Ecological Design: A New Critique

Author(s): Pauline Madge

Reviewed work(s):
Source: Design Issues, Vol. 13, No. 2, A Critical Condition: Design and Its Criticism (Summer,
1997), pp. 44-54
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1511730 .
Accessed: 02/12/2011 08:58
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Design Issues.

http://www.jstor.org

EcologicalDesign:A New Critique

Madge
Pauline

wouldliketo thankGuiBonsiepe,
Theauthor
Harry
andespecially,
TonyFry,PhilipGoggin
of
fortheirhelponthepreparation
Sutcliffe
thisarticle.

44

Ecological design has come of age. It is now about a decade since

the first wave of green design emerged as a significant new factor in
product and graphic design. Though it is, by no means, fully developed and accepted, and only just beginning to be implemented in
design education, for example, there is a broad consensus that environmental issues can no longer be ignored by designers and critics.
There has been a significant change in recent years, from the days
when it was just a matter of getting the environment onto the
agenda, and establishing the broad parameters of a green design
practice-the inevitable process of reappraisal and differentiation as
a movement begins to acquire a history and a polemics. Already, a
second or third wave of ecodesign practice and criticism has
emerged which is concerned with a more subtle analysis of meaning and methodology.
As it has developed over the last decade, ecodesign has
constantly borrowed ideas and terminology from ecology and environmentalism, though rarely is this explicitly acknowledged. It
seems important, therefore, to evaluate the changing course of
ecodesign since the mid-1980s within the framework of the broader
development of ecological ideas. One notable feature is a change in
terminology: the original term "green design" is rarely used today
and, although it was the buzzword the late 1980s, it is already passe.
Instead, ecologically or environmentally-sensitive or affirmative
design, or more generally ecodesign, has become the most widely
accepted term. In the last year or so, this has, in turn, given way to
"sustainable design." These terms are fairly interchangeable, and
perhaps the importance of such substitution of words should not be
exaggerated, but they are one indication of shifting attitudes.
The transition from "green" to "eco-" to "sustainable" in the
design field represents a steady broadening of scope in theory and
practice, and to a certain extent, an increasingly critical perspective
on ecology and design. Here, use of terms seems to indicate an
attempt to wrestle with the complexities and implications of an
ecological approach to design-going beyond the rather simplistic
notions of design and the environment in the previous decade.
In this essay, which is part history and part analysis of ecodesign criticism, I use these three terms as keywords to explore different facets of ecological design, and to contextualize them within
particular phases of the environmental movement in the last
decade. I have emphasized the more radical theories to emerge
within both design and environmental thinking in order to demon1997Massachusetts
C Copyright
Institute
ofTechnology
DesignIssues:Volume
13,Number
2 Summer
1997

strate what this might imply for a new ecological design criticism.
What will emerge is that this is not necessarily a cohesive or unified
phenomenon-there are many shades of green and different ecological perspectives, reflecting political distinctions within the environmentalism and differences within ecological theory and practice.
Although ecodesign in the last decade has been dominated by a
concern for the mechanisms of putting policy into practice, a fundamental recognition has emerged that what is at stake is a new view
of the world and a choice of possible futures, and it is this which has
the most interesting implications for design criticism.
Green Design
"Green" became the buzzword of the 1980s. As public awareness of
environmental problems spread and green parties became more
prominent throughout Europe, there was a sudden profusion of
greenery within the media and in advertising in the mid-to late-'80s.
Because "green" encapsulated green politics, current environmental
concerns, and identified them with a specific color, in an unprecedented way, green design arrived with a ready-made symbolism:
green products, green packaging, and numerous books on "how to
be green" in green book jackets. The "lead" nations, within Europe,
in environmental terms, such as Germany and the Netherlands,
began research into design and the environment in the early 1980s.
Evelyn Moller coined the phrase "ecological functionalism" in 1982,
and devised an ecological checklist for product designers and
manufacturers which formed the basis of a working group on ecol1
ogy and design in the VerbandDeutscherIndustrie-Designer.
In the UK, the Design Council took the lead with an exhibition called "The Green Designer" in 1986, organized by Paul Burall,
Design Council publicity officer, and John Elkington, environmental consultant. Despite the fact that the term "green" was borrowed
from politics, the approach in this exhibition was largely apolitical,
Evelyn
Moller,
"Design-Philosophie
der
taking place as it did in the design culture of the mid-'80s, when the
Kommit
mitdemEndeder
80erJahre(2).
idea of "winning by design" or "profit by design," as the Design
Wegwerf-ldeologie
einOkologischer
Council
called it, was paramount. In fact, the exhibition was the
Form
Funktionalismus?
98 (1982)and
Design Council's contribution to Industry Year in 1986, and it was
Unternehmen
ProUmwelt.
Ansatze
inPolitik
ganzheitlichen
Denkens
and
mainly concerned with demonstrating that green design was not
Wirtschaft
Architektur
"anti-industry," and that the "the greening of industry had gone
andDesign
Produktionentwikklung
further than most people imagined." John Elkington argued that the
(Munich:
Lexika,
1989).Inthe
problems had now been largely overcome because green markets
at thistime,1984-5,the
Netherlands
and
the emergence of the environmental industry meant that there
forResearch
Advisory
Council
onNature
no longer a conflict between a green approach to design and
was
andtheEnvironment
waspromoting
research
intoproduct
design:J. C.Van
business success.2 The exhibition focused on examples of specific
Weenen,C.A.Bakker,
and1.V.de Keijser, products, and devised "10 Questions for the Green Designer" relatEco-design:
AnExploration
of the
ed to energy use, durability, recyclabilty, and acceptability in the
Environment(Milieukunde:
Universiteit
marketplace. Five years later, a similar exhibition was held at the
vanAmsterdam,
1991).
Design Centre called "More From Less" which also included
2 TheGreenDesigner(London:
Design
"Cradle to Grave Guidelines for Design." A number of books on
Council,
1986),4.
Design Issues: Volume13, Number2 Summer1997

