courage. In this case our client just invites the grumpy dude
to join the conversation, and makes friends with him: a kind of graceful and self-assured behavior that
prompts that woman swoon over our guy immediately for some magical reason.
For me the Alpha Nice comes from the realization that there is only one true and ultimate authority over
all the matters related to my life: myself.
Say this with me: I am the true and ultimate authority over my life.
Hey, I did not mean that you should say: Dimitri is the true and ultimate authority over his life! When I
said I, I meant you. So let us say it again:
Just you.
You, and no one else must make choices in your life. You, and no one else should take responsibilities for
those choices.
Take charge now. Become the authority over the only thing that matters, a thing that includes all the other
things: your life.
And when you see that something in your life needs to be improved, it is your responsibility to make this
improvement. Be on it.
If you remember to pay proper respect to your own authority over your life, you will achieve and maintain
the ultimate state of self-respect and confidence.
Confidence does not come from success. It is the other way around. Success comes from confidence.
Confidence comes from acknowledging and respecting your own authority over your life.
Having the ultimate respect to myself, I am being nice to myself of course. So should you. Tell the
self-deprecating, down-putting voices in your mind to shut up.
And now please realize that you cannot be the authority over the life of anyone else, simply because in
their life they are the true and ultimate authorities!
So not only you respect yourself as the ultimate authority over your life, but you respect every single
person around you for being the ultimate authorities over their lives.
When I respect others as the ultimate authorities over their lives, I feel compelled to be nice to them.
Successful social life can be described as the great conspiracy of the authorities to be nice to each other.
Chapter 27
And yet, the irony is that our desire to project our minds outward has been continuously punished by the
very civilization that owes its existence to that desire.
We have been socially conditioned to repress our emotions, to clam up, to hide our creativity, to adopt the
verbal language and the body language of the servitude.
The grade system in out schools, throughout the world, has taught us to conform to a standard of
mediocrity and to seek approval. The true knowledge is almost never achieved, having been replaced by
the corrupt principle of saying something to please the teacher and examiner. And we either choose to
please, and become sickeningly nice, or we get into a trap of aimless rebellion, of being fake-bad boys and
fake-bad girls, and lose our identity to the various forms of sociopathic behavior. We had been
programmed to self-destruct if we do not obey, and we self-destruct through self-expression, first
suppressed and then channeled the wrong way.
The goal of the Juggler Method is to direct both categories of people, the neurotic nice guys and the
neurotic rebels, to the path of true self-expression. In some other society in some other time the essence of
the method might have been different, but in our increasingly robotized, mechanized society the key to
developing the healthy self is connecting to own EMOTIONS and bringing those emotions out there.
The fundamental principle of Self-Expression is rooted in the fundamental principle of Alpha Nice. The
ability to express oneself comes from taking charge of own life and taking absolute responsibility for own
choices. Fearlessness of the self-expression comes from the state of ultimate authority, achieved through
the mastery of Alpha Nice.
From my point of view of the Alpha Nice individual, when something does not seem right, when
something bothers me about my condition, I must express it, at least through my words or, preferably,
through action. I like it better to speak in the language of action. But the language of words also helps
every now and then.
On the other hand, when something feels right, when the truth and kindness triumph, when someone does
something brave or talented or cute or simply genuine, I express what I feel about it and give people the
gift of my emotional generosity.
All the specific techniques of the Juggler Method branch from the principle of Self-Expression. What I
have described two paragraphs above is called Disqualification. What I had described one paragraph
above is called the Reward.
When I find something sexy about a woman, I do not hesitate to express that to her, and this is called the
Statement of Intent.
When something she says or does reminds me of something else, I freely share my experience with her,
and that is what Relating is all about.
But I must emphasize that the principle of Self-Expression goes way beyond the basic conversational
skills.
Expressing my emotions, and especially my Alpha Nice state of mind through my posture and body
language is unbelievably important.
Expressing my self-respect through my choice of clothes and through grooming is equally important.
Expressing my confidence via the eye contact, expressing my friendliness when it is proper via the
confident smile, and expressing the seriousness of my intentions via the I-will-not-back-off kind of
vacuum, those are crucial.
I would like to share with you a wonderful short poem by the great American Walt Whitman, from the
Leaves of Grass.
Stranger! If you, passing, meet me, and desire to speak to me, why should you not speak to me? And why
should I not speak to you?
Such are the words of the man who knew the power of the Self-Expression.
So if I want to approach a woman and to talk to her, I express this desire through the action of the
Approach. If I want to touch someone I speak with, I do so. When I want to speak the truth, I do.
At the same time, back to the Alpha Nice principle, whatever specific means of self-expression I pursue, I
do it in such a way as to not repress the self-expression of the others.
And yet I project myself even further outward. Expressing my desire to be my best Self through my
choices and my behavior leads me through the journey of the spiritual growth. Fulfilling my dreams is one
of the highest forms of Self-Expression. Being able to sacrifice my ego for the sake of something beyond
it is the ultimate Self-Expression.
Part VII
From the Journal of a Courtship Instructor
Chapter 28
One of my private clients asked me recently during our one-on-one training session whats it like to have
taught dozens of men how to seduce women. I told him quite sincerely that I had no clue what that would
be like.
I teach men how to be so damn cool that the women they meet would crave to seduce them.
I teach the art of self-respect and the craft of confidence, and I school my students in how to project those
qualities outward.
I am proud to say that it took me only a little over a year to figure out what the hell I teach.
What shocks me the most when I think about my past is how frighteningly cool I actually used to be, back
when I was a kid, and how easily and imperceptibly I allowed my great human qualities to slip away. By
twenty four I knew how to fly airplanes, trained martial artists, composed symphony music, and conducted
operas and ballets for living. I was healthy, full of life, driven by my interest in art, and brimming with
great expectations. I was popular and surrounded by friends. I had to be very selective with girls because
they stalked me everywhere.
And there I was ten years afterwards, stuck in a horribly boring 80 hours a week job which couldnt even
pay my bills, up-to the hairline in debt, a two-to-three-packs-a-day chain smoker, overweight by seventy
pounds, lonely and unkept, divorced from the woman whose life I felt I had ruined, vainly trying to drawn
my grief in alcohol every night, and watching helplessly how the creative aspirations of my youth were
about to be extinguished. My talents and my ambition to become a creative writer were slipping through
my fingers. I felt on the verge of emotional and spiritual death.
The change to the worse was so subtle and insidious that I had turned into the opposite of how I saw
myself. By the mid-thirties I became my own doppelganger. I knew it, and I knew I would never be able to
get myself back.
What I did not know was that all of it was about to change.
Im still trying to figure out what made me sign up for a Charm School in New York (thats where I live).
I can tell you though that back then the cost of the bootcamp seemed to me like a hell of a lot of money,
and whats worse, I did not even had that money, the only way for me to sign up was to go deeper into
debt (something I would not advocate). Well, I signed up anyway, not knowing why, not knowing I had
just done something that would empower me to resurrect to happiness.
I signed up two weeks before the date, and spent those two weeks trying to talk myself into the
commitment to the change. I remember that somehow I expected to have challenging but great time
during my bootcamp.
I was wrong.
The bootcamp seemed like a miserable experience. At least, thats how I felt right after it.
Judge for yourself: I got one married womans phone number on the first night of practice; a rather
well-known young fashion model rejected my advances very politely during the day game; later on the
same day in the same bookstore I number-closed a radiant nineteen year-old girl from Brazil, and on the
second night I made out with everyone in a bachelorette party. Unfortunately, the glorious deed seemed to
have drained my energy, and I spent the rest of the night sulking in a corner.
One of the instructors who helped me through the camp commented on my ever-unsmiling face. I dont
remember what did I expect to happen during the bootcamp, but I do remember that I felt dissatisfied with
my performance. I suspect that the dissatisfaction I felt was quite simply the sign of my overall
dissatisfaction with who I was and what my life was like back then.
And I do remember how during the first minutes of the bootcamp I felt a strong intuitive urge to apply for
the instructors job. Actually, now that I think of it, the first words that came out of my mouth during the
bootcamp were, I want to be an instructor for Charisma Arts.
I repeated the same words in the end of the Charm School. I wanted partying, adventure, coolness and
glamor as legitimate items on the list of my job duties.
My instructor told me to practice at least once a week and come back to see him in about half a year. He
sounded very polite and very skeptical.
The problem was, I didnt feel I had half a year. I was in a now or never situation. Even these days as I
look back and think about it I do believe that my life would never change and just roll speeding downhill
if I hadnt made a deal with myself.
The deal was that I would practice every day and every night, and come back to the next Charisma Arts
bootcamp in New York as a volunteer wingman.
So I started practicing. There was a problem though: my 80 hours a week working schedule. I had to find
the way around it.
And I did.
Every morning and every evening on my way to and from work I had to spend an hour on a subway.
Normally it would be time to catch up on sleep. I decided to sacrifice that to self-improvement.
So every morning I walked along the train, from a car to a next car, and talked to every woman who
seemed receptive and approachable. I recall awakening some of those women so that they could talk to
me.
I finished work at midnight every night, and headed to some of the largest bars in New York. I warmed up
on my way there, talking to people on the streets and in trains.
In bars, I began with having to have at least one practice interaction per night. Which meant that the
earlier I begin, the earlier I would get home, and the more sleep I would have. So most of the time I would
open the very first group, lead the conversation quickly to the statement of intent, wish them good night
and bail out. Some other times, when I was not feeling it, I had to wait till almost closing time before
having my obligatory interaction. On such bad nights I didnt go home at all, I just went straight back to
work and slept there for a couple of hours.
Two interactions a night. Three. Four. Then I told myself I would not leave the bar until I get one girls
phone number or email address or until the bar is closed (the annoyance of staying yet another night out
of bed led me to some spectacular, lightning-fast number closes).
And I was posting on Charisma Arts alumni board several times a day. Every question, every discovery,
every doubt and every little triumph, everything went there.
After three weeks of doing that I could number-close and kiss-close quite consistently, and felt I could
demonstrate some of the techniques. On the other hand, due to sheer exhaustion the vibe I projected was
getting worse and worse. I started freaking girls out on the approach so I began getting blown off much
more often than before. I was in a fog. I felt drunk with fatigue. And yet, somehow, I managed to progress.
I got blown off. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got
blown off. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got a phone
number. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got a phone number. I got blown off. I got blown off. I made
out with an ugly girl. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got an email address. I got blown off. I got blown
off. I made out with a cute girl. I got blown off. I got blown off. I got laid. I got blown off. I got a phone
number. I got laid. I got blown off. I got a phone number. I got a phone number. I got laid. I got a phone
number. I got laid. I got laid. I got blown off (who cares?) I got laid. I got an email address.
And so on.
I remember having an incredibly inspiring conversation with a girl who I walked home with, spent a night,
and never heard back from, no matter how many times I texted or called her. I remember almost
accidentally opening a woman in her late twenties with Hey, Id like to make love to you tonight! and
sealing the deal on her couch a few hours afterwards. I remember having my neck licked profusely by an
overwhelmingly hot and equally drunk Harvard coed who forced her number into my phone and never
picked up the phone when I called her.
Then one day I felt I couldnt do it anymore. So I decided to go one extra mile and get the job or die. I
took a week off work, and put myself through a five days and five nights of non-stop practice.
On the fifth night I demonstrated my skills to the same skeptical instructor who came back to run the
Charm School in New York. I opened the set of about five guys and three girls, knife through the butter
style. I started talking about various aspects of relationships, and I knew what would happen, and it did:
the five guys stood up and left to get their drinks, bored with the topic. The three girls flocked around me,
chirping animatedly. I put my arms around the two girls.
I took a quick look back and saw my former instructor goggling, his jaw on the floor.
Six weeks after I went through what seemed like a torture of being a really bad Charm School student, I
was teaching my first one. Those were six weeks of insanity, but they paid off.
I got a 10 out of 10 from all the clients of my first bootcamp, so I never had a chance to be an
instructor-in-training.
A lot of stuff happened since. I had to reinvent the method to make it fit my personality. As a matter of
fact, I had to do that several times, as my character changed drastically more than once. I was a
high-energy goofy guy; a clown. A serious deep guy, a la Mr. Darcy from Pride and Prejudice. A
conversational technician. A philosopher. A too-cool-for-school rebel. A messiah. You may have noticed
the changes in the style of the chapters of this book, the ones you have read by now and the ones which I
hope you will read ahead. Those chapters were written in the different moments of the last year, and
reflect my progress and change.
I had a performance crisis when my game crashed and hit the bottom of a deepest pit in April in Vegas; it
rose from ashes in May in Boston. Once a well-known instructor from one of the leading rival companies
tried to amog me in front of my clients; he did not succeed. The other time I pulled three cute girls one
by one from a bunch of instructors and clients of another rival company, and my co-instructor Rob
cemented that interaction, while one of those guys tried to hover and listen and make notes and what Rob
was saying to one of the girls. Get used to it gentlemen, happens all the time. People living in countries as
far apart as Morocco, Japan, Chili, and Kenya read my articles on courtship and encouraged me to write
more. A guy who saw me in action once introduced me as the strongest pick-up artist in the world to his
friends in a posh Manhattan high society party filled with stage- and TV celebrities.
