Performance of Homogeneous Charge - Dual Engine
Performance of Homogeneous Charge - Dual Engine
Performance of Homogeneous Charge - Dual Engine
1 Introduction
The increase of the environmental concern and the
more stringent regulations about pollutants emissions
from internal combustion engines make necessary the
search of alternatives for current automotive engine
combustion processes [1].
One of the technologies which is receiving attention
is the homogeneous charge compression ignition
(HCCI). The main reason for the ongoing interest in
homogeneous charge compression ignition engines is
the potential for high thermal efficiency, the absence of
soot and the low NOx emissions [2]. The lean
homogeneous fuel/air mixture is essentially inducted
into the cylinder without throttling losses and then
compressed to auto ignition which occurs
simultaneously through the cylinder without
discernable flame propagation. These features lead to
very low NOx and PM emissions while maintaining
high thermal efficiency [3].
However, there are still many challenges to
overcome before full HCCI operation can be used
reliably over the full engine operation range. The
challenges can be briefly summarized as combustion
control (start and rate) and high emissions of unburned
HC and CO emission [4]. These challenges are difficult
to overcome firstly because HCCI is lack of ignition
control mechanism like the spark and direct injection
timing control. Secondly the HCCI combustion is
dominated by the chemical kinetics based on the fuel
properties therefore the occurrences of misfiring at low
ISSN: 1792-4596
ISBN: 978-960-474-215-8
v
C11 C12 swirl
Sp
VT
S p C2 d i ( p pmotored )
PV
i i
(2)
T (ms )
1.028
P
(3)
(1)
Nuh a Reb Pr c
80
ISBN: 978-960-474-215-8
1 a /
(4)
(5)
xD 1 exp( K 3 K 4 )
K1 , K 2 , K 3 ,
650
Model(Thisstudy)
600
550
500
450
400
300
(7)
-150
-100
-50
50
100
150
CAD
14.2
0.644
K 4 0.79 K 30.25
Model(Machrafi)
350
K 2 5000
K3
700
81
ISBN: 978-960-474-215-8
HCDE,totalequivalenceratio=1
HCCIengine,equivalenceratio=1
180
HCCIengine,equivalenceratio=0.6
Model(Mikalsen)
3500
Model(Thisstudy)
140
3000
120
2500
100
Temperature (K)
160
80
60
40
2000
1500
1000
20
500
0
-150
-100
-50
50
100
150
CAD
0
-150
Setting
16.5
103.3 cm3
1000 rpm
3.714286
12.065 cm
Value
2.28
0.308
3.24
100
PureHCCI
HCDE
50
15
Coefficient
Parameter
-50
CAD
Compression ratio
Cylinder clearance volume
Engine speed
Connecting rod to crank radius ratio
Cylinder bore diameter
-100
10
5
0.6
0.8
Equivalence Ratio
PureHCCI
1.60E-05
CO Emission (gr)
HCDE
8.00E-06
0.00E+00
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
Equivalence Ratio
0.8
ISSN: 1792-4596
82
ISBN: 978-960-474-215-8
4 Conclusions
HCD engine is a compromise between HCCI engine
and conventional compression ignition engine.
Although this engine has higher indicated power than
HCCI engine, but HCCI engine has less CO pollution.
References:
[1] J.J. Hernande, J. Sanz-Argent, J. Benajes and S. Molina,
Selection of a diesel fuel surrogate for the prediction of
auto-ignition under HCCI engine conditions, Fuel 87
(2008) 655665.
[2] Alkidas AC. Combustion advancements in gasoline
engines. Energy Convers Manage 2007,48:275161.
[3] Junjun Ma, Xingcai L, Libin Ji, and Zhen Huang, An
experimental study of HCCI-DI combustion and
emissions in a diesel engine with dual fuel,
International Journal of Thermal Sciences 47 (2008)
12351242
[4] Wang Ying, He Li, Zhou Jie, and Zhou Jie, Study of
HCCI-DI combustion and emissions in a DME engine,
Fuel 88 (2009) 22552261.
[5] Jos A. Veisquez, and Luiz F.Milanez, Computational
Model for Simulation of Processes in Diesel Engines,
SAE paper, No 952304, 1995.
[6] R. Stone, Introduction to Internal Combustion Engines,
third ed., 1999, Macmillan Press, London, UK.
[7] Krieger R. B. and Borman G. L. The computation of
apparent heat release for internal combustion
engines.,ASME paper, (66-WA/DGP-4), 1966.
ISSN: 1792-4596
83
ISBN: 978-960-474-215-8