Chapter 8
Chapter 8
Chapter 8
SO
BT
Item
SO
1.
2.
3.
4.
1
1
1
1
K
K
K
K
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
K
K
K
K
AP
AP
AP
AP
8
AP
C
68.
69.
1
1
AP
AP
74.
75.
76.
1
2
2
K
AP
AP
77.
78.
79.
2
2
2
86.
87.
1
1
K
K
88.
89.
1
1
95.
96.
2,5
AP
**99.
*
**
5.
6.
7.
8.
1
1
1
2
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
*37.
*38.
39.
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
70.
71.
2
2
BT
Item
SO
BT
Item
True-False Statements
K
9.
2
C
13.
K
10.
2
K
14.
K
11.
2
K
15.
K
12.
2
K
16.
Multiple Choice Questions
C
40.
2
C
50.
K
41.
2
K
51.
K
*42.
4
K
52.
AP
43.
2
C
53.
AP
44.
2
K
54.
AP
45.
2
K
55.
AP
46.
3
K
56.
C
47.
5
K
57.
K
48.
5
K
58.
AP
49.
5
K
59.
Brief Exercises
AP
72. 1 AP
AP
73. 1 AP
Exercises
AP
80.
2
AP
83.
AP
81. 2,3 AP
84.
AP
82. 2,3 AP
85.
Completion Statements
K
90.
2
K
92.
K
91.
2
K
93.
Essay
K
97.
3
K
**98.
Multi Part Question
SO
BT
Item
2
3
3
2
K
K
K
K
17.
18.
19.
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
1
1
C
C
AP
AP
AP
AP
C
C
K
K
**60.
*61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
2,3
2,3
2,3
AP
AP
AP
2
2
K
K
94.
SO
BT
3
2
3
K
K
K
5
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
K
K
C
C
C
C
C
C
8-2
Type
Item
Type
Item
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
TF
TF
TF
TF
TF
6.
7.
20.
21.
22.
TF
TF
MC
MC
MC
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
16.
TF
TF
TF
TF
TF
TF
TF
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
36.
39.
40.
41.
43.
44.
45.
TF
TF
TF
19.
46.
50.
TF
MC
MC
51.
52.
53.
37.
MC
38.
MC
42.
47.
MC
48.
MC
49.
14.
15.
17.
Note:
TF = True-False
MC = Multiple Choice
BE = Brief Exercise
MP = Multi Part
Type
Item
Type
Item
Study Objective 1
MC
28. MC
65.
MC
58. MC
66.
MC
59. MC
67.
MC
63. MC
68.
MC
64. MC
69.
Study Objective 2
MC
54. MC
76.
MC
55. MC
77.
MC
56. MC
78.
MC
62. MC
79.
MC
70. BE
80.
MC
71. BE
81.
MC
75. Ex
82.
Study Objective 3
MC
57. MC
83.
MC
81. Ex
84.
MC
82. Ex
85.
Study Objective 4
MC
61. MC
Study Objective 5
MC
60. MC
98.
Ex = Exercise
C = Completion
Es = Essay
Type
Item
Type
Item
Type
MC
MC
MC
BE
BE
72.
73.
86.
87.
88.
BE
BE
C
C
C
89.
95.
C
Es
Ex
Ex
Ex
Ex
Ex
Ex
Ex
83.
84.
85.
90.
91.
92.
93.
Ex
Ex
Ex
C
C
C
C
Ex
Ex
Ex
94.
97.
C
Es
Es
96.
ES
2.
Discuss the effect that changes in production level and sales level have on
net income measured under absorption costing versus under variable
costing. If the production volume is greater than the sales volume, net income
under absorption costing will be greater than net income under variable costing
by the amount of fixed manufacturing costs included in the ending inventory that
results from the units produced but not sold during the period. If the production
volume is less than the sales volume, net income under absorption costing will be
less than it is under variable costing by the amount of fixed manufacturing costs
included in the units sold during the period that were not produced during the
period.
3.
4.
5.
8-3
8-4
TRUE-FALSE STATEMENTS
1.
2.
In full or absorption costing, all manufacturing costs are charged to the product.
3.
Variable costing is the approach used for external reporting under generally
accepted accounting principles.
4.
Fixed manufacturing costs are not charged to the product under variable costing.
5.
