Load Tests For Jet Grouting at Macau

Load Tests for Jet Grouting at Macau
T.M.H. Lok, H.S. Leong, Y.L. Wong, I.C. Chan & W.M. Yan
Macau Association for Geotechnical Engineering, Macau SAR, China
ABSTRACT
A construction project involved ground improvement for a mat foundation with high pressure jet
grouting is described. The mat foundation is about 1700 m2 in area. The soil profile consists of
12 m of soft soil below the ground surface, which was improved by jet grout piles at 1.5 m
spacing. There were two tests on individual jet grout piles and two plate load tests on the
composite foundation. Observations of the foundation settlements during and after construction
showed satisfactory performance of the ground improvement.
1 INTRODUCTION
This paper describes a project of ground improvement for a mat foundation by jet grouting at Macau (Tai Ah
Co., 2006). The project is for the extension of police station which covers an area of about 1700 m2,
approximately in L shape with maximum dimension of about 39m 70m. As shown in Figure 1, the center to
center spacing of jet grout columns is 150 cm. There are about 780 jet grout columns with depth from GL-1.1
to 12.0 m and diameter of about 30 cm.
Figure 1: Plan of jet grouting (jet grout piles shown in dots)
2 SITE INVESTIGATION
According to the site investigation, a layer of fill of about 2 m is found at the ground surface, underlain by soft
clay followed by alluvium and decomposed soils. The variation of SPT N values is shown in Figure 2. N
values are generally less than 12 from depth of 0 to 12 m, where jet grouting was applied. Below 12 m, N
values are generally over 25 where soil improvement was not planned. Average ground water table is at about
GL-2.0 m.
N-Value
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
Back Filling
N=5
Marine Deposit
5
N = 12
Alluvium
10
N = 24
Alluvium
Depth, m
15
20
C.D.G.
25
N = 50
30
Bore Hole No.1

Bore Hole No.2
Bore Hole No.3
Bore Hole No.4
35
Figure 2: SPT N values vs. depth
Table 1 shows the simplified soil parameters for design purpose. Undrained shear strength was determined
from consolidated undrained triaxial tests. Undrained shear strength (Su) was correlated with preconsolidation
pressure (pc), and the Young modulus was estimated based on Bjerrum (1972), where Es = 1000Su for
cohesive soils, or as Es = 4000log N for cohesionless soils.
Soil Layer
Table 1 Simplified soil parameters for design

Depth
t
SPT
Description
3
(m)
(kN/m )
(Navg)
pc
(kN/m2)
Su
(kN/m2)
Es
(kN/m2)
Back filling
silty sand
2.0
19.6
__
__
29,430
Marine deposit
sandy silty clay
6.0
16.7
92.2
106.0
106,050
Alluvium
fine to coarse
clayey sand /sand Silt
12.0
19.8
12
136.0
156.4
156,370
Alluvium
medium to coarse
clayey sand /sand silt
19.0
19.6
24
200.3
230.3
230,340
Completely
Discomposed
Granite (C.D.G)
fine to medium
sand /sandy silt
26.0
20.6
>50
267.0
307.1
307,050
3 FIELD LOADING TESTS

3.1 Jet grout pile tests
There are two tests performed on individual jet grout piles, No. N25 and No. Q22, as shown in Figure 3.
Loading was applied with a hydraulic jack under a weight platform (kentledge). Three cycles of loading were
applied up to 70, 120 and 165kN, corresponding to 100%, 170%, and 235% of the design load. At each
loading stage, the load was maintained until the pile head settlement rate was less than 0.004 mm/min. The
maximum loading was maintained for 24 hours for studying long term settlement. The load vs. settlement
curves are shown in Figure 4a and 4b.
As shown in Figure 4a, for pile No. N25, the maximum pile head settlement was 3.17 mm under the
maximum load of 165 kN including the 0.7 mm due to creeping from 24 hours of maintained load, while for
pile No. Q22, the maximum pile head settlement was 5.88 mm under the maximum load of 165 kN including
the 0.9 mm due to creeping from 24 hours of maintained load as shown in Figure 4b. The settlements
observed for the individual jet grout piles are relatively small compared with those from the plate load tests as
described below, implying probably the loading for the jet grout piles were well below the ultimate condition.
3.2 Plate load tests
There are two plate load tests performed at the locations shown in Figure 3. The plates were made of 30 cm
thick reinforced concrete with an area of 3 m by 3 m. The pressure vs. settlement curves are shown in Figure
5a and 5b. The design load of the foundation was estimated to be 86.6 kPa, 2.5 times of which was planned as
the applied loading, for plate load tests. However, as shown in Figure 5a for test A, settlement quickly
increased upon 139 kPa, and the test was terminated. This was probably due to adverse site condition after
heavy rainstorm on the testing day. For test B, the maximum load of 224 kPa was achieved before unloading
as shown in Figure 5b. The corresponding average settlement at maximum load was about 16 mm.
Also shown in Figure 5a and 5b are the reading from different dial gauges located at the four corners of the
plate. As the applied loading approached the maximum load, the readings from different dial gauges started to
deviate from each other, implying possible rotational failure of the foundation.
Pile Q22
Pile N25
Plate B
Site boundary
Plate A
Figure 3: Location of jet grout pile and plate load tests
Pile head loading (kN)
50
100
150
Pile head loading (kN)
200
2
3
4
50
100
150
200
1
Pile head settlement (mm)
pile head settlement (mm)
24 hours
load maintaining
2
3
4
Figure 4a: Load test curve for jet grout pile No. N25
24 hours
load maintaining
Figure 4b: Load test curve for jet grout pile No. Q22
Loading (kPa)
settlement (mm)
50
100
150
5
3
4
10
1
dial gauge 2
15
Figure 5a: Load settlement curve for plate load test A
Loading (kPa)
50
100
150
200
250
settlement (mm)
5
10
4
1
15
3
20
25
dial gauge 2
30
Figure 5b: Load settlement curve for plate load test B
4 ESTIMATED AND OBSERVED SETTLEMENT

