Integrated Coverage Measurement and Analysis System For Outdoor Coverage Wlan
Integrated Coverage Measurement and Analysis System For Outdoor Coverage Wlan
Integrated Coverage Measurement and Analysis System For Outdoor Coverage Wlan
Radiobolaget AB
Mrbylnga, land
Supervisor: Niklas Gunhamn
ABSTRACT
Daily usage of Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN) in business life for specific
purposes has became much more critical than before since it is sometimes crucial to have
wireless connectivity and seamless roaming around the working environment. In this thesis,
steps required in order to design and implement a large scale outdoor IEEE 802.11g WLAN will
be shown. This WLAN project has been deployed in north of Sweden and target coverage was an
open area consisting of a deep pit mine, connecting roads, workshops, offices, dumps and
storage areas. All telecommunications equipment used in this project is from the manufacturer
Cisco using centralized solution. The special purpose of this project is to collect and analyze a
series of coverage measurement data and correlate this data to predict the coverage area. Linux
bash scripting and Gnuplot has been used to analyze coverage data. Finally, WRAP spectrum
management and radio planning software has been used in modeling and designing of the whole
network
Contents
1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3
2 Overview of Wireless Networking and IEEE 802.11 Standards........................................... 4
2.1 Introduction to Wireless Networking and WLAN ............................................................... 4
2.1.1 Wireless Networks ..................................................................................................... 4
2.1.2 IEEE 802.11 Elements ............................................................................................... 5
2.1.3 Nonstandard IEEE 802.11 Topologies ....................................................................... 8
2.2 Wireless Networks and Spread Spectrum Technologies ...................................................... 8
2.3 IEEE802.11 Medium Access Control (MAC) and MAC Architecture .............................. 12
2.3.1 CSMA/CA vs CSMA/CD ........................................................................................ 12
2.3.2 Distributed Coordination Function ........................................................................... 13
2.4 IEEE 802.11 Standards ..................................................................................................... 15
3 Measurement Campaign and Technique............................................................................. 17
3.1 Measurement Equipment .................................................................................................. 17
3.1.1 Cisco CT5508 WLAN Controller ............................................................................. 17
3.1.2 Cisco AP1242AG AP .............................................................................................. 17
3.1.3 GPS Receiver........................................................................................................... 18
3.1.4 Antennas .................................................................................................................. 18
3.2 Measurement Technique ................................................................................................... 21
4 Measurement Results, Analysis and Discussion .................................................................. 22
4.1 Collected Data Processing ................................................................................................ 22
4.2 Site Survey Fundamentals ................................................................................................ 22
4.3 Assisted Coverage Analysis with Measurement Data ........................................................ 25
4.3.1 Total Coverage Area Results and Analysis ............................................................... 25
4.3.2 AP Specific Results and Analysis ............................................................................ 28
4.4 Predictive Coverage Analysis with WRAP ....................................................................... 39
4.5 Correlation Between Assisted and Predictive Coverage Analysis ...................................... 41
5 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 44
6 References ............................................................................................................................. 45
WPAN
WPAN is used for close distance communications between computer devices such as
laptops, Personal Digital Assistants (PDA), mobile phones, printers etc. as portals to higher level
networks such as Internet or local area networks (LAN). Most common technologies are
Bluetooth and infrared networks. Bluetooth uses frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS)
technology to establish a connection in RF medium and infrared networks work on a light based
medium [1]. The IEEE 802.15 Working Group defines the standards in Bluetooth and ZigBee
technologies. ZigBee is another RF based technology designed for low cost network
establishments between WPAN devices [1].
WLAN
As obviously seen from its name, WLANs provide coverage for limited size areas like
buildings or campus environments. In this thesis, target area is a specific mining area of the
customer company. IEEE 802.11-2007 standard is defined as WLAN technology. The marketing
term Wi-Fi has been used for IEEE 802.11 technologies. In a typical WLAN, network connection
is established by IEEE 802.11 access points (AP) which are connected to wired network
backbone. Therefore, the main goal of a WLAN is to provide network access, network resources
and gateway to internet for mobile users [1] [3] [4].
topologies implemented for WLANs; basic service set (BSS), extended service set (ESS) and
independent basic service set (IBBS) [1]. Here it should be noted that IEEE 802.11 wireless
networks use half duplex communications where both sides are able to function as a transmitter
and receiver but only one device can transmit at a time.
