SEC Form 17-A
SEC Form 17-A
SEC Form 17-A
A 1 9 9 6 1 1 5 9 3
S.E.C. Registration Number
M A N I
L A
W A T E R
C O M P A N Y
N C
M W S S
A D M I
4 8 9
K A T I
Q U E Z O N
N I
S T R A T I
P U N A N
C I
T Y
O N
R O A D
M E T R O
B U I
L D I
B A L A R A
M A N I
N G
1 1 0 5
L A
981-8122
Contact Person
1 2
3 1
Month
Day
Fiscal Year
0 4
FORM TYPE
Any
Month
Day
Annual Meeting
File Number
____________________________________
LCU
Document I.D.
____________________________________
Cashier
STAMPS
As of March 31, 2016, there are 2,017,240,763 Common Shares, par value P1.00 per share
listed in the Philippine Stock Exchange.
10. State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant.
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates was computed by reference
to the price at which the stock was sold as of a specified date within sixty (60) days prior to the
date of filing. The term affiliate covers those identified in the 2015 Audited Financial
Statements of the Company attached to this Report.
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Company as of
March 31, 2016 is Php30,932,746,209.00 computed as follows:
Outstanding Listed Shares as of March 31, 2016
Shares Held by Ayala Corporation as of March 31, 2016*
Shares Held by Non-Affiliates
Closing Price as of March 31, 2016
2,017,240,763.00
871,583,496.00
1,145,657,267.00
27.00
Php30,932,746,209.00
* The shares held by Ayala Corporation includes the 1,000,000 common shares held through
Michigan Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Ayala Corporation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1
Business
Item 2
Properties
38
Item 3
Legal Proceedings
39
Item 4
49
PART II
Item 5
49
Item 6
52
Item 7
104
Item 8
104
PART III
Item 9
105
Item 10
Executive Compensation
123
Item 11
125
Item 12
128
PART IV
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 13
Corporate Governance
PART V
Item 14
Item 14 Exhibits
128
129
Lastly, the Group has Manila Water Total Solutions Corporation (MWTS), a wholly-owned
subsidiary that handles after-the-meter products and services. Among its products is Healthy
Family Purified Drinking Water which sells five-gallon packaged water in pilot areas in Metro
Manila.
The Concession
The following are some of the key terms of the Concession Agreement:
Term and Service Area of Concession. The Concession Agreement took effect on August
1, 1997 (Commencement Date) and will expire on May 6, 2037 or on an early
termination date as provided therein. By virtue of the Concession Agreement, MWSS
transferred its service obligations (i.e., water supply, sewerage and sanitation, and
customer service) in the East Zone to the Company.
Ownership of Assets. While the Company has the right to manage, operate, repair,
decommission and refurbish specified MWSS facilities in the East Zone, legal title to
these assets remains with MWSS. The legal title to all fixed assets contributed to MWSS
by the Company during the concession remains with the Company until the expiration
date (or an early termination date), at which time, all rights, titles and interests in such
assets will automatically vest in MWSS.
Operations and Performance. The Company has the right to bill and collect for water
and sewerage services supplied in the East Zone. In return, the Company is responsible
for the management, operation, repair and refurbishment of MWSS facilities in the East
Zone and must provide service in accordance with specific operating and performance
targets described in the Concession Agreement.
Concession fees consisting of the peso equivalent of (i) 10% of the payments due
under any MWSS loan that was disbursed prior to the Commencement Date; (ii)
10% of payments due under any MWSS loan designated for the Umiray-Angat
Transbasin Project (UATP) that was not disbursed prior to the Commencement
Date; (iii) 10% of the local component costs and cost overruns related to the
UATP; (iv) 100% of the payments due under any MWSS designated loans for
existing projects in the East Zone that were not disbursed prior to the
Commencement Date and were awarded to third party bidders or elected by the
Company for continuation; and (v) 100% of the local component costs and cost
overruns related to existing projects in the East Zone; and
MWSS is required to provide the Company with a schedule of concession fees payable
during any year by January 15 of that year and a written notice of amounts due no later
than 14 days prior to the scheduled payment date of principal, interest, fees and other
amounts due. Currently, MWSS gives monthly invoices to the Company for these fees.
Appropriate Discount Rate. The Company is entitled to earn a rate of return equal to the
Appropriate Discount Rate (ADR) on its expenditures prudently and efficiently
incurred for the remaining term of the concession. The ADR is the real (i.e. not inflation
adjusted) weighted average cost of capital after taxes as determined by the MWSS
Regulatory Office based on conventionally and internationally accepted methods, using
estimates of the cost of debt in domestic and international markets, the cost of equity for
utility business in the Philippines and abroad with adjustments to reflect country risk,
exchange rate risk and any other project risk.
Tariff Adjustments and Rate Regulation. Water tariff rates are adjusted according to
mechanisms that relate to inflation, extraordinary events, foreign currency differentials
and Rate Rebasing exercises.
Early Termination. MWSS has a right to terminate the concession under certain
circumstances which include insolvency of the Company or failure to perform an
obligation under the Concession Agreement, which, in the reasonable opinion of the
MWSS-Regulatory Office, jeopardizes the provision of essential water and sewerage
supply services to all or any significant part of the East Zone. The Company also has the
right to terminate the concession for the failure of MWSS to perform an obligation under
the Concession Agreement, which prevents the Company from carrying out its
responsibilities or upon occurrence of certain events that would impair the rights of the
Company.
Reversion. On the expiration of the Concession Agreement, all the rights, duties and
powers of the Company automatically revert to MWSS or its successors or assigns.
MWSS has the option to rebid the concession or renew the agreement with the express
written consent of the government.
Under the Concession Agreement, the Company and the concessionaire of the West Zone of
Metro Manila, Maynilad Water Services, Inc. (Maynilad), were required to enter into a joint
venture or other arrangement that identifies the responsibilities and liabilities of each with regard
to the operation, maintenance, renewal and decommissioning of Common Purpose Facilities
(CPF), as well as an interconnection agreement which governs such matters as water supply
transfers between the East and West Zones and boundary definitions and identifies the
responsibilities and liabilities of parties with regard to the management, operation and
and extend the Concession Agreement for an additional period of fifteen (15) years from the year
2022 or until 2037, under the same terms and conditions.
Organization
The Organizational structure described below became effective as of April 1, 2015, with the
objective of decentralizing the locus of operating control to the Senior Leadership Team
composed of the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer for Manila
Water Operations, the Chief Operating Officer for New Business Operations and New Business
Development, and the Chief Finance Officer and Treasurer.
A.
Manila Water Operations (MWO) is responsible for the East Zone Business Operations and the
Companys Corporate Support Functions. It is headed by the Chief Operating Officer for Manila
Water Operations.
The East Zone Business Operations (EZBO) is responsible for the delivery of water and used
water services to the whole East Zone and deals directly with the Companys customers. It is
composed of the East Zone Business Area Operations, East Zone Business Support, Technical
Support Services for Water Network and Technical Support Services for Used Water.
The East Zone Business Area Operations is the house of the eight (8) Business Areas.
This Division is directly responsible for the delivery of water, used water and sanitation
services to the customers and key accounts, geared towards achieving company targets on
billed volume, revenue and customer service.
The East Zone Business Support Division is composed of four (4) departments:
Demand Forecasting and Total Management System (TMS) Management, Billing and
Collection, Customer Service and Stakeholder Management and Program and Policy
Development. The Demand Forecasting and TMS Management Department is
responsible for revenue management, demand forecasting, provision of systems and
analytical tools and performance management of all EZBO employees. The Billing and
Collection Department ensures efficient meter reading to deliver quality customer bills. It
also provides collection support to the business areas through service provider
management and payment facilities sourcing. The Customer Service and Stakeholder
Management Department reviews and enhances customer service processes and standards
aimed to drive customer satisfaction. It regularly monitors customer centricity metrics to
ensure that all customers concerns are attended to efficiently and effectively. The
Program and Policy Development Department handles the EZBO rewards and
recognition programs, and policy development and compliance.
The Technical Support Services Department for Water Network oversees the water
network and ensures efficiency and reliability within the distribution system. It develops
programs and conducts research on the latest technologies to reduce water losses.
The Technical Support Services Department for Used Water manages the
implementation of the Companys desludging services and all sewer connection-related
activities with customer touch points.
The Business Areas and HQ departments aim towards driving the growth of the business,
reduce water losses, manage water network operations and used water services and
ensure achievement of regulatory targets in terms of delivery of quality service to
Manila Water customers.
The Corporate Support Functions are responsible for providing support to the entire
organization. It leads in the development of enterprise-wide policies, plans, and programs. The
following are the Corporate Support Functions:
a.
The Corporate Operations Group (COG) operates and maintains all of Manila Waters
water and used water facilities. It constantly seeks ways to further improve the efficiency
and reliability in managing all of Manila Waters facilities by developing high quality
engineering standards, delivering innovative technology solutions and support, exploring
new technologies and promoting a culture of a safe work environment while remaining
compliant to environmental and regulatory standards. The COG is committed to protect
the environment through environmental sustainability programs such as the Three-River
Master Plan, the protection and development of the watersheds, and other various
environmental efforts. The COG is composed of Water Source, Water Supply Operations,
Used Water Operations, Corporate Business Resiliency, Operations Services and
Technical Services.
The COG, in cooperation with counterparts from Maynilad, manages the Water
Source or the Common Purpose Facilities (CPF), which includes headworks
upstream of the La Mesa Dam (Angat Dam, Ipo Dam and the Novaliches
portals). Water Source ensures that sufficient raw water allocation is maintained
throughout the year.
From the La Mesa Dam, Water Supply Operations manages the water
treatment facilities, primary transmission lines, pumping stations and service
reservoirs to provide 24/7 water supply at a reliability level of, at least, 99.99%
while maintaining 100% compliance in water quality as defined in the Philippine
National Standards for Drinking Water. It is also responsible for ensuring that
water supply meets demand by means of accurate forecasting from source to
production, despite variability in consumer demand or environmental pressures.
Used Water Operations manages the used water treatment facilities and lift
stations to ensure that treated used water discharge is consistently compliant to
environmental standards. It is responsible for implementing the used water
service expansion plan, advocating the Three-River System targeted to be
completed by 2022.
ii.
iii.
ii.
iii.
10
iv.
b.
c.
The Corporate Human Resources Group (CHRG) is organized into six (6) core
functions: Talent Management and Leadership Development, Manpower Planning and
Organization Development, Total Rewards Management and PMO, HR Operations
Management, Employee Engagement, and HR Business Partnering.
The Total Rewards Management and PMO Department handles the design and
implementation of programs in rewards and performance management.
The Systems and Solutions Department is responsible for the development and
maintenance of all projects and systems supporting the business. It is in charge of
identifying, designing, and delivering technology solutions and applications that
support the success of the business.
11
d.
The Corporate Project Management Group (CPMG) is tasked with the planning,
design and construction of all water, used water and network capital projects that are
crucial for the Company to achieve regulatory commitments as stipulated in the
Concession Agreement and Rate Rebasing plans. The careful delivery of projects, strict
adherence to the target timelines, prudent and efficient cost and highest standards of
quality and safety, is the basis for the achievement of corporate business objectives
aligned with the sustainable expansion of services that improve people's lives and support
regional economic growth. CPMG is organized for an integrated, collaborative approach
to project execution. It is composed of seven (7) departments namely: Project
Management, Construction Management, Engineering, Project Management Office,
Project Stakeholder Engagement, Quality Assurance, and Safety Solutions.
The Project Management Office is responsible for (1) project control functions
to support construction projects, (2) implementation of integrated project
management system and facilitation of continuous improvement initiatives, (3)
strengthening of project information and analytics, and (4) building systems to
ensure project construction documentation and control.
12
agencies and the public through proactive project pre-selling and relationship
building that ensure timely and smooth resolution of any project concerns.
e.
The Safety Solutions Department performs a vital role in ensuring that not only
are Manila Water employees empowered to work safely, but also ensures that
vendors and contractors are well-trained in keeping worksites safe for employees
and the general public, especially during construction activities. This utmost
regard for a safety environment and mindset has top management support and
carried-out by its employees and contractors/vendors.
The Strategic Asset Management Group (SAMG) was formed to help the Company
achieve the optimal and sustainable delivery of services and profitability through the
efficient and effective management and development of assets. The group is mandated to
provide a comprehensive, holistic and integrated master plan that will address capital
investments both for water and used water systems, the operation and maintenance of
existing and new assets, and the rationalization and disposal of surplus assets.
To deliver these services, SAMG is organized into six (6) departments namely, (1) Value
Assurance, (2) Portfolio Management, (3) Strategic Asset Planning, (4) Asset
Management (5) Asset Investment and Management Support and (6) Water Sources and
Environmental Planning.
The Value Assurance Department provides a holistic approach that will help
ensure the delivery of the programs/projects ultimate goals through value
analysis and risk assessment that facilitate faster decision-making and thus
optimize capital expenditures/life cycle costs and satisfy stakeholders.
13
f.
The Corporate Regulatory Affairs Group (CRAG) is mandated to (1) lead the planning
and development of the East Zone rate rebasing submission and Rate Rebasing Readiness
Program, (2) engage different groups within the MWO in the aligned execution of the
MWSS-approved East Zone business plan, (3) advocate with MWSS and other key
government/private/non-government organizations to advance the Companys policy
interests, (4) provide political-regulatory management support services to the entire
organization, and (5) conceptualize, develop and implement major Company politicalregulatory initiatives.
The said mandates are carried out through four (4) departments, namely: the Business
Operations Regulation (BOR) Department, the Financial Regulation (FR)
Department, the Technical Regulation (TR) Department and the Public Policy
Department. The Group, particularly through the Group Head and members of the
BOR, FR and TR Departments, interface with the MWSS on matters relating to the
Concession Agreement. It includes submitting reports and disclosures relating to
compliance, handling negotiations with the MWSS relating to the Companys service
targets, and distilling information from the Companys other groups to produce and
periodically update financial projections (the bases for petitions submitted to the MWSS
for quarterly, annual, and five-year tariff adjustments. The Public Policy Department
handles matters related to public policy (e.g. preparation of policy position papers and
attendance in various policy fora/dialogues, hearings) and relations with key government
and non-government offices.
g.
The Corporate Strategic Affairs Group (CSAG) is responsible for creating consistent
corporate messaging and harmonizing communication channels that are aligned with the
Companys objectives in order to effectively connect with customers and stakeholders.
The group is composed of two (2) departments: the Advocacy and Research Department
and the Corporate Communications Department.
The Advocacy and Research Department handles the Lakbayan or Water Trail
program as the Companys information, education and communication program
on water and used water appreciation. It also handles the Toka Toka
Environmental Movement which is the countrys first and only environmental
program focused on used water management. It is also in charge of building and
differentiating the Manila Water brand through strategic communications
research and development, and visual standards management.
14
B.
The New Business Operations and New Business Development Group is focused on existing
products and services leveraging on expanding the core business to new geographies in the
country and in Vietnam, Indonesia and Myanmar markets. These products and services are
intended to be implemented through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Manila Water Philippine
Ventures, Inc. (MWPV) and Manila Water Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. (MWAP), to ensure sustained
growth beyond the East Zone. The strategic mandate of this group is to expand the business
throughout the Philippines and in the ASEAN region. The geographical expansion is anchored on
the core competencies of the Company which have already been proven through its subsidiaries,
Laguna AAAWater Corporation, Clark Water Corporation, Boracay Island Water Company, Inc.,
and Cebu Manila Water Development, Inc., all under the MWPV. In addition, MWPV also has
its own operations through its operating division, Estate Water (EW), which has been created to
implement projects with strategic partners.
The Manila Water Group has likewise gained traction in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, through the
MWAP Singapore subsidiaries (Manila Water South Asia Holdings Pte. Ltd., Kenh Dong Water
Holdings Pte. Ltd., Thu Duc Water Holdings Pte. Ltd.) and affiliates/associates in Vietnam (Kenh
Dong Water Supply Joint Stock Company, Thu Duc Water B.O.O. Corporation, Saigon Water
Infrastructure Corporation and Asia Water Network Solutions Joint Stock Company).
Both MWPV and MWAP have their own new Business Development units who are responsible
for identifying and pursuing new business opportunities in the Philippines and in the ASEAN
region.
Finally, Zamboanga Water Company, Inc. and Tagum Water Company, Inc., are the recent joint
ventures of the Company with local water districts for implementation of non-revenue water
reduction program and bulk water supply project, respectively.
C.
The Corporate Finance and Governance Group, which is headed by the Chief Finance Officer
and Treasurer, provides financial and legal services to the Company. The Group is composed of
three (3) divisions the Accounting, Risk Management and Treasury Division; the Financial
Planning, Controllership, Investor Relations and Supply Chain Division; and Legal and Corporate
Governance Division. Other departments under this group are Finance and Governance for
Subsidiaries and Corporate Planning Department.
15
Department, the Enterprise Risk and Insurance Management Department, and the
Treasury Operations Department. The division provides financial and regulatory
accounting, as well as treasury and risk management services.
i.
ii.
The Fixed Assets, Project and Regulatory Accounting Department is a multidisciplinary group which has key roles in the Companys compliance with
various regulators. It is responsible for providing management and the regulators
with timely reports that are in compliance with all applicable accounting and
regulatory standards. In line with the Companys obligations as a concessionaire
of the East Zone, it maintains records of the acquisition, status, and
disposal/transfer of all fixed and movable assets of the Company. The
department provides appropriate safeguards on disbursements of the Company
and ensures that payments for goods and services are carried out in accordance
with contractual requirements, and consistent with internal policies and tax
requirements. It also ensures that capital projects are completed on time, within
budget and in compliance with the Companys business plan.
iii.
iv.
16
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
The Legal and Corporate Governance Division is composed of the Legal and
Corporate Governance Department and the Tax Management Department. The division
provides legal services, tax advisory, land acquisition and right-of-of way services, and
corporate governance guidance to the Company and across the organization.
i.
17
The other departments which are reporting directly to the Chief Finance Officer and Treasurer are
as follows:
The Corporate Planning Department is responsible for providing timely, objective and
sound advice to the Board on strategic decisions and related matters. The department
supports top management in charting the organizations strategic roadmap, and in
executing its strategic initiatives. This support is extended to the rest of the organization
through timely strategic information analysis and provision, as well as the effective
implementation of the management review cycle.
The Finance and Governance for Subsidiaries Department leads the finance operations
of the Companys subsidiaries, which include, Manila Water Philippine Ventures, Inc.
(MWPV) and the MWPV subsidiaries, Manila Water Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. (MWAP)
and the MWAP subsidiaries and associates, and the MWTS. The department ensures
preparation of accurate and timely financial reports, as well as implementation of
financial systems and controls in all non-East Zone entities. The department is also
responsible for building the capability of the new businesses to be able to manage and
perform all finance-related operations such as, but not limited to, accounting, treasury,
procurement, policy development, risk management and tax management.
Please refer to Schedule J (Supplementary Schedules) on the relationships of the entities
within the Group.
The Internal Audit Department provides independent and objective assurance and
internal consulting services and evaluates the effectiveness of the Companys risk
management, control and governance processes. The department reports functionally to
the Audit and Governance Committee (AGC) and administratively to the Chief Finance
Officer and Treasurer. It supports the AGC in the effective discharge of its oversight role
and responsibility, and provides the management and the Board of Directors, through the
AGC, with analyses, recommendations, advice and information concerning the activities
and processes reviewed. The department obtained a Generally Conforms rating from
the External Quality Assessment Review performed by IIA-Philippines in June 2012.
18
Water Operations
The supply of water by the Company to its customers generally involves abstraction from water
sources and the subsequent treatment and distribution to customers premises. In 2014, the East
Zone Business Operations supplied approximately 1,386 million liters per day (MLD) and billed
448.96 MCM of water compared to 1,434 MLD of water supplied and 448.96 MCM billed in
2014. The Company served a total of 1,342,807 households through 948,230 water service
connections as of December 31, 2015, as compared to last years level of 1,342,807 households
and 948,230 water service connections.
Water Resources
Under the Concession Agreement, MWSS is responsible for the supply of raw water to the
Companys distribution system and is required to supply to the Company a maximum quantity of
water, currently pegged at 1,600 MLD. In case MWSS fails to supply the required quantity, the
Company is required to distribute available water equitably.
The Company substantially receives all of its water from MWSS, which holds permits to the raw
surface waters of the Angat and Umiray Rivers. The raw surface water which MWSS supplies to
the Company comes from the Angat and Umiray Rivers, abstracted from the Angat Dam, and
conveyed to the Ipo Dam through the Ipo River. Only a very small amount of the Companys
water supply is still ground-sourced through deep wells, which are primarily for the benefit of
customers in the remotest towns of the Province of Rizal wherein conveyance from the existing
treatment plants would be impractical. As of December 31, 2015, the Company has only three
(3) operational deep wells with an average production of 2.04 MLD.
Water Treatment
Raw water is stored at the La Mesa reservoir located immediately downstream of the Novaliches
portal interconnection before going to the three (3) treatment plants, two (2) of which are in
Balara located seven (7) kilometers away and the third is nestled just at the northeast of La Mesa
Dam.
The Balara treatment plants have a total design capacity of 1,600 MLD and consist of two (2)
separate treatment systems: Balara Filter 1, which was commissioned in 1935 and Balara Filter 2
which was commissioned in 1958. These treatment plants make use of the same chemical
preparation equipment and dosing facilities. The treatment process in these plants involves
coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration and chlorination. The facilities consume
higher quantities of chemicals during the rainy season when the turbidity of water increases,
which leads to increased costs of operations.
Both plants are operating with an on-line monitoring system which enables real-time monitoring
of water quality data which, in turn, provide an enhancement in chemical dosing efficiency. All of
the filter beds have been recently upgraded to improve efficiency. The beds were modified using
a multi-block underdrain system that includes an air-scour wash system, a more efficient method
of cleaning the media using less water. Bulk of the sludge management plant was constructed in
2010 and started operating in 2011. Both plants have undergone a structural retrofit to make the
facilities more resilient to earthquakes.
19
Water Distribution
After treatment, water is distributed through the Company's network of pipelines, pumping
stations and mini-boosters. As of December 31, 2015, the Company's network consisted of
approximately 5,000 km of total pipeline, comprising of primary, secondary and tertiary pipelines
ranging in diameter from 50 to 2,200 mm. The pipes are made of steel, cast iron, asbestos cement
pipe, polyvinyl chloride and other materials. Due to pipes' excessive tendency to leak, the
Company have replaced most of its Asbestos Cement Pipes (ACP), down to 0.001% which at the
start were estimated to comprise approximately 25.5% of the total pipeline length. From the start
of the concession in 1997 until the end of 2015, the Company has laid almost 4,800 km of
pipeline through expansion or replacement. This holistic pipe replacement supported with
effective area management has led to a non-revenue water (NRW) percentage of 11.2%, far from
the 1997 value of 63%.
Pumping stations also play a critical part in water distribution. Approximately 66% of the surface
water supplied by the Company is pumped to ensure supply in high elevation areas. Currently,
the Company operates nineteen (19) pumping stations with a combined maximum pumping
capacity of 3000 MLD and an average plant output of 904 MLD. Most of the major pumping
stations have reservoirs with a combined capacity of almost 400 MLD.
The Company operates twenty-one (21) line boosters in order to reach the fringe areas, which are
quite distant from the treatment plants. Line boosters typically are small facilities aimed at
augmenting water supply for areas that are not sufficiently supplied during the regular pumping
operations of the pump stations.
Non-Revenue Water
NRW refers to the volume of water lost in the Companys distribution system due to leakage,
pilferage, illegal connections and metering errors. As determined by the MWSS-Regulatory
Office, NRW is calculated as a percentage of the net volume of water supplied by the Company.
The net volume of water supplied by the Company comprises the total volume of water supplied
by the Company net of Cross Border Volume. Cross Border Volume is the volume of water
transferred to the West Zone concessionaire less transfers received by the East Zone from the
West Zone Concessionaire in the past. To date, the cross border flows have completely stopped.
The Companys NRW levels have been significantly reduced from an average of 63% at the date
of commencement of operations under the Concession Agreement to 11.2% for the year ended
December 31, 2015. The significant improvement in the Companys system losses was
accomplished through effective management of water supply coupled with massive pipe
replacement projects.
Water Quality
Since 1998, the Companys water quality has consistently surpassed the Philippine National
Standards for Drinking Water (PNSDW) set by the Department of Health (DOH) and based on
World Health Organization (WHO) water quality guidelines. The Companys rating is based on a
series of tests conducted regularly at 836 (3% above the PNSDW requirement of 814 as of end of
2015) regulatory sampling points within the East Zone. The Companys water samples scored an
average bacteriological compliance of 100%, surpassing the threshold of 95% set in the PNSDW.
In 1997, when the concession began, only 87% of water samples complied with these quality
20
standards. The Company collects and tests samples for microbial examination and physicochemical examination from its surface water sources, (Angat, Ipo, Bicti and La Mesa reservoirs),
ground water sources (deepwells), water treatment plants and distribution points based on
frequencies as required in the standard.
Water quality at the Companys water treatment plants undergoes daily microbial
(bacteriological) and physico-chemical analysis and consistently is 100% compliant on the basic
and health significant parameters required in the PNSDW. Regulatory sampling points are
designated at strategic locations across the distribution system within the coverage area wherein
sampling is conducted daily by Manila Water. The MWSS-Regulatory Office, Local Government
Units (LGUs) and DOH likewise collect random samples from these designated sampling points
and have them tested by third party laboratories and designated government laboratories. The
results were consistently beyond the 95% set in the PNSDW.
The samples collected are tested at Manila Waters own Laboratory, which is accredited by the
DOH and a recognized EMB-DENR testing laboratory. The Laboratory has also gained its
recognition as an ISO/IEC 17025:2005 accredited laboratory (meeting the principles of ISO
9001:2008 obtained by the Companys laboratory for water/used water testing and sampling in
October 2006) granted by the Philippine Accreditation Office, Department of Trade and Industry
(DTI). These recognition and accreditations subject the laboratory to regular surveillance audits.
Consistently, the Laboratory has gained excellent and satisfactory ratings on most proficiency
testing programs it has participated through local and international proficiency testing program
providers. In 2010, the Laboratory also gained certifications for ISO 9001:2008, ISO 14001:2004
and OSHAS 18001:2007. These recognitions have gained the confidence of the MWSSRegulatory Office, the DOH and DENR in the tests results that are regularly provided to them.
Sewerage Operations
The Company is responsible for the provision of sewerage and sanitation services through the
operation of new and existing sewerage systems and a program of regular maintenance of
household septic tanks in the East Zone.
Sewerage and Sanitation System
Since 1997, the Company has significantly improved and expanded the limited used water
infrastructure originally operated and maintained by the MWSS. Sewerage services are provided
in areas where treatment facilities are available. Sewered areas are currently located in Quezon
City and Makati, but parts of Manila, Taguig, Cainta, Pasig and Mandaluyong are also connected
to sewer networks.
The Company had few facilities for sewerage services in 1997. The Sewage Treatment Plant
(STP) in Magallanes Village was then the largest treatment facility in the country with a 40 MLD
capacity. The STP in Magallanes provides sewerage services to the Makati central business
district and some residential villages. Prior to privatization, this facility had poor treatment
efficiency and did not meet effluent quality standards. The Karangalan Bio-module in
Karangalan Village was serving approximately 100 households but also produced substandard
effluent quality before 1997. An Imhoff tank in Phil-Am Village and thirty-one communal septic
tanks (CSTs) in Quezon City were also turned-over in 1997. These facilities were serving
approximately 19,000 households. These facilities have been upgraded to secondary treatment
and now meet effluent standards set by the DENR.
21
In 2001, the Company constructed two (2) pilot package plants to determine if they were feasible
in terms of social, financial, and environmental aspects. These are located in Valle Verde Homes,
Pasig, one of which serves approximately 100 households and another serves some 400
households of the housing project in Makati together with approximately 4,000 students and
employees in Rizal Elementary School.
With the success of the two (2) pilot STPs, the Company implemented the Manila Second
Sewerage Project (MSSP) funded by World Bank. Under the MSSP, twenty-six (26) STPs were
constructed. Sixteen (16) of these STPs were formerly CSTs and the rest are on-site STPs for
medium and high rise housing establishments and for the University of the Philippines campus.
Takeover and upgrade of the STP in Diego Silang, Taguig was also part of the MSSP.
As part of its commitment to expand this service, the Company constructed and subsequently
operated in 2008 under the Manila Third Sewerage Project (MTSP) two (2) Septage Treatment
Plans (SpTPs) aimed at managing septic tank materials siphoned from the East Concession
customers. A total of 77 desludging trucks operate daily to ensure the desludging service is
rendered to the entire East Zone population over the next five years. Since 1997, the Company
has already provided such service to more than 1,000,000 households.
The MTSP is a follow-up to the MSSP and has the ultimate objective of improving sewerage and
sanitation conditions in the East Zone. It was developed as a means of achieving the Companys
sewerage and sanitation service targets. The remaining components of the MTSP include the
construction of sewer networks and treatment plants in several locations in the East Zone
including upgrading of existing communal septic tanks with secondary treatment levels. There
were six (6) sewage and septage treatment plants that were constructed under MTSP. It was in
this project that combined sewer and drainage system was implemented. Out of the six (6)
facilities, four (4) employed this approach.
As of the end of 2014, the Company has already served through sewer service, 251,868
households within the East Zone. As of year-end 2014, the Company operates 38 Used Water
Facilities including the two (2) SpTPs, with a total capacity of 135 MLD, compared to 40 MLD
in 1997.
In 2015, two (2) new used water facilities became operational, and these are the Marikina North
STP and Liwasan ng Kagitingan at Kalikasan STP which have a combined capacity of 175 MLD
and by far, the biggest STPs of the Company. Another remarkable feature of two (2) STPs is that
both have the same treatment technology known as the Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) whereas
the thirty-eight (38) facilities that were constructed under MSSP, MTSP and the take-over
projects all employ the Conventional Activated Sludge treatment. As of year-end 2015, the total
used water treatment capacity of the Company has increased to 310 MLD.
Customers who are not connected to the sewer network are provided with septic tank
maintenance services through the Sanitasyon Para Sa Barangay (SPSB) program. Through
cooperation with the barangays, the program aims to desludge all septic tanks in a barangay
without charge over a specified, set schedule. For the period covering 2007 up to 2015, a total of
1,879,057 households have availed of the desludging service while a total of 515,317 septic tanks
have been desludged for the said period.
The technical assistance component focus on information and education campaigns on proper
liquid waste disposal and environment preservation and the preparation of follow-up programs on
sewerage and sanitation, with emphasis on low-cost sanitation systems.
22
23
35 million liters per day of bulk water for years two up to twenty. Thereafter, in the same month,
Laguna Water signed an Asset Purchase Agreement with the Laguna Technopark, Inc. (LTI)
for the acquisition of the water reticulation system of LTI in Laguna Technopark, a premier
industrial park located in Sta. Rosa and Binan, Laguna which is home to some of the regions
largest and more successful light to medium non-polluting industries.
On December 19, 2014, the Company received a notice from the Zamboanga City Water District
(ZCWD) awarding the project for nonrevenue water reduction activities in Zamboanga City. A
10-year JV agreement between the Parent Company and the ZCWD was signed on January 30,
2015 and the JVs operations commenced on June 2, 2015 upon signing of the Nonrevenue Water
Service Agreement.
In October 2015, Davao Del Norte Water Infrastructure Company, Inc., the consortium formed
between the Company and iWater, Inc., signed a JV agreement with the Tagum City Water
District for the operation of a 15-year take-or-pay bulk water supply arrangement for up to 38
MLD.
Finally, MWTS, also a wholly-owned subsidiary of Manila Water, is engaged, among others, in
the provision of consultancy and related services for the implementation of water and used water
network-related projects, as well as the maintenance, repair and installation of after-the-meter
(water service) connection and appurtenances. In 2015, MWTS launched its first product offering
in the packaged water category called Healthy Family purified water, which aims to address the
purified drinking water needs of households in and out of the East Zone.
International New Business and Investments
International new business and investments of the Company are generally undertaken through its
wholly-owned Singapore subsidiary, Manila Water Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. (MWAP), and the
latters subsidiaries, namely, Manila Water South Asia Holdings Pte. Ltd. (MWSAH), Thu Duc
Water Holdings Pte. Ltd. (TDWH), and Kenh Dong Water Holdings Pte. Ltd. (KDWH). In
November 2015, a new Singapore subsidiary, North-West of Saigon Holdings Pte. Ltd.
(NWSH), was incorporated whose objective is to implement future expansions in the region.
In December 2011, TDWH purchased a 49% share ownership in Thu Duc Water B.O.O.
Corporation (Thu Duc Water) which owns the second largest water treatment plant in Ho Chi
Minh City. Thu Duc Water has a bulk water supply contract with Saigon Water Corporation
(SAWACO) for a minimum consumption of 300 MLD on a take-or-pay arrangement.
In July 2012, KDWH completed the acquisition of a 47.35% stake in Kenh Dong Water Supply
Joint Stock Company (Kenh Dong Water), a Vietnamese company established in 2003 to build,
own, and operate major water infrastructure facilities in Ho Chi Minh City.
In October 2013, MWSAH completed the acquisition of 31.47% stake in Saigon Water
Infrastructure Corporation (Saigon Water), a listed company in Vietnam.
In 2015, Saigon Water entered into a 25-year Build-Own-Operate joint undertaking with
Vietnam-Oman Investment Company and the Peoples Committee of Ho Chi Minh City to
expand and operate the water network in Cu Chi, a district in Ho Chi Minh City. The project will
be undertaken with Cu Chi Water Supply Sewerage Company Limited (Cu Chi Water), a
Vietnam limited company. Through a Capital Transfer Agreement executed with Saigon Water
on November 3, 2015, a 24.5% share in the charter capital of Cu Chi Water was acquired by
MWSAH.
24
On March 17, 2014, the Parent Company and Mitsubishi Corporation, signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the Yangon City Development Committee (YCDC) in Yangon
City, Myanmar for the development of a proposed nonrevenue water reduction project for
Yangon City. YCDC is an administrative body of the city government in Yangon in charge of the
water, infrastructure, business licenses and city property management, among others.
On November 6, 2015, MWAP signed an MOU with PDAM Tirtawening Bandung City for a
nonrevenue water reduction demonstration project in Bandung City, Indonesia. PDAM Bandung
is a water utility company owned and controlled by the Regional Government of Bandung City in
West Java, Indonesia.
Environmental Compliance
The Companys water and used water facilities must comply with Philippine environmental
standards set by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) on water
quality, air quality, hazardous and solid wastes, and environmental impacts. In keeping with the
Companys commitment to sustainable development, all projects are assessed for their
environmental impact and where applicable, must obtain an Environmental Compliance
Certificate (ECC) from the DENR prior to construction or expansion and the conditions complied
with, along with all other existing environmental regulations. During and subsequent to
construction, ambient conditions and facility-specific emissions (e.g. air, water, hazardous wastes,
treatment by-products) from water and used water facilities are routinely sampled and tested
against DENR environmental quality standards using international sampling, testing and
reporting procedures.
The Company has made efforts to meet and exceed all statutory and regulatory standards. The
Company employs the appropriate environmental management systems and communicates to its
employees, business partners and customers the need to take environmental responsibility
seriously. The Company uses controlled work practices and preventive measures to minimize
risk to the water supply, public health and the environment. The Companys regular maintenance
procedures involve regular disinfection of service reservoirs and mains and replacement of
corroded pipes. Implementation and effectiveness of established operations and maintenance
procedures is being monitored and checked for continual improvement through the Operations
Management System (OMS). Monitoring of environmental compliance for operating facilities
and on-going projects is being carried out proactively using risk-based assessment checklist in
order to internally address compliance risks before it resulted into legal non-compliances. The
Companys water and used water treatment processes meet the current standards of the PNSDW,
DOH, DENR and LLDA. The Company continues to undertake improvements in the way it
manages both treated water and used water as well as treatment of by-products such as backwash
water, sludge and biosolids.
The Company has contingency plans in the event of unforeseen failures in the water and used
water treatment or chemical leakage and accidental discharge of septage and sewage. The
Companys Customer Care Center is trained to ensure that environmental incidents are tracked,
monitored and resolved.
A policy on climate change was formulated to define the Companys commitment to the National
Framework Strategy for Climate Change. While the company is undertaking climate change
mitigating measures such as greenhouse gas accounting and reporting along with initiatives to
optimize consumption of fuel and electricity to reduce its carbon footprint, there is a current
25
emphasis towards climate change adaptation such as intensifying watershed rehabilitation work,
vulnerability assessment of water sources and assets, improving the climate-resiliency of existing
and future water and used water facilities, strengthening risk reduction and management systems
with a business continuity plan, and development of new water sources.
Developing Employees
The Company created a Talent Master Plan to ensure that it is able to sustain the development of
the right quantity and quality of talents, not only for the current needs of the business but also for
future requirements, as the Company has a rich pipeline of projects and business prospects. In
2015, the Manila Water University (MWU) launched and completed a competency assessment
for each talent which is the basis for the trainings of talents to meet their competency
requirements.
Manila Water formally launched in 2015, Bawat Patak, Tumatatak, which is an employee
volunteerism program that focuses on education, environment and emergency. Consequently,
several projects under each category were initiated.
26
Through its Lingap program, Manila Water has rehabilitated the water reticulation systems and
installed wash facilities and drinking fountains in 354 public service institutions such as schools,
hospitals, city jails, markets and orphanages, benefitting about 1.5 million people.
27
Sanitation Safety Plan is being developed for the used water facilities of the Metro Manila East
Zone, and will be replicated in the Philippine subsidiaries.
Manila Water embarked on providing Healthy Family bottled water in the second half of 2014 in
the advocacy for healthy living through the consumption of water that is clean and potable, as
opposed to the prevailing lack of quality control and assurance among the small-scale and poorly
regulated water refilling stations around the country.
Employees
As of December 31, 2015, the Company had 1,365 employees. Approximately 14% were nonmanagement employees and 86% held management positions. Six (6) employees are seconded
from Ayala Corporation.
The following table presents the number of employees as of the end of the period indicated:
Year
2015
Former MWSS
611
Direct Hires
748
Seconded from
Ayala Corp.
6
Total
1,365
The following table presents the number of employees by function as of the December 31, 2015:
Group
Management
Non-Management
Total
118
7
54
16
11
493
22
4
13
4
5
0
1
0
0
90
0
0
0
0
123
7
55
16
11
583
22
4
13
4
28
2
200
122
60
44
0
99
0
0
0
2
299
122
60
44
1170
195
1365
Before privatization, the MWSS had 8.4 employees per 1,000 service connections. Manila Water
Company has improved this ratio to 1.5 employees per 1,000 service connections as of December
31, 2015. This was accomplished through improvements in productivity achieved through,
among other initiatives, value enhancement programs, improvements in work processes,
employee coaching and mentoring, transformation of employees into knowledge workers, and
various training programs. Manila Waters organizational structure has been streamlined, and has
empowered employees through decentralized teams with responsibility for managing territories.
In addition, the Company formed multi-functional working teams which are composed of
members of the management team tasked with addressing corporate issues such as quality and
risk, and crisis management.
As of December 31, 2015, 188 or 14 percent of the employees of the company are members of
the Manila Water Employees Union (MWEU). In 2013, the company and the MWEU concluded
negotiations on a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA). MWEU has the option under the
law to renegotiate the non-representation provisions of the CBA by the third quarter of 2016. The
company believes that its management maintains a strong partnership with union officials and
members as it has not had any strikes since its inception. Grievances are handled in managementled labor councils. The CBA also provides for a mechanism for the settlement of grievances.
The Company has a two-pronged strategy in talent development strengthening leadership
capabilities, and building and strengthening technical expertise to maintain its leadership in the
water industry and contribute to national development. Programs were implemented in
partnership with the line managers with the aim of ensuring an agile, enabled, mobile and highly
engaged workforce that will support the corporate growth strategy.
On the leadership front, several initiatives were undertaken to ensure a strategic, well-rounded
approach to leadership development:
Succession Management: Manila Water has expanded its talent pool to strengthen the senior
management leadership pool of Manila Water. Talents receive deliberate development
interventions individual development planning, stretched assignments, executive coaching,
and mentorship to accelerate their development. Talent reviews have also been conducted
with the line managers to identify and develop talents to assume current and emerging roles.
Another key initiative was the integration of Manila Waters talent and succession
management process with the New Business Operations (i.e. Laguna Water, Clark Water and
Boracay Water). This exercise aims to strengthen the talent bench in the subsidiaries, so that
they may become a potential talent source for the Group.
29
Complementing leadership development, the same level of focus is given to technical roles where
talents occupying highly technical positions are likewise given technical development through the
Manila Water Universitys Center for Technical Excellence. It aims to ensure that the Company
strengthens the technical competencies of its talents in its fields of operations.
The Company ensures that its reward system is market competitive, performance-based, aligned
with business strategies and results, and within regulatory parameters. In 2005, the Company
extended an equal cash incentive to each employee covered by the reward system. In succeeding
years, the Company further improved the system by taking care of the gaps in the distribution
system and aligning the reward system with the yearend goals of the Company, which are
anchored on the KPI/ BEM targets. In 2013, the Company updated its guaranteed pay structure to
ensure alignment with industry practices. Also in 2013, the company enhanced its variable pay
program to increase the alignment of bonus scheme with business results. The Company
continues to monitor pay competitiveness and reward talents according to their achievements and
contributions to the business objectives.
In 2014, the Company implemented the Talent Mobility Program which is a talent management
and reward platform that allows the seamless transition of talents from one Manila Water
business to another. The program ensures a reasonable, engaging, and competitive secondment
process to Manila Water businesses covering pre-deployment, actual deployment, and repatriation
benefits and support for secondees.
Pursuant to the concession agreement (CA), the Company adopted the Employee Stock Option
Plan (ESOP). The ESOP was instituted to allow employees to participate directly in the growth of
the company and enhance the employees commitment toward its long-term profitability. In 2005,
the company adopted an Employee Stock Ownership Plan as part of its incentives and rewards
system.
Also in 2005, the company's Board of Directors approved the establishment of an enhanced
retirement and welfare plan. The plan is being administered by a Retirement and Welfare Plan
Committee, which also has the authority to make decisions on the investment parameters to be
used by the trustee bank.
Over and above these benefit and reward schemes, the Company gives recognition for employees
who best exemplify the Companys culture of excellence through the Chairmans Circle (C2)
Awards for senior managers, the Presidents Pride due to Performance (P3) honors for middle
managers and the Huwarang Manggagawa (Model Employee) Awards for the rank-and-file
employees. Eight (8) of the Companys model employee awardees have also been awarded The
Outstanding Workers of the Republic (TOWER) Award by the Rotary Club of Manila from 1999
to 2009, by far the most number of awards won by any single company over that period.
30
The exemplary performance of its employees have earned for Manila Water several awards and
recognitions. Over the past seventeen years, the Company has been the recipient of numerous
awards that include the following: the Global Grand Prize in the 2010 International Water
Association Project Innovation Awards for the Companys creative approaches in reducing
systems losses to benefit its customers; the Water Efficiency Project of the Year from Global
Water Intelligence and Water Desalination Report for the Manila Water NRW Strategy that
reduced systems losses significantly and improved customer satisfaction; the Honour Award in
the 2010 International Water Association Project Innovation Awards for the Olandes Sewage
Treatment Plant project; 1st Philippine Stock Exchange Bell Awards for Corporate Governance;
Platinum Plus award from the Institute of Corporate Directors; the four Best-Managed Company
Awards from Asiamoney Magazine; the seven corporate governance awards from Corporate
Governance Asia; the Best-Managed Mid-Cap Company Award from Finance Asia Magazine;
twenty Anvil awards from the Public Relations Society of the Philippines from 2004 to 2012;
twelve Quill Awards from the International Association of Business Communicators Philippines
from 2006 to 2012; the Distinction Award for the Water Deal of the Year from Global Water
Intelligence; the Asia Water Management Excellence Award-Industry Category; the Intel-Asian
Institute of Management Corporate Responsibility Award in 2009; the Most Integrated into the
Core Business Award from the Management Association of the Philippines and League of
Corporate Foundations; and the 2002 Model Company Award and 2010 Hall of Fame Award
from the Department of Trade and Industry, which singled out the companys consistency and
passion in pursuing programs on labor and management cooperation, quality and productivity
improvement, and family welfare and community relations.
A landmark recognition was earned by Company when it was cited the 2006 Employer of the
Year by the People Management Association of the Philippines. Another prestigious award
earned by the Company was the Asian Human Capital Award given by the Singaporean
government in 2012. The 2006 Employer of the Year honors were bestowed upon Manila Water
for providing a remarkable example of how a group of much-maligned government workers was
transformed into a thoroughly efficient organization that is now a leader in its industry. The Asian
Human Capital Award, is one of the biggest recognition earned by the Company as an employer
and is an award that is so difficult to obtain due the stringent standards of its giver, the
Singaporean Ministry of Manpower. However, the comprehensive selection process did not
prevent Manila Water from becoming the first-ever Filipino company to capture the elite honors
when the Singaporean government deemed the Company worthy of the award for harnessing its
people in transforming from a languishing water service provider into a world-class water and
used water company, citing not only its accomplishments but also the way it turned around its
business using its human resource.
In 2014, the Company bagged the following awards and recognitions: One of 20 Global Growth
Companies (GGC) in East Asia World Economic Forum (May 2014); No. 2 in the 2014
Sustainability Ranking Channel NewsAsia (November 2014); Asias Icon on Corporate
Governance CorporateGovernance Asia (November 2014); 1st in Innovation in Water,
Wastewater and Stormwater Network Modelling and Analysis for the Marikina North STP
Project - Bentley Systems, Inc.s Be Inspired Awards (November 2014); PSE Bell Award for
Corporate Governance, Hall of Fame Philippine Stock Exchange (November 2014); Asia
Geospatial Excellence Award Asia Geospatial Forum (November 2014); Philippine Esri Best
Overall Map Award for The Business Risk Exposure Assessment of Manila Water Network
Asset Project Map Philippine Esri User Conference and 2nd Philippine Esri Education GIS
Conference (September 2014); First Don Emilio Abello Energy Efficiency Award for the San
Juan Pumping Station Department of Energy (October 2014); IABC Quill Awards, Awards of
31
Excellence and Awards of Merit for various business communication programs International
Association of Business Communicators (IABC) Philippines (2014).
In April 2014, the Laguna Lake Development Authority cited the following employees as
Outstanding Pollution Control Officers Blue Ratee for the 7 Sewage Treatment Plants of Manila
Water: Sharon B. Cerbito - North Septage Treatment Plant (San Mateo); Jimaima M. Hoque Sikatuna STP; Jocelyn M. General (PCO), Johannes Paulus O. Costales (Plant Manager) Fisheries STP; John Von Wernher C. Dela Cruz - Pagasa STP, Heroes Hill STP; Ninya Kristina
L. Cabico - Belarmino Stp, Palosapis STP; and Jeremaine V. Esguerra - East Ave STP. In August
2014, the Department of Health also gave the Typhoon Yolanda Unsung Heroes Plaque of
Recognition for Manila Waters Mobile Treatment Plant Operations.
In 2014, Manila Water was given the ISO 50001 Certification for Energy Management System
(April 2014). Manila Water was the first Philippine company to receive this certification. As of
2015, Manila Water has the following ISO Certifications: ISO 50001: 2011 Energy Management
System (ENMS) for five (5) water supply and five (5) used water facilities; ISO 9001:2008
Quality Management System, ISO 14001:2004 Environmental Management System, and OHSAS
18001:2007 Occupational Health and Safety Management System (QEHSMS) for nine (9) water
supply and six (6) used water facilities, and two (2) support departments (Laboratory and
Maintenance Services); and ISO/IEC 17025:2005 for the Companys Laboratory Management
System.
In 2015, the awards and recognitions received by the Company include the following: Awards
and Citations for Corporate Governance and Management (2015 One of ASEAN Top 50
Publicly Listed Companies, ASEAN Corporate Governance Conference and Awards; 2015 9th
ING-FINEX CFO of the Year for Mr. Luis Juan B. Oreta); Awards and Citations for
Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (2015 Change the World List (Ranked No.
29 out of 51), Fortune; 2015 One of Top Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Advocates in
Asia, Asia Corporate Excellence and Sustainability (ACES) Awards; 2015 Winner, Sustainability
Strategy and Resource Efficiency Category, ASEAN Corporate Sustainability Summit and
Awards (ACSSA); 2015 Runner-up, Supply Chain Sustainability Category, ASEAN Corporate
Sustainability Summit and Awards (ACSSA)); Awards and Citations for Operations and
Technical Management (2015 Asia Geospatial Excellence Award for the Critical Activity
Review and Geographic Information System (GIS) Integration, Asia Geospatial Forum; 2015
Special Award for Performance in Energy Efficiency and Conservation for Siruna Pumping
Station, Don Emilio Abello Energy Efficiency Awards, Department of Energy; 2015 Award of
Recognition for ASEAN Energy Awards Competition for Balara Pumping Station, Don Emilio
Abello Energy Efficiency Awards, Department of Energy; 2015 Outstanding Award for
Performance in Energy Efficiency and Conservation for San Juan Pumping Station, Don Emilio
Abello Energy Efficiency Awards, Department of Energy; 2015 Outstanding Energy Manager
Award (Mr. Rolando Mosqueda, San Juan Pumping Station), Don Emilio Abello Energy
Efficiency Awards, Department of Energy; 2015 Special Award for Performance in Energy
Efficiency and Conservation for Kingsville Pumping Station), Don Emilio Abello Energy
Efficiency Awards, Department of Energy); Awards and Citations for Communications (2015
Gold Anvil Award and Silver Anvil Awards, 50th Anvil Awards, Public Relations Society of the
Philippines (PRSP); 2015 Awards of Excellence and Awards of Merit, Quill Awards,
International Association of Business Communicators (IABC) Philippines); Others
(Subsidiaries) (2015 Case Study Category Winner of the Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) Short
Stories Competition for Laguna Waters Alternative PPP Model: The Laguna Water Story, World
Bank Group and the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF)).
32
2015
Receivables
2014
Advances to contractors
2015
2014
Trade payables
2015
2014
P
=
P
=
P
= 11,111
P
= 39,156
P
=
P
=
P
=
P
=
77,209
4,930,789
207,400
242,671,961
243,325,649
2,346,595,838 1,998,160,172
2,346,595,838 1,998,160,172
P
= 2,346,595,838 P
= 1,998,160,172
77,209
P
= 88,320
24,293
4,955,082
P
= 4,994,238
P
=
207,400
P
= 207,400
242,671,961
P
= 242,671,961
243,325,649
P
= 243,325,649
Cash in banks and cash equivalents pertain to deposits and investments with original maturities of
3 months or less from the date of original acquisition.
33
Receivables are primarily composed of trade receivables for water and sewerage services
rendered by the Group. These are non-interest bearing and are collectible within 30 days from
bill generation. No allowance for doubtful accounts was provided for receivables from related
parties as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.
Advances to contractors included as part of Other current assets pertains to down payments
related to construction of fixed assets. These are normally applied within a year against progress
billings.
Trade payables pertain to retentions deducted from contractors billings and are normally paid
within a year after project acceptance.
Revenue
2015
Shareholder:
Ayala
Affiliates:
Ayala Land and Subsidiaries
BPI and Subsidiaries
Globe and Subsidiaries
Integrated Microelectronics,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
AAHC
2014
Purchases
2015
2014
P
= 7,288,972
P
= 7,177,859
P
= 218,310,790
P
= 198,979,421
116,965,856
9,913,438
3,131,483
137,380,568
9,739,496
2,933,077
1,428,393
9,127,597
1,792,850
10,015,352
8,466,732
481,838
138,959,347
P
= 344,592,861
4,077,818
403,824
154,534,783
P
= 158,473,726
641,470
11,197,460
P
= 229,508,250
11,808,202
P
= 210,787,623
Revenue is mainly attributable to water and sewerage services rendered by the Group to its
shareholder and affiliates. Purchases from Ayala Land and subsidiaries mainly pertain to
construction of fixed assets while purchases from AAHC relates to acquisition and repairs of
transportation equipment. Purchases from Globe pertain to telecommunication services and
purchases from BPI relate to banking transactions and financial services to the Group.
c. On June 1, 2010, MWAP and Speedy-Tech Electronics Ltd. (Speedy-Tech), a subsidiary of
Integrated Microelectronics, Inc., entered into a Tenancy Agreement wherein Speedy-Tech will
lease office space to MWAP. On May 31, 2015, the Tenancy Agreement with Speedy-Tech was
terminated. Total rent expense paid by MWAP to Speedy-Tech amounted to Php0.64 million and
Php0.47 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively.
d. On April 9, 2002, Laguna Water entered into a concession agreement (as amended on March 31,
2004) with PGL, one of its shareholders. Concession fees paid to PGL amounted to Php22.70
million and Php15.06 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively (see Notes 1 and 28).
e. One of the trustee banks which manages the Groups retirement fund is BPI, an affiliate. The
Groups plan assets under BPI amounted to Php576.84 million and Php587.42 million as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
f.
On November 3, 2015, MWSAH completed the execution of a Capital Transfer Agreement with
Saigon Water for the acquisition of 24.5% of the charter capital of Cu Chi Water Supply
Sewerage Company Ltd., a company incorporated in Vietnam, in the total amount of VND154.35
billion or equivalent to Php330.10 million.
34
g. Compensation of key management personnel of the Group by benefit type, included as part of
Salaries, wages and employee benefits, are as follows:
Short-term employee benefits
Post-employment benefits
Share-based payment
2015
P
= 397,804,200
23,832,969
50,584,861
P
= 472,222,030
2014
P
= 283,797,080
18,971,484
30,227,909
P
= 332,996,473
Risks Disclosure
2015 Top Corporate Risks
Rate Rebasing
Failure to manage the results of
the arbitral award
Mitigation Strategies
Review and analysis of approved business plan versus actual
accomplishment is done to ensure compliance to the arbitral
award. In addition, improvements in various processes and
systems have been implemented.
35
In order to achieve its corporate objectives, Manila Water acknowledges the need for the active
management of the risks inherent in its business which should involve the entire organization. For
this reason, Manila Water has established an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Program which
aims to use a globally accepted approach in managing imminent and emerging risks in its internal
and external operating environments. Under the ERM Program, Manila Water shall appropriately
respond to risks and manage them in order to increase shareholder value and enhance its
competitive advantage.
Manila Water, through its Enterprise Risk and Insurance Management Department (ERIM
Department), seeks to integrate risk awareness and responsibility at each level of management
activities, and into all strategic planning and decision-making processes within Manila Water and
its subsidiaries to support achievement of strategies and objectives.
In its report to the Board of Directors, the Risk Committee of the Board confirmed that:
The Risk Committee discussed with Management the adequacy and effectiveness of the
Enterprise Risk Management process, including significant risk exposures, the related riskmitigation efforts and initiatives, and the status of the mitigation plans. The review was
undertaken in the context that Management is primarily responsible for the risk management
process.
The Risk Committee has reviewed the Enterprise Risk Management Process and is satisfied
that sufficient risk management systems are in place in Manila Water.
The Committee noted the 2016 plans and initiatives of the Enterprise Risk and Insurance
Management (ERIM) Department to create a robust risk awareness and management culture and
to promote good risk management practices achieving appropriate risk and reward in Manila
Waters business.
In its report to the Board of Directors, the Audit and Governance Committee confirmed that:
The Committee discussed and approved the overall scope and the respective audit plans of
the Companys internal auditors and of SGV & Co., the results of their audits and their
assessment of the Companys internal controls, and the overall quality of the financial reporting
process.
The Committee discussed the reports of the internal auditors, and ensured that Management is
taking appropriate actions in a timely manner, including addressing internal control and
compliance issues. All the activities performed by Internal Audit were conducted in conformance
with the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.
The Audit and Governance Committee, through the audits conducted by SGV & Company
and Internal Audit, has reviewed Managements system of internal controls and the Committee
found the internal control system to be adequate and effective.
The Committee discussed with Management the adequacy and effectiveness of the Enterprise
Risk Management process, including significant risk exposures, the related risk-mitigation efforts
and initiatives, and the status of the mitigation plans. The review was undertaken in the context
that Management is primarily responsible for the risk management process.
36
Government Regulations
The Company has to comply with environmental laws and regulations which include:
Water
Air
Republic Act No. 9275 or the Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004
DENR Administrative Order No. 10, Series of 2005 (Implementing Rules and
Regulations of R.A. No. 9275)
DENR Administrative Order No. 35, Series of 1990 (General Effluent Standards)
DENR Administrative Order No. 39, Series of 2003 (Environmental Users Fees)
Republic Act No. 8749 or the Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999
DENR Administrative Order No. 81, Series of 2000 (Implementing Rules and
Regulations of R.A. 8749)
Solid Waste
Republic Act No. 9003 or the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000
DENR Administrative Order No. 34, Series of 2001 (Implementing Rules and
Regulations of R.A. No. 9003)
Others
Republic Act No. 4850 or the Act Creating the Laguna Lake Development Authority
(LLDA)
Relevant LLDA Board Resolutions and Memorandum Circulars, including but not
limited to Resolution No. 25, Series of 1996 (Environmental User Fee System in the
37
Laguna de Bay Region) and Resolution No. 33, Series of 1996 (Approving the Rules
and Regulations Implementing the Environmental User Fee System in the Laguna de
Bay Region)
Presidential Decree No. 856 or the Philippine Sanitation Code
Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Philippine Sanitation Code
Other Matters
The Company has not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceeding as of
December 31, 2015. Further, except as discussed above, the Company has not been involved in
any material reclassification, consolidation or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets
not in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not engaged in sales to foreign markets.
The Company is not dependent on a single customer or a few customers, the loss of any or more
of which would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Item 2. Properties
The Concession Agreement grants the Company the right to operate, maintain in good working
order, repair, decommission, and refurbish the MWSS facilities in the East Zone, which include
treatment plants, pumping stations, aqueducts and the business area office. However, legal title to
these facilities remains with MWSS. The net book value of these facilities on Commencement
Date based on MWSS closing audit report amounted to Php4.6 billion, with a sound value, or the
appraised value less observed depreciation, of Php10.40 billion. These assets are not reflected in
the financial statements of the Company.
Pursuant to the terms of the Concession Agreement, new assets contributed to the MWSS system
by the Company during the term of the Concession Agreement are reflected in the Companys
financial statements and remain with the Company until the Expiration Date (as defined in the
Concession Agreement), at which time all right, title and interest in such assets automatically vest
to MWSS. The Concession Agreement allows the Company to mortgage or create security
interests over its assets solely for the purpose of financing, or refinancing, the acquisition or
construction of the said assets, provided that no such mortgage or security interest shall (i) extend
beyond the Expiration Date of the Concession Agreement, and (ii) be subject to foreclosure
except following an event of termination as defined under the Concession Agreement.
On July 17, 2008, the Parent Company, together with all of its Lenders signed an Omnibus
Amendment Agreement and Intercreditor Agreement and these agreements became effective on
September 30, 2008.
Prior to the execution of the Omnibus Amendment Agreement, the obligations of the Company to
pay amounts due and owing or committed to be repaid to the lenders under the existing facility
agreements were secured by Assignments of Interests by Way of Security executed by the Parent
Company in favor of a trustee acting on behalf of the lenders. The Assignments were also subject
to the provisions of the Amended and Restated Intercreditor Agreement dated March 1, 2004 and
its Amendatory Agreement dated December 15, 2005 executed by the Company, the lenders and
their appointed trustee.
Under the Omnibus Amendment Agreement, the lenders effectively released the Company from
the assignment of its present and future fixed assets, receivables and present and future bank
38
accounts, all the Project Documents (except for the Agreement, Technical Corrections Agreement
and the Department of Finance Undertaking Letter), all insurance policies where the Company is
the beneficiary and performance bonds posted in its favor by contractors or suppliers.
In consideration for the release of the assignment of the above-mentioned assets, the Company
agreed not to create, assume, incur, permit or suffer to exist, any mortgage, lien, pledge, security
interest, charge, encumbrance or other preferential arrangement of any kind, upon or with respect
to any of its properties or assets, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, or upon or with
respect to any right to receive income, subject only to some legal exceptions. The lenders shall
continue to enjoy their rights and privileges as Concessionaire Lenders (as defined under the
Agreement), which include the right to appoint a qualified replacement operator and the right to
receive payments and/or other consideration pursuant to the Agreement in case of a default of
either the Company or MWSS. Currently, all lenders of the Company are considered
Concessionaire Lenders and are on pari passu status with one another.
The Companys corporate head office located in Balara, Quezon City and a stockyard located in
San Juan is leased from MWSS and is subject to yearly renewal. In 2015 and 2014, rent expense
of the Company to MWSS amounted to Php188.90 million and Php16.91 million, respectively.
In 2015, this included a one-time payment of additional fees to MWSS amounting to Php154.25
million for the use of the stockyard.
39
The PCA and the Republic confirmed the receipt of the Notice of Arbitration on December 14,
2015 and December 11, 2015, respectively. Copy of the Republics acknowledgement was
received by Manila Water on January 18, 2016.
On March 21, 2016, Manila Water nominated its arbitrator while the Republic is yet to nominate
its arbitrator. The Chairman of the panel will thereafter be chosen by the nominees of the parties.
40
Manila Water Company, Inc. and Maynilad Water Services, Inc. vs. Hon. Borbe, et al.
CBAA Case No. L-69
Central Board of Assessment Appeals (Central Board)
This is an appeal from the denial by the Local Board of Assessment Appeals of Bulacan Province
(the Local Board) of the Companys (and Maynilad Water Services, Inc.s [Maynilad]) appeal
from the Notice of Assessment and Notice of Demand for Payment of Real Property Tax in the
amount of Php357,110,945 made by the Municipal Assessor of Norzagaray, Bulacan. The
Company is being assessed for half of the amount. In a letter dated April 3, 2008, the Municipal
Treasurer of Norzagaray and the Provincial Treasurer of the Province of Bulacan, informed both
MWSS concessionaires (the Company and Maynilad) that their total real property tax
accountabilities have reached Php648,777,944.60 as of December 31, 2007. This amount, if paid
by the concessionaires, will ultimately be charged to the customers as part of the water tariff rate.
The concessionaires (and the MWSS, which intervened as a party in the case) are thus contesting
the legality of the tax on a number of grounds, including the fact that the properties subject of the
assessment, are owned by the MWSS. MWSS is both a government-owned and controlled
corporation and an instrumentality of the National Government that is exempt from taxation
under the Local Government Code.
The Central Board conducted a hearing on June 25, 2009. In the said hearing, parties were given
the opportunity and time to exchange pleadings regarding a motion for reconsideration filed by
the Municipality to have the case remanded to and heard by the Local Board rather than by the
Central Board.
Manila Water and Maynilad have concluded presentation of their respective evidence and
witnesses, while MWSS has waived the presentation of its evidence.
41
On 12, 2015, the newly-constituted members of the Central Boards Panel conducted an ocular
inspection of the subject property. On September 17, 2015, the Province of Bulacan presented its
first witness, Ms. Gloria P. Sta. Maria, the former Municipal Assessor of Norzagaray, Bulacan.
The Company, Maynilad and MWSS have completed their cross-examination of Ms. Sta. Maria.
The Province of Bulacan is scheduled to present its second witness (Marty Marcelo) on April 7,
2016. The hearing scheduled on January 28, 2016 was cancelled as Mr. Marcelo was not
available.
Manila Water Company, Inc. vs. The Regional Director, Environmental Management BureauNational Capital Region, et al.
CA-G.R. No. 112023 (DENR-PAB Case No. NCR-00794-09)
Supreme Court
This case arose from a complaint filed by OIC Regional Director Roberto D. Sheen of the
Environmental Management Bureau-National Capital Region (EMB-NCR) before the Pollution
Adjudication Board (PAB) against the Company, Maynilad and the MWSS for alleged
violation of R.A. No. 9275 (Philippine Water Act of 2004), particularly the five-year deadline
imposed in Section 8 thereof for connecting the existing sewage line found in all subdivisions,
condominiums, commercial centers, hotels, sports and recreational facilities, hospitals, market
places, public buildings, industrial complex and other similar establishments including
households, to an available sewerage system. Two (2) similar complaints against Maynilad and
MWSS were consolidated with this case.
On April 22, 2009, the PAB through DENR Secretary and Chair Jose L. Atienza, Jr., issued a
Notice of Violation finding that the Company, Maynilad and MWSS have committed the
aforesaid violation of R.A. 9275. Subsequently, a Technical Conference was scheduled on May 5,
2009. In the said Technical Conference, the Company, MWSS and Maynilad explained to the
PAB their respective positions and it was established that DENR has a great role to play to
compel people to connect to existing sewer lines and those that are yet to be established by the
Company and Maynilad.
In addition to the explanations made by the Company during the Technical Conference, the
Company together with MWSS and Maynilad wrote a letter dated May 25, 2009 and addressed to
the respondent Secretary where they outlined their position on the matter.
In response to the May 25, 2009 letter, the OIC, Regional Director for NCR, the Regional
Director of Region IV-A and the Regional Director of EMB Region III submitted their respective
Comments. The Company thereafter submitted its letter dated July 13, 2009 to the PAB where it
detailed its compliance with the provisions of R.A. No. 9275 and reiterated its position that the
continuing compliance should be within the context of the Companys Concession Agreement
with MWSS. Despite the explanations of the Company, the PAB issued the Order dated October
7, 2009 which found the Company, Maynilad and MWSS to have violated R.A. 9275. The
Company filed its Motion for Reconsideration dated October 22, 2009 which the PAB denied in
an Order dated December 2, 2009. Hence, the Company filed its Petition for Review dated
December 21, 2009 with the Court of Appeals. The Company thereafter filed an amended Petition
for Review dated January 25, 2010.
42
In a Decision dated August 14, 2012, the Court of Appeals denied the Companys Petition for
Review and on September 26, 2012, the Company filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the
Court of Appeals Decision.
On April 29, 2013, the Company received the Resolution dated April 11, 2013 of the Court of
Appeals, denying its Motion for Reconsideration.
The Company has filed its appeal from the decision and resolution of the Court of Appeals in the
form of a Petition for Review on Certiorari with the Supreme Court on May 29, 2013. In this
Petition, the Company reinforced its argument that it did not violate Section 8 of R.A. 9275 as it
was able to connect existing sewage lines to available sewage facilities contrary to the findings of
the Court of Appeals.
The case remains pending with the Supreme Court and is now submitted for decision. Based on
records, the last pleadings filed by the Company were the Motion for Leave to File and Admit
Reply and Reply [To Respondents Comment dated 06 December 2013] which refutes the claim
of the respondents in their Comment dated December 6, 2013.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
The Concession Agreements are unconstitutional for granting inherent sovereign powers
to the Concessionaires who insists they are private entities and mere agents of the
MWSS;
The Concessionaires are public utilities;
The Concession system of MWSS, the Company and Maynilad is in a state of regulatory
capture;
The Concession Agreements are State Contracts and cannot invoke the non-impairment
clause in the Constitution;
The Concessionaires have no vested property rights;
MWSS is in a state of regulatory capture;
43
b.
c.
d.
e.
The Concession Agreements are unconstitutional and/or ultra vires for being delegations
of sovereign power without consent of the Congress;
The Concessionaires are public utilities;
Respondents have improperly implemented RORB calculations for purposes of
establishing tariffs;
The Concession Agreements are not protected by the non-impairment clause;
Respondents should be enjoined from proceeding with arbitration;
MWSS is in a state of regulatory capture;
On February 4, 2014, the Company received a copy of the Supreme Courts resolution dated
January 14, 2014 consolidating the three (3) cases. The Company filed a consolidated Comment
on the aforesaid Petitions. The arguments raised by Manila Water in response to the Petitions are
as follows:
a.
b.
c.
The Concession Agreements are valid, legal and constitutional as these have statutory
basis and do not involve any grant or delegation of the inherent sovereign powers of
police power, eminent domain and taxation.
The Concessionaires are not public utilities in themselves but are mere agents and
contractors of a public utility (MWSS).
The Concession Agreements are protected by the non-impairment clause. Petitioners
cannot invoke police power for courts to nullify, modify, alter or supplant the Concession
Agreements. Police power is exercised by Congress, through the enactment of laws for
the general welfare. No such law or enactment is involved in this case. If and when
Congress passes a law affecting the Concession Agreements, only then will it be proper
44
d.
e.
f.
to examine the interplay between police power vis--vis due process and the nonimpairment clause.
The rates set under the Concession Agreements are compliant with the 12% rate of return
cap in the MWSS Charter.
Not being public utilities but mere agents of the MWSS, the Concessionaires are not
subject to COA audit.
The Concessionaires are authorized to pass on corporate income taxes to water
consumers.
45
Comment/Opposition (Re: Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition [with Application for the
Issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Writ of Preliminary Injunction] dated 06
August 2015). On November 13, 2015, the MWSS and MWSS-Regulatory Office filed their
Comment. On November 28, 2015, Maynilad filed its Comment with Opposition (To the
Application for the Issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Writ of Preliminary
Injunction).
These consolidated cases are still pending with the Supreme Court.
46
On August 13, 2015, the Company and Mr. Ablaza received a copy of the Resolution of the
NLRC denying the Motion for Reconsideration.
On September 7, 2015, the Company and Mr. Ablaza filed a Petition for Certiorari (with
Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Writ of Preliminary Prohibitory
Injunction) with the Court of Appeals assailing the NLRC Decision and Resolution.
On October 7, 2015, the Company and Mr. Ablaza received the Notice of Resolution and
Resolution of the Court of Appeals dated September 22, 2015 denying the Company and Mr.
Ablazas prayer for the issuance of an injunctive writ. The Company and Mr. Ablaza filed a
Motion for Reconsideration on the denial of the issuance of the injunctive relief raising the
following arguments: (a) the Companys management prerogative to streamline its redundant
manpower complement to achieve operational efficiency exists prima facie; (b) the execution of
the assailed resolution and assailed decision would violate the Companys exercise of
management prerogative; and (c) the Company would suffer grave and irreparable injury if the
assailed decision and the assailed resolution are enforced.
On October 13, 2015, the Company and Mr. Ablaza received a copy of private respondents
Comment dated October 8, 2015. On October 28, 2015, the Company and Mr. Ablaza filed its
Reply to Private Respondents Comment. In addition, the Company and Mr. Ablaza filed its
Supplemental Reply on December 7, 2015.
Meanwhile, on January 8, 2016, the Company and Mr. Ablaza received an Entry of Judgment
from the Sixth Division of the NLRC dated December 22, 2015. It states that the decision dated
April 29, 2015 has become final and executory on October 12, 2015.
On January 21, 2016, the Company and Mr. Ablaza received a Notice of Resolution accompanied
by the Resolution dated January 11, 2016 wherein the Court of Appeals ruled as follows: (a)
denies the Company and Mr. Ablazas Motion for Reconsideration (Re: Denial of the Application
for the Injunctive Writ); (b) notes the respondents Comment (On Petitioners Motion for
Reconsideration Re: Injunctive Writ); and (c) notes the Company and Mr. Ablazas Supplemental
Reply (To Private Respondents Comment to the Petition) and Rejoinder (To Private
Respondents Comment to the Motion for Reconsideration).
The main case is still pending resolution.
47
48
The presiding judge stated that the proceedings for a petition for mandamus are summary in
nature. Thus, he directed the parties to simultaneously submit their respective Memoranda within
sixty days, or by May 5, 2015. He directed the parties to address all legal issues and if there are
factual issues, to attach judicial affidavits of witnesses. Upon submission of the Memoranda, he
will determine if a party would be allowed to cross-examine the others witnesses or if he would
still conduct oral arguments.
The parties subsequently filed their respective Memoranda.
In an Order dated September 14, 2015, the parties were directed to manifest whether they would
be submitting the case on the basis of their respective Memoranda or if they would request for a
trial on the merits. At the October 12, 2015 hearing before the clerk of court, the Company and
Mr. Ablaza, through counsel, reiterated that they would prefer if the issues on jurisdiction and
other grounds for dismissal be resolved first before deciding whether or not the case should go to
trial. The clerk of court noted this manifestation for discussion with the presiding judge.
High
32.95
27.50
25.40
25.55
Low
25.50
23.50
20.00
21.80
2014
High
25.40
27.15
30.00
29.45
Low
21.60
23.85
25.50
27.50
2013
High
40.00
41.00
33.80
28.00
Low
32.00
29.35
26.30
21.35
The price per share information as of the close of the latest practicable trading date, April 11, 2016,
is Php26.70.
49
The Company had a total of 904 certificated stockholders as of December 31, 2015. The Scripless
shareholders of the Company are counted under PCD Nominee Corporation (Filipino) and PCD
Nominee Corporation (Non-Filipino). Please refer to Exhibit 1.D for the names of the top 20
holders of common shares, the number of shares held and the percentage of total outstanding
shares held by each.
The Company has two classes of equity: common shares and PPS. As of December 31, 2015,
outstanding shares of the Company consisted of 2,053,945,884 million common shares (including
36,778,165 common shares under the stock ownership plans, the listing of which has been
approved in principle by the PSE), and 4 billion PPS.
Ayala Corporation
Ayala is the Philippines oldest business conglomerate. It is publicly listed with diversified
businesses in real estate, banking and financial services, telecommunications, utilities, electronics
and information technology, automotive, and international operations. Its subsidiaries include
market leaders in their respective fields, namely: Ayala Land, Inc., Ayalas principal real estate
subsidiary, is the premier property developer in the Philippines; the Bank of the Philippine
Islands, Ayalas principal financial services subsidiary, is the oldest and one of the largest banks
in the Philippines; and Globe Telecom, Inc., Ayalas telecommunications subsidiary, is one of the
leading telecommunications companies in the Philippines.
Dividends
Subject to the preferential dividend rights of the participating preferred shares (PPS), each
holder of a share of stock is entitled to such dividends as may be declared in accordance with the
Companys dividend policy. Under the Companys cash dividend policy, common shares shall be
entitled to annual cash dividends equivalent to 35% of the prior years net income, payable semiannually in May and October. The Companys Board may change the cash dividend policy at
any time.
50
The Companys Board is authorized to declare cash dividends. A cash dividend declaration does
not require any further approval from the stockholders. A stock dividend declaration requires the
further approval of stockholders representing not less than two-thirds (2/3) of the Companys
outstanding capital stock. The Corporation Code defines the term outstanding capital stock to
mean the total shares of stock issued, regardless of nomenclature, classification or voting rights,
except treasury shares. Such stockholders approval may be given at a general or special meeting
duly called for the purpose. Dividends may be declared only from unrestricted retained earnings.
Some of the Companys loan agreements carry covenants that restrict declaration of payments of
dividends under certain circumstances, such as in the event of default or if payment would cause
an event of default, if certain financial ratios are not met or if payment would cause them not to
be met, requiring revenues of the Company to be applied toward certain expenses prior to the
payment of dividends, and other circumstances.
Within the last two years, the Company has declared the following dividends:
Declaration Date
Amount*
(P thousands)
Payment Date
40,000
September 9, 2015
834,364
September 9, 2015
163,000
834,364
163,000
40,000
October 7, 2014
November 5, 2014
825,354
October 7, 2014
November 5, 2014
161,200
825,354
161,200
Security Sold
No. of Shares
February 1999
Common Shares
104,443,965
April 2004
April 2004
April 2004
August 2004
March 2005
RPS
RPS
RPS
Common Shares
Common Shares
310,344,828
68,965,517
120,689,655
176,400,000
550,000,000
Purchaser
ESOP
Shareholders
Ayala
BPI Capital
United Utilities
IFC
Public
Consideration
P1.00 par
P1.00 par
P1.00 par
P1.00 par
P4.75 per share
P6.50 per share
The foregoing table sets out details of the issuance of new shares from 1999 up to December 31,
2004. Under existing regulations, the original issuance, an issuance to existing shareholders, and
issuance pursuant to a private placement are exempt from the registration requirement for the sale
of securities.
51
On June 11, 2001, the SEC approved the exemption from registration of the proposed issuance of
120 million common shares to the Companys qualified employees pursuant to the ESOP under
Section 10.2 of the SRC.
For its grant of 23.6 million shares under the Executive SOP, Manila Water sought the SECs
confirmation that such issuance is exempt from the registration requirements of the SRC. In a
resolution dated March 3, 2005, the SEC granted Manila Waters application for confirmation.
On January 31, 2006, the SEC approved the registration exemption of the Companys proposed
issuance of 25 million common shares under its ESOWN Plan.
On October 12, 2006, the PSE approved the listing of additional 25 million common shares to
cover the Companys ESOWN Plan. The PSE further resolved that the remaining 1,525,000 listed
treasury shares previously allocated for the Companys Executive SOP, be re-allocated and
distributed under the Companys ESOWN Plan. The actual listing of the shares shall take effect
only upon full payment.
As of March 31, 2016, of the 26,525,000 common shares (including 1,525,000 treasury shares)
approved for listing by the PSE in its letter dated October 12, 2006 (the PSE Letter) for the
Companys ESOWN Plan (the Plan), 13,338,016 shares have been fully paid.
Item 6. Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations
Plan of Operations
The Company will employ various strategies to meet its targets by growing the business. This
will be achieved through enhancement of key accounts management, establishment of demandbased management, integrated meter management, and full deep-well conversion in the East
Zone. The growth of the East Zone has not ended. There is still about one million new customers
to be connected in the Rizal expansion area, notwithstanding the growth in the areas already
served. Billed volume is estimated to grow from 2% to 3% per annum over the remaining life of
the concession. This expansion will require execution of various capital investments for reliability
and expansion projects in both water and used water services.
Manila Water laid the foundation for a renewed and energized business in 2015. The Company
aligned its organizational structure with the strategy of transforming operating models across the
enterprise and accelerating growth. The new organization gives equal focus between platform and
new businesses, with a leadership team to support growth and diversification efforts.
To sustain growth beyond the East Zone concession, the Company restructured the organization
in 2015 and designated MWPV as the vehicle to expand the water business in the Philippines.