The difference between absorption costing and variable costing is the treatment
of fixed manufacturing overhead.
6.
7.
Selling and administrative costs are period costs under both absorption and
variable costing.
8.
Manufacturing cost per unit will be higher under variable costing than under
absorption costing.
9.
Some fixed manufacturing costs of the current period are deferred to future
periods through ending inventory under variable costing.
10.
When units produced exceed units sold, income under absorption costing is
higher than income under variable costing.
11.
When units sold exceed units produced, income under absorption costing is
higher than income under variable costing.
12.
GAAP requires that absorption costing be used for the costing of inventory for
external reporting purposes.
13.
Net income under GAAP highlights differences between variable and fixed costs.
14.
When absorption costing is used for external reporting, variable costing can still
16.
17.
18.
Net income under variable costing is closely tied to changes in sales levels.
19.
8-5
8-6
1.
2.
3.
4.
Ans.
T
T
F
T
Item
5.
6.
7.
8.
Ans.
T
F
T
F
Item
9.
10.
11.
12.
Ans.
F
T
F
T
Item
13.
14.
15.
16.
Ans.
F
T
T
T
Item
17.
18.
19.
Ans.
F
T
F
21.
22.
23.
8-7
8-8
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
EKPs unit production cost under variable costing is $5, and $7 under absorption
costing. Net income under variable costing was $10,000 and $12,000 under
absorption costing last year. EKP sold 15,000 units. How many units did it
produce?
a. 16,000
b. 14,000
c. 17,000
d. 13,000
34.
35.
8-9
8-10
d.
$22,000.
36.
*37.
*38.
39.
M&Hs unit production cost under variable costing is $25, and $32 under
absorption costing. Net income under variable costing was $250,000 and
$187,000 under absorption costing last year. Production equalled 63,000 units.
How many units did M&H sell?
a. 72,000.
b. 54,000.
c. 70,000.
d. 56,000.
40.
8-11
41. In income statements prepared under absorption costing and variable costing,
where would you find the terms contribution margin and gross profit?
a.
b.
c.
d.
Contribution margin
In absorption costing income
statement
In absorption costing income
statement
In variable costing income statement
In both income statements
Gross profit
In variable costing income
statement
In both income statements
In absorption costing income statement
In variable costing income statement
*42.
43.
44.
45.
8-12
b.
c.
d.
net income under absorption costing is lower than net income under
variable costing.
net income under absorption costing equals net income under variable
costing.
the relationship between net income under absorption costing and net
income under variable costing cannot be predicted.
46.
Absorption costing
a. is preferred to variable costing for external reporting purposes, but either
method is acceptable.
b. normally results in higher net income than variable costing, and is
therefore required for income tax purposes.
c. is not allowed for external reporting purposes.
d. is required under GAAP.
**47.
**48.
**49.
50.
51.
What would the manufacturing cost per unit be under absorption costing for each
alternative?
40,000 units
50,000 units
a. $12.00
$12.00
b. $14.00
$14.00
c. $16.00
$17.00
d. $17.00
$16.00
53.
What would the manufacturing cost per unit be under variable costing for each
alternative?
40,000 units
50,000 units
a. $12.00
$12.00
b. $14.00
$14.00
c. $16.00
$17.00
d. $17.00
$16.00
54
What would the net income be under absorption costing for each alternative?
40,000 units
50,000 units
a. $390,000
$390,000
b. $390,000
$430,000
c. $390,000
$440,000
d. $430,000
$390,000
8-13
8-14
55.
What would the net income be under variable costing for each alternative?
40,000 units
50,000 units
a. $390,000
$390,000
b. $390,000
$430,000
c. $390,000
$440,000
d. $430,000
$390,000
56.
Expected sales for next year for the Brady Division are 120,000 units. Drew
Carey, the manager of the Brady Division, is under pressure to improve the
performance of the Division. As he plans for next year, he has to decide whether
to produce 120,000 units or 140,000 units. The Brady Division will have higher
net income, if Drew Carey decides to
a. produce 140,000 units if income is measured under absorption costing.
b. produce 140,000 units if income is measured under variable costing.
c. produce 120,000 units if income is measured under absorption costing.
d. produce 120,000 units if income is measured under variable costing.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
8-15
8-16
b.
c.
d.