AP
APs are critical devices in wireless networks that can direct traffic either to the wired
network backbone or to the wireless medium. APs are like Ethernet hubs with a radio card and
antenna functioning half-duplex. There are two types of APs, autonomous APs and lightweight
APs. In autonomous APs, all the configuration and Media Access Control (MAC) layer
specifications reside inside the AP and it is said to have a switchlike intelligence where they have
the capability of address and direct wireless traffic at data link layer. However, lightweight APs
are managed by WLAN controller and intelligence resides inside the controller. In wired
networks, switches have MAC address tables known as content addressable memory (CAM) to
direct frames to ports based on these tables. In IEEE 802.11 wireless networks, wireless frames
contain three up to four MAC addresses helping APs to make upper layer decisions. Upper layers
information contained in a wireless frame is known as MAC Service Data Unit (MSDU). The
forwarding of this information is the switchlike intelligence compared to CAM tables and known
as distribution system services (DSS) [11].
Client Station
When radio cards are not used in APs, they are defined as client stations. Examples are
laptops, PDAs, scanners, cellular phones and many other mobile devices. When connection is
established between client and APs at layer 2, they are said to be associated [4] [11].
Integration Service (IS)
An IS provides the data frame transformation between IEEE 802.11 and IEEE 802.3
technologies. It can be simply defined as a frame format transfer method. For example, in a voice
over Wi-Fi (VoWiFi) communication, when mobile phone sends an IEEE 802.11 data frame to
an AP and its frame containing a final destination at a VoIP server residing at IEEE 802.3
network core, it is ISs duty to remove IEEE 802.11 header and payload of the frame and format
a new IEEE 802.3 network frame with MSDU payload [1] [3] [11].
Distribution System (DS)
A DS helps to connect different BSSs with the help of integrated LANs to create an ESS.
Two main components exits: distribution system medium (DSM) and distribution system
services (DSS). DSM is known as the logical physical medium used to connect APs. DSS are
6
Dwell Time
As given in Figure 3, dwell time is predefined as the amount of time it takes to transmit
data in each frequency hop.
Hop Time
This is the amount of time it takes to hop from one frequency to another. Hop time is not
predefined and it is a measurement and waste of time. When dwell time is longer, it will require
less hop time to change frequency and it will give better throughput otherwise frequent change in
hopping will decrease system performance.
Modulation
FHSS uses Gaussian Frequency Shift Keying (GFSK) to modulate data bits. 2 level GFSK
9
uses two different frequencies to represent data bits 0 or 1 and 4 level uses four frequencies to
represent 2 bits combination of 0 and 1 which 00, 01, 10, 11.
10
11
5 GHz Channels
IEEE 802.11-2007 standards define 5 GHz UNII bands: UNII-1, UNII-2, UNII-2 Extended
and UNII-3. Each band has four channels nonoverlapping with 20 MHz frequency space
between them as shown in Figure 6. Channel 36 is highlighted in the figure so as to clearly see
the main and sideband frequencies [11].
still collisions when two or more stations transmit at the same time. However, CSMA/CA
introduces an access method called Distribute Coordination Function (DCF) which performs
multiple checks and controls to minimize the risk of collisions. There is an optional function
called Point Coordination Function (PCF) that helps APs inform client stations about their data.
Yet another function called Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) is developed to define quality
of service methods [2].
In short, carrier sense checks for medium busy or not. Multiple access utilizes that every
single node of the system has equal chances of transmitting at a time. Collision avoidance means
that only one radio acts in the medium.
Collision Detection
As mentioned earlier, IEEE 802.11 radios cannot transmit and receive at the same time,
therefore they are not able to detect collision but they actually do know when there is a collision
with the help of acknowledgment (ACK) frames. Every time IEEE 802.11 radios transmit
unicast frame. If they receive ACK for a successful transmission of frame, they are ready to start
communication otherwise frame is to be retransmitted. This is not solely an indication for a
collision but assumption could be made [1] [2] [11].