With focus on geographic expansion, its specific mandate is to look for new acquisitions and
partnerships while leveraging on the track record set by the new businesses in Boracay, Cebu,
Clark and Laguna. Manila Waters first venture in Mindanao is a 10-year non-revenue water
reduction project in Zamboanga City. Its second venture in Mindanao is in Tagum city for a bulk
water supply project. In the early part of 2015, MWPV also signed an agreement with Ayala Land
to provide water and used water services to all Ayala Land developments nationwide.
The Company is pushing the boundaries for its new businesses, through expansion across the
region. As such, the Company will be actively engaged in seeking new business opportunities in
52
the Philippines and in emerging countries in Asia through MWAP. At present, MWAP has
projects in Vietnam, Indonesia and Myanmar in varying degrees of market penetration. It is
geared to take advantage of opportunities in countries with similar characteristics to the
Philippines.
Manila Water is also going into vertical expansion through the development of MWTS. This is
done through the creation of innovative products and services that are not as regulated as
concession-type arrangements.
To promote transparency and ensure that these programs will be properly communicated to the
Companys shareholders, a focused investor relations program will continue to be put in place.
The Company will implement measures to widen its investor base with socially responsible
investment funds.
With these strategies complemented by a strong financial performance and a commitment to good
governance, the Company expects to sustain the growth of its shareholder value through the
coming years.
Managements Discussion & Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
The following managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) of Manila Water Company Inc.
and subsidiaries (Group) financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the Groups audited financial statements, including related notes. This report
may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The actual results
may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of
various factors, including but not limited to, economic, regulatory, socio-political, financial and
other risk factors.
Any references in this MD&A to our, us, we, MWCI or the Group shall refer to
Manila Water Company, Inc., including its subsidiaries. Any reference to Manila Water
Company, Manila Water, MWC or the Company shall refer to the parent company only.
Additional information about the Group, including recent disclosures of material events and
annual/ quarterly reports, are available at our corporate website at www.manilawater.com.
53
towns of Rizal: Angono, Antipolo, Baras, Binangonan, Cainta, Cardona, Jala-Jala, Morong,
Pililia, Rodriguez, San Mateo, Tanay, Taytay and Teresa.
Under the terms of the Concession Agreement, the Company has the right to the use of land and
operational fixed assets, and the exclusive right, as agent of MWSS, to extract and treat raw
water, distribute and sell water, and collect, transport, treat and dispose used water, including
reusable industrial effluent discharged by the sewerage system in the East Zone. The Company is
entitled to recover over the concession period its operating, capital maintenance and investment
expenditures, business taxes, and concession fee payments, and to earn a rate of return on these
expenditures for the remaining term of the concession.
Aside from the East Zone, the Group has a holding company for all its domestic operating
subsidiaries through Manila Water Philippine Ventures, Inc. (MWPV). Currently under MWPV
are Laguna AAAWater Corporation (Laguna Water), Boracay Island Water Company, Inc.
(Boracay Water), Clark Water Corporation (Clark Water), and Manila Water Consortium,
Inc. (MW Consortium). Cebu Manila Water Development (CMWD), a subsidiary of MW
Consortium that provides bulk water in the province of Cebu, commenced operations on January
5, 2015. In 2015, the Group added two new projects to its portfolio, namely the Zamboanga City
performance-based non-revenue water reduction project, and the Tagum City bulk water supply
project.
The Group also has a holding company for its international ventures through Manila Water Asia
Pacific Pte. Ltd. (MWAP). Included under MWAP are two affiliated companies in Vietnam,
namely Thu Duc Water B.O.O Corporation (Thu Duc Water) and Kenh Dong Water Supply
Joint Stock Company (Kenh Dong Water), both supplying treated water to Saigon Water
Company (SAWACO) under a take-or-pay arrangement. Also under MWAP are Saigon Water
Infrastructure Corporation (Saigon Water), a holding company listed in the Ho Chi Minh City
Stock Exchange, Cu Chi Water Supply Sewerage Company, Ltd. (Cu Chi Water) and Asia
Water Network Solutions, a company tasked to pursue non-revenue water reduction projects in
Vietnam. Meanwhile, the Companys pilot leakage reduction project in Ho Chi Minh City which
started in 2008 was completed in August 2014.
Lastly, the Group has Manila Water Total Solutions Corporation (MWTS), a wholly-owned
subsidiary that handles after-the-meter products and services. Among its products is Healthy
Family Purified Drinking Water which sells five-gallon packaged water in pilot areas in Metro
Manila.
54
291,349
357,298
(65,949)
11,560,736
2,443,987
9,116,748
(1,450,501)
7,666,247
1,836,298
5,829,949
16,860
5,813,089
291,526
46,216
245,309
109,032
156,226
(47,194)
309,910
262,716
(41,374)
304,090
159,400
144,690
%
4%
15%
100%
13%
-372%
1%
6%
-1%
-21%
3%
-2%
5%
945%
2%
Consolidated net income grew by 2% to Php5,958 million in 2015 from Php5,813 million the
previous year on the back of a 4% growth to P16,936 million in consolidated operating revenues.
The growth in revenues was driven by the continued expansion in the East Zone, with its billed
volume rising by 3%. Furthermore, the domestic operating subsidiaries and MWTS contributed
Php2,067 million in revenues, higher by 43% year-on-year.
A breakdown of the revenue drivers is shown below:
Water
Environmental charges
Sewer
Revenue from management contracts
Other operating income
Total operating revenues
The Group derived 78% of its operating revenues from the sale of water, while 17% came from
environmental and sewer charges. Other revenues, which accounted for the balance of 5%, were
from after-the-meter services, connection fees and septic sludge disposal, among others.
On the other hand, consolidated operating costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization) rose by 15% to Php5,849 million in 2015. Non-personnel costs led the growth with
an increase of 15%, primarily because of higher direct costs, materials and supplies. The biggest
55
%
3%
3%
4%
-100%
19%
4%
contributors to the increase in direct costs include the start-up expenses of the packaged water
business under MWTS, increased contractual services due to the expansion of water and used
water facilities as well as IT maintenance. Higher premises cost, due to the payment of back
rentals of the San Juan stock yard in the second quarter which resolved a long outstanding matter
with MWSS relating to turned over assets, also contributed to the increase. For salaries, wages
and employee benefits, the increase was due to the reclassification of department-related
personnel costs from capital expenditures to operating expenses, and additional manpower for the
new subsidiaries.
Below is a summary of the operating expenses incurred during the period:
Meanwhile, other income (net of expense) rose by 100% to Php583 million in 2015 from Php291
million in 2014 due to the improvement in equity share in net income of associates and the
reversal of contingent liability of a subsidiary. The two bulk water companies in Vietnam, Thu
Duc Water and Kenh Dong Water, with the addition of SII, contributed Php404 million in net
income, growing by 13% from the previous year.
The movements in operating revenues and expenses, as well as other income that increased by
100%, resulted in a consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) of Php11,670 million in 2015, growing by 1% from the previous year. EBITDA
margin, however, slightly declined to 69% from 71%.
56
%
19%
15%
-6%
25%
9%
112%
-2%
15%
Revenue
Operating expenses (including depreciation and amortization)
Operating income
Revenue from rehabilitation works
Cost of rehabilitation works
Interest income
Interest expense
Share in equity income of associates
Others
Income before income tax
Provision for tax
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive income
Actuarial gain (loss) on pension liabilities - net
Income tax effect
Cumulative translation adjustment
Total comprehensive income
(36,907)
4,926,283
16,179
285
278,620
1,517,827
(51,893)
(20,728)
285
278,620
6,392,217
4,926,283
4,926,283
1,341,567
176,260
1,517,827
(51,893)
(51,893)
6,215,957
176,260
6,392,217
63,278,437
853,139
64,131,576
10,526,958
5,723,534
71,363
16,321,855
155,055
155,055
73,960,450
5,723,534
924,502
80,608,486
34,653,561
34,653,561
6,120,466
71,912
6,192,378
43,554
43,554
40,817,581
71,912
40,889,493
4,156,950
2,331,131
(20,453)
1,789,508
269,079
33,734
5,946,458
2,600,210
13,281
Net income in 2015 was derived largely from the East Zone, accounting for 84% of the total.
Businesses outside the East Zone, which collectively grew by 46%, contributed the balance of
16% to consolidated net income.
57
461.4
301.7
50.6
89.7
19.4
976,321.0
11%
14,910,074
4,711,099
10,198,975
4,963,190
449.0
292.9
47.3
91.0
17.7
949,230
11%
14,882,023
4,428,431
10,453,592
5,148,502
12.4
8.8
3.3
-1.3
1.7
27,091
0% pts
3%
3%
7%
-1%
10%
3%
28,051
282,668
(254,617)
(185,312)
0%
6%
-2%
-4%
East Zones billed volume, reported in millions of cubic meters (mcm), increased by 3% in
2015. The number of water connections grew by 3% to 976,321 customers at the end of the
period, mostly from the expansion areas of Pasig, Marikina and Taguig. Average consumption
was maintained 43.2 cubic meters per connection while average effective tariff dropped slightly
by 1% due to implementation of the arbitral ruling reducing the basic water charge beginning
June 1, 2015.
Aside from the continued growth in residential customers, billed volume growth was also driven
by the improvement in semi-commercial accounts by 7% with the completion of new residential
buildings and the conversion of deep well users in the areas of Pasig and Marikina, as well as the
10% growth of industrial customers. Billed volume from commercial accounts saw a decline of
1% year-on-year due to the reclassification of some commercial accounts to semi-commercial.
The level of system losses, as measured by the non-revenue water (NRW) ratio, was recorded
at 11.2% at the end of 2015, which was almost the same level at the end of 2014 at 11.3%. The
maintenance of NRW at this level is a result of continuous repair works done at the distribution
lines.
Collection efficiency in 2015 was strong at 100%. Meanwhile, average accounts receivable days
was at 19 days which was the same number of days registered in the previous year.
Manila Water received on April 21, 2015 the decision of the Appeals Panel in the arbitration
proceedings between the Company and MWSS. The decision concluded a three-year rate
rebasing process that began in March 2012 with the submission of a business plan by Manila
Water to MWSS and which subsequently resulted in arbitration. The final award of the Appeals
Panel resulted in the setting of the rate rebasing adjustment for the period 2013 to 2017 at a
negative 11.05% from Manila Waters 2012 average basic water charge of P25.07 per cubic
meter. This translates to a decrease of Php2.77 per cubic meter in the basic water charge for
implementation in the following manner: (a) negative Php1.66 per cubic meter in 2015, (b)
negative Php0.55 per cubic meter in 2016, and (c) negative Php0.55 per cubic meter in 2017.
58
The negative Php1.66 per cubic meter adjustment was implemented on June 1, 2015 together with
a CPI adjustment of 4.19% on top of the basic water charge equivalent to Php1.08 per cubic
meter.
4.3
6,379
21%
4.0
6,125
17%
401,304
206,548
194,755
69,855
327,270
140,068
187,202
96,059
0.3
254.0
(4% pts)
%
8%
4%
74,034
66,480
7,553
(26,204)
Boracay Water posted a billed volume growth of 8% in 2015 to 4.3 mcm from 4.0 mcm in 2014.
The growth was driven by a 4% expansion in water service connections and 6% growth in tourist
arrivals that reached almost 1.6 million during the year. NRW, however, increased to 21% at the
end of December 2015 from 17% at the end of 2014 due to leaks in the main line and defective
meters that are due for replacement. Boracay Water spent Php399 million in capital expenditures
in 2015 mostly for the expansion of used water services, growing by 385% year-on-year.
The growth in billed volume coupled with a higher average tariff led to a 23% improvement in
total revenues to Php401 million. Boracay Water implemented a scheduled tariff adjustment as
part of the February 2013 rate rebasing resulting in an increase in average effective tariff by 16%
to Php78.25 per cubic meter. Operating expenses increased by 47% to Php207 million due to
higher direct and overhead costs, particularly higher treatment cost and maintenance cost of used
water facilities. Notwithstanding the rise in operating expenses, EBITDA still improved by 4% to
Php195 million. However, due to higher depreciation and amortization, net income dropped by
27% to Php70 million in 2015.
59
23%
47%
4%
-27%
12.8
1,978
4%
11.6
1,978
5%
1.3
1% pt
11%
0%
400,036
206,731
193,306
116,927
382,592
197,648
184,944
100,185
17,444
9,083
8,362
16,742
5%
5%
5%
17%
Clark Water posted billed volume growth of 11% to 12.8 mcm with the higher consumption of
key commercial accounts and the sale of bulk water to residential subdivisions outside the Clark
Freeport Zone in nearby Angeles City, Pampanga. The sale of bulk water outside the Zone
reduced average tariff by 6% to Php30.70 per cubic meter. Nevertheless, Clark Water continued
to be very efficient in its non-revenue water reduction efforts as the NRW level declined further
to 4% at the end 2015 from 5% at the end of 2014. Clark Water disbursed Php305 million for
capital expenditures in 2015 mostly for the expansion of the water and used water networks.
Capital expenditures in 2015 was 52% higher than the Php200 million spent in the previous year.
The increase in billed volume that was tempered by lower average tariff led to a revenue growth
of 5% from Php383 million in 2014 to P400 million in 2015. Meanwhile, operating expenses
increased by 5% to P207 million thereby resulting in a 4% growth in EBITDA to P193 million.
With lower depreciation and amortization due to the extension of the Concession Agreement, net
income of Clark Water in 2015 rose by 17% to P117 million.
36.2
107,263
11%
827,671
383,078
444,592
203,207
31.8
90,016
12%
676,883
322,976
353,908
165,160
4.4
17,247.0
1% pt
14%
19%
150,788
60,102
90,684
38,047
22%
19%
26%
23%
Billed volume of Laguna Water grew by 14% to 36.2 mcm in 2015 largely brought about by
additional service connections totaling more than 17,000 that raised billed volume in the base
business to 22.3 mcm, growing by 20% year-on-year. The balance of 13.9 mcm came from the
164 industrial customers of Laguna Technopark, Inc. (LTI), growing by 5% from the previous
year. NRW improved further by one percentage point at the end of 2015 to 11% from 12% at the
60
end of 2014 despite the higher number of water service connections due to continuing leak repair
programs. Laguna Water maintained its level of expenditures in 2015, disbursing Php760 million
during the year mostly for the development of new water sources and network expansion.
Revenues grew by 22% in 2015 to Php828 million as a result of the higher billed volume, service
connection fees and other income, more than offsetting the 3% decline in average effective tariff
to Php17.14 per cubic meter. On the other hand, operating expenses grew by 19% to Php383
million, resulting in an EBITDA growth of 26% to Php445 million. Net income of Laguna Water
reached Php203 million in 2015, growing by 23% from the previous year.
On June 30, 2015, Laguna Water signed an amendment to its Concession Agreement with the
Provincial Government of Laguna expanding the scope of its concession from the cities of Bian,
Cabuyao and Sta. Rosa to cover all cities and municipalities in the entire Province of Laguna.
The amendment likewise included the provision of used water services and the establishment of
an integrated sewage and septage system in the province.
109.9
119.7
(9.8)
-8%
312,310
105,918
206,392
97,470
331,240
101,418
229,822
116,617
(18,930)
4,500
(23,430)
(19,147)
-6%
4%
-10%
-16%
215,207
217,705
(2,498)
-1%
Thu Duc Water sold a total of 109.9 mcm in 2015, dropping by 8% from the 119.7 mcm billed
volume the previous year. The decline was due to the lower water intake of Saigon Water
Corporation (SAWACO) which was slightly over the take-or-pay contract of 300 million liters
per day (mld), at 301 mld, against the previous years average of 328 mld.
Under Vietnamese Accounting Standards (VAS), revenues declined by 6% to VND312 billion
while operating expenses likewise increased by 4% to VND106 billion due to higher direct costs
particularly power, raw materials and maintenance costs. This led to a drop of 10% in EBITDA
and a decline of 16% in net income to VND97 billion. In peso terms, the PFRS-translated income
reflected in the consolidated financial statements as equity share in net income of associates
amounted to Php215 million, equivalent to Manila Waters 49% stake in Thu Duc Water.
61
Kenh Dong Water Supply Joint Stock Company (Kenh Dong Water)
For the years ended December 31
Increase/
(Decrease)
2015
2014
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Financial Highlights (in million VND)
Revenues
Cost and expenses
EBITDA
Net income
in PFRS (in thousand Pesos)
Net income (47% contribution)
55.1
55.2
(0.1)
0%
203,981
57,776
146,205
54,860
203,018
52,120
150,898
46,619
963
5,656
(4,693)
8,241
0%
11%
-3%
18%
118,957
111,800
7,157
6%
Kenh Dong Water registered a billed volume of 55.1 mcm in 2015 which was almost the same
level posted in 2014. The billed volume, at 151 million liters per day (mld), is slightly higher than
the guaranteed minimum consumption of 150 mld under the bulk water supply take-or-pay
arrangement with SAWACO.
Under Vietnamese Accounting Standards (VAS), Kenh Dong Water posted revenues of VND204
billion and an EBITDA of VND146 billion. With lower interest expense, this led to a net income
of VND55 billion, growing by 18% year-on-year. Similar to Thu Duc Water, income from Kenh
Dong Water is translated into PFRS and is reported as equity share in net income of associates in
the consolidated financial statements. In peso terms, the PFRS-translated income of Manila
Waters 47.35% stake in Kenh Dong Water amounted to Php119 million.
BALANCE SHEET
The consolidated balance sheet as of the end of 2015 remained strong and supportive of future
expansion. Strong cash inflows attributable to the high collection efficiency during the year and
lower capital expenditure due to the delay in the approval of the East Zones business plan
brought cash and cash equivalents to Php6.8 billion. Total assets rose by 8% or Php6.0 billion to
Php80.6 billion as the Company continued to undertake additional capital investments for
headline projects. Liabilities, on the other hand, increased by 3% to Php40.9 billion.
The Company continued to be compliant with its loan covenants. Debt to equity ratio stood at
0.85x, excluding concession obligations, while net bank debt to equity registered at 0.50x.
The Company signed a seven-year JPY40 billion loan facility on September 30, 2015 with three
international banks to finance capital expenditures for 2016 and 2017. The Company has yet to
draw from the facility as of the end of 2015.
Under the Companys cash dividend policy, common shares are entitled to annual cash dividends
equivalent to 35% of the prior years net income, payable semi-annually. This translated to
dividend payments of Php0.815 per common share and P0.0815 per preferred share in 2015.
62
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
The Companys East Zone spent a total of Php4,224 million (inclusive of concession fee
payments) for capital expenditures in 2015, 2% more than the Php4,135 million spent the
previous year. The bulk of capital expenditures was spent on headline projects such as used water
expansion, network reliability and overhead projects, which accounted for 79% of the total. The
balance of 21% was accounted for by concession fees paid to MWSS. Capital expenditures in the
next two years is expected to increase with an approved business plan in place following the
conclusion of the 2013 Rate Rebasing exercise.
Meanwhile, total capital expenditures of the domestic operating subsidiaries grew by 38% to
Php1,464 million from the Php1,062 million spent in 2014. Of the total amount, Php760 million
was used by Laguna Water for its network coverage expansion, while Boracay Water and Clark
Water disbursed Php399 million and Php305 million, respectively.
63
64
65
66
67
68
Consolidated net income grew by 1% to Php5,813 million in 2014 from Php5,752 million the
previous year despite of the absence of a tariff adjustment in the East Zone. Consolidated
operating revenues rose by 3% to Php16,357 million driven largely by the continued expansion in
the East Zone, with its billed volume growing by 3.6%. The contribution from the domestic
operating subsidiaries amounting to Php1,450 million, higher by 48% year-on-year, also helped
improve the growth in revenues. This offset the decline in revenues due to the completion of the
leakage reduction project in Zone 1 of Ho Chi Minh City in 2014.
A breakdown of the revenue drivers is shown below:
BREAKDOWN OF REVENUE DRIVERS
Water
Environmental charges
Sewer
Revenue from management contracts
Others
Total operating revenues
The Group derived 78% of its operating revenues from water bills, while 17% came from
environmental and sewer charges. Other revenues, which accounted for the balance of 5%, came
from connection fees and laboratory fees, among others.
On the other hand, consolidated operating costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization) rose by 9% to P5,088 million in 2014. Non-personnel costs led the growth with an
increase of 7%, primarily because of the increase in power, light and water due to the higher
power rates, and other direct costs, materials and supplies.
Below is a summary of the operating expenses incurred during the period:
Meanwhile, other income (net of expense) declined by 22% to Php291 million in 2014 from
Php375 million the previous year, due largely to higher transaction costs incurred for a loan, that
outweighed the higher equity share in net income of associates. The two bulk water companies in
69
%
7%
2%
6%
-85%
-31%
3%
Vietnam, Thu Duc Water and Kenh Dong Water, together with Saigon Water Infrastructure,
contributed P357 million in net income, growing by 22% in 2014 from the previous year.
The movements in operating revenues and expenses, together with the decrease in other income,
resulted in consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)
of Php11,561 million in 2014, slightly dropping by 1% from the previous year. EBITDA margin
declined to 71% from 73% as the growth of expenses outpaced revenues.
Business Segments Financial and Operating Performance
Results of operations detailed as to business segment are shown below:
SEGMENT REPORTING
Revenue
Operating expenses (including depreciation and amortization)
Operating income
Revenue from rehabilitation works
Cost of rehabilitation works
Interest income
Interest expense
Share in equity income of associates
Others
Income before income tax
Provision for tax
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income (PAS 19)
Income tax effect
Unrealized gain (loss) on AFS Financial assets
Cumulative translation adjustment
Total comprehensive income
40,538
(370)
(3,301)
5,185,369
(3,310)
112
101,970
809,018
(28,798)
37,228
(258)
(3,301)
101,970
5,965,588
5,185,369
5,185,369
792,158
16,860
809,018
(28,798)
(28,798)
5,948,728
16,860
5,965,588
60,977,236
819,584
61,796,820
7,833,131
4,961,500
61,599
12,856,230
206,854
206,854
69,017,221
4,961,500
881,183
74,859,904
35,428,341
35,428,341
4,236,623
68,950
4,305,573
24,420
24,420
39,689,384
68,950
39,758,334
2,924,926
2,192,870
13,693
919,491
251,117
21,876
3,844,417
2,443,987
35,570
70
The Group is composed of the Metro Manila East Zone Concession, its operating subsidiaries and
management contracts secured outside of the service concession. The operating subsidiaries in the
Philippines include Boracay Island Water Company, Inc. (Boracay Water), Clark Water
Corporation (Clark Water) and Laguna AAAWater Corporation (Laguna Water). The Group
is also the single largest shareholder in two bulk water suppliers in Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam,
namely Thu Duc Water BOO Corporation (Thu Duc Water) and Kenh Dong Water Supply
Joint Stock Company (Kehn Dong Water). It also has a stake in the listed holding company,
Saigon Water Infrastructure Corporation (Saigon Water), and it has completed its performancebased leakage reduction contract in Zone 1 of Ho Chi Minh City. Meanwhile, the project in the
Province of Cebu started its commercial operations following the delivery of first water on
January 5, 2015.
Net income in 2014 was derived largely from the East Zone Concession, accounting for 89% of
the total. Businesses outside the East Zone contributed the balance of 11% to consolidated net
income.
East Zone Concession (East Zone)
For the years ended December 31
Increase/
(Decrease)
2014
2013
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Domestic
Semi-Commercial
Commercial
Industrial
Number of water connections
Non-revenue water
Financial Highlights (in thousand Pesos)
Revenues
Cost and expenses
EBITDA
Net income
449.0
292.9
47.3
91.0
17.7
949,230
11%
14,882,023
4,428,431
10,453,592
5,148,502
433.6
283.6
45.3
89.0
15.7
921,898
11%
14,794,066
4,123,258
10,670,808
5,102,510
15.4
9.3
2.0
2.0
2.0
27,332
0%
4%
3%
4%
2%
13%
3%
87,957
305,173
(217,216)
45,992
1%
7%
-2%
1%
East Zones billed volume, reported in millions of cubic meters (mcm), increased by 4% to 449
mcm in 2014, driven largely by the continued growth of domestic/residential customers. Aside
from this segment, all other customer classes registered improvements in billed volume. Semicommercial accounts grew by 4% with the completion of new buildings and the conversion of
deep well users in the areas of Taguig, Marikina and Rizal, while industrial accounts rose by
13%. Commercial accounts, which were on a decline the previous year, also posted a 2% growth.
The growth in billed volume outpaced the growth in water connections as the latter increased at
3% to 949,000 customers at the end of 2014, mostly from the expansion areas of Pasig, Marikina
and Rizal. Average consumption was almost flat at 43.3 cubic meters, while average effective
tariff was kept at Php31.35 per cubic meter with the absence of any tariff increase in 2014.
The level of system losses, as measured by the non-revenue water (NRW) ratio, was
maintained at 11% at the end of 2014. The NRW of the East Zone has stabilized since the
operational adjustments made in late-2012 to the water flows from the primary transmission lines
going to the expansion areas to service the demand of the existing and new customers.
71
Collection efficiency in 2014 registered at 100%, slightly lower than the 101% the previous year
following Manila Waters alignment with MWSS policy of allowing for a longer disconnection
period. Average account receivable days however improved to 19 days from 20 days in 2013. The
impact of the longer reading and billing days following the implementation in August 2012 of a
new meter reading and billing system has already normalized.
On 12 September 2013, MWSS released the final tariff determination for the East Zone after
reviewing Manila Waters submitted business plan for the 2013 Rate Rebasing exercise. MWSS
determined a negative adjustment of 29.47% from Manila Waters 2012 average basic water
charge, eliminating what the Company believes to be significant programs for building and
maintaining the water and used water systems in the East Zone.
Manila Water, on 24 September 2013, raised its objection by filing a Dispute Notice with the
International Chamber of Commerce, formally commencing the arbitration process which is a
dispute resolution mechanism outlined under the Concession Agreement. While awaiting the
outcome of the arbitration process which is ongoing to date, existing tariffs previously approved
by the MWSS have been maintained in the East Zone.
Boracay Island Water Company, Inc. (Boracay Water)
For the years ended December 31
2014
2013
Increase/
(Decrease)
4.0
6,125
16%
3.6
5,647
14%
0.4
478
2%
11%
8%
60,476
28,819
31,657
23,288
23%
26%
20%
32%
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Number of water connections
Non-revenue water
Financial Highlights (in thousand Pesos)
Revenues
Cost and expenses
EBITDA
Net income
327,266
140,139
187,127
96,058
266,790
111,320
155,470
72,770
Boracay Water posted an increase in billed volume of 11% in 2014 to 4.0 mcm from 3.6 mcm in
2013 on the back of an 8% increase in both water service connections and tourist arrivals, with
the latter totaling 1.5 million. It however faced a slight setback in NRW as this increased to 16%
in 2014 from 14% the previous year due to leaks in the main line and defective meters that are
due for replacement.
The growth in billed volume coupled with the higher average tariff led to a 23% improvement in
total revenues to Php327 million. Boracay Water implemented a scheduled tariff adjustment as
part of the February 2013 rate rebasing resulting in an increase in average effective tariff by 8%.
Meanwhile, operating expenses increased by 26% to Php140 million due to higher direct costs,
thereby leading to an EBITDA of Php187 million, with an EBITDA margin of 57%. With the
slower growth of depreciation and amortization, net income grew by 32% to P96 million.
72
11.6
1,978
5%
9.8
1,975
8%
1.8
3
-3%
18%
0%
382,592
197,049
185,543
100,195
335,612
167,483
168,129
85,627
46,980
29,566
17,414
14,568
14%
18%
10%
17%
Clark Water posted a billed volume growth of 18% to 11.6 mcm as it continued to connect new
commercial customers in its concession area. Efforts to reduce non-revenue water resulted in
significant results as the NRW level declined further to 5% in 2014 from 8% in 2013 due to the
proper management of water levels and monitoring of water pumping schedules.
The increase in billed volume, tempered by a 4% reduction in average effective tariff, led to a
revenue growth of 14% from P336 million in 2013 to P383 million in 2014. Meanwhile,
operating expenses increased by 18% to Php197 million largely due to higher direct costs,
resulting in a 10% EBITDA growth to P186 million. Net income growth of 17% to P100 million
in 2014 outpaced EBITDA growth as depreciation and amortization was lower by 4% due to the
concession extension.
Clark Water, together with Clark Development Corporation, signed in August 2014 an
amendment agreement to extend the original concession period for another 15 years up to 2040.
The extension requires an investment by Clark Water of Php5.0 billion over the life of the
concession, while the recovery will henceforth be defined by a rebasing mechanism that is similar
to the East Zone concession.
Laguna AAAWater Corporation (Laguna Water)
For the years ended December 31
Increase/
(Decrease)
2014
2013
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Number of water connections
Non-revenue water
Financial Highlights (in thousand Pesos)
Revenues
Cost and expenses
EBITDA
Net income
31.8
90,016
12%
676,883
322,976
353,908
163,949
11.4
66,433
18%
332,308
132,174
200,134
107,539
20.4
23,583
-6%
179%
35%
344,575
190,802
153,774
56,410
104%
144%
77%
52%
Billed volume of Laguna Water grew by 179% to 31.8 mcm in 2014 brought about by the
additional volume of 13.3 mcm coming from the 160 industrial customers of Laguna Technopark,
Inc. (LTI). Laguna Water officially took over at the beginning of 2014 as the exclusive water
73
provider in LTI, which is an industrial estate located within the cities of Sta. Rosa and Bian in
Laguna, following the signing of an Asset Purchase Agreement with LTI for the acquisition of the
latters water reticulation and sewerage system. Excluding LTI, additional service connections in
the base business totaling almost 24,000 also helped raise billed volume to 18.6 mcm, growing by
7.2 mcm or 63% year-on-year. The NRW ratio improved by six percentage points to end 2014 at
12% from 18% in 2013 following the continuing leak repair programs.
Revenues grew by 104% in 2014 to Php677 million as a result of the significant increase in billed
volume despite the 14% drop in average effective tariff to Php16.72 per cubic meter. On the
other hand, operating expenses grew by 144% to P323 million, resulting in an EBITDA growth of
77% to Php354 million. Net income of LAWC reached P164 million in 2014, growing by 52%
from the previous year.
Thu Duc Water B.O.O Corporation (Thu Duc Water)
For the years ended December 31
Increase/
(Decrease)
2014
2013
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Financial Highlights (in million VND)
Revenues
Cost and expenses
EBITDA
Net income
in PFRS (in thousand Pesos)
Net income (49% contribution)
-0.7
119.7
120.4
331,622
101,207
230,414
117,154
323,994
97,639
226,355
111,702
7,628
3,568
4,059
5,452
2%
4%
2%
5%
217,705
216,301
1,404
1%
Thu Duc Water sold a total of 119.7 mcm in 2014, slightly less than the 120.4 mcm billed volume
in 2013, due to the lower water intake of Saigon Water Corporation (SAWACO). Nevertheless,
the billed volume of 328 million liters per day (mld) is higher than the guaranteed minimum
consumption of 300 mld under the bulk water supply take-or-pay arrangement with SAWACO.
Under Vietnamese Accounting Standards (VAS), revenues grew by 2% to VND332 billion while
operating expenses went up by 4%, attributable to the increase in direct costs brought about by
higher power rates and cost of raw materials. It led to a 2% growth in EBITDA and 5%
improvement in net income to VND117 billion as the Company booked lower interest expenses
owing to the continued paydown of its debt. In peso terms, the PFRS-translated income reflected
in the consolidated financial statements as Equity Share in Net Income of Associates amounted to
Php218 million, equivalent to Manila Waters 49% stake in Thu Duc Water.
74
-1%
Kenh Dong Water Supply Joint Stock Company (Kehn Dong Water)
For the years ended December 31
Increase/
(Decrease)
2014
2013
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Financial Highlights (in million VND)
Revenues
Cost and expenses
EBITDA
Net income
in PFRS (in thousand Pesos)
Net income (47% contribution)
55.2
20.6
34.6
%
168%
203,018
51,580
151,438
47,103
74,509
18,795
55,714
(1,002)
128,509
32,785
95,724
48,105
172%
174%
172%
-4801%
111,800
76,653
35,147
46%
Kenh Dong Water registered a billed volume of 55.2 mcm in its first full year of operations in
2014, more than doubling the volume of 20.6 mcm posted the previous year as it started
commercial operations in July 2013. The billed volume is in line with the guaranteed minimum
consumption of 150 million liters per day (mld) under the bulk water supply take-or-pay
arrangement with SAWACO.
Under Vietnamese Accounting Standards (VAS), Kenh Dong Water posted revenues of VND203
billion and an EBITDA of VND151 billion. Together with depreciation and interest expenses of
VND103 billion, this led to a net income of VND47 billion. Similar to Thu Duc Water, income
from Kenh Dong Water is translated into PFRS using the financial asset model due to its take-orpay arrangement, and is reported as Equity in Net Earnings of Associates in the consolidated
financial statements. In peso terms, the PFRS-translated income of Manila Waters 47.35% stake
in Kenh Dong Water amounted to Php112 million.
Balance Sheet
The consolidated balance sheet remained strong and geared for expansion at the end of 2014.
Strong cash inflows attributable to the high collection efficiency during the period and the delay
in the implementation of capital expenditure projects due to the ongoing arbitration brought cash
and cash equivalents to Php6.5 billion. Total assets rose by 3% to Php74.9 billion as the
Company continued to make additional capital investments on network, water and used water
expansion projects, albeit at a slower pace. Liabilities, on the other hand, dropped by 5% to
P39.8 billion due to the payment of debt and other service concession obligations.
The Company continued to be compliant with its loan covenants. Debt to equity ratio stood at
0.92x, excluding concession obligations, while, net bank debt to equity registered at 0.56x.
The Company declared cash dividends for the first and second semesters of the year on February
20, 2014 and October 7, 2014, respectively. Under the Companys cash dividend policy,
shareholders are entitled to annual cash dividends equivalent to 35% of the prior years net
income, payable semi-annually. As such, common shareholders received Php0.8063 per common
share, while preferred shareholders got Php0.0806 per preferred share, for dividends totaling to
Php1.97 billion in 2014.
75
Capital Expenditures
The Companys East Zone spent a total of Php4,135 million (inclusive of concession fee
payments) for capital expenditures in 2014, 12% less than the P4,682 million spent the previous
year. The bulk of capital expenditures was spent on used water expansion and network reliability
projects, which accounted for 72% of the total. The balance of 28% or Php1,167 million was
accounted for by concession fees paid to MWSS. Capital expenditures in 2014 was limited to ongoing and service reliability projects in the absence of an approved business and capital
expenditure plan as part of the 2013 Rate Rebasing exercise.
Meanwhile, total capital expenditures of the domestic subsidiaries amounted to Php1,062 million
in 2014, growing by 11% from the previous year. Of the total amount, Php758 million or 71%
was used by Laguna Water for its network coverage expansion, while the balance was disbursed
by Boracay Water and Clark Water.
76
77
78
79
80
15,925,817
4,653,609
375,264
293,975
81,289
11,647,472
2,494,763
9,152,709
(1,560,575)
7,592,134
1,811,573
5,780,561
28,199
5,752,362
4,228,846
393,637
206,762
186,875
10,717,859
2,320,075
8,397,784
(1,299,439)
7,098,345
1,595,053
5,503,292
12,849
5,490,443
2013
Total operating revenues
Total cost and expenses, excluding depreciation and
amortization
Other income/(expense) - net
Equity share in net income of associates
Others
EBITDA
Depreciation and amortization
Income before other income/expenses
Interest income/(expense) - net
Income before income tax
Provision for income tax
Net income
Non-controlling interests
Net income attributable to MWC
424,763
(18,373)
87,213
(105,586)
929,613
174,688
754,925
(261,136)
493,789
216,520
277,269
15,350
261,919
%
9%
10%
-5%
42%
-57%
9%
8%
9%
20%
7%
14%
5%
119%
5%
81
Manila Water posted Php5,752 million in net income for the year 2013, 5% higher than the
Php5,490 million recorded the previous year. Consolidated operating revenues reached
Php15,926 million, or 9% higher year-on-year. The increase was driven largely by the continued
expansion in the East Zone, with the 1.5% billed volume growth and 2% improvement in average
effective tariff resulting from the CPI adjustment of 3.2% implemented at the beginning of the
year. The contribution from the domestic operating subsidiaries amounting to Php957 million,
higher by 30% year-on-year, also helped improve the growth in revenues.
A breakdown of the revenue drivers is shown below:
For the years ended December 31
Water
Environmental charges
Sewer
Revenue from management contracts
Other operating income
Total operating revenues
2013
11,995,693
2,250,483
396,664
174,939
1,108,038
15,925,817
%
4%
1%
2%
3%
319%
9%
The Group derived 75% of its operating revenues from water bills, while 17% came from
environmental and sewer charges. Other revenues, which accounted for the balance of 8%, were
from connection fees, management contracts in Vietnam, and septic sludge disposal, among
others. The Company realized income from reconciliation of service connection costs amounting
to Php609 million, helping boost other operating income.
On the other hand, consolidated operating costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization) rose by 10% to Php4,654 million in 2013. Non-personnel costs led the growth with
an increase of 19%. Overhead, in particular, rose by 30% as higher management and professional
fees were incurred during the period arising from the ongoing arbitration proceedings with
MWSS. This will be discussed in more detail in the East Zone Concession section. Higher nonpersonnel costs were however tempered by lower salaries, wages and employee benefits which
dropped by 8% as the Company continued to benefit from the manpower restructuring program
initiated in 2012.
Below is a summary of the operating expenses incurred during the period:
For the years ended December 31
2013
1,258,241
3,152,824
1,302,190
1,676,804
173,831
242,544
4,653,609
82
%
-8%
19%
9%
30%
11%
12%
10%
Meanwhile, other income (net of expense) decreased by 5% to Php375 million from Php394 million in
2012. The two bulk water companies in Vietnam, Thu Duc Water and Kenh Dong Water, contributed
Php294 million in net income, growing by 42% from the previous year.
The movements in revenues and operating expenses, together with other income that decreased by
5%, resulted in a consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) of Php11,647 million in 2013, growing by 9% from the previous year. EBITDA margin
was maintained at 73%.
BUSINESS SEGMENTS FINANCIAL AND OPERATING PERFORMANCE
Results of operations detailed as to business segment are shown below:
For the years ended December 31
Revenue
Operating expenses
Operating income
Revenue from rehabilitation works
Cost of rehabilitation works
Interest income
Interest expense
Share in equity income of associates
Others
Income before income tax
Provision for income tax
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Unrealized loss on AFS financial assets
Cumulative translation adjustment
Actuarial loss on pension liabilities - net
Total comprehensive income
East Zone
14,794,066
6,421,361
8,372,705
4,177,636
(4,177,636)
152,614
(1,671,312)
6,039
6,860,046
1,757,536
5,102,510
Operating Management
Subsidiaries
Contracts Consolidated
956,812
174,939
15,925,817
630,798
96,213
7,148,372
326,014
78,726
8,777,445
893,622
5,071,258
(893,622)
(5,071,258)
20,211
172,825
(62,088)
(1,733,400)
293,975
293,975
75,250
81,289
653,362
78,726
7,592,134
54,037
1,811,573
599,325
78,726
5,780,561
(18,568)
(66,233)
5,017,709
127,109
(1,462)
724,972
78,726
(18,568)
127,109
(67,695)
5,821,407
5,017,709
5,017,709
696,870
28,102
724,972
5,714,579
28,102
5,742,681
60,651,146
781,409
61,432,555
6,479,136
4,708,207
40,331
11,227,674
197,296
197,296
67,327,578
4,708,207
821,740
72,857,525
38,388,811
38,388,811
3,390,062
3,390,062
24,595
24,595
41,803,468
41,803,468
4,856,870
2,298,103
32,677
1,388,686
196,660
22,968
6,245,556
2,494,763
55,645
83
The Group is comprised of the Metro Manila East Zone Concession, its operating subsidiaries
and management contracts secured outside of the service concession. The operating subsidiaries
in the Philippines include Boracay Island Water Company (Boracay Water), Clark Water
Corporation (Clark Water) and Laguna AAAWater Corporation (Laguna Water). The Group
also has a leakage reduction contract and stakes in two bulk water suppliers in Ho Chi Minh City
in Vietnam, namely Thu Duc Water BOO Corporation (Thu Duc Water) and Kenh Dong Water
Supply Joint Stock Company (Kenh Dong Water). Meanwhile, contribution from the new project
in the Province of Cebu will be recognized upon completion of the transmission lines which is
expected to be in the second quarter of 2014.
Net income in 2013 was derived largely from the East Zone Concession, accounting for 88% of
the total. Businesses outside the East Zone contributed the balance of 12% to consolidated net
income.
East Zone Concession (East Zone)
For the years ended December 31
Increase/
(Decrease)
2013
2012
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Domestic
Semi-Commercial
Commercial
Industrial
Number of water connections
Non-revenue water
Financial Highlights (in thousand Pesos)
Revenues
Operating expenses
EBITDA
Net income
433.6
283.6
45.3
89.0
15.7
921,898
11.2%
14,794,066
4,123,258
10,670,808
5,102,510
427.3
278.2
43.0
92.4
13.8
896,148
12.2%
13,648,127
3,841,492
9,806,635
5,130,555
6.4
5.4
2.3
-3.3
1.9
25,750
-1.0%
1%
2%
5%
-4%
14%
3%
1,145,939
281,766
864,173
(28,045)
8%
7%
9%
-1%
East Zones billed volume, reported in millions of cubic meters (mcm), increased by nearly
1.5% in 2013. The number of water connections grew by 3% to 921,898 customers at the end of
the period, mostly from the expansion areas of Marikina, Pasig and Rizal. However, since the
new connections were mostly residential customers with relatively lower water usage, average
consumption dropped by 2% to 43.1 cubic meters from 44.2 cubic meters in the previous year.
The impact on tariff of the slight change in customer mix biased towards residential customers
was muted by the CPI adjustment of 3.2% implemented at the beginning of the year resulting in a
2% improvement in average effective tariff.
Aside from the continued growth in residential customers, billed volume growth was also driven
by the improvement in semi-commercial accounts by 5% with the completion of new buildings
and the conversion of deep well users in the areas of Pasig and Taguig, as well as the 14% growth
of industrial customers. This was however tempered by the 4% decline in commercial accounts.
The level of system losses, as measured by the non-revenue water (NRW) ratio, improved to
11.2% at the end of 2013 from 12.2% at the end of 2012. The NRW of the East Zone
deteriorated in 2012 as a result of the stabilization of the Companys operational adjustment in
84
the water flows from the primary transmission lines going to the expansion areas of Marikina,
Pasig, Rizal and some parts of Taguig to service the demand of the existing and new customers.
Collection efficiency in 2013 was recorded at 101%, a significant improvement from the previous
years 97%. However, average account receivable days rose to 20 days in 2013 from 17 days in
2012 as a result of the longer reading and billing days following the implementation in August
2012 of a new meter reading and billing system.
On 12 September 2013, MWSS released a new set of tariffs for the East Zone as part of the rate
rebasing review of Manila Waters investment plan for the continuing provision of quality water
supply and used water services to its customers. MWSS determined a negative adjustment of
29.47% from Manila Waters 2012 average basic water charge, eliminating what the Company
believes to be significant programs for building and maintaining the water and used water
systems in the East Zone.
Manila Water, on 24 September 2013, raised its objection by filing a Dispute Notice with the
International Chamber of Commerce, formally commencing the arbitration process which is a
dispute resolution mechanism outlined under the Concession Agreement. While awaiting the
outcome of the arbitration proceedings, existing tariffs as previously approved by the MWSS will
be maintained in the East Zone at present levels.
Boracay Island Water Company, Inc. (Boracay Water)
For the years ended December 31
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Number of water connections
Non-revenue water
Financial Highlights (in thousand Pesos)
Revenues
Operating expenses
EBITDA
Net income
2013
2012
Increase/
(Decrease)
3.6
5,647
13%
3.1
5,288
14%
0.5
359
-1%
266,790
111,320
155,470
72,770
223,480
108,400
115,080
32,820
43,310
2,920
40,390
39,950
%
15%
7%
19%
3%
35%
122%
Boracay Water posted a 15% increase in billed volume in 2013 to 3.6 mcm from 3.1 mcm in the
previous year on the back of a 7% increase in water service connections and 13% growth in
tourist arrivals that reached 1.4 million. With the continued improvement in network operations,
the NRW level improved by one percentage point to 13% in 2013 from 14% in the previous year.
The growth in billed volume coupled with higher average tariff led to a 19% improvement in total
revenues to Php267 million. Boracay Water implemented its approved rate rebasing tariff
adjustment in February 2013 resulting in an increase in average tariff of 6%. Operating expenses
increased at a slower rate of 3% to Php111 million, corresponding to the higher water production
and used water expansion, thereby improving its EBITDA margin to 58% from 51% last year.
Net income grew by 122% to Php73 million as higher depreciation and amortization charges were
offset by lower interest expense and deferred tax provision.
85
9.8
1,975
6%
335,612
167,483
168,129
85,627
9.0
1,913
12%
318,567
149,213
169,354
85,935
0.8
62
-6%
9%
3%
17,045
18,270
(1,225)
(308)
5%
12%
-1%
0%
Clark Water posted a billed volume growth of 9% to 9.8 mcm as it continued to connect new
customers in its concession area. Efforts to reduce non-revenue water resulted in significant
results as the NRW level as of the end of 2013 declined to 6% from 12% in 2012. Proper
management of water levels and monitoring of water pumping schedules led to the NRW
improvement.
The increase in billed volume led to a revenue growth of 5% from Php319 million in 2012 to
Php336 million in 2013. Meanwhile, operating expenses increased by 12% to Php167 million,
thereby resulting in a slight decline in EBITDA to Php168 million. Net income of Clark Water
reached Php86 million in 2013, moving sideways, as the higher depreciation was offset by lower
interest expense during the year.
Laguna AAAWater Corporation (Laguna Water)
For the years ended December 31
Increase/
(Decrease)
2013
2012
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Number of water connections
Non-revenue water
Financial Highlights (in thousand Pesos)
Revenues
Operating expenses
EBITDA
Net income
11.4
65,665
18%
332,308
132,174
200,134
107,539
8.1
42,343
25%
189,554
89,300
100,254
56,478
3.3
23,322
-7%
142,754
42,874
99,880
51,061
%
41%
55%
75%
48%
100%
90%
Billed volume of Laguna Water grew by 41% to 11.4 mcm largely due to the additional service
connections totaling more than 23,000. Laguna Water converted a number of residential
subdivisions and commercial accounts during year. The NRW ratio improved by seven
percentage points to end 2013 at 18% from 25% the previous year with the completion of the pipe
replacement projects in Cabuyao and leak repair activities in the old Matang Tubig Spring
transmission lines in late 2012.
Revenues grew by 75% in 2013 to Php332 million as a result of the higher billed volume and
average effective tariff that went up by 8% to Php21.07 per cubic meter with the improved share
of commercial customers in the mix. On the other hand, operating expenses grew at a slower rate
86
of 48%, resulting in an EBITDA growth of 100% to P200 million. Net income of Laguna Water
reached Php108 million in 2013, growing by 90% from the previous year.
On January 2, 2014, Laguna Water signed an Asset Purchase Agreement with Laguna
Technopark, Inc. for the acquisition of the water reticulation and sewerage system of Laguna
Technopark which is an industrial estate located within the cities of Sta. Rosa and Binan in
Laguna. Laguna Water officially took over at the beginning of 2014 as the exclusive water
provider in the said industrial estate that is home to some of the regions largest and more
successful light to medium non-polluting industries.
Thu Duc Water B.O.O Corporation (Thu Duc Water)
For the years ended December 31
Increase/
(Decrease)
2013
2012
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Financial Highlights (in million VND)
Revenues
Operating expenses
EBITDA
Net income
in PFRS (in thousand Pesos)
Net income (49% contribution)
120.4
360,167
99,358
260,809
240,507
122.4
312,568
90,674
221,894
94,352
-2.0
47,599
8,684
38,915
146,155
%
-2%
15%
10%
18%
155%
216,301
Thu Duc Water sold a total of 120.4 mcm in 2013, dropping by 2% from the 122.4 mcm billed
volume the previous year, due to the lower water intake of Saigon Water Corporation
(SAWACO). The billed volume is however still higher than the guaranteed minimum
consumption of 300 million liters per day (mld) under the bulk water supply take-or-pay
arrangement with SAWACO.
Using Vietnamese Accounting Standards (VAS), revenues grew by 15% to VND360 billion
despite the slight decline of 2% in billed volume as SAWACO drew less water from Thu Duc
Water during the year. Meanwhile, operating expenses went up by 10%, attributable to the
increase in General and Administrative Expenses. This led to a growth of 18% in EBITDA and
155% improvement in net income to VND241 billion as the company booked lower interest
expenses owing to the continued paydown of its debt, and recognized deferred tax assets. In peso
terms, the PFRS-translated income reflected in the consolidated financial statements as Equity
Share in Net Income of Associates amounted to Php216 million, equivalent to Manila Waters
49% stake in Thu Duc Water.
87
Kenh Dong Water Supply Joint Stock Company (Kehn Dong Water)
For the years ended December 31
Increase/
(Decrease)
2013
2012
Operating Highlights
Billed volume (in million cubic meters)
Financial Highlights (in million VND)
Revenues
Operating expenses
EBITDA
Net income
in PFRS (in thousand Pesos)
Net income (47% contribution)
20.6
200,383
58,162
142,221
79,929
76,653
Kenh Dong Water started commercial operations in July 2013, registering a billed volume of 20.6
mcm in the six- month period ending December. The billed volume started lower than the
guaranteed minimum consumption of 150 million liters per day (mld) under the bulk water supply
take-or-pay arrangement with SAWACO but improved to 150 mld in December 2013.
Using Vietnamese Accounting Standards (VAS), Kenh Dong Water posted revenues of VND200
billion and an EBITDA of VND142 billion. Together with depreciation and interest expenses of
VND62 billion, this led to a net income of VND80 billion. Similar to Thu Duc Water, income
from Kenh Dong Water is translated into PFRS and is reported as Equity in Net Earnings of
Associates in the consolidated financial statements. In peso terms, the PFRS-translated income of
Manila Waters 47% stake in Kenh Dong Water amounted to Php77 million.
BALANCE SHEET
The consolidated balance sheet remained strong and prepared for expansion at the end of 2013.
Strong cash inflows brought about by the higher collection efficiency during the period and
additional debt brought cash and cash equivalents to Php6.8 billion. Total assets rose by 9% to
Php72.9 billion as the Company continued to lay additional capital investments on network, water
and used water expansion projects. Liabilities, on the other hand, rose by 4% to Php41.8 billion
due to new loan availments.
The Company continued to be compliant with the loan covenants, as the debt to equity ratio stood
at 1.09x, excluding concession obligations. Meanwhile, net bank debt to equity registered at
0.64x.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
The Companys East Zone spent a total of Php4,682 million (inclusive of concession fee
payments) for capital expenditures in 2013, 35% less than the Php7,215 million spent the
previous year. The bulk of capital expenditures was spent on network reliability, water supply and
used water expansion projects, which accounted for 76% of the total. The balance of 24% was
accounted for by concession fees paid to MWSS. Capital expenditures in 2013 were limited to
on-going and service reliability projects in the absence of an approved business and capital
expenditure plan as part of the 2013 Rate Rebasing exercise.
88
Meanwhile, total capital expenditures of the subsidiaries amounted to Php954 million, growing
by 101% from 2012. Of the total amount, 79% was used by Laguna Water for its network
coverage expansion, while the balance was disbursed by Boracay Island Water and Clark Water.
89
90
91
92
93
Results of Operations
The Groups revenue is composed of:
other income (which includes connection fees, integrated used water services,
reconnection fees, sale of packaged water, sale of scrap materials, and income from septic
sludge disposal and bacteriological water analysis).
contractual services;
management, technical and professional fees (including system costs under the
Administrative and Support Services Agreement with Ayala Corporation and payments
for audit fees);
others (which include regulatory costs, interest expense, amortization of deferred credits,
foreign exchange losses, collection fees, provision for probable losses and doubtful
accounts, water treatment chemicals, transportation and travel, taxes and licenses,
insurance, premium on performance bond, business meetings and representation,
donations, postage, telephone and telegram, supplies, and others).
The following table sets out, for the periods indicated, certain items in the Groups statements of
income, each expressed as a percentage of revenue:
94
Revenue:
Water revenue
Sewer revenue
Environmental charge
Other income
Cost and Expenses:
Depreciation and amortization
Salaries wages and employee benefits
Power, light and water
Contractual services
Management, technical and professional
fees
Repairs and maintenance
Occupancy costs
Others
2015
100.0%
78
3
14
5
2014
100.0%
78
3
14
5
2013
100.0%
75
2
14
7
15
10
6
3
15
9
6
2
16
8
5
1
3
2
2
8
3
2
1
8
4
2
1
8
In 2015, the Group generated a net income after non-controlling interests of Php5.96 billion
which was 2.49% higher than last years Php5.81 billion. The increase was driven by higher
billed volume and additional service connections of the Parent Company which cushioned the
increase in cost and expenses and the rate rebasing adjustment resulting from the conclusion of its
2013 Rate Rebasing exercise.
Water Tariff
The Parent Companys water rates are determined according to the Concession Agreement.
Different water tariff schedules apply to the four main categories of retail customers: residential,
small business, large commercial and industrial. Each category has a graduated block rate cost
structure, divided into nine (9) consumption bands for each residential and small business and
thirty-three (33) bands for each commercial and industrial customers. As a result, large
commercial and industrial customers, on average, pay more than the average residential customer
on a unit cost per volume of water consumed basis.
Customers pay service charges based on the following:
In 2015, the Parent Company generated 79% of its revenue from water tariff charges to
customers, 16% of its revenue from environmental charges, 2% of its revenue from sewerage
charges and 4% from other income including its projects outside the East Zone.
95
annual standard rates adjustment to compensate for increases in the Philippine Consumer
Price Index (CPI), subject to the rates adjustment limit;
extraordinary price adjustments (EPAs) to account for the financial consequences of certain
unforeseen events, subject to the grounds stipulated in the Concession Agreement; and
FCDAs to recover or account for foreign exchange losses and gains arising from MWSS
loans and any concessionaire loans used for its service expansion and improvement.
In addition to the tariff adjustments described above, under the Concession Agreement, tariff
rates are evaluated and adjusted every five years under a process called Rate Rebasing, through
which the rates for water and sewerage services are reset to allow the Company to recover over
the remaining concession period the following:
its operating, capital maintenance and investment expenditures (efficiently and prudently
incurred);
payments corresponding to the Companys debt service on MWSS loans and concession fees.
The Rate Rebasing also allows the Company to earn a rate of return equal to the ADR on these
expenditures for the remaining term of the concession.
Philippine Economic Conditions
With most of the Companys operations based in the Philippines, the Companys results of
operations and financial condition are affected by general economic conditions in the country,
particularly by inflation rates, interest rates and currency exchange rate movements. For
example, the general performance of the Philippine economy affects demand for water and sewer
services, and inflation affects the Companys costs and its margins. Although the Concession
Agreement allows the Company to recover certain costs associated with changes in inflation and
currency exchange rates, these adjustments are implemented after varying periods of time.
Additionally, approved tariff rate adjustments may not cover all increased costs to the Company
associated with changes in economic conditions. The Philippine economic environment has
historically been characterized by significant variations in economic growth rates.
Inflation. Each year, the Company may propose tariff rate adjustments to account for inflation, as
measured by the CPI and published by the Philippine Statistics Authority, subject to the rates
adjustment limit set forth in the Concession Agreement. Although the Company has generally
96
been granted its proposed CPI related tariff rate adjustments in the past, a significant increase in
inflation could increase the Companys costs beyond what it may be able to recover through the
CPI tariff rate adjustment.
Currency Exchange Rates. The Company is also allowed to request a quarterly tariff rate
adjustment for foreign currency differentials in order to recover or compensate for present and
future foreign exchange losses or gains on MWSS loans and Company loans used for capital
expenditures and payments of concession fees. Similar to the CPI adjustment, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to obtain adjustments on its tariff rates for full
reimbursement of these losses, particularly tariff rates where there is a significant depreciation of
the peso.
Water Supply
The Philippines cyclically experiences the El Nio phenomenon which is characterized by
prolonged and severe drought. During such periods, sources of water available to the Company
from MWSS is diminished dramatically which may affect the Companys ability to supply
adequate treated water to its customers.
Accounting Treatments
The Concession Agreement has an impact on the manner of treating Depreciation and
Amortization Expense in the Companys financial statements. Property, plant and equipment are
depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. Service concession
assets, on the other hand, are amortized over the remaining term of the Concession Agreement.
With the Concession Agreement extended by another 15 years by MWSS and the Philippine
Government in 2009, the amortization period has been extended until 2037.
97
plant and equipment, additional investment in associates amounting to Php318.16 million and
increase in other noncurrent assets by Php164.06 million which were partly offset by the
Php259.01 million proceeds from dividends from associates and Php107.60 million interest
received during the year.
Cash Used in Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities amounted to Php3.80
billion in 2015. The Parent Company paid out cash dividends to common and preferred
shareholders of Php0.815 and Php0.0915 per share, respectively, or a total of Php2.04 billion,
representing 35% percent of prior years net income.
Debt Financing. The Group had approximately Php19.96 billion in long-term debt outstanding
(net of the current portion of long-term debt), of which approximately 33% consists of foreign
currency-denominated long-term debt. The current portion of the Groups long-term debt was
approximately Php6.26 billion on December 31, 2015.
Parent Company
NEXI Loan
On October 21, 2010, the Parent Company entered into a term loan agreement (NEXI Loan)
amounting to US$150.00 million to partially finance capital expenditures within the East Zone.
The loan has a tenor of 10 years and is financed by a syndicate of four banks namely, ING N.V
Tokyo, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. and Sumitomo
Mitsui Banking Corporation, and is insured by Nippon Export and Investment Insurance. The
first, second and third drawdowns of the loan amounted to US$84.00 million, US$30.00 million
and US$36.00 million, respectively. The carrying value of the loan as of December 31, 2015 and
2014 amounted to US$90.63 million and US$108.08 million, respectively.
LBP Loan
On October 20, 2005, the Parent Company entered into a Subsidiary Loan Agreement with Land
Bank of the Philippines (LBP Loan) to finance the improvement of the sewerage and sanitation
conditions in the East Zone. The loan has a term of 17 years, and was made available in Japanese
Yen in the aggregate principal amount of JPY6.59 billion payable via semi-annual installments
after the 5-year grace period. The Parent Company made its last drawdown on October 26, 2012.
The total drawn amount from the loan is JPY3.99 billion. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014,
the outstanding balance of the LBP loan amounted to JP2,192.93 million and JP2,527.86
million, respectively.
IFC Loan
On March 28, 2003, the Parent Company entered into a loan agreement with IFC (First IFC Loan)
to partially finance the Parent Companys investment program from 2002-2005 to expand water
supply and sanitation services, improvement on the existing facilities of the Parent Company, and
concession fee payments. The First IFC Loan was made available in Japanese Yen in the
aggregate principal amount of JP3,591.60 million equivalent to US$30.00 million and payable
in 25 semi-annual installments, within 12 years starting on July 15, 2006. As of December 31,
2015 and 2014, the carrying value of the loan amounted to JP710.97 million and JP992.06
million, respectively.
98
On May 31, 2004, the Parent Company entered into a loan agreement with IFC (Second IFC
Loan) composed of a regular loan in the amount of up to US$20.00 million and a standby loan in
the amount of up to US$10.00 million to finance the investment program from 2004 to 2007 to
expand water supply and sanitation services, improvement of existing facilities of the Parent
Company, and concession fee payments. This loan was subsequently amended on November 22,
2006 when the Parent Company executed the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement for the
restructuring of the Second IFC Loan. The terms of the second loan were amended to a loan in
the aggregate amount of up to US$30.00 million, no part of which shall consist of a standby loan.
On December 12, 2008, the Parent Company made a full drawdown on the said facility. As of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, outstanding balance of the Second IFC loan amounted to US$1.99
million and US$5.91 million, respectively.
On July 31, 2013, the Parent Company entered into a loan agreement with IFC (Fourth Omnibus
Agreement) in the amount of up to $100.00 million for financing the Projects in accordance with
the provisions of the Agreement. The loan has a term of 18 years, payable in semi-annual
installments after the grace period. This loan facility has neither been activated nor disbursed and
was consequently cancelled in November 2014. The transaction costs related to the cancellation
of the loan were included as part of Other income (loss).
EIB Loan
On June 20, 2007, the Parent Company entered into a Finance Contract (EIB Loan) with the
European Investment Bank (EIB) to partially finance the capital expenditures of the Parent
Company from 2007 to 2010, as specified under Schedule 1 of the Finance Contract. The loan, in
the aggregate principal amount of EUR60.00 million, having a term of 10 years, is subject to the
Relevant Interbank Rate plus a spread to be determined by EIB, and may be drawn in either
fixed-rate or floating-rate tranches. The loan has two tranches as described below:
a. Sub-Credit A: In an amount of EUR40.00 million to be disbursed in US Dollars and
Japanese Yen payable via semi-annual installments after the 2 1/2 grace period. This
loan tranche is guaranteed against all commercial risks by a consortium of international
commercial banks composed of ING Bank, Development Bank of Singapore and
Sumitomo-Mitsui Banking Corporation under a Guaranty Facility Agreement; and
b. Sub-Credit B: In an amount of EUR20.00 million to be disbursed in Japanese Yen
payable via semi-annual installments after the 2 1/2 grace period. This loan tranche is
guaranteed against all commercial risks by ING Bank under a Guaranty Facility
Agreement.
On May 21, 2012, the Sub-Credit A Guarantee Facility Agreement was amended to extend the
effectivity of the guarantee. Two of the original guarantors, ING Bank and Sumitomo Mitsui
Banking Corporation, agreed to extend the guarantee by another 5 years towards the maturity of
the loan.
On July 30, 2013, the Sub-Credit B Guarantee Facility Agreement was amended to extend the
effectivity of the guarantee. The original guarantor, ING Bank, agreed to extend the guarantee by
another 5 years towards the maturity of the loan.
The carrying values of the EIB Loan amounted to nil as of December 31, 2015 and JPY1,755.06
million and US$9.33 million as of December 31, 2014. On February 20, 2015, the Parent
Company prepaid the EIB Loan amounting to JPY1,807.98 million and US$9.38 million.
99
100
The first and second drawdowns on the loan were made in September and December 2015,
amounting to Php800.00 million and Php200.00 million, respectively. The carrying value of the
loan amounted to Php990.94 million as of December 31, 2015.
Cebu Water Loan
On December 19, 2013, Cebu Water entered into an Omnibus Loan and Security Agreement with
Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) to partially finance the construction works in
relation to its bulk water supply project in Cebu. The lender has agreed to extend a loan facility
in the aggregate principal amount of Php800.00 million or up to 70% of the total project cost,
whichever is lower.
The first, second and final drawdowns on the loan facility amounted to Php541.13 million on
December 20, 2013, Php195.64 million on May 20, 2014 and Php14.22 million on November 14,
2014, respectively. The carrying value of the loan as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted
to Php741.77 million and Php741.01 million, respectively.
Laguna Water Loans
On September 7, 2010, Laguna Water entered into a loan agreement with two local banks for the
financing of its construction, operation, maintenance and expansion of facilities in its servicing
area. Pursuant to the loan agreement, the lenders have agreed to provide loans to Laguna Water
up to Php500.00 million, the principal payments of which will be made in 30 consecutive equal
quarterly installments starting August 2013. The first and second drawdowns from the loan were
made in November 2010 and July 2011 amounting to Php250.00 million each. The carrying
value of this loan amounted to Php330.89 million and Php396.56 million as of December 31,
2015 and 2014, respectively.
On April 29, 2013, Laguna Water entered into a loan agreement with Development Bank of the
Philippines (DBP) to partially finance the modernization and expansion of the water network
system and water supply facilities in Bian, Sta. Rosa and Cabuyao, Laguna. Under the
agreement, the lender has agreed to provide a loan to the borrower through the Philippine Water
Revolving Fund (PWRF) in the aggregate principal amount of up to Php500.00 million bearing
an effective interest rate of 7.25%. The first and second drawdowns were made in July 2013 and
December 2013 which amounted to Php250.00 million each. The carrying value of this loan as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to Php498.81 million and Php498.71 million.
On January 9, 2014, Laguna Water exercised its option to avail of the second tranche of its loan
agreement with DBP, to finance its water network and supply projects, including the development
of a well-field network in the Bian, Sta. Rosa area of Laguna. Under the expanded facility
agreement, the lender provided additional loans to Laguna Water in the aggregate principal
amount of Php833.00 million. The first and second drawdowns were made in January and May
2014, respectively, amounting to Php416.50 million each. The carrying value of the loans
amounted to Php830.94 million and Php830.78 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively.
On October 23, 2015, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Security Bank Corp.
(SBC) to finance the modernization and expansion of its water network system and water supply
facilities throughout the province of Laguna. Under the loan agreement, the lender agreed to
provide a loan to the borrower in the aggregate principal amount of up to Php2.50 billion for an
101
applicable fixed interest rate, as determined in respect of each drawdown. The first drawdown
was made in December 2015 amounting to Php600.00 million bearing an effective interest rate of
6.03%.
Boracay Water Loans
On July 29, 2011, Boracay Water entered into an Omnibus Loan and Security Agreement with
DBP and SBC to finance the construction, operation, maintenance and expansion of facilities for
the fulfillment of certain service targets for water supply and waste water services for its service
area under its concession agreement with TIEZA, as well as the operation and maintenance of the
completed drainage system. The loan shall not exceed the principal amount of Php500.00 million
and is payable in 20 years inclusive of a 3-year grace period.
Omnibus loan and security agreement - Sub-tranche 1
The loan shall be available in three sub-tranches, as follows:
Sub-tranche 1A, the loan in the amount of Php250.00 million to be provided by DBP and
funded through Philippine Water Revolving Fund (PWRF);
Sub-tranche 1B, the loan in the amount of Php125.00 million to be provided by SBC and
funded through PWRF; and
Sub-tranche 1C, the loan in the amount of Php125.00 million to be provided by SBC and
funded through its internally-generated funds.
The first loan drawdown made on August 25, 2011 amounted to Php150.00 million, second
drawdown on August 25, 2012 amounted to Php155.00 million and final drawdown on
August 23, 2013 amounted to Php195.00 million. The carrying value of the loan as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to Php474.16 million and Php487.58 million,
respectively.
Omnibus loan and security agreement - Sub-tranche 2
The Agreement provided Boracay Water the option to borrow additional loans from the
lenders. On November 14, 2012, Boracay Water entered into the second omnibus loan and
security agreement with DBP and SBC. The agreed aggregate principal of the loan amounted
to Php500.00 million which is available in three sub-tranches:
Sub-tranche 2A, the loan in the amount of Php250.00 million to be provided by DBP and
funded through Philippine Water Revolving Fund (PWRF);
Sub-tranche 2B, the loan in the amount of Php125.00 million to be provided by SBC and
funded through PWRF; and
Sub-tranche 2C, the loan in the amount of Php125.00 million to be provided by SBC and
funded through Boracay Waters internally-generated funds.
The first loan drawdown made on November 23, 2012 amounted to Php75.00 million, second
loan drawdown on August 26, 2014 amounted to Php200.00 million and final drawdown on
November 25, 2015 amounted to Php225.00 million. The carrying value of the loan as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to Php476.90 million and Php271.35 million,
respectively.
On October 9, 2014, Boracay Water signed a Third Omnibus Loan and Security Agreement
in the amount of Php650.00 million with SBC. The loan will be used to fund the capital
102
expenditures which will be used to provide water and sewerage services in the concession
area of Boracay Water. As of December 31, 2015, Boracay Water has not made any
drawdown from this facility.
Capital Requirements
The Group has, and expects to continue to have, substantial liquidity and capital resource
requirements to fund debt repayment, concession fees to MWSS, and capital expenditures to
maintain, improve and expand the water and sewage systems.
Debt Principal Repayment. The Groups debt service obligations as of December 31, 2015
included debt maturities in 2015 amounting to approximately Php2.48 billion.
Capital Expenditures. The Groups cash disbursements for purchases of property, plant and
equipment and service concession assets under its capital expenditure program (including
concession fees) totaled approximately Php5.18 billion in 2015.
Contractual obligations:
Long-term debt,
including current portion
Domestic
Foreign
Concession fees
Capital expenditure
commitments
Total contractual obligations
2016
2017
2018
Total
2,496
1,749
1,119
75
1,696
1,167
75
2,364
867
4,950
1,221
932
50
1,127
863
50
1,071
7,696
9,228
4,948
3,563
8,927
2,968
5,906
3,357
6,663
7,858
14,961
10,164
12,204
1,121
27,910
49,782
Concession Fees and Capital Expenditure Commitments for 2018 are subject to approval.
Under the Concession Agreement, the Parent Company is required to post a performance bond,
bank guarantee or other security acceptable to MWSS amounting to US$60.00 million in favor of
MWSS as a bond for the full and prompt performance of the Parents obligation under the
Concession Agreement. A new standby letter of credit (in compliance with the 2015 performance
bond) was issued by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. for the full amount of US$60.00
million prior to the expiry of the performance bond in December 31, 2015.
103
The Companys Audit and Governance Committee1 reviews and approves the scope of audit
work of the external auditor and the amount of audit fees for a given year. The amount of audit
fees will then be presented for approval by the stockholders in the annual meeting. The scope of
and payment of services rendered by the external auditor other than the audit of financial
statements are also subject to review and approval by the Audit and Governance Committee.
The Audit and Governance Committee is composed of the following: Oscar S. Reyes (Chairman / independent director), Jose L.
Cuisia Jr. (independent director), Victoria P. Garchitorena, and Jaime C. Laya (independent director).
104
105
The following are the members of the Board as of December 31, 2015:
Name
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala
Gerardo C. Ablaza Jr.
Antonino T. Aquino
Delfin L. Lazaro
John Eric T. Francia
Sherisa P. Nuesa
Oscar S. Reyes
Jose L. Cuisia, Jr.
Jaime C. Laya
Victoria P. Garchitorena
Age
54
55
62
68
68
44
61
69
71
75
71
Position
Chairman of the Board and Executive
Committee
Vice Chairman
President and CEO
Director
Director
Director
Independent Director
Independent Director
Independent Director
Independent Director
Director
Years as
Director
18
18
6
17
13
5
2
10
5
1
1
The same set of directors were elected during the Annual Stockholders Meeting held on April 11,
2016.
106
107
108
109
In 2004, Mr. Ablaza was recognized by CNBC as the Asia Business Leader of the Year, making
him the first Filipino CEO to win the award. In the same year, he was awarded by Telecom Asia
as the Best Asian Telecom CEO. In 2013, he was recognized for his consistent leadership and
innovation across the banking, investment, telecommunications and utility service industries
through the Citi Distinguished Alumni Award for Leadership and Ingenuity. Mr. Ablaza was the
first and only Filipino to be awarded with such an honor.
ANTONINO T. AQUINO
Member of the Board of Directors
Member, Executive Committee
Filipino, 68 years old
Director of Manila Water since April 24, 1998
Education and Training:
Bachelor of Science, major in Management degree, Ateneo de Manila University
Masteral Degree in Business Management, Ateneo Graduate School of Business
Membership in the Board of Listed Companies:
Manila Water Company, Inc. (Ayala Group)
Ayala Land, Inc. (Ayala Group)
Membership in the Board of Non-Listed Companies:
Anvaya Cove Beach and Nature Club, Inc.
The Philippine American Life & General Insurance Company
Mr. Aquino first joined Manila Water as Group Director for Corporate Affairs and was later
appointed President and CEO in January 1999. He left Manila Water to take on the position of
President of Ayala Land, Inc. on April 1, 2009, but remained a Director of the Company.
He was named Co-Management Man of the Year 2009 by the Management Association of the
Philippines for his leadership role in a very successful waterworks privatization and publicprivate sector partnership.
Mr. Aquino has been with the Ayala Group in various capacities for the past thirty (30) years and
has held the position of Senior Managing Director in Ayala Corporation. He was President of the
Ayala Property Management Corporation from 1990 to 1998 and Senior Vice President of Ayala
Land, Inc. from 1989 to 1998. He was also a Business Unit Manager at IBM Philippines, Inc.
from 1968-1980.
DELFIN L. LAZARO
Member of the Board
Filipino, 68 years old
Director of Manila Water since May 6, 2002
Education and Training:
B.S. in Metallurgical Engineering degree, University of the Philippines
MBA (with Distinction), Harvard Graduate School of Business
Membership in the Board of Listed Companies:
110
111
SHERISA P. NUESA
Independent Director
Member of the Executive Committee
Member of the Remuneration Committee
Filipino, 61 years old
Independent Director of the Company since April 15, 2013
Education and Training:
Ms. Nuesa attended the Advanced Management Program of the Harvard Business School in the
US in June 1999 and completed her Master in Business Administration degree from the AteneoRegis Graduate School of Business in 2011. She also attended the Financial Management
Program of the Stanford University in 1991. A Certified Public Accountant, she graduated with a
BS in Commerce degree (summa cum Laude) from the Far Eastern University in 1974.
Membership in the Board of Listed Companies:
FINEX Foundation
112
Ms. Nuesa was a Managing Director of Ayala Corporation where she served in various senior
management positions until December 2011 which includes the following:
Chief Finance Officer, Manila Water Company, Inc. (January 2000 to December 2008)
Group Controller and later Vice President for Commercial Centers, Ayala Land, Inc.
(January 1989 to March 1999);
Member of the boards of various subsidiaries of ALI and IMI and member of the board of
trustees of Manila Water Foundation, Inc.
Ms. Nuesa was awarded the ING-FINEX Chief Finance Officer of the year for 2008.
OSCAR S. REYES
Independent Director, Board of Directors
Chairman, Audit and Governance Committee
Chairman, Related Party Transaction Committee
Chairman, Remuneration Committee
Member, Nomination Committee
Member, Risk Committee
Filipino, 69 years old
Independent Director of the Company since February 3, 2005[1]
Education and Training:
Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics, Cum Laude, Ateneo de Manila University
Post-Graduate studies at the Ateneo Graduate School of Business, Waterloo Lutheran
University and the Harvard Business School.
Membership in the Board of Listed Companies:
Manila Water Company, Inc. (Ayala Group)
Bank of the Philippine Islands (Ayala Group)
Manila Electric Company
Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company
Pepsi Cola Products (Philippines), Inc.
Basic Energy Corporation
Cosco Capital, Inc.
Membership in the Board of Non-Listed Companies:
PLDT Communications & Energy Ventures, Inc.
Sun Life Financial Plans, Inc.
Sun Life Prosperity Dollar Advantage Fund, Inc.
Sun Life Prosperity Dollar Abundance Fund, Inc.
Sun Life Prosperity GS Fund, Inc.
Sun Life of Canada Prosperity Bond Fund, Inc.
Sun Life Prosperity Money Market Fund, Inc.
Sun Life Prosperity Dynamic Fund, Inc.
[1]
Pursuant to SEC Memorandum Circular No. 9 Series of 2011 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, all
previous terms served by existing Independent Directors as of January 2, 2012 shall not be included in the
application of the term limits under the Circular.
113
114
JAIME C. LAYA
Independent Director, Board of Directors
Member, Audit and Governance Committee
Member, Related Party Transaction Committee
Member, Nomination Committee
Chairman, Risk Committee
Filipino, 75 years old
Independent Director of the Company since April 4, 2014
Education and Training:
Certified Public Accountant
BSBA, Magna cum Laude, University of the Philippines
M.S. in Industrial Management, Georgia Institute of Technology
Ph.D. in Financial Management, Stanford University in 1966
Membership in the Board of Listed Companies:
Manila Water Company, Inc. (Ayala Group)
Ayala Land, Inc. (Ayala Group)
Philippine Trust Company (Philtrust Bank)
GMA Network, Inc.
GMA Holdings, Inc.
Membership in the Board of Non-Listed Companies:
Philippine AXA Life Insurance Co., Inc.
Cultural Center of the Philippines
St. Pauls University Quezon City
115
VICTORIA P. GARCHITORENA
Member of the Board of Directors
Member, Audit and Governance Committee
Member, Risk Committee
Filipino, 71 years old
Director of the Company since April 4, 2014
Education and Training:
B.S. Physics, Summa cum Laude, College of the Holy Spirit
Post-graduate studies in Management Development Program, Asian Institute of Management
Post-graduate studies in Environmental Economics & Policy Analysis, Harvard Institute for
International Development
Membership in the Board of Listed Companies:
Manila Water Company, Inc. (Ayala Group)
Membership in the Board of Non-Listed Companies:
UCPB Finance Corp.
UCPB Foundation, Inc.
Avignon Tower Condominium Corporation
Asian Institute of Management
Ayala Foundation, Inc.
Positions in Other Organizations and Corporations:
Consultant of Ayala Corporation
Member, Makati Business Club
Member, National Executive Committee of the Bishops-Businessmen's Conference for
Human Development
Member, National Executive Committee of the UBAS (Ugnayan ng Barangay at Simbahan)
Adviser, Gerry Roxas Foundation
Adviser, United CSO Federation of Makati
116
Ms. Garchitorena has served as a member of the Management Committee of Ayala Corporation
(Ayala Group) from 2006 until 2011.
She was a Managing Director of Ayala Corporation, President of Ayala Foundation, Inc. and
Philippine Development Foundation (formerly Ayala Foundation USA). Her other significant
past positions include: Trustee of the International Center on Innovation, Transformation and
Excellence in Governance and Pinoy Me Foundation; member of the Asia Pacific Advisory
Council Against Corruption-World Bank and the World Bank Social Protection Advisory Board;
League of Corporate Foundations and Makati Business Club; and member of the National
Committee of Bishops-Businessmens Council for Human Development.