45

green design appeared around this date to answer the need for basic
information on environmental issues for designers, adopting the

4
5

46

same basic approach as the Design Council.3

In political terms, all of these exhibitions and publications
can be classified as "light green," as opposed to "dark green," terms
that were being used by the mid-'80s to designate different tendencies within the green movement. To distinguish itself from the
red/blue, left/right of traditional politics, the green movement
ieferred to a spectrum from gray to green, with the deeper the
shades of green being the more radical. In the late-'80s, the terms
were somewhat trivialized to refer to light and dark green
consumers, but they reflected a deep division within the environmental movement between those who advocated a radical rejection
of the status quo, a critique of the paradigm of modern industrial
society (whether capitalist or socialist), and the lighter green idea of
modifying existing institutions and practices. This ideological division goes back to the historic roots of the environmental movement
in the late 1960s and early '70s (and beyond), but it acquired a new
urgency in the 1980s as the green movement came into the mainstream.
One very influential way of designating these different
strands within the environmental movement which still seems relevant to the green or ecodesign movement today, is Timothy
O'Riordan's classification of "technocentric" and "ecocentric." He
used these terms to represent two fundamentally different outlooks
on the world. The ecocentric attitude is based on bioethics and a
deep reverence for nature. It is in favor of low-impact technology,
and is concerned with the environmental impact of rampant
economic growth and large-scale industrial development; emphasizing, instead, morally and ecologically sound alternatives. Conversely, the technocentric mode is characterized by an unswerving
belief in the ability of human science and high technology to
Forexample,
PaulBurall,
GreenDesign
manage the environment for the benefit of present and future gener(London:
GreenCouncil,
1990)and
ations and is based on an ideology of progress, efficiency, rationalDorothy
Mackenzie,
GreenDesign,
ity, and control, viewing discussions about the wider political, social
DesignfortheEnvironment
(London:
or ethical dimensions of the environment with suspicion.4 In the
Lawrence
King,1991).
T.O'Riordan,
Environmentalism
(London: 1970s and 1980s, these different attitudes also came to be described
PionLtd.,1976).
in terms of "shallow" and "deep" ecology, the latter, like ecocenDeepecologywasfirstdeveloped
bythe
trism, emphasizing harmony with nature and the intrinsic worth of
Norwegian
philosopher
ArneNaessin
all forms of life, as well as simplifying material needs so as to
theearly1970s.See ArneNaess,"The
reduce human impact on planetary ecology. 5
ShallowandtheDeep,Long-range
In the mid-to-late '80s, the predominate form of green design
Ecology
Movement.
A Summary,"
Inquiry
16(1973)andspecialissueof The
represented a light green, technocentric, or shallow ecological apEcologiston
DeepEcology:
"Rethinking proach, but it is possible to identify darker green or deeper ecologiManandNature:
Towards
andEcological
cal design, too. For example, the range of products and services
World
View"188,no.415(1988).
listed in John Button's GreenPages, with its emphasis on consuming
JohnButton,
GreenPages:A Directory
of
less; 6 or the German Baubiologie movement which believes that
Natural
Products,
Services,Resources
andIdeas(London:
Optima,
1988).
"living with less is better than saving energy," and that it is possible
DesignIssues: Volume13, Number2 Summer1997