2.3.2 DCF
It is the fundamental access method for IEEE 802.11 communications. There are four main
components working together as part of CSMA/CA process so as to ensure that only one radio is
transmitting at that time. These are interframe space (IFS), random back-off timer, physical and
virtual carrier-sense [2].
IFS
An IF is the amount of time between transmissions of wireless frames and also IFS defines
which type of frame is to be transmitted firstly on the medium. For example, an ACK frame has
priority to be transmitted first and waits for short interframe space (SIFS). There are five types of
interframe spaces: SIFS, point coordination function interframe space (PIFS), distributed
coordination function interframe space (DIFS), arbitration interframe space (AIFS) and extended
interframe space (EIFS). SIFS has the lowest duration and EIFS highest respectively [2].
Duration/ID Field
Represents a number which is the time, in microseconds, it takes to transmit an ACK frame
plus a SIFS interval. This field is utilized to know how long the medium will be busy [2].
13
14
IEEE 802.11g
This amendment is the most successful one and widely used in market. Also in this project,
we have implemented an IEEE 802.11g network. This standard defines a new technology called
Extended Rate Physical (ERP). Main goal was to achieve higher bandwidth in physical layer.
15
There are two compulsory technologies developed; ERP-OFDM is defined to achieve higher
data rates such as 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 54 Mbps. ERP-DSSS/CCK is defined to provide
backward compatibility with 802.11/802.11b networks. There three main modes of an 802.11g
AP exist [3] [4] [7];
B-only mode: Only support for DSSS, HR-DSSS and ERP-DSSS/CCK technologies
are enabled and only IEEE 802.11b clients can communicate with AP.
G-only mode: Only IEEE 802.11g client radios can communicate with AP achieving
data rates from 6 to 54 Mbps. This is called Pure G network.
B/G mode: Mostly used operational mode what is known as mixed mode. Both IEEE
802.11b/g clients can communicate but due to the protection mechanism which
allows different radios to coexist in same place, there will be a decrease in
aggregate throughput.
IEEE 802.11n
This is an amendment to all previous standards published in October 2009. Main goal is to
achieve higher throughput from 54 Mbps up to 600 Mbps with using Multiple-Input-MultipleOutput (MIMO) technology together with Spatial Division Multiplexing (SDM) technology.
With MIMO, multiple antennas used to take advantage of multipath effect and with SDM
technology; multiple independent streams of data could be multiplexed spatially and transmitted
simultaneously in a specific given channel of bandwidth. Furthermore, channel bandwidth is
doubled in IEEE 802.11n technology to 40 MHz which also doubles the PHY data rate speed of
the system [7].
IEEE 802.11ac
This standard is now being developed and will be the best standard providing the highest
throughput, theoretically up to 1 Gbps with the help of wide RF bandwidth which is 160 MHz,
up to 8 MIMO spatial streams and enhanced modulation technique being 256 quadrature
amplitude modulation (QAM) [7].
16
Moreover, this device can be used both as a client and a base station in the network. In this
project, a machine is used which is equipped with a Cisco AP1242AG configured as a Work
Group Bridge (WGB). WGB has been used as a pure client where it associates with an AP and
bridges data to the Ethernet port. This machine has been used to measure coverage data as it had
been continued to carry on its usual work [13].
3.1.4 Antennas
MIMO 3x180 Panel Antenna 2.4 GHz
This is the Radiobolagets production of MIMO 3x180 panel antenna used in 16 of all APs
with 2400 2485 MHz frequency range. Here are the key features of this antenna;
Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) < 1.25
18
Here as seen in figure 11, first two figures show the scale for both azimuth and elevation
radiation patterns of the antenna respectively and they are given with decreasing signal strength
with 5 dB intervals. This antenna is produced to be used in IEEE 802.11n systems but can also
be used as a diversity antenna for IEEE 802.11b/g systems. Outer antenna elements are used for
2xTX configuration and all three for 3xRX [15].
