Introduction To The Five Branches of Philosophy
Introduction To The Five Branches of Philosophy
Introduction To The Five Branches of Philosophy
Philosophy can be divided into five branches which address the following questions:
Metaphysics
Study of Existence
Epistemology
Ethics
Study of Knowledge
Study of Action
Politics
permissible?
Esthetics
Study of Force
Study of Art
What is Metaphysics?
the world, and act accordingly. Without this firm foundation, all knowledge becomes
suspect. Any flaw in our view of reality will make it more difficult to live.
The physical world exists, and every entity has a specific nature. It acts according to
that nature. When different entities interact, they do so according to the nature of
both. Every action has a cause and an effect. Causality is the means by which
change occurs, but the change occurs via a specific nature.
Reality Is Absolute:
The Primacy of Existence
The primacy of existence states the irrefutable truth that existence is primary and
consciousness is secondary. Consciousness is the faculty which perceives and
identifies existents (things that exists). For two reasons we say that existence is
primary, that consciousness requires existence, and that there is no consciousness
without existence.
All forms of mysticism derive from the false premise of the primacy of
consciousness, which is demonstratively false. Also, the assertion that existence
somehow requires consciousness, sometimes called the Interdependence Theory, is
arbitrary at best without objective basis.
Causality
Causality is the Law of Identity applied over time. It is the identity of actions. An
action requires an entity. It presupposes an entity. Without an entity, action is
meaningless. There are no "floating" actions that aren't actions of an entity.
Action is a change in the identity of an entity. Every action has a particular nature.
The action is determined by the entities involved. The change of the entities occurs
based on the identities. A marble, when dropped, falls towards the ground. Its
position (part of its identity) changes. This change, though, is dependent on the
nature of the objects involved. It is dependent on the Earth and the Earth's gravity.
It is dependent on the friction of the air.
A log that burns is also acting. Its identity is changing. In this case, its position stays
the same, but its chemical structure is changing. It is changing into ash. It is
releasing smoke into the air. The oxygen in the air is being combined with the
carbon in the fire. Heat is being released. All of these changes are determined by
the identity of the entities involved. As the entities change, so do their natures. With
the altered identities, the actions change to match. This continual process of change
is all determined by the initial identities.
Causality is the term used to describe this dependence of an action on the identities
of the entities involved. The changes in the identities of the objects are a result of
their identities interacting. This interaction, which is an action, is based on the
previous natures of the objects involved. In short, for something to change (which is
Every effect must have a cause. That cause, however, is an effect of a previous
cause. Causality is the law that states that each cause has a specific effect, and that
this effect is dependent on the identities of the agents involved.
Nothing
The important point is that "nothing" is just that: nothing. It doesn't exist. It has no
identity. It's not a vacuum. It's not dark. It's not cold. It has no characteristics. As a
tool of cognition, it can be useful, but doesn't exist.
Metaphysical vs. the Man-Made
An important difference exists between the rules that govern existence (the
metaphysical), and the rules that men create to govern themselves (the manmade). This should be obvious, but confusion of the two has led to all kinds of
problems. The problems stem from not clearly differentiating between those things
men need to do, and those things man chooses to do.
The first common problem is the belief that the man-made is metaphysical. The
important distinction here is that rules that men choose are not necessary. That
they are chosen. For instance, any particular law is chosen. This is not to say it's
chosen without reason. Many laws are. But the fact that a choice is made is
important to remember. Often people believe that things are the way they are, and
nothing can change it. If it is man-made, though, this is wrong. It still may be
difficult to change, but it is possible. This error is usually an excuse not to act. It
assumes a difficult task is an impossible task, which allows the person to remain
free of guilt, since morality requires a choice between alternatives.
The second common problem is the belief that the metaphysical is man-made. This
error is usually made in the field of ethics when the assumption is made that a man
can act any way that is physically allowed to him. For instance, a man can be
completely selfless, but this is ultimately destructive. The metaphysical fact being
ignored is that death would follow shortly. That man, in order to live, must act in his
own interest to further his life. One cannot defy reality without consequence.
Epistemology
What is Epistemology?
Our senses are valid, and the only way to gain information about the world. Reason
is our method of gaining knowledge, and acquiring understanding. Logic is our
method of maintaining consistency within our set of knowledge. Objectivity is our
means of associating knowledge with reality to determine its validity. Concepts are
abstracts of specific details of reality, or of other abstractions. A proper
epistemology is a rational epistemology.
thics
What is Ethics?