I do not think I am the strongest pick up artist in the world. Actually, I do not consider myself a pick-up
artist at all.
But these days I am indeed one of the best experts in the world at teaching modern courtship for men.
That much I know for sure and can say with certainty.
In one year I taught close to 200 men how to meet and connect with women. I do fail sometimes. But most
of the time, I succeed.
By the way, since the day I took a bootcamp as a client, a few things changed in my life. I quit smoking. I
dropped fifty pounds, and counting. I work out. I am out of debt. I tripled my income while having cut my
working hours by four times. I spend my free time writing stories. I have plenty of designer clothes, and a
high-performance motorcycle that I ride to Boston and D.C. to teach my private clients and Charm
Schools students. I own a business. And I am in a relationship with an attractive and intelligent woman
whom I love and who loves me.
Chapter 29
I was rearranging items in my traveling bag and in a side pocket found a notebook I lost a while ago. The
last entries were made in Washington D.C. where I ran a workshop in the early spring.
The notes I made in that notebook were random and chaotic and not very original. There is not much logic
there, either. And a lot of things changed in my life since that time. But something in those notes from
Washington still strikes the cord with me. I am going to publish those notes here in this little book just in
case I lose that notebook again.
Mindless sex with someone I do not care about emphasizes loneliness instead of intimate connection, and
I feels used. I am not saying that casual sex is always bad. It might be okay on the condition that you and
she are pleased and most importantly you are not ruining lives yours, hers, or that of anyone else. If I were
single and saw a great woman I liked who would be suffering in her relationship, i.e. being mistreated, I
would remove her from the relationship. Ethical choices are not given to us by our heritage, culture, etc.
They are our personal choices. They are something we have to decide for ourselves every time anew.
People who create that notion of playboy lifestyle have unrealistic expectations and not necessarily very
smart. Why should I be brainwashed by people whose judgment I can not trust? I would ask myself, who
am I, what do I really want?
If I have a doubt, I would test it, I would not dedicate myself to something I were not sure about. No one
will punish you if you live playboy lifestyle, but it has the potential to be an addiction. A few months ago I
quit smoking because it mad me miserable. Playboy lifestyle is more addictive, it's materialistic and
makes people lose who they are. Playboy lifestyle can lead to neurosis, to losing touch with who you are.
What a man really needs is to do is to check his values and follow the path that leads you to the true
happiness. Do not do it by the Hollywood standards or any other social standards, this is all much more
personal. I am still trying to get rid of a lot of wrong beliefs.
My ideal picture of happiness in my romantic life is to be with one woman I truly like and have a deep
spiritual connection, and have kids with her and be their friend, and teach them what I know.
Recommended readings. Plato, because he makes people question their values. Materialistic values were
the ones that led people to emptiness of the soul. Socrates was a great psychologist, because he came from
the idea that happiness is based on a pure soul. The soul is the one that suffers.
There is a possibility of emptiness and destroying your own soul. If you get hooked on sexual experience
you might end up being psychotic. If a guy has the power to pursue material happiness repeatedly, it is
never perfect. One's sexual craving can never get completely fulfilled.
I eat it but my stomach is not full, and I feel if I eat more I will get fulfilled. Meanwhile, my soul gets
neglected.
There is also a possibility to remove meaning from life. There must be a higher goal than just hedonistic
enjoyment. It is a reality that a lot of fulfillment that can come from women, but if a guy is not happy in
the first place, no woman will make him feel happy. This is why I do not believe in finding my other half.
A man who looks for a woman to complete him is incomplete and all he can expect is a neurotic
relationship. We must be complete in order to be with the other person.
I would not be able to handle many women, life is to precious and too short to dedicate it only to sexual
pursuits.
Chapter 30
There is a certain disparity in the mating game. A man must initiate it. That gives a woman initial
advantage in power. To avoid turning the courtship into a power struggle, a man has to balance the scales.
That is why a man must provide a woman with the opportunity to make the next move.
Showing early sexual interest in a woman is the main problem with many of my clients. There is the time
to check out her body, but in the majority of cases the approach is not that time.
It works very well for some of my friends and colleagues, but I personally find it counterproductive to
immediately emotionally open to a woman I had just met. I do not make myself emotionally available to
her before she has deserved it. I open up gradually, and make each of the steps in that process a reward to
her for taking a step toward me.
Early in the interaction, avoid bringing irrelevant generic commonalities into it. Oh, I have a good friend
who is from Cleveland, too! This is stupid and irritating, and communicates a naive desire to build rapport
at any cost.
Disqualify by behavior.
After having sex with a woman for the first time, and in some cases even after having sex with a woman a
thousand times, do not mention that sexual encounter next time you talk to her. Talking about it would
make her feel put on the spot and guilty for having sex with you, even punished.
Complimenting a very attractive woman on her looks on the approach has the effect of wearing a T-shirt
with a slogan, an idiot with zero social skills.
Projecting sexual vibe during the day game approach and asking for a book recommendation is a sure way
to trigger a resistance in the majority of the situations. Imagine asking a woman about a good book she
can recommend, while clutching a dildo. Same effect. If you go indirect, go nonsexual.
Accept the risks associated with the life you want to live.
Chapter 31
Being a good communicator does not necessarily mean that I have to spill the guts to someone I had just
met. In fact, it might be easy to punch through the envelope when trying too hard to build the rapport.
When a woman asks me a question I do not want to answer, I would rather gracefully avoid answering it. I
say things like-
"Well, how about you let me remain a little enigmatic to you for a while?"
"It is a little early for us to discuss that, but I promise I will definitely tell you eventually when we get to
know each other a little better."
Composure is everything.
Know what you want from the interaction, but be flexible in accepting higher goal midway.
I like to communicate with women who can handle a situation of being approached by a man. My
approach is the first test among many I put a woman through during our interaction. On the approach I test
and qualify her in how well she handles being approached.
I prefer to take a few moments and figure out the logistics of the group before the approach. I can usually
find out a lot about the group or a single person before I even approach them. For example in a bar I find it
quite easy to recognize every woman who came to hook up with a guy, in a bookstore or any other day
game place it is easy to recognize if a woman would not mind being courted by a man who knows how to
behave.
If a woman is comfortable with the approach and receptive right after, it usually takes no effort to seduce
her.
I take the initiative to immediately get out of an interaction that clearly leads nowhere. I prefer to leave
such interaction as soon as I can do it gracefully.
A man who takes himself seriously is very attractive to most women. A man who takes himself TOO
seriously appears ridiculous to most women. When I talk to women who were perfect strangers to me only
minutes ago, I subtly make fun of my vulnerabilities, and keep my cool.
Chapter 32
I'll be brief.
Nightgame during the bootcamp. 18th Street Lounge in DC. I open an all-female 7-set. It's one of the girl's
birthday. Instead of saying "Happy birthday!" as probably every guy who tried to hit on her said to her
tonight, I say: "Cool, means I'm in the right place. I'm your birthday present!" She giggles. I add: "I'm here
to do whatever it takes to make you feel great".
Sure enough, her friend fires off a hoop: "Dance for her!"
I say, "I don't dance, but I'm going to show her a magic trick."
The friend yells out for everyone at the table to hear: "Hey! He's gonna show us a magic trick!"
I get myself next to the birthday girl. I say: "This magic trick is called "the Stolen Kiss". I'm afraid it's not
a very good magic trick, but I promise you'll be entertained. Close your eyes."
She does.
I kiss her.
Everybody is stunned. Then they crack up, including the birthday girl who is giving me THE LOOK.
I go: "Actually, I don't know any magic tricks. But I have another kind of present for you. It's a secret I
would like to tell you. Lean closer."
She does.
I kiss her. This time she is quite comfortable with the idea of kissing me and is very willing.
The tactic here is to provoke the hoop from the target or anyone else in proximity, and then use the hoop
as the justification for the kiss.
Chapter 33
It's last November, if I'm not mistaken. I run a solo bootcamp in New York, Saturday nightgame, about 2
in the morning, I'm insanely tired, and so are both clients. I and one of the guys are at a bar, he says, I'm
done for tonight, but Dee, I wanna see you in action just one more time to have a high note of the night.
But I'm to lazy to look for a good set, so I go after the closest target available: a chick buying drinks a
couple of feet away. "Hey, what's up?"
I guess because of being tired, my vibe was a little off, so she got somewhat defensive. The first words
from her are: "But I'm here with my friends!"
The rest was automatic. Pure Juggler method, no thinking, just skills working for themselves without any
participation of my mind. I say "Cool, why don't you introduce me to them?"
And she takes off and walks across the entire bar. I drag behind her, and the client follows me.
To my horror I realize that the chick heads straight toward a set of about 30 0r 40 people partying at the
farthest end of the bar, mostly girls. I say "to my horror" not because I scared of big sets (anyone with a bit
of experience knows that those are are the easiest ones), but because large sets are "sticky", and no matter
how much I wanna go home I would have to spend another hour there. But the client's wish is above all,
so I decide, let me experiment at least. So I think, why don't I escalate not with just one person in the
group, but instead escalate my way around the set.
So I shake the first chick's hand rather formally, the other one I touch on the shoulder as I shake her hand,
I put my arm around the third one, I give the forth one a hug and kiss her one on the neck (never kiss
anyone on the cheek), I turn the fifth one around and kiss her on the lips, and then I make the sixth one
stand up, I sit on her stool, pull her on my lap and make out with her. Then I shake her off, stand up and
move to the seventh chick.
And that dude stands up. And stands up. And STANDS UP.
And then he continues to stand up some more. By this time I see that he's about seven feet tall and weights
something like three hundred seventy five pounds, all muscle.
So I go into the well-trained pattern of behavior: when there is a dark male mass towering in front of me, I
crack a hearty grin, and generously reach out for a handshake.
- "Hey man, I'm Dimitri!"
- "Pardon me?"
His voice sounds like a growl of a dog who's about to attack. But I am still not thinking, everything I say
is automatic.
- "Hey, I don't give a @#$% either, Dimitri's just what my parents called me. I'd rather be called
something else!"
An awkward pause, while we both try to balance our fight-or-flight dilemma. I guess it's time for me to
say something.
- "By the way, I see you stand up for your women like a soldier... and you look like a soldier... and you
have a crew cut like a soldier... I'd bet you're a soldier!"
- "Hey man, great to meet you, I'm a Russian Air Force captain! Only I'm in reserve cause I'm not as
young as you are."
- "So you wanted to bomb us, right? You wanted to bomb the Americans?"
- "No, man. Not to bomb. To shoot down. (I point at my chest) A fighter, not a bomber".
Another long pause. Finally the would-be-murderer in front of me shakes his head.
- "Okay, then".
But I must seal the deal. Nothing better than making a demand in such case.
- "HAHAHAHA!"
So I sit down next to him and his girlfriend, and then realize the client of mine who I completely forgot
about is standing right here, his jaw dropped to the floor. He is invited to join, and we spend the next two
hours getting smashed.
What I like the best about that experience is that I cannot even take credit for it. Whatever I did was a pure
improvisation, but it was based on the techniques and structures I've learned from Juggler. Can't take
credit for it, but would gladly take credit for being a damn good learner and for allowing my mind to solve
the problem without me interfering.
Whew... Nothing like a little bragging before going to bed. Always wanted to describe this experience in
writing, and always kept forgetting. Now it's done.
I wish I had stuff like that happen more often. I can't boast I'm always like that, though. Sometimes I can't
talk my way out of simplest situations. Sometimes the whole bootcamp is one endless "@#$% off"
experience. And for mercy's sake don't ask me about what conversation took place between me and a
Delaware highway patrolman last Thursday, at about five in the morning, when I accidentally passed him
on a motorcycle on my way to meet the private client in DC. Very embarrassing.
Chapter 34
Girls are socially conditioned to think of themselves as buyers on the meat market. I want to reverse the
role and make her feel she's a seller.
:-)
I pause. She expects me to follow up with a lame line like, you and your friends have great energy, or you
guys are having so much fun, etc.
Instead, I say: "For the last ten minutes you were checking out my penis. What's the deal?"
I do it because even though it seems like a tough thing to say, it will greatly simplify everything for me in
the long run.
Or if I calibrate that she might not be receptive to the hardcore role reversal on the opening, I reverse the
roles after about a minute of conversation.
I ask her a simple questions. For example, "What's your racket?" (Whenever I find myself asking a dull
question, like "what do you do?" I rephrase it to make it sound interesting).
Let's say, she responds with "I'm a math teacher".
I immediately say: "Oh, that means you have a lot of one-night stands!"
All I have to do now is justify: "Well, as a math teacher you sure appreciate the difference between less
and more. Which means, you know that being just friends means being just friends, while being lovers
means being lovers AND friends. Hence, you have a lot of one-night stands because you can never resist a
higher offer!"
I do not prepare any routines. I just use my imagination to justify the sexual behavior I presume about her.
Or if she goes, "I am a nurse!" I go" "Oh... that means you're into sixty nine!" She laughs and goes,
"Why?" I say: "Because as a nurse you're anatomically curious and believe in reciprocation!"