Dual Band Quad Element Omni Antenna
This is Radiobolagets production of 4 sets of 90 panel antennas each of them used for
2.4/5 GHz dual range. These types of antennas were properly used to beam the signal so as to
provide desired coverage area around challenging areas. DBQO antennas were mostly used in
about 28 APs as in two forms; front+back and single. In Figure 12, first part shows the azimuth
pattern of front+back usage and second part of the figure shows the azimuth pattern of single
usage and the last figure shows the antenna view together with weather proof. Here are the key
characteristics of this antenna. Elevation radiation pattern for both usages are the same and
shown in Figure 13 [15];
Gain: 11 dBi for front+back usage and 14 dBi for single usage
Polarization: Vertical
Azimuth: 90 for front+back usage and 0 for single usage.
19
Most of the Cisco 1242APs was mounted inside the antenna and therefore very short length
of antenna cables used to keep loss at a minimum level.
This antenna was used only in two of the APs to cover specific areas. Here are the elevation
and radiation patterns shown in Figure 14 together with outside view of the antenna [16];
Data applications: Applications play a key role in the utilization of each AP and number of
users. Nevertheless, performance also depends on the purpose of the WLAN. In this project, a
typical application is to provide 1 Mb of critical data every five minutes. Therefore, amount of
data rate was quite low to implement. In addition, application data was buffered and stored on
board sometimes in order to be sent when the wireless link is available.
User Density: 40 vehicles consisting of trucks, tractors, service vehicles etc. were provided
with wireless access. 36 APs were actively used to provide connectivity for the said vehicles. As
seen in Figure 16, deep pit mine and surrounding areas were the most important areas to have RF
coverage.
Peak on/off use: It was crucial to define when access to WLAN is the heaviest and when is
the lowest so as to pay attention to defined areas. In this project, pit mine and close surrounding
areas plus office buildings were taken care of very well to meet critical timing.
Existing transmitters: Since there were no other WLAN installations or any other RF
source existing around the area, this factor was out of concern.
Mobile vs. Mobility: It was not crucial to have 100% mobility around the area since
transfer of application data could be performed in between connections.
Antenna Structure: As mentioned before, special type of antenna products have been used
to meet specific areas to be covered.
Topographic map: Since this was an outdoor installation, a topographic map, also called
contour map was necessary to show terrain information such as waters, hills and elevations etc.
which was shown in Figure 17 with 1 m2 resolution.
AP placement: After carrying out the site survey work, proper placement of APs and
according frequency assignment of them is another factor which plays an important role in
designing of WLANs. Each AP equipped with different type of antennas provides coverage for
smaller but challenging areas which will be shown later in next sections. Moreover, frequency
assignment of each antenna was considered to follow most common technique to prevent
interference between each cell as shown in Figure 15 where first, sixth and eleventh
nonoverlapping channels of 2.4 GHz band were chosen to be deployed around coverage area
suitably. As a result, co-channel interference was kept at minimum level because in IEEE
802.11g technology, nearby APs cannot communicate at the same time if both use the same
channel.
23
Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI): RSSI is the measurement of received signal
power recorded at the receiver station. It is usually given in dBm similar to dB but referenced to
1 mW. In IEEE 802.11 technologies, most APs have radio transmit power between 1 mW to 100
mW. To make it easier to read and compare, this value is converted to dBm. Most WLAN
vendors define a receiver sensitivity which indicates the lowest power value of received signal
that can be considered as intelligible. For Cisco AP1242g radios, this value is -90 dBm.
However, one can still get data rates of 1 and 2 Mbps below the threshold as seen in Table 1.
24
Yellow colored figures are the buildings located around the area. Here are useful statistics
concluded from total of measurements:
-
Around 24 km2 of vital areas consisting of the mine, connecting roads, offices, work
stations and storages have been provided with coverage out of 50 km2 total area.
Measurements were made to receive information from AP in one second intervals. Total
number of measurements is 169156 lines which results as approximately 50 hours of
25
data and 352 km measurement travel. On the other hand, there have been measurements
resulted as erroneous data in variety of forms. Here are some examples of erroneous
data which were neglected:
-1716979 7451871 000000000000 where there is no association with an AP.
