pl01 PDF
pl01 PDF
pl01 PDF
Introduction
XXIV
131
USA
117
164
SEM
P<
Dry matter
88.5
88.6
88.6
0.08
NS
Crude protein
51.6c
53.0b 53.8a
0.15
***
Crude fiber
5.5b
6.4a
4.3c
0.09
***
10.6b
12.0a
8.8c
0.16
***
Sucrose
7.6b
6.5c
8.2a
0.09
***
Stachyose
5.6b
5.3c
6.5a
0.05
***
Raffinose
1.3b
1.6a
1.1c
0.03
***
Ether extract
1.9ab
2.0a
1.8b
0.05
***
7.1b
Total ash
7.6a
0.05
***
Phosphorous
0.75b
7.5a
0.69c 0.79a
0.01
***
Iron, mg/kg
127b
193a
4.7
***
131b
Brazil
USA
SEM
P<
108
105
161
Lys
6.09b
6.05c
6.15a
0.006
***
Met
1.36a
1.33b
1.36a
0.002
***
Cys
1.51a
1.47b
1.50a
0.004
***
Thr
3.93a
3.88b
3.91a
0.003
***
Trp
1.37a
1.36c
1.36b
0.002
***
113
111
164
TIA1, mg/g
3.0b
3.0b
3.9a
Utilization of fats
in poultry diets: the
use of acidulated
soapstocks
and
lecithins
Fats have been considered
traditionally as an unwanted
source of energy in poultry diets.
The reasons were multiple and
included the lack of adequate
methodology to detect the mixing
with low quality lipid sources as a
method to reduce cost. Moreover,
existing techniques for evaluating
the degree of deterioration of a fat
(i.e., peroxidation and degradation
of the structure of the fatty acids) are
of limited value. Currently, it is easy
(although expensive) to determine
the fatty acid (FA) profile and the
percentage of real fat of a given
batch of fat, which facilitates the
evaluation of the nutritive value and
the understanding of the process that
has undergone that fat. Again, the
implementation of adequate quality
control measurements will permit to
increase the level of inclusion of nontraditional fat sources in diets.
0.08
***
XXIV
Table 3 - Effect of type of soy oil source on productive performance of laying hens from 44 to 56 weeks of
age (Irandoust et al., 2012).
Item
Egg weight g
Fat source
100
85.9
60.4
51.9
1.93
1.40
185
RSO2
98.5
86.4
60.1
51.9
1.90
1.37
163
ASO2
98.2
85.0
60.2
51.1
1.93
1.39
196
0.362
0.004
0.16
0.30
0.01
0.01
9.3
0.10
0.39
0.72
0.07
0.40
0.30
0.34
SEM
P value
SO2
1 - Body weight gain. The initial BW of the hens was 1,31539 g. 2 - Soy oil, recycled soy oil and acidulated soy oil
soapstock.3Standard error of the means (n = 12 replicates of 6 hens each).
Table 4 - Influence of the main effects of cereal and fat source of the diet on performance of laying hens
from 22 to 54 wks of age (Prez-Bonilla et al., 2011).
Cereal
Cereal
Egg
Egg weight g
production %
Fat
92.1
64.1
59.1
115.3
1.95
202b
Wheat
91.5
63.6
58.2
115.4
1.98
243a
Corn
92.9
64.5
59.9
117.3
1.96
238a
91.7
64.3
58.9
115.6
1.96
221b
92.6
64.5
59.7
115.8
1.94
210b
92.2
63.5
58.5
116.6
1.99
251a
1.10
0.26
0.78
1.11
0.017
9.71
NS
NS
NS
NS
AVO
Lard
SEM
ADFI g/d
Barley
SBO
Fat
Probability3
Cereal
NS
Fat
NS
NS
NS
1- Soybean oil and acidulated vegetable soapstocks. 2 - Standard error of the mean (12 replicates of 21 hens each per
treatment).3 - The interaction between main cereal of the diet and source of supplemental fat was not significant (P >0.05).
Area: Nutrition and Feed Technologies August 06
XXIV
38.9
29.5
9,232
6,998
Total phosphorous, %
3.94
Digestible phosphorous, %
3.55
Choline, %
3.94
95.3
71.5
Linoleic acid, %
51.0
38.3
Utilization of fibrous
ingredients in poultry diets
Traditionally, most research conducted on poultry
feeding considered dietary fiber (DF) as a diluent
of the diet (Jansen and Carr, 1985; Mateos et al.,
2002) with negative connotations in relation with
voluntary FI and nutrient digestibility. Consequently,
commercial diets, especially those for young broilers,
XXIV
Table 6 - Effects of oat hulls and soy hull inclusion in the diet on growth performance of broilers1 (GonzlezAlvarado et al., 2007).
Control1
Oat hulls2
Soy hull3
SEM (n=36)
ADG (g)
13.2
13.3
13.3
ADFI (g)
17.2a
16.6b
FCR
1.30a
ADG (g)
Probability3
C1
C2
0.09
NS
NS
16.7ab
0.19
NS
1.25b
1.26b
0.019
**
NS
31.7b
33.4a
33.4a
0.42
**
NS
ADFI (g)
43.2
44.3
44.6
0.55
NS
NS
FCR
1.37a
1.33b
1.34b
0.008
***
NS
1 to 4 d of age
1 to 21 d of age
1 - Data presented correspond to the average of the rice (1.5% CF)- and the corn (2.5% CF) based diets. 2 - The sepiolite
of the control diet was substituted (wt/wt) by 3% oat hull or 3% soy hull in the corresponding experimental diets. 3 - C1
contrast = control vs. fiber inclusion; C2 contrast = oat hulls vs. soy hulls.
Table 7 - Effects of inclusion of oat hulls and sugar beet pulp in the diet on growth performance and selected
carcass components of broilers at 42 d of age of age (Gonzlez-Alvarado et al., 2010).
Control1
Oat hulls
SEM (n=5)
Probability
ADG (g)
17b
19a
18ab
0.4
**
ADFI (g)
22
24
23
0.6
NS
1.33a
1.21b
1.23b
0.017
**
4.15a
3.94b
3.94b
0.055
55b
60a
56b
0.9
**
1 to 10 d of age
Energy efficiency
1 to 42 d of age
ADG (g)
ADFI (g)
88ab
90a
85b
1.0
FCR
1.59a
1.49b
1.53b
0.014
**
Energy efficiency2
4.97
4.87
4.89
0.045
NS
900
901
892
4.2
NS
265
266
264
2.5
NS
222
219
217
3.8
NS
FCR
1 - The sepiolite was substituted (wt/wt) by 3% oat hull or 3% sugar beet pulp in the corresponding experimental diets.
2 - Energy efficiency (kcal AMEn/g BW gain). The AMEn determined at 32 d of age was 3,117, 3,255, and 3,210 kcal/
kg for the control, oat hulls, and sugar beet pulp diets, respectively. 3 - g BW excluding the gastrointestinal tract and its
contents. 4 - Drumsticks, thighs, and back posterior to the thoracic vertebrae, including bones and skin. 5 - Pectoralis
mayor and Pectoralis minor, including bones and skin.
XXIV
Table 8 - Effects of particle size and source of fiber on growth performance, AMEn content and the gizzard
weight, and pH in broilers from 1 to 21 d of age (Jimnez-Moreno et al., 2010).
Growth performance
Fiber source
FCR
AMEn1
(Mcal/kg)
Empty weight
(%BW)
pH
Control2
29.3b
40.1ab
1.36a
3.01d
2.38d
3.64a
Mycrocrystalline cellulose
31.5ab
41.9a
1.33ab
3.02d
2.32d
3.38ab
32.4a
41.7a
1.29b
3.21a
2.73bc
2.92b
32.1a
41.6a
1.29b
3.16ab
3.31a
2.86b
30.5ab
39.9b
1.31ab
3.10bc
2.56cd
3.09ab
30.2ab
39.3b
1.30b
3.09c
2.99b
2.76b
0.57
0.90
0.014
0.012
0.057
0.156
SEM (n = 5)
Effects
Gizzard1
Probability
Diet
**
NS
**
***
***
**
**
NS
***
***
***
**
NS
NS
***
***
**
**
NS
***
***
NS
NS
NS
***
NS
NS
NS
NS
***
NS
1 - Average of data at 4, 9, and 21 d of age. 2 - The control diet contained 3% sepiolite and 1.5% CF. The sepiolite of
the control diet was substituted (wt/wt) by 3% cellulose, oat hulls, or sugar beet pulp in the corresponding experimental
diets.
Table 9 - Effects of pea hull inclusion on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and jejunal morphology
in broilers from 1 to 18 d of age (Jimnez-Moreno et al., 2011).
n
2.5
5.0
7.5
SEM
Probability
Linear Quadratic
Growth performance
ADG (g)
30.0b
31.2b
34.5a
31.1b
1.01
NS
ADFI (g)
41.2
41.2
45.9
39.6
1.15
NS
NS
FCR
1.378a
0.014
NS
**
Energy efficiency2
18
0.0024
NS
EE digestibility
18
90.7b
91.8a
91.3ab
0.32
NS
**
18
3,126b
***
***
AMEn (kcal/kg)
92.1a
75.9c
82.1a
79.3b
76.2c
0.85
NS
***
Starch
90.2
94.2
93.9
93.6
1.83
Jejunal morphology
Villus height (m)
12
863
930
852
751
53.0
NS
12
125a
118ab
115ab
110b
5.2
NS
12
7.31b
8.83a
8.13ab
7.14b
0.39
NS
**
1 - The control diet (1.6% CF) was diluted (wt/wt) with 2.5, 5.0, or 7.5% of pea hulls, according to treatment. 2 - g BW
gain/kcal AMEn ingested. 3 - Data determined at 18 d of age.
XXIV
Table 10 - Effects of oat hulls (OH) and sugar beet pulp (SBP) inclusion in the
diet on crop and ceca microbiota (log10 cfu/g) of broilers reared on floor pens1
at 36 d of age (Mateos et al., 2012).
Control2 OH3 (5%) SBP3 (5%) Probability
Crop
Lactobacilli
7.9b
7.1b
8.4a
***
Ceca
Lactobacilli
9.8
8.6
10.0
Clostridium perfringens
5.9a
1.2b
6.2
Enterobacterias
8.4a
5.9b
8.4a
**
1 - Woodshavings as litter.2 - Contained 1.6% CF.3 - The control diet was diluted (wt/
wt) with 5% OH or 5% SBP, according to treatment.
XXIV
Feed particle
size and diet
form
Table 12 - Influence of the main cereal of the diet and screen size of the
cereal on growth performance of pullets from 1 to 120 days of age (Frikha
et al., 2011).
Cereal
From 1 to 45 d
From 1 to 120 d
BWG, g
ADFI, g
FCR
BWG, g
ADFI, g
FCR
9.9
25.6
2.58
12.0
53.0
4.42
Wheat
10.0
25.4
2.54
11.9
52.4
4.39
S.E.M. (n = 18)
0.061
0.25
0.02
0.06
0.56
0.032
10.3a
25.7
2.50b
12.0
52.6
4.36
9.9b
25.6
2.58a
12.0
53.0
4.43
10
9.7b
25.2
2.60a
11.9
52.6
4.42
S.E.M. (n = 12)
0.08
0.31
0.023
0.07
0.68
0.039
0.718
0.456
0.065
0.380
0.435
0.557
***
0.588
0.330
0.874
0.454
Corn
Screen size, mm
Effect
Cereal
Screen size
Table 13 - Influence of main cereal and mean particle size (MPS) of the diet on productive performance of
laying hens from 20 to 48 wk of age1 (Safaa et al., 2009).
Item
GMD2
Cereal type
Fine
Medium
Coarse
SEM
(n = 16)
BW gain, g
483
494
19.3
483
466
516
23.6
79.9
81.1
0.64
79.9
79.9
81.6
0.78
Egg weight, g
64.5
64.0
0.21
64.1
64.1
64.4
0.25
Egg mass, g
52.1
52.4
0.46
51.8
51.8
53.1
0.56
108.8
108.9
0.62
107.9b
108.0b
110.6a
0.76
2.09
2.08
0.022
2.09
2.09
2.08
0.027
1.62
1.60
0.017
1.60
1.61
1.61
0.021
Mortality, %
2.08
1.25
2.19
1.56
1.25
Corn
SEM
(n
= 24)
Wheat
1 - Average initial BW of 1,597 9.2 g.2 - Cereals passed through 6-, 8-, and 10-mm screens, respectively.
XXIV
Table 14 - Influence of feed form on ADG (g), ADFI (g), and feed to gain ratio (F:G) of broilers from 1 to 42
d of age (Serrano et al., 2012a).
1 to 21 d
21 to 42 d
ADG
ADFI
F:G
ADG
ADFI
Mash
34.6b
57.0ab
1.65
89.1
Crumbles
42.4
58.8a
1.39b
43.4a
56.3b
1.30c
0.71
0.79
0.0316
<0.001
<0.05
<0.001
1 to 42 d
F:G
ADG
ADFI
F:G
154.0b
1.73b
62.5b
106.7c
1.71a
90.6
166.1
1.83
67.1
113.8
1.70ab
87.8
161.0a
1.84a
66.1a
109.9b
1.66b
2.24
0.0154
0.61
1.20
0.0137
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.05
Diet form
Pellets
1
SEM (n = 12)
Effect
1.26
0.11
1 - Twelve replicates of 65 birds each per treatment. 2 - The interaction between diet form and SBM source was not
significant (P> 0.05).
Table 15 - Influence of AMEn and feed form (FF) of the diet on BW gain (g/d),
ADFI (g/d) and FCR of pullets (Frikha et al., 2009a).
1- 45 d
Treatment
1 - 120 d
BWG
ADFI
FCR
BWG
ADFI
FCR
Low
10.5b
27.8a
2.65a
11.8c
56.3a
4.77a
Medium
10.8a
27.5a
2.54b
12.1b
54.5b
4.51b
High
10.9a
26.5b
2.44c
12.3a
52.2c
4.23c
0.06
0.15
0.017
0.05
0.45
0.028
Mash
10.6
26.9
2.55
12.0
53.9
4.50
Pellet
10.9
27.7
2.54
12.2
54.8
4.51
S.E.M. (n=24)
0.05
0.12
0.014
0.04
0.37
0.023
AMEn
***
***
***
***
***
***
FF
***
***
0.72
**
0.09
0.71
AMEna
S.E.M. (n=16)
FF
Effect
a - AMEn was 11.44, 12.05 and 12.66 MJ/kg from 1 to 45 d, 11.11, 11.71 and 12.32
MJ/kg from 46 to 85 d and 10.96, 11.55 and 12.13 MJ/kg from 86 to 120 d of age
for the low, medium and high energy diets, respectively.
Diet form
XXIV
Table 16 - Influence of the main cereal and feed form of the diet on productive
performance of pullets from 1 to 120 days of age (Frikha et al., 2009b).
1 to 45 d
1 to 120 d
BWG, g
ADFI, g
FCR
BWG, g ADFI, g
FCR
Corn
10.66
26.53
2.49
12.29
53.90
4.39
Wheat
10.51
26.40
2.51
12.11
53.61
4.43
Cereal
10
XXIV
Conclusions
The number of ingredients available for poultry
worldwide is abundant but not always the use of
unknown raw materials is cost effective. In fact,
most of these new ingredients are not available
References
ABDOLLAHI, M.R., RAVINDRAN, V., WESTER, T.J.,
RAVINDRAN, G. and THOMAS, D.V. (2010) Influence
of conditioning temperature on the performance,
nutrient utilisation and digestive tract development of
broilers fed on maize- and wheat-based diets. British
Poultry Science 51:648-657.
AERNI, V., EL-LETHEY, H. and WECHSLER, B. (2000) Effect
of foraging material and food form on feather pecking
in laying hens. British Poultry Science 41:16-21.
AMERAH, A.M., RAVINDRAN, V. and LENTLE, R.G. (2009)
Influence of insoluble fibre and whole wheat inclusion
on the performance, digestive tract development
and ileal microbiota profile of broiler chickens. British
Poultry Science 50:366-375.
ANONIMO. (2011) Lecithins in poultry and pig diets.
Circular letter SFR 2011-24. (Lelystad, The Netherlands,
Schothorst Feed Research).
DUNKLEY, K.D., MCREYNOLDS, J.L., HUME, M.E.,
DUNKLEY, C.S., CALLAWAY, T.R., KUBENA, L.F.,
NISBET, D.J. and RICKE, S.C. (2007) Molting in
Salmonella enteritidis-challenged laying hens fed
alfalfa crumbles. II. Fermentation and microbial
ecology response. Poultry Science 86:2101-2109.
11
XXIV
Feed Science and Technology 164:106-115.
FRIKHA, M., SERRANO, M.P. and MATEOS, G.G. (2012)
Animal Feed Science and Technology (in evaluation).
GARCA, M., LZARO, R., LATORRE, M.A., GRACIA,
M.I. and MATEOS, G.G. (2008) Influence of enzyme
supplementation and heat processing of barley
on digestive traits and productive performance of
broilers. Poultry Science 87:940-948.
GONZLEZ-ALVARADO, J.M., JIMNEZ-MORENO, E.,
LZARO, R. and MATEOS, G.G. (2007) Effects of type
of cereal, heat processing of the cereal, and inclusion
of fiber in the diet on productive performance and
digestive traits of broilers. Poultry Science 86:17051715.
GONZLEZ-ALVARADO, J.M., JIMNEZ-MORENO, E.,
GONZLEZ-SNCHEZ, D., LZARO, R. and MATEOS,
G.G. (2010) Effect of inclusion of oat hulls and sugar
beet pulp in the diet on productive performance and
digestive traits of broilers from 1 to 42 days of age.
Animal Feed Science and Technology 162:37-46.
12
XXIV
13