67.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
Ans.
d
d
a
b
b
a
b
a
b
d
Item
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
Ans.
a
d
a
b
c
a
d
b
b
a
Item
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
Ans.
b
c
b
c
a
b
d
a
d
c
Item
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
Ans.
c
c
d
a
b
a
a
d
a
c
Item
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
Ans.
c
c
a
c
d
c
b
b
8-17
8-18
BRIEF EXERCISES
Brief Exercise 68
Huskie Company produces footballs. It incurred the following costs this year:
Direct materials
$75,000
Direct labour
80,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead
125,000
Variable manufacturing overhead
60,000
Fixed selling and administrative expenses
90,000
Variable selling and administrative expenses 33,000
What are the total product costs for the company under variable costing?
Solution Brief Exercise 68 (35 min.)
Direct materials
$75,000
Direct labour
80,000
Variable manufacturing overhead
60,000
Total product costs under variable costing $215,000
Brief Exercise 69
Huskie Company produces footballs. It incurred the following costs this year:
Direct materials
$75,000
Direct labour
80,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead
125,000
Variable manufacturing overhead
60,000
Fixed selling and administrative expenses
90,000
Variable selling and administrative expenses 33,000
What are the total product costs for the company under absorption costing?
Solution Brief Exercise 69 (35 min.)
Direct materials
$75,000
Direct labour
80,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead
125,000
Variable manufacturing overhead
60,000
Total product costs under variable costing $340,000
Brief Exercise 70
During 2012 EKP Ltd. produced 40,000 units and sold 30,000 for $15 per unit. Variable
manufacturing costs were $7 per unit. Annual fixed manufacturing overhead was
$40,000 ($1 per unit). Variable selling and administrative costs were $2 per unit sold,
and fixed selling and administrative costs were $70,000. Prepare a variable costing
income statement.
Solution Brief Exercise 70 (57 min.)
Sales (30,000 X $15)
Variable cost of goods sold (30,000 X $7)
$210,000
Variable selling and administrative expense (30,000 X $2)
60,000
Contribution margin
Fixed manufacturing overhead
40,000
Fixed selling and administrative expense
70,000
Net income
$450,000
270,000
180,000
110,000
$70,000
Brief Exercise 71
During 2012 EKP Ltd. produced 40,000 units and sold 30,000 for $15 per unit. Variable
manufacturing costs were $7 per unit. Annual fixed manufacturing overhead was
$40,000 ($1 per unit). Variable selling and administrative costs were $2 per unit sold,
and fixed selling and administrative costs were $70,000. Prepare an absorption costing
income statement.
Solution Brief Exercise 71 (57 min.)
Sales (30,000 X $15)
Cost of goods sold (30,000 X $8)
Gross margin
Variable selling and administrative expense (30,000 X $2)
Fixed selling and administrative expense
Net income
$450,000
240,000
210,000
60,000
70,000
130,000
$80,000
Brief Exercise 72
In 2011, the ABC Company produced 90,000 units but only sold 70,000 units. Costs
incurred were:
Direct materials
$ 20,000
Direct labour
30,000
Variable manufacturing overhead
15,000
Variable selling and administration
18,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead
25,000
Fixed selling and administration
15,000
Total
$123,000
Instructions:
a. Calculate the value of inventory at the end of the year assuming ABC uses
absorption costing
b. Calculate the value of inventory at the end of the year assuming ABC uses variable
costing
Solution Brief Exercise 72
Direct materials
Direct labour
a. Absorption
$ 20,000
30,000
b. Variable
$20,000
30,000
8-19
8-20
15,000
0
25,000
0
$90,000
90,000
$1.00
20,000
$20,000
0
0
0
0
$50,000
90,000
$0.556
20,000
$11,111
Brief Exercise 73
Simplex Computer Systems has crews of computer repair people that it sends out to job
sites. It has the following information on its activities in the previous year:
Total corporate overhead incurred
$1,250,000
Total corporate overhead estimated for next year
$1,500,000
Hours worked by computer technicians
120,000
Budgeted technician hours for the next year
150,000
Instructions:
Calculate the companys predetermined overhead rate for the next year
Solution Brief Exercise 73
$1,500,000 150,000 = $10.00 per hour worked
EXERCISES
Exercise 74
Determine whether each of the following would be a product cost or a period cost under
an absorption or a variable system for K&N Company
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
l.