Previously, she was a Senior Consultant on Poverty Alleviation and Good Governance and the
Head of the Presidential Management Staff and Secretary to the Cabinet under the Office of the
President of the Republic of the Philippines; a Director of Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office;
Executive Assistant to the Chairman and President of the Meralco Foundation, Inc.; a Trustee of
the Ramon Magsaysay Awards Foundation; and Co-Chairperson of EDSA People Power
Commission; a Board Member of the US based Council of Foundations; Member of the Global
Foundation Leaders Advisory Group of World Economic Forum and Governor of Management
Association of the Philippines.
SOLOMON M. HERMOSURA
Corporate Secretary
Filipino, 53 years old
Mr. Hermosura assumed his role as Corporate Secretary on April 3, 2006.
Mr. Hermosura has served as Managing Director of Ayala since 1999 and a member of the
Management Committee of Ayala (Holding Company) since 2009 and the Group Management
Committee since 2010.
He also holds the following positions:
Mr. Hermosura graduated valedictorian with Bachelor of Laws degree from San Beda College of
Law in 1986 and placed third in the 1986 Bar Examinations.
117
Executive Officers
The following are the Companys key executive officers as of December 31, 2015:
Name
Gerardo C. Ablaza Jr.
Luis Juan B. Oreta
Virgilio C. Rivera Jr.
Ferdinand M. dela Cruz
Geodino V. Carpio
Abelardo P. Basilio
Rodell A. Garcia
Thomas T. Mattison
Age
62
59
54
49
55
55
59
50
Position
President and Chief Executive Officer
Chief Finance Officer and Treasurer
Chief Operating Officer, New Business Operations
Chief Operating Officer, Manila Water Operations
Group Director, Operations
Group Director, Strategic Asset Management
Chief Technology Adviser
Group Director, Corporate Project Management
118
119
developing new knowledge and mutual professional growth, organized by the Public Utility
Research Center at the University of Florida.
His achievements have earned him distinction as a valuable resource person in international
conferences on infrastructure privatization, regular and PPP initiatives sponsored by the World
Bank, Asian Development Bank, Japan International Cooperation Agency, IWA, Singapore
Public Utilities Board, academic institutions such as TERI and Stanford University, and host
national governments in emerging countries. Mr. Rivera has extensive experience in strategic
planning, price reviews and contract amendments resulting in extension of concession period and
enhanced profitability of the concession company. He also acted as Chairman of the
managements negotiating panel for the 2006 and 2008 collective bargaining agreements.
Mr. Rivera holds two university degrees in Economics and Behavioral Science from the
University of Sto. Tomas. He also completed graduate-level course work in M.S. Economics
from De La Salle University. In 2011, he completed the Advanced Management Program of the
Harvard Business School. His book on Manila Water, Tap Secrets: The Manila Water Story, An
Exercise in Successful Utility Reform in Urban Water Sector, was published by the Asian
Development Bank in 2014.
120
GEODINO V. CARPIO
Group Director, Operations
Filipino, 55 years old
Mr. Carpio joined Manila Water in 1997 as Chief Information Officer. His responsibility as such
included the implementation, operation and maintenance of Information Technology
Infrastructure and applications for the Companys head office, 8 business areas, and various
operations facilities.
In 2004, he became Group Director for the Project Delivery Group (PDG) responsible for the
formulation of strategy, planning and management of capital works for the Company. Since 2010,
he has lead the Operations Group, ensuring the efficient and reliable operation of all treatment
and primary conveyance facilities for water sources, drinking water and used water.
Mr. Carpio is also a member of the Board of Directors of Manila Water Philippine Ventures, Inc.,
Laguna AAAWater Corporation, Boracay Island Water Company, Inc., Clark Water Corporation,
Manila Water International Solutions, Inc., Manila Water Total Solutions Corporation, Manila
Water Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., Manila Water South Asia Holdings Pte. Ltd., Kenh Dong Water
Holdings Pte. Ltd., Thu Duc Water Holdings Pte. Ltd., and Kenh Dong Water Supply and Joint
Stock Company. He is also a member of the Board of Trustees and the Vice President of Manila
Water Foundation, Inc.
Before joining Manila Water, Mr. Carpio was the Vice President for Information Technology for
the Marsman Group of Companies (1995 to 1997). In that role, Mr. Carpio was responsible for
the IT planning and management for the four Marsman companies across 32 branches
nationwide.
He holds a B.S. in Physics Teaching degree (Cum Laude) from the Philippine Normal College in
consortium with De La Salle University under the National Science Development Board
Scholarship Grant and attended a Software Engineering Course under the Scholarship Grant from
the Center for International Cooperation for Computerization in Tokyo, Japan in 1986.
RODELL A. GARCIA
Chief Technology Adviser
Filipino, 59 years old
Mr. Garcia has been in the IT industry for over 39 years. He joined Manila Water in September
2012 to oversee the transformation of the companys information and communications
technology. Prior to this appointment, Mr. Garcia was with Globe Telecom as Chief Information
Officer (CIO) from 2000 to 2009, Chief Technical Officer (CTO) from 2009 to 2010, and Head
of IT Transformation from 2011 up to 2012. As CIO, Mr. Garcia was responsible for defining and
implementing Globes IT strategy, and for ensuring the stability of the IT infrastructure. As CTO,
he was primarily responsible for Network Technology Strategy, Planning, Engineering, and
Network Operations.
Mr. Garcia also spent 22 years in the banking industry, having worked in various capacities in
companies such as Citytrust Banking Corporation, where he last held the position of Vice
President of Corporate Technology Division, and DBS Bank Philippines as Executive Vice
President of Information Technology.
121
Mr. Garcia graduated from the Ateneo de Manila University with a degree in Bachelor of Science
in Mathematics, under a scholarship grant from the National Science Development Board.
ABELARDO P. BASILIO
Group Director, Strategic Asset Management
Filipino, 55 years old
Mr. Basilio has been with Manila Water for 18 years and has held several appointments under
various capacities within the company including Director of Technical Services Group and Group
Director of East Zone Business Operations. He is currently the Group Director of Strategic Asset
Management Group.
Mr. Basilio joined Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage Systems (MWSS) as a young cadet in
1984 and gained experience in utility operations which include hydraulic engineering, water
treatment, distribution and network management. He later joined Manila Water in 1997.
Currently, as the Strategic Asset Management Group Director, he provides comprehensive,
holistic and integrated strategic plans that sets up the platform for capital investment, operation
and maintenance of existing and new assets and the rationalization and disposal of assets.
He holds a degree in Civil Engineering from the University of the Philippine under the university
scholarship program. He completed a Management Development Program in Asian Institute of
Management, Water Network Design and Modelling in Manchester, United Kingdom and
SCADA/Telemetry Training in Singapore.
THOMAS T. MATTISON
Group Director, Corporate Project Management Group2
British, 50 years old
Mr. Mattison has worked in the Utility industry for 34 years, 32 of which being in the Water
Sector and 2 of which being in the Electricity Sector. He was seconded to Manila Water in 1997
as Technical Manager for Maintenance Services and in 2007 as Reliability and Efficiency
Consultant. In 2011, he became the Operations Support Services Director managing 9 diverse
departments under the Operations Group. These included: Maintenance Services, Fleet Services,
Property Services, Laboratory Services, Environmental Management, Safety Solutions, Business
Continuity, Engineering Standards, Energy Management and System Analytics.
In September 2013, Mr. Mattison was designated to lead the Corporate Project Management
Group and has since that designation began transforming the function of the Group into a full
engineering services provider. He is responsible for the management of the engineering and
project delivery function within the Company as well as the management of the planning, design
and construction of all Water, Used Water and Network capital projects.
In recognition of his exemplary contributions to the Company, Mr. Mattison was appointed
Group Director of the Corporate Project Management Group of the Company in February 2015.
Mr. Mattison graduated from Manchester Metropolitan University, UK with a degree in Engineering.
Mr. Mattison was appointed Group Director for Project Delivery on February 6, 2015. His appointments effectivity is on March 1,
2015.
122
Significant Employees
The Company considers its human resources working as a team as a key element for its continued
success. The Company has no employee who is not an executive officer and who is expected to make
individually on his own a significant contribution to the business.
Family Relationships
The Companys Chairman, Fernando Zobel de Ayala, and Vice Chairman, Jaime Augusto Zobel de
Ayala are brothers.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
There is no bankruptcy petition, conviction by final judgment, order, judgment or decree or any
violation of a Securities or Commodities Law involving any director, any nominee for election as
director, executive officer, underwriter or control person of the Company that occurred during the past
five (5) years up to the present that is material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity of the
director, nominee for election as director, executive officer, underwriter or control person of the
Company.
2014
2015
Estimated
2016
2014
2015
Estimated
2016
90.1
96.3
102.1
14.5
15.4
16.3
22.7
23.3
24.7
490.0
525.3
556.8
123.6
133.4
141.4
120.2
129.6
137.4
123
The Company has no standard arrangement or any other arrangements or compensation plan or
arrangement with regard to the remuneration of its existing officers aside from the compensation
herein stated.
Directors Compensation3
In a special meeting held on April 11, 2011, the Board recommended for stockholders approval the
following compensation of the members of the Board and the Board Committees:
The aforesaid compensation of the members of the Board was approved by the stockholders in the
annual stockholders meeting held on April 11, 2011. This compensation scheme has not changed
since then.
Currently, Article III, Section 10 of the By-Laws provides that: By resolution of the Board, each
director shall receive a reasonable per diem for his attendance at each meeting of the Board. As
compensation, the Board shall receive and allocate an amount of not more than 1% of the net income
before income tax of the Company during the preceding year. Such compensation shall be determined
and apportioned among the directors in such manner as the Board may deem proper. The Board of
Directors shall have the sole authority to determine the amount, form and structure of the fees and
other compensation of the directors.
The table below summarizes the compensation/remuneration received or to be received by the
directors for 2015 as members of the Board of Directors of the Company:
Name of Directors
Fixed
Retainer for
2015**
Php500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
Remuneration
for ASM and
Board Meetings
Attended in
2015**
Php1,400,000
1,400,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,400,000
1,400,000
1,400,000
1,400,000
1,400,000
1,400,000
Remuneration
for Committee
Meetings
Attended in
2015**
Php200,000
100,000
150,000
100,000
150,000
300,000
250,000
600,000
550,000
450,000
Total
Php2,100,000
2,000,000
2,050,000
1,700,000
2,000,000
2,050,000
2,200,000
2,150,000
2,500,000
2,450,000
2,350,000
The board remuneration of Messrs. Gerardo C. Ablaza Jr., Fernando Zobel de Ayala, Jaime Augusto Zobel de
Ayala, John Eric T. Francia and Delfin L. Lazaro were paid directly to Ayala Corporation.
** Tax.inclusive
The Remuneration Committee is composed of the following: Oscar S. Reyes (Chairman / independent director), Jose L. Cuisia Jr.
(independent director), Sherisa P. Nuesa (independent director), and Fernando Zobel de Ayala
124
No. of Shares
6,787,676 common
shares
11,575,040 common
shares
Date of
Grant
Exercise
Price
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Market Price
at Date of
Grant
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
The Exercise Price is the Subscription price. For the 2014 ESOWN grant, the Subscription Price
is based on the average closing price at the PSE for twenty (20) consecutive trading days with a
discount to be determined by the Remuneration Committee at the date of grant.
Title of
class
Common
Name of beneficial
owner
Ayala Corporation
34F Tower One, Ayala
Triangle, Ayala Ave.,
Makati City
(Principal shareholder)
Ayala Corporation*
(The same as the record
owner)
Citizenship
Filipino
No of shares
held
Percent
of class
871,383,496**
42.42%
125
Common
PCD Nominee
Corporation
G/F MSE Bldg. Ayala
Ave., Makati City
(Not related)
Multilateral
Preferred
Philwater Holdings
Company, Inc.
MWSS Admin. Bldg., 489
Katipunan Rd., 1105
Balara, QC
(Principal owner)
Philwater Holdings
Company, Inc.*
(The same as the record
owner)
Filipino
152,142,261
7.41%
3,999,999,998
100%
* The Boards of Directors of Ayala Corporation and Philwater Holdings Company, Inc. have the power to decide how
their respective shares in the Company are to be voted. The Company has no knowledge on how the shares of First
State Investment Management in the Company are to be voted.
** Inclusive of 1,000,000 shares held through Michigan Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Ayala
Corporation.
There are no voting trust agreements or any other similar agreement that may result in a change in
control of the Company of which the Company has any knowledge. The following persons shall
have the right to vote on behalf of the following shareholders:
Shareholder
Proxy
Ayala Corporation
or the
The Company has no knowledge on how the shares of First State Investment Management in the
Company are to be voted.
.
Citizenship
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Preferred
Preferred
Common
Common
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership
1
200,001
4,126,078
1
12,749,543
1
1
5,000
1
Nature of Beneficial
Ownership
Percent of Class
Direct
Direct
Direct and Indirect
Direct
Direct and Indirect
Direct
Direct
Direct and Indirect
Direct
0.00000005%
0.00973740%
0.20088543%
0.00000005%
0.62073412%
0.00000003%
0.00000003%
0.00024343%
0.00000005%
126
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Oscar S. Reyes
Sherisa P. Nuesa
Solomon M. Hermosura
Geodino V. Carpio
Luis Juan B. Oreta
Ferdinand M. dela Cruz
Virgilio C. Rivera, Jr.
Rodell A. Garcia
Abelardo P. Basilio
Thomas T. Mattison
All Directors and Officers as a
group
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
British
330,001
5,301,607
50,100
1,629,800
1,572,727
1,248,264
2,242,795
513,600
775,200
274,100
0.01606668%
0.25811814%
0.00243921%
0.07934971%
0.07657100%
0.06077395%
0.10919445%
0.02500553%
0.03774199%
0.01334504%
31,018,821
1.51020624%*
*Excludes the percentage of the two (2) preferred shares in the name of Directors Garchitorena and Francia.
None of the members of the Companys Board of Directors (the Board) and management owns 2.0% or
more of the outstanding capital stock of the Company.
Changes in Legal and Beneficial Ownership of the Board, the Key Officers and the Major
Shareholders (December 31, 2015 vs. December 31, 2014)
Name
DIRECTORS
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala
Delfin L. Lazaro
Gerardo C. Ablaza, Jr.
Antonino T. Aquino
John Eric T. Francia
Oscar S. Reyes
Jose L. Cuisia, Jr.
Sherisa P. Nuesa
Victoria P. Garchitorena
Jaime C. Laya
OFFICERS
Gerardo C. Ablaza, Jr.
Virgilio C. Rivera, Jr.
Luis Juan B. Oreta
Ferdinand M. dela Cruz
Geodino V. Carpio
Rodell A. Garcia
Abelardo P. Basilio
Solomon M. Hermosura
Thomas T. Mattison
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
Ayala Corporation
First State Investment Management
(UK) Limited (through PCD
Nominee Corporation)
Philwater Holdings Corporation
As of December
31, 2015
Class of
Share
As of
December 31, 2014
Class of
Share
1
200,001
1
4,126,078
12,749,543
1
330,001
1
5,309,607
1
5,000
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Preferred
Common
Common
Common
Preferred
Common
1
200,001
1
3,626,078
12,749,543
1
330,001
1
5,309,607
1
5,000
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Preferred
Common
Common
Common
Preferred
Common
4,126,078
2,242,795
1,572,727
1,248,264
1,629,800
513,600
775,200
50,100
274,100
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
3,626,078
1,974,212
1,281,341
921,517
1,372,500
253,500
609,800
50,100
0
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
870,542,896*
152,142,261
Common
Common
791,912,996
117,100,761
Common
Common
3,999,999,998
Preferred
3,999,999,998
Preferred
* Inclusive of 1,000,000 shares held through Michigan Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Ayala Corporation
127
In its report to the Board of Directors, the Risk Committee of the Board confirmed that:
The Risk Committee discussed with Management the adequacy and effectiveness of the
Enterprise Risk Management process, including significant risk exposures, the related riskmitigation efforts and initiatives, and the status of the mitigation plans. The review was
undertaken in the context that Management is primarily responsible for the risk management
process.
The Risk Committee has reviewed the Enterprise Risk Management Process and is satisfied
that sufficient risk management systems are in place in Manila Water.
128
The Committee noted the 2016 plans and initiatives of the Enterprise Risk and Insurance
Management (ERIM) Department to create a robust risk awareness and management culture
and to promote good risk management practices achieving appropriate risk and reward in
Manila Waters business.
In its report to the Board of Directors, the Audit and Governance Committee confirmed that:
The Committee discussed and approved the overall scope and the respective audit plans of
the Companys internal auditors and of SGV & Co., the results of their audits and their
assessment of the Companys internal controls, and the overall quality of the financial
reporting process.
The Committee discussed the reports of the internal auditors, and ensured that Management is
taking appropriate actions in a timely manner, including addressing internal control and
compliance issues. All the activities performed by Internal Audit were conducted in
conformance with the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal
Auditing.
The Audit and Governance Committee, through the audits conducted by SGV & Company
and Internal Audit, has reviewed Managements system of internal controls and the
Committee found the internal control system to be adequate and effective.
The Committee discussed with Management the adequacy and effectiveness of the Enterprise
Risk Management process, including significant risk exposures, the related risk-mitigation
efforts and initiatives, and the status of the mitigation plans. The review was undertaken in
the context that Management is primarily responsible for the risk management process.
b.
b.
c.
d.
Statements of Income for the Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
e.
Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2014 and 2013
f.
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
129
g.
SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULES
Report of Independent Auditors on Supplementary Schedules - Exhibit 1.A
Schedule A
Financial Assets
Schedule B
Schedule C
Schedule D
Schedule E
Long-Term Debt
Schedule F
Schedule G
Schedule H
Capital Stock
Schedule I
Schedule J
Schedule K
Financial Ratios
Schedule L
OTHERS
a.
b.
Certification from the Treasurer that the GFFS Diskette has the Basic
and Material Data in the Audited Financial Statements - Exhibit 1.C
c.
130
acquisitions, the sale and disposition of significant assets, and other information that may affect
the decision of the investing public.
In 2015 the Company filed the following reports using SEC Form 17C:
DATE
TEMPLATE NAME
January 6, 2015
Material Information/Transactions
Resignation of Officer
Material Information/Transactions
February 2, 2015
February 6, 2015
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
SUBJECT
Appointment of Officer
Unaudited Full Year 2014 Performance
Results
Results of Regular Meeting of the Board
of Directors on February 20, 2015
Declaration of Cash Dividends
Foreign Currency Differential Adjustment
Annual Stockholders Meeting
Results of Annual Stockholders Meeting
Results of Organizational Board Meeting
Results of Meetings of the Board of
Directors and Meeting of the NonExecutive Directors
Clarification on the News Article entitled
Manila Water ramp up annual spending
to over P10B
Term-Loan Facility for Clark Water
Corporation
April 7, 2015
Material Information/Transactions
April 8 2015
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
131
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Notice of Analysts/Investors
Briefing
May 7, 2015
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
June 8, 2015
Material Information/Transactions
June 9, 2015
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Notice of Analysts/Investors
Briefing
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
October 5, 2015
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Notice of Analysts/Investors
Briefings
Change in the Number of Issued
and/or Outstanding Shares
November 3, 2015
Material Information/Transactions
November 4, 2015
Acquisition or Disposition of
Shares of Another Corporation
132
Vietnam
November 6, 2015
Material Information/Transactions
November 6, 2015
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
Material Information/Transactions
133
COVER
SHEET
for
A 1 9 9 6 - 1 1 5 9 3
COMPANY
NAME
M A N I L A
W A T E R
C O M P A N Y ,
I N C .
A N D
S U B S I D I A R I E S
M W S S
4 8 9
A D M I N I S T R A T I O N
K A T I P U N A N
Q U E Z O N
B U I L D I N G ,
R O A D ,
B A L A R A ,
C I T Y
Form Type
A A C F S
COMPANY
INFORMATION
Mobile Number
(632) 917-5900
No. of Stockholders
904
04/07
12/31
Email Address
Telephone Number/s
(632) 981-8156
Mobile Number
2nd floor, MWSS Administration Building, 489 Katipunan Road, Balara, Quezon City
NOTE 1 : In case of death, resignation or cessation of office of the officer designated as contact person, such incident shall be reported to the
Commission within thirty (30) calendar days from the occurrence thereof with information and complete contact details of the new contact person
designated.
2 : All Boxes must be properly and completely filled-up. Failure to do so shall cause the delay in updating the corporations records with
the Commission and/or non-receipt of Notice of Deficiencies. Further, non-receipt of Notice of Deficiencies shall not excuse the corporation from
liability for its deficiencies.
*SGVFS015775*
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Manila Water Company, Inc.
and its subsidiaries, which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at
December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income,
consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, and a summary of significant accounting
policies and other explanatory information.
Managements Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial
statements in accordance with Philippine Financial Reporting Standards and for such internal control
as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation and fair presentation of
consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing. Those
standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material
misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures
in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgment,
including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers
internal control relevant to the entitys preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial
statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for
the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entitys internal control. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our audit opinion.
*SGVFS015775*
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
-2Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Manila Water Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries as at December 31, 2015 and
2014, and their financial performance and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2015 in accordance with Philippine Financial Reporting Standards.
Dhonabee B. Seeres
Partner
CPA Certificate No. 97133
SEC Accreditation No. 1196-AR-1 (Group A),
June 30, 2015, valid until June 29, 2018
Tax Identification No. 201-959-816
BIR Accreditation No. 08-001998-98-2015,
January 5, 2015, valid until January 4, 2018
PTR No. 5321694, January 4, 2016, Makati City
February 26, 2016
*SGVFS015775*
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
-2-
December 31
2015
Equity
Attributable to equity holders of Manila Water Company, Inc.
Capital stock (Note 19)
Common stock
Preferred stock
Additional paid-in capital
Subscriptions receivable
Total paid-up capital
Common stock options outstanding (Note 19)
Retained earnings
Remeasurement loss on defined benefit plans (Note 15)
Other equity reserve (Note 19)
Cumulative translation adjustment (Note 2)
Non-controlling interests (Note 1)
Total Equity
P
= 2,053,666,576
400,000,000
2,453,666,576
4,193,022,955
(346,017,395)
6,300,672,136
20,818,325
32,120,480,845
(123,583,985)
7,500,000
498,830,099
38,824,717,420
894,274,986
39,718,992,406
P
= 80,608,485,782
2014
P
= 2,047,270,452
400,000,000
2,447,270,452
3,969,016,591
(251,543,666)
6,164,743,377
16,206,572
28,202,654,069
(103,140,677)
7,500,000
220,209,709
34,508,173,050
593,397,014
35,101,570,064
P
= 74,859,903,596
*SGVFS015775*
2015
REVENUE
Water (Note 21)
East Zone
Outside East Zone
Environmental charges (Note 21)
Sewer (Note 21)
East Zone
Outside East Zone
Revenue from management contracts (Note 22)
Other operating income (Notes 16 and 17)
2013
P
= 11,897,119,383 P
= 11,772,381,095 P
= 11,322,404,038
1,323,110,432
1,074,829,358
673,289,068
2,374,388,215
2,303,873,152
2,250,482,542
269,456,863
165,292,277
906,515,470
16,935,882,640
271,008,639
148,710,996
25,488,456
760,853,355
16,357,145,051
265,462,739
131,201,229
174,938,833
1,108,039,013
15,925,817,462
2,303,707,042
1,183,972,052
911,444,002
432,550,207
383,996,024
365,645,322
280,036,911
126,288,346
110,420,035
108,904,080
104,063,441
83,546,019
56,056,426
21,278,116
18,170,276
12,881,411
173,814,720
6,676,774,430
2,135,943,763
1,049,288,817
1,009,782,892
270,242,113
409,090,595
384,165,387
98,763,316
99,493,003
109,241,055
119,147,381
92,601,779
71,179,346
45,775,658
18,342,226
26,154,855
14,679,755
55,534,248
6,009,426,189
2,384,936,194
960,101,617
814,227,751
215,824,474
412,606,429
358,204,520
98,618,208
65,882,799
114,102,430
104,861,585
84,042,255
79,103,032
49,702,630
23,020,977
40,531,449
22,505,452
44,560,692
5,872,832,494
10,259,108,210
10,347,718,862
10,052,984,968
1,772,425,207
1,522,320,184
1,275,539,592
8,486,683,003
8,825,398,678
8,777,445,376
5,219,358,277
(5,219,358,277)
517,463,433
(413,741,038)
(1,457,535,361)
316,944,042
403,514,812
24,952,444
8,432,177
3,435,789,320
(3,435,789,320)
(174,789,330)
167,614,258
(1,636,136,708)
185,635,301
357,298,362
42,524
7,240,954
5,071,257,510
(5,071,257,510)
545,916,143
(539,490,917)
(1,733,400,506)
172,825,432
293,975,032
13,448
6,167,676
42,250,317
(557,719,174)
(66,057,375)
(1,159,152,014)
(1,411,856)
70,093,853
(1,185,311,695)
COST OF SERVICES
Depreciation and amortization (Notes 8 and 9)
Salaries, wages and employee benefits (Notes 15, 19 and 21)
Power, light and water
Contractual services
Management, technical and professional fees (Note 21)
Repairs and maintenance
Occupancy costs (Note 24)
Regulatory costs (Note 1)
Collection fees
Cost of water service connections
Wastewater costs
Water treatment chemicals
Insurance
Postage, telephone and supplies
Transportation and travel
Taxes and licenses
Other expenses
GROSS PROFIT
7,928,963,829
7,666,246,664
7,592,133,681
1,794,923,838
1,836,298,011
1,811,572,574
NET INCOME
6,134,039,991
5,829,948,653
5,780,561,107
(Forward)
*SGVFS015775*
-2-
2015
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Other comprehensive income (loss) to be reclassified to profit
and loss in subsequent periods:
Unrealized fair value gain (loss) on available-for-sale financial
assets (Note 10)
Realized fair value gain on available-for-sale transferred to
profit or loss (Note 10)
Cumulative translation adjustment (Note 11)
Other comprehensive income (loss) not to be reclassified to
profit or loss in subsequent periods:
Actuarial gain (loss) on pension liabilities (Note 15)
Income tax effect (Note 18)
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net income attributable to:
Equity holders of Manila Water Company, Inc.
Non-controlling interests (Note 1)
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Equity holders of Manila Water Company, Inc.
Non-controlling interests (Note 1)
Earnings per Share (Note 20)
Net income attributable to common equity holders of Manila
Water Company, Inc.
Basic
Diluted
P
=
278,620,390
278,620,390
(20,727,744)
285,264
(20,442,480)
2013
(P
= 3,300,716)
(P
= 3,502,145)
101,970,215
98,669,499
(15,065,800)
127,109,003
108,541,058
37,227,700
(257,680)
36,970,020
(68,194,900)
499,830
(67,695,070)
P
= 6,392,217,901
P
= 5,965,588,172
P
= 5,821,407,095
P
= 5,957,780,447
176,259,544
P
= 6,134,039,991
P
= 5,813,088,880
16,859,773
P
= 5,829,948,653
P
= 5,752,361,946
28,199,161
P
= 5,780,561,107
P
= 6,215,957,529
176,260,372
P
= 6,392,217,901
P
= 5,948,616,019
16,972,153
P
= 5,965,588,172
P
= 5,793,304,768
28,102,327
P
= 5,821,407,095
P
= 2.41
P
= 2.41
P
= 2.36
P
= 2.36
P
= 2.34
P
= 2.34
*SGVFS015775*
2015
2013
P
= 2,018,209,523
30,561,845
6,396,124
(1,500,916)
35,457,053
P
= 2,016,708,607
31,968,978
(1,407,133)
30,561,845
P
= 2,015,301,474
36,009,267
5,817,220
(9,857,509)
31,968,978
400,000,000
2,453,666,576
400,000,000
2,447,270,452
400,000,000
2,447,270,452
3,969,016,591
224,006,364
4,193,022,955
3,908,364,990
60,651,601
3,969,016,591
3,750,425,522
157,939,468
3,908,364,990
(251,543,666)
(166,316,124)
71,842,395
(346,017,395)
(283,527,324)
31,983,658
(251,543,666)
(221,425,456)
(113,151,413)
51,049,545
(283,527,324)
16,206,572
68,698,117
(64,086,364)
20,818,325
13,806,787
63,051,386
(60,651,601)
16,206,572
13,578,433
50,833,629
(50,605,275)
13,806,787
7,000,000,000
(7,000,000,000)
7,000,000,000
7,000,000,000
17,402,675,096
5,813,088,880
7,000,000,000
(2,013,109,907)
28,202,654,069
28,202,654,069
13,555,773,394
5,752,361,946
(1,905,460,244)
17,402,675,096
24,402,675,096
(Forward)
*SGVFS015775*
-2-
2015
UNREALIZED GAIN ON AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE
FINANCIAL ASSETS
Balance at beginning of year
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized fair value loss on available-for-sale financial
assets (Note 10)
Realized fair value gain on available-for-sale financial
assets transferred to profit and loss (Note 10)
Balance at end of year
P
=
(103,140,677)
(20,728,572)
285,264
(123,583,985)
P
= 3,300,716
(3,300,716)
(140,372,917)
37,602,300
(370,060)
(103,140,677)
7,500,000
7,500,000
220,209,709
278,620,390
498,830,099
118,239,494
101,970,215
220,209,709
2013
P
= 21,868,661
(3,502,145)
(15,065,800)
3,300,716
(72,774,681)
(68,094,610)
496,374
(140,372,917)
7,500,000
(8,869,509)
127,109,003
118,239,494
593,397,014
576,799,461
266,739,634
124,617,600
281,957,500
828
(262,220)
(96,834)
176,259,544
16,859,773
28,199,161
894,274,986
593,397,014
576,799,461
P
= 39,718,992,406 P
= 35,101,570,064 P
= 31,054,056,755
*SGVFS015775*
2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Income before income tax
Adjustments for:
Depreciation and amortization (Notes 8 and 9)
Interest expense (Notes 14 and 17)
Equity share in net income of associates (Note 11)
Interest income (Note 17)
Provision for probable losses and doubtful accounts
(Note 17)
Share-based payments (Note 19)
Pension expense, net of contribution and benefit payment
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Amortization of deferred credits (Note 16)
Loss on revaluation of receivable from Bonifacio Water
Corporation (Notes 5 and 12)
Operating income before changes in operating assets and
liabilities
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in:
Receivables
Materials and supplies
Service concession assets (Note 9)
Concession financial receivable
Other current assets
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts and other payables
Payables to related parties
Net cash provided by operations
Income tax paid
Net cash provided by operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Interest received
Dividends received from associates (Note 11)
Acquisitions of:
Investments in associates (Notes 1 and 11)
Property and equipment (Note 8)
Proceeds from:
Sale of property and equipment
Maturities of available-for-sale financial assets
Decrease (increase) in:
Short-term cash investments
Other noncurrent assets
Net cash provided by (used) in investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Long-term debt (Note 14):
Availments
Payments
Payments of service concession obligation (Note 9)
Payments of dividends (Note 19)
P
= 7,928,963,829
P
= 7,666,246,664
2013
P
= 7,592,133,681
2,600,212,924
1,457,535,361
(403,514,812)
(316,944,042)
2,443,987,307
1,636,136,708
(357,298,362)
(185,635,301)
2,494,762,992
1,733,400,506
(293,975,032)
(172,825,432)
76,525,809
68,698,117
42,252,955
(24,952,444)
(8,432,177)
188,034,322
63,051,387
(324,173,020)
(42,524)
(7,240,954)
171,294,230
50,833,629
(68,614,844)
(13,448)
(6,167,676)
1,411,856
11,420,345,520
11,123,066,227
11,502,240,462
(178,664,379)
9,262,790
(4,449,379,786)
(13,254,662)
(255,161,602)
(291,607,402)
(82,692,799)
(3,252,081,286)
(212,288,640)
(158,105,895)
40,374,240
7,704,418
(4,677,183,266)
(681,363,724)
391,470,005
243,998,576
(655,359)
6,776,491,098
(1,787,621,757)
4,988,869,341
(197,048,448)
(127,528,720)
6,801,713,037
(1,777,131,404)
5,024,581,633
(640,874,433)
111,459,197
6,053,826,899
(1,714,907,911)
4,338,918,988
107,602,321
259,014,197
58,444,925
134,028,372
133,816,460
87,749,151
(318,163,290)
(725,855,263)
(352,516,515)
(642,759,834)
(274,945,648)
45,935,076
1,243,709
100,000,000
3,042,742
370,043,605
(164,061,650)
(795,528,609)
94,344,600
(395,042,077)
(359,496,986)
(94,344,600)
433,218,351
15,820,227
2,798,379,413
(2,476,014,276)
(799,794,043)
(2,039,953,670)
1,235,628,647
(1,886,518,477)
(698,927,235)
(2,013,109,906)
6,195,926,714
(4,255,918,126)
(924,935,673)
(1,905,460,244)
(Forward)
*SGVFS015775*
-2-
2015
P
= 71,842,395
(1,341,395,535)
(133,620,769)
124,617,600
(3,795,938,885)
397,401,847
281,957,500
(4,992,311,660) (3,115,109,454)
(327,227,013)
1,239,629,761
6,452,553,832
6,779,780,845
5,540,151,084
P
= 6,849,955,679
P
= 6,452,553,832
P
= 6,779,780,845
*SGVFS015775*
1.
Corporate Information
Manila Water Company, Inc. (the Parent Company) was incorporated on January 6, 1997 and started
commercial operations on January 1, 2000. It became a publicly listed company via an initial public offering
on March 18, 2005. As of December 31, 2015, the Parent Company is 42.38% owned by Ayala Corporation
(Ayala). Ayala is a publicly listed company which is 49.01% owned by Mermac, Inc., 10.18% owned by
Mitsubishi Corporation and the rest by the public. The Parent Company and its Subsidiaries (collectively
referred to as the Group) are incorporated to provide water, sewerage and sanitation, distribution services,
pipeworks and management services.
The Parent Companys principal place of business is at the MWSS Administration Building, Katipunan Road,
Balara, Quezon City.
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Parent Company and the
following subsidiaries:
Country of
Incorporation
Philippines
-doSingapore
-do-
Percentages
of Ownership
2015
2014
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Vietnam
Singapore
-doPhilippines
-do-do-do-
48.5
100
100
100
70
100
51
100
100
100
70
100
51
-do-do-do-
51
80
70
51
80
-do-do-
51
90
*Asia Water is 51.0% owned by Saigon Water Infrastructure Corporation (Saigon Water) and 48.5% owned by MWSAH.
MWSAHs effective ownership interest in Asia Water is 64.55% by virtue of its 31.47% ownership interest in Saigon Water.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Philippines is the principal place of business and country of incorporation of
the Groups investments in subsidiaries.
Group Reorganization
On June 19, 2014, AAA Water Corporation changed its corporate name to Manila Water Philippine Ventures,
Inc. (MWPVI). On October 13, 2014, the Board of Directors (BOD) of MWPVI approved the increase of
MWPVIs authorized capital stock. The BOD approved the subscription of the Parent Company to new and
additional shares of MWPVI and the exchange of shares between the Parent Company and MWPVI for the
Parent Companys shares in Boracay Water, Clark Water and MW Consortium.
On February 20, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the increase of the
authorized capital stock of MWPVI from 750.00 million shares to 1,750.00 million shares. In March 2015, the
Parent Company transferred to MWPVI the ownership of all its shares in Boracay Water, Clark Water and
MW Consortium in exchange for new shares of MWPVI.
*SGVFS015775*
-2-
Parent Companys Concession Agreement with Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS)
On February 21, 1997, the Parent Company entered into a Concession Agreement (the Concession
Agreement) with MWSS, a government corporation organized and existing pursuant to Republic Act (RA) No.
6234, as amended, with respect to the MWSS East Zone (East Zone). The Concession Agreement sets forth
the rights and obligations of the Parent Company throughout a 25-year concession period. The MWSS
Regulatory Office (MWSS-RO) monitors and reviews the performance of each of the Concessionaires the
Parent Company and Maynilad Water Services, Inc. (Maynilad), the West Zone Concessionaire.
Under the Concession Agreement, MWSS grants the Parent Company (as contractor to perform certain
functions and as agent for the exercise of certain rights and powers under RA No. 6234) the sole right to
manage, operate, repair, decommission, and refurbish all fixed and movable assets (except certain retained
assets) required to provide water delivery and sewerage services in the East Zone for a period of 25 years
commencing on August 1, 1997 (the Commencement Date) up to May 6, 2022 (the Expiration Date) or the
early termination date as the case may be. While the Parent Company has the right to manage, operate,
repair and refurbish specified MWSS facilities in the East Zone, legal title to these assets remains with
MWSS. The legal title to all fixed assets contributed to the existing MWSS system by the Parent Company
during the Concession remains with the Parent Company until the Expiration Date (or until the early
termination date) at which time all rights, titles and interest in such assets will automatically vest in MWSS.
On Commencement Date, the Parent Company officially took over the operations of the East Zone and
rehabilitation works for the service area commenced immediately thereafter. As provided in the Parent
Companys project plans, operational commercial capacity will be attained upon substantial completion of the
rehabilitation work.
Under the Concession Agreement, the Parent Company is entitled to the following rate adjustments:
a.
b.
c.
d.
Annual standard rate adjustment to compensate for increases in the consumer price index (CPI);
Extraordinary price adjustment (EPA) to account for the financial consequences of the occurrence of
certain unforeseen events stipulated in the Concession Agreement;
Foreign Currency Differential Adjustment (FCDA) to recover foreign exchange losses including
accruals and carrying costs thereof arising from MWSS loans and any Concessionaire loans used
for capital expenditures and concession fee payments, in accordance with the provisions set forth in
Amendment No. 1 of the Concession Agreement dated October 12, 2001 (see Notes 2, 9 and 14);
and
Rebasing Convergence Adjustment for the purposes of calculating the Rates Adjustment Limit for
each of the five Charging Years of the Rebasing Period determined based on the following:
i.
where the Rebasing Adjustment is found to be positive, the Rebasing Convergence
Adjustment for the first Charging Year of the Rate Rebasing Period shall be equal to the
Rebasing Adjustment, and the Rebasing Convergence Adjustment for each of the following
four Charging Years shall be zero; and
ii.
where the Rebasing Adjustment is found to be negative, the Rebasing Adjustment for each
of the five Charging Years of the Rebasing Period shall be equal to the Rebasing
Adjustment divided by five.
These rate adjustments are subject to a rate adjustment limit which is equivalent to the sum of CPI published
in the Philippines, EPA and Rebasing Convergence Adjustment as defined in the Concession Agreement.
The Concession Agreement also provides a general rate setting policy for rates chargeable by the Parent
Company for water and sewerage services as follows:
a.
b.
For the period through the second Rate Rebasing date (January 1, 2008), the maximum rates
chargeable by the Parent Company (subject to interim adjustments) are set out in the Concession
Agreement.
From and after the second Rate Rebasing date, the rates for water and sewerage services shall be
set at a level that will permit the Parent Company to recover, over the 25-year term of the
concession, its investment including operating, capital maintenance and investment incurred,
Philippine business taxes and payments corresponding to debt service on MWSS loans and the
Parent Companys loans incurred to finance such expenditures, and to earn a rate of return equal to
the appropriate discount rate (ADR) on these expenditures for the remaining term of the concession.
The maximum rates chargeable for such water and sewerage services shall be subject to general adjustment
at five-year intervals commencing on the second Rate Rebasing date, provided that the MWSS-RO may
exercise its discretion to make a general adjustment of such rates.
*SGVFS015775*
-3-
On April 16, 2009, the MWSS Board of Trustees passed Resolution No. 2009-072 approving the 15-year
extension of the Concession Agreement (the Extension) from May 7, 2022 to May 6, 2037. This resolution
was confirmed by the Department of Finance (DOF), by authority from the office of the President of the
Republic of the Philippines, on October 19, 2009. The significant commitments under the Extension follow:
a.
b.
c.
To mitigate tariff increases such that there will be reduction of the balance of the approved 2008
rebased tariff by 66%, zero increase of the rebased tariff in 2009 and a P
= 1.00 increase for years
2010 to 2016, subject to CPI and FCDA adjustments.
To increase the share in the current operating budget support to MWSS by 100% as part of the
concession fees starting 2009.
To increase the total investments from the approved P
= 187.00 billion for the periods 2008 to 2022 to
P
= 450.00 billion for 2008 to 2037.
With the approval of the Extension, the recovery period for the Parent Companys investment is now
extended by another 15 years from 2022 to 2037.
In March 2012, the Parent Company submitted to MWSS a business plan embodying its rate rebasing
proposals for charging year 2013. The rate rebasing activity is done every five (5) years. The MWSS
conducted a review of the proposal including the Parent Companys last five (5) years financial performance.
The financial review process extended up to the third quarter of 2013. On September 10, 2013, the MWSSRO issued Resolution No. 13-09-CA providing for a negative rate rebasing adjustment of 29.47% on the
Parent Companys 2012 average basic water rate of P
= 24.57 per cubic meter shall be implemented in 5 equal
tranches of negative 5.894% per charging year. The Parent Company objected to the MWSS Rate
Rebasing determination and formally filed its Dispute Notice on September 24, 2013, before a dulyconstituted Appeals Panel, commencing the arbitration process, as provided under Section 12 (in relation to
Section 9.4 of the Concession Agreement).
On December 10, 2013, the MWSS Board of Trustees, through MWSS-RO Resolution No. 13-012 CA,
approved the implementation of a status quo for the Parent Companys Standard Rates including FCDA until
such time that the Appeals Panel has rendered a final award on the 2013 Rate Rebasing determination.
On April 21, 2015, the Parent Company received the final award of the Appeals Panel in the arbitration which
final award included the following tariff component determination:
a.
b.
c.
d.
P
= 28.1 billion Opening Cash Position (OCP) which restored P
= 11.0 billion from the September 2013
OCP determination of MWSS of P
= 17.1 billion;
P
= 199.6 billion capital expenditures and concession fees which restores P
= 29.5 billion from the
September 2013 future capital and concession fee expenditure of P
= 170.1 billion;
7.61% Appropriate Discount Rate (ADR) which was an improvement of 79 bps from the post-tax
ADR of 6.82% in September 2013; and
Exclusion of corporate income tax from cash flows beginning January 1, 2013.
Consequently, the final award resulted in a rate rebasing adjustment for the period 2013 to 2017 of negative
11.05% on the 2012 basic average water charge of P
= 25.07 per cubic meter. This adjustment translates to a
decrease of P
= 2.77 per cubic meter from the tariff during the intervening years before the 2018 rate rebasing.
Annual CPI adjustments and the quarterly FCDA will continue to be made consistent with the Parent
Companys Concession Agreement with MWSS.
On December 10, 2015, the Company filed a Notice of Arbitration with the Permanent Court of Arbitration
against the National Government. The Notice of Arbitration was filed with respect to a Notice of Claim made
on the National Government on April 23, 2015 and reiterated on August 13, 2015 and October 20, 2015. The
Notice of Claim was made under the Letter of Undertaking of the National Government, which was dated July
31, 1997 and issued through the DOF, and was subsequently reiterated in the DOF Letter dated October 19,
2009 (the Sovereign Undertaking). These were issued to guarantee the obligations of the MWSS under its
Concession Agreement with the Parent Company executed on February 21, 1997.
In the Sovereign Undertaking, the National Government, through the DOF, undertook to indemnify the Parent
Company against any loss caused by any action on the part of the National Government and/or the MWSS
resulting in the reduction of the standard rates below the level that would otherwise be applicable in
accordance with the Concession Agreement, thereby denying the Parent Company the rate of return
allowed from time to time to operators of long term infrastructure concession agreement in other countries
having a credit standing similar to the Philippines pursuant to Section 9.4 of the Concession Agreement. As
a result of certain actions by the MWSS and the National Government, which are covered by the provisions
*SGVFS015775*
-4-
of the Sovereign Undertaking, the Parent Company demanded indemnification from the National Government
by reimbursing its losses in operating revenues to be realized for each remaining year of the Concession as
such losses are realized.
The MWSS Board of Trustees approves the FCDA adjustment quarterly. The FCDA has no impact on the
net income of the Parent Company, as the same is a recovery or refund mechanism of foreign exchange
losses or gains. During 2015, the following FCDA adjustments and their related foreign exchange basis took
effect.
Approval Date
December 18, 2014
March 12, 2015
June 4, 2015
September 9, 2015
FCDA Adjustment
P
= 0.36 per cubic meter
P
= 0.05 per cubic meter
P
= 0.02 per cubic meter
P
= 0.05 per cubic meter
Laguna Waters Concession Agreement with the Provincial Government of Laguna (PGL)
On April 9, 2002, Laguna Water entered into a concession agreement (as amended on March 31, 2004 and
July 22, 2009) with PGL, a local government unit organized and existing under Philippine Laws.
Under the terms of the concession agreement, the PGL grants Laguna Water (as contractor and as agent for
the exercise of certain rights in Laguna) the sole and exclusive right and discretion during the concession
period to manage, occupy, operate, repair, maintain, decommission and refurbish the identified facilities
required to provide water services to specific areas for an operational period of 25 years which commenced
on October 20, 2004.
While Laguna Water has the right to manage, occupy, operate, repair, maintain, decommission and refurbish
specified PGL facilities, legal title to these assets remains with PGL. Legal title to all assets procured by
Laguna Water in the performance of its obligations under the agreement remains with Laguna Water and
shall not pass to PGL until the end of the concession period at which time, Laguna Water will transfer, or if
the ownership is vested in another person, cause the transfer to PGL. Laguna Water has the exclusive rights
to provide water services in the service areas specified in the concession agreement. Concession fees set
forth in the concession agreement are computed as a percentage of revenue from water services (see Note
9).
Seventy percent (70%) of the concession fees are applied against any advances made by Laguna Water to
PGL. The remaining thirty percent (30%) of the concession fees are payable annually 30 days after the
submission of the audited financial statements by Laguna Water, from the start of the operational period.
On June 30, 2015, Laguna Water and the PGL signed an amendment to the concession agreement which
expands the concession area to cover all cities and municipalities in the province of Laguna, as well as the
service obligation to include the provision of wastewater services and the establishment of an integrated
sewage and septage system in the province.
Boracay Waters Concession Agreement with Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority (TIEZA)
On December 17, 2009, Boracay Water entered into a concession agreement with TIEZA, formerly Philippine
Tourism Authority (PTA). The concession agreement sets forth the rights and obligations of Boracay Water
as concessionaire throughout the 25-year concession period. The TIEZA Regulatory Office will monitor and
review the performance of the concessionaire throughout the concession period.
Under the concession agreement, TIEZA grants Boracay Water the sole right to manage, operate, repair,
decommission, and refurbish all fixed and movable assets (except certain retained assets) required to
provide water delivery and sewerage services in the entire Boracay Island. The legal title to all fixed assets
contributed to the existing TIEZA system by Boracay Water during the concession remains with Boracay
Water until the expiration date (or the early termination date) at which time all rights, titles and interest in such
assets will automatically vest in TIEZA.
As part of the agreement, Boracay Water advanced concession fees to TIEZA amounting to P
= 60.00 million,
which will be applied as payment of, and shall be offset against the annual concession fees payable to TIEZA
equivalent to 5% of the annual gross revenue of Boracay Water.
*SGVFS015775*
-5-
Under its concession agreement, Boracay Water is entitled to the following rate adjustments:
a.
b.
c.
Annual standard rate adjustment to compensate for increases in the consumer CPI;
EPA to account for the financial consequences of the occurrence of certain unforeseen events
stipulated in the concession agreement; and
FCDA to recover foreign exchange losses including accruals and carrying costs thereof arising from
TIEZA loans and any loans used for capital expenditures and concession fee payments (see Notes
2, 9 and 14).
These rate adjustments are subject to a rate adjustment limit which is equivalent to the sum of CPI published
in the Philippines, EPA and Rebasing Convergence adjustment as defined in Boracay Waters concession
agreement.
The rate rebasing date is set every five (5) years starting January 1, 2011. Hence, the first rate rebasing
period commenced on January 1, 2010 and ended on December 31, 2010 and, in the case of subsequent
rate rebasing periods, the period commencing on the last rate rebasing date and ending on December 31 of
the fifth year thereafter.
Boracay Water requested for the deferment of the rate rebasing since it was not able to commence
operations in June 2009, as originally planned, because the SEC required the Company to seek conformity
from the DOF before it could be incorporated.
In January 14, 2013, TIEZA approved the Rebasing Convergence adjustment for Boracay Water which is
equivalent to an increase from its existing rates of 35% to be implemented on a staggered basis for a period
of four (4) years with a 10.10% increase in 2013; 9.18% in 2014; 8.40% in 2015; and 7.75% in 2016, effective
starting February 1, 2013.
For 2013 and 2014, only the approved rate rebasing adjustment was implemented while the CPI adjustment
was deferred due to economic considerations relative to the first time adjustment and natural calamities in
2013.
For 2015, the rate rebasing adjustment was implemented plus the catch-up CPI adjustment of 3.70%
pertaining to 2013. In September 2015, Boracay Water also implemented a downward adjustment in the
FCDA of 14.34% together with two CPI adjustments of 2.70% and 4.40% pertaining to years 2014 and 2015,
respectively.
The Agreement also provides a general rate setting policy for rates chargeable by Boracay Water for water
and sewerage services as follows:
a.
For the period through the second rate rebasing date (January 1, 2016), the maximum rates chargeable
by Boracay Water (subject to interim adjustments) are set out in the Agreement; and
b.
From and after the second rate rebasing date, the rates for water and sewerage services shall be set at
a level that will permit Boracay Water to recover, over the 25-year term of its concession, its investment
including operating expenses, capital maintenance and investment incurred, Philippine business taxes
and payments corresponding to debt service on the TIEZA loans incurred to finance such expenditures,
and to earn a rate of return on these expenditures for the remaining term of the concession in line with
the rates of return being allowed from time to time to operators of long-term infrastructure concession
arrangements in other countries having a credit standing similar to that of the Philippines.
The maximum rates chargeable for such water and sewerage services shall be subject to general adjustment
at five-year intervals commencing on the second rate rebasing date, provided that the TIEZA may exercise its
discretion to make a general adjustment of such rates.
Also part of the concession agreement, Boracay Water assumed certain property and equipment of Boracay
Water Sewerage System (BWSS), as well as its outstanding loan from Japan International Cooperation
Agency (JICA), considered as part of its TIEZA loans under the concession agreement, and regulatory costs.
As a result of the above terms of the concession agreement, Boracay Water recognized a total of
P
= 986.86 million service concession assets on commencement date. It includes the JICA loan assumed by
Boracay Water, regulatory costs, construction costs for the improvement and expansion of the water and
wastewater facilities and the advanced concession fees (see Note 9).
*SGVFS015775*
-6-
*SGVFS015775*
-7-
venture company serving as a bulk water supplier. The term of the agreement is 30 years starting March
2012 and renewable for another 25 years. MW Consortium and the PGC incorporated Cebu Water, with an
ownership of 51% and 49%, respectively, pursuant to the joint investment agreement.
On December 13, 2013, Cebu Water received a Notice of Award for the bulk supply of water to the
Metropolitan Cebu Water District (MCWD). On December 18, 2013, Cebu Water and MCWD signed a
20-year Bulk Water Supply Contract for the supply of 18.00 million liters per day of water for the first year and
35.00 million liters per day of water for years two (2) up to 20. Cebu Water delivered its initial 18.00 million
liters per day bulk water supply to MCWD on January 5, 2015. Cebu Water will increase its bulk water
delivery to 35.00 million liters per day in 2016.
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Yangon City Development Committee (YCDC)
On March 17, 2014, the Parent Company and Mitsubishi Corporation, signed a MOU with the YCDC in
Yangon City, Myanmar for the development of a proposed non-revenue water reduction (NRW) project for
Yangon City. YCDC is an administrative body of the city government in Yangon in charge of the water,
infrastructure, business licenses and city property management, among others.
As of December 31, 2015, the Parent Company, through its subsidiary, MWAP, is in the process of
implementing its pilot NRW reduction project in Yangon.
Joint Venture for NRW Reduction Activities with Zamboanga City Water District (ZCWD)
On December 19, 2014, the Parent Company received a notice from the ZCWD awarding the project for
NRW reduction in Zamboanga City, Zamboanga. On January 30, 2015, the Parent Company and ZCWD
signed and executed a joint venture agreement in relation to the NRW reduction project in Zamboanga City.
On April 10, 2015, the Parent Company and ZCWD incorporated Zamboanga Water.
On June 2, 2015, Zamboanga Water entered into a Non-revenue Water Reduction Service Agreement
(NRWSA) with ZCWD. Under the NRWSA, ZCWD grants the Zamboanga Water the right to implement
Network Restructuring and Non-Revenue Water Reduction Programs for ZCWDs water distribution system.
The project will run for a 10-year period, beginning June 2, 2015, with three (3) phases namely:
a. Network Improvement Program (DMA Formation) and NRW Reduction Program (Service Line and
Meter Replacement, Active Leak Detection and Repair) from Year 1 to 5
b. Maintenance Period in Year 6
c. Technical Assistance and Consultancy from Year 7 to 10
In consideration of the above, ZCWD shall pay Zamboanga Water the following:
a.
b.
Fixed Fees of P
=16.00 million annually (VAT inclusive, subject to annual inflation adjustment),
payable quarterly in equal amounts of P
= 4.00 million.
Performance Fees of P
=11.00 per cubic meter volume recovered (VAT inclusive, subject to annual
inflation adjustment), payable quarterly
The annual fixed fees shall cover the total cost of the Network Restructuring Program (from Year 1 to 5) and
overhead and miscellaneous costs (from Year 1 to 10).
Joint Venture for NRW Reduction Activities by Asia Water and Saigon Water
On April 22, 2015, Asia Water was granted the Investment Certificate from the Department of Planning and
Investment of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Asia Water is a joint venture between MWSAH and Saigon Water
which aims to carry out activities such as NRW reduction management, waste system design and
construction, and operation and management of distribution system and network. MWSAH, a wholly owned
subsidiary, effectively owns a 64.55% stake in Asia Water as of December 31, 2015.
Healthy Family Purified Drinking Water
On April 15, 2015, MWTS was granted by the Bureau of Food and Drugs its Certificate of Product
Registration for its Healthy Family Purified Drinking Water. This authorizes MWTS to implement the full-scale
marketing and promotion of its product to further expand its distribution in Metro Manila.
Joint Venture for the Tagum City Bulk Water Supply Project with Tagum Water District (TWD)
On July 28, 2015, the TWD awarded the Tagum City Bulk Water Supply Project to the consortium of the
Parent Company and iWater, Inc. On October 15, 2015, Davao Water, the joint venture company of Parent
Company and iWater, Inc., signed and executed a joint venture agreement with the TWD. Under the said
agreement, Davao Water and the TWD shall cause the incorporation of a joint venture company which shall
*SGVFS015775*
-8-
implement the Bulk Water Supply Project for 15 years from the operations start date as defined in the joint
venture agreement. Tagum Water, the joint venture company, which is 90% and 10% owned by Davao
Water and TWD, was registered with the SEC on December 15, 2015. Tagum Water will develop
supplemental surface water resources that will deliver potable bulk water to TWD.
MWSAH Capital Transfer Agreement with Saigon Water
On November 3, 2015, MWSAH completed the execution of a Capital Transfer Agreement with Saigon Water
for the acquisition of 24.5% of the charter capital of Cu Chi Water Supply Sewerage Company Ltd., a
company incorporated in Vietnam, in the total amount of VND154.35 billion. Pursuant to the Capital Transfer
Agreement, Saigon Water has granted a put option to MWSAH and VIAC (No 1) Limited Partnership, another
party to the agreement, which option can be exercised upon the occurrence of certain trigger events. As of
December 31, 2015, no trigger event has occurred and the value of the put option was determined to be nil.
Cu Chi Water is limited liability company in Vietnam with the following line of business, among others: water
exploitation, treatment and supply sewerage and wastewater treatment, installation of water supply system
and management consultancy services.
MWAP MOU with the Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM) Tirtawening Kota Bandung (PDAM Bandung)
On November 6, 2015, MWAP signed a MOU with the PDAM Bandung in Bandung City, West Java,
Indonesia. PDAM Bandung is a water utility company owned and controlled by the Regional Government of
Bandung City.
Pursuant to the MOU, MWAP shall conduct a Demonstration Project for NRW reduction in Bandung City,
Indonesia as the first step in the implementation of other cooperation schemes for the development of PDAM
Bandung services in accordance with the prevailing Indonesian laws and regulations. MWAP and PDAM
Bandung intend to cooperate to undertake the Demonstration Project towards the successful realization of
the cooperation scheme. The execution of the MOU is in line with the Groups strategic objective to pursue
expansion projects and investments outside of the East Zone business area.
Approval for the Issuance of the Consolidated Financial Statements
The BOD approved and authorized the issuance of the accompanying consolidated financial statements on
February 26, 2016.
2.
*SGVFS015775*
-9-
When the Group has less than a majority of the voting or similar rights of an investee, the Group considers all
relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether it has power over an investee, including:
a. the contractual arrangement with the other vote holders of the investee;
b. rights arising from other contractual arrangements; and
c. the Groups voting rights and potential voting rights.
The Group reassesses whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there
are changes to one or more of the three elements of control.
Profit or loss and each component of other comprehensive income (OCI) are attributed to the equity holders
of the parent of the Group and to the non-controlling interests, even if this results in the non-controlling
interests having a deficit balance. When necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of
subsidiaries to bring their accounting policies into line with the Groups accounting policies. All intra-group
assets and liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows relating to transactions between members of
the Group are eliminated in full on consolidation.
A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as an equity
transaction. If the Group loses control over a subsidiary, it:
a. derecognizes the assets (including goodwill) and liabilities of the subsidiary;
b. derecognizes the carrying amount of any non-controlling interests;
c. derecognizes the cumulative translation differences recorded in equity;
d. recognizes the fair value of the consideration received;
e. recognizes the fair value of any investment retained;
f. recognizes any surplus or deficit in profit or loss; and
g. reclassifies the parents share of components previously recognized in OCI to profit or loss or
retained earnings, as appropriate, as would be required if the Group had directly disposed of the
related assets or liabilities.
Changes in Accounting Policies and Disclosures
The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are consistent
with those of the previous financial years except for the PFRS, amended PFRS and improvements to PFRS
which were adopted as of January 1, 2015. The nature and the impact of each of new standards and
amendments are described below:
a.
PAS 19, Employee Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans: Employee Contributions (Amendments)
PAS 19 requires an entity to consider contributions from employees or third parties when accounting for
defined benefit plans. Where the contributions are linked to service, they should be attributed to periods
of service as a negative benefit. These amendments clarify that, if the amount of the contributions is
independent of the number of years of service, an entity is permitted to recognize such contributions as a
reduction in the service cost in the period in which the service is rendered, instead of allocating the
contributions to the periods of service. This amendment does not have an impact to the Group, since
none of the entities within the Group has defined benefit plans with contributions from employees or third
parties.
*SGVFS015775*
- 10 -
b.
c.
ii.
An entity must disclose the judgements made by management in applying the aggregation
criteria in paragraph 12 of PFRS 8, including a brief description of operating segments that
have been aggregated and the economic characteristics (e.g., sales and gross margins) used
to assess whether the segments are similar; and
The reconciliation of segment assets to total assets is only required to be disclosed if the
reconciliation is reported to the chief operating decision maker, similar to the required
disclosure for segment liabilities.
d.
PAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment and PAS 38, Intangible Assets
The amendment is applied retrospectively and clarifies in PAS 16 and PAS 38 that the asset may be
revalued by reference to observable data by either adjusting the gross carrying amount of the asset to
market value or by determining the market value of the carrying value and adjusting the gross carrying
amount proportionately so that the resulting carrying amount equals the market value. In addition, the
accumulated depreciation or amortization is the difference between the gross and carrying amounts of
the asset.
e.
Joint arrangements, not just joint ventures, are outside the scope of PFRS 3; and
This scope exception applies only to the accounting in the financial statements of the joint
arrangement itself.
b.
c.
*SGVFS015775*
- 11 -
That entities shall not reduce the understandability of their financial statements by either
obscuring material information with immaterial information; or aggregating material items that
have different natures or functions;
That specific line items in the statement of income and other comprehensive income and the
statement of financial position may be disaggregated;
That entities have flexibility as to the order in which they present the notes to financial
statements; and
That the share of other comprehensive income of associates and joint ventures accounted for
using the equity method must be presented in aggregate as a single line item, and classified
between those items that will or will not be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss.
The Group is currently assessing the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial
statements.
b.
PAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, and PAS 38, Intangible Assets - Clarification of Acceptable
Methods of Depreciation and Amortization (Amendments)
The amendments clarify the principle in PAS 16 and PAS 38 that revenue reflects a pattern of economic
benefits that are generated from operating a business (of which the asset is part) rather than the
economic benefits that are consumed through use of the asset. As a result, a revenue-based method
cannot be used to depreciate property, plant and equipment and may only be used in very limited
circumstances to amortize intangible assets. The amendments are effective prospectively for annual
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. These amendments are
not expected to have any impact to the Group given that the Group has not used a revenue-based
method to depreciate its property and equipment.
c.
PAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, and PAS 41, Agriculture - Bearer Plants (Amendments)
The amendments change the accounting requirements for biological assets that meet the definition of
bearer plants. Under the amendments, biological assets that meet the definition of bearer plants will no
longer be within the scope of PAS 41. Instead, PAS 16 will apply. After initial recognition, bearer plants
will be measured under PAS 16 at accumulated cost (before maturity) and using either the cost model or
revaluation model (after maturity). The amendments also require that produce that grows on bearer
plants will remain in the scope of PAS 41 measured at fair value less costs to sell. For government
grants related to bearer plants, PAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of
Government Assistance, will apply. The amendments are retrospectively effective for annual periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. These amendments are not
expected to have any impact as the Group does not have any bearer plants.
d.
PAS 27, Separate Financial Statements - Equity Method in Separate Financial Statements
(Amendments)
The amendments will allow entities to use the equity method to account for investments in subsidiaries,
joint ventures and associates in their separate financial statements. Entities already applying PFRS and
electing to change to the equity method in its separate financial statements will have to apply that
change retrospectively. For first-time adopters of PFRS electing to use the equity method in its separate
financial statements, they will be required to apply this method from the date of transition to PFRS. The
amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016, with early adoption
permitted. These amendments will not have any impact on the Groups consolidated financial
statements.
*SGVFS015775*
- 12 -
e.
PFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, and PAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint
Ventures - Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture and
PAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation
Exception (Amendments)
These amendments clarify that the exemption in PFRS 10 from presenting consolidated financial
statements applies to a parent entity that is a subsidiary of an investment entity that measures all of its
subsidiaries at fair value and that only a subsidiary of an investment entity that is not an investment
entity itself and that provides support services to the investment entity parent is consolidated. The
amendments also allow an investor (that is not an investment entity and has an investment entity
associate or joint venture), when applying the equity method, to retain the fair value measurement
applied by the investment entity associate or joint venture to its interests in subsidiaries. These
amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016. The Group will
assess the impact on its consolidated financial statements when such sale or contribution of assets take
place in future periods.
f.
PFRS 11, Joint Arrangements - Accounting for Acquisitions of Interests in Joint Operations
(Amendments)
The amendments to PFRS 11 require that a joint operator accounting for the acquisition of an interest in
a joint operation, in which the activity of the joint operation constitutes a business (as defined by PFRS
3) must apply the relevant PFRS 3 principles for business combinations accounting. The amendments
also clarify that a previously held interest in a joint operation is not remeasured on the acquisition of an
additional interest in the same joint operation while joint control is retained. In addition, a scope
exclusion has been added to PFRS 11 to specify that the amendments do not apply when the parties
sharing joint control, including the reporting entity, are under common control of the same ultimate
controlling party.
The amendments apply to both the acquisition of the initial interest in a joint operation and the
acquisition of any additional interests in the same joint operation and are prospectively effective for
annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. These
amendments are not expected to have any impact as the Group currently has no interest in joint
operations.
g.
PFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations - Changes in Methods of
Disposal
The amendment is applied prospectively and clarifies that changing from a disposal through sale to a
disposal through distribution to owners and vice-versa should not be considered to be a new plan of
disposal, rather it is a continuation of the original plan. There is, therefore, no interruption of the
application of the requirements in PFRS 5. The amendment also clarifies that changing the disposal
method does not change the date of classification.
b.
*SGVFS015775*
- 13 -
c.
d.
PAS 19, Employee Benefits - Regional Market Issue Regarding Discount Rate
This amendment is applied prospectively and clarifies that market depth of high quality corporate bonds
is assessed based on the currency in which the obligation is denominated, rather than the country where
the obligation is located. When there is no deep market for high quality corporate bonds in that currency,
government bond rates must be used. The amendment will not have an impact on the Groups financial
statements since the Groups policy is already consistent with the amendment.
e.
PAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting - Disclosure of Information Elsewhere in the Interim Financial
Report
The amendment is applied retrospectively and clarifies that the required interim disclosures must either
be in the interim financial statements or incorporated by cross-reference between the interim financial
statements and wherever they are included within the greater interim financial report (e.g., in the
management commentary or risk report). The amendment will not have an impact on the Groups
financial statements since the Group already presents the required disclosures in its interim financial
statements.
Effective in 2018
a.
b.
Effective in 2019
a.
*SGVFS015775*
- 14 -
The accounting by lessors is substantially unchanged as the new standard carries forward the principles
of lessor accounting under IAS 17. Lessors, however, will be required to disclose more information in
their financial statements, particularly on the risk exposure to residual value.
The new standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. Entities may
early adopt IFRS 16 but only if they have also adopted IFRS 15. When adopting IFRS 16, an entity is
permitted to use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach, with options to use
certain transition reliefs.
The Group will perform an assessment of the impact of IFRS 16 on its existing lease agreements.
Interpretation with Deferred Effective Date
a.
Philippine Interpretation IFRIC 15, Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate
This interpretation covers accounting for revenue and associated expenses by entities that undertake the
construction of real estate directly or through subcontractors. The SEC and the Financial Reporting
Standards Council (FRSC) have deferred the effectivity of this interpretation until the final revenue
standard is issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and an evaluation of the
requirements of the final revenue standard against the practices of the Philippine real estate industry is
completed. This interpretation is not relevant to the Group since the Group does not engage in the
construction of real estate directly or indirectly through subcontractor.
The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Group.
The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use
when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest.
A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant's ability to generate
economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant
that would use the asset in its highest and best use. The Group uses valuation techniques that are
appropriate in the circumstances and for which value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and
minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
*SGVFS015775*
- 15 -
The Group uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments
by valuation technique:
a.
b.
c.
Level 1: quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2: other techniques for which all inputs which have a significant effect on the recorded fair
value are observable, either directly or indirectly
Level 3: techniques which use inputs which have a significant effect on the recorded fair value that
are not based on observable market data.
For assets and liabilities that are recognized in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis, the
Group determines whether transfers have occurred between Levels in the hierarchy by reassessing
categorization (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at
the end of each reporting period.
The Groups management determines the policies and procedures for both recurring and non-recurring fair
value measurement.
For the purpose of fair value disclosures, the Group has determined classes of assets and liabilities on the
basis of the nature, characteristics and risks of the asset or liability and the level of the fair value hierarchy as
explained above.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes cash on hand and in banks. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that
are readily convertible to known amounts of cash with original maturities of three months or less from dates
of acquisition and that are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Date of recognition
The Group recognizes a financial asset or a financial liability on the consolidated statement of financial
position when it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Purchases or sales of
financial assets that require delivery of assets within the time frame established by regulation or convention in
the marketplace are recognized on the settlement date.
Initial recognition of financial instruments
All financial assets are initially recognized at fair value. Except for financial assets at fair value through profit
or loss (FVPL), the initial measurement of financial assets includes transaction costs. The Group classifies
its financial assets in the following categories: financial assets at FVPL, held-to-maturity (HTM) investments,
available-for-sale (AFS) financial assets and loans and receivables. The Group classifies its financial
liabilities as either financial liabilities at FVPL or other financial liabilities. The classification depends on the
purpose for which the investments were acquired and whether these are quoted in an active market.
Management determines the classification of its investments at initial recognition and, where allowed and
appropriate, re-evaluates such designation at every reporting date.
Financial instruments are classified as liability or equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual
arrangement. Interest, dividends, gains and losses relating to a financial instrument or a component that is a
financial liability, are reported as expense or income. Distributions to holders of financial instruments
classified as equity are charged directly to equity, net of any related income tax benefits.
Day 1 profit
For transactions other than those related to customers guaranty deposits and other deposits, where the
transaction price in a non-active market is different from the fair value from other observable current market
transactions in the same instruments or based on a valuation technique whose variables include only data
from observable market, the Group recognizes the difference between the transaction price and fair value (a
Day 1 profit) in profit or loss under Other income unless it qualifies for recognition as some other type of
asset or liability. In cases where use is made of data which is not observable, the difference between the
transaction price and model value is only recognized in profit or loss when the inputs become observable or
when the instrument is derecognized. For each transaction, the Group determines the appropriate method of
recognizing the Day 1 profit amount.
Embedded derivatives
An embedded derivative is separated from the host contract and accounted for as a derivative if all of the
following conditions are met: (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not
closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract; (b) a separate instrument with
the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the definition of a derivative; and (c) the hybrid or
*SGVFS015775*
- 16 -
combined instrument is not recognized at FVPL. Embedded derivatives are measured at fair value with fair
value changes being reported through profit or loss, and are carried as assets when the fair value is positive
and as liabilities when the fair value is negative.
Subsequent reassessment is prohibited unless there is a change in the terms of the contract that significantly
modifies the cash flows that otherwise would be required under the contract, in which case reassessment is
required. The Group determines whether a modification in the cash flows is significant by considering the
extent to which the expected future cash flows associated with the embedded derivative, the host contract, or
both have changed and whether the change is significant relative to the previously expected cash flows from
the contract.
The Group has certain closely and clearly related derivatives that are embedded in the host contract (such as
long-term debt) which does not require bifurcation.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities that are
not quoted in an active market. These are not entered into with the intention of immediate or short-term
resale and are not designated as AFS financial assets or financial assets at FVPL. These are included in
current assets if maturity is within twelve months from the reporting date. Otherwise, these are classified as
noncurrent assets.
After initial measurement, loans and receivables are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the
effective interest rate method, less allowance for impairment. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into
account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees that are an integral part of the effective interest
rate. The amortization is included in Interest income in profit or loss. The losses arising from impairment of
such loans and receivables are recognized as Provision for probable losses and doubtful accounts in profit
or loss.
This accounting policy applies primarily to the Groups cash and cash equivalents, receivables, concession
financial receivable and deposits.
AFS financial assets
AFS financial assets are those which are designated as such or do not qualify to be classified as financial
assets at FVPL, HTM investments or loans and receivables. These are purchased and held indefinitely, and
may be sold in response to liquidity requirements or changes in market conditions. These include equity
investments, money market papers and other debt instruments. After initial measurement, AFS financial
assets are subsequently measured at fair value. The effective yield component of AFS debt securities, as
well as the impact of restatement on foreign currency-denominated AFS debt securities, is reported in profit
or loss. The unrealized gains and losses arising from the fair valuation of AFS financial assets are excluded
net of tax from net income and are reported as Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale financial assets
under OCI.
When the investment is disposed of, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognized under OCI is
recognized as Gain (loss) on disposal of available-for-sale financial assets in profit or loss. Where the
Group holds more than one investment in the same security, these are deemed to be disposed of on a first-in
first-out basis. Interest earned on holding AFS financial assets are reported as interest income using the
effective interest rate. Dividends earned on holding AFS financial assets are recognized under the Other
income account when the right to receive payment has been established. The losses arising from
impairment of such investments are recognized as Provisions for probable losses in profit or loss.
Fair value of AFS financial assets which cannot be measured reliably because of lack of reliable estimates of
future cash flows and discount rates necessary to calculate the fair value of unquoted equity instruments, are
carried at cost.
The Groups AFS financial assets are presented as noncurrent in the consolidated statement of financial
position. The details of the Groups AFS financial assets are disclosed in Note 10.
Other financial liabilities
Issued financial instruments or their components, which are not designated as at FVPL are classified as other
financial liabilities where the substance of the contractual arrangement results in the Group having an
obligation either to deliver cash or another financial asset to the holder, or to satisfy the obligation other than
by the exchange of a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of its own equity
shares. The components of issued financial instruments that contain both liability and equity elements are
*SGVFS015775*
- 17 -
accounted for separately, with the equity component being assigned the residual amount, after deducting
from the instrument as a whole the amount separately determined as the fair value of the liability component
on the date of issuance.
After initial measurement, other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the
effective interest rate method. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium
on the issue and fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate. Any effects of restatement of
foreign currency-denominated liabilities are recognized in profit or loss.
This accounting policy applies primarily to the Groups long-term debt, accounts and other payables,
customers guaranty deposits and other deposits under other noncurrent liabilities, service concession
obligation, payable to related parties and other payables that meet the above definition (other than liabilities
covered by other accounting standards, such as pension liabilities and income tax payable).
Derecognition of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Financial assets
A financial asset (or, where applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a group of financial assets) is
derecognized when:
1.
2.
3.
the right to receive cash flows from the asset has expired;
the Group retains the right to receive cash flows from the asset, but has assumed an obligation to pay
them in full without material delay to a third party under a pass-through arrangement; or
the Group has transferred its right to receive cash flows from the asset and either (a) has transferred
substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or (b) has neither transferred nor retained the risks
and rewards of the asset but has transferred the control of the asset.
Where the Group has transferred its right to receive cash flows from an asset or has entered into a
pass-through arrangement, and has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and
rewards of the asset nor transferred control of the asset, the asset is recognized to the extent of the
Groups continuing involvement in the asset. Continuing involvement that takes the form of a guarantee
over the transferred asset is measured at the lower of the original carrying amount of the asset and the
maximum amount of consideration that the Group could be required to repay.
Financial liabilities
A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability is discharged, cancelled, or has
expired. Where an existing financial liability is replaced by another financial liability from the same lender on
substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange
or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, and
the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognized in profit or loss.
Impairment of Financial Assets
The Group assesses at each reporting date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or
group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is deemed to be
impaired if, and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that has
occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (an incurred loss event) and that loss event (or events) has
an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the group of financial assets that can be
reliably estimated. Objective evidence of impairment may include indications that the borrower or a group of
borrowers is experiencing significant financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or principal
payments, the probability that they will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization and where
observable data indicate that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows, such as
changes in arrears or economic condition that correlate with default. For the Groups receivables from
customers, evidence of impairment may also include non-collection of the Groups trade receivables, which
remain unpaid after thirty days from bill generation.
Loans and receivables
For loans and receivables carried at amortized cost, the Group first assesses whether objective evidence of
impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually significant, or collectively for financial
assets that are not individually significant. If the Group determines that no objective evidence of impairment
exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, it includes the asset in a group
of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and collectively assessed for impairment. Those
characteristics are relevant to the estimation of future cash flows for groups of such assets by being
*SGVFS015775*
- 18 -
indicative of the debtors ability to pay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the assets being
evaluated. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is, or
continues to be recognized, are not included in a collective assessment for impairment.
If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured
as the difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash
flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred). The carrying amount of the asset is
reduced through use of an allowance account and the amount of loss is charged to profit or loss. Interest
income continues to be recognized based on the original effective interest rate of the asset. Receivables,
together with the associated allowance accounts, are written off when there is no realistic prospect of future
recovery.
If, in a subsequent year, the amount of the estimated impairment loss decreases because of an event
occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed. Any
subsequent reversal of an impairment loss is recognized in profit or loss, to the extent that the carrying value
of the asset does not exceed its amortized cost at the reversal date.
For the purpose of a collective evaluation of impairment, financial assets are grouped on the basis of such
credit risk characteristics as industry, customer type, customer location, past-due status and term. Future
cash flows in a group of financial assets that are collectively evaluated for impairment are estimated on the
basis of historical loss experience for assets with credit risk characteristics similar to those in the group.
Historical loss experience is adjusted on the basis of current observable data to reflect the effects of current
conditions that did not affect the period on which the historical loss experience is based and to remove the
effects of conditions in the historical period that do not exist currently. The methodology and assumptions
used for estimating future cash flows are reviewed regularly by the Group to reduce any differences between
loss estimates and actual loss experience.
AFS financial assets
For AFS financial assets, the Group assesses at each reporting date whether there is objective evidence that
a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired.
In the case of equity investments classified as AFS financial assets, this would include a significant or
prolonged decline in the fair value of the investments below cost. Where there is evidence of impairment, the
cumulative loss measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less
any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognized in profit or loss is removed from OCI and
recognized in profit or loss. Impairment losses on equity investments are not reversed through profit or loss.
Increases in fair value after impairment are recognized directly in OCI.
Financial Guarantee Contracts
Financial guarantee contracts issued by the Parent Company to its subsidiaries are those contracts that
require a payment to be made to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because the specified holder fails to
make a payment when due in accordance with the terms of a debt instrument. Financial guarantees are
initially recognized at fair value, and the initial fair value is amortized over the life of the financial guarantee.
The guarantee liability is subsequently carried at the higher of this amortized amount and the present value
of any expected payment (when a payment under the guaranty has become probable).
Offsetting Financial Instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the consolidated statement
of financial position if, and only if, there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognized amounts
and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value (NRV). NRV is the estimated selling price
less estimated costs to complete and to sell. The cost is determined using the moving average method for all
inventories except for raw materials and finished goods. The cost of raw materials and finished goods are
determined based on the periodic weighted average method.
The cost of raw materials includes all costs directly attributable to its acquisition.
Finished goods include the cost of raw materials, direct labor and a proportion of manufacturing overhead.
Prepaid Expenses
Prepaid expenses are carried at cost less the amortized portion. These typically include prepayments for
business taxes, insurance and employee health care expenses and other benefits.
