Exhaust Emissions and Its Control Technology For An Internal Combustion Engine
Exhaust Emissions and Its Control Technology For An Internal Combustion Engine
Exhaust Emissions and Its Control Technology For An Internal Combustion Engine
(IJERA)
ISSN: 2248-9622
www.ijera.com
Vol. 3, Issue 4, Jul-Aug 2013, pp.947-960
ABSTRACT
The automobiles play an important role
in the transport system. With an increase in
population and living standard, the transport
vehicles as well as car population is increasing
day by day. In addition to this there is steep
increase in the number of two wheelers during
the last two decades. All these are increasing
exhaust pollution and particularly in metros as
density of these vehicles in metros are very high.
The main pollutants contributed by I.C.
engines are CO, NOX unburned hydro-carbons
(HC)
and other particulate emissions. Other
sources such as Electric power stations industrial
and domestic fuel consumers also add pollution
like NOX, SO2 and particulate matters. In
addition to this, all fuel burning systems emit
CO2 in large quantities and this is more
concerned with the Green House Effect which is
going to decide the health of earth.
Lot of efforts are made to reduce the air
pollution from petrol and diesel engines and
regulations for emission limits are also imposed
in USA and in a few cities of India. An extensive
analysis of energy usage and pollution shows that
alternative power systems are still a long way
behind the conventional ones. Further
developments in petrol and diesel engines,
combined with improvements in the vehicles, will
make fuel consumption reduction of 40% or
more in the future cars. This, in turn, will reduce
the CO2 emissions, a gas which is responsible for
greenhouse effect.
II.
I.
Introduction
Undesirable
emissions
in
internal
combustion engines are of major concern because of
their negative impact on air quality, human health,
and global warming. Therefore, there is a concerted
effort by most governments to control them.
Undesirable
emissions
include
unburned
hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO),
nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter (PM),
we present the U.S. and European emissions
standards, both for gasoline and diesel operated
engines, and strategies to control the undesirable
Perfect Combustion
III.
Exhaust Pollutants
HYDROCARBONS
947 | P a g e
948 | P a g e
Reference Date
Bharat
Stage II
Euro 2
Region
2000
Nationwide
2001
NCR*, Mumbai,
Kolkata,
Chennai
2003.04
NCR*,
Cities
12
2005.04 Nationwide
IV.
Euro norms
2005.04
Bharat
Stage III
Euro 3
Bharat
Stage IV
Euro 4
NCR*,
Cities
12
2010.04 Nationwide
2010.04
NCR*,
Cities
12
V.
Reference
CO
HC
NOx PM
1992
17.332.6
2.73.7
1996
11.20
2.40
14.4
2000
Euro I
4.5
1.1
8.0
0.36*
2005 Euro II
4.0
1.1
7.0
0.15
2.1
0.66
5.0
0.10
VI.
949 | P a g e
Reference CO
HC HC+NOx PM
1992
1996
5.09.0
2000
Euro 1
2.726.90
0.97-1.70
0.140.25
1.01.5
0.7-1.2
0.080.17
2005 Euro 2
2.0-4.0
Reference
CO
HC
NOx PM
1992
14.0
3.5
18.0
1996
11.20
2.40 14.4
2000
Euro I
4.5
1.1
8.0
0.36*
2005
Euro II
4.0
1.1
7.0
0.15
Reference
CO
HC
HC+NOx
1991
14.327.1
2.02.9
1996
8.6812.4
3.00-4.36
1998*
4.346.20
1.50-2.18
2000
Euro 1
2.726.90
0.97-1.70
2005
Euro 2
2.2-5.0
0.5-0.7
VII.
CO
HC
HC+NOx
1991
12-30
8-12
1996
6.75
5.40
2000
4.00
2.00
2.25
2.00
CO
HC
HC+NOx
1991
12-30
8-12
1996
5.50
3.60
950 | P a g e
IX.
Methods
of
gas
concentration
measurement:
Broadly the gas concentration methods
may be classified as Non separation methods and
Separation methods. In the former there is no effort
made to isolate the candidate gas from the gas
mixture. In the latter the candidate gas is physically
separated before being measured.