Direct Materials
Variable Indirect Materials
Direct Labour
Factory Utilities (variable)
Factory Rent
Indirect Labour
Factory Supervisory Salaries
Factory Maintenance (variable)
Factory Depreciation
Delivery Truck Insurance
Sales salaries
Sales commissions
Solution Exercise 74
Absorption
Product
Period
___________ _________
___________ __________
___________ __________
___________ __________
___________ __________
___________ __________
___________ __________
___________ __________
___________ __________
___________ __________
___________ __________
___________ __________
Variable
Product Period
______ _______
______ _______
______ _______
______ _______
______ _______
______ _______
_______ _______
______ _______
______ _______
______ _______
______ _______
_______ _______
(1015 min.)
a. Direct Materials
Absorption
Variable
Product
Period
Product
Period
_____X_____ __________ _____X____ _________
c. Direct Labour
e. Factory Rent
f. Indirect Labour
8-21
8-22
Exercise 75
Fresh Air Products manufactures and sells a variety of camping products. Recently the
company opened a new plant to manufacture a deluxe portable cooking unit. Cost and
sales data for the first month of operations are shown below:
Manufacturing Costs
Fixed overhead
Variable overhead
Direct labour
Direct material
$ 150,000
$ 7 per unit
$ 15 per unit
$ 33 per unit
Beginning inventory
Units produced
Units sold
0 units
15,000
11,000
$ 121,000
$ 3 per unit sold
The portable cooking unit sells for $90. Management is interested in the opening
months results and has asked for an income statement.
Instructions
Assume the company uses absorption costing. Calculate the production cost per unit,
and prepare an income statement for the month of June 2012.
Solution Exercise 75
(812 min.)
Per Unit
Direct materials
Direct labour
Variable overhead
Fixed overhead ($150,000 15,000)
Total cost
$33
15
7
10
$65
Fresh Air Products manufactures and sells a variety of camping products. Recently the
company opened a new plant to manufacture a deluxe portable cooking unit. Cost and
sales data for the first month of operations are shown below:
Manufacturing Costs
Fixed overhead
Variable overhead
Direct labour
Direct material
$
$
$
$
150,000
7 per unit
15 per unit
33 per unit
Beginning inventory
Units produced
Units sold
0 units
15,000
11,000
$ 121,000
$ 3 per unit sold
The portable cooking unit sells for $90. Management is interested in the opening
months results and has asked for an income statement.
Instructions
Assume the company uses variable costing.
a. Calculate the production cost per unit, and prepare an income statement for the
month of June 2012.
b. Explain the amount by which absorption costing income would differ from variable
costing income. (Calculate difference without computing absorption costing income)
Solution Exercise 76
a.
Direct materials
Direct labour
Variable overhead
Total cost
(913 min.)
Per Unit
$33
15
7
$55
Fresh Air Products
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Month Ending June 30, 2012
$990,000
638,000
352,000
8-23
8-24
Fixed overhead
Fixed selling & administrative costs
Net income
150,000
121,000
271,000
$ 81,000
b. When production exceeds sales, absorption costing net income will exceed variable
costing net income by an amount equal to the fixed overhead rate times the number of
units in ending inventory. The ending inventory for June was 4,000 units and the fixed
overhead rate was $10 per unit ($150,000 15,000). Therefore, absorption costing
income would exceed variable costing income by $40,000 (4,000 X $10).
Exercise 77
Momentum Bikes manufactures a basic road bicycle. Production and sales data for the
most recent year are as follows (no beginning inventory):
Variable production costs
Fixed production costs
Variable selling & administrative costs
Fixed selling & administrative costs
Selling price
Production
Sales
Instructions
a. Prepare a brief income statement using absorption costing.
b. Calculate the amount to be reported for inventory in the year end absorption costing
balance sheet.
Solution Exercise 77 (8 - 12 min.)
a.
Sales (19,000 x $195)
Less: Cost of goods sold (19,000 x $110*)
Gross profit
Less: selling & administrative costs
[(19,000 x $17) + $480,000]
Net income
$3,705,000
2,090,000
1,615,000
803,000
$ 812,000
$ 85 per bike
25 per bike
$110 per bike
$242,000
Exercise 78
Momentum Bikes manufactures a basic road bicycle. Production and sales data for the
most recent year are as follows (no beginning inventory):
Variable production costs
Fixed production costs
Instructions
a. Prepare a brief income statement using variable costing.
b. Calculate the amount to be reported for inventory in the year end variable costing
balance sheet.