to do without many existing products through the improved design

of buildings and changes in lifestyles.7 This raises the whole question of alternative or green lifestyles, which have long been part of
the green movement but which came to the fore in the debate over
green consumerism in the late-'80s.
Green consumerism arrived in 1988 with the publication of
the best-selling Green ConsumerGuide, by John Elkington and Julia
Hailes. It was timed to coincide with "Green Consumer Week,"
organized by Friends of the Earth in September 1988. In the next
year or so, there was frenzied activity on the green marketing front
with some major claims being made for the new green products.
This led to certain misgivings on the part of environmental groups
and, while supporting green consumerism in principle, Friends of
Earth, for example, warned of a "green con," and argued for the
need to go BeyondGreenConsumerism.8 An essential conflict appeared to exist between what could be called a dark green approach to
design and consumption, and the values of advertising and marketing:
Notions such as durability, reduced or shared consumption,
or substituting nonmaterial pleasures for the use of objects,
conflict with requirements of mass marketing. Advertising
is tied to an expanding economy, the one thing that we
living on a finite planet, must avoid.9
Here was a danger that:
efforts to promote a demand for consumer goods that are
environmentally benign will simply result in strengthening
the growth of consumerism. 10
As a response to this two new consumer magazines emerged
in 1989. Ethical Consumerand New Consumerattempted to promote
7 Keystone
Architects,
statement
at the
the use of "consumer power for positive economic, social, and enviEDAexhibition,
London
Ecology
Centre,
ronmental change."11 There was an essential contrast between this
1990.Hartwin
Busch"Building
Biology:
approach and the more mainstream studies such as Green, Greener,
Towards
a neweraof healthybuilding,"
Greenest by Michael Peters, an investigation into whether green
7 (1989).
Caduceus
8 SandyIrvine,
BeyondGreenConsumerism consumerism was a significant marketing trend in Europe. 12
(London:
Friends
oftheEarth,
1989).
Although these issues were not explicitly discussed within
9 SandyIrvine
A Green
andAlecPonton,
green design circles at the time, and there was never any question
Manifesto:
Politicsfora GreenFuture
that a dark green approach would be on the agenda, there were
(London:
Optima,
1989).
occasional nods toward darker shades of green. For example, the
10 JamesRobertson,
A New
Future
Wealth:
Economics
forthe21stCentury(London: title of a conference at the Design Museum in 1990, "Green Design:
Beyond the Bandwagon," reflected a similar concern over green con
Cassell,1989),9.
11 NewConsumer
Review(Newcastle,
to that expressed by Friends of the Earth, and concentrated on
England:
NewConsumer,
1991).
genuine green products and graphics. Alongside speakers from
12 MichaelPetersBrand
Development
design and industry, Richard Adams of New Consumerbroadened
Division
andDiagnostic
Market
Research
the debate.
Ltd.,Green,Greener,
Greenest:
The
In the next few years, the practicalities of greening products
GreenConsumer
in theUK,Netherlands
andGermany(September
and industry came to the fore. The Design Research Society, for
1989).
DesignIssues: Volume13, Number2 Summer1997

47

example, organized a conference called "The Greening of Design" in

Manchester in 1992 which concentrated on environmental factors in
new product development and business from a design management
point of view. There was considerable overlap between this and
attempts to introduce business ethics and green management into
industry on the part of the New Economics Foundation and the
New Consumer. But the latter adopted a more radical, watchdog
role:
The vital issues of the coming decades will revolve around
the nature of global consumption and distribution.
Fundamental choices will have to be made about lifestyles,
patterns of production and consumer priorities. Planetsustaining decisions must be based on extensive and wide
ranging information about the nature of our consumer society and those who service it. 13
In the next few years, such ideas were to be taken on board by green
designers who, as a kind of recognition of a wider frame of reference, began increasingly to refer to their work as "ecological
design."

and
Adams,JaneCarruthers,
13 Richard
Values.
SeanHamil,Changing
Corporate
A GuidetoSocialandEnvironmental
inBritain
's Top
PolicyandPractice
KoganPage,
Companies
(Newcastle:
1990),x.
14 JohnButton,A Dictionary
of Green
fora Saneand
Ideas.Vocabulary
Future
Routledge,
Sustainable
(London:
1988),139-142.
1990).
15 EDAleaflet(London
1
16 Ecodesign
Foundation
NewsLines
(Sept.1991):4.
to
17 ChrisRyan,"From
EcoREdesign
Ecodesign
IV,no.I(1996).
Ecodesign,"
48

Ecological Design
The adoption of the term "ecological" to refer to anything vaguely
to do with the environment dates back to the beginning of the environmental movement in the late 1960s and '70s. In 1988, John Button
referred to about ninety sightings of the prefix "eco" including ecocity, ecomanagement, ecotechnics, and eco(logical archi)tecture; but
not at that time, ecodesign. 14 The term came into prominence a few
years later, but one early use was by the Ecological Design
Association, formed by 1989, whose journal was called Ecodesign.
The EDA chose "ecological" rather than "green" because it was
thought, quite rightly, that "green" would soon be an outdated
term. This also reflected a broad understanding of ecological design,
including radical notions of deep ecology:
The design of materials and products, projects and systems
environments communities which are friendly to living
species and planetary ecology.15
Although, by 1990, ecodesign was most advanced in European
countries, there were some new initiatives in the early 90s in
Australia. In 1990, the EcoDesign Foundation in Sydney was set up,
"dedicated to the promotion of ecological sustainability through
industrial re-creation." 16 There, Tony Fry and Ann-Marie Willis
focused on both the immediate task of greening products and the
longer-term goals of redefining design and industrial practicewhat Chris Ryan of the Centre for Design at the Royal Melbourne
Institute of Technology has recently referred to as "EcoRedesign"
and "Ecodesign," respectively 17 An international EcoDesign conference was held at RMIT in October 1991 which, according to AnneMarie Willis, reflected "the unchoate nature of ecodesign":
1997
2 Summer
DesignIssues:Volume
13,Number