*SGVFS015775*
- 19 -
3 to 5 years
5 years
Leasehold improvements are amortized over 5 years or the term of the lease, whichever is shorter.
Plant and technical equipment are depreciated over 5 years or the term of the related management contract,
whichever is shorter.
The EUL and depreciation and amortization method are reviewed periodically to ensure that the period and
method of depreciation and amortization are consistent with the expected pattern of economic benefits from
items of property, plant and equipment.
When property, plant and equipment is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and the related accumulated
depreciation and amortization and accumulated impairment, if any, are removed from the accounts and any
resulting gain or loss is credited to or charged against current operations.
Service Concession Assets and Obligations
The Group accounts for its concession arrangements with MWSS, PGL, TIEZA and CDC under the
Intangible Asset model as it receives the right (license) to charge users of public service. Under the Groups
concession agreements, the Group is granted the sole and exclusive right and discretion during the
concession period to manage, occupy, operate, repair, maintain, decommission and refurbish the identified
facilities required to provide water services. The legal title to these assets shall remain with MWSS, PGL,
TIEZA and CDC at the end of the concession period.
On the other hand, the concession arrangement with the PGC is accounted for under the Financial Asset
model as it has an unconditional contractual right to receive cash or other financial asset for its construction
services from or at the direction of the grantor. Under the concession arrangement, Cebu Water is awarded
the right to deliver bulk water supply to the grantor for a specific period of time under the concession period.
The Service concession assets (SCA) pertain to the fair value of the service concession obligations at
drawdown date, construction costs related to the rehabilitation works performed by the Group, and other local
component costs and cost overruns paid by the Group. These are amortized using the straight-line method
over the life of the related concession.
In addition, the Parent Company, Boracay Water, Clark Water and Laguna Water recognize and measure
revenue from rehabilitation works in accordance with PAS 11, Construction Contracts, and PAS 18,
Revenue, for the services it performs. Recognition of revenue is by reference to the stage of completion
method, also known as the percentage of completion method as provided under PAS 11. Contract revenue
and costs from rehabilitation works are recognized as Revenue from rehabilitation works and Cost of
rehabilitation works in profit or loss in the period in which the work is performed.
Investments in Associates
An associate is an entity in which the Group has significant influence and which is neither a subsidiary.
Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee,
but is not control or joint control over these policies.
*SGVFS015775*
- 20 -
The considerations made in determining significant influence is similar to those necessary to determine
control over subsidiaries.
The Groups investments in its associate are accounted for using the equity method.
Under the equity method, the investment in an associate is initially recognized at cost. The carrying amount
of the investment is adjusted to recognize changes in the Groups share of net assets of the associate since
the acquisition date. Goodwill relating to the associate is included in the carrying amount of the investment
and is not tested for impairment separately.
The statement of comprehensive income reflects the Groups share of the results of operations of the
associate. Any change in the other comprehensive income of those investees is presented as part of the
Groups other comprehensive income. In addition, when there has been a change recognized directly in the
equity of the associate, the Group recognizes its share of any changes, when applicable, in the statement of
changes in equity. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from transactions between the Group and the
associate are eliminated to the extent of the interest in the associate.
The aggregate of the Groups share of profit or loss of an associate is shown on the face of the statement of
income outside operating profit and represents profit or loss after tax and non-controlling interests in the
subsidiaries of the associate. If the Groups share of losses of an associate equals or exceeds its interest in
the associate, the Group discontinues recognizing its share of further losses.
The financial statements of the associate are prepared for the same reporting period as the Group. When
necessary, adjustments are made to bring the accounting policies in line with those of the Group.
After application of the equity method, the Group determines whether it is necessary to recognize an
impairment loss on its investment in its associate. At each reporting date, the Group determines whether
there is objective evidence that the investment in the associate is impaired. If there is such evidence, the
Group calculates the amount of impairment as the difference between the recoverable amount of the
associate and its carrying value, and then recognizes the loss as Share of profit of an associate in the
consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
Upon loss of significant influence over the associate, the Group measures and recognizes any retained
investment at its fair value. Any difference between the carrying amount of the associate upon loss of
significant influence and the fair value of the retained investment and proceeds from disposal is recognized in
profit or loss.
Business Combinations and Goodwill
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The cost of an acquisition is
measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred, measured at acquisition date fair value and the
amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. For each business combination, the acquirer
measures the non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the proportionate share of the
acquirees identifiable net assets. Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred.
When the Group acquires a business, it assesses the financial assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate
classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and
pertinent conditions as at the acquisition date. This includes the separation of embedded derivatives in host
contracts by the acquiree.
If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition date fair value of the acquirers previously
held equity interest in the acquiree is remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date through profit or loss
included under Remeasurement gain (loss) arising from business combination.
Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be recognized at fair value at the
acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration which is deemed to
be an asset or liability will be recognized in accordance with PAS 39 either in profit or loss or as a change to
OCI. If the contingent consideration is classified as equity, it should not be remeasured until it is finally
settled within equity.
If the initial accounting for a business combination can be determined only provisionally by the end of the
period in which the combination is effected because either the fair values to be assigned to the acquirees
identifiable assets, liabilities or contingent liabilities or the cost of the combination can be determined only
provisionally, the acquirer shall account for the combination using those provisional values. The acquirer
shall recognize any adjustments to those provisional values as a result of completing the initial accounting
*SGVFS015775*
- 21 -
within twelve months of the acquisition date as follows: (i) the carrying amount of the identifiable asset,
liability or contingent liability that is recognized or adjusted as a result of completing the initial accounting
shall be calculated as if its fair value at the acquisition date had been recognized from that date; (ii) goodwill
or any gain recognized shall be adjusted by an amount equal to the adjustment to the fair value at the
acquisition date of the identifiable asset, liability or contingent liability being recognized or adjusted; and (iii)
comparative information presented for the periods before the initial accounting for the combination is
complete shall be presented as if the initial accounting has been completed from the acquisition date.
Goodwill is initially measured at cost being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and
the amount recognized for non-controlling interest over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. If this consideration is lower than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the
difference is recognized in profit or loss.
Following initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment loss. Goodwill is
reviewed for impairment, annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may be impaired. For purposes of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business
combination is, from the acquisition date, allocated to each of the Groups cash-generating units (CGUs), or
groups of CGUs, that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination, irrespective of whether
other assets or liabilities of the Group are assigned to those units or groups of units. Each unit or group of
units to which the goodwill is allocated should:
represent the lowest level within the Group at which the goodwill is monitored for internal management
purposes; and
not be larger than an operating segment determined in accordance with PFRS 8, Operating Segments.
Impairment is determined by assessing the recoverable amount of the CGU (or group of CGUs), to which the
goodwill relates. Where the recoverable amount of the CGU (or group of CGUs) is less than the carrying
amount, an impairment loss is recognized. Where goodwill forms part of a CGU (or group of CGUs) and part
of the operation within that unit is disposed of, the goodwill associated with the operation disposed of is
included in the carrying amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss on disposal of the
operation. Goodwill disposed of in these circumstances is measured based on the relative values of the
operation disposed of and the portion of the CGU retained. If the acquirers interest in the net fair value of the
identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities exceeds the cost of the business combination, the
acquirer shall recognize immediately in profit or loss any excess remaining after reassessment.
Impairment of Non-financial Assets
This accounting policy applies primarily to the Groups property and equipment, service concession assets
and investments in associates. The Group assesses at each reporting date whether there is an indication
that an asset may be impaired. If any such indication exists, or when annual impairment testing for an asset
is required, the Group makes an estimate of the assets recoverable amount. An assets recoverable amount
is calculated as the higher of the assets or CGUs fair value less costs to sell and its value in use and is
determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely
independent of those from other assets or groups of assets. Where the carrying amount of an asset exceeds
its recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount. In
assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax
discount rate that reflects current market assessment of the time value of money and the risks specific to the
asset. In determining fair value less cost to sell, an appropriate valuation model is used. These calculations
are corroborated by valuation multiples or other fair value indicators. Impairment losses of continuing
operations are recognized in profit or loss in those expense categories consistent with the function of the
impaired asset.
For assets excluding goodwill, an assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any
indication that previously recognized impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such
indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognized impairment loss is reversed
only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the assets recoverable amount since the
last impairment loss was recognized. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its
recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been
determined, net of depreciation and amortization, had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in
prior years. Such reversal is recognized in profit or loss unless the asset is carried at revalued amount, in
which case the reversal is treated as revaluation increase. After such a reversal, the depreciation and
amortization charge is adjusted in future periods to allocate the assets revised carrying amount, less any
residual value, on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life.
*SGVFS015775*
- 22 -
Leases
The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains a lease, is based on the substance of the
arrangement at inception date of whether the fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a
specific asset or assets or the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset, even if that right is not explicitly
specified in an arrangement.
A reassessment is made after the inception of the lease only if one of the following applies:
a.
b.
c.
d.
there is a change in contractual terms, other than a renewal of or extension of the arrangement;
a renewal option is exercised or extension granted, unless the term of the renewal or extension was
initially included in the lease term;
there is a change in the determination of whether fulfillment is dependent on a specified asset; or
there is a substantial change to the asset.
Where reassessment is made, lease accounting shall commence or cease from the date when the change in
circumstances gave rise to the reassessment scenarios (a), (c) or (d) and at the date of renewal or extension
period for scenario (b).
A lease where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset is classified
as an operating lease.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group and
the revenue can be reliably measured, regardless of when the payment is made. Revenue is measured at
the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, taking into account contractually defined terms of
payment and excluding taxes or duty. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before
revenue is recognized.
Water and sewer revenue
Water and sewer revenue are recognized when the related water and sewerage services are rendered.
Water and sewerage are billed every month according to the bill cycles of the customers. As a result of bill
cycle cut-off, monthly service revenue earned but not yet billed at end of the month are estimated and
accrued. These estimates are based on historical consumption of the customers. Also, twenty percent
(20%) of water revenue is recognized by the Parent Company as environmental charge.
Interest income
Interest income is recognized as it accrues, taking into account the effective yield of the assets.
For all financial instruments measured at amortized cost and interest-bearing financial assets classified as
AFS, interest income is recorded using the effective interest rate (EIR). EIR is the rate that exactly discounts
the estimated future cash payments or receipts over the expected life of the financial instrument or a shorter
period, where appropriate, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability. Interest income is
included in finance income in the statement of income.
Revenue from rehabilitation works and Cost of rehabilitation works
Revenue from rehabilitation works is recognized and measured by the Group in accordance with PAS 11 for
the construction and PAS 18 for the service. This includes revenue from rehabilitation works which is
equivalent to the related cost for the rehabilitation works covered by the service concession arrangements
which is recognized as part of SCA.
When the Group provides construction or upgrade services, the consideration received or receivable is
recognized at fair value. The Group accounts for revenue and costs relating to operation services in
accordance with PAS 18 under the captions Revenue from rehabilitation works and Cost of rehabilitation
works in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
Management contracts
Management contracts are recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting, measured
principally on the basis of the physical proportion of the contract work to the estimated completion of a
project.
Other operating income
Other customer related fees such as connection, reconnection and disconnection fees are recognized when
these services have been rendered.
*SGVFS015775*
- 23 -
*SGVFS015775*
- 24 -
Borrowing Costs
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, development, improvement and construction
of fixed assets (including costs incurred in connection with rehabilitation works) that necessarily takes a
substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use are recorded as SCA are capitalized as part of the
cost of fixed assets. All other borrowing costs are expensed in the period they occur. Borrowing costs
consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds.
The interest capitalized is calculated using the Groups weighted average cost of borrowings after adjusting
for borrowing associated with specific developments. Where borrowings are associated with specific
developments, the amounts capitalized is the gross incurred on those borrowings less any investment
income arising on their temporary investment.
The capitalization of those borrowing costs commences when the activities to prepare the asset are in
progress and expenditures and borrowing costs are being incurred. Capitalization of borrowing costs ceases
when substantially all activities necessary in preparing the related assets for their intended use are complete.
Borrowing costs include interest charges and other related financing charges incurred in connection with the
borrowing of funds. Premiums and/or discounts on long-term debt are included in the Long-term debt
account in the consolidated statement of financial position and are amortized using the effective interest rate
method.
Provisions
A provision is recognized when the Group has: (a) a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a
past event; (b) it is probable (i.e. more likely than not) that an outflow of resources embodying economic
benefits will be required to settle the obligation; and (c) a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the
obligation. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the
expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessment of the time value of
money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in
the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as an interest expense. Where the Group expects a
provision to be reimbursed, the reimbursement is not recognized as a separate asset but only when the
reimbursement is virtually certain. Provisions are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted to reflect the
current best estimate.
Contingencies
Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements. These are disclosed unless
the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote. Contingent assets are not
recognized in the consolidated financial statements but disclosed when an inflow of economic benefits is
probable.
Defined Benefit Plan
The net defined benefit liability or asset is the aggregate of the present value of the defined benefit obligation
at the end of the reporting period reduced by the fair value of plan assets (if any), adjusted for any effect of
limiting a net defined benefit asset to the asset ceiling. The asset ceiling is the present value of any economic
benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan.
The cost of providing benefits under the defined benefit plans is actuarially determined using the projected
unit credit method.
Defined benefit costs comprise the following:
Service cost
*SGVFS015775*
- 25 -
Remeasurements comprising actuarial gains and losses, return on plan assets and any change in the effect
of the asset ceiling (excluding net interest on defined benefit liability) are recognized immediately in other
comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. Remeasurements are not reclassified to profit or
loss in subsequent periods.
Plan assets are assets that are held by a long-term employee benefit fund or qualifying insurance policies.
Plan assets are not available to the creditors of the Group, nor can they be paid directly to the Group. The fair
value of plan assets is based on market price information. When no market price is available, the fair value
of plan assets is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using a discount rate that reflects both
the risk associated with the plan assets and the maturity or expected disposal date of those assets (or, if they
have no maturity, the expected period until the settlement of the related obligations). If the fair value of the
plan assets is higher than the present value of the defined benefit obligation, the measurement of the
resulting defined benefit asset is limited to the present value of economic benefits available in the form of
refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan.
The Groups right to be reimbursed of some or all of the expenditure required to settle a defined benefit
obligation is recognized as a separate asset at fair value when and only when reimbursement is virtually
certain.
Termination Benefit
Termination benefits are employee benefits provided in exchange for the termination of an employees
employment as a result of either an entitys decision to terminate an employees employment before the
normal retirement date or an employees decision to accept an offer of benefits in exchange for the
termination of employment.
A liability and expense for a termination benefit is recognized at the earlier of when the entity can no longer
withdraw the offer of those benefits and when the entity recognizes related restructuring costs. Initial
recognition and subsequent changes to termination benefits are measured in accordance with the nature of
the employee benefit, as either post-employment benefits, short-term employee benefits, or other long-term
employee benefits.
Short-term Employee Benefits
Short-term employee benefits include items such as salaries and wages, social security contributions and
nonmonetary benefits, if expected to be settled wholly within twelve months after the end of the reporting
period in which the employees rendered the related services. Short-term employee benefits are recognized
as expense as incurred. When an employee has rendered service to the Company during the reporting
period, the Company recognizes the undiscounted amount of short-term employee benefits expected to be
paid in exchange for that service as a liability (accrued expense), after deducting any amount already paid.
Employee Leave Entitlement
Employee entitlements to annual leave are recognized as a liability when they are accrued to the employees.
The undiscounted liability for leave expected to be settled wholly before twelve months after the end of the
annual reporting period is recognized for services rendered by employees up to the end of the reporting
period.
Share-Based Payment
Employee share purchase plans
The Parent Company has an employee stock ownership plan (ESOWN) which allows the grantees to
purchase the Companys shares at a discounted price. The Parent Company recognizes stock
compensation expense over the holding period. The Parent Company treats its ESOWN plan as option
exercisable within a given period. These are accounted for similar to the PFRS 2, Share-based Payment,
options. Dividends paid on the awards that have vested are deducted from equity and those paid on awards
that are unvested are charged to profit or loss. For the unsubscribed shares where the employees still have
the option to subscribe in the future, these are accounted for as options.
Equity
When the shares are sold at premium, the difference between the proceeds at the par value is credited to
Additional paid-in capital account. Direct costs incurred related to equity issuance are chargeable to
Additional paid-in capital account. If additional paid-in capital is not sufficient, the excess is charged against
retained earnings. When the Group issues more than one class of stock, a separate account is maintained
for each class of stock and the number of shares issued.
Subscriptions receivable pertains to the uncollected portion of the subscribed shares.
*SGVFS015775*
- 26 -
Retained earnings represent accumulated earnings of the Group less dividends declared.
Own equity instruments which are reacquired (treasury shares) are recognized at cost and deducted from
equity. No gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of the
Groups own equity instruments. Any difference between the carrying amount and the consideration, if
reissued, is recognized in additional paid-in capital. Voting rights related to treasury shares are nullified for
the Group and no dividends are allocated to them respectively. When the shares are retired, the capital
stock account is reduced by its par value and the excess of cost over par value upon retirement is debited to
additional paid-in capital to the extent of the specific or average additional paid-in capital when the shares
were issued and to retained earnings for the remaining balance.
Other reserves pertain to gain from sale of investments in a subsidiary by the Parent Company that did not
result to a loss of control.
Taxes
Value-Added Tax (VAT)
Input VAT pertains to the 12% indirect tax paid by the Group in the course of the Groups trade or business
on local purchase of goods or services.
Output VAT pertains to the 12% tax due on the local sale of goods and services by the Group.
If at the end of any taxable month, the output VAT exceeds the input VAT, the outstanding balance is
included under Accounts and other payables account. If the input VAT exceeds the output VAT, the excess
shall be carried over to the succeeding months and included under Other current assets account.
Current tax
Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be
recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount
are those that have been enacted or substantively enacted as of the reporting date.
Deferred tax
Deferred tax is provided, using the liability method, for all temporary differences, with certain exceptions, at
the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial
reporting purposes.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences, except:
When the deferred tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or an asset or liability in a
transaction that is not a business combination, and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the
accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss.
In respect of taxable temporary difference associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and
interests in joint ventures, when the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled
and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future,
Deferred tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, the carry forward of unused tax
credits and any unused tax losses. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that
taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carryforward of
unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilized, except:
When the deferred tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial
recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of
the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss.
*SGVFS015775*
- 27 -
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rate that is expected to apply in the year when the
asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or
substantively enacted as of the reporting date.
Deferred tax relating to items recognized outside profit or loss is recognized outside profit or loss. Deferred
tax items are recognized in correlation to the underlying transaction either in other comprehensive income or
directly in equity.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets
against current income tax liabilities and the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the
same taxation authority.
Earnings per Share (EPS)
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the year and adjusted to give retroactive effect to any stock dividends
declared during the period. The net income attributable to common stock is net of the dividends attributable
to participating preferred stock. The participating preferred shares participate in the earnings at a rate of 1/10
of the dividends paid to a common share.
Diluted EPS is computed by dividing earnings attributable to common shares by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period, after giving retroactive effect of any stock dividends
during the period and adjusted for the effect of dilutive options. Outstanding stock options will have a dilutive
effect under the treasury stock method only when the average market price of the underlying common share
during the period exceeds the exercise price of the option. Where the effects of the assumed exercise of all
outstanding options have anti-dilutive effect, basic and diluted EPS are stated at the same amount.
Assets Held in Trust
Assets which are owned by MWSS, PGL, TIEZA and CDC that are operated by the Group under the Groups
concession agreements are not reflected in the consolidated statement of financial position but are
considered as Assets Held in Trust.
Segment Reporting
The Groups operating businesses are organized based on geographic location. Financial information on
business segments is presented in Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements.
Events after the Reporting Date
Any event after the reporting date up to the date of the auditors report that provide additional information
about the Groups financial position at the reporting date (adjusting events) is reflected in the consolidated
financial statements. Any event after the reporting date that is not an adjusting event is disclosed in the
consolidated financial statements when material.
3.
*SGVFS015775*
- 28 -
On the under hand, the Group has made a judgment that the concession agreement with PGC qualifies
under the Financial Asset model as it has an unconditional contractual right to receive cash or other financial
assets for its construction services directly from PGC (see Notes 2 and 9).
Investments in subsidiaries
The Group considers the entities listed in Note 1 as its subsidiaries because it exercises control over the said
entities. The Group is exposed, or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with the entities and has
the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entities (see Note 1).
The Group has determined that it exercises control over Asia Water even though it owns less than 51% of
Asia Waters shares of stock. Factors considered include, among others, its representation in the BOD and
the assignment of Parent Company employees in the key management positions to direct the activities that
significantly affect the returns of Asia Water.
Investments in associates
The Parent Company considers Thu Duc Water B.O.O. Corporation (Thu Duc Water), Kenh Dong Water
Supply Joint Stock Company (Kenh Dong Water), Saigon Water and Cu Chi Water as associates because it
has the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of these entities but does not have
control or joint control over those policies. See Note 11 for the related balances.
Impairment of investments in associates
At each reporting date, the Group makes an assessment whether it is necessary to recognize an impairment
loss in its Investments in associates by considering internal and external sources of information (e.g., the
Group has determined that there are no indicators of impairment for its investments in Thu Duc Water, Kenh
Dong Water, Saigon Water and Cu Chi Water).
Non-financial asset impairment
The Group assesses the impairment of non-financial assets (property, plant and equipment, SCA, other
current assets and other noncurrent assets) whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The factors that the Group considers important which
could trigger an impairment review include the following:
As described in the accounting policy, the Group estimates the recoverable amount as the higher of the net
selling price and value in use.
In determining the present value of estimated future cash flows expected to be generated from the continued
use of the assets, the Group is required to make estimates and assumptions regarding the expected future
cash generation of the assets, discount rates to be applied and the expected period of benefits. As of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Group did not recognize any impairment loss on its non-financial assets
(see Notes 7, 8, 9 and 12 for the related balances).
Operating lease commitments - Group as lessee
The Group has determined, based on the evaluation of the terms and conditions of the arrangements, that
the significant risks and rewards for properties leased from third parties are retained by the lessors and
accordingly, accounts for these contracts as operating leases. See Note 24 for related disclosure.
Embedded derivative
The Group has entered into loan facility agreements with prepayment options. These prepayment options
give the Group the right to redeem the outstanding loans in part or in full after the lapse of a prescribed
period. The Group assessed that these prepayment options are clearly and closely related considering that
the amortized cost of the loan approximates the prepayment at exercise dates. As a result, the Group did not
bifurcate any embedded derivative as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 (see Note 14).
Segment reporting
The Group aggregates two or more operating segments into a single operating segment when separately,
each operating segment has similar economic characteristics and service area. The Group considers the
East Zone, Outside East Zone and Management Contracts as its operating segments and are aggregated as
such based on the source and types of revenues (see Note 25).
*SGVFS015775*
- 29 -
Contingencies
The Group is currently involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary conduct of business. The
estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims has been developed in consultation with
internal and outside counsels handling the defense in these matters and is based upon an analysis of
potential results.
The Group currently does not believe these proceedings will have a material or adverse effect on the Groups
financial position and results of operations (see Note 29).
Use of Estimates
Key assumptions concerning the future and other sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting date that
have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities are
discussed below. Existing circumstances and assumptions about future developments, however, may
change due to market changes or circumstances arising that are beyond the control of the Group. Such
changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur.
Revenue and cost recognition
The Groups revenue recognition policies require management to make use of estimates and assumptions
that may affect the reported amounts of the following revenue and costs:
Management contracts
The Groups management contracts recognized based on the percentage of completion method is
measured principally on the basis of the estimated completion of a physical proportion of the contract
work, and by reference to the actual costs incurred to date over the estimated total costs of the project.
Rehabilitation works
The Group measures revenue from rehabilitation works at the fair value of the consideration received or
receivable. The Companys revenue from rehabilitation works recognized based on the percentage of
completion are measured principally on the basis of the estimated completion of a physical proportion of
the contract works, and by reference to the actual costs incurred to date over the estimated total costs of
the project. Revenue from rehabilitation works recognized by the Group is equivalent to the costs of
rehabilitation works incurred as these costs are recovered by the Group through its right to charge the
customers.
*SGVFS015775*
- 30 -
*SGVFS015775*
- 31 -
The Groups deferred FCDA arises from a rate adjustment mechanism for the recovery or compensation on a
current basis, subject to quarterly review and adjustment by MWSS or TIEZA, when necessary, of accrued
foreign exchange gains and losses, arising from MWSS or TIEZA loans and concession loans used for
capital expenditures and concession fee payments.
Share-based payments
The expected life of the options is based on the expected exercise behavior of the stock option holders and is
not necessarily indicative of the exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility is based on the
average historical price volatility which may be different from the expected volatility of the shares of stock of
the Parent Company. See Note 19 for the related balances.
Pension expense
The cost of defined benefit pension plans are determined using actuarial valuations. The actuarial valuation
involves making various assumptions. These include the determination of the discount rates, future salary
increases, mortality rates and future pension increases. Due to the complexity of the valuation, the
underlying assumptions and its long-term nature, defined benefit obligations are highly sensitive to changes
in these assumptions. Discount rate and salary increase rate assumptions are reviewed at each reporting
date. The net benefit liability as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 is P
= 102.35 million and P
= 38.77 million,
respectively (see Note 15).
In determining the appropriate discount rate, management considers the interest rates of government bonds
that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid, with extrapolated maturities
corresponding to the expected duration of the defined benefit obligation.
The mortality rate is based on publicly available mortality tables for the specific country and is modified
accordingly with estimates of mortality improvements. Future salary increases and pension increases are
based on expected future inflation rates for the specific country.
Further details about the assumptions used are provided in Note 15.
Fair value of financial instruments
Where the fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the consolidated statement of
financial position or disclosed in the notes cannot be derived from active markets, they are determined using
internal valuation techniques using generally accepted market valuation models. While significant
components of the fair value measurement were determined using verifiable objective evidence (i.e., foreign
exchange rate and interest rate), the amount of changes in fair value may differ due to usage of different
methodology (see Note 26).
4.
2015
P
= 1,862,685,336
4,987,270,343
P
= 6,849,955,679
2014
P
= 1,478,227,092
4,974,326,740
P
= 6,452,553,832
Cash in banks earn interest at the respective bank deposit rates ranging from 0.19% to 2.50%, 0.50% to
3.25% and 1.25% to 5.00% in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Cash equivalents are highly liquid
investments with varying periods of up to 3 months and earn interest at the respective short-term rates.
Interest income earned from cash in banks and cash equivalents amounted to P
= 70.33 million, P
= 66.98 million,
and P
= 99.63 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively (see Note 17).
*SGVFS015775*
- 32 -
5.
Receivables
This account consists of receivables from:
2015
Customers:
Residential
Commercial
Semi-business
Industrial
BWC (Note 12)
Employees
Interest from banks
Saigon Water Corporation (SAWACO) (Note 22)
Others (Note 14)
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
Less noncurrent portion of receivable from BWC (Note 12)
P
= 1,613,144,600
452,559,164
74,353,461
113,826,382
529,500,647
39,753,731
12,438,613
214,408,000
3,049,984,598
(726,494,508)
2,323,490,090
(458,642,155)
P
= 1,864,847,935
2014
P
= 1,638,350,565
229,566,366
81,124,140
47,132,293
529,500,647
39,554,286
11,941,957
32,888,246
267,174,450
2,877,232,950
(717,734,719)
2,159,498,231
(465,051,543)
P
= 1,694,446,688
The classes of the Groups receivables arising from water and sewer services rendered to customers,
collectible within 30 days from billing date, follow:
a.
b.
c.
d.
Receivable from BWC pertains to the assigned receivable between the Parent Company and VWPI covered
by the Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) related to the acquisition of VWPIs interest in Clark Water in 2011.
The loss from revaluation amounting to P
= 1.41 million in 2013 was recorded as a Gain (loss) on revaluation
of receivable from Bonifacio Water Corporation in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (nil
in 2015 and 2014).
The assigned receivable will be paid by BWC at an amount equal to 30% of the product consumed by all of
BWCs customers and the tariff imposed by the Parent Company on its customers falling under the
corresponding classification pursuant to the Concession Agreement, and all amounts received by BWC as
connection fees from customers, and any fee BWC may charge in relation to the interconnection with the
wastewater treatment plant of areas of developments outside the BWC service area.
Receivable from SAWACO pertains to the unpaid portion of billing for services rendered by the Group in
relation to its management contract with SAWACO (see Note 22).
Receivable from employees are due and demandable and are collected through salary deductions or
expense liquidations.
Others include receivables from indemnity related to the acquisition of Kenh Dong Water (see Note 11), and
receivables from shared facilities, insurance agencies and collection facilities.
Movements in the Groups allowance for doubtful accounts follow:
Balance at beginning of
year
Provision (Note 17)
Reversal (Note 17)
Balance at end of year
Individual impairment
Collective impairment
Residential
P
= 481,392,378
30,276,922
P
= 511,669,300
P
= 25,550,322
486,118,978
2015
Receivable from Customers
Commercial Semi-business
P
= 113,411,221
P
= 33,250,662
5,547,030
(22,125,608)
P
= 96,832,643
P
= 12,269,836
84,562,807
2,106,786
(6,522,876)
P
= 28,834,572
P
= 1,788,489
27,046,083
Industrial
P
= 5,644,348
Other
Receivables
P
= 84,036,110
Total
P
= 717,734,719
53,612
(998,718)
P
= 4,699,242
P
= 807,161
3,892,081
422,641
P
= 84,458,751
P
= 2,411,865
82,046,886
38,406,991
(29,647,202)
P
= 726,494,508
P
= 42,827,673
683,666,835
*SGVFS015775*
- 33 -
6.
Residential
P
= 460,288,640
21,103,738
P
= 481,392,378
P
= 25,953,548
455,438,830
2014
Receivable from Customers
Commercial
Semi-business
P
= 107,303,430
P
= 32,118,694
6,107,791
1,131,968
P
= 113,411,221
P
= 33,250,662
P
= 10,893,892
P
= 1,895,555
102,517,329
31,355,107
Industrial
P
= 4,962,559
681,789
P
= 5,644,348
P
= 855,138
4,789,210
Other
Receivables
P
= 78,750,136
5,285,974
P
= 84,036,110
P
= 2,411,865
81,624,245
Total
P
= 683,423,459
34,311,260
P
= 717,734,719
P
= 42,009,998
675,724,721
Inventories
This account consists of:
2015
P
= 53,617,721
81,109,681
37,308,637
4,991,232
P
= 177,027,271
Maintenance materials
Water meters and connection supplies
Water treatment chemicals
Others
2014
P
= 90,142,091
66,646,295
29,501,675
P
= 186,290,061
Others includes finished goods and raw materials. Finished goods consist of 5-gallon packaged water and
dispenser while raw materials consist of the cap seals for the 5-gallon packaged water bottles.
7.
P
= 847,456,833
Advances to contractors
Prepaid expenses
Guaranty deposits
Input VAT
2014
P
= 419,941,769
125,899,202
20,993,444
117,025,342
P
= 683,859,757
Advances to contractors are normally applied within a year against progress billings.
Prepaid expenses consist of prepayments for business taxes, insurance and employee health care expenses
and other benefits.
Guaranty deposits consist of rental deposits and other advance payments that can be recovered within one
year.
Input VAT is fully realizable and will be applied against future output VAT.
8.
Transfer (Note 9)
(38,393,459)
Disposals
= 1,694,076,546
Balance at end of year P
Plant
Leasehold and Technical Construction
Land Improvements
Equipment in Progress
Total
P
= 444,701,760 P
= 1,495,255,532 P
= 285,698,144 P
= 1,041,616,501
P
= P
= 4,695,174,070
157,182,295
4,463,062
17,581,813
108,681,104 133,379,117
725,855,263
(1,297,667,113)
(1,297,667,113)
(74,309,538)
(574,933)
(113,277,930)
P
= 527,574,517
P
= 202,051,481 P
= 302,705,024 P
= 1,150,297,605 P
= 133,379,117 P
= 4,010,084,290
(Forward)
*SGVFS015775*
- 34 -
2015
Office Furniture Transportation
and Equipment
Equipment
Accumulated
Depreciation
and Amortization
Balance at beginning of
P
= 1,268,182,404
year
Depreciation and
106,226,772
amortization
(18,068,993)
Disposals
1,356,340,183
Balance at end of year
Net Book Value
P
= 337,736,363
P
= 352,132,955
49,818,653
(73,746,640)
328,204,968
P
= 199,369,549
Plant
Leasehold and Technical Construction
Land Improvements
Equipment in Progress
P
= P
= 205,694,517
P
= 202,051,481
24,206,395
(479,665)
229,421,247
P
= 73,283,777
P
= 737,198,576
Total
P
= P
= 2,563,208,452
104,031,758
284,283,578
(92,295,298)
841,230,334
2,755,196,732
P
= 309,067,271 P
= 133,379,117 P
= 1,254,887,558
2014
Office Furniture
and Equipment
Cost
Balance at beginning of
year
P
= 1,334,639,136
Additions
93,307,101
Disposals
(44,104)
Balance at end of year
1,427,902,133
Accumulated
Depreciation
and Amortization
Balance at beginning of
year
1,174,089,196
Depreciation and
amortization
94,124,520
Disposals
(31,312)
Balance at end of year
1,268,182,404
Net Book Value
P
= 159,719,729
Transportation
Equipment
Leasehold
Land Improvements
Plant
and Technical Construction in
Equipment
Progress
Total
P
=
= 236,175,702
P
= 419,011,115 P
= 1,472,106,478 P
33,729,574
23,149,054
49,522,442
(8,038,929)
444,701,760 1,495,255,532
285,698,144
326,713,533
P
= 888,808,157
152,808,344
1,041,616,501
P
= 4,350,740,588
352,516,515
(8,083,033)
4,695,174,070
2,311,979,671
184,489,353
626,687,589
32,269,958
(6,850,536)
352,132,955
P
= 92,568,805 P
= 1,495,255,532
21,205,164
205,694,517
P
= 80,003,627
110,510,987
737,198,576
P
= 304,417,925
258,110,629
(6,881,848)
2,563,208,452
P
= P
= 2,131,965,618
9.
Cost
Balance at beginning of year
Additions:
Rehabilitation works
Transfer (Note 8)
Adjustments (Note 1)
Local component cost
Balance at end of year
Accumulated Amortization
Balance at beginning of year
Amortization
Balance at end of year
Net Book Value
2015
2014
P
= 73,381,997,758
P
= 69,942,684,717
5,219,358,277
1,297,667,113
154,844,638
1,249,863
80,055,117,649
3,435,789,320
3,523,721
73,381,997,758
17,546,332,000
2,315,929,346
19,862,261,346
P
= 60,192,856,303
15,360,455,322
2,185,876,678
17,546,332,000
P
= 55,835,665,758
SCA consists of the present value of total estimated concession fee payments, including regulatory costs and
local component costs, of the Parent Company, Laguna Water, Boracay Water and Clark Water, pursuant to
the Groups concession agreements and the revenue from rehabilitation works which is equivalent to the
related cost for the rehabilitation works covered by the service concession arrangements.
*SGVFS015775*
- 35 -
Total interest and other borrowing costs capitalized as part of the rehabilitation works amounted to
P
= 513.17 million, P
= 377.70 million, and P
= 299.48 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The
capitalization rates used ranged from 6.24% to 8.10% in 2015, 7.01% to 8.78% in 2014, and 4.16% to 7.06%
in 2013.
b.
Current
Noncurrent
2015
P
= 1,255,676,876
6,671,193,814
P
= 7,926,870,690
2014
P
= 1,019,515,457
6,981,693,612
P
= 8,001,209,069
Estimated concession fee payments on future concession projects, excluding the Groups share in current
operating budget is still not determinable. It is only determinable upon either loan drawdowns and actual
construction of the related concession projects, as a percentage of revenues, or as a fixed amount.
MWSS Concession Fees
The aggregate concession fees of the Parent Company pursuant to the Agreement are equal to the sum of
the following:
i.
10% of the aggregate Peso equivalent due under any MWSS loan which has been disbursed prior
to the Commencement Date, including MWSS loans for existing projects and the Umiray Angat
Transbasin Project (UATP), on the prescribed payment date;
ii.
10% of the aggregate Peso equivalent due under any MWSS loan designated for the UATP which
has not been disbursed prior to the Commencement Date, on the prescribed payment date;
iii.
10% of the local component costs and cost overruns related to the UATP;
iv.
100% of the aggregate Peso equivalent due under MWSS loans designated for existing projects,
which have not been disbursed prior to the Commencement Date and have been either awarded to
third party bidders or elected by the Parent Company for continuation;
v.
100% of the local component costs and cost overruns related to existing projects;
vi.
Parent Companys share in the repayment of MWSS loan for the financing of new projects; and
vii.
In March 2010, MWSS entered into a loan agreement with The Export-Import Bank of China to finance the
Angat Water Utilization and Aqueduct Improvement Project Phase II (the Project). Total loan facility
amounted to $116.60 million with maturity of 20 years including a 5-year grace period. Interest rate is 3% per
annum.
MWSS subsequently entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Parent Company and
Maynilad for the Parent Company and Maynilad to equally shoulder the repayment of the loan with such
repayment to be part of the concession fees.
The schedule of undiscounted future concession fee payments follows:
Foreign Currency
Denominated
Loans
Peso Loans/
(Translated to
Project Local
Total Peso
USD)
Year
Support
Equivalent*
2016
$19,043,231
P
= 395,714,907
P
= 1,291,889,358
2017
10,960,747
395,714,907
911,527,661
2018
10,836,185
395,714,907
905,665,773
2019
8,526,286
395,714,907
796,961,926
2020 onwards
53,484,891
7,122,868,322
9,639,867,292
$102,851,340
P
= 8,705,727,950
P
= 13,545,912,010
*Peso equivalent is translated using the closing rate as of December 31, 2015 amounting to P
= 47.06 to US$1.
*SGVFS015775*
- 36 -
Advance payment to PGL was made for the said concession fees and 70% of the annual concession fees is
applied against the said advances. The remaining 30% of the annual concession fees is expensed in the
period they are incurred. Advances as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to P
= 86.58 million and
P
= 102.83 million, respectively.
TIEZA Concession Fees
The aggregate concession fee pursuant to Boracay Waters concession agreement with TIEZA is equal to the
sum of the following:
i.
Servicing the aggregate Peso equivalent of all liabilities of BWSS as of commencement date;
ii.
5% of the monthly gross revenue of Boracay Water, inclusive of all applicable taxes which are for
the account of Boracay Water; and
iii.
Payment of annual operating budget of the TIEZA Regulatory Office starting 2010. For 2010 and
2011, the amount shall not exceed P
= 15.00 million. For the year 2012 and beyond, Boracay Water
shall pay not more than P
= 20.00 million, subject to annual CPI adjustments.
ii.
As a result of the extension of the Concession Agreement of Clark Water, payment of rental fees on the CDC
existing facilities was extended by an additional 15 years from October 1, 2025 to October 1, 2040 (see
Note 1).
c.
On December 13, 2013, Cebu Water received a Notice of Award for the bulk supply of water to the
Metropolitan Cebu Water District (MCWD). In relation to this, Cebu Water and MCWD signed a 20-year Bulk
Water Supply Contract for the supply of 18 million liters per day of water for the first year and 35 million liters
per day of water for years 2 up to 20.
Concession financial receivable is accounted for in accordance with IFRIC 12, arising from the bulk water
contract between Cebu Water and MCWD whereby the facilities constructed by Cebu Water shall be used for
the delivery of potable and treated water to MCWD at an aggregate volume of 18,000 cubic meters per day
for the first year and 35,000 cubic meters per day for the succeeding years up to 20 years at P
= 24.59 per
cubic meter.
Cebu Water entered into a 30-year Right of Way Agreement with certain individuals for an easement of right
of way of a portion of their lands wherein the pipelines and other appurtenances between the weir and water
treatment plant of Cebu Water will pass through. In 2014, this was transferred from Other noncurrent
assets to Concession financial receivable as this formed part of rehabilitation works.
*SGVFS015775*
- 37 -
Current
Noncurrent
2015
P
= 209,010,713
989,072,850
P
= 1,198,083,563
2014
P
= 76,914,317
899,069,520
P
= 975,983,837
Acquisition cost
Accumulated equity in net earnings
Cumulative translation adjustment
2015
P
= 4,408,813,817
780,758,895
533,961,310
P
= 5,723,534,022
2014
P
= 4,090,650,527
636,258,280
234,590,946
P
= 4,961,499,753
Details of the Groups investments in associates, all of which are incorporated in the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam and have their principal place of business in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, are shown below:
Thu Duc Water
On October 12, 2011, TDWH and Ho Chi Minh City Infrastructure Investment Joint Stock Company (CII)
entered into a share sale and purchase agreement whereby CII will sell to TDWH its 49.00% interest (2.45
million common shares) in Thu Duc Water. On December 8, 2011, TDWH completed the acquisition of CIIs
interest in the common shares of Thu Duc Water after which TDWH obtained significant influence in Thu Duc
Water.
The acquisition cost of the investment amounted to P
= 1.79 billion (VND858.00 billion). The investments in
associate account includes a notional goodwill amounting to P
= 1.41 billion arising from the acquisition of
shares of stock in Thu Duc Water.
The financial information of Thu Duc Water as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
follows:
Current assets
Noncurrent assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Revenue
Net income
2015
P
= 151,081,711
2,724,185,482
381,307,348
476,530,416
742,538,177
439,198,016
2014
P
= 102,232,559
2,279,923,547
399,688,104
260,590,404
770,316,632
444,295,946
The share of the Group in the net income of Thu Duc Water for the years ended December 31, 2015 and
2014 amounted to P
= 215.21 million and P
=217.71 million, respectively.
Kenh Dong Water
On May 17, 2012, the Parent Company thru KDWH entered into a SPA with CII for the purchase of 47.35%
of CIIs interest in Kenh Dong Water. The payment for the shares shall be done in two tranches, with
additional contingent considerations subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions precedent, for a total
purchase price of P
= 1.66 billion.
*SGVFS015775*
- 38 -
As of December 31, 2012, considerations paid by the Parent Company for its investment in Kenh Dong
Water amounted to P
= 1.57 billion (VND785.24 billion). Contingent consideration included in the purchase
price allocation amounted to P
= 95.98 million (VND44.49 billion) (see Note 16). The share purchase
transaction was completed on July 20, 2012 and KDWH gained significant influence in Kenh Dong Water.
In 2013, Kenh Dong Water finalized its purchase price allocation which resulted in a final notional goodwill
amounting to P
= 1.38 billion. The Group also recorded an income of P
= 62.90 million under the caption Other
income in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as indemnification for the damages resulting
from the delay in the start of the bulk water operations of Kenh Dong Water.
On December 31, 2015, the KDWH reversed its previously recognized contingent liability amounting to
P
= 95.98 million (VND44.49 billion) (see Note 16).
The financial information of Kenh Dong Water as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
follows:
Current assets
Noncurrent assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Revenue
Net income
2015
P
= 737,695,232
3,028,507,933
229,930,299
1,798,451,225
435,517,225
251,229,754
2014
P
= 654,566,749
2,251,871,473
346,204,390
1,510,062,513
464,795,958
236,113,628
The share of the Group in the net income of Kenh Dong Water for the years ended December 31, 2015 and
2014 amounted to P
= 118.96 million and P
=111.80 million, respectively.
The Groups share in net income from its investments in Thu Duc Water and Kenh Dong Water resulted from
concession arrangements with the Peoples Committee of Ho Chi Minh City (the Grantor). These concession
arrangements are accounted under the Financial Asset model of IFRIC 12 as these associates have an
unconditional contractual right to receive fixed and determinable amounts of payment for its construction
services at the direction of the Grantor.
Saigon Water
On October 8, 2013, the Parent Company through MWSAH entered into an Investment Agreement for the
acquisition of a 31.47% stake in Saigon Water. The acquisition cost of the investment amounted to
P
= 642.76 million (VND310.45 billion). The share subscription transaction was completed on October 8, 2013
and MWSAH gained significant influence in Saigon Water.
In 2014, MWSAH finalized the notional goodwill amounting to P
=288.84 million arising from the acquisition of
shares of stock in Saigon Water by the Group as of December 31, 2013. There were no adjustments made
to the fair values of the net assets as of acquisition date.
The financial information of Saigon Water as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
follows:
Current assets
Noncurrent assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Revenue
Net income
2015
P
= 1,865,305,459
4,459,192,292
476,056,119
4,244,995,687
1,277,090,235
220,370,179
2014
P
= 640,519,449
1,084,396,628
231,758,420
231,758,420
127,870,666
88,317,587
The share of the Group in the consolidated net income of Saigon Water for the years ended December 31,
2015 and 2014 amounted to P
=69.35 million and P
=27.79 million, respectively.
Cu Chi Water
On October 10, 2015, MWSAH executed a Capital Transfer Agreement with Saigon Water for the acquisition
of 24.5% of the charter of Cu Chi Water Supply Sewerage Company Ltd. in the amount of
P
= 318.16 million (VND154.35 billion).
*SGVFS015775*
- 39 -
The financial information of Cu Chi Water as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 is as follows:
2015
P
= 7,790,792
1,324,000,275
1,099,863
371,910
(5,376)
Current assets
Noncurrent assets
Current liabilities
Revenue
Net loss
The conversion rate used was P
= 0.0021 to VND1 as of December 31, 2015.
The share of the Group in the net loss of Cu Chi Water for the year ended December 31, 2015 amounted to
P
= 1,317.
The reconciliation of the net assets of the associates to the carrying amounts of the Investments in
associates recognized in the consolidated financial statements follows:
2015
Thu Duc Water
Net assets of associate
attributable to common
shareholders
Proportionate ownership in the
associate
Share in net identifiable assets
Notional goodwill
Carrying values
Saigon Water
Cu Chi Water
Total
P
= 2,017,429,429 P
= 1,737,821,641 P
= 1,603,445,945 P
= 1,330,691,204 P
= 6,689,388,219
49.00%
47.35%
988,540,420
822,858,547
1,413,891,653 1,378,777,432
P
= 2,402,432,073 P
= 2,201,635,979
Kenh Dong
Water
31.47%
504,604,439
288,842,185
P
= 793,446,624
2014
Kenh Dong Water
P
= 1,721,877,598
P
= 1,350,171,319
49.00%
843,720,023
1,413,891,653
P
= 2,257,611,676
47.35%
639,306,120
1,378,777,432
P
= 2,018,083,552
24.50%
326,019,345 2,642,022,751
3,081,511,270
P
= 326,019,345 P
= 5,723,534,021
Saigon Water
Total
P
= 1,261,399,237
P
= 4,333,448,154
31.47%
396,962,340
288,842,185
P
= 685,804,525
1,879,988,483
3,081,511,270
P
= 4,961,499,753
2015
P
= 636,258,280
403,514,812
(259,014,197)
P
= 780,758,895
2014
P
= 412,988,290
357,298,362
(134,028,372)
P
= 636,258,280
2015
P
= 644,428,617
458,642,155
103,863,952
2014
P
= 141,189,217
465,051,543
121,579,940
95,757,000
45,000,000
35,000,000
59,914,167
P
= 1,442,605,891
89,124,098
45,000,000
35,000,000
26,781,828
P
= 923,726,626
Deferred FCDA
Receivable from BWC - net of current portion (Note 5)
Deposits
Receivable from Ayala Multi-Purpose Cooperative
(AMPC)
Water banking rights
Advances to Carmen Development Fund
Miscellaneous
*SGVFS015775*
- 40 -
Deferred FCDA refers to the net unrecovered amounts from (amounts for refund to) customers for realized
losses (gains) from payments of foreign loans based on the difference between the drawdown or rebased
rate versus the closing rate at payment date. This account also covers the unrealized gains or losses from
loan valuations.
Deposits pertain to the Groups advance payments for the guarantee deposits with Manila Electric Company
for the electric connection, its related deferred charges, deposits to the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and land acquisitions.
Receivable from AMPC pertains to the term loan and credit line facility agreement.
Water banking rights pertains to the rights assigned by MW Consortium to Cebu Water. On August 22, 2012,
the National Water Resources Board (NWRB) approved the assignment of Water Permit No. 16241 from
Central Equity Ventures Inc. (now Stateland Inc.) to MW Consortium. The NWRB likewise approved the
change of the purpose of Water Permit No. 16241 from Domestic to Municipal. MW Consortium allows Cebu
Water to use the said water permit for its project.
Advances to Carmen Development Fund pertain to the advance payments for the permit to extract water at
the Carmen property in Cebu.
Trade payables
Accrued expenses:
Salaries, wages and employee benefits
Management and professional fees
Repairs and maintenance
Utilities
Wastewater costs
Collection fees
Occupancy costs
Others
Interest payable (Note 14)
Contracts payable
Advances from SAWACO
Others
2015
P
= 2,451,213,310
2014
P
= 2,347,681,511
298,094,912
293,513,008
223,669,358
98,897,160
184,729,370
61,543,234
25,474,682
93,673,091
341,550,237
284,090,343
76,638,682
P
= 4,433,087,387
324,935,018
180,703,866
173,402,270
140,858,704
86,108,068
109,910,311
22,336,280
59,990,835
321,624,639
26,034,472
719,292
52,519,230
P
= 3,846,824,496
Trade payables and accrued expenses are non-interest-bearing and are normally settled on 15 to 60-day
terms. Other payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled within one year.
Other accrued expenses include accruals for advertising, insurance, transportation and travel, postage,
telephone and supplies.
Interest payable pertains to the unpaid portion of interest arising from the long-term debts of the Group.
Contracts payable pertains to the accrual of expenses which requires the Group to pay the contractor based
on progress billings. Contracts payable are due and demandable and are normally settled within one year.
Advances from SAWACO pertain to the advance payments made by SAWACO to the Parent Company to
facilitate the start-up and operating expenses related to the management contract entered with SAWACO
(see Note 22). These are offset against the progress billings made by the Parent Company.
*SGVFS015775*
- 41 -
USD loans:
NEXI Loan
LBP Loan
Second IFC Loan
EIB Loan
Japanese Yen (JPY) loans:
LBP Loan
First IFC Loan
EIB Loan
PHP loans:
Fixed Rate Corporate Notes
P
= 5.00 billion Loan
P
= 1.15 billion Clark Water RCBC Loan
P
= 0.75 billion Cebu Water DBP Loan
P
= 0.83 billion Laguna Water DBP Loan
P
= 2.50 billion Laguna Water SBC Loan
P
= 0.50 billion Laguna Water DBP Loan
P
= 0.50 billion Laguna Water Loan
P
= 0.50 billion Boracay Water DBP-SBC Loan
P
= 0.50 billion Boracay Water DBP-SBC Loan
Less current portion
2015
2014
P
= 4,264,837,624
1,055,747,830
93,457,939
P
= 4,833,453,736
264,444,993
417,288,433
859,630,505
278,701,027
936,826,680
367,657,849
650,425,082
9,795,031,029
4,928,561,646
990,939,069
741,770,953
830,941,608
599,996,080
498,812,152
330,889,889
474,158,175
476,897,143
26,220,372,669
(6,259,416,860)
P
= 19,960,955,809
9,825,180,078
4,949,487,025
741,007,446
830,777,810
498,711,853
396,563,814
487,580,163
271,345,756
25,470,750,718
(2,495,629,251)
P
= 22,975,121,467
Unamortized debt discounts and issuance costs of the Groups long-term debt as of December 31, 2015 and
2014 follow:
USD loans
JPY loans
PHP loans
2015
P
= 155,507,607
9,715,183
66,732,599
P
= 231,955,389
2014
P
= 203,422,898
33,523,618
74,956,319
P
= 311,902,835
The rollforward analysis of unamortized debt discounts and issuance costs of long-term debt follows:
2015
P
= 311,902,835
17,287,841
(94,503,563)
(2,731,724)
P
= 231,955,389
2014
P
= 427,238,334
11,119,023
(122,224,413)
(4,230,109)
P
= 311,902,835
*SGVFS015775*
- 42 -
LBP Loan
On October 20, 2005, the Parent Company entered into a Subsidiary Loan Agreement with Land Bank of the
Philippines (LBP Loan) to finance the improvement of the sewerage and sanitation conditions in the East
Zone. The loan has a term of 17 years, and was made available in Japanese Yen in the aggregate principal
amount of JPY6.59 billion payable via semi-annual installments after the 5-year grace period. The Parent
Company made its last drawdown on October 26, 2012.
The total drawn amount from the loan is JPY3.99 billion. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the
outstanding balance of the LBP loan amounted to JP2,192.93 million and JP2,527.86 million, respectively.
On October 2, 2012, the Parent Company entered into a Subsidiary Loan Agreement with Land Bank of the
Philippines under the Metro Manila Wastewater Management Project (MWMP) with the World Bank (MWMP
Loan). The MWMP aims to improve wastewater services in Metro Manila through increased wastewater
collection and treatment. The loan has a term of 25 years, and was made available in United States Dollars
in the aggregated principal amount of US$137.5 million payable via semi-annual installments after the 7-year
grace period. The Parent Company has made four drawdowns during 2015 amounting to US$22.60 million.
The carrying value of the MWMP loan as of December 31, 2015 is US$22.43 million.
Summary of financial transactions related to the MWMP Loan for the year ended December 31, 2015 are
shown below (in thousands):
Balance at beginning of year
Amounts received during the period
Expenditures during the period
Balance at end of year
$
22,600
(22,362)
$238
The US$0.24 million as at December 31, 2015 represents the outstanding balance of the Land Bank of the
Philippines designated account No. 3404-032-835, under the account name MWMP - Category 1 - MWCI,
and is presented as part of Other receivables under Receivables account (see Note 5). The proceeds of
the MWMP loan will be expended in accordance with the intended purposes as specified in the loan
agreement.
IFC Loan
On March 28, 2003, the Parent Company entered into a loan agreement with IFC (First IFC Loan) to partially
finance the Parent Companys investment program from 2002-2005 to expand water supply and sanitation
services, improvement on the existing facilities of the Parent Company, and concession fee payments. The
First IFC Loan was made available in Japanese Yen in the aggregate principal amount of JP3,591.60 million
equivalent to US$30.00 million and payable in 25 semi-annual installments, within 12 years starting on July
15, 2006. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the carrying value of the loan amounted to JP710.97 million
and JP992.06 million, respectively.
On May 31, 2004, the Parent Company entered into a loan agreement with IFC (Second IFC Loan)
composed of a regular loan in the amount of up to US$20.00 million and a standby loan in the amount of up
to US$10.00 million to finance the investment program from 2004 to 2007 to expand water supply and
sanitation services, improvement of existing facilities of the Parent Company, and concession fee payments.
This loan was subsequently amended on November 22, 2006 when the Parent Company executed the
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement for the restructuring of the Second IFC Loan. The terms of the
second loan were amended to a loan in the aggregate amount of up to US$30.00 million, no part of which
shall consist of a standby loan. On December 12, 2008, the Parent Company made a full drawdown on the
said facility. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, outstanding balance of the Second IFC loan amounted to
US$1.99 million and US$5.91 million, respectively.
On July 31, 2013, the Parent Company entered into a loan agreement with IFC (Fourth Omnibus Agreement)
in the amount of up to $100.00 million for financing the Projects in accordance with the provisions of the
Agreement. The loan has a term of 18 years, payable in semi-annual installments after the grace period.
This loan facility has neither been activated nor disbursed and was consequently cancelled in November
2014. The transaction costs related to the cancellation of the loan were included as part of Other income
(loss).
*SGVFS015775*
- 43 -
EIB Loan
On June 20, 2007, the Parent Company entered into a Finance Contract (EIB Loan) with the European
Investment Bank (EIB) to partially finance the capital expenditures of the Parent Company from 2007 to
2010, as specified under Schedule 1 of the Finance Contract. The loan, in the aggregate principal amount of
EUR60.00 million, having a term of 10 years, is subject to the Relevant Interbank Rate plus a spread to be
determined by EIB, and may be drawn in either fixed-rate or floating-rate tranches. The loan has two
tranches as described below:
a.
b.
On May 21, 2012, the Sub-Credit A Guarantee Facility Agreement was amended to extend the effectivity of
the guarantee. Two of the original guarantors, ING Bank and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, agreed
to extend the guarantee by another 5 years towards the maturity of the loan.
On July 30, 2013, the Sub-Credit B Guarantee Facility Agreement was amended to extend the effectivity of
the guarantee. The original guarantor, ING Bank, agreed to extend the guarantee by another 5 years
towards the maturity of the loan.
The carrying values of the EIB Loan amounted to nil as of December 31, 2015 and JPY1,755.06 million and
US$9.33 million as of December 31, 2014. On February 20, 2015, the Parent Company prepaid the EIB
Loan amounting to JPY1,807.98 million and US$9.38 million.
Fixed Rate Corporate Notes
On April 8, 2011, the Parent Company issued P
= 10.00 billion notes (Fixed Rate Corporate Notes) with
P
= 5.00 billion having a term of 5 years (Five-Year FXCN Note) from the issue date and the other P
= 5.00 billion
with a term of 10 years (Ten-Year FXCN Note) from the issue date which is both payable quarterly. The
Parent Company may repay the whole and not a part only of the Ten-Year FXCN Notes on the 7th
anniversary of the drawdown date of such FXCN Note or on any FXCN interest payment date thereafter. The
amount payable in respect to such prepayment shall be calculated as 102.00% of the principal amount being
prepaid and accrued interest on the prepayment date. The carrying value of the fixed rate corporate notes as
of December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to P
= 9.80 billion and P
= 9.83 billion, respectively.
P
= 5.00 billion Loan
On August 16, 2013, the Company entered into a Credit Facility Agreement (P
=5.00 billion Loan) with
Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company (Metrobank) having a fixed nominal rate of 4.42% and with a term of 7
years from the issue date and is payable annually. The Parent Company may repay the whole and not a part
only of the loan starting on the 3rd anniversary of the drawdown date of such loan or on any interest payment
date thereafter.
The amount payable in respect to such prepayment shall be calculated as 102.00% of the principal amount
being prepaid and accrued interest if such prepayment occurs on or after the 3rd anniversary but before the
4th anniversary of the drawdown date. The amount payable in respect to such prepayment shall be
calculated as 101.5% of the principal amount being prepaid and accrued interest if such prepayment occurs
on or after the 4th anniversary but before the 5th anniversary of the drawdown date. The amount payable in
respect to such prepayment shall be calculated as 101.00% of the principal amount being prepaid and
accrued interest if such prepayment occurs on or after the 5th anniversary but before the 6th anniversary of
the drawdown date. The amount payable in respect to such prepayment shall be calculated as 100.50% of
the principal amount being prepaid and accrued interest if such prepayment occurs on or after the 6th
anniversary but before the 7th anniversary of the drawdown date. The carrying value of the notes as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to P
=4.93 billion and P
= 4.95 billion, respectively.
JPY40 billion Loan
On September 30, 2015, the Parent Company signed a 7-year JPY40.00 billion term loan facility with three
international banks: The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Mizuho Bank, Ltd. and Sumitomo Mitsui
Banking Corporation. The proceeds of the loan will be used to finance the Parent Companys capital
expenditures. As of December 31, 2015, the Parent Company has not made any drawdown from this facility.
*SGVFS015775*
- 44 -
*SGVFS015775*
- 45 -
On April 29, 2013, Laguna Water entered into a loan agreement with Development Bank of the Philippines
(DBP) to partially finance the modernization and expansion of the water network system and water supply
facilities in Bian, Sta. Rosa and Cabuyao, Laguna. Under the agreement, the lender has agreed to provide
a loan to the borrower through the Philippine Water Revolving Fund (PWRF) in the aggregate principal
amount of up to P
= 500.00 million bearing an effective interest rate of 7.25%. The first and second drawdowns
were made in July 2013 and December 2013 which amounted to P
= 250.00 million each. The carrying value of
this loan as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to P
= 498.81 million and P
= 498.71 million.
On January 9, 2014, Laguna Water exercised its option to avail of the second tranche of its loan agreement
with DBP, to finance its water network and supply projects, including the development of a well-field network
in the Bian, Sta. Rosa area of Laguna. Under the expanded facility agreement, the lender provided
additional loans to Laguna Water in the aggregate principal amount of P
= 833.00 million. The first and second
drawdowns were made in January and May 2014, respectively, amounting to P
= 416.50 million each. The
carrying value of the loans amounted to P
= 830.94 million and P
= 830.78 million as of December 31, 2015 and
2014, respectively.
On October 23, 2015, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Security Bank Corp. (SBC) to finance
the modernization and expansion of its water network system and water supply facilities throughout the
province of Laguna. Under the loan agreement, the lender agreed to provide a loan to the borrower in the
aggregate principal amount of up to P
= 2.50 billion for an applicable fixed interest rate, as determined in
respect of each drawdown. The first drawdown was made in December 2015 amounting to P
= 600.00 million
bearing an effective interest rate of 6.03%.
Boracay Water Loans
On July 29, 2011, Boracay Water entered into an Omnibus Loan and Security Agreement with DBP and SBC
to finance the construction, operation, maintenance and expansion of facilities for the fulfillment of certain
service targets for water supply and waste water services for its service area under its concession agreement
with TIEZA, as well as the operation and maintenance of the completed drainage system. The loan shall not
exceed the principal amount of P
= 500.00 million and is payable in 20 years inclusive of a 3-year grace period.
Omnibus loan and security agreement - Sub-tranche 1
The loan shall be available in three sub-tranches, as follows:
*SGVFS015775*
- 46 -
On October 9, 2014, Boracay Water signed a Third Omnibus Loan and Security Agreement in the amount of
P
= 650.00 million with SBC. The loan will be used to fund the capital expenditures which will be used to
provide water and sewerage services in the concession area of Boracay Water. As of December 31, 2015,
Boracay Water has not made any drawdown from this facility.
Compliance with loan covenants
All these loan agreements provide for certain covenants which must be complied by the Parent Company,
Clark Water, Cebu Water, Laguna Water and Boracay Water which include compliance with certain financial
ratios such as the debt-to-equity and debt-service-coverage ratios. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the
Parent Company, Clark Water, Cebu Water, Laguna Water and Boracay Water were in compliance with all
the loan covenants required by the creditors.
*SGVFS015775*
- 47 -
Present value of
defined benefit
obligation
Fair value of
plan assets
At January 1
Current
service cost
Net interest
Subtotal
Benefits paid
Transfers
P
= 856,262,000
P
= 92,640,256
P
= 37,540,700
P
= 130,180,956
(P
= 26,490,700)
(P
= 6,615,200)
P
=
(P
= 364,000)
P
= 4,581,444
P
= 4,217,444
26,103,400
(P
= 387,300)
6,615,200
P
=
16,510,300
P
= 16,510,300
(P
= 364,000)
P
= 4,581,444
16,510,300
P
= 20,727,744
(817,492,900)
P
= 38,769,100
P
= 92,640,256
(36,943,900)
P
= 596,800
(36,943,900)
P
= 93,237,056
Contribution
by employer At December 31
P
=
(50,000,000)
(P
= 50,000,000)
P
= 957,554,500
(855,207,900)
P
= 102,346,600
2014
Net benefit cost in consolidated statement of
comprehensive income
Present value of
defined benefit
obligation
Fair value of
plan assets
At January 1
Current
service cost
Net interest
Subtotal
Benefits paid
Settlements
P
= 783,835,800
P
= 77,841,000
P
= 38,421,000
P
= 116,262,000
(P
= 20,436,700)
P
=
P
= 3,018,700
P
= 13,055,200
(P
= 39,473,000)
(P
= 23,399,100)
(402,234,900)
P
= 381,600,900
P
= 77,841,000
(21,866,100)
P
= 16,554,900
P
=
(13,828,600)
(P
= 10,809,900)
P
= 13,055,200
(P
= 39,473,000)
(13,828,600)
(P
= 37,227,700)
(21,866,100)
P
= 94,395,900
20,436,700
P
=
Contribution
by employer At December 31
P
=
(400,000,000)
(P
= 400,000,000)
P
= 856,262,000
(817,492,900)
P
= 38,769,100
*SGVFS015775*
2015
2014
P
= 12,916,006
P
= 196,670,028
591,637,863
53,267,010
390,397,982
20,483,958
193,519,695
6,817,792
858,158,366
179,425,727
26,442,028
12,001,590
825,421,313
654,335
2,296,131
2,950,466
P
= 855,207,900
7,928,413
7,928,413
P
= 817,492,900
All equity and debt investments held have quoted prices in active markets. The remaining plan assets do not
have quoted market prices in active markets.
The plan assets have diverse investments and do not have any concentration risk.
The cost of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment medical benefits, as well as the
present value of the pension obligation are determined using actuarial valuations. The actuarial valuations
involve making various assumptions. The principal assumptions used in determining pension and postemployment medical benefit obligations for the defined benefit plans are shown below:
Discount rate
Salary increase rate
2015
4.25% to 5.00%
5.00% to 15.00%
2014
4.50% to 5.00%
6.00% to 7.00%
2013
5.25%
7.00%
The overall expected rate of return on assets is determined based on the market expectation prevailing on
that date, applicable to the period over which the obligation is settled.
The sensitivity analysis below has been determined based on reasonably possible changes of each
significant assumption on the defined benefit obligation as of the end of the reporting period, assuming all
other assumptions were held constant:
2015
Effect
Increase
on defined
(Decrease) benefit obligation
1.00%
(P
= 83,179,669)
(1.00%)
99,749,158
Discount rate
Salary increase rate
1.00%
(1.00%)
P
= 96,979,200
(79,846,929)
Increase
(Decrease)
1.00%
(1.00%)
Effect
on defined
benefit obligation
(P
= 74,468,769)
88,770,462
1.00%
(1.00%)
P
= 86,584,204
(74,119,832)
2014
Discount rate
Salary increase rate
*SGVFS015775*
2015
P
= 55,246,200
368,353,700
571,955,600
P
= 995,555,500
2014
P
= 44,053,200
307,057,700
591,940,300
P
= 943,051,200
The average duration of the defined benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period is 14.31 years and
20.86 years as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The asset allocation of the plan is set and reviewed from time to time by the Committee taking into account
the membership profile and the liquidity requirements of the plan. This also considers the expected benefit
cash flows to be matched with asset durations.
Contributions to the plan are recommended by the Retirement and Welfare Plan Committee and approved by
the Parent Company, in consideration of the contribution advice from the actuary. The Parent Company
expects to contribute P
= 56.95 million to the defined benefit pension plan in 2016 based on the latest actuarial
valuation report.
Deferred credits
Customers guaranty deposits and other deposits
Contingent consideration (Note 11)
2015
P
= 384,875,516
294,883,786
P
= 679,759,302
2014
P
= 363,763,649
362,064,821
95,983,778
P
= 821,812,248
Deferred credits pertain to the unamortized discounts of the customers guaranty deposits. The rollforward
analysis of the deferred credits follows:
2015
P
= 363,763,649
29,544,044
(8,432,177)
P
= 384,875,516
2014
P
= 338,857,711
32,146,892
(7,240,954)
P
= 363,763,649
Customers guaranty deposits and other deposits pertain to the deposits paid by the Groups customers for
the set-up of new connections which will be refunded to the customers upon termination of the customers
water service connections or at the end of the concession, whichever comes first.
The deposits include amounts collected from customers to cover service connection related expenses. The
Group recognized income arising from liquidation of these service connection expenses amounting to
P
= 103.49 million, P
= 214.66 million and P
= 609.47 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively (see Note 17).
Contingent consideration is part of the purchase price of Kenh Dong Water (see Note 11). In 2015, the
contingent consideration amounting to P
= 95.98 million was reversed and included as part of Other income
(loss) in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as CII failed to obtain a new or amended
Investment Certificate 3 years from KDWHs date of acquisition of Kenh Dong Water.
*SGVFS015775*
- 50 -
17. Other Operating Income, Operating Expenses, Interest Income and Interest Expense
Other operating income includes the following:
Connection fees:
Realized income from liquidation
of service connection costs
(Note 16)
Water and service connections
and pipeworks
Integrated used water services
Reconnection fee
Sale of packaged water
Sale of scrap materials
Septic sludge disposal and
bacteriological water analysis
Income from customer late payments
Sale of inventories
Miscellaneous (Note 16)
2015
2014
2013
P
= 103,485,786
P
= 214,659,742
P
= 609,473,171
518,527,626
59,849,074
34,287,722
33,356,824
24,735,957
357,942,748
44,720,908
37,312,115
274,736,513
66,607,107
4,076,150
17,230,920
14,972,262
462,456
99,606,843
P
= 906,515,470
15,207,029
11,844,816
20,857,925
58,308,072
P
= 760,853,355
13,235,506
4,266,713
82,666,483
52,977,370
P
= 1,108,039,013
Integrated used water services pertain to the income earned by MWTS in providing used water management
solutions.
Sale of packaged water relates to the sale of the Healthy Family purified water, which aims to address the
drinking water needs of households in and out of the East Zone.
Miscellaneous income includes income from rental of equipment, other customer related fees, consultancy
services and sale of signages.
Operating expenses consist of:
2015
2014
2013
P
= 455,211,346
P
= 364,968,537
P
= 298,139,404
296,505,882
308,043,544
109,826,798
180,470,373
66,111,403
170,462,704
160,892,401
147,555,407
78,158,862
149,571,570
122,256,707
41,670,677
131,402,042
110,682,255
39,969,853
76,525,809
64,726,087
52,304,277
51,666,524
46,790,795
44,246,344
41,064,364
15,804,595
12,194,613
188,034,322
39,203,693
10,014,173
30,889,230
22,161,854
27,820,073
36,558,225
20,321,270
9,124,903
171,294,230
26,051,134
3,234,791
2,127,256
26,928,190
22,451,751
19,700,378
3,058,258
7,476,820
559,265
40,271,443
P
= 1,772,425,207
5,034,285
160,001
18,987,514
61,388,203
P
= 1,522,320,184
6,568,035
7,717,258
75,173,746
33,053,221
17,698,288
P
= 1,275,539,592
*SGVFS015775*
- 51 Other expenses include expenses incurred for bank charges and equipment rental.
Interest income consists of:
2015
2014
2013
P
= 70,329,969
P
= 66,976,304
P
= 99,632,252
208,845,065
35,739,893
2,029,115
P
= 316,944,042
82,331,472
32,916,947
2,900,000
510,578
P
= 185,635,301
44,629,842
28,177,467
385,871
P
= 172,825,432
2015
2014
2013
P
= 558,434,006
P
= 578,508,902
P
= 613,142,324
804,000,992
918,848,493
967,841,819
94,503,563
596,800
P
= 1,457,535,361
122,224,413
16,554,900
P
= 1,636,136,708
134,167,263
18,249,100
P
= 1,733,400,506
2015
P
= 1,835,280,307
(40,356,469)
P
= 1,794,923,838
2014
P
= 1,826,790,779
9,507,232
P
= 1,836,298,011
2013
P
= 1,802,808,076
8,764,498
P
= 1,811,572,574
Current
Deferred
The reconciliation of the statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate follows:
2015
30.00%
2014
30.00%
2013
30.00%
0.21
0.11
1.33
2.35
5.76
0.63
(4.76)
(1.64)
(3.99)
(4.17)
(10.71)
0.10
(1.53)
(0.26)
0.51
22.64%
(0.25)
(1.32)
23.95%
(0.44)
(1.48)
23.86%
*SGVFS015775*
- 52 The net deferred tax assets of the Group pertain to the deferred income tax effects of the following:
2015
P
= 891,967,100
17,397,960
11,504,635
3,632,277
P
= 924,501,972
2014
P
= 855,049,666
13,406,942
10,079,437
2,646,866
P
= 881,182,911
The components of the net deferred tax liabilities of the Group as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 represent
the deferred income tax effects of the following:
2015
P
= 68,677,309
4,828,269
(796,419)
(791,869)
(4,900)
P
= 71,912,390
2014
P
= 67,873,534
2,494,975
(704,267)
(709,544)
(4,900)
P
= 68,949,798
Parent Company
RR No. 16-2008 provided the implementing guidelines for Section 34 of RA No. 9504 on the use of the
optional standard deductions (OSD) for corporations. The OSD allowed shall be an amount not exceeding
40% of the gross income. Gross income earned refers to gross sales or gross revenue derived from any
business activity, net of returns and allowances, less cost of sales or direct costs but before any deduction is
made for administrative expenses or incidental losses. This was applied by the Parent Company for the
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
The Parent Company secured an income tax holiday (ITH) benefit for the Antipolo Water Supply Project in
2011 and East La Mesa Water Treatment Plant Project in 2012. These projects have been registered with
the Board of Investments (BOI).
The tax rate of 18% for the years in which OSD is projected to be utilized was used in computing the deferred
income taxes on the net service concession obligation starting 2009.
The availment of OSD affected the recognition of several deferred tax assets and liabilities, in which the
related income and expenses are not considered in determining gross income for income tax purposes. The
Parent Company forecasts that it will continue to avail of the OSD, such that the manner by which it will
recover or settle the underlying assets and liabilities, for which the deferred tax assets and liabilities were
initially recognized, would not result in any future tax consequence under OSD.
Details of the accounts for which no deferred taxes were recognized as of December 31, 2015 and 2014
follow:
2015
P
= 585,686,205
2014
P
= 606,331,445
(191,630,115)
73,191,500
P
= 467,247,590
(287,279,413)
10,850,200
P
= 329,902,232
The net reduction in deferred tax assets from applying the 18% tax rate to the recognized deferred taxes on
net service obligation, and the derecognition of the deferred taxes relating to the accounts with temporary
differences which are not considered in determining gross income for income tax purposes by the Parent
Company amounted to P
= 467.25 million and P
= 329.90 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
In addition to the deferred tax assets and liabilities that have not been recognized as a consequence of the
OSD availment, the Parent Companys subsidiaries, MWIS and MWTS, have Net Operating Loss Carry Over
(NOLCO) amounting to P
= 14.02 million and P
= 6.32 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively,
that are available for offset against future taxable income, for which no deferred tax assets have been
recognized. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the unrecognized deferred tax assets on NOLCO
amounted to P
= 4.21 million and P
= 1.89 million, respectively.
*SGVFS015775*
- 53 Clark Water
Clark Water as a duly registered CFZ enterprise under RA No. 9400, An Act Amending RA No. 7227
otherwise known as the Bases Conversion and Development Act of 1992, is entitled to all the rights,
privileges and benefits established there under including tax and duty-free importation of capital equipment
and special income tax rate of 5% of gross income earned from sources within the CFZ.
Boracay Water
On January 25, 2011, Boracay Water filed an application for registration with the BOI under Executive Order
(EO) No. 226, as amended, as a new operator of water supply and distribution for the Boracay Island on a
non-pioneer status. The application was ratified on February 9, 2011.
On June 17, 2011, Boracay Waters application was registered with the BOI under Book 1 of EO 226. The
ITH is for 4 years from June 2011 or actual start of commercial operations, whichever is earlier but in no case
earlier than the date of registration. The ITH entitlement shall be limited to the water sales schedule reflected
in specific terms and condition of the registration. Further, the ITH entitlement for the wastewater or
sewerage services shall be limited only to 10% of the total revenue derived from its water supply.
In June 2015, the BOI has approved the bonus year under Boracay Waters Certificate of Registration
No. 2011-127 from June 17, 2015 to June 16, 2016 using the indigenous raw material criterion pursuant to
Article 39(1)(ii) of EO 226 subject to the following conditions:
1.
At the time of actual availment of the ITH incentive, the derived ratio of the cost of indigenous raw
materials shall be at least 50% of the total raw materials cost; and
2.
The grantee shall undertake Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) activities which shall be completed
on the actual availment of the bonus year. The CSR activity shall be aligned with the priority
programs/projects of the National Anti-Poverty Commission and/or other special laws such as R.A. 7942
or the Mining Act and DOE Energy Regulation 1-94. The amount spent for the CSR activities shall be
reflected in the notes to the audited financial statements. Failure to complete with the CSR activity shall
mean forfeiture of the approved ITH bonus year.
In compliance with the second requirement, Boracay Water has entered into a MOA with Barangay Nabaoy,
Malay, Aklan, last December 11, 2015. Both parties agreed to implement poverty alleviation programs in the
community. The parties recognize education, specifically early childhood care and development, is the key to
alleviate poverty in the community. Boracay Water committed to spend P
= 50,000 for 2015 and P
= 0.20 million
for 2016 by purchasing learning materials and equipment, repairs of the day care center, institute feeding
programs, provide trainings and additional honorarium for the day care worker, among others. In December
2015, Boracay Water spent P
= 50,000 for the purchase of learning materials and equipment for the adopted
Day Care Center.
Laguna Water
Laguna Water is registered with the BOI under the Omnibus Investment Code of 1987. The registration
entitles the Company to an ITH for 4 years until 2010. In 2011, Laguna Water applied for a 1 year extension
of the ITH incentive which was approved by BOI on January 19, 2012.
In 2013 and 2015, Laguna Water availed of the OSD and the tax rate of 18% for the years in which OSD is
projected to be utilized was used in computing the deferred income taxes of Laguna Water. In 2014, Laguna
Water applied the Regular Corporate Income Tax of 30% for transactions outside of LTI.
Laguna Waters transactions within LTI are registered with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority. Under
the registration, Laguna Water is entitled to certain tax and non-tax incentives, which includes, but are not
limited to, a special tax rate of 5% on Laguna Waters gross income on water and used water revenues within
the premises. In October 2015, Laguna Water received approval of its de-registration from the Philippine
Economic Zone Authority.
Other subsidiaries
All other domestic subsidiaries are subject to Regular Corporate Income Tax of 30% while foreign
subsidiaries are subject to tax rates applicable in their respective countries.
