2 5 The Quarter Wave Transformer Package PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

2/13/2005

2_5 The Quarter Wave Transformer

1/1

2.5 The Quarter-Wave Transformer


Reading Assignment: pp. 73-76
By now youve noticed that a quarter-wave length of
transmission line ( A = 4 , 2 A = ) appears often in
microwave engineering problems.

HO: The Quarter-Wave Transformer


Q: Why does the quarter-wave matching network work
after all, the quarter-wave line is mismatched at both ends?
A: HO: Multiple Reflection Viewpoint

Jim Stiles

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

The Quarter Wave Transformer

1/5

The Quarter-Wave
Transformer
Say the end of a transmission line with characteristic
impedance Z0 is terminated with a resistive (i.e., real) load.

Z0

RL

We typically would like all power traveling down the line to be


absorbed by the load RL.
But if RL Z 0 , the line is unmatched and some of the incident

power will be reflected.

Q: Can all incident power be delivered to a resistive load if


RL Z 0 ??
A: Yes! We can insert a matching network between the
transmission line and the load.

Z0

Jim Stiles

Matching
Network

The Univ. of Kansas

RL

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

The Quarter Wave Transformer

2/5

A matching network is a lossless, 2-port device. Its job is to


transform the load RL ( or even ZL ) to a value Z0.
In other words, we want the input impedance of the matching
network to be Zin =Z0, so that in = 0 --no reflection!
Since none of the incident power is reflected, and none is
absorbed by the lossless matching network, it all must be
absorbed by the load RL !
Q: These matching networks sound too good to be true.

Exactly how do we build them?

A: There are many methods and ways, but perhaps the


easiest is the quarter-wave transformer.
First, insert a transmission line with characteristic impedance
Z1 and length A = 4 (i.e., a quarter-wave line) between the load
and the Z0 transmission line.

Z0

Z1

Zin

A =

RL

The 4 line is the matching network!

Jim Stiles

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

The Quarter Wave Transformer

3/5

Q: But what about the characteristic impedance Z1; what

should its value be??

A: Remember, the quarter wavelength case is one of the special


cases that we studied. We know that the input impedance of
the quarter wavelength line is:

Zin =

( Z1

ZL

( Z1

RL

Thus, if we wish for Zin to be numerically equal to Z0, we find:

(Z )
=

Zin

RL

= Z0

Solving for Z1, we find its required value to be:

(Z ) R
(Z )
2

= Z0
= Z 0 RL

Z 1 = Z 0 RL

In other words, the characteristic impedance of the quarter


wave line is the geometric average Z0 and RL!

Jim Stiles

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

The Quarter Wave Transformer

4/5

Therefore, a 4 line with characteristic impedance

Z 1 = Z 0RL will match a transmission line with characteristic


impedance Z0 to a resistive load RL.

Z0

Z1 =

Zin =Z0

Z 0RL

A =

RL

Thus, all power is delivered to load RL !

Important Note: We find that Zin = Z 0 only if the matching if

the quarter-wave transmission line is exactly one-quarter


wavelength in length A = 4 .

The problem with this, of course, is that a physical length A of


transmission line is exactly one-quarter wavelength at only one
frequency f !
Remember, wavelength is related to frequency as:

vp
1
=
f f LC

where vp is the propagation velocity of the wave .

Jim Stiles

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

The Quarter Wave Transformer

5/5

For example, assuming that vp = c (c = the speed of light in a


vacuum), one wavelength at 1 GHz is 30 cm ( = 0.3 m ), while one
wavelength at 3 GHz is 10 cm ( = 0.1 m ). As a result, a
transmission line length A = 7.5 cm is a quarter wavelength for a
signal at 1GHz only.
Thus, a quarter-wave transformer provides a perfect match
( in = 0 ) at one and only one signal frequency!

Jim Stiles

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

Multiple Reflection Viewpoint

1/7

Multiple Reflection
Viewpoint
The quarter-wave transformer brings up an interesting
question in -wave engineering.

Z0

Z1 =

in = 0

Z 0RL

A =

RL

Q: Why is there no reflection at z = A ? It appears


that the line is mismatched at both z = 0 and z = A .
A: In fact there are reflections at these mismatched
interfacesan infinite number of them!