-After roaming to another AP, first RSSI measured was way higher than the following
measurements which was also a bug omitted.
-1716979 7451871 003A98B6E3B0 where RSSI is missing.
-1716979 7451871 0 003A98B6E3B0 where RSSI is 0, often seen in roaming.
-
Figure 17 shows the corresponding coverage graph of total measurement survey including
erroneous data. In comparison, Figure 18 shows coverage graph with corrected measurements
with erroneous data being filtered out. RSSI level measured higher than -70 dBm considered as a
high speed connection with data rate up to 54 Mbps. Note that this is not the actual throughput of
the system but the highest possible data rate in a given bandwidth. Levels between -70 dBm and
-85 dBm were considered as average speed connection and levels lower than -85 dBm were
considered as low speed connections. Although there are some weak signals received lower than
-90 dBm, connection was still achievable. In Figure 17, it can be observed that in some time
intervals, there are continuous measurements colored as red. This might occur due to errors
mentioned above or WGB might have stopped taking measurements while traveling between
long connecting roads of the whole area. As mentioned before, pit mine, workshops and
buildings were the most critical areas to be covered. Thus, good coverage performance was
achieved around these areas as seen in Figures 17 and 18 with green colored measurement
points. However, there had been still number of dead spots recorded due to the complex hilly
terrain profile.
26
27
Note that the following all analysis graphs and histograms were produced referring to the
corrected measurement data. Figure 19 shows the histogram of all RSSI values. Y coordinate
shows the amount of measurement records for each RSSI values which were given in dBm as X
coordinate. Average RSSI value of all measurement is -74 dBm which concludes that the total
WLAN performance is very good.
utilized APs. Thus, areas covered by these APs were the most critical areas that needed to be
covered well.
Since there are so many APs in the network, coverage analysis of only most utilized ones
were shown with deep analysis in the following figures. X and Y axises denote the
corresponding geographical coordinate of the measurement bus where there was a RSSI recorded
in the machine. Origin was taken as the coordinate where the related AP was installed. Each line
represents a single measurement record with corresponding signal power indicated with prior
colors. In analysis graphs, there are three different scales used to show Y axis of RSSI histogram
for each AP being 4000, 7000 and 10000 highest value of measurement points. This is due to
frequent variation of utilization among all APs. Some have very low utilization with only up to
500 measurement points, on the other hand, most utilized ones have up to 30000 measurement
points recorded. Note that AP specific coverage figures depend only the measurement values do
not mean to show all area that a single AP can cover. Predicted coverage of all APs and
correlation between measured values were shown in the next section. Here are the statistics and
explanation for each APs coverage and histogram figures with each bullet represents the related
29
APs name:
AP G56_AP16_99_dispatch: Figures 21 and 22 show the coverage and RSSI
histogram figures respectively. In this AP, DBQO antenna was used with both
configurations which are single and front+back in order to take advantage of the
antenna diversity. This is the most utilized AP with 17.7% ratio of all
measurements. This AP has around 7.7 hours of data.
AP G56_AP16_90_truckverkstad: Figures 23 and 24 show the coverage and RSSI
histogram figures respectively. With the help of antenna type DBQO, coverage was
established in every direction like an omnidirectional antenna using each 90 panel
antennas. This APs location was around trucks work station, one of the most
critical areas. It can be concluded from the RSSI histogram that this AP has the best
RSSI performance of all since measurement had been taken within a close distance
to the AP. This AP was utilized in 6.7 hours of total measurement time. It has the
highest RSSI average as approximately -54 dBm.
AP G56_AP16_95_Telia: Figures 25 and 26 show the coverage and RSSI histogram
figures respectively. In this AP, combination of single and front+back
configurations was used to cover a specific area. During 5.5 hours of total
measurement time, this AP was used to have access to internet.
AP G56_AP16_87_BT2030: Figures 27 and 28 show the coverage and RSSI
histogram figures respectively. In this AP, Radiobolagets MIMO 3x180 antenna
was used to cover a specific area with an azimuth angle of 180. RSSI performance
of this AP was quite low due to the challenging terrain profile with inconsistent
heights. However, time spent close to this AP was quite high being 3 hours.