*SGVFS015775*
- 54 NOLCO
The movements of the Groups NOLCO as of December 31, 2015, which are available for offset against
future taxable income for 3 succeeding years and for which no deferred tax assets have been recognized
follow:
Year Incurred
2012
2013
2014
2015
Amount
P
= 11,564,673
35,982
2,423,834
3,855,223
P
= 17,879,712
Used/Expired
P
= 11,564,673
P
= 11,564,673
Balance
P
=
35,982
2,423,834
3,855,223
P
= 6,315,039
Expiry Year
2015
2016
2017
2018
19. Equity
The Parent Companys capital stock consists of:
2015
Shares
Common stock - P
= 1 per share
Authorized
Issued and subscribed
Outstanding
Preferred stock - P
=0.10 par value, 10%
cumulative, voting, participating,
nonredeemable and nonconvertible
Authorized, issued and outstanding 4,000,000,000 shares
Amount
2014
Shares
Amount
3,100,000,000
2,053,666,576
2,018,209,523
P
= 3,100,000,000
2,053,666,576
2,018,209,523
3,100,000,000
2,047,270,452
2,016,708,607
P
= 3,100,000,000
2,047,270,452
2,016,708,607
4,000,000,000
400,000,000
4,000,000,000
400,000,000
On March 18, 2005, the Parent Company launched its Initial Public Offering where a total of 745.33 million
common shares were offered at an offering price of P
= 6.50 per share. The Parent Company has 904 and 916
existing certificated shareholders as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Scripless
shareholders are counted under PCD Nominee Corporation (Filipino) and PCD Nominee Corporation (NonFilipino).
Dividends
The following table shows the cash dividends declared by the Parent Companys BOD on the outstanding
capital stock for each of the 3 years ended December 31, 2015:
Declaration Date
April 15, 2013
September 26, 2013
November 28, 2013
February 20, 2014
October 8, 2014
November 27, 2014
February 20, 2015
August 11, 2015
November 27, 2015
Record Date
April 29, 2013
October 10, 2013
December 1, 2013
March 6, 2014
October 21, 2014
December 1, 2014
March 6, 2015
August 26, 2015
December 1, 2015
0.0100
0.4031
0.0403
0.4031
0.0403
0.0100
0.4075
0.04075
0.4075
0.04075
0.0100
Payment Date
May 15, 2013
October 25, 2013
December 27, 2013
March 21, 2014
November 5, 2014
December 26, 2014
March 20, 2015
September 9, 2015
December 26, 2015
There are no dividends in arrears for the Parent Companys participating preferred shares as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014.
Retained earnings
In 2014, the Parent Company reversed its appropriation which were approved by the BOD on April 15, 2013
amounting to P
= 7.00 billion and was intended to fund major capital expenditures arising from its mandate
under the Concession Agreement.
Retained earnings include the accumulated equity in undistributed net earnings of consolidated subsidiaries
and associates accounted for under the equity method amounting to P
= 1,867.14 million and P
= 1,242.58 million
as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which are not available for dividend declaration by the
Company until these are declared by the investee companies.
*SGVFS015775*
- 55 In accordance with SRC Rule 68, as Amended (2011), Annex 68-C, the Parent Companys retained earnings
available for dividend declaration as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to P
= 28.66 billion and
P
= 25.75 billion, respectively.
The approved Business Plan, consistent with the final determination of the Appeals Panel on April 21, 2015
following the results of the Rate Rebasing charging year 2013, included planned capital expenditures on
(1) service continuity, (2) service accessibility, (3) water security and (4) environmental sustainability,
particularly described as follows:
Service continuity projects are endeavored to maintain the level of service provided to its customers
even in times of calamity;
Service accessibility projects would enable the Parent Company to expand its service coverage,
particularly to the Municipalities of Rizal;
Water security projects include two components: (1) new water source development and, (2) existing
water source rehabilitation and improvement. New water source development projects include the Rizal
Province Water Supply Improvement Project, as well as the Sumag, Tayabasan and Kaliwa River
development projects. Other components include major improvement works for key raw water structures
such as Angat Dam and Ipo Dam, transmission aqueducts extending from Bulacan to La Mesa Dam
managed under the Common Purpose Facilities framework, and transmission aqueducts extending from
La Mesa Dam to the Balara Treatment Plant; and
Projects under the Environmental Sustainability Investment category are comprised of wastewater
projects endeavored to achieve the Parent Companys wastewater coverage targets.
Grant Dates
October 5, 2012 September 19, 2011
4,772,414
5,073,000
460,000
992,000
P
= 11.76
P
= 8.68
P
= 26.24
P
= 19.80
P
= 24.07
P
= 17.38
30.66%
33.68%
2.56%
2.68%
4.57%
4.76%
4 years
4 years
To enjoy the rights provided for in the ESOWN, the grantee should be with the Parent Company at the time
the holding period expires. The Holding Period of the ESOWN shares follows:
Year
After one year from subscription date
After two years from subscription date
After three years from subscription date
Holding Period
40%
30%
30%
*SGVFS015775*
- 56 The ESOWN grantees are allowed to subscribe fully or partially to whatever allocation may have been
granted to them. In case of partial subscriptions, the employees are still allowed to subscribe to the
remaining unsubscribed shares granted to them provided that this would be made at the start of Year 5 from
grant date up to the end of Year 6. Any additional subscription made by the employee (after the initial
subscription) will be subjected to another 3-year holding period.
Movements in the number of stock options outstanding under ESOWN are as follows:
At January 1
Granted
Exercised
Cancelled
At December 31
2015
4,193,347
7,281,647
(6,396,774)
(81,627)
4,996,593
Weighted average
exercise price
P
= 22.92
26.00
26.00
P
= 23.49
2014
6,791,736
(2,528,708)
(69,681)
4,193,347
Weighted average
exercise price
P
= 22.92
22.92
P
= 22.92
*SGVFS015775*
- 57 -
The Parent Company entered into an Administrative and Support Services Agreement (ASSA) with
Ayala in 1997, being its sponsor as required during the privatization process. The ASSA was initially
effective for 10 years and automatically renewable every 5 years. Under the agreement, Ayala shall
provide technical and other knowledge, experience and skills as reasonably necessary for the
development, administration and operation of the concession, for which the Parent Company shall pay
an annual base fee of US$1.00 million and adjusted for the effect of CPI. As a result, certain key
management positions are occupied by employees of Ayala.
Total management and professional fees charged to operations arising from these agreements
amounted to P
= 218.31 million and P
= 198.98 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Total outstanding
payables amounted to nil and P
= 34.88 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
b.
The following tables provide the total amount of all other transactions that have been entered into with
the Parent Companys shareholders and affiliates for the relevant financial year:
Cash in banks and cash
equivalents
2015
2014
Shareholder:
Ayala
Affiliates:
Ayala Land and
Subsidiaries
BPI and
Subsidiaries
2015
Receivables
2014
Advances to contractors
2015
2014
Trade payables
2015
2014
P
=
P
=
P
= 11,111
P
= 39,156
P
=
P
=
P
=
P
=
77,209
4,930,789
207,400
242,671,961
243,325,649
2,346,595,838 1,998,160,172
2,346,595,838 1,998,160,172
P
= 2,346,595,838 P
= 1,998,160,172
77,209
P
= 88,320
24,293
4,955,082
P
= 4,994,238
P
=
207,400
P
= 207,400
242,671,961
P
= 242,671,961
243,325,649
P
= 243,325,649
Cash in banks and cash equivalents pertain to deposits and investments with original maturities of
3 months or less from the date of original acquisition.
Receivables are primarily composed of trade receivables for water and sewerage services rendered by
the Group. These are non-interest bearing and are collectible within 30 days from bill generation. No
allowance for doubtful accounts was provided for receivables from related parties as of December 31,
2015 and 2014.
Advances to contractors included as part of Other current assets pertains to down payments related to
construction of fixed assets. These are normally applied within a year against progress billings.
*SGVFS015775*
- 58 Trade payables pertain to retentions deducted from contractors billings and are normally paid within a
year after project acceptance.
Revenue
2015
Shareholder:
Ayala
Affiliates:
Ayala Land and Subsidiaries
BPI and Subsidiaries
Globe and Subsidiaries
Integrated Microelectronics,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
AAHC
2014
Purchases
2015
2014
P
= 7,288,972
P
= 7,177,859
P
= 218,310,790
P
= 198,979,421
116,965,856
9,913,438
3,131,483
137,380,568
9,739,496
2,933,077
1,428,393
9,127,597
1,792,850
10,015,352
8,466,732
481,838
138,959,347
P
= 146,248,319
4,077,818
403,824
154,534,783
P
= 161,712,642
641,470
11,197,460
P
= 229,508,250
11,808,202
P
= 210,787,623
Revenue is mainly attributable to water and sewerage services rendered by the Group to its shareholder
and affiliates. Purchases from Ayala Land and subsidiaries mainly pertain to construction of fixed assets
while purchases from AAHC relates to acquisition and repairs of transportation equipment. Purchases
from Globe pertain to telecommunication services and purchases from BPI relate to banking transactions
and financial services to the Group.
c.
On June 1, 2010, MWAP and Speedy-Tech Electronics Ltd. (Speedy-Tech), a subsidiary of Integrated
Microelectronics, Inc., entered into a Tenancy Agreement wherein Speedy-Tech will lease office space
to MWAP. On May 31, 2015, the Tenancy Agreement with Speedy-Tech was terminated. Total rent
expense paid by MWAP to Speedy-Tech amounted to P
= 0.64 million and P
= 0.47 million in 2015 and 2014,
respectively.
d.
On April 9, 2002, Laguna Water entered into a concession agreement (as amended on March 31, 2004)
with PGL, one of its shareholders. Concession fees paid to PGL amounted to P
= 22.70 million and
P
= 15.06 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively (see Notes 1 and 28).
e.
One of the trustee banks which manages the Groups retirement fund is BPI, an affiliate. The Groups
plan assets under BPI amounted to P
= 572.81 million and P
= 587.42 million as of December 31, 2015 and
2014, respectively.
f.
On November 3, 2015, MWSAH completed the execution of a Capital Transfer Agreement with Saigon
Water for the acquisition of 24.5% of the charter capital of Cu Chi Water Supply Sewerage Company
Ltd., a company incorporated in Vietnam, in the total amount of VND154.35 billion or equivalent to
P
= 330.10 million.
g.
Compensation of key management personnel of the Group by benefit type, included as part of Salaries,
wages and employee benefits, are as follows:
2015
P
= 397,804,200
23,832,969
50,584,861
P
= 472,222,030
2014
P
= 283,797,080
18,971,484
30,227,909
P
= 332,996,473
General requirements;
District Metering Area establishment;
Leakage reduction and management services;
System expansion work;
Emergency and unforeseen works; and
Daywork schedule.
*SGVFS015775*
- 59 On August 19, 2014, the management contract with SAWACO expired. In 2015, 2014 and 2013, total
revenue from the Vietnam Project amounted to nil, P
= 25.49 million and P
= 174.94 million. Total costs related to
the Vietnam Project amounted to P
=51.89 million, P
= 54.29 million and P
= 96.21 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively. Costs arising from the management contract in 2015 pertain to maintenance, manpower and
other administrative expenses arising from the winding down of the project which is expected to be finalized
by February 2016.
Interconnection Agreement wherein the two Concessionaires shall form an unincorporated joint venture
that will manage, operate, and maintain interconnection facilities. The terms of the agreement provide,
among others, the cost and the volume of water to be transferred between zones.
b.
Joint Venture Arrangement that will operate, maintain, renew, and as appropriate, decommission
common purpose facilities, and perform other functions pursuant to and in accordance with the
provisions of the Agreement and perform such other functions relating to the concession (and the
concession of the West Zone Concessionaire) as the Concessionaires may choose to delegate to the
joint venture, subject to the approval of MWSS.
c.
In March 2010, MWSS entered into a loan agreement with The Export-Import Bank of China to finance
the Angat Water Utilization and Aqueduct Improvement Project Phase II (the Project). Total loan facility
is US$116.60 million with maturity of 20 years including five (5) years of grace period. Interest rate is 3%
per annum. MWSS then entered into a MOA with the Parent Company and Maynilad for the Parent
Company and Maynilad to shoulder equally the repayment of the loan, with such repayment to be part of
the concession fees (see Note 9).
*SGVFS015775*
- 60 In March 2015, the Parent Company and MWSS entered into an agreement for the lease of a portion of the
San Juan Reservoir and Aqueduct Complex being utilized by the Parent Company as stockyard for its pipes
and other materials. The lease agreement shall continue to be in effect until the termination of the
Concession Agreement. Rent expense recognized in 2015 amounted to P
= 170.45 million which is included
under Occupancy costs in consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
PGL
Laguna Water is granted the right to manage, occupy, operate, repair, maintain, decommission and refurbish
the property required to provide water services under its concession agreement with PGL. The legal title of
all property in existence at the commencement date shall be retained by PGL. Upon expiration of the useful
life of any such property as may be determined by Laguna Water, such property shall be returned to PGL in
its then condition at no charge to PGL or Laguna Water.
In 2014, Laguna Water engaged the services of Cuervo Appraisers to conduct a re-appraisal of PGL assets
on record as of December 31, 2013. Total replacement cost as of December 31, 2013 amounted to
P
= 2,138.38 million with a sound value of P
= 1,596.19 million.
TIEZA
Boracay Water is granted the right to operate, maintain in good working order, repair, decommission and
refurbish all fixed and movable property (except retained assets) required to provide the water and sewerage
services under its concession agreement with TIEZA. The legal title to all these assets in existence at the
commencement date, however, shall be retained by TIEZA and upon expiration of the useful life of such
assets as may be determined by Boracay Water, such assets shall be returned to TIEZA in its then-current
condition at no charge to TIEZA or Boracay Water.
The net book value of the facilities transferred to Boracay Water on commencement date based on TIEZAs
closing audit report amounted to P
= 618.24 million.
East Zone Head Office - manage, operate, repair, decommission, and refurbish all fixed and movable
assets (except certain retained assets) required to provide water delivery services and sewerage
services in the East Zone. Revenue from this business segment consists of water, environmental
charges, sewer, income from septic sludge disposal and bacteriological water analysis and other
miscellaneous income.
Outside East Zone - manage, operate, repair, decommission, and refurbish all fixed and movable assets
(except certain retained assets) required to provide water delivery services and sewerage services
outside the East Zone. Revenue from this segment consists of water and other miscellaneous income.
Management contracts - agreements related to improvements in the customers water systems.
Revenue from management contracts comprises the revenue of this business segment.
*SGVFS015775*
- 61 Details of the Groups operating segments as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
are as follows:
2015
East Zone
(Head Office)
Revenue
Sales to external customers
Operating expenses
Operating income
Revenue from rehabilitation works
Cost of rehabilitation works
Interest income
Interest expense
Equity share in net income of associates
Other income
Income before income tax
Provision for income tax
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Cumulative translation adjustment
Actuarial gain (loss) on pension liabilities - net
Income tax effect
Total comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Equity holders of the Parent Company
Non-controlling interests
Other information
Segment assets, exclusive of investment in associates
and deferred tax assets
Investment in associates
Deferred tax assets
Segment liabilities, exclusive of deferred tax liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Outside
East Zone
(Operating
Management
Subsidiaries)
Contracts
(In Thousands)
P
= 14,910,074
7,066,555
7,843,519
3,834,841
(3,834,841)
100,468
(1,311,938)
24,325
6,656,374
1,693,184
4,963,190
P
= 2,025,809
1,330,752
695,057
1,384,517
(1,384,517)
216,476
(145,597)
403,515
155,032
1,324,483
101,740
1,222,743
(36,907)
P
= 4,926,283
Consolidated
P
=
51,893
(51,893)
(51,893)
(51,893)
P
= 16,935,883
8,449,200
8,486,683
5,219,358
(5,219,358)
316,944
(1,457,535)
403,515
179,357
7,928,964
1,794,924
6,134,040
278,620
16,179
285
P
= 1,517,827
(P
= 51,893)
278,620
(20,728)
285
P
= 6,392,217
P
= 4,926,283
P
= 4,926,283
P
= 1,341,567
176,260
P
= 1,517,827
(P
= 51,893)
(P
= 51,893)
P
= 6,215,957
176,260
P
= 6,392,217
P
= 63,278,437
853,139
P
= 64,131,576
34,653,561
P
= 34,653,561
P
= 10,526,958
5,723,534
71,363
P
= 16,321,855
6,120,466
71,912
P
= 6,192,378
P
= 155,055
P
= 155,055
43,554
P
= 43,554
P
= 73,960,450
5,723,534
924,502
P
= 80,608,486
40,817,581
71,912
P
= 40,889,493
P
= 4,156,950
P
= 2,331,134
P
= 1,789,508
P
= 269,079
P
=
P
=
P
= 5,946,458
P
= 2,600,213
P
= 33,734
P
=
P
= 13,281
(P
= 20,453)
2014
East Zone
(Head Office)
Revenue
Sales to external customers
Operating expenses
Operating income
Revenue from rehabilitation works
Cost of rehabilitation works
Interest income
Interest expense
Equity share in net income of associates
Other income
Income before income tax
Provision for income tax
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Unrealized loss on AFS financial assets
Cumulative translation adjustment
Actuarial gain (loss) on pension liabilities - net
Income tax effect
Total comprehensive income
P
= 14,882,023
6,537,113
8,344,910
2,749,201
(2,749,201)
94,485
(1,513,124)
Outside
East Zone
(Operating
Management
Subsidiaries)
Contracts
(In Thousands)
(84,188)
6,842,083
1,693,581
5,148,502
P
= 1,449,634
940,347
509,287
686,588
(686,588)
91,150
(123,013)
357,298
18,240
852,962
142,717
710,245
(P
= 3,301)
40,537
(370)
P
= 5,185,368
P
=
101,970
(3,309)
112
P
= 809,018
P
= 25,488
54,286
(28,798)
(28,798)
(28,798)
P
=
(P
= 28,798)
Consolidated
P
= 16,357,145
7,531,746
8,825,399
3,435,789
(3,435,789)
185,635
(1,636,137)
357,298
(65,948)
7,666,247
1,836,298
5,829,949
(P
= 3,301)
101,970
37,228
(258)
P
= 5,965,588
(Forward)
*SGVFS015775*
- 62 -
East Zone
(Head Office)
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Equity holders of Manila Water Company, Inc.
Non-controlling interests
Other information
Segment assets, exclusive of investment in associates
and deferred tax assets
Investment in associates
Deferred tax assets
Segment liabilities, exclusive of deferred tax liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Outside
East Zone
(Operating
Management
Subsidiaries)
Contracts
(In Thousands)
P
= 5,185,368
P
= 5,185,368
P
= 792,046
16,972
P
= 809,018
P
= 60,977,237
819,584
P
= 61,796,821
P
= 35,428,341
P
= 35,428,341
Consolidated
(P
= 28,798)
(P
= 28,798)
P
= 5,948,616
16,972
P
= 5,965,588
P
= 7,833,131
4,961,500
61,599
P
= 12,856,230
P
= 4,236,623
68,949
P
= 4,305,572
P
= 206,853
P
= 206,853
P
= 24,420
P
= 24,420
P
= 69,017,221
4,961,500
881,183
P
= 74,859,904
P
= 39,689,384
68,949
P
= 39,758,333
P
= 2,924,926
P
= 2,192,870
P
= 919,490
P
= 251,117
P
=
P
=
P
= 3,844,416
P
= 2,443,987
P
= 13,693
P
= 21,876
P
=
P
= 35,569
Outside
Management
East Zone
Contracts
(In Thousands)
Consolidated
2013
East Zone
Revenue
Sales to external customers
Operating expenses
Operating income
Revenue from rehabilitation works
Cost of rehabilitation works
Interest income
Interest expense
Equity share in net income of associates
Other income
Income before income tax
Provision for income tax
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Unrealized gain (loss) on AFS financial assets
Cumulative translation adjustment
Actuarial gain (loss) on pension liabilities - net
Total comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Equity holders of Manila Water Company, Inc.
Non-controlling interests
Other information
Segment assets, exclusive of investment in associates
and deferred tax assets
Investment in associates
Deferred tax assets
Segment liabilities, exclusive of deferred tax liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
P
= 14,794,066
6,421,361
8,372,705
4,177,636
(4,177,636)
152,614
(1,671,312)
P
= 174,939
96,213
78,726
6,039
6,860,046
1,757,536
5,102,510
P
= 956,812
630,798
326,014
893,622
(893,622)
20,211
(62,088)
293,975
75,250
653,362
54,037
599,325
78,726
P
= 15,925,817
7,148,372
8,777,445
5,071,258
(5,071,258)
172,825
(1,733,400)
293,975
81,289
7,592,134
1,811,573
5,780,561
(P
= 18,568)
(66,233)
P
= 5,017,709
P
=
127,109
(1,462)
P
= 724,972
P
=
P
= 78,726
(P
= 18,568)
127,109
(67,695)
P
= 5,821,407
P
= 5,017,709
P
= 5,017,709
P
= 696,870
28,102
P
= 724,972
P
= 78,726
P
= 78,726
P
= 5,793,305
28,102
P
= 5,821,407
P
= 60,651,146
781,409
P
= 61,432,555
P
= 38,388,811
P
= 38,388,811
P
= 6,479,136
4,708,207
40,331
P
= 11,227,674
P
= 3,390,062
P
= 3,390,062
P
= 197,296
P
= 197,296
P
= 24,595
P
= 24,595
P
= 67,327,578
4,708,207
821,740
P
= 72,857,525
P
= 41,803,468
P
= 41,803,468
P
= 4,856,870
P
= 2,298,103
P
= 1,388,686
P
= 196,660
P
=
P
=
P
= 6,245,556
P
= 2,494,763
P
= 32,677
P
= 22,968
P
=
P
= 55,645
78,726
*SGVFS015775*
- 63 -
Carrying Value
AFS financial assets
Unquoted
Loans and receivables
Concession financial receivable
2014
Fair Value
Significant
unobservable
inputs (Level 3) Carrying Value
(In Thousands)
Fair Value
Significant
unobservable
inputs (Level 3)
P
= 2,409,290
P
= 2,409,290
P
= 2,409,290
P
= 2,409,290
1,198,084
P
= 3,607,374
2,140,700
P
= 4,549,990
975,984
P
= 3,385,274
1,881,765
P
= 4,291,055
P
= 26,220,373
7,926,871
P
= 24,688,413
11,701,046
P
= 25,470,751
8,001,209
P
= 25,141,255
11,806,727
384,876
P
= 34,532,120
355,509
P
= 36,744,968
362,065
P
= 33,834,025
544,866
P
= 37,492,848
The methods and assumptions used by the Group in estimating the fair value of the long-term loans and
receivables and other financial liabilities such as long-term debt, customers guaranty deposits and other
deposits, and service concession obligations are as follows:
a.
The fair values are estimated using the discounted cash flow methodology using the Groups current
incremental borrowing rates for similar borrowings with maturities consistent with those remaining for the
liability being valued.
b.
The discount rates used for PHP-denominated loans was 2.68% to 4.90% in 2015 and 2.54% to 5.17%
in 2014 while the discount rates used for foreign currency-denominated loans ranged from 0.02% to
3.01% in 2015 and 0.02% to 2.17% in 2014.
*SGVFS015775*
- 64 For cash flow interest rate risk, the Groups policy is to manage the interest payments using a mix of fixed
and variable rate debts. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Groups mix of fixed interest and floating
interest rate of long-term debt are 70.00% to 30.00% and 74.00% to 26.00%, respectively.
For fair value interest rate risk, the Groups investment policy requires it to hold AFS financial assets until
maturity, unless the need to sell arises, and to reduce the duration gap between financial assets and financial
liabilities to minimize interest rate risk. Debt securities are also marked-to-market monthly to reflect and
account for both unrealized gains and losses.
*SGVFS015775*
- 65 -
2015
Liabilities:
Long-Term Debt
Fixed Rate (exposed to
fair value risk)
IFC Loan - JPY
Interest rate
IFC Loan USD
Interest rate
Fixed Rate Corporate Notes
Interest rate
P
= 5.00 billion Loan
Interest rate
P
= 1.15 billion Clark Water
RCBC Loan
Interest rate
P
= 0.75 billion Cebu Water
DBP Loan
Interest rate
P
= 0.83 Laguna Water DBP
Loan
Interest rate
P
= 2.50 Laguna Water SBC
Loan
Interest rate
P
= 0.50 Laguna Water DBP
Loan
Interest rate
P
= 0.50 Laguna Water Loan
Interest rate
P
= 0.50 billion Boracay Water
DBP-SBC Loan
Interest rate
P
= 0.50 billion Boracay Water
DBP-SBC Loan
Interest rate
Floating Rate (exposed to cash
flow risk)
NEXI Loan
Interest rate
IFC Loan - JPY
Interest rate
IFC Loan - USD
Interest rate
MTSP Loan
Interest rate
MWMP Loan
Interest rate
Within 1 year
44,048,000
4.66%
$1,000,000
4.57%
P
= 4,925,000,000
6.33-7.33%
P
= 25,000,000
4.42%
1-2 years
2-3 years
3-4 years
4-5 years
More than
5 years
Total
(In JPY)
Total - Gross
(In USD)
Total - Gross
(In PHP)
44,048,000
22,024,000
110,120,000
P
= 43,167,040
$1,000,000
P
= 47,060,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 4,775,000,000
P
= 9,800,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 4,850,000,000
P
=
P
= 4,950,000,000
P
= 1,000,000,000
6.24%
P
= 150,000,000
P
=
P
=
P
=
P
=
P
= 1,150,000,000
P
=
7.32%
P
= 44,209,804
P
= 44,209,804
P
= 44,209,804
P
= 44,209,804
P
= 574,727,451
P
= 751,566,667
P
=
7.25%
P
= 49,000,000
P
= 49,000,000
P
= 49,000,000
P
= 49,000,000
P
= 643,125,000
P
= 839,125,000
P
=
6.03%
P
=
P
= 46,153,846
P
= 46,153,846
P
= 46,153,846
P
= 426,923,077
P
= 565,384,615
7,352,941
7.25%
P
=
6.73% to 7.58%
29,411,765
P
= 29,411,765
P
= 29,411,765
P
= 29,411,765
P
= 375,000,000
P
= 500,000,001
66,666,667
P
= 66,666,667
P
= 66,666,667
P
= 66,666,667
P
=
P
= 266,666,668
P
= 7,610,622
9.00%
P
= 7,610,622
P
= 7,610,622
P
= 7,610,622
P
= 7,610,622
P
= 327,256,792
P
= 365,309,902
P
= 7,610,622
9.00%
P
= 7,610,622
P
= 7,610,622
P
= 7,610,622
P
= 7,610,622
P
= 327,256,792
P
= 365,309,902
$18,750,000
6m Libor plus margin
243,280,000
6m Libor plus margin
$1,000,000
6m Libor plus margin
340,366,724
6m Libor plus margin
$
6m Libor plus margin
$18,750,000
$18,750,000
$18,750,000
$18,750,000
$93,750,000
P
= 4,411,875,000
243,280,000
121,640,000
608,200,000
P
= 238,414,400
$1,000,000
P
= 47,060,000
340,366,724
340,366,724
340,366,724
340,366,724
508,536,981
2,210,370,601
P
= 866,465,276
$610,200
$1,220,400
$20,769,400
$22,600,000
P
= 1,063,556,000
2,928,690,601
$118,350,000
P
= 26,270,960,471
Interest on financial instruments classified as floating rate is repriced on a semi-annual basis, unless otherwise stated. Interest on financial instruments classified as fixed rate is fixed until the maturity of the instrument.
*SGVFS015775*
- 66 -
2014
Liabilities:
Long-Term Debt
Fixed Rate (exposed to
fair value risk)
EIB Loan - JPY
Interest rate
EIB Loan - USD
Interest rate
IFC Loan - JPY
Interest rate
IFC Loan USD
Interest rate
P
= 10.00 Billion Notes
Interest rate
P
= 5.00 Billion Loan
Interest rate
P
= 0.50 Billion Laguna Water 1
Interest rate
P
= 0.83 Billion Laguna Water 2
Interest rate
P
= 0.50 Billion Boracay Water 1
Interest rate
P
= 0.50 Billion Boracay Water 2
Interest rate
P
= 0.75 Billion - Cebu Water
Interest rate
Floating Rate (exposed to cash
flow risk)
NEXI Loan
Interest rate
EIB Loan
Interest rate
IFC Loan JPY
Interest rate
IFC Loan - USD
Interest rate
MTSP Loan
Interest rate
P
= 0.50 Billion Boracay Water
Interest rate
Within 1 year
1,167,353,232
2.5430%- 2.5440%
$9,375,000
5.53%
44,048,000
4.57%
$2,000,000
4.57%
P
= 50,000,000
6.34% - 7.33%
P
= 25,000,000
4.42%
1-2 years
2-3 years
3-4 years
4-5 years
More than
5 years
Total
(In JPY)
Total - Gross
(In USD)
Total Gross
(In PHP)
1,167,353,232
P
= 432,621,108
$9,375,000
P
= 419,250,000
44,048,000
44,048,000
22,024,000
154,168,000
P
= 57,134,661
$1,000,000
$3,000,000
P
= 134,160,000
P
= 4,925,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 4,800,000,000
P
= 9,850,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 25,000,000
P
= 4,850,000,000
P
= 4,975,000,000
P
= 66,666,667
6.73% - 7.58%
P
= 66,666,667
P
= 66,666,667
P
= 66,666,666
P
= 66,666,667
P
= 66,666,666
P
= 400,000,000
7.25%
P
= 7,352,941
P
= 72,286,765
P
= 78,411,765
P
= 78,411,765
P
= 1,096,536,764
P
= 1,333,000,000
P
= 22,058,824
2.25%-9.48%
P
= 22,058,824
P
= 22,058,824
P
= 22,058,824
P
= 22,058,824
P
= 259,191,176
P
= 369,485,296
P
= 4,296,875
2.25%-9.48%
7.32%
P
= 17,187,500
P
= 17,187,500
P
= 17,187,500
P
= 17,187,500
P
= 201,953,125
P
= 275,000,000
P
= 44,209,804
P
= 44,209,804
P
= 44,209,804
P
= 618,937,255
P
= 751,566,667
$18,750,000
6m Libor plus margin
640,625,000
6m Libor plus margin
243,280,000
6m Libor plus margin
$2,000,000
6m Libor plus margin
340,366,724
6m Libor plus margin
$18,750,000
$18,750,000
$18,750,000
$18,750,000
$18,750,000
$112,500,000
P
= 5,031,000,000
640,625,000
P
= 237,415,625
243,280,000
243,280,000
121,640,000
851,480,000
P
= 315,558,488
$1,000,000
$3,000,000
P
= 134,160,000
340,366,724
340,366,724
340,366,724
340,366,724
848,634,730
2,550,468,350
P
= 945,203,571
P
= 7,352,941
P
= 7,352,941
P
= 7,352,941
P
= 7,352,941
P
= 86,397,060
P
= 123,161,765
P
= 7,352,941
3m PDST-F plus
margin
5,364,094,582
$127,875,000
P
= 25,783,717,181
Interest on financial instruments classified as floating rate is repriced on a semi-annual basis, unless otherwise stated. Interest on financial instruments classified as fixed rate is fixed until the maturity of the instrument.
*SGVFS015775*
- 67 -
The following tables demonstrate the sensitivity of the Groups income before income tax to a reasonably
possible change in interest rates on December 31, 2015 and 2014, with all variables held constant (through
the impact on floating rate borrowings).
2015
Changes in
basis points
Floating rate borrowings
100
(100)
Effect on income
before income tax
(In Thousands)
(P
= 64,323)
64,323
2014
Changes in
basis points
Floating rate borrowings
100
(100)
Effect on income
before income tax
(In Thousands)
(P
= 75,550)
75,550
2014
Original
Peso
Currency
Equivalent
(In Thousands )
USD7,269
VND62,102,626
AUD31
SGD211
P
= 342,056
129,173
1,067
7,089
479,385
JPY2,903,907
USD115,046
1,138,332
5,414,043
JPY5,274,985
USD123,327
1,954,909
5,515,187
JPY1,249,435
USD76,897
FRF1,175
489,778
3,618,787
9,249
10,670,189
JPY1,288,651
USD77,950
FRF1,493
477,574
3,485,924
12,396
11,445,990
(P
= 10,190,804)
USD8,176
VND23,999,786
AUD6
SGD102
P
= 365,631
50,160
217
3,437
P
= 419,445
(P
= 11,026,545)
The Group does not expect any movement of the USD, VND, SGD, AUD and FRF against the Philippine
Peso to have a significant effect on the Groups profit before tax.
Credit risk
The Group trades only with recognized, creditworthy third parties. It is the Groups policy that except for
connection fees and other highly meritorious cases, the Group does not offer credit terms to its customers.
*SGVFS015775*
- 68 -
With respect to credit risk arising from the other financial assets of the Group, which comprise cash and cash
equivalents and short-term cash investments, the Groups exposure to credit risk arises from default of the
counterparty, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments. The Group
transacts only with institutions or banks which have demonstrated financial soundness for the past five (5)
years.
With respect to receivables from customers, credit risk is managed primarily through credit reviews and an
analysis of receivables on a continuous basis. Customer payments are facilitated through various collection
modes including the use of postdated checks and auto-debit arrangements.
The Group has no significant concentrations of credit risk.
The maximum exposure to credit risk for the components of the consolidated statement of financial position is
equal to their carrying value.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the credit quality per class of the Groups financial assets are as follows:
2015
Cash and cash equivalents*
Receivables:
Customers:
Residential
Commercial
Semi-business
Industrial
Concession financial receivable
Employees
Interest from banks
Receivable from BWC
Others
Total
Total
P
= 6,844,465,827
918,762,413
337,068,574
40,577,782
58,481,871
1,198,083,563
205,071
97,344,108
P
= 9,494,989,209
250,126,476
19,857,607
6,829,564
2,106,249
39,126,019
12,438,613
529,500,647
53,759,982
P
= 913,745,157
444,255,711
95,632,983
26,946,115
53,238,262
422,641
63,303,910
P
= 683,799,622
1,613,144,600
452,559,164
74,353,461
113,826,382
1,198,083,563
39,753,731
12,438,613
529,500,647
214,408,000
P
= 11,092,533,988
Total
P
= 6,450,907,044
1,146,667,730
112,670,545
46,745,213
41,487,945
975,983,837
138,930
P
= 8,774,601,244
481,392,378
113,411,221
33,250,662
5,644,348
84,036,110
P
= 717,734,719
1,638,350,565
229,566,366
81,124,140
47,132,293
975,983,837
39,554,286
11,941,957
32,888,246
529,500,647
267,174,450
P
= 10,304,123,831
2014
Cash and cash equivalents*
Receivables:
Customers:
Residential
Commercial
Semi-business
Industrial
Concession financial receivable
Employees
Interest from banks
Receivable from SAWACO
Receivable from BWC
Others
Total
10,290,457
3,484,600
1,128,265
39,415,356
11,941,957
32,888,246
529,500,647
183,138,340
P
= 811,787,868
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Group does not have financial assets that are past due but not
impaired.
The credit quality of the financial assets was determined as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents are placed in various banks. Material amounts are held by banks which belong to
the top 5 banks in the country. The rest are held by local banks that have good reputation and low probability
of insolvency. Management assesses the quality of these assets as high grade.
Receivables which are classified as high grade pertains to receivables that are collectible within 7 days from
bill delivery. Receivables rated as standard are collectible from 11 to 30 days from bill delivery.
*SGVFS015775*
- 69 -
Liquidity risk
The Groups objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of
bank overdrafts, bank loans, debentures, preference shares, leases and hire purchase contracts. The
Groups policy is to maintain a level of cash that is sufficient to fund its operating cash requirements for the
next 4 to 6 months and any claim for refund of customers guaranty deposits. Capital expenditures are
funded through long-term debt, while operating expenses and working capital requirements are sufficiently
funded through internal cash generation.
The Groups financial assets used for liquidity management based on their maturities are as follows:
2015
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables:
Customers
Employees
Interest from banks
Others
AFS financial assets
Within 1 Year
1-5 years
More than
5 years
P
= 6,849,955,679
P
=
P
=
P
=
P
=
2,253,883,607
39,753,731
12,438,613
214,408,000
2,409,290
P
= 9,372,848,920
Total - Gross
P
= 6,849,955,679
2,253,883,607
39,753,731
12,438,613
214,408,000
2,409,290
P
= 9,372,848,920
2014
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables:
Customers
Employees
SAWACO
Interest from banks
Others
AFS financial assets
Within 1 Year
1-5 years
More than
5 years
Total - Gross
P
= 6,452,553,832
P
=
P
=
P
= 6,452,553,832
1,996,173,364
39,554,286
32,888,246
11,941,957
267,174,450
2,409,290
P
= 8,802,695,425
P
=
P
=
1,996,173,364
39,554,286
32,888,246
11,941,957
267,174,450
2,409,290
P
= 8,802,695,425
Liabilities:
Accounts and other payables
Payables to related parties
Long-term debt*
Service concession obligation*
Customers guaranty deposits and other
deposits
Within 1 year
1-5 years
More than
5 years
Total - Gross
P
= 4,433,087,387
10,834,774
7,308,311,734
1,452,667,556
P
=
19,255,909,286
5,030,175,936
P
=
3,507,885,936
12,537,719,686
P
= 4,433,087,387
10,834,774
30,072,106,956
19,020,563,178
P
= 13,204,901,451
P
= 24,286,085,222
294,883,786
P
= 16,340,489,408
294,883,786
P
= 53,831,476,081
2014
Liabilities:
Accounts and other payables
Payables to related parties
Long-term debt*
Service concession obligation*
Customers guaranty deposits and other
deposits
Within 1 year
1-5 years
More than
5 years
Total - Gross
P
= 3,846,824,496
11,490,133
3,961,634,952
903,512,645
P
=
17,158,019,319
3,734,356,285
P
=
14,198,608,704
17,571,906,659
P
= 3,846,824,496
11,490,133
35,318,262,975
22,209,775,589
P
= 8,723,462,226
P
= 20,892,375,604
362,064,821
P
= 32,132,580,184
362,064,821
P
= 61,748,418,014
*SGVFS015775*
- 70 -
Capital management
The primary objective of the Groups capital management strategy is to ensure that it maintains a healthy
capital structure, in order to maintain a strong credit standing while it maximizes shareholder value.
The Group closely manages its capital structure vis--vis a certain target gearing ratio, which is total debt
(less service concession obligation) divided by the sum of the total stockholders equity and total debt (less
service concession obligation). The Groups target gearing ratio is set at 60%. This target is to be achieved
by managing the Groups level of borrowings and dividend payments to shareholders.
Total liabilities
Less service concession obligation
Total stockholders equity
Total
Gearing ratio
2015
2014
P
= 40,889,493,376
P
= 39,758,333,532
7,926,870,690
8,001,209,069
32,962,622,686
31,757,124,463
39,718,992,406
35,101,570,064
P
= 72,681,615,092
P
= 66,858,694,527
45%
47%
For purposes of computing its net debt, the Group includes the outstanding balance of its long-term debt
(including current portion), accounts and other payables, less cash and cash equivalents and AFS financial
assets. To compute its total capital, the Group uses the total stockholders equity.
Total liabilities
Less:
Total service concession obligation
Cash and cash equivalents
AFS financial assets
Net debt
Total stockholders equity
Total net debt and stockholders equity
Total net debt to equity ratio
2015
P
= 40,889,493,376
2014
P
= 39,758,333,532
7,926,870,690
8,001,209,069
6,849,955,679
6,452,553,832
2,409,290
2,409,290
14,779,235,659
14,456,172,191
26,110,257,717
25,302,161,341
39,718,992,406
35,101,570,064
P
= 65,829,250,123
P
= 60,403,731,405
40%
42%
28. Commitments
Parent Companys Concession Agreement
The significant commitments of the Parent Company under the Concession Agreement and Extension are as
follows:
a.
b.
To post a performance bond, bank guarantee or other security acceptable to MWSS amounting to
US$70.00 million in favor of MWSS as a bond for the full and prompt performance of the Parent
Companys obligations under the Agreement. The aggregate amounts drawable in one or more
installments under such performance bond during the Rate Rebasing Period to which it relates are set
out below.
Within 30 days from the commencement of each renewal date, the Parent Company shall cause the
performance bond to be reinstated in the full amount set forth above as applicable for that year.
*SGVFS015775*
- 71 -
Upon not less than 10-day written notice to the Parent Company, MWSS may make one or more
drawings under the performance bond relating to a Rate Rebasing Period to cover amounts due to
MWSS during that period; provided, however, that no such drawing shall be made in respect of any
claim that has been submitted to the Appeals Panel for adjudication until the Appeals Panel has handed
down its decision on the matter.
In the event that any amount payable to MWSS by the Parent Company is not paid when due, such
amount shall accrue interest at a rate equal to that of a 364-day Treasury Bill for each day it remains
unpaid;
c.
With the Extension, the Parent Company agreed to increase its annual share in MWSS operating budget
by 100% from P
= 100.00 million to P
= 395.00 million, subject to annual CPI;
d.
To meet certain specific commitments in respect of the provision of water and sewerage services in the
East Zone, unless deferred by MWSS-RO due to unforeseen circumstances or modified as a result of
rate rebasing exercise;
e.
To operate, maintain, renew and, as appropriate, decommission facilities in a manner consistent with the
National Building Standards and best industrial practices so that, at all times, the water and sewerage
system in the East Zone is capable of meeting the service obligations (as such obligations may be
revised from time to time by the MWSS-RO following consultation with the Parent Company);
f.
To repair and correct, on a priority basis, any defect in the facilities that could adversely affect public
health or welfare, or cause damage to persons or third party property;
g.
To ensure that at all times, the Parent Company has sufficient financial, material and personnel
resources available to meet its obligations under the Agreement; and
h.
To ensure that no debt or liability that would mature after the life of the Agreement will be incurred unless
with the approval of MWSS.
The Parent Company is committed to perform its obligations under the Concession Agreement and Extension
to safeguard its continued right to operate the Concession.
Laguna Waters Concession Agreement
The significant commitments of Laguna Water under its concession agreement with PGL are as follows:
a.
b.
To manage, occupy, operate, repair, maintain, decommission, and refurbish the transferred facilities;
c.
To design, construct and commission the new facilities during the cooperation period;
d.
e.
To bill and collect payment from the customer for all services;
f.
To extract raw water exclusively from all sources of raw water; and
g.
To negotiate in good faith with PGL any amendment or supplement to the concession agreement to
establish, operate and maintain wastewater facilities if doing such is financially and economically
feasible.
On June 30, 2015, PGL and MWPV signed an amendment to their joint venture agreement dated November
10, 2000. Simultaneously, and consequent to the amendment of the joint venture agreement of Laguna
Water, Laguna Water signed an amendment to its concession agreement with the PGL which includes the
following:
a.
Expansion of its concession area to cover all cities and municipalities in the PGL; and
b.
Inclusion in the service obligations of Laguna Water the provision of wastewater services and the
establishment of an integrated sewage and septage system in the province.
*SGVFS015775*
- 72 -
a. Meet certain specific commitments in respect of the provision of water and sewerage services in the
service area, unless deferred by the TIEZA Regulatory Office (TIEZA-RO) due to unforeseen
circumstances or modified as a result of rate rebasing exercise;
Assumption of all liabilities of the BWSS as of commencement date and service such liabilities as
they fall due. BWSS has jurisdiction, supervision and control over all waterworks and sewerage
systems within Boracay Island prior to commencement date. The servicing of such liabilities shall
be applied to the concession fees;
ii.
Payment of an amount equivalent to 5% of the monthly gross revenue of Boracay Water, inclusive
of all applicable taxes. Such payments shall be subject to adjustment based on the gross revenue
of Boracay Water as reflected in its separate financial statements;
iii.
Provision of the amount of the TIEZA BODs approved budget in 2012, payable semi-annually and
not exceeding:
Month
January
July
iv.
Provision of the annual operating budget of the TIEZA-RO, payable in 2 equal tranches in January
and July and not exceeding:
Year
2011
2012
2013 and beyond
c.
Maximum Amount
P
= 10,000,000
10,000,000
Maximum Amount
P
= 15,000,000
20,000,000
previous year, subject to annual
CPI adjustment
Establish, at Boracay Island, a TIEZA-RO building with staff house, the cost of which should be
reasonable and prudent;
Operate, maintain, repair, improve, renew and, as appropriate, decommission facilities, as well as to
operate and maintain the drainage system upon its completion, in a manner consistent with the National
Building Standards and best industrial practices so that, at all times, the water and sewerage system in
the service area is capable of meeting the service obligations (as such obligations may be revised from
time to time by the TIEZA-RO following consultation with Boracay Water);
g. Repair and correct, on a priority basis, any defect in the facilities that could adversely affect public health
or welfare, or cause damage to persons or third party property; and
h. Ensure that at all times, Boracay Water has sufficient financial, material and personnel resources
available to meet its obligations under the concession agreement.
*SGVFS015775*
- 73 -
In addition, the Parent Company, as the main proponent of Boracay Water shall post a bank security in the
amount of US$2.50 million to secure the Parent Companys and Boracay Waters performance of their
respective obligations under the agreement. The amount of the performance security shall be reduced by the
Parent Company following the schedule below:
Amount of
Performance Security
(in US$ millions)
US$2.50
2.50
1.10
1.10
1.10
On or before the start of each year, Boracay Water shall cause the performance security to be reinstated in
the full amount set forth as applicable for that year.
Upon not less than 10 days written notice to Boracay Water, TIEZA may take one or more drawings under
the performance security relating to a Rate Rebasing Period to cover amounts due to TIEZA during that
period; provided, however, that no such drawing shall be made in respect of any claim that has been
submitted to the Arbitration Panel for adjudication until the Arbitration Panel has handed its decision on the
matter.
In the event that any amount payable to TIEZA by Boracay Water is not paid when due, such amount shall
accrue interest at a rate equal to that of a 364-day Treasury Bill for each day it remains unpaid.
Failure of Boracay Water to perform any of its obligations that is deemed material by TIEZA-RO may cause
the concession agreement to be terminated.
Technical Services Agreement
Simultaneous with the execution of Boracay Waters concession agreement, Boracay Water and the Parent
Company executed a Technical Services Agreement by which the Parent Company is being paid by Boracay
Water a technical services fee equivalent to 4% of the annual gross revenue of Boracay Water, for rendering
the following services to Boracay Water:
a.
Financial management, including billing and collection services, accounting methods and financial
control devices; and
b.
Operations and project management, including facility operations and maintenance, and infrastructure
project management.
b.
Finance, design, and construct new facilities - defined as any improvement and extension works to (i) all
existing facilities - defined as all fixed and movable assets specifically listed in the concession
agreement; (ii) construction work - defined as the scope of construction work set out in the concession
agreement; and (iii) other new works that do not constitute refurbishment or repair of existing facilities
undertaken after commencement date;
c.
Manage, exclusively possess, occupy, operate, repair, maintain, decommission and refurbish the
existing facilities, except for the private deep wells set out in the concession agreement, the negotiations
for the acquisition and control of which shall be the sole responsibility and for the account of the Clark
Water; and manage, own, operate, repair, maintain, decommission and refurbish the new facilities;
d.
e.
Provide and manage all water and wastewater related services like assisting locator of relocating of
pipes and assess internal leaks;
*SGVFS015775*
- 74 -
f.
Bill and collect payment from the customers for the services (with the exception of SM City Clark). SM
City Clark has been carved out by virtue of Republic Act 9400 effective 2007 even if it is located within
the franchise area; and
g.
Extract raw water exclusively from all sources of raw water including all catchment areas, watersheds,
springs, wells and reservoirs in CFZ free of charge by CDC.
On August 15, 2014, the Clark Water and CDC signed an amendment agreement to the concession
agreement dated March 16, 2000. The Amendment provides for the following:
a.
Extension of the original concession period for another 15 years up to October 1, 2040;
b.
Additional investment of P
=4.00 billion provided under the amended concession agreement to be spent
for further improvement and expansion water and waste water services in the area. Investment
requirement under the original CA amounted to P
= 3.00 billion and the amended concession agreement
required an additional investment of P
=2.00 billion. Total investment prior to the amendment of the
concession agreement amounted to P
= 1.00 billion;
c.
Introduction of rate rebasing mechanism for every four years starting 2014;
d.
e.
to P
= 25.04/m3) in 2018
to P
= 25.45/m3) in 2019
to P
= 25.87/m3) in 2020
to P
= 26.30/ m3) in 2021
As a result of the extension of the concession period, service concession assets and service concession
obligation as of August 15, 2014 increased by P
= 56.58 million. Further, the recovery period of the Companys
investment is now extended by another 15 years from 2025 to 2040.
On July 28, 2014, Clark Waters BOD approved and authorized the equity restructuring of Clark Water. Clark
Water converted 700 issued and outstanding common stock to redeemable preferred stock with par value of
P
= 100.00 per share. Subsequently, on September 29, 2014, Clark Water redeemed all issued and
outstanding preferred stock.
On August 15, 2014 Clark Water and CDC signed an amendment agreement to their Concession Agreement
dated March 16, 2000 (the Amendment). The Amendment provides for, among others, the (a) extension of
the original concession period for another fifteen years; (b) additional investment by Clark Water of P
= 5.00
billion for the entire concession period, as extended, to be spent for the further improvement and expansion
of water and wastewater services in the service area; and (c) the introduction of rebasing mechanism that will
enable Clark Water to recover its investment at a reasonable tariff to the locators and residents of CDC in the
service area.
Bulk Water Supply Agreement with MCWD
On December 18, 2013, Cebu Water entered into a bulk water supply agreement with MCWD. The
significant commitments of Cebu Water under its agreement with MCWD are as follows:
a.
Provide potable and treated water at an aggregate volume of 18,000 cubic meters per day for the first
year and 35,000 cubic meters per day for the succeeding years up to 20 years at P
= 24.59 per cubic
meter;
b.
Ensure that the source shall be sustainable and 100% reliable at any day the duration of the agreement;
and
c.
Construct a facility capable of delivering a production capacity of 35,000 cubic meters per day and
maintain the same on its account.
*SGVFS015775*
- 75 -
Offer water supply and sewerage services to all current or future locators in the Laguna Technopark,
including future area(s) of expansion;
b.
Ensure the availability of an uninterrupted 24-hour supply of water to all current and future locators,
subject to interruptions resulting from the temporary failure of items of the Water Facilities (where
Laguna Water acts promptly to remedy such failure) or required for the repair of the construction of the
Water Facilities where such repairs or construction cannot be performed without interruption to the
supply of water;
c.
Upon request from a current or future locator in the LTI for a connection to a water main, make such a
connection as soon as reasonably practicable, upon payment of reasonable connection fees as
determined by Laguna Water;
d.
Ensure at all times that the water supplied to current and future locators in LTI complies with Philippine
National Standards for Drinking Water as published by the Department of Health (or successor entity
responsible for such standards) and prevailing at such time and shall observe any requirement regarding
sampling, record keeping or reporting as may be specified by law;
e.
Make available an adequate supply of water for firefighting and other public purposes as the municipality
and/or barangay in which LTI may reasonably request. Laguna Water shall not assess for such water
used for firefighting purposes but may charge for all other water used for public purposes; and
f.
Laguna Water shall make a supply of water available to current and future locators in LTI, including the
areas of expansion in the future.
Zamboanga Water being required to implement Network Restructuring and Non-Revenue Water
Reduction Programs for ZCWDs water distribution system; and
b.
Zamboanga Water having the right to restructure and maintain the facilities in the ZCWD service area,
legal title to these assets remains with ZCWD. The legal title to all fixed assets contributed to the
existing ZCWD system by Zamboanga Water during the project tenure remains with Zamboanga Water
until the expiration date (or an early termination date) at which time all rights, titles and interest in such
assets will automatically vest in ZCWD.
*SGVFS015775*
- 76 -
The Group is also involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Management
believes that any amount the Group may have to pay in connection with any of these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on the Groups financial position or operating results. The information normally
required under PAS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, is not disclosed as it may
prejudice the outcome of the proceedings.
*SGVFS015775*
We have audited in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing, the consolidated financial
statements of Manila Water Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries as at December 31, 2015 and 2014,
and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, included in this Form 17-A
and have issued our report thereon dated February 26, 2016. Our audits were made for the purpose
of forming an opinion on the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The Schedules
A to L listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Schedules are the
responsibility of the Companys management. These schedules are presented for purposes of
complying with the Securities Regulation Code Rules 68, As Amended (2011) and are not part of the
basic consolidated financial statements. These schedules have been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audit of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion,
present fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be set forth therein in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
Dhonabee B. Seeres
Partner
CPA Certificate No. 97133
SEC Accreditation No. 1196-AR-1 (Group A),
June 30, 2015, valid until June 29, 2018
Tax Identification No. 201-959-816
BIR Accreditation No. 08-001998-98-2015,
January 5, 2015, valid until January 4, 2018
PTR No. 5321694, January 4, 2016, Makati City
February 26, 2016
*SGVFS015775*
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
P
= 28,202,654,069
(1,242,581,377)
(1,174,431,248)
(120,591,565)
(113,488,598)
(13,408,630)
25,538,152,651
5,333,135,806
(131,709,583)
(35,739,893)
(8,432,177)
30,695,406,804
(2,039,953,671)
P
= 28,655,453,133
*As discussed in Note 19 to the audited financial statements, excess retained earnings will be utilized for capital expenditures
under the approved Business Plan in compliance with the Parent Companys service obligations under the Concession
Agreement.
*SGVFS015775*
COVER SHEET
A 1 9 9 6 1 1 5 9 3
S.E.C. Registration Number
M A N I
L A
W A T E R
C O M P A N Y
N C
M W S S
A D M I
4 8 9
K A T I
Q U E Z O N
N I
S T R A T I
P U N A N
C I
T Y
O N
R O A D
M E T R O
B U I
L D I
B A L A R A
M A N I
N G
1 1 0 5
L A
981-8122
Contact Person
1 2
3 1
Month
Day
Fiscal Year
0 4
FORM TYPE
Any
Month
Day
Annual Meeting
File Number
____________________________________
LCU
Document I.D.
____________________________________
Cashier
STAMPS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A.
BOARD MATTERS 1
1) BOARD OF DIRECTORS
(a) Composition of the Board...... 1
(b) Directorship in Other Companies.. 4
(c) Shareholding in the Company...................................10
2) CHAIRMAN AND CEO. 12
3) OTHER EXECUTIVE, NON-EXECUTIVE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS.. 17
4) CHANGES IN THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. 22
5) ORIENTATION AND EDUCATION PROGRAM. 32
B.
C.
D.
REMUNERATION MATTERS... 78
1) REMUNERATION PROCESS 78
2) REMUNERATION POLICY AND STRUCTURE FOR DIRECTORS. 79
3) AGGREGATE REMUNERATION .. 80
4) STOCK RIGHTS, OPTIONS AND WARRANTS 81
5) REMUNERATION OF MANAGEMENT. 82
E.
BOARD COMMITTEES. 82
1) NUMBER OF MEMBERS, FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.... 82
2) COMMITTEE MEMBERS.. 91
3) CHANGES IN COMMITTEE MEMBERS 101
4) WORK DONE AND ISSUES ADDRESSED. 101
5) COMMITTEE PROGRAM.. 104
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
A. BOARD MATTERS
1)
Board of Directors
Eleven (11)
Eleven (11)
(a)
No. of
years
served as
Director3
If nominee,
identify the
principal
Nominator in the
last election2
Date first
elected
Elected when
NED
AC*
AC
April 7, 2015
ASM
18
NED
AC
AC
April 7, 2015
ASM
18
ED
AC
AC
November 26,
2009
April 7, 2015
ASM
Directors Name
Type1
Antonino T. Aquino
NED
AC
AC
April 7, 2015
ASM
17
Delfin L. Lazaro
NED
AC
AC
May 6, 2002
April 7, 2015
ASM
13
NED
Philwater **
Philwater **
April 7, 2015
ASM
Oscar S. Reyes
ID
N/A
February 3, 2005
April 7, 2015
ASM
10
ID
N/A
April 7, 2015
ASM
ID
N/A
Thom Ryan Q.
Ortega
(not related)
April 7, 2015
ASM
Jaime C. Laya
ID
N/A
Thom Ryan Q.
Ortega
(not related)
April 4, 2014
April 7, 2015
ASM
Victoria P. Garchitorena
NED
N/A
April 4, 2014
April 7, 2015
ASM
Sherisa P. Nuesa
*Ayala Corporation
**Philwater Holdings Company, Inc.
(b)
Provide a brief summary of the corporate governance policy that the board of directors has adopted. Please emphasize the policy/ies relative to the
treatment of all shareholders, respect for the rights of minority shareholders and of other stakeholders, disclosure duties, and board responsibilities.
The corporate governance policy of Manila Water Company, Inc. (hereafter, the Company, the Corporation, or Manila Water) is primarily contained in
its Manual of Corporate Governance (Manual) which the Board of Directors adopted and approved on April 11, 2011. As contained in the Manual, the
Companys corporate governance framework is based on the following principles:
Accountability - The Manual establishes the Companys accountability to all its shareholders and guides the Board in setting strategies and
monitoring the Companys management.
Fairness - The Company obligates itself to safeguard shareholder rights and ensure the fair treatment of all shareholders, including minority
shareholders.
Transparency - The Company ensures that timely and accurate disclosures are made on all material matters, including the financial situation,
performance, ownership, and governance, in a manner easily accessible to the public and all interested parties.
Sustainability - The Company believes that its business goals are intertwined with the well-being of the communities that it serves, and that of the
natural environment that supports its resources. It recognizes the value of working with all its stakeholders in order to achieve its social,
environmental and business objectives.4
The last update to the Manual was approved by the Board in its regular meeting held on June 25, 2014 to comply with SEC Memorandum Circular No. 9
Series of 2014 dated May 6, 2014. In addition to the changes required by the said Circular, some changes were also made to the Manual for the purpose of
improving its format. The endorsement of the Audit and Governance Committee on the proposed changes to the Manual was obtained last June 6, 2014.
(c)
How often does the Board review and approve the vision and mission?
To ensure good governance of the Company, the Board is mandated under the Manual to establish a vision and mission and strategic objectives and key
policies and procedures for the management of the Company, as well as the mechanism for monitoring and evaluating the Managements performance,
especially that of the President and CEO. The Board is enjoined to periodically review the vision, mission, corporate strategic objectives and key policies of
the Company in order to sustain the Companys market competitiveness and enhance shareholder value.
Pursuant to the Rate Rebasing provision of the Concession Agreement of the Company with the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS),
and in accordance with good corporate business practice, the Company revisits its business plan every five (5) years. Further, in its Charter which the Board
approved and adopted on April 4, 2014 (Charter of the Board), it is provided in Section 3.12 thereof that the Board shall regularly review, at least
annually, the vision and mission of the Corporation and shall revise the same, as may be necessary, in accordance with the strategic directions of the
Company.
In its regular meeting held on August 11, 2015, which meeting was attended by all the members of the Board, the Board has approved the new missionvision statement and strategy of the Company, to wit:
Mission
Our mission is to create an exceptional customer experience in the provision of sustainable solutions vital to health and life.
Vision
Our vision is to become a leader in the provision of water, used water and environmental services which will empower people, protect the
environment, and enhance sustainable development.
(d)
Directors Name
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
Ayala Corporation
Type of Directorship6
Executive
Ayala Land, Inc., AC Energy Holdings, Inc., Accendo Commercial Corporation, Non-Executive (Chairman)
Alabang Commercial Corporation, AC International Finance Ltd. , Ayala
International Pte. Ltd., Ayala Automotive Holdings Corporation, Automobile
Central Enterprises, Inc., Liontide Holdings, Inc.
5
6
The Group is composed of the parent, subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures of the Company.
Executive, Non-Executive, Independent. Indicate if director is also the Chairman.
Aurora Properties, Inc., Bank of The Philippine Islands, Ceci Realty, Inc., Vesta Non-Executive (Vice Chairman)
Property Holdings, Inc., Emerging City Holdings, Inc., Bonifacio Land
Corporation, LiveIt Investments, Ltd., Columbus Holdings, Inc., Fort Bonifacio
Development Corporation
Mermac, Inc.
Non-Executive (Co-Chairman)
Ayala Corporation
Executive (Chairman)
Globe Telecom, Bank of the Philippine Islands, and Integrated Micro- Non-Executive (Chairman)
Electronics, Inc., Ayala Education, Inc., Ayala Retirement Fund Holdings, Inc.
and Asiacom Philippines, Inc.
Ayala Foundation and Ayala Group Club, Inc.
Non-Executive (Co-Chairman)
Mermac, Inc.
Manila Water Philippine Ventures, Inc., Boracay Island Water Company, Inc., Non-Executive (Chairman)
Clark Water Corporation, Manila Water Total Solutions Corp., Manila Water
Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd, Manila Water South Asia Holdings Pte. Ltd., Thu Duc
Water Holdings Pte. Ltd., Kenh Dong Water Holdings Pte. Ltd. and Manila
Water Foundation, Inc.
Laguna AAAWater Corporation
Non-Executive (Vice-Chairman)
Executive (Chairman)
5
Non-Executive (Co-Vice-Chairman)
Ayala Land, Inc. and Anvaya Cove Beach and Nature Club, Inc.
Delfin L. Lazaro
Ayala Corporation, Ayala Land, Inc., Integrated Micro-Electronics, Inc., Globe Non-Executive
Telecom, Inc.
Non-Executive
Executive
Executive
Non-Executive
Victoria P. Garchitorena
Non-Executive
Jaime C. Laya
Non-Executive
Sherisa P. Nuesa
Actimed Group composed of Actimed, Inc., Erikagen, Inc., Novelis Solutions, Non-Executive
Inc. and Pharma Gen Ventures Corp.
Type of Directorship
Non-Executive
Oscar S. Reyes
Non-Executive (Chairman)
Basic Energy Corporation, Cosco Capital, Inc., PLDT, Sun Life Financial Phils., Inc.
Non-Executive
Executive
SM Prime Holdings
Non-Executive (Vice-Chairman)
Phinma Corporation
Non-Executive
Non-Executive (Independent)
Executive (Chairman)
Non-Executive
Jaime C. Laya
Name of the
Significant Shareholder
Ayala Corporation
Ayala Corporation
Ayala Corporation
(iv) Has the company set a limit on the number of board seats in other companies (publicly listed, ordinary and companies with secondary license) that
an individual director or CEO may hold simultaneously? In particular, is the limit of five board seats in other publicly listed companies imposed and
observed? If yes, briefly describe other guidelines:
Yes. The Company ensures that adequate time and attention is given to the fulfillment of the directors of their duties. The independent directors can
hold no more than five board seats in publicly-listed companies and executive directors can hold no more than two board seats in listed companies
outside the Corporations group. In the implementation of this policy, the Charter of the Board considers several directorships in related companies or
companies in the same industry as one.7
In particular, the Company subscribes to the following guidelines which are contained in the Manual, in the Charter of the Board, and in the relevant
laws, rules and regulations:
CEO
Guidelines
The President, who is also the CEO, must be a director. Hence, the
guidelines for a director apply to the CEO.
Executive Director
Non-Executive Director
(c)
17
10
The following table lists the shareholding of the Board of Directors in the Company as of December 31, 2015:
Name of Director
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala
Gerardo C. Ablaza Jr.
Delfin L. Lazaro
Antonino T. Aquino
John Eric T. Francia
Sherisa P. Nuesa (Independent)
Jose L. Cuisia Jr. (Independent)
Oscar S. Reyes (Independent)
Victoria P. Garchitorena
Jaime C. Laya (Independent)
TOTAL
Number of Direct
shares
1
200,001
1
1
7,200,001
1
1,900,000
1
200,001
1
100
9,500,109
Number of
Indirect shares /
Through (name of
record owner)
0
0
4,126,077
0
5,549,542
0
3,409,607
0
130,000
0
4,900
13,220,126
Class of Share
% of Total Common
Stock or Preferred
Stock25
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Preferred
Common
Common
Common
Preferred
Common
% of Total Outstanding
Capital Stock26
0.00000005%
0.00973740%
0.20088543%
0.00000005%
0.62073412%
0.00000003%
0.25850764%
0.00000005%
0.01606668%
0.00000003%
0.00024343%
0.00000002%
0.00330365%
0.06815518%
0.00000002%
0.21059889%
0.00000002%
0.08770489%
0.00000002%
0.00545101%
0.00000002%
0.00008259%
0.37529631%
The following table lists the shareholding of the Board of Directors in the Company as of December 31, 2014:
Name of Director
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala
Gerardo C. Ablaza Jr.
Delfin L. Lazaro
Number of Direct
shares
1
200,001
1
1
Number of
Indirect shares /
Through (name of
record owner)
0
0
3,626,077
0
Class of Share
Common
Common
Common
Common
0.00000005%
0.00976797%
0.17709617%
0.00000005%
% of Total
Outstanding Capital
Stock28
0.00000002%
0.00330716%
0.05995976%
0.00000002%
25
Based on the number of Common Shares (2,053,945,884) or Preferred Shares (4,000,000,000) of the Company as of December 31, 2015, as the case may be
Based on the total number of outstanding capital stock of the Company as of December 31, 2015
27
Based on the number of Common Shares (2,047,519,110) or Preferred Shares (4,000,000,000) of the Company as of December 31, 2014, as the case may be
28
Based on the total number of outstanding capital stock of the Company (6,053,915,884) as of December 31, 2014
26
11
Antonino T. Aquino
John Eric T. Francia
Sherisa P. Nuesa (Independent)
Jose L. Cuisia Jr. (Independent)
Oscar S. Reyes (Independent)
Victoria P. Garchitorena
Jaime C. Laya (Independent)
TOTAL
7,200,001
1
5,309,607
1
200,001
1
100
5,549,542
0
0
0
130,000
0
4,900
12,709,716
9,510,520
Common
Preferred
Common
Common
Common
Preferred
Common
0.62268244%
0.00000005%
0.25931904%
0.00000005%
0.01611711%
0.00000005%
0.00024420%
0.21082268%
0.00000002%
0.08779810%
0.00000002%
0.00545680%
0.00000002%
0.00008268%
0.36742728%
2)
(a)
Do different persons assume the role of Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO? If no, describe the checks and balances laid down to ensure that the
Board gets the benefit of independent views.
Yes
No
(b)
CEO/President
Role
12
Accountabilities
29
13
a. Board Management35
a.1 The Chairman shall provide leadership of the Board and shall
initiate the Boards performance of its responsibility to review
and monitor the aims, strategy, policy and directions of the
Corporation and the achievement of its objectives.
Deliverables
a.2 The Chairman shall keep open the communication among the
members of the Board to keep it up to-date on major
developments about the Corporation,
through timely
discussion of potential developments and to provide the Board
with sufficient knowledge to permit it to make informed
decisions.
a.3 The Chairman shall chair the Board meetings and all annual
general meetings. The Chairman may vote at a Board meeting
on any matter requiring resolutions or approval by the Board.
14
15
3)
Explain how the board of directors plans for the succession of the CEO/Managing Director/President and the top key management positions?
The Board, with the assistance of the Remuneration Committee and the Companys Corporate Human Resources Group, has adopted a professional
development program for employees, officers and senior management. Through Competency Management, the Company has put in place a process to
determine the skills necessary for particular positions in the Company and identifies key talents for purposes of succession. The Companys Corporate
Human Resources Group has developed a Talent Master Plan to determine the right organizational structuring, recruitment strategies, performance
evaluation methodologies, total rewards management, and career development all geared to attract, retain, and engage the companys employees, officers
and senior management and to cultivate them to become the Companys future business leaders.
The development of leadership talent is crucial to the success of Manila Water in the future. Hence, it is one of the top strategic priorities of the Company.
For the succession of the top key management positions, the Company has formed an Acceleration Pool composed of selected high potential key talents
within the organization, who embodies the values and commitment to excellence of a Manila Water leader.
38
39
16
41
17
experiences of said directors in the industry contribute to the informed discussion on the previous and/or similar issues confronting the Company.
Define and clarify the roles, accountabilities and deliverables of the Executive, Non-Executive and Independent Directors:
Under the Companys current set up, the only executive director of the Company is the President/CEO. Hence, the role, accountabilities and deliverables of
the executive director is generally that of the President and CEO.
On the other hand, the directors, whether executive or non-executive, act as body and deliberate as a whole on matters presented to the board.
Executive
The CEO/President, in general, shall have
the administration and direction of the
day to day business affairs of the
Company. He also exercises such powers
and perform such duties specified in the
By Laws and in the Manual of Corporate
Governance.42
Role
Non-Executive
The corporate powers of the Company
shall be exercised, all business conducted
and all property of such corporations
controlled and held by the board.43
Independent Director
Independent directors shall hold no interests
or relationships with the Company that may
hinder their independence from the Company
or its management which would interfere with
the exercise of independent judgment in
carrying out the responsibilities of a director.44
The Nomination Committee shall be composed
of at least three (3) members, majority of
whom shall be independent directors. The
Chairman of the Nomination Committee must
be an independent director. 45
The Remuneration Committee shall be
composed of at least three (3) members,
majority of whom shall be independent
directors. The Chairman of the Nomination
Committee must be an independent director. 46
42
18
Accountabilities
Directors who willfully and knowingly vote for or consent to patently unlawful acts of the Company or who are guilty of gross negligence
or bad faith in directing the affairs of the Company or acquire any personal or pecuniary interest in conflict with their duty as directors
shall be liable jointly and severally for all damages resulting therefrom suffered by the Company, its stockholders and other persons. 51
Where a director, by virtue of his office, acquires for himself a business opportunity which should belong to the Company, he must
account to the latter for all such profits by refunding the same unless ratified by the stockholders.52
When a director or officer attempts to acquire or acquires, in violation of his duty any interest adverse to the Company in respect of any
matter which has been reposed in him in confidence, as to which equity imposes a disability upon him to deal in his own behalf, he shall
be liable as a trustee for the Company and must account for the profits which otherwise would have accrued to the Company. 53
47
Manual of Corporate Governance, Article I, Section 2.2, page 19, and Section 2.5, page 23.
Corporation Code, Section 23.
49 Manual of Corporate Governance, Article I, Section 1, page 3.
50 Manual of Corporate Governance, Article II, Section 2, page 26.
51 Manual of Corporate Governance, Article I, Section 1.11, page 16; Corporation Code Section 31.
52 Manual of Corporate Governance, Article III, page 31; Corporation Code, Section 34.
53 Manual of Corporate Governance, Article I, Section 1.11, page 16; Section 31, Corporation Code.
48
19
The Companys directors shall act in good faith, with due care and in the best interests
of the Company and all its shareholders, including minority shareholders, based on all
relevant information. Each director is expected to attend board meetings and
applicable committee meetings. Directors are expected to ensure that other
commitments do not interfere in the discharge of their duties. 55
Deliverables
d. Report to the Board from time to time all
matters within its knowledge which the
interest of the Company may require to be
brought to their notice.54
The Board shall exercise such express powers in the By Laws and in the Manual and those that may be authorized under existing laws, rules
and regulations. In this connection, the Board shall fulfil certain key functions56, including:
a.
Reviewing and guiding corporate strategy, major plans of action, risk policy, annual budgets and business plans; setting performance
objectives; monitoring implementation and corporate performance; and overseeing major capital expenditures, acquisitions and
divestitures.
b.
Monitoring the effectiveness of the Corporations governance practices and making changes as needed.
c.
Selecting, compensating, monitoring and, when necessary, replacing key executives and overseeing succession planning.
54
20
d.
Aligning key executive and board remuneration with the longer term interests of the Corporation and its shareholders.
e.
f.
Monitoring and managing potential conflicts of interest of management, board members and shareholders, including misuse of corporate
assets and abuse in related party transactions.
g.
Ensuring the integrity of the Corporations accounting and financial reporting systems, including the independent audit, and that
appropriate systems of control are in place, in particular, systems for risk management, financial and operational control, and compliance
with the law and relevant standards.
Overseeing the process of disclosure and communications.
h.
Without prejudice to the requirements of existing laws, rules and regulation, and the provisions of the By Laws and the Manual, the Board may
delegate the implementation of the foregoing functions to the Board Committees, Executive Officers and key senior managers of the
Corporation.
The Board shall regularly review, at least annually, the vision and mission of the Corporation and shall revise the same, as may be necessary, in
accordance with the strategic directions of the Corporation.57
Provide the companys definition of "independence" and describe the companys compliance to the definition.
Under the Charter of the Board, Independence58 is defined as, with respect to any person, the absence of any restrictions or limitations or freedom from any
interests or relationships that would interfere with the exercise of impartial and objective judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of that person.
Under the Manual59, a director is considered independent if he holds no interests or relationships with the Company that may hinder his independence from the
Company or its management which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
The Company also subscribes to the requirements of independence under existing laws, rules and regulations, in particular, the SEC Memorandum Circular No. 16
Series of 2002. Hence, the Company ensures that its independent directors have all the qualifications and none of the disqualifications specified in the said SEC
Memorandum Circular.
57
21
In addition, the Manual 60 provides for the following policy regarding independent directors:
a. Officers, executives and employees of the Company may be elected as directors but cannot and shall not be characterized as independent directors.
b. If a director elected or appointed as an independent director becomes an officer, employee or consultant of the Company, the Company shall forthwith
cease to consider him as an independent director.
c. If the beneficial ownership of an independent director in the Company or its related corporations shall exceed 2% of the subscribed capital stock of such
corporation, the Company shall forthwith cease to consider him as an independent director. However, should the independent director take the appropriate
action to remedy or correct the disqualification within 60 days from the occurrence of the ground, he may still be considered an independent director. 61
Does the company have a term limit of five consecutive years for independent directors? If after two years, the company wishes to bring back an independent
director who had served for five years, does it limit the term for no more than four additional years? Please explain.
Yes. Under the Charter of the Board, an independent director can serve as such for five (5) consecutive years. After completion of the five-year period, an
independent director shall be ineligible for election as such unless the independent director has undergone a cooling off period of two (2) years. Subject to the
provisions of existing laws, rules and regulations, an independent director shall not serve for more than five (5) consecutive years and for a total of nine (9) years.62
In this regard, the Company also complies with the requirements of SEC Memorandum Circular No. 9 S. 2011 which imposes a five year limitation and such other
limitations to serve as an independent director. Specifically, the SEC Memorandum Circular provides that an independent director can serve as such for five (5)
consecutive years. After completion of the five-year service period, an independent director shall be ineligible for election as such in the same company unless the
independent director has undergone a cooling off period of two (2) years.
5)
(a)
Resignation/Death/Removal
Indicate any changes in the composition of the Board of Directors that happened during the period:
There is no change in the composition of the incumbent Board of Directors since their election at the Annual Stockholders Meeting held on April 7, 2015.
60
22
The same set of directors was elected at the Annual Stockholders Meeting held on April 11, 2016.
(b)
63
64
23
d. After evaluation of the qualifications/disqualifications of the nominees, the Nomination Committee shall issue a resolution whether endorsing
or not the nominees for election to the Board of Directors.
e. If a nominee is not endorsed for election by reason of a disqualification, the resolution of the Nomination Committee should clearly specify
the grounds relied upon for disqualification.
Criteria for Selection/Appointment/Re-appointment of Directors:
The criteria for the selection/appointment and re-appointment of directors are as follows:
a. Any stockholder having at least one (1) share registered in his name may be nominated and elected Director.65
b. All nominees for election to the Board shall have all the qualifications and none of the disqualifications specified in the By Laws, in the Manual, and under
existing laws, rules and regulations.66
c. The President and Chief Executive Officer must always be a Director.67
d. At least one non-executive Director shall have a prior working experience in the industry to which the Corporation belongs.68
e. The number of Directors who are citizens of the Philippines shall be proportionate to the percentage of the total outstanding capital stock of the
Corporation owned by Philippine nationals as defined by law.69
f. An independent director shall have the additional qualifications prescribed by the applicable laws, rules and regulations, in particular, SRC Rule 38 and SEC
Memorandum Circular No. 9 S. 2011 or any amendment thereto.70
Process for Permanent or Temporary Disqualification of Directors71
Section 2.4 of the Charter of the Board provides the process for the permanent and temporary disqualification of directors:
2.4.1 The disqualification of Directors shall either be permanent or temporary. The grounds for disqualification of directors to be nominated for election to
the Board shall be the same grounds for permanent disqualification of Directors, other than the grounds for temporary disqualification that has not
become permanent.
65
24
If the ground for disqualification of a nominated director becomes known prior to the scheduled annual stockholders meeting, the nominated
director will not be endorsed for election at the stockholders meeting except when such disqualification is temporary and the same is cured or
remedied prior to the scheduled stockholders meeting.
2.4.2
A director shall have sixty (60) days upon the occurrence of any ground for temporary disqualification to remedy or correct the same otherwise, the
disqualification shall become permanent.
If the ground for permanent disqualification of the director occurs during his term of office, the director should file his resignation motu proprio.
If the director does not resign despite the existence of a ground for permanent disqualification, the Board may, by a majority vote of all its members
in a meeting called for the purpose, remove the director or recommend to the stockholders the removal of the concerned director. If the Board
recommends the removal of the director to the stockholders, the procedures specified in Section 2872 of the Corporation Code shall be strictly followed
and complied with.
2.4.3
Subject to Section 2.7, a director may be declared temporarily disqualified by a resolution of a majority of the Board. A director so disqualified shall
have sixty (60) days to remedy or correct the ground upon which such resolution was based otherwise, the disqualification shall become permanent.
A director with temporary disqualification may still be endorsed by the Nomination Committee for election at the annual stockholders meeting
subject to the 60 day curing period, if the ground for temporary disqualification is capable of being cured.
However, if the disqualification becomes permanent after endorsement by the Nomination Committee and before the annual stockholders meeting,
the nominee shall be given the discretion to refuse his nomination. If the nominee is thereafter elected, or the disqualification becomes permanent
during his term of office, the provisions of 2.4.2 above shall apply.