Solution Exercise 78 (8 - 12 min.)
a.
Sales (19,000 x $195)
Less: Variable costs
Variable cost of goods sold (19,000 x $85)
Variable selling & admin. costs (19,000 x $17)
Contribution margin
Less: Fixed costs
Fixed production costs
Fixed selling & administrative costs
Net income
b. (21,200 19,000) X $85 =
$3,705,000
$1,615,000
323,000
530,000
480,000
1,938,000
1,767,000
1,010,000
$ 757,000
$187,000
Exercise 79
Conan Company produces sporting equipment. In 2011, the first year of operations,
Conan produced 25,000 units and sold 18,000 units. In 2012, the production and sales
results were exactly reversed. In each year, selling price was $100, variable
manufacturing costs were $40 per unit, variable selling expenses were $8 per unit, fixed
manufacturing costs were $540,000, and fixed administrative expenses were $200,000.
Instructions
a. Calculate net income under variable costing for each year.
b. Calculate net income under absorption costing for each year.
c. Reconcile the differences each year in income from operations under the two costing
approaches.
Solution Exercise 79 (2025 min.)
a. 2011: [18,000 X ($100 $40 $8)] ($540,000 + $200,000) = $196,000
2012: [25,000 X ($100 $40 $8)] ($540,000 + $200,000) = $560,000
b. 2011: [18,000 X ($100 $40 $21.60)] [$200,000 + (18,000 X $8) = $347,200
2012: {(25,000 X $100) [7,000 X ($40 + $21.60)] [18,000 X ($40 + $30)]}
[$200,000 + (25,000 X $8)] = $408,800
c. The variable costing and the absorption costing income can be reconciled as follows:
2011 variable costing income
$196,000
8-25
8-26
151,200
$347,200
$560,000
(151,200)
$ 408,800
Exercise 80
Conan Company produces sporting equipment. In 2011, the first year of operations,
Conan produced 25,000 units and sold 18,000 units. In 2012, the production and sales
results were exactly reversed. In each year, selling price was $100, variable
manufacturing costs were $40 per unit, variable selling expenses were $8 per unit, fixed
manufacturing costs were $540,000, and fixed administrative expenses were $200,000.
Instructions
a. Prepare an income statement for 2011 using variable costing
b. Prepare an income statement for 2011 using absorption costing.
c. Reconcile the differences each year in income from operations under the two costing
approaches.
Solution Exercise 80
a.
(1520 min.)
Conan Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
2011
$1,800,000
864,000
936,000
740,000
$ 196,000
b.
Conan Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
2011
Sales (18,000 x $100)
Less: Cost of goods sold (18,000 x $61.60)
Gross profit
Less: Selling & administrative costs
Variable (18,000 x $8)
$1,800,000
1,108,800
691,200
$ 144,000
Fixed
Net income
200,000
344,000
$ 347,200
c. The variable costing and the absorption costing income can be reconciled as follows:
2011 variable costing income
Fixed manufacturing costs deferred at 12/31/11
under absorption costing (7,000 X $21.60)
2011 absorption costing income
$196,000
151,200
$347,200
Exercise 81
McCartney Pumps is a division of UK Controls Corporation. The division manufactures
and sells a pump used in a wide variety of applications. During the coming year it
expects to sell 25,000 units for $17 per unit. George Harrison manages the division. He
is considering producing either 25,000 or 35,000 units during the period. Other
information is presented in the schedule.
Division information - 2012
Beginning inventory
0
Expected sales in units
25,000
Selling price per unit
$ 17.00
Variable manufacturing cost per unit
$
6.00
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost (total)
$ 140,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead costs per unit
Based on 25,000 units
$ 5.60 per unit ($140,000 25,000)
Based on 35,000 units
$ 4.00 per unit ($140,000 35,000)
Manufacturing cost per unit
Based on 25,000 units
$ 11.60 per unit ($6.00 variable + $5.60 fixed)
Based on 35,000 units
$ 10.00 per unit ($6.00 variable + $4.00 fixed)
Selling and administrative expense (all fixed)
$37,000
Instructions
a. Prepare an absorption costing income statement with one column showing the results
if 25,000 units are produced, and one column showing the results if 35,000 units are
produced.
b. Why is income different for the two production levels, when sales is 25,000 units
either way?