Or she says, "I'm a lawyer", and I say, "Oh... it means you like it in the butt!" She cracks up completely. I
aught, too, and then say, "Oh you do, don't you?" She says, "Well, yeah, I kinda do, but how the @#$% is
this related to being a lawyer?" And I say, "Well, it's very simple. Because... mmmm... ghm... Actually, I
have no clue, I've just made it up. So how old were you when you had your first crush?"
Then I escalate.
Part VIII
Inner Game
Chapter 35
Existential proof. My existence in the material world is due to the fact that my mother had been attracted
to my father enough to not only have sex with him but to want to have a child with him.
My existence is the fact I have to deal with rather regularly - like 24 hours a day seven days a week or
something - - so it would be hard for me to ignore this most essential proof of the fact of sexual attraction
women feel toward men. Going out to meet some people I take a few minutes to meditate on the fact of
my existence - which is of course illusory in the idealistic sense - and yet it is important for me to be able
to function in the material plane, since the material world is the world of choice and action, and my
choices and my actions make me who I am and thus build my soul.
Ordinary human females (including very beautiful ones) need ordinary human males for sex and male
companionship. I fit in the category and possess the required characteristics. I have what they need. There
is nothing accidental about having a romantic experience - it is an ordinary part of the existence.
There is a higher level of connection - to my true Self. When I am connected to my true Self, the illusory
fact of my of my birth becomes irrelevant.
When I do not care about anything that had happened to me before and I do not give a damn about the
future, when I am "drunk with now" - the most amazing things occur - because I am truly who I am,
because I can take any risk, because there will be no consequences, because I am immortal (death is the
event of the future and the future does not exist, therefore the death does not exist) and because I had
never been born (birth is the event of the past, the past does not exists, therefore the birth does not exist).
So when I am in the moment, I am the immortal, ever-present being that had never been born and will
never die.
I am God.
Being "in the moment" is the way to connect to God - in myself. Being God is the way to go.
As God, I do whatever I want with my world. Being God, I am eternally, endlessly, absolutely beautiful.
Including women.
Chapter 36
Let me ask a few open-ended questions to help someone with their inner game.
If you had owned a socially valuable object, for example, a really fast and expensive car like Ferrari or
Lamborghini, or a really beautiful large piece of real estate like an historic castle in Europe - how proud
would have you been of owning it? How much owning such object would contribute to your positive
self-image and to your self-esteem? On the scale of one to ten - in the aspect of owning something in your
life - how would it make you feel?
If you had achieved something in life that would immediately give you enormous social status - for
example, cured a disease that was previously thought incurable, saved the world from hunger - or did
something simpler like having acted the lead role in one of the all-time best films - and everyone you met
were expressing their respect to you - how proud of your achievement would you have been? In what way
having unlimited social respect would contribute to your self-respect? On the scale of one to ten, how
would it make you feel?
If your face and body were so perfectly proportionate that you were the absolute representation of human
beauty - how confident would it make you? If you were that beautiful, how would your rate your physical
appearance on the scale of one to ten?
If you had physical beauty, social respect and the property - and were forced to choose between losing
them all and losing your life or your mind - what would you choose to loose?
The conclusion is - you already have something much more valuable than the three assets I have
mentioned in my questions.
And, with the exception of a few people you would be eager to sacrifice your life or even your soul for,
you are your own most valuable thing.
You are the combination of your mind and your body. These two things are worth much more than any
motor vehicle or any peace of real estate, much more than any social position, no matter how high it is,
and much more than any kind of physical appearance. So treat yourself with much more respect than you
would treat a Ferrari, treat yourself with much more respect than any social position would deserve -
because you are much more valuable.
And treasure the beauty of your soul much more than you would treasure any kind of physical beauty. You
are already a "10", just by the virtue of owning a unique valuable object: yourself. Have an attitude to
owing self as if it were a car infinitely more expensive than a Ferrari, a unique prototype. As if you were a
masterpiece created by the greatest artist - because that is what you are. Carry yourself with this attitude.
Expect the same kind of attitude toward you from others. And be calm and keep your cool in all
circumstances. Knowing your absolute worth, you will behave with absolute worth.
This attitude is already there. I had not given it to you. I only have helped you to connect to it by asking
my questions.
I am sure you agree that even though people you care about might be the ones you would die for - but you
do not own them. It is impossible to own another human being. But you do own yourself (to a maximum
degree it is possible to own anything) - and you are not only the most important thing you own, you are
the ONLY thing that gets the closest to actually being your property. So own it.
Once you try this mental state out, you will find it very easy to keep it on at all times. And it will express
itself in your behavior, your choices, your ways of communicating, and in your relationships.
Chapter 37
One thing that had always bothered me about current situation in courtship is that we always treat hurting
the other guy as something inevitable. Well, sometimes it is, I agree, but most of the time it isn't. It
bothers me that someone always has to suffer: me or he other guy (and if the other guy suffers, the girl
will suffer, too).
Suffering is okay. We live in the world of suffering. And yet, there must be a way to do what we must and
yet to avoid causing the unnecessary pain. For me there is a difference between taking a woman out of a
wasteland relationship to make her happy - and undermining her imperfect, but fully alive relationship to
boost my ego.
I always felt uneasy when I had to explain to my clients that it's "them or the other guy". And I had always
intuitively sensed that there must be something within the Juggler Method that could be developed into a
mechanism that would help to prevent the unnecessary heartbreak.
I've learned form the experience that high ethical standards work as a powerful aphrodisiac on many
attractive women. I remember talking to a Russian supermodel from my home town who I knew when she
was a thirteen-year-old kid, and when I told her about my fascination with young Charles Lindbergh's
moral beauty, her eyes lit up.
So I deduced that if in my conversation with a woman I make a statement that sticking with my ethical
standards are more important to me than having sex with her, no matter how attractive I find her, this
might actually serve as a powerful disqualification/sexual barrier. It would work well for my clients who
have yet to find that woman they would want to be loyal to.
And since my personal quest is to reject the temptations and to remain loyal to the a woman I want to be
with, I allow myself something otherwise not recommended in Juggler Method: I impose the
near-impenetrable barriers. If my partner in the interaction chooses to overcome the obstacle, well, there's
still a chance for us to be friends. If not - she is out, thank God.
At the same time, the truth is, having been hurt by some other guys taking away my women before, I
sincerely do not want to inflict that pain on anyone if I can help it. Laugh at me if you want, but I always
think of the other guy.
"I'd like to share with you something I consider important. Please listen. In you I find the interesting and
tremendously desirable woman. I would eagerly invite you to spend the night with me, and yet I have to
think of the pain I might cause to you and to a man who loves you. I believe in love, and I hate hurting the
other guy. Here's the deal: if you think you love your boyfriend, or even if you're going through tough
times with him these days but hope to change it in the future, we cannot be anything more than just
friends."
And trust me, when I say it, I mean it. No "frame control" here.
I believe that seducers of the past - even the famous ones - when they made the statements that they
couldn't care less about the other guys - those seducers had only revealed their clumsiness in seduction. It's
like a lousy doctor who cuts out the appendix and leaves the huge ugly scar across the abdomen. Or like
bombing out the entire Germany in order to get to one villain in hiding.
I prefer modern technology: fly a few thousand miles, dive on the bastard, and put the missile right up his
nostril.
Well, okay, I admit this wasn't a nice analogy, but I hope you understand my point. We need to be neat.
Why cause unnecessary suffering if it can be avoided? And we must be selective anyway, so why not to be
selective through avoidance of causing the heartbreak?
My rationalization is this: when I deliver my short monologue I trigger her awareness of the wider
implications of the situation. I am responsible for my choices and I want her to take responsibility for hers.
I would honestly rather prefer to be friends with her - or not to know her at all - than to ruin some guy's
life for years, months, or even weeks.
Or forever.
I used to envy the guys who broke my heart by taking my girls away from me and then dumping them
after a one-night stand. I wanted to be like those guys.
This has changed. I don't want to be like them anymore. I want to be unlike them. I want to be the
opposite of them.
I remember how it felt to be heartbroken. It was awful. And some guys are probably less sensitive than I
was, some are more sensitive. A guy might never recover. He might walk through the rest of his life in
shock. Or he might kill himself. Or something I do can trigger a domino effect, and cause suffering to a lot
of other people - his and her parents, etc.
I don't want to ruin or shorten someone's life for the sake of my split-second pleasure.
At the same time, if a woman consciously checks her relationship in her mind and realizes that there is
nothing that holds her there - well, then - and only then, she's a fair game. And then my "Boyfriend
Supporter Pattern" will make her respect me and like me more. As I've said before, man's high ethical
standards serve as a powerful aphrodisiac for a woman.
Chapter 38
When a man with worse-than-average communication skills meets a woman he finds attractive, he of
course wants her to reciprocate. Nothing wrong with that so far. But he neglects the fact that the woman
he is interested in had done absolutely nothing to create the attraction in him! He is attracted to her just the
way she is, without her investing any commitment into the interaction, just for her looks. By the same
token, the self-esteem of that man is relatively low, so he believes that just the way he is he is absolutely
unattractive to her. So he figures out what he needs now is to be entertaining.
And he begins telling stories he considers spectacular. Those stories typically include explosions, fast
vehicles, money, a doze of violence, and a few sexually explicit moments from his past, real or imaginary.
I seriously suspect that most of modern Hollywood screenwriters and directors battle some serious
self-esteem issues. It looks like those guys believe that without explosions, fast vehicles, money, violence,
and a few sexually explicit moments their works would be boring. That is why there is almost nothing else
in the movie theaters except explosions, fast vehicles, money, violence, and sex scenes. Such is my
theory.
The problem is, the woman whom our guy tells about explosions, fast vehicles, money, violence, and past
sexual experiences, has heard it all before. In fact, if she fits the current social model of female beauty, she
has already heard from men who tried to pick her up all about explosions, fast vehicles, money, violence,
and their real or imaginary past sexual experiences, and that might have happened a few thousand times.
But that woman is also polite. So she goes, oh, how exciting. Then she yawns.
There might be some exceptions of course. If that attractive woman have been struck with a sudden
amnesia, she might not feel familiar with male stories about explosions, fast vehicles, money, violence,
and past sexual experiences, real or imaginary. Or she might be from Siberia where men in such situations
talk about vodka and bear hunting. In these two rare cases a woman might actually be impressed, even if
slightly confused, as in: Why is this man telling me about all those things?
Then a moment comes when she inevitably asks herself another question: What am I so impressed with?
Women check on their emotions at random intervals usually no longer than a minute. Then she answers:
Oh, I see! I am so impressed because that man tells me about explosions, fast vehicles, money, violence,
and his sexual experiences, which are probably imaginary. Got it! So I am not actually impressed with
him as a person at all. Neither am I impressed with him as a man, because he is obviously trying to
entertain me to get into my pants. I am just impressed by his stories. What a drag. But she is also polite, so
she goes, oh, how exciting. Then she yawns.
Now what if we imagine an alternative reality in which a woman is approached by a man of a very
different kind. This new man is normal, and he also has a secret, which tremendously boosts his
confidence.
So he walks up to her and starts a conversation. What do you think he talks to her about?
Hell no!
He makes sure to secure her attention, introduces himself calmly, and then says something along these
lines:
You know, today is Thursday, and every Thursday morning I do my laundry. Through the week I collect
quite a few items I need cleaned. It has become a ritual. Watching them all tumble in the washer give me
incredible peace of mind, it tells me the world is still a very safe place. What about you, what makes you
feel safe?
And thus it continues. The man escalates subtly, and as he does, he progresses from boring topics to really
boring to extremely boring one:
I am addicted to brushing my hair. I actually have a favorite hairbrush I would never share with anyone.
Every time I run it through my hair it sends shivers down my spine. Tell me, what has a similar effect on
you?
And the woman asks herself: Why do I feel so attracted to this man? He talks about unbelievably boring
stuff, and yet I feel like I know him so well. He is so real. I like his lips. What is going on?! This guy is so
fascinating. Not his stories, because he sure is not like all those other guys who just try to entertain. The
man himself is so interesting. What is his secret? Oh. I get it. It must be chemistry. So this is how it feels
to be in love at first sight!
And then our man shifts to the highest gear of escalation, and deploys the heavy artillery of boring:
POLITICS.
And so on, all the way to the weather talk, tell me, what does the shape of that cumulus cloud make you
think of?
Definitely not the Action/Adventure genre. Probably more like a Romantic Comedy.
Just the kind of genre that brings men and women together.
Chapter 39
I used to work as an assistant conductor in one of the largest opera theaters in the world.
One of our lead conductors seemed to have lacked every characteristic necessary for being a successful
professional musician in any branch of music, to say nothing of being a conductor, which requires the
most thorough knowledge of every single element of music.
And yet, he was a conductor, and as a conductor he fared better than anyone in that theater. The
instrumentalists in the orchestra and the singers and dancers on stage all trusted and loved him.
That guy and I were friends, having studied conducting from the same professor who we called simply the
Maestro. I asked my friend once how did he make it all happen for him. And he told me his story.
