UV Glibenclamide
UV Glibenclamide
UV Glibenclamide
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304241687
READS
31
1 author:
Raja Abhilash
SVS Group of Institutions
9 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Raja Abhilash on 22 June 2016.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
Research Article
ABSTRACT:
A rapid, specific and economic UV spectrophotometric method has been developed using a solvent composed of Methanol and
Water (50:50, v/v) to determine the Glibenclamide content in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage formulations. At a
predetermined max at 308 nm, it was proved linear in the range of 10.070.0g/mL, and exhibited good correlation
coefficient (R20.9998) and excellent mean recovery (98.82- 100.61%). This method was successfully applied to the
determination of Glibenclamide content and the results were in good agreement with the label claims. The method was
validated for linearity, precision, repeatability, and reproducibility. The obtained results proved that the method can be
employed for the routine analysis of Glibenclamide in bulk as well as in the commercial formulations.
KEYWORDS:
Glibenclamide, UV Spectroscopy, method development, ICH guidelines
52
Page
1. INTRODUCTION
*Raja Abhilash Punugoti & Venkateshwar Rao Jupally; DESIGN AND VALIDATIONOF SIMPLE UV SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC
10ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with
diluent. Mix well and filter through 0.45m filter
2.4 Test Preparation
Weigh 5 Glibenclamide Tablets and calculate the
average weight. Accurately weigh and transfer the
sample equivalent to 10 mg of Glibenclamide into a 10
mL volumetric flask. Add about 7 mL of diluent and
sonicated to dissolve it completely and make volume up
to the mark with diluent. Mix well and filter through
0.45m filter.
Further pipette 5 ml of the above stock solution into a
50ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with
diluent. Mix well and filter through 0.45m filter.
Further pipette 3 ml of the above stock solution into a
10ml volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with
diluent. Mix well and filter through 0.45m filter.
2.5 Instrumentation
UV-VISIBLE double beam Spectrophotomer model
no.2202 made by SYSTRONICS and Sonicator model
no.2200MH, made by SONICA.
3. METHOD DEVELOPMENT
3.1 Development and Optimization of the
Spectrophotometric Method
Proper wave length selection of the methods depends
upon the nature of the sampleand its solubility. To
develop a rugged and suitable spectrophotometric
method
for
thequantitative
determination
of
Glibenclamide, the analytical conditions were selected
after testingthe different parameters such as diluents,
wavelength, and other spectroscopic conditions.
Our preliminary trials using different composition of
diluents consisting of water with buffer and methanol.
By using diluent consisted of methanol water (50:50,
v/v) best resultwas obtained and degassed in an
ultrasonic bath. Belowfigures represent the spectrums of
blank, standard and test preparation respectively.
3.1.1 Selection of Wavelength
Scan standard solution in UV spectrophotometer
between 200 nm to 400 nm on spectrum mode, using
diluents as a blank.The spectrums are shown in Figure
2.
4. METHOD VALIDATION:
Based on International Conference on Harmonization
(ICH) guidelines, the proposed method is validated with
regard to system suitability, linearity, accuracy,
precision, LOD, LOQ , robustness and sensitivity as
follows.
4.1 Specificity
Specificity of an analytical method is its ability to
measure the analyteaccurately and specifically in the
presence of component that may beexpected to be
present in the sample matrix. The specificity of the
method was determined by checking the interference of
placebo with analyte.
4.2 Precision:
The precision of the method was evaluated by carrying
out six independent asses of test sample against a
qualified reference standard and the %RSD of assay was
calculated (% RSD should not be more than 2%).
International Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences (IJPBCS) | OCT-DEC 2013 | VOLUME 2 | ISSUE 4 | 52-56| www.ijpbcs.net
Page
53
*Raja Abhilash Punugoti & Venkateshwar Rao Jupally; DESIGN AND VALIDATIONOF SIMPLE UV SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC
which Percentage recoveries were calculated. (%
Recovery should be between 98.0 to 102.0%).
4.5 Linearity:
Test solutions were prepared from stock solution at 5
concentration levels (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 m/ml). The
absorbance vs. concentration data treated by least square
linear regression analysis. (Correlation coefficient should
be not less than 0.999.)
4.6 Robustness:
To prove the reliability of the analytical method during
normal usage, some small but deliberate changes were
made in the analytical method.
Absorbance
y = 0.022x + 0.241
R = 0.999
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
20
40
60
80
Concentration g/ml
Figure 4: Linearity curve for Glibenclamide
5.3 Precision
The result of repeatability and intermediate precision
study are shown in Table 2.The developed method was
found to be precise as the %RSD values for the
101.2
98.6
100.6
99.3
99.1
99.0
101.5
100.5
101.8
98.2
101.3
99.0
Mean
101.1
99.1
Standard Deviation
0.99
0.78
% RSD
0.98
0.79
5.4 Accuracy
The spectrophotometer absorbance responses for
accuracy determination are depicted in Table 3. The
International Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences (IJPBCS) | OCT-DEC 2013 | VOLUME 2 | ISSUE 4 | 52-56| www.ijpbcs.net
54
Page
S.No.
*Raja Abhilash Punugoti & Venkateshwar Rao Jupally; DESIGN AND VALIDATIONOF SIMPLE UV SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC
50
100
0.4040
0.03992
98.82
1.13
150
0.6067
0.06104
100.61
0.20
Level (%)
% RSD
1.82
Intervals
Initial
101.3
100.5
12 h
98.7
98.7
24 h
100.2
101.0
36 h
100.1
101.8
48 h
100.8
100.2
5.6 Robustness
The result of robustness study of the developed assay
method was established in Table 5. The result shown
that during all variance conditions, assay value of the test
99.6
Analyst change
102.0
6. CONCLUSION
3.
4.
7. REFERENCES
1.
2.
5.
International Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences (IJPBCS) | OCT-DEC 2013 | VOLUME 2 | ISSUE 4 | 52-56| www.ijpbcs.net
Page
55
*Raja Abhilash Punugoti & Venkateshwar Rao Jupally; DESIGN AND VALIDATIONOF SIMPLE UV SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC
8.
56
7.
Page
6.