... for many this simply meant the "addingin" of environmental criteriato the design process.Yetecodesign has the
potentialto be more than the reformof existing design, for
if takenseriously,it can establisha new foundationfor
design that could bring economicand ecologicalneeds into
a new union...."

of EcoDesign
18 Anne-Marie
Willis,"Echoes
Newsletter
1,"EcoDesign
Foundation
(Sydney,
Dec.1991):2.
and1.V.
19 J. C.VanWeenen,C.A.Bakker,
Eco-Design:
AnExploration
of
de Keijser,
The
theEnvironment.
(Milieukunde,
van
Netherlands:
Universiteit
Amsterdam,
1991).Delegatesincluded
EzioManzini,
Mackenzie,
and
Dorothy
ChrisRyan.
Initiatives
Gather
20 "Eco-design
231(April
Momentum,"
ENDSReport
1994):29.
therewasdiscussion
21 IntheNetherlands,
of a formalsystemto putproducts
a greenfilteranda teamof
through
andenvironmental
expertsat
designers
DelftTechnical
theTNOProduct
Centre.
studiedeightproduct
systems
University
intermsof material
andenergyuse,and
suggestedwaysinwhichmanufacturers
them.Harry
te Rieleand
couldimprove
Acht
AlbertZweers,Eco-design.
vanmilieugerichte
produktvorbeelden
DelftTechnical
ontwikkeling(Delft:
University,
1994).
22 IntheUK,a Eureka
seminar
eco-design
wasorganized
bytheRoyalSocietyof
ArtsinMarchin1994onthetelecommuThisprovided
a forum
nications
industry.
forallthoseresearching
intoeco-design,
andthestrategyof
LCA,
innovation,
for
firms,notably
attheInstitute
Advanced
Studies,Manchester
University
andthe Design
Metropolitan
Innovation
attheOpenUniversity.
Group
23 BradAllenby
"Sustainable
(AT&T),
Industrial
Ecology,
and
Development,
Whitepaper
DesignfortheEnvironment"
no.10(June1993).
24 SilviaPizzacaro,
"Theoretical
Approaches
to Industrial
Ecology:
Statusand
seminar
international
Perspectives,"
"TheScenario
of Sustainability:
The
(Milan,
April1994):1.
SystemicContext"

In the Netherlands an internationalgathering of designers

met in March1991to discuss ecodesign, focusing on principlesand
methods as well as prevention by design.'9This was a working
group of the EuropeanUnion's Eurekaprogram,set up to provide
the forumfor the conceptof environmentallysound productdesign.
It was organized under the auspices of the Dutch Ministry of
Economic Affairs. This was one example of many governmentsponsored initiatives in the early '90s. UNEP (the United Nations
EnvironmentProgram)had identifiedfifty of these by 1994',-a sign
that ecodesign was beginningto be incorporatedinto nationalpolicies. Joint researchwas undertakenby academic institutions and
industry,too, in the Netherlands21 and the UK.22
Much of this researchin the UK and elsewhere focused on
the minutiae of ecodesign practice,adopting a systems approach
eitherto the individualproductor productsystem, or to industryas
a whole. This included life cycle models which chartedenergy and
materialflow through a product system from "cradleto grave"or
"womb to tomb,"and there was a proliferationof flowchartsand
circular diagrams. This was related to the new interdisciplinary
subject of industrial ecology, "a framework for conceptualizing
environmentaland technicalissues"which could help to informthe
implementationof ecodesignor DFE(Designfor the Environment).23
Industrial ecology, like LCA, is closely modeled on ecological
systems:
Industrialecology is meant as a conceptualtool emulating
models derived fromnaturalecosystems,aimed at developing fundamentallynew approachesto the industrialsystem
reorganization.24

This attempt to draw upon ecological models to analyze

product or industrial systems has proven very useful, since it is a
way of containingthe complexitiesof an environmentalapproachto
design within limits by defining the boundariesof a system. But it
does present some problems.It tends to be technocentricin that it
embodies a belief in objective, value-free, scientific evidence;
whereas, like EIA (EnvironmentalImpact Assessment) or COBA
(CostBenefitAnalysis),it clearlyinvolves value judgments.Only by
"scoping," that is concentrating on key areas of environmental
impact,can LCA,for example,be at all manageable.Otherwise,the
detailed analysis would include a huge amount of data and take
years to complete. Selectivity inevitably introduces an element of
DesignIssues: Volume13, Number2 Summer1997