72
Sec. 28. Removal of directors or trustees. - Any director or trustee of a corporation may be removed from office by a vote of the stockholders holding or representing at least two thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock, or if
the corporation be a non-stock corporation, by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the members entitled to vote: Provided, That such removal shall take place either at a regular meeting of the corporation or at a special meeting
called for the purpose, and in either case, after previous notice to stockholders or members of the corporation of the intention to propose such removal at the meeting. A special meeting of the stockholders or members of a
corporation for the purpose of removal of directors or trustees, or any of them, must be called by the secretary on order of the president or on the written demand of the stockholders representing or holding at least a majority of
the outstanding capital stock, or, if it be a non-stock corporation, on the written demand of a majority of the members entitled to vote. Should the secretary fail or refuse to call the special meeting upon such demand or fail or
refuse to give the notice, or if there is no secretary, the call for the meeting may be addressed directly to the stockholders or members by any stockholder or member of the corporation signing the demand. Notice of the time and
place of such meeting, as well as of the intention to propose such removal, must be given by publication or by written notice prescribed in this Code. Removal may be with or without cause: Provided, That removal without cause
may not be used to deprive minority stockholders or members of the right of representation to which they may be entitled unde r Section 24 of this Code.
25
Any person who has been finally convicted by a competent judicial or administrative body of the following : (i) any crime involving the purchase or
sale of securities as defined in the Securities Regulation Code, e.g. proprietary or non-proprietary membership certificate, commodity futures
contract, or interest in a common trust fund, pre-need plan, pension plan or life plan; (ii) any crime arising out of the persons conduct as an
underwriter, broker, dealer, investment corporation, investment adviser, principal distributor, mutual fund dealer, futures commission merchant,
commodity trading advisor, or floor broker; or, (iii) any crime arising out of his fiduciary relationship with a bank, quasi-bank, trust company,
investment house or as an affiliated person of any of them;
b)
Any person who, by reason of any misconduct, after hearing or trial, is permanently or temporarily enjoined by order, judgment or decree of the
Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or any court or other administrative body of competent jurisdiction from; (i) acting as an
underwriter, broker, dealer, investment adviser, principal distributor, mutual fund dealer, futures commission merchant, commodity trading advisor,
or a floor broker; (ii) acting as a director or officer of a bank, quasi-bank, trust company, investment house, investment company or an affiliated
person of any of them; (iii) engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with any such activity or willfully violating laws governing
securities, and banking activities. Such disqualification shall also apply when such person is currently subject to an effective order of the SEC or any
court or other administrative body refusing, revoking or suspending any registration, license or permit issued under the Corporation Code, Securities
Regulation Code (SRC), or any other law administered by the SEC or Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), or under any rule or regulation
promulgated by the SEC or BSP, or otherwise restrained to engage in any activity involving securities and banking. Such person is also disqualified
when he is currently subject to an effective order of a self-regulatory organization suspending or expelling him from membership or participation or
from association with a member or participant of the organization;
c)
Any person finally convicted judicially or administratively of an offense involving moral turpitude or fraudulent acts or transgressions such as, but not
limited to, embezzlement, theft, estafa, counterfeiting, misappropriation, forgery, bribery, false affirmation or perjury;
d)
Any person finally found by the SEC or a court or other administrative body to have willfully violated, or willfully aided, abetted, counseled, induced
or procured the violation of any provision of the Securities Regulation Code, the Corporation Code of the Philippines, or any other law administered
by the SEC, or any rule, regulation or order of the SEC or the BSP;
e)
f)
Any person finally found guilty by a foreign court or equivalent financial regulatory authority of acts, violations or misconduct listed in the foregoing
paragraphs;
26
g)
Any person convicted by final and executory judgment of an offense punishable by imprisonment for a period exceeding six (6) years, or a violation
of the Corporation Code, committed within five (5) years prior to the date of his election or appointment 73; and,
h)
No person shall qualify or be eligible for nomination or election to the Board of Directors if he is engaged in any business which competes with or is
antagonistic to that of the Company. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, a person shall be deemed to be so engaged -h.1)
If he is an officer, manager or controlling person of, or the owner (either of record or beneficially) of 10% or more of any outstanding class of
shares of, any corporation (other than one in which the Company owns at least 30% of the capital stock) engaged in a business which the
Board, by at least three-fourths (3/4) vote, determines to be competitive or antagonistic to that of the Company, or
h.2)
If he is an officer, manager or controlling person, or the owner (either of record or beneficially) of 10% or more of any outstanding class of
shares of any other corporation or entity engaged in any line of business of the Company, or when in the judgment of the Board, by at least
three-fourths (3/4) vote, deems that the laws against combinations in restraint of trade shall be violated by such persons membership in the
Board of Directors; or
h.3)
If the Board, in the exercise of its judgment in good faith, determines by at least three-fourths (3/4) vote that he is the nominee of any
person set forth in (h.1) or (h.2).
In determining whether or not a person is a controlling person, beneficial owner, or the nominee of another, the Board may take into
account such factors as business and family relations.
73
27
c) Dismissal/ termination from directorship in another listed Company for cause. This disqualification shall be in effect until he has cleared himself of any
involvement in the alleged irregularity.
d) Being under preventive suspension by the Company for any reason.
e) Conviction that has not yet become final referred to in the grounds for disqualification of directors.
Process and Criteria for Removal of Directors:
Section 2.5 of the Charter of the Board provides the process and criteria/grounds for the removal of directors:
2.5.1 Directors may be removed in the manner provided by law.
2.5.2
Directors may be removed by the Board by reason of permanent disqualification or for committing three (3) violations of the Manual74 or for any
violation of the Code or relevant policies of the Corporation. The removal of the director shall be decided by the Board in a meeting called for the
purpose, at which meeting a quorum duly existed.
2.5.3
The stockholders may also exercise the right to remove a director with or without cause, for which purpose, Section 28 of the Corporation Code shall
apply.
74
28
stockholders or members of the corporation of the intention to propose such removal at the meeting. A special meeting of the
stockholders or members of a corporation for the purpose of removal of directors or trustees, or any of them, must be called by the
secretary on order of the president or on the written demand of the stockholders representing or holding at least a majority of the
outstanding capital stock, or, if it be a non-stock corporation, on the written demand of a majority of the members entitled to vote.
Should the secretary fail or refuse to call the special meeting upon such demand or fail or refuse to give the notice, or if there is no
secretary, the call for the meeting may be addressed directly to the stockholders or members by any stockholder or member of the
corporation signing the demand. Notice of the time and place of such meeting, as well as of the intention to propose such removal, must
be given by publication or by written notice prescribed in this Code. Removal may be with or without cause: Provided, That removal
without cause may not be used to deprive minority stockholders or members of the right of representation to which they may be entitled
under Section 24 of this Code.
Under the Manual, the Board of Directors may also remove a director for committing three violations of the Manual after due notice and hearing.
Process and Criteria for Reinstatement of Directors
Section 2.6 of the Charter of the Board provides for the process and criteria/ground for the reinstatement of directors:
2.6.1 If the removal of the Director was due to permanent disqualification, the Director will not be endorsed for re-election to the Board.
2.6.2
If the removal of the Director was due to temporary disqualification as resolved by the Board and the temporary disqualification has not become
permanent, the Board may reinstate the director75 by a resolution of a majority of the Board.
2.6.3
If the removal of the Director was without cause but pursuant to a resolution adopted by the stockholders in a meeting for the purpose pursuant to
Section 28 of the Corporation Code, the director may still be nominated for future election and his election may still be endorsed by the Nomination
Committee if he has all the qualifications and none of the disqualifications.
29
2.7.2
A Director may be suspended by the Board for committing two (2) violations of the provisions of the Manual 77 or for committing any violation of the
Code or relevant policies of the Corporation.
Voting Results for the Election of Directors at the 2016 Annual Stockholders Meeting (Held on April 11, 2016):
Number of Votes
and Percentage of Outstanding and Voting Stock
Nominees
For**
Against*
Abstain*
5,444,244,814
89.93%
77,024,541
1.27%
0.00%
5,446,754,764
89.97%
68,270,441
1.13%
6,270,000
0.10%
5,506,192,805
90.95%
15,076,400
0.25%
0.00%
5,492,341,505
90.72%
28,927,700
0.48%
0.00%
5,487,348,905
90.64%
33,920,300
0.56%
0.00%
5,492,341,505
90.72%
28,927,700
0.48%
0.00%
5,436,076,864
89.79%
85,192,341
1.41%
0.00%
Jaime C. Laya
(Independent)
5,474,294,755
90.43%
40,704,450
0.67%
6,270,000
0.10%
5,501,487,605
90.87%
19,781,600
0.33%
0.00%
Oscar S. Reyes
(Independent)
5,457,971,664
90.16%
63,297,541
1.05%
0.00%
77
30
Sherisa P. Nuesa
(Independent)
5,483,795,514
90.58%
37,473,691
0.62%
0.00%
Voting Results for the Election of Directors at the most recent Annual Stockholders Meeting (Held on April 7, 2015)
Nominees
For**
Number of Votes
and Percentage of Outstanding and Voting Stock
%
Against*
%
Abstain*
5,429,901,366
89.69%
85,958,265
1.42%
5,000
0.00%
5,419,829,815
89.53%
79,688,265
1.32%
16,346,451
0.27%
5,486,758,173
90.63%
29,097,191
0.48%
5,000
0.00%
Antonino T. Aquino
5,472,928,313
90.40%
32,855,800
0.54%
10,076,451
0.17%
Delfin L. Lazaro
5,472,928,413
90.40%
32,855,800
0.54%
10,076,451
0.17%
5,472,928,013
90.40%
32,855,800
0.54
10,076,451
0.17%
Victoria P. Garchitorena
5,419,957,315
89.53%
85,830,365
1.42%
10,076,451
0.17%
31
Jaime C. Laya
(Independent)
5,505,962,211
90.95%
9,896,900
0.16%
5,000
0.00%
5,503,097,831
90.90%
1,451,300
0.02%
11,315,000
0.19%
Oscar S. Reyes
(Independent)
5,444,964,005
89.94%
60,823,765
1.00%
10,076,451
0.17%
Sherisa P. Nuesa
(Independent)
5,503,102,503
90.90%
7,721,300
0.13%
5,036,451
0.08%
Disclose details of the companys orientation program for new directors, if any.
Every board meeting, directors are provided with Management Update on the operational and financial status of the Company. This is to ensure that the
directors are continuously apprised of the performance of the Company.
The board meetings are also the avenue for the directors to inquire about the status of the Companys financials and operations.
Upon assumption of office, a director appointed for the first time shall undergo a corporate orientation program to be conducted by the Office of the
Corporate Secretary. The Corporate Secretary shall prepare the curriculum for the corporate orientation program. The curriculum of the corporate
orientation program shall contain as a minimum, a topic on the operations of the Corporation and the applicable legal framework thereto, and relevant
contracts of the Corporation, if any, as well as the existing policies, rules and regulations of the Corporation, such as but not limited to: the Code, the
Manual, the Charters of the Board and the Board Committees, corporate governance framework, enterprise risk management, and corporate
32
communications. The curriculum of the orientation program shall be revised as often as necessary to include other subjects and matters relating to the
Corporation.78
In addition to the corporate orientation program for new directors, the Office of the Corporate Secretary shall inform the Board of any updates on the
matters covered by the orientation program. The updates can be given during the regular meetings of the Board.79
The foregoing notwithstanding, Directors are encouraged to attend external trainings, courses or continuing professional education programs on corporate
governance, or that are relevant to the performance of their functions as directors of the Corporation or the latters industry. Director/s shall inform the
Office of the Corporate Secretary of the trainings or courses attended for record and disclosure purposes.80
(b)
State any in-house training and external courses attended by Directors and Senior Management81 for the past three (3) years:
During board meetings, the management or the relevant unit/department of the Company presents to the Board and the Senior Management the latest
update on corporate governance best practices, policies, regulations and standards.
In addition, the following in-house training and external courses are available to the directors and Senior Management:
Ayala-LEAP (Ayala Leadership Acceleration Program)
EAGLE (Emerging Ayala Group Leaders Program)
The Leadership Circle (integrated within Ayala-LEAP and EAGLE)
LEAP Alumni Learning Series (presentations by visiting professors and practitioners in the fields of customer centricity, strategy, leadership, etc.)
Executive Coaching
Ayala Group Sustainability Summit
Harvard Advanced Management Development Program
Temasek Foundation Water Leadership Program
(c)
Continuing education programs for directors: programs and seminars and roundtables attended during the year.
During meetings of the Board, the management or the relevant unit/department of the Company presents to the Board and the Senior Management the
latest update on corporate governance best practices, policies, regulations and standards.
78
81
Senior Management refers to the CEO and other persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the company.
33
During meetings of the Board, the management or the relevant unit/department of the Company presents to the Board and the Senior Management the
latest update on corporate governance best practices, policies, regulations and standards.
In addition, the following in-house training and external courses are available to the directors and Senior Management:
Ayala-LEAP (Ayala Leadership Acceleration Program)
EAGLE (Emerging Ayala Group Leaders Program)
The Leadership Circle (integrated within Ayala-LEAP and EAGLE)
LEAP Alumni Learning Series (presentations by visiting professors and practitioners in the fields of customer centricity, strategy, leadership, etc.)
Executive Coaching
Ayala Group Sustainability Summit
The table below lists the trainings and seminars attended by the directors for the year 2015:
Director
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala
Program
Corporate Governance Summit:
Learnings from the Public Sector on Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance Summit:
Learnings from the Public Sector on Corporate Governance
Date of Training
Antonino T. Aquino
Delfin L. Lazaro
34
Jaime C. Laya
Victoria P. Garchitorena
Jose L. Cuisia, Jr.
N/A
N/A
The table below lists the trainings and seminars so far attended by the directors for the year 2016:
Director
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
Program
Annual Corporate Governance Training Program
Date of Training
March 8, 2016
March 8, 2016
Antonino T. Aquino
March 8, 2016
March 8, 2016
Delfin L. Lazaro
March 8, 2016
March 8, 2016
March 8, 2016
March 8, 2016
March 8, 2016
Victoria P. Garchitorena
March 8, 2016
N/A
N/A
35
If an actual or potential conflict of interest should arise on the part of directors, it should be fully disclosed and the concerned director
should not participate in the decision making process. A director who has a continuing conflict of interest of a material nature should
either resign or, if the Board deems appropriate, be removed from the Board. 85 (Manual of Corporate Governance)
A conflict of interest arises when a Director, or an Officer or employee appears to have a direct or indirect personal or financial
interest in any transaction, which may deter or influence him from acting in the best interest of the Corporation. It is not required
that there be an actual conflict, it is only required that there could be perceived or seen to be a conflict by an impartial observer. 86
(Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
A Director shall not use his position to make profit or to acquire benefit or advantage for himself and/or his related interests.87
(Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
82
36
A Director shall not use his position in the Corporation for personal gain or advantage or to promote any action that may run counter
to the Corporations ethical standards. 88 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
A Director shall not use the Corporations facilities, materials, intellectual properties, vehicles, equipment and supplies for his or
another partys personal purpose.89 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
The personal interest of officers should never prevail over the interest of the Company. They are required to be loyal to the
organization so much so that they may not directly or indirectly derive any personal profit or advantage by reason of their position in
the Company.90 (Manual of Corporate Governance)
A conflict of interest arises when a Director, or an Officer or employee appears to have a direct or indirect personal or financial
interest in any transaction, which may deter or influence him from acting in the best interest of the Corporation. It is not required
that there be an actual conflict, it is only required that there could be perceived or seen to be a conflict by an impartial observer.91
(Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Senior Management
No officer or employee may have financial interest in a privately owned enterprise, which directly or indirectly deals or transacts
business with the Corporation.92 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
No officer or employee may use his position in the Corporation for personal gain or advantage or to promote any action that may run
counter to the Corporations ethical standards.93 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
No Officer or employee shall use the Corporations facilities, materials, intellectual properties, vehicles, equipment and supplies for
his or another partys personal purpose.94 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Employees
A conflict of interest arises when a Director, or an Officer or employee appears to have a direct or indirect personal or financial
88
37
interest in any transaction, which may deter or influence him from acting in the best interest of the Corporation. It is not required
that there be an actual conflict, it is only required that there could be perceived or seen to be a conflict by an impartial observer.95
(Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
No officer or employee may have financial interest in a privately owned enterprise, which directly or indirectly deals or transacts
business with the Corporation.96 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
No officer or employee may use his position in the Corporation for personal gain or advantage or to promote any action that may run
counter to the Corporations ethical standards.97 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
No Officer or employee shall use the Corporations facilities, materials, intellectual properties, vehicles, equipment and supplies for
his or another partys personal purpose.98 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Directors
The personal interest of directors should never prevail over the interest of the Company. They are required to be loyal to the
organization so much so that they may not directly or indirectly derive any personal profit or advantage by reason of their position in
the Company.100 (Manual of Corporate Governance)
The core principle of the Corporation is to conduct business honestly and fairly with its investors, suppliers, contractors, service
providers, customers and employees and other third parties.101 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Directors, Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and protect
the name and reputation of the Corporation.102 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
95
38
Directors, Officers and employees shall not engage in any unfair dealing practices, such as taking advantage of anyone through abuse
of confidential information, manipulation, concealment, or misrepresentation or other similar acts. 103 (Revised Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics)
The personal interest of officers should never prevail over the interest of the Company. They are required to be loyal to the
organization so much so that they may not directly or indirectly derive any personal profit or advantage by reason of their position in
the Company.104 (Manual of Corporate Governance)
The core principle of the Corporation is to conduct business honestly and fairly with its investors, suppliers, contractors, service
providers, customers and employees and other third parties.105 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Senior Management
Directors, Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and protect
the name and reputation of the Corporation.106 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Directors, Officers and employees shall not engage in any unfair dealing practices, such as taking advantage of anyone through abuse
of confidential information, manipulation, concealment, or misrepresentation or other similar acts. 107 (Revised Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics)
The core principle of the Corporation is to conduct business honestly and fairly with its investors, suppliers, contractors, service
providers, customers and employees and other third parties.108 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Employees
Directors, Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and protect
the name and reputation of the Corporation.109 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Directors, Officers and employees shall not engage in any unfair dealing practices, such as taking advantage of anyone through abuse
of confidential information, manipulation, concealment, or misrepresentation or other similar acts. 110 (Revised Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics)
103
39
Directors
Directors, Officers and employees shall strictly follow the principles of highest ethical business standards and comply with all relevant
laws and regulations. Towards this end, Directors, Officers and employees shall not accept corporate entertainment/gifts with an
approximate value of more than Three Thousand Pesos (Php3,000.00) or anything that can or can be viewed to influence the manner
on which a director, officer or employee may discharge his duties.113 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
The Corporation strictly prohibits giving facilitating payments to any private or government officials or employees, their agents or
intermediaries in order to expedite or secure performance of any governmental action, or to gain any perceived or actual favor or
advantage from any private or government entities. The Corporation must ensure that it and its directors, officers and employees fully
comply with the laws governing bribes, unlawful payments and other corrupt practices. 114 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics)
Senior Management
Directors, Officers and employees shall strictly follow the principles of highest ethical business standards and comply with all relevant
laws and regulations. Towards this end, Directors, Officers and employees shall not accept corporate entertainment/gifts with an
approximate value of more than Three Thousand Pesos (Php3,000.00) or anything that can or can be viewed to influence the manner
on which a director, officer or employee may discharge his duties.115 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
The Corporation strictly prohibits giving facilitating payments to any private or government officials or employees, their agents or
intermediaries in order to expedite or secure performance of any governmental action, or to gain any perceived or actual favor or
111
40
advantage from any private or government entities. The Corporation must ensure that it and its directors, officers and employees fully
comply with the laws governing bribes, unlawful payments and other corrupt practices. 116 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics)
Directors, Officers and employees shall strictly follow the principles of highest ethical business standards and comply with all relevant
laws and regulations. Towards this end, Directors, Officers and employees shall not accept corporate entertainment/gifts with an
approximate value of more than Three Thousand Pesos (Php3,000.00) or anything that can or can be viewed to influence the manner
on which a director, officer or employee may discharge his duties.117 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Employees
The Corporation strictly prohibits giving facilitating payments to any private or government officials or employees, their agents or
intermediaries in order to expedite or secure performance of any governmental action, or to gain any perceived or actual favor or
advantage from any private or government entities. The Corporation must ensure that it and its directors, officers and employees fully
comply with the laws governing bribes, unlawful payments and other corrupt practices. 118 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics)
Directors
The Board shall keep the activities and decisions of the Board within its authority under the articles of incorporation and by-laws and
in accordance with existing laws, rules and regulations and ensure that the Company complies with all relevant laws, regulations and,
as far as possible, best business practices. 120 (Manual of Corporate Governance).
Directors, Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and protect
the name and reputation of the Corporation.121 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
116
41
The core principle of the Corporation is to conduct business honestly and fairly with its investors, suppliers, contractors, service
providers, customers and employees and other third parties.122 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Senior Management
Directors, Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and protect
the name and reputation of the Corporation.123 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
The core principle of the Corporation is to conduct business honestly and fairly with its investors, suppliers, contractors, service
providers, customers and employees and other third parties.124 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Employees
Directors, Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and protect
the name and reputation of the Corporation.125 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Directors
A director shall keep secure and confidential all non-public information acquired or learned by reason of his position as a director. He
should not reveal any confidential information to unauthorized persons without the authority of the Board.127 (Manual of Corporate
Governance)
Directors, Officers and employees shall not engage in any unfair dealing practices, such as taking advantage of anyone through abuse
of confidential information, manipulation, concealment, or misrepresentation or other similar acts.128 (Revised Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics)
122
42
Directors, Officers and employees shall not knowingly misrepresent or cause others to misrepresent information relating to the
Corporation to government and regulatory agencies, independent auditors, the media or any other person.129 (Revised Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics)
No Director, Officer or employee shall disclose any confidential information obtained from the Corporation for personal gain or for
the advantage of any other person. This prohibition shall include investment in securities and association with a competitor,
customer or supplier of the Corporation.130 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Directors, Officers and employees shall not engage in any unfair dealing practices, such as taking advantage of anyone through abuse
of confidential information, manipulation, concealment, or misrepresentation or other similar acts. 131 (Revised Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics)
Senior Management
Directors, Officers and employees shall not knowingly misrepresent or cause others to misrepresent information relating to the
Corporation to government and regulatory agencies, independent auditors, the media or any other person. 132 (Revised Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics)
No Director, Officer or employee shall disclose any confidential information obtained from the Corporation for personal gain or for
the advantage of any other person. This prohibition shall include investment in securities and association with a competitor,
customer or supplier of the Corporation.133 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Directors, Officers and employees shall not engage in any unfair dealing practices, such as taking advantage of anyone through abuse
of confidential information, manipulation, concealment, or misrepresentation or other similar acts.134 (Revised Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics)
Employees
Directors, Officers and employees shall not knowingly misrepresent or cause others to misrepresent information relating to the
Corporation to government and regulatory agencies, independent auditors, the media or any other person. 135 (Revised Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics)
129
43
No Director, Officer or employee shall disclose any confidential information obtained from the Corporation for personal gain or for
the advantage of any other person. This prohibition shall include investment in securities and association with a competitor,
customer or supplier of the Corporation.136 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Directors
The personal interest of directors should never prevail over the interest of the Company. They are required to be loyal to the
organization so much so that they may not directly or indirectly derive any personal profit or advantage by reason of their position in
the Company.138 (Manual of Corporate Governance)
No Director, Officer or employee may use his position in the Corporation for personal gain or advantage or to promote any action that
may run counter to the Corporations ethical standards.139 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
No Director, Officer or employee shall use the Corporations facilities, materials, intellectual properties, vehicles, equipment and
supplies for his or another partys personal purpose.140 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
No Director, Officer or employee may use his position in the Corporation for personal gain or advantage or to promote any action that
may run counter to the Corporations ethical standards.141 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Senior Management
No Director, Officer or employee shall use the Corporations facilities, materials, intellectual properties, vehicles, equipment and
supplies for his or another partys personal purpose.142 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Employees should keep all Company equipment in good working condition and should eliminate unnecessary consumption and
wasteful practices. They should avoid losing or damaging these equipment by using them with care. 143 (Employee Code of Conduct
136
44
and Discipline)
All employees are furnished with office equipment, furniture, facilities and tools of work to ensure comfort and convenience as they
perform their duties and tasks. Consequently, employees are expected to exercise due care in the handling and use of these
properties.144 (Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
Company equipment should not be taken out of the work area, much less out of the Company premises without proper authority.145
(Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
No Director, Officer or employee may use his position in the Corporation for personal gain or advantage or to promote any action that
may run counter to the Corporations ethical standards.146 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
No Director, Officer or employee shall use the Corporations facilities, materials, intellectual properties, vehicles, equipment and
supplies for his or another partys personal purpose.147 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Employees
Employees should keep all Company equipment in good working condition and should eliminate unnecessary consumption and
wasteful practices. They should avoid losing or damaging these equipment by using them with care.148 (Employee Code of Conduct
and Discipline)
All employees are furnished with office equipment, furniture, facilities and tools of work to ensure comfort and convenience as they
perform their duties and tasks. Consequently, employees are expected to exercise due care in the handling and use of these
properties.149 (Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
Company equipment should not be taken out of the work area, much less out of the Company premises without proper authority. 150
(Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
143
45
Directors
Directors, Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and protect
the name and reputation of the Corporation.153 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
The Corporation values the dignity of every individual, promotes the enhancement of the development of its human resources,
guarantees full respect for human rights, and uphold the dignity of its stakeholders, customers, workers, employees, applicants for
employment, students or those undergoing training, instruction or education. 154 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Hence, the Corporation shall ensure that its directors, officers and employees subscribe strictly to this policy. All forms of sexual
harassment shall be dealt with appropriately and in accordance with the applicable and all relevant laws, rules and regulations on the
subject matter. 155 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
The core principle of the Corporation is to conduct business honestly and fairly with its investors, suppliers, contractors, service
providers, customers and employees and other third parties.156 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Senior Management
Directors, Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and protect
the name and reputation of the Corporation.157 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
The Corporation values the dignity of every individual, promotes the enhancement of the development of its human resources,
guarantees full respect for human rights, and uphold the dignity of its stakeholders, customers, workers, employees, applicants for
151
46
employment, students or those undergoing training, instruction or education. 158 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Hence, the Corporation shall ensure that its directors, officers and employees subscribe strictly to this policy. All forms of sexual
harassment shall be dealt with appropriately and in accordance with the applicable and all relevant laws, rules and regulations on the
subject matter. 159 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
The core principle of the Corporation is to conduct business honestly and fairly with its investors, suppliers, contractors, service
providers, customers and employees and other third parties.160 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Directors, Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and protect
the name and reputation of the Corporation.161 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Employees
The Corporation values the dignity of every individual, promotes the enhancement of the development of its human resources,
guarantees full respect for human rights, and uphold the dignity of its stakeholders, customers, workers, employees, applicants for
employment, students or those undergoing training, instruction or education. 162 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Hence, the Corporation shall ensure that its directors, officers and employees subscribe strictly to this policy. All forms of sexual
harassment shall be dealt with appropriately and in accordance with the applicable and all relevant laws, rules and regulations on the
subject matter. 163 (Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics)
Disciplinary Action
The Manual of Corporate Governance provides for the gradation of penalties to be imposed upon the directors, officers and staff,
after due notice and hearing, for violation of the provisions of the Manual, to wit:
Directors
158
47
Senior Management
Corporate Officers, or those appointed by the Board, are subject to disciplinary actions by the Board of Directors. Those members of
the management that are not appointed by the Board are subject to the Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline and by the
applicable provisions of the labor laws and regulations.
Disciplinary actions upon employees are provided under the Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline and by the applicable
provisions of the labor laws and regulations.
Employees
Positive staff discipline as a fundamental management responsibility is a line function to be exercised by all Managers within the
organization. This being so, Managers shall be held responsible for enforcing the necessary controls to prevent the commission of any
violation by their subordinates. Other than taking charge of initiating corrective action in the behaviour of their subordinates,
164
48
whenever necessary, they shall also be held accountable for the results or repercussions of their subordinates offense to the
Company especially for integrity-related cases.167 (Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
Due process shall be observed in the management of all administrative cases, in accordance with the Law. This will ensure that the
erring employee is afforded an opportunity to be heard and that his/her case is managed with objectivity, fairness and consistency.
Detailed procedures are itemized in the succeeding section.168 (Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
Whistle Blower
A director is required to comply with all disclosure requirements of the SRC and its Implementing Rules and Regulations and
voluntarily disclose any conflict of interest, whether actual or potential upon its occurrence. The disclosure should be made fully and
immediately.169 (Manual of Corporate Governance)
The Board shall commit at all times to adequately and timely disclose all material information that could potentially affect Manila
Waters share price and such other information that are required to be disclosed pursuant to the SRC and its Implementing Rules and
Regulations as well as other relevant laws.170 (Manual of Corporate Governance)
Directors
Directors, Officers and employees are required to immediately report all suspected or actual fraudulent or dishonest acts to the
Board, in case of directors, and to the immediate supervisor or to the Office of the Compliance Officer in case of officers and
employees. The Corporation shall promptly identify and investigate any suspected fraudulent or dishonest acts. Without prejudice to
applicable administrative sanctions, the Corporation may pursue civil and/or criminal actions against directors, officers and employees
as may be warranted.171
Below is the pertinent portion of the guidelines on the Reporting of Fraudulent or Dishonest Acts: 172
3.
Obligation to Report
3.1
All Directors, Officers and employees are required to immediately report all suspected or actual fraudulent or dishonest acts to
167
49
the Board of Directors, in case of a Director and to the Line Manager/Immediate Superior and/or the Compliance Officer, in
case of Officers and employees. Such acts may include, but are not limited to, the following:
a.
any criminal act or gross violation of any corporate governance policy;
b.
failure to comply with a legal duty through negligence or gross misconduct;
c.
any loss or damage to the Corporation due to fraud, corruption, or similar cause;
d.
conflicts of interest; and
e.
deliberate cover-up of any of the above acts.
3.2
The report should be in writing, properly signed and pertain to a matter relevant to the business of Manila Water. It must
contain sufficient details and include supporting documents as may be available, to enable the Board or the Compliance
Officer to properly investigate the incident reported and take the necessary action. Further, the report must be made in good
faith (i.e., the employee or officer reporting has a reasonable suspicion that a fraudulent or dishonest act has occurred, is
occurring or is likely to occur).
3.3
Where the report is made for an ulterior and undesirable purpose (e.g., for blackmail), it will not be considered as having been
done in good faith. Anonymous reports (through letters, email or text messages or any other means) shall not be given due
course.
3.4
Upon receipt of a report that complies with the requirements of Section 3.2 with respect to those involving Officers and
employees, the Compliance Officer shall investigate the matter and make a report on the results of the investigation. The
Compliance Officer may refer the matter to the Internal Audit Department for further investigation as may be warranted, in
coordination with the appropriate units of the Corporation (e.g. Legal and Corporate Governance, Corporate Human
Resources, the concerned department).
3.5
The person making the report shall be informed of the results of the evaluation/investigation and if warranted, it shall also be
reported to the Audit Committee.
4.
Protection to Reporter
4.1
The Corporation shall protect the reporter from any form of retaliation or discrimination by the concerned person, his coemployees or superiors. The identity of the person making the report and the contents of the report shall be kept confidential
to the extent legally permissible.
5.
Prohibited Acts
50
5.1
The following acts are subject to disciplinary action, as provided under the Code, without prejudice to any civil or criminal
proceedings that the Corporation or regulators may file for violation of existing laws:
a.
retaliating or discriminating against Directors, Officers and employees who raise genuine concerns;
b.
reporting a false allegation with malice or bad faith;
c.
failure to report fraudulent or dishonest acts, despite knowledge of the same; and
d.
deliberate cover-up of any fraudulent or dishonest acts.
Directors, Officers and employees are required to immediately report all suspected or actual fraudulent or dishonest acts to the
Board, in case of directors, and to the immediate supervisor or to the Office of the Compliance Officer in case of officers and
employees. The Corporation shall promptly identify and investigate any suspected fraudulent or dishonest acts. Without prejudice to
applicable administrative sanctions, the Corporation may pursue civil and/or criminal actions against directors, officers and employees
as may be warranted.173
Below is the pertinent portion of the guidelines on the Reporting of Fraudulent or Dishonest Acts: 174
3.
Obligation to Report
3.6
All Directors, Officers and employees are required to immediately report all suspected or actual fraudulent or dishonest acts to
the Board of Directors, in case of a Director and to the Line Manager/Immediate Superior and/or the Compliance Officer, in
case of Officers and employees. Such acts may include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. any criminal act or gross violation of any corporate governance policy;
b. failure to comply with a legal duty through negligence or gross misconduct;
c. any loss or damage to the Corporation due to fraud, corruption, or similar cause;
d. conflicts of interest; and
e. deliberate cover-up of any of the above acts.
3.7
The report should be in writing, properly signed and pertain to a matter relevant to the business of Manila Water. It must
contain sufficient details and include supporting documents as may be available, to enable the Board or the Compliance
Officer to properly investigate the incident reported and take the necessary action. Further, the report must be made in good
faith (i.e., the employee or officer reporting has a reasonable suspicion that a fraudulent or dishonest act has occurred, is
occurring or is likely to occur).
Senior Management
173
174
51
3.8
Where the report is made for an ulterior and undesirable purpose (e.g., for blackmail), it will not be considered as having been
done in good faith. Anonymous reports (through letters, email or text messages or any other means) shall not be given due
course.
3.9
Upon receipt of a report that complies with the requirements of Section 3.2 with respect to those involving Officers and
employees, the Compliance Officer shall investigate the matter and make a report on the results of the investigation. The
Compliance Officer may refer the matter to the Internal Audit Department for further investigation as may be warranted, in
coordination with the appropriate units of the Corporation (e.g. Legal and Corporate Governance, Corporate Human
Resources, the concerned department).
3.10
The person making the report shall be informed of the results of the evaluation/investigation and if warranted, it shall also be
reported to the Audit Committee.
4.
Protection to Reporter
4.1
The Corporation shall protect the reporter from any form of retaliation or discrimination by the concerned person, his coemployees or superiors. The identity of the person making the report and the contents of the report shall be kept confidential
to the extent legally permissible.
5.
5.1
Employees
175
Prohibited Acts
The following acts are subject to disciplinary action, as provided under the Code, without prejudice to any civil or criminal
proceedings that the Corporation or regulators may file for violation of existing laws:
a. retaliating or discriminating against Directors, Officers and employees who raise genuine concerns;
b. reporting a false allegation with malice or bad faith;
c. failure to report fraudulent or dishonest acts, despite knowledge of the same; and
d. deliberate cover-up of any fraudulent or dishonest acts.
Directors, Officers and employees are required to immediately report all suspected or actual fraudulent or dishonest acts to the
Board, in case of directors, and to the immediate supervisor or to the Office of the Compliance Officer in case of officers and
employees. The Corporation shall promptly identify and investigate any suspected fraudulent or dishonest acts. Without prejudice to
applicable administrative sanctions, the Corporation may pursue civil and/or criminal actions against directors, officers and employees
as may be warranted.175
52
Below is the pertinent portion of the guidelines on the Reporting of Fraudulent or Dishonest Acts: 176
176
3.
Obligation to Report
3.11
All Directors, Officers and employees are required to immediately report all suspected or actual fraudulent or dishonest acts to
the Board of Directors, in case of a Director and to the Line Manager/Immediate Superior and/or the Compliance Officer, in
case of Officers and employees. Such acts may include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. any criminal act or gross violation of any corporate governance policy;
b. failure to comply with a legal duty through negligence or gross misconduct;
c. any loss or damage to the Corporation due to fraud, corruption, or similar cause;
d. conflicts of interest; and
e. deliberate cover-up of any of the above acts.
3.12
The report should be in writing, properly signed and pertain to a matter relevant to the business of Manila Water. It must
contain sufficient details and include supporting documents as may be available, to enable the Board or the Compliance
Officer to properly investigate the incident reported and take the necessary action. Further, the report must be made in good
faith (i.e., the employee or officer reporting has a reasonable suspicion that a fraudulent or dishonest act has occurred, is
occurring or is likely to occur).
3.13
Where the report is made for an ulterior and undesirable purpose (e.g., for blackmail), it will not be considered as having been
done in good faith. Anonymous reports (through letters, email or text messages or any other means) shall not be given due
course.
3.14
Upon receipt of a report that complies with the requirements of Section 3.2 with respect to those involving Officers and
employees, the Compliance Officer shall investigate the matter and make a report on the results of the investigation. The
Compliance Officer may refer the matter to the Internal Audit Department for further investigation as may be warranted, in
coordination with the appropriate units of the Corporation (e.g. Legal and Corporate Governance, Corporate Human
Resources, the concerned department).
3.15
The person making the report shall be informed of the results of the evaluation/investigation and if warranted, it shall also be
reported to the Audit Committee.
Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Annex A, Implementing Guidelines on Reporting of Fraudulent or Dishonest Acts.
53
4.
Protection to Reporter
4.1
The Corporation shall protect the reporter from any form of retaliation or discrimination by the concerned person, his coemployees or superiors. The identity of the person making the report and the contents of the report shall be kept confidential
to the extent legally permissible.
5.
5.1
Prohibited Acts
The following acts are subject to disciplinary action, as provided under the Code, without prejudice to any civil or criminal
proceedings that the Corporation or regulators may file for violation of existing laws:
a. retaliating or discriminating against Directors, Officers and employees who raise genuine concerns;
b. reporting a false allegation with malice or bad faith;
c. failure to report fraudulent or dishonest acts, despite knowledge of the same; and
d. deliberate cover-up of any fraudulent or dishonest acts.
Conflict Resolution
The Board shall ensure the presence and adequacy of internal control mechanisms for good governance by, among others, reviewing
conflict-of-interest situations and providing appropriate remedial measures for the same.177 (Manual of Corporate Governance)
Directors
The Board shall establish and maintain an alternative dispute resolution system in the Company that can amicably settle conflicts of
differences between the Company and its stockholders and the Company and third parties, including regulatory authorities., without
prejudice to the Companys ability to avail of its legal rights to address or resolve conflicts or differences with such parties in the
proper venue as it deems appropriated or warranted. 178 (Manual of Corporate Governance).
The Board shall monitor and manage potential conflicts of interest of management, board members and shareholders, including
misuse of corporate assets and abuse in related party transactions.179
177
54
Senior Management
Due Process shall be observed in the management of all administrative cases, in accordance with the law. This will ensure that the
erring employee is afforded an opportunity to be heard and that his/her case is managed with objectivity, fairness and consistency.180
(Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
Positive staff discipline as a fundamental management responsibility is a line function to be exercised by all Managers within the
organization. This being so, Managers shall be held responsible for enforcing the necessary controls to prevent the commission of any
violation by their subordinates. Other than taking charge of initiating corrective action in the behaviour of their subordinates,
wherever necessary, they shall also be held accountable for the results or repercussions of their subordinates offense to the
Company especially for integrity-related cases.181 (Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
Employees
Due process shall be observed in the management of all administrative cases, in accordance with the Law. This will ensure the erring
employee is afforded an opportunity to be heard and that his/her case is managed with objectivity, fairness, and consistency. 182
(Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
Disciplinary and corrective action should always be treated with utmost confidentiality. This will ensure that the erring employee is
afforded an opportunity to be heard and that his/her case is managed with objectivity, fairness and consistency. Detailed procedures
are itemized in the succeeding section.183 (Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
Grievance arising from such disciplinary/corrective actions involving staff employees will be addressed through the grievance
procedures/machinery stated in the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Grievance arising from disciplinary/corrective actions involving
officers of the Company will be referred to the next higher manager up to the level of the Corporate Human Resources Group
Director.184 (Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline)
2)
Has the code of ethics or conduct been disseminated to all directors, senior management and employees?
Yes. The Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics was approved by the Board in its special meeting held on April 4, 2014. A copy of the Revised Code
was furnished to each member of the Board.
An electronic copy of the Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics has been sent by electronic mail to the officers and employees of the Company and
can also be downloaded from the Companys website.
180
55
The Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics consolidates and enhances the Companys existing policies on honesty and fair dealing, conflict of interest,
corporate entertainment and gifts, insider trading, prompt and adequate disclosure of material information, creditor rights, anti-corruption, and anti-sexual
harassment. The Code also includes provisions on the powers and duties of the Office of the Compliance Officer in relation to the implementation and
monitoring of the Revised Code.
3)
Discuss how the company implements and monitors compliance with the code of ethics or conduct.
The Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of the Company provides for the process for the implementation thereof. In particular, Articles 12 and 13
of the Revised Code provide:
12.
12.1
Except as otherwise provided in this Code, the Office of the Compliance Officer shall be primarily responsible for the
implementation of this Code.
12.2
There shall be a Corporate Governance Panel (the Panel) composed of three (3) members which shall be under the
direct supervision and control of the Compliance Officer. The Head of the Legal Department shall be the ex-officio
chairman of the Panel, while the Heads of the Internal Audit Department and the Employee Engagement Department
shall be the ex-officio members.
The Panel shall be responsible for receiving and investigating complaints for violations of the Code.
12.3
In performing any function within their authority pursuant to this Code, the chairman and the members of the panel may
appoint their respective representatives.
12.4
The Panel shall, in the conduct of investigation, comply with the following procedures:
a.
b.
The Respondent shall be notified of the Complaint against him and shall be given a period of five (5) days within
which to respond to the notice. The notice shall attach the Complaint, if any, or shall specify in detail the subject
of the Complaint.
c.
The Panel may, based on the response of the Respondent, conduct further hearings or dismiss the Complaint motu
proprio. However, no finding of violation of the Code shall be issued motu proprio.
56
d.
After conducting hearings, the Panel shall issue a resolution either finding the Respondent to have violated the
Code or dismissing the Complaint. In which case, all resolutions of the Panel shall be endorsed to the Office of the
Compliance Officer for his final decision.
e.
The Compliance Officer may either affirm or reverse the resolution of the Panel. The Respondent shall be
furnished with a copy of the decision of the Compliance Officer.
A decision exonerating the Respondent shall be deemed final and executory. A finding of violation shall be
referred to the Labor Relations Department for appropriate action. A decision issued after a finding of violation of
the Code shall form part of the 201 File of the Officer or the employee.
13.
13.1
The Code shall be distributed to all directors, officers and employees, who shall signify, in any manner capable of being
recorded, that they have received, read and understood the Code. The Office of the Compliance Officer shall keep a record
of this acknowledgement.
13.2
A Director, officer or employee who becomes aware of any violation of the Code shall immediately notify the Board, in
case of a Director, or the immediate supervisor or the Office of the Compliance Officer, in case of officers and employees.
The Board and the Office of the Compliance Officer shall take all the necessary action to investigate any and all reported
violations.
13.3
An officer or employee who commits a violation of this Code shall be subject to disciplinary action, without prejudice to
any civil or criminal proceedings that the Corporation or any government regulators or agencies may institute for violation
of existing laws, rules or regulations.
Directors who violate the applicable provisions of this Code shall be subject to disciplinary actions by the Board, in
accordance with existing laws, rules, and regulations, the By Laws of the Corporation, and other company policies. This is
without prejudice to any liability, whether criminal, civil or otherwise, of the directors under the provisions of existing
laws, rules and regulations.
13.4
The Board or the Office of the Compliance Officer, as the case may be, shall be responsible for implementing and
monitoring compliance with the Code. The Office of the Compliance Officer shall also have the authority to decide any
issues that may arise in connection with the implementation of this Code.
57
There shall be no exceptions from or waivers of any provision of this Code, except as expressly approved by the Office of
the Compliance Officer in writing, and only under exceptional circumstances. The Office of the Compliance Officer shall
maintain a record of all such requests for exceptions and waivers, the basis for the grant thereof.
13.5
The provisions of this Code shall be without prejudice to the provisions of existing and relevant laws, rules and
regulations.
4)
(a)
185
58
Arms-length
In furtherance of common projects
Appropriate disclosure
Material RPTs with the Company are subject to the review and approval of a Committee composed entirely of the
independent directors of the Audit and Governance Committee
Non-material RPTs are subject to review and approval of the Compliance Officer
(3) Subsidiaries
Arms-length
In furtherance of the Companys business and operations
Appropriate disclosure
Material RPTs with the Company are subject to the review and approval of a Committee composed entirely of the
independent directors of the Audit and Governance Committee
Non-material RPTs are subject to review and approval of the Compliance Officer
Arms-length
Appropriate disclosure
Material RPTs with the Company are subject to the review and approval of a Committee composed entirely of the
independent directors of the Audit and Governance Committee
Non-material RPTs are subject to review and approval of the Compliance Officer
Arms-length
Appropriate disclosure
59
Material RPTs with the Company are subject to the review and approval of a Committee composed entirely of the
independent directors of the Audit and Governance Committee
Non-material RPTs are subject to review and approval of the Compliance Officer
(6) Officers including
spouse/children/siblings/parents
To be avoided pursuant to the Conflict of Interest policy pursuant to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and
the Manual of Corporate Governance
Material RPTs with the Company are subject to the review and approval of a Committee (composed entirely of the
independent directors of the Audit and Governance Committee)
Non-material RPTs are subject to review and approval of the Compliance Officer
To be avoided pursuant to the Conflict of Interest policy under the Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
and the Manual of Corporate Governance
Material RPTs with the Company are subject to the review and approval of a Committee (composed entirely of the
independent directors of the Audit and Governance Committee)
Non-material RPTs are subject to review and approval of the Compliance Officer
(8) Interlocking director relationship of Board of To be avoided pursuant to the Conflict of Interest policy under the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the
Directors
Manual of Corporate Governance
Material RPTs with the Company are subject to the review and approval of a Committee (composed entirely of the
independent directors of the Audit and Governance Committee)
Non-material RPTs are subject to review and approval of the Compliance Officer
* Under the Policy on RPT, Material RPT means any RPT with a stated value of at least Ten Million Pesos (Php10,000,000.00)
On April 4, 2014, the Board, in its special meeting, approved the Policy on Related Party Transactions (RPT). The Policy on RPT has the following objectives:
a. To provide guidance on what constitutes RPTs;
60
b. To avoid conflict of interest and comply with regulatory and good governance practices;
c. To ensure that the appropriate process for approval of the transaction has been undertaken; and
d. To ensure compliance with the Disclosure Policy of the Corporation and disclosure requirements of Financial Statement Reporting
On February 20, 2015, the Board approved the revision to the Policy on RPTs. In particular the revision requires that material RPTs shall be approved by a
Committee composed only of all the independent directors of the Audit and Governance Committee, provided that there are at least three (3)
independent directors in the Audit and Governance Committee.
Below is the relevant provisions of the Policy on RPT:
5.
Disclosure Requirements:
5.1
The Corporation must comply with all disclosure requirements of RPT mandated under applicable law, rules and regulations.
5.2
The Related Parties must comply with all the disclosure requirements of RPTs required under applicable law, rules and regulations
of the SEC, PSE and the BIR, and other relevant government agencies.
5.3
Each director, executive officer and members of the Key Management is responsible for providing written notice to the Office of
the Compliance Officer of any potential RPT involving him or her or his or her Immediate Family Member, including any additional
information about the transaction that may reasonably be requested by the Corporation.
The Office of the Compliance Officer, by himself, or in consultation with the Management Committee and with the Chief Legal
Counsel or external counsel, as appropriate, will determine whether the notified transaction does, in fact, constitute a RPT
requiring compliance with this Policy.
Disclosure of a RPT shall include information about the price of the transaction, outstanding balances, if any, major terms and
conditions and guarantees, if any. The Office of the Compliance Officer may require additional and other relevant information
sufficient to enable the Office of the Compliance Officer to determine any Conflict of Interest and the potential effect of the
relationship.
5.4
In addition, each director, executive officer and member of the Key Management may be required to complete a questionnaire
that inquiries about their RPTs and those of their Immediate Family Members.
6.
6.1
All RPTs shall have terms and conditions that are fair and equitable to the Corporation.
6.2
The approval, award, processing and payment of RPTs shall follow the same procedures as the other transactions and contracts of
the Corporation. No unusual privilege or special treatment shall be afforded a Related Party.
6.3
In case of doubt on the nature of a transaction subject of investigation or review pursuant to this Policy, the Office of the
Compliance Officer, in consultation with the RPT Committee, shall determine whether the transaction or relationship constitutes a
RPT, and whether the same shall be pursued taking into consideration the cost and benefit to the Corporation.
6.4
Prior to the award of any Material RPT, the Corporation shall submit the same for the review of the RPT Committee to confirm
that it has undergone the same process as an ordinary transaction and to determine that the Material RPT under review is in the
best interest of the Corporation.
Non-Material RPTs shall be subject to the review and/or approval of the Compliance Officer.
7.
7.1
7.2
The Compliance Officer, with the assistance of the Chief Legal Counsel, shall prepare a monthly report on RPTs based on the
disclosures and/or reports of RPTs submitted to the Compliance Officer.
62
The Report shall be submitted to the Accounting Department to be furnished the External Auditor for proper disclosure in the
Financial Statements of the Corporation, if necessary under applicable financial reporting rules and policies.
8.
Prohibited RPTs
8.1
Notwithstanding any provision of this Policy to the contrary, the following RPTs shall not be allowed:
a.
b.
Loans and/or financial assistance to the Key Management, except when allowed pursuant to an established company
benefit or plan
9.
Sanctions
9.1
Non-compliance with any provision of this Policy, in particular, the reporting, and disclosure requirements, the guidelines prior to
entering into RPT and the prohibited RPTs, shall result in the invalidation of the Contract involved in the RPT.
9.2
Any officer or employee of the Corporation who has knowledge of any violation of this Policy shall report the same to the Office of
the Compliance Officer.
The Chief Legal Counsel, in coordination with the Office of the Compliance Officer, shall report to the RPT Committee all violations
of this Policy.
9.3
The RPT Committee shall have the authority to recommend to the Board of Directors the invalidation of the Contract.
9.4
This Policy shall be without prejudice to the provisions of the Code, the Manual of Corporate Governance and all related and
relevant policies of the Corporation which shall be observed and shall apply to the fullest extent possible. In particular, RPTs shall
not be allowed if it would present a conflict of interest for any Related Party as defined in the Code.
10.
This Policy shall be reviewed from time to time in order to reflect the requirements of applicable law, rules and regulations.
63
(b)
Conflict of Interest
(i) Directors/Officers and 5% or more Shareholders
Identify any actual or probable conflict of interest to which directors/officers/5% or more shareholders may be involved.
Name of Director/s
Name of Officer/s
Name of Significant Shareholders
Details of Conflict
of Interest (Actual or Probable)
None
None
None
(ii) Mechanism
Describe the mechanism laid down to detect, determine and resolve any possible conflict of interest between the company and/or its group and their
directors, officers and significant shareholders.
Directors/Officers/Significant Shareholders
The Company obtains sufficient information regarding the counterparty, including financial and ownership information.
Company
Hence, any potential conflict of interest will be determined at the earliest instance and appropriate actions are immediately adopted. In
certain instances, transactions that involve potential conflict of interest are not pursued.
Group
186
In case of related party transactions, the Companys policy requires that it shall avoid the same. In instances where related party
transactions cannot be avoided, the Company shall disclose all relevant information on the same, including information on the affiliated
parties and the affiliation of directors and principal officers.186
64
5)
(a)
Indicate, if applicable, any relation of a family,187 commercial, contractual or business nature that exists between the holders of significant equity (5% or
more), to the extent that they are known to the company:
Names of Related
Significant Shareholders
None
(b)
None
None
Type of Relationship
Brief Description
None
None
Indicate any shareholder agreements that may impact on the control, ownership and strategic direction of the company:
Name of Shareholders
Ayala Corporation
6)
Indicate, if applicable, any relation of a commercial, contractual or business nature that exists between the holders of significant equity (5% or more) and
the company:
Names of Related
Significant Shareholders
None
(c)
Type of Relationship
At least 10%
187
65
The Letter of Undertaking of the National Government in favor of the Company provides for
arbitration before an arbitration panel consisting of three (3) members appointed and
conducting proceedings in Singapore in accordance with the arbitration rules of the United
Nations Commission on International Trade Law
The Company has not been in conflict with any of its stockholders in the last three years.
With regard to third parties and regulatory authorities, the Company has availed of arbitration or court proceedings, in accordance with the provisions of the
relevant contracts, or in accordance with the applicable laws, rules and regulations, if there is no contract. Nevertheless, the Company, stockholders, third
parties and regulatory authorities are entitled to avail of the remedies provided under existing laws, rules and regulations.
C.
1)
Are Board of Directors meetings scheduled before or at the beginning of the year?
Meetings of Board of Directors are scheduled before the beginning of the year.
In its regular meeting held on November 26, 2015, which meeting was attended by 10 out of 11 members of the Board, the Board approved the holding of
Board meetings for the year 2016 on the dates and at times specified below, subject to the authority given by the Board to the Chairman to make changes
to the schedules after consultation with the members of the Board:
66
Nature of Meeting
Regular Meeting
Organizational Board Meeting
Meeting of Non-Executive Directors
Regular Meeting
Regular Meeting
Regular Meeting
Regular Meeting
Date of Meeting
February 26, 2016, Friday
April 11, 2016, Monday
April 11, 2016, Monday
June 9, 2016, Thursday
August 11, 2016, Thursday
October 4, 2016, Tuesday
November 24, 2016, Thursday
Time
9:00 a.m.
Immediately after the 2016 ASM
Immediately after the Organizational Meeting of the Board
9:00 a.m.
9:00 a.m.
9:00 a.m.
9:00 a.m.
In the same meeting, the Board authorized the holding of the 2016 Annual Stockholders Meeting on April 11, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. at Fairmont Makati, Makati City,
with record date of February 19, 2016.
2)
Attendance of Directors
Board Meeting Attendance of Board of Directors in 2015:
Board
Chairman
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Independent
Independent
Independent
Independent
Member
Name
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala
Gerardo C. Ablaza Jr.
Delfin L. Lazaro
Antonino T. Aquino
John Eric T. Francia
Sherisa P. Nuesa
Jose L. Cuisia Jr.
Oscar S. Reyes
Jaime C. Laya
Victoria P. Garchitorena
Date of Election
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
No. of Meetings
Attended
7/7
7/7
6/6
6/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
%
100%
100%
100%
86%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
67
3)
Do non-executive directors have a separate meeting during the year without the presence of any executive? If yes, how many times?
Yes. On April 11, 2016, immediately after the organizational meeting of the Board of Directors, the non-executive directors held a separate meeting, without
Mr. Gerardo C. Ablaza, Jr., the President and CEO and the sole executive director of the Company.
On April 7, 2015, and on April 4, 2014, immediately after the organizational meeting of the Board of Directors, the non-executive directors held a separate
meeting.
4)
Is the minimum quorum requirement for Board decisions set at two-thirds of board members? Please explain.
Yes. In its special meeting held on April 4, 2014, the Charter of the Board was approved and adopted by the Board of Directors, wherein the minimum
quorum requirement for Board decisions is set at 2/3 of the Board members. In particular, Section 4.2.1 provides:
4.2.1 At least 2/3 of the number of directors as fixed in the Articles of Incorporation shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of
corporate business, and every decision of at least a majority of the directors present at a meeting at which there is a quorum shall be valid
as a corporate act, except as may have been provided in contracts binding on the Corporation, and except for the election of officers
which shall require the vote of a majority of all the members of the Board. In the absence of a quorum, a majority of the directors present
may adjourn any meeting from time to time until a quorum is had.
5)
Access to Information
(a)
How many days in advance are board papers188 for board of directors meetings provided to the board?
The Company provides the board papers to the members of the board at least five (5) days before the scheduled meeting.
Section 4.1.5 of the Charter of the Board specifically requires that [T]he materials for the meetings shall be given to each Director at least five (5) days prior
to the intended meeting to give the Directors sufficient time to prepare for the meeting and to raise any concern on the materials.
(b)
Do board members have independent access to Management and the Corporate Secretary?
Yes. The Manual of Corporate Governance states that members of the board should be given independent access to the management and the corporate
188
Board papers consist of complete and adequate information about the matters to be taken in the board meeting. Information includes the background or explanation on matters brought before the
Board, disclosures, budgets, forecasts and internal financial documents.
68
secretary.189 Accordingly, members of the board may make further inquiries as regards the operations and affairs of Company to enable them to properly
perform their duties and responsibilities.190
This is consistent with the principle that the Board oversees the management of the Company and provides directions towards the formulation of a sound
corporate strategy.191 In this connection, the management is also obligated to provide the Board with complete, adequate and timely information on the
operations and affairs of the Company.192 In practice, the members of the Board of the Company do actually and directly refer their queries and concerns to
the Management and the Corporate Secretary.
(c)
State the policy of the role of the company secretary. Does such role include assisting the Chairman in preparing the board agenda, facilitating training of
directors, keeping directors updated regarding any relevant statutory and regulatory changes, etc.?
The Corporate Secretary shall ensure that the Board and management follow internal and external rules and regulations, and facilitate clear communications
between the Board and management. The Office of the Corporate Secretary, in coordination with the Compliance Officer, shall be the forerunner of the
Corporation in championing corporate governance practices and policies.
Upon assumption of office, a director appointed for the first time shall undergo a corporate orientation program to be conducted by the Office of the
Corporate Secretary. The Corporate Secretary shall prepare the curriculum for the corporate orientation program. The curriculum of the corporate
orientation program shall contain as a minimum, a topic on the operations of the Corporation and the applicable legal framework thereto, and relevant
contracts of the Corporation, if any, as well as the existing policies, rules and regulations of the Corporation, such as but not limited to: the Code, the
Manual, the Charters of the Board and the Board Committees, corporate governance framework, enterprise risk management, and corporate
communications. The curriculum of the orientation program shall be revised as often as necessary to include other subjects and matters relating to the
Corporation.193 In addition to the corporate orientation program for new directors, the Office of the Corporate Secretary shall inform the Board of any
updates on the matters covered by the orientation program. The updates can be given during the regular meetings of the Board. 194
The Charter of the Corporate Secretary which was approved by the Board of Directors in its special meeting held on April 4, 2014 provide that the Corporate
Secretary has the following specific functions:
a. Adviser to the directors on their functions, responsibilities and obligations.
b. Responsible for the safekeeping and preservation of the integrity of the minutes of meetings of the stockholders, the Board, the Executive Committee,
and all other committees, as well as all other official records of the Corporation.
189
69
He shall furnish copies thereof to the Chairman, the President and other members of the Board as appropriate.
c. Work fairly and objectively with the Board, management and stockholders.
Custodian of the seal of the Corporation and with authority to affix it to any instrument requiring the same.
d. Custodian of the stock certificate book and such other books and papers as the Board may direct.
e. Attend to the giving and serving of notices of Board and shareholder meetings.
f. Inform the members of the Board, in accordance with the by-laws, of the agenda of their meetings and ensure that the members have before them
accurate information that will enable them to arrive at intelligent decisions on matters that require their approval.
g. Be fully informed and be part of the scheduling process of other activities of the Board.
h. Attend all Board meetings, except when justifiable causes prevent him from doing so. For this purpose, the Board shall have discretion of determining
what causes are justifiable.
i. Ensure that all Board procedures, rules and regulations are strictly followed by the members.
j. Prepare an annual schedule of board meetings and the agenda of meetings, and put the Board on notice of such agenda at every meeting.
k. Oversee the adequate flow of information to the Board prior to meetings.
l. Ensure fulfillment of disclosure requirements to the SEC and the PSE.
m. If he is also the Compliance Officer, perform all the duties and responsibilities of the said officer as provided for in the Manual.
The Corporate Secretary shall have such other responsibilities as the Board of Directors may impose upon him.
Under the Charter of the Corporate Secretary and the Manual, the Corporate Secretary shall be a resident and citizen of the Philippines. He must possess
organizational and interpersonal skills, the legal skills of a chief legal officer and the following additional qualifications:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
(d)
Is the company secretary trained in legal, accountancy or company secretarial practices? Please explain should the answer be in the negative.
Yes. The Corporate Secretary of the Company. Atty. Solomon M. Hermosura, is a lawyer by profession, a member of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines in
good standing, and a bar examinations topnotcher. Moroever, he has the necessary experience and skills in legal and corporate secretarial practices. He also
has knowledge of accounting principles and can readily apply it in the performance of his duties as Corporate Secretary.
In sum, the Corporate Secretary of the Company has all the qualifications required under the Charter of the Corporate Secretary and the Manual, to wit:
70
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
(e)
Committee Procedures
Disclose whether there is a procedure that Directors can avail of to enable them to get information necessary to be able to prepare in advance for the
meetings of different committees:
Yes
Committee
No
Details of the procedures
The members of the Executive Committee are provided in advance by the Office of the Corporate Secretary with the
agenda of the meeting and information on the matters to be discussed during the meetings.
Executive Committee
The members of the Committee are free to communicate with the Office of the Corporate Secretary for additional
information regarding the meeting.
As a general rule, Committee meetings shall be announced at least two (2) weeks in advance. Notice of meetings may
be given by any customary means of communication such as electronic mail, in writing, by telephone, by telefax and
other similar means. The notice shall specify the time and place of the meeting and include a detailed agenda. The
materials of the meetings shall be given to each member of the Committee at least five (5) days prior to the intended
meeting, except as otherwise provided herein.195
The Committee shall have free and full access to all relevant information, data, records, properties and personnel of
the Corporation.196
The Corporate Secretary, the management and all personnel of the Corporation shall provide assistance and support to
the Committee.197
195
71
The Committee may also invite such members of management and other resource persons to its meetings and may
secure independent expert and/or professional advice as it may deem desirable or appropriate.198
All resources necessary for the Committee to perform its duties and functions shall be provided by the Corporation, at
its expense.199
The members of the Audit and Governance Committee are provided by the Office of the Corporate Secretary or
Internal Audit Department of the Company in advance with the agenda of the meeting and information on the matters
to be discussed during the meetings.
The members of the Committee are free to communicate with the Office of the Corporate Secretary for additional
information regarding the meeting.
The Internal Audit (IA) of the Company shall support the Committee in the rendition of its functions, specifically200:
i.
ii.
The Chief Audit Executive (CAE) shall attend all the Committee meetings and ensure that a legal officer records
the minutes of the meetings.
iii.
IA shall keep all minutes of the meetings and make these available for inspection by any member of the
Committee or the Board of Directors, as and when requested.
iv.
IA shall review all papers for submission to the Committee, including any proposals from management before
these are submitted to the Committee for approval. If there are unresolved differences in opinion on any
proposal between the proponent and IA, these shall be highlighted to the Committee for consideration and
decision.
The members of the Nomination Committee are provided by the Office of the Corporate Secretary in advance with the
agenda and information on the matters to be discussed during the meetings.
Nomination Committee
The members of the Committee are free to communicate with the Office of the Corporate Secretary for additional
198
Ibid.
Ibid.
200 Charter of the Audit and Governance Committee (K)
199
72
Remuneration Committee
The members of the Remuneration Committee are provided by the Office of the Corporate Secretary or the Corporate
Human Resources Group of the Company in advance with the agenda and information on the matters to be discussed
during the meetings.
The members of the Committee are free to communicate with the Office of the Corporate Secretary for additional
information regarding the meeting.
As a general rule, Committee meetings shall be announced at least two (2) weeks in advance. Notice of meetings may
be given by any customary means of communication such as electronic mail, in writing, by telephone, by telefax and
other similar means. The notice shall specify the time and place of the meeting and include a detailed agenda. The
201
73
materials for the meetings shall be given to each member of the Committee at least five (5) days prior to the intended
meeting, except as otherwise provided herein.206
The Committee shall have free and full access to all relevant information, data, records, properties and personnel of
the Corporation.207
The Corporate Secretary, the Group Director for Corporate Human Resources Group, management and personnel of
the Corporation shall provide assistance and support to the Committee.208
The Committee may also invite such members of management and other persons to its meetings and may secure
independent expert and/or professional advice as it may deem desirable or appropriate. 209
All resources necessary for the Committee to perform its duties and functions shall be provided by the Corporation, at
its expense.210
Related Party Transactions Committee
Same process and procedure as that applied to the Audit and Governance Committee since the RPT Committee is a
sub-committee of and composed of all the independent directors of the Audit and Governance Committee.
Risk Committee
Same process as the other Board Committees. In addition, the Enterprise Risk and Insurance Management (ERIM)
Department shall support the Committee in the performance of its functions, specifically:
The ERIM Department shall provide all the secretariat support to the Committee.
The Chief Risk Officer shall attend all the Committee meetings and ensure that the minutes of the meetings are
properly recorded by a representative from the Office of the Corporate Secretary.
The ERIM Department shall keep all minutes and records of the meetings, recorded and prepared by the Office of
the Corporate Secretary and make these available for inspection by any member of the Committee or the Board, as
and when requested.
206
74
6)
The ERIM Department shall review all papers for submission to the Committee, including any proposals from
management before these are submitted to the Committee for approval. If there are unresolved differences in
opinion on any proposal between the proponent and ERIM Department, these shall be highlighted to the
Committee for consideration and decision.211
The Committee shall have reasonably free and full access to the Companys data, records and properties, as well as
information from employees, officers, directors or external parties that may be relevant in monitoring and
assessing risk exposures and their implications to the Company.212
External Advice
Indicate whether or not a procedure exists whereby directors can receive external advice and, if so, provide details:
Yes, there is such procedure.
The Manual provides that directors can create a procedure for directors, either individually or as a group, in the furtherance of their duties, to take
independent professional advice, if necessary, at the Companys expense, which expense shall be reasonable. Moreover, members of the Board are given
independent access to the Management and the Corporate Secretary for making inquiries to enable them to properly perform their duties and
responsibilities.
Pursuant to the foregoing, the Charter of the Board of Directors provide for the following procedures:
Section 7.1 Access to Information
The Board shall have free and full access to all relevant information, data, records, properties and personnel of the Corporation.
Section 7.2 Technical Assistance
The Corporate Secretary, the management and all personnel of the Corporation shall provide assistance and support to the Board.
211
212
75
The Board may also invite such members of management and other resource persons to its meetings and may secure independent expert
and/or professional advice as it may deem desirable or appropriate. All resources necessary for the Board to perform its duties and
functions shall be provided by the Corporation, at its expense.
7)
within which the Company is operating and there were also new international standards. Given these factors, the management revisited the Companys
Sustainability Policy and identified the gaps that need to be addressed.
On other hand, the Climate Change Policy was ratified by the Board in 2007 and Manila Water was the first company to have a formal climate change policy.
This Policy predates the Philippine Climate Change Act, National Framework Strategy on Climate Change and National Climate Change Action Plan which
were passed/implemented in 2009, 2010 and 2011 respectively. To align the Companys Climate Change Policy with the Philippine governments anchor
strategy of Adaptation, Manila Water revised its existing Climate Change Policy.
In its regular meeting held on November 29, 2013, the Board approved the Charters of the Board Committees, namely, the Executive Committee, the
Nomination Committee, the Remuneration Committee, and the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies. The Audit and Governance Committee has
an existing charter. In its Regular Meeting held on February 26, 2016, the Board approved the amendment to the Charter of the Audit and Governance
Committee which pertains to the transfer of the risk management and oversight functions to the recently established Risk Committee.
Prior to the adoption of the Board Committee Charters, the Manual, with the exception of the Audit and Governance Committee Charter, is the only basis of
the authority, functions and duties of the Board Committees. With the recent trend of empowering the Board Committees, there existed a need to codify
this empowerment and to supplement the Manual with regard to the duties, functions, and composition of the Board Committees.
The primary objective of the Board Committee Charters is to establish the requirements of membership of the aforesaid Committee, the powers, duties and
responsibilities of the members, the meeting and quorum requirements, and the method of adopting resolutions. With the approval of the charters, the
Committees will have a clearer and more direct participation in the functioning of the Board. However, the Board Committee Charters is not intended to
replace, but only to supplement, the Manual.
In its special meeting held on April 4, 2014, the Board approved the following:
a.
b.
c.
d.
The Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics contains improvements in the existing policies of the Company on conflict of interest, honesty and fair
dealing, disclosure, insider trading, and corporate entertainment and gifts. In addition, policies on creditor rights, anti-corruption and anti-sexual harassment
have been incorporated as well. More importantly, the provisions on implementation of the Revised Code through the Compliance Officer have been made
clearer and more stringent, and a corporate governance panel has been tasked to assist the Compliance Officer in the investigation of the violations of the
Revised Code.
77
The Policy on Related Party Transactions (RPT), the Charter of the Corporate Secretary and the Charter of the Board seek to supplement the provisions of the
Manual on the said relevant subjects.
The RPT Policy requires that the Company shall enter into any related-party transactions solely in the ordinary course of business, on ordinary commercial
terms and on the basis of arms length arrangements, and subject to appropriate corporate approvals and actions of the Corporation or the Related Parties,
as the case may be. More importantly, approval of the RPT Committee (composed entirely of the independent directors of the Audit and Governance
Committee) is required prior to award of Material RPTs. With respect to non-material RPTs, the approval of the Compliance Officer is required prior to award
thereof. Material RPTs are those with contract price of at least Php10,000,000.00.
The Charter of the Corporate Secretary institutionalizes the Office of the Corporate Secretary as the office with the primary function of assisting the Board of
Directors.
The Charter of the Board of Directors includes, among others, the process for selection, appointment, disqualification, suspension, reinstatement, and
removal of directors, meeting and quorum requirements, clear delineation of the functions of the Board as a collegial body and the Chairman of the Board of
Directors, and the evaluation of the Board, the Board Committees and the President of the Company. The Charter of the Board also clarifies and ingrains the
policies of the Board on Business Conduct and Ethics, Diversity and Multiple Directorships.
The adoption of the above changes in or new policies are in line with the Companys efforts to further its corporate governance practices and
implementation.
D.
REMUNERATION MATTERS
1)
Remuneration Process
Disclose the process used for determining the remuneration of the CEO and the four (4) most highly compensated management officers:
Process
CEO
Executive Directors
Industry Practice
Industry Practice
Non-Executive Directors
Industry Practice
Industry Practice
Do stockholders have the opportunity to approve the decision on total remuneration (fees, allowances, benefits-in-kind and other emoluments) of board
of directors? Provide details for the last three (3) years.
Yes. In the annual stockholders meeting held on April 11, 2011, the stockholders approved the following remuneration scheme for directors and members of
board committees:
Remuneration Scheme
Retainer of P500,000.00 per member of the Board
79
Aggregate Remuneration
Complete the following table on the aggregate remuneration accrued during the most recent year:
Executive Directors*
Independent Directors
P500,000
P3,000,000
P2,000,000
None
None
None
P1,550,000
P9,100,000
P7,300,000
(d) Bonuses
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P2,050,000
P12,100,000
9,300,000
Remuneration Item
(a) Fixed Remuneration
(b) Variable Remuneration
(c) Per diem Allowance
Total
* The Fixed Remunerations and Per Diem allowances for Gerardo C. Ablaza, Jr. (Executive Director), Fernando Zobel de Ayala, Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala, John Eric T. Francia
and Delfin L. Lazaro were paid directly to Ayala Corporation.
Other Benefits
Executive Directors
Independent Directors
1) Advances
None
None
None
2) Credit granted
None
None
None
80
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Total
4)
(a)
Board of Directors
Complete the following table, on the members of the companys Board of Directors who own or are entitled to stock rights, options or warrants over the
Companys shares:
Data as of March 31, 2016:
Directors Name
Gerardo C. Ablaza, Jr.
Antonino T. Aquino
Sherisa P. Nuesa
Oscar S. Reyes
*Common Shares Only
(b)
Number of Direct
Option/Rights/
Warrants
4,126,077
5,549,542
708,304
130,000
Number of Indirect
Option/Rights/
Warrants
0
0
0
0
4,126,077
5,549,542
708,304
130,000
0.20088538%
0.27018929%
0.03448504%
0.00632928%
There was no amendments or discontinuance of any incentive programs introduced during the period.
5)
Remuneration of Management
Identify the five (5) members of management who are not at the same time executive directors and indicate the total remuneration received during the
financial year:
Name of Officer/Position
Total Remuneration
PhP87,196,000
Geodino V. Carpio
Rodell A. Garcia
E.
BOARD COMMITTEES
1)
Committee
Independent
Director
(ID)
Non-executive
Director (NED)
Committee Charter
Functions
Key
Responsibilities
Power
Executive
YES
Refer below
Refer below
Refer below
Audit
YES
Refer below
Refer below
Refer below
Nomination*
YES
Refer below
Refer below
Refer below
Remuneration
YES
Refer below
Refer below
Refer below
82
YES
Refer Below
Refer below
Refer below
Risk
YES
Refer below
Refer below
Refer below
Others (specify)
*During the organizational meeting of the Board of Directors held on April 11, 2016, the members appointed to the Nomination Committee consist only of
independent directors.
The Executive Committee
The Board shall appoint from among its members an Executive Committee composed of five (5) members. The Board shall designate the Chairman of the
Executive Committee.
The Executive Committee is authorized to act, and shall act, on matters within the competence of the Board of Directors, except with respect to -a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
The attendance of at least four (4) members of the Executive Committee shall constitute a quorum but the majority vote of all members shall be necessary
to carry an act or resolution of the Committee. An act of the Executive Committee which is within the scope of its powers shall not require ratification or
approval by the Board for its validity and effectivity. However, any such act shall be subject to revision or alteration by the Board.
The Committee shall perform such other functions as may be properly delegated to it by the Board.
The Committee shall be guided by the Companys mission and vision in the fulfilment of its functions.
The Audit and Governance Committee
There shall be an Audit and Governance Committee composed of four (4) members, and at least one of whom shall be an independent director. The
independent director shall chair the Audit and Governance Committee.
The Audit and Governance Committee has three (3) independent directors, one of whom is the Chairman.
83
Each member shall have an adequate understanding of accounting and auditing principles in general and of the Companys financial management systems
and environment in particular. One of the independent directors, Director Jaime C. Laya, is a Certified Public Accountant.
The Audit and Governance Committee is expected, through the provision of checks and balances, to bring positive results in supervising and supporting the
management of the Company. It shall be responsible for ensuring the development of, compliance with, and periodic review of corporate governance
policies and practices in the Company.
In general, the Audit and Governance Committee shall assist the Board in the performance of the following functions:
i.
Ensure the presence of organizational and procedural controls, supported by an effective management information system and risk management
reporting system;
ii.
Reviewing conflict-of-interest situations and providing appropriate remedial measures for the same;
iii.
Institutionalizing the internal audit functions;
iv.
Ensuring the presence of, and regularly reviewing, the performance and quality of external audit;
v.
Provide strategic policies and guidelines to the Company on major capital expenditures and key investments. Establish programs that can sustain its
long-term viability and strength. Periodically evaluate and monitor the implementation of such policies and strategies;
vi.
Formulate a clear communication and disclosure strategy to promptly and regularly communicate with the regulators and the Companys
shareholders and other stakeholders on matters of importance;
vii.
Identify the sectors in the community in which the Company operates or are directly affected by its operations, and formulate a clear policy of
accurate, timely and effective communication with them;
viii.
Adopt a system of internal checks and balances for the Board and management which systems shall be continuously and regularly reviewed and
updated to ensure adequacy and effectiveness;
ix.
Provide the stockholders and stakeholders with relevant and timely information about the Companys performance, position and prospects as well as
other financial reporting and control requirements as may be issued by regulator or required by the shareholders and stakeholders from time to time.
x.
Adoption, implementation and continuous monitoring of policies and procedures that will ensure the integrity and transparency of related party
transactions between and among the Company and its parent company, joint ventures, subsidiaries, affiliates, major stockholders, officers and
directors, including their spouses, children and dependent siblings and parents, and of interlocking director relationships by members of the Board as
well as other unusual or complex transactions;
xi.
Recommend the appointment and removal of the external auditors;
xii.
Creation of procedures for directors, either individually or as a group, in the furtherance of their duties, to take independent professional advice, if
necessary, subject only to reasonableness of expense;
In particular, the Audit and Governance Committee shall have the following duties and responsibilities:
i.
assist the Board in its oversight responsibility for the financial reporting process, system of internal control, audit process, and monitoring of
compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations and secure Managements assurance as to the state of the Companys internal control;
84
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
viii.
ix.
x.
xi.
xii.
xiii.
xiv.
xv.
xvi.
xvii.
xviii.
xix.
make a fair and balanced review of all financial reports and check against its compliance with both the internal financial management handbook and
pertinent accounting standards, including regulatory requirements;
determine the impact of new accounting standards and interpretations in the financial standing and reports of the Company;
assess annual and interim financial reports as to completeness, clarity, consistency and accuracy of disclosures including information on related party
transactions;
perform oversight financial management functions specifically in the areas of managing credit, market, liquidity, operational, legal and other risks of
the Company, and crisis management;
be responsible for setting up an internal audit department and consider the appointment and removal of the CAE; establish and identify the reporting
line of the CAE so that the reporting levels allow the internal audit activity to fulfill its responsibilities;
ensure that internal auditors have free and full access to all the Companys records, properties and personnel relevant to and required by its function
and that the internal audit activity shall be free from interference in determining its scope, performing its work and communicating its results;
provide oversight of the Companys internal and external auditors; ensure that the internal and external auditors act independently from each other;
and ensure that the external auditor is given unrestricted access to all records, properties and personnel to enable it to perform its audit function;
review internal audit plans, including audit scope, resources and budget necessary to implement it, to ensure its conformity with the objectives of the
Company;
discuss with the external auditor before the audit commences the nature and scope of the audit, and ensure cooperation where more than one audit
firm is needed in order to secure proper coverage and minimize duplication of efforts;
monitor and evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the Companys internal control system, including financial reporting control and information
technology security;
ensure that accounting system of the Company adheres to internationally accepted financial reporting standards and that auditing processes,
practices and methodologies are compliant with generally accepted audit standards and practices.
develop a transparent financial management system that will ensure the integrity of internal control activities throughout the Company through a
procedures and policies handbook that will be used by the entire organization;
receive and review reports of internal and external auditors and regulatory agencies, where applicable, and ensure that management is taking
appropriate corrective actions in a timely manner in addressing control and compliance functions with regulatory agencies;
establish and identify the reporting line of the internal auditor to enable him to properly fulfill his duties and responsibilities. The internal auditor shall
functionally report directly to the Audit and Governance Committee which committee shall ensure the internal auditors independence and freedom
from interference by outside parties;
review the quarterly, half-year and annual financial statements before submission to the Board, focusing on changes in accounting policies and
practices, major judgmental areas, significant adjustments resulting from the audit, going concern assumptions, compliance with accounting
standards, and compliance with tax, legal, stock exchange and other regulatory requirements;
recommend and review the appointment and removal of external auditors and their remuneration;
coordinate, monitor and facilitate compliance with laws, rules and regulations;
evaluate and determine the non-audit work, if any, of the external auditor, and review periodically the non-audit fees paid to the external auditor in
relation to their significance to the total annual income of the external auditor and to the Companys overall consultancy expenses. The Committee
85
xx.
xxi
xxii
xxiii
xxiv
xxv
xxvi
shall disallow any non-audit work that will conflict with his duties as an external auditor or may pose a threat to his independence. The non-audit
work, if allowed, shall be disclosed in the Companys annual report;
understand and evaluate disagreements between the external auditors and management and make the appropriate recommendation to the Board
for redress of the matter.
conduct a yearly self-evaluation of the directors and executive officers and report the results of the same to the Board. Independent consultants may
also be invited to assist the Committee in the process;
develop and recommend to the Board corporate governance principles applicable to the Company;
monitor and assess the Companys compliance with rules and regulations relating to corporate governance policies;
make an assessment of the correspondence between the Company and its regulators regarding financial statement filings and disclosures;
evaluate and monitor compliance with the Companys policy in detection of fraud and whistle-blower program;
evaluate compliance with the Companys Code of Conduct and Ethics.