Solution Exercise 81
a.
(15 - 20 min.)
McCartney Pumps Division
Income Statement
For the Year Ended 2012
Absorption Costing
25,000
Produced
$ 425,000
35,000
Produced
$ 425,000
8-27
8-28
37,000
98,000
b. Net income is $40,000 higher when 35,000 units are produced, because under
absorption costing $40,000 of fixed manufacturing costs (10,000 X $4) are deferred to
the next year.
Exercise 82
McCartney Pumps is a division of UK Controls Corporation. The division manufactures
and sells a pump used in a wide variety of applications. During the coming year it
expects to sell 25,000 units for $17 per unit. George Harrison manages the division. He
is considering producing either 25,000 or 35,000 units during the period. Other
information is presented in the schedule.
Division information - 2012
Beginning inventory
0
Expected sales in units
25,000
Selling price per unit
$ 17.00
Variable manufacturing cost per unit
$
6.00
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost (total)
$140,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead costs per unit
Based on 25,000units
$ 5.60 per unit ($140,000 25,000)
Based on 35,000 units
$ 4.00 per unit ($140,000 35,000)
Manufacturing cost per unit
Based on 25,000 units
$ 11.60 per unit ($6.00 variable + $5.60 fixed)
Based on 35,000 units
$ 10.00 per unit ($6.00 variable + $4.00 fixed)
Selling and administrative expense (all fixed)
$37,000
Instructions
Prepare an variable costing income statement with one column showing the results if
25,000 units are produced, and one column showing the results if 35,000 units are
produced.
Solution Exercise 82
(1520 min.)
35,000
Produced
$ 425,000
150,000
275,000
140,000
37,000
$ 98,000
37,000
$ 98,000
Exercise 83
E&P Ltd. produced 20,000 units last year. Under absorption costing, operating income
was $3,000 more than it was under variable costing. Variable manufacturing costs per
unit were $17, variable selling and administration costs per unit were $5, total fixed
manufacturing overhead was $150,000, and total fixed selling and administration costs
were $78,000. Determine how many units were sold last year.
Solution Exercise 83 (46 min.)
The difference between operating income under absorption costing and operating
income under variable costing is caused by the difference between the number of units
produced and the number sold multiplied by the fixed manufacturing cost per unit.
In this case, fixed manufacturing cost per unit equals $150,000 20,000 units, or $7.50.
Therefore, $3,000 $7.50/unit = 400 units.
If operating income under absorption costing is greater than under variable costing, it
means that production exceeded sales. Therefore, if production equalled 20,000 units,
sales equalled 19,600 units.
Exercise 84
ABC Company uses the FIFO method for
the following information:
Opening inventory
Units produced
Units sold
Prior year fixed overhead costs
Current year fixed overhead costs
Instructions:
Calculate the difference between operating income in the current year if the company
uses variable or absorption costing
Solution Exercise 84 (46 min.)
Difference: 300 units x ($50 - $44) = $1,800
Absorption costing will result in $1,800 less income in the current year since the current
overhead rate is lower than last years and more fixed overhead is released into income.
Exercise 85
Bobs Burgers makes burger patties for large supermarket chains. The burgers are
frozen and can last in storage for months. Cost information on the burgers is as follows:
Meat used for burgers
$200,000
Wages used to make burgers
100,000
8-29
8-30
50,000
70,000
60,000
120,000
50,000
Bob made 500,000 burgers this past year but only sold 450,000 to his customers. He
sells them for $1.50 per burger patty. Bob tells you that the office and sales staff are
variable costs while his salary is fixed.
Instructions:
a. Calculate Bobs income assuming he uses variable costing
b. Calculate Bobs income assuming he uses absorption costing
Solution Exercise 85
(10-12 min.)