The settlement was estimated by considering elastic settlement and consolidation settlement for the treated
and untreated soil layers, respectively. Youngs modulus of the jet grout treated soil was estimated to be
144,800 kN/m2, based on the area ratio of the jet grout to the untreated soil. The following properties were
obtained for the alluvium and the weathered soil:
Soil
Alluvium
Weathered soil
Table 2 Consolidation properties of untreated soils

eo
Cc
0.63
0.0975
0.54
0.030
Cr
0.0139
0.0043
The distributed loading from the superstructure is shown in Figure 6. Most of the foundation will be loaded
with 63.8 kPa (6.5 t/m2) except the lower rectangular part will be loaded with 25.5 kPa (2.6 t/m2). The
estimated settlements of the mat foundation are within 1.4 cm as shown in Figure 7. A monitoring program of
the settlement after the completion of the superstructure was carried out for a period of about 8 months. As
shown in Figure 8a, 8b and 8c; the observed settlement at the end of the monitoring were in the range of 5 to 8
mm, which were generally less than the predicted final settlement except at a few locations.
10 m
Figure 6: Distributed load on the mat foundation
(Point No. 1)
(Point No. 3)
10 m
(Point No. 12)

Y
Figure 7: Estimated settlement for the mat foundation (values in cm)
X-X direction
0
86 days - observed
166 days - observed
250 days - observed
predicted final settlement
Settlement (mm)
10
0
20
40
60
Distance from Point No. 1 (m)

Figure 8a: Settlement profile along X-X section
Y-Y direction
Settlement (mm)
12
86 days - observed
166 days - observed
250 days - observed
predicted final settlement
16
0
10
20
Distance from Point No. 3 (m)

Figure 8b: Settlement profile along Y-Y section
30
0
Monitoring Point
Observed - Point No. 1
Predicted final settlement (No.3)
Settlement (mm)
10
0
50
100
150
200
250
Time (day)
Figure 8c: Settlement vs. time curve for selected monitoring points
5 CONCLUDING REMARKS
A case history of load tests for jet grouting at Macau was presented. The project involves ground
improvement of an area of about 1700 m2. Two tests on individual jet grout piles and two plate load tests on
the composite foundation were carried out according to the local requirements. The monitoring of the
settlement during construction of the superstructure indicated that the improved foundation performed
satisfactory.
As driven piles are commonly recommended for such scale of construction projects in Macau, jet grouting
provides an economical alternative. The case history presented here is just one of the few cases using ground
improvement in Macau. Further utilization and improvement of the technique in Macau is foreseen for the
future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The information of this paper is provided by Tai Ah Construction and LECM. The assistance of relevant
personnel is greatly appreciated. The responsibility of the correctness of the presentation, however, is borne
by the authors.
REFERENCES
Bjerrum, L. (1972) Embankments on Soft Ground, 5th PSC, ASCE, vol. 2, pp. 1-54.
Tai Ah Construction (2006) Police Station 2 Extension: Ground Improvement for Foundation - Construction
Plan for High Pressure Jet Grouting. (in Chinese)

Load Tests For Jet Grouting at Macau

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Load Tests For Jet Grouting at Macau

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Load Tests For Jet Grouting at Macau

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Load Tests for Jet Grouting at Macau

Figure 1: Plan of jet grouting (jet grout piles shown in dots)

Bore Hole No.1

Figure 2: SPT N values vs. depth

Table 1 Simplified soil parameters for design

sandy silty clay

3 FIELD LOADING TESTS

Figure 3: Location of jet grout pile and plate load tests

Pile head loading (kN)

Pile head loading (kN)

pile head settlement (mm)

4 ESTIMATED AND OBSERVED SETTLEMENT

Table 2 Consolidation properties of untreated soils

Figure 6: Distributed load on the mat foundation

(Point No. 12)

Distance from Point No. 1 (m)

Distance from Point No. 3 (m)

You might also like