Article 1793

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Article 1793

A partner who has received, in whole or in part, his share of a


partnership credit, when the other partners have not collected theirs,
shall be obliged, if the debtor should thereafter become insolvent, to
bring to the partnership capital what he received even though he may
have given receipt for his share only.
In this case, there is only one debt but two or more debtors, both of
each are partners.
Example: A and B are partner and C owes the partnership a sum of Php10,000.B is
the managing partner but A collects his share in the Php10,000 and C pays Php5000
to which A issues a receipt in his name. When Bs turn to collect comes, C is already
insolvent.
In this case A shall return his Php5000 to the partnership and split it with B
because C has already become insolvent. It would be unjust for B not to share
in the loss of the partnership. It is based on the underlying provision of
community of interest among partners.
Take note that whoever collects doesnt matter as it doesnt make a
difference
If you get your share early, and the other parties cannot get theirs because
the debtor has become insolvent the n you must return your share to the
partnership so that no one gets more than he should have.
Article 1794
Every partner is responsible to the partnership for damages suffered by it
through his fault, and he cannot compensate them with the profits and
benefits which he may have earned for the partnership by his industry.
However, the courts may equitably lessen this responsibility if through the
partner's extraordinary efforts in other activities of the partnership, unusual
profits have been realized.
Why compensation will not apply?
Compensation will not apply because in compensation, you should be both a
debtor and a creditor at the same time. However, the partner here is only a
debtor for damages and he cannot compensate using his profits and benefits
earned for the partnership because it is hi duty to do so in the first place.
Responsibility may be equitably mitigated by the court if, through
extraordinary efforts of the partner, unusual profits are recognized/realized.
If a partner is guilty of fraud or damages, he shall be liable for that.
Example: A partnership between A and B is engaged in an autoshop business. A
customer brought his car in to be painted Yellow but A bought red paint instead and
the car is painted red. Damages are suffered by the partnership Php30000 due to

the repainting. Can A compensate this loss using the profits he earned for the
partnership?
Answer: A cannot compensate it with the profits he earned because it his obligation
to bring profits in the first place. The responsibility of the Php30000, however, may
be mitigated by the court if by other activities, A is able to bring about unusual or
extraordinary profits, meaning, he may be allowed by the courts to pay back
Php15,000 instead.

You might also like