49

bias, and what is excluded from the debatemay be as importantas

what is included. A recent study of 132 LCA schemes found that
they did not sharea commonmethodology,and that they tended to
25 "Critical
Reviewof LCA
ENDS
Practice,"
Report219
(April
1994).
supportthe views of the companywhich sponsoredthem.25 A more
inthe
26 AnnaBramewell,
Ecology
fundamental issue is that certain kinds of ecological models are
A History(New
Twentieth
Century:
being borrowed from ecological science as if they were absolutes,
Haven:
YaleUniversity
Press,1989).A
whereas, in fact, a closer look at the history and development of
goodexampleoftheword"ecology"
ecology revealsa rangeof methods,approaches,and philosophies.
beingusedina generalphilosophical
or
Thereis no realconsensuson whetherecology is a scienceor
political
sense.
B.
27 Daniel Botkin,
Discordant
Harmonies: a philosophy, even though the term "ecology"was coined in the
A NewEcology
of the21stCentury(New mid-19thcenturyby ErnstHaeckel to referto a new sub-branchof
York:
OUP,
1990).
biology concernedwith the relationshipbetween living organisms
28 See Donald
Nature's
Worster,
Economy.
and theirsurroundings.Forhim, it had social and politicalimplicaA History
of Ecological
Ideas,2ndedition
tions, too. 26 In the 20th century,ecological science can be roughly
(Cambridge:
Cambridge
University
Press,
divided into two mainphases.In the periodup to about1960,it was
1994)andRichard
Huggett,
"Nature's
TheEcologist's
Design:
a paper
View,"
based on the idea of homeostasis and ecological balance. The
intended
originally
to begivenatthe
concept of the ecosystem was developed by Tansley,Odum, and
"EcoDesign"
conference
heldinthe
others.Thishas been describedas the "ecologyof the machineage,"
Department
of Philosophy,
University
of
and is still based largely on the mechanisticbeliefs of 19th century
inOctober
Manchester
1995.Iwouldlike
science.27 By contrast,the new ecology which developed from the
to acknowledge
howmuchthisinteresting,interdisciplinary
conference
has
1970sonwardsrejectedthe idea of natureas a balancedsystem, and
influenced
myrecentthinking
onecology
emphasized instead the disequilibriumof naturalsystems. Linked
andecodesign,
especially
papersbyJohn
as it was with chaos and complexity theory,it revolutionized the
Wood,JamesCullen,
andRichard
of naturewhich was now seen to consist of unpredictable,
concept
Huggett
(whosepaperwascirculated
to
dynamic,evolving, self-adaptivesystems.28
delegatesafterward).
29 See,forexample,
JohnHarte,
In many respects,the ecodesignstudies referredto above are
andDiversity"
in
"Ecosystem
Stability
based more on the first kind of ecology than on the second, and
andPenelope
J
StephenHSchneider
reflect a mechanisticview of the world. The new ecology of chaos
Boston,eds.,ScientistsonGaia
and complexitythrows the whole basis of the inquiryinto dispute.
MITPress,1991).
(Cambridge:
In a pragmatic sense, designing systems or products based on a
30 I.G.Simmons,
Nature:
Interpreting
Cultural
Constructions
of theEnvironment mechanistic mode would be doomed to failure if the real world
(London:
Routledge,
1993)
does not, in fact,work like that.The old dogma that the modelingof
31 A pointmadebyJohnWoodat theEcoecosystemsis an exactscienceappearsto have been shattered.29 This
inManchester
Designconference
raises the problemof the natureof the evidence culled fromecolog1995.TheSantaFeInstitute
October
in
ical science. Not only does the long-term nature of ecological
theUSA,homeof complexity
theory,
researchmake it difficult to produce the hard and fast evidence
in
beganto lookat globalsustainability
theearly'90s,andsuggestedthatthe
called for by environmentalists,policymakers-and now designstudyof complex
adaptive
systems
ers-but recentecology presentsa dynamicpictureof unpredictable
a newmodel.Sustainable
human
implied
chaos-like successions which contradict the classical models of
societyis aninterconnected
systemin
stabilityand homeostasis.30 The implicationof chaos and complexwhicheconomic,
social,andpolitical
ity theoryfor ecodesignarenot yet clear,but it does seem to suggest
forcesaredeeplyintertwined
andmututhat an incrementalapproachis difficultbecause small changes can
oneachother.Thus,a
allydependent
sustainable
human
societycannotbe
trigger gigantic impacts. The study of complex adaptive systems
achievedbyrational
methods
andtechni- also implies a new model of design, one that is more modest and
calfixes,butonlybythetransformation
oftraditional
attitudesandappetites.M.
Mitchell
The
Waldrop,
Complexity:
Scienceat theEdgeof Order
&
Emerging
Chaos(NewYork:
Viking,
1992).
50

relational.31

There is a furtherimplication of recent ecological thinking

for design. EdwardGoldsmith contrastsan ecological world-view
with the modernistworld-view of industrialsociety,which is:
DesignIssues:Volume
13,Number
2 Summer
1997

... methodicallysubstitutingthe technosphereor the surrogate world of human artifactsfor the biosphere-or the real
world of living things-from which the formerderives its
resourcesand to which it consigns its waste products....