Ethics is the branch of study dealing with what is the proper course of action for
man. It answers the question, "What do I do?" It is the study of right and wrong in
human endeavors. At a more fundamental level, it is the method by which we
categorize our values and pursue them. Do we pursue our own happiness, or do we
sacrifice ourselves to a greater cause? Is that foundation of ethics based on the
Bible, or on the very nature of man himself, or neither?
Ethics is a requirement for human life. It is our means of deciding a course of action.
Without it, our actions would be random and aimless. There would be no way to
work towards a goal because there would be no way to pick between a limitless
number of goals. Even with an ethical standard, we may be unable to pursue our
goals with the possibility of success. To the degree which a rational ethical standard
is taken, we are able to correctly organize our goals and actions to accomplish our
most important values. Any flaw in our ethics will reduce our ability to be successful
in our endeavors.
A proper foundation of ethics requires a standard of value to which all goals and
actions can be compared to. This standard is our own lives, and the happiness
which makes them livable. This is our ultimate standard of value, the goal in which
an ethical man must always aim. It is arrived at by an examination of man's nature,
and recognizing his peculiar needs. A system of ethics must further consist of not
only emergency situations, but the day to day choices we make constantly. It must
include our relations to others, and recognize their importance not only to our
physical survival, but to our well-being and happiness. It must recognize that our
lives are an end in themselves, and that sacrifice is not only not necessary, but
destructive.
Politics
What is Politics?
Politics tells you how a society must be set up and how one should act within a
society. Except for hermits, this comes up a lot.
The requirement for a political system is that the individuals within that system are
allowed to fully function according to their nature. If that's not the case, they will
either rebel, as in Czarist Russia, or the system will eventually collapse, as in
Communist Russia.
Reason is man's prime means of survival. A human being can not survive in an
environment where reason is ineffective, and will thrive or starve to a degree in
proportion to the effectiveness of reason. This means that the prime goal of a
political system must be the preservation and enabling of the faculty of reason.
Reason does not function under coercion. A man can be forced to act at the point of
a gun, but he can not be forced to think. Likewise, in an environment where might
makes right, reason can not function because the fruits of rationality can not be
enjoyed. Why plant crops and domesticate animals if any raider can come by and
take them from you?
A moral political system must ban coercion. Or put another way, a moral political
system must ban the initiation of force, since retaliatory force is both just and
necessary. This means there must be some way to keep one person from killing,
threatening, or robbing another. This is accomplished by bestowing on government
a monopoly on retaliatory force and objectifying laws.
Esthetics
What is Esthetics?
Esthetics is the study of art. It includes what art consists of, as well as the purpose
behind it. Does art consist of music, literature, and painting? Or does it include a
good engineering solution, or a beautiful sunset? These are the questions that
aimed at in esthetics. It also studies methods of evaluating art, and allows
judgments of the art. Is art in the eye of the beholder? Does anything that appeals
to you fit under the umbrella of art? Or does it have a specific nature? Does it
accomplish a goal?
Art has existed through all of recorded human history. It is unique to humans
because of our unique form of thinking. Its importance is based on this nature,
specifically, man's ability to abstract. Art is a little understood tool of man to bring
meaning to abstract concept. Esthetics is important because it delves into the
reason why art has always existed, the burning need of mankind through the ages
to see the world in a different, clear way. It further evaluates art by the standard of
human life, and whether it accomplishes the job of satisfying man's intellectual
needs, or whether it tends to hurt or make worse those needs.
The first philosopher to use the term was Soren Kierkegaard (1813 - 1855), who
reacted against systematic rational philosophy, specially Hegel, and grasped the
notion of a truth inside of the evolving self.
Deriving from this stress on existence there are other main subjects and images
that have been developed by the existentialists.
Choice is all that we have, without confirmation of our act; we never know what was
right to choose. The doubt of our acts, together with the contingence of existence,
leads to
Angst
The main characteristic of existence itself, when we face our contingence, and the
absurdity of our acts and choices:
For Heidegger, it is that trough which fear becomes possible. For Kierkegaard is a
desire for what one fears. For Sartre, it is the immediate consequence of facing the
possibility of nothingness.
http://www.thecry.com/existentialism/