In his late teens and early twenties he was a soldier in the Russian Special Forces. Most of his time in the
military he was involved in severe physical training, and the considerable everyday part of this training
was the exercise of crashing bricks with the head. I suppose, Russian commandos are not required to be
able to think much.
Anyway, after having broken one of those bricks, my friend was visited by a very strange idea. He
suddenly realized that he did not want to be a commando any more. He wanted to become an opera
conductor.
After his discharge a year later, he went to a conservatory of music and told someone he wanted to
become a musician, but had no clue where to start. He didn't know musical notation, had not really have
any ear for music, and his voice was rather mediocre.
And yet somehow he emotionally blackmailed his way into the choral conducting and singing class, where
he was a dreadful student for the next five years. He found a construction worker job at the opera theater,
than gradually made his way up to a position of a prompter. He earned some extra money by copying the
opera scores by nights.
He also became friends with every singer and every instrumentalist in the theater. He asked them
questions about the music they performed, and kept a journal where he wrote everything he learned from
them. He continued studying choral conducting in the conservatory of music, and every now and then the
singers began asking him to conduct during the small group rehearsals. Somehow imperceptibly it became
his additional official duty.
Then his five years of study ended - and he immediately went back to the same conservatory of music,
only this time he signed up for the classes with the most famous and unapproachable professor there, the
Maestro, the genius of conducting who tyrannically ruled one of the best symphony orchestras in Russia.
The Maestro hated my friend, but the problem was he just could not get rid of him. My friend was stalking
the Maestro and asked and asked and asked endless questions. It went on for another five years.
And then for another two years of the postgraduate studies. All through great pain.
And I forgot to mention that my friend had a wife he loved and two kids. And that one day his wife had
enough of this musical obsession, and left him, and took the children with her, and broke his heart.
By that time my friend had left the opera theater where he knew everyone, and found a badly paid job as a
conductor in a small-time musical theater, where he worked for two years. It was a small theater indeed,
but it was the opportunity to conduct an orchestra every night.
Then one day he got a phone call from the theater where he used to work as a handyman and a prompter.
They had a job of an assistant conductor available, would he be interested? Well, it so happened that he
was.
And then three years later he got promoted, and became the full time opera conductor.
The quest lasted eighteen years, from the moment he broke that brick against his head.
This is what my friend told me, I might be mediocre at everything, but if there is one thing I know I have
mastered, it is WAITING.
It has been ten years since my friend and I had that conversation. He still conducts operas in that theater.
Whenever he is not busy performing music all over the world.
Chapter 40
I tried that method first myself in Boston during one of the recent Charm Schools, and it worked very
well. I then began teaching it to our clients, and was impressed with how quickly they became the masters
of the touch.
The key to this exercise is to never touch a woman more than once on the same spot of her body, unless
she is not very receptive and you feel you have to pull back a little.
Here is the sequence of the now notoriously effective Boston Physical Escalation.
Begin by touching a woman with the back of your hand on her forearm, as in classic Juggler Method. Or if
she is seated, you can begin by touching her on the outside of her thigh.
Kiss.
There are a few additional, optional spots. For example you can rub her shoulders, or her back, or massage
her feet if you can reach them without freaking out her friends, or hold her hand, put your hand on he
knee, or touch her belly. Add them to main structure to your liking. But even without those additions you
will be able to escalate the touch very effectively if you follow the simple main structure I had delineated
above.
Please keep in mind that touching should be very well calibrated, and it takes somewhat longer to
physically escalate an interaction than to read the description of the Boston Physical Escalation, especially
when it is applied for the day game in public places.
Chapter 41
The ultimate mastery in any human craft comes from the opposite side of that craft.
For example, the ultimate mastery of the art of war is winning without fighting. The ultimate mastery in
painting comes when the painter rejects his technical skills and paints with his heart.
The ideal rapport is when the two people gaze at the eyes of each other, not saying a word. The ideal
conversation is nonverbal.
We can create a situation when the nonverbal conversation takes place almost immediately after we
approach a stranger. All we have to do is just speak your mind, I do not feel like talking at all tonight, and
for some reason you seam like a person who I would feel really comfortable being silent with; let us spend
a minute or two in silence. Of course she might say no. She is in charge of her reality and has a choice to
accept or reject the offer. And yet, she might say yes. In this case, we will not have to waste any effort for
building rapport, because the rapport is a given.
Listening while being spoken to is another application of silence. Do not smile. Do not break tension.
Tension equals rapport. You do not have to know a lot about many topics. Not knowing is better than
knowing for having a conversation. Tel her you do not know much about her area of expertise, and ask her
to teach you what you must know. She will be speaking. You will be listening in silence. Just give her a
smile and touch her gently to make her feel good about her knowledge and sharing it.
When she asks you a question, ask her how she would answer it. Listen earnestly. Hold her hand.
You want to find out more about her. You want her to WANT to find out more about you. Keep your
statements concise, and you will achieve both.
Chapter 42
The innocent is not afraid of the punishment. The stronger is not afraid of the punishment.
Be innocent and act like you are stronger, and there is no way for you to get punished.
Men who feel guilty for having sexual interest in a woman on the approach act defensively, they mentally
run away after the approach. Men who feel week on the approach act defensively, they mentally guard
themselves after the approach.
Men who accept the fact that there is no guilt in wanting sex, men who realize and believe that they
deserve sex simply because they were born into the two-sex species, the ones that know that sex is their
right, ARE innocent.
Men who know that as men they ARE stronger, and therefore should act from the position of emotional
and physical generosity, such men cannot be afraid of women. They are stronger and therefore project
positive attitude and positive expectations.
A man who behaves undefended, and demonstrates positive confidence generates natural curiosity in
almost any woman.
Chapter 43
1. Rattlehead
I've noticed that a lot of men who are naturally good conversationalists have a habit of jerking their heads
non-stop in a series of fast vigorous moves. I know I do that quite often, to the disastrous results, because
this uncontrolled continuous movement is awfully distracting to the people I talk to - women or men.
A solution: I make sure that my head doesn't move when I speak most of the time. If I need to emphasize
something I say with a nod, tilt of my head, or any other head movement, I do my best to make the
movement slow and smooth.
2. Torso Lock
For some reason this is a challenge of choice among many slender men. Have you seen a skinny guy who
doesn't move his upper body as he walks? Are you one of them? I definitely used to be like this, but I got
horribly overweight, and the problem had disappeared. Often such guy is quite relaxed, but because his
body doesn't rotate around the natural axis that goes through the spine, he creates an impression of being
incredibly tense.
A solution: learn the "fat man walk" a.k.a. "tired man walk". Make it a conscious habit until it becomes
completely natural. If you want to see an example, rent "Rain Man" and compare the gait of Charlie
Babbit with that of his brother Raymond Babbit when they walk next to each other. Raymond is the guy
with the mild case of a torso lock, while Charlie, being relatively slim, exhibits the perfect "fat man walk",
creating an impression of total confidence and nonchalant self-sufficiency (a$$hole as he is).
Often comes together with the torso lock. Guys who walk with their arms seemingly attached to the sides
of their pants - you know the type. Looks very creepy.
A solution: fling your arms slightly around your body while walking. NOT TOO MUCH! It's a part of the
"fat man walk", "Rain Man" is still a good example.
A defense mechanism: the instinctive attempt to protect the chest, belly, throat, or other vital organs.
Sometimes isn't apparent as a habit, and suddenly kicks in in the presence of someone intimidating: an
overwhelmingly beautiful woman or an overwhelmingly burly or dominating man. In such cases the man
who does this this isn't usually aware of doing it. Often disguised as a quasi-comfortable way to hold a
drink.
Solutions:
b) Every now and then consciously relax your arm if it tends to creep up toward your chest;
c) Keep your arms behind your back, Bruce Lee style, while talking to tough men and hot women when
you and they are standing;
d) Train yourself to keep your arms along the sides of your trousers while talking to people when you and
they are standing;
e) This one is the best: use your arms to do something meaningful - for example, touching a woman you
are talking to.
EVERYONE does that. It's all James Dean's fault. This is moderately acceptable if it's casual, but holding
your hands in your pockets all the time does project the image of insecurity.
Solutions:
6. Windmill Arms
a) Wide, smooth, fast movements (that's how you spill your red wine on her white blouse);
b) Sharp, abrupt movements (these convey aggression, and in combination with some body rocking will
make you look as if you're feinting in order to punch her in the face);
Solution: treasure your gestures. Only use them to emphasize the most important points of what you're
saying. Do it in a smooth, relaxed, slow fashion, as if your hands and arms move through water.
7. Body Rocking
Whether accepted and advocated by somje of the leading "pick-up" companies or not, this often
uncontrolled type of movement in reality more often than not conveys nervousness, and effectively
irritates the hell out of whoever you're speaking with. I know what I'm talking about 'cause I used to do
that for quite a while. This particular quirk has several curious variations:
a) Plain rocking;
c) Sexual act-like movements while standing (I saw two guys doing it in two ways: 1) smooth, and 2) fast
and abrupt. First version looks extremely sleazy, second one is hilarious and very embarrassing. Neither of
the guys was aware of doing that!)
Solution: Stand up firmly on your feet, make a conscious effort to be erect (do I really have to say that no
pun is intended?)
8. Legs Lock
Walking on the unbending legs. This problem is related to the Torso Lock and Arms Lock, and often
accompanies them.
This one is the gem of my collection: walking with the knees permanently half-bent, Groucho Marx style.
Often comes together with severe slouch.
Solutions:
a) Five - ten minutes of walking around on the unbending legs (as in Legs Lock) could be a healthy way of
becoming aware of the difference - and of the challenge;
Solution: imagine being pulled up by your hair. Hold yourself like that.
Tapping on the tabletop or grabbing objects shows her how nervous you are. And yet, if you stop doing
this, you will stop being nervous.
Move the glass or the ash tray further from you on the table so you cannot reach it. Fold the napkin and
place it on the table. Etc.
A lot of guys do it when they sit next to a woman at the table. This fast rhythmical movement not only
shakes the table and telegraphs nervousness, but also makes her think that you actually would very much
like to use a urinal but are too shy to do so.
Chapter 44
One of the exercises I often practice with my private clients is the conversational exercise that enables my
clients to to disarm and channel away any Resistance Phrase if it occurs in a conversation with a woman.
I throw a random "Resistance Phrase" to a client, and request a positive response within a few seconds.
It is a phrase that a woman utters as a form of resistance to the actions or words of a man who escalates
the interaction with her.
Examples:
She: Don't bother us, we're having girl's talk! (Resistance Phrase)
Other examples:
"I'm engaged!"
"I'm a lesbian!"
"Why are you asking me? Why don't you ask a sales clerk instead?"
"We hadn't seen each other for a long time. Do you mind?"
"Leave us alone!"
"I don't want to talk to anyone right now but please feel free to come back later"
"I will not have sex with you, so don't waste your time"
"We don't speak English" (said with the perfect New England accent, or with the fake Zimbabvian accent)
"Buy me a drink".
"Oh no, not another one! What's the matter with them today?"
"Is this all? Do you have anything else to add? I didn't think so". (turns away)
"Let's make a deal: you don't talk to us, we don't talk to you. Okay?"
"I'm here with my friends, and you are intruding".
"Would you like a drink? Well, you're not getting one here. Go away".
"BUSY!"
"So what?"
As you see from my example, and perhaps know from own experience, some women are quite inventive
with their Resistance Phrases. It is my opinion that a man who tries to stay in the interaction no matter
what would inevitably run a risk of being perceived and perceiving himself as needy. However, a graceful
response before leaving politely would make such man impervious to heartbreak.
I would like to encourage you, my reader, to proactive improvising multiple different responses to each of
the Resistance Phrases I had provided in this chapter.
I would like to give you an example of what this exercise might look like.
Let's take the most common Resistance Phrase: "I have a boyfriend". I would like to emphasize that I am
not talking about the scenario when a woman says "I have a boyfriend" as the response to your question
about her relationship situation. I am describing here the event when a girl rubs her having a boyfriend
into your face a moment after you said "Hi", or at any other point of a conversation when such information
is clearly intended to block the possibility of any escalation.
So...
"I have a boyfriend!" I think the healthy response to this line should come from the psychological place of
understanding that a woman might have a number of motivations to say it - and that the motivation is not
present in the words.
Since the motivation is not present in the words, I can read any motivation into those words - and that
includes the one that would work to my advantage.
Obviously, quite often "I have a boyfriend" line is motivated by the sexual presumption mechanism: a
woman presumes that if I talk to her, I am hitting on her. However, I choose to interpret her words as if
they were motivated by her desire to seek my approval. I interpret "I have a boyfriend!" similarly to how I
would interpret a guy telling me "I have a BMW".
Or, to put it differently, there's always subtext behind words. I operate on a level of the subtext. When a
woman says to me "I have a boyfriend!" she might or might not mean "I know that you are making
yourself sexually available to me by seeking sex with me but I am not sexually available to you because I
am sexually available to another, more dominant man who you should envy and fear" - but I choose to
interpret her words as if the subtext were "I want to impress you by boasting that I am socially accepted
enough to have a man who is interested in me sexually".