(i) Non separation methods:
(a) Non Dispersive Infrared Analysed (NDIR)
(b) Differential Absorption LIDAR (DIAL)
(c) Chemiluminescence NOx detection
(ii) Separation methods:
(a) Gas Chromatography
(b) Orsat gas analyser
951 | P a g e
952 | P a g e
X.
953 | P a g e
XI.
XII.
954 | P a g e
XIV.
XV.
of
955 | P a g e
XVI.
956 | P a g e
Control
of
957 | P a g e
XX.
958 | P a g e
XXIII. Conclusion
Maximum permitted noise level at a
distance of 75m from the path of the vehicles, being
driven within an area providing a clear space of at
least 50m radius.
Aircraft noises: Of all the noises, those produced
by modern jet engines are by far the worst and the
most difficult to do anything about. Ground
personnel have to wear special ear protection, and
passengers entering or leaving aircraft are protected
by noise deflecting barriers. There is a trend, as the
noise level at airports increases, to allow passengers
to remain entirely indoors by providing movable
covered ramps that connect between the aircraft and
the terminal building. Propeller driven aircrafts
reach their peak sound level at the low frequency of
the sound spectrum, but unsuppressed jet exhaust
sounds tend to have their maximum at the higher
ranges, which are far more penetrating. Aircraft
speed has not been found to be related to the noise
volume given off by jet engines and there is no
reason for engine noises of supersonic to be greater
than those of subsonic aircraft. Supersonic aircrafts,
however, produce a sonic boom, which can be
extremely damaging. There is no way of avoiding
the sonic boom nor can much be done in general to
reduce noise from jet aircraft.
The sound levels inside certain premises are listed
below:
Sound
Enclosure
Level (dB)
Jet engine test room
Inside bus
Inside car in city traffic
Heavy traffic(8-16 m
away)
30 m away (average
traffic)
30 m away (light traffic)
114
92
85
75
65
46
References
[1]
959 | P a g e
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
thehindu/2003/02/02/stories/200302020248
1100.htm, (2003).
Anoop Singh., Prasad, S., Joshi, Ethanol
as an Alternative Fuel from Agricultural,
Industrial
and
Urban
Residues,
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Journal, Vol. 50, (2007), 1-39.
Niven, R., Ethanol in Gasoline:
Environmental Impacts and Sustainability
Review
Article,
Renewable
and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 9,
(2005), 535-555.
Al Baghdadi, M. A. S., Performance
Study of a Four- Stroke Spark Ignition
Engine working with both Hydrogen and
Ethyl Alcohol as Supplementary Fuel,
International Journal of Hydrogen
Energy, Vol. 25, (2000), 1005-1009.
Brinkman, N. D., Ethanol Fuel-A Single
Cylinder Engine Study of Efficiency and
Exhaust Emissions, SAE Paper, No.
810345, (1982).
Al-Hasan, M., Effect of Ethanol-Unleaded
Gasoline Blends on Engine Performance
and
Exhaust
Emission,
Energy
Conversion and Management, Vol. 44,
(2003), 1547-1561.
Desoky, A. A. and El-Emam, S. H., A
Study on the Combustion of Alternative
Fuels
in
Spark-Ignition
Engines,
International Journal of Hydrogen
Energy, Vol. 10, Issue 8, (1985).
Jamal, Y. and Wyszynski M. L., OnBoard Generation of Hydrogen-Rich
Gaseous Fuel-A Review, International
Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 19, No.
7, (1994), 557-572.
Al-Baghdadi M. A. S. and Al-Janabi, H. A.
S., Improvement of Performance and
Reduction of Pollutant Emission of a Four
Stroke Spark Ignition Engine Fueled with
Hydrogen-Gasoline Fuel Mixture, Energy
Conversion Management Journal, Vol.
41, No. 1, (2000), 77-91.
Das,
L.
M.,
Exhaust
Emission
Characterization of Hydrogen Operated
Engine System, International Journal of
Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 15, (1990), 815833.
Mathur, H. B., Khajuria, P. R.,
Performance and Emission Characteristics
of Hydrogen Fuelled Spark Ignition
Engine, International Journal of
Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 9, No. 8, (1984) ,
729-735.
Mclean, W. J. and Homan, H. S.,
Performance and Emissions of Hydrogen
Fuelled Internal Combustion Engines,
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
960 | P a g e