First, lets define a few terms:

Jim Stiles

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

Multiple Reflection Viewpoint

2/7

V i e j z
V re + j z

Z0

Z1 =

Z 0RL

A =

RL

1 = partial reflection coefficient of a wave incident on the


z = A interface from the Z0 line:
1 =

Z1 Z 0
Z1 + Z 0

Z0

Z 0RL

RL

2 = partial reflection coefficient of a wave incident on the


z = A interface from the Z1 line:
2 =

Z 0 Z1
= 1
Z 0 + Z1

Z0

Z 0RL

RL

3 = partial reflection coefficient of a wave incident on the


z = 0 interface from the Z1 line:
3 =

RL Z 1
RL + Z 1

Jim Stiles

Z0

The Univ. of Kansas

Z 0RL

RL

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

Multiple Reflection Viewpoint

3/7

T1 = partial transmission coefficient of a wave incident on the


z = A interface from the Z0 line:

1 =

2Z 1
Z1 + Z 0

Z0

Z 0RL

RL

T2 = partial transmission coefficient of a wave incident on the


z = A interface from the Z1 line:

2 =

2 Z0
Z 0 + Z1

Z0

Z 0RL

RL

Now lets try to intemperate what physically happens when the


incident voltage wave:

V i e j z
Z 0RL

Z0

RL

reaches the interface at z = A .

Jim Stiles

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

Multiple Reflection Viewpoint

4/7

1. At z = A , the characteristic impedance of the transmission


line changes from Z0 to Z1. This mismatch creates a reflected
wave:

V i e j z

Z 0RL

Z0

RL

V1r e + j z
where V1 r = 1V i .
2.

However, a portion of the incident wave is transmitted (T1 )

across the interface at z = A , this wave travels a distance of


A = 90D to the load at z = 0 , where a portion of it is reflected
( 3 ). This wave travels back A = 90D to the interface at

z = A , where a portion is again transmitted (T2 ) across into the


Z0 transmission lineanother reflected wave (V2r )!
V i e j z
Z 0RL

Z0

RL

V2r e + j z
where we have found that traveling 2 A = 180D has produced a
minus sign in our result:

V2r = 2 e j 90 3 e j 90 1V i
D

= 1 2 3V i
Jim Stiles

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

Multiple Reflection Viewpoint

5/7

3. However, a portion of this second wave is also reflected


( 2 ) back into the Z1 transmission line at z = A , where it again

travels to A = 90D the load, is partially reflected ( 3 ), travels

A = 90D back to z = A , and is partially transmitted into Z0


(T2 )our third reflected wave!
V i e j z

Z 0RL

Z0

RL

V3r e + j z
where:

V3r = 2 e j 90 3 e j 90 2 e j 90 3 e j 90 1V i
D

= 1 2 ( 3 ) 2V i
2

n. We can see that this bouncing back and forth can go on

forever, with each trip launching a new reflected wave into the
Z0 transmission line.

Note however, that the power associated with each successive


reflected wave is smaller than the previous, and so eventually,
the power associated with the reflected waves will diminish to
insignificance!
Q:

But, why then is = 0 ?

Jim Stiles

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

A:

Multiple Reflection Viewpoint

6/7

Each reflected wave Vn r is a coherent wave. That is, they

all oscillate at same frequency ; the reflected waves differ


only in terms of their magnitude and phase.
Therefore, to determine the total reflected wave, we must
perform a coherent summation of each reflected wavea
operation easily performed since we have expressed our waves
with complex notation:

V e
r

+ j z

= Vn r e + j z
n =1

It can be shown that this infinite series converges, with the


result:
+ 1 2 3 1 2 3 i
Vr = 1
V
1
+

2 3

Thus, the total reflection coefficient is:

V r 1 + 1 2 3 1 2 3
= i =
1 + 2 3
V
Using our definitions, it can likewise be shown that the
numerator of the above expression is:
1 + 1 2 3 1 2 3 =

Jim Stiles

2 ( Z 12 Z 0 RL )

( Z1 + Z 0 ) (RL + Z1 )

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

2/13/2005

Multiple Reflection Viewpoint

7/7

It is evident that the numerator (and therefore ) will be zero


if:
Z 12 Z 0 RL

Z 1 = Z 0 RL
Just as we expected!
Physically, this results insures that all the reflected waves add
coherently together to produce a zero value!
A simple example of this phenomenon is the addition of two
waves with equal magnitude and opposite phase (i.e., their phase
difference is 180D ).

cos ( t ) + cos ( t + 180D ) = cos ( t ) cos ( t ) = 0


Note all of our transmission line analysis has been steady-state
analysis. We assume our signals are sinusoidal, of the form
exp( j t ) . Note this signal exists for all time tthe signal is
assumed to have been on forever, and assumed to continue on
forever.
In other words, in steady-state analysis, all the multiple
reflections have long since occurred, and thus have reached a
steady statethe reflected wave is zero!

Jim Stiles

The Univ. of Kansas

Dept. of EECS

You might also like