In the fulfillment of the foregoing functions, the Committee shall maintain a free and open communication with the Companys independent auditors,
the internal auditors and the management of the Company. In discharging its oversight role, the Committee is empowered to investigate any matter
brought to its attention, with full access to all records, books of accounts, facilities and personnel of the company and the power to retain outside
counsel or other experts for this purpose.
Furthermore, the Committee may rely upon the expertise and knowledge of Management, the Internal Auditors and Independent Auditors in the
fulfillment of its responsibilities. The independent Auditors are responsible to the Committee in helping ensure the integrity of the financial
statements while the Internal Auditors help the Committee identify the risks, control and financial reporting issues through the continuous review of
the effectiveness of the organizations risk management, financial reporting and controls, and corporate governance processes.
Ii
iii
iv
With regard to Financial Reporting, the Audit and Governance Committee shall:
Review of the financial statements and all related disclosures and reports certified by the Chief Finance Officer (CFO) and released to the public
and/or submitted to the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission for compliance with both the internal financial management handbook and
existing financial accounting standards, legal and regulatory requirements.
Review of the quarterly, mid-year and annual financial statements before submission to the Board, focusing on changes in accounting policies and
practices, alternative accounting treatments and significant adjustments resulting from the audit, on-going concern assumptions, compliance with
accounting standards, tax, legal, and stock exchange requirements.
Ensure that a transparent financial management system is established to ensure the integrity of internal control activities throughout the
organization.
Maintain at international standards, the Companys accounting and auditing processes, practices and methodologies, and ensure that: (a) The
accounting system of the Company is compliant with the current and existing financial accounting standards; and (b) An accountability statement is
in place that specifically identifies officers and/or personnel directly responsible for the accomplishment of such task.
Review and approve management representation letter before the same is submitted to the independent auditor.
86
vi
Communicate with the Companys legal officer/s or counsel/s regarding litigations, claims, contingencies or other significant legal issues that may
have an impact on the financial standing of the Company.
With regard to Internal Audit, the Audit and Governance Committee shall:
i
Review and approval of the Internal Audit Charter and subsequent revisions thereto.
ii
Set up the Internal Audit Activity (IAA), including the appointment and removal of the CAE. The Committee shall establish and identify the reporting
line of the CAE so that the reporting levels allow the IAA to fulfill its responsibilities. The Committee, having appointed the CAE, shall also concur in
his/her replacement, re-assignment or dismissal.
iii
Ensure that the Internal Auditors have free and full access to all Corporations records, properties and personnel relevant to and required by its
function and that the IAA shall be free from interference in determining its scope, performing its work and communicating its results.
iv
Approve the Annual Internal Audit Work Plan and all deviations therefrom, ensure that the audit resources are reasonably allocated to the areas of
higher risk.
v
Review reports of the IAA and regulatory agencies, where applicable, ensure that management is taking appropriate and corrective actions in a
timely manner, including addressing internal control and compliance issues.
vi
Review of the IAAs periodic reports and the IAA Annual Report. Periodic reports shall highlight the status of projects in accordance with the audit
plan approved by the Committee, as well any unplanned projects. Such reports shall include a summary of key findings and recommendations,
including the status of implementation. The Annual Report shall discuss the IAAs activities and performance relative to the audit plans and strategies
approved by the Committee.
vii
Conduct separate meetings with the President to discuss any matter that the Committee or the auditors may deem necessary to be discussed
privately.
viii
Provide inputs on the performance of the IAA and communicate/ discuss such inputs with the President who shall then translate these into a
performance appraisal applicable to the CAE and the Internal Auditors taken as a whole.
ix
As necessary, institute special investigations and, if appropriate the hire of special counsel or experts to provide the necessary assistance.
x.
Monitor the assessment of IAA in determining whether the information technology governance of the organization sustains and supports the
organizations strategies and objectives. (New standard ISPPIA 2110.A2)
xi.
Provide inputs on the IAAs evaluation of the potential occurrence of material errors and fraud. IAA should inform the Committee how the
organization manages fraud risk. The Committee shall determine the sufficiency of the risk controls applied in the Company for the occurrence of such
material errors and fraud and provide inputs and/or guidance on how to improve the same. (New standardISPPIA 2120.A2)
xii
The Committee shall report to the Board any material error or fraud it may have found on its own or through the evaluation conducted by the IAA
related to the business of the Company, particularly in financial reporting, and recommend appropriate actions to be taken by the Board to correct
the same.
xiii
Provide and approve the limits of IAAs responsibility in assisting the management in establishing and improving risk management process. IAA must
refrain from assuming management responsibility by actually managing risks. (New standard-ISPPIA 2120.C3)
xiv
Oversee that IAA will only state that their engagements are conducted in conformance with the International Standards for the Professional Practice
of Internal Auditing, only if the results of the quality assurance and improvement program support the statement. (New standard-ISPPIA 2430)
87
xv
xvi
xvii
xviii
Review and evaluate IAAs evaluation of the Companys internal controls including Information Technology systems and functions;
Evaluate and deliberate on the weaknesses of the Companys internal control and reporting processes and provide guidance or establish corrective
measures for its improvement;
Ensure that management employs the services of internal auditors who are compliant with all qualification requirements of existing regulations, if
any, and/or have sufficient experience and expertise in the performance of internal audit functions and that the performance of the internal auditors
functions are in compliance with international standards on the Practice of Internal Auditing;
Determine the propriety of keeping an in-house audit function as compared to outsourcing. The Committee shall make the appropriate
recommendation to the Board should it determine that the internal audit function should be outsourced.
With regard to External Audit, the Audit and Governance Committee shall:
i.
Recommend the appointment and removal of the Independent Auditors and the fixing of their compensation to the Board and ensure that the
rotation process of the auditors of the external auditors of the firm engaged is enforced.
ii.
Ensure that the external auditors comply with relevant and applicable auditing standards.
iii.
Review and pre-approve the Independent Auditors plans to understand the basis for their risk assessment and financial statement materiality
including the scope and frequency of the audit, and ensure cooperation when more than one professional service firm is needed.
iv.
Monitor the coordination efforts of the external and internal auditors.
v.
Review the reports of the Independent Auditors and regulatory agencies, where applicable. Ensure that management is taking appropriate corrective
actions in a timely manner, including addressing control and compliance issues.
vi.
Conduct a separate meeting in executive session, with the external auditors to discuss any matter that the committee or auditors believe should be
discussed privately, including the results of the audit, year-end financial statements, the quality of management, financial and accounting controls.
vii.
Review and approve the proportion of audit versus non-audit work both in relation to their significance to the auditor and in relation to the
Companys year-end financial statements, and total expenditure on consultancy, to ensure that non-audit work will not be in conflict with the audit
functions of the independent auditor. The amount of non-audit work of independent auditors shall be disclosed in the annual report.
viii.
Evaluate the internal control issues that have been raised by the independent auditor.
ix.
Communicate with the external auditors of the Company within a reasonable period of time after the completion of the independent audit and to
discuss any material findings on the Company relating to critical policy weaknesses, the external auditors observation on the Companys internal
controls, audit adjustments, alternative treatments, the independent auditors independence and limitations on the audit that may have been
imposed by management and other material issues that affect the integrity and accuracy of the Companys financial reporting;
x.
Evaluate the performance of the external auditor and to ensure that the same performs its functions in compliance with the relevant and applicable
auditing standards.
The Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee shall be composed of at least three (3) members, majority of whom shall be independent directors. The Board will designate the
Chairman of the Committee who must be an independent director.
88
At present, the Nomination Committee of Manila Water has four (4) members, three (3) of whom are independent directors. The Chairman is an
independent Director.
The Committee shall have the following functions:
a. Install and maintain a process to ensure that all directors to be nominated for election at the next Annual General Stockholders Meeting have the
qualifications and none of the disqualifications stated above;
b. Encourage the selection of a mix of competent directors, each of whom can add value and create independent judgment as to the formulation of sound
corporate strategies and policies;
c. Review and evaluate the qualifications of all persons nominated to positions in the Company which require appointment by the Board and provide
guidance and advice as necessary for the appointment of persons nominated to other positions;
d. Review and revise if necessary, the succession plans for members of the Board and officers from Group Directors to the President/CEO;
e. Provide assessment on the Boards effectiveness in directing the process of renewing and replacing Board members and in appointing officers or
advisors and develop, update as necessary and recommend to the Board policies for considering nominees for directors, officers or advisors;
f. Discharge any other duties and responsibilities delegated to the Committee by the Board from time to time.
The Committee shall be guided by the Corporations vision and mission in the fulfilment of its functions.
The Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee shall be composed of at least three (3) members, a majority of whom shall be independent director. The Board will designate
the Chairman of the Committee who must be an independent director.
At present, the Nomination Committee of Manila Water has four (4) members, three (3) of whom are independent directors. The Chairman is an
independent Director.
The Committee shall have the following functions:
a. Establish a formal and transparent procedure for developing a policy on remuneration of directors and officers to ensure that their compensation is
consistent with the Companys culture, strategy and the business environment in which it operates;
b. Determine and approve all matters relating to the remuneration and benefits of the Board and the Companys officers;
c. Evaluate and recommend for Board approval the pertinent guidelines on executive compensation, including non-monetary remuneration;
d. Periodically review and evaluate the policy on remuneration in order that it be in a sufficient level to attract and retain directors and officers of the
Company;
e. Provide in the Companys Required Reportorial Requirements, a clear, concise and understandable disclosure of all compensation that may be paid to its
directors and key officers during the preceding fiscal year;
89
f.
Review and revise, if necessary, the existing Company policies to strengthen provisions on conflict of interest, compensation and benefit policies,
promotion and career advancement and compliance with all regulatory policies.
No member of the Committee will act to fix his or her own compensation except for uniform compensation to directors for their services as a director.
The Related Party Transaction Committee
The Related Party Transactions Committee consists of all of the independent directors of the Audit and Governance Committee, provided that there are at
least three (3) independent directors in the Committee. As such, the RPT Committee is considered a subset of the Audit and Governance Committee. Hence,
except on matters relating specifically to their functions as members of the RPT Committee, the members are subject to the charter of the Audit and
Governance Committee.
Prior to entering into any Material RPT, the Company shall submit the same for the review of the RPT Committee to confirm that it has undergone the same
process as an ordinary transaction and to determine that the Material RPT under review is in the best interest of the Corporation. A Material RPT means any
RPT with a stated value of at least Ten Million Pesos (Php10,000,000.00).
The Risk Committee
The Risk Committee shall be comprised of at least four (4) members of the Board, majority of whom shall be independent directors of the Company. The
Board shall designate one member, who must be an independent director, to serve as the Committee Chairman.
The Board shall appoint the Committee members at its annual organizational meeting. Membership shall be reviewed annually, subject to the approval of
the Board.
The Committee shall have the following authority, roles and responsibilities;
a. Promote an open discussion regarding risks faced by the Company, as well as risks faced by its subsidiaries that may have potential impact on the
Companys operations, and ensure that risk awareness culture is pervasive throughout the organization.
b. Ensure that an overall set of risk management policies and procedures exist for the Company.
c. Review the Companys risk governance structure and the adequacy of the Companys risk management framework/process.
d. Review and endorse to the Board changes or amendments to the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Policy.
e. Perform oversight functions specifically in the areas of managing strategic, financial, compliance, regulatory, operational and other risks of the Company,
and crisis management.
f. In coordination with the Audit and Governance Committee, ensure that the Companys internal audit work plan is aligned with risk management
activities and that the internal control system considers all risks identified in the risk assessment process.
g. Perform other activities related to this Charter as requested by the Board.
90
The Committee shall meet at least twice a year, or more frequently as needed. All meetings shall be presided by the Committee Chairman and attended by
all committee members, whether in person or via teleconference or videoconference. Meetings shall not proceed in the absence of a quorum; that is, more
than half of the total number of committee members.
Separate executive sessions may be conducted by the Committee with the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), Chief Finance Officer (CFO), Chief Audit Executive (CAE),
other members of the Management team and/or external auditors to foster open communication and discuss any matter that the Committee believes as
needed to be discussed in private.
The Committee Chairman shall submit and present a report to the Board, containing updates on all actions taken by the Committee at the Board meeting
following the Committee meeting.
2)
Committee Members
(a)
Executive Committee
Length of Service
Office
Name*
%
in the Committee214
Chairman (NED)
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
April 7, 2015
3
3
100%
18
Member (ED)
Gerardo C. Ablaza Jr.
April 7, 2015
3
3
100%
6
Member (ID)
Sherisa P. Nuesa
April 7, 2015
3
3
100%
1
Member (NED)
Antonino T. Aquino
April 7, 2015
3
2
66.7%
17
Member (NED)
John Eric T. Francia
April 7, 2015
3
3
100%
5
*The same individuals have been nominated and appointed members of the Executive Committee during the Organizational Meeting of the Board held on April
11, 2016.
Date of Appointment213
213
214
No. of Meetings
Held
No. of Meetings
Attended
91
(b)
Length of Service
in the Committee216
Chairman (ID)
Oscar S. Reyes
April 7, 2015
5
5
100%
9
Member (ID)
Jaime C. Laya
April 7, 2015
5
4
80%
0
Member (NED)
Victoria P. Garchitorena
April 7, 2015
5
5
100%
0
Member (ID)
Jose L. Cuisia Jr.
April 7, 2015
5
4
80%
4
*The same individuals have been nominated and appointed members of the Audit and Governance Committee during the Organizational Meeting of the Board
held on April 11, 2016.
Office
Name*
Date of Appointment215
No. of Meetings
Held
No. of Meetings
Attended
Disclose the profile or qualifications of the Audit and Governance Committee members.
OSCAR S. REYES
Independent Director, Board of Directors
Chairman, Audit and Governance Committee
Chairman, Related Party Transaction Committee
Chairman, Remuneration Committee
Member, Nomination Committee
Member, Risk Committee
Filipino, 69 years old
Independent Director of the Company since February 3, 2005 217
Education and Training:
Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics, Cum Laude, Ateneo de Manila University
Post-Graduate studies at the Ateneo Graduate School of Business, Waterloo Lutheran University and the Harvard Business School.
Membership in the Board of Listed Companies:
Manila Water Company, Inc. (Ayala Group)
215
92
Mr. Reyes served as Country Chairman of the Shell Companies in the Philippines and concurrently President of Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation and
Managing Director of Shell Philippines Exploration B.V.
JOSE L. CUISIA JR.
Independent Director, Board of Directors
Chairman, Nomination Committee
Member, Remuneration Committee
Member, Audit and Governance Committee
Member, Related Party Transaction Committee
Member, Risk Committee
Filipino, 71 years old
Independent Director of the Company since April 12, 2010218
Education and Training:
AB-BSC degrees, Magna Cum Laude, De La Salle University
MBA degree, University of Pennsylvania (University Scholar)
Membership in the Board of Directors of Listed Companies:
Manila Water Company, Inc. (Ayala Group)
SM Prime Holdings
PHINMA Corporation
Century Properties Group, Inc.
Membership in the Board of Other Organizations and Corporations:
The Covenant Car Company, Inc.
AIG Shared Services Business Processing, Inc.
Phinma, Inc.
218
Pursuant to SEC Memorandum Circular No. 9 Series of 2011 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, all previous terms served by existing Independent Directors as of January 2, 2012 shall not
be included in the application of the term limits under the Circular.
94
96
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
viii.
ix.
x.
(c)
Review and pre-approve the Independent Auditors plans to understand the basis for their risk assessment and financial statement materiality
including the scope and frequency of the audit, and ensure cooperation when more than one professional service firm is needed.
Monitor the coordination efforts of the external and internal auditors.
Review the reports of the Independent Auditors and regulatory agencies, where applicable. Ensure that management is taking appropriate corrective
actions in a timely manner, including addressing control and compliance issues.
Conduct a separate meeting in executive session, with the external auditors to discuss any matter that the committee or auditors believe should be
discussed privately, including the results of the audit, year-end financial statements, the quality of management, financial and accounting controls.
Review and approve the proportion of audit versus non-audit work both in relation to their significance to the auditor and in relation to the
Companys year-end financial statements, and total expenditure on consultancy, to ensure that non-audit work will not be in conflict with the audit
functions of the independent auditor. The amount of non-audit work of independent auditors shall be disclosed in the annual report.
Evaluate the internal control issues that have been raised by the independent auditor.
Communicate with the external auditors of the Company within a reasonable period of time after the completion of the independent audit and to
discuss any material findings on the Company relating to critical policy weaknesses, the external auditors observation on the Companys internal
controls, audit adjustments, alternative treatments, the independent auditors independence and limitations on the audit that may have been
imposed by management and other material issues that affect the integrity and accuracy of the Companys financial reporting;
Evaluate the performance of the external auditor and to ensure that the same performs its functions in compliance with the relevant and applicable
auditing standards. 219
Nomination Committee
Office
Name
Date of
Appointment220
No. of Meetings
Held
No. of Meetings
Attended
Chairman (ID)
Member (NED)
Member (ID)
Member (ID)
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
April 7, 2015
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
100%
100%
100%
100%
Length of Service
in the Committee221
5
10
1
10
At the Organizational Meeting of the Board held on April 11, 2016, the following individuals were elected Chairman and members of the Nomination Committee.
Hence, for the ensuing year, the Nomination Committee of the Company is composed only of independent directors.
219
98
Office
Chairman (ID)
Member (ID)
Member (ID)
(d)
Name
Jose L. Cuisia Jr.
Jaime C. Laya
Oscar S. Reyes
Remuneration Committee
Office
Name*
Date of
Appointment222
Chairman (ID)
Oscar S. Reyes
April 7, 2015
100%
Length of Service
in the Committee223
6
Member (ID)
Sherisa P. Nuesa
April 7, 2015
100%
Member (NED)
April 7, 2015
100%
Member (ID)
April 7, 2015
100%
* The same individuals have been nominated and appointed members of the Remuneration Committee during the Organizational Meeting of the Board held on
April 11, 2016.
(e)
Risk Committee
Office
Name*
Date of Appointment224
No. of Meetings
Held
Chairman (ID)
Jaime C. Laya
August 11, 2015
Member (ID)
Oscar S. Reyes
August 11, 2015
Member (NED)
Victoria P. Garchitorena
August 11, 2015
Member (ID)
Jose L. Cuisia Jr.
August 11, 2015
*The same individuals have been nominated and appointed members of the Risk Committee
2016..
No. of Meetings
Attended
1
1
100%
1
1
100%
1
1
100%
1
1
100%
during the Organizational Meeting of the
Length of Service
in the Committee225
0
0
0
0
Board held on April 11,
222
99
(f)
Others (Specify)
Provide the same information on all other committees constituted by the Board of Directors:
Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies*:
Office
Name
Date of Appointment226
Length of Service
in the Committee
Name*
Date of
Appointment227
No. of Meetings
Held
No. of Meetings
Attended
226
100
3)
Name
Reason
Mr. Ordanez previously held the position of Officer-in-Charge of Internal Audit,
until the confirmation of his appointment as Head of the Internal Audit
Department
Executive
Audit
Nomination
Remuneration
Others (specify) Proxy Validation Committee
Work Done
Issues Addressed
Refer below
Refer below
Refer below
Refer below
Refer below
Resolution No. E-1 (2015) on the appointment of Mr. Thomas T. Mattison as Group Director for Project Delivery Group (Resolution No. E-1 (2015)
Resolution No. E-2 (2015) on the investment for the Bulk Water Supply Project in Tagum City
Resolution No. E-3 (2015) on the availment of a Stand By Letter of Credit as bid security for the Bulacan Bulk Water Supply Project
Resolution No. E-4 (2015) on the availment of 40 Billion Yen Loan
Resolution No. E-5 (2015) on the cancellation of Income Tax Holiday granted by the Bureau of Internal Revenue
Resolution No. E-6 (2015) on the availment of appropriate remedy under the Letter of Undertaking of the Republic of the Philippines
101
g. Resolution No. E-7 and E-8 (2015) on the additional investment of the Company in its wholly owned subsidiary, Manila Water Total Solutions Corporation
and Manila Water Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
h. Resolution No. E-9 (2015) on the changes in the composition of the Retirement Committee of the Company
The acts and resolutions approved and/or passed by the Executive Committee were those acts necessary for or in furtherance of the operations of the Company.
These acts and resolutions were ratified by the Board in its meeting immediately succeeding the relevant Executive Committee meeting.
THE NOMINATION COMMITTEE:
For 2015, the Nomination Committee has evaluated and endorsed:
a. the nomination of Mr. Thomas T. Mattison as Group Director for Project Delivery Group
b. the nomination for election of the eleven (11) nominees to the Board of Directors at the ASM on April 7, 2015
c. the nomination for election of the nominees to the positions of officers of the Company and the board committees at the Organizational Meeting on
April 7, 2015
For 2016, the Nomination Committee has evaluated and endorsed:
a. the nomination for election of the eleven (11) nominees to the Board of Directors at the ASM on April 11, 2016
b. the nomination for election of the nominees to the positions of officers of the Company and the Board Committees at the Organizational Meeting on
April 11, 2016
THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE:
For 2015, the Remuneration Committee has approved:
a. the 2014 Employee Stock Option Plan Grant to qualified officers and employees of the Company
b. the 2015 Compensation Program of the Company
For 2016, the Remuneration Committee has evaluated and approved the 2016 Compensation Program of the Company.
THE COMMITTEE OF INSPECTORS OF BALLOTS AND PROXIES:
On March 27, 2015, the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies validated the proxies submitted by the stockholders for the purpose of the 2015 ASM
held on April 7, 2015.
102
On April 4, 2016, the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies validated the proxies submitted by the stockholders for the purpose of the 2016 ASM held
on April 11, 2016.
THE AUDIT AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE:
For 2015, the Audit and Governance Committee has approved the following matters:
a. 2014 Consolidated Financial Statements including the Notes to the Financial Statements, Management Discussion and Analysis and Management
Representation Letters
b. 2015 SGV Audit Plan
c. 2015 Quarterly Consolidated Financial Results
d. Re-appointment of SGV and Co. as external auditor of the Company and the subsidiaries
e. The total audit fee of SGV for the audit engagement of the Company and its subsidiaries and for other audit engagements amounting to Php3,527,350,
exclusive of value added tax and out of pocket expenses. Of this total audit fee, Php2 million pertains to the audit engagement of the Company.
f. Report of the Audit and Governance Committee to the Board
g. Revision to the Policy on Related Party Transactions and approval of the Secondment Agreement with Manila Water Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. (acting as Related
Party Committee)
h. Proposed Committee Meeting Schedules and Agenda for 2015
i. Minutes of Previous Audit Committee Meetings
j. 2016 Risk-Based Audit Plan
k. Establishment of a Risk Committee
For 2016, the Audit and Governance Committee has approved the following matters:
a. 2015 Consolidated Financial Statements including the Notes to the Financial Statements, Management Discussion and Analysis and Management
Representation Letters
b. Endorsed the re-appointment and fixed the remuneration of SGV as external auditors of the Company and its subsidiaries for fiscal year 2016
c. Counterparty limits for relationship banks of the Company
d. Revision to the Charter of the Committee which revisions pertain to the transfer of the risk management and oversight function to the recently established
Risk Committee
e. Minutes of Previous Audit Committee Meetings
f. Report of the Committee to the Board
103
Committee Program
Provide a list of programs that each committee plans to undertake to address relevant issues in the improvement or enforcement of effective governance
for the coming year.
Each of the Board Committees is required under its own Charter to regularly review the provisions of its Charter to ensure compliance with the relevant
corporate governance policies and practices. They are mandated to diligently comply with their duties, functions and responsibilities as set out in their
respective Charters and in the Manual.
In addition, the Audit and Governance Committee is expected, through the provision of checks and balances, to bring positive results in supervising and
supporting the management of the Company and shall be responsible for ensuring the development of, compliance with, and periodic review of corporate
governance policies and practices of the Company. The Audit and Governance Committee is also tasked to oversee the risk management system of the
Company.
The Related Party Transactions Committee will ensure the all material RPTs have undergone the same process as an ordinary transaction and determine that
the material RPT under review is in the best interest of the Corporation.
The establishment of the Risk Committee will ensure effective management of strategic, operational, financial and compliance-related risks. The Committee
will also assist the Board in its oversight functions in relation to risk governance in the Company.
104
F.
1)
(a)
(b)
A statement that the directors have reviewed the effectiveness of the risk management system and commenting on the adequacy thereof;
The 2015 Annual Report of the Risk Committee to the Board of Directors reads in part:
The Committee discussed with Management the adequacy and effectiveness of the Enterprise Risk Management Process, including significant risk
exposures, the related risk-mitigation efforts and initiatives, and the status of the mitigation plans. The review was undertaken in the context that
Management is primarily responsible for the risk management process.
The Committee has reviewed the Enterprise Risk Management Process and is satisfied that sufficient risk management systems are in place in the
Company.
The Committee noted the 2016 plans and initiatives of the Enterprise Risk and Insurance Management (ERIM) Department to create a robust risk
awareness and management culture and to promote good risk management practices achieving appropriate risk and reward in Manila Waters
business.
The Internal Audit Department assessed the state of the ERM framework of Manila Water and the results of the assessment was reported to the Risk
Committee (RC) and the Board of Directors (BOD). The assessment of the ERM framework covered the following components, namely:
The RC and the BOD reviewed and approved the top enterprise risks of the Company and reviewed the progress of the action plans to manage these risks. In
addition, the risk management programs are reviewed and approved by RC which make a report to the BOD. The comments and recommendations of the
RC and BOD were incorporated in the programs for 2015.
For 2015, the following are the improvements in the Risk Management System:
Creation of Risk Committee of the BOD
Conduct of Black Swan Workshop attended by Senior Leadership Team and Management Committee
Inclusion of Manila Water subsidiaries in the Risk Management Excellence Awards program
Inclusion of ERM maturity in corporate and group targets
In addition, an external assessment of Manila Waters ERM maturity was conducted by Aon Philippines. Manila Water achieved a rating of 4.5 which means
Manila Water is between the operational and advanced levels of ERM implementation. The 4.5 score is also above the global average for all industries (3.0)
and global average for utility companies (2.5). The assessment covered the following components of ERM:
(c)
(d)
How often the risk management system is reviewed and the directors criteria for assessing its effectiveness; and
Annual for the assessment of framework; quarterly progress review
(e)
Where no review was conducted during the year, an explanation why not.
Not applicable
2) Risk Policy
(a)
Company
Give a general description of the companys risk management policy, setting out and assessing the risk/s covered by the system (ranked according to
priority), along with the objective behind the policy for each kind of risk:
The ERM Policy:
Establishes the framework that shall be employed for risk management at Manila Water;
Establishes the risk management process;
Establishes the risk management oversight structure; and
Defines the authorities and responsibilities of individuals, committees and organization units with roles in ERM.
Risk Exposure
Objective
Operational
Provide funding provision for the Big One and now covers not only
Financial
107
Financial
Compliance
(b)
Group
Give a general description of the Groups risk management policy, setting out and assessing the risk/s covered by the system (ranked according to
priority), along with the objective behind the policy for each kind of risk:
Risk Exposure
Objective
Subsidiaries are required to adopt the same risk management
framework as the Parent Company. Subsidiaries are required to
attain a certain level of risk management maturity.
General
Strategic
Minority Shareholders
Indicate the principal risk of the exercise of controlling shareholders voting power.
108
(a)
Company
Briefly describe the control systems set up to assess, manage and control the main issue/s faced by the company:
2015 TOP CORPORATE RISKS
MITIGATION STRATEGIES
RATE REBASING
Review and analysis of approved business plan versus actual accomplishment is done to
Failure to manage the results of the arbitral award
ensure compliance to the arbitral award. In addition, improvements in various processes
and systems have been implemented.
INVESTMENT PLAN EXECUTION
A capex optimization project was undertaken to optimize processes, functions and
Failure to meet CAPEX targets within the approved cost, time and resources to ensure projects are implemented within budget and timeline, and at an
quality.
acceptable quality level.
A project risk management program is in place wherein
projects are categorized in different tiers with varying frequency of review and reporting
of risks and levels for risk acceptance.
WATER SUPPLY
Activities are being done to further increase reliability and efficiency of the current water
Failure to ensure adequacy and reliability of raw water supply.
supply system such as the development of medium-term water sources, weekly
monitoring and investigation of non-revenue water (NRW) contributors, weekly
monitoring of dam water levels, preventive and corrective maintenance of dam facilities
and aqueducts and implementation of metering at raw water portal and tailrace
metering.
REGULATORY
Programs have been implemented to ensure control of regulatory and socio-political
Failure to meet regulatory requirements and manage threats / changes risks at both compliance and strategic levels. There were organizational changes to
to such requirements (e.g. premature termination of CA, consolidation of improve the regulatory compliance of the organization. The document management
water sector) which may adversely affect the organization.
system has been enhanced to improve readiness in regulatory review and audit. In
109
(b)
addition, guidelines on concession accounting and auditing and technical audit are under
development.
Organizational enhancements were implemented to improve Manila Waters control and
visibility in the subsidiaries. Risk Officers have been appointed to strengthen risk
governance in the subsidiaries. The enterprise risk management framework had been
implemented by the new businesses and their top risks and action plans are being
reported to Manila Water.
Group
Briefly describe the control systems set up to assess, manage and control the main issue/s faced by the company:
Risk Exposure
Various Risks
Risk Assessment
(Monitoring and Measurement Process)
Various Risks
Internal Audit
Operational Risks
110
(c)
Committee
Identify the committee or any other body of corporate governance in charge of laying down and supervising these control mechanisms, and give details
of its functions:
Committee/Unit
ERIM Department
G.
1)
Control Mechanism
Monitoring and Reporting of Top Risks of the
company and the treatment for the risks.
Provides management oversight for the risk
management program of the company.
Disclose the following information pertaining to the internal control system of the company:
(a)
Explain how the internal control system is defined for the company;
The Companys internal control is aligned with the COSOs Interrelated Components of Internal Control
Control Environment/Activities
External Control Environment
Risk Management
111
(b)
A statement that the directors have reviewed the effectiveness of the internal control system and whether they consider them effective and adequate;
The 2015 Annual Report of the Audit and Governance Committee to the Board of Directors reads in part:
The Committee discussed and approved the overall scope and the respective audit plans of the Companys internal auditors and of SGV & Co., the results of
their audits and their assessment of the Companys internal controls, and the overall quality of the financial reporting process.
The Committee discussed the reports of the internal auditors, and ensured that Management is taking appropriate actions in a timely manner, including
addressing internal control and compliance issues. All the activities performed by Internal Audit were conducted in conformance with the International
Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.
The Audit and Governance Committee, through the audits conducted by SGV & Company and Internal Audit, has reviewed Managements system of internal
controls and the Committee found the internal control system to be adequate and effective.
The Committee discussed with Management the adequacy and effectiveness of the Enterprise Risk Management process, including significant risk
exposures, the related risk-mitigation efforts and initiatives, and the status of the mitigation plans. The review was undertaken in the context that
Management is primarily responsible for the risk management process.
(c)
(d)
How often internal controls are reviewed and the directors criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the internal control system; and
Internal controls are reviewed on an annual basis
(e)
Where no review was conducted during the year, an explanation why not.
Review of internal controls is part of the audit activities and based on Audits assessment of risks.
112
2)
Internal Audit
(a)
Review the effectiveness by which risks that may threaten the achievement of organizational and financial reporting objectives are identified and
managed.
Review the reliability and integrity of the financial reporting process and operating information and the business process used to identify, measure,
classify and report such information.
Review the adequacy of the system of internal controls, planned and in use, to safeguard the Companys assets and operations.
Review the effectiveness of management controls meant to ensure the economic and efficient utilization of resources and achieve the Companys
corporate vision and objectives.
Review the adequacy, existence and degree of adherence to Company policies, procedures and sound business practices.
Report the result of audit reviews and other activities in a manner that helps management address the identified risk issues/ concerns and take
appropriate action within a reasonable period of time.
Appraise the adequacy of action taken by management in response to reported risk issues, control weaknesses and opportunities for improvement.
Assurance Services
The IAA provides reasonable assurance on the following to help ensure that management enhances the value of the Company as it competes in an ever
dynamic and increasingly competitive marketplace;
o
o
o
o
Overall effectiveness and efficiency of the control environment and the risk management and governance processes
Compliance with policies, laws and regulations
Safeguarding of assets
Reasonableness of financial information, in conjunction with the external/independent auditors activities
Consulting Services
113
The IAA of the Company shall provide advisory and related client service activities, the nature and scope of which are agreed with the client, and are
intended to add value and improve the organizations governance, risk management, and control processes without assuming managements responsibility.
Examples of consulting services are:
Role
Scope
Financial Auditor
In-house
In-house
System Auditor
In-house
Reporting process
Functionally reporting to
the Audit and Governance
Committee and
Administratively reporting
to the CFO
Construction Auditor
(b)
In-house
Do the appointment and/or removal of the Internal Auditor or the accounting /auditing firm or corporation to which the internal audit function is
outsourced require the approval of the audit committee?
YES. The appointment and/or removal of the Internal Auditor requires the approval of the Audit and Governance Committee. This is specifically provided in
the Charter of the Audit and Governance Committee.
(c)
Discuss the internal auditors reporting relationship with the audit committee. Does the internal auditor have direct and unfettered access to the board
of directors and the audit committee and to all records, properties and personnel?
The Internal Audit Activity (IAA) functionally reports to the Audit and Governance Committee and administratively to the Chief Finance Officer. Though this is
not the optimum placement of the department to ensure independence since the standards explicitly states that IAA should administratively reports to the
Chief Executive Officer, IAA maintains its independence by adhering to the provisions stated in the Internal Audit Charter where the purpose, authority, and
responsibility of the IAA were formally defined consistent with the Auditing Standards, and approved by the board. The charter established the IAAs position
within the organization. It authorizes access to records, personnel, and physical properties relevant to the performance of engagements and defines the scope
of internal audit activities.
(d)
Reason
Resigned
Re-assigned from Systems Auditor to Head of the Internal Audit Department
Issues229
Findings230
Examination Trends
[The relationship among progress, plans, issues and findings should be viewed as an internal control review cycle which involves the following step-by-step
activities:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Note: MWC Internal Audit Activity for the given year has been performed in accordance with the Provisions of the International Standards on the
Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (ISPPIA).
(f)
Implementation
229
230
Issues are compliance matters that arise from adopting different interpretations.
Findings are those with concrete basis under the companys policies and rules.
116
(g)
Auditors
Financial Analysts
Investment Banks
Rating Agencies
(Internal and External)
Mechanisms under the Internal Audit
Charter and the Audit and Governance
Committee Charter
Mechanisms under the Revised Code Mechanisms under the Revised Code Mechanisms under the Revised Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
of Business Conduct and Ethics.
of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Mechanisms under the Revised Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
Refer to discussions below.
Refer to discussions below.
Refer to discussions below.
Refer to discussions below.
The Internal Audit Charter provides for the mechanisms to ensure independence of the auditors. In particular, it provides that:
RESPONSIBILITIES of Internal Audit Activity
The internal audit activity will govern itself by adherence to the Institute of Internal Auditors mandatory guidance including the Definition of Internal Auditing,
the Code of Ethics, and the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards). This mandatory guidance constitutes principles
of the fundamental requirements for the professional practice of internal auditing and for evaluating the effectiveness of the internal audit activitys
performance.
1. General
Review the effectiveness by which risks that may threaten the achievement of organizational and financial reporting objectives are identified and
managed.
Review the reliability and integrity of the financial reporting process and operating information and the business process used to identify, measure,
classify and report such information.
Review the adequacy of the system of internal controls, planned and in use, to safeguard the Companys assets and operations.
117
Review the effectiveness of management controls meant to ensure the economic and efficient utilization of resources and achieve the Companys
corporate vision and objectives.
Review the adequacy, existence and degree of adherence to Company policies, procedures and sound business practices.
Report the result of audit reviews and other activities in a manner that helps management address the identified risk issues/ concerns and take
appropriate action within a reasonable period of time.
Appraise the adequacy of action taken by management in response to reported risk issues, control weaknesses and opportunities for improvement.
Under the Audit and Governance Committee Charter, the Audit and Governance Committee also evaluates and determines the non-audit work, if any, of the
external auditor, and reviews periodically the non-audit fees paid to the external auditor in relation to their significance to the total annual income of the
external auditor and to the Companys overall consultancy expenses. The Committee shall disallow any non-audit work that will conflict with his duties as an
external auditor or may pose a threat to his independence.
The Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also provides for the mechanisms that can ensure the independence of the Financial Analysts, Investment
Banks and Rating Agencies.
The Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics provides that:
Honesty and Fair Dealing
d. The core principle of the Corporation is to conduct business honestly and fairly with its investors, suppliers, contractors, service providers, customers and
employees and other third parties.
e. Directors, Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and in comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and protect the name and
reputation of the Corporation.
f.
Directors, Officers and employees shall not engage in any unfair dealing practices, such as taking advantage of anyone through abuse of confidential
information, manipulation, concealment, or misrepresentation or other similar acts.
g. Officers and employees involved in the procurement process for services, materials, supplies, and equipment shall strictly comply with the Corporations
Procurement Policy. The Procurement Policy is an integral part of this Code.
h. Directors, Officers and employees are required to immediately report all suspected or actual fraudulent or dishonest acts to the Board, in case of directors,
and to the immediate supervisor or to the Office of the Compliance Officer in case of officers and employees. The Corporation shall promptly identify and
118
investigate any suspected fraudulent or dishonest acts. Without prejudice to applicable administrative sanctions, the Corporation may pursue civil and/or
criminal actions against directors, officers and employees as may be warranted.
Conflict of Interest
a. A conflict of interest arises when a Director, or an Officer or employee appears to have a direct or indirect personal or financial interest in any transaction,
which may deter or influence him from acting in the best interest of the Corporation. It is not required that there be an actual conflict, it is only required
that there could be perceived or seen to be a conflict by an impartial observer.
b. When an actual or apparent conflict of interest arises, a Director must inform the Board, and the Officer or employee must immediately inform his
immediate supervisor or the Compliance Officer. Such Director, Officer or employee should not participate in, or in any way seek to influence, any
negotiations, or decisions pertaining to the transaction, which is the subject of interest.
c. The Director, Officer or employee must also file a Conflict of Interest Report with the Board in case of a director or to the immediate supervisor and the
Office of the Compliance Officer in case of an officer or employee. The report shall indicate a brief description of the conflict, the date when the Board, or
immediate supervisor and the Office of the Compliance Officer were notified, and the action taken on the conflict.
d. No Officer or employee may have financial interest in a privately owned enterprise, which directly or indirectly deals or transacts business with the
Corporation.
A Director shall not use his position to make profit or to acquire benefit or advantage for himself and/or his related interests.
e. No Director, Officer or employee may use his position in the Corporation for personal gain or advantage or to promote any action that may run counter to
the Corporations ethical standards.
f.
No Director, Officer or employee shall use the Corporations facilities, materials, intellectual properties, vehicles, equipment and supplies for his or another
partys personal purpose.
b. Within five (5) business days from receipt of corporate entertainment and gifts, directors, officers and employees are required to submit a report to the
Board, in case of directors, or to their immediate supervisor and the Office of the Compliance Officer, in case of officers and employees. The report shall
identify the giver, date of receipt, and type and approximate value of the corporate entertainment/gifts received.
Insider Trading
a. Directors, Officers and employees who have a direct or indirect knowledge, from time to time, of material facts or changes in the affairs of the Corporation,
which have not been disclosed to the public, including any information likely to affect the market price of the Corporations shares, are restricted to buy or
sell Manila Water shares during the following period:
b. Ten (10) calendar trading days before and three (3) calendar trading days after the disclosure of quarterly and annual financial results; and
c. Three (3) calendar trading days before and three (3) calendar trading days after the disclosure of any material information other than the above.
d. All Directors, Officers, and employees are required to report their trades on a quarterly basis to the Office of the Compliance Officer within fifteen (15)
calendar days from the end of each quarter.
e. Directors and Officers who may be covered by the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Philippine Stock
Exchange (PSE) in respect of their shareholding in the Corporation or any changes thereof shall do so promptly and accurately. Notwithstanding anything to
the contrary, the directors shall report their dealings in Corporation shares one (1) business day before the dealing and within three (3) business days after
the dealing.
Disclosure
a. The Corporation hereby adopts a policy of prompt and adequate disclosure of all material facts or changes in the affairs of the Corporation including any
information likely to affect the market price of the Corporations shares.
b. The Corporation shall ensure transparency of information to its shareholders, stakeholders and the public. It shall regularly and truthfully update its
shareholders, stakeholders and the public on its financial and operational results, business prospects and all other relevant information.
c. The Corporation shall fully comply with all the disclosure and reporting requirements of the SEC, PSE and all other government and regulatory agencies.
d. Directors, Officers and employees shall not knowingly misrepresent or cause others to misrepresent information relating to the Corporation to government
and regulatory agencies, independent auditors, the media or any other person.
120
e. No Director, Officer or employee shall disclose any confidential information obtained from the Corporation for personal gain or for the advantage of any
other person. This prohibition shall include investment in securities and association with a competitor, customer or supplier of the Corporation.
Creditor Rights
a. The Corporation values its partnership with its creditors. The Corporation shall at all times, strictly comply with its covenants under its agreements with its
creditors.
b. No distribution or disposal of assets of the Corporation shall be made except:
Anti-Corruption
The Corporation strictly prohibits giving facilitating payments to any private or government officials or employees, their agents or intermediaries in order to
expedite or secure performance of any governmental action, or to gain any perceived or actual favor or advantage from any private or government entities. The
Corporation must ensure that it and its directors, officers and employees fully comply with the laws governing bribes, unlawful payments and other corrupt
practices.
(h)
State the officers (preferably the Chairman and the CEO) who will have to attest to the companys full compliance with the SEC Code of Corporate
Governance. Such confirmation must state that all directors, officers and employees of the company have been given proper instruction on their
respective duties as mandated by the Code and that internal mechanisms are in place to ensure that compliance.
In its Annual Reports (glossy and SEC Form 17A), the Company affirms its full compliance with the SEC Code of Corporate Governance.
Moreover, in a Certification dated January 30, 2016, Mr. Luis Juan B. Oreta, the Compliance Officer, and Mr.Gerardo C. Ablaza, Jr., President and CEO of the
Company, affirmed the Companys full compliance with the Manual of Corporate Governance pursuant to Article V, Section 3 of the Manual of Corporate
Governance.
H.
ROLE OF STAKEHOLDERS
1)
Policy
Activities
Excellent customer service
Strong partnership with
Customers
24/7 water supply
Environmental protection initiatives
Customers' welfare
The core principle of the Company is to conduct business Water quality compliance with the PNSDW
honestly and fairly with its investors, suppliers, contractors,
service providers, customers and employees.
Sustainability programs that
affect the triple bottom line
Making clean water accessible
to urban poor communities
Enabling better health and
sanitation / improving general
welfare of communities
Community programs
Supplier/contractor
selection practice
All suppliers and contractors are expected to comply strictly with the
The core principle of the Company is to conduct business Companys Vendor Management Policies and Standard Contracting
honestly and fairly with its investors, suppliers, contractors, Procedures and adhere to the Manila Water Vendors Code of
service providers, customers and employees.
Conduct, which requires all accredited vendors to conduct their
business with utmost integrity and professionalism and in full
Officers and employees shall act honestly, ethically and in compliance with Philippine tax laws, statutory fund laws, and the
compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and Philippine Labor Code. The Company also studies the results of their
to protect the good name and reputation of the Company.
commercial evaluations, which it contracts from a third party, as part
of its due diligence to further mitigate risks of violations of labor laws
and human rights. Moreover, Manila Water conducts regular
performance evaluation according to the guidelines of its Service
122
Safety policy
Sustainability policy
Environmental protection initiatives
Greening the Supply Chain
Fair treatment of vendors
Payment method
Community interaction
Anti-corruption
programmes and
procedures
2)
Does the company have a separate corporate responsibility (CR) report/section or sustainability report/section?
Yes. Manila Water published its first Sustainability Report in 2005. Manila Water prides itself as the first Philippine company to adopt sustainability
reporting.
For the years 2005 up to 2012, Manila Water has published its Sustainability Report. Manila Water has published its 2013-2014 Sustainability Report, a
biennial report in accordance to the latest Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines G4- Core option. Published Sustainability Reports can be downloaded from
124
the Manila Water website. In addition, the Annual Reports (glossy and SEC Form 17A) and the Definitive Information Statement of Manila Water issued every
year and its website contain a section on Sustainability.
3)
(a)
What are the companys policy for its employees safety, health, and welfare?
An orientation towards healthy and safe practices at work is ingrained in the culture of Manila Water.
Manila Water is committed to achieving customer satisfaction, upholding environmental sustainability and ensuring safety, preservation of life and health of
its employees and all stakeholders. To achieve these objectives, it is the policy of Manila Water to:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
(b)
Continuously assess, implement and improve its processes and the way it conducts its business by adopting best practices and keeping abreast with
the latest innovations to ensure reliability and efficiency of its operations;
Ensure full compliance with relevant laws and standards in pollution prevention and environmental sustainability, safety and health protection, as
well as applicable regulatory standards and customer requirements related to the quality of its products and services;
Build a strong culture committed to customer satisfaction, environmental protection, health and safety through education, training and awareness
at all levels of the organization that will empower its employees, contractors, suppliers and stakeholders;
Actively promote the conservation and optimal use of precious resources by constantly creating and improving existing programs aimed at pollution
prevention, waste minimization, resource conservation and environmental sustainability;
Systematically manage and control its health and safety risks through effective risk assessment processes; and
Regularly revisit, improve, develop and maintain its Quality, Environment, Health and Safety management system to ensure its effectiveness and
relevance to the changing needs of the company to drive continuous improvement in operations, quality, environmental, health and safety
performances.
Training programs held last year were on safety topics such as Behavioral Based Safety Training (employees and contractors), First Aid and Basic Life Support,
Safe Operation of Overhead Cranes, Electrical Safety, Safe Systems of Work, Fire Safety, Chemical Safety and Spill Response. The Company also observes and
complies with the Labor Codes Working Conditions and rest Periods, Hours of Work and Weekly Rest Periods. Employees involved in operations that require
a 24 x 7 work schedule are provided two consecutive rest days per week.
Manila Water has several health and safety committees on relevant Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) issues and practices such as HMO screening, safe
conditions, observance of safe working practices and the use of personal protective equipment. A new brand of safety was also launched which is SAFETY
MANES I CARE. This campaign exemplifies the value we put in the in caring for the safety of our employees and other stakeholders. The workforce is well
represented in these various joint management-worker health and safety committees. Wellness programs were also implemented and these covered a
variety of topics determined to be relevant to and requested by the employees. These are: education and awareness campaigns, in the form of lectures,
wellness bulletins, and emails, on healthy lifestyles to help prevent cardiovascular diseases and the risk of smoking; free vaccinations against flu, pneumonia,
cervical cancer, dog bites; annual physical examination and follow-up counseling on identified illnesses; regular audiometry test (measuring of hearing
capacity) for plant operators and employees exposed to noise; and physical fitness sessions such as aerobics and cardiovascular exercises. Counseling and
training on the prevention, risk control, and treatment of serious and seasonal diseases like dengue were also conducted. These programs are made
available to Manila Water employees, their family members, and the community.
(c)
State the companys training and development programmes for its employees. Show the data.
Manila Water reinforces human capital as the companys competitive advantage by continuing to invest significantly on its talents training and
development. The transition to competency-based training and development at both the individual and the organizational level took off as integrated
support for various forms of learning and for various types of learning environments have been instituted to facilitate in the development of the core,
leadership and technical competencies of Manila Water. Employees were equipped with the knowledge and skills required to perform their current jobs
effectively as well as prepare them for future roles.
In 2015, a total of 41,326 training hours were logged by 1,081 employees who comprise approximately 80 % of the Manila Water workforce across all levels
of the organization. This translates to an average of 32 training hours or 4 training days per employee.
Apart from the launch of the competency-based Management Development Training Program (MDTP) and kick-off of the competency-based Business Zone
Leadership School (BZLS) that continue to help sustain the organizations talent supply, in-house functional trainings such as Stakeholder Relations
Management and Communication, Project Management, Business and Technical Writing, among others, were also provided to employees to help drive their
performance at work.
As Manila Water recognizes that its institutional knowledge also constitutes a valuable intangible asset for creating and sustaining competitive advantage,
capture of the companys technical expertise was also set in motion through the development of a holistic technical curriculum which lays the foundation for
Manila Waters Center for Technical Excellence. Knowledge sharing activities are now supported by the newly established learning platform that is the
126
Manila Water University designed to conduct activities that foster individual and organizational learning and knowledge in support of the companys
business objectives.
(d)
State the companys reward/compensation policy that accounts for the performance of the company beyond short-term financial measures
The Company as a policy, assesses the individual performance of the officers and employees annually. Based on the metrics used, the performance of the
officers and employees are rated and rewarded. Rewards are based on company performance and individual achievements, and target amounts are predetermined prior to the applicable year and depends on market conditions.
4)
What are the companys procedures for handling complaints by employees concerning illegal (including corruption) and unethica l behavior? Explain how
employees are protected from retaliation.
Under the Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Directors, Officers and employees are required to immediately report all suspected or actual
fraudulent or dishonest acts to the Board, in case of directors, and to the immediate supervisor or to the Office of the Compliance Officer in case of officers
and employees. The Corporation shall promptly identify and investigate any suspected fraudulent or dishonest acts. Without prejudice to applicable
administrative sanctions, the Corporation may pursue civil and/or criminal actions against directors, officers and employees as may be warranted.231
Below is the pertinent portion of the guidelines on the Reporting of Fraudulent or Dishonest Acts: 232
3.
Obligation to Report
3.1
All Directors, Officers and employees are required to immediately report all suspected or actual fraudulent or dishonest acts to the Board of
Directors, in case of a Director and to the Line Manager/Immediate Superior and/or the Compliance Officer, in case of Officers and
employees. Such acts may include, but are not limited to, the following:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
231
232
127
3.2
The report should be in writing, properly signed and pertain to a matter relevant to the business of Manila Water. It must contain sufficient
details and include supporting documents as may be available, to enable the Board or the Compliance Officer to properly investigate the
incident reported and take the necessary action. Further, the report must be made in good faith (i.e., the employee or officer reporting has a
reasonable suspicion that a fraudulent or dishonest act has occurred, is occurring or is likely to occur).
3.3
Where the report is made for an ulterior and undesirable purpose (e.g., for blackmail), it will not be considered as having been done in good
faith. Anonymous reports (through letters, email or text messages or any other means) shall not be given due course.
3.4
Upon receipt of a report that complies with the requirements of Section 3.2 with respect to those involving Officers and employees, the
Compliance Officer shall investigate the matter and make a report on the results of the investigation. The Compliance Officer may refer the
matter to the Internal Audit Department for further investigation as may be warranted, in coordination with the appropriate units of the
Corporation (e.g. Legal and Corporate Governance, Corporate Human Resources, the concerned department).
3.5
The person making the report shall be informed of the results of the evaluation/investigation and if warranted, it shall also be reported to the
Audit Committee.
4.
Protection to Reporter
4.1
The Corporation shall protect the reporter from any form of retaliation or discrimination by the concerned person, his co-employees or
superiors. The identity of the person making the report and the contents of the report shall be kept confidential to the extent legally
permissible.
5.
5.1
Prohibited Acts
The following acts are subject to disciplinary action, as provided under the Code, without prejudice to any civil or criminal proceedings that
the Corporation or regulators may file for violation of existing laws:
a.
b.
c.
d.
retaliating or discriminating against Directors, Officers and employees who raise genuine concerns;
reporting a false allegation with malice or bad faith;
failure to report fraudulent or dishonest acts, despite knowledge of the same; and
deliberate cover-up of any fraudulent or dishonest acts.
I.
1)
Ownership Structure
128
(a)
Number of Shares
870,542,896 common shares***
Percent of class
Beneficial Owner
42.38%* Ayala Corporation
7.41%* First State Investment Management (UK) Limited,
Number of Direct
shares
4,126,077 / ESOWN
1,572,727 / ESOWN
1,248,264 / ESOWN
2,242,795 / ESOWN
1,629,800/ ESOWN
513,600 / ESOWN
775,200 / ESOWN
274,100 / ESOWN
12,382,563/ESOWN
% of Capital Stock*
0.20088542%
0.07657100%
0.06077395%
0.10919445%
0.07934971%
0.02500553%
0.03774199%
0.01334504%
0.60286709%
2)
Yes
129
Corporate objectives
Financial performance indicators
Non-financial performance indicators
Dividend policy
Details of whistle-blowing policy
Biographical details (at least age, qualifications, date of first appointment,
relevant experience, and any other directorships of listed companies) of
directors/commissioners
Training and/or continuing education programme attended by each
director/commissioner
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Should the Annual Report not disclose any of the above, please indicate the reason for the non-disclosure.
3)
4)
Audit Fee
PhP2,000,000
Non-audit Fee
PhP82,880
Medium of Communication
List down the mode/s of communication that the company is using for disseminating information.
The Company disseminates information through the following:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
5)
6)
Company Website
Does the company have a website disclosing up-to-date information about the following?
Business operations
Yes
Yes
Yes
Shareholding structure
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Should any of the foregoing information be not disclosed, please indicate the reason thereto.
131
7)
Disclosure of RPT
RPT
Relationship
Nature
as
Value
the Service Agreement for the provision of services in $1,000,000.00 Annual Base
relation to human resources, treasury, accounting, Fee
capital works, corporate services, regulatory affairs and
administrative management of the Company.
This Service Agreement was entered into by the
Company to ensure compliance with its service and
contractual obligations under the Concession Agreement
with the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage
System.
When RPTs are involved, what processes are in place to address them in the manner that will safeguard the interest of the company and in particular of
its minority shareholders and other stakeholders?
The Company shall avoid related party transactions. In instances where related party transactions cannot be avoided, the Company shall disclose all relevant
information on the same, including information on the affiliated parties and the affiliation of directors and principal officers.233
In addition, the Company shall ensure that those related party transactions are arms-length-transaction.
On April 4, 2014, the Board, in its special meeting, approved the Policy on Related Party Transactions (RPT). The Policy on RPT has the following objectives:
a.
b.
c.
d.
233
132
Disclosure Requirements:
5.2
The Corporation must comply with all disclosure requirements of RPT mandated under applicable law, rules and regulations.
5.2
The Related Parties must comply with all the disclosure requirements of RPTs required under applicable law, rules and regulations
of the SEC, PSE and the BIR, and other relevant government agencies.
5.3
Each director, executive officer and members of the Key Management is responsible for providing written notice to the Office of
the Compliance Officer of any potential RPT involving him or her or his or her Immediate Family Member, including any additional
information about the transaction that may reasonably be requested by the Corporation.
The Office of the Compliance Officer, by himself, or in consultation with the Management Committee and with the Chief Legal
Counsel or external counsel, as appropriate, will determine whether the notified transaction does, in fact, constitute a RPT
requiring compliance with this Policy.
Disclosure of a RPT shall include information about the price of the transaction, outstanding balances, if any, major terms and
conditions and guarantees, if any. The Office of the Compliance Officer may require additional and other relevant information
sufficient to enable the Office of the Compliance Officer to determine any Conflict of Interest and the potential effect of the
relationship.
5.5
In addition, each director, executive officer and member of the Key Management may be required to complete a questionnaire
that inquires about their RPTs and those of their Immediate Family Members.
All RPTs shall have terms and conditions that are fair and equitable to the Corporation.
6.6
The approval, award, processing and payment of RPTs shall follow the same procedures as the other transactions and contracts of
the Corporation. No unusual privilege or special treatment shall be afforded a Related Party.
6.7
In case of doubt on the nature of a transaction subject of investigation or review pursuant to this Policy, the Office of the
Compliance Officer, in consultation with the Committee, shall determine whether the transaction or relationship constitutes a
RPT, and whether the same shall be pursued taking into consideration the cost and benefit to the Corporation.
133
6.8
Prior to the award of any Material RPT, the Corporation shall submit the same for the review of the Committee to confirm that it
has undergone the same process as an ordinary transaction and to determine that the Material RPT under review is in the best
interest of the Corporation.
When a Material RPT is submitted to the Committee for review, the presence of at least two (2) independent directors shall be
necessary to constitute a quorum of the Committee.
Non-Material RPTs shall be subject to the review and/or approval of the Compliance Officer.
7.
7.3
7.4
The Compliance Officer, with the assistance of the Chief Legal Counsel, shall prepare a monthly report on RPTs based on the
disclosures and/or reports of RPTs submitted to the Compliance Officer.
The Report shall be submitted to the Accounting Department to be furnished the External Auditor for proper disclosure in the
Financial Statements of the Corporation, if necessary under applicable financial reporting rules and policies.
8.
Prohibited RPTs
134
8.2
Notwithstanding any provision of this Policy to the contrary, the following RPTs shall not be allowed:
a.
b.
9.
Sanctions
9.1
Non-compliance with any provision of this Policy, in particular, the reporting, and disclosure requirements, the guidelines prior to
entering into RPT and the prohibited RPTs, shall result in the invalidation of the Contract involved in the RPT.
9.2
Any officer or employee of the Corporation who has knowledge of any violation of this Policy shall report the same to the Office of
the Compliance Officer.
The Chief Legal Counsel, in coordination with the Office of the Compliance Officer, shall report to the Committee all violations of
this Policy.
9.3
The Committee shall have the authority to recommend to the Board of Directors the invalidation of the Contract.
9.4
This Policy shall be without prejudice to the provisions of the Code, the Manual of Corporate Governance and all related and
relevant policies of the Corporation which shall be observed and shall apply to the fullest extent possible. In particular, RPTs shall
not be allowed if it would present a conflict of interest for any Related Party as defined in the Code.
10
This Policy shall be reviewed from time to time in order to reflect the requirements of applicable law, rules and regulations.
J.
RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS
1)
(a)
Quorum
Give details on the quorum required to convene the Annual/Special Stockholders Meeting as set forth in its By-laws.
135
Attendance in person or by proxy of the Majority of the outstanding voting capital stock of
the Company
Quorum Required
(b)
System Used
By Poll
Unless otherwise provided by law, in all regular or special meeting of stockholders, the affirmative vote of stockholders
constituting at least a majority of the outstanding voting capital stock of the Company shall be necessary to approve matters
requiring stockholders action.234
Description
(c)
Stockholders Rights
List any Stockholders Rights concerning Annual/Special Stockholders Meeting that differ from those laid down in the Corporation Code.
Stockholders Rights under
The Corporation Code
Pre-emptive rights
Dividends
Declaration Date
February 20, 2014*
234
235
Record Date
March 6, 2014
Payment Date
March 21, 2014
136
October 7, 2014*
November 5, 2014
December 1, 2014
March 6, 2015
September 9, 2015
Stockholders Participation
1)
State, if any, the measures adopted to promote stockholder participation in the Annual/Special Stockholders Meeting, including the procedure on how
stockholders and other parties interested may communicate directly with the Chairman of the Board, individual directors or board committees. Include
in the discussion the steps the Board has taken to solicit and understand the views of the stockholders as well as procedures for putting forward
proposals at stockholders meetings.
Measures Adopted
2)
Communication Procedure
Stockholders are given opportunity to ask questions and seek clarification regarding the agenda item
A question and answer portion is allotted during every stockholders meeting to allow stockholders
to ask questions regarding matters that concern them as stockholders of the Company.
State the company policy of asking shareholders to actively participate in corporate decisions regarding:
(a)
(b)
236
137
This is subject to approval by stockholders owning or representing at least 2/3 of the outstanding voting capital stock of the Company.237
(c)
Transfer of all or substantially all assets, which in effect results in the sale of the company
This is subject to approval by stockholders owning or representing at least 2/3 of the outstanding voting capital stock of the Company.238
3)
Does the company observe a minimum of 21 business days for giving out of notices to the AGM where items to be resolved by sh areholders are taken
up?
Yes. For purposes of the 2016 Annual Stockholders Meeting held on April 11, 2016, the Company:
a. Sent on March 2, 2016 via registered mail copies of the Notice and Agenda of ASM to the stockholders of record as of February 19, 2016;
b. Published on March 12 and 13, 2016, respectively, in the Philippine Daily Inquirer and Philippine Star, the Notice and Agenda of ASM;
c. Sent the Definitive Information Statement starting March 9, 2016 via electronic mail, and thereafter, via registered mail in compact disc and hard copy
formats
This is because the Company is required to comply with Section 7 of the Revised PSE Disclosure Rules which provides that:
For the holding of any stockholders meeting, the Philippine Stock Exchange must be given a written notice thereof at least ten (10) trading days prior to the
record date fixed by the Issuer. The notice must include all the necessary details including the time, venue and agenda of the meeting and the inclusive dates
when the stock and transfer books will be closed. The Issuer shall further submit within five (5) trading days after the record date the list of stockholders who
are entitled to notice and to vote at a regular or special stockholders meeting.
The disclosure to the PSE also serves as the initial notice of the meeting to the stockholders. Thereafter, the stockholders will still be furnished with the
Definitive Information Statement at least fifteen (15) working days prior to the meeting.
a.
237
238
Ibid.
Corporation Code, Section 40.
138
b. Published on March 12 and 13, 2016, respectively, in the Philippine Daily Inquirer and Philippine Star, the Notice and Agenda of ASM;
c. Sent the Definitive Information Statement starting March 9, 2016 via electronic mail, and thereafter, via registered mail in compact disc and hard
copy formats
For the 2015 ASM held on April 7, 2015, the notice and agenda of ASM was disclosed to the PSE on February 2, 2015. The notice and agenda of
meeting was also sent out to stockholders via electronic mail by March13, 2015.
b.
4)
State, if any, questions and answers during the Annual/Special Stockholders Meeting.
The Questions and Answers during the April 11, 2016 ASM are as follows:
Stockholder:
Query:
Response:
Stephen G. Soliven
Are there legal cases filed against Manila Mr. Gerardo C. Ablaza, Jr., the President and CEO, responded that there are
Water?
a number of legal suits involving Manila Water but the most significant of
which are the cases now pending with the Supreme Court and filed against
Manila Water, together with Maynilad Water Services, Inc. (Maynilad)
and the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS), which
cases raise the following similar issues, among others:
a. a challenge to the validity of the concession agreement with the MWSS;
b. whether Manila Water and Maynilad, as concessionaires of the MWSS,
are public utilities; and
c. whether Manila Water and Maynilad, as concessionaires of MWSS, are
eligible to recover their corporate income taxes
As regards the other cases, the President mentioned that they are being
attended to, and do not pose significant risks to the Company at this time.
139
Note: In the Definitive Information Statement of the Company for its 2016
Annual Stockholders Meeting, the Company listed some of the most
relevant and important legal proceedings involving the Company.
Jose Leonardo
Mr. Ablaza directly responded to the second question of Mr. Lorenzo, and
he said that the Company actually initiated a project for a treatment plant
that will extract water from Laguna Lake to produce 15 million liters per day
(MLD) of treated water. This treatment plant is expandable to 100 mld and
is one of the ways the Company will provide for and ensure water supply
reliability because 97% of Metro Manilas water source is the Angat Dam.
Mr. Ablaza responded that the water supply for the project is obtained by
the Luyang River in the town of Carmen, which is around 35 kilometers
from the city of Cebu. A 35 km pipeline had to be constructed to convey
140
Considering that there is El Nino, will the water from the Luyang River.
Company ration water to its customers?
He added that there are other potential sources of surface water that are
being explored for the project. Mr. Ablaza acknowledged that ground water
source is seriously depleted in Cebu.
On the second query, Mr. Ablaza said that around the third quarter of 2015,
the Company was worried that there might not be enough water supply
due to the El Nino phenomenon. However, the tropical depression Lando
brought with it sufficient water which filled the Angat Dam. Towards the
end of the year, the Angat Dam level was above spilling level, for which
reason the Company does not foresee any water shortage problem during
the current year.
Esperanza S. Lopez
Which concessionaire of MWSS (Manila Mr. Ablaza responded that the tariffs in the East Zone concession (operated
Water and Maynilad) charges higher tariffs?
by Manila Water) and in the West Zone (operated by Maynilad) are not the
same. The tariff being charged by Manila Water in the East Zone is cheaper
by 20% than the tariff being charged by Maynilad in the West Zone. The
reason for this is that each concessionaire has a different set of programs of
operating and capital expenditures and the tariff is determined according
to the value of the approved expenditure plan of the concessionaire.
The Questions and Answers during the April 7, 2015 ASM are as follows:
Stockholder:
Query:
Response:
Carmencita C. Santos
The Chairman said that the Company has several banking relationships
both in the domestic and international scene. He added that the Board also
has independent directors who take part in the decision process relating to
the banking transactions and relationships of the Company.
Mr. Ablaza said that the Company has counterparty limits with all banking
relationships of the Company and each of the counterparty limits is
141
Carmencita C. Santos
Ms. Santos inquired how long has the Director Oscar S. Reyes responded that the Company has not replaced SGV
Company engaged SGV and Company as for a long time. He explained further SGV has satisfactorily performed its
external auditor.
task as independent director of Manila Water. However, as an internal
control, the Partner assigned to the Company is rotated every five (5)
years239. SGV is also subjected to annual performance review and
evaluation before the management of the Company recommends further
engagement of its service to the Audit and Governance Committee, which
is composed mainly of independent directors.
The Questions and Answers during the April 4, 2014 ASM are as follows:
Stockholder:
Query:
Pacifico Pacu
What is the reason for the failure of the The Chairman responded that the Company went through a bidding and
investment in Palyja in Jakarta, Indonesia?
negotiation process with the private party who owned the concession in
Jakarta. Mr. Ablaza confirmed that all of the elements of the sale had been
completed. In fact, a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) had been executed.
However, the SPA included as a condition precedent the grant of consent of
the government of Jakarta through the governor of Jakarta, in compliance
with the requirement of the concession agreement of Palyja. The governor
of Jakarta eventually decided to withhold the consent to the transaction
239
Response:
Rotation of signing partner is based on SRC Rule No. 68 as amended (in 2011) per Provision No. 3 B(ix) under the Qualification and Report of Independent Auditors which states that:
ix)
The independent auditors or in the case of an audit firm, the signing partner, of the aforementioned regulated entities shall be rotated after every five (5) years of engagement. A two-year
cooling off period shall be observed in the re-engagement of the same signing partner or individual auditor.
142
and the explanation that the management obtained was that the governor
was considering a governmentlinked corporation to be the owner of the
51% stake.
Alfred Reiterer
Alfred Reiterer
The Chairman said that the Company will continue to look for opportunities
in Indonesia because of the very good investment prospects therein. Mr.
Ablaza also mentioned his observation of the Indonesian political
regulatory environment, in particular, that the local governments in
Indonesia are very strong and independent units. When it comes to
infrastructure, particularly, water infrastructure projects, the governors and
the mayors appear to have significant control than the national
government. Hence, the assumption is that all the intended projects of the
Company in Indonesia would have to be pursued at the local level, rather
than at the national level.
What is the aim of the Company in relation Mr. Ablaza said that the ASEAN integration may have more advantage in
to the ASEAN integration in 2015?
terms of trade rather than in the areas of infrastructure investment. In any
case, the Company has made a strategic commitment to expansion in the
emerging markets, in particular, Vietnam, Indonesia, Myanmar and the
Philippines (VIMP).
Jose Leonardo
How does the Company plan to increase the Mr. Ablaza replied that part of the business plan that the Company has
supply of water in its service areas?
submitted under the RR13 submission is a plan for new water sources. In
particular, the Company is considering the areas of Kaliwa, Tayabasan, and
Kanan as potential sources of new water for Metro Manila. There was also
a plan to develop a small project to draw 50 to 100 mld of water from
Laguna Lake which is within the ability of the lake to provide. Mr. Ablaza
said that there is a very well-planned sequence of new water source
development programs but these are now under discussion with the MWSS
under the RR 2013.
Jose Leonardo
How does the Company plan to address the Mr. Ablaza said that the clearing of siltation in the Laguna Lake is beyond
siltation in Laguna Lake?
the ability of the Company to undertake and it is in fact a subject of a
national government project. In connection with the intended new water
source project of the Company, the Company understands that it may have
to use technology to clean and treat the water.
143
Stephen Soliven
What is the nature of the following items in Ms. Marilou P. Bago, the Head of the Accounting Department of Manila
the financial statements of the Company:
Water, addressed the query of Mr. Soliven. She said that the item on the
concession financial receivables pertains to the investment in the Province
1. Concession financial receivables;
of Cebu. Under the Water Purchase Agreement between the water district
2. Schedule of payments;
and the Cebu Manila Water Development, Inc., the subsidiary of the
3. Increase in related party transactions Company, there is an arrangement whereby CMWD is entitled to be paid a
minimum fixed amount for the guaranteed supply of bulk water. Under
IFRIC 12 financial asset model, this fixed income is required to be
recognized as a receivable. On the schedule of payments, Ms. Bago
explained that the Company has assumed the dollar denominated loans of
the MWSS and these loans are booked as an obligation to pay of the
Company. Finally, on the increase of RPT, Ms. Bago explain that the
increase pertains to the acquisition of the water system of the Laguna
Technopark, Inc. Laguna Water, the subsidiary of Manila Water, initially
paid 35% of the purchase price and undertook to pay the remainder within
the year.
Stephen Soliven
The Chairman responded that the budget has been done and approved by
the Board several months ago in anticipation of year 2014.
Rommel Sangco
Mr. Ablaza stated that the Company will always be committed to fulfil its
service obligations that span the rest of the concessions life up to 2037.
Therefore, the Company will definitely undertake the capital expenditures
and operating expenditures necessary to fulfil those obligations.
Nevertheless, the management would like to see an increasing
diversification of the overall groups investment portfolio, because from a
growth point of view, Metro Manila is reaching its maturity stage and for
the Company to pursue its expansion plans, it must continue to look for
other markets and opportunities.
Rommel Sangco
What is the effect on the revenues of the Mr. Ablaza said that he preferred providing the details at the conclusion of
water rate adjustment should the Company the arbitration proceeding. Nevertheless, he said that should the Company
lose or win the arbitration with the MWSS?
prevail in the arbitration, then its financial projections will remain very
healthy over the next five years. If it loses, then the Company will have to
144
5)
How much environmental fees are being Mr. Oreta replied that in the audited FS of the Company, the amount of
paid by the customers of Manila Water and environmental charges paid by the customers in 2013 amounted to
how do these compared to that of Maynilad? approximately P2.2 billion. As a percentage of the bill, the customers paid
about 20% of the basic water tariff as environmental charges. With regard
to the environmental charges of Maynilad, Mr. Oreta said that the amount
of environmental fee is the same in terms of the percentage of the basic
water tariff. However, Maynilad charges a basic water tariff which is about
20% more than the basic water tariff being charged by Maynilad.
For
Against
Abstain
5,523,090,519
(91.23%)
0
(0.00%)
26,900
(0.00%)
5,515,418,619
(91.10%)
0
(0.00%)
7,698,800
(0.13%)
5,516,816,518
(91.23%)
0
(0.00%)
6,300,900
(0.10%)
Nominees
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
For**
5,444,244,814
Number of Votes
and Percentage of Outstanding and Voting Stock
%
Against*
%
89.93%
77,024,541
1.27%
Abstain*
%
0
0.00%
145
5,446,754,764
89.97
68,270,441
1.13%
6,270,000
0.10%
5,506,192,805
90.95%
15,076,400
0.25%
0.00%
5,492,341,505
90.72%
28,927,700
0.48%
0.00%
90.64%
33,920,300
0.56%
0.00%
90.72%
28,927,700
0.48%
0.00%
89.79%
85,192,341
1.41%
0.00%
5,487,348,905
5,492,341,505
5,436,076,864
Jaime C. Laya
(Independent)
5,474,294,755
90.43%
40,704,450
0.67%
6,270,000
0.10%
5,501,487,605
90.87%
19,781,600
0.33%
0.00%
Oscar S. Reyes
(Independent)
5,457,971,664
90.16%
63,297,541
1.05%
0.00%
Sherisa P. Nuesa
(Independent)
5,483,795,514
90.58%
37,473,691
0.62%
0.00%
146
For
Against
Abstain
5,514,829,696
91.10%
0
0.00%
5,000
0.00%
5,462,906,131
90.00%
23,186,681
0.38%
29,843,584
0.49%
5,514,821,996
91.10%
0
0.00%
1,114,400
0.02%
5,494,600,844
90.76%
15,058,500
0.25%
6,277,000
0.10%
Nominees
For**
Number of Votes
and Percentage of Outstanding and Voting Stock
%
Against*
%
Abstain*
5,429,901,366
89.69%
85,958,265
1.42%
5,000
0.00%
5,419,829,815
89.53%
79,688,265
1.32%
16,346,451
0.27%
5,486,758,173
90.63%
29,097,191
0.48%
5,000
0.00%
Antonino T. Aquino
5,472,928,313
90.40%
32,855,800
0.54%
10,076,451
0.17%
147
Delfin L. Lazaro
5,472,928,413
90.40%
32,855,800
0.54%
10,076,451
0.17%
5,472,928,013
90.40%
32,855,800
0.54
10,076,451
0.17%
Victoria P. Garchitorena
5,419,957,315
89.53%
85,830,365
1.42%
10,076,451
0.17%
Jaime C. Laya
(Independent)
5,505,962,211
90.95%
9,896,900
0.16%
5,000
0.00%
5,503,097,831
90.90%
1,451,300
0.02%
11,315,000
0.19%
Oscar S. Reyes
(Independent)
5,444,964,005
89.94%
60,823,765
1.00%
10,076,451
0.17%
Sherisa P. Nuesa
(Independent)
5,503,102,503
90.90%
7,721,300
0.13%
5,036,451
0.08%
For
5,270,976,635
(87.16%)
Against
0
(0.00%)
Abstain
200
(0.00%)
148
5,270,951,235
(87.16%)
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
5,270,975,935
(87.16%)
1,000
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
5,270,956,935
(87.16%)
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
5,264,686,835
(87.06%)
0
(0.00%)
6,270,000
(0.10%)
For**
Against*
Abstain*
5,228,165,594
86.45%
35,755,091
0.68%
6,270,000
0.12%
5,227,341,940
86.44%
36,621,455
0.69%
6,270,000
0.12%
5,231,497,545
86.51%
44,546,340
0.84%
0%
Antonino T. Aquino
5,226,683,245
86.43%
34,881,200
0.66%
8,873,440
0.17%
Delfin L. Lazaro
5,234,459,994
86.56%
34,881,200
0.66%
0%
149
5,235,243,285
86.57%
35,607,791
0.68%
0%
Victoria P. Garchitorena
5,235,186,685
86.57%
34,881,200
0.66%
0%
Jaime C. Laya
(Independent)
5,263,817,885
87.04%
6,270,000
0.12%
0%
5,263,847,835
87.04%
42,025,091
0.80%
0%
Oscar S. Reyes
(Independent)
5,228,040,294
86.45%
0%
6,270,000
0.12%
Sherisa P. Nuesa
(Independent)
5,263,967,785
87.04%
6,270,700
012%
0%
6)
Date of publishing of the result of the votes taken during the most recent ASM for all resolutions:
The results of the 2016 ASM was disclosed to the PSE immediately after the ASM. In addition, the results of voting in the 2016 ASM was published on the
website of the Company immediately on the next day.
The results of the 2015 ASM was disclosed to the PSE immediately after the ASM. In addition, the results of voting in the ASM was published on the website
of the Company on the next day.
150
(e)
Modifications
State, if any, the modifications made in the Annual/Special Stockholders Meeting regulations during the most recent year and the reason for such
modification:
The following modifications were applied to the proceedings of the ASM starting April 15, 2013:
Modifications
In addition to the modifications applied for the ASM conducted for 2013, the following mechanism was applied to the proceedings of the ASM conducted
last April 4, 2014, April 7, 2015, and April 11, 2016:
Modifications
Electronic Voting
(f)
Stockholders Attendance
(i)
present
The senior management of the Company The senior management of the Company The senior management of the Company
were also all in attendance.
were also all in attendance.
were also all in attendance.
Date of Meeting
April 4, 2014
April 7, 2015
Voting Procedures (by By Poll (electronic and manual voting By Poll (electronic and manual voting By Poll (electronic and manual voting
poll, show of hands, through the use of ballots and computers)
through the use of ballots and computers)
through the use of ballots and computers)
etc.)
152
8.85%
9.39%
0.19%
Percentage
of 91.15%
Shareholders in Proxy
90.61%
91.04%
Total Percentage
Shareholders
Attendance
91.11%
91.23%
Percentage
of
Shareholders Attending
in Person
of 87.22%
in
No special meeting for the stockholders was held in 2013, 2014 and 2015.