A few examples:
"I have a boyfriend!"- "Sorry... I'm not sure if I understand the principle..." (Credit - one of my recent
clients)
"I have a boyfriend!" - "Hey, we're talking for only thirty seconds and you're already trying to make me
jealous!"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "I would be truly surprised if you hadn't!" (Credit: another client)
I find it important not to get stuck waiting for her response to my response. Proceed immediately with the
I statement and/or Open-Ended Question.
Like this:
"I have a boyfriend!" - "You could sound a little more enthusiastic. So, one thing I enjoy the most is a
well-done crusty barbecue with lemon and a flask of brandy by the campfire after a long day of flying.
Now let's talk about you. What's your bliss?" (Last week's private client)
"I have a boyfriend!" - "And I have a hamster. Now why don't we quit bragging about our prized
possessions and have a normal talk like two intelligent human beings? My idea of fun is making short
home movies. What about you?"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "Great. It means, you probably won't try to get into my pants too soon. Now as we
got sex out of the way, have a normal conversation with me, will you? I like motorcycles and art history.
What normal topics do you enjoy talking about?"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "From what you've just said I can deduce that you're either straight or bisexual.
Duly noted. But I am not yet ready to talk with you about sex. How about we discuss something less
intimate first and see where it can gradually take us?"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "Oh, I am happy to oblige by acting shocked and panic-stricken. Such a waste!
And yet I suppose I must not let myself sink in misery, I shall endure and press on. So, when it comes to
choosing drinks, what are your criteria?"
"I have a boyfriend"- "Yeah, and I guess it makes you a grown-up girl after all. Congratulations. Now that
we got that obligatory "boyfriend" line out of the way, a hope still remains one might have a normal talk
with you".
"I have a boyfriend!" - "No you don't! Don't get me wrong, I do believe there is a man who finds you
attractive and has a relationship with you, but you do not HAVE him. It's impossible to own a human
being".
"I have a boyfriend!"- "Thank God, it means you're probably normal. Please do not disappoint me. So --"
etc.
"I have a boyfriend!" - "What's new about that? Anyway -- " etc.
"I have a boyfriend!"- "Tragic. I was warned it might happen. So, as I was saying -- " etc.
"I have a boyfriend!" - "It's okay. We'll be discreet." (Credit: Rob; I personally consider this a classic)
"I have a boyfriend!" - "Outstanding! Why don't you give me your phone number while your boyfriend is
not around?"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "I'm devastated. By the way, I've spent the entire day today looking for free AOL
installation software all over Manhattan, and I couldn't find any. So I expressed my frustration to an AOL
manager over the phone, and guess what - I'm getting free Internet access for the next year. What was your
day like?"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "It's okay. I believe you. You don't have to prove anything to me. Please remind me
what the hell was I taking about? Ah yes, I remember --"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "I sympathize. But please let me finish. I remember we talked about --"
"I have a boyfriend" -"And I most certainly hope he keeps you active. Yesterday when I was running on a
treadmill --"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "Sorry I forgot my snappy retort to that one... So I guess I'll just have to break
down sobbing instead. Boo-hoo! Happy now? Got a Cleanex for me? Anyway --"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "I find it sexy about you! By the way --"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "I like that about you. Incidentally --"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "Hey, you've just trigged a HUGE inferiority complex in me! Who's the best
shrink you can recommend? So, as I was saying --"
"I have a boyfriend!" - "That sounds like a high-quality problem. So, as I was saying --"
"I have a boyfriend!" - (I look around, indicating subtle embarrassment, then lean in to her, and whisper
in her ear) "You are being very direct. I am not sure if it is appropriate in current circumstances".
And so on.
The point of the exercise is not to memorize all the possible responses, but to develop the natural
effortless ability to shrug away any Resistance Phrase and have a choice of either continuing the
conversation or cutting it short and leaving. And remember: the Resistance Phrase is the sign of the lack
of communicational elegance, so by channeling it away you help your partner in the conversation to be
more graceful.
Part IX
How to Begin a Conversation With a Woman
Chapter 45
First thing you want to figure out is one of the two possible mindsets a stranger might be in.
Sociable mindset is often associated with the so called nightgame. Unsociable mindset, correspondingly,
with the daygame.
Ever met a haughty, uptight woman who looks sulky and guarded in a middle of otherwise cheerful and
happy crowd of people in a bar or a nightclub? It is a night time, all right, but that woman is in a highly
unsociable mindset. Yes, she is in that bar, but meeting and communicating with strangers is probably the
last thing on her mind. May be she had just learned some extremely unpleasant news. Or she just broke up
with her boyfriend. Or she is one of those rare girls who, unfortunately, receives her validation from
hurting men. Whatever the reason is, it is quite easy to recognize the unsociable mindset in any person
during the nightgame.
A woman immersed in her college homework in a caf or the one living in a fictional reality of the last
part of Harry Potter series in a bookstore would be a good example of the unsociable mindset of the
relatively unsociable mindset during the daygame.
On the other hand, a couple of excitedly laughing bikini-clad girls on the lawn in the middle of New York
Central Park or Union Square would be no less open to meeting a charismatic stranger than as though they
were in a bar, because they are in the sociable mindset You can recognize that mindset in the daytime by
how easy it is to make eye contact with such girls and how animated they are.
Clearly, in most cases bars and clubs are filled with people in a sociable mindset.
The important thing to realize is that sociable and unsociable mindset do not replace each other in people
as if by a turn of on-and-off switch. In fact, there is a very gradual scale of sociability from completely
unsociable on the verge of autistic to frighteningly sociable when you wish it was not that in-your-face.
The skill of recognizing the sociability level in each particular person before you approach them is
incredibly easy to master. Simply give yourself a few moments to observe them, and it will become clear
for you how open they might be to interacting with you.
Remember that after you begin the conversation with them, you are in the partial control of their
sociability level. You can make that person more sociable by building rapport. You can even choose the
form of sociability for them, for example you can lead the conversation in such way that they will become
more open to you while ignoring everyone else around them, or you can steer the conversation into
acknowledging everyone else and getting them involved also.
It is highly important to assess the sociability level of the person you are about to approach, because the
particular method you are going to use to begin the conversation depends almost entirely on how open
they are to the idea of having a conversation with you.
Unsociable mindset does not mean anything bad. It simply means that you will have to use the specific
technique for opening people in the unsociable mindset. It is not harder to do when you know the
principles, it is just different.
Chapter 46
The difference in tactic between beginning a conversation with people in sociable and unsociable mindset
is that the unsociable mindset requires one extra step. This step is very simple, but it calls for a bit of
explanation.
The problem with the unsociable mindset is that the attention of a person you want to engage is occupied
by something other than you.
To be able to begin a conversation with them, you will need to get their attention.
So the extra step when dealing with the people in the unsociable mindset is GETTING THEIR
ATTENTION before you begin the interaction.
Correction: you will need to get their attention without scaring them out of their wits.
By far one of the worst things you can do upon approaching a stranger whose mind is focused entirely on
some inner reality is to position yourself behind them and touch them veeeryyy liiiightlyyyy on the their
neck, next to where the artery goes up toward the brain. Imagine someone doing that to you. Such
approach would jolt nearly anyone out of whatever their mind is busy with, but it would take a champion
of recovery to have a decent conversation after that.
Second worst way of getting the attention of a busy stranger is this. Place yourself anywhere out of their
field of vision but right next to them, as close to their ear as you can, and loudly clear your throat,
GHM-GHM! Then watch them hit the ceiling.
I am giving these examples of what not to do so we can figure out what to do.
So it is obvious that you have to make yourself visible before you make yourself audible or kinesthetically
sensed. If a person hears you without seeing you first, or if you touch them, especially on some physically
vulnerable part of their body before they are aware of their presence, their mind will presume that you
present the threat to their life. Unfortunately, we are all animals.
At the same time, even though the goal is to make yourself visible, you should not block their field of
vision and their potential escape route. This is why it rarely wise to position yourself directly in front of a
woman you had just approached, facing her.
If a woman who is the unsociable mindset is already aware of your presence, and knows that you do not
constitute any physical threat, you may safely tough her to get her attention. For example, if you are
behind her in a line in a coffee shop, and she saw you getting in the line, it would feel normal if you get
her attention by touching her upper arm with the back of your hand. She already knew you were there, her
mind had already assessed the possible threat and qualified it as minimal, so she would let you engage her.
However, if a woman is not aware of your presence, first you have to make her aware, and to give her
mind a second or two to make sure you are not a threat.
The solution for attraction the attention of someone who is not yet aware of your presence and is in the
unsociable mindset is to make them aware of your presence by placing something in their peripheral
vision.
The best and most natural thing to place in their peripheral vision is your cock.
The best and most natural thing to place in their peripheral vision is your hand.
A hand is a wonderful communication device. Using only gestures and eye contact, you can charm the
pants off a girl whose language you do not speak, as my friend Rob the Irresistible recently proved. And
one important thing to consider is that you want to communicate to them that you want to communicate to
them. A hand is very good for that.
It all leads me to the specific technique that I had already described in a number of articles.
It would be really easy to show and really hard to explain in words, but I will try.
Do this for me. With your hand palm downward, extend your arm forward until there is about 45-degree
angle between your forearm and your upper arm. Then turn your hand palm upward, with your index and
middle finger semi-open, and the rest of your fingers relaxed.
I know this is a hell of a way to describe a very natural and commonly used gesture, but how else could I
have described it?
A hand flip seems to be a universally human nonverbal signal for engaging another human in an
interaction.
The good things about the hand flip is that it replaces the inner question, what the hell do I say to her, with
the reassuring inner statement, I know just what to DO. I know that when I see a girl I like I will throw my
hand, palm upward, into her peripheral vision, and I know that will open the interaction.
To illustrate that, imagine a situation. You are in a museum, and you see a woman who is examining a
huge canvas painted by Rembrandt or Velasquez. To begin a conversation with her, all you have to do is
place yourself next to that woman, looking at the painting, than hand flip her, and ask, what do you think?
You can even go completely nonverbal. Hand flip, she makes eye contact, you keep eye contact, she goes,
yes? By that time your mind will put some words into your mouth.
If not, I will tell you just what to say in any possible situation.
Chapter 47
Some of the stuff I put in this part of the book might seem a little complex, but it is not. If it appears
complex, it is because I suck as a writer. Things I am talking about are not rocket science, nothing
esoteric, this is no high level psychology or philosophy, just plain common sense.
So common sense tells me, to help you guys to begin conversations with strangers, with ANY stranger of
your choosing, ANY time you want it, in ANY situation, to help you to do that I gotta make it completely
safe for you in case something goes terribly wrong.
I am going to give you some techniques to fix a screwed-up approach. If you know how to recover and
have a conversation no matter what was your first impression like, you will feel pretty safe, I can
guarantee you that.
But before I teach you those extremely primitive techniques for making any conversation safe, let me
digress a little into an autobiographical story. And as much as I enjoy telling people about me, this story
has a point related to the topic of this article, starting conversations with perfect strangers.
I came to US roughly seven years ago, hoping to make it big as a creative writer. I had a couple of master
degrees in classical music under my belt, I knew how to fly planes, I was good with motorbikes, I had
some connections in the high society, I was young, I felt like Tony Montana when he got himself that
mansion.
That was how I found myself one day, six and a half years ago, driving an eighteen-wheeler across
Manhattan. My very first day at work as a truck driver.
And by the way, I never had much chance to drive anything on more than two wheels back where I came
from. Riding a motorcycle, yes. Flying a plane, OH YES! Driving, no.
So here I am, dragging a fifty-tree-feet long trailer along East Seventeenth, approaching Union Square.
And there is some kind of public event on the Union Square, the place is crowded like hell, and a lot of
cops around. And there is a police van parked on the left side of my street near the intersection, and
another one parked on the left side. And I can see a bunch of blue uniforms inside the vans, and there are
some people inside the uniforms.
I tell myself, whatever you do, make sure not to touch the vans with the trailer. As soon as I say that,
KABOOM, I hear horrible scraping sound from the left, I freak out, jerk the steering wheel to the right,
and hear identical scraping sound from the right. I hit the brakes, stall the engine, and block the entire
intersection with the truck.
I look into the left mirror and I see a side and a roof of a police van FALLING OFF.
I look into the right mirror, and by a curious coincidence, I see the same thing happening to the other van.
And interestingly enough, when I get to see the insides of the vans clearly, I realize that all the forty or so
police officers I had just deprived of the roofs over their heads happen to be females.
Now imagine for a second twenty girls in a van talking peacefully about, uh, about whatever twenty girl
cops might be talking about when they are stuck together in a van for an hour. Britney Spears may be, I
have no idea. And then they look around and, hop-la, the wall and the roof is gone! And twenty more of
them going through the same experience. Of course the girls got a little, well, a little excited.
I was anxious to see how well they were taking the new experience, so I got out of the truck.
I had no lack of women explaining to me why it was a mistake, and you better believe me, I heard them
very well. The problem was, I did not speak a lot of English back then.
And all the drivers behind my truck start honking. You know how they do it in New York. Stick your
elbow into the horn and hold.
The scene reminded me of those climactic moments in Quentin Tarantino movies, when all the good bad
guys and bad bad guys are pointing guns at each other from all angles, shouting at the top of their lungs,
and then a cell phone rings in a pocket of one of them, that sort of thing.