32 Edward
Goldsmith
TheEcologist
188,no.
An
415(1988):118,andTheWay:
Ecological
World
View,2ndedition
(London:
GreenBooks,1996);DeIndustrializing
Society(London:
The
Ecologist,
1988).
33 Gaia,theearth-goddess,
is thename
givenbyscientistJamesLovelock
to his
hypothesis
thattheearthis likea super,
Gaiahas
self-regulating
organism.
becomea potentsymbolinthelastfew
a planetary
yearsbecauseit provides
onthecurrent
perspective
ecological
Gaia:A New
crisis.See JamesLovelock,
&NewYork:
Lookat LifeonEarth
(Oxford
OUP1987)andTheAgesof Gaia.A
Biography
of OurLiving
Earth,
2nd
&NewYork:
Edition,
(Oxford
OUP,
1995).
or
34.Permaculture
(permanent
agriculture
is a totaldesign
permanent
culture)
systembasedonthefunctional
zoningof
a site ina seriesof concentric
circles
to frequency
of use,andbrings
according
animal
togetherthedesignof dwellings,
and
husbandry
andediblelandscaping,
Thereis littlerefercommunity
building.
enceto thecontentsof theinnermost
butpermaculture
zone,thedwelling,
impliesa radical
rethinking
of products
andservices,too.Permaculture
hasbeen
oneof thefastestgrowing
organizations
inthe1980s
withinthegreenmovement
and'90s-it is theequivalent
of the
alternative
technology
movement
of the
A
70s.See Mollison,
Permaculture:
Designer's
Manual(Tagari:
Tyalgum,
Australia:
1988).
35 "Striking
02 Event(Netherlands
Visions,"
Nov.1993)organized
bytheDutch02
group.02 was founded
bytheDanish
designerNielsPeterFlintas aninternaof environmentally
tionalorganization
awareindustrial
designers.
36 JohnButton,
of GreenIdeas,
Dictionary
446.
37 WorldCommission
onEnvironment
and
OurCommon
Future
Development,
(Oxford:
OUP,
1987).
38 Ibid.,9.
39 Ibid.,8.

This suggests a differentversionof ecologicaldesign because

to reverse this process means rethinkingpriorities and changing
fundamentalattitudesincludingphasing out unnecessaryproducts,
reversingthe processwherebyluxuriesare turnedinto needs, living
with less, and working with the naturalsystem.32Under the impact
of such thinking,and that of the Gaia Hypothesis33and the PermacultureMovement,`4a new model of a radical,dark green, sustainable lifestyle has begun to emerge but this has, so far, been only
partiallyreflectedin ecodesign-in the EDA,for instance.Thereare
some signs that such ideas arebeginningto have an impacton more
mainstreamecodesign. In 1993,the 02 Group, for example, held a
conferencecall "StrikingVisions" to create visions of sustainable
lifestyles, taking a long-term view of the changes in attitudes
needed to bring this about, and how design can make a new
consumerless world palatable and even enjoyable.35This was
reflected in a shift in the discussion about ecological design and a
move towardthe idea of "sustainable"or "global"design.
Sustainable Design
Sustainabilityis not a new concept.It is an ecologicalterm that has
been used since the early 1970sto mean: "thecapacityof a system
to maintaina continuousflow of whatevereach part of that system
needs for a healthy existence,"36and when applied to ecosystems
containing human beings refers to the limitations imposed by the
abilityof the biosphereto absorbthe effectsof humanactivities.The
term sustainabledevelopment was first used in the early '80s, but
was popularizedby the BrundtlandReportof 1987.37"Sustainable"
has become the buzzword of the '90s in the same way "green"was
in the '80s, and is equally open to different interpretationsand
misuse. The BrundtlandReportadopted a globalperspectiveon the
consumption of energy and resources,and emphasized the imbalance between rich and poor parts of the world, arguing that:
"Sustainabledevelopmentrequiresthatthose who aremoreaffluent
adopt lifestyles within the planet's ecological means."38However,
because the report also argued that economic growth or development is still possibleas long as it is green growth,this has been interpreted by many to endorse a "business as usual" approach,with
just a nod in the directionof environmentalprotection.This ignores
the realmeaningof sustainabledevelopment,which is enshrinedin
the widely quoted concept of "futurity":..."meeting the needs of
the presentwithout compromisingthe ability of futuregenerations
to meet theirown needs."39