Absorption
$ 200,000
100,000
50,000
70,000
0
0
0
$420,000
500,000
$0.84
Variable
$200,000
100,000
50,000
0
0
0
0
$350,000
500,000
$0.70
Bobs Burgers
Absorption Costing Income Statement
Sales (450,000 x $1.50)
Cost of sales: 450,000 x $0.84
Gross profit
Variable costs office staff $60,000
sales staff $120,000
Fixed admin Bobs salary $50,000
Net income
$675,000
378,000
$297,000
230,000
$67,000
Bobs Burgers
Variable Costing Income Statement
Sales (450,000 x $1.50)
Variable cost of goods sold 450,000 x $0.70 $315,000
Variable selling and admin
180,000
Contribution margin
Fixed costs factory
Bobs salary
Net income
$675,000
495,000
$180,000
70,000
50,000
$60,000
COMPLETION STATEMENTS
86.
87.
Only direct materials, direct labour, and variable manufacturing costs are
considered product costs when using _________________ .
88.
Fixed manufacturing
__________________.
89.
90.
91.
The one primary difference between variable costing and absorption costing is
that under variable costing, fixed manufacturing overhead is recorded as a(an)
_______________ in the current period.
92.
When units produced exceed units sold, income under absorption costing is
_________________ than income under variable costing.
93.
The amount remaining after deducting total variable costs from revenue is called
the _________________________.
94.
costs
are
treated
as
period
costs
under
8-31
8-32
8-33
8-34
costing system for internal decision-making. Why do many firms maintain accounting
records under both systems?
Solution Short Answer Essay 97
Variable costing is generally preferred over absorption costing for internal decisionmaking. Net income calculated using GAAP (absorption costing) does not highlight
differences between variable and fixed costs, as does variable costing, and can lead to
poor business decisions. Managers may be tempted to over produce in a given period in
order to increase net income when absorption costing is used. Net income under
variable costing is unaffected by changes in production levels. In addition, the use of
variable costing is consistent with cost-volume-profit analysis and other decision-making
tools.
Many firms maintain accounting records under both systems because while they want to
use variable costing for internal decision-making, GAAP does require the use of
absorption costing for external financial reports. Also, absorption costing must be used
on tax returns.
**Short Answer Essay 98
What practical points should a company consider before adopting throughput costing?
**Solution Short Answer Essay 98
Users of throughput costing should be highly automated, process-oriented companies in
which direct labour and manufacturing overhead are fixed costs that do not vary with the
number of units produced. Car companies, with unionized employees provide a good
example of this. Whether cars are produced or not; on a given day of the month, the car
company still incurs direct labour and manufacturing overhead costs. The logic of this is
that since the direct labour and manufacturing overhead costs are fixed, they can be
treated as period costs, rather than product costs, for internal reporting purposes.
The other consideration is that users of throughput costing must acknowledge that they
are doing so for short-term incremental analysis. Users of throughput costing should
therefore be cautioned that use of this method in the long term (without any other costing
method employed for longer term planning) could have negative consequences.
$7,200,000
900,000
1,200,000
1,500,000
1,800,000
600,000
600,000
$6,600,000
$600,000
Instructions:
a. Calculate the predetermined overhead rate to be used by the company.
b. If the company produces 100,000 spark plugs but only sells 70,000, calculate its
operating income if the company uses normal absorption costing.
c. Using the same information as part b) calculate the operating income if the company
uses throughput costing
Solution Multi Part Question 99
a. ($1,500,000 + $1,800,000) 100,000 = $33.00
b. Contribution margin per plug: $3,000,000 100,000 = $30
Operating income = 70,000 x $30 (1,800,000 x 70%) 600,000
= $2,100,000 - $1,260,000 - $ 600,000
= $240,000
c. Contribution margin per plug: $6,570,000 100,000 =
Contribution margin:
70,000 x $65.70 =
Less:
Direct labour
$1,200,000
Variable factory overhead
1,500,000
Fixed factory overhead
1,800,000
Variable selling & admin
600,000
Fixed selling & admin
600,000
Operating income (loss)
CM:
Opening Inventory
DM costs
$65.70
$4,599,000
5,700,000
($1,101,000)
0
$900,000
8-35
8-36
LEGAL NOTICE
Copyright 2011 by John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. or related companies. All rights
reserved.
The data contained in these files are protected by copyright. This manual is furnished
under licence and may be used only in accordance with the terms of such licence.
The material provided herein may not be downloaded, reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, modified, made available on a network, used to create derivative works, or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording, scanning, or otherwise without the prior written permission of John Wiley &
Sons Canada, Ltd.
8-37