Heya reader, I know I am pushing my luck here, risking to lose your attention, but it just felt like a perfect
moment to have a little cutaway. Seriously though, stay with me, the story does have a relevant point!
So the tension grows, ready to explode, I know I am about to get riddled with bullets.
Then this guy in a three-piece suit shows up, gets the female cops to look at him, and points at the
sidewalks. The girls group on both sidewalks and begin chatting among themselves, like nothing
happened. The three-piece-suit guy steps toward me, touches my shoulder, and says, are you okay? I nod. I
did not even say anything, but he immediately slows down his speech. He ASSUMED I did not speak
English!
ME: Siberia.
ME: Yes.
SUIT GUY: No. One. Is. Hurt. No. One. Goes. To. Jail. Understand?
ME: Yes.
SUIT GUY: This. City. Has. Plenty. Of. Police. Vans. You. Will. Not. Pay. For. The. Ones. You.
Wrecked. Understand?
ME: Yes.
A few minutes later I was off to deliver my cargo, musing on what I could learn from the experience.
Okay, I did learn something else, too. Well, the suit guy assessed the situation immediately. He figured
out what was going on in my mind, what negative expectations I had that prevented me from functioning
rationally. Using only a few words and one touch he neutralized all of my negative expectations by
directly addressing them. It was unbelievable how calm I felt less than a minute after being in the midst of
a Mexican standoff with forty cops.
Now let me get back to the main topic. What the hell was I talking about? Oh yes, beginning
conversations with strangers. Making it safe.
To make it safe you will probably have to have a default bail-out technique. Like, if a conversation goes
horribly wrong, you would know what to say to get your ass out of it and to save your face.
First technique. Justify your departure. Instead of saying, uh, mmm, ergh, well, nice seeing you, and
walking away, say something like this, hey, I am going to grab a cup of coffee in a Starbucks over there,
would you like to join me? No? Too bad. Well, no problem, have a very pleasant afternoon.
Or,
Hey, guess what, my phone is buzzing, and I am afraid I gotta take this call. Very important. It was great
having a chat with you, make sure to have a wonderful evening!
This technique works day or night, and the important thing here is that you will feel that you have ended
the interaction positively AND on your terms.
Let us proceed.
Using the example of the Suit Guy from my autobiographical story, we can pretty much figure out what
might be on the mind of a woman we had approached if we happen to do it not as smoothly as we should
have.
Rough, creepy approach is bound to trigger all sort of negative expectations and many questions.
Why has this man approached me? Why is he talking to me? What does he want? Is he hitting on me?
Does he want my money?
Now, I am not saying, open in a creepy way and then use this technique. I presume in the ninety nine point
nine percent of cases you will not need the default safety measures. But in case accidentally something
goes wrong, I would like to think that you would know what to say and do.
So in case you see her totally weirded out by your approach, you might want to INSTANTLY address her
negative expectations. More or less directly, HEY! I am not hitting on you, I am not asking for anything,
OKAY? My approach has NO REASON. YOU ARE SAFE. Make sure she hears that. Then smile and
talk friendly, and guess what, you had just recovered from a botched approach. You just gave yourself a
second chance to date that girl.
You may also want to have to have the default answer along the lines of, frankly, there is no special
reason why I wanted to talk to you, except may be wishing you a very pleasant afternoon. So here it is, a
very pleasant afternoon to you! This is it! See ya!
Of course you may choose to follow up with, actually, I take it back, I am here because I wanted to bang
you, but I am a little shy, so I did not know how to bring it up, that is why I wished you a pleasant
afternoon instead. I am only joking. I am not that shy. Or may be I am, I do not know. Shy or not shy, I
still wanted to bang you. Actually I did not. But I do now. Anyway, I am Dimitri, and you are? Hi
Melanie! Tell me, how would you describe your most unexpected romantic experience?
But I am jumping the gun here. What I had just quoted is the famous self-push-pull daygame transitioning
technique, patented by Juggler. There will be time to discuss it, but now is not that time.
Chapter 48
Emotion versus logic. Positive versus negative. Statement versus question. Feeling versus thought. Yes
versus no.
Juggling with the two opposite sides of a statement is at the core of the verbal playfulness. To see what I
mean, check one of the paragraphs that describes the self-push-pull technique, near the end of the previous
chapter.
Vacuum and Vibe are the two opposite sides of physical charisma.
Both of these sides depend on eye contact, and have eye contact as their fundamental element.
Prolonged eye contact, semi-relaxed face, neck, and body and, of course, friendly smile, this is called
Vibe. The overall effect is warm and soft.
Prolonged eye contact, relaxed face, frozen but relaxed neck and body, and no smile, that is called
Vacuum. The overall effect is hard and cold.
The true mastery of physical charisma can be achieved by combining the Vibe and the Vacuum in a
perfect proportion suitable for a specific situation.
Vacuum and Vibe provide the opportunities for some of the easiest of the conversational openers. These
openers are completely nonverbal.
Extend your arm and touch a woman on the upper arm with the back of your hand. When she turns to you,
make and keep the eye contact, relax your face, neck and torso, and smile. Wait till she says, "Yes?"
Extend your arm and touch a woman on the upper arm with the back of your hand. When she turns to you,
make and keep the eye contact, freeze your neck and torso, relax your face, and DO NOT smile. Wait until
she says, "Yes?"
The same can be done without touching her, is the physical logistic does not allow a woman to move
away too far. Simply position yourself within her field of vision, keep and eye contact, and either relax
your body and smile, or freeze your body and stop smiling. The first word of that conversation will come
from her mouth.
Would you like me to tell you how to create a love at first sight?
Love at first sight starts with Vibe and ends with Vacuum. Love at first sight more often than not happens
in the social gatherings when people are cheerful and smile a lot. So imagine that you are with your
friends, you share fascinating stories, smile and laugh. And then you see a woman who seems to be
special. You make eye contact with her, and then your smile fades, while you keep the eye contact, and
your face turns from elated to tragic, nearly mournful. What you just did was switching from Vibe to
Vacuum. And the effect is the love at first sight.
Or you may do the opposite. Position yourself in the psychologically powerful zone of the room, for
example, in a bar it would be one of the places where people seem to pass more often, freeze your body,
and do not smile. You will vacuum the entire room. Rob and I practiced that technique a few months ago
in Washington, D.C., and the result was beyond our wildest expectations. Male patrons abandoned the
place. Bouncers gathered in the corners, whispering to each other and giving us furtive looks. Women
started tripping over their feet accidentally-on-purpose, and bumping into us.
When you vacuum the room, choose a woman you like, and make an eye contact with her. When a man
does the Vacuum, his eye contact seems to stick. When it becomes nearly unbearable, you should
suddenly smile and drawn her in your warm Vibe. That woman will come over to you and begin talking.
As I have said, the combination of Vibe and Vacuum should be used whenever you open a new
conversation. Such openings do not have to be nonverbal.
For example, you might do the classic Juggler Method nightgame opener. With your face completely
relaxed and non-smiling, make the eye contact, and ask a woman, what is your name? Be hard and cold.
But as soon as she gives you her name, overwhelm her with your warmth as you introduce yourself.
I feel it is the time for me to wrap up all the talk about the fundamental principles, and to go into more
detail about specific techniques for beginning the conversations with total strangers.
Chapter 49
Come to a dance club a little early. Around 9 or 10 PM, it all depends on the season, really. On a hot
summer Saturday night it could be earlier.
You will notice a very special coy, hesitant vibe. The dancefloor is empty. There will probably be two or
three girls moving bashfully to the music, a few girls chatting around, holdng on to their defencive drinks,
and a bunch of guys in the corners, trying to look cool.
You do not have to be a great dancer, but you do have to unleash yourself. Have fun. Act like there is no
one around. In a cool way, obviously.
If you ARE a great dancer, this would help, as long as you are not trying too hard to show off with your
skills, as long as you can communicate through movement that you are just having fun.
Be relaxed. Make it about dancing, not just dancing. Find a way to express through the dance that you are
sexually comfortable man. IN A SUBTLE WAY, you Michael Jackson impersonators!
If you do this, you will single-handedly transform the vibe of the entire venue.
The girls will be the first to join you on the dance floor. The guys will follow.
As soon as you see people begin to dance, you stop. Go grab a drink.
Because you have already achieved three crucial things. You became the absolute leader for that night,
you secured plenty of space for yourself on the dancefloor whenever you feel like dancing again, and,
most importantly, every girl in the club bar will try to open you or will indicate unmistakably that she
wants to be open by you. Choose a few that you like the best, and run relaxed, casual Juggler Method on
them.
There is pretty much NO WAY for you to not get hooked up with a cute girl on that night when you
implement such tactic.
Chapter 50
Next time you're out in a bar, club, bookstore, or coffee shop - any female stomping ground - do the
following.
Hey! I love what you do with that umbrella. I feel you are about to fly away to some distant exotic land. Is
that where you come from?
Or any variation that would make your free association more romantic.
This way you have a poetic justification for approaching a woman. And she is not going to think of your
approach as unmotivated or strange. You are just making a poetic comment, something that is never
perceived as a boring supplicating kind of compliment. Plus, psychologically you have a task you need to
fulfill, a goal to accomplish.
Having an agenda in the first moment of interaction actually helps. Only this agenda should not have
much to do with sexually pursuing a woman, the agenda is entirely creative or intellectual, to discover the
most unique thing, and to come up with the most poetic free association.
Chapter 51
Open softly.
Being men, we tend to go in very hard when we open sets, almost like we're stepping out of a trench to
attack the enemy with a bayonet: we are high energy, eyes shining, arms flailing, trying to say something
sharp and b ready to roll with the punches. This is the hard way.
The soft way is the low-energy opening for the sociable environment.
Melt yourself all over them. Slow, sleepy, helpless, with a wide sloe goofy smile, warm like a cow, VERY
low energy. Turn yourself into a newborn baby. Go over-the-top physical. Stare them in the eyes
lllllloooooowwwwwwlllllllyyyyy, tenderly.
Women love babies. They love kissing babies, love playing with their little cojones. Be a baby on the
approach. Be more and more of a baby throughout the interaction, while remaining ulra-masculine man at
the same time.
Be like water that is soft but penetrates everywhere and knows no obstacles.
It's the key to instant makeout and instant non-verbal isolation. If you do the soft style properly, you can
take a woman you just approached by the hand and lead her to the dark corner.
During one of the bootcamps a client of mine who used to have a bit of a problem with approaches and
touching, tried out the soft method.
He went soft into a two-set, melted all over the two women like a sweet ice-cream cone, and kinoed them
mercilessly without the slightest protest.
Then I opened another two-set, going soft, and the same client came in, super-soft, I then took one of the
two girls by the hand (about half a minute after the approach) and lead her away to the dark corner, soft.
By the time we came back less than ten minutes later, my client number-closed and kiss-closed the other
girl.
The woman he was making out with stared at me and said in the voice hoarse with lust and nearly
religious awe: "Thank you!"
The way that guy later described his interaction, he hardly said anything at all to that woman. Just pure
vibe.
Or I may look at the soft style form a different angle, and say this:
Sing her a lullaby (I have a few favorite songs, very soft and tender ones, that I like to whisper/sing to
women's ears. Those songs with intensely sensual and somehow intensely innocent lyrics. Just to give her
goosebumps.
Chapter 52
Not sure if you often encounter this challenge where you live, but in New York City women who know
they are attractive had developed a simple and very effective way of keeping themselves relatively
unapproachable.
To be more specific, it is a way to keep themselves out of reach of the men who would not know how to
deal with the presented challenge. It is a psychological filter of sorts.
I am talking about the situation when a shockingly beautiful woman would wear headphones in any public
place, whether it is a subway or coffee shop or art gallery or library or bookstore. Even the usually very
effective hand flip might not work with such girl, because she would simply turn away, refusing to
acknowledge a man who tries to engage her.
Or how in the world are you supposed to begin a conversation with a girl who is chatting animatedly on
her cellular phone?
I suspect that way too many men give up on the girls who defend themselves in such way, and tell
themselves that one way they would sure meet a woman who is attractive and yet not so standoffish as to
defend herself from being approached by hundreds of strangers every day. How rude of her!
They presume that the girl on the headphones is rude, and that the girl on the phone talks to her boyfriend,
so what would be the point of having a conversation with her anyway?
But what if that girl wearing the headphones or talking on the phone were actually a woman of your
dreams? What if your very destiny were at stake? What if she, and no one else was there for you to meet
and talk, and you are only headphones away from possible happiness? (This would be a very needy
mindset, by the way, but still, what if?)
You must have a tactic for that.
To begin a conversation with a girl who is listening to her iPod, you may want to touch her on the outside
of the upper arm with the back of your hand. In the majority of the situations, she will make eye contact
with you, pull out one of her headphones, smile, and say, yes?
This would work even if the woman with the headphones has her eyes closed.
You may do the same with the girl on the phone, but make sure to get a strong eye contact before you
touch her otherwise she will mutter the apology under her breath and remove herself from the contact
with you.
