CH 3 - The Market System: Market Economy - Interaction Between Supply and Demand Determines What Is
CH 3 - The Market System: Market Economy - Interaction Between Supply and Demand Determines What Is
CH 3 - The Market System: Market Economy - Interaction Between Supply and Demand Determines What Is
2. Market Forces
3.
Downward sloping demand curve, effect of price on demand assuming all other
factions are constant.
P= Equilibrium Price
Q= Equilibrium Quantity
Generally , the lower the price the higher the demand due to 1. Substitution Effect the consumer buys more of one product than another
due to a relative price change.
2. Income effect the change in price of a good effects the purchasing power of
the consumers' income. Normally weak unless the expenditure is on the
goods is a large proportion of income.
Price change - will result in a movement along the demand curve resulting in
either an expansion or contraction in demand.
Conditions of demand change there will be a shift in the demand curve
resulting in an inrease or decrease in demand.
PED and Gradient Elasticity and gradient are not he same thing. The PED will
depend on where you are on the demand curve.
As the calculation of the PED moves down a linear curve from top left to bottom
right, elasticity falls in value, ie the curve becomes relatively more elastic.
Link Between PED and Total Revenue If Total revenue increases following a price cut, then demand is price elastic.
If Total revenue increases following a price rise then demand is price inelastic.
At price P the quantity supply shifts from Q to Q1, hence the supply curve shifts
from S2 to S1.
This could be caused by
Higher production costs or indirect taxes.
Supply
Downward Shift
This is an increase in supply at a given price curve shifts from S1 to S2, showing
that the cost of production has fallen. Lower unit costs may be caused by Technology innovations, more efficient use of factors of productivity, lower input
process, reduction of indirect taxes or additional subsidies.
Elasticity of Supply (PES)
A normal supply curve will slope upwards indicating that producers will supply more
at higher prices.
Increase in price = expansion
Decrease in price = contraction
The price elasticity of supply (PES) is positive
PES > 1 - price elastic supply
PES < 1 - price inelastic supply
PES = 1 unit elasticity
Factors that influence elasticity of supply.
Time Supply tends to be more elastic in the long term.
Factors of production the availability of trained labour, raw materials and spare
capacity will make supply more elastic.
Stock levels high stock levels of finished goods will make supply elastic.
Number of firms in the industry supply is more elastic the more firms there are in
the industry.
Point P shows where the consumer demand and supply plans of producers
correspond, the equilibrium point. P is the equilibrium price and Q the equilibrium
quantity. At prices and outputs other than (P,Q) either demand or supply aspirations
can be met not both at the same time.
For example
P1 consumers only want Q1, but producers are making Q2 available, leaving an
excess supply of Q1Q2 output. Eventually a reduction in price will lead to a
contraction in supply and an expansion in demand until equilibrium price P is
reached.
P2 conversely, at price P2, the quantity demanded Q2 will exceed the quantity
supplied Q3, leaving a shortage (Q2-Q3) representing excess demand. This demand
will show as back orders, empty shelves and high second hand values. The excess
demand will lead to a rise in the market price until equilibrium point P is reached.
Maximum Price
Where the government seeks to protect the low paid or to control inflation. This
maximum price must be set below the equilibrium price and will have the effect of
creating a shortage of supply. This shortage is Q1Q2
Imposing a tax on to the supplier, would shift the supply curve to the left, resulting
in an equilibrium with a higher price and lower quantity.
For pricing policies to maximise net social benefits they would need to consider
such externalities by
Calculate Social Costs
Use indirect taxes/subsidies
Extend private property rights
Regulations
Tradeable permits
Merit Goods
These are defined by their positive externalities positive social benefits in
consumption. Also, merit goods are seen as ones that should be available to al
irrespective of ability to pay. Government often provide these merit goods even
though these can be provided by the market.The private sector provides
alternatives to consumers with the means and willingness to pay for them.
Demerit Goods
Goods or services that are seen as unhealthy or undesirable. The concern is that a
free market results in an excess consumption of the goods, eg. Smoking, drinking,
drugs and gambling. The focus on demerit goods is the negative impact on the
consumer rather than externalities.