2 Summer
1997
DesignIssues:Volume
13,Number

51

When applied to design, this not only introduces-or reintroduces-the ideas of ethicaland social responsibility,but also the
notion of time and timescale.Thinkingabout the life cycle of products through time, and considerationsabout design for recycling,
have led to the conceptof DfD-Design for Disassembly-followed
by the idea of going BeyondRecycling40towards the design of longlife, durableproducts.These two concepts are not as contradictory
as they sound, as VictorPapanekhas recentlyremarked:"Todesign
durable goods for eventual disassembly may sound like an
oxymoron,yet it is profoundlyimportantin a sustainableworld.
The term "sustainabledesign" has begun to be used in the
last year or so to referto a broader,longer-termvision of ecodesign.
At the Centre for Sustainable Design, established at the Surrey
Instituteof Art and Design in July 1995,sustainabledesign means
"/analyzingand changingthe 'systems'in which we make,use, and
dispose of products,"as opposed to more limited,short-termDFE.42
The ECO2 group makes a similar distinction between "green
design, project-based,single issue and relatively short-term;and
/sustainable'design, which is system-based,long-term"ethical design. EmmaDewberryand Phillip Goggin have also explored the
distinctions between ecodesign and sustainable design; arguing
that, whereas ecodesign can be applied to all productsand used as
a suitable guide for designing at product level: "The concept of
sustainabledesign, however,is much morecomplex and moves the
interfaceof design outwards toward societal conditions, development, and ethics....44This suggests changesin design and the role of
design, including an inevitablemove from a product to a systemsbased approach, from hardware to software, from ownership to
service,and will involve conceptssuch as dematerializationand "a
general shift from physiological to psychological needs." Finally,
they emphasize the extent to which consumption patterns must
change, and referto the inequality between developed and developing nations, the fact that 20 percent of the world's population
consumes 80 percent of the world's resources and conclude that
ecodesign does fit into a global move towardsustainability,but has
many limitations in this context.4 This is the point made by Gui
Bonsiepe, who has expressed the fear that ecological design will
remainthe luxury of the affluentcountrieswhile "thecost of environmental standards would be shifted onto the shoulders of the
ThirdWorld."
46
Thisraisesthe otherdimensionsof sustainabledevelopment:
"Equity,"meetingthe needs of all, and "Participation,"
effectivecitizen involvementin decision-making,without which global sustainable growth would be impossible except by an unacceptableform
of "ecofascism."These issues are only just being raised in design
circles, but were explored in detail recently by the WorldWatch
Institutein reportson global resourcesand consumption patterns.

40 TimCooper,
The
Beyond
Recycling:
Longer
LifeOption
New
(London:
Economics
Foundation,
1994).
41 Victor
Papanek,
"Eco-logic"
Ecodesign
ll,
no.1(1994):
10.Discussed
inhisrecent
book,TheGreenImperative:
and
Ecology
EthicinDesignandArchitecture
(London:
Thames&Hudson,
1995).
42 AnneChick,
"MAinSustainable
Design,"
Centre
forSustainable
Designleaflet,
1995.
in
43 ECO2
of EcoProducts
group,"Hierarchy
Strategies,"
workshop
ondefining
ecodesign,Nov.1994.
44 Emma
andPhillip
Dewberry
Goggin,
"Ecodesign
&Beyond:
Stepstowards
"(OpenUniversity
'Sustainability'
and
TrentUniversity,
Nottingham
Nov.1994):
7-8;andEmma
Dewberry,
"Ecodesign
Strategies,"
EcoDesign
IV,no.I(1996),in
whichshedistinguishes
betweengreen
design,ecodesign,
andglobaldesign
approaches
andcompany
initiatives.
45 Dewberry
andGoggin,
&
"Ecodesign
Beyond."
46 GuiBonsiepe,
'North/South:
Inca14Gui
Environment/Design,"
Bonsiepe,
formerly
of theHochschule
fur
Gestaltung,
Ulm,untilrecently
hasbeen
inLatinAmerica
livingandworking
since
the 1970s,andso he is ina goodposition
to viewthesituation
froma "south"
perspective.
In How Much is Enough? The Consumer Society and the Future of the
52

DesignIssues:Volume
2 Summer
13,Number
1997

Earth, Alan Durning divides the world population into three

47 AlanTheinDurning,
HowMuchis
Enough?
TheConsumer
Societyandthe
Earthscan,
Future
of theEarth
(London:
and
1992),109.See alsoJohnE.Young
AaronSachs,TheNextEfficiency
Revolution:
Creating
a Sustainable
Paper
Materials
Economy
(Worldwatch
of theCenter
for
121,1994).PeterHarper
Wales,hasbeen
Alternative
Technology,
working
alongthesamelines,andhas
madeaninteresting
analysisof the
"eco-technolacceptability
of putative
ogy"andlifestylechanges.Hehasclassifiedpossibleresponsefromlightto dark
A.T.and
greenin"TheL-Word:
ofAT200O:
A
Lifestyles,"
Proceedings
onAltemative
Technology
for
Conference
the21stCentury(Milton
Keynes:
Open
University,
1994).
48 UnitedNationsWorking
on
Group
Product
DesignNewsFax
Sustainable
(August
11,1965);1.
Benjamin,
49 Ibid.,23. See alsoYorick
seniorresearcher,
"Sustainable
Product
IV,no.196.
Development,"
EcoDesign
50 "Design
forNeed"wasthenameof an
forSocieties
ICSID
(International
Council
heldat
of Industrial
Design)conference
theRoyalCollegeof Artin1976.See J.
Bicknell
andL.McQuiston,
eds.,Design
forNeed:TheSocialContribution
of
Press,1977).
Design(Oxford:
Pergamon