Or you may choose to make eye contact with the girl on the phone, and communicate with the sign
language. The most effective way of doing that would be to imitate talking on the imaginary phone, and
than hang up that imaginary phone. In my experience, when I do that, most women actually tell their
friend on the phone, hey, I will call you back in a couple of minutes, and then they hand up! The great part
is, if you managed to get them hang up on whoever they were talking to, you definitely get their complete
commitment to the conversation.
Which means, a girl on the phone is EASIER to engage into a real conversation!
You may use the same tactic with the woman who wears headphones: simply make the eye contact and
then pretend as if you were taking off the imaginary headphones. In most cases, she will smile and do the
same with her real ones.
Or if you find the logistics a little more complex, you may chose to make the eye contact, and write her a
note on a piece of paper. Something along the lines of, I have something to tell you.
And when she takes off her headphones or lowers her phone, it is up to you if you want to follow up in a
direct or indirect way. Indirect would be, you have something on your cheek, actually, you do not, I simply
wanted to talk to you. Direct would be, I saw you listening to, well, whatever you were listening to, and
suddenly I thought, what if you were a woman of my dreams? So I apologize for interrupting, but I hope
you understand, I HAD to interrupt.
She would either laugh and provide you with the commitment you required, or she might smile and say,
thank you but I actually have a boyfriend. To which you might say, of course you do! As a matter of fact, I
just won a six-figure bet with myself that you would have something like that. But see, having a boyfriend
is exactly what makes you so interesting! Why? Well, because the way you said this, you sounded like you
know life, and you know what you want from it, and I found it very feminine, and altogether I feel it
makes you quite irresistible. Anyway, please tell me, what is it like to be in a perfect relationship?
Because if a woman brings up a topic of her boyfriend, in many cases you may consider yourself lucky:
she had just escalated a conversation for you.
Chapter 53
Imagine that you are in a bookstore, and all of a sudden you see a woman you think you might actually
like.
The big truth is, she is not there in the middle of the blank white abstract space like one in the Matrix
movie. She is surrounded by the environment.
Most likely this girl will be right next to a bookshelf. Bookstores are known for having bookshelves in
them.
There are sections in the bookstores: Fiction, Travel, Arts, Cooking, Fitness, and so on.
To begin a conversation with any woman in a bookstore you may have to just figure out the section of the
bookstore that person is in, and then ASK HER A QUESTION or MAKE A STATEMENT FOLLOWED
BY A QUESTION related to that section.
If she is in the Music section, you may say, hey, what do you think about jazz? Or you may say, I think
have the irrefutable proof that Mozart was almost exactly a century ahead of his time. Because Mozart
was born in 1756, and the very first elevator was built in 1857. Anyway, who is your favorite classical
composer?
If she is in the Travel section, you may say, what do you think about Japan? Or, my absolute favorite
country in the world is Bulgaria. I have an incredible collection of romantic memories from that country.
What about you, which place in the world do you consider the most romantic?
And by the way, as I am sure you have noticed, by that moment you have already escalated quite far.
Or you might want to use another form of the universal bookstore opener.
If you are in the bookstore, chances are, you are there to pick up a book.. Imagine you came to a bookstore
and found a book you really like. If you have a few more minutes before you have to leave the store, walk
around and see if you can find a girl you might like. Then share the book with the girl.
Hey, you seem like the right person to share this book with. Check it out. I am overwhelmed with
anticipation, I only flipped through the first few pages, and already cannot wait till I get to the final
chapter.
The great thing about the universal bookstore opener is that it works not only in bookstores, but anywhere
else.
Think of the entire world as your bookstore. Wen you see a woman you feel you might like, figure out in
which section of the universal bookstore you meet her at that moment, and ask her a question or make a
statement followed by a question related to that situation.
If she is in the Catching a Cab section of the universal bookstore, you might tell her, hey, it is impossible
to catch a cab on that street corner during this time of the year. Let me show you a better place, just half a
block away. You will find a line of idling taxis there.
If she is in the I Am Sad section, you might ask her if there is anything you could do to make her feel a
little better. May be she wants an ice cream or something.
Chapter 54
To understand the best way to begin a conversation with a woman who is walking fast toward you or in
the same direction where you are walking, you have to know a little about the so-called sexual
presumption mechanism.
Whenever a man approaches a woman, no matter how smooth or subtle his approach might be,
somewhere in the back of that womans mind there still might be a pare-programmed set of questions:
Why is this human being approaching me?, Why is this human being engaging me in the interaction?,
What does this human being want from me?, and so on. If the man does not quickly provide her with
the answer, her mind will find the typical answer based on the simplest thing that she can perceive: the
gender difference. She identifies the gender of the other human being: a male. And her mind goes:
attention, sexual approach.
Next thing, her survival instinct tell her to resist, because in our mind every change is potentially a change
to the worst. So if the man does not answer her questions in time (not necessarily verbally but in one
way or another if he does not provide his own answers to her inner questions) almost immediately he will
have to face her psychological resistance.
Such resistance might be particularly strong when you deal with a moving target.
Walking with her wherever she goes is the second best strategy. No matter how fast a woman of your
dreams is walking, and no matter how busy she seems to you, if she is indeed a woman of your dreams, it
is my opinion based on the experience that you must stop her.
And you have to know how to do it without triggering her sexual presumption mechanism and her
resistance.
Hope I got your attention by now, because I am going to explain to you exactly how to do it best. And
guess what, the rest of this article will be in the "you" perspective, and I don't care if I break a sacred rule
by doing this. So what? Sue me.
Anyway, first scenario: as you walk along the street or alley in a park, you notice an interesting woman
who walks quickly toward you and is about to pass you.
Imagine what would happen if you tried to stop her by blocking her way or addressing her while she is
still in front of you. If you do not do it confidently enough, she would probably swerve aside, walk around
you and speed up, muttering some really dirty words about you. If you are committed enough and jump in
front of her with your arms and legs spread like youre the Vitruvian Man, she will probably stop dead in
front of you, but she will be damn scared because by that time she will probably think youre a sexual
predator. All her defenses and shields will be up, alarm blaring, red flags waiving in the air.
Now imagine that instead you let that woman pass. As she passes by you, no matter how focused she is on
some inner things, some part of her mind will register a male presence, which means that at the moment
when she is closest to you, semi-consciously she is at the moist critical point of the sexual presumption
mechanism, her defenses ready to be employed. What you need now is to CONFIRM her sexual
presumption, by acknowledging the woman. Turn your head to look at her not to undress her with your
insolent stare but just to acknowledge her as a passerby in the casual way. She will probably return the
gaze briefly, or she wont, but at this point you more or less confirm her sexual presumption fro her mind.
Then you turn away from her and look straight ahead again. And you keep walking.
Now she is side by side with you. Now she is behind you, you hear her footsteps moving away.
For the woman, the moment has passed. Her mind says, phew, this guy is not going to sexually attack me,
thank God. Her defenses go, false alarm, the threat is gone, its okay to rest now. She walks away,
unconsciously satisfies that she does not have to defend herself against the potential sexual aggression any
longer.
Thats when you stop and say calmly and confidently, Excuse me.
You wont even have to turn around as you deliver the words. Smile to yourself as you still look ahead.
Then you turn around and you will see that she stopped and turned around to face you.
And her defenses were not ready, so there will be no resistance whatsoever. I mean, literally, even if you
say, Id like to kiss you right now, it will probably take her up to 10 seconds before she can say no.
(And if you know a little about Dark Juggler Method, you know how to say or do literally ANYTHING
with complete confidence to a total stranger and not only get away with it but get whatever result you
might have had in mind in the majority of cases, and be perfectly safe in the psychological and even legal
aspects of your performance).
The interesting thing is, since you made her stop and turn around, you got her complete commitment to
the interaction, you got her on the platter, from the first moment.
And you dont have to yell your Excuse me either. In fact, an interesting exercise you might want to
consider trying and practicing would be stopping several people in the course of the few minutes, no
matter even men or women, with the same excuse me, saying it each time quieter and quieter, all the
way until the last person stops reacting.
When that last person doesnt stop for you, it is not because they didnt hear you, its because they heard
you but their mind didnt register it as something worthy of their commitment. All you have to do next is
to let them take two or three more steps and then raise your voice and say loudly, never mind! It will
make that person stop like they hit a brick wall and wheel around. And guess what are going to be the first
lines coming out of that persons mouth? Oh Im sorry! Guilt does not just add to the commitment,
but it multiplies it.
Now lets consider the second scenario: a woman is moving in the same direction as yourself and she is
already ahead of you.
You might of course wait till she stops at the traffic light.
But then again, you might not want to leave it all to chance. In that latter case, heres what you do.
You speed up. You might even run if thats necessary. You overtake her. You keep walking straight ahead
faster than she does, until you are a considerable distance ahead of her. Then you slow down and stop, not
too abruptly, then turn around and walk toward her.
At the moment when you stop and turn around her defenses will be already up. As you are approaching
her, her mind will feel the tension building to almost unbearable degree, and the funniest part is, she might
not even be consciously aware of that tension. As you are right next to her, the critical point will reach its
peak, this is when all her alarms are blaring and red flags are flying high in the air. You spike it even
higher by turning your head toward her and making eye contact. Then you turn away, look straight ahead
and keep walking.
You take a couple more steps and then you stop say calmly, Excuse me. Then you turn around.
Chapter 55
Ive just stepped over the threshold of my house, having spent the last three and a half hours in a saddle of
my motorcycle on the way from Boston to New York. I have a few hours left to wash and dry my clothes
and to catch a nap, and at three in the morning I hope in a cab to LGA and then on a plane to LAX to give
a couple of days of private coaching to a very interesting client and to hang out with Wayne and learn
from him.
And yet some unstoppable force seems to drag me to the computer so I can write another article about the
first crucial moment of any human interaction the beginning. Too bad, perhaps.
I believe that, philosophically speaking, the beginning carries 99.9 percent of the informational charge in
any interaction. Think of it: the beginning means the difference between the other person not knowing that
I even exist - and accepting me as the fact of their life! Its no less than the difference between being and
non-being!
As Ive mentioned elsewhere, there are two fundamentally different types of opening that I might choose
to begin any interaction with a total stranger: either direct or indirect.
Direct means that I let a woman know immediately what the hell I want from her. Hey, Id like to speak
with you for a few moments! or I have a confession to make. I know you might find it very unusual, and
I cannot believe Im even saying this right now, but I feel I must tell you that when I noticed you looking
at this bookshelf with such concentration, I felt overwhelmed with the incredibly powerful urge to walk up
to you and kiss you
(Please remind me to demonstrate that one to you during your bootcamp; works the best in bookstores for
some reason).
Indirect means talking in the beginning about something other than what you really want from her. The
Universal Bookstore Opener is a typical example of the indirect beginning.
Indirect beginning requires a transitioning. To transition means to throw away the topic that was used to
begin the conversation with a woman, and to involve her into a talk about you and her.
The simplest, and the best one, is the no transitioning technique. Instead of trying to smoothly and
gradually get from the initial topic to the personal conversation, I just cut off the first topic and go into the
emotional I-statement. Something like this: My book is about the samurai code of honor, and yours?
Knitting! Yuck! Hehehe! You know, some time ago I was on the highway from Boston to
New York, and suddenly realize that I nearly ran out of gas. I felt really angry at myself for this stupid
blunder. So I took the very first highway exit, and found the gas station. But more importantly, I
accidentally discovered a really beautiful small town in Connecticut. Asking you about your book and
then seeing your eyes made me think of that story. What about you, what was your recent most
unexpected discovery?
(Actually Ive just realized that Ive automatically inserted the Push-Pull into this transitioning. Good,
because now I wont have to explain to you that another form of transitioning would be the transitioning
by Push-Pull.
Or sometimes when I open indirectly, I transition via the why question. Questions about reasons and
motivations are the most powerful ones, because our motivations and reasons lead to our choices, and our
choices form our characters and our destinies. So why question is bound to make the conversation
personal. Why knitting? Because my mom always wanted me to learn how to knit, and her birthday
is next month, so I wanted to give her something I make myself and please notice that she does no
longer talk about books, she talks about her relationship with her mom. I had transitioned.
Or I can use the Whats your name? (vacuum) kind of transitioning - because after she and I know each
others names, were no longer strangers, at least from the superficially social point of view, so it would
be appropriate to talk about personal stuff.
There are a few hundred possible transitioning structures, but I guess I will have to keep them all for some
other chapter. Bedtime.
Chapter 56
Last weekends Charm School gave me thrills. That was the bootcamp when I had done my, by far,
absolutely best daygame demonstration, something to tell my grandkids about. It was also during the same
daygame session when for the first time in my life a woman I had approached in a bookstore told me to
@#$& off before I had a chance to open my mouth. She said that to me several times. To be completely
frank, after a while I actually stopped counting how many times she said it. (Among the instructors we call
it the Rainman pattern, but thats besides the point).
It was that womans beautifully challenging reaction to my approach that had inspired me to write this
article.