AP G56_AP16_73_RM1: Figures 29 and 30 show the coverage and RSSI histogram
figures respectively. In this AP, DBQO type antenna was used with both
configurations. RSSI performance of this AP was good because the path that
measurement bus had been travelling was quite close to this AP. 2.5 hours of data
were collected prior to this AP.
AP G56_AP16_92_kross_i_dagen: Figures 31 and 32 show the coverage and RSSI
histogram figures respectively. This AP was also equipped with DBQO antenna
with the same configuration as previous one. RSSI performance was average
because of both challenging and clear line of sight areas were to be covered. 2 hours
of data were collected.
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
frequency range. Since WRAP uses exact geometrical calculations, it allows us to perform
calculations with arbitrary antenna heights from sea level.
Figure 38 shows the terrain profile from the measurement buss (located in north) to
G56_AP16_86_pressfilter. It is simply from north part to the south part of the most critical area
consisting of the deep pit mine. Throughout the whole area, a static point was chosen as relative
to the sea level in order to make calculation more accurate.
40
41
42
Discussion
As shown in Figure 20 in total AP utilization histogram, there are some APs which were
utilized much less than the others. There are numerous reasons for that; since measurements
were done only with service bus traveling around the specified roads, it might had stopped or
moved around these APs for a very limited time. Actually, it can be concluded that these areas
were low utilized by the customer company. This information was considered before the
installation so that much concentration was focused on dense areas like in offices, workshops
and deep pit mine area. Therefore, suitable antennas were chosen to provide sufficient coverage
in these areas.
Answers to Some Research Questions
Is it possible to further extend the coverage area of outdoor WLAN?
There are numerous ways to extend the coverage area of an outdoor WLAN by adding
more APs, repeaters or using higher gain antennas. However, extending the coverage area further
was not a concern in this project since requirements were adhered to customer demands.
Which kind of techniques should be introduced to extend it?
Other than the methods mentioned above, strategic placement of APs with a proper
mathematical modeling could extend the coverage further a bit. Nevertheless, using more APs,
repeaters, wireless mesh APs or infrastructureless APs would be the best way to extend the
coverage area of WLANs.
43
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION
Implementing a large scale outdoor WLAN solely depends on the customers wireless
needs and the area needs to be covered. First of all, proper site survey and planning for capacity
and coverage are mandatory tasks to perform. Site survey plays such an important role as it gives
most of the information about the target coverage area and limitations before deployment
process. After that, satisfactory planning for capacity will result as sufficient coverage. Looking
at the figures of APs, it can be concluded that it is crucial to decide where to place each AP and
the direction of corresponding antenna equipment taking into account of the terrain profile of the
area. Depending on different heights of the area, suitable selection of antennas and directing
them showed sufficient performance as preventing the network from having more APs. In this
way, whole network was economically optimized while keeping the cost lower.
Correlating the manual coverage analysis with the predicted coverage of a simulation tool
helps one to have an idea of how the network is being utilized, so called birds eye perspective.
Hence, necessary precautions shall be taken when needed.
44
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
P. Brenner. (1996, July). A Technical Tutorial on the IEEE 802.11 Protocol. SSS Online.
[Online]. Available: http://www.sss-mag.com/pdf/802_11tut.pdf
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
Glenn Baddeley. (2001, July). GPS - NMEA sentence information. [Online]. Available:
http://aprs.gids.nl/nmea/
[7]
[8]
Free Software Foundation. (2010). The GNU Awk User's Guide. [Online]. Available:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/html_node/
[9]
[17] Cisco Systems, WLAN Radio Frequency Design Considerations in Enterprise Mobility
3.0 Design Guide, San Jose: Cisco Systems, Inc., 2007.
[18] G. Bianchi, F. Formisano, D. Giustiniano, 802.11b/g Link Level Measurements for an
Outdoor Wireless Campus Network in 2006 International Symposium on a World of
Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks, Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY, 2006.
[19] Rohde & Schwarz. (2006, July). WiMAX, General information about the standard
802.16. [Online]. Available: http://www2.rohde-schwarz.com/file_1782/1MA96_0.pdf
46