United States Patent 0 ": Agriculture
United States Patent 0 ": Agriculture
United States Patent 0 ": Agriculture
3,809,773
Patented May 7., 1974
3,809,773
FORTIFYING COMPOSITION
George N. Bookwalter, Peoria, Ill., assignor to the United
States of America as represented by the Secretary of
Agriculture
U.S. CL 426-380
4 Claims
complete solution.
When the liquid iron-fortifying composition contains
ferrous sulfate heptahydrate as the iron-fortifying agent,
it has the further advantage of being substantially color
less. This is a great advantage in certain food products
such as baked goods where off colors are objectionable to
consumers.
fu'marate, ferric choline citrate, and ferrous gluconate. 45 rous sulfate. Any iron salt within the above limits will be
considered equivalent for the purpose of the invention. Fer
Commercial preparations of these compounds include the
rous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4-7H2O) is preferred
relatively insoluble -. FeSOy 1.2H2O (32.1 percent Fe).
primarily because it provides compositions which range
When the ferrous sulfate compound is combined with
from colorless (compositions containing up to 0.1 percent
wheat flour, 01f ?avors develop during storage. Therefore,
it is usually added during the baking process at the dough 50 ferrous ions) to very slightly blue (compositions contain
ing 0.1 to 1.0 percent ferrous ions) while other ferrous or
mixing stage in tablet form. The tablets, added at the rate
ferric salts produce compositions which range from medi
of one per 100 pounds of ?our, are broken up by hand
which causes some doubt as to the completeness of distri
salts, high conversion corn syrup, and water does not pro
Water solutions of iron salts such as ferric ammonium
citrate, ferric choline citrate, or ferrous gluconate are 70 duce a stable liquid iron-forti?ed composition. Prepared
in this manner, compositions quickly darken due to pre
fairly stable but are quite highly colored. Water solutions
cipitated iron. However, iron will not precipitate when pre
of ferrous sulfate, on the other hand, are substantially
3,809,773
considered
following
to embodiments
be essentially colorless.
are intended
'? to further-de
' " ' L
content'any dissolved ferrous or ferric ions over about 1 20 areThe
scribe the invention which is de?ned only by the claims." _
precipitate. The concentration of ferrous or ferric ions
EXAMPLES 1-4
in the examples has been calculated from the total amount
is not in free ionic form, but could be bound in some 25 mixing for about 10 minutes a ferrous or ferric [salt indis
manner to the anion or to other compounds present in
tilled water which had previously boiled (to deaeratenand
Sucrose___________________________ _.
liltiira'aerr'
3,570
3, 938
524
523
3 5
100
164.5
400
230
380
207
360
74.9
0. 69
Remainder
................... --
Final composition:
pH
3,938
'3
75. 4
1. 01
75. 1
0. 92
' .
5. 0
20
3. 6
2. 3
EXAMPLE 5
An iron-fortifying composition was prepared as in Ex~
3,809,773
5
EXAMPLE 6
'
10
EXAMPLES 7-10
The following four compositions were prepared as in
Table 2.
TABLE 2
Examples
7
Orange-pineapple drink:
9
10
522
3, 100
4, 000
850
4, 000 20
0
Salt .......................... ..
206
201
194
202
380
880
386
380
Remainder
75
75
75
0.85
0.85
0.85
pH
8. 2
72 25
0. 85
Remainder
3.2
3.3
G.
123
Sugar
328
Water
FeSO4-7HzO solution:
Water.i ______________________ __
EXAMPLE 13
3. 2
4.7
4.7
2,515
268
105
Orange oil
Tween 60 '
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.2
EXAMPLE 11
Total
6.2
3,356.2
Water
370
Baby formula:
'
I claim:
420
Water
268
14
3.5
Dough formula
Wheat ?our ________________________ _..
Water _.-
65
16.2
14
28.7
References Cited
UNITED STATES PATENTS
280
174
70
21
21
75
2,985,559
5/1961
3,692,542
3,668,007
2,822,317
3,344,027
2,939,820
9/ 1972
6/1972
2/ 1958
9/ 1967
6/1960
3,809,773
2,820,740
1/1958
3,734,742
5/1973
~
OTHER REFERENCES
'
'
"
'