About a week ago I had the pleasure and honor to spend a couple of days with Juggler, working to help
our private client together. It was the private instruction on crack, the inversion of our usual two-to-one
ratio: this time it was two instructors, one client. Whenever I meet Juggler, I learn a lot. And probably the
most important things Ive learned this time was the simple practical way of teaching people how to lose
the dependency on the outcome in their interactions with women. Wayne explained to me and to our
client, that in the crude reality a very considerable part of success in any interaction truly depends on luck,
also known as logistic. (In fact, the word luck means logistic in the archaic latinized pre-Gaelic
dialect or may be it doesnt). Hence - and I am about to reveal to you one of the most powerful things I
know about the interpersonal dynamic hence there is no need to push against the flow, there is no need
to try hard, to strive to overcome all the obstacles and break through all the barriers and to talk your way
through the impossible resistance and win each interaction at any cost. It means that if I sense as much as
a tiny hint of displeasure with the interaction Im having, I am perfectly entitled to cut that interaction
short as soon as I choose, wish that person a very pleasant evening, and leave to chat to someone else
instead.
It means freedom.
On the conditions that such philosophy must not be your default justification for not escalating. Meaning,
the mindset Ive just described only applies to men who get it, who know what they are doing, who
know the difference between not enjoying the interaction for logistical reasons impossible to control
versus not being able to create the enjoyable interaction by controlling what can and should be controlled.
And yet that occurs quite rarely, but what if for one reason or another you feel you absolutely must stay
in the interaction longer despite the initially lukewarm reception or outright aggression? In my case it was
the presence of the client a few steps away, who was pretending to read a book, and was taking in every
word of the interaction. In your case it might be something else. I guess I must give you tools for that.
So, I walk up to a girl and sit next to her, and before I have a chance to open my mouth, she says, @#$&
off! Thats quite unusual. My first and quite sincere reaction is the perplexed look I give her. And I dont
hold anything back, Im generous to people, I make sure to keep eye contact and to flood her with my
nonverbal bewilderment. Jaw dropped, eyes bulging, and all. Then I tighten the emotional bolt: I turn
around to look back as if to see if she was addressing someone else. Then I look back at her. Helplessly.
Think Puss in the Boots from Shreck 2.
Thats my tool number one, I figured it out not so long ago, in Toronto. Normally such act breaks the ice
and makes the aggressive person smile or even laugh, whether they wanted it or not. Unfortunately, it
wasnt so that time.
So, she keeps the eye contact and fumes. I go: I beg you pardon? I say it in the loud and leisurely voice.
This is my tool number two. If someone says something rude, I politely insist that they repeat. Normally
they back off and feel a little guilty for being socially ungraceful. Guess what in the interaction I am
describing, this tactic didnt work. She repeated her words verbatim. I respond with my tool number three,
a Reward/Question: You are being straightforward. I find it refreshing. Whats your name? (Vacuum).
So I go, Hm thats quite an unusual name. I sure hope you kicked your mom and dad for that! My
name is Dimitri. I read books about music and
(This is my technique number three. If I get a rude reaction to my question, I act as if they had answered
my question.)
She interrupts, Didnt you hear me? I said, @#$& off! She looks a little offended by the fact that I keep
my face on. This promises to be a fun interaction. The problem is, I am running out of ammo. I have to
improvise.
So I go, Oh, I heard you first time. I dont feel Ive deserved it, though. Anyway, I hadnt finished. So, as
I was saying, I tend to read about music and film history. Whats your book about? (Vacuum).
I guess this is my new technique, number four. When I look back on the interaction and analyze it now, I
can see a few things. The principle here, demonstrate the authority, but not contempt. If I say as much as,
I think youre being a little rude, I would give that girl what she wants: me being hurt, on the platter.
But I am not hurt, and guess what, she doesnt know it, but Im being paid for every minute of this
interaction, while shes doing it for free. She is an amateur, Im a pro. Pros rule. So I treat her kindly. I do
not tell her she is rude. I tell her calmly my subjective feeling: I do not feel Ive deserved that. Then I
make her listen. I ask my question.
She goes, DUDE, @#$& OFF! That attracts the attention of another girl sitting nearby. I look at her and
smile. She smiles and turns back to her book, still smiling. I turn back to the first girl and revert to my
technique number three. I demonstrate enthusiasm and say, Oh, I see what you mean. Your book is about
good manners! Well, I am proud of you, and I am sure you will learn a lot!
I say it loudly so that the other girl hears my words. Then I turn my attention to that other girl and say to
her, loudly: My new friend here reads a guidebook about manners. So far she had learned only how to
say @#$& off. Whats your take on that?
She looks at me, still smiling. And I can see the words forming in her mind, shes trying to hold herself
from saying it. I look at her and nod as expressively as I can. She cracks up. I crawl away from the rude
girl, and sit next to the second girl. We talk for a little while before I go back to my client. All this time
the rude girl breathes real deep. I wish her a very pleasant day as I walk away.
This is my technique number five. When everything else fails, I use the rude reaction given to me by one
person to justify why I talk to someone else nearby. Ive learned it from my good friend Javier, who is
among the leading members of the Charisma Arts New York posse, and the true master of psychology of
human interaction.
Normally the unexpected rude reaction means to me that this person really needs my attention. So I give
her or him enough attention to quench the need. Sometimes I forget this simple principle though. For
example, a couple of weekend ago in Boston I was demonstrating for a client, and opened a group of two
attractive girls and a rather burly guy. I usually I tend to recognize the social situation of pickup and avoid
undermining another guys effort until and unless I see that hes not getting anywhere anyway. But I was
slightly tired and I didnt catch the fact that the guy was in the middle of the subtlest moment of
escalation. So when I opened him and the girls, he got a little upset. He moved around and positioned
himself on the other side of the table. That was a right move in his situation, because by positioning
himself in a new place he got the girls to focus on him. And, as Ive said, I felt a little tired by then
because it was the end of the second night of the bootcamp, and I guess that was the reason why I made a
rookie mistake. (Most of the mistakes people make are rookie mistakes, have you noticed?) I should have
re-engaged the guy immediately, and I focused on the girls instead. As a result I had to work hard to get
their commitment, and even though the interaction went okay in the end, it did not go as greatly as it could
and should have. Lesson reinforced: even though all rules should be broken, the rule of thumb is to give
so much attention to the current attention magnet of the group that his magnetic powers are drained and I
become the attention magnet.
Chapter 57
More on troubleshooting.
If a woman I had just approached gives me an out-of-all-proportion negative reaction, I might do the
following:
The main goal of this structure is to leave gracefully and immediately and feel good about it. The
secondary goal is to make that woman re-open you and apologize.
Example 1
Example 2
I: Excuse me. I felt like introducing myself to you for some reason.
I: I see.
I: Sure. I will not bother you. You that you strike me as a frank and open-hearted person. But perhaps
someone had hurt you very recently that's why you chose to hurt me. It's okay. I hope something makes
you feel better later tonight.
Example 3
I: How's it going?
I: Had a tough day, right? Hey, I understand. Your words didn't hurt me and you should not feel guilty. I
hope you make the most of your evening. Ciao!
When I explained this technique to my friend and private client from Israel, he told me a joke indirectly
related to the subject. "How many Jewish moms does it take to change a light bulb? - Oh, it's all right, a
Jewish mom will just sit there in the dark, lonely and sad..."
Chapter 58
Increasingly more often than not I find myself surrounded by people who show a lot of respect to me for
teaching them something interesting and valuable (and I keep my fingers and TOES crossed hoping they
continue to do so; I am hooked on respect). And increasingly more often than not I discover a girl or two
hovering in proximity, trying to overhear our conversation.
And I have noticed that the girls who are curious about our topic (human contact in general and how to
pick up chicks in particular) tend to be intelligent, emotionally healthy and, in most cases, for some
magical reason, attractive, at least to me.
Probably it is so because they understand the simple truth that men who want to learn how to
communicate with women have a higher probability of making women around them happy, too. Those
girls cannot help but feel respect and admiration to men who want to learn to become better at being
worthy of a great womans love.
So all I have to do to open one of such hovering girls is to finish the sentence that helped me to make the
point, and then turn to her suddenly and say, Right?
Usually she laughs and says, Absolutely! Then we do the rock or high five or I open my arms and
she hugs me, and then I ask her name. Then she joins our conversation and we talk about relationships.
Or sometimes when Im in a naughty mood, instead of simply asking Right? I choose the dorkiest
female name I can come up with, and throw it in, too. So it goes like this:
I: (to the guys) And you should keep in mind that psychologically, men tend to expand in space and
shrink in time, while women tend to shrink in space and expand in time. (to the hovering girl) Right,
Gertrude?
and so on.
And there might be endless variations. I blame you! (Credit: Rob); Its all your fault!; Whats your
take on that?, What do you think? etc.
Or if I accidentally (or on purpose) overhear someones conversation, I can start talking to them, making it
look like they were talking to me in the first place. For example, speaking of Rob: last weekend I
witnessed him giving a brilliant demonstration of this technique. He and I were walking down the street in
a crowd of people headed to the famous for its nightlife meatpacking district of New York, and suddenly
someone behind us says quite loudly, Yo, whats up, punk? How are you doing? Rob reacted
immediately, without even looking back, and projecting his voice equally well: Not bad, man! How
about you? Everybody around us, whoever heard that, looked around. I did the same, and saw a random
guy on a cell phone who interrupted his call to shake Robs hand appreciatively. Obviously, Yo, whats
up, punk? was meant for someone on the other end of the line, but Rob reacted in the split second, to
engage a stranger in a tiny but meaningful emotional exchange. Such little emotional exchanges, such
flirting with anyone and everyone instantly and effortlessly creates that elusive something that many men
so desperately try to imitate, calling it high social value.
Sometimes simply saluting a group with a drink is enough to make friends with them.
Sometimes I bluntly point at them and pause, not a trace of smile on my face. When enough tension builds
up, I smile and give then thumbs up; which tends to open the group. I and Rob argued about that opener
for a while and couldnt come to an agreement. I insist that the thumbs up opener qualifies as lousy,
while Rob prefers to think of it as retarded. But thats exactly the point: the opener doesnt have to be
spectacular. A bad opener is a good opener as long as it does what it supposed to do: open.
Here's another ridiculosuly bad one for you: "Vy govorite po russki? Habla espanol? Parlais-vu francais?
Sprechen Sie Deutsch?" - "No, I'm sorry, I do not know any languages" - "That's too bad. Well, let's talk in
English, then. What's your name?!"
Or just begin in whatever language you know: "Zdravstvuyte, sudarynya. Ya znayu chto vy vpolne
vozmozhno sochtyote moye poyavlenie neozhidannym, no ya ne mog otkazat sebye v vozmozhnosti
poznakomit'sya s vami. Kak vas zovut?" - "Oh, I'm sorry I do not understand!" - "Oh thank goodness, you
do speak English!" etc.
Or you may even open in gibberish. I did once, on a bet with a client. Worked wonders.
Chapter 59
Girl: Yeah!
Wayne: Cool.
He shuts up and turns away from the girl, but doesnt move away, and continues checking out the books.
A pause.
Then a little miracle happens (and it happens more or less seven times out of ten; a very consistent little
miracle). A girl turns to Wayne and asks: Whats yours about?
I like this a lot because I find it elegant and natural. To test if what I believed about the mindset for this
approach was true, I asked Wayne, What happens when a girl just walks away after the first
micro-interaction? Wayne confirmed my belief: You let her go and find someone else to talk to. In my
opinion, that is as non-needy as it can get.
I also saw Wayne handing a book to a random stranger and saying, Here. You MUST read this book. Its
the best one for you in the whole store. I insist.
(I do it somewhat differently, by the way. I tend to point at the book I like, and say: "This one. Definitely
this one!" - "Oh yeah?" - "Trust me" But as you see it is essentially the same thing, which is, instead of
asking for a book recommendation, giving a book recommendation. Much more macho. And the best part
is, such approach works in clothing stores and supermarkets as effectively as in bookstores.)
And heres Wayne version of beginning the conversation with a girl whos chatting with someone on the
phone: Sit next to her on the bench - not too close! - and wait till she hangs up. When she hangs up, she
is quite likely to tell or ask you something. If she doesnt, you do.
Rob contributes to that his trademarked way of dealing with the boring answers. Whats the book
about? Nothing See? You are different from everyone else in this store. Everyone reads about
something, and it makes it boring. But you are special because your book is the only one about nothing. I
think I like you so far. You might yet disappoint me but I hope that you do not. Whats your name?
Part X
Beyond the Charm School
Chapter 60
And yet, there are certain skills in the Juggler Method that do not fit within the structure of the Charm
School, simply because neither me nor any other instructor working for the company would be able to
teach everything we know in one weekend. These advanced skills are the ones I can only teach
one-on-one. Giving my clients the opportunity to master the skills beyond the bootcamp program is the
purpose of the private one-on-one instruction with me.
In addition to learning the skills and practicing them in real life situations under my close observation, my
private clients receive free study materials not available to the students of the Charm School.
Heres the list of practical programs that I offer to the clients who are interested in one-on-one instruction
with me:
58 Openers
Complex Logistics on the Approach
Transitioning Phase
500 Approaches within 8 Hours (during summer season)
Clothing
Grooming
Body Language
Voice
More
If you feel you might be interested in the private one-on-one training with me, please contact me via
email: