Regulatory Requirements:

Sick Industrial Companies Act (SICA)

Sick industrial unit is defined as a unit or a company (having been in existence for not less than
five years) which is found at the end of any financial year to have incurred accumulated losses
equal to or exceeding its entire net worth. The net worth is calculated as sum total of paid up
capital and free reserves of a company less the provisions and expenses, as may be prescribed.
An industrial unit is also regarded as potentially sick or weak unit if at the end of any financial
year, it has accumulated losses equal to or exceeding 50 per cent of its average net worth in the
immediately preceding four financial years and has failed to repay debts to its creditor(s) in three
consecutive quarters on demand made in writing for such repayment. The two basic factors
which may result in sickness of an industrial unit are:

Internal factors are those which arise within an organisation. They include:-

Mismanagement in various functional areas of a company like finance,

production, marketing and personnel;

Wrong location of a unit;

Overestimation of demand and wrong dividend policy;

Poor implementation of projects which may be due to improper planning or

managerial inefficiency;

Poor inventory management in respect of finished goods as well as inputs;

Unwarranted expansion and diversion of resources such as personal

extravagances,excessive overheads, acquisition of unproductive fixed assets,etc.;

Failure to modernise the productive apparatus, change the product mix and other
elements of marketing mix to suit the changing environment;

Poor labour-management relationship and associated low workers' morale and

low productivity,strikes,lockouts, etc.

External factors are those which take place outside an organisation. They include:-

Energy crisis arising out of power cuts or shortage of coal or oil;

Failure to achieve optimum capacity due to shortage of raw materials as a result

of production set-backs in the supply industries, poor agricultural output because
of natural reasons,changes in the import conditions,etc.

Infrastructural problems like transport bottlenecks;

Credit squeeze;

Situations like market recession, changes in technology,etc;

International pressures or circumstances, etc.

Industrial sickness may be caused by a combination of all such factors. It has several adverse
consequences on the economy as a whole. Some of which may be enumerated as follows:

It leads to loss of substantial revenue to the Government and enhances its public
expenditure;

It locks up necessary resources and funds in the sick unit. This also increases the nonperforming assets (NPAs) of banks and financial institutions;

It leads to loss of production and productivity in the economy;

It aggravates the problem of unemployment in the economy;

It vitiates the industrial atmosphere and leads to worker-management

disputes,strikes,lock-outs,etc;

It undermines the public confidence in the functioning of the organised sector in the
country which in turn affects the overall investment climate of the economy.

In the light of the above consequences of sickness and its growing incidence by size, region and
industry followed by its far-reaching adverse socio-economic effects, the Government has been
taking many steps and remedial measures in order to tackle this problem in India. The most
significant measure has been the enactment of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special
Provisions) Act,1985 (SICA).
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985
The most important piece of legislation dealing with industrial sickness was the Sick Industrial
Companies (Special Provisions) Act,1985 (SICA). It applies to industrial undertakings both in

the public and private sectors. SICA pertains to the industries specified in the First Schedule to
the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, (IDR Act) subject to the exceptions
specified in the Act. SICA, including any rules or schemes made thereunder, had overriding
provisions over other laws except the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act,1973
and the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
The basic rationale of enacting SICA was to determine sickness in the industrial units. It also
aimed at expediting the revival of potentially viable units so as to make the investments in such
units profitable. At the same time, to ensure the closure of unviable units so as to release the
investments locked up in such units for productive use elsewhere.
Thus, the broad objectives of SICA were:

Timely detection of sick and potentially sick companies.

Speedy determination by a body of experts of the preventive, ameliorative, remedial and

other measures which need to be taken with respect to such companies.

The expeditious enforcement of the measures so determined and for all matters connected
therewith or incidental thereto.

The important provisions of SICA were:

It provided for the constitution of two quasi-judicial bodies, that is, Board for Industrial
and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) and Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial
Reconstruction (AAIFR). BIFR was set up as an apex board to tackle industrial sickness
and was entrusted with the work of taking appropriate measures for revival and
rehabilitation of potentially sick undertakings and for liquidation of non-viable
companies. While, AAIFR was constituted for hearing the appeals against the orders of
the BIFR.

BIFR would make an inquiry as it may deem fit for determining whether any industrial
company had become sick, under the following conditions:

If the Board of Directors of a sick industrial company made a reference to the

BIFR for determination of the remedial measures with respect to their company.
Such reference was to be made within sixty days from the date of finalisation of

the duly audited accounts of the company for the financial year at the end of
which the company had become sick. For filing the reference, the Board of
Directors must have sufficient reasons to form the opinion that the company had
become sick; or

On receiving such information (reference) with respect to a sick company or upon

its own knowledge as to the financial condition of a company. Such a reference to
the board may be made by:- (i) The Central Government; (ii) The Reserve Bank
of India; (iii) State Governments; (iv) Public financial institutions; (v) State level
institutions; or (vi) Scheduled banks.

However, such a reference shall not be made in respect of any industrial company by :(i) the Government of any State, unless all or any of the industrial undertakings
(belonging to such a company) were situated in that State; (ii) a public financial
institution or a State level institution or a scheduled bank, unless it had, by reason of any
financial assistance or obligation rendered by it or undertaken by it, interest in such a
company.
The Board may order any operating agency to enquire into the matter and complete the
inquiry as expeditiously as possible.

If the Board deems it fit to make an inquiry or to cause an inquiry to be made into any
industrial company, it may appoint one or more persons as special director(s) of the
company for safeguarding the financial and other interests of the company. The
appointment of a special director shall be valid and effective notwithstanding anything to
the contrary contained in the Companies Act, 1956 or in any other law for the time being
in force or in the memorandum and articles of association or any other instrument relating
to the industrial company.

Any special director so appointed shall :- (i) hold office during the pleasure of the Board
and may be removed or substituted by any person by order in writing by the Board; (ii)
not incur any obligation or liability by reason only of his being a director or for anything
done or omitted to be done in good faith in the discharge of his duties as a director or
anything in relation thereto; (iii) not be liable to retirement by rotation and shall not be
taken into account for computing the number of directors liable to such retirement; (iv)
not be liable to be prosecuted under any law for anything, done or omitted to be done in
good faith in the discharge of his duties in relation to the sick industrial company.

If after making an inquiry, the Board is satisfied that the company has become sick, it

shall, after considering all the relevant facts and circumstances of the case, may take
either of the following decisions:

If the Board decides that it is practicable, it shall, by order in writing and subject
to such restrictions or conditions as may be specified in the order, give such time
to the company as it may deem fit to make its net worth exceed the accumulated
losses.

If the Board decides that it is not practicable for the sick company to make its net
worth exceed the accumulated losses within a reasonable time and that it is
necessary or expedient in the public interest to adopt all or any of the measures in
relation to the said company, it may, as soon as may be, by order in writing, direct
any operating agency specified in the order to prepare a scheme providing for
such measures in relation to that company. The measures may include:o The financial reconstruction of the sick industrial company;

o The proper management of the sick industrial company by change in or

take over of the management of the company;

o The amalgamation of the sick industrial company with any other company
(transferee company), or any other company with the sick industrial
company (transferee company);

o The sale or lease of a part or whole of the sick industrial company;

o Such other preventive, ameliorative and remedial measures as may be

appropriate;

o Such incidental, consequential or supplemental measures as may be

necessary or expedient in connection with or for the purposes of the
measures specified above.

If the Board is of the opinion that the sick industrial company is not likely to
make its net worth exceed the accumulated losses within a reasonable time while
meeting all its financial obligations and that the company as a result thereof is not
likely to become viable in future and that it is just and equitable that the company
should be wound up, it may record and forward its opinion to the concerned High
Court. The High Court shall, on the basis of the opinion of the Board, order
winding-up of the sick industrial company in accordance with the provisions of
the Companies Act, 1956.

Where in respect of an industrial company, an inquiry is pending, or any scheme referred

is under preparation or consideration or a sanctioned scheme is under implementation,
then no proceedings for the winding-up of the industrial company or for execution,
distress or the like against any of the properties of the industrial company shall be made.
Also, no suit for the recovery of money or for the enforcement of any security against the
industrial company or of any guarantee in respect of any loans, or advance granted to the
industrial company shall lie or be proceeded with further, except with the consent of the
Board or, as the case may be, the Appellate Authority.
Also with respect to the above conditions, the Board may by order declare with respect to
the sick industrial company concerned that the operation of all or any of the contracts,
assurances of property, agreements, settlements, awards, standing orders or other
instruments in force, to which such sick industrial company is a party or which may be
applicable to such sick industrial company immediately before the date of such order,
shall remain suspended or that all or any of the rights, privileges, obligations and
liabilities accruing or arising there under before the said date, shall remain suspended or
shall be enforceable with such adaptations and in such manner as may be specified by the
Board.
However, such declaration shall not be made for a period exceeding two years, which
may be extended by one year at a time so that the total period shall not exceed seven
years in the aggregate.

Under the Act, whosoever violates its provisions or any scheme or any order of the Board
or of the Appellate Authority, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which
may extend to three years and shall also be liable to a fine. No court shall take cognizance
of any offence mentioned except on a complaint in writing of the secretary or any such
other officer of the Board or the Appellate Authority or any such officer of an operating
agency as may be authorised in this behalf by the Board or the Appellate Authority.

Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act,1985 (SICA) was repealed and replaced by
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act,2003. The new Act diluted some of
the provisions of SICA and plugged certain loopholes. It aimed not only to combat industrial
sickness but also to reduce the same by ensuring that companies do not view declaration of
sickness as an escapist route from legal provisions after the failure of the project or similar other
reasons and thereby gain access to various benefits or concessions from financial institutions.
Under it, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) and Appellate Authority
for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) were dissolved and replaced by National
Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and National Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) respectively.
^ Top