consumption classes and analyses their consumption of food, transport, and goods, concluding that environmental destruction results
from the overconsumption of the top one-fifth of the world's population and from the poverty of the bottom one-fifth. He asks if is
there is a level of sufficiency for all the world's population, a level
above poverty and subsistence but below the affluent consumer
lifestyle that is sustainable? The answer is a shift from the "cultivation of needs" to "a culture of permanence": "substituting local
foods for grain-fed meat and packaged fare, switching from cars to
bikes and buses, and replacing throwaways with durable goods."47
This obviously implies a new agenda for design, and this is beginning to be discussed in the UNEP Working Group on Sustainable
Product Development which was started in January 1994 as a
follow-up initiative to the Rio Conference of 1992. It is a network of
360 people in 40 countries all over the world, including 18 from
developing and transitional countries. The Research Programme is
based on the principles of sustainable development:
The very concept of 'sustainability' underlies our fear for
the next generation's future, and forces the question; is a
harmonious balance between their product demands and
the earth's ecology possible and how can it be sustained? 48
Products are redefined in terms of categories such as
"/service"(transport "pool," rented products); "dematerialization"
(virtual libraries, teleworking systems), as well as life cycle design
and longevity. But perhaps even more interesting is the focus on
"Products, Services and Systems that Meet Human Needs," and
which can lead to an improvement in living and working conditions. Areas of "need" to be explored include transportation,
communication, heating, cooling, clothing and textiles, and the use
of water by the end-consumer. This shift of emphasis from the
products to the needs reintroduces an important theme from the
1970s, that of "Design for Need," 50 and, in many ways, sustainable
design has come back full circle to some of the radical design theories of the 1970s.
Conclusion
Thus, ecological design, as it has developed over the last decade,
has reinvented some old ideas and produced some new ones. It has
gone through a process of maturity, moving toward a deepening of
understanding of environmental issues and a darker shade of green.
It has become increasingly evident that the radical nature of an
ecological approach to design implies a new design critique. In the
1980s, this was not necessarily apparent when green was the flavor,
or rather the color, of the month and it seemed that green design
would comfortably settle down into the mainstream of design
industrial practice. In the 1990s, the oppositional nature of ecologiDesignIssues: Volume13, Number2 Summer1997

53

cal design is more apparent,since even fairlypragmaticattemptsto

apply ecological principles to design seem to inevitably challenge
existing practicesand ideologies.
Designers and design critics are increasingly emphasizing
the actualor,potentially,radicalnatureof an ecologicalapproachto
design which implies a new critique-a recognitionof the fact that
to adopt an ecologicalapproachto design is, by definition,to question and oppose the status quo. Ezio Manzini, for example, has
describedthis as a shift from the "normalizedecologicaldesign"of
the 1980sand the "new radicalism"of the '90s, which increasingly
recognizes that ecological design necessitates changes in lifestyles
that challengethe currentglobal model of development.51 In a similar way, Tony Fry argues that ecodesign is the means by which
industrialculturecan be remade,and that the need to changebasic
values can only be achieved "by design so long as design itself is
redesigned."He is criticalof existingecodesigntheoryand practice,
but postulates a potentiallyradicallyecodesign which could create
a new direction for design. 52 From a different perspective, Gui
Bonsiepehas also recentlycriticallyevaluatedecodesign.Although
a new environmental ethic implies a new design ethic, he says,
ecodesign, in theory and practice,has not yet developed enough to
have createda new paradigmfor industrialdesign. However:
The unquestionablemerit of ecodesign consists in having
articulatedconcernswhich put into questionparadigmsof
design and industrialproductionand consumptionthat we
took for granted.5

51 EzioManzini,
"Prometheus
of the
Everyday:
TheEcology
of theArtificial
andtheDesigner's
Responsibility,"
DesignIssuesIX,no.11(Fall1992):5 and
"Design,
Environment,
andSocialQuality:
From'existenzminimum'to
quality
maximum,"
DesignIssues,10,no.1 (Spring
1994).
52 TonyFry,Remarkings.
Ecology.
Design.
Philosophy
( Sydney:
Envirobook,
1994),
9, 11-12.
53 GuiBonsiepe,
"North/South
Environment/Design,"
Inca,a publication
of theSanFrancisco
ofthe
Chapter
Industrial
Designer's
SocietyofAmerica
(August
1992).

54

These issues may be new to design in the 1990sbut, within

the environmentalliterature,there has been a constant discussion
since the 1960s of the extent to which an ecological world-view
representsa new paradigm requiringa fundamentalchallenge to
industrialsociety,or merelya minormodificationof existing values
and practices,and a debate over the degree of change requiredto
overcome the current ecological crisis. That such issues are now
being taken seriously within the design field-more so than the
1970s-suggests a shift in attitudes which will have far-reaching
consequences for design criticism. During the last few decades,
design criticismhas followed design practiceand has been dominatedby a nonecologicalapproach,tendingto view consumerismas
having positive economic and social value, and therebyendorsing
the kind of industrialcultureunder attackby Greens.Only now, in
the wake of discussions of ecologicaldesign theory and practice,is
an ecologicaldesign criticismbeginning to emerge.

1997
13,Number
2 Summer
DesignIssues:Volume