(ii)
Does the company appoint an independent party (inspectors) to count and/or validate the votes at the ASM/SSMs?
For the 2016 ASM, the Company appointed the firm of Sycip Gorres Velayo and Company to validate the votes at the 2016 ASM. The counting and
validating of votes were primarily performed by the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies, in coordination with the Office of the Corporate
Secretary.
For the 2015 ASM, the Company appointed the firm of Sycip Gorres Velayo and Company to validate the votes at the 2015 ASM. The counting and
validating of votes were primarily performed by the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies, in coordination with the Office of the Corporate
Secretary.
(iii)
Do the companys common shares carry one vote for one share? If not, disclose and give reasons for any divergence to this standard. Where the
company has more than one class of shares, describe the voting rights attached to each class of shares.
All shares of the Company, regardless of class, have the same voting rights.240
240
153
(g)
Notary
Submission of Proxy
Duly accomplished proxies must be submitted to the Office of the Corporate Secretary not later
than seven (7) working days prior to the date of the stockholders meeting.242
No need for notarization of proxy.
Duly accomplished proxies must be submitted to the Office of the Corporate Secretary not later
than seven (7) working days prior to the date of the stockholders meeting.243
Stockholders may authorized such number of proxies to represent them in the stockholders
meeting.
Several Proxies
Validity of Proxy
In case of shares of stock owned jointly by two or more persons, in order to vote the same, the
consent of all the co-owners shall be necessary, unless there is a written proxy, signed by all the coowners authorizing one or some of them or any other person to vote such shares: Provided that
when the shares are owned in an and/or capacity by the holders thereof, any one of the joint
owners can vote said shares or appoint a proxy therefor.244
Generally, a proxy is valid for five (5) years, unless, the proxy specifically states that it is valid only
for the meeting for which it is intended.245
Any doubt on the validity of the Proxy shall be resolved in the stockholders favor. 246
241
Corporation Code, Section 58; Charter of the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies
By Laws, Article II, Section 7; Charter of the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies
243 By Laws, Article II, Section 7; Charter of the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies
244 Corporation Code, Section 56; Charter of the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies
245 Corporation Code, Section 58; Charter of the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies
246 Manual of Corporate Governance, Article IX, page 42; Charter of the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies
242
154
Invalidated Proxy
Validation of the proxies shall be conducted by the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies
at least five (5) days prior to the date of the stockholders meeting.248
Validation of Proxy
Any doubt on the Validity of the Proxy shall be resolved in the stockholders favor. 249
Violation of Proxy
(h)
Sending of Notices
State the companys policies and procedure on the sending of notices of Annual/Special Stockholders Meeting.
Policies
Procedure
Under the Revised PSE Disclosure Rules:
For the holding of any stockholders meeting, the Philippine Stock Exchange must be given
a written notice thereof at least ten (10) trading days prior to the record date fixed by the
Issuer. The notice must include all the necessary details including the time, venue and
agenda of the meeting and the inclusive dates when the stock and transfer books will be
closed. The Issuer shall further submit within five (5) trading days after the record date the
list of stockholders who are entitled to notice and to vote at a regular or special
stockholders meeting.250
Under the By Laws:
Notices for regular or special meetings of stockholders may be sent by the Secretary by
personal delivery, postal or electronic mail, telegraph, or cable at least fifteen (15) working
days prior to the date of the meeting to each stockholder of record at his address as it
247
Manual of Corporate Governance, Article IX, page 42; Charter of the Committee of Inspector of Ballots and Proxies
Amended By Laws, Article II, Section 7; Charter of the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies
249 Manual of Corporate Governance, Article IX, page 42; Charter of the Committee of Inspector of Ballots and Proxies
250 PSE Revised Disclosure Rules, Section 7.
248
155
251
252
253
156
1,200
March 9, 2016
March 9, 2016
CD format and hardcopies were given to the stockholders.
254
Soft copy of the DIS were also mailed electronically to stockholders who
indicated their electronic mail addresses.
157
1,260
March 17, 2015
March 17, 2015
CD format and hardcopies were given to the stockholders.
Soft copy of the DIS were also mailed electronically to stockholders who
indicated their electronic mail addresses.
YES
YES
YES
during stockholders
meeting
Should any of the foregoing information be not disclosed, please indicate the reason thereto.
The dividend policy was included in the Definitive Information but the amount payable for final dividends are not included in the notice of stockholders
meeting because the declaration of cash dividends is not required to be approved by the stockholders as these are matters only for board approval.
Nevertheless, declaration of cash dividends by the Board of Directors are disclosed pursuant to the disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the Philippine Stock Exchange.
2)
(a)
State the companys policies with respect to the treatment of minority stockholders.
Policies
Right to Information
Implementation
In accordance with existing law and jurisprudence, minority shareholders shall have access to any and
all information relating to matters for which the management is accountable for and to those relating
to matters for which the management should include such information, and if not included, then the
minority shareholders can propose to include such matters in the agenda of stockholders meeting
provided always that this right of access is conditioned upon the requesting shareholders having a
legitimate purpose for such access.255
It is the duty of the directors to promote shareholders rights, remove impediments to the exercise of
159
shareholders rights and provide effective redress for violation of their rights. They shall encourage the
exercise of shareholders voting rights and the solution of collective action problems through
appropriate mechanisms. They shall be instrumental in removing excessive costs and other
administrative or practical impediments to shareholders participating in meetings and/or voting in
person. The directors shall pave the way for the electronic filing and distribution of shareholder
information necessary to make informed decisions subject to legal constraints.
The Board should be transparent and fair in the conduct of the annual and special stockholders
meetings of the Company. The stockholders should be encouraged to personally attend such meetings.
If they cannot attend, they should be apprised ahead of time of their right to appoint a proxy. Subject to
the requirements of the By-laws, the exercise of that right shall not be unduly restricted and any
reasonable doubt about the validity of a proxy should be resolved in the stockholders favor.
Although all stockholders should be treated equally or without discrimination, the Board should give
minority stockholders the right to propose the holding of a meeting and the right to propose items in
the agenda of the meeting that relate directly to legitimate business purposes, all in accordance with
the By-laws.256
Cumulative voting shall be used in the election of directors. Directors may be removed with or without
cause, but directors shall not be removed without cause if it will deny minority shareholders
representation in the Board.257
Voting Right/Removal of directors
All shares of the Company, regardless of class, have the same voting rights.258
Each share of stock is entitled to one vote.
(b)
256
257
Manual of Corporate Governance, Article IX, page 40; Corporation Code of the Philippines, Section 28.
258
160
Every stockholder has a right to submit a nomination for election to the Board. All nominations to the Board, whether for first time nominees or repeat
nominees, or for independent directors, shall be submitted to the Nomination Committee at least thirty (30) working days before the date of the annual
stockholders meeting. The stockholders, in making their nominations, or the Company, may make use of professional search firms or external sources of
candidates when searching for candidates to the Board. For this years election of directors, the last day of nomination was on February 24, 2016.
There is nothing in the constitutional documents of the Company that prohibit an individual stockholder to nominate candidates to the board of directors. In
fact, the Independent Directors of the Company have always been nominated by individual shareholders of the Company. Mr. Jaime C. Laya was nominated
as independent director by Loida S. Dio, Mr. Jose L. Cuisia, Jr. by Dave Michael V. Valeriano, Mr. Oscar S. Reyes by Jennifer S. Gutierrez, and Ms. Sherisa P.
Nuesa by Mary Lorraine Ibasco-Gomez. Ms. Dio, Mr. Valeriano, Ms. Gutierrez and Ms. Ibasco are minority stockholders of the Company, each owning less
than 0.02% of the outstanding voting capital stock of the Company.
K.
1)
Discuss the companys external and internal communications policies and how frequently they are reviewed. Disclose who reviews and approves major
company announcements. Identify the committee with this responsibility, if it has been assigned to a committee.
The Company is committed to the highest standards of disclosure, transparency and information dissemination. The Company provides the public with
strategic, operating and financial information through adequate and timely disclosure filings submitted to the regulatory authorities. Along with regular
quarterly financial reports, the Company discloses any and all material and critical information about the Company that may have an impact on the market
price and trading volume of its securities.
Aside from disclosures to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Philippine Stock Exchange that are handled by the Governance Department, the
Company also addresses the various information requirements of the investors and other stakeholders through a dedicated Investor Relations Department.
Both the Governance and Investor Relations Departments report directly to the Chief Finance Officer (CFO).
2)
Describe the companys investor relations program including its communications strategy to promote effective communication with its stockholders,
other stakeholders and the public in general. Disclose the contact details (e.g. telephone, fax and email) of the officer responsible for investor relations.
The Company believes in open and transparent communication with all shareholders in order to build investor confidence. Through the Investor Relations
Department, which reports directly to the Chief Finance Officer (CFO), the Company addresses the various information requirements of the investing public
in general, and minority shareholders, in particular, and fosters dialogue between senior management and the investors.
Aside from disclosures to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Philippine Stock Exchange, the Company conducts quarterly Analysts Briefings
for both equity (buy-side and sell-side) and credit analysts and communicates directly with institutional and retail investors through one-on-one meetings,
161
(1) Objectives
(2) Principles
(3) Modes of Communications
(4) Investors Relations Officer
Details
To adhere to the highest standards of disclosure, transparency and information dissemination
The Company believes in open and transparent communication with all shareholders in order to build
investor confidence
Disclosures to SEC and PSE, Analysts Briefings, one-on-one meetings, written communications such as
electronic mails, conference calls, website, participation in local and international investor conferences
Rosenni A. Basilio Director of Financial Planning, Investor Relations and Supply Chain; Patricia Carmen D.
Pineda Head of Investor Relations; Abby Nicole A. Romasanta* Investor Relations Officer
3)
What are the companys rules and procedures governing the acquisition of corporate control in the capital markets, and extraordinary transactions such as
mergers, and sales of substantial portions of corporate assets?
NOT APPLICABLE. THE COMPANY HAS NOT HAD ANY TRANSACTION INVOLVING ACQUISITION OF CORPORATE CONTROL IN THE CAPITAL MARKETS AND
EXTRA-ORDINARY TRANSACTIONS SUCH AS MERGERS, AND SALES OF SUBSTANTIAL PORTIONS OF CORPORATE ASSETS.
Name of the independent party the board of directors of the company appointed to evaluate the fairness of the transaction price.
NOT APPLICABLE. THE COMPANY HAS NOT HAD ANY TRANSACTION INVOLVING ACQUISITION OF CORPORATE CONTROL IN THE CAPITAL MARKETS AND
EXTRA-ORDINARY TRANSACTIONS SUCH AS MERGERS, AND SALES OF SUBSTANTIAL PORTIONS OF CORPORATE ASSETS.
L.
Beneficiary
Inputs
2015 Accomplishments (as of Nov. 2015)
This Program makes piped-in water supply available to low-income 1.8 million people from urban poor East Zone of Metro Manila:
communities by offering flexible payment schemes and lower tariff, communities
2,107 households
especially for customers consuming 10 cubic meters or less.
Laguna: 150 households
Lingap programs
This Program involves improvement of water supply and sanitation
for public service institutions such as schools, hospitals / health
centers, markets, city jails, orphanages, etc.
2015 Accomplishments:
27 institutions
381 institutions (plus 9 Lingap projects rehabilitated)
The activities conducted pursuant to this Program includes rehabilitated)/ 1.6 million people
rehabilitation of the reticulation of after-the-meter pipelines;
construction / installation of drinking fountains and hand washing
facilities; and the rehabilitation of toilet facilities
(plus
Lingap
projects
2015 Accomplishments:
Total of 195 Cooperatives
68,250 families
Program Cost:
P 19,500,000.00
163
Initiative
Beneficiary
Inputs
Lakbayan
Lakbayan:
1,210 groups
40,135 participants from NonGovernmental Agencies, Local
Government Units, academe, media,
corporates, Non-Governmental
Participants are given a tour of the water and wastewater Organizations, and similar entities.
treatment facilities of the Company. The Program aims to promote
stakeholder awareness on the need to conserve water and to care
for our water sources.
Mobile Lakbayan
Mobile Lakbayan:
Another scheme is the Mobile Lakbayan wherein Lakbayan 195 groups
educational tools are brought to the communities, schools and 9,868 participants
other partner agencies.
Lakbayan:
96 groups/ 2,009 participants
from Non-Governmental Agencies, Local
Government Units, academe, media, corporates,
Non-Governmental Organizations, and similar
entities.
Mobile Lakbayan:
Jan- Dec 2015 Accomplishments:
195 groups
9,868 participants
Toka Toka
164
Initiative
Manila Water Used Water Advocacy which partners with different
public and private institutions to help inform, educate, and influence
each individual to do their toka (share) to help revive the waterways.
This 2015, Manila Water launched Toka-Toka Lingap Sapa in
Maytunas Creek which traverses the cities of Mandaluyong and San
Juan. Lingap Sapa aims to:
1. To develop Toka-Toka Barangay Champions who meet the
following criteria:
a. Conducts regular waterway clean-up involving
residents of the barangay in coordination with the
local government unit;
b. Implements barangay ordinances in support of RA
9275 (Clean Water Act) and RA 9003 (Solid Waste
Management Act);
c. Conducts information, education, campaigns for the
residents of the barangays regarding solid waste
management, environmental protection, Supreme
Court Continuing Mandamus to rehabilitate Manila
Bay, etc.
Beneficiary
Inputs
M.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
The idea for the evaluation is to give the Board and the management information on the areas that need improvement in terms of the foregoing scope.
The evaluation process also allows the Board to explain the ratings they gave and to provide their own comments and recommendations on the matters
discussed in the evaluation.
The evaluation criteria are as follows:
Scope
Compliance
with
the
Responsibilities and Functions of
the Board
Criteria
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
Adequacy, frequency, duration and scheduling of Board and Committee meetings per year
Attendance to the Board and Committee meetings
Adequacy of materials for meetings of the Board and the Committees
Content and quality of materials for meetings of the Board and the Committees
Quality of presentations to the Board and the Committees
Quality and adequacy of discussions and deliberations during Board and Committee meetings
Preparedness of the directors for the Board and Committee meetings
Appropriateness of delegation of business to the respective Board Committees
Adequate information to the Board of Committee acts and approvals
a. Involvement of the Board and the Committees in the determination of the Corporations
strategic initiatives and direction
b. Effectiveness of the Board and the Committees in monitoring of managements
implementation of corporate strategy
c. Effectiveness of the Board and the Committees in monitoring the operational and financial
performance of the Corporation
d. Effectiveness of the Board and the Committees in handling crisis situation
e. Commitment of the Board and the Committees to good corporate governance practices
Point System
Rate of 1 to 5, 1
being the lowest
Rate of 1 to 5, 1 being
the lowest
166
f.
Consideration by the Board and the Committees of the interest of the minority shareholders
a. Existence of open lines of communication and constructive interaction between directors and
the management of the Corporation
b. Clear understanding of the delineation between the roles of the Board and the Committees
and the key officers/management
Support of the Board and the Committees to the management
Rate of 1 to 5, 1 being
the lowest
Rate of 1 to 5, 1 being
the lowest
Rate of 1 to 5, 1 being
the lowest
In addition, the Audit and Governance Committee adopted SEC Memorandum Circular No. 4 Series of 2012 on the Guidelines for the Assessment of the
Performance of Audit Committees of Companies Listed on the Exchange which took effect on 30 June 2012.
N.
167
To strictly observe and implement the provisions of the Manual, the following penalties260 shall be imposed after notice and hearing, on the Companys
directors, officers, and staff in case of violation of any of the provisions of the Manual:
Violations
Sanctions
First Violation
Reprimand
Second Violation
Suspension from office, for such duration at the reasonable discretion of the
Board, depending on the gravity of the violation
Third Violation
260
168
References:
Amended Articles of Incorporation
Amended By Laws
Manual of Corporate Governance
Revised Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Charter of the Board of Directors
Charter of the Executive Committee
Charter of the Nomination Committee
Charter of the Remuneration Committee
Charter of the Audit and Governance Committee
Charter of the Committee of Inspectors of Ballots and Proxies
Charter of the Risk Committee
Policy on Related Party Transactions
2012 Sustainability Report
2013 Annual Report
2014 Annual Report
2013 Financial Statements
2013 Definitive Information Statement
Quality, Environment, Health and Safety Policy
2014 Definitive Information Statement
2015 Definitive Information Statement
Minutes of Meeting 2013 Annual Stockholders Meeting
Minutes of Meeting 2014 Annual Stockholders Meeting
2015 ASM Voting Results
Procurement Policy
Vendors Code of Conduct
Employee Code of Conduct and Discipline
Corporation Code of the Philippines (Batas Pambansa Blg. 68)
Securities Regulations Code (Republic Act No. 8799)
SEC Memorandum Circular No. 9 Series of 2011 (Term Limits for Independent Directors)
SEC Memorandum Circular No. 16 Series of 2002 (Guidelines on the Nomination and Election of Independent Directors)
SEC Memorandum Circular No. 4 Series of 2012 (Guidelines for the Assessment of the Performance of Audit Committees of Companies Listed on the Exchange)
Internal Audit Charter
Enterprise Risk Management Policy
Certification of Full Compliance to the Manual of Corporate Governance
Report of the Risk Committee to the Board of Directors
Report of the Audit and Governance Committee to the Board of Directors
SEC Certification on permanent exemption of Ambassador Jose L. Cuisia, Jr. (independent director), from attendance in Corporate Governance Training requirements of the SEC
169
(a)
P 0.4075 per share on the outstanding Common shares;
(b)
P0.04075 per share on the outstanding Participating Preferred shares,
payable on March 20, 2015 to stockholders of record of the Company as of March 6,
2015.
4.0
At the Annual Stockholders Meeting held on April 7, 2015, at which meeting a quorum duly
existed, the stockholders:
a.
b.
Approved the re-Appointment of SyCip Gorres Velayo & Co. as external auditor and
adopted the following resolution:
Resolution No. 4 (2015): RESOLVED, to approve the re-appointment of the firm of SyCip
Gorres Velayo & Company as external auditor of the Company for the fiscal year January
1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 for an audit fee of Pesos: Two Million (P2,000,000.00),
exclusive of value-added tax and out-of-pocket expenses.
5.0
At the organizational meeting of the Board held on April 7, 2015, at which meeting all eleven
(11) directors are present, the Board unanimously approved the following appointments:
Board Chairman and Vice Chairman
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Member
Member
Member
Chairman
Member
Member
Member
Nomination Committee
Jose L. Cuisia, Jr.
Oscar S. Reyes
Jaime C. Laya
Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala
Chairman
Member
Member
Member
Remuneration Committee
Oscar S. Reyes
Jose L. Cuisia, Jr.
Sherisa P. Nuesa
Fernando Zobel de Ayala
Chairman
Member
Member
Member
6.0
At the regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company held on August 11, 2015, at
which meeting all eleven (11) directors are present, the Board unanimously approved the following
resolutions:
Jaime C. Laya
Jose L. Cuisia, Jr.
Victoria P. Garchitorena
Oscar S. Reyes
xxx
xxx
VERSION NO. 3
A.
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 1 of 13
INTRODUCTION
This document shall be known as the Audit and Governance Committee Charter (the
Charter) and shall prescribe the roles, responsibilities, and authority of the Audit and
Governance Committee (Committee) of Manila Water Company, Inc. (Manila Water or
the Company), including the rules of procedures necessary for the conduct of the duties
and functions of the Committee, as approved by the Board of Directors (the Board).
The Committee is expected, through the provision of checks and balances, to bring
positive results in supervising and supporting the management of the Company and shall be
responsible for ensuring the development of, compliance with, and periodic review of
corporate governance policies and practices of the Company.
B.
iii.
VERSION NO. 3
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 2 of 13
The Committee members shall be prohibited from being an employee of the Company.
In addition, the Committee members shall not engage in any private business transactions
with the Company or receive compensation from any private entity that has material
business relationship with the Company other than being a shareholder thereon.
C.
VERSION NO. 3
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 3 of 13
The Committee shall meet with the internal and the external auditors in executive
session at least once a year. The CAE must communicate and interact directly with the
Committee. (New standard ISPPIA 1111)
The Committee shall meet with the CAE and the Senior Management, as it may deem
necessary, to discuss the Definition of Internal Auditing, the Code of Ethics, and the
Standards. (New standard-ISPPIA 1010)
D.
In general, the Committee shall assist the Board in the performance of the following
functions:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Ensuring the presence of, and regularly reviewing, the performance and quality
of external audit;
v.
vi.
vii.
Identify the sectors in the community in which the Company operates or are
directly affected by its operations, and formulate a clear policy of accurate,
timely and effective communication with them;
viii.
Adopt a system of internal checks and balances for the Board and management
which systems shall be continuously and regularly reviewed and updated to
ensure adequacy and effectiveness;
ix.
Provide the stockholders and stakeholders with relevant and timely information
about the Companys performance, position and prospects as well as other
VERSION NO. 3
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 4 of 13
xi.
xii.
In particular, the Committee shall have the following duties and responsibilities:
i.
assist the Board in its oversight responsibility for the financial reporting process,
system of internal control, audit process, and monitoring of compliance with
applicable laws, rules and regulations and secure Managements assurance as to
the state of the Companys internal control;
ii.
make a fair and balanced review of all financial reports and check against its
compliance with both the internal financial management handbook and
pertinent accounting standards, including regulatory requirements;
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
VERSION NO. 3
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 5 of 13
vii.
ensure that internal auditors have free and full access to all the Companys
records, properties and personnel relevant to and required by its function and
that the internal audit activity shall be free from interference in determining its
scope, performing its work and communicating its results;
viii.
provide oversight of the Companys internal and external auditors; ensure that
the internal and external auditors act independently from each other; and
ensure that the external auditor is given unrestricted access to all records,
properties and personnel to enable it to perform its audit function;
ix.
review internal audit plans, including audit scope, resources and budget
necessary to implement it, to ensure its conformity with the objectives of the
Company;
x.
discuss with the external auditor before the audit commences the nature and
scope of the audit, and ensure cooperation where more than one audit firm is
needed in order to secure proper coverage and minimize duplication of efforts;
xi.
monitor and evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the Companys internal
control system, including financial reporting control and information technology
security;
xii.
xiii.
xiv.
receive and review reports of internal and external auditors and regulatory
agencies, where applicable, and ensure that management is taking appropriate
corrective actions in a timely manner in addressing control and compliance
functions with regulatory agencies;
xv.
establish and identify the reporting line of the internal auditor to enable him to
properly fulfill his duties and responsibilities. The internal auditor shall
functionally report directly to the Audit and Governance Committee which
committee shall ensure the internal auditors independence and freedom from
interference by outside parties;
xvi.
VERSION NO. 3
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 6 of 13
recommend and review the appointment and removal of external auditors and
their remuneration;
xviii.
coordinate, monitor and facilitate compliance with laws, rules and regulations;
xix.
evaluate and determine the non-audit work, if any, of the external auditor, and
review periodically the non-audit fees paid to the external auditor in relation to
their significance to the total annual income of the external auditor and to the
Companys overall consultancy expenses. The Committee shall disallow any nonaudit work that will conflict with his duties as an external auditor or may pose a
threat to his independence. The non-audit work, if allowed, shall be disclosed in
the Companys annual report;
xx.
xxi.
xxii.
xxiii.
monitor and assess the Companys compliance with rules and regulations
relating to corporate governance policies;
xxiv.
xxv.
xxvi.
In the fulfillment of the foregoing functions, the Committee shall maintain a free and
open communication with the Companys independent auditors, the internal auditors
and the management of the Company.
In discharging its oversight role, the Committee is empowered to investigate any
matter brought to its attention, with full access to all records, books of accounts,
VERSION NO. 3
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 7 of 13
facilities and personnel of the company and the power to retain outside counsel or
other experts for this purpose.
Furthermore, the Committee may rely upon the expertise and knowledge of
Management, the Internal Auditors and Independent Auditors in the fulfillment of its
responsibilities.
The independent Auditors are responsible to the Committee in helping ensure the
integrity of the financial statements while the Internal Auditors help the Committee
identify the risks, control and financial reporting issues through the continuous review
of the effectiveness of the organizations risk management, financial reporting and
controls, and corporate governance processes.
E.
FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Committee shall:
i.
Review of the financial statements and all related disclosures and reports
certified by the Chief Finance Officer (CFO) and released to the public and/or
submitted to the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission for compliance
with both the internal financial management handbook and existing financial
accounting standards, legal and regulatory requirements.
ii.
VERSION NO. 3
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 8 of 13
INTERNAL AUDIT
The Committee shall:
i.
Review and approval of the Internal Audit Charter and subsequent revisions
thereto.
ii. Set up the Internal Audit Activity (IAA), including the appointment and removal
of the CAE. The Committee shall establish and identify the reporting line of the
CAE so that the reporting levels allow the IAA to fulfill its responsibilities. The
Committee, having appointed the CAE, shall also concur in his/her replacement,
re-assignment or dismissal.
iii. Ensure that the Internal Auditors have free and full access to all Corporations
records, properties and personnel relevant to and required by its function and
that the IAA shall be free from interference in determining its scope, performing
its work and communicating its results.
iv. Approve the Annual Internal Audit Work Plan and all deviations therefrom,
ensure that the audit resources are reasonably allocated to the areas of higher
risk.
v. Review reports of the IAA and regulatory agencies, where applicable, ensure that
management is taking appropriate and corrective actions in a timely manner,
including addressing internal control and compliance issues.
vi. Review of the IAAs periodic reports and the IAA Annual Report. Periodic reports
shall highlight the status of projects in accordance with the audit plan approved
by the Committee, as well any unplanned projects. Such reports shall include a
summary of key findings and recommendations, including the status of
implementation. The Annual Report shall discuss the IAAs activities and
performance relative to the audit plans and strategies approved by the
Committee.
vii. Conduct separate meetings with the President to discuss any matter that the
Committee or the auditors may deem necessary to be discussed privately.
viii. Provide inputs on the performance of the IAA and communicate/ discuss such
inputs with the President who shall then translate these into a performance
appraisal applicable to the CAE and the Internal Auditors taken as a whole.
VERSION NO. 3
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 9 of 13
VERSION NO. 3
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 10 of 13
the Board should it determine that the internal audit function should be
outsourced.
G.
EXTERNAL AUDIT
The Committee shall:
i.
Recommend the appointment and removal of the Independent Auditors and the
fixing of their compensation to the Board and ensure that the rotation process of
the auditors of the external auditors of the firm engaged is enforced.
ii. Ensure that the external auditors comply with relevant and applicable auditing
standards.
iii. Review and pre-approve the Independent Auditors plans to understand the
basis for their risk assessment and financial statement materiality including the
scope and frequency of the audit, and ensure cooperation when more than one
professional service firm is needed.
iv. Monitor the coordination efforts of the external and internal auditors.
v.
Review the reports of the Independent Auditors and regulatory agencies, where
applicable. Ensure that management is taking appropriate corrective actions in a
timely manner, including addressing control and compliance issues.
vi. Conduct a separate meeting in executive session, with the external auditors to
discuss any matter that the committee or auditors believe should be discussed
privately, including the results of the audit, year-end financial statements, the
quality of management, financial and accounting controls.
vii. Review and approve the proportion of audit versus non-audit work both in
relation to their significance to the auditor and in relation to the Companys
year-end financial statements, and total expenditure on consultancy, to ensure
that non-audit work will not be in conflict with the audit functions of the
independent auditor. The amount of non-audit work of independent auditors
shall be disclosed in the annual report.
viii. Evaluate the internal control issues that have been raised by the independent
auditor.
ix. Communicate with the external auditors of the Company within a reasonable
period of time after the completion of the independent audit and to discuss any
material findings on the Company relating to critical policy weaknesses, the
external auditors observation on the Companys internal controls, audit
adjustments, alternative treatments, the independent auditors independence
and limitations on the audit that may have been imposed by management and
VERSION NO. 3
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 11 of 13
other material issues that affect the integrity and accuracy of the Companys
financial reporting;
x. Evaluate the performance of the external auditor and to ensure that the same
performs its functions in compliance with the relevant and applicable auditing
standards.
I.
REPORTING PROCEDURES
To keep the Board of Directors appraised on the results of the Committees activities,
the Committee Chairman shall submit a report every quarter to the Chairman of the
Board and shall report to the Board during its meeting for the quarter, if necessary.
The Committee Chairman will also submit and present an Annual Audit and Governance
Committee report to the Board during its first meeting immediately following the end of
the fiscal year.
J.
ii.
iii.
iv.
VERSION NO. 3
K.
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 12 of 13
L.
i.
ii.
The CAE shall attend all the Committee meetings and ensure that a legal officer
records the minutes of the meetings.
iii.
IAA shall keep all minutes of the meetings and make these available for
inspection by any member of the Committee or the Board of Directors, as and
when requested.
iv.
IAA shall review all papers for submission to the Committee, including any
proposals from management before these are submitted to the Committee for
approval. If there are unresolved differences in opinion on any proposal
between the proponent and IAA, these shall be highlighted to the Committee for
consideration and decision.
M.
APPROVAL
This revised Charter was approved by unanimous vote of the members of the Audit and
Governance Committee during its Audit and Governance Committee Meeting on 24
February 2016 held at 34th Floor, Mancom Dining, Ayala Tower 1, Ayala Avenue, Makati
City.
The Charter was revised to remove the roles and responsibilities on Risk Management
that is contained in the Risk Committee Charter that was approved in the November 26,
2015 Board Meeting.
JOSE L. CUISIA, JR.
Member
Jaime C. Laya
Member
OSCAR S. REYES
Chairman
Victoria P. Garchitorena
Member
VERSION NO. 3
REVISION NO. 4
REVISION DATE
February 24, 2016
Page 13 of 13
February 15, 2010 to explicitly state and clearly define Definition of Internal
Auditing and the responsibilities of IAA in consulting services
February 14, 2011 - to include the ERM functions of the AGC that is also the
function of the Board to review and endorse to the Board the adequacy and
effectiveness of Manila Waters enterprise risk management process.
February 14, 2012 change in Audit and Governance Committee Members. The
AGC reviewed the Charter to determine its adequacy in achieving the AGCs and
Internal Audits objectives. Consequently, the AGC approved and signed Charter.
August 29, 2012 to adopt the guidelines set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in its Memorandum Circular No. 4 Series of 2012 on the
specific functions of the Audit Committee and an assessment of its performance.
February 24, 2016 to reflect new roles of the Audit & Governance Committee
in light of the creation of Risk Committee
VERSION NO.
1
REVISION NO.
REVISION DATE
Page 1 of 4
A. Introduction
In line with best corporate governance practices and to ensure effective management of
strategic, operational, financial and compliance-related risks, the Board of Directors (the
Board) of Manila Water Company, Inc. (the Company) created the Risk Committee (the
Committee) to provide assistance in fulfilling the Boards oversight responsibilities in
relation to risk governance in the Company.
B. Committee Structure
The Committee shall be comprised of four (4) members of the Board, majority of whom
shall be independent directors of the Company. The Board shall designate one member,
who must be an independent director, to serve as the Committee Chairman.
The Board shall appoint the Committee members at its annual organizational meeting.
Membership shall be reviewed annually, subject to the approval of the Board.
C. Authority, Roles and Responsibilities of the Committee
The Committee shall have the following authority, roles and responsibilities:
1. Promote an open discussion regarding risks faced by the Company, as well as risks faced
by its subsidiaries that may have potential impact on the Company operations, and
ensure that risk awareness culture is pervasive throughout the organization.
2. Ensure that an overall set of risk management policies and procedures exist for the
Company.
3. Review the Companys risk governance structure and the adequacy of the Companys
risk management framework / process.
4. Review and endorse to the Board changes or amendments to the Enterprise Risk
Management (ERM) Policy.
5. Perform oversight functions specifically in the areas of managing strategic, financial,
compliance, operational and other risks of the Company, and crisis management.
VERSION NO.
1
REVISION NO.
REVISION DATE
Page 2 of 4
6. In coordination with the Audit and Governance Committee, ensure that the Companys
internal audit work plan is aligned with risk management activities and that the internal
control system considers all risks identified in the risk assessment process.
7. Perform other activities related to this Charter as requested by the Board.
This policy notwithstanding, Management shall remain primarily responsible for the
development, implementation, monitoring and reporting of the risk management framework,
process and strategies intended to address the identified risks.
D. Meetings and Schedule of Activities
The Committee shall meet at least twice a year, or more frequently as needed. All meetings
shall be presided by the Committee Chairman and attended by all committee members,
whether in person or via teleconference or videoconference. Meetings shall not proceed in
the absence of a quorum; that is, three (3) committee members.
Separate executive sessions may be conducted by the Committee with the Chief Risk Officer
(CRO), Chief Finance Officer (CFO), Chief Audit Executive (CAE), other members of the
Management team and/or external auditors to foster open communication and discuss any
matter that the Committee believes as needed to be discussed in private.
The minutes of the Committee meeting shall be recorded and maintained by the Enterprise
Risk and Insurance Management (ERIM) Department and presented to the Committee at
the next meeting for approval.
Aside from regular meetings, the Committee shall also construct and agree on an annual
calendar, which will lay down the schedule of activities for the year. This shall provide a
systematic guide for the discharge of the Committees responsibilities. Accordingly, the
Chief Risk Officer shall ensure that the schedule is followed as planned.
E. Functional and Secretariat Support
The Enterprise Risk and Insurance Management (ERIM) Department shall support the
Committee in the performance of its functions, specifically:
1. The ERIM Department shall provide all the secretariat support to the Committee.
VERSION NO.
1
REVISION NO.
REVISION DATE
Page 3 of 4
2. The Chief Risk Officer shall attend all the Committee meetings and ensure that the
minutes of the meetings are properly recorded by a representative from the Office of
the Corporate Secretary.
3. The ERIM Department shall keep all minutes of the meetings, recorded and prepared by
the Office of the Corporate Secretary and make these available for inspection by any
member of the Committee or the Board, as and when requested.
4. The ERIM Department shall review all papers for submission to the Committee,
including any proposals from management before these are submitted to the
Committee for approval. If there are unresolved differences in opinion on any proposal
between the proponent and ERIM Department, these shall be highlighted to the
Committee for consideration and decision.
F. Other Matters
1. Reports to the Board
The Committee Chairman shall submit and present a report to the Board, containing
updates on all actions taken by the Committee at the Board meeting following the
Committee meeting.
Similarly, the Committee Chairman shall also submit and present an annual report to the
Board during its first meeting following the immediate calendar year. The annual report
shall include a summary of the Committees activities during the year, an over-all
assessment of its performance and recommendations for improvement.
2. Performance Evaluation
The Committee shall review its performance annually with respect to the fulfillment of
its functions and responsibilities as mandated in this Charter. The Board may conduct an
independent annual assessment of the Committees performance.
3. Annual Charter Review
This Charter shall be reviewed annually by the Committee to ensure its continuing
adequacy and consistency with the Boards objectives and responsibilities. Any
proposed changes shall be approved by the Board.
VERSION NO.
1
REVISION NO.
REVISION DATE
Page 4 of 4
4. Access to Information
The Committee shall have reasonably free and full access to the Companys data,
records and properties, as well as information from employees, officers, directors or
external parties that may be relevant in monitoring and assessing risk exposures and
their implications to the Company.
(Original Signed)
Jaime C. Laya
Chairman
(Original Signed)
Oscar S. Reyes
Member
(Original Signed)
Jose L. Cuisia, Jr.
Member
Approved by:
(Original Signed)
Date Approved:
(Original Signed)
Victoria P. Garchitorena
Member
Number of Shares
Principal Amount of
Bonds and Notes
1,862,685,336
Cash equivalents
BPI
BDO
Metrobank
Security Bank
Citibank
AUB
RCBC
1,557,873,534
1,419,249,553
1,396,591,124
292,000,000
94,120,000
82,800,000
144,636,132
Receivables
2,323,490,090
TOTAL
1,198,083,563
10,371,529,332
2,409,290
2,409,290
10,373,938,622
70,329,969
Note: Receivables from related parties and principal stockholders represent receivables for water revenue which arise in the ordinary course of business.
Beginning Balance
Additions
Deductions
Collections Other than
Cash Collections
Cash
Ending Balance
(Current)
39,554,286
62,310,590
62,111,144
39,753,731
4,930,789
24,293
323,777,129.36
9,913,437.56
328,630,709.36
9,937,730.56
77,209
-
39,156
7,288,971.67
7,317,016.67
11,111
44,548,523.50
403,290,128.13
407,996,601
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
Ayala Corporation
TOTAL
39,842,051
CURRENT
Relationship to
the Reporting
Co. (Subsidiary
or Parent)
Deductions
Account Type
Beginning Balance
Additions
Ending Balance
Collections
Written-off
Volume
Credit Terms
Remarks
Volume
Credit Terms
Remarks
Adjustments
Trade receivable
Advances to contractors
Notes receivable
Dividends receivable
Interest receivable
Other receivables
TOTAL
NONCURRENT
Relationship to
the Reporting
Co. (Subsidiary
or Parent)
Deductions
Account Type
Beginning Balance
Additions
Ending Balance
Collections
Subsidiary
Subsidiary
Dividend receivable
Interest receivable
Subsidiary
MWIS
Written-off
Adjustments
30,099,009
5,678,232
30,099,009
5,678,232
Other receivables
792,021,495
8,824,002
783,197,493
Subsidiary
Other receivables
34,307,380
34,307,380
MWTS
Subsidiary
Other receivables
31,634,951
19,465,051
23,092,784
28,007,218
Zamboanga Water
Subsidiary
Other receivables
8,628,820
9,673,552
(1,044,732)
Subsidiary
Other receivables
535,133
535,133
Subsidiary
Other receivables
1,604,087
24,421,271
26,025,358
895,345,154
53,050,275
77,367,579
871,027,850
TOTAL
Description
Goodwill
Intangible service concession assets
Beginning Balance
130,319,465
55,835,665,758
Additions at Cost
6,673,119,891
Charged to Other
Accounts
Other Charges
Add/(Ded)
-
Ending Balance
-
130,319,465
60,192,856,303
60,323,175,768
Exchange Rates
JPY
USD
Interest Rates
Principal Amount as of
December 31, 2015
Maturity
Current Portion of
Long-term Debt
Closing Rates
0.3706
44.7200
Long-term Debt
Total
$
$
$
$
JPY
Manila Water
First IFC Loan
First IFC Loan
LBP Loan
4.66%
6m Libor plus margin
6m Libor plus margin
93,750,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
22,600,000
21-Oct-20
15-Jun-16
15-Jun-16
15-May-37
Php
Php
Php
Php
882,375,000
47,059,134
47,060,866
-
Php
Php
Php
Php
3,382,462,624
(331,030)
(331,030)
1,055,747,830
Php
Php
Php
Php
4,264,837,624
46,728,104
46,729,836
1,055,747,830
JPY
JPY
JPY
110,120,000
608,200,000
2,210,370,601
15-Jun-18
15-Jun-18
15-Apr-22
Php
Php
Php
17,266,816
95,365,760
133,423,756
Php
Php
Php
25,626,855
140,441,597
726,206,749
Php
Php
Php
42,893,671
235,807,357
859,630,505
6.34% to 7.33%
4.42%
Php
Php
9,800,000,000
4,950,000,000
Php
Php
4,925,000,000
25,000,000
Php
Php
4,870,031,029
4,903,561,646
Php
Php
9,795,031,029
4,928,561,646
Laguna Water
P0.50 billion Laguna Water Loan
P0.83 billion Laguna Water DBP Loan
P0.50 billion Laguna Water DBP Loan
P2.50 billion Laguna Water SBC Loan
6.73%
7.25%
7.25%
6.03%
Php
Php
Php
Php
250,000,000
833,000,000
500,000,000
600,000,000
15-Nov-20
15-Jan-34
15-Jul-33
09-Dec-30
Php
Php
Php
Php
25,000,000
-
Php
Php
Php
Php
305,889,889
830,941,608
498,812,152
599,996,080
Php
Php
Php
Php
330,889,889
830,941,608
498,812,152
599,996,080
Clark Water
P1.15 billion Clark Water RCBC Loan
6.18%
Php
1,000,000,000
30-Apr-30
Php
Php
990,939,069
Php
990,939,069
Cebu Water
0.75 billion Cebu Water DBP Loan
7.32%
Php
751,566,667
20-Dec-33
Php
Php
741,770,953
Php
741,770,953
1.99% to 9.00%
9.00%
Php
Php
383,823,529
383,823,529
25-Aug-31
25-Aug-31
Php
Php
32,419,205
29,446,324
Php
Php
441,738,970
447,450,819
Php
Php
474,158,175
476,897,143
Php
6,259,416,860
Php
19,960,955,809
Php
26,220,372,669
PESO-DENOMINATED LOANS
PHP
Manila Water
Fixed Rate Corporate Notes
P5.00 billion Loan
Boracay Water
P0.50 billion Boracay Water DBP-SBC Loan
P0.50 billion Boracay Water DBP-SBC Loan
Total
Note: This pertains to payable assumed from MWSS by the Parent Company.
Amount Authorized by
Indenture
65,601,367
65,354,758
1,239,175
50,336,540
338,786,826
149,317,591
4,119,633
121,713
JPY
JBIC-PH110
91,694,689
110,571,509
2,416,798
4,576,997
180,914,751
2,559,757,964
1,046,919
80,540
French Loan
Treasury Loan
China Loan
Eximbank
Before turn-over(FRF)
Accrued interest payable
337,433,236
796,038,231
3,167,332,773
REGULATORY FEE
Manila Water
395,714,907
3,016,084,119
395,714,907
3,016,084,119
1,191,753,138
6,183,416,892
Grand Total
Nature of guaranty
TITLE OF ISSUE
# OF SHARES
RESERVED FOR
OPTIONS,
WARRANTS,
CONVERSION &
RIGHTS
# OF SHARES HELD
BY AFFILIATES,
DIRECTORS,
OFFICERS &
EMPLOYEES
OTHERS
4,000,000,000
4,000,000,000
4,000,000,000
3,100,000,000
2,018,209,523
920,318,928
1,097,890,595
28,202,654,069
(1,242,581,377)
(1,174,431,248)
(120,591,565)
(113,488,598)
(13,408,630)
25,538,152,651
5,333,135,806
(131,709,583)
(35,739,893)
(8,432,177)
30,695,406,804
(2,039,953,671)
28,655,453,133
*As discussed in Note 19 to the audited consolidated financial statements, excess retained earnings will be utilized for capital
expenditures under the approved Business Plan in compliance with Manila Waters service obligations under the Concession
Agreement.
Ayala Corporation
42.38%
Manila Water
Company, Inc.
(Parent
Company)
Manila Water
Philippine
Ventures, Inc.
(MWPVI)
100%
Manila Water
International
Solutions, Inc.
(MWIS)
100%
Manila Water
Total Solutions
Corp. (MWTS)
100%
Clark Water
Corporation
(Clark Water)
100%
Boracay Island
Water, Inc.
(Boracay Water)
80%
Manila Water
Consortium, Inc.
(MW
Consortium)
51%
Laguna
AAAWater
Corporation
(Laguna Water)
70%
Cebu Manila
Water
Development, Inc.
(Cebu Water)
51%
*Associates
Zamboanga
Water
Company, Inc.
(Zamboanga
Water)
70%
Asia Water
Network Solutions
Joint Stock
Company (Asia
Water) 48.5%
Manila Water
Asia Pacific Pte.
Ltd. (MWAP)
100%
Tagum Water
Company, Inc.
(Tagum Water)
90%
Manila Water
South Asia
Holdings Pte.
Ltd.
(MWSAH)
100%
Kenh Dong
Water Holdings
Pte. Ltd.
(KDWH)
100%
Cu Chi Water
Supply Sewerage
Company Limited
(Cu Chi Water)*
24.5%
Saigon Water
Infrastructure
Corporation
(Saigon Water)*
31.47%
Liquidity Ratio
Solvency Ratio
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
Assets-to-Equity Ratio
Interest Rate Coverage Ratio
Return on Equity
Return on Assets
Ratio
Liquidity Ratio
Solvency Ratio
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
2015
0.55
0.21
0.83
2.03
8.22
0.15
0.08
2014
0.82
0.23
0.90
2.13
7.07
0.17
0.08
2013
0.85
0.21
1.07
2.35
6.72
0.19
0.08
Formula
Cash/ Cash equivalents + Short-term cash investments
Current Liabilities
After-Tax Net Profit + (Depreciation + Amortization)+
Allowance for Bad Debts
Long-term Liabilites + Short Term Liabilities
Total Liabilities - Service Concession Obligations
Total Stockholders' Equity
Total Assets
Total Stockholders' Equity
EBITDA
Interest Expense
Return on Equity
Net Income
Total Stockholders' Equity
Return on Assets
Net Income
Total Assets
Schedule L
(1)
Ayala Corporation
Ayala Corporation is a publicly listed Philippine company. The following table
lists the record of beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of the issued
and outstanding shares of Ayala Corporation as of December 31, 2015:
Name of Stockholder
Mermac, Inc.
PCD Nominee Corporation
(Non-Filipino)
PCD Nominee Corporation
(Filipino)
Mitsubishi Corporation
(2)
Number of
Shares
303,689,196
161,544,933
Percentage
49.01%
26.07%
Nationality
Filipino
Various
68,662,712
11.08%
Filipino
63,077,540
10.18%
Japanese
Name
Ayala Corporation
Delfin L. Lazaro
Jose Teodoro K. Limcaoco
Solomon M. Hermosura
Felipe P. Estrella III
Ma. Cecilia T. Cruzabra
Number of
Shares
333,383,32
(common)
1 (common)
1 (common)
1 (common)
1 (common)
1 (common)
Percentage
100%
Nationality
Filipino
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
Filipino
(3)
COVER SHEET
A 1 9 9 6 1 1 5 9 3
S.E.C. Registration Number
M A N I
L A
W A T E R
C O M P A N Y
N C .
M W S S
A D M I
4 8 9
K A T I
Q U E Z O N
N I
S T R A T I
P U N A N
C I
T Y
O N
R O A D
M E T R O
B U I
L D I
B A L A R A
M A N I
N G
1 1 0 5
L A
981-8122
Contact Person
1 2
GFFS
S T O C K
3 1
Month
Day
Fiscal Year
0 4
FORM TYPE
Any
Month
Day
Annual Meeting
File Number
____________________________________
LCU
Document I.D.
____________________________________
Cashier
STAMPS
Control No.:
Form Type:
ASSETS (A.1 + A.2 + A.3 + A.4 + A.5 + A.6 + A.7 + A.8 + A.9 + A.10)
A.1 Current Assets (A.1.1 + A.1.2 + A.1.3 + A.1.4 + A.1.5)
A.1.1 Cash and cash equivalents (A.1.1.1 + A.1.1.2 + A.1.1.3)
A.1.1.1 On hand
A.1.1.2 In domestic banks/entities
A.1.1.3 In foreign banks/entities
A.1.2 Trade and Other Receivables (A.1.2.1 + A.1.2.2)
A.1.2.1 Due from domestic entities (A.1.2.1.1 + A.1.2.1.2 + A.1.2.1.3 + A.1.2.1.4)
A.1.2.1.1 Due from customers (trade)
A.1.2.1.2 Due from related parties
A.1.2.1.3 Others, specify (A.1.2.1.3.1+A.1.2.1.3.2)
A.1.2.1.3.1 Receivable from Bonifacio Water Corporation (BWC)
A.1.2.1.3.2 Receivable from Saigon Water Corporation (SAWACO)
A.1.2.1.3.3 Other receivables
A.1.2.1.4 Allowance for doubtful accounts (negative entry)
A.1.2.2 Due from foreign entities, specify
(A.1.3.2.1 + A.1.3.2.2 + A.1.3.2.3 + A.1.3.2.4)
A.1.2.2.1
A.1.2.2.2
A.1.2.2.3
A.1.2.2.4 Allowance for doubtful accounts (negative entry)
A.1.3 Inventories (A.1.3.1 + A.1.3.2 + A.1.3.3 + A.1.3.4 + A.1.3.5 + A.1.3.6)
A.1.3.1 Raw materials and supplies
A.1.3.2 Goods in process (including unfinished goods, growing crops, unfinished seeds)
A.1.3.3 Finished goods
A.1.3.4 Merchandise/Goods in transit
A.1.3.5 Unbilled Services (in case of service providers)
A.1.3.6 Others, specify (A.1.3.6.1+A.1.3.6.2)
A.1.3.6.1
A.1.3.6.2
A.1.4 Financial Assets other than Cash/Receivables/Equity investments (A.1.4.1 + A.1.4.2 +
A.1.4.3 + A.1.4.4+A.1.4.5+A.1.4.6)
A.1.4.1 Financial Assets at Fair Value through Profit or Loss - issued by domestic entities
(A.1.4.1.1 + A.1.4.1.2 + A.1.4.1.3 + A.1.4.1.4 + A.1.4.1.5)
A.1.4.1.1 National Government
A.1.4.1.2 Public Financial Institutions
A.1.4.1.3 Public Non-Financial Institutions
A.1.4.1.4 Private Financial Institutions
A.1.4.1.5 Private Non-Financial Institutions
A.1.4.2 Held to Maturity Investments - issued by domestic entities
(A.1.4.2.1 + A.1.4.2.2 + A.1.4.2.3 + A.1.4.2.4 + A.1.4.2.5)
A.1.4.2.1 National Government
A.1.4.2.2 Public Financial Institutions
A.1.4.2.3 Public Non-Financial Institutions
A.1.4.2.4 Private Financial Institutions
A.1.4.2.5 Private Non-Financial Institutions
PSIC:
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
71,211,077.00
7,136,796.00
5,359,929.00
812.00
5,359,117.00
68,436,594.00
8,032,928.00
5,484,020.00
1,451.00
5,482,569.00
1,001,609.00
1,001,609.00
1,208,424.00
158,025.00
220,846.00
70,858.00
0.00
149,988.00
(585,686.00)
1,926,442.00
1,926,442.00
1,424,072.00
889,410.00
219,291.00
64,449.00
32,888.00
121,954.00
(606,331.00)
99,461.00
99,461.00
91,146.00
91,146.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
NOTE:
This general form is applicable to companies engaged in Agriculture, Fishery, Forestry, Mining, and Quarrying, Manufacturing, Electricity, Gas and Water, Construction, Wholesale and Retail Trade,
Transportation, Storage and Communications, Hotels and Restaurants, Real Estate, Community, Social and Personal Services, other forms of production, and general business operations. This form is also
applicable to other companies that do not have industry-specific Special Forms. Special forms shall be used by publicly-held companies and those engaged in non-bank financial intermediation activities,
credit granting, and activities auxiliary to financial intermediation, which require secondary license from SEC.
Domestic corporations are those which are incorporated under Philippine laws or branches/subsidiaries of foreign corporations that are licensed to do business in the Philippines where the center of
economic interest or activity is within the Philippines. On the other hand, foreign corporations are those that are incorporated abroad, including branches of Philippine corporations operating abroad.
Financial Institutions are corporations principally engaged in financial intermediation, facilitating financial intermediation, or auxiliary financial services. Non-Financial institutions refer to corporations that
are primarily engaged in the production of market goods and non-financial services.
Page 1
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
675,797.00
517,972.00
155,301.00
0.00
0.00
2,524.00
531,320.00
372,921.00
111,263.00
44,631.00
0.00
2,505.00
817,080.00
202,051.00
264,526.00
967,518.00
423,901.00
1,601,189.00
1,601,189.00
1,884,242.00
1,452,597.00
253,041.00
936,777.00
394,545.00
1,340,643.00
1,340,643.00
(2,642,105.00)
(2,493,361.00)
6,676,877.00
5,564,520.00
6,676,877.00
0.00
5,564,520.00
0.00
54,336,998.00
54,336,998.00
54,336,998.00
51,211,361.00
51,211,361.00
51,211,361.00
0.00
0.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
458,642.00
458,642.00
458,642.00
465,052.00
465,052.00
465,052.00
0.00
0.00
1,784,684.00
707,226.00
853,139.00
96,800.00
127,519.00
125,110.00
2,409.00
1,278,491.00
237,799.00
819,584.00
104,592.00
116,516.00
114,107.00
2,409.00
34,761,045.00
11,772,040.00
3,995,780.00
35,383,378.00
7,399,352.00
3,547,658.00
2,150,286.00
17,580.00
17,580.00
1,827,914.00
1,224,678.00
299,469.00
231,299.00
72,468.00
0.00
0.00
2,149,066.00
17,028.00
17,028.00
1,381,564.00
1,034,654.00
298,387.00
0.00
48,523.00
0.00
411,956
452,874
7,364,304.00
3,398,820.00
6,172,551
2,392,717.00
1,191,753.00
1,006,103.00
1,191,753
1,006,103
Control No.:
Form Type:
Page 4
PSIC:
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
15,103,416.00
19,852,047.00
9,773,593
14,774,667
5,329,823
5,077,380
7,885,589.00
8,131,979.00
7,885,589.00
6,183,416
73,192
1,003,512
625,469.00
36,450,032.00
2,453,667.00
8,131,979.00
6,427,356
10,850
1,013,825
679,948.00
33,053,216.00
2,447,270.00
2,053,667.00
400,000.00
2,047,270.00
400,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,193,023.00
3,969,017.00
(449,913.00)
20,818.00
(346,017.00)
0.00
(124,714.00)
(323,144.00)
16,207.00
(251,544.00)
0.00
(87,807.00)
30,253,255.00
0.00
30,253,255.00
26,960,073.00
0.00
26,960,073.00
71,211,077.00
68,436,594.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
MWSS Administration Building, 489 Katipunan Road, Balara, Quezon City 1105
CURRENT ADDRESS:
(02) 917 - 5900
TEL. NO.:
FAX NO.:
PSIC:
Water Utility
COMPANY TYPE :
If these are based on consolidated financial statements, please so indicate in the caption.
B.
C.
D.
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
15,476,465.00
15,088,029.00
15,122,178.00
14,995,128.00
180,472.00
38,283.00
24,590.00
43.00
155,882.00
38,240.00
3,767,456.00
(3,767,456.00)
8,432.00
0.00
0.00
147,450.00
2,729,011.00
(2,729,011.00)
7,241.00
0.00
30,999.00
0.00
207,964.00
101,106.00
88,767.00
96,668.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
106,858.00
502,580.00
(395,722.00)
(7,901.00)
(133,789.00)
125,888.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,794,263.00
5,794,263.00
5,193,214.00
5,193,214.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
FAX NO.:
PSIC:
Water Utility
If these are based on consolidated financial statements, please so indicate in the caption.
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS, SPECIFY (E.1 + E.2 + E.3 + E.4 + E.5 + E.6)
E.1
E.2
E.3
E.4
E.5
E.6
F. GROSS PROFIT (A - B - C - D - E) *
9,682,202.00
G. OPERATING EXPENSES (G.1 + G.2 + G.3 + G.4)
1,326,353.00
G.1 Selling or Marketing Expenses
G.2 Administrative Expenses
G.3 General Expenses
1,326,353.00
G.4 Other Expenses, specify (G.4.1 + G.4.2 + G.4.3 + G.4.4 + G.4.5 + G.4.6)
0.00
G.4.1 Others
0.00
G.4.2
G.4.3
G.4.4
G.4.5
G.4.6
H. FINANCE COSTS
1,329,441.00
I. NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAX ( F - G - H)
7,026,408.00
J. INCOME TAX EXPENSE (negative entry)
(1,693,271.00)
K. INCOME AFTER TAX
5,333,137.00
L. Amount of (i) Post-Tax Profit or Loss of Discontinued Operations; and (ii) PostTax Gain or Loss Recognized on theMeasurement of Fair Value less Cost to
Sell or on the Disposal of the Assets or Disposal Group(s) constituting the
Discontinued Operation (if any)
L.1
L.2
M. Profit or Loss Attributable to Minority Interest
0.00
N. Profit or Loss Attributable to Equity Holders of the Parent
5,333,137.00
*Difference in the gross profjt per audited financial statements was due to grouping presentation in the GFFS form.
Page 6
9,928,964.00
1,483,065.00
1,399,494.00
83,571.00
83,571.00
1,513,124.00
6,932,775.00
(1,694,747.00)
5,238,028.00
0.00
5,238,028.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
Interest expense
Provision for probable losses
Share-based payments
Due from domestic
Gain fromentities
sale of(A.1.2.1.1
investment
+ A.1.2.1.2
in subsidiary
+ A.1.2.1.3 + A.1.2.1.4)
Gain on disposal of property and equipment
Gain on shares swap
Amortization of deferred credits
Pension expense (contribution)
Interest income
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
7,026,408.00
6,932,776.00
2,287,129.00
2,192,870.00
1,328,803.00
86,981.00
68,698.00
0.00
(24,590.00)
(183,352.00)
(8,432.00)
26,072.00
(101,106.00)
1,513,124.00
166,158.00
63,051.00
0.00
(43.00)
0.00
(7,241.00)
(365,742.00)
(96,668.00)
0.00
0.00
358,457.00
(8,315.00)
(237,016.00)
(3,447,799.00)
(501,387.00)
(64,218.00)
(157,521.00)
(2,667,716.00)
328,550.00
551.00
(1,675,204.00)
(16,647.00)
0.00
(1,712,589.00)
5,825,834.00
5,278,207.00
100,624.00
63,351.00
0.00
25,168.00
0.00
587,502.00
100,000.00
1,244.00
0.00
0.00
(929,005.00)
(422,631.00)
0.00
(27,010.00)
(163,054.00)
0.00
0.00
(81,587.00)
(719,929.00)
71,845.00
341,375.00
387,751.00
1,020,102.00
(2,435,995.00)
(1,812,499.00)
(735,199.00)
(2,039,954.00)
(868,768.00)
(2,013,110.00)
71,842.00
(1,064,746.00)
(46,046.00)
31,984.00
(1,340,656.00)
(162,840.00)
(5,229,996.00)
(124,091.00)
(6,165,889.00)
(499,931.00)
5,484,020.00
5,359,929.00
5,983,952.00
5,484,020.00
A. Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities (sum of above rows)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Interest received
Proceeds from:
Maturities of available-for-sale financial assets
Sale of property and equipment
Issuance of Securities
Others, specify:
Redemption of investment in shares of stock of a subsidiary
Acquisitions of:
Investments in subsidiaries
Property and equipment
Available-for-sale financial assets
Others, specify (negative entry):
Decrease (increase) in:
Short-term cash investments
Other noncurrent assets
B. Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities (sum of above rows)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Long term debt:
Availments
Payments
Service concession obligation:
Availments
Payments
Others, specify:
Payments of dividends
C. Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities (sum of above rows)
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (A + B + C)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Beginning of year
Page 7
End of year
Control No.:
Form Type:
Capital Stock
Additional Paid-in
Capital
Subscriptions
Receivable
Common Stock
Options Outstanding
Translation
Differences
Retained Earnings
2,447,270.00
3,908,364.00
(283,527.00)
13,807.00
0.00
23,735,154.00
0.00
60,653.00
0.00
31,983.00
2,400.00
0.00
0.00
Remeasurement gain
(loss on defined
benefit plans
3,301.00
(128,345.00)
Unrealized gain on
AFS assets
(3,301.00)
40,538.00
Other equity
reserve
Noncontrolling
interest
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
60,653.00
31,983.00
31,983.00
60,653.00
2,400.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(3,301.00)
40,538.00
0.00
0.00
(3,302.00)
(3,302.00)
40,538.00
40,538.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,238,028.00
(2,013,110.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,447,270.00
3,969,017.00
(251,544.00)
16,207.00
0.00
26,960,072.00
0.00
(87,807.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(36,907.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(94,473.00)
4,612.00
0.00
0.00
5,238,028.00
(2,013,110.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
33,053,215.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(126,768.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(94,473.00)
(94,473.00)
4,612.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(36,907.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
(126,768.00)
(94,473.00)
4,612.00
4,612.00
0.00
132,273.00
31,983.00
63,053.00
2,400.00
29,696,024.00
0.00
0.00
29,696,024.00
132,273.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL
0.00
0.00
(36,907.00)
Page 8
(36,907.00)
Control No.:
Form Type:
5,333,137.00
(2,039,954.00)
0.00
6,397.00
6,397.00
224,006.00
224,006.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,453,667.00
4,193,023.00
(346,017.00)
20,818.00
0.00
30,253,255.00
0.00
(124,714.00)
0.00
0.00
Page 8
5,333,137.00
(2,039,954.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
230,403.00
230,403.00
0.00
0.00
36,450,032.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
FAX NO.:
PSIC:
Water Utility
If these are based on consolidated financial statements, please so indicate in the caption.
FINANCIAL DATA
A. REVENUE / INCOME (A.1 + A.2)
A.1 Net Sales or Revenue / Receipts from Operations (manufacturing, mining,utilities, trade, services, etc.) (from
Primary Activity) (A.1.1 +A.1.2)
A.1.1 Domestic
A.1.2 Foreign
A.2 Other Revenue (A.2.1 +A.2.2)
A.2.1 Domestic
A.2.2 Foreign, specify (A.2.2.1+A.2.2.2+ A.2.2.3+ A.2.2.4+ A.2.2.5+ A.2.2.6+A.2.2.7+
A.2.2.8+A.2.2.9+A.2.2.10)
A.2.2.1 Due from domestic entities (A.1.2.1.1 + A.1.2.1.2 + A.1.2.1.3 + A.1.2.1.4)
A.2.2.2
A.2.2.3
A.2.2.4
A.2.2.5
A.2.2.6
A.2.2.7
A.2.2.8
A.2.2.9
A.2.2.10
B. EXPENSES (B.1 + B.2)
B.1 Domestic
B.2 Foreign, specify (B.2.1+B.2.2+B.2.3+B.2.4+B.2.5+B.2.6+B.2.7+B.2.8+B.2.9+B.2.10)
B.2.1 Cost of management contracts
B.2.2
B.2.3
B.2.4
B.2.5
B.2.6
B.2.7
B.2.8
B.2.9
B.2.10
Page 9
2014
( in P'000 )
15,088,029.00
14,995,128.00
15,088,029.00
0.00
14,969,640.00
25,488.00
7,120,616.00
7,068,723.00
51,893.00
51,893.00
6,592,708.00
6,538,421.00
54,287.00
54,287.00
COVER SHEET
A 1 9 9 6 1 1 5 9 3
S.E.C. Registration Number
M A N I
L A
W A T E R
C O M P A N Y
N C .
M W S S
A D M I
4 8 9
K A T I
Q U E Z O N
N I
S T R A T I
P U N A N
C I
T Y
O N
R O A D
M E T R O
B U I
L D I
B A L A R A
M A N I
N G
1 1 0 5
L A
981-8122
Contact Person
1 2
GFFS
S T O C K
3 1
Month
Day
Fiscal Year
0 4
FORM TYPE
Any
Month
Day
Annual Meeting
File Number
____________________________________
LCU
Document I.D.
____________________________________
Cashier
STAMPS
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
80,608,485.00
9,948,298.00
6,849,956.00
5,490.00
6,080,765.00
763,701.00
1,864,847.00
1,864,847.00
2,253,884.00
0.00
337,458.00
74,859,904.00
9,094,063.00
6,452,554.00
1,647.00
5,654,866.00
796,041.00
1,694,446.00
1,694,446.00
1,996,173.00
0.00
416,008.00
0.00
32,888.00
70,858.00
266,600.00
(726,495.00)
64,449.00
318,671.00
(717,735.00)
0.00
0.00
177,027.00
174,465.00
186,290.00
186,290.00
2,562.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
NOTE:
This general form is applicable to companies engaged in Agriculture, Fishery, Forestry, Mining, and Quarrying, Manufacturing, Electricity, Gas and Water, Construction, Wholesale and
Retail Trade, Transportation, Storage and Communications, Hotels and Restaurants, Real Estate, Community, Social and Personal Services, other forms of production, and general business
operations. This form is also applicable to other companies that do not have industry-specific Special Forms. Special forms shall be used by publicly-held companies and those engaged in nonbank financial intermediation activities, credit granting, and activities auxiliary to financial intermediation, which require secondary license from SEC.
Domestic corporations are those which are incorporated under Philippine laws or branches/subsidiaries of foreign corporations that are licensed to do business in the Philippines where the
center of economic interest or activity is within the Philippines. On the other hand, foreign corporations are those that are incorporated abroad, including branches of Philippine corporations
operating abroad.
Financial Institutions are corporations principally engaged in financial intermediation, facilitating financial intermediation, or auxiliary financial services. Non-Financial institutions refer to
corporations that are primarily engaged in the production of market goods and non-financial services.
Page 1
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
FINANCIAL DATA
2014
( in P'000 )
Page 2
( in P'000 )
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,056,468.00
209,011.00
201,545.00
577,979.00
0.00
0.00
67,933.00
1,254,888.00
202,051.00
436,084.00
1,150,298.00
527,575.00
1,694,077.00
1,694,077.00
0.00
0.00
760,773.00
76,914.00
125,899.00
419,942.00
117,025.00
0.00
20,993.00
2,131,967.00
1,495,256.00
285,698.00
1,041,617.00
444,702.00
1,427,902.00
1,427,902.00
0.00
(2,755,197.00)
0.00
5,723,534.00
0.00
5,723,534.00
0.00
(2,563,208.00)
0.00
4,961,500.00
0.00
4,961,500.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
60,323,175.00
60,323,175.00
60,192,856.00
130,319.00
0.00
0.00
55,965,985.00
55,965,985.00
55,835,666.00
130,319.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
Page 3
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
458,642.00
458,642.00
458,642.00
465,052.00
465,052.00
465,052.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,899,948.00
644,429.00
924,502.00
148,864.00
1,182,153.00
989,073.00
95,757.00
94,914.00
2,409.00
0.00
40,889,492.00
12,399,812.00
4,443,921.00
0.00
2,241,337.00
141,189.00
881,183.00
166,580.00
1,052,385.00
899,070.00
89,124.00
61,782.00
2,409.00
0.00
39,758,334.00
7,858,162.00
3,857,596.00
2,451,212.00
10,835.00
10,835.00
1,981,874.00
1,279,595.00
341,550.00
284,090.00
76,639.00
0.00
0.00
2,347,683.00
11,490.00
11,490.00
1,498,423.00
1,098,245.00
321,625.00
26,034.00
52,519.00
719.00
719.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
440,797.00
0.00
7,515,094.00
484,703.00
0.00
3,515,144.00
6,259,417.00
2,495,629.00
1,255,677.00
1,255,677.00
1,019,515.00
1,019,515.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
19,960,956.00
0.00
0.00
14,568,815.00
0.00
5,392,141.00
0.00
0.00
8,528,724.00
71,912.00
8,456,812.00
6,671,194.00
102,347.00
1,003,512.00
679,759.00
39,718,993.00
2,453,667.00
22,975,122.00
0.00
0.00
17,822,742.00
0.00
5,152,380.00
0.00
0.00
8,925,050.00
68,950.00
8,856,100.00
6,981,694.00
38,769.00
1,013,825.00
821,812.00
35,101,570.00
2,447,270.00
2,053,667.00
400,000.00
2,047,270.00
400,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,193,023.00
894,275.00
57,547.00
20,818.00
(346,017.00)
0.00
(123,584.00)
7,500.00
498,830.00
0.00
32,120,481.00
0.00
32,120,481.00
3,969,017.00
593,397.00
(110,768.00)
16,207.00
(251,544.00)
0.00
(103,141.00)
7,500.00
220,210.00
0.00
28,202,654.00
0.00
28,202,654.00
80,608,485.00
74,859,904.00
Page 4
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
Page 5
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
17,835,698.00
16,935,883.00
403,515.00
75,634.00
0.00
0.00
24,952.00
0.00
50,682.00
5,219,358.00
(5,219,358.00)
8,432.00
0.00
42,250.00
16,900,187.00
16,357,145.00
357,298.00
7,284.00
0.00
0.00
43.00
0.00
7,241.00
3,435,789.00
(3,435,789.00)
7,241.00
0.00
420,666.00
316,944.00
0.00
0.00
178,460.00
185,635.00
0.00
0.00
103,722.00
517,463.00
(413,741.00)
(7,175.00)
(174,789.00)
167,614.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6,676,774.00
6,676,774.00
6,009,426.00
6,009,426.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
Page 6
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
11,158,924.00
1,772,425.00
10,890,761.00
1,588,377.00
1,772,425.00
0.00
1,522,320.00
66,057.00
66,057.00
1,457,535.00
7,928,964.00
(1,794,924.00)
6,134,040.00
0.00
1,636,137.00
7,666,247.00
(1,836,298.00)
5,829,949.00
0.00
176,260.00
5,957,780.00
16,860.00
5,813,089.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
FINANCIAL DATA
A. REVENUE / INCOME (A.1 + A.2)
Net Sales or Revenue / Receipts from Operations (manufacturing, mining,utilities, trade,
A.1 services, etc.) (from Primary Activity) (A.1.1 +A.1.2)
A. Domestic
A. Foreign
A.2 Other Revenue (A.2.1 +A.2.2)
A.2.1 Domestic
Foreign, specify (A.2.2.1+A.2.2.2+ A.2.2.3+ A.2.2.4+ A.2.2.5+ A.2.2.6+A.2.2.7+
A.2.2 A.2.2.8+A.2.2.9+A.2.2.10)
A.2.2.1
A.2.2.2
A.2.2.3
A.2.2.4
A.2.2.5
A.2.2.6
A.2.2.7
A.2.2.8
A.2.2.9
A.2.2.10
B. EXPENSES (B.1 + B.2)
B.1 Domestic
B.2 Foreign, specify (B.2.1+B.2.2+B.2.3+B.2.4+B.2.5+B.2.6+B.2.7+B.2.8+B.2.9+B.2.10)
B.2.1 Cost of management contracts
B.2.2
B.2.3
B.2.4
B.2.5
B.2.6
B.2.7
B.2.8
B.2.9
B.2.10
Page 7
2014
( in P'000 )
16,935,883.00
16,935,883.00
0.00
16,357,145.00
16,331,657.00
25,488.00
0.00
0.00
8,397,307.00
51,893.00
51,893.00
7,477,460.00
54,287.00
54,287.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
PSIC:
2015
2014
( in P'000 )
( in P'000 )
A. Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities (sum of above rows)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from:
Maturities of available-for-sale financial assets
Sale of property and equipment
Issuance of securities
Others, specify:
Interest received
Dividends received from associates
Acquisitions of:
Investment in associates
Property, plant and equipment
Available-for-sale financial assets
Others, specify (negative entry):
Decrease (increase) in:
Short-term cash investments
Other noncurrent assets
B. Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities (sum of above rows)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Long term debt:
Availments
Payments
Payments of service concession obligation
Others, specify:
Payments of dividends
C. Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities (sum of above rows)
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (A + B + C)
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of year
End of year
Page 8
7,928,964.00
7,666,247.00
2,600,213.00
0.00
1,457,535.00
76,526.00
68,698.00
(24,952.00)
(8,432.00)
42,253.00
(316,944.00)
(403,515.00)
0.00
2,443,987.00
0.00
1,636,137.00
188,034.00
63,051.00
(43.00)
(7,241.00)
(324,173.00)
(185,635.00)
(357,298.00)
0.00
(178,664.00)
9,263.00
(255,162.00)
(4,449,380.00)
(13,255.00)
(291,607.00)
(82,693.00)
(158,107.00)
(3,252,081.00)
(212,289.00)
243,999.00
(1,787,622.00)
(655.00)
(197,048.00)
(1,777,131.00)
(127,529.00)
4,988,870.00
5,024,581.00
0.00
45,935.00
0.00
107,602.00
259,014.00
100,000.00
1,244.00
0.00
58,445.00
134,028.00
(318,163.00)
(725,855.00)
0.00
0.00
(352,517.00)
0.00
0.00
(164,062.00)
(795,529.00)
94,345.00
(395,042.00)
(359,497.00)
2,798,379.00
(2,476,014.00)
(799,794.00)
(2,039,954.00)
1,235,629.00
(1,886,518.00)
(698,927.00)
(2,013,110.00)
71,842.00
(1,341,396.00)
(133,621.00)
124,618.00
0.00
31,984.00
(1,507,050.00)
(154,318.00)
0.00
0.00
(3,795,940.00)
397,401.00
(4,992,310.00)
(327,226.00)
6,452,555.00
6,849,956.00
6,779,781.00
6,452,555.00
Control No.:
Form Type:
GENERAL FORM FOR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NAME OF CORPORATION:
Manila Water Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CURRENT ADDRESS:
MWSS Administration Building, 489 Katipunan Road, Balara, Quezon City
TEL. NO.:
(632) 917-5900
COMPANY TYPE :
If these are based on consolidated financial statements, please so indicate in the caption.
FAX NO.:
WATER UTILITY
PSIC:
FINANCIAL DATA
A. Balance, 2013
Capital Stock
2,447,270.00
Additional Paid-in
Capital
3,908,364.00
Subscriptions
Receivable
(283,527.00)
Common Stock
Options
Outstanding
13,807.00
Translation
Differences
Retained Earnings
118,239.00
24,402,675.00
Unrealized Gain on
AFS Assets
3,302.00
Remeasurement
Gain (Loss) on
Defined Benefit
Plans
(140,373.00)
Other Equity
Reserve
7,500.00
Non-controlling
Interest
576,800.00
0.00
0.00
B. Restated Balance
C. Surplus
0.00
0.00
60,653.00
0.00
0.00
31,983.00
2,400.00
101,971.00
0.00
(3,302.00)
37,232.00
0.00
0.00
60,653.00
31,983.00
2,400.00
0.00
101,971.00
0.00
(3,302.00)
37,232.00
0.00
60,653.00
2,400.00
63,053.00
37,231.00
C.4.
4 Realized FV gain transferred to profit and loss
37,231.00
(3,302.00)
(3,302.00)
C.4.
5 Share of non controlling interest
E.
F.
5,813,089.00
(263.00)
(263.00)
16,860.00
5,829,949.00
(2,013,110.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(2,013,110.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
F.1
0.00
F.2
0.00
F.3
0.00
F.4
0.00
F.5
Issuance of Capital Stock
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
G.3 Others
H.
128,703.00
31,983.00
C.4.
3 Acturial gain (loss) on defined benefit plans
(263.00)
31,983.00
C.4.
2 Exercised common stock outstanding
230,674.00
0.00
101,971.00
C.4.
1 Collections from subscriptions receivable
D.
(263.00)
0.00
G.
TOTAL
31,054,057.00
Balance, 2014
0.00
2,447,270.00
3,969,017.00
(251,544.00)
16,207.00
220,210.00
28,202,654.00
0.00
(103,141.00)
7,500.00
593,397.00
35,101,570.00
0.00
0.00
I.
Restated Balance
J.
Surplus
0.00
0.00
0.00
(94,473.00)
4,611.00
278,620.00
Page 9
0.00
0.00
(20,443.00)
0.00
124,618.00
292,933.00
FINANCIAL DATA
Capital Stock
Additional Paid-in
Capital
Subscriptions
Receivable
Common Stock
Options
Outstanding
Translation
Differences
Retained Earnings
Unrealized Gain on
AFS Assets
Remeasurement
Gain (Loss) on
Defined Benefit
Plans
Other Equity
Reserve
Non-controlling
Interest
0.00
0.00
278,620.00
0.00
0.00
J.4.
1 Collections from subscriptions receivable
(94,473.00)
4,611.00
0.00
278,620.00
0.00
0.00
(20,443.00)
0.00
124,618.00
(94,473.00)
J.4.
2 Exercised common stock outstanding
4,611.00
4,611.00
0.00
J.4.
4 Acturial gain (loss) on defined benefit plans
(20,443.00)
(20,443.00)
J.4.
5 Additions to noncontrolling interest
Net Income (Loss) for the Period
L.
5,957,780.00
124,618.00
124,618.00
176,260.00
6,134,040.00
(2,039,953.00)
(2,039,953.00)
0.00
M.1
0.00
M.2
0.00
M.3
0.00
M.4
0.00
M.5
N.
0.00
6,397.00
224,006.00
6,397.00
224,006.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N.3 Others
Balance, 2015
230,403.00
230,403.00
14,313.00
(94,473.00)
J.4.
3 Realized FV gain transferred to profit and loss
K.
TOTAL
0.00
2,453,667.00
4,193,023.00
(346,017.00)
20,818.00
498,830.00
Page 10
32,120,481.00
0.00
(123,584.00)
7,500.00
894,275.00
39,718,993.00
NAME
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Ayala Corporation*
PCD Nominee Corporation (Non-Filipino)**
PCD Nominee Corporation (Filipino)***
Antonino Aquino
ESOWN Administrator 2014****
ESOWN Administrator 2013****
ESOWN Administrator 2005****
ESOWN Administrator 2009****
ESOWN Administrator 2008****
Janine T. Carreon as
Manila Water Company, Inc. ESOP Administrator
ESOWN Administrator 2011****
ESOWN Administrator 2012****
Ernesto O. Chua Chiaco and/or
Margaret Sy Chua Chiaco
Sherisa P. Nuesa
Genevieve Sy Chuachiaco
Peace Equity Access for
Community Empowerment Foundation
Ruel Ternate Maranan
Ernesson Sy Chua Chiaco
Margaret Sy Chua Chiaco
Lozano A. Tan
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
NUMBER OF
COMMON SHARES
869,542,896
787,889,063
316,545,367
7,200,000
6,393,986
5,797,256
5,757,501
5,252,080
5,032,870
PERCENTAGE OF
COMMON SHARES
42.34%
38.36%
15.41%
0.35%
0.31%
0.28%
0.28%
0.26%
0.25%
4,644,924
0.23%
4,387,732
4,200,886
0.21%
0.20%
2,240,000
0.11%
1,900,000
1,490,500
0.09%
0.07%
1,345,000
0.07%
1,275,000
1,258,000
1,106,000
950,000
0.06%
0.06%
0.05%
0.05%
* Excludes shares of Michigan Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Ayala Corporation
** Includes shares of First State Investment Management
*** Includes shares of Michigan Holdings, Inc.
**** Shares granted under the Companys ESOWN Plan