Competition Rivalry
Different Levels
Market Structures
Defined by buyers and sellers of goods/services willingly participating trading these
goods/services transacted in an underlying currency. The participants in these
trades require information on the prices of the goods/services being traded. This
price acts as a signal as well as an incentive.
Perfect Competition
Imperfect Competition oligopoly and duopoly
Monopoly
Market concentration this describes the phenomenon whereby the growth of firms
leads to a few large firms dominating an industry's output, sales and employment.
For example the five firm concentration ratio is over 85 % in the car, cement
tobacco and steel industries.
Aggregate concentration ratio this measures the share of the total production or
employment contributed by the top 100 firms in an industry. This growth in firm size
and rise in concentration ratios have occurred more by takeovers and mergers than
by internal growth.
The Growth of Firms
Perfect Competition many buyers and sellers, behaving rationally with perfect
information about unbranded homogenous products. No barriers to entry exist to
the market and normal profits as abnormal profits/losses are removed by
competitive forces. These rarely exist in real life, the closest would be the stock
exchange or the local farmers markets. An implication is that since suppliers can sell
all their stock at a given price, there is no incentive to offer discounts. Conversely
profits are constrained as any attempts to raise prices will shift customers to the
competition.
This level of rivalry forces firms to operate at minimum costs implying technical
efficiency and the lowest prices suggest allocative efficiency.
Although and extreme, this model demonstrates that high levels of competition are
good for the consumer (low prices) and good for the economy (low costs).
The down sides being - lack of choice for consumer and limited profits which
constrain growth and innovation.
Monopoly
They fix the price and let demand determine the amount supplied or
Fix supply and let demand determine the amount supplied
Price discrimination
Examples
Time Gym fees cheaper during off peak hours
Customer- non members at a golf club pay more
Income pensioners pay more
Place house calls cost more than surgery visits
These pricing strategies can be successful if several conditions are met At least two distinct markets with no seepage between them. If there was seepage
then enterprising consumers could buy the product in the lower priced market and
sell in the higher priced market, hence undercutting the monopolist.
Differing demand elasticities a higher price could be set in the more inelastic
market.
Imperfect Competition
Between perfect competition and monopoly several forms of market exist which
share characteristics of these two extremes.
Monopolistic Competition
Large numbers of producers supplying similar but not homogenous products.
Competition on price to gain market share at the expense of rivals.
Consumers lack perfect knowledge but have a choice.
Low barriers to entry, firms can enter and leave at little cost.
Prices higher than at perfect competition but consumers benefit from more choice.
Example the market for greeting cards.
Oligopoly
A few large firms with a high concentration ratio.
Behaviour of firms dependent on actions of rivals, with an interdependence on
decision making.
Consumers lack detailed product information and are susceptible to the strategies
of suppliers.
Very high barriers to entry due to entrenched market dominance involvement of
economies of scale. Advances in technology and global corporations can still
provide a challenge to established oligopolies.
Typical strategies for an oligopolistic firm Cooperate with other large firms within the constraints of competition legislation.
Make their own decision and ignore rivals - try to set higher price and behave like a
monopolist or risk a price war if a price cut is copied by rivals.
Become a price follower by awaiting the action of a price leader (firm behaves like a
price taker).
Avoid price based competition. Price stability is often associated with oligopolistic
behaviour as they cannot predict how rivals will behave. Instead there is substantial
non price competition eg. Advertising campaigns. Firms often produce multiple non
branded goods in the same market at different price points (not homogenous).
In the absence of collusion and price fixing does not occur, consumers may benefit
from an oligopoly through access to a wide range of branded goods, price stability
and after sales support.
A duopoly in once such example of the above.
Regulation
3 aspects which require government regulation
1. Mergers and Acquisitions monitored to see if the resulting organisation has
excessive power that may not be in the public interest. In the UK the
Competition and Markets Authority sets this threshold at 25%.
2. Restrictive Trade Practices collusion by suppliers over price fixing
undermines consumer power, in the UK the OFT investigates such anti
competitive behaviour.
3. State Created Regional Monopolies the process of privitisation of state
owned utility companies has created regional monopolies. Regulators such as
OFWAT have been setup to regulate pricing and minimum investment and set
an appropriate return for investments e. maximum ROCE.
The European Commission
The Treaty of Rome allows the European Commission to control behaviour of
monopolists and to increase the level of competition across Europe. An example is
the prevention of dual pricing. For example distillers sold whisky at higher prices in
France and tried to prevent British buyers from buying more cheaply in England and
selling at lower prices in France. The European court ruled against the distillers dual
pricing.
The transfer of ownership of a business, public service or property from the public
sector to businesses or to non profit organisations, includes government outsourcing.
Can be achieved by either selling state owned assets or the introduction of
competition between an existing monopoly of existing suppliers (deregulation and
competitive tendering).
Arguments for privatisation
Improve efficiency in state owned industries
Wider share ownership employees are more invested, work harder and strike less
Improved quality privatised companies have to compete to survive and have to be
more efficient and responsive to customers.
Greater economic freedom market forces are more influential than political forces.
Will provide funds for the treasury.
Arguments against privatisation
Fewer services and higher prices
Private monopolies are created
Quality of service diminished example G4S and London Olympics
Assets sales under priced
Only the profitable parts of the public sectors are sold off
Impact on the balance of payments dividends payments go abroad
Executive bonuses and high salaries stand in contrast with wage restraint.
Competition is not enhanced - due to the creation of local monopolies that require
the creation of regulatory control to manage investment and pricing decisions.
The poor suffer, water privatisation in developing countries, the poorest 20% of the
population spend 10% on water.
Pricing as many privatised companies are now private monopolies they are
expected to follow profit maximisation principles. This on it's own does not lead to
technical or allocative efficiency as this would require perfect competition. The
government therefore is obliged to create such competition.
Public Private Partnerships (private finance initiatives)
Private sector financing of public services, transfer of council housing to housing
association using private loans or the contracting out of refuse collection to a
private firm.
Perceived advantages are finances public projects without the need for
government borrowing or more taxes.
Risk transferred to the private firm, who will be paid less if they miss performance
targets.
Introduces private sector efficiencies such innovation and raises the quality of the
provision.
Critics of PFI point out
This method of finance is more expensive as the government has access to the
cheapet of funds.
How much risk is really transferred to the private companies as the government has
a record of bailing out private firms manage troubled public services.
Efficiency savings are made at the expense of quality of service eg. hospital
cleaning.
Public and Merit Goods revisited
Public goods are those for which no market exists, characterised by consumption by
one individual does not prevent someone else from benefiting. This allows freeriders benefit from the service even though they would not be prepared to pay for
it. Hence Defence is provided at zero price but tax payers fund the service. As the
government can proide the services in bulk technical efficiencies could be achieved
through economies of scale.eack of choice.
Merit goods, which the government provides for the benefit of society and it's
general wellbeing have alternatives from the private sector eg private health,
private education, private security. In the case of merit goods provided by the
government, technical efficiency can be sought (state education is one third the
cost of private on a per pupil basis). This technical efficiency cannot be maximised
as in practice it has proven difficult to close local schools and hospitals. Free
marketeers would point out that zero pricing goes against allocative efficiency.
Financial Intermediaries their job is to match entities with trading surpluses who
seek to invest and make an economic return with parties who wish to borrow to
improve their liquidity position.
These two groups of end user can choose to interact in 3 way
1. Contact each other directly
2. Lenders and borrowers use an organised financial market
3. Lenders and borrowers use intermediaries.
Financial Intermediaries have a number of important roles.
Risk Reduction lending to a wide range of individuals mitigates the risk of a single
default causing a significant wipe out of assets.le d
Aggregation by pooling a large number of small deposits, intermediaries can make
larger advances than would otherwise be possible.
Maturity Transformation typically borrowers want to borrow for the long term and
savers do not want their money tied up for a long time. Financial intermediaries with
their floating pool of resources are able to satisfy both sets of conflicting
requirements.
Financial Intermediation the process by which financial intermediaries bring
together lenders and borrowers.
Liquidity Surpluses and Deficits
The lack k of synchronisation between payments and receipts effects